HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2002.07.18 - 26820PLANNING ND BUILDING COMMITTEE
/
ChafOs E. Palmer,airperson
---r.
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION#02163 , 2002
BY: Planning and Building Committee, Charles E. Palmer, Chairperson
IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - Main 1-2 Stream Bank Inventory Project: $49,645 GRANT
APPLICATION/ACCEPTANCE
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Drain Commissioner proposes to implement the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Wastewater Discharge Permit for
Storm Water Discharges from Separate Storm Water Drainage Systems issued by the
State of Michigan; and
WHEREAS the County of Wayne through the Rouge River National Wet Weather
Demonstration Project has offered technical assistance and Federal grants to
government entities for addressing and improving the water quality and
recreational use of the Rouge River; and
WHEREAS the purpose of the grant is to enable the County and local units
of government within the Rouge River and other watershed to evaluate alternative
approaches for controlling sources of water pollution; and
WHEREAS illicit discharge elimination, public education and sub-watershed
management planning are considered examples of the types of activities included
in the Storm Water General Permit which will assist in restoring the water
quality of the Rouge River and other river systems within Oakland County; and
WHEREAS Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied for and awarded
$49,645 of Federal grant reimbursement from the County of Wayne; and
WHEREAS the total project cost is $99,290 of which $49,645 is
Oakland County matching funds; and
WHEREAS the required County match will be charged to the maintenance funds
from the respective County drains, and will be partially reimbursed by local
municipalities; and
WHEREAS no additional County personnel are required, and all grant funds
will go towards the Main % Stream Bank Inventory Project; and
WHEREAS the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has
established grant conditions and regulations that require the County to act as
the responsible party with respect to the grant, including those provisions
described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31; and
WHEREAS the USEPA will supervise the grant and grant conditions in order
that the grant be used in accordance with the requirements of the law; and
WHEREAS acceptance of this reimbursement grant does not obligate the
County to any future commitment; and
WHEREAS the grant agreement has been approved through the County
Executive's Contract Review Process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners approves the application and accepts reimbursement in the amount
of $49,645 for (the Main % Stream Bank Inventory Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Drain Commissioner and the Chairperson of
the Board of Commissioners are authorized to sign the grant agreement and to
approve grant modification and extensions, within fifteen (15) percent of the
original award, consistent with the grant agreement approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Interlocal Agreements be entered into between
the Drain Commissioner and the local communities prior to any work being done.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move the
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
Planning & Building Committee Vote:
Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Garfield absent
ROUGE RIVER NATIO:: AL WET WEATHER P EMONSTRATION PROJECT
ROUGE RIVER GENERAL PERA IT PROJECTS
GRANT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WAYNE AND THE OAKLAND COUNTY DRAIN
COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE
•THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2002, between the
County of Wayne, Michigan, a body corporate and Charter County ("County") and Oakland County
Drain Commissioner's Office ("Entity").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County is the recipient of, and is responsible for the administration of certain
federal grant funds referred to as the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project
Grant ("Grant").
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has established
Grant conditions and regulations that require the County to act as the responsible party with respect
to the Grant, including those provisions described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31.
WHEREAS, the USEPA will supervise the Grant and Grant conditions in order that the Grant
be used in accordance with the requirements of the law.
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to follow certain administrative procedures and
cooperate on the various tasks to be undertaken in order for the County to comply with the Grant's
requirements and objectives.
WHEREAS, the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project ("Rouge
Project") is a comprehensive watershed-wide program addressing wet weather pollution problems
ranging from controlling combined sewer overflows ("CS 0") to storm water runoff in the Rouge
River.
WHEREAS, one of the purposes of the Grant is to enable the County and local units of
government within the Rouge River Watershed to evaluate . alternative approaches for controlling
sources of water pollution.
WHEREAS, implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separate Storm Water
Drainage Systems (Permit No. i'vlIG6 10000) ("Storni Water General Permit") issued by The Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ") for the local unit will further the Grant's goal to
improve water quality and recreational use of the Rouge River.
WHEREAS, illicit discharge elimination, public education and subwatershed management
planning and implementation are considered examples of the types of activities included the Storm
Water General Permit which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge River.
WHEREAS, the Main 1/2 Storin Water Detention Pond inventoty & Assessment Project
set forth in this Agreement would further the goals of the Grant.
THEREFORE, N CO.N.SIDRATIO)l\T OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS
çONTAINM fiE101; the parties hereby' agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
SCOPE OF PROJECT
1.1 The County will provide a portion of the Grant to Entity to enable the Entity to do the
activities described in Attachment "A"
1.2 The budget presented in Attachment "A" along with the scope of work presented in
Attachment "A" specify the performance of the work as anticipated at the time the contract is signed.
1.3 The Entity agrees to submit a Final Project Summary Report at the project end to assist the
County in the grant close-out process. The Final Project Summary Report should generally be 4-10
pages in length and should include:
A. A summarized clear description of the project. In addition to the project description,
the report should include the following: project objectives; major elements of the
project; project products completed (project products are listed in Attachment "A");
and project highlights.
B. Comments on how the completion of this project benefitted or is projected to improve
the Rouge River.
C. A written set of recommendations to other local governments and agencies that
evaluates the benefits and cost effectiveness of the project. The evaluation should
consider the total proj ect cost. The recommendations should also summarize how the
project was evaluated and the evaluation results of the effectiveness of the project.
D. Comments on how the results of this project are transferrable to other communities
or agencies.
E. List of all task products completed. The list should include the official name of the
products.
ARTICLE II
SCHEDULE OF WORK
2.1 The Time Frame for the project milestones completion is contained in Attachment "A".
2
ARTICLE III
FINANCIAL PROVISIONS AND BUDGET
3.1 The detailed budget is contained in Attachment "A" be considered an approximation
based on the best infolluation available at the time of this .A.greernent. The internal distribution of the
monies allocated among project eiements,may 'be‘,Modifted by the Entity up to a total cumulative
transfer among dire-et cost categories not to exceed 10% of the total budget without written approval
by the county_ Other modifications to the budget will be only upon written Agreement between the
County and the Entity .
