Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2002.12.12 - 26757MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #02306 December 12, 2002 BY: Public Services Committee, Hugh D. Crawford, Chairperson IN RE: 52nd DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION IV - 2003 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT PROGRAM CONTINUATION GRANT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the 52 nd District Court, Division IV (Troy) applied for a grant with the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Grant Program with a granting period of January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003; and WHEREAS the total program cost is $121,444 of which $35,000 is the State portion, $55,944 is the County's in-kind match and $25,000 will be derived from other sources of funding, and a local match from the city of Troy of $5,500; and WHEREAS the award from the SCAO is for $35,000 and $55,944 is the County's in-kind match, $5,500 will be funded from the City of Troy, and $25,000 from other sources for a total of $121,444; and WHEREAS the contract will require a twenty-five percent (25%) County Match of $55,944 that must come from local or other sources and an undefined portion of that match must be cash; and WHEREAS the actual County Itatch is an in-kind match of $55,944 and will not require any additional County appropriation; and WHEREAS the court intends to continue the Drug Court to deal with the problems of increasing recidivism, increasing use of alcohol and illegal drugs, rising systems costs, and an increase in jail days ordered; and WHEREAS to provide intensive probation supervision and frequent drug testing of defendants, one (1) part-time non-eligible Probation Officer I position, be continued in the Probation Unit, which will be covered by grant funds; and WHEREAS the Court contracts with A.D.E. inc. for its NEEDS assessment instrument; and WHEREAS A.D.E. inc. has case management software and an outcome assessment instrument available that will meet data reporting requirements for the State and Federal government; and WHEREAS the cost of the case management software is $2.00 per case, with the outcome assessment instrument provided at no additional cost; and WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution #90004 established a fiscal policy to maintain proportionate funding for Federal, State and Private grants; and WHEREAS the contract has been approved in accordance with the County Executive's Review Process. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the State Court Administrative Office, Michigan Drug Court Program Grant in the amount of $121,444 which includes $35,000 from the State, $55,944 as the County's In-kind Match, $5,500 from the City of Troy and $25,000 from Other sources. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the contract agreement and that the chairperson may approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen (15%) percent variance from the award, consistent with the original agreement as approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant is conditioned upon continued interpretation of the contract consistent with the February 6, 2001, letter from the Michigan Supreme Court, State Court Administrative Office, providing that assurance #4 of the grant application Public Services Committee Vote: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with McPherson, Obrecht, Garfield and Sever absent. shall not be construed as a mandate for future funding of the program from the funding unit, said letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that one (1) part-time non-eligible special revenue Probation Officer I position (pos. 32505-09716) be continued within the Probation Unit of the 52 nd District Court, Division IV (Troy). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no positions may be filled nor expenditures authorized until a grant agreement is fully executed with the County's obligation limited to the grant funding period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the court utilize the case management and outcome assessment instruments available through A.D.E. inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Court report semi-annually to the Public Services Committee and the Finance Committee on the effectiveness of the grant program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the existing positions associated with this grant is contingent upon continuation of state funding. