HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2002.10.10 - 26967MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #02246 October 10, 2002
BY: Public Services Committee, Hugh D. Crawford, Chairperson
IN RE: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, SHERIFF, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS - ACCEPTANCE OF
THE FISCAL YEAR 2003 BYRNE MEMORIAL GRANT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Department of Community Health - Office of Drug Control
Policy has issued a single contract for three Oakland County Byrne Grant
recipients (see attachments A, B, and C). The three programs contained in
this contract are Prosecutor/Child Abuse Task Force (Special Unit),
Sheriff/Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET), and Community Corrections/In-Step
Program; and
WHEREAS the grant funding is for the period of October 1, 2002, through
September 30, 2003, in the amount of $1,155,555; and
WHEREAS this grant award has been processed through the County
Executive's Contract Review Process and the Board of Commissioners Grant
Application Procedures; and
WHEREAS the recipient departments have been notified of an award of
$1,155,555; and
WHEREAS grant funding totals $1,155,555, of which $589,463 (51%) is
state funded, and $566,092 (49%) is County grant match; and
WHEREAS the required County match of $566,092 has been included in the
FY 2003 Finance Committee Recommended Budget; and
WHEREAS the grant will fund one (1) SR Assistant Prosecutor IV
(position #07207), one (1) SR Assistant Prosecutor III (position #07959) and
one (1) SR Assistant Prosecutor I positions (#06386) for NET and one (1) SR
Assistant Prosecutor IV (position #09833) and one (1) Social Worker (position
#09834) for the Child Abuse Task Force Special Unit in the Prosecuting
Attorney's office; and
WHEREAS the grant will fund two (2) SR Sergeant positions (#09829,
#09830), one (1) SR Deputy II (position #09831), and one (1) SR Office
Assistant II (position #07960) in the Sheriff Department/Technical Services
division for NET, and one (1) SR Sergeant position (#09832) in Sheriff
Department/Technical Services/Admin. to work with the Prosecutor's Child
Abuse Task Force; and
WHEREAS the grant will fund two (2) SR Community Corrections Specialist
II positions (#09332, #09401) in the Community Corrections/In-Step Program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners accepts this grant award, for the period October 1, 2002,
through September 30, 2003, in the amount of $1,155,555 for the Child Abuse
Unit, Sheriff NET and Community Corrections In-Step Program which includes
$589,463 state allocation and $566,092 in grant match budgeted in the
Prosecuting Attorney, Sheriff, and Community Corrections Departments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a department requiring a budget amendment
for any of the grants covered by this agreement; will initiate the amendment
process without requiring the other departments to sign off on the amendment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners is authorized to execute the grant award and to approve any
grant extensions or changes, with fifteen percent (15%) of the original
award, which are consistent with the original application as approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of this program, including
positions, is contingent upon continued grant funding.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE
Public Services Committee Vote:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Galloway and Causey-Mitchell absent.
R .. CONTRACT REVIEW — Sheriff/Prosecutor/Community Corrections
Subject: Re: CONTRACT REVIEW — Sheriff/Prosecutor/Community Corrections
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:09:41 -0400
From: Greg Givens <givensg@co.oakland.mi.us >
Organization: Oakland County
To: "Jackson, Pamela" <jacksonp@co.oakland.mi.us >
Greg Givens wrote:
> RE: CONTRACT REVIEW - Sheriff/Prosecutor/Community Corrections
> GRANT NAME: FY 2003 Byrne Funding
> FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Office of Drug Control Policy
> DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Dale Cunningham
> STATUS: Acceptance
> DATE: 24 September 2002
> Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned
> grant materials have completed internal contract review. Below are the
> comments returned by review departments.
> Department of Management and Budget:
> Approved with the following note:
> It was noted that the county match has increased from 40% to 60%, and as
> directed by the County Executive, this issue has been reviewed by the
> Personnel and Management & Budget Departments. Since this is the last
> year of the grant and since, from the beginning of this grant program, it
> was
> known that this grant would require an increasing county match by
> incrementing percentages each year, it is being approved for this last
> year of the grant. Future grant opportunities for continuation or
> expansion
> of this program will need further scrutiny prior to application to
> determine if any required county match funding is available given the
> budget
> challenge for FY 2004.- Laurie Van Pelt (9/24/2002)
> Personnel Department:
> I approve - Judy Eaton (9/10/2002)
> Risk Management and Safety:
> Approved. - Stan Payne (9/14/2002)
> Corporation Counsel:
> I have reviewed the Byrne Grant Agreement between Oakland county and the
> MDCH for the Oakland County Narcotic Enforcement Team, the Child Abuse
> Special Unit, and InStep. There are no legal issues that must be
> resolved prior to signing this agreement. However, please note the
> section 2 of the grant agreement does not contain a total grant amount.
> I suggest that an grant amount be inserted. Furthermore, section 9 of
> the grant agreement requires a financial contact person at the County.
> I suggest that this information be inserted, too Please let me know if
> I can be of further assistance on this issue. Jody Schaffer (9/5/2002)
> Please note the comments from Management and Budget and Corporation
> Counsel. These issues should be considered before submission to the
> Board for acceptance. Once this is done the captioned grant materials
> and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of
> Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant
> agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this email
> containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the
1 of2 9/25/02 9:36 AM
CONTRACT REVIEW — Sheriff/Prosecutor/Community Corrections
> appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by
> Board resolution.
> Greg Givens, Supervisor
> Grants Administration Unit
> Fiscal Services Division
2 of 2 9/25/02 9:36 AM
•
$ 129,888
43,296
$ 107,371
71,580
$ 107,371
71,580
(22,517)
28,284
61,626
20,542
$ 255,352
57,545
38,364
$ 274,860
50,945
33,964
$ 263,860
(10,681)
13,422
8,508
44600 2001 Salaries
44600 2075 Fringe Benefits
44600 2540 Communications
44600 6636 I.T. Operations
44600 6660 Radio Rental
44600 6631 Leased Vehicles
55,929 57,887 57,887 1,958
22,371 23,154 23,154 783
208 208 208
3,660 3,660 3,660
2,000
9,000
Attachment A
Prosecuting Attorney
Child Abuse Byrne Grant
Comparison of FY 2002 Budget to FY 2003 Grant Award
Budget
FY 2002
Application Award
FY 2003 FY 2003
Variance
FY 2002 Budget
to FY 2003 Award
Dept OCA PCA Obj
Revenue
Prosecuting Attorney
41 161012 41800
41 161012 41800
Sheriff
43 161022 44600 171 Grants-State
43 161022 44600 167 Grant Match
171 Grants-State
167 Grant Match
Expenditures
Prosecuting Attorney
41 261012
41 261012
41 261012
41 261012
41 261012
Sheriff
43 480600
43 480600
43 480600
43 480600
43 480600
43 480600
41800 2001
41800 2075
41800 3292
41800 2540
41800 6636
Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Pers. Mileage
Communications
I.T. Operations
$ 117,684 $ 121,803
47,074 48,722
690 690
416 416
7,320 7,320
$ 121,803 $
48,722
690
416
7,320
4,119
1,648
$ 255,352 $ 274,860 $ 263,860 $ 8,508
41 294418
41 294418
41 294418
41 294418
41 294418
41 294418
41 294418
41 294418
41900
41900
41900
41900
41900
41900
41900
41900
Sheriff
43 480600 44600
43 480600 44600
43 480600 44600
43 480600 44600
$ 278,735 $ 17,354
111,495 6,941
2,044 (233)
3,000 1,000
330 (82)
(7,263)
5,496 3,608
5,131 (9,509)
216,647 38,515
86,658 15,405
35,154 (44,046)
e
Attachment B
Sheriff NET Grant
Comparison of FY 2002 Budget to FY 2003 Grant Award
Budget
FY 2002
Application Award
FY 2003 FY 2003
Variance
FY 2002 Budget
to FY 2003 Award
Dept OCA PCA Obj
Revenue
Prosecuting Attorney
41 194408 41900 171 Grants-State
41 194408 41900 167 Grant Match
Sheriff
43 580600 44600 171 Grants - State
43 580600 44600 167 Grant Match
Expenditures
Prosecuting Attorney
$ 197,207 $ 211,852 $ 203,115 $ 5,908
197,208 211,852 203,115 5,907
164,293 422,151 169,230 4,937
164,292 422,151 169,230 4,938
$ 723,000 $ 1,268,006 $ 744,690 $ 21,690
Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Pers. Mileage
Travel & Conference
Materials & Supplies
Bldg. Space
Telephone Comm.
I.T. Operations
2001 Salaries
2075 Fringe Benefits
6661 Leased Vehicle
6631 Bldg. Space Alloc.
$ 261,381 $ 278,735
104,554 111,495
2,277 2,044
2,000 3,000
412 330
7,263 7,548
1,888 5,496
14,640 15,056
178,132 447,194
71,253 178,879
79,200 95,040
123,189
2001
2075
3292
3756
4172
6631
6675
6636
$ 723,000 $ 1,268,006 $ 744,690 $ 21,690
Dept OCA PCA Obj
Revenue
17 306001
17 306001
$ 73,503
73,502
$ 147,005
$ 60,602
86,403
$ 147,005
$ 58,802
88,203
$ 147,005 $
(14,701)
14,701
70500 171 Grants - State
70500 167 Grant Match
Expenditures
17 306002
17 306002
17 306002
17 306002
17 306002
17 306002
17 306002
17 306002
306002
306002
306002
306002
306002
306002
306002
70500 2001
70500 2075
70500 2540
70500 3348
70500 3476
70500 3596
70500 3756
70500 4080
70500 4100
70500 4140
70500 4172
70500 4252
70500 4336
70500 6667
70500 6675
Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Communications
Professional Services
Rent
Software Rental/Lease
Travel and Conference
Educational Supplies
FA Expendable Equip.
Incentives
Materials and Supplies
Office Supplies
Testing Materials
Convenience Copier
Telephone Comm.
