HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2002.12.12 - 26759MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 102308 December 12, 2002
BY: Public Services Committee, Hugh D. Crawford, Chairperson
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION - 2003 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT CONTINUATION
GRANT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Circuit Court, Family Division, applied for a grant with
the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Grant
Program with a granting period of January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003;
and
WHEREAS the application requested total funding in the amount of
$140,000 of which $105,000 was the State portion, and $35,000 was the
County's match; and
WHEREAS the award from the SCAO is for $105,000, the twenty-five
percent (25%) County Match of $35,000 will come from the FY 2003 Byrne
Memorial Grant, requiring no additional County appropriations; and
WHEREAS the court intends to continue the Drug Court to deal with the
problems of increasing recidivism, increasing use of alcohol and illegal
drugs, rising systems costs, and an increase in jail days ordered; and
WHEREAS to provide coordination and supervision of the grant program,
one (1) full-time eligible special revenue SCAO funded Community Service
Coordinator (Juvenile Drug Court Coordinator) will be continued within the
Family Division of the Circuit Court, which will be covered by grant funds;
and
WHEREAS to carry out the duties of the program one (1) full time
Special Revenue Youth and Family Case Worker II (34502-09835) and one (1)
PTNE Special Revenue Technical Aide (35402-09836) in Circuit Court Family
Div., are funded by the Byrne Memorial Grant, with the grant match being
furnished by the SCAO grant; and
WHEREAS the Family Court is taking part in the drug court program and
needs to evaluate that program; and
WHEREAS a case management and outcome assessment tool has been
implemented; and
WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution #90004 established a fiscal policy to
maintain proportionate funding for Federal, State and Private grants; and
WHEREAS the contract has been approved in accordance with the County
Executive's Review Process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners accepts the State Court Administrative Office, Michigan Drug
Court Program Grant, in the amount of $140,000 which includes $105,000 from
the State, and $35,000 as the County Match to be funded by the Byrne Memorial
Grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the total grant funded program cost of
$140,000 include personnel cost of $72,983, contractual consultant cost of
$62,800, travel of $2,794, and operating supplies of $1,423.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners is authorized to execute the contract agreement and that the
chairperson may approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen (15%) percent
variance from the award, consistent with the original agreement as approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant is conditioned
upon continued interpretation of the contract consistent with the
February 6, 2001, letter from the Michigan Supreme Court, State Court
Administrative Office, providing that assurance #4 of the grant application
Public Services Committee Vote:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with McPherson, Obrecht, Garfield and Sever
absent.
shall not be construed as a mandate for future funding of the program from
the funding unit, said letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that one (1) full-time eligible special revenue
Community Service Coordinator (Juvenile Drug Court Coordinator) position
(35402-9712) be continued within the Family Division of the Circuit Court,
with the 25% grant match funding ($35,000) paid by budgeted departmental
funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 25% grant match funding ($35,000) for
one (1) full-time eligible Special Revenue Youth and Family Case Worker II
(34502-09835) and one (1) PTNE Special Revenue Technical Aide (35402-09836)
within the Family Division of the Circuit Court, funded by the Byrne Memorial
Grant, be paid by the SCAO grant award, effective the first pay period of the
second quarter of FY 2003, per approval of the SCAO.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no positions may be filled nor expenditures
authorized until a grant agreement is fully executed with the County's
obligation limited to the grant funding period.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the court utilize a case management and
outcome assessment instrument acceptable to the Board of Commissioners.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Court report semi-annually to the
Public Services Committee and the Finance Committee on the effectiveness of
the grant program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the new position associated
with this grant is contingent upon continuation of state funding.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE
47
Sincerely,
Feb-06-01 01:16P mackenzie
FE-0-01 /2:47 PrOm:SCAO oENTRAL
248r-30579747 P.02
5173732/12 7-420 F.:22/D2 Jab-ill
MicbiganSupremeCourt
State Court Admin stratLve Office
RO. Box 3004B
Lansing, Michigan 48909
?hone (517) 373-0131)
John D. Ferry, Jr., Sum Court Administrator
February 6, 2001
Honorable Brian MacICenzie
52qd District Court
4$15O Grand River Ave.
