Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2002.07.18 - 26819MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #02162 ,2002 BY: Planning and Building Committee, Charles E. Palmer, Chairperson IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - Main 1-2 Storm Water Detention Pond Inventory and Assessment Project: $54,350 GRANT APPLICATION/ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Drain Commissioner proposes to implement the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separate Storm Water Drainage Systems issued by the State of Michigan; and WHEREAS the County of Wayne through the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project has offered technical assistance and Federal grants to government entities for addressing and improving the water quality and recreational use of the Rouge River; and WHEREAS the purpose of the grant is to enable the County and local units of government within the Rouge River and other watershed to evaluate alternative approaches for controlling sources of water pollution; and WHEREAS illicit discharge elimination, public education and sub-watershed management planning are considered examples of the types of activities included in the Storm Water General Permit which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge River and other river systems within Oakland County; and WHEREAS Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied for and awarded $54,350 of Federal grant reimbursement from the County of Wayne; and WHEREAS the total project cost is $108,700 of which $54,350 is Oakland County matching funds; and WHEREAS the required County match will be charged to the maintenance funds from the respective County drains, and will be partially reimbursed by local municipalities; and WHEREAS no additional County personnel are required, and all grant funds will go towards the Main 1-2 Storm Water Detention Pond Inventory & Assessment Project; and WHEREAS the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has established grant conditions and regulations that require the County to act as the responsible party with respect to the grant, including those provisions described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31; and WHEREAS the USEPA will supervise the grant and grant conditions in order that the grant be used in accordance with the requirements of the law; and WHEREAS acceptance of this reimbursement grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment; and WHEREAS the grant agreement has been approved through the County Executive's Contract Review Process. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners apiproves the application and accepts reimbursement in the amount of $54,350 for the Main 1-2 Storm Water Detention Pond Inventory & Assessment Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Drain Commissioner and the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners are authorized to sign the grant agreement and to approve grant modification and extensions, within fifteen (15) percent of the original award, consistent with the grant agreement approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Interlocal Agreements be entered into between the Drain Commissioner and the local communities prior to any work being done. Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE r , Charles E. Palmer, ChairperE,m Planning & Building Committee Vote: Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Carfield absent ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ROUGE RIVER GENERAL PERMIT PROJECTS GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WAYNE AND THE OAKLAND COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE TS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2002, between the County of Wayne, Michigan, a body corporate and Charter County ("County") and Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office ("Entity"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the County is the recipient of, and is responsible for the administration of certain federal grant funds referred to as the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project Grant ("Grant"). WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has established Grant conditions and regulations that require the County to act as the responsible party with respect to the Grant, including those provisions described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31. WHEREAS, the USEPA will supervise the Grant and Grant conditions in order that the Grant be used in accordance with the requirements of the law. WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to follow certain administrative procedures and cooperate on the various tasks to be undertaken in order for the County to comply with the Grant's requirements and objectives. WHEREAS, the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project ("Rouge Project") is a comprehensive watershed-wide program addressing wet weather pollution problems ranging from controlling combined sewer overflows ("CSO") to storm water runoff in the Rouge River. WHEREAS, one of the purposes of the Grant is to enable the County and local units of government within the Rouge River Watershed to evaluate alternative approaches for controlling sources of water pollution. WHEREAS, implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separate Storm Water Drainage Systems (Permit No . MIG610000) ("Storm Water General Permit") issued by The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ") for the local unit will further the Grant's goal to improve water quality and recreational use of the Rouge River. WHEREAS, illicit discharge elimination, public education and subwatershed management planning and implementation are considered examples of the types of activities included the Storm Water General Peunit which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge River. WHEREAS, the Main 1/2 Storm Water Detention Pond Inventory & Assessment Project set forth in this Agreement would further the goals of the Grant. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS CONTAINED wow.; the parties hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I SCOPE OF PROJECT 1.1 The County will provide a portion of the Grant to Entity to enable the Entity to do the activities described in Attachment "A" 1.2 The budget presented in Attachment "A" along with the scope of work presented in Attachment "A" specify the performance of the work as anticipated at the time the contract is signed. 