3.2 The County vill provide funds from the Rouge Project grant to partially fund the approved,
allowed, and eligible costs for activities outlined in Attachment "A". The total amount to be
reimbursed to the Entity shall not exceed $54,350. The Entity shall provide a minimum match of
$54,350 of approved costs, which may be satisfied by demonstrating either cash or in-kind services
from non-federal sources.
3.3 The County will hold the final 10 to 20 percent of the total federal fund allowable to the
Entity until the completion of the project by the Entity as identified in Attachment "A". Upon
completion of all the tasks by the Entity, the approval of the Entity task products by the County, and
the approval of the Entity submittal of the documentation of the final project cost by the County, the
remaining 10 percent of the federal funds will be reimbursed to the Entity.
ARTICLE IV
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND PAYMENT
4.1 This Agreement will be administered on a cost reimbursement basis. The Entity shall submit
to the County project status reports and invoices on standard forms provided by the County.
4.2 All reports and invoices shall be submitted at least quarterly, no more than forty (40) days
after each quarter end date. Reimbursements shall not be allowed without a status report submission.
4.3 Invoices must clearly identify:
A. Total program outlays to the date of the invoice.
B. The non-federal share of amount expended.
C. The federal share of amount expended.
D. The federal payments previously received.
E. The reimbursements requested for the billing period.
F. Project work element detail.
G. Project direct costs and outside services.
H. Time sheets for hourly employees and labor distribution sheets for salaried
employees.
I. Documentation of all contractor costs.
3
4.5 The invoices must be certified for completeness and correctness by an appropriate
4.6 All invoices will be paid by the County within thirty (30) days of receipt of funds from the
USEPA. •
4.7 The Entity wiTh provide documentation to the County that demonstrates compliance with
'federal and state regulations before payments will be processed. The Entity will prepare all cost
estindatesforimplementafion of the planned activities, including a breakdown of eligible and ineligible
cost items, with respect to grant funding. These cost estimates will be provided in a format to be
established by the County.
4.8 The Entity will exercise the necessary contract oversight and administration of any
subcontracts. These duties include, but are not limited to construction inspection and negotiating
and executing change orders (where construction is to occur), monitoring project progress,
responding to subcontractor or citizen omplaints, coordinating between different subcontracts, and
overseeing subcontractor's compliance with the approved project plans and specifications. These
activities are to be done in accordance with procedures established by the Grant and by 40 C.F.R.
Part 31.1, et seq.
4.9 All reports, invoices, and work products required under this contract will be transmitted to
the Director of Watershed Management Division, Department of Environment, Wayne County, care
of Mr. Razik Alsaigh, 415 Cliff )rd, Detroit Michigan 48226.
ARTICLE V
AUDIT AND ACCESS TO RECORDS
5.1 The Entity will maintain and retain financial records and supporting documentation in
accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures and in accordance with the requirements
of federal and state regulations.
5.2 The Entity will cooperate with and assist the County with respect to federal or state audit
review related to the use of Grant funds. This cooperation shall include preservation of the necessary
documentation and access to the records until federal and/or state audit resolution processes have
been completed and notification of records disposal has been received by the County. The Entity will
cooperate with the County with respect to evaluating audit findings of this Agreement.
5.3 The Entity will be responsible for the reimbursement of any funds required to be returned to
the USEPA due to Entity actions or omissions, as determined by audit findings, and the Entity will
be soley responsible for the repayment of such funds to the County or USEPA.
4
ARTICLE VI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1 This Agreement is expected to be funded in part with funds from the USEPA. The Entity will
not enter into any agreements with either the United States or any of its departments, agencies, or
employees which are or will be a party to this Agreement or any lower tier subag -,reement for monies
related to this specific Project. This Agreement is subject to regulations contained in 40 C.F.R. Part
31 in effect on the date of the assistance award for this project.
6.2 The Entity understands that the County has no funds other than the Grant funds to pay for
the project costs. All costs other than the Grant funds associated with the activities which are the
subject matter of this Agreement will be the responsibility of the Entity.
6.3 The Entity will cooperate with the County to ensure timely completion of the tasks
undertaken as part of the project. Cooperation includes, but is not limited to sharing infoimation and
records, participation in applicable committees, and assisting in development and evaluation of water
quality improvement alternatives.
6.4 The Entity warrants that it will comply with tl - provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31 and, as
applicable, all provisions contained in the Grant. In the event there are any conflicts between the
provisions of this Agreement and the terms of the Grant, the Grant terms will prevail. The Grant
document and the -Willis and conditions of the Grant are included here in Attachment "B". The June
16, 1998 correction letter of the grant fair share goals from EPA is also included here in Attachment
"B". The fair share goals for the Gran as identified in that letter are as follows:
Construction
Services
Equipment
Supplies
20% Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) 10% Woman Business Enterprise (WEE)
20% MBE 10% WEE
8% MBE 4% WBE
8% MBE 4% WBE
6.5 The Entity is responsible for securing all necessary permits from regulatory agencies and is
responsible for obtaining any professional services necessary for the Project Activities. The Entity
will act at all times in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations, and will secure any
permits and negotiate the terms of agreements in accordance with those requirements.
6.6 If the Entity secures any interest in lands, including easements, these acquisitions will be in
accordance with applicable federal law and regulations including 49 C.F.R., Part 24 and state statutes
related to the taking of interests in land.
6.7 With respect to construction projects, the Entity is responsible for conducting post-project
evaluation and certifying that any construction meets the approved design criteria. These
certifications will be submitted to Wayne County and the USEPA and MDEQ, where appropriate,
in accordance with the Grant requirements and applicable regulations. If the project does not meet
5
the ciesiffn criteria, the Entity will be responsible for taking the necessary corrective measures.