Novi, MI 48374-1222
Dear Judge MacKenzie:
Pursuant to our conversation this morning regarding the Michigan Drug Court Grant
Program, I am providing information concerning Assurance #4 in the application materials.
The assurances included in the Michigan Drug Court Grant application materials are the
same as the assurances required to apply for and accept federal program funding for irug court
programs. Assurance #4 calls for the applicant to provide assurance of a program's intent to
continue funding whether that be from local, other state, or federal sources of funding. The
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program is a atatc-appropriated program funded with limited general
fund dollars. The funding is intended to assist in developing and inaplementing new programs
and provide limited support to continuing programs. It is, however, the program's responsibility
to eventually seek additional sources of funding. This should not be construed as a mandate for
future funding of a program from the funding Unit.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Dawn A. Monk
Deputy State Court Administrator
Prentiss Malone, Jr.
From: Greg Givens [givensg@co.oakland.mi.us]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:40 AM
To: VanLeuvenj; Howitt, Pam; Malone, Prentiss; Frederick, Candace
Subject: (no subject)
RE: CONTRACT REVIEW - Circuit Court Family Division
GRANT NAME: Juvenile Drug Court - CY 2003 SCAO
FUNDING AGENCY: State Court Administrative Office (SCAO)
DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Pam Howitt - 80247
STATUS: Acceptance
DATE: 2 December 2002
Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned
grant materials have completed internal contract review. Below are the
comments returned by review departments.
Department of Management and Budget:
Approved. - Laurie Van Pelt (2 Dec 2002)
Personnel Department:
I approve. - Judy Eaton (25 Nov 2002)
Risk Management and Safety:
Risk Management approves this contract without modification.
- Gerald Mathews (25 Nov 2002)
Corporation Counsel:
On review of this grant contract, there appear to be no outstanding
legal issues that require additional action or resolution. Please be
aware that the assurances in the contract should be "passed through" to
any subcontractors. - Karen Agacinski (27 Nov 2002)
The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which
should include the Board of Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution,
the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this
email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on
the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant
acceptance by Board resolution.
Greg Givens, Supervisor
Grants Administration Unit
Fiscal Services Division
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT
STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM
2003
GRANT CONTRACT
6th Circuit Court-Juvenile
Grantee
38-6004876
Federal ID Number
SCAO 2003-15
SCAO Grant Number
$105,000.00
Grant Amount
Public Act 137, effective July 28, 1999 provided funding for the Michigan Drug Court
Grant Program for FY 1999-2000 which is administered by the State Court Administrative
Office. Funding for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program has been continued for FY 2002-
2003.
The purpose of the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program is to provide funding assistance
to circuit and district courts to help with planning and implementation of new drug courts,
expansion of existing drug courts, and continuation funding for drug court programs no longer
eligible to receive federal funding for their drug court program.
Grants from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program are awarded to Grantees
conditioned upon the Grantee's agreement to comply with the policies and procedures set forth in
the Application Guidelines and Administrative Requirements for the Program and this grant
contract. The Grant Contract becomes effective upon signatures of the Grantee's Authorizing
Official and the State Court Administrator or his designee.
-1-
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Two
1. Contract
This contract consists of and incorporates Grantee's Approved Grant Request and
Budget.
2. Definitions
The budget submitted with Grantee's Grant as approved by the State Court
Administrative Office, shall be referred to as the "Budget Section".
3. Contract Administration
The State Court Administrator or his agent shall have full authority to act for the Grantor
in the Administration of this Contract consistent with the following provisions.
4. Term of Contract
The contract shall be effective upon signattire of the State Court Administrator or Deputy
State Court Administrator when signed by the authorizing official, and shall terminate on
December 31, 2003, unless terminated earlier. Grantee understands that funding under this
Contract does not provide for future funding from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program.
5. Contract Funding
Upon approval of the Grantee's Application, the State Court Administrative Office agrees
to.provide funding from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program in an amount not to exceed the
amount of the grant contract. In no event does this contract create a charge against any other
funds of the State Court Administrative Office or the Michigan Supreme Court.
