HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2001.04.05 - 26279PublLe Shrvices Committee
MISCELLANOUS RESOLUTION #01092
BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE, DAVID MOFFITT, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION/PROBATE COURT - NEXT GENERATION
MODEL TRIAL COURT GRANT ACCEPTANCE
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County 6th Circuit and Probate Court applied
for a grant from the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Next
Generation Model Trial Court Grant Program; and
WHEREAS the application requested total funding in the amount of
$21,178 of which $11,250 was the State portion and $9,928 was the
County's match; and
WHEREAS the award from the SCAO is for $11,250 and the County's
match is $9,928 totaling $21,178 (no variance from application); and
WHEREAS the twenty-five percent (25%) County match of $9,928 must
come from cash and/or In Kind contributions; and
WHEREAS the $9,928 County match will be In Kind and consist of
current County personnel that will be performing grant related tasks;
and
WHEREAS the Court intends to use the grant funds to develop
implementation plans that identify issues affecting court operations,
the Administration of Justice and the services and cost effectiveness
of merged trial court operations; and
WHEREAS acceptance of this grant will not obligate the County to
continue the program beyond the grant funding period; and
WHEREAS the contract has been approved in accordance with the
County Executive's review process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners accepts the State Court Administrative Office, Next
Generation Model Trial Court Grant in the amount of $21,178 which
includes $11,250 from the State and $9,928 as the County's match.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners is authorized to execute that contract agreement and that
the Chairperson may approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen
percent (15%) variance from the award, consistent with the original
agreement as approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no expenditures be authorized until a
grant agreement is fully executed.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
Public Services Committee Vote:
Motion carried on a unanimous roll call vote with Garfield, Buckley and
Coleman absent.
March 22, 2001
AMMON.
71 Initial 7 Revision • I l Extension Other Fl
Is Board Resolution required? ripbX
Yee - Resokidon # Date:
Signature
03/06/01 16:54 5:02/02 N0:139
Date:
To:
From:
CONTRACT/PROGRAM REVIEW REGUEST
March 8, 2001
Stephanie Rodgers
Karen Aoacinaki
Title/Subject: Next Generation Trial Court Grant
File # SCAO Grant No. NG 2000-05
Contact Person: Lisa Syrnula_
Department: Family .Division/Probate Court
Telephone i248) 858-0960
STATUS: (Check appropriate bag)
* if "white is checked, please explain:
PERSONNEL DEPT:
Approved El Dleapproved * ED Modify • Date: 3/8/0
RISK MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY:
F-1 Approved 7 Disapproved 1:::1 Modify * Date: -15/1 '2// Signature:
///
/,‘
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET:
Approved Ei Disapproved * Modify • Date: Signature:
CORPORATION COUNSEL:
rui Approved fl Disapproved fl Modify * Date: 318101 Signature:
CONTRACT/PROGRAM SYNOPSIS:
* When -Meariprovod" Is noted or "Modify" is requested. attach exphwration.
Melt Managemest & WOW — ftvilbed 2155 inetryl fikalWurd V15aurka1VislernhodnCONTRACT-1•1COGRAM KEVTW KEOUTEST.cloc
J '02/06/01 TUE 14:28 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. Z009
" •
STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
NEXT GENERATION MODEL TRIAL COURTS PROJECT
GRANT APPLICATION
I SCAO Project Number (SCA) Use Only)
1. Applicant
Oakland County 6th Circuit and Probate Courts
Address:
1200 N. Telegraph Rd.
J.. ..In
City: Pontiac State: MI Zip: 48341-0449
2. Federal ID Number: 38-6004876
•
3. Project Title:
Next Generation Model Trial Courts Project
•
4. Project Contact Person: Title:
Lisa Symula Family Division Administrator - Probate/ Juvenile Register
-% Address Same 93 above
Phone: 248-858-0950
Fax: 248-858-1126
E-Mail: symulak§co.oakland.mi.urs
5. Application Type/Program Areas
i I Project Area (1) - Planning Project - Circuit, Probate and District Court Jurisdictions
[x1 Project Area (2) - Planning Project - Circuit and Probate Court Jurisdictions
(I Project Area (3) - Implementation Project - Circuit, Probate and District Court Jurisdictions
[ 1 Project Area (4) - Implementation Project - Circuit and Probate Court Jurisdictions
6. Proposed Start Date: Proposed Completion Date:
September 1,2000 April 30, 2001
Project Area (1) and (2) Grant Application due September 1,2000 - Project Area (3) and (4) Grant Applications
may be submitted as plans are completed.
