Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2001.06.14 - 26428AND BUILDING—COMMITTEE June 14, 2001 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #01154 BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE, CHARLES E. PALMER, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECT PLAN (ROCHESTER COLLEGE PROJECT) - CITY OF ROCHESTER HILLS To Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS The Economic Development Corporation of the County of Oakland (the "EDC") has recommended that the Board of Commissioners approve the Project Plan required by the Economic Development Corporations Act (the "Act") for the captioned Project, a copy of which has been presented to this meeting (the "Project Plan"); and WHEREAS the EDC's recommendations to the Board of Commissioners were based upon its determinations that the Project is reasonable and necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act and that the Project Plan satisfies all of the requirements of the Act regarding project plans; and WHEREAS the governing body of the City of Rochester Hills, Oakland County, Michigan, has also approved the Project Plan and given its consent to the exercise of jurisdiction over the Project by the EDC; and WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners has held a public hearing to consider whether the Project Plan constitutes a public purpose as contemplated by the Act; and WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners, following such public hearing and its review of the Project Plan, concurs in the determinations of the EDC with respect thereto; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Project Plan is hereby determined to constitute a public purpose as contemplated by the Act and is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the EDC is hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to implement the Project and the financing thereof by the issuance of its limited obligation revenue bonds as contemplated by the Project Plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Clerk is hereby directed to provide four certified copies of this resolution to the Assistant Secretary of the Board of the EDC. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Planing & Building Committee Vote: Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Dingeldey and Gregory absent THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND Oakland County, Michigan Rochester College Project PROJECT PLAN CONTENTS 1. Summary Description of Project (Page 1) 2. Project Plan Certification by Company (Page 2) 3. Statutorily Required Information (Page 3) 4. Exhibits "A" - Project Area Legal Description "B" - Letter of Credit Commitment Letter "C" - Company Certificate Regarding Transfer of Employment - Company Certificate Regarding Payment of Prevailing Wages "E" — Depiction of Existing and Planned Improvements PROJECT PLAN SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ROCHESTER COLLEGE PROJECT OWNER OF PROJECT: Rochester College, a Michigan nonprofit corporation CONTACT PERSON: (Name, address, telephone number) Mark VanRheenen Executive Vice President Rochester College 800 West Avon Road Rochester Hills, MI 48306 (248) 218-2016 Fax (248) 218-2017 LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Local municipality) City of Rochester Hills PROJECT AREA/DISTRICT AREA: See Exhibit A NATURE OF PROJECT: Construction of a new library/classroom complex and related roadways and parking, new residential housing hall, a new warehouse facility and other classroom renovation. EMPLOYMENT CREATED OR RETAINED: 10 new permanent jobs created TOTAL PROJECT COST: $9,000,000 BONDS TO BE ISSUED: $9,000,000 LETTER OF CREDIT ISSUER OR BOND PURCHASER: Bank One PROJECT PLAN CERTIFICATION THIS PROJECT PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS ACT, ACT NO. 338 OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC ACTS OF 1974, AS AMENDED. THE UNDERSIGNED HAS PROVIDED ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN AND HEREBY CERTIFIES AS TO THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF SUCH INFORMATION AS OF THIS DATE. THE UNDERSIGNED UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS PROJECT PLAN IS STATUTORILY REQUIRED AND, IF IT CONTAINS ANY MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION OR INACCURACY, COULD RESULT IN THE INVALIDATION OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROCEEDINGS REGARDING THE PROJECT TO WHICH THE PROJECT PLAN PERTAINS. ROCHESTER COLLEGE By: C • malt va.