-2-
5
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Three
6. Conduct of the Project
A. Grantee shall abide by all terms and conditions imposed and required by the Grant
Application Guidelines, Administrative and Budget Requirements.
B. Grantee shall operate its drug court project in accordance with the Key Components
of Drug Courts as outlined in the Application Guidelines.
C. Grantee shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, rules, and
regulations.
7. cash/In-Kind Match
The State share of the grant project may not exceed 75% of the total project costs. At
least 25% of the total project cost is a required match and must come from local or other sources.
Cash contributions must constitute a portion of the required match. Portion is not defined.
8. Assignments and Subcontracts
All appropriate provisions and requirements of this Contract shall apply to any sub-
contracts or agreements. Grantee shall be held responsible by the State Court Administrator for
the performance of any sub-contractor.
-3-
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Four
9. Independent Contractor Status
A. Both parties of this Contract will be acting in an independent capacity and not as
agents, employees, partners, joint ventures, or associates of one another. The employees or
agents of one party shall not be deemed or construed to be the agent or employee of the other
party for any purpose.
B. Grantee understands and agrees that all persons furnishing services pursuant to this
Contract are, for purposes of Workers Compensation liability or other actions of employee-
related liability, not employee of the State Court Administrative Office Or Supreme Court.
Grantee bears the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing Workers Compensation benefits
to any of its employees for injuries arising from or connected with services performed pursuant
to the Contract. Grantee may require subcontractors expected to perform services under this
contract to provide further information according to local policies and procedures.
10. Indemnification
Each party to this Contract will remain responsible for any claims arising out of that
parties performance of this Contract as provided by this Contract or law. This Contract is not
intended to increase or decrease either parties liability for or immunity from tort claims. This
Contract is not intended to nor will it be interpreted as giving either party hereto a right of
indemnification, either by contract or at law, for claims arising out of the performance of this
Contract.
-4-
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Five
11. Debarment and Suspension
A. Grantee may not contract with or make any award of the State Court Administrative
Office Drug Grant funds at any time to any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise
excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs under Executive
Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension."
12. Acquisition, Accounting, Record Keeping & Inspection
A. Grantee agrees that all expenditures from this Contract including the acquisition of
personnel services, contractual services, supplies, and equipment, shall be in accordance with (1)
the standard procedures of Grantee's unit of government and (2) the Administrative and Budget
Requirements of the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program.
B. Grantee agrees to maintain accounting records following generally accepted
accounting principles for the expenditure of funds for the purposes identified in the Grant
Application, Budget, and any applicable approved contract addendum and/or budget amendment.
-5-
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Six
C. Grantee agrees that the Supreme Court, State Court Administrative Office, the local
government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State Auditor General,
or any of their duly authorized representatives, including program evaluators and auditors, shall
have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent
transaction, books, accounts, data, time cards, or other records related to this Contract. Such
materials, including all pertinent costs reports, accounting and financial records shall be kept and
maintained by Grantee for a period of five (5) years after completion of this Contract or until all
State Court Administrative Office audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever is later.
Failure of Grantee to comply with requirements of this section shall constitute a material breach
of this Contract upon which the State Court Administrator may cancel, terminate, or suspend this
Contract.
D. The grantee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or account which
segregates the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program contract receipts and expenditures.
13. Accountability for Michigan Drug Court Grant Program Funds
Grantee agrees that it will not expend funds obtained under this agreement for any
purpose other than those authorized in the Administrative Requirements and specified in the
Grant Application and Budget for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program and will expend
granted funds only during the period covered by the Contract unless prior written approval is
received from the State Court Administrative Office.
-6-
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Seven
19. Program Evaluation and Review
Grantee shall allow appropriate Supreme Court and State Court Administrative Office
representatives to evaluate, audit, inspect and monitor operation of the drug court. The
inspection methods that may be used include: on-site visits; interviews of staff and drug court
participants; and review of case records, receipts, monthly/quarterly statistical reports, and fiscal
records.