6.8 The ownership of any facilities constructed under this A c_treement will remain with the Entity.
The E ;:tity agrees to operate and maintain the facility consistent NA 1;11, the grant project goals and in
accordance with the requirern ..nts of the applicable federal and state statutes and regulations, Grant
conditions, and local ordinances.
, 6.9 . The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.32 relating
to any equipment including computers and peripheral computer equipment purchased as part of this
grant assistance pi oject.
6.10 Any rnendment to this agreement must be in 'writing, and signed and acknowledged by a duly
authorized representative of each party.
6.11 The Entity \yam nts that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.36(d) relating
to procurement of services as part of this grant assistance project. For construction contracts the
Entity shall use bid type contracts. For consulting contracts, the Entity shall use any of the four
procurement procedures in the 40 CFR 31. For most of the consulting contracts, the RFQ or RF'P
procurement procedure is the applicable one. The selection of the consultant can be based on the
qualification or qualification and cost proposal. After selecting your consultant, submit your
procurement documentation to the County. The procurement documentation should include:
— Rationale for method of procurement
— Copy of advertisement, where it was published and for how long.
— Hew many propusals received?
— How was company X selected (You can use pre-established criteria of qualification or cost or both).
— Selection of type of contract to be used.
6.12 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.36 (1) relating
to contract cost or price of services as part of this grant assistance project. Price/cost analysis must
be perfoinied by the Entity prior to award of any type of contract. The selected contractor must
submit a cost proposal to the Entity. The cost should be broken down by task. The cost proposal
should consist of the following categories:
Direct labor (with backup that establish this cost (hours and personnel))
Overhead (backup to establish this rate)
Other Direct Expenses (backup to establish this item)
S ub co nsultant
Subconsultant Administrative Charge (if applicable)
Total
Fee (Fixed for a fixed fee contract)
The cost analysis consists of the Entity detenuining the reasonableness of the selected contractor's
proposed cost, (i.e. is the allowable overhead rate used, correct pay rates for employees, accurate
6
expense rate charges). Price analysis: consists of the Eilfity c ,:parinL, proposed prices t.eceived with
other proposals submitted for this job, independent estirriaL -e from the Entity experience or cost
estimate from existing master plan. Copies of price/cost analysis documentation should submitted
to the County. After completing the price/cost analysis, any type of the contracts indicated below
can be executed:
— cost plus fixed fee Contract.
Fixed price (Intl!), Sum) contract.
-,- Catalog price contracts, example: geotechnical investigations with the price of the test are
established in the market.
— For certain contracts where the above types are not applicable, the county will allow contracts
with proscribed billing rates (per diem contracts), which establishes pay rate for professional
categories example: Engineer I, Engineer II, Project Engineer, Field technical Help, etc.
These above types of contracts are applicable for the main contractor and the sub-contractor level
also. Cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contractin?; shall
not be used.
ARTICLE VII
WAIVER OF BREACH
7.1 No failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any teini of this Agreement or
to exercise any term after a breach, constitutes a waiver of any breach of the term. No waiver of any
breach affects or alters this Agreement, but every term of this Agreement remains effective with
respect to any other existing or subsequent breach.
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
1 8 - J • This Agreement will terminate after the final audit and final resolution of any issues related
thereto as described within 40 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart D.
8.2 This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the County for its
convenience. The Entity must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of
intent to terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the County prior to teimination.
This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the Entity for its convenience.
The County must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of intent to
terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the Entity prior to termination.
8.3 If termination for convenience is effected by the County or the Entity, an equitable adjustment
in the Agreement price will be made. The equitable adjustment for any termination will provide for
payment to the Entity for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to termination. Equitable
adjustment also will include termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the Entity and
7
approved by the County, relating_ to personnel hired specifically for activities related to this
Agreement, provided such costs are eligible and allowable under the terms of the Grant.
8.4 Upon receipt of a termination notice pursuant paragraphs 8.2 or 8.3, above, the Entity will:
(1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless thenoti ,- e, directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or
otherwise make available tb.. the County all data; drm,vinas, specifications, reports, estimates,
Summaries, and slich . other information and materials as milr be accumulated by the Entity in
performing this Agreement whether completed or in process.
8.5 Upon termination pursuant to paragraphs 8.2 or 8.3, above, the County may take over the
work and prosecute the same to completion by Agreement with another party or otherwise.
8.6 All notices of teimination will be sent certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt
requested.
ARTICLE IX
LIABILITY
9.1 All liability, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out
of activities of the Entity will be the sole responsibility of the Entity and not the responsibility of the
County. Nothing herein will be construed as a wavier of any governmental immunity by the Entity,
its agencies, or employees have as provided by statute or modified by court decisions.
9.2 All liability, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out
of activities of the County will be the sole responsibility of the County and not the responsibility of
the Entity. Nothing herein will be construed as a wavier of any governmental immunity by the
County, its agencies, or employees have as provided by statute or modified by court decisions.
ARTICLE X
This Article is left blank intentionally.
ARTICLE XI
INSURANCE
11.1 The Entity shall purchase and/or self-insure, to the extent permissible by 1‘,w, have the
County, its officers, commission, boards, and employees named as additional parties insured under
the policy or policies of insurance and maintain such insurance so as to protect the County from
claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the project services, whether such
services be by the Entity, by any subcontractor, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the
Entity, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable.
8
11 .2 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion
and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost
and expense, a professional liabilit - hsurance policy for claims for damages arising out of an error,
omission, or negligent act in the performance ofprofessional services, withlimits of $1 million dollars
per claim and $1 million dollars in the aggregate for each twelve (12) month period. The Entity
agrees that the Policy May not be suhstantially modified or canceled without thirty (30) days prior
written notice, to the County and shall promptly notify the County of any failure to renew such policy
as necessary Prior to final 'completion Of the Project.
11.3 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion
and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost
and expense, with insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Michigan, the
following insurance coverages:
11.3.1 Workers' Compensation which meets Ailichigan's statutory requirements, or other
similar employee benefit act of any other state applicable to an employee.