„ Its: Executive Vice President Dated: CI 7 lo t I. PROJECT PLAN STATUTORILY REQUIRED INFORMATION REGARDING ROCHESTER COLLEGE PROJECT I. THE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF EXISTING STREETS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT DISTRICT AREA; THE LOCATION, CHARACTER, AND EXTENT OF THE CATEGORIES OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAND USES NOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT AREA, INCLUDING RESIDENTIAL, RECREATIONAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND OTHER USES; AND A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA: No streets or other "public facilities" exist within the Project Area/District Area. Proposed facilities will be located on and throughout the existing private campus. All proposed facilities will be owned and operated by Rochester College. Legal description of Project Area attached as Exhibit A. H. A DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PROJECT AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED, REPAIRED, OR ALTERED; A DESCRIPTION OF REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS; AND AN ESTIMATE OF THE TIME REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION: See Item #III. DI THE LOCATION, EXTENT, CHARACTER, AND ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING REHABILITATION CONTEMPLATED FOR THE PROJECT AREA, AND AN ESTIMATE OF THE TIME REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION: See attached Exhibit E. This project encompasses a new library/classroom complex with approximately 17,000 square feet along with related roadways and parking. In addition, it includes a new residential housing hall for students with approximately 22,158 square feet. Also included is a tower to Dearborn Commons, a part of the residential project funded in the mid nineties that was not completed due to cost constraints. Another new construction part of the proposed project includes a 5,000 square foot warehouse building. Facilities scheduled for renovation include the Muirhead Building (7,500 square feet), Utley Center (3,300 square feet), Barbier (8,600 square feet), auditorium (5,000 square feet), telecounselor room (1,000 square feet), Gatewood Hall (28,000 square feet), and selected other classroom and energy conservation items. The project also includes computer 3 hardware and other selected technology items as well as a re-working of the master plan for the College. IV. A DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION PLANNED, AND THE ESTIMATED TIME OF COMPLETION OF EACH STAGE: See Item #III. V. A DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTS OF THE PROJECT AREA TO BE LEFT AS OPEN SPACE AND THE USE CONTEMPLATED FOR THE SPACE: See attached Exhibit E. VI. A DESCRIPTION OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA WHICH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OR THE COMPANY DESIRES TO SELL, DONATE, EXCHANGE OR LEASE TO OR FROM THE MUNICIPALITY AND THE PROPOSED TERMS Not Applicable VII. A DESCRIPTION OF DESIRED ZONING CHANGES AND CHANGES IN STREET, STREET LEVELS, INTERSECTIONS AND UTILITIES: None VIII. A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING THE PROJECT, INCLUDING ATTACHMENT OF A COPY OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT OR BOND PURCHASER'S COMMITMENT LETTER: The Project is proposed to be financed with the proceeds of sale of the EDC's limited obligation revenue bonds. The bonds will be sold or placed by Banc One Capital Markets. The bonds will be secured by a letter of credit issued by Bank One. Copy of Letter of Credit commitment letter attached as Exhibit B. IX. A STATEMENT REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF PREVAILING WAGE AND FRINGE BENEFIT RATES AS DETERMINED PURSUANT TO ACT NO. 166 OF THE 4 MICHIGAN PUBLIC ACTS OF 1965, AS AMENDED (REGARDING WAGES ON STATE • CONTRACTS): See Exhibit D X. A LIST OF PERSONS WHO WILL MANAGE OR BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN 1 (ONE) YEAR FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT PLAN: C. Mark VanRheenen, Executive Vice President Scott Niemann, Director of Facilities Barry Nebhut, TMP, Outside Architect Construction Manager, to be selected May 14, 2001 XI. DESIGNATION OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS, NATURAL OR CORPORATE, TO WHOM THE PROJECT IS TO BE LEASED, SOLD OR CONVEYED AND FOR WHOSE BENEFIT THE PROJECT IS BEING UNDERTAKEN, TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION IS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE: The Project is being undertaken for the benefit of, and will be owned and operated by, Rochester College, a Michigan nonprofit corporation. • XII IF THERE IS NOT AN EXPRESS OR IMPLIED AGREEMENT