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
3,500
500
4,445
(1,514)
500
(7,208)
(223)
Attachment C
Community Corrections In-Step Program
Comparison of FY 2002 Budget to FY 2003 Grant Award
Budget
FY 2002
Application Award
FY 2003 FY 2003
Variance
FY 2002 Budget
to FY 2003 Award
$ 85,037 $ 85,037 $ 85,037 $
34,015 34,015 34,015
- 2,660 3,500
- 14,022 -
1,000 840 1,500
- 1,300 4,445
3,014 1,500 1,500
1,500 - 1,500
- 4,000 -
2,000 - 2,500
9,263 - 2,055
- 2,500 -
11,176 500 10,953
- 631 -
$ 147,005 $ 147,005 $ 147,005 $
Contract #
P.O. #
Grant Agreement Between
Michigan Department of Community Health
hereinafter referred to as the "Department"
and
County of Oakland
1200 N. Telegraph Rd
Pontiac, Ml 43341
Federal ID#:38-6004876
hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor"
for
Oaknd County i\lror\tic Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) ODCP#70653-8K02
Child Abuse Special Unit ODCP#72003-2K02
InStee OnCP#70870-4K02
Part,
1. Period of Agreement: This agreement shall commence on October 1, 2002
and continue through September 30, 2003. This agreement is in full force and
effect for the period specified.
2. Program Budget and Agreement Amount:
A. Agreement Amount
The total amount of this agreement is $ The Department under the
terms of this agreement will provide funding not to exceed $ The
federal funding provided by the Department is approximately the $
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numbers, the CFDA
Title, federal agency name, federal grant award numbers and federal
program titles are as follows:
16.579 and the CFDA Title is Byrne Formula Grant Program; the
federal agency name is U.S. Department of Justice; the federal grant
award number is 2002-DB-BX-0026 and federal program title is Byrne
Formula Grant Program.
1.21:1-4 T5FY:1003 2102 CCI)
The match requirement of this agreement is identified on Attachment
B, Budget pages, fnr each project and is as follows:
70653-8K02 is 50% of the total agreement amount. The Agency
budgeted match amount is $372,345.
72003-2K02 is 40% of the total agreement amount. The Agency
budgeted match amount is $105,544.
70870-4K02 is 60% of the total agreement amount. The Agency
budgeted match amount is $88,203.
The total match amount for the Contractor is $566,092
B. Equipment Purchases and Title
Any contractor equipment purchases supported in whole or in part
through this agreement must be detailed in the supporting detail
schedule. Equipment means tangible, non-expendable, personal
property having useful life of more than one (1) year and an acquisition
cost of $5,000 or more per unit. Title to items having a unit acquisition
cost of less than $5,000 shall vest with the Contractor upon acquisition.
The Department reserves the riaht to retain or transfer the title to all
items of equipment having a unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or more, to
U.he extent that the Department's proportiol -iate interest fl such
equipment supports such rete-,ntion or transfer of title.
Deviation Allowance
A deviation allowance modifying an established budget category by
$10,000 or 15%, whichever is greater, is permissible without prior
written approval of the Department. Any modification or deviations in
excess of this provision including any adjustment to the total amount of
this agreement must be made in writing and executed by all parties to
this agreement before the modifications can be implemented. This
deviation allowance does not authorize new categories, subcontracts,
equipment items or positions not shown in the attached Program
Budget Summary and supporting detail schedules.
3. Purpose: The purpose of this Master Agreement is to provide funding for:
70653-8K02 - The Oakland County Narcotic Enforcement Team is a
multifurisdictional task force, which is designed to integrate federal and
local law enforcement agencies for the purpose of identifying,
investigating and prosecuting drug traffickers and to dismantle their
organizations.
72003-2K02 - The Child Abuse Special Unit pairs a cross-trained
investigator with a trial prosecutor and social worker to prosecute
cases of physical child abuse in criminal and child protective
proceedings
c.
DCH-C665P1'2003 2,102 (,V,./)
l`lana:zer rn 76A-R58-oan
Title
Tim Soave
Name Telephone No. E-Mail Address
70870-4K02 - This project provides for a community-based central
juvenile diagnostic center for youth at risk of drug substance abuse,
violence, or other behavioral problems.
4. Statement of Work: The Contractor agrees to undertake, perform and
complete the services described in Attachment A, which is attached and
hereby made a part of this agreement through reference.
5. Financial Requirements: The reimbursement process shall be followed as d
in Part II of this agreement. A copy of the approved Budgets, referenced as
Attachment B, is hereby made part of this agreement.
6. Performance/Progress Report Requirements: The progress reporting
methods, as applicable, shall be followed as described in Part 11 of this
agreement.
General Provisions: The Contractor agrees to comply with the General
Provisions outlined in Part It, hereby made part of this agreement through
reference.
8. Administration of the Agreement:
The person acting for the Department in administering this agreement
(hereinafter referred to as the Contract Manager and Location/Building) will be:
r 7 N---, Lit-A in :',
Name
Manader (517) 373-2952
Title Telephone No.
Contractor's Financial Contact for the Agreement:
The person acting for the Contractor on the financial reporting for this
agreement will be:
10. Special Conditions:
A. This agreement is valid upon approval by the State Administrative
Board as appropriate and approval and execution by the Department.
B. This agreement is conditionally approved subject to and contingent
upon the availability of funds.
C. The Department will not assume any responsibility or liability for costs
incurred by the Contractor prior to the signing of this agreement.
11. Special Certification:
The individual or officer signing this agreement certifies by his or her signature
that he or she is authorized to sign this agreement on behalf of the responsible
governing board, official or Contractor.
1.)C,H ,0665FY 2003 2/02 ON.)
-
Name and Title
(4:,,V.4.7•VS/C711.4,-;;CS
Signature
12. Signature Section:
For the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
Peter L. Trezise, Chief Operating Officer Date
For the CONTRACTOR
Letw C-€02-
uate
DGii-G665F(2UO2, 2102 CAI)
Part II
General Provisions
I. Responsibilities - Contractor
The Contractor in accordance with the general purposes and objectives of this
agreement will:
A. Publication Rights
1. Where activities supported by this agreement produce books, films,
or other such copyrightable materials issued by the Contractor, the
Contractor may copyright such but shall acknowledge that the
Department reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable
license to reproduce, publish and use such materials and to
authorize others to reproduce and use such materials. This cannot
include service recipient information or personal identification data.
2. Any copyrighted materials or modifications bearing
acknowledgment or the Department's name must be approved by
the Department prior to reproduction and use of such materials.
Any publication (written, visual, or sound, but excluding press
releases, newsletters, and issue analyses) issued by the
Contractor, or by a Subcontractor describing programs or projects
funded in whole or in part with Federal funds, shall contain the
following statement:
"This project was supported by grant project It
awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of
Justice programs, U.S, Department of Justice. Points of
view or opinions contained within this document are
those of the author and do not necessarily represent the
official position or policies of the U.S. Department of
Justice."
3. The Contractor shall give recognition to the Department in any and
all publications papers and presentations arising from the program
and service contract herein; the Department will do likewise.
B. Fees
Make reasonable efforts to collect 1 st and 3rd party fees, where applicable,
and report these as outlined by the Department's fiscal procedures. Any
underrecoveries of otherwise available fees resulting from failure to bill for
eligible services will be excluded from reimbursable expenditures.
C. Program Operation
Provide the necessary administrative, professional, and technical staff for
operation of the program.
DCH-0665FY2003 2/02 (.11\0
D. Reporting
Utilize all report forms and reporting formats required by the Department at
the effective date of this agreement, and provide the Department with
timely review and commentary on any new report forms and reporting
formats proposed for issuance thereafter. Applicable reporting forms are
available through your Contract Manager or the Department's web site.
Failure to meet reporting responsibilities may result in withholding future
payments.
E. Record Maintenance/Retention
Maintain adequate program and fiscal records and files including source
documentation to support program activities and all expenditures made
under the terms of this agreement, as required.
Assure that all terms of the agreement vv -ill be appropriateix,/ adhered to and
that records and detailed documentation for the project or program
identified in this agreement will be maintained for a period of not less than
three (3) years from the date of termination, the date of submission of the
final expenditure report or until litigation and audit findings have been
resolved.
F. Authorized Access
Permit upon reasonable notification and at reasonable times, access by
authorized representatives of the Department ; Federal Grantor Agency,
Comptroller General of the United States and State Auditor General, or any
of their duly authorized representatives, to the extent authorized by
applicable state or federal law, rule or regulation, to records, files, and
documentation related to this agreement.
G. Single Audit
Provide, consistent with regulations set forth in the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996, 31 USC 7501 et seq, and Office of Management and
Budget Circular (OMB) A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and
Non-Profit Organizations", a copy of the annual audit reporting package of
the Contractor to the Department. The audit reporting package and
management letter are due within nine months after the end of the
Contractor's fiscal year. The audit reporting package and management
letter are required to be filed with the Department even if there are no
findings reported in the audit pertaining to Department programs.
The federal OMB Circular A-133 requires either a single audit or program-
specific audit (when administering one federal program) of agencies that
expend $300,000 or more of federal grant funding during the Contractor's
fiscal year. Contractors that fall below the single audit threshold, are
exempt from the single audit requirements. However, for Contractors
receiving $300,000 or more of total Department grant funding, a copy of
the financial audit prepared in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards must be submitted as a minimum requirement of the
Department.
DCH-0665FY2UO3 2102 (71;
The Department or federal agencies, may also conduct or arrange for
"agreed upon procedures" or additional audits to meet their needs. The
Contractor's records must also be available for review or audit by
appropriate officials of the Department or federal agencies (i.e., federal
awarding agency or General Accounting Office).
The Contractor must also assure that each of its subcontractors comply
with the above audit requirements, as applicable, and provide for other
subrecipient monitoring procedures, as deemed necessary.