1.3 The Entity agrees to submit a Final Project Summary Report at the project end to assist the County in the grant close-out process. The Final Project Summary Report should generally be 4-10 pages in length and should include: A. A summarized clear description of the project. In addition to the project description, the report should include the following: project objectives; major elements of the project; project products completed (project products are listed in Attachment "A"); and project highlights. B. Comments on how the completion of this project benefitted or is projected to improve the Rouge River. C. A written set of recommendations to other local governments and agencies that evaluates the benefits and cost effectiveness of the project. The evaluation should consider the total project cost. The recommendations should also summarize how the project was evaluated and the evaluation results of the effectiveness of the project. D. Comments on how the results of this project are transferrable to other communities or agencies. E. List of all task products completed. The list should include the official name of the products. ARTICLE II SCHEDULE OF WORK 2.1 The Time Frame for the project milestones completion is contained in Attachment "A". 2 ARTICLE III FINANCIAL PROVISIONS AND BUDGET 3.1 The detailed budget is contained in Attachment "A" and will be considered an approximation based on the best information available at the time of this Agreement. The internal distribution of the monies allocated among project elements may be modified by the Entity up to a total cumulative transfer among direct cost categories not to exceed 10% of the total budget without written approval by the County. Other modifications to the budget will be only upon written Agreement between the • County :and the En'tiOr. 3.2 The County will provide funds from the Rouge Project grant to partially fund the approved, allowed, and eligible costs for activities outlined in Attachment "A". The total amount to be reimbursed to the Entity shall not exceed $54,350. The Entity shall provide a minimum match of $54,350 of approved costs, which may be satisfied by demonstrating either cash or in-kind services from non-federal sources. 3.3 The County will hold the final 10 to 20 percent of the total federal fund allowable to the Entity until the completion of the project by the Entity as identified in Attachment "A". Upon completion of all the tasks by the Entity, the approval of the Entity task products by the County, and the approval of the Entity submittal of the documentation of the final project cost by the County, the remaining 10 percent of the federal funds will be reimbursed to the Entity. ARTICLE IV CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND PAYMENT 4.1 This Agreement will be administered on a cost reimbursement basis. The Entity shall submit to the County project status reports and invoices on standard forms provided by the County. 4.2 All reports and invoices shall be submitted at least quarterly, no more than forty (40) days after each quarter end date. Reimbursements shall not be allowed without a status report submission. 4.3 Invoices must clearly identify: A. Total program outlays to the date of the invoice. B. The non-federal share of amount expended. C. The federal share of amount expended. D. The federal payments previously received. E. The reimbursements requested for the billing period. F. Project work element detail. G. Project direct costs and outside services. H. Time sheets for hourly employees and labor distribution sheets for salaried employees. I. Documentation of all contractor costs. 3 4.5 The invoices must be certified for completeness and correctness by an appropriate Entity official. 4.6 All invoices will be paid by the County within thirty (30) days of receipt of funds from the USEPA. • • • • 4.7 The Entity will provide .i.ocumentation to the County that demonstrates compliance with federal and Stare regulations before payments will be processed. The Entity will prepare all cost estimates for implementation of the planned activities, including a breakdown of eligible and ineligible cost items, with respect to grant funding. These cost estimates will be provided in a format to be established by the County. 4.8 The Entity will exercise the necessary contract oversight and administration of any subcontracts. These duties include, but are not limited to construction inspection and negotiating and executing change orders (where construction is to occur), monitoring project progress, responding to subcontractor or citizen complaints, coordinating between different subcontracts, and overseeing subcontractor's compliance with the approved project plans and specifications. These activities are to be done in accordance with procedures established by the Grant and by 40 C.F.R. Part 31.1, et seq. 4.9 All reports, invoices, and work products required under this contract will be transmitted to the Director of Watershed Management Division, Department of Environment, Wayne County, care of Mr. Razik Alsaigh, 415 Clifford, Detroit Michigan 48226. ARTICLE V AUDIT AND ACCESS TO RECORDS 5.1 The Entity will maintain and retain financial records and supporting documentation in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures and in accordance with the requirements of federal and state regulations. 5.2 The Entity will cooperate with and assist the County with respect to federal or state audit review related to the use of Grant funds. This cooperation shall include preservation of the necessary documentation and access to the records until federal and/or state audit resolution processes have been completed and notification of records disposal has been received by the County. The Entity will cooperate with the County with respect to evaluating audit findings of this Agreement. 5.3 The Entity will be responsible for the reimbursement of any funds required to be returned to the USEPA due to Entity actions or omissions, as determined by audit findings, and the Entity will be soley responsible for the repayment of such funds to the County or USEPA. 4 ARTICLE VI GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1 This Agreement is expected to be funded in part with funds from the USEPA. The Entity will not enter into any agreements with either the United States or any of its departments, agencies, or employees which are or will be a party to this Agreement or any lower tier subagreement for monies related to this specific Project. This Agreement is subject to regulations contained in 40 C.F.R. Part 31 in effect On the date of the assistance award for this project. 61 The Entity understands that the County has no funds other than the Grant funds to pay for the project costs. All costs other than the Grant funds associated with the activities which are the subject matter of this Agreement will be the responsibility of the Entity. 6.3 The Entity will cooperate with the County to ensure timely completion of the tasks undertaken as part of the project. Cooperation includes, but is not limited to sharing information and records, participation in applicable committees, and assisting in development and evaluation of water quality improvement alternatives. 