t 02/06/01 TUE 14:28 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
7. CERTIFICATION: We certify that the project proposed in this application meets applicable requirements of
the Next Generation Model Trial Courts Project, that all information presented is correct, .fnd that the applicant
will comply with the provisions of all applicable state laws.
Chief Circuit Court Judge (Name): ' Signature: /7 / Date: 9/1/00
Hon. Barry Howard
Address: City: Pontiac Phone:2488585284
1200 N. Telegraph Rd.
State: MI Fax:24885811920
Zip: 48341-0449 Etna:
howardb@co.oaki
sada:id-us
Chief Probate Court Judge(Name):
Hon. Linda Hallmark
\„signa . • Date: 9/1/00
Address: : P tiac Phone:24885110289
1200 N. Telegraph Rd.
State: MI Fax:2484525194
Zip: 48341-0449 E-
Moil:hallmarkl®
co.oakland.mi.us
Chief District Court Judge (Name): Signature: Date:
* Only required for Projects Areas (land3)
.-.,_
Address: City: Phone:
State: Fax:
ZIP: E-Mail:
8. FUNDING
Zolo
8A. Total Project Costs:
(100% of Project Cost)
_$21,178
8B. State Request: S11,250_
(Maximum 75% of Project Costs)
SC. Local Match:
(Minimum 25% Cash/In-Kind) _$9,928*_
8D. Other Sources of Funding
for Project n/a Amount:
Amount
Amount:
(Attach additional paper if necessary for other sources of funding for project)
10
Barry L. Howard
(Court)
9/ 5--/o0
(Date)
, 02/06/01 TUE 14:29 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
NEXT GENERATION MODEL TRIAL COURTS PROJECT
GRANT APPLICATION
ASSURANCES
I. Applicants must provide assurance that there has been appropriate consultation with all
affected agencies and that there will be appropriate coordination with all affected agencies in
the development and implementation of the Project Plan. •
2. Applicants must provide assurance that all recipients of funding undertbis project are required
to comply with nondiscrimination requirements contained in various federal laws. Each
applicant court should have a copy of their EEO Plan on file and available for review by the
State Court Administrative Office upon request.
3. Applicants must assure that the applicant and its sub-grantees will not use state funds for
lobbying and will disclose any lobbying activities.
4. Recipients of funding will assure that the Supreme Court, the State Court Administrative
Office, the local goverrunent audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State
Auditor General or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to and the
right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent financial transactions,
accounting records or other fiscal records related to this grant. Such records shall be
maintained for a period of Eve years after completion of the grant project or until all State
Court Administrative Office audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever is later..
By signing the Assurances form, the applicant court assures that it will comply with the
requirements set forth in the project application in order to receive funding.
1 O11
Linda S. Hallmark
Oakland County Circuit Court
(Court)
(Date)
Oakland County Probate Court
rer.c e Obr eCht Oakland County Board of Commissioners
444-11CCO,
an19-
Q.6t /‘"
• (N
(Date) ‘741) ( ignature)
11
02/06/01 TUE 14:29 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. Lj 012
THE BUDGET SECTION
12
02/06/01 TUE 14:29 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. a1013
I .
BUDGET SUMMARY
Budget Categqry Total Cost
(100%)
A. Personnel $7,300*
B. Fringe Benefits $2,628*
C. Consultant/
Contractual $10,000
D. Travel 0
E. Consultant/
Contractual Travel $750
F. Supplies/Operating $500
G. Equipment 0
TOTAL PROJECT
COSTS $21,178
State Request (75% max) $11,250 ...
