HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2001.02.22 - 26390PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
REPORT (Misc. #01040) February 22, 2001
BY: Personnel Committee, Thomas A. Law, Chairperson
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION - MICHIGAN DRUG COURT
IMPLEMENTATION GRANT AND PERSONNEL RELATED ACTIONS
To The Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Personnel Committee, having reviewed the above referenced resolution
on February 7, 2001, recommends to amend and adopt the resolution by
adding a Be it Further Resolved paragraph as follows:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the new positions
associated with this grant are contingent upon continuation of state
funding."
Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move acceptance
of the foregoing report.
Personnel Committee vote:
Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #01040 February 22, 2001
BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE, DAVID MOFFITT, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION - MICHIGAN DRUG COURT IMPLEMENTATION
GRANT AND PERSONNEL RELATED ACTIONS
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Circuit Court, Family Division, applied for a grant with
the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Grant
Program with a granting period of January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001;
and
WHEREAS the application requested total funding in the amount of
$487,333 of which $150,000 was the state portion, $37,500 was the County's
match, and $299,833 would be derived from other sources of funding; and
WHEREAS the award from the SCAO is for $105,000, $33,914 is the
County's match and $50,182 is from the Substance Abuse funding for a total of
$189,096 (a 61% variance for the application); and
WHEREAS the twenty-five percent (25%) County Match of $35,000 must come
from local or other sources and an undefined portion of that match must be
cash; and
WHEREAS the actual County match will be $33,914 requiring an additional
$1,086 in County appropriations; and
WHEREAS the court intends to implement the Drug Court to deal with the
problems of increasing recidivism, increasing use of alcohol and illegal
drugs, rising systems costs, and an increase in jail days ordered; and
WHEREAS to provide intensive probation supervision and frequent drug
testing of defendants, one (1) full-time eligible special revenue Child
Welfare Worker II and one (1) full-time eligible special revenue Community
Service Coordinator are requested within the Family Division of the Circuit
Court, which will be covered by grant funds; and
WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution 90004 established a fiscal policy to
maintain proportionate funding for Federal, State and Private grants; and
WHEREAS the contract has been approved in accordance with the County
Executive's review process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners accepts the State Court Administrative Office, Michigan Drug
Court Program Grant, in the amount of $189,096 which includes $105,000 from
the State, $33,914 as the County Match, and $50,182 from Substance Abuse
funding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners is authorized to execute the contract agreement and that the
chairperson may approve amendments and extensions, up to fifteen (15%) percent
variance from the award, consistent with the original agreement as approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant is conditioned
upon continued interpretation of the contract consistent wLth the February 6,
2001, letter from the Michigan Supreme Court, State Court Administrative
Office, providing that assurance #4 of the grant application shall not be
construed as a mandate for future funding of the program from the funding
unit, said letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that one (1) full-time eligible special revenue
Child Welfare Worker II and one (1) full-time eligible special revenue
Community Service Coordinator be created within the Family Division of the
Circuit Court.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Obrecht absent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no positions may be filled nor expenditures
authorized until a grant agreement is fully executed with the County's
obligation limited to the grant funding period.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
248=305-9747 P.02
6173732M T-420 P.02/02 Job-171
Feb-08-01 01:16P mackenzie
FES-03-01 'From:SCAO CENTRAL
Michigan Supreme Court
State Court Administrative Office
EQ. Box 30048
Lansing, Michigan 0909
Phone (517) 373-0130
Joho D. 'Ferry, Jr.. State Court Adtninisma tor
February 6. 2001
Honorable Brian MacKenzie
52'4 District Court
42150 Grand River Ave.
Novi, MI 48374-1222
Dear Judge MacKenzie:
Pursuant to our conversation this morning regarding the Michigan Drug Court Grant
Program, I am providing information concerning Assurance #4 in the application materials.