11.3.2 Employers' Liability Insurance, in conjunction with Workers' Compensation Insurance
for claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of an
employee when Workers' Compensation may not be an exclusive remedy. Such insurance shall be
subject to limits of liability of not less than $500,000 dollars for each incident.
11.3.3 General Liability Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injury or death
of any person, other than the Entity's employees, or damage to tangible property of others, including
loss of use resulting therefrom. Such insurance shall be subject to bodily injury limits of not less than
$500,000 per occurrence and $1 million annual aggregate and property damage limits of not less than
$500,000 per occurrence or combined bodily injury/property damage limits of not less than $750,000
per occurrence and $1 million annual aggregate.
11.3.4 Contractual Liability Insurance for claims for damages that may arise from the Entity's
contract under Article X concerning indemnification for errors, omissions, or negligent acts in the
course of the professional service or other provision within this Agreement, to the extent that such
kinds of contractual liability are insurable in connection with, and subjct to, limits of liability not less
than for the professional liability insurance and general liability insurance set forth in subparagraphs
11.2 and 11.3.3, above.
11.3.5 Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including coverage for all owned,
hired, and non-owned vehicles with coverage of $1 million dollars per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage combined.
11.3.6 Automobile No-Fault Insurance required by law for claims arising from ownership,
maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle owned or non-owned, County, or for-hire vehicles, with,
coverage of $ lmillion single limit of liability and any applicable first-party benefits based on
Michigan's no-fault law.
9
11.4 Certificates of insurance shall he provided to the County prior to commencing Project Services
under this Agreement. Said certificates shall contain a provision that coverage afforded shall not be
canceled, materially modified, or allowed to expire unless the insurance carrier has given at least thirty
(30) days prior written notice to the County.
11.5 The County ahd .the Entity .waiN:e all rights:against each. other and their consultants, agents, and
employees for damages c9 -yerect.by any property casualty insurance during the Project Services, but
only f6:the-,eXtent covered by such insurance.
11.6 Compliance by the Entity with the requirements of this Article as to carrying insurance and
furnishing proof thereof to the County, shall not relieve the Entity of its liabilities and obligations
under this Agreement.
11.7 The provisions of this Article shall survive the expiration of any termination of this Agreement
for a period of three (3) years.
ARTICLE XII
NON-DISCRIMINATION
12.1 In accordance with the United States Constitution and au i federal legislation and regulations
governing fair employment practices and equal employment opportunity, the Entity shall comply with:
A. Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 252) and
the United States Department of Justice regulations (28 C.F.R. Part 52) issued
pursuant to Titles VI and VII;
B. Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 C.F.R., Parts 7 and 12);
C. The Age Discrimination Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. §6101-07);
D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794);
E. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §12101 et. seq.) and its
associated regulations; and
F. The Michigan Constitution and all state law s and regulations governing fair
employment practices and equal employment opportunity, including but not limited
to the Michigan Civil Rights Act (1976 P.A. 453),and the Michigan Handicappers
Civil Rights Act (1976 P.A. 220).
12.2 The Entity agrees that it will not discriminate against any person, employee, consultant or
applicant for employment with respect to his or her hire, tenure, teims, conditions or privileges of
employment because of his or her religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight,
10
marital status, or a handicap that is unrelated to the individual's abi)ity to perform tasks particular to
a job Or position.
12.3 The Entity further agrees that it will require each contractor perf )rming services under
this Agreement to agree to the provisions of this Article.
12.4 The Entity is responsible for complying with all federal and state laws and regulations
regarding competitive bidding.
ARTICLE XIII
ASSIGNABILITY
13.1 This Agreement will be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto and
their respective heirs and assigns.
13.2 Neither of the parties hereto may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent
of the other.
ARTICLE XIV
VALIDITY
14.1 If any provision of this Agreement or the application to any person or circumstance is, to any
extent, judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement, or the
application of the provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or
unenforceable, is not affected and is enforceable, provided the invalid provision does not substantially
alter the contract or make execution impractical.
ARTICLE XV
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
15.1 This document, including any attachments, contains the entire agreement between the parties.
15.2 Neither party has made any representations except those expressly set forth herein.
15.3 No rights or remedies are, or will be acquired, by either party by implication or otherwise
unless set forth herein.
ARTICLE XVI
PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, AND RIGHTS IN DATA
16.1 If this Agreement involves research, developmental, experimental, or demonstration work
and any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of, or under this Agreement, the
Entity and the County shall retain joint authority to patent or license.
11
16.2 The Frties agree that any plans, drawings, specificarion, computer programs, technical
reports, operating manuals, and other work submitted, or which are specified to be delivered under
this Agreement, or which are developed or produced and paid for under this Agreement are subject
to the rights of both parties and both parties shall retain an irrevocable license to reproduce, publish
and use in whole or in part and to authorize others to .do so.
16.3 This Agreement is funded in part by the USEPA and is therefore subject to the reporting and
rights prOviSic.ms of 49 C.F.R. Part 30 Subpart D including Appendix B and Appendix C.
16.4 ThiS clause shall be included in all subcontracts.
ARTICLE XVII
This Article is left blank intentionally.
ARTICLE XVIII
JURISDICTION AND GOVERNING LAW
18.1 This Agreement, and all actions arising from it, must be governed by, subject to, and
construed according to the law of the State of Michigan.
ARTICLE XIX
EFFECTIVE DATES
19.1 This Agreement becomes effective immediately upon signing by both parties and shall allow
for billing all costs incurred from April 1, 2002. This Agreement, unless extended by mutual written
agreement, expires on March 31, 2004. Should the USEPA require reimbursement by the County
of funds transferred to the Entity for costs incurred prior to this Agreement, the Entity shall be
responsible for any such reimbursement.
ARTICLE XX
PARTY REPRESENTATIVES
20.1 The County's representative for this Agreement is the Director of Watershed Management
Division, Department of Environment, Wayne County. The Entity representative for this Agreement
is the Assistant Chief Engineer for Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office. Either party may
assign alternate representatives upon written notification of the other party.