6.4 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31 and, as applicable, all provisions contained in the Grant. In the event there are any conflicts between the provisions of this Agreement and the terms of the Grant, the Grant terms will prevail. The Grant document and the terms and conditions of the Grant are included here in Attachment "B". The June 16, 1998 correction letter of the grant fair share goals from EPA is also included here in Attachment "B". The fair share goals for the Grant as identified in that letter are as follows: Construction Services Equipment Supplies 20% Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) 10% Woman Business Enterprise (VV13E) 20% MBE 10% WBE 8% MBE 4% WBE 8% MBE 4% W13E 6.5 The Entity is responsible for securing all necessary permits from regulatory agencies and is responsible for obtaining any professional services necessary for the Project Activities. The Entity will act at all times in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations, and will secure any permits and negotiate the terms of agreements in accordance with those requirements. 6.6 If the Entity secures any interest in lands, including easements, these acquisitions will be in accordance with applicable federal law and regulations including 49 C.F.R., Part 24 and state statutes related to the taking of interests in land. 6.7 With respect to construction projects, the Entity is responsible for conducting post-project evaluation and certifying that any construction meets the approved design criteria. These certifications will be submitted to Wayne County and the USEPA and MDEQ, where appropriate, in accordance with the Grant requirements and applicable regulations. If the project does not meet 5 IV+ 6 ,„ the design criteria, the Entity will be responsible for taking the necessary corrective measures. 6.8 The ownership of any facilities constructed under this Agreement will remain with the Entity. The Entity agrees to operate and maintain the facility consistent with the Grant project goals and in accordance with the requirements of the applicable federal and state statutes and regulations, Grant conditions, and local ordinances. , 6.9 The Entity Warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.32 relating to any equipment including computers and peripheral computer equipment purchased as part of this grant assistance project. 6.10 Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing, and signed and acknowledged by a duly authorized representative of each party. 6.11 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.36 (d) relating to procurement of services as part of this grant assistance project. For construction contracts the Entity shall use bid type contracts. For consulting contracts, the Entity shall use any of the four procurement procedures in the 40 CFR 31. For most of the consulting contracts, the RFQ or RFP procurement procedure is the applicable one. The selection of the consultant can be based on the qualification or qualification and cost proposal. After selecting your consultant, submit your procurement documentation to the County. The procurement documentation should include: — Rationale for Method of procurement — Copy of advertisement, where it was published and for how long. — How many proposals received? — How was company X selected (You can use pre-established criteria of qualification or cost or both). — Selection of type of contract to be used. 6.12 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.36 (f) relating to contract cost or price of services as part of this grant assistance project. Price/cost analysis must be performed by the Entity prior to award of any type of contract. The selected contractor must submit a cost proposal to the Entity. The cost should be broken down by task. The cost proposal should consist of the following categories: Direct labor (with backup that establish this cost (hours and personnel)) Overhead (backup to establish this rate) Other Direct Expenses (backup to establish this item) Subconsultant Subconsultant Administrative Charge (if applicable) Total Fee (Fixed for a fixed fee contract) The cost analysis consists of the Entity detemiining the reasonableness of the selected contractor's proposed cost, (i.e. is the allowable overhead rate used, correct pay rates for employees, accurate expense rate charges). Price analysis consists of the Entity comparing proposed prices received with other proposals submitted for this job, independent estimate from the Entity experience or cost estimate from existing master plan. Copies of price/cost analysis documentation should submitted to the County. After completing the price/cost analysis, any type of the contracts indicated below can be executed: — Cost plus fixed fee contract. - Fisxect price (lump SUM) contract. -.- Catalog price contracts, example: geotechnical investigations with the price of the test are established in the market. — For certain contracts where the above types are not applicable, the county will allow contracts with proscribed billing rates (per diem contracts), which establishes pay rate for professional categories example: Engineer I, Engineer II, Project Engineer, Field technical Help, etc. These above types of contracts are applicable for the main contractor and the sub-contractor level also. Cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting shall not be used. ARTICLE VII WAIVER OF BREACH 7.1 No failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any term of this Agreement or to exercise any term after a breach, constitutes a waiver of any breach of the term. No waiver of any breach affects or alters this Agreement, but every term of this Agreement remains effective with respect to any other existing or subsequent breach. ARTICLE VIII TERMINATION ,- 8.1 This Agreement will terminate after the final audit and final resolution of any issues related thereto as described within 40 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart D. 8.2 This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the County for its convenience. The Entity must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of intent to terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the County prior to termination. This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the Entity for its convenience. The County must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of intent to terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the Entity prior to termination. 8.3 If termination for convenience is effected by the County or the Entity, an equitable adjustment in the Agreement price will be made. The equitable adjustment for any termination will provide for payment to the Entity for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to termination. Equitable adjustment also will include termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the Entity and 7 approved by the County, relating to personnel hired specifically for activities related to this Agreement, provided such costs are eligible and allowable under the terms of the Grant. 