WITH A PERSON OR PERSONS, NATURAL OR CORPORATE, THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE LEASED, SOLD, OR CONVEYED TO THOSE PERSONS, THE PROCEDURES FOR BIDDING FOR THE LEASING, PURCHASING OR CONVEYING OF THE PROJECT UPON ITS COMPLETION: Not Applicable XIII ESTIMATES OF THE NUMBER OF PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE NUMBER OF FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS TO BE DISPLACED. IF OCCUPIED RESIDENCES ARE DESIGNATED FOR ACQUISITION AND CLEARANCE, INCLUDE A SURVEY OF THE FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS TO BE DISPLACED, INCLUDING THEIR INCOME AND RACIAL COMPOSITION, A STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE HOUSING SUPPLY IN THE COMMUNITY, INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UNITS IN EXISTENCE OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION, THE CONDITION OF THOSE IN EXISTENCE, THE NUMBER OF OWNER-OCCUPIED AND RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS, THE ANNUAL RATE OF TURNOVER OF THE VARIOUS TYPES OF HOUSING AND THE RANGE OF RENTS 5 AND SALE PRICES, AN ESTIMATE OF THE TOTAL DEMAND FOR HOUSING IN THE • COMMUNITY, AND THE ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC HOUSING AVAILABLE TO DISPLACED FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: Not Applicable XIV. A PLAN FOR ESTABLISHING PRIORITY FOR THE RELOCATION OF PERSONS DISPLACED BY THE PROJECT IN NEW HOUSING IN THE PROJECT AREA: Not Applicable XV. PROVISION FOR THE COSTS OF RELOCATING PERSONS DISPLACED BY THE PROJECT AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, INCLUDING LITIGATION EXPENSES AND EXPENSES INCIDENT TO THE TRANSFER OF TITLE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICIES ACT OF 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4601 TO 4655: Not Applicable XVI. A PLAN FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACT NO. 227 OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC ACTS OF 1972, WHICH PERTAINS TO PROVIDING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE, ADVISORY SERVICES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN EXPENSES TO DISPLACED PERSONS: Not Applicable XVII. OTHER MATERIAL AS THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY, OR GOVERNING BODY CONSIDERS PERTINENT: Not Applicable 6 Exhibit A PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION Legal description of property located in the City of Rochester Hills, County of Oakland, State of Michigan, owned by Michigan Christian College, comprising in total one contiguous parcel approximating 83 acres, described as: Section 1.1 Parcel A "Part of Southwest quarter of Section 15, Town 3 North, range 11 East, described as: Beginning at the South quarter comer of Section 15, running thence West 1311.8 feet to the 1/8 corner, thence North 1 degree 16 minutes West 173.4 feet to a point, thence North 89 degrees 24 minutes East 242.2 feet to a point, thence North 81 degrees 50 minutes East 253.7 feet to a point, thence North 49 degrees 16 minutes East 401.7 feet to a point, thence North 31 Degrees 3 minutes East 114.3 feet to a point, thence North 2 degrees 22 minutes West 172.5 feet to a point, thence North 53 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West 210.1 feet to a point, thence North 85 degrees 30 minutes West 245.22 feet to a point, thence North 49 degrees 33 minutes East 852.1 feet to a point, thence South 89 degrees 20 minutes East 300.9 feet to a point, thence South 3 degrees 4 minutes 30 seconds West 1440 feet to the place of beginning, containing 23.62 acres; expecting land beginning at a point in the South line of Section 15 which is West 730 feet from South Quarter comer of Section 15, running thence West along section line 581.8 feet, thence leaving section line North 1 degree 16 minutes West 173.4 feet, thence North 89 degrees 24 minutes East 242.2 feet, thence North 81 degrees 50 minutes East 253.7 feet, thence North 49 degrees 16 minutes East 121.57 feet, thence South 291.27 feet to point of beginning, containing 2.6 acres more or less and excepting the sand pit as reserved in deed Liber 252, page 551." Section 1.2 Parcel B "Part of Southwest quarter of Section 15, Town 3 North, Range 11 East, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the South line of Section 15, which is West 730 feet from the South quarter comer of Section 15, running thence West along Section line 581.8 feet, thence leaving section line North 1 degree 16 minutes West 173.4 feet, thence North 89 degrees 24 minutes East 242.2 feet, thence North 81 degrees 50 minutes East 253.7 feet, thence North 49 degrees 16 minutes East 