HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2004.12.09 - 27458rr-
December 9, 2004
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION # 04360
BY: Planning and Building Committee, Charles E. Palmer,
Chairperson
IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - ROUGE-OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION
ACTIVITIES PROJECT GRANT - INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency's Phase II Storm Water Regulations ("Phase II") of the
Federal Clean Water Act went into effect March 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Phase II regulations mandate that
municipalities located within or near an "urbanized" area must be
permitted under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
Permit ("NPDES") program; and,
WHEREAS, in compliance with the Phase II, the Oakland
County Drain Commissioner applied and received coverage under
Michigan Watershed-based Storm Water General Permit ("Storm Water
general permit") for Oakland County;
WHEREAS the County of Wayne through the Rouge River
National Wet Weather Demonstration Project has offered technical
assistance and Federal grants to government entities for
addressing and improving the water quality and recreational use
of the Rouge River; and
WHEREAS the purpose of the grant is to enable the County
and local units of government within the Rouge River to evaluate
alternative approaches for controlling sources of water
pollution; and
WHEREAS illicit discharge elimination, public education and
sub-watershed management planning are considered examples of the
types of activities included in the Storm Water General Permit
which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge
River and other river systems within Oakland County; and
WHEREAS Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied for
and was awarded $155,000.00 of Federal grant reimbursement from
the County of Wayne; and
WHEREAS the total project cost is $310,000.00 of which
$155,000.00 is required from Oakland County as matching funds;
and
WHEREAS the required County march will be met with existing
OCDC personnel time already assigned this task, as well as
documented donations and free services; and
WHEREAS no additional County personnel or monies are
required, and all grant funds will go towards the Rouge-Oakland
Public Education Activities Project; and
WHEREAS the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) has established grant conditions and regulations that
require the County to act as the responsible party with respect
to the grant, including those provisions described within 40
C.F.R. Part 31: and
Planning & Building Committee Vote:
Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Coleman absent
WHEREAS the USEPA will supervise the grant and grant
conditions in order that the grant be used in accordance with the
requirements of the law; and
WHEREAS acceptance of the reimbursement grant does not
obligate the County to any future commitment; and
WHEREAS the grant agreement has been approved through the
County's Executive's Contract Review Process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board
of Commissioner's approves the application and accepts
reimbursement in the amount of $155,000 for the Rouge-Oakland
Public Education Activities Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperscn of the Board of
Commissioners is authorized to sign the grant agreement and to
approve grant modification and extensions, within fifteen (15)
percent of the original award, consistent with the grant
agreement approved.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building
Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PLARIUN AND BUILD-141G COMMITTEE
Nancy Wenzel
From: Greg Givens [givensg@co.oakland.mi.usj
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10.52 AM
To: Doyle, Larry; Tauriainen, Karen; Colaianne, Joseph
Cc: Lease, Leo; Phelps, Shawn; Smith, Laverne, Frederick, Candace; Wenzel, Nancy; Hanger,
Helen
Subject: CONTRACT REVIEW— Drain Commissioners Office
CONTRACT REVIEW - Drain Commissioner's Office
GRANT NAME: Rouge Oakland County Public Education Activities 42 Project
(RV-26)
FUNDING AGENCY: Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project
/ Wayne County Department of the Environment
DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Karen Taurlanen / 85264
STATUS: Acceptance
DATE: November 17, 2004
Pursuant to Misc. Resolution 401320, please be advised the captioned
grant materials have completed internal contract review. Below are the
comments returned by review departments. Please note the comment from
Corporation Counsel.
The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should
include the Board of Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution, the
grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this email
containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the
appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee Is) for grant acceptance by
Board resolution.
Department of Management and Budget:
Approved.- Laurie Van Pelt (11/9/20:)4;
Department of Human Resources:
Approved. - Ed Poisson (11/5/2004
Risk Management and Safety:
Approved. - Gerald Mathews (11/8/2634)
Corporation Counsel:
There are no outstanding legal issues concerning this grant agreement.
I was advised by Joseph Cciaianne that the grant should be in the name
of Oakland County. The Drain Commissioner's office has asked Wayne
County to correct the grant. A signature line for the Board Chair
should be added to the grant. - SoeLlen Shortley (11/16/2004)
1
I.
ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
ROUGE RIVER GENERAL PERMIT PROJECTS
GRANT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WAYNE AND THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of „ between the
County of Wayne, Michigan, a body corporate and Charter County ("County") and The County of
Oakland, a Michigan Public Corporation ("Entity").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County is the recipient of, and is responsible for the administration of
certain federal grant funds referred to as the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration
Project Grant ("Grant").
WHEREAS. the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has established
Grant conditions and regulations that require the County to act as the responsible party with respect
to the Grant, including those provisions described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31.
WHEREAS, the USEPA will supervise the Grant and Grant conditions in order that the
Grant be used in accordance with the requirements of the law.
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to follow certain administrative procedures and
cooperate on the various tasks to be undertaken in order for the County to comply with the Grant's
requirements and objectives.
WHEREAS, the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project ("Rouge
Project") is a comprehensive watershed-wide program addressing wet weather pollution problems
ranging from controlling combined sewer overflows ("CSO") to storm water runoff in the Rouge
River.
WHEREAS, one of the purposes of the Grant is to enable the County and local units of
government within the Rouge River Watershed to evaluate alternative approaches for controlling
sources of water pollution.
WHEREAS, implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separate Storm Water
Drainage Systems (Permit No. MIG610000) ("Storm Water General Permit") issued by The
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ") for the local unit will further the Grant's
goal to improve water quality and recreational use of the Rouge River.
WHEREAS, illicit discharge elimination, public education and subwatershed management
planning and implementation are considered examples of the types of activities included the Storm
Water General Permit which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge River.
ARTICLE III
FINANCIAL PROVISIONS AND BUDGET
3.1 The detailed budget is contained in Attachment "A" and will be considered an approximation
based on the best information available at the time of this Agreement. The internal distribution of
the monies allocated among project elements may be modified by the Entity up to a total cumulative
transfer among direct cost categories not to exceed 10% of the total budget without written approval
by the County. Other modifications to the budget will be only upon written Agreement between the
County and the Entity.
3.2 The County will provide funds from the Rouge Project grant to partially fund the approved,
allowed, and eligible costs for activities outlined in Attachment "A". The total amount to be
reimbursed to the Entity shall not exceed $155,000. The Entity shall provide a minimum match
of $155,000 of approved costs, which may be satisfied by demonstrating either cash or in-kind
services from non-federal sources.
3.3 The County will hold the final 10 to 20 percent of the total federal fund allowable to the
Entity until the completion of the project by the Entity as identified in Attachment "A". Upon
completion of all the tasks by the Entity, the approval of the Entity task products by the County, and
the approval of the Entity submittal of the documentation of the final project cost by the County, the
remaining 10 percent of the federal funds will be reimbursed to the Entity,
ARTICLE IV
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND PAYMENT
4.1 This Agreement will be administered on a cost reimbursement basis. The Entity shall submit
to the County project status reports and invoices on standard forms provided by the County.
4.2 All reports and invoices shall be submitted at least quarterly, no more than forty (40) days
after each quarter end date. Reimbursements shall not be allowed without a status report submission.
4.3 Invoices must clearly identify:
A. Total program outlays to the date of the invoice.
B. The non-federal share of amount expended.
C. The federal share of amount expended.
D. The federal payments previously received.
E. The reimbursements requested for the billing period.
F. Project work element detail.
G. Project direct costs and outside services.
H. Time sheets for hourly employees and labor distribution sheets for salaried
employees.
I. Documentation of all contracto; costs.
3
ARTICLE VI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1 This Agreement is expected to be funded in part with funds from the USEPA. The Entity
will not enter into any agreements with either the United States or any of its departments, agencies,
or employees which are or will be a party to this Agreement or any lower tier subagreement for
monies related to this specific project. This Agreement is subject to regulations contained in 40
C.F.R. Part 31 in effect on the date of the assistance award for this project.
6.2 The Entity understands that the County has no funds other than the Grant funds to pay for
the project costs. All costs other than the Grant funds associated with the activities which are the
subject matter of this Agreement will be the responsibility of the Entity.
6.3 The Entity will cooperate with the County to ensure timely completion of the tasks
undertaken as part of the project. Cooperation includes, but is not limited to sharing information and
records, participation in applicable committees, and assisting in development and evaluation of water
quality improvement alternatives.