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE \/ (11', Feb-06-01 01: 16P . mackenz la FU-OS-01 12:47 Prom;SCAO CENITAL 248 -305 -9747 P.02 5173732)12 T-420 P.02/02 Jo-/11 MichiganSupremeCourt state Court Administrative Office P.O. Box 30048 Lansing, Michigan 0909 Phone (517) 373-0130 Jahn D. Ferry, Jr., State Court Adrnististntat February 6, 2001 Honorable Brian MacKenzie 52"d District Court 41150 Grand River Ave. Novi, MI 48374-1222 Dear Judge MacKenzie: Pursuant to our conversation this morning regarding the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program, I am providing information concerning Assurance #4 in the application materials. The assurances included in the Michigan Drug Court Grant application materials are the same as the assurances required to apply for and accept federal program funding for drug court programs. Assurance #4 calls for the applicant to provide assurance of a program's interg to continue funding whether that be from local, other state, or federal sources of funding. The Michigan Drug Court Grant Program is a atato-appropriatcd program funded with limited general fund dollars. The funding is intended to assist in developing and implementing new programs and provide limited support to continuing programs. It is, however, the program's responsibility to eventually seek sukiitional sources of fundins. This should not be construed as a mandate for future funding of a program from the finding unit, If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Dawn A. Monk Deputy State Court Administrator Prentiss Malone, Jr. From: Greg Givens [givensg@co.oakland.mi.us] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:10 AM . To: VanLeuvenj; Malone, Prentiss; Frederick, Candace; VerPloeg, James Subject: CONTRACT REVIEW - District Court 52-4 - Troy RE: CONTRACT REVIEW - District Court 52-4 - Troy GRANT NAME: District Court Adult Drug Court - CY 2003 SCAO FUNDING AGENCY: State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: James Verploeg - 248/528.0406 STATUS: Acceptance DATE: 2 December 2002 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal contract review. Below are the comments returned by review departments. Department of Management and Budget: Approved. - Laurie Van Pelt (27 Nov 2002) Personnel Department: I approve. - Judy Eaton (25 Nov 2002) Risk Management and Safety: Risk Management approves this contract without modification. - Gerald Mathews (27 Nov 2002) Corporation Counsel: On review of this grant contract, there appear to be no outstanding legal issues that require additional action or resolution. Please be aware that the assurances should be passed through to any subcontractors. - Karen Agacinski (27 Nov 2002) The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. Greg Givens, Supervisor Grants Administration Unit Fiscal Services Division THE BUDGET SECTION CALENDAR YEAR 2003 Lk 121,444 35 _ ,000 -0- 5,500 55,944 BUDGET SUMMARY CALENDAR YEAR 2003 Budget Category 1. Personnel 2. Fringe Benefits 3. Consultant/ Contractual 4. Travel 5. Consultant/ Contractual Travel 6. Supplies/Operating Total Cost (100%) 61,957 20,827 38,160 -0- -0- 500 State Grant In-Kind ODCP Cash Other Match GRANT Match 22,000 39,957 -0- -0- 4,840 15,987 -0- -0- 8,160 5,000 25,000 -0- -0- 500 -0- TOTAL PROJECT COSTS State Request (75% max) ODCP Grant Local Match (25% min) Cash In-Kind Other Sources of Funding for Drug Court Program Subs. Ab. Coord. Agency State of Michigan Amount: 25,000 Amount: _11,796_ Amount: (Attach additional paper if necessary for other sources of funding for the Drug Court Program) Note: At least 25% of the total project cost is a required match and must come from a combination of local cash and in-kind contributions. The percentage of cash for the local match is not defmed. Please identify which categories are to be funded with state grant funds and which categories are to be funded as match funds or other funds. Equipment purchases may be recorded in the Supplies and Operating category but will be authorized for match expenditures only. -1- BUDGET NARRATIVE FISCAL YEAR 2003 BUDGET NARRATIVE: The budget narrative should justify all costs associated with the proposed project. The Court will provide $500 in supplies as a cash match. All other costs are directly related to the grant and the in-kind matches. (0 -2- BUDGET DETAIL WORKSHEET CALENDAR YEAR 2003 The Budget Detail Worksheet: The budget detail worksheet should include a thorough justification for all costs including the basis for computing these costs. The budget must be complete, reasonable, and directly related to the activities proposed in the application. The Budget Detail Worksheet may be submitted on plain sheets following the format below. Indicate in each category what the funding source is for the category. (State grant, match or other.) 1. PERSONNEL: List each position by title or name of employee if available. Show the annual salary rate and the percentage of time devoted to the project. Name/Position Computation Cost Dennis C. Drury, Judge 400 hrs x $69.14 27,656 James A. VerPloeg, Ct. Adm.400 hrs x $37.85 15,140 Patricia Bates, Sen. Prob. Of. 120 hrs x 27.39 13,148 Kelly Wood, Prob. Of. 22,000 Personnel Total $ 61,957 2. FRINGE BENEFITS: Fringe benefits should be based on actual known costs or an established formula. Fringe benefits are only for the personnel listed in the budget and only for the percentage of time devoted to the project. Check the fringe benefits that apply and indicate the composite rate percentage. X FICA X Life Insurance X Unemployment Insurance X Vision Insurance X Retirement X Dental Insurance X Hospital Insurance X Worker's Compensation Other Composite Rate: 4 % (PTNE @ 22%) Fringe Benefit Total $ 20,827 TOTAL PERSONNEL & FRINGE BENEFITS 82,784 et Location Item Computation Cost Meals/Mileage) Purpose