121.57 feet, thence South 291.27 feet to the point of beginning, containing 2.6 acres more or less, excepting the sand pit and right of way over 12 foot roadway running from sand pit to the public highway on southerly line of property as reserved and recited in deed Liber 252, page 551." Section 1.3 Parcel C "Part of Southwest quarter of Section 15, Town 3 North, Range 11 East, described as follows: Beginning at the eighth corner, which is west 1311.8 feet of the South Quarter comer of said Section 15, running thence North 1 degree 16 minutes West 173.4 feet to a point, thence North 89 degrees 24 minutes East 242.2 feet to a point, thence North 81 degrees 50 minutes East 253.7 feet to a point, thence North 49 degrees 16 minutes East 401.7 feet to a point, thence North 31 degrees 3 minutes East 114.3 feet to a point, thence North 2 degrees 22 minutes West 172.5 feet to a point, thence North 53 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West 210.1 feet to a point, thence North 85 degrees 30 minutes West 245.22 feet to a point, thence South 49 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds West 575.2 feet to a point, thence South 41 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds West 692.89 feet to a point, thence East 458.7 feet to the place of beginning," except that part said premises falling within the Rail Road right-of-way. Section 1.4 Parcel D "That part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Town 3 North, Range 11 East, Michigan, described as commencing at the Southeast corner thereof; thence North 1637 feet to a point of the East line thereof; thence North 78 degrees 18 minutes West 610 feet; thence North 28 degrees 34 minutes West to center of the Clinton River; thence along center of said river to West line of West Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South to the Southwest corner thereof; thence East along the South line of said Section to the point of beginning." Section 1.5 Less Parcels E and F Parcels E Commencing at the South 400 feet of the South 1/4 corner of said Section 15; thence due East, along the South line of Section 15, 1003.13 feet to the point of beginning of this parcel; thence North 01 degree 40 minutes 04 seconds East, 887.19 feet; -thence due East, 393.37 feet to a point on the West line of a 12.46 acre parcel; thence South 01 degree 50 minutes 10 seconds West, along the West line of said 12.46 acre parcel; 260.31 feet to the Northwest corner of a 7.00 acre parcel; thence South 01 degree 35 minutes 20 seconds West, along the West line of said 7.00 acre parcel, 626.88 feet to a point on the South line of Section 15; thence due West, along the South line of Section 15, 393.47 feet to the point of beginning. Section 1.6 Parcel F Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 15; thence due East, along the South line of Section 15, 1003.13 feet to the point of beginning of this parcel; thence North 01 degree 40 minutes 04 seconds East, 887.19 feet; thence due East 393.37 feet to a point on the West line of a 12.46 acre parcel; thence South 01 degree 50 minutes 10 seconds West, along the West line of said 12.46 acre parcel; 260.31 feet to the Northwest corner of a 7.00 acre parcel; thence South 01 degree 35 minutes 20 seconds West, along the West line of said 7.00 acre parcel, 626.88 feet to a point on the South line of Section 15; thence due West, along the South line of Section 15, 393.47 feet to the point of beginning, except the South 400 feet thereof. Exhibit B LETTER OF CREDIT COMMITMENT LETTER C. Mark VanRheenen 248-218-2017 p.02 Monday, May 14, 2001 1:16 PM. Michael S. Farley First Vice President Bank One, Michigan MI1 8949 3121 University Drive Suite 100 Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 tel 248 276 0873 fax 248 276 0900 BANK = ONE May 14, 2001 Dr. Kenneth Johnson, President Mr. C. Mark VanRheenen, Vice President for Finance Rochester College 800 West Avon Road Rochester Hills, MI 48307 I am pleased to inform you that Bank One has approved the issuance of a letter of credit in support of Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds to be issued to assist with your planned campus expansion subject to certain terms and conditions as described below: The following is intended to be a summary of the principal terrhs and conditions for the transaction with the actual letter of credit documents including other provisions typical to this type of credit facility. PARTIES: Proposed irrevocable letter of credit ("L/C") to be issued by Bank One ("Bank One") in favor of Bank One Trust Company, N.A. ("Trustee") for the account of Rochester College (the "Obligor"). PURPOSE: To insure the payment of up to $9,000,000 in Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds ("Bonds") to be issued for the benefit of Rochester College for a project located in Rochester Hills, Michigan. AMOUNT: Bank One's aggregate liability under the L/C will not exceed $9,133,151 which includes required interest coverage and principal for a bond issue of up to $9,000,000. The interest coverage represents 45 days of interest at a maximum rate of 12% per annum based on a 365- day year. 05/14/01 MON 12:21 [1I/RX NO 8649] Dr. Kenneth Johnson Mr. C. Mark VanRheenen -2- May 14, 2001 C. Mark VanRheenen 248-218-2017 p.03 Monday, May 14, 2001 1:16 PM BOND FORMAT: The bonds would initially be marketed on a "lower-floater" basis, i.e. interest rate re-set weekly to reflect the then current market rate for equivalent tax-exempt securities. Bondholders would have the right to tender their Bonds to the Trustee for purchase by Rochester College on seven days notice. The Remarketing Agent would endeavor to sell any Bonds tendered by the tender date. Any Bonds not remarketed could be held by Rochester College pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement until a remarketing opportunity arose (as detailed in Reimbursement Agreement paragraph below) or surrendered to the Trustee for cancellation. Bond documentation would provide Rochester College an option to convert the Bonds to a fixed rate if buyers could be found at mutually acceptable rates and terms. In the event of such conversion, the Bank One L/C would be amended to accommodate the fixed rate option or terminated. Prior to such conversion, the Bonds would be prepayable in multiples of $100,000 without premium at the option of the Company upon 45-days notice. BOND MATURITIES: Interest only for years 1 and 2. Annual principal payments of $200,000 plus interest for years 3 through 6. $300,000 annual principal reductions plus interest for years 7 through 9. $700,000 annual principal payments plus interest for years 10 through 20. Interest is paid monthly. So long as the Bonds bear interest at a variable rate, the Bonds are prepayable in multiples of $100,000 without premium, at the option of Rochester College. Prepayments can occur only on interest payment dates with forty-five daysnotice to the bondholders. Interest Rate Protection Requirement. Within 6 months, Obligor must fix the rate on a minimum of 50% of the Obligor's total bond exposure. This will be accomplished through the use of interest rate swap products. CREDIT ENHANCEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT: LETTER OF CREDIT COMMISSION: 1% per annum, payable annually in advance, based upon Bank One's liability under the L/C (including any liability subject to reinstatement). The commission rate may be subject to annual adjustment as provided in the paragraph entitled "Yield Protection" below. FACILITY FEE: $10,000 fee for issuance of the L/C. CONSTRUCTION DRAW FEE: $250 fee for each draw package submitted. 05/14/01 MON 12:21 [TX/RX NO 8649] Dr. Kenneth Johnson Mr. C. Mark VanRheenen -3- May 14, 2001 C. Mark VanRheenen 248-218-2017 p.04 Monday, May 14, 2001 1:16 PM DISBURSEMENT EXPENSES: $100 fee for each draw by the Trustee under the L/C. EXPENSES: Legal expenses of Bank One together with all other out-of-pocket costs to be paid by the company. LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTIONS: Reductions in the L/C will be automatically instituted with each scheduled principal payment and will be permitted by written authorization of the Trustee based on principal prepayments on the Bonds. REDUCTIONS AND EARLY TERMINATION: Prepaid commissions will be refunded on a pro-rata basis after the first year as L/C reductions are authorized by the Trustee as a result of scheduled Bond principal payments or pre-payments. In the event that Bank One is replaced by another bank as letter of credit issuer for the Bonds, or the Bonds are refunded through another issue prior to an expiry date, a premium will be due equal to the commissions that would accrue over the remaining scheduled maturities at the then existing commission rate discounted to the L/C scheduled expiry date at the U.S. Treasury rate with maturity equal to the remaining term of the L/C plus 50 basis points. No such premium will be payable, however, if Bank One's credit rating by a major credit rating agency declines below single A and the replacement bank's equivalent rating is single A or higher. LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRY: Not later than 15 days following the fifth anniversary of the Bonds' issuance date unless extended at the sole