A copy of the audit reporting package or financial audit should be
forwarded to:
Michigan Department of Community Health
Rate Development , Revenue Reimbursement
and Payment Settlement Bureau
P.O. Box 30479
Lansing, MI 48909-7979
H. Notification of Modifications
Provide timely notification to the Department, in writing, of any action by its
governing board or any other funding source which would require or result
in significant modification in the provision of services or funding or
compliance with operational procedures.
Year 2000 Compatibility
The Contractor must ensure year 2000 compatibility for any software
purchases related to this agreement. This shall include, but is not limited
to: data structures (databases, data files, etc.) that provide 4-digit date
century; stored data that contain date century recognition, including but
not limited to, data stored in databases and hardware device internal
system dates; calculations and program logic (e.g., sort algorithms,
calendar generation, event recognition, and all processing actions that use
or produce date values) that accommodates same century and multi-
century formulas and date values; interfaces that supply data to and
receive data from other systems or organizations that prevent non-
compliant dates and data from entering any State system; user interfaces
(i.e., screens, reports, etc,) that accurately show 4-digit years; and
assurance that the year 2000 shall be correctly treated as a leap year
within all calculation and calendar logic.
J. Human Subjects
The Contractor agrees to submit all research involving human subjects,
which is conducted in programs sponsored by the Department, or in
programs which receive funding from or through the State of Michigan, to the
Department's Human Subjects Committee for approval prior to the initiation
of the research.
DC11-0665F(2003 2102 (VV),
U. Responsibilities - Department
The Department in accordance with the general purposes and objectives of this
agreement will:
A. Reimbursement
Provide reimbursement in accordance with the terms and conditions of this
agreement based upon appropriate reports, records, and documentation
maintained by the Contractor. Failure to comply with performance reports as
scheduled will result in action to withhold release of funds to the grantee for
this grant and other grants to grantee.
B. Report Forms
Provide any report forms and reporting formats required by the Department
at the effective date of this agreement, and to provide the Contractor with any
new report forms and reporting formats proposed for issuance thereafter at
least ninety (90) days prior to required usage to afford the Contractor an
opportunity for review and commentary.
III. Assurances
The following assurances are hereby given to the Department:
A Compliance with Applicable Laws
The Contractor will comply wit applicable federal and state laws, guidelines,
rules and regulations in carrying out the terms of this agreement. The
Contractor vvill also comply with ail applicable general administrative
requirements such as OMB Circulars covering cost principles,
grant/agreement principles, and audits in carrying out the terms of this
agreement.
B. Supplanting
The Contractor will comply with federal requirements concerning supplanting.
Funds must be used to supplement existing funds for program activities and
not replace those funds which have been appropriated for the same purpose.
Potential supplanting will be the subject of application review, as well as pre-
award review, post-award monitoring, and audit.
Supplanting means to deliberately reduce state or local funds because of the
existence of federal funds. (e.g., when state funds are appropriated for a
stated purpose and federal funds are awarded for that same purpose, the
state replaces its state funds with federal funds, thereby reducing the total
amount available for the stated purpose.)
DCH-0665PY2003 2/02 (W)
C. Anti-Lobbying Act
The Contractor will comply with the Anti-Lobbying Act, 31 USC 1352 as
revised by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, 2 USC 1601 et seq, and
Section 503 of the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and
Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (Public Law 104-208).
Further, the Contractor shall require that the language of this assurance be
included in the award documents of all subawards at all tiers (including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative
agreements) and that all sithrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
D. Non-Discrimination
1. In the performance of any contract or purchase order resulting
herefrom, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment or service delivery and access,
with respect to their hire, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of
employment, programs and services provided or any matter directly or
indirectly related to employment, because of race, color, religion,
national origin, ancestry, age, sex, height, weight, marital status,
physical or mental disability unrelated to the individual's ability to
perform the duties of the particular job or position. The Contractor
further agrees that every subcontract entered into for the performance
of any contract or purchase order resulting herefrom will contain a
provision requiring non-discrimination in employment, service delivery
and access, as herein specified binding upon each subcontractor. This
covenant is required pursuant to the Elliot Larsen Civil Rights Act,
1976 PA 453, as amended, MCL 37.2201 at seq, and the Persons with
Disabilities Civil Rights Act, 1976 PA 220, as amended, MCL 37.1101
et seq, and any breach thereof may be regarded as a material breach
of the contract or purchase order.
Additionally, assurance is given to the Department that proactive
efforts will be Made to identify and encourage the participation of
minority owned, women owned, and handicapper owned businesses in
contract solicitations. The Contractor shall incorporate language in all
contracts awarded: (1) prohibiting discrimination against minority
owned, women owned, and handicapper owned businesses in
subcontracting; and (2) making discrimination a material breach of
contract.
E. Debarment and Suspension
Assurance is hereby given to the Department that the Contractor will comply
with federal regulation 45 CFR Part 76 and certifies to the best of its
knowledge and belief that it, including its employees and subcontractors:
1. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment,
declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions
by any federal department or contractor;
2. Have not within a 3 year period preceding this agreement been
convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for
DCH 0665FY2003 2/02 (WP) Page 8 or 1.c..
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local)
transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or
state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements,
or receiving stolen property;
3. Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a
government entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of
the offenses enumerated in section 2, and;
4. Have not within a 3 year period preceding this agreement had one or
more public transactions (federal, state or local) terminated for cause
or default.
F. Federal Requirement: Pro-Children Act
1. Assurance is hereby given to the Department that the Contractor will
comply with Public Law 103-227, also known as the Pro-Children Act
of 1994, 20 USC 6081 et seq, which requires that smoking not be
nnrniiiQr in any portion of any indoor facility owned or leased or
contracted by and used routinely or regularly for the provision of
health, day care, early childhood development services, education or
library services to children under the age of 18, if the services are
funded by federal programs either directly or through state or local
governments, by federal grant, contract, loan or loan guarantee. The
law also applies to children's services that are provided in indoor
facilities that are constructed, operated, or maintained with such
federal funds. The law does not apply to children's services provided
in private residences; portions of facilities used for inpatient drug or
alcohol treatment; service providers whose sole source of applicable
federal funds is Medicare or Medicaid; or facilities where Women,
Infants, and Children (WIC) coupons are redeemed. Failure to comply
with the provisions of the law may result in the imposition of a civil
monetary penalty of up to $1,000 for each violation and/or the
imposition of an administrative compliance order on the responsible
entity. The Contractor also assures that this language will be included
in any subawards which contain provisions for children's services.
2. The Contractor also assures, in addition to compliance with Public Law
103-227, any service or activity funded in whole or in part through this
agreement will be delivered in a smoke-free facility or environment.
Smoking shall not be permitted anywhere in the facility, or those parts
of the facility under the control of the Contractor. If activities or
services are delivered in facilities or areas that are not under the
control of the Contractor (e.g., a mall, restaurant or private work site),
the activities or services shall be smoke-free.
DC;11-0b65Ff2C103 2/02 (W)
G. Hatch Political Activity Act and Intergovernmental Personnel Act
The Contractor will comply with the Hatch Political Activity Act, 5 USC 1501-
1508, and the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, as amended by Title
VI of the Civil Service Reform Act, Public Law 95-454, 42 USC 4728. Federal
funds cannot be used for partisan political purposes of any kind by any person
or organization involved in the administration of federally-assisted programs.
H. Home Health Services
If the Contractor provides Home Health Services (as defined in Medicare Part
B), the following requirements apply:
1. The Contractor shall not use categorical grant funds provided under
this agreement to unfairly compete for home health services available
from private providers of the same type of services in the Contractor's
service area.
2. For purposes of this agreement, the term "unfair competition" shall be
defined as offering of home health services at fees substantially less
than those generally charged by private providers of the same type of
services in the Contractor's area, except as allowed under Medicare
customary charge regulations involving sliding fee scale discounts for
low-income clients based upon their ability to pay.
If the Department finds that the Contractor is not in compliance with its
assurance not to use state local public health operations and
categorical grant funds to unfairly compete, the Department shall follow
the procedure required for failure by local health departments to
adequately provide required services set forth in Sections 2497 and
2498 of 1978, PA 368, as amended (Public Health Code), MCL
333.2497 and 2498, MSA 14.15 (2497) and (2498).
I. Subcontracts
Assure for any subcontracted service, activity or product:
1. That a written subcontract is executed by all affected parties prior to
the initiation of any new subcontract activity. Exceptions to this policy
may be granted by the Department upon written request within 30 days
of execution of the agreement.
2. That any executed subcontract to this agreement shall require the
subcontractor to comply with all applicable terms and conditions of this
agreement. In the event of a conflict between this agreement and the
provisions of the subcontract, the provisions of this agreement shall
prevail.
A conflict between this agreement and a subcontract, however, shall
not be deemed to exist where the subcontract:
a. Contains additional non-conflicting provisions not set forth in this
agreement;
DC.:11-0665FY2003 2/02 (W)
b. Restates provisions of this agreement to afford the Contractor
the same or substantially the same rights and privileges as the
Department; or
c. Requires the subcontractor to perform duties and/or services in
less time than that afforded the Contractor in this agreement.
3. That the subcontract does not affect the Contractor's accountability to
the Department for the subcontracted activity.
4. That any billing or request for reimbursement for subcontract costs is
supported by a valid subcontract and adequate source documentation
on costs and services.
5. That the Contractor will submit a copy of the executed subcontract if
requested by the Department.
J. Procurement
Assure that all purchase transactions, whether negotiated or advertised, shall
be conducted openly and competitively in accordance with the principles and
requirements of OMB Circular A-102 (as revised), implemented through
applicable portions of the associated "Common Rule" as promulgated by
responsible federal contractor(s), or OMB Circular A-110, as applicable, and
that records sufficient to document the significant history of all purchases are
maintained for a minimum of three years after the end of the agreement
period.
K. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
To the extent that this act is pertinent to the services that the Contractor
provides to the Department, the Contractor assures that it is in compliance
with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H1PAA)
requirements.