8.4 Upon receipt of a tennination notice pursuant paragraphs 8.2 or 8.3, above, the Entity will: (1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or otherwise make available to the County all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, Summaries, and such other information and materials as may be accumulated by the Entity in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process. 8.5 Upon termination pursuant to paragraphs 8.2 or 8.3, above, the County may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by Agreement with another party or otherwise. 8.6 All notices of termination will be sent certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested. ARTICLE IX LIABILITY 9.1 All liability, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities of the Entity will be the sole responsibility of the Entity and not the responsibility of the County. Nothing herein will be construed as a wavier of any governmental immunity by the Entity, its agencies, or employees have as provided by statute or modified by court decisions. 9.2 All liability, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities of the County will be the sole responsibility of the County and not the responsibility of the Entity. Nothing herein will be construed as a wavier of any governmental immunity by the County, its agencies, or employees have as provided by statute or modified by court decisions. ARTICLE X This Article is left blank intentionally. ARTICLE XI INSURANCE 11.1 The Entity shall purchase and/or self-insure, to the extent permissible by law, have the County, its officers, commission, boards, and employees named as additional parties insured under the policy or policies of insurance and maintain such insurance so as to protect the County from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the project services, whether such services be by the Entity, by any subcontractor, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Entity, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. 8 11.2 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost and expense, a professional liability insurance policy for claims for damages arising out of an error, omission, or negligent act in the performance ofprofessional services, with limits of $1 million dollars per claim and $1 million dollars in the aggregate for each twelve (12) month period. The Entity agrees that the policy may not be substantially modified or canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the County and shall promptly notify the County of any failure to renew such policy as necessary prior to final completion Of the Project. 11.3 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost and expense, with insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Michigan, the following insurance coverages: 11.3.1 Workers' Compensation which meets Michigan's statutory requirements, or other similar employee benefit act of any other state applicable to an employee. 11.3.2 Employers' Liability Insurance, in conjunction with Workers' Compensation Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of an employee when Workers' Compensation may not be an exclusive remedy. Such insurance shall be subject to limits of liability of not less than $500,000 dollars for each incident. 11.3.3 General Liability Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injury or death of any person, other than the Entity's employees, or damage to tangible property of others, including loss of use resulting therefrom. Such insurance shall be subject to bodily injury limits of not less than $500,000 per occurrence and $1 million annual aggregate and property damage limits of not less than $500,000 per occurrence or combined bodily injury/property damage limits of not less than $750,000 per occurrence and $1 million annual aggregate. 11.3.4 Contractual Liability Insurance for claims for damages that may arise from the Entity's contract under Article X concerning indemnification for errors, omissions, or negligent acts in the course of the professional service or other provision within this Agreement, to the extent that such kinds of contractual liability are insurable in connection with, and subject to, limits of liability not less than for the professional liability insurance and general liability insurance set forth in subparagraphs 11.2 and 11.3.3, above. 11.3.5 Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles with coverage of $1 million dollars per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage combined. 11.3.6 Automobile No-Fault Insurance required by law for claims arising from ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle owned or non-owned, County, or for-hire vehicles, with, coverage of $ 1 million single limit of liability and any applicable first-party benefits based on Michigan's no-fault law. 9 11.4 Certificates of insurance shall be provided to the County prior to commencing Project Services under this Agreement. Said certificates shall contain a provision that coverage afforded shall not be canceled, materially modified, or allowed to expire unless the insurance carrier has given at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the County. 11.5 The County and the Entity waive all rights against each other and their consultants, agents, and employees for damages covered by any property casualty insurance during the Project Services, but 014 to the extent covered by such insurance. 11.6 Compliance by the Entity with the requirements of this Article as to carrying insurance and furnishing proof thereof to the County, shall not relieve the Entity of its liabilities and obligations under this Agreement. 11.7 The provisions of this Article shall survive the expiration of any termination of this Agreement for a period of three (3) years. ARTICLE XII NON-DISCRIMINATION 12.1 In accordance with the United States Constitution and all federal legislation and regulations governing fair employment practices and equal employment opportunity, the Entity shall comply with: A. Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 252) and the United States Department of Justice regulations (28 C.F.R. Part 52) issued pursuant to Titles VI and VII; B. Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 C.F.R., Parts 7 and 12); C. The Age Discrimination Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. §6101-07); D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794); E. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §12101 et. seq.) and its associated regulations; and F. The Michigan Constitution and all state laws and regulations governing fair employment practices and equal employment opportunity, including but not limited to the Michigan Civil Rights Act (1976 P.A. 453),and the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act (1976 P.A. 220). 