6.4 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31 and, as
applicable, all provisions contained in the Grant. In the event there are any conflicts between the
provisions of this Agreement and the terms of the Grant, the Grant terms will prevail. The Grant
document and the terms and conditions of the Grant are included here in Attachment "B". The June
16, 1998 correction letter of the grant fair share goals from EPA is also included here in Attachment
"B". The fair share goals for the Grant as identified in that letter are as follows:
Construction 20% Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) 10% Woman Business Enterprise
(WBE)
Services 20% MBE 10% WBE
Equipment 8% MBE 4% WBE
Supplies 8% MBE 4% WBE
6.5 The Entity is responsible for securing all necessary permits from regulatory agencies and is
responsible for obtaining any professional services necessary for the Project Activities. The Entity
will act at all times in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations, and will secure any
permits and negotiate the terms of agreements in accordance with those requirements.
6.6 If the Entity secures any interest in lands, including easements, these acquisitions will be in
accordance with applicable federal law and regulations including 49 C.F.R., Part 24 and state statutes
related to the taking of interests in land.
6.7 With respect to construction projects, the Entity is responsible for conducting post-project
evaluation and certifying that any construction meets the approved design criteria. These
certifications will be submitted to Wayne County and the USEPA and MDEQ, where appropriate,
5
S.
expense rate charges). Price analysis consists of the Entity comparing proposed prices received with
other proposals submitted for this job, independent estimate from the Entity experience or cost
estimate from existing master plan. Copies of price/cost analysis documentation should submitted
to the County. After completing the price/cost analysis, any type of the contracts indicated below
can be executed:
— Cost plus fixed fee contract.
— Fixed price (lump Sum) contract.
— Catalog price contracts, example: geotechnical investigations with the price of the test are
established in the market.
— For certain contracts where the above types are not applicable, the county will allow contracts
with proscribed billing rates (per diem contracts), which establishes pay rate for professional
categories example: Engineer I, Engineer II, Project Engineer, Field technical Help, etc.
These above types of contracts are applicable for the main contractor and the sub-contractor level
also. Cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting shall
not be used.
ARTICLE VII
WAIVER OF BREACH
7.1 No failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any term of this Agreement or
to exercise any term after a breach, constitutes a waiver of any breach of the term. No waiver of any
breach affects or alters this Agreement, but every term of this Agreement remains effective with
respect to any other existing or subsequent breach.
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
8.1 This Agreement will terminate after the final audit and final resolution of any issues related
thereto as described within 40 C.F.R. Part I, Subpart D.
8.2 This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the County for its
convenience. The Entity must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of
intent to terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the County prior to termination.
This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the Entity for its convenience.
The County must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of intent to
terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the Entity prior to termination.
8.3 If termination for convenience is effected by the County or the Entity, an equitable
adjustment in the Agreement price will be made. The equitable adjustment for any termination will
provide for payment to the Entity for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to termination.
Equitable adjustment also will include termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the Entity
7
11.2 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion
and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost
and expense, a professional liability insurance policy for claims for damages arising out of an error,
omission, or negligent act in the performance of professional services, with limits of $1 million
dollars per claim and $1 million dollars in the aggregate for each twelve (12) month period. The
Entity agrees that the policy may not be substantially modified or canceled without thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the County and shall promptly notify the County of any failure to renew such
policy as necessary prior to final completion of the Project.
11.3 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion
and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost
and expense, with insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Michigan, the
following insurance coverages:
11.3.1 Workers' Compensation which meets Michigan's statutory requirements, or other
similar employee benefit act of any other state applicable to an employee.
11.3.2 Employers' Liability Insurance, in conjunction with Workers' Compensation
Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death
of an employee when Workers' Compensation may not be an exclusive remedy. Such insurance shall
be subject to limits of liability of not less than $500,000 dollars for each incident.
11.3.3 General Liability Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injury or death
of any person, other than the Entity's employees, or damage to tangible property of others, including
loss of use resulting therefrom. Such insurance shall be subject to bodily injury limits of not less
than $500,000 per occurrence and $1 million annual aggregate and property damage limits of not less
than $500,000 per occurrence or combined bodily injury/property damage limits of not less than
$750,000 per occurrence and $1 million annual aggregate.
