The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolutions - 2001.02.22 - 26392REPORT (Misc. #01042) February 22, 2001 BY: Personnel Committee, Thomas A. Law, Chairperson IN RE: 52'd DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION 1 - MICHIGAN DRUG COURT IMPLEMENTATION GRANT AND PERSONNEL RELATED ACTIONS To The Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Personnel Committee, having reviewed the above referenced resolution on February 7, 2001, recommends to amend and adopt the resolution by adding a Be it Further Resolved paragraph as follows: "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the new positions associated with this grant are contingent upon continuation of state funding." Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move acceptance of the foregoing report. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Personnel Committee vote: Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no positions may be filled nor expenditures authorized until a grant agreement is fully executed with the County's obligation limited to the grant funding period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County accepts pass through federal grant funding from the Traffic Improvement Association (TIA) Highway Safety Program in the amount of $27,273. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the federal TIA grant is for the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution. Public Services Committee Feb-06-01 0116P mackenzie FE21-05-01 2 ; 47 - rots: SCAO CENTRAL 248-30579747 P.02 $173732)12 7-420 P.02/02 Jab-)11 Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office BOX 30048 Lansing, Michigan 48949 Phone (517) 375.-0130 joho D. fertyjn, State Court Administrator February 6, 2001 Honorable Brian Mackenzie 524d District Court aft 1 5 0 Grand River Ave. Novi, MI 48314-1222 Dear Judge MacKenzie: Pursuant to our conversation this morning regarding the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program, I am providing information concerning Assurance #4 in the application materials. The assurances included in the Michigan Drug Court Grant application materials are the same as the assurances required to apply for and accept federal program funding for drug court programs. Assurance #4 culls for the applicant to provide assurance of a program's intent to continue funding whether that be from locg, other state, or federal sources of funding. The Michigan Drug Court Grant Program is a state-appropriated program funded with limited general fund dollars. The funding is intended to assist in developing and implementing new programs and provide limited support to continuing programs. It is, however, the program's responsibility to eventually seek stdditional sources of funding. This should not be construed as a mandate for future funding of a program from the funding unit. If you have any further questions. please contact me. • Sincerely, Dawn A. Monk Deputy State Court Administrator _ • __• VC. 7 4". ,•rc. FISCAL NOTE (Misc. #01042) February 22, 2001 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: 52 nd DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION I - MICHIGAN DRUG COURT IMPLEMENTATION GRANT AND PERSONNEL RELATED ACTIONS TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The 52'd District Court, Division I (Novi) has received a grant from the State Court Administrators Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Program, for the period of January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2001. 2. The award from SCAO is for $95,000 and includes $31,667 in County match. The total program amount equals $126,667. 3. Of the $31,667 in County match, $27,273 will be in-kind covered by a grant from the Traffic Improvement Association, $2,926 will be in-kind match using current County resources (office space). The remaining $1,486 is a cash match. This match was not anticipated in the FY 2001 budget; therefore, a transfer from the FY 2001 non- departmental contingency account is recommended. 4. The grant application included the creation of two (2) full-time eligible special revenue Probation Officer I positions is requested within the Probation Unit. 5. According to the current agreement language, acceptance of this grant will require the County to continue the program beyond the grant funding period. 6. The Fiscal Year 2001 budget should be amended as follows to add the new District Court Drug Court grant: General Fund 2-90-101-290000-25000-2564 Contingency $ (1,468) 2-32-101-201200-20001-0167 Grant Match $ 1,468 0 Special Revenue Fund 272 1-43-272-XXXXXX-XXXXX-0171 Grants-State $27,273 2-43-272-XXXXXX-XXXXX-XXXX Court Security $27,273 0 Special Revenue Fund 279 Revenue 1-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-0171 Grants-State $ 95,000 1-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-0167 Grant Match $ 1,468 $ 96,468 Expenditures 2-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-2001 Salaries $ 68,906 2-35-279-XXXXXX-28000-2075 Fringe Benefits $ 27,562 $ 96,468 7. Program continuation, including personnel, is contingent upon continued grant funding. 41/ /'W(7(45'/ FINANCE COMMITTEE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Palmer absent. Resolution #01042 February 22, 2001 Moved by Crawford supported by Douglas the Personnel Committee Report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted. Moved by Taub supported by Crawford the resolution be adopted. Moved by Taub supported by Garfield the resolution be amended as follows: • Insert the three following WHEREAS paragraphs immediately following the 8 th WHEREAS paragraph: WHEREAS the Court contracts with A.D.E. inc. for its NEEDS assessment instrument; and WHEREAS A.D.E. inc, has case management software and an outcome assessment instrument available that will meet data reporting requirements for the State and Federal government; and WHEREAS the cost of the case management software is $2.00 per case, with the outcome assessment instrument provided at no additional cost; and • Insert the following two paragraphs as the seventh and eighth BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraphs: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the court utilize the case management and outcome assessment instruments available through A.D.E. inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Court report semi-annually to the Public Services Committee and the Finance Committee on the effectiveness of the grant program. • Amend the resolution to coincide with the recommendation in the Personnel Committee Report, i.e. add the following BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the new positions associated with this grant are contingent upon continuation of state funding. Vote on amendment: AYES: Sever, Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos, Appel, Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, McPherson, Melton, Millard, Moss, Patterson. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote AYES Mitchell, McPherson, NAYS on resolution, as amended: : Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos, Appel, Brian, Buckley, Causey- Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, Melton, Millard, Moss, Patterson, Sever. (20) : None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, as amended, was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on February 22, 2001 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and aft' ed the seal of the Coalty of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 22nd diglof J4bruary, 254)1. ---.6••••n••••nn.... I HEREBY 1,124Vyff3HE FOREGOING RESOL I I g/2e16/ I L. Brooks Pattgison.—County Executive Date