Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolutions - 2006.03.22 - 28208
March 23, 2006 REPORT (MISC. #06065) BY: Planning and Building Committee, Charles Palmer, Chairperson RE: Parks and Recreation — Support for Submission of Grant Application to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trust Fund to Provide Matching Funds for the Acquisition of the Springfield Township Property TO: Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Planning and Building Committee having reviewed the aforementioned Resolution on March 14, 2006 Reports with the recommendation the resolution be adopted. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning & Building Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. PLANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE Planning & Building Committee Vote: Motion carried on a unanimous roll call vote with Hatchett absent MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #06065 March 23, 200 BY: GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE, William R. Patterson, Chairperson IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION — SUPPORT FOR SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND TO PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE ACQUISTION OF THE SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP PROPERTY TO: OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has been notified that applications for the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund may be submitted for 2006 funding; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has resolved on February 1 st, 2006 to submit an application for the following grant, SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP PROPERTY ACQUISITION; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has the required grant match funds available to expand the development of the parks; and WHEREAS, the purpose of said grant is to provide open space, facilities and recreational opportunities for all residents of Oakland County; and WHEREAS, the grant meets the goals and objectives of the Oakland County Recreational Master Plan — February 6, 2002. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes the Parks and Recreation Commission to submit said grant application as stated above, with said monies for this project to come from Parks and Recreation funds and funds awarded as a result of this grant application. Chairperson, on behalf of the General Government Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Helen Hanger From: Greg Givens [givensg@co.oakland.mi.us] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 3:52 PM To: Doyle, Larry; Noyes, Jon; Falardeau, Nancy Cc: Frederick, Candace; Smith, Laverne; Mitchell, Sheryl; Pardee, Mary; Hanger, Helen; Wenzel, Nancy; Johnston, Brenthy; Worthington, Pam Subject: GRANT REVIEW - Parks and Recreation / Springfield GRANT REVIEW - Parks and Recreation GRANT NAME: 2006 Springfield Township Property Acquisition FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Trust Fund DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Jon Noyes / 8- 4624 STATUS: Application (Grantor requires a resolution with application) DATE: March 2, 2006 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the comments returned by review departments. Please note the comment by Risk Management and Safety. Corporation Counsel has also provided comment. The changes required by Corporation Counsel must be incorporated into the application prior to execution by the Board Chair. The captioned grant materials and grant application package (which should include the Board of Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution required by the grantor agency, the grant application, Report from Fiscal Services to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners, and this email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s). Department of Management and Budget: Approved.- Laurie Van Pelt (2/24/2006) Department of Human Resources: Approved. - Nancy Scarlet (2/28/2006) Risk Management and Safety: Approved by Risk Management. We will need to add the structures to our property policy. Please advise our office date of acquisition.- Andrea Plotkowski (3/2/2006) Corporation Counsel: Based upon the changes indicated below that Parks will incorporate into the signature copies of this grant, I approve same for signature. John Ross (3/1/2006) Application Form 5750 1. Part I #9: Indicated Capital Outlay figure does not represent 2006 anticipated expenditure. P&R Response: Changed to "See Attached". The amount for current and future capital outlay is included in the supplementary information. 2. Part I #22 Economic Benefits: Additional tourism is checked but no figures are provided. P&R Response: No Change. Reference to attached supplemental is sufficient based on past applications. 3. Part II Environmental Conditions: OCPR has indicated that no fill material of unknown origin is present on the site. P&R Response: Response: No Change. The current owner of the proposed acquisition site (the Samuel Farm) has confirmed the agricultural use of the property since 1845. There has been no indication of use of fill material on the site. 4. Part V Attached Documents: No documents are indicated. P&RResponse: Attached Documents have been indicated by appropriate checkmarks. 1 Oakland County GRANT REVIEW REVIEW MATERIALS - BRIEF OAKLAND COUNTY Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund — Application Review Springfield Township Property Acquisition Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation REPORT TO: THE CHAIRPERSON, OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BY: FISCAL SERVICES DIVISION IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION - SUPPORT FOR SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND To PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE ACQUISTION OF THE SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP PROPERTY The Fiscal Services Division has reviewed the above referenced grant application and finds: 1. The grant application is to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trust Fund for $360,000. 2. The grant request is a new grant for the acquisition of the Samuel Farm property in Springfield Township, that will expand the development of Springfield Oaks County Park and the continued viability of the County Fairgrounds. 3. The acquisition of the Samuel 'Farm property would create event parking that could double as recreational fields for the local community, a 20-acre natural area preserve with demonstration meadow restoration activities and 1.5 miles of accessible trails, a 9-acre farm demonstration area featuring a livestock pasture, rotational crops, farm pond, fruit trees and simulated 1800's homestead and heirloom garden, a possible future location for the historic Davis House, enhanced vegetation buffers and tree rows, and 2 miles of gravel park roads to accommodate event traffic and provide recreational pathways for equestrian riders, hikers bikers and cross-county runners. 