Local Match (25% min) $9,928*
(Cash/1n-Kind)
Other Sources of
Funding for Project - Amount: 0
Amount: 0
Amount: 0
(Attach additional paper if necessary for other sources of finding
for the Project)
Note: At least 25% of the total project cost is a required match and must come from a
combination of local cash and in-kind contributions.. The percentage of cash for
the local match is not defined. Within each budget category on the grant
application, the applicant must dearly indicate the individual items that are used
as match with an asterisk (*).
13
02/06/01 TUE 14:30 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
BUDGET NARRATIVE
BUDGET NARRATIVE: The budget narrative should justify all ants associated with
the proposed project
Personnel and_Fringe Benefits:
This item reflects a portion of court personnel hours expected to be devoted to the planning process.
As itemized in the Budget Detail Worksheet, four court staff will be dedicating at least eight hours per
month to meetings, documentation, materials preparation and review, interviews and consultation with
facilitators, other administrators, judges and staff. It is anticipated that additional administrative and
support staff, not specifically referenced as a budget item, will also be engaged in the planning of court
reorganization. Further, involvement of non-court personnel, from Oaldand County's budget and
finance area, personnel, Reimbursement and Board of Commissioners (to name a few) will be invited
into the planning project where appropriate. Fringe benefits are reflected at a standard percentage, for
the staff specifically listed.
Consultant and Consultant Travel:
As consultants have not yet been interviewed or selected, the fee for facilitation services and travel
are merely estimates, which will likely require adjustment
iSupplies and Operating:
Materials will be required to support information gathering, copmunication and promotion of court
planning efforts. These supplies will largely support clerical functions, and are expected to include,
but not be confined to: paper, printing and duplicating, postage and other miscellaneous supplies.
a014
14
02/06/01 TUE 14:30 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
•
BUDGET DETAIL WORKSHEET
The Budget Detail Worksheet: The budget detail worksheet should include a thorough
justification for all costs including the basis for computing these costs. The budget must be
complete, reasonable, and directly related to the activities proposed in the application. The
Budget Detail Worksheet may be submitted on plain sheets following the format below.
Indicate any items to be used to meet the 25% required match from local cash and in-kind
contributions with an asterisk (*).
A. PERSONNEL: List each position by title or name of employee if available. Show the annual
salary rate and the percentage of time devoted to the project.
a015
Cost
S2228
$2056
$1746
$1270
Name/Position
Kevin Oefiner/ Court Administrator
Lisa Symula/ Fain. Div. Admin.
John Cooperrider/ Business Admin.
Karen MacKenzie/ Res. and Frog Spec.
Computation
$46.42/hr ® 8 hrshno ® 6 mo
$42.85/hr (4) 8 brs/rao ® 6 mo
$36.37/br (418 hrs/mo ® 6 mo
$26.48/hr ® 8 hrshno ® 6 mo
Personnel Total $7300*
B. FRINGE BENEFITS: Fringe benefits should be based on actual known costs or an
established formula. Fringe benefits are only for the personnel listed in the budget and only
for the percentage of time devoted to the project. Check the fringe benefits that apply and
indicate the composite rate percentage.
a FICA
x Unemployment Insurance
Retirement
Hospital Insurance
Other (Disability)
Life Insurance
Vision Insurance
x Dental Insurance
Worker's Compensation
Composite Rate: 36%
Fringe Benefit Total $2628*
TOTAL PERSONNEL & FRINGE BENEFITS $9,928
15
02/06/01 TUE 14:30 FAX 18108581126 , PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
*n .
C. CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL: For each consultant enter the name (if known), service
to be provided, hourly or daily fee (8-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant
fees in excess of $250 per day require prior SCAO approval. (Note: Consultant Travel should
be listed separately under category E).
Q01.6
Name of Consultant
Unknown at tbis writing
Service Provided Computation Cost
Review and support 100 bra ® $100/br $10,000
court planning process
Consultant/Contractual Total $10,000
D. TRAVEL: Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (ex. training etc.). Show
the basis of computation. For training programs, travel and meals should be listed separately.