of Travel -3- 3. CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL: For each consultant enter the name (if known), service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (8-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of $250 per day require prior SCAO approval. (Note: Consultant Travel should be listed separately under category E). Contractual services for treatment, case management/monitoring and drug testing should be included in this section. Name of Consultant Service Provided Computation Cost _ Subst. Abuse Coord. Agency Treatment Services varies, depending on 25,000 modality Consultant/Contractual Total $ 25,000 4. TRAVEL: Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (ex. training etc.). Show the basis of computation. For training programs, travel and meals should be listed separately. Show the number of trainees, the unit costs involved, and the location of travel. Travel for consultants should be listed under Section E under Consultant Travel. All travel must adhere to the Michigan Supreme Court Standardized Travel Rates for the Judicial Branch effective 10/01/01 which are included in the grant application kit. Approved travel expenses will be limited to in- state travel. TOTAL PERSONNEL TRAVEL $ -0- 5. CONSULTANT TRAVEL: List all travel expenses to be paid from the grant to consultants. Item Location Computation Cost TOTAL CONSULTANT TRAVEL $ -0- TOTAL PERSONNEL TRAVEL AND CONSULTANT TRAVEL: $ -0- -4- 6. SUPPLIES/OPERATING: Supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project. Training registration costs should be included under this section. Supply Items/ Training Registration Costs Computation Costs TOTAL SUPPLIES/OPERATING $ -0- MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM 2003 GRANT CONTRACT 52-4 District Court-Troy Grantee 38-60004876 Federal ID Number SCAO 2003-20 SCAO Grant Number. $35,000.00 Grant Amount Public Act 137, effective July 28, 1999 provided funding for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program for FY 1999-2000 'which is administered by the State Court Administrative Office. Funding for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program has been continued for Calendar year 2003. The purpose of the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program is to provide funding assistance to circuit and district courts to help with planning and implementation of new drug courts, expansion of existing drug courts, and continuation funding for drug court programs no longer eligible to receive federal funding for their drug court program. Grants from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program are awarded to Grantees conditioned upon the Grantee's agreement to comply with the policies and procedures set forth in the Application Guidelines and Administrative Requirements for the Program and this grant contract. The Grant Contract becomes effective upon signatures of the Grantee's Authorizing Official and the State Court Administrator or his designee. -1 - Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Two 1. Contract This contract consists of and incorporates Grantee's Approved Grant Request and Budget. 2. Definitions The budget submitted with Grantee's Grant as approved by the State Court Administrative Office, shall be referred to as the "Budget Section". 3. Contract Administration The State Court Administrator or his agent shall have full authority to act for the Grantor in the Administration of this Contract consistent with the following provisions. 4. Term of Contract The contract shall be effective upon signatire of the State Court Administrator or Deputy State Court Administrator when signed by the authorizing official, and shall terminate on December 31, 2003, unless terminated earlier. Grantee understands that funding under this Contract does not provide for future funding from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. 5. Contract Funding Upon approval of the Grantee's Application, the State Court Administrative Office agrees to provide funding from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program in an amount not to exceed the amount of the grant contract. In no event does this contract create a charge against any other funds of the State Court Administrative Office or the Michigan Supreme Court. -2- t Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Three 6. Conduct of the Project A. Grantee shall abide by all terms and conditions imposed and required by the Grant Application Guidelines, Administrative and Budget Requirements. B. Grantee shall operate its drug court project in accordance with the Key Components of Drug Courts as outlined in the Application Guidelines. C. Grantee shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, rules, and ' regulations. 7. Cash/In-Kind Match The State share of the grant project may not exceed 75% of the total project costs. At least 25% of the total project cost is a required match and must come from local or other sources. Cash contributions must constitute a portion of the required match. Portion is not defined. 