12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as
of the date and year first written above.
COUNTY OF WAYNE„. MICHIGAN •
By:
EDAKALRD H McNAMARA
Its Chief Executive Officer
OAKLAND COUNTRY DRAIN COMMISSIONER, MICHIGAN
By:
Its:
T:\watershed\Razik\Subgrants\Funded Projects RoundHAVIA-13 \IAA-IIA13.wpd May 30, 2002
13
ATTACHMENT
Wayne County Department of Environment
Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project
Round 11.4 Grant Proposal
for the
Rouge River Main 1-2 Subwatershed
Stormwater Detention Pond Inventory & Assessment Project
Project Purpose and Objectives
Oakland County communities have required that any new developments retain stormwater on-
site. This requirement spawned the building of detention ponds throughout the Rouge River
Watershed. These basins effectively reduce peak flooding and reduce pollutant loads from
stornawater runoff. However, opportunities exist to improve the performance of existing
stormwater detention basins by improving pollutant removal efficiencies and reducing the
"flashiness" of downstream flows. Such improvements can be accomplished by basin outlet
design modifications. This project will 1) Inventory the existing stormwater detention basins
within the Main 1-2 Subwatershed, 2) Identify the existing capacity and outlet structure, 3)
Recommend improvements to each basin, and 4) Prioritize the basin improvements.
A well-designed detention pond provides several benefits including 1) prevention of downstream
flooding; 2) collection of pollutant-laden stoimwater runoff and 3) slow release of captured
runoff. Detention of stormwater runoff allows for physical, chemical and biological interactions
which serve to improve the quality or water discharged into streams, rivers and lakes. As with
many stormwater control devices, however, a certain amount of maintenance must be performed
on detention ponds to ensure that they continue to function as designed. In addition, modem
detention pond design standards have improved, making the ponds easier to maintain and more
effective with smaller stomas.
The completion of this project works toward the fulfillment of the following two long-term goals
of the Main 1-2 Subwatershed Management Plan: 4. Minimizing the Amount of Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation; and 5. Minimize Flow Variability and Associated Negative Impacts., This project
also addressed two short-temi goals: They are as follows: 4.g. — Improve on the Maintenance of
Publicly Owned Detention Basins and Related Infrastructure; and 5.d. — Enhance Existing Off-
Channel Regional Stormwater Detention Facilities or Wetlands that Serve Developed Areas.
The purpose of this project is to identify and make recommendations for detention pond
improvements for existing detention facilities in the Main 1-2 Subwatershed. The gOal of these
improvements is to increase detention pond pollutant removal efficiency. This will be
accomplished by first performing an inventory of the existing detention facilities in the
Subwatershed. The inventory will be followed by a field assessment to determine the physical
and hydraulic characteristics of each facility and an evaluation to determine if it is functioning as
designed. Once these tasks have been completed, they will be compiled in an electronic database
that will be accessible using ArcView. A summary of the findings will be included in a final
report.
.) Round IIA Grant Proposal
:lin 1-2 Stormwatet Detention Pond Project ;in')
Communities that do not intend on participating due to lack of detention ponds of Significance
include: Birmingham, Southfield Twp., Franklin, Lathing Village, Fainiington, Bloomfield Hills,
and Pontiac. At this time, nine communities have provided initial information regarding number
of detention ponds located within their jurisdiction include:
Southfield (115 mostly private)
Farmington }Tills (90)
Wekl3loctifteict Twp. (35)
Rochester Hills (60- inc. OCDC)
Bloomfield Twp. (50)
Troy (15)
Bingham Faims (7)
Beverly Hills (2 — commercial)
Auburn Hills (1)
OCDC (75)
The estimated number of ponds at this time is about 450. That number may change, likely
decrease once overall size is evaluated. The focus will be upon ponds that have a significant
capacity and drainage area first. •
Task Descriptions
Task 1: Inventory
An inventory of existing detention ponds will be performed for the Main 1-2 Subwatershed. This
inventory will include the development of a database and location map for all detention pond and
related facilities throughout the entire subwatershed to review for other facilities not reported.
The database and location map of all existing facilities shall be prepared so that they are
accessible using ArcView GIS software.
Deliverable:
o Shapefile and Database file of Inventory Results
Task 2: Assessment
An assessment of the existing detention facilities will be performed, consisting of a design plan
review and a field assessment of each facility. The field assessment is not intended to entail a
detailed engineering survey, but only verification of the characteristics of each facility.
These characteristics include:
• detention volume, .
• outlet flow control,
• quantity and size of the inlet and outlet structures,
• permanent pool depth; and ,
• storinwater quality enhancement capabilities.
Hydrologic parameters relative to each basin will be tabulated, including the drainage area and
type of development. Furthermore, characteristics relating to the existing condition of each
RPO Round ILA Grant Proposal
Main 1-2 Stormwater Detention Pond Project 2 2/15/02
facility will be documented during field assessment including he presence of bank erosion,
excessive sediment build-up, existing vegetation and condition of infrastructure.
Deliverable:
ta Field assessment forms
, .
Task 3: .Evaluation
evaluation of each existino detention facility will be perfoinied. This task will include a
review of the local unit of government's records relative to drainage, facility construction and
maintenance and any other records available for the facility. The evaluation will address the on-
going maintenance and up-keep of each individual facility and rank each pond for improvements
and impact on water quality and flow.
Deliverable:
o Evaluation Summary
Task 4: Final Report
The findings of the assessment and evaluation tasks will be compiled and incorporated into the
database developed in the inventory stage. For each facility, the field data will be reviewed and
recommendations will be made to determine if retrofitting measures are necessary to improve
outlet water quality. These measures may include removing existing outlet structures for 100-
year ponds and replacing them with low flow openings; retrofitting ponds with wetlands; or
retrofitting ponds with sediment forebays.
A summary of field findings and the accompanying recommendations will be included in a
comprehensive report. The report and database will be arranged so that each community can
easily access the infoimation that applies to each of their detention ponds.