IV. Financial Requirements
A. Reimbursement Method
The Contractor will be reimbursed in accordance with the staffing grant
reimbursement mechanism as follows:
Reimbursement from the Department based on the understanding that
Department funds will be paid up to the total Department allocation as agreed
to in the approved budget. Department funds are first source after the
application of fees and earmarked sources unless a specific local match
condition exists.
B. Financial Status Report Submission
Financial Status Reports (FSRs) shall be prepared and submitted to the
Michigan Department of Community Health, Bureau of Finance, Accounting
DCH-0065FY2003 2102 (WP) Page 11 of 19
Division, P.O. Box 30720, Lansing, Michigan 48909-8220, on a monthly
basis, no later than thirty (30) days after the close of each calendar month.
The monthly FSRs must reflect total actual program expenditures, regardless
of the source of funds. Instructions for completing the FSR form are available
through your Contract Manager or the Department's web site. Failure to meet
financial reporting responsibilities as identified in this agreement may result in
withholding future payments.
D. Reimbursement Mechanism
All contractors are encouraged to sign up through the on-line vendor
registration process to receive all State of Michigan payments as Electronic
Funds Transfers (EFT)/Direct Deposits.
E. Final Obligations and Financial Status Report Requirements
A report of estimated total agreement expenditures must be submitted based
on annual guidelines and deadlines issued by the Department. Final FSRs
are due sixty (60) days following the end of the fiscal year or agreement
period. The final FSR must be clearly marked "Final". Final FSRs not
received by the due date may result in a loss of funding requested per the
report of estimated total agreement expenditures and may result in the
potential reduction in the subsequent year's agreement amount.
F. Unobligated Funds
Any unobligated balance of funds held by the Contractor at the end of the
agreement period will he returned to the Department OF treated in accordance
with instructions provided by the Department.
V. Agreement Termination
The Department may cancel this agreement without further liability or penalty to the
Department for any of the following reasons:
A. This agreement may be terminated by either party by giving thirty (30) days
written notice to the other party stating the reasons for termination and the
effective date.
DC,H-0665FY2003 2/02 (NT)
B. This agreement may be terminated on thirty (30) days prior written notice
upon the failure of either party to carry out the terms and conditions of this
agreement, provided the alleged defaulting party is given notice of the alleged
breach and fails to cure the default within the thirty (30) day period.
C. This agreement may be terminated immediately if the Contractor or an official
of the Contractor or an owner is convicted of any activity referenced in
Section 111.D, of this agreement during the term of this agreement or any
extension thereof.
VI. Final Reporting Upon Termination
Should this agreement be terminated by either party, within thirty (30) days after the
termination, the Contractor shall provide the Department with all financial
performance, and other reports required as a condition of this agreement. The
Department will make payments to the Contractor for allowable reimbursable costs
not covered by previous payments or other state or federal programs. The
Contractor shall immediately refund to the Department any funds not authorized for
use and any payments or funds advanced to the Contractor in excess of allowable
reimbursable expenditures. Any dispute arising as a result of this agreement shall
be resolved in the State of Michigan_
Severability
If any provision of this agreement or any provision of any document attached to or
incorporated by reference is waived or held to be invalid, such waiver or invalidity
shall not affect other provisions of this agreement.
VW. Amendments
Any changes to this agreement will be valid only if made in writing and accepted by
all parties to this agreement.
Ix. Liability
A. All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands,
costs, or judgments arising out of activities, such as direct service delivery, to
be carried out by the Contractor in the performance of this agreement shall be
the responsibility of the Contractor, and not the responsibility of the
Department, if the liability, loss, or damage is caused by, or arises out of, the
actions or failure to act on the part of the Contractor, any subcontractor,
anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor, provided that
nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity
that has been provided to the Contractor or its employees by statute or court
decisions.
All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands,
costs, or judgments arising out of activities, such as the provision of policy
and procedural direction, to be carried out by the Department in the
performance of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Department,
and not the responsibility of the Contractor, if the liability, loss, or damage is
caused by, or arises out of, the action or failure to act on the part of any
IL)CH-0665FY2003 2/02 (W)
Department employee or agent, provided that nothing herein shall be
construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity by the State, its
agencies (the Department) or employees as provided by statute or court
decisions.
In the event that liability to third parties, loss, or damage arises as a result of
activities conducted jointly by the Contractor and the Department in fulfillment
of their responsibilities under this agreement, such liability, loss, or damage
shall be borne by the Contractor and the Department in relation to each
party's responsibilities under these joint activities, provided that nothing herein
shall be construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity by the
Contractor, the State, its agencies (the Department) or their employees,
respectively, as provided by statute or court decisions.
f I in r. f l III reSu
The Contractor and the Department are subject to the provisions of 1968 PA 317, as
amended, MCL 15.321 et seq, MSA 4.1700(51) et seq, and 1973 PA 196, as
amended, MCL 15.341 et seq, MSA 4.1700 (71) et seq.
XI. State of Michigan Agreement This is a State of Michigan Agreement and is
governed by the laws of Michigan. Any dispute arising as a result of this agreement
shall be resolved in the State of Michigan.
XII. Confidentiality
Both the Department and the Contractor shall assure that medical services to and
information contained in medical records of persons served under this agreement, or
other such recorded information required to be held confidential by federal or state
law, rule or regulation, in connection with the provision of services or other activity
under this agreement shall be privileged communication, shall be held confidential,
and shall not be divulged without the written consent of either the patient or a person
responsible for the patient, except as may be otherwise required by applicable law or
regulation. Such information may be disclosed in summary, statistical, or other form
which does not directly or indirectly identify particular individuals_
DCH-0665FY2003 2/02 (W.)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
FY 02/03 AGREEMENT ADDENDUM A
This addendum modifies the following sections of Part II, General Provisions:
Part II
Responsibilities-Contractor
I. Year 2000 Compatibility. This section will be deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following language:
The Michigan Department of Community Health and the County of
Oakland will work together to determine and avoid potential Year
2000 computer systems problems.
COIrlDliatiCC.; with Applicable Laws. This first sentence of this
paragraph will be stricken in its entirety and replace with the
following language:
The Contractor will comply with applicable Federal and State laws,
and lawfully enacted administrative rules or regulations, in carrying
out the terms of this agreement.
VIII. Liability. Paragraph A. will be deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following language.
A. Except as otherwise provided for in this Contract, all liability, loss,
or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments
arising out of activities to be carried out pursuant to the obligations
of the Contractor under this Contract shall be the responsibility of
the Contractor and not the responsibility of the Department, if the
liability, loss, or damage is caused by, or arises out to the actions
or failure to act on the part of the Contractor, its employees,
officers or agents. Nothing therein shall be construed as a waiver
of any governmental immunity for the Contractor, its agencies,
employees, or Oakland County, as provided by statute or modified
by court decisions.
< < A
Name and Title
a4F.
Signature Date
2. Special Certification:
The individual or officer signing this agreement certifies by his or her signature
that he or she is authorized to sign this agreement on behalf of the responsible
governing board, official or Contractor.
3. Signature Section:
For the NI IC.H1GAN DEPA RI Ail r-r_NTOFC0rvirii Li i TY HE.ALTH
Peter L. Trezise, Chief Operating Officer
For the CONTRACTOR
Date
Attachment A
Michigan HIDIA Decontfiction Center
The Michi gan HIDTA Deconflietion Center be gan operations on June 15, )998. The
primary purpose of the Deeonflietion Center is officer safet y throu gh event &confliction
and the reduction in duplication of effort. When an y law enforcement activit y is to be
conducted that could potentially conflict with other enforcement activities (i.e. bu y/bust
operations, surveillances, reverse stin gs, undercover meetin gs, search warrants, fu g itive
apprehension sweeps, trash pulls, or an y other le g itimate law enforcement operation), the
responsible a gency/task force should call the Deconflietion Center and have the event
entered. When a conflict is discovered, both affected a gencies will be contacted b y the
Decontliction (.,enter immediately. No operational information is g iven to either part y,
the likcordlietion personnel simpl y notify each party that a potential conflict exists and
that the affected a gencies need to contact each other.
To dale, over 20,000 events have been entered into the Deconfliction database, with over
1,500 potential conflicts between law enforcement a gencies avoided.
Lvcnts can be called in to (313; 967-L1-540 or (877 ) 40,4-4600, or faxed in to (313) 956-
8183. 1-lours of operation are from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm Monda y throu gh Friday.
Attachment A
44. Project Description: (Unlimited Ditty)
The Oakland County Narcotic Enforcement Team (NET) is a multijurisdictionai
task force which is designed to integrate federal and local law enforcement
agencies for the purpose of identifying, investigating, and prosecuting drug
traffickers and to dasman -th their organization. In 1971, participating law
enforcement agencies in Oakland County agreed to organize and support, on an
inter-agency level, a task force known as the Oakland County Narcotic
Enforcement Team. This was the first multi-agency concept of its kind in the
state of Michigan.
NET, currently under direction from the Oakland County Sheriff's Department,
has officers from the FBI, Macomb County Sheriff's Department, and eleven
local police departments_ This strong cooperation from county, local, and
federal departments and agencies is why NET is very effective in combating
the drug problem in our area.