8. Assignments and Subcontracts All appropriate provisions and requirements of this Contract shall apply to any sub- contracts or agreements. Grantee shall be held responsible by the State Court Administrator for the performance of any sub-contractor. -3- Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Four 9. Independent Contractor Status A. Both parties of this Contract will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, joint ventures, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of one party shall not be deemed or construed to be the agent or employee of the other party for any purpose. B. Grantee understands and agrees that all persons furnishing services pursuant to this Contract are, for purposes of Workers Compensation liability or other actions of employee- related liability, not employee of the State Court Administrative Office or Supreme Court. Grantee bears the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing Workers Compensation benefits to any of its employees for injuries arising from or connected with services performed pursuant to the Contract. Grantee may require subcontractOrs expected to perform services under this contract to provide further information according to local policies and procedures. 10. Indemnification Each party to this Contract will remain responsible for any claims arising out of that parties performance of this Contract as provided by this Contract or law. This Contract is not intended to increase or decrease either parties liability for or immunity from tort claims. This Contract is not intended to nor will it be interpreted as giving either party hereto a right of indemnification, either by contract or at law, for claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. -4- Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Five 11. Debarment and Suspension A. Grantee may not contract with or make any award of the State Court Administrative Office Drug Grant funds at any time to any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension." 12. Acquisition, Accounting, Record Keeping & Inspection A. Grantee agrees that all expenditures from this Contract including the acquisition of personnel services, contractual services, supplies, and equipment, shall be in accordance with (1) the standard procedures of Grantee's unit of government and (2) the Administrative and Budget Requirements of the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. B. Grantee agrees to maintain accounting records following generally accepted accounting principles for the expenditure of funds for the purposes identified in the Grant Application, Budget, and any applicable approved contract addendum and/or budget amendment. Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Six C. Grantee agrees that the Supreme Court, State Court Administrative Office, the local government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State Auditor General, or any of their duly authorized representatives, including program evaluators and auditors, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent transaction, books, accounts, data, time cards, or other records related to this Contract. Such materials, including all pertinent costs reports, accounting and financial records shall be kept and maintained by Grantee for a period of five (5) years after completion of this Contract or until all State Court Administrative Office audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever is later. Failure of Grantee to comply with requirements of this section shall constitute a material breach of this Contract upon which the State Court Administrator may cancel, terminate, or suspend this Contract. D. The grantee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or account which segregates the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program contract receipts and expenditures. 13. Accountability for Michigan Drug Court Grant Program Funds Grantee agrees that it will not expend funds obtained under this agreement for any purpose other than those authorized in the Administrative Requirements and specified in the - Grant Application and Budget for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program and will expend granted funds only during the period covered by the Contract unless prior written approval is received from the State Court Administrative Office. -6- I (# Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Seven 14. Program Evaluation and Review Grantee shall allow appropriate Supreme Court and State Court Administrative Office representatives to evaluate, audit, inspect and monitor operation of the drug court. The inspection methods that may be used include: on-site visits; interviews of staff and drug court participants; and review of case records, receipts, monthly/quarterly statistical reports, and fiscal records. • 15. Reports A. Grantee agrees to provide reports as identified in the Application Guidelines and Administrative Requirements for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program to the State Court Administrative Office as follows: B. Financial Reports: Financial reports are due quarterly one month following each quarter of the fiscal year with the exception of the 3rd quarterly report which