11.3.4 Contractual Liability Insurance for claims for damages that may arise from the
Entity's contract under Article X concerning indemnification for errors, omissions, or negligent acts
in the course of the professional service or other provision within this Agreement, to the extent that
such kinds of contractual liability are insurable in connection with, and subject to, limits of liability
not less than for the professional liability insurance and general liability insurance set forth in
subparagraphs 11.2 and 11.3.3, above.
11.3.5 Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including coverage for all owned,
hired, and non-owned vehicles with coverage of $1 million dollars per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage combined.
11.3.6 Automobile No-Fault Insurance required by law for claims arising from ownership,
maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle owned or non-owned, County, or for-hire vehicles, with,
coverage of $1million single limit of liability and any applicable first-party benefits based on
Michigan's no-fault law.
9
12.2 The Entity agrees that it will not discriminate against any person, employee, consultant or
applicant for employment with respect to his or her hire, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of
employment because of his or her religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight,
marital status, or a handicap that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform tasks particular
to a job or position.
12.3 The Entity further agrees that it will require each contractor performing services under
this Agreement to agree to the provisions of this Article.
12.4 The Entity is responsible for complying with all federal and state laws and regulations
regarding competitive bidding.
ARTICLE XIII
ASSIGNABILITY
13.1 This Agreement will be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto and
their respective heirs and assigns.
13.2 Neither of the parties hereto may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent
of the other.
ARTICLE XIV
VALIDITY
14.1 If any provision of this Agreement or the application to any person or circumstance is, to any
extent, judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement, or the
application of the provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or
unenforceable, is not affected and is enforceable, provided the invalid provision does not
substantially alter the contract or make execution impractical.
ARTICLE XV
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
15,1 This document, including any attachments, contains the entire agreement between the parties.
15.2 Neither party has made any representations except those expressly set forth herein.
15,3 No rights or remedies are, or will be acquired, by either party by implication or otherwise
unless set forth herein.
11
is the Chief Engineer for Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office. Either party may assign
alternate representatives upon written notification of the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as
of the date and year first written above.
COUNTY OF WAYNE, MICHIGAN
By:
ROBERT A. FICANO
Its: Wayne County Executive
COUNTY OF OAKLAND, MICHIGAN
By:
Its:
r:\watershecl\Razik\Rouge Subgrants\Funde.2 ProjectAtnundV1RV-2611AA-RV2634d November 10, 2004
13
Mat Sticii - Number
B\'12 Mailings to riparian landowners
BV16 Newsletter
B2 Citizen Newsletter; Quarterly
, B17 Identification of riparian landowners
BT7 Developing list of riparian landowners
BT16 Citizen Newsletter _
FH27 Environmental Education Programs
FH28 Direct mailings to homes/Rouge Rescue
FH32 Cable broadcasts/web site
FH33 _ Video tapes
, Fl Newsletter
F5 Direct mailing to residents and businesses about recycling; leaf pickup
F12 Cable TV running Headwaters and RPO videos.
, 0C18 Maintain list of Riparian landowners
S7 Riparian land owner mailing__
S27 Publicize correct HHW mgmt practices
S39 Cable TV pr_p_gramming_ ._ . _.. _ •..
T8 Septics education n-- WB15 Mailings/Pollution Prevention
WB17Brochure distribution
2. BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT:
U. is the intention of this proposed piojeet to incorporate 1;oth lece.! (subwatershed) and egi(t.,
(watershed-wide) public education and information measures to ensure the changed behavior
patterns of not only our neighbors and residents, but those that share our watershed boundaries of
the Great Lakes. Each activity listed in this project educates the public on an array of watershed
and environmental issues that are important in the urban society we live in. By using multiple
information vehicles, this project will reach a multitude of individuals in different backgrounds,
locales and grou-,)s.
Additional benefits., other than the educAtion of so twiny inelude the potential lei
improved water quality, increased stewardship of the Rouge River, increased water consetvation.,
and so many otht-.T ways that the single per:ie n can make a difference in their watershed.