Show the number of trainees, the unit costs involved, and the location of travel. Travel for
consultants should be listed under Section E under Consultant Travel. All travel must adhere
to the Michigan Supreme Court Standardized Travel Rates for the Judicial Branch effective
10/01/99 which are included in the grant application kit.
Purpose kcin .
of Travel Locatiort (Aldan/ Hotel Computation fag
Mcals/Mileatel
NM
TOTAL PERSONNEL TRAVEL $ 0
E. CONSULTANT TRAVEL: List all travel expenses to be paid from the grant to consultants.
Item Location Computation Cost
aidEg
gar Rental/ Lansing to Pontiac 14 days @ 160 miles @ .32/mile* $750
HwelMicalt)
TOTAL CONSULTANT TRAVEL $ 750
TOTAL PERSONNEL TRAVEL AND CONSULTANT TRAVEL: $ 750
* Calculation is an estimate based on the potential point of origin for traveling consultant.
16
02/06/01 TUE 14:31 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. 017
• a
F. SUPPLIES/OPERATING: Supplies include any materials that are: expendable orconsumed
during the course of the project. Training registration-costs_ should be included under this
section.
Supply Items/
Training Regis1r4tion Costs Computation Costs
Duplication, prindug, postage, paper, other $500
TOTAL SUPPLIES/OPERATING S 500
G. EQUIPMENT: Equipment is tangible property having a useful life of more than two years. Explain how the
equipment is necessary for the success of the project in the Budget Nazi-strife. Equipment purchased with funding
under this grant will be the property of the State Court Administrative Office but will be retained by the grant
recipient as long as the equipment is used for the specific purposes identified in the grant request.
Computation
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0
•••••
Iim
17
02/06/01 TUE 14:26 FAX 18108581126 ,PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
•
R302
r 4 ' •
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT
STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
NEXT GENERATION MODEL TRIAL COURT GRANT PROGRAM
GRANT CONTRACT
Oakland County Trial Courts
(C6 - Oakland County. Probate)
Grantee
38-6004876
Federal ID Number
NG -2000-05
SCAO Grant Number
$ 11.250M
Approved Grant Amount
The purpose of the Next Generation Model Trial Court Grant Program is to provide funding
assistance to Michigan trial courts to help with planning and implementation of Next Generation
Model Trial Court initiatives.
Grants from the Program are awarded to Grantees conditioned upon the Grantee's agreement
to comply with the policies and procedures set forth in the Application Guidelines and
Administrative Requirements for the Program and this grant contract. The Grant Contract becomes
effective upon signatures of the Grantee's Authorizing Official(s) and the State Court Administrator
or his designee.
1. Contract
This contract consists of and incorporates Grantee's Approved Grant Application and
Budget.
-1-
02/06/01 THE 14:26 FAX 18108581126 ,PROBATE COURT ADMIN. Q003
2. Definitions
A. Grantee's Grant Application submitted to and approved by the State Court Administrative
Office for funding and documents submitted in addition to or in clarification of that document at the
request of the State Court Administrative Office shall be referred to as the "Grant Application".
B. The budget submitted with Grantee's Grant as approved by the State Court
Administrative Office, shall be referred to as the "Budget Section".
3. Contract Administration
The State Court Administrator or his agent shall have full authority to act for the Grantor in
the Administration of this Contract consistent with the following provisions.
4. Term of Contract
The contract shall be effective upon signature of the Deputy Director of the State Court
Administrative Office when signed by the authorizing official.
5. Contract Funding
Upon approval of the Grantee's Application, the State Court Administrative Office agrees
to provide funding for the Project from the Next Generation Fund in an amount not to exceed the
amount of the grant contract. In no event does this contract create athargeagainst any other funds
of the State Court Administrative Office or the Michigan Supreme Court.
6. Conduct of the Project
A. Grantee shall abide by all terms and conditions imposed and required by the Grant
Application Guidelines, Administrative and Budget Requirements.
B. Grantee shall operate its project in accordance with the Key Components as outlined in
the Application Guidelines.