NET will continue with the type of investigations and workload that have
always been an integral part to NET's success For example, NET will have
continued involvement with all local police departments and be responsive to
their direct needs. This will enable NET to have stronger local ties and
provide for better sharing of intelligence information. NET will continue
with the operation of street level crews for undercover drug buys and
investigations of street level dealers. NET now has a conspiracy team where
investigations can be turned over for development of arrests of conspiracy
and RICO cases. NET will continue with the operation of an interdiction team
and will work closely with the FBI in identifying interstate and
international couriers. NET is requesting three additional Oakland County
Sheriff's Department deputies he added to the NET grant. Two of these new
po,sitions will he added to the interdiction team. New positions are required
due to the labor intensive nature of the interdiction team, many hours are
spent on surveillance of suspects, and development of leads through NADDIS
and HIDTA. The interdiction team currently has a total of four officers and
the addition of two new officers would increase productivity and improve
officer safety. The third new deputy position will be added to the conspiracy
team. This position is needed because this team also requires many man hours
to develop cases and conduct the thorough investigation needed to further
these cases. The other new position requested is for a chemist. In January
2001, NET started submitting all of their drug cases to the Oakland County
Sheriff's Department laboratory for analysis. Activity at the OCSD laboratory
has increased by 40% since that time. The OCSD laboratory is considered an
integral part of NET. This continuation of what NET does best, plus the
ongoing evolution of the interdiction team and conspiracy team should result
in arrest and prosecution of higher level dealers and investigations of
, individuals who bring drugs into Oakland County from out-of-state locations.
The Oakland County Sheriff's Department will provide the Unit Commander,
officers, and administrative positions. OCSD will also provide investigative
buy funds, phones, pagers, vests, vehicles, and all other equipment and
supplies needed. The local departments will provide their officers, fringe
benefits, and related overtime costs.
NET will further develop a true partnership between the Oakland County
Sheriff's Department, all local police departments, and federal agencies such
as FBI, DEA, and ATF. The Oakland County Sheriff's Department will take the
lead role in the NET Unit, but will follow the general direction of the NET
Advisory Board which consists of all departments and agencies that provide a
"
DCP-0001(E) (1-02) (W) Obsoletes and Reolace.s DCH-0867 Page 5 of 9
full-time officer to NET. NET plans to utilize all resources available, by
working closely with the specialized units of the local police departments
such as their undercover teams, vice units, and detective bureaus. NET will
develop cases and informants with these units to ensure great success. NET
will continue to work closely with the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office so
that cases are developed and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. NET
will also utilize more of the resources of the-entire Oakland County
Sheriff's Department and work with the officers at the various sub-stations
to better understand localized drug problems. NET's involvement and
cooperation with the federal agencies, such as the FBI, DEA, ATF, and HIDTA,
will increase under the OCSD . leadership. It is NET's plan to utilize all of
these resources to the fullest.
At the present time the NET commitment is as follows:
Oakland County Sheriff's Department
1 Lieutenant - Unit Commander
3 Sergeants - street team leaders
1 Sergeant -• interdiction team leader
3 Deputies - team members
1 Deputy - interdiction team member
1 auditor
3 office support staff
NET building, utilities, office equipment, sutolies, phones, p agers,
computers, cell phones, officer equipment, undercover vehicles, 1 raid van
Buy money-, investigative expenses, and informant fees
Additional full-time team members supplied
Bloomfield Police Department
Farmington Hills Police Decartment (2)
Ferndale Police Department
Hazel Park Polace DePartmet
Lathrup Village Police Department
Madison Heights Police Department
Pontiac Police Department
Royal Oak Police Department
Southfield Police Department (2)
West Bloomfield Police Department (2)
Waterford Police Department
FBI
Macomb County Sheriff's Department
NET would like to provide additional officers for the interdiction and
conspiracy crews. NET is continuing to explore the possibilitiy of other
departments joining NET. The Byrne grant positions are needed to keep NET at
current level. Any decrease in staffing at this time would be detrimental to
the effectiveness of NET and would decrease officer safety.
The Narcotics Section of the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office is a
specialized section developed to assist in not only the prosecution, but also
the investigation, of repeat and large-scale drug offenders. The members of .
the Narcotics Section of the Prosecutor's Office are on call 24 hours a day,
7 days a week, to assist law enforcement agencies (including NET) in search
warrant preparation and other search and seizure issues that develop during
the course of investigations. Additionally, the prosecutors assigned to the
section conduct training seminars for various agencies on proper preparation
DCP-0001(E) (1-02) (W) Obsoletes and Replaces DCH-0867 Page 6 of 9
of search warrants, preParation for court, and chances in the law that effect
.investigation procedures and evidence collection. The multijurisdictional
task force will continue to integrate this specialized prosecution unit with
federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies through NET and the
Oakland County Citizens Grand Jury. Continuation of this special prosecution
section depends upon the Byrne Grant award and county- matched funds.
The assignment of one special assistant prosecutinc attorney to the Oakland
County Citizens Grand Jury, when impaneled, will impact narcotics trafficking
organizations by assisting the Grand Jury in dismantling drug delivery
networks and indicting those persons responsible for the distribution of
large quantities of narcotics. Aggressive prosecution and a continued no-
plea-bargaining policy will create a reduction in the rate of crime growth.
The no -plea -bargaining policy of the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office.
Narcotics Section facilitates police agencies in their Ability to apprehend
traffickers higher up in the chain of distribution. Defendants faced with the
grim reality of substantial prison time are often willing to inform law
enforcement of the identity of their supPliers in order to receive
consideration for cooperation at sentencing_
The prosecution aspect of this multijurisdictional drug task force will
continue to augment the funding for a special unit of four assistant drug
prosecutors, one of whom will continue to be assigned to the Oakland County
Citizens Grand Jury, when impaneled, in the investigation and prosecution of
major drug traffickers. Special assistant prosecutors will be assigned to
vertically prosecute serious drug offenders by utilizing a drug offender
classificatlon system, The assessment of each offender allows the prosecution
unit to target repeat offenders, mid- and upper-level traffickers, as well as
gire ssecial attenticn to the more comic': consciracy and racketeering cases.
Tots tin: will cont±nue to be enforced, and the
spec ial prosecution unit will vertically prosecute all cases in which Level
I, II, and III dealers are identified.
The pagers and cellular phones allow prosecutors to be available at all times
to communicate with law enforcement agencies whose hours of operation
frequently differ from that of an assistant prosecutor. The laptop computers
will aid each prosecutor in the retrieval of valuable information in the
field, and enhance the presentation of evidence from each case in court
through the use of litigation support software.
As law enforcement agencies (such as NET) become more and more effective in
infiltrating drug organizations the number of cases requiring the speci1;,..A
attention the vertical prosecution unit increases. The effectiveness of NET
and other agencies is reflected in the increase in the number of eases
handled by the prosecution unit over the past year. Four assistant
prosecutors are necessary to handle the volume of incoming cases.
DCP-0001(E) (1-02) (W) Cbsoletes and Replacps DCH-0367 Page 7 of 9
45. Anticipated Outcomes and Performance Measures: (Unlimited Entry)
The following measurements have always been tracked and reported by NET. This
objective data will continue to be gathered and reported and utilized to
track the success and progress of NET. This data is compiled monthly and
reviewed by the Unit Commander. This information is shared quarterly with the
NET Advisory Board. The data compiled is as follows:
L Complaints initiated
• Intelligence Reports
U Search Warrants Executed
(._1 Informants developed
U Number of Arrests
L Arrests by Class
H Amount of drugs seized and purchased
Li Number of charges
L Amount Forfeited
Also NET complies a weekly activity summary which details all activity for
the week. This report is disbursed to all participating departments and
agencies. The sharing of this information not only keeps the departments
informed of NET's progress but the sharing of informaton with local
departments sometimes results in the furthering of the NET investigations.
NET also monitors more subjective measurements to determine if it is meeting
its objectives. These subjective measurements include:
• C000eration with .1 7-DT.Ti and ut tion of tbcse ruse' roes
Li Interaction with community and school groups
Cooperation with other department' s teams and other dE LIU Learns
Development investigatio ns with federal agencies
L Impact of drug supply levels within Oakland County
H Reduction of violent crimes
The data and criteria listed above will be analyzed and compared to previous
years to determine trends and success rates. Local community leaders will be
invited to share their concerns to get the needed feedback from the
community. The NET Advisory Board will conduct at least quarterly meetings to
discuss problems, and improvements of the NET Unit. Their imput will be
crucial in determining how successful NET is and into what direction NET
should go in the future. Lastly,. meetings with federal agencies will be
conducted so that their input can be used to assist NET in its progress.
The special prosecution unit of the multijurisdictional task force will also
continue to ut_4 17 ,.‘4 tistcal reporting to demonstrate accountability.
Monthly, quarterly, and annual reports will be prepared for review, and
utilized to refine case selection and develop prosecution techniques for
future investigations.
Performance indicators for the prosecution aspect include:
1. The number of full-time prosecutors assigned to the unit;
2. The number of cases investigated and prosecuted where the offenders met
the minimum criteria for special prosecution;
3. The number of defendants charged;
DCP-0001(E) (1-02) (W) Obsoletes and Replaces DC1-1-0867 Page 8 of 9
4. The number of defendants convicted;
5. The number of Class I, II, and III defendants identified and convicted;
6. The number of Clas:,-; TV and V defendants identified and convicted;
7. The number of individuals incarcerated and the lengths of sentences;
8. The average time from charge through conviction of a defendant.
The prosecution unit will also monitor the number of cases in the county
where defendants are charged with crimes involving the new "trend" drugs:
This additional information will assist law enforcement in determining their
effectiveness in detecting these types of offenders, as well as informing
them of changes or increases in the drugs of choice. By increasing the number
of drug offenders who are investigated and prosecuted, the grant project will
reduce the overall crime growth rate, disrupt the distribution of dangerous
drugs, and impact violent crime by removinu dangerous criminals from our
communities.
Should this project be awarded to the Oakland County Narcotic Enforcement
Team, we anticipate that the conspiracy and interdiction teams will be
significantly more effective. These two teams target mid- and upper-level
distribution organizations, and staffing is critical to their success. We
believe that Oakland County is a central area to a great number of drug
distribution organizations. Although NET must continue to prioritize its
staffing to the street crews, we must also recognize the importance of
targeting mid and high level organizations. These t-;pes of investigations are
typically manpower intensie and can only be successful with the added
staffinc of this project_ This gtcant project_ will successfully allow us to
apprehend and convict those involved in the use, sale, and distribution of
illegal drugs and narcotics. Also, these types of cases are labor intensive
from the prosecution standnoint. The preparation and court time needed to
successfully prosecute the multiple defendant conspiracies often requires one
prosecutor to devote their full attention to one case for an extended period.