4. The grant period is from April1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. 5. The total cost of the project is $900,000, with $360,000 (40%) being requested through the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trust Fund and a local match of $540,000 (602.) from the Oakland County Parks and Recreation fund. Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation fund. 6. Application and acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment. Continuation of the grant is contingent upon future levels of grant funding. Informational Copies: General Government Committee Planning and Building Committee Finance Committee Oakland County Grant Application Summary Report Requesting Department/Program/Agency Oakland County Parks and Recreation Title of Grant Springfield Township Property Acquisition , Grantor Agency Mich. Dept of Natl. Resources Title of Grant Funded Program MNRTF Grant Submission/Acceptance 12/10/05 4/1/06 Notification Date: Deadline Grant being submitted is: New t2 1 Renewal • I Modified • Is a County match required: Yes m No • Is match in your current budget: Yes El No • Will the requested County match Yes • No Ei require an additional appropriation: I This will be the 1st year of grant funding for this program. Is this program projected to extend beyond the current grant funding period? No. The maximum number of years for which this grant is available: One year from signed agreement Briefly, describe any program and/or personnel changes since the most recent grant acceptance: Not applicable GRANT SUMMARY PRIOR YEAR AMT GRANT REQUEST GENERAL INFORMATION Grant funding period 04106-04/07 (provide mm/yy— mm/yy) Total amount ($$) of grant $360,000 ,REVENUE / MATCH REQUIREMENTS Federal match N/A _ State match 40% ($360,000) Local or agency match 60% ($540,000) PERSONNEL Number of grant funded positions N/A (list classes, ex. 3 clerks) Grant funded personnel costs N/A Grant funded fringe benefits N/A EXPENDITURES Grant funded program costs N/A Count match requirements . , Please attach: Program Summary; Approvals from Fiscal Services, Corporation Counsel, Risk Management and Personnel (if required) Revised 02127/01 STATUS: (Check appropriate box) Initial Revision # X Final Extension Other * No Date: X Is Board Resolution required? Yes — Resolution # Approved Disapproved * Modify * Date: Signature: CONTRACT/PROGRAM REVIEW REQUEST Date: To: From: February 06, 2006 Greg Givens Joe Figa, Chief of Design and Development - Parks and Recreation Title/Subject: MNRTF Grant Application: Springfield Township Property Acquisition File # Department: Parks and Recreation Contact Person: Joe Fiqa, Chief of Design & Dev Telephone #: 248-858-4620 * If "other" is checked, please explain: PERSONNEL DEPT: Approved Disapproved * Modify * Date: Signature: RISK MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET: Approved j Disapproved * I I Modify * Date: Signature: CORPORATION COUNSEL: Approved Disapproved * Modify * Date: Signature: CONTRACT/PROGRAM SYNOPSIS: The option to acquire the 57 acre Samuel Farm presents the one of the last opportunities to increase the size of Springfield Oaks before it is encircled by residential development. The property includes fields currently under agricultural production and several acres of wooded natural areas. This acquisition would promote the existing facilities at Springfield Oaks by providing additional grass parking for the 90,000 visitors to the County Fair and recreational fields for the local area. * When "Disapproved" is noted or "Modify" is requested, attach explanation. Oakland County GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS: Laurie Van Pelt - Management and Budget Ed Poisson - Human Resources Julie Secontine - Risk Management and Safety Pat Davis - Corporation Council RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW - Oakland County Parks and Recreation (OCPR) GRANT: Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant - Springfield Township Property Acquisition GRANTOR: Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Please be advised the above referenced grant application was put into contract review today. A hard copy of these materials has been sent to you for review. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: March 6th, 2006 GRANT INFORMATION Date: February 6, 2006 Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Department Contact: Jon Noyes Contact Phone: 858-4624 Other ID Number: REVIEW STATUS: Application Funding Period: 04/06-04/07 New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: No IT Resources (New Computer Hardware / Software Needs or Purchases): No Funding Continuation/New: New Application Total Project Amount: $900,000 Prior Year Total Funding: New Grant Funded Positions Requested: 0 Changes to Current Positions: 0 Grantor Funds: $360,000 Total Budget: $900,000 Match: $540,000 Source: % mil Parks and Recreation Funding Page 1 of 5 Oakland County GRANT REVIEW FORM PROJECT SYNOPSIS OAKLAND COUNTY Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund — Application Review Springfield Township Property Acquisition Acquisition Target Description Samuel Family Farm The 57-acre Samuel Farm has been owned and operated by the Samuel Family since 1845. The Samuel property is separated from Springfield Oaks by Hall Road (a lightly traveled, two lane gravel road) and features a historic farmstead, a wooded natural area, wetlands and a several fields under agricultural production. Park staff and members of the Oakland County 4-H Fair Board are recommending the acquisition of the Samuel Farm as it offers the last opportunity to significantly expand Springfield Oaks before the park becomes bounded by residential development. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm will significantly add to the Springfield Oaks facilities and the continued viability of the County Fairgrounds. Site Description Location: 7141 Hall Road; opposite Springfield Oaks County Park Parcel Size: 56.93-ac Buildings: House, garage and three barns State Equalized Value (X2): $157,280 Estimated Value: $700,000 - $850,000 (Subject to final appraisal) Zoning: (R-1), One Family Residential Acquisition Context Staff has considered the following characteristics of the Samuel Farm and the surrounding area in proposing this acquisition: • Township officials have acknowledged the rapid conversion of local farmland to residential development and have confirmed that the Samuel Family is moving toward the sale of the farm. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm would be the last opportunity to significantly add to the Springfield Oaks County Park. Page 2 of 5 • Hall Road separates the Samuel Farm from Springfield Oaks Fair Grounds but the road is lightly traveled and should not significantly restrict the use of the site to augment existing facilities. Township officials have indicated that they would consider the temporary closure of Hall Road during park events as the access would be maintained to nearby residences from Scott and Andersonville Road. • Hall Road has also been identified as a rural connector road in the Oakland County Trail Network, Oak Routes. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm will maximize the federal, state and local investment in the Ellis Barn as a Multi-modal Trail Head and historical resource. • The southern portion of the Samuel Property contains 15-acres of forest and wetland (4 acres) that are at the western tip of a wildlife corridor that extends through Springfield Oaks down to and including Indian Springs Metro Park. • The existing hay fields could easily be modified to create grass covered event parking that would accommodate the growing attendance of the Oakland County Fair (90,000 visitors in 2005) and regional recreation events including International Cross-County Running Competitions, Bike Rallies and Equestrian Trail Rides/Shows. • The design of the grass parking could fit into the existing field layout in order to maintain the agricultural aesthetic of the site. • Grass parking could double as recreational fields for the local community and special events. • The existing farm house, stone barn and several out buildings could be investigated for use in park educational programs and 4-H activities. • The 1/3 acre pond adjacent to the farm house could be explored for use as a fishing pond for use by park guests. Site Concept OCPR staff has proposed the following uses for the Samuel Farm Property (refer to attached concept map): • Event parking that could double as recreational fields for the local community • An 20-acre natural area preserve with demonstration meadow restoration activities and 1.5 miles of accessible trails • A 9-acre farm demonstration area featuring a livestock pasture, rotational crops, farm pond, fruit trees and simulated 1800's homestead and heirloom garden (to be maintained by local 4H Clubs, volunteers and Oakland County Corrections' WWAM Program) • A possible future location for the historic Davis House (owned by Oakland County Parks and maintained on the Springfield Oaks Golf Course) • Enhanced vegetation buffers and tree rows • 2 miles of gravel park roads to accommodate event traffic and to provide recreational pathways for equestrian riders, hikers, bikers and cross-country runners Page 3 of 5 Local Community Demographics Community 1990 2000 Census % Growth Census Commerce Township 26,955 34,764 29% Groveland Township 4,705 6,150 31% Highland Township 17,941 19,169 7% Holly Township 8,852 10,037 13% Holly Village 5,595 6,135 10% Milford Township 12,121 15,271 26% Milford Village 5,511 6,272 14% Rose Township 4,926 6,210 26% Springfield Township 9,927 13,338 34% White Lake Township 22,608 28,219 25% Oakland County 1,083,592 1,194,156 10% (in total) 10 Communities directly served by the property 145,565 acquisition. Population total: Average Growth for Local Communities: 21% Projected Population of Local Communities for 2010: 176,818 Page 4 of 5 Proposal for MNRTF Grant Application OCPR staff is seeking Commission approval to submit an application for financial assistance from the 2006 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) for the purpose of acquiring the 57-acre Samuel Farm near Springfield Oaks. Estimated budget for this acquisition is as follows: Estimated Estimated Incidental Expenditures Costs Prorated Taxes: $4,000 Recording Fees: $100 Transfer Tax: $2,600 Title Insurance: $2,000 Appraisal Fees: $16,200 Plaque: $60 Closing Fees: $10,000 Environmental Assessment: $15,000 Total (Round to Nearest $50,000 Hundred): Acquisition Project Esctimatted Incidental Expenditure: $50,000 ' Estimated Value: $850,000 Total Acquisition Costs: $900,000 MNRTF Grant Funds (40%): $360,000 Local Match (60%): _ $540,000 Local matching funds will be allocated from the 'A mil parks and recreation levy. NO GENERAL FUND DOLLARS WILL BE REQUESTED FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPOSED HIGHLAND TOWNSHIP LAND ACQUISITION. Attachments: 1. MNRTF Grant Application 2. OCPR Grant Application Resolution 3. OCPR Public Hearing Minutes 4. Oakland County Board of Commissioners Draft Resolution Page 5 of 5 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION OAKLAND COUNTY Springfield Township Property Acquisition Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Oakland County GRANT REVIEW FULL APPLICATION OAKLAND COUNTY Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund — Application Review Springfield Township Property Acquisition Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation REPORT TO: THE CHAIRPERSON, OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BY: FISCAL SERVICES DIVISION IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION - SUPPORT FOR SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND TO PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE ACQU/STION OF THE SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP PROPERTY The Fiscal Services Division has reviewed the above referenced grant application and finds: 1. The grant application is to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trust Fund for $360,000. 2. The grant request is a new grant for the acquisition of the Samuel Farm property in Springfield Township, that will expand the development of Springfield Oaks County Park and the continued viability of the County Fairgrounds. 3. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm property would create event parking that could double as recreational fields for the local community, a 20-acre natural area preserve with demonstration meadow restoration activities and 1.5 miles of accessible trails, a 9-acre farm demonstration area featuring a livestock pasture, rotational crops, farm pond, fruit trees and simulated 1800's homestead and heirloom garden, a possible future location for the historic Davis House, enhanced vegetation buffers and tree rows, and 2 miles of gravel park roads to accommodate event traffic and provide recreational pathways for equestrian riders, hikers bikers and cross-county runners. 4. The grant period is from April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. 5. The total cost of the project is $900,000, with $360,000 (40W) being requested through the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trust Fund and a local match of $540,000 (60t) from the Oakland County Parks and Recreation fund. Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation fund. 6. Application and acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment. Continuation of the grant is contingent upon future levels of grant funding. Informational Copies: General Government Committee Planning and Building Committee Finance Committee Oakland County Grant Application Summary Report 1 Requesting Department/Program/Agency Oakland County Parks and Recreation Title of Grant Springfield Township Property Acquisition Grantor Agency Mich. Dept of Natl. Resources Title of Grant Funded Program MNRTF Grant Submission/Acceptance 12/10/05 4/1/06 Notification Date: Deadline Grant being submitted is: New EI I Renewal • I Modified • Is a County match required: Yes m No • Is match in your current budget: Yes Ki No • Will the requested County match Yes • No gi require an additional appropriation: This will be the 1st year of grant funding for this program. Is this program projected to extend beyond the current grant funding period? No. The maximum number of years for which this grant is available: One year from signed agreement. Briefly, describe any program and/or personnel changes since the most recent grant acceptance: Not applicable GRANT SUMMARY PRIOR YEAR AMT ( GRANT REQUEST GENERAL INFORMATION Grant funding period 04/06-04/07 (provide mm/yy— mm/yy) Total amount ($$) of 'rant $360.000 REVENUE / MATCH REQUIREMENTS Federal match N/A State match 40% L$360.0001 Local or agency match 60% ($540.0001 PERSONNEL Number of grant funded positions N/A (list classes, ex. 3 clerks) Grant funded personnel costs N/A Grant funded fringe benefits N/A EXPENDITURES Grant funded program costs N/A County match requirements N/A Please attach: Program Summary; Approvals from Fiscal Services, Corporation Counsel, Risk Management and Personnel (if required) Revised 02/27/01 X Initial Revision # Extension Final Other * Approved CONTRACT/PROGRAM REVIEW REQUEST Date: To: From: February 06, 2006 Greg Givens Joe Figa, Chief of Design and Development - Parks and Recreation Title/Subject MNRTF Grant Application: Springfield Township Property Acquisition File # Department: Parks and Recreation Contact Person: Joe Fiqa, Chief of Design & Dev Telephone #: 248-858-4620 STATUS: (Check appropriate box) * If "other" is checked, please explain: Is Board Resolution required? No Ey-1 Yes — Resolution # Date: PERSONNEL DEPT: Approved I I Disapproved * RISK MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY: Disapproved * MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET: Disapproved * CORPORATION COUNSEL: Disapproved * Modify * Date: Signature: Modify * Date: Signature: Modify * Date: Signature: Modify * Date: Signature: Approved Approved CONTRACT/PROGRAM SYNOPSIS: The option to acquire the 57 acre Samuel Farm presents the one of the last opportunities to increase the size of Springfield Oaks before it is encircled by residential development. The property includes fields currently under agricultural production and several acres of wooded natural areas. This acquisition would promote the existing facilities at Springfield Oaks by providing additional grass parking for the 90,000 visitors to the County Fair and recreational fields for the local area. * When "Disapproved" is noted or "Modify" is requested, attach explanation. Oakland County GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS: Laurie Van Pelt — Management and Budget Ed Poisson — Human Resources Julie Secontine — Risk Management and Safety Pat Davis — Corporation Council RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW — Oakland County Parks and Recreation (OCPR) GRANT: Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant — Springfield Township Property Acquisition GRANTOR: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Please be advised the above referenced grant application was put into contract review today. A hard copy of these materials has been sent to you for review. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: March 6th, 2006 GRANT INFORMATION Date: February 6, 2006 Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Department Contact: Jon Noyes Contact Phone: 858-4624 Other ID Number: REVIEW STATUS: Application Funding Period: 04/06-04/07 New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: No IT Resources (New Computer Hardware / Software Needs or Purchases): No Funding Continuation/New: New Application Total Project Amount: $900,000 Prior Year Total Funding: New Grant Funded Positions Requested: 0 Changes to Current Positions: 0 Grantor Funds: $360,000 Total Budget: $900,000 Match: $540,000 Source: 1/4 mil Parks and Recreation Funding Page 1 of 5 Oakland County GRANT REVIEW FORM PROJECT SYNOPSIS OAKLAND COUNTY Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund — Application Review Springfield Township Property Acquisition Acquisition Target Description Samuel Family Farm The 57-acre Samuel Farm has been owned and operated by the Samuel Family since 1845. The Samuel property is separated from Springfield Oaks by Hall Road (a lightly traveled, two lane gravel road) and features a historic farmstead, a wooded natural area, wetlands and a several fields under agricultural production. Park staff and members of the Oakland County 4-H Fair Board are recommending the acquisition of the Samuel Farm as it offers the last opportunity to significantly expand Springfield Oaks before the park becomes bounded by residential development. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm will significantly add to the Springfield Oaks facilities and the continued viability of the County Fairgrounds. Site Description Location: 7141 Hall Road; opposite Springfield Oaks County Park Parcel Size: 56.93-ac Buildings: House, garage and three barns State Equalized Value (X2): $157,280 Estimated Value: $700,000 - $850,000 (Subject to final appraisal) Zoning: (R-1), One Family Residential Acquisition Context Staff has considered the following characteristics of the Samuel Farm and the surrounding area in proposing this acquisition: • Township officials have acknowledged the rapid conversion of local farmland to residential development and have confirmed that the Samuel Family is moving toward the sale of the farm. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm would be the last opportunity to significantly add to the Springfield Oaks County Park. Page 2 of 5 • Hall Road separates the Samuel Farm from Springfield Oaks Fair Grounds but the road is lightly traveled and should not significantly restrict the use of the site to augment existing facilities. Township officials have indicated that they would consider the temporary closure of Hall Road during park events as the access would be maintained to nearby residences from Scott and Andersonville Road. • Hall Road has also been identified as a rural connector road in the Oakland County Trail Network, Oak Routes. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm will maximize the federal, state and local investment in the Ellis Barn as a Multi-modal Trail Head and historical resource. • The southern portion of the Samuel Property contains 15-acres of forest and wetland (4 acres) that are at the western tip of a wildlife corridor that extends through Springfield Oaks down to and including Indian Springs Metro Park. • The existing hay fields could easily be modified to create grass covered event parking that would accommodate the growing attendance of the Oakland County Fair (90,000 visitors in 2005) and regional recreation events including International Cross-Country Running Competitions, Bike Rallies and Equestrian Trail Rides/Shows. • The design of the grass parking could fit into the existing field layout in order to maintain the agricultural aesthetic of the site. • Grass parking could double as recreational fields for the local community and special events. • The existing farm house, stone barn and several out buildings could be investigated for use in park educational programs and 4-H activities. • The 1/3 acre pond adjacent to the farm house could be explored for use as a fishing pond for use by park guests. Site Concept OCPR staff has proposed the following uses for the Samuel Farm Property (refer to attached concept map): • Event parking that could double as recreational fields for the local community • An 20-acre natural area preserve with demonstration meadow restoration activities and 1.5 miles of accessible trails • A 9-acre farm demonstration area featuring a livestock pasture, rotational crops, farm pond, fruit trees and simulated 1800's homestead and heirloom garden (to be maintained by local 4H Clubs, volunteers and Oakland County Corrections' WWAM Program) • A possible future location for the historic Davis House (owned by Oakland County Parks and maintained on the Springfield Oaks Golf Course) • Enhanced vegetation buffers and tree rows • 2 miles of gravel park roads to accommodate event traffic and to provide recreational pathways for equestrian riders, hikers, bikers and cross-country runners Page 3 of 5 Local Community Demographics Community 1990 2000 Census % Growth Census Commerce Township 26,955 34,764 29% _ Groveland Township 4,705 6,150 31% Highland Township 17,941 19,169 7% Holly Township 8,852 10,037 13% . . Holly Village 5,595 6,135 10% _ Milford Township 12,121 15,271 26% , Milford Village 5,511 6,272 14% Rose Township 4,926 6,210 26% Springfield Township 9,927 13,338 34% White Lake Township 22,608 28,219 25% Oakland County 1,083,592 1,194,156 10% (in total) 10 Communities directly served by the properly 145,565 acquisition. Population total: Average Growth for Local Communities: 21% Projected Population of Local Communities for 2010: 176,818 Page 4 of 5 Proposal for MNRTF Grant Application OCPR staff is seeking Commission approval to submit an application for financial assistance from the 2006 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) for the purpose of acquiring the 57-acre Samuel Farm near Springfield Oaks. Estimated budget for this acquisition is as follows: Estimated Estimated Incidental Expenditures Costs Prorated Taxes: $4,000 Recording Fees: $100 Transfer Tax: $2,600 Title Insurance: $2,000 Appraisal Fees: $16,200 Plaque: $60 Closing Fees: $10,000 Environmental Assessment: $15,000 Total (Round to Nearest $50,000 Hundred): Estimated Acquisition Project Costs Incidental Expenditure: $50,000 _ Estimated Value: $850,000 Total Acquisition Costs: $900,000 MNRTF Grant Funds (40%): $360,000 Local Match (60%): $540,000 Local matching funds will be allocated from the 1/4 mil parks and recreation levy. NO GENERAL FUND DOLLARS WILL BE REQUESTED FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPOSED HIGHLAND TOWNSHIP LAND ACQUISITION. Attachments: 1. MNRTF Grant Application 2. OCPR Grant Application Resolution 3. OCPR Public Hearing Minutes 4. Oakland County Board of Commissioners Draft Resolution Page 5 of 5 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund OAKLAND COUNTY Springfield Township Property Acquisition MARCH 24m, 2006 Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund APPLICATION FORM 5750 1=11=I SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1=11••=11 PROJECT SUMMARY AND NEED STATEMENT ATTACHMENTS OAKLAND COUNTY Springfield Township Property Acquisition Operating Department: Oakland County Parks. and Recreation Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Grants Management 2006 MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND GRANT APPLICATION GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS For detailed instructions on applying for a grant, refer to the 2006 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) Application Guidelines booklet APPLICATION DEADLINE Mailed applications must be postmarked by the US Postal Service no later than midnight on April 1, 2006. • A secondary deadline for acquisition applications only will be accepted on August 1, 2006. An approved, up-to-date recreation plan is a prerequisite for applicant eligibility. This plan must be locally-adopted and approved by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) Grants Management by April 1 st for the primary deadline or locally adopted and approved by the Michigan DNR by August 1 st for the secondary acquisition deadline. Only final, locally approved plans and plan amendments will be approved by the Michigan DNR. APPLICATION CONTENT A complete application for a 2006 MNRTF grant consists of all of the following as further described in the 2006 MNRTF Application Guidelines booklet 1. The following materials are required for all applications: CI One MNRTF Grant Application PR5750, completed and signed; O Two copies of the Project Summary and Need Statement; O Appendix A - Explanation of Match Sources, if required; ▪ Two 8-1/2" x 11" project location maps; • Two 8-1/2" x 11" preliminary site development plans; O Photos of the site (recommended, but not required); O One copy of the advance notice and minutes of a meeting held to take public comments on the application; O One certified resolution from the governing body; O One copy of the letter transmitting the Notice of Intent PR5750-2, to the Regional Clearinghouse and one copy of the completed Notice of Intent PR5750-2; O Letters or other documentation required supporting information included in the application; O An environmental report, if required. 2. For acquisition proposals, the following additional materials: Cl Two 8-1/2" x 11" plat or parcel maps with subject parcels highlighted; O If applicable, the Disclosure and Certification Statements for Purchase Agreements and Options (PR1923-1) and a copy of the purchase option or agreement. 3. For development proposals, the following additional materials: O One 8-1/2" x 11" map delineating legal boundaries of the park site; • One copy of preliminary floor plans and elevation drawings for any proposed buildings or other structures; O One copy of the Documentation of Site Control PR5750-4. Direct any questions to the Grants Management staff assigned to specific areas of the state. (refer to the map provided with the application package) or Telephone (517) 373-9125 or TTY/TDD 711 (Michigan Relay Center) A large print version of this application is available upon request. PLEASE Do NOT FAX APPLICATION MATERIALS OR BIND OR STAPLE THE APPLICATION MATERIALS. USE OF BINDER CLIPS OR RUBBER BANDS IS RECOMMENDED. PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FORM, NOT A PHOTOCOPY. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tear Off This Sheet Before Submitting Application <<<<<<<<<<<<< PR5750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) For DNR use only App. # Region # Michigan Department of Natural Resources — Grants Management 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION This information is requested by authority of Part 19 of Act 451 of 1994, to be considered for a recreation grant. This application must be completed in full to apply for a grant from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund. A large print version of this application is available upon request. PART I GENERAL INFORMATION . Name of government unit (Applicant) Federal ID # (Required for local units of gov't) County Oakland County 386-004-876 Oakland Name of Authorized Representative (responsible for project day-to-day) Title Joseph P. Figa, Jr. Chief of Design and Development Address Telephone (between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.) 2 800 Watkins Lake Road ( 248 ) 858 - 4620 City State Zip Code Fax e-mail Waterford MI 48328 ( 248 ) 858 - 1683 f igaj @co . oakland .mi . us 2. Project Title Be as brief, yet descriptive, as possible and include the site name, if available. Springfield Township Property Acquisition 3. Brief description of proposal Include the primary scope items (development) or the amount of acreage to be purchased (acquisition); presence of significant natural resources (by name) or water (by name) at the site; and overall purpose of project. See Attached 4. Site Location For projects which cross more than one jurisdiction, list all on a separate sheet and show the political boundaries on all maps. City •Village CI Township Name of City, Village or Township Springfield Township Address of site Zip code Samuel Farm, 7141 Hall Road, Davisburg 48350 County Town, Range and Section Numbers for Site Location Latitude/Longitude at Park Entrance Oakland T.4N. -R.8E. ; Section #20 State Plane: x-1334622, y-452911 5. State House District State Senate District U.S. Congressional District #44 #26 #8 6. Proposal Type Indicate if the application is for a development project or an acquisition project (cannot be both). • Development or El Acquisition 7a. Total Project Cost and Grant Amount requested MNRTF Grant request amounts must be rounded to the nearest hundred dollars. i. Grant Amount Requested . The grant amount requested cannot exceed 75% of the total project cost for MNRTF. For a development application, it cannot be less than $15,000 or more than $500,000. There are no minimum or maximum grant amounts for acquisition applications. ' $ 360, 000 ii. Applicant's Matching Funds - Indicate the dollar amount of the match commitment. $ 540, 000 iii. Total Project $ 900,000 Cost- This amount must equal the total of the project scope or acquisition costs from Part III. iv. Indicate the percentage of the match commitment - Must be at least 25% of the total project cost as indicated in Part III. °A 7b. Project cost and grant amount requested for phased acquisition projects only. Grant request amounts must be rounded to the nearest hundred dollars. 2006 2007 2008 i. Grant Amount Requested - The grant amount requested cannot exceed 75% of the total project cost for each phase. $ 360,000 $ 0 $ 0 ii. Applicant's Matching Funds - Indicate the dollar amount of the match commitment for each phase. $ 540,000 $ 0 $ 0 iii. Total Project Cost per phase $ 900,000 $ 0 $ 0 iv. Indicate the percentage of the match commitment- Must be at least 25% for each phase. 6 0 % 0 0 % Page 1 PR5750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ o 8. Sources of Local Match Complete the chart below and Appendix A, if needed. Sources of match must add up to the total local match that is needed as indicated on line 7.a.ii. (See the 2006 MNRTF Application Guidelines booklet for details). SOURCE a) General Funds or Local Restricted Funds (applicant's own cash) $ 540,000 b) Force Account Labor (applicants own paid labor) c) Federal or State Funds (other than MNRTF, complete appendix A) d) Cash Donations (complete appendix A) e) Donated Labor and/or Materials (complete appendix A) f) Donated Land Value (acquisitions only; complete appendix A) LOCAL MATCH AMOUNT TOTAL MATCH $ 540,000 9. Applicant's current year budget for parks and recreation Local government applicants only. Enter total dollars budgeted for parks and recreation for the current year; if unknown, enter total spent in prior year. Parks Operation and Maintenance Recreation Programming Capital Outlay $23,086,468 $4,310,943 $ See Attached 10. Estimated annual operation and maintenance costs associated with the proposed project Indicate the cost and percentage of the total budget for parks and recreation this project will represent. $ 4,000 Explain Estimate based on similarly managed park facilities 11. Principal source of operation and maintenance funding for the proposed project once completed General Funds , Park Millage SPark Fees QOther (Specify) 12. Applicant has one or more of the following (check all that apply) • Citizen Recreation Body which is established by 12 Full-Time Park and/or Recreation Director (Name and Title) • State Legislation Dan Stencil, Executive Officer (If the citizen recreation body was created by State statute, provide the public act number and year enacted) • Part-Time Park and/or Recreation Director (Name and Title) • Local Ordinance • Governing Body Officials Appointed To Committee • Community School Director (Name and brief description of Director's role) •Volunteers Appointed By Governing Body 13. School District Applicants Only a. Recreational opportunities for the general public are available at school facilities (check at that apply) During Normal School Hours EOutside Normal School Hours During the Summer b. What percentage of time (on an annual basis) will the recreation opportunities provided by this project be available to the general public? % per year 14. Public Participation Applicants must hold a public meeting within six (6) months prior to the application deadline, at which the public has an opportunity to comment on the proposal. There must be advance public notice for the meeting that identifies the application as an agenda item, provides a brief description and specific location of the project and indicates the applicant's intent to apply for grant assistance. Date of the Public Meeting 02 / 01 / 06 IMPORTANT Attach a copy of the public notice and meeting minutes. Applicants are also encouraged to make specific efforts to seek input from individual residents and landowners adjacent to the project site, adjacent communities, or others who would be directly affected by the project. Additional efforts taken to inform affected residents or others and summary of resulting comments: 15. Population of the project service area 1,194,156 county NOTE The population served by the project is based on the applicant's population, but may be smaller or larger. Please justify the service population you report here in Part 2.b. of the Project Summary and Need Statement. (See the 2006 MNRTF Application Guidelines booklet, Chapter 3.) Page 2 PR5750 (Rev. 01104/2006) .... 