3. TASK DESCRIPTION:
A. Cable Broadcasts of Educational Videk.,.:
The PE Committee has worked whil the City of Southfield mid Con -least cable company to
produce and air a 30-second video commercial addressing ultimate discharge and proper car
washing procedures as required in MDEQ Storm Water General Permit (MIG619000). This
11/10/04
D. Riparian newsletter
Continue the effort for the production and distribution of a bi-annual newsletter to send to all
riparian landowners. All articles will be written by community representatives and Rouge
watershed interest groups. The end document would be presented digitally to all Communities to
add their own community information, print and distribute. OCDC will rely on local community
input and assistance in the mailing and distribution process, including reviewing and revising
community mailing lists.
DELIVERABLES:
• Digital newsletter layout in PageMaker format (twice a year) (total of 3)
• Report on mailings sent (number and community)
• Mailing to riparian landowners in Fall 2004, Spring 2005 and Fall 2005
E. Municipal Education
In a majority of the Rouge-Oakland Communities' SWPPIs, a specific action for educational
materials for municipal official and staff is required. The committee will work with the involved
communities and Oakland County to develop and produce presentations and support materials
for local officials and their staff The focus of the materials will be 1) stormwater permit 2) non-
point source pollution 3) role of communities in permit implementation 4) best management
practices. With this developed, the group will make ten presentations to local governments
and/or municipal staff
DELIVERABLES:
• Presentation package and support materials
• Report on presentation made
R Grant Administration
OCDC will provide all necessary grant administration tasks, including accounting, Interagency
Agreement preparation and work plan, presentations to Board of Commissioners, as well as
providing facilitation of the project tasks above, and all necessary reporting.
DELIVERABLES:
IAA/workplan
Quarterly reports
Final report
All tasks will integrate the efforts that are occurring throughout Southeast Michigan, including
SEMCOG, the new Rouge Assembly, neighboring counties and communities and will provide
template materials from each of the tasks to these groups.
11/10/04
Materials and Labor Cost Breakdown:
ITEM Task Cost Description
Materials
Cable Airtime A $55,000 —Contract for ##, channels, time coverage
Cable Airtime – Match A $70,000* In-kind random plays
Radio Airtime B $47,000 Contract for ##, channels, time coverage
Radio Match B $65,000** Discount / in-kind plays
Print Ads C $10,000 Print Costs
Riparian Newsletter D $20,000 Print, graphics, production costs
Riparian Newsletter D $3,000 OCDC Staff effort regarding newsletter
preparation
Municipal Education E $23,000 Materials development, print, produce,
presentation costs
Municipal Education E $7,000 OCDC Staff effort regarding host,
presentation
Grant Administration F $10,000 OCDC staff time to manage the grant
T--
TOTAL COST $310,000.00
* Oakland County may have additional $40,000 of random play over the $70,000.
**Oakland County may have additional $12,000 of In-kind play over the $65,000.
6. LOCAL MATCH:
The match will be met by invoices documenting free airtime (radio/cable/theatre) and services,
as well as in-kind salaries from OCDC and Public Education committee members (if
appropriately documented).
11/10/04
•
EPA Funding Information X - 995747206 - C Page 2
FUNDS FORMER AWARD THIS ACTION I AMENDED TO
EPA Amount This Action $ 8,700,000 s 8,700
'PA In-Kind Amount IIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIM
unexpended Prior Year Balance $ 11111111
Other Federal Funds S IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIII
Recipient Contribution $
,:,.ate Contribution $ _
5 $ 7,118,182 S 7,118,1
,- ...:t1- Contribution S S
Allowable Project Cost 5 0 5 15,818,1821 $ 15,818,1
Assistance Program (CFDA) Statutory Authority Regulatory Authority
55.608 - Surveys - Studies - Investigations - Soebi Accropriations Act Of 1999 P.L.( 125-275) 40 CFR PART 31
Fiscal
Site Name I DCN I FY 1 Approp. Eludget I PRO Object SitetPro ect i Cost Obligation I
1 Code Organization I Class Organization , Deoblictation
PvVX008 00 E.--4C 050CAK9 27:301'S 4 .; 11 8700000
,
I Li
X - 99574306 - 0 Page 4
Administrative Conditions
The Technical Contact for this Grant is Quintin VVnite (312) 886-0182.