15. Reports
A. Grantee agrees to provide reports as identified in the Application Guidelines and
Administrative Requirements for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program to the State Court
Administrative Office as follows:
B. Financial Reports: Financial reports are due quarterly one month following each
quarter of the fiscal year with the exception of the 3rd quarterly report which will be due October
10, 2003 in order to meet fiscal year end reporting requirements. Therefore, quarterly reports
will be due April 30, 2003; July 31, 2003; October 10, 2003, and January 31, 2004.
Reimbursement for grant costs and future funding may be withheld if the progress and financial
reports are delinquent. The State Court Administrative Office will provide copies of the
financial report forms with grant contracts for each grant award made.
-7-
IA
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Eight
C. Progress Reports: Progress reports are due semi-annually. The reports will be due on
June 30, 2003 and one month after the end of the calendar year or January 31, 2004. The
progress reports describe activities during the reporting period and the status of accomplishment
of objectives as set forth in the application for grant funding. The final report must provide a
summary of progress toward achieving the goals and objectives of the award, significant results,
and any products developed under the award. The State Court Administrative Office will
provide copies of the progress report forms with the grant contract for each grant award made.
D. Drug Court Grantee Data Collection Survey: Recipients of implementation,
enhancement and continuation funding are required to submit to the SCAO the Drug Court
Grantee Data Collection Survey developed by the federal Drug Court Grant Program one month
after the end of the grant project or January 31, 2004. These data will capture baseline
information on both drug courts and defendants. The data are intended to serve as a minimum
data set for both local and national evaluation efforts.
E. The State Court Administrative Office retains the right to reallocate grant funding if
ongoing progress is not being made toward implementation of the drug court grant project.
Reimbursement for grant costs and future funding may be withheld if the Financial Reports
and/or Program Progress Reports are delinquent or the Drug Court Grantee Data Collection
Survey is not completed.
-8-
I I
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Nine
16. Modification
Program Modification: This Contract fully expresses the agreement between the parties.
No modification of Grantee's Contract regarding the program can be made without prior written
approval of the State Court Administrative Office using a Contract Adjustment Request Form
included in the Grant Application packet.
Budget Modification: Adjustments in expenditures within line item categories in the
approved budget may be made qp to $1,000 without prior written approval of the State Court
Administrative Office. Modifications in line item categories in excess of $1,000 require prior
written approval of the State Court Administrative Office and can be requested using a Contract
Adjustment Request Form included in the Grant Application packet.
-9-
17.
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program-2003
Page Ten
17. Funding Hold/Termination
The State Court Administrative Office, may at its election, place a funding hold on
contracted amounts not yet disbursed, or terminate the contract if the State Court Administrative
Office concludes that the Grantee is not in compliance with the conditions and provisions of this
Grant Contract, the Grant Application Guidelines and Administrative Requirements or the
Budget Requirements of the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. The State Court
Administrative Office may extend an opportunity for the Grantee to demonstrate compliance.
Notification of a funding hold or termination will be in writing.
Authorized By:
State Court Administrative Office Date
Acceptance by Grantee:
Authorizing Official Signature and Title Date
Chief Judge (Signature) Date
-10-
13
MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2003
ASSURANCES
1. Applicants must provide assurance that there has been appropriate consultation with all
affected agencies and that there will be appropriate coordination with all affected
agencies in implementation of the drug court program.
2. Applicants must provide assurance that all treatment programs and providers used in the
drug court program are licensed, certified, or accredited by appropriate State government
or professional agencies.
3. Applicants must provide assurance that violent offenders, as defined in the application
guidelines will be excluded from drug court programs receiving funds under this
program.
4. Applicants must explain the inability to fund the program adequately without assistance
from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program. Applicants must also provide assurance
of the intention and capability of the jurisdiction to continue the program after the
funding from the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program has been expended.
5. Applicants must provide assurance that all recipients of funding under this grant program
are required to comply with nondiscrimination requirements contained in various federal
laws. Each applicant court should have a copy of their EEO Plan on file and available for
review by the State Court Administrative Office upon request.
6. Applicants must assure that the applicant and its subgrantees will not use funds from the
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program for lobbying and will disclose any lobbying
activities related to the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program..