will be due October 10, 2003 in order to meet fiscal year end reporting requirements. Therefore, quarterly reports will be due April 30, 2003; July 31, 2003; October 10, 2003, and January 31, 2004. Reimbursement for grant costs and future funding may be withheld if the progress and financial reports are delinquent. The State Court Administrative Office will provide copies of the financial report forms with grant contracts for each grant award made. -7- Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Eight C. Progress Reports: Progress reports are due semi-annually. The reports will be due on June 30, 2003 and one month after the end of the calendar year or January 31, 2004. The progress reports describe activities during the reporting period and the status of accomplishment of objectives as set forth in the application for grant funding. The final report must provide a summary of progress toward achieving the goals and objectives of the award, significant results, and any products developed under the award. The State Court Administrative Office will provide copies of the progress report forms with the grant contract for each grant award made. D. Drug Court Grantee Data Collection Survey: Recipients of implementation, enhancement and continuation funding are required to submit to the SCAO the Drug Court Grantee Data Collection Survey developed by the federal Drug Court Grant Program one month after the end of the grant project or January 31, 2004. These data will capture baseline information on both drug courts and defendants. The data are intended to serve as a minimum data set for both local and national evaluation efforts. E. The State Court Administrative Office retains the right to reallocate grant funding if ongoing progress is not being made toward implementation of the drug court grant project. Reimbursement for grant costs and future funding may be withheld if the Financial Reports and/or Program Progress Reports are delinquent or the Drug Court Grantee Data Collection Survey is not completed. -8- Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Nine 16. Modification Program Modification: This Contract fully expresses the agreement between the parties. No modification of Grantee's Contract regarding the program can be made without prior written approval of the State Court Administrative Office using a Contract Adjustment Request Form included in the Grant Application packet. Budget Modification: Adjustments in expenditures within line item categories in the approved budget may be made up to $1,000 without prior written approval of the State Court Administrative Office. Modifications in line item categories in excess of $1,000 require prior written approval of the State Court Administrative Office and can be requested using a Contract Adjustment Request Form included in the Grant 4plication packet. -9- t°1 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003 Page Ten 17. Funding Hold/Termination The State Court Administrative Office, may at its election, place a funding hold on contracted amounts not yet disbursed, or terminate the contract if the State Court Administrative Office concludes that the Grantee is not in compliance with the conditions and provisions of this Grant Contract, the Grant Application Guidelines and Administrative Requirements or the Budget Requirements of the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. The State Court Administrative Office may extend an opportunity for the Grantee to demonstrate compliance. Notification of a funding hold or termination will be in writing. Authorized By: State Court Administrative Office Date Acceptance by Grantee: Authorizing Official Signature and Title Date Chief Judge (Signature) Date -10- 4 , MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2003 ASSURANCES 1. Applicants must provide assurance that there has been appropriate consultation with all affected agencies and that there will be appropriate coordination with all affected agencies in implementation of the drug court program. 2. Applicants must provide assurance that all treatment programs and providers used in the drug court program are licensed, certified, or accredited by appropriate State government or professional agencies. 3. Applicants must provide assurance that violent offenders, as defined in the application guidelines will be excluded from drug court programs receiving funds under this program. 4. Applicants must explain the inability to fund the program adequately without assistance from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. Applicants must also provide assurance of the intention and capability of the jurisdiction to continue the program after the - funding from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program has been expended. 5. Applicants must provide assurance that all tecipients of funding under this grant program are required to comply with nondiscrimination requirements contained in various federal laws. Each applicant court should have a copy of their EEO Plan on file and available for review by the State Court Administrative Office upon request. 