discretion of Bank One. Upon Rochester College's request (received within 6 months of the original expiry date or any subsequent extension thereof) Bank One will, within 30 days, advise the Company of the terms by which it is willing to extend the existing expiry date. YIELD PROTECTION: The Obligor would be required to reimburse the Bank for any increased cost in the issuing or maintaining the L/C imposed by a change in any law, rule, regulation, or circumstance affecting the Bank's yield. This would include any change to the capital adequacy requirements. nc/laini moN 12:21 fTX/RX NO 86491 Dr. Kenneth Johnson Mr. C. Mark VanRheenen -4- May 14, 2001 Monday, May 14, 2001 116 PM • C. Mark VanRheenen 248-218-2017 p.05 DRAWING RIGHTS: Drawings under the L/C by the Trustee may result from: I. Payment of principal and/or interest on the Bonds when due. 2. Default under the Bond Indenture if the Trustee is required, at the direction of the Bondholders, to accelerate payment of the Bonds. 3. A default under the Reimbursement Agreement resulting in Bank One directing the trustee to prepay the Bonds. 4. The tender of Bonds under the Bondholder's tender option if the Bonds are not remarketed by the tender date. PLACEMENT AGENT/REMARKETING AGENT: Banc One Capital Markets Placement Fee: 0.50% of the amount of the Bond issue, payable at closing. Remarketing Fee: 0.125% per annum, payable annually in advance based upon the amount of the Bonds outstanding. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT: As the draws described above are made, Rochester College will then reimburse the Bank for those draws under the terms and conditions of the Reimbursement Agreement entered into between Rochester College and the Bank. The Reimbursement Agreement between Bank One and Rochester College will provide as follows: 1. So long as no default exists, the Company may defer payment of the principal portion of its reimbursement obligation arising from Bonds being tendered and not remarketed until the earlier of 180 days after the date of the drawing or the expiry of the L/C. Such obligation will bear interest at the Bank One Prime rate plus 3.0% as it exists from time to time. 2. Except for reimbursement obligations deferred pursuant to the item number immediately above, Rochester College will be obligated to reimburse Bank One for all amounts drawn under the L/C on the day of the drawing and any shortfall in reimbursement will accrue interest at Bank One's, prime rate plus 3.00%. 3. Bank One may direct the Trustee to prepay the Bonds if there is a drawing under the L/C not immediately reimbursed by Rochester College unless deferred pursuant to Item #2 above or if there is any other default under the Reimbursement Agreement. 4. The Reimbursement Agreement will include business covenants customary to term financing to be mutually agreed upon by Bank One and Rochester College. 05/14/01 MON 12:21 [TX/RX NO 8649] Dr. Kenneth Johnson Mr. C. Mark Van R heenen -5- May 14, 2001 C. Mark VapRheenen 248-218-2017 p.06 Monday, May 14, 2001 1:16 PM SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS/COLLATERAL: To secure its obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement, Rochester College will provide: 1. First Real Estate Mortgage on land and buildings located at 800 West Avon Road, Rochester Hills, Michigan. 2. Mortgage title policy and survey provided by companies acceptable to the Bank. 3. Cross-liened and cross-defaulted to all other Bank One debt. Bonds tendered under the tender option will be retained by the Trustee as collateral for Rochester College's obligation to Bank One arising from the drawing under the L/C until the Bonds are remarketed or the reimbursement obligation otherwise paid. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Rochester College will be obligated to provide to Bank One the following reporting: 1. Annual audited financial statements prepared by independent certified public accountants satisfactory to Bank One. 2. Internally prepared quarterly fund summaries. 3. Quarterly pledge campaign updates. 4. Annual fiscal year budgets. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT: 1. Designation of Bond Counsel and Trustee acceptable to Bank One. 2. Negotiation of satisfactory financial covenants. 3. Satisfactory compliance with Bank One's Environmental and Real Estate policies to be provided under separate cover. 