7. Recipients of funding will assure that the Supreme Court, the State Court Administrative
Office, the local government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the
State Auditor General or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to
and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent financial
transactions, accounting records or other fiscal records related to this grant. Such records
shall be maintained for a period of five years after completion of the grant project or until
all State Court Administrative Office audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever
is later.
-1-
14
MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM
ASSURANCES (cont)
8. Applicants for Implementation and Continuation Grants must assure that they will submit
to the SCAO the Drug Court Grantee Data Collection Survey developed by the federal
Drug Courts Program Office 30 days after the end of the grant project or October 30,
2003.
By signing the Assurances form, the applicant court assures that it will comply with
the requirements set forth in'the grant application in order to receive funding
under the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program.
Project Director (Name/Title) Project Director (Signature)
Date:
Financial Officer (Name/Title) Financial Officer (Signature)
Date:
Authorizing Official (Name/Title) Authorizing Official (Signature)
Date:
-2-
t6
THE BUDGET SECTION
FISCAL YEAR 2003
,2-7c/q
9.9soo
g
-1-
tel
BUDGET SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2003
Budget Category Total Cost
(100%)
State Grant In-Kind ODCP
Match GRANT
Cash Other
Match
"16.5. A. Personnel
B. Fringe Benefits
C. Consultant/
Contractual
D. Travel
E. Consultant/
Contractual Travel
51-1, Gos'
1 (00o 000
F. Supplies/Operating 4'0(7
135*)q77 - - , /t7 g3 i>00
I 1-f0
TOTAL PROJECT
COSTS
State Request (75% max)
ODCP Grant
Local Match (25% min) Cash S 3q 1-1
In-Kind ( (0 0 0
1 39 9 T1)
lo cig
Other Sources of
Funding for Drug
Court Program • A
* P
Amount: Li I
Amount: 164-1, 90 0
Amount: (4,0 000
(Attach additional paper if necessary for other sources of funding for the Drug
Court Program)
Note: At least 25% of the total project cost is a required match and must come from a combination
of local cash and in-kind contributions. The percentage of cash for the local match is not
defined. Please identify which categories are to be funded with state grant funds and which
categories are to be funded as match funds or other funds. Equipment purchases may be
recorded in the Supplies and Operating category but will be authorized for match
expenditures only.
BUDGET NARRATIVE
FISCAL YEAR 2003
A. PERSONNEL
Coordinator: The coordinator performs the job duties of staff supervision and
training, backup coverage for probation officers' caseloads in staff absence,
coordination of weekly case conferences, initial case screening for eligibility, liaison
and contract oversight with service providers, and preparation and maintenance of
program procedural manuals. Oakland County established the pay grade for this
position as the equivalent of a "Community Service Coordinator". The incumbent is
a tenured employee who is paid at the top of the salary grade, based on her experience
and qualifications.
B. FRINGE BENEFITS
Benefits are paid according to the Oakland County Merit System. The rate for full
time employees is e'stimated at 34% of the salary.
C. CONTRACTUAL
Treatment: Individual and family treatment is provided to drug court participants as
part of the step-down from TOP.
Defense Counsel: The drug court continues' to require the defense attorney to meet
with youth and family prior to entering a conditional plea for admission to drug court
and the attorney also attends drug court hearings. The pay rate is established by
Oakland County Circuit Court policy.
Interns: The drug court employees 3-4 student interns through a contractual
arrangement with Oaldand University. The interns assist with case contacts, home
and school visits, record keeping, recreation and transportation.
Security: The Juvenile Drug court convenes from 6:00 —7:00pm every Tuesday
evening. Through written agreement with the Oakland County Sheriffs Department,
a Deputy is on duty to provide security to the court during that time. The JDC
receives overtime reports from the supervising Lieutenant and reimburses the
Sheriffs department accordingly.
Assistant Prosecutor: The Oakland County Prosecutor's Office has assigned one
APA to review all potential drug court pleas, attend case conferences and participate
in the weekly drug court review hearings. A time sheet of this individual's activities
specific to the JDC is maintained and signed by the Project Director.
D. TRAVEL
Travel expenses represent costs of attending state and national drug court trainings in
2003. Oakland County Circuit Court will fund the travel expenses for up to six team
members to attend the state conference and two team members to attend a
national/state training. MADCP is scheduled for January 2003, and national trainings
will occur throughout the year.
E. CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL TRAVEL
N/A
F. SUPPLIES /OPERATING
Training conference fees and travel for national trainings are estimates. The fees for
MADCP are actual.
2
(
BUDGET DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2003
A. PERSONNEL —Grant Funded
Name/Position Computation
Corene Munro Coordinator 40hrs x 52 wks x $26.19
Cost
$ 54,465
B. FRINGE BENEFITS- Grant Funded
X FICA ( 7.65%)
X Unemployment (.14%)
X Retirement (15.4%)
X Hospital Insur (12.16%)
Composite Rate: 34%
Fringe Benefit Total: $18,518
X Life Insur (.52%)
X Vision ( .2%)
X Dental (1.45%)
X Workers comp (2.02%)
C. CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL — Grant Funded
Name of Consultant Services Computation Cost
Oakland Family Services Treatment Family therapy @ $65 $32,000
Individual ther @ $60
CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL — Match Funded
Eliot Zipser Defense Counsel 10 new cases X $200 $2,000
4 hrgs /mo @ $150 $7,200
Security
Prosecutor
Sheriff's Dept
Robert Zivian
Interns
4 hrgs/mo @$100
4 hrgs/mo @ $100
3 x 500hrs@$8.00
$4,800
$4,800
$12,000
:§iirrANTIC(1)C
27000 Crant ed
,7
34:000 ma 62,8 00
3
11)
State/National Training
Registration
$500 x 2 people $1,000
• I
D. TRAVEL
Purpose Location Item Computation Cost
MADCP Conference Lansing Meals $22x6people x2days $264
Mileage 144x6 x$.365x2 $630
State/national training Meals $40x2peoplex4days $320
Hotel $100x 2x 3 nights $600
Airfare $490 x 2 people $980
E. CONSULTANT TRAVEL
N/A
ToTeirrtsoNNEL, aidvosmir -A-Nrrlavr $2794katcb-.Fiiiiilid)
F. SUPPLIES/OPERATING
Item Computation Cost
MADCP Annual Conference $50 x 4 people $200
Registration $400 x 2 people $200
4
Grants-State
Grant Match
Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Contracted Services
Travel and Conference
Office Supplies
$105,000
0
$105,000
$ 54,500
$ 18,500
$ 32,000
0
0
$105,000
FISCAL NOTE (MISC. 102308) December 12, 2002
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION - 2003 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT CONTINUATION
GRANT ACCEPTANCE
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. The Circuit Court has received a grant from the State Court
Administrators Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Program, for
the period of January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, in the
amount of $105,000.
2. In addition to the grant award of $105,000, a County in-kind
match (currently budgeted in the Byrne Memorial Grant for FY
2003) of $35,000 is required, for total program funding of
$140,000.
3. This grant funds one (1) full-time eligible special revenue
Community Service Coordinator position (35402-09712) to provide
program coordination and supervision, in the amount of $73,000
also, program related contracted services of $32,000. In
addition, in-kind matching funds from the Byrne Memorial Grant
funds additional contracted services, travel and conference, and
operating supplies in the amount of $35,000.
4. According to the current agreement language, acceptance of this
grant will not require the County to continue the program beyond
the grant-funding period.
5. A budget amendment is recommended as follows:
Special Revenue Fund 279
Revenue
1-35-279-100203-28000-0171
1-35-279-100203-28000-0167
Expenditures
2-35-279-200203-28000-2001
2-35-279-200203-28000-2075
2-35-279-200203-28000-2572
2-35-279-200203-28000-3756
2-35-279-200203-28000-4252
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Obrecht, Taub and Melton
absent.
G. William Caddell, County Clerk
Resolution #02308 December 12, 2002
Moved by Sever supported by Suarez the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, be adopted (with
accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Gregory, Law,
McPherson, Melton, Middleton, Moffitt, Moss, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Sever, Suarez,
Webster, Appel. (21)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, were adopted (with
accompanying reports being accepted).
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on
December 12, 2002, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at
Pontiac, Michigan this 12th day of December, 2002.