6. Applicants must assure that the applicant and its subgrantees will not use funds from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program for lobbying and will disclose any lobbying activities related to the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program.. 7. Recipients of funding will assure that the Supreme Court, the State Court Administrative Office, the local government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State Auditor General or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent financial transactions, accounting records or other fiscal records related to this grant. Such records shall be maintained for a period of five years after completion of the grant project or until all State Court Administrative Office audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever is later. MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM ASSURANCES (cont) 8. Applicants for Implementation and Continuation Grants must assure that they will submit to the SCAO the Drug Court Grantee Data Collection Survey developed by the federal Drug Courts Program Office 30 days after the end of the grant project or December 31, 2003. By signing the Assurances form, the applicant court assures that it will comply with the requirements set forth in the grant application in order to receive funding under the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. Project Director (Name/Title) Project Director (Signature) Date: Financial Officer (Name/Title) Financial Officer (Signature) Date: Authorizing Official (Name/Title) Authorizing Official (Signature) Date: • t I 0 N. I I h. A 1 Memorandum To: Fiscal Services CC: file From: Jim VerPloeg Date: 12/03/02 Re: Drug Court Grant Please be advised that the in-kind match from the City of Troy is for the City Attorney's time involved in attending the Drug Court sessions weekly. This accounts for the $5000 cash match in the budget section of the 2003 grant. The $25,000 is for services provided from the Oakland County Health division, office of Substance Abuse Coordinating Agency. They have agreed to match the amount of treatment dollars that are being spent on the drug court participants in the program who are being referred to treatment that do not have insurance. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, James VerPloeg Court Administrator 52-4 District Court FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #02306) December 12, 2002 BY: Finance Committee, Sue Ann Douglas, Chairperson IN RE: 52nd DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION IV - 2003 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT PROGRAM CONTINUATION GRANT CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The 52nd District Court, Division IV (Troy) has received a grant from the State Court Administrator's Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Program, for the period of January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003. 2. The award from SCAO is for $35,000 in addition $55,944 in County in-kind match, $5,500 from the city of Troy local in-kind match, and $25,000 of County in-kind match. The total program amount is $121,444. 3. The County match of $55,944 is in-kind personnel support from general fund funded employees. 4. The match of $25,000 is also in-kind County match support from the Office of Substance Abuse Coordinating Agency of the Oakland County Health Department. 5. Because the in-kind matches are currently budgeted in the General Fund/General Purpose budget, an amendment adding the match to the Special Revenue Fund is inappropriate. 6. The grant contract includes the continued funding of one (1) special revenue part-time non-eligible Probation Officer I position (32505-09716) total salary and fringes are $26,840. 7. The grant also funds the $8,160 of contracted services consultant cost, for a total SCAO grant funded budget of $35,000. 8. The Fiscal Year 2003 budget should be amended as follows to accept continued funding from the SCAO, 52-4 District Court Drug Court grant: Special Revenue Revenue 1-32-279-100403- 1 -32 -279 -100403 - Fund 279 28000-0171 28000-0218 Grants-State Local Match Salaries Fringe Benefits Consultant Lab. Supplies $ 35,000 0 $ 35,000 $ 22,000 $ 4,840 $ 8,160 0 $ 35,000 Expenditures 2-32-279-200403-28000-2001 2-32-279-200403-28000-2075 2-32-279-200403-28000-2560 2-32-279-200403-28000-4156 is contingent upon 7. Program continuation, including personnel, continued grant funding. FINANCE COMMITTEE FINANCE COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Dingeldey, Taub and Melton absent. tive ar, D* • 4 f E FOREGOING RESOI.Ir'' Date son, G. William Caddell, County Clerk 4 V Resolution #02306 December 12, 2002 Moved by Sever supported by Suarez the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Gregory, Law, McPherson, Melton, Middleton, Moffitt, Moss, Obrecht, Palmer, Palterson, Sever, Suarez, Webster, Appel. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). I HERE§ - L BrOC4(3 Pa STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on December 12, 2002, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of The County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 12th day of December, 2002.