HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2004.06.17 - 27552MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 104149 June 17, 2004
BY: Finance Committee, Chuck Moss, Chairperson
IN RE: BOARD OF COMM/SSIONERS - AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 THROUGH
FISCAL YEAR 2008 INDEPENDENT ANNUAL AUDITS
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the County is required to hire an independent party to conduct
annual audits of the County's financial statements; and
WHEREAS the contract with the current independent auditor, Pricewaterhouse
Coopers, expires on June 30, 2004; and
WHEREAS in March 2004, the County issued REP #2030901 to conduct the
annual independent audit of the County's financial statements; and
WHEREAS the Audit Subcommittee has reviewed proposals submitted by various
firms and recommends contracting with Plante and Moran, LLP to conduct the annual
independent audit of the County's financial statements for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2004 through the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 with an
option to include Fiscal Year 2009 and Fiscal Year 2010; and
WHEREAS Plante & Moran's proposal includes audit fees of $192,000 for the
first year, with inflationary adjustments each succeeding year; and
WHEREAS the County Executive's FY 2005 and FY 2006 Budget recommendation
will include sufficient funding, under the Board of Commissioners, to cover the
cost of this agreement.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners awards a
contract to Plante & Moran, LLP to conduct the annual independent audit of the
County's financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004
through the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, with an option to include
Fiscal Year 2009 and Fiscal Year 2010.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the May 24, 2004, memo from the Administrative
Audit Evaluation Committee to the Audit Committee regarding its recommendation
for Professional Audit Services be attached to this resolution.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move adoption of the
foregoing resolution.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried on a roll call vote with Jamian voting no and Webster absent.
COUNTY MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET FISCAL SERVICES DIVISION
'Timothy J. Soave, Manager
COAKLANDT- L. BROOKS PATTERSON, OAKLAND COUNTY EXECUTIVE
Commissioner Bill Bullard, Chair, Audit Committee
Commissioner Pete Webster, Member, Audit Committee
Commissioner Vince Gregory, Member, Audit Committee
From: Administrative Audit Evaluation Committee
Harvey Wedell, Senior Analyst, Board of Commissioners
Tim Soave, Manager, Fiscal Services
Penny Cremer, Chief, Fiscal Services
Bruce Karmami, Chief, Auditing
Scott Guzzy, Chief, Purchasing
Subject: Recommendation on RFP # 2030901 Professional Audit Services
Date: May 24, 2004
In March, the County issued RFP # 2030901, seeking an independent accounting firm to
conduct the annual external audit of the County's financial statements. In response to
that RFP, four (4) firms submitted proposals: Pricewaterhouse Coopers (the current
auditor), Plante & Moran, LLP, Relunami Robson, CPAs, and Vichow Krause and
Company, LLP. A summary of the first year (FY 2004) cost and committed hours,
appears below:
Pricewaterhouse Coopers 1,500 hours $224,055
Plante & Moran 1,800 hours $192,000
Vichow, Krause 2,000 hours $184,000
Rehmann Robson 1,836 hours $176,100
(Please note that comparisons of hours and dollars between firms is complicated by the
fact that firms proposes different combinations of partner hours, senior hours, and staff , , . . hours)
After reviewing and discussing the proposals, the Evaluation Committee decided to
interview Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Plante & Moran, and Rehmann Robson. The
interviews were conducted on May 19, 2004. Based upon the proposal review and the
interviews, the Evaluation Committee recommends that the Audit Committee approve a
five-year contract with Plante & Moran, LLP to conduct the annual external county
audit.
To:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING 34 EAST • 1200 N TELEGRAPH RD • PONTIAC MI 48341-0403 • (248) 858-0807 • FAX (248) 452-9467
The decision to change auditors is not taken lightly. The committee thoroughly discussed
the commitment of staff time required by a new auditor. Additionally, this process will
coincide with the planned implementation of the PeopleSoft financial system, which will
also increase work requirements. However, even with this concern, the Evaluation
Committee believes the Plante & Moran is the best choice to perform this required
function.
Below, is a brief summary of the reasons for this recommendation:
Plante & Moran
- Commitment from two experienced partners.
Quicker response to questions.
- Leaders in governmental accounting in the state.
Can call upon these individuals for a number of questions, a real coup to
have these two individuals.
- Staff experienced with Michigan governmental accounting.
- Leaders at the state level in GASB 34 implementation and other GASB
pronouncements.
- Because of this, they can provide more management suggestions and
comments.
- Have audited a number of major communities (Novi, Sterling Heights,
Farmington Hills), also the Road Commission for Oakland County, certain State
of Michigan audits, and several district courts.
- Have audited PeopleSoft clients.
Will utilize PeopleSoft individuals within company ranks.
- Both internal control and extensive transaction testing.
- We will be a big client for them, important for them to provide us service.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers
Ongoing concerns regarding responsiveness.
The County's experience is that reviews and comments by the firm were delayed
to the end of the process, causing additional, unnecessary work.
Senior Partner placed responsibility for last year's delay onto subordinate.
Price much higher than other vendors, with less proposed hours, even though they
are the most experienced with us.
Time for someone new, fresh set of eyes.
Rehmann Robson
No experience with government of our size.
Concern regarding Wall Street view of our audit.
Only 35 government group associates.
Audit approach totally inappropriate for a government of our size. Use a balance
sheet approach only, very little on internal controls.
- We need both approaches
- They do not understand the amount of testing they are committing to.
No PeopleSoft experience. Hesitant regarding how PeopleSoft implementation
would impact their pricing scheme, however they admitted that additional cost
may be required to cover the conversion.
Vichow Krause
Experience with big governments out of state, very little Michigan experience.
Subcontracting relationship, not clear of how this would work.
In conclusion, the Administrative Audit Evaluation Committee recommends the county
contract with Plante & Moran, LLP to conduct the required annual external county
audit for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2009 (covering fiscal years 2004-
2008).
G. William Caddell, County Clerk
Resolution #04149
Moved by Moss supported by Bullard the resolution be adopted.
Discussion followed.
June 17, 2004
Vote on resolution:
AYES: Coulter, Crawford, Douglas, Gregory, Hatchett, Knollenberg, KowaII, Law, Long, McMillin,
Middleton, Moss, Palmer, Patterson, Potter, Rogers, Scott, Suarez, Webster,Wilson, Zack, Bullard,
Coleman. (23)
NAYS: Jamian. (1)
A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolution was adopted.
I NOM MOVE ME FORKING IESOLUTION
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on June 17, 2004
with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affix, 3(d theXeal of the Co)trity of Oakland at
Pontiac, Michigan this 17th day of June, 2004.