12.2 The Entity agrees that it will not discriminate against any person, employee, consultant or applicant for employment with respect to his or her hire, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of his or her religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, 10 marital status, or a handicap that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform tasks particular to a job or position. 12.3 The Entity further agrees that it will require each contractor perfofluing services under this Agreement to agree to the provisions of this Article. 12.4 The is responsible for complying with all federal and state laws and regulations regarding competitive bidding. ARTICLE XIII ASSIGNABILITY 13.1 This Agreement will be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs and assigns. 13.2 Neither of the parties hereto may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other. ARTICLE XIV VALIDITY 14.1 If any provision of this Agreement or the application to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement, or the application of the provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, is not affected and is enforceable, provided the invalid provision does not substantially alter the contract or make execution impractical. ARTICLE XV ENTIRE AGREEMENT 15.1 This document, including any attachments, contains the entire agreement between the parties. 15.2 Neither party has made any representations except those expressly set forth herein. 15.3 No rights or remedies are, or will be acquired, by either party by implication or otherwise unless set forth herein. ARTICLE WI PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, AND RIGHTS IN DATA 16.1 If this Agreement involves research, developmental, experimental, or demonstration work and any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of, or under this Agreement, the Entity and the County shall retain joint authority to patent or license. 11 16.2 The parties agree that any plans, drawings, specifications, computer programs, technical reports, operating manuals, and other work submitted, or which are specified to be delivered under this Agreement, or which are developed or produced and paid for under this Agreement are subject to the rights of both parties and both parties shall retain an irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use in whole or in part and to authorize others to do so. 16.3 This Agreement is funded in part by the I.JEPA and is therefore subject to the reporting and rights provisions of 49 C.F.R. Part 30 Subpart D including Appendix B and Appendix C. 16.4 This clause shall be included in all subcontracts. ARTICLE XVII This Article is left blank intentionally. ARTICLE XVIII JURISDICTION AND GOVERNING LAW 18.1 This Agreement, and all actions arising from it, must be governed by, subject to, and construed according to the law of the State of Michigan. ARTICLE XIX EFFECTIVE DATES 19.1 This Agreement becomes effective immediately upon signing by both parties and shall allow for billing all costs incurred from April 1, 2002. This Agreement, unless extended by mutual written agreement, expires on March 31, 2004. Should the USEPA require reimbursement by the County of funds transferred to the Entity for costs incurred prior to this Agreement, the Entity shall be responsible for any such reimbursement. ARTICLE XX PARTY REPRESENTATIVES 20.1 The County's representative for this Agreement is the Director of Watershed Management Division, Department of Environment, Wayne County. The Entity representative for this Agreement is the Assistant Chief Engineer for Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office. Either party may assign alternate representatives upon written notification of the other party. 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first written above. COUNTY OF WAYNE, I\AICH/GAN By: EDWARD R. McNAMARA Its Chief Executive Officer OAKLAND COUNTRY DRAIN COMMISSIONER, MICHIGAN By: Its: T: \watershed \Razik1 SubgrantsTunded Projects \RoundIlATA-131IAA-IIA13.wpd May 30, 2002 13 1.1 11 II 111 1!1- 111 11 it! ;III ,111 14 ih II 111' 11111 1i1 ATTACHMENT "A" Wayne County Department of Environment Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project Round IIA Grant Proposal for the Rouge River Main 1-2 Subwatershed Stormwater Detention Pond Inventory & Assessment Project Project Purpose and Objectives Oakland County communities have required that any new developments retain stormwater on- site. This requirement spawned the building of detention ponds throughout the Rouge River Watershed. These basins effectively reduce peak flooding and reduce pollutant loads from stormwater runoff. However, opportunities exist to improve the performance of existing stormwater detention basins by improving pollutant removal efficiencies and reducing the "flashiness" of downstream flows. Such improvements can be accomplished by basin outlet design modifications. This project will 1) Inventory the existing stomiwater detention basins within the Main 1-2 Subwatershed, 2) Identify the existing capacity and outlet structure, 3) Recommend improvements to each basin, and 4) Prioritize the basin improvements. A well-designed detention pond provides several benefits including 1) prevention of downstream flooding; 2) collection of pollutant-laden storrnwater runoff and 3) slow release of captured runoff. Detention of stormwater runoff allows for physical, chemical and biological interactions which serve to improve the quality of water discharged into streams, rivers and lakes. As with many stormwater control devices, however, a certain amount of maintenance must be performed on detention ponds to ensure that they continue to function as designed. In addition, modern detention pond design standards have improved, making the ponds easier to maintain and more effective with smaller stoiiiis. The completion of this project works toward the fulfillment of the following two long-term goals of the Main 1-2 Subwatershed Management Plan: 4. Minimizing the Amount of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation; and 5. Minimize Flow Variability and Associated Negative Impacts. This project also addressed two short-term goals: They are as follows: 4.g. — Improve on the Maintenance of Publicly Owned Detention Basins and Related Infrastructure; and 5.d. — Enhance Existing Off- Channel Regional Stormwater Detention Facilities or Wetlands that Serve Developed Areas. The purpose of this project is to identify and make recommendations for detention pond improvements for existing detention facilities in the Main 1-2 Subwatershed. The gOal of these improvements is to increase detention pond pollutant removal efficiency. This will be accomplished by first performing an inventory of the existing detention facilities in the Subwatershed. The inventory will be followed by a field assessment to determine the physical and hydraulic characteristics of each facility and an evaluation to determine if it is functioning as designed. Once these tasks have been completed, they will be compiled in an electronic database