Deliverables:
o Database of assessment and evaluation results, two electronic copies per community
o Detention Pond Assessment Report, two hard copies per community
RPO Round IIA Grant Proposal
Main 1-2 Storrnwater Detention Pond Project 3 2/1.5/02
2003 2004 2002
1 4 3 3
Project Schedule
It is estimated that this project will take two years to complete. The project is scheduled to begin
in April 2002 following the completion of the Inter -Agency,- Agreement between Wayne County
and the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office. The cornplLte project schedule is present
in Table 1 below;
.:Table 1. Project Schedule
'Year:1
Quarter:
Month: A A FIMIA M IJ A 0
Task 1: Inventory
jfask 2: Assessment
Task 3: Evaluation
Task 4: Final Report
Project Cost
Table 2 depicts the project cost summary by task and Table 3 gives the detailed costs for the
project.
Table 2. Cost Summary
Task Number and Party Responsible for
Description Task Cost Type of Effort Task Implementation
Task 1: Inventory $15,740 Planning Consultant
Task 2: Assessment $48,345 Planning Consultant
Task i: Evaluation $30,015 Planning Consultant
Task 4: Final Report $8,120 Planning Consultant
ODC's $6,500
Total $108,700.00
Federal Grant Funding $54,350.00
Requested
RPO Round IIA Grant Proposal.
Main 1-2 Stormwater 11),menlion Pone p 2/15102
Table 3. Cost Detail
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4
•LABOR , , Rate ' Total
CATEGORY (VI-tour) Inventory Assessment Evaluation Final Report Hours Total Costs , .
ollars rs dollars hrs dollars s •ollars
rincipal Engineer $150.0 4 $600.00 8 $1,200.00 5 57,00.00 4 $600.00 66 $9,900.00
enior Engineer/
Scientist 5110.00 10 51,100.00 12 $1,320.00 $660.01 6 5660.00 34 53,740.00
Staff Engineer/ •
Scientist 595.00 12 51,140.00 80 $7,600.00 6 55,700.00 28 52,660.00 180 $17,100.0
ssociate
Engineer/ Scientist $65.00 180 $ 11,700.0 565 $36,725.00 23 $15,405.0 50 $3,250.06 1032 $67,080.0
dministrative
Staff 550.00 24 51,200.00 30 $1,500.00 1 $750.00 19 5950.00 86 $4,300.00
Labor Task Subtotals (Hours) 230 695 368 105 1398
Labor Task Subtotals
(Dollars) 515,740.0 $48,345.00 $30,015.00 $8,120.00 $102,220.01
ODC's (GPS, Digital Camera, Color copies, printing, etc.) $6,500.01
Total Cost: $108,700.00
Local Match
The Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office is applying for this grant. The match will be
divided among the Drain Office and the local communities. The consultant selected to perform
the work will be required to track their time by community, in order to ensure proper billing. The
Drain Office, as the grant recipient, will then be billed for the work and will pass the bill on to
the respective community for reimbursement. The Drain Office will likely provide in-kind
match, whereas the communities will provide hard cash match for their portions of the project.
This approach of having one agency apply for the grant has been successfully implemented with
the Oakland County... Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (General Permit
Activities Grant). This experience has shown that the -arrangement greatly decreases the amount
of administrative work that would have to be performed by the grant administrator if 12
communities were to apply individually.
RPO Round HA Grant Proposal
Main 1 -2 Storrnwater Detention Pond Project 5
avant, ,
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL P'ROTECTICil AGENCY
EPA ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENT
PART I - ASSISTANCE NOTIF'CATION INFORMATION - _
State
26. BUDGET PERIOD
01/01/99 - 11/30/01
29. TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD COST
• $25,454,545
1 Congressional Diatrict
MU Li IP MI I MU Li IP LE
FORMER AWARD
$0
0
0
0
FUNDS THIS ACTION I AMENDED TOTAL
O. EPA Amount This Action
1.1. Other Feder.i Funds
Recipierrt Contribution
Stale Contribution
'A. Local Contribution
7. :Hher Comnbution
$14,000,000
11.454.545
0
0
11. EPA In-Aind Amount
12 Unexpended Pnor Year aalance
Alkyeo.o44 Protect C.zee
j II
Document
Control
Number
PWX027
Apprcn. .1 Buaget
Crganizzion
05:30AK9
525.4E4,545
Proc.rzun
clA1 • :41.11
Cos; 1 Obligation SI
3rgoniza1ion1 Deobligation
1$, 1,.;
SitelPrect.
C
FY
Op
Site Name
,
Page 1 (.11' 8
1. ASSiSTANCE10 NO. 2. LOG t-ILIMBER
X 995743-05-0 , 05-X -000
3. DATE OF AWARD 4. MAIUNG DATE
.CD 47/ i00Tg
5. AGREic..MENT TYPE 6PAYMENT METHoU -
Coop...were Agreement I L. Adv.. ri Rembunmenerrt al ACH Number. AC H - 0512
,-
, end- P r.reerrt Amplest to: 7. TYPE OF ACTION Grant Atimensartt - , .
COMPTROLLER: BRANCH, MF-10..1 i CONTINUATION
8. RECIPIENT. -. ' 9. PAYEE
' - WAYNE COUNTY =? MICHIGAN: WAYNE COUNTY - MICHIGAN
41 CLIFFORD 415 CLIFFORD
DE i HQ(T,. .it.t 48226 - DE 1 HOF, MI 48226 ,
E
N E1N NO. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 10. RECIPIENT TYPE
T 38-6004895 13 COUNTY OR PARISH
0 11. PROJECT MANAGER AND TELEPHONE NO. 12. CONSULTANT (werr Construction Grants only)
H JAMES E MURRAY ,
G N/A
(313) 224-3601
E 13. ISSUING OFFICE (CITY/ STATE) 14. EPA PROJECT! STATE OFFICER AND TELEPHONE NO.