-2-
02/06/01 TUE 14:27 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. •
• .1.
0 16,
C. Grantee shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, rules, and
regulations.
7. Cash/In-Kind Match
The State share of the grant project may not exceed 75% of the total project costs. At least
25% of the total project cost is a required match and must come from local or other sources. Cash
and/or In Kind contributions must constitute a portion of the required match. Portion is not defined.
8. Assignynents and Subcontracts
All appropriate provisions and requirements of this Contract shall apply to any sub-contracts
or agreements. Grantee shall be held responsible by the State Court Administrator for the
performance of any sub-contractor.
9. Independent Contractor Status
A. Both parties of this Contract will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents,
employees, partners, joint ventures, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of one
party shall not be deemed or construed to be the agent or employee of the other party for any
purpose.
B. Grantee understands and agrees that all persons furnishing jervices pursuant to this
Contract are, for purposes of Workers Compensation liability or other actions of employee-related
liability, employees solely of Grantee and not of the State Court Administrative Office or Supreme
Court. Grantee bears the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing Workers Compensation
benefits to any person for injuries arising from or connected with services performed pursuant to the
Contract.
gl004
-3-
02/06/01 TUE 14:27 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. g1005
r
10. Indemnification
Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Michigan Supreme Court, the
State Court Administrative Office, their agents, officers, and employees from and against any and
all liability expense, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages of any nature
whatsoever, including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage
arising from or connected with Grantee's operations or services performed pursuant to this Contract.
11. Acquisition, Accounting, Record Seeping & Inspection
A. Grantee agrees that all expenditures from this Contact including the acquisition of
personnel services, contactual services, supplies, and equipment, shall be in accordance with (1) the
standard procedures of Grantee's unit of government and (2) the Administrative and Budget
Requirements of the Grant Program.
B. Grantee agrees to maintain accounting records following generally accepted accounting
principles for the expenditure of funds for the purposes identified in the Grant Application, Budget,
and any applicable approved contract addendum and/or budget amendment.
C. Grantee agrees that the Supreme Court, State Court Administrative Office, the local
government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State Auditor General, or
any of their duly authorized representatives, including program evaluators and auditors, shall have
access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent transaction,
books, accounts, data, time cards, or other records related to this Contract. Such materials, including
all pertinent costs reports, accounting and financial records shall be kept and maintained by Grantee
for a period of five (5) years after completion of this Contract or until all State Court Administrative
Office audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever is later. Failure of Grantee to comply
•
-4-
. O2/O6/O1 TUE 14:27 FAX 18108581126 PROBATE COURT ADMIN. 006
'
• gas
with requirements of this section shall constitute a material breach of this Contract upon which the
State Court Administrator may cancel, terminate, or suspend this Contract.
D. The grantee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or account which
segregates the Grant Program contract receipts and expenditures.
12. Accountability for Grant Program Funds
Grantee agrees that it will not expend funds obtained under this agreement for any purpose
other than those authorized in the Administrative Requirements and specified in the Grant
Application and Budget for the Next Generation Model Trail Court Grant Program and will expend
granted funds only during the period covered by the Contract unless prior written approval is
received from the State Court Administrative Office.
• 13. Program Evaluation and Review
Grantee shall allow appropriate Supreme Court and State Court Administrative Office
representatives to evaluate, audit inspect and monitor program progress. The inspection methods
that may be used include: on-site visits; interviews of staff; and review of case records, receipts,
monthly/quarterly statistical reports, and fiscal records.
14. Reports _
A. Grantee agrees to provide reports as identified in the Application Guidelines and
Administrative Requirements for the Program to the State Court Administrative Office as follows:
B. Quarterly Financial/Expenditure Reports: Financial reports are due quarterly 30 days
following each quarter of the fiscal year. A Quarterly Financial/Expenditure Report must be
submitted every quarter the award is active even if there has been no financial activity during the
reporting period.
-5-
• .02/06/01 TUE 14:28 FAX 18108581126
•
,
C. Program Progress Reports: Progress reports are due semi-annually. The report will be
due on April 30 and one week after the end of the fiscal year or October 6.
