HomeMy WebLinkAboutElection Canvasses - 1979.02.13 - 2803FARMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
. „
• FEBRUARY. ••1•3•.L. 1979 :
• ..(r) El7Ef..TIONY •
AND CANVASSED BY THE BOARD OF CANVASSERS
OAKLAND
• • • • • • •
xVW.,00-(xx+).Pxxxxx.Smo<xl..x:xp000pi. • • • . •
.M.A.NLI.FACTUF.Psfil
.P.Pt...)-••••:4A.N.tiFA:C :.R.47.R.S.:. • .•
(,)rtior by orrit No. M- 397
. CANV.ASSER I40OK ,
whe.A.11r Priniaiy: Sopc...461 Erkon
••• F: February 13,
_PROPOSITION
OPERATING
M I LLAGE
RENEWAL
PRECINCTS F.:
1
STATEMENT OF VOTES
- 0PERATtN- • __ OROS IT VON
The whole humber of NeotPS
tax increase which
taxes whi ch _may_be
perty in the Farmi
in Section 6, Art i
idaqoiiitthe In order to renew the one and three'Fourths (l -3/i) mill operatng
• e*.0..1 .e0d.:::1•0.•.::..197.8-,:.:..:Sh0.1•1•: the limitat ion
impo..ed for all purposes in any one year upon real and tangible personal pro-
ngton Public School District, Oakland County, Michigan, be increased 3$ provided
cle IX, of the Constitution of Michigan br a period p_f_nin (9) years from
1979 to 1987 both inclusive, by one and three-fourths (1-3/4) mills on each dollar ($1.75 per
$1,000) of assessed valuation of property as finally equal ized, for the purpose of defraying a
part of the operation expense of the school district? rImIRrs
14 THIS CHIMP.
. . . .
nun-bet •
011 6
voles were:mai:6d NO
TOTAL VOTES
the whole numbr OF vb.
v:Otes Wcoo marked YES
and
voles viiere:morked NO
th:e w h:61 e Eou h1601' :0 of votes fdt and::or_jo.inst 11
wcf•
ot :Whith nOnipei.:•
v.rites were hicillod YES
votes were marked NO
ERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION
NI: (7 A
OAKLAND. : _
: : C.OVn t Oakland
yi;lii r I I :0. it; ; ii
6 :5:•;c's . FO .17.)91011 Public School Disi-ric-t_
,• . • , •:6:017,
. cm tile_ h . of _ _Eel? rua ry
. _. seven ty..:n me. .
Etete ioe 1.).0 fle..reby
. • • .• • . • • • • • • • • • ri
VP4tt5 -.
• . . . . . ••••••_. .
htl V ....• . ••.- • • . .
i-if • • • . :."I
4r i l4 41)1 ho
. .
• • . . . . . .
• • . -• • _ . .
. . . . .
iiec _
t . • . . . • • . • ri't i':••Ci .5 I.
. .
. . . . . . . • . . .
• " •
--
h v iuti r .• • • . .
. .
•
vc" t es
.• . • • •• • - „ . • :
. .
. .
• . . • •
Fo
- ,• ,
h Ic i t t i n
: E: I":1
OPERATING MILLAGE RENEWAL PROPOSITION
Pq
..possed •ci cs Ii I
teNt d " • • . • • • . . .1% • • Si ,ffI I 1FP. IS • .• NONE
N A .15“:' 04 P4e.1 :VS/ TION
Rec. • • ::•• • •
• • • --1017.t.,,."1 P.!.-1- • . • :
7.... ' '
NONE_
:SID A
• if'..kcE..71:76701:512a-a7
ii••• :riff i•xec.i.:.411.4:••:..56
(II County-• .• . • • • ••• Oakland...• •••...... •
.• • ••• •
• • • • • • • • •• • • • •• •• • •
• • . • • • " • •••• ..". • • • • • . . • . . . •.: • • • . • . .• . • ;•••s s • . . • . . • . • • •
ERK 0: L4(1 OF c\IJ:Arni