The assurances included in the Michigan Drug Court Grant application materials are the
same as the assurances required to apply for and accept federal program funding for drug court
programs. Assurance #4 culls for the applicant to provide assurance of a program's intent to
continue funding whether that be from local, other state, or federal sources of funding. The
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program is a mato-appropriated program funded with limited general
fund dollars. The funding is intended to assist in developing and implementing new programs
and provide limited support to continuing programs. It is, however, the program's responsibility
to eventually seek additional sources of funding. This should not be construed as a mandate for
future funding of a program from the funding unit.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, •
I .„ 7
Dawn A. Monk
Deputy State Court Administrator
Grants-State
Grant Match
Special Revenue Fund 279
Revenue
1-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-0171
1-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-0167
$105,000
$ 1,086
$106,086
FISCAL NOTE (Misc. #01040) February 22, 2001
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION - MICHIGAN DRUG COURT
IMPLEMENTATION GRANT AND PERSONNEL RELATED ACTIONS
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. The Circuit Court, Family Division, has received a grant
from the State Court Administrators Office (SCAO), Michigan
Drug Court Program, for the period of January 1, 2001,
through December 31, 2001.
2. The award from SCAO is for $105,000. Including $33,914 in
County's match and the use of $50,182 from Substance Abuse
Funding, the total program amount equals $189,096.
3. Of the $33,914 in County match, $32,828 will be an in-kind
match using current County resources. The remaining $1,086
is required to be a cash match. This match was not
anticipated in the FY 2001 budget; therefore, a transfer
from the FY 2001 non-departmental Contingency account is
recommended.
4. The Substance Abuse funding is already included in the
Health Division's Substance Abuse grant; therefore no
amendments are required to utilize these funds with this
Drug Court grant.
5. The grant application included the creation of one (1)
full-time eligible special revenue Child Welfare Worker II
position and one (1) full-time eligible special revenue
Community Service Coordinator position to be placed within
the Circuit Court Family Division. One-half (50%) of the
funding for the Community Service Coordinator will be
derived from the Circuit Court Adult grant.
6. According to the current agreement language, acceptance of
this grant will require the County to continue the program
beyond the grant funding period.
7. The Fiscal Year 2001 Special Revenue budget should be
amended as follows to add the new Circuit Court Family
Division Michigan Drug Court grant:
General Fund
2-90-101-290000-25000-2564 Contingency $ (1,086)
2-35-101-242000-11000-0167 Grant Match $ 1,086
0
FINANCE COMMITTEE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Palmer absent.
Expenditures
2-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-2001
2-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-2075
2-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-3348
2-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-4252
Salaries $ 59,130
Fringe Benefits $ 23,908
Professional Services $ 21,962
Office Supplies $ 1,086
$106,086
8. Program continuation, including personnel, will be
contingent upon continued grant funding.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Resolution #01040 February 22, 2001
Moved by Crawford supported by Taub the Personnel Committee Report be
accepted.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted.
Moved by Taub supported by Melton the resolution be adopted.
Moved by Taub supported by Buckley the resolution be amended as
follows:
• Insert the three following WHEREAS paragraphs immediately following
the 7th WHEREAS paragraph:
WHEREAS the Family Court is taking part in the drug court program
and needs to evaluate that program; and
WHEREAS a case management and outcome assessment tool is needed;
and
• Insert the following two paragraphs as the fifth and sixth be it
further resolved paragraphs:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the court utilize a case management
and outcome assessment instrument acceptable to the Board of
Commissioners.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Court report semi-annually to the
Public Services Committee and the Finance Committee on the
effectiveness of the grant program.
• Amend the resolution to coincide with the recommendation in the
Personnel Committee Report, i.e. add the following BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED paragraph:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the new positions
associated with this grant are contingent upon continuation of state
funding.
Vote on amendment:
AYES: Melton, Millard, Moss, Patterson, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Webster,
Amos, Appel, Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas,
Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, McPherson. (20)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried.
Vote on resolution, as amended:
AYES: Millard, Moss, Patterson, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos,
Appel, Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas,
Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, McPherson, Melton. (20)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, as
amended, was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted
by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on February 22, 2001 with the
original record thereof now remaining in my office.
[HEREBY
L.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affi.-d the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 22nd da oeof F-.ruary, 20,
41,/} •G
rooks &son, County Executive
PRO, HE FOREGOIN T't- G
/0 I 4/0 I
Date
WI jam y Cl