P US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WOJCIK A ACQUISITION-ASSISTANCE BRANCH WATER DIVISION
c US EPA, REGIONS, MC-10J W5-15J. (312) 886-0174 o
N 77 W JACKSON BLVD WHITE - TECHNICAL CONTACT
T CHICAGO, IL 60604-3500 WA-16J (312) 886-0134
15. EPA CONGRESSIONAL LIAISON li, PHONE 115. STATE APPLII5 (creinnoou..0 17. SCIENCE FIELD 118. PROJECT STEP onty) c BARBARA BROOKS, (202) 260-5660 N/A NA c ma Q 1
„ STATUTORY AUTHORITY 1 20. REGULATORY AUTHORITY 1 21. STEP 2 4 3 & STEP 3 (WW1' Contruction Gramm Only)
. ;dee continuation page) 40 CFR PART 31 4. Treatment Level L I
I h. Protect Type N/A I I
1 .. Treatment PY0c:cso
/ 1 Sludae Oe-Jlan I I
22. PROJECT TITLE AND DESCRIPTION ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATION
23. PROJECT LOCATION (At. I moacled by ormectl
Ca.,/ Place County
ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED WAYNE
24. ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CFDA Program Ho. Tafel 66.606: 25. PROJECT PERIOD
Surveys, Studies, Investigations, Spec! 01/01/99 - 11/30/01
27. COMMUNITY POPULATION 128. TOTAL BUDGET PERIOD COST
(WYfr Conatruction Grams Onryl N/A $25,454,545
ART 11 - APPROVED, BUDGET :DEN'TIFiCA- 9S:57 Pane 13 of Fi
- -----------------. - -. ,,-,--
TABLE A - OBJECT Ot...,1,135 CATEC,OF1Y TOTAL APPROVED AU 014VABLF:
NCilt-t.-.1 a i. V c,1,141 i BUDGET PER1OE COST
-
I. PERSONNEL Sal 0.000 -
• 2. FRINGE BENEFITS 652.779
3. TRAVEL 78.100
4. EQUIPMENT 68.700
5. SUPPLIES 26:200
9, CONTRACTUAL 10.125.339
. 7; CONSTRUCTION: 1 13.380.000
. 8....OTHEkl.,• 64,755
.*. TOTAL. DIRECT. CHARGES:::.. $25,205,873
•1•04..INDIFIEOT COSTS :.' RATE. ,•17.00 . N:' BASE 'S 4, FB • 248,672
" .n ..'.11....T0tAL. (Share: R 4etipient . --$.5.u?Iu% Federal 55.00 %.) $25,454,545
,
12. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
$14000,000
-
TABLE B - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION
(Non -construction
1. ..
2.
. 3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
3.
9.
1 •
-
12. TOTAL (Share: Recipient . % Federal
13. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
TABLE C - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION
• (c.aelstruction)
1. ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE
2. PRELIMINARY EXPENSE
• 3. LAND STRUCTURES. RIGHT-OF-WAY .
4. ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING BASIC FEES
5. OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING FEES .
6. PROJECT INSPECTION FEES
7. LAND DEVELOPMENT
8. RELOCATION EXPENSE
9. RELOCATION PAYMENTS TO INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESS
10. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL
11. CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECT IMPROVEMENT
12. EQUIPMENT
13. MISCELLANEOUS -
. 14. TOTAL a.h... I troll 13)
_ 15. ESTIMATED INCOME fit Jaqiicaciei
_. 16. t,IET PROJECT \ MOUNT (un<pla ilmu. 151
17. LESS: INELIGIBLE EXCLUSIONS
15. A 1 D: CONTINGENCES -
. .9. TOTAL (Share: Recipient % T v.n -:1- 11'3 L.----------. .„-----.-------------- -
2'.I. TOTAL AP1:'R-"r:.:1:3 ASSISTANCE :V1,1•7)1.1t1T
PART Li -- WRD CONDITIONS :DENTIF-?CATTCN: X q.9:57-Oti.-.1 Pnge 4
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. RECYCLED- PAPER
Pursuant to EPA Order 1.006:25, dated January 24, 1990, the recipient agrees to use recycled . . Paper far-,allieports which are -prepared as a parr of this agreement and delivered to the
'Aaenev: -This. requirement does riot apoiy to reports whicn are prepared on forms supplied . Agency • , . , ,
s...by EPA.. This reduiremeni aPplies even when the cost of recycled paper is higher than that . . . ..Of:virgiri ,paper.-: .
SMALL BUSINESS IN RURAL AREAS
By accepting this agreement, the recipient agrees to comply with Section 129 of Public Law
100-890, the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988.
Therefore, if the recipient awards a contract under this assistance agreement, it will utilize the
following affirmative steps relative to Small Business in Rural Areas (SBRAs):
a. Placing SBRAs on solicitation lists; -
b. Ensuring that SBRAs are solicited whenever they are potential sources;
C. Dividing total requirements when economically feasible into small tasks or
quantities to permit maximum participation by SBRAs;
d. Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirements of work will permit,
which would encourage participation by SaRAs;
a. Using the services of the Small Business Administration and the Minority
Business Development Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, as
appropriate; and,
f. Requiring the contractor, if it awards subcontracts, to take the affirmative steps
in subparagraphs a. through e. of this condition.
3. PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION
The recipient agrees to ensure that all conference, meeting, convention or
training space funded in whole, or in part with Federal funds, complies with the
Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990.
FAIR SHARE
The recipient must ensure to the fullest extent possible that at least 8% (Equipment), 8%
(Supplies) and 20%(Construction) of Federal funds -for prime contracts or subcontracts for
supplies, construction, equipment or services are made available. to organizations owned or
controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and historically black
colleges and universities, and that at least 4% (Equipment), 4% (Supplies) and 8%
(Construction) of such funds are made available to organizations owned or controlled by
women.