that will be accessible using ArcView. A summary of the findings will be included in a final report. RPO Round HA Grant Proposal Main 1-2 Stormwater Detention Pond Project 1 2/15/02 Communities that do not intend on participating due to lack of detention ponds of significance include: Birmingham, Southfield Twp., Franklin, Latin-up Village, Farmington, Bloomfield Hills, and Pontiac. At this time, nine communities have provided initial information regarding number of detention ponds located within their jurisdiction include: Southfield (115 mostly private) Fannington Hills (90) West Bloomfield Tim). (35) RocheSter Hills (60- inc. OCDC) Bloomfield Twp. (50) Troy (15) Bingham Farms (7) Beverly Hills (2 — commercial) Auburn Hills (1) OCDC (75) The estimated number of ponds at this time is about 450. That number may change, likely decrease once overall size is evaluated. The focus will be upon ponds that have a significant capacity and drainage area first. Task Descriptions Task 1: Inventory An inventory of existing detention ponds will be performed for the Main 1-2 Subwatershed. This inventory will include the development of a database and location map for all detention pond and related facilities throughout the entire subwatershed to review for other facilities not reported. The database and location map of all existing facilities shall be prepared so that they are accessible using ArcView GIS software. Deliverable: Shapefile and Database file of Inventory Results Task 2: Assessment An assessment of the existing detention facilities will be performed, consisting of a design plan review and a field assessment of each facility. The field assessment is not intended to entail a detailed engineering survey, but only verification of the characteristics of each facility. These characteristics include: 4 % • detention volume, • outlet flow control, • quantity and size of the inlet and outlet structures, • permanent pool depth; and , ' • storrnwater quality enhancement capabilities. Hydrologic parameters relative to each basin will be tabulated, including the drainage area and type of development. Furthermore, characteristics relating to the existing condition of each RPO Round 11A Grant Proposal Main 1-2 Stomwater Detention Pond Project 2 2/15/02 facility will be documented during field assessment including the presence of bank erosion, excessive sediment build-up, existing vegetation and condition of infrastructure. Deliverable: o Field assessment forms Task 3: Evaluation evaluation of each existing detention facility will be perfoinied. This task will include a reVieW of the local unit of government's records relative to drainage, facility construction and maintenance and any other records available for the facility. The evaluation will address the on- going maintenance and up-keep of each individual facility and rank each pond for improvements and impact on water quality and flow. Deliverable: o Evaluation Summary Task 4: Final Report The findings of the assessment and evaluation tasks will be compiled and incorporated into the database developed in the inventory stage. For each facility, the field data will be reviewed and recommendations will be made to determine if retrofitting measures are necessary to improve outlet water quality. These measures may include removing existing outlet structures for 100- year ponds and replacing them with low flow openings; retrofitting ponds with wetlands; or retrofitting ponds with sediment forebays. A summary of field findings and the accompanying recommendations will be included in a comprehensive report. The report and database will be arranged so that each community can easily access the information that applies to each of their detention ponds. Deliverables: o Database of assessment and evaluation results, two electronic copies per community o Detention Pond Assessment Report, two hard copies per community RPO Round IIA Grant Proposal Main 1-2 Stormwater Detention Pond Project 3 . 2115/02 Project Schedule It is estimated that this project will take two years to complete. The project is scheduled to begin in April 2002 following the completion of the Inter-Agency Agreement between Wayne County and the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office. The c,omplete project schedule is present in Table 1 below: TableL:PrOject Schedule Year 2002 2003 2004 Quarter: 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 Month.AMJJASONDJFM A MJJ_AS 0 ND JFM Task 1: Inventory i_. Task 2: Assessment I Task 3: Evaluation Task 4: Final Report I I I I 1 1 Project Cost Table 2 depicts the project cost summary by task and Table 3 gives the detailed costs for the project. Table 2. Cost Summary Task Number and Party Responsible for Description Task Cost Type of Effort Task Implementation Task 1: Inventory $15,740 Planning Consultant Task 2: Assessment $48,345 Planning Consultant Task 3: Evaluation $30,015 Planning Consultant Task 4: Final Report $8,120 Planning Consultant ODC's $6,500 4 4: Total $108,700.00 Federal Grant Funding $54,350.00 , . Requested RPO Round IIA Grant Proposal Main 1-2 Stormwater Detention Pond Project 4 2/15/02 I1i Table 3. Cost Detail Ta.sk 1 . Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 . :LABOR , , , ib..tP Total - CATEGORY ($1Hour) inventory Assessment Evaluation Final Report Hours Total Costs lu-s•dollars hrs dollars hrs dollars hrs dollars _ Principal Engineer $150.00 4 $600.00 8 $1,200.00 5 $7,500.00 4 $600.00 66 $9,900.00 Senior Engineer/ Scientist $110.00 10 $1,100.00 12 $1,320.00 $660.00 6 $660.00 34 $3,740.00 Staff Engineer/ ' Scientist $95.00 12 $1,140.00 80 $7,600.00 6 $5,700.00 28 $2,660.00 180 $17,100.0 Associate Engineer/ Scientist $65.00 180 $11,700.0 565 $36,725.00 23 $15,405.0 50 $3,250.00 1032 $67,080.0 Administrative Staff $50.00 24 $1,200.00 30 $1,500.00_ I _ $750.00_ 19 $950.00L 86 $4,300.00 Labor Task Subtotals (Hours) 230 695 368 105 1398 Labor Task Subtotals (Dollars) $15,740.0 $48,345.00 $30,015.00 $8,120.00 $102,220.00 ODC's (GPS, Digital Camera, Color copies, printing, etc.) $6,500.00 Total Cost: $108,700.00 Local Match The Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office is applying for this grant. The match will be divided among the Drain Office and the local communities. The consultant selected to perform the work will be required to track their time by community, in order to ensure proper billing. The Drain Office, as the grant recipient, will then be billed for the work and will pass the bill on to the respective community for reimbursement. The Drain Office will likely provide in-kind match, whereas the communities will provide hard cash match for their portions of the project. This approach of having one agency apply for the grant has been successfully implemented with the Oakland County _ Community Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (General Permit Activities Grant). This experience has shown that the -arrangement greatly decreases the amount of administrative work that would have to be performed by the grant administrator if 12 communities were to apply individually. 