D. Final Financial Expenditure Report: A Final Financial Expenditure Report will be due
one week subsequent to the end of the fiscal year or October 6.
E. The State Court Administrative Office retains the right to reallocate grant funding if
ongoing progress is not being made toward implementation of the grant project. Reimbursement for
grant costs and future funding may be withheld if the Financial/Expenditure Reports and/or Program
Progress Reports are delinquent.
15. Modification
Program Modification: This Contract fully expresses the agreement between the parties. No
modification of Grantee's Contract regarding the program can be made without prior written
approval of the State Court Administrative Office using a Contract Adjustment Request Form.
Budget Modification: Adjustments in expenditures within line item categories in the
approved budget may be made up to $1,000 without prior written approval of the State Court
Administrative Office. Modifications in line item categories in excess of $1,000 require prior
written approval of the State Court Administrative Office and can be requested using a Contract
Adjustment Request Form.
16 Funding Hold/Termination
The State Court Administrative Office, may at its election, place a funding hold on contracted
amounts not yet disbursed, or terminate the contract if the State Court Administrative Office
concludes that the Grantee is not in compliance with the conditions and provisions of this Grant
Contract, the Grant Application Guidelines and Administrative Requirements or the Budget
• PROBATE COURT ADMIN. ra007
-6-
Zoos. 02/06/01 TUE 14:28 FAX 18108581126 , PROBATE COURT ADMIN.
/ .• • 4.•
Requirements of the Grant Program. The State Court Administrative Office may extend an
opportunity for the Grantee to demonstrate compliance. Notification of a funding hold or
termination will be in writing.
Authorized By:
Dawn Monk
Deputy State Court Administrator Date
Acceptance by Grantee:
Authorizing Official (Signature) Date
Hon. Barry Howard
Chief Circuit Court Judge
Authorizing Official/Title
Authorizing Official (Signature) Date
Hon. Linda Hallmark
Chief Probate Court Judge
Authorizing Official/Title
6-cooe_ PA*, (me- L
0
Resolution #01092 March 22, 2001
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee.
There were no objections.
4
f 1
14. 4 S
FISCAL NOTE (M.R. #01092) April 5, 2001
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION/PROBATE COURT - NEXT GENERATION
MODEL TRIAL COURT GRANT ACCEPTANCE
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. The Oakland County 6 th Circuit and Probate Court applied for a
grant through the State Court Administrative Cffice (SCAO),
Next Generation Model Trial Court Grant Program.
2. The Court intends to use the grant funds to develop
implementation plans that identify issues affecting Court
operations, the administration of justice, and the services
and cost effectiveness of merged trial court operations.
3. The Court has been awarded the grant for services not to
exceed $21,178 of which $11,250 is state funding and $9,928
is the County's match.
4. The County match will consist of current County personnel
that will be performing grant related tasks, no additional
General Fund / General Purpose appropriation is required.
5. The Circuit Court FY 2001 Special Revenue budget be amended
as follows:
Revenue
35-279-510091-11000-0171 Grants-State
FY 2001
$11,250
Expenditure
35-279-610011-11000-3348 Professional Services $10,000
35-279-610011-11000-3292 Mileage $ 750
35-279-610011-11000-4252 Office Supplies $ 500
0
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote.
L Brooks Ps
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 5 djo, of M5ril, 2001.
G. William Caddell, County Clerk
• •n• t • 1
Resolution #01092 April 5, 2001
Moved by Palmer supported by Buckley the resolutions on the Consent
Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
Vote on resolutions on the Consent Agenda:
AYES: Appel, Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey,
Douglas, Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, Law, McPherson, Melton, Millard, Moss,
Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos. (23)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolutions on the
Consent Agenda were adopted, with accompanying reports being accepted.
I HEREBY OREGOING RESOLUTION
ti:a1/21
Date
T1EBY. 411019 ORI
W&A T- oon, County EXOCUtiVe
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on April 5, 2001 with the original record
thereof now remaining in my office.