The assignment of four assistant prosecuting attorneys is necessary to allow
the large volume, and these types, of cases to be handled efficiently, yet
giving each case the attention it deserves.
DCP-0001(E) (1-02) (W) Obsoletes and Replaces DUI -i-0867 Page 9 of 9
671 = _ • •
44, Project Description: (Unlimited Entry)
The Child Abuse Special Unit Project will continue training activities in the
development of a multi-jurisdictional child abuse investigative task force
consisting of representatives of the Oakland County Sheriff's Department, the
Michigan State Police, local police agencies, the Family Independence Agency,
the Oakland County Medical Examiner and the Oakland County Prosecuting
Attorney.
Best practice strategy requirements for the Child Abuse Special Unit Project
for a multi-jurisdictional team approach to the investigation and prosecution
of the physical abuse of children fall into three categories: staffing
resources, organizational resources and technical resources. The staffing and
organizational resources for implementation include the continuation of a
special unit within the prosecutor's office staffed by an experienced cross-
trained trial prosecutor and by a social worker with special credentials in
forensic interviewing and child abuse prosecution. The prosecutor has already
been selected and paired with a specially designated investigator from the
Sheriff's Department exclusively assigned to assist in neglect and abuse
petitions, criminal physical child abuse cases and in county wide training of
other investigators. Numerous investigations and prosecution have already
begununder the aegis of this unit. The assistant prosecutor has a criminal
caseload of 36 cases and has closed 4 cases pursuant to the initial funding
of this unit. The sheriff's department's specially assigned investigator has
12 active investigations and has closed 30 others during the first quarter of
the initial grant period. The majority of the funding requested in this
proposal will he directed toward these staffing and organizational efforts.
iTechnical resources for implementation will include the creation of tracking
systems to ensure cr,mmi:-flirc-,f1 beteen lLLco lorcsecutors and both criminal
i and fairlaly coi.a:ctzE .
The Child Tjrlf Project is necessary to continue the multi-
jurisdictional team approach to the investigation and prosecution of physical
child abuse cases. This project addresses the need for continuation of
investigative and prosecution practices and policies which result in the
pursuit of child abuse, cases with or without the cooperation of the child.
Additionally the project conducts a continuing calendar of training events
for police investigators, child protection workers, medical and school
personnel to ensure enhanced reporting and investigations of child abuse. The
training results from the collaborative efforts of the special child abuse
prosecutor and the sheriff's department child abuse investigator and selected
members of the multi-jurisdictional physical child abuse task force. The
multi-jurisdictional task force will continue to integrate this special
prosecution unit through state and local law enforcement agencies and the
Family Independence Agency. Continuation of this special prosecution unit
depends upon the Byrne Grant award and county matched funds.
DCP-000-1(E) (1-02) (W) Obsoletes and Replaces DCH-0867 Page 5 of 7
<
44. Project Description: (Unlimited Entry)
InStep is a central diaanostic and referral center for juveniles (aces 11-
18) The program (InStep) identifies and assesses juveniles at risk and also
provides to thcm and their families support services that prowoLe posiLive
chance and reduce the risk of substance abuse and recidivism. Standardized
assessments for substance abuse and mental health are beinc given to the
participants at time of intake in order to effectively match them with any of
the various program services listed below.
The program currently offers a Level One education substance abuse group that
meets weekly and averages 12-15 adolescents each week. Collaborative
Solutions - Easter Seals has 5 mental health counselors assigned to InStep,
which is an increase of 2 from last year. They are facilitating an anger
awareness croup titled Self-Awareness for Everyone (S.A.F.E.) and a 15 week
group for adolescent girls ages 14-18 called Supporting Adolescent Girls
Empowerment (S.A.G.E.). Along with this they see the adolescents and their
families for counseling sessions and refer them for psychiatric services if
needed. None of the costs associated with these services are being charged
to the grant, they are provided as part of a collaboration with Easter Seals.
The InStep Case Managers have began facilitating "in-house" groups.
S.E.A.L.S. (Self-expresion and Life Skills), a parenting group, and a smoking
cessation group. Case managers have also had the adolescents participate in
Postive activities over the past year. A trip to a ropes course was taken
this summer to promote teamwork and positive thinking. Incentives play a
large oart in rewardina positive behavior and the trips serve as "clean" ways
e7:posed to posit ive mentor role models. Future
trips to educational site:3 and to a ropes coarse will be taken auain this
ye sr
Since InStep was implemented, the police department and school system have
referred over 350 youth. Last year, the success rate for the InStep
participants was 60%, which increased 12% from the previous year. The
transportation provided by InStep and the school district,the recognition of
the program and a high level of motivation by the adolescents have been
attributing factors to this increase.
There is still a strong collaboration between nine governmental agencies that
work with the InStep program. These partners include: Oakland County Family
Court Division, Waterford District Court, Waterford Coalition for Youth,
Waterford School District, Water-ford Police r),=.fll-tment, Oakland County Office
of Substance Abuse, Collaborative Solutions- Easter Seals, Waterford Youth
Assistance, and Oakland County Community Corrections Division. The Waterford
Police Department and the Waterford School District are the primary referral
sources into the program. As previously mentioned, the School District has
also committed to providing transportation for students to the program. The
Oakland County Family Court and Waterford District Court are primarily
responsible for enforcement of petitions or sanctions should an individual
"bomb out of the program. However both of these entities may also refer
into the program. The Waterford Youth Coalition has been the main resource
for gathering information as it relates to the youth within Waterford.
Collaborative Solutions has provided facil i tators for individual, croups and
family counseling, in addition to an on-call psychiatrist. The Oakland
County Substance Abuse Agency has committed dollars in the form of providing
a substance abuse agency, The Counseling Center. This agency performs on-
site substance abuse couselinc. The Oakland County Community Corrections
Page ,4 of 6 DCP-0001(E) (1-02) (VI) Obsoletos and Pctoiaus DCH-0267
to hae fun as well as bei=
Division has been responsible for staffing the Program with case managers to
do screening and assessment, treatment planning, and grant reporting. The
relationship with Waterford Youth Assistance is strong and referrals are made
from one agency to another and the services offered by each are complimentary
rather than repetitive. All parties involved meet on a quarterly basis for
case conferencina and brainstorming new ideas that could be implemented at
InStep.
Many of the above listed partners are sunnlyina funding in one form or
another. Collaborative Solutions provides a psychiatrist at $100 per hour, 5
counselors whom run 2 mental health groups and also conduct individual and
family sessions. The Substance Abuse Office has contributed a contracted
provider who runs 1 substance abuse group at $20.00 per person and individual
sessions at $65.00 per session. Waterford Township has provided InStep with
building space rent free for 2 years. The school district provides after
school transnoration and InStap provides other transporation with a 13-
passenger van that it received from the JAIBG grant.
Anticipated Outcomes and Performance MeEisures: (Unlimited Ent)
The InStep proaram has been using the JASAE assessment tool developed by ADE,
INC. and the MAYSI (Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument). The JASAE
provides a Drinking Evaluation Category and a Drug Evaluation Category, which
gives the assessor a good basis as to the depth of an alcohol or drug
problem. In addition, the JASAE provides an overall Summary Score as well as
a Suggested DSM-IV Classification. The above measures have been used to
det:rmine if the InSteP Qroaram is meeting the needs of these juveniles and
placing them in appropriate services. The MAYSI is being used to determine
the mental health concerns of the adolescents referred to the program. Since
u tili zrs, both the y:12731 and JASAE together to assess the luveniles, it has
shown a greater dual diagnosis population among the youth than first
recognized. This is along with the disturbina amount of drug and alcohol
dependence that is still being seen.
Participants from ages 13-17 that took both the JASAE and MAYSI were queried
(N=26). 18 of those adolescents were diagnosed with a DSM-IV classification
of 304.30 Cannihis Dependence, 8 with Alcohol Abuse, 4 - Alcohol Dependence,
2 - Cannibis Abuse, 1 - Opiate Abuse, 1 - Hallucinagen Dependence, and only 2
with no drug history. Out of these juveniles, 14 were also diagnosed with
mental health concerns and 7 scored in the top 5-15% of justice system youths
on this scale. Only 1 in 10 youths score this high for mental health
concerns.
Based on these outcomes, it is evident that Mental health treatment is a
necessity in conjuction with substance abuse treatment.
The following measures will continue to be used to determine outcomes and the
impact of the InStep program. •
Number of juveniles referred to the oroaram
Number of eligible participants
Number of participants accepted
Number of drug tests given
Number of positive drug tests
Number of sanctions used
Number of incentives given
Number of terminations Successful and =successful
DCP-6001(E) 1 (Y,r) Obscietes and Replace Pane 5 of 6
Number of participants re-arrested
Number of juveniles reporting re-use of substances
These measures are a carry over from the previous grants with the exception
of adding "Number of incentives given". It is believed that positive
incentives provided to the participants has also impacted the success rate of
the program. We are continuing to evaluate the juveniles overall performance
and improvement in behavior. We are looking at increased school attendance
and grades, reduced disciplinary problems, reduced drug use, parent
evaluation, and case manager evaluation.
Objectives for the InSteo program will remain the same.
Objective #1: To continue to use the JASAE as an assessment tool, for 100% of
individuals referred into the InStep program.
Objective #2: To provide appropirate services to 90% of all assessed
juveniles.
Objective #3: To achieve a negative (clean.) drug test percentage of 70%
overall. Case managers are responsible for testing clients as often as
deemed necessary.
Objective #4: To achieve a level of at least 75% successful terminations.
The assessment of the juvenil ,-- and the res u lting supe=ision plan are key
compenents to impacting juvenile behavior.