5 2/15/02 RPO Round ICA. Grant Proposal Main 1-2 Stormwater Detention Pond Project Page 1 ol 6 1 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1. ASSISTANCE ID NO. 2. LOG NUMBER 1 X 995743-05-0 05-X -000 EPA ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT / AMENDMENT o. DATE OF AWARD . ' 4. MAILING DATE PART! - ASSISTANCE NOTIFICATION INFORMATION RP .4. . 6, ;998 • _cr.):4), n !a o ' 5. AGREEMENT TYPE [S. PAYMENT ME11-1,00 Copperas, Agresameert F.: ,td„.,,a..... ,-: ' .i 0 Rinisbursatiesie TO ACH Aurae, ACH - 0512 ,-.nI . . • . • , - , . • Gram agreement I. X r Sart Payment :Arne,* tr.*: '. . 1 .7. TYPE OF ACTION . .A....p.Airmendsrirv .. - ..QQMPTPaLER.BRANCKI MF-404 I CONTINUATION EL RECIPIENT; . ., . 9. PAYEE .,:.WAYNE0..10.4-rf..t..NtIqHfQ?-* -: WAYNE COUNTY - MICHIGAN . 4.15•CLIFFORa .,':. • .. 415 CLIFFORD • ....: •....•_••.. ,••.,• .•• .......—. .. DETROIT, MI , DE i HOIT, MI 48226 - •E N ElN NO. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 10. RECIPIENT TYPE T 38-6004895 13 ' . COUNTY OR PARISH 0 11. PROJECT MANAGER AND TELEPHONE NO. 12. CONSULTANT over cAmitniction GISMOS 011Iy) R JAMES E MURRAY , G N/A _ (313) 224-3631 E 13. ISSUING OFFICE (CITY! STATE) 14. EPA PROJECT/ STATE OFFICER AND TELEPHONE NO. P US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WOJCIK A ACQUISITION-ASSISTANCE BRANCH • WATER DIVISION c US EPA, REGION 5, MC-10J WS-15J. . (312) 886-0174 0 N 77 W JACKSON BLVD WHITE - TECHNICAL CONTACT T CHICAGO, IL 50604-3590 WA-16J (312) 886-0134 A 15. EPA CONGRESSIONAL UAISON I. PHONE ubm 116. STATE APPL ID (cingholAwo 17. SCIENCE FIELD 118. PROJECT STEP C (WWT Construction Grants Onrg BARBARA BROOKS, (202) 260-5660 N/A NA N/A ' RA , STATUTORY AUTHORITY ' • 20. REGULATORY AUTHORITY 121. STEP 2 ÷ 3 & STEP 3 iWWT Construction Grants aut`g 'aee continuation page) 40 CFR PART 31 a. Treatment Level 1 I I b. ?rota= TYP• • N/A 1 1 1 c. Treatment Proem, I d Slucloe Deoion 22. PROJECT TITLE AND DESCRIPTION ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATION . - 23 PROJECT LOCATION Are, impacted by Proiectl Cali, Placa , County . State Congressional District ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED WAYNE MI MU LT IP LE 24. ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CFDA Program Tin & Tide) 66.6061 25. PROJECT PERIOD 26. BUDGET PERIOD Surveys, Studies. Investigations, Spec! 01/01/99 - 11/30/01 01/01/99 -11/30101 .27. COMMUNITY POPULATION 28. TOTAL BUDGET PERIOD COST 29. TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD COST NWT Cometniction Cumin. Only) N/A 525,454,545 • 525,454,545 FUNDS FORMER AWARD THIS ACTION ' • AMENDED TOTAL — us. EPA Amount This Action $0 $14,000,000 - 31. EPA In-Kind Amount 0 0 . 32- Unexpended Prior Year Soignee 0 0 33. Other Federal Funds 0 0 14. Recipient Contribution • 0 11,454.545 S. slit. caninbwion 0 0 4. Local Comnbution 0 0 7. 01ber Cornbution 0 0 P. Allowable ?reale Carat $0 $25,454,545 , - Site Name Document FY Approp. I Suoget Program Obiect SiteiProleci I CostObligation , Control 'Organization Element Class Organization DeobligatIo Number 01) PWX027 98 E 0530AK9 9A1 . 41.11 14,000,000 ART 11 - APPROVED BUDGET ASSISTANC...11DENTIFICATION: X 9S574:3-05-0 Page 3 of 8 TABLE A - OBJECT CLASS CATEGORY TOTAL APPROVED ALLOWABLE I- (Norrooftertructionf BUDGET PERIOD COST 1. PERSONNEL $810,000 , 2. FRINGE BENEFITS 652.779 • 3. TRAVEL • 78,100 _ 4. EQUIPMENT 68.700 5. SUPPLIES 26200 -6. CONTRACTUAL 10.125.339 7; CONSTRUCTION :," 13.380.000 s,': LITHO:F.- . 64,755 9.. Tip,* offigqr CHARGES': $25.205,873 , 111. INDIRECT COSTS:" RATE i 7. 00". '6: BASE S± F8 248,672 ..'11. TOi-AL, (Share: Recipient 45.00% Federal 55.00 "1.4 $25,454,545 12. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT $14,000,000 r TABLE B - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION (Mon-construction/ 2. . 3. , . 4. 5. , 6. 7. 8. 9. .:10. ... . 12. TOTAL (Share: Recipient' ‘,1. Federal 13. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT TABLE C. PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION (Coetstruclion ._ 1. ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE 2. PRELIMINARY EXPENSE _ . 3. LAND STRUCTURES. RIGHT-OF-WAY f 4. ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING BASIC FEES . 5. OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING FEES , 6. PROJECT INSPECTION FEES - 7. LAND DEVELOPMENT 8. RELOCATION EXPENSE _ 9. RELOCATION PAYMENTS TO INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESS - 10. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL 11. CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECT IMPROVEMENT 12. EQUIPMENT 13. MISCELLANEOUS I _ 14. TOTAL clines t thru 111 - 15. ESTIMATED INCOME ;it aoolicaciel 16. NET PROJEC.T AMOUNTi i (-414e 14 minus 151 17. LESS: INELIGIBLE EXCLUSIONS 18. A00: CONTINGENCES .9. TOTAL (Share: Recipient % Federal 20. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT a. b. C. d. e. ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: X g95743-05-4 PART Ili - AWARD CONDITIONS Page 4 ef 6 I TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. RECYCLED- PAPER Pursuant to EPA Order 1000.25, dated January 24, 1990, the recipient agrees to use recycled Paper for all reports which are prepared as a part of this agreement and delivered to the Agency. This requirement does not apply to reports whorl are prepared on farms supplied by EpA. This requiremPnt applies even when the cost of recycled paper is higher than that or virgin ,pa SMALL BUSINESS IN RURAL AREAS By accepting this agreement, the recipient agrees to comply with Section 129 of Public Law 100-590, the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988. Therefore, if the recipient awards a contract under this assistance agreement, it will utilize the following affirmative steps relative to Small Business in Rural Areas (SBRAs): Placing SBRAs on solicitation lists; Ensuring that SBRAs are solicited whenever they are potential sources; Dividing total requirements when economically feasible into small tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by SBRAs; Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirements of work will permit, which would encourage participation by SBRAs; Using the services of the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, as appropriate; and, f. Requiring the contractor, if it awards subcontracts, to take the affirmative steps in subparagraphs a. through e. of this condition. 3. PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION The recipient agrees to ensure that 211 conference, meeting, convention or training space funded in whole,or in part with Federal funds, complies with the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990. 