1. FAIR SHARE
In accordance with EPA's Program for Utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business
Enterprises in procurement under assistance programs, the recipient agrees to:
,-‘ccept the applicable FY 1998 "fair share" goals negotiated with EPA by the Wayne
CountyDepartment of Environment as follows:
MBE: FY98 Categorical Rate - Service: 20%, 03/31/98 Availability Analysis Supplies:8%
Equipment: 8% Construction 20%
WEE: FY98 Categorical Rate - Service: 10% 03/31198 Availability Analysis Supplies:8/0
-Equipment: 8% Construction 10%
The recipient agrees to submit FY 2000 proposed MEIENVBE goals based on availability of
qualified minority and women-owned businesses to do work in the relevant market for
construction, services, supplies and equipment. "Fair share" objectives must be submitted to
Robert Richardson, Region 5 Coordinator within 30 days of award and approved by EPA no
later than 30 days thereafter.
b) Ensure to the fullest extent possible that at ,east the applicaole "fair share" objective
(see a) above] of Federal funds for prime contracts or subcontracts for supplies, construction,
equipment or services are made available to organizations owned or controlled by socially and
economically disadvantaged individuals, women and historically black colleges and
universities.
Include in its bid documents applicable "fair share" objectives csee a) above] and
leduire all of its prime contractors to include in their bid documents for subcontracts the
negotiated fair share percentages.
d) Follow the six affirmative steps stated in CFR 31.35(e).
e) Fcr assistance awards for continuing environmental proarams and assistance awards
with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other non-profit organizations, submit an
EPA Form 5700-52A, "MBENVBE Utilization Under Federal Grants, Cooperative Agreements
and Interagency Agreements" to the EPA Award Official by October 30 of each year.
In the event race and/or gender neutral efforts prove to be inadequate to achieve a
fair share objective for MBENVBEs, the recipient agrees to notify EPA in advance of any race
and/or gender conscious action it plans to take to more closely achieve the fair share objective
2. RECYCLED PAPER
Pursuant oo EPA Order 1000.25, dated January 24, 1990, the recipient agrees to use recycled
paper for all reports which are prepared as a part of this agreement and delivered to the
Agency. This requirement does not apply to reports which are prepared on forms supplied by
EPA. This requirement applies even when the cost of recycled paper is higher than that of
virgin paper.
3. SMALL BUSINESS IN RURAL AREAS
By accepting this agreement, the recipient agrees to comoly with Section 129 of Public Law
100-590, the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988,
Therefore, if the recipient awards a contract under this assistance agreement, it will utilize the
following affirmative steps relative to Small Business in Rural Areas (SBRAs):
Expenditures
61-231868-71000-2024
61-231868-71000-2090
61-231868-71000-3348
Salary Adj.
Fringe Benefit Adj.
Professional Services
Total Expenditures
Pollution Control Grant (285)
Revenue
61-131868-71000-0167 Grant Match
FY 2005
$155,000
$13,378
$ 6,622
$135,000
$155,000
•4 4
FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #04360)
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, CHUCK MOSS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - ROUGE-OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION ACTIVITIES
PROJECT GRANT - INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. The Grant is to enable the County and local units of
government within the Rouae River Watershed to evaluate
alternative approaches for controlling sources of water
pollution, increase public education, improve water quality
and assist in restoring the water quality of river systems
within Oakland County.
2. The Rouge Oakland Public Education Activities Project cost is
$310,000.00 with County match of 50%., or $155,000.00.
3. This is a one-time grant and therefore indirect costs for this
particular grant were not calculated in the County's indirect
cost plan.
4. The County match will be met with existing Drain Commissioner
personnel and other in-kind services from documented donations
and volunteer services. No additional General Fund Monies
required.
5. The fiscal year 2005 budget should be amended as follows for
the Drain Commissioner personnel cost that will be charged to
the Grant.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Webster absent.
Art
Resolution #04360 December 9, 2004
Moved by Bullard supported by Coulter the resolutons on the Consent Agenda, as amended, be adopted
(with accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Coulter, Crawford, Douglas, Gregory, Hatchett, Jamian, Knollenberg, KowaII, Law, Long,
McMillin, Moffitt, Moss, Palmer, Patterson, Potter, Rogers, Scott, Suarez, Wilson, Zack, Bullard.
(22)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda, as amended, were
adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
1".
I IIREBY APPROVE THE FORESONO RESOLUTION
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on
December 9, 2004 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal, of the ,dCounty of Oakland at
Pontiac, Michigan this 9th day of December, 2004.
•-?/ le/
G. William Caddell, County Clerk