Objective 45: To T:ealize a. r.earrest ratealac .,:-.1g successful terminations
more than 10%.
Objective 46: To have no more than a 10% recurrence of drug use among
successful terminations.
DCP-0001(F) (.1 -02) (1)1:,5oter..95 E.nr+ Page45 of
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
PROGRAM CODE BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
Office of Drug Control Policy FROM TO
10/01/2002 09/30/2003 08/30/2002
CONTRACTOR AMENDMENT NUMBER ORIGINAL AGREEMENT County of Oakland
0 AMENDMENT
ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PAYEE IDENTIFICATION
1200 N. Telegraph Rd. Pontiac MI 48341 38-6004876
EXPENDITURE CATEGORY TOTAL BUDGET
1 Salaries and Wages 760,109
Fringe Benefits 304,044
3 Travel I 7,234
4 Supplies and Materials 58,719
I 5 IContractual (Subcontracts) 0
6 IEquipment 0
1 7 !Other Expenses 25,449
1 01 n
_
01
, ; , I _ 01 , ____„_ ____
,,,, SO1 $1 155,5551 f_91F:IT E_._:fi‘•4DITURES I $01 ,Ki I _;......:—.--.---:.---_— i , I 9 !indirect Costs: Rate 4 1 % 1 I u
I Indirec.-,t Costs: Rate # 2 0
10 Other Cost Distributions I
0
I
i 11 'TOTAL EXPENDITURES $01 $01 $ $1,155,555
SOURCE OF FUNDS
'12 Fees and Collections 01 _
13 State Agreement I
589,4631
14 Local 566,0921
15 Federal 0
16 Other 0
0
0
17 TOTAL FUNDING $01 $0 $0 $1,155,555
COMPLETION IS A CONDITION! OF FUNDING DCH-0385FY2002 6/01 Replaces FIN-110 (Excel)
DC,H-0386FY2002 (EXCEL) COMP! E. I ION IS A CONDITION OF FUNDING AUTHORITY: RA. 36 6/2001
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET - COST DETAIL
PROGRAM CODE BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
Office of Drug Control Policy ht-WM TO
10/01/2002 09/30/2003 08/30/2002
CONTRACTOR J ORIGINAL BUDGET 0 AMENDMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER
County of Oakland
POSITIONS TOTAL
1. SALARY & WAGES - POSITION DESCRIPTION REQUIRED SALARY COMMENTS
See Attachments B
I
1
I
-
I
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES! 0.0 $780,109 I
2. FRINGE BENEFITS: (Specify) COMPOSITE RATE '% •
-, FIC4 . ,/ LIFE INS. H.DENTAL INS. See Attachments B
-/ UNEMPLOYMENT INS. s/ VISION INS. 112 WORK COMP. -
Li RETIREMENT 0 HEARING INS.
J HOSPITAL INS. 2 OTHER .TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $304,044
3. TRAVEL (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
See Attachments B
I TOTAL TRAVEL $7,234
1. t-IIDL-1.,:c7,-.• ,^ .n41 ,-7-;::,:lif 1 s /ci, „,,-,c„ :. any ;•-- ,,,,,,,o A- '!),, ,f T f-] Expenditures ) 14. Ovi ,' it_.) LA . t'N I ;__.I \I. \L_ ‘,,pc--iiy if c41 if it,-.:11i ...:,..,..,.-t.:, i ,, /,, , . 0,3
!See Attachmentrz, 13
I
ITOTAL SUPPLIES & N TERISI ri53,719
—
5. CONTRACTUAL (Subcontracts) I -
IName Address Amount
See Attachrnents B
_ TOTAL CONTRACTUAL $0
6. EQUIPMENT (Specify) 1
See Attachments B
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0 ,
7 OTHER EXPENSES (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
Communication
Space Cost
Other (explain)
See Attachments B
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES $25,449
8. TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES (Sum of Totals 1-7) $1,155,555
9. INDIRECT COST CALCULATIONS
Rate #1 Base $ x Rate % 0
Rate #2 Base $ x Rate °A 0
TOTAL INDIRECTI $0 ,
1 10. OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS (LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ONLY)
TOTAL OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS $0
,11. TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum of lines 8-10) I $1,155,555
f•
.uacnrnent
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
1pRrv-_,D A AA CODE BUDGET PERIOD !DATE PREPARED
!
I Office Control ce of Druu trol Policv I r-- `-' • FROM TO
I 1 0/01 /2002 09/30/2003 1 08/0212002 ......._, ,
iCONTRACTO: WI ORIGINAL AGREEMENT IAMENDMENT NUMBER
ICOLIntY of Oakland . , , , ._. E AMENDMENT I • — I
'ADDRESS ICITY 'STATE - r- I ZIP CODE I PAYEE IDENTIFICATION
11200 N. MU Teleora .Th ''' ,, 1.) I .
!Pontiac I MI 1 48341 138-6004876 I 1
I EXPENDITURE CATEGORY TOTAL BUDGET
1 I 1 !Salaries and Wages I 495 ,382
1
2 Fringe Benefits 198,153 — - i 3 !Travel 5,044
1 615! 4 IS.uoplies and Materials 40, 1
5 'Contractual (Subcontracts) 0
6 Equipment I 0
_ Other Expenses 5,4 96 I '
0
0 — n 1 I I _ t _. --,
n i i ___ _ _.............,i_
8 11OTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES! $01 _ So So $744,690 _____,........, ... .......... ,..- ....- 1 1 . 9 ilndirect Costs: Rate # 1 0 . % 1 I
'Indirect Costs: Rate #2 % 0
10 Other Cost Distributions 1 0
1 I
11 'TOTAL EXPENDITURES $01 $0 $01 $744,6901
SOURCE OF FUNDS
1
-121Fees and Collections 0
13 }State Agreement I_ I 372,345
1 ca I NET- $169,230 Prosecutor - 5203 115 372,345 Il4L
I 15 Federal 0
16 Other I 0
0
I 1 0
' 7 1TOTAL FUNDING SO $01 SO1 $744,690
-7(
DCH-0385FY2002 6/01 Replaces FIN-110 (Excel) COMPLETION IS A CONDITION OF FUNDING AUTHORITY OF PA 368 OF •
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET — COST DETAIL Page 1 Of 1
PROGRAM CODE BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
FROM TO
Oakland County Narcotic Enforcement 10/01/02 09/30/03 08/02/02
Team
LOCAL AGENCY ORIGINAL BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER H
Oakland County Sheriffs / Prosecutor's X
POSITIONS TOTAL
1. SALARY & WAGES — POSITION DESCRIPTION REQUIRED SALARY COMMENTS
Sergeant 2 131,991
Deputy II 1 59.964
Clerk II 1 1 24,692
L_ =
ARA IV 1 88,562
APA III 1 71,670
APA II 1 an (O A . - 1 ..:: , CI t -: •1.
APA II 1 58,519 — Total Salaries and Wages 8 .495,382
2. FRINGE BENEFITS: (Specify)
Z FICA LIFE INS. N DENTAL INS ri COMPOSITE RATE
0 UNEMPLOY INS. Z VISION INS. Z WORK COMP AMOUNT40°/0
Z RETIREMENT D HEARING INS.
6 HOSPITAL INS. • PI OTHER Total Fringe Benefits $198,153
3. TRAVEL (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
TOTAL TRAVEL I $5 ,044
4. :il JPPLiE -3. MATERIALSKSpecify if any itern exceeds 10% of Total Expcndituresl
NET i ,--,as ,--,c1 vE.Thides - 35,154
Prosecutor. supplies - 5,461
TOTAL SUPPLIES & MATERIALS $40,615
61- CONTRACTUAL (Subcontracts)
Name Address Amount
$
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL
6. EQUPMENT(Specify)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $
7. OTHER EXPENSES(Specify if any itern exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
Communication
Space Cost
Other
TOTAL OTHER $5,496
8. TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES (Sum of Totals 1-7) $744,690
9. INDIRECT COST CALCULATIONS
Rate #1: Base $ X Rate % Total $
Rate #2: Base $ X Rate % Total
$
10. OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS (LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ONLY)
TOTAL OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS $
11. TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum of lines 8-10) $744,690 1
6/2001 COMPLETIONI IS A CONDITION OF F 1-\U I 1.--1(J 1,-<1 I Y: Jbe c. DCH-0386FY2002(E) (W)
L
)t t•-•
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
OGRAM !CODE BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
Office of Drug Control Policy 1 10101/2002 09130/2003 07/15/2002
1 )NTRACTOR AMENDMENT NUMBER 51 ORIGINAL AGREEMENT
.ounty of Oakland
S AMENDMENT
DDRESS ICITY 1STATE ZIP CODE PAYEE IDENTIFICATION
200 N. Telegraph Pontiac MI 48341 38-600-4876
1 i EXPENDITURE CATEGORY I TOTAL BUDGET
-
'I Salaries and Wages 179,690
2 iFringe Benefits 71,876
3 'Travel 690 ‘
4 Supplies and Materials 11 ,604
5 'Contractual (Subcontracts) 0
6 !Equipment 0
7 'Other Expenses
I
}
0
i 01 ,
n 0 1
8 ITOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURESI $ 1 $01 $0 $263 860
9 Indirect Costs: Rate # 1 0
'Indirect Costs: Rate #2 % I 0
10 Other Cost Distributions
ITOTAL EXPENDITURES so l $0 1 $0 $263,860
SOURCE OF FUNDS
12 Fees and Collections 0
13 State Agreement I 158,316
14 Local 105,544
15 Federal 0
16 Other 0
0
0
17 TOTAL FUNDING $0 s0 $0 $263,860
DOH-0385FY2002 6/01 Replaces RN-110 (Excel) COMPLETION IS A CONDITION OF FUNDING AUTHORITY OF P.A. 368 OF 1978
IVIILII 11,-Jf-ll 1 NI sI IVIL-1
PROGRAM BUDGET - COST DETAIL
/
.._- i 'PROGRAM CODE BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
I - Office of Drug Control Policy 10/0112002 09/30/2003 07/15/2002
I 1 CONTRACTOR 4 ORIGINAL BUDUE I 0 AMENDMENT A.MENDMFNT NI IMRFR
1County of Oakland
1 POSITIONS - TOTAL 1
11. SALARY & WAGES - POSITION DESCRIPTION REQUIRED SALARY 1 COMMENTS
1Assistant Prosecutor 1.0 811491
'Sergeant 1.0 .57,887 i I 1Social Worker 1 1.0 40,654 [
1 _
_ .
