Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2004.09.09 - 27739MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #04239 September 9, 2004 BY: Finance Committee, Chuck Moss, Chairperson IN RE: TREASURER'S OFFICE - POLICY FOR COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITIES (LDFA's) WITH TAX INCREMENT FINANCING To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners strongly supports the economic growth of Oakland County; and WHEREAS one of the tools used to promote this economic growth is Tax Increment Financing, used in conjunction with Downtown Development Authorities (DDAs) and Local Development Finance Authorities (LDFAs); and WHEREAS twenty-eight (28) of the County's cities, villages and townships use Tax Increment Financing as a tool to promote their economic growth; and WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners, through adoption of Miscellaneous Resolutions No. 90144, No. 97157, No. 99010, No. 01002, and No. 01193, established the current Oakland County Tax Increment Financing program; and WHEREAS pursuant to Miscellaneous Resolution 03081, this Board of Commissioners approved a revised policy for County participation in Downtown Development Authorities with Tax Increment Financing and noted that a similar policy should be established for County participation in Local Development Finance Authorities; and WHEREAS an LDFA is empowered to develop plans and acquire and construct public facilities for the purpose of encouraging local development so as to prevent conditions of unemployment and underemployment; and WHEREAS upon recommendation by the Tax Increment Financing District Review Policy Ad Hoc Review Committee (Ad Hoc Committee), the proposed policy should be applied in circumstances in which the County is considering participation in LDFAs with Tax Increment Financing. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County of Commissioners, upon recommendation of the Ad Hoc Review Committee, hereby adopts the attached policy for County participation in Local Development Authorities (LDFAs) with Tax Increment Financing. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. FINANCE COMMITTEE ( ,420 FINANCE COMMITTEE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. POLICY FOR COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITIES WITH TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Overview: Public Act 281 of 1986 was promulgated to encourage local development to prevent conditions of unemployment and promote economic growth. Known as the Local Development Financing Act, its purpose is to help municipalities create jobs, address issues of unemployment, underemployment and joblessness, and to create jobs and promote economic growth in municipalities throughout the state. LDFAs may be created in areas with "eligible properties" whose primary purpose or land use is or will be among the following: manufacturing, agricultural processing, high tech activity, and production of energy by small power production facility (primarily fueled by biomass or wood waste). A recent amendment to the Local Development Financing Act includes provisions for certified business parks as defined by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation. Performance Standards: The following performance standards are established as guidelines for evaluating new LDFAs with Tax Increment Financing requests and requests for expanded LDFAs with Tax Increment Financing: 1. The applicant must demonstrate the number and type of jobs to be retained and/or created. 2. The applicant must demonstrate, through financial projections, a positive return on investment of County incremental taxes proposed for capture. If applicable, include real and personal property, and any non-TIF sources to be leveraged. The Ad Hoc Review Committee may request the County Equalization Division to conduct a review of the applicant's projections. 3. The applicant must adopt/amend its Community Master Plan to accurately incorporate the LDFA plan. 4. The plan must include an expiration date for the proposed district, or if an amendment, it shall incorporate an expiration date for the amended district or total district. 5. The requesting community must acknowledge and disclose that it is aware of the impact on any voted millage. 3 6. The applicant shall establish a business retention effort to support businesses. 7. The applicant shall consider supporting use of the Michigan Economic Growth Authority program on projects in the district, if appropriate. 8. The applicant shall promote to investors in the district the Oakland County Economic Development Corporation and the Oakland County Business Finance Corporation. 9. The requesting community must provide annual reports to Oakland County Planning and Economic Development on the progress of the district. These performance standards are guidelines to assist the County in its review of a municipality's LDFA plan. They are not determinative of the County's decision whether or not to participate in the Tax Increment Financing of an LDFA. The County may determine to "opt out" as permitted by law, or may negotiate a contractual arrangement with the municipality to share a portion of the captured tax revenue of a district for specified project plans, for a specified period of years, or for whatever purpose the County deems appropriate. I HBEBY MEM FOREGOING RESOLUTION 7// 7/0y Resolution #04239 September 9, 2004 Moved by KowaII supported by Zack the resolutions on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Coulter, Crawford, Douglas, Gregory, Jamian, Knollenberg, KowaII, Law, Long, McMillin, Middleton, Moss, Palmer, Patterson, Potter, Rogers, Scott, Suarez, Webster, Wilson, Zack, Bullard. (22) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefore, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports be accepted). STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on September 9th, 2004 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 9th day of September, 2004. G. William Caddell, County Clerk