The recipient agrees, in the event of any contracting, to include in its bid documents 8%
(Equipment), 8% (Supplies) and 20°70(Construction) MSE: "Fair Share' and .require all of its
prime contractors to include_ in their documents for subcontr,--as 4% (Equipment), 4%
(Supplies) and 8% (Cor.-3tructicn) WEE "Fair Share" percant.ag.
Page of 6 .P.AT III - RID CONOITIn5 ICIENTIFiCATION: X 995741-05-)
=Irr
The recipient also agrees to comply with the six affirmative stes of the "Fair Share" policy
stated in 40 CFR 33,240, 31.36(e) or 35.680(a), as aporpriate,
The State and/or recipient aoreeS.to .subrnit 'al‘ EPA Form-5700-52A‘WBEIWBE Utilization
Under Federal Grante,I.Cdoperative AcreerrientS; and other .Feee'rat: FinanCial Assistance", to
he EPA beginnind with the Federal fiscal veer quarter the 'recipient awards its
rirst-COntract and:cdntihbing until all .contracts and subcontracts have been reported. These , . .
report S must be SubMitted . to the a vard afficial-.Within 30 days of the end of the Federal fiscal „.. .
dUartér.:(JanUary 3Q-; APrif 30, July 30 and October 30).
5.. The recipient agrees that prior to initiating any work associated with project Groups
B ("Wetlands Projects") and D, ("Recreation and Habitat Projects"), the recipient shall submit,
and receive USEPA approval for, further detailed workolans for activities to be included in
these project groups. The recipient agrees that USEPA shall be provided with at least 45 days
to review and provide comments on these detailed work plans. The recipient further agrees
that it will comply with "Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of
Mitigation Banks" dated August 1995.
THIS AWARD IS IN RESPONSE TO THE RECIPIENTS APPLICATION DATED
JUNE 12, 1998.
1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS
SOT 'CE IDENTTF:CATION: X 99574-1- Page of 8 _
PART IV
NOTE: Th:.; Agreement must be completed in duplicate and the Original returned to the Grants Administration Division for Headquarters
awards and to the appropriate Grants Administration Office for State and local awards Within 3 calendar weeks after receipt or
within any extension of time as may be granted by EPA.
Receipt of a written refusal or failure to return the properly executed document within the prescribed lime. may result in the
withdrawal of the-offer by the Agency. Any change to the Agreement by the recipient subsequent to the document being signed
by the EPA Award Official, which the Award Official determines to materially alter the Agreement, shall void the Agreement.
OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
The United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Environmental Protection.Agency (EPA), hereby offers
assistance/amendment to the WAYNE COUNTY - MICHIGAN ' for 55.00 1. of all approved
RECIPIENT ORGANTZATION
costs incurred up to and not exceeding S 14.000.000 for the support of approved budget period effort described
. .ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
in application (including all application modifications). cited in Item 22 of this Agreement
• ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATIOn , included herein by reference.
- DATE AND TITLE
ISSUING OFFICE :courts Admtnistrartion Crfic.c) AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE _
ORGANIZATION I ADDRESS Oi ,GANIZATION / ADDRESS
ACQUISMON-ASSISTANCE BRANCH WATER DIVISION
US ERA, REGION 5, MC-10J US EPA, REGION 5, W-15J
77 W JACKSON 3LVD 77 W JACKSON BLVD
CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590
, ,/ ---. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERIca.BY THE U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION aGENcY .
SIGNkTU,PPFPF AWARD OFFIZIAIT_
-
/TYPED NAME AND TITLE JO LYNN TRAUB, DIRECTOR L /v7 WATER DIVISION, REGION 5
' This agreement is subject to apdiicable U Protection Agency statutory provisions and .assiStance regulations. In
accepting this award or amendment and any paymentz made pursuant thereto, (1) the undersigned represents that he is duly
authorized to act on behalf of the red-L....Int organization, and (2) the recipient agrees (a) thal ,he award is Suhiect to the
applicablse ZO4k1 of 41 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter Sand of the provision.; of this agreement (Parts I thru l ,, and (b) that
acr.:eptanne of any ..zymH.nits cons-titutz.s an agreement by the payee that the amounts, i! any foury: by EPA to have been
July 18, 2002
FISCAL NOTE 102163
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - MAIN 1-2 STREAM BANK INVENTORY PROJECT:
$49,645 GRANT APPLICATION/ACCEPTANCE
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. The Drain Commissioner proposes to implement the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Wastewater
Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from separate
storm water drainage systems issued by the State of
Michigan.
2. Wayne County through the Rouge River National Wet Weather
Demonstration Project has offered technical assistance and
Federal grants to government entities for addressing and
improving the Rouge River.
3. The purpose of the grant is to enable the county and local
units of government within the Rouge River and other
watershed areas to evaluate the alternatives for
controlling sources of water pollution.
4. Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied for and
awarded $49,645 of Federal grant reimbursement from the
County of Wayne.
5. The total project cost of $99,290 of which $49,645 is
Oakland County matching funds.
6. Oakland County match will be charged to the respective
drain maintenance funds and will be partially reimbursed by
local municipalities.
7. There will be no additional County personnel required and
all grant funds will go towards the Main 1-2 Stream
Inventory Project.
8. No General Funds are being requested.
9. Since specific benefiting county drains have yet to be
indentified, a budget amendment is not being requested at
this time.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Finance Committee Vote:
Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote
with Causey-Mitchell and Palmer absent
QPP; iL 41,
n wi
HE FOREGOING TOLUTION
" Date
I HEREB
C13
brson, County Executive L Brooks P
Resolution #02163 July 18, 2002
Moved by Dingeldey supported by Webster the resolutions on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with
accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Coleman, Crawford, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway,
Garfield, Gregory, Law, McPherson, Melton, Middleton, Moffitt, Moss, Palmer, Patterson, Sever,
Suarez, Taub, Webster, Amos, Appel. (24)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, were adopted (with
accompanying reports being accepted).
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 18, 2002,
with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac,
Michigan this 18th day of July, 2002.
G. William Caddell, County Clerk