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES 3.0 $179,690 '
2. FRINGE BENEFITS: (Specify) COMPOSITE RATE %
...) Firm, ri ilu LLF-I- IN,-.., 15_i DEt,ii,AL Ii,..). I 40c,'10
2 UNEMPLOYMENT INS. ill VISION INS. WORK COMP.
MI RETIREMENT El HEARING INS.
1 is HOSPITAL INS. Iii OTHER TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $71,876
13. TRAVEL (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
TOTAL TRAVEL $690
14. SUPPLIES & MATERIALS (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures) 1
I
_ .101A1.. SUPPLIES S MATERIALS $11,604
15. CONTRACTUAL (Subcontracts)
i Name Address Amount
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL $0
6. EQUIPMENT (Specify)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0
7. OTHER EXPENSES (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
Communication
Space Cost
Other (explain)
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES
8. TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES (Sum of Totals 1-7) $463,860
9. INDIRECT COST CALCULATIONS
Rate #1 Base $ x Rate % 0
Rate #2 Base $ x Rate % 0
TOTAL INDIRECT $0
10. OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS (LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ONLY)
TOTAL OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS $0
111. TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum of lines 8-10) $263,860
DCH-0386FY2002 6/2001 (EXCEL) COMPLETION IS A CONDITION OF FUNDING AUTHORITY: P.A. 368 OF 197
•
•
• • •
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
PROGRAM CODE f BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
Office of Drug Control Policy FROM TO
• 10/01/02 09/30/4 07/30/02
CONTRACTOR ORIGINAL AGREEMENT 'AMENDMENT NUMBER Oakland County Community Corrections Division
0 AMENDMENT
ADDRESS 1CITY STATE 'ZIP CODE PAYEE IDENTIFICATION
2300 Dixie Highway, Suite 200 iVVaterford MI 48328 38-6004876
1
EXPENDITURE CATEGORY 1 TOTAL BUDGET
1 Salaries and Wages . 85,037
2 Fringe Benefits 34,015
I 3 Travel ; 1,500 _ ._
1 i 4 Supplies and Materials 6,500
5 Contractual (Subcontracts) I 0
6 Eauipment 0
7 Other Expenses I 19,953
01
___ 0
t 0
I —
___
01
_ -I 6 I -LAI_ DIRE(..;1- EXPII:NnITURES $01 :Su; $01 $147,0051
i 1 9 'indirect Costs: Rate # 1 % 0 _
!Indirect Costs: Rate # 2 % 0
10 Other Cost Distributions
11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $147,005
SOURCE OF FUNDS
121Fees and Collections 0
13 State Aareement 58,802
14 Local 88,203
15 Federal 0
16 Other 0
0
0
17 ITOTAL FUNDING $0 $0 $147,005
AUTHORITY OF P.A. 368 OF 19/ NIPLETION IS A CONDITION or FUNDIN OCH-0385FY2002 6/01 Replaces FIN-110 (Excel)
det
6/2001 (EXCEL) — MPLETION IS A CONDITION OF FUNDING DCH-0386FY2002
.MICHIAN DEPARTMEN1' 0.1-= COMMUNITY HEALTH
PROGRAM BUDGET - COST DETAIL
— wPROGRAM CODE BUDGET PERIOD DATE PREPARED
Office of Drug Control Policy FROM TO
10/01/02 09/30/03 07/30/02
CONTRACTOR AMENDMENT NUMBER ei ORIGINAL BUDGET 0 AMENDMENT
Oakland County Community Correction Div.
. POSITIONS I TOTAL
1. SALARY & WAGES - POSITION DESCRIPTION REQUIRED I SALARY COMMENTS
Case Manager 1.0 41,510
Case Manager 1.0 43,527
I
I I 1
I
,
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES 2.0 I $85,037
2. FRINGE BENEFITS: (Specify) COMPOSITE RATE % 1
.2 FICA 2 LIFE INS. r-.711,cniTAL INS. ',U, /0
Ano/
IEJ UNEMPLOYMENT INS. • VISION INS. 2 WORK COMP.
at RETIREMENT • HEARING INS.
E HOSPITAL INS. • OTHER TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $34,015
3. TRAVEL (Specify if any itern exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures) 1,500
1 TOTAL TRAVEL. $1,500 -
4. SUPPLIES & MATERIALS (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures) 6,500
JASAE Assessment To 5 rr:D,889
1 TOTAL SUPPLIES 8, MATERIALS $6,500 _ _ _ 1 .=, CONTRACTUAL (Ca;contrGcts,) 0
Addre:i.:3 A.ruc:11)
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL\ $0
6 EQUIPMENT (Specify) 0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0
7 OTHER EXPENSES (Specify if any item exceeds 10% of Total Expenditures)
Communication 2 Phones -3500 3,500
Space Cost 1,500
Other (explain) Incentives -2500 10,953
Videos -Resources-1500 Drug Testing Supplies -10,953 2,500
1,500
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES $19,953
3. TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES (Sum of Totals 1-7) $147,005 ,
9. INDIRECT COST CALCULATIONS I
Rate #1 Base $ x Rate % 0
Rate #2 Base $ x Rate % 0
TOTAL INDIRECT $0
10. OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS (LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ONLY)
TOTAL OTHER COST DISTRIBUTIONS $0
11. TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum of fines 8-10) $147,005
• I
FISCAL NOTE (MISC. 102246) October 10, 2002
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, SHERIFF, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS -
ACCEPTANCE OF THE FY 2003 BYRNE MEMORIAL GRANT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed the above referenced Resolution and finds:
1. The Prosecuting Attorney, Sheriff and Community
Corrections are requesting the acceptance of the FY 2003
Byrne Memorial Grant.
2. The grant funding is for the period of October 1, 2002
through September 30, 2003.
3. The grant award of $1,155,555 combines three programs:
Prosecuting Attorney Child Abuse Task Force (Special
Unit), Sheriff Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET) and
Community Corrections In-Step Program.
4. The State contribution is $589,463 (51%) and the County
grant match is $566,092 (49%), which is included in the
FY 2003 Finance Committee Recommended Budget.
5. Acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to
future commitments and continuation as stated is
contingent upon future grant funding.
6. The recipient departments grant budgets will be amended
as shown below.
PROSECUTOR CHILD ABUSE TASK FORCE GRANT
Revenue
Prosecuting Attorney
41 161012 41800 171 Grants - State
41 161012 41800 167 Grant Match
$ 107,371
71,580
Sheriff
43 161022 44600
43 161022 44600
Expenditures
171 Grants - State
167 Grant Match
50,945
33,964
$ 263,860
$ 121,803
48,722
690
416
7,320
Prosecuting Attorney
41 261012 41800 2001 Salaries
41 261012 41800 2075 Fringe Benefits
41 261012 41800 3292 Pers. Mileage
41 261012 41800 2540 Communications
41 261012 41800 6636 I.T. Operations
Sheriff
43 480600
43 480600
43 480600
43 480600
44600 2001 Salaries
44600 2075 Fringe Benefits
44600 2540 Communications
44600 6636I.T. Operations
57,887
23,154
208
3,660
$ 263,860
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Moss, Obrecht and Friedman Appel absent.
SHERIFF NARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT TEAM GRANT
Revenue
Prosecuting Attorney
41 194408 41900 171 Grants - State
41 194408 41900 167 Grant Match
Sheriff
43 580600 44600
43 580600 44600
Expenditures
Prosecuting Attorney
41 294418 41900 2001 Salaries
41 294418 41900 2075 Fringe Benefits
41 294418 41900 3292 Pers. Mileage
41 294418 41900 3756 Travel & Conference
41 294418 41900 4172 Materials & Supplies
41 294418 41900 6675 Telephone Comm.
41 294418 41900 6636I.T. Operations
Sheriff
43 480600 44600 2001 Salaries
43 480600 44600 2075 Fringe Benefits
43 480600 44600 6661 Leased Vehicle
171 Grants - State
167 Grant Match
$ 203,115
203,115
169,230
169,230
$ 744,690
$ 278,735
111,495
2,044
3,000
330
5,496
5,131
216,647
86,658
35,154
$ 744,690
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS IN-STEP GRANT
Revenue
17 306001 70500
17 306001 70500
Expenditures
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
17 306002 70500
171 Grants - State
167 Grant Match
2001 Salaries
2075 Fringe Benefits
2540 Communications
3476 Rent
3596 Software Rental/Lease
3756 Travel and Conference
4080 Educational Supplies
4140 Incentives
4172 Materials & Supplies
4336 Testing Materials
$ 58,802
88,203
$ 147,005
85,037
34,015
3,500
1,500
4,445
1,500
1,500
2,500
2,055
10,953
$ 147,005
FINANCE COMMITTEE
9
;t:ti 'orir -!F:F7E.BY
G. William Caddell, County Clerk
4 V. ,)
Resolution #02246 October 10, 2002
Moved by Palmer supported by Gregory the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, as amended, be
adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Brian, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Coleman, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Gregory,
Law, McPherson, Melton, Middleton, Moss, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Sever, Suarez,
Taub, Webster, Amos. (21)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, as amended,
were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
CAEGOING .PFSOLOTION
Date 00(8 Pott6rson. County ExectItIve
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on October 10,
2002, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of thjoCounty of Oakland at Pontiac,
Michigan this 10th day of October, 2002.