4. Documents prepared by Bond Counsel and other closing documents must be satisfactory in form and substance to Bank One and its legal counsel. PRINCIPAL COVENANTS: To be negotiated. In addition, the final documentation will include representations, warranties, and other covenants of Rochester College standard for this type of facility. The foregoing is intended to provide a substantive outline of the commitment of Bank One rather than a complete statement of all terms, conditions and documents which would be required in connection with the transactions described above. It is possible that substantive terms and conditions may be changed in order to account for or reflect changes in statutory or regulatory authorities governing the subject matter of the transaction. Exhibit C COMPANY CERTIFICATE REGARDING TRANSFER OF EMPLOYMENT (Rochester College Project) The undersigned, Rochester College, a Michigan nonprofit corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies to The Economic Development Corporation of the County of Oakland (the "EDC") as follows: 1. This Certificate is made and based upon the best of the Company's knowledge and belief, only after thorough investigation and discussion with all owners of the Company and others who might have knowledge regarding the subject matter. 2. The Company acknowledges that this Certificate will be employed by the EDC as the sole basis for the EDC's certification to the Board of Commissioners of the County of Oaldand as to transfer of employment as required by Section 8(3) of the Economic Development Corporations Act, Act No. 338 of the Michigan Public Acts of 1974, as amended (the "Act"). 3. The Company understands that the EDC's Certification to the Board of Commissioners of the County of Oakland is a statutory requirement which, if improperly made or based upon any material misrepresentation or inaccuracy, might invalidate the proceedings regarding the Rochester College Project (the "Project") pursuant to which the EDC expects ultimately to issue its limited obligation economic developinent revenue bonds to finance all or part of the Project. 4. As of the date hereof, the Project shall not have the effect of transferring employment of more than 20 full-time persons from a municipality (as that term is defined in the Act) of this State to the City of Rochester Hills, Michigan, the municipality in which the Project will be located. 5. The Company understands that a covenant to effectuate the purposes of this Certificate will be included in those covenants to be made by the Company when bonds are issued by the EDC for the benefit of the Project. ROCHESTER COLLEGE, a Michigan nonprofit corporation By: C . 1116.04 Vaftel Its: Executive Vice President Dated: 5 1 1 to Exhibit D COMPANY CERTIFICATE REGARDING PAYMENT OF PREVAILING WAGES (Rochester College Project) The undersigned, Rochester College, a Michigan nonprofit corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies to The Economic Development Corporation of the County of Oakland (the "EDC") as follows: 1. The Company understands that this Certificate is a statutory requirement under the Economic Development Corporations Act, Act No. 338 of the Michigan Public Acts of 1974, as amended (the "Act") which, if improperly made or based upon any material misrepresentation or inaccuracy, might invalidate the proceedings regarding the Rochester College Project (the "Project") pursuant to which the EDC expects ultimately to issue its limited obligation economic development revenue bonds to finance all or part of the Project. 2. Within the meaning and intent of Section 8(4)(h) of the Act, all persons performing work on the construction of the Project will be paid the prevailing wage and fringe benefit rates for the same or similar work in the locality in which the work is to be performed, as determined pursuant to Act No. 166 of the Michigan Public Acts of 1965, as amended. ROCHESTER COLLEGE By: C - 114Lk4.t Va.v. Its: Executive Vice President Dated: G:\E\EconDev\Oakland\BOND\RochColl\Oak EDC - Project Plan Form.doc 1"54,4 VISMIPOeff ARBRCV5(THF." FOREGOING RESOLIJ7 7 I Date I "••• JiookyFatterson. County Executive 11.111n11111•10nMMIS•111111111•11. . Resolution #01154 June 14, 2001 Moved by Palmer supported by Moss the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, as amended, be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted and appointments being confirmed). AYES: Appel, Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey, Garfield, Gregory, Law, Melton, Moffitt, Moss, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, as amended, were adopted, with accompanying reports being accepted and appointments being confirmed. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on June 14, 2001 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 14 th /0.y o June, 2001 G. William Caddell, County Clerk