4. FAIR SHARE The recipient must ensure to the fullest extent possible that at least 8% (Equipment), 8% (Supplies) and 20%(Construction) of Federal funds for prime contracts or subcontracts for supplies, construction, equipment or services are made available to organizations owned or controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and historically black colleges and universities, and that at least 4% (Equipment), 4% (Supplies) and 8% (Construction) of such funds are made available to organizations owned or controlled by women. The recipient agrees, in the event of any contracting, to include in its bid documents 8% (Equipment), 8% (Supplies) and 20%(Construction) MBE "Fair Share" and .require all of its prime contractors to include. in their documents for subcontracts 4% (Equipment), 4% (Supplies) and 8% (CanStruction) WBE "Fair Share" percentages. PART III - AWARD CONDITIONS ASSISTANCZ-: IDENTIFICATION: X 995743-05-0 Page 5 of 6 The recipient also agrees to comply with the six affirmative steps of the "Fair Sharp" policy stated in 40 CFR 33.240, 31.36(e) or 35.680(a), as appropriate. . The State anciforrecipient agrees to submit ‘a. EPA Form-5700-52A:-WBEMBE Utilization Under Federal Gsrants,:Cooperative AgreementS'i'and other Federaf.Finanbial Assistance", to the EPA aWard --.offitiafb:.eginning with, the Federal fiscal year quarter the 'recipient awards its , . „ _ , . . - first dontraCt.andLO.Ontitioing Until ali.cOntraCts and subcontracts have been reported. These , - rep'OrtSmistb0':1Subititted, to the award official-Within 30 days of the end of the Federal fiscal - r. dUarter(January:30-, Aprif 30 .,: July 30 and October 30). 5., The recipient agrees that prior to initiating any work associated with Project Groups B ("Wetlands Projects") and ID, ("Recreation and Habitat Projects"), the recipient shall submit, and receive USEPA approval for, further detailed workplans for activities to be included in these project groups. The recipient agrees that US EPA shall be provided with at least 45 days to review and provide comments on these detailed work plans. The recipient further agrees that it will comply with "Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks" dated August 1995. THIS AWARD IS IN RESPONSE TO THE RECIPIENTS APPLICATION DATED JUNE 12, 1998. / ' This agreement is stibject to apt:likable U.Y. Environmental Protection Agency statutory provisions and .assistance regulations. accepting this award or amendment and any payments made pursuant thereto, (1) the undersigned represents that he is duly authorized to act on behalf of the recipient organization, and (2) the recipient agrees (a) that the award Is Sublect to the applicable provisions of 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter B and of the provisions of this agreement (Parts I thru IV), and (b) that acceptance of any payments constitutes an agreement by the payee that the amounts, if any found by EPA to have been overpaid will be reiundmd ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: X 995743-05-0 RECIAL CONDITIONS Page 6 of 6 PART IV NOTE: Th .Agreement must be completed in duplicate and the Original returned to the Grants Administration Division for Headquarters awards and to the appropriate Grants Administration CrefIce for State and local awards within 3 calendar weeks after receipt or within any extension of time as may be granted by EPA. Receipt of a written refusal or failure to return the properly executed document within the prescribed time, may result in the withdrawal of the'Offer by the Agency. Any change to the Agreement by the recipient subsequent to the document being signed by the EPA Award Official, which the Award Official determines to materially alter the Agreement, shall void the Agreement. OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE The United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hereby offers assistance/amendment to the WAYNE COUNTY - MICHIGAN RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION costs incurred up to and not exceeding S 14.000.000 for the support of approved budget period effort described ASSISTANCE AMOUNT in application (including all application modifications) cited in Item 22 of this Agreement ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATIOn DATE AND TITLE for 55.00 % of all approved , included herein by reference. ISSUING OFFICE ;Courts Administration °Marti ORGANIZATION ADDRESS ACCUISITION-ASSISTANCE BRANCH US ERA, REGION 5, MC-10J . 77 W JACKSON BLVD CHICAGO, IL 60504-3590 AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS WATER DIVISION US EPA, REGION 5, W-15J 77 W JACKSON BLVD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 SIGNATUA l( THE _UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AWARD OFFTAT,_ ‘TYPED NAME Arm TITLE JO LYNN TP.AUB, DIRECTOR I 901f3 , -Z-K37L WATER DIVISION, REGION 5 In Finance Committee Vote: FINANCE COMMITTEE July 18, 2002 FISCAL NOTE (MISC. 102162) BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - MAIN 1-2 STORM WATER DETENTION POND INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT PROJECT: $54,350 GRANT APPLICATION/ACCEPTANCE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The Drain Commissioner proposes to implement the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from separate storm water drainage systems issued by the State of Michigan. 2. Wayne County through the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project has offered technical assistance and Federal grants to government entities for addressing and improving the Rouge River. 3. The purpose of the grant is to enable the county and local units of government within the Rouge River and other watershed areas to evaluate the alternatives for controlling sources of water pollution. 4. Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied for and awarded $54,350 of Federal grant reimbursement from the County of Wayne. 5. The total project cost of $108,700 of which $54,350 is Oakland County matching funds. 6. Oakland County match will be charged to the respective drain maintenance funds and will be partially reimbursed by local municipalities. 7. There will be no additional County personnel required and all grant funds will go towards the Main 1-2 Storm Water Detention Pond. 8. No General Funds are being requested. 9. Since specific benefiting county drains have yet to be identified, a budget amendment is not being requested at this time. Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Causey-Mitchell absent 1 HERESY L Brooks P, FokcGoING RE toN tri G. William Caddell, County Clerk Resolution #02162 July 18, 2002 Moved by Dingeldey supported by Webster the resolutions on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Coleman, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, Law, McPherson, Melton, Middleton, Moffitt, Moss, Palmer, Patterson, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos, Appel. (24) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 18, 2002, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 18th day of July, 2002.