16. Date application was submitted for regional planning review (required by E.O. 12372) Applicants are required to submit a Notice of Intent (PR 5750-2) to the appropriate regional planning agency for review. Date of Submittal 3 /25 /06 IMPORTANT - Attach a copy of the transmittal letter and a copy of the completed Notice of Intent form with the application. Submit the original letter and form to the regional planning clearinghouse. 17. Recreation Plan Applicants are required to have a recreation plan approved by and on file with the DNR by the application due date. The proposal is justified on page(s) 77 -79,96,125 18a. Has applicant closed, sold, or transferred any parkland or recreation facilities in the past five (5) years? Yes v No If Yes, on a separate sheet of paper, provide the type and name of the park or recreation land, and the reason(s) it was closed, sold, or transferred. 18b. Does applicant have a "Residents Only" policy for this park or other parks or recreation facilities? Yes w No If Yes, on a separate sheet of paper, provide an explanation of any "resident only" restriction for the use of parks, recreation facilities, or events at facilities owned or operated by the applicant. NOTE: Grant-assisted sites and facilities cannot be limited to residents only. 18c. Do you now, or do you intend in the future to, charge an entrance fee to the project site? Yes v No If Yes, provide a copy of your current or proposed fee schedule and describe any fee reduction programs or policies you offer to persons of low-income status. 18d. How will the public be reasonably able to access this site? Automobile , Yes ElNo Boat DYes , No Bus DYes , No Non-Motorized Trail , Yes ElNo Motorized Trail DYes v No Pedestrian , Yes ElNo Other (describe) DYes ElNo See Attached 19a. Will the proposed project provide access to, preserve or protect any significant natural resources? Elves ElNo Wetlands Acres OPigeon River State Forest Land Acres State or Federal Dedicated Wilderness or Natural Area Acres Doreat Lakes Shoreline Frontage feet Sand Dunes Acres DState or Federal Rare or Endangered Species Species Great Lakes Connecting Waters (Detroit, St. Mary's, or St. Clair Rivers; Lake St. Clair) Frontage feet State or Federal Dedicated Natural Rivers Frontage feet Other significant feature, as defined by the MI Natural Features Inventory program Feature See Attached Approx. extent of occurrence (acres) 19b. Briefly describe how the project will protect, preserve, or provide new or increased access, including the type of access provided (swimming, fishing, hiking, scenic views, etc.). Refer to specific project scope items, as appropriate. See Attached 19c. If your project includes the acquisition or development of a linear strip of land (for example, the purchase of a former railroad corridor), describe the ownership and protection status of adjacent significant natural resources, as defined by the MNRTF program criteria, that will be accessed by this project. See Attached IMPORTANT - The application will be strengthened with documentation from outside experts that verifies the type, quantity and quality of the significant natural resources. The presence and extent of these resources should be clearly depicted on the site plan. 20a. Will the proposed project provide new or increased inland water? • Yes CI No Name the inland water (lake, river, stream, pond, impoundment) Farm Pond - See Attached Specify acreage (for lakes, ponds, impoundments) or frontage in feet (for lakes, rivers and streams) 20b. Briefly describe how the project will protect, preserve, or provide new or increased access to the inland water, including the type of access provided (swimming, fishing, boating, scenic views, etc.) Refer to specific project scope items, as appropriate See Attached 20c. For acquisition projects only, will the project permanently protect an entire inland water body or river headwaters? • Yes • No (Explain) See Attached IMPORTANT The location of the inland waters should be clearly depicted on the site plan. 21a. Will the proposed project provide new opportunities for one or more of the following? CI Yes • No Hunting v Fishing , Other Wildlife-Related Recreation Activities .' Fish or Wildlife Habitat Protection Page 3 PR5750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) 21b. Briefly describe what opportunities will be provided for hunting, fishing, other wildlife-related recreation activities or habitat protection. See Attached 21c. Briefly describe how the project will provide these opportunities. Refer to specific project scope items, as appropriate. Include information on the specific seasons in which hunting/fishing will be allowed. See Attached 21d. If your project includes the acquisition or development of a linear strip of land (for example, the purchase of a former railroad corridor) describe the ownership and protection status of adjacent lands and water bodies that the project will provide access to for hunting, fishing, or other wildlife-related recreation. See Attached IMPORTANTAftach documentation from DNR fisheries or wildlife biologists or other experts that indicate the type, quantity and quality of the existing fish or wildlife resources, the need for additional fishing or hunting access, and/or the need for habitat protection. 22. Economic benefits of the proposed project (Check all that apply) • The proposed project will provide for increased private investment in the area estimated at $ by the year • The proposed project will provide for new permanent jobs in the area, estimated at by the year a The proposed project will attract additional tourists,* estimated at by the year • The proposed project is part of a local or regional economic development or redevelopment plan for the area. Plan name See Attached Plan date Plan prepared by IMPORTANT If any of the above are checked, the rationale and methods for numerical estimates provided must be included in the Project Summary and Need Statement (see Part IV). Also attach letters from local or regional planning agencies, economic development agencies, tourist associations, and local businesses and/or copies or excerpts from economic development or redevelopment plans that justify and support the economic development benefits indicated above. * Additional users are not considered additional tourists unless the application demonstrates that the persons are from outside the service area and will spend money while visiting the area. PART II SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Part II must be completed for all acquisition applications and for development applications if any portion of the project site is not currently owned or otherwise controlled by the applicant and/or has been used for purposes other than parks and recreation in the past 10 years. If the project includes multiple parcels with different owners or histories, a checklist must be completed for each parcel. Check here if Part II does not apply and explain why A. PROPERTY CHECKLIST - The checklist should be completed in conjunction with the landowner and anyone else that would have knowledge about the site. Yos* Pb Urit* 1. Is any portion of the property used for industrial purposes, including manufacturing and/or minerals processing or extraction (sand, gravel, oil or gas) at this time? • v 2. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that any portion of the property has been used for purposes listed in Question #1 in the past? • v 3. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that any of the adjoining properties are currently being used or have been used in the past for the purposes listed in Question #1? • v 4. Is any portion of the property used at this time for a gas station, motor vehicle service or repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, photo developing lab, junkyard, landfill, waste treatment, storage, processing or recycling or disposal facility? • v 5. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knoMedge that the property has been used in the pastas indicated in Question #4? 0 , 6. Are any of the following stored, discarded or used on the property at this time— automotive or industrial batteries, pesticides or other chemicals used in agricultural practices, paints, industrial waste or other chemicals in drums or other containers? • v 7. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that the property has been used in the pastas indicated in Question #6? 0 , 8. Is there fill dirt or other fill material on the property at this time from an unknown origin? •' 9. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that fill dirt or other fill material of unknown origin has been placed on the property in the past? 0v 10. At this time is there any evidence of leaks, spill or stains from a substance other than water or does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that there has been such a leak, spill or stain in the past? • v 11. Are there any waste disposal pits, lagoons or ponds on the property at this time? • w 12. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that there have been waste disposal pits, lagoons or ponds on the property In the past? m , Page 4 PR5750 (Rev. 01/0412006) 13. Are there any registered or unregistered storage tanks on the property at thislirne? IT 14. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that there have been registered or unregistered storage tanks on the ___p_LoVi_r_p____... the st? w 15. If there is a water well on the property, does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that contaminants have been identified in the well that exceeded I- •al standa • •. •,- ,,- •.- -1 •-.Ai.. . •a'.'.. -• . _ • •1 ,.• .6 !I • • , • •.. , III El II 16. Has the landowner been notified about any current violations of environmental laws pertaining to activities on the property or does applicant, landowner or others have Icnowled•e atxxil past violations? M El IN 17. Has the landowner been notified of any environmental assessments of the property that identified a) the presence of hazardous substances, petroleum products or contamination; or bl the need for further RASP qmpnt? IT 17, 17 18. Does the applicant, landowner or others have knowledge that any hazardous substances, unidentified waste materials, tires, or automotive or industrial batteries have been dumped above around buried or biimed on the nrnnertv? IT 71 IT 19. Is the property listed on any federal or state list of contaminated sites, including the site of a leaking under!ound storage tank? 0 .. * Applications to acquire or develop property that have current or past uses that suggest there may be contamination will be considered for funding if based on the additional information in the application, it appears the property can and will be made safe forks intended use ** Unknown. Applications to develop or acquire property for which there is inadequate information about site conditions may not be considered for grant funding. B. Additional Information If answers to any of the questions in the Property Checklist are "Yes," an Environmental Report must also be prepared and submitted with the Application. The Environmental Report should be no more than five (5) pages and should include information under the following headings. Refer to the specific guidance included in Chapter 3, Section C, Part II of the 2006 MNRTF Application Guidelines booklet for the information that should be included in this section. 1. Title Page 2. Site Conditions 3. Environmental Assessment Results 4. Assessment and Cleanup Actions Needed 5. Implementation Responsibilities 6. Schedule 7. Confirmation Statement PART III ESTIMATED COSTS AND ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION When completing this section, keep in mind that the appropriation of funds for successful MNRTF proposals may take as long as 18 months from the date of submission; your estimates should take this into consideration. For development projects, requirements for barrier-free accessibility as required by State and federal law should be factored into the costs. SECTION A — DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY 1. Applicant's legal Interest in the site (check one) • Fee Simple • Lease • Easement • Other (Explain) IMPORTANT To be eligible, the application must include the completed Documentation of Site Control"(PR 5750-4) and the required attachments. Any form of control other than fee simple. includina lease and easement terms is slink:Q.4 ft% n KIP 2ntarnuni 2. PROJECT COST ESTIMATE List the specific development scope items (trail construction, parking lot paving, landscaping) rather than aspects of project execution (materials, labor, equipment). Scope items listed in this section should be clearly marked on the preliminary site plan to differentiate items proposed under this grant from existing or future development. Specify sizes and quantities where appropriate (length of trail, number of picnic tables, for example). Do not include ineligible items such as engineering costs beyond 10% of the subtotal and contingencies. Applications that include ineligible scope items mayleeliminated from consideration. SCOPE ITEMS SIZE OR (Limit each item descri 'lion to 25 characters - Do Not Abbreviate QUANTITY COST (MUST BE ROUNDED TO NEAREST $100) $ 00 2 Ii 3 $ OD 4 5 ______________________________ 6 0 7 4--.........sialsi — .00 9 0 10 *5 MNRTF Plaque $60.00 1 Permit Fees • i Subtotal $ .0a Engineering (NOTE professional design services are required to complete a MNRTF project. These fees may not exceed 10% of subtotal) on Total Estimated Cost $ * * This Total Amount must match Item #7.a.III. of Part I of this application 412n lir Page 5 PR5750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) 3. PERMIT ISSUES Applicants must identify all possible local, state and federal permits that may be required for the proposed project and, at a minimum, make initial contact with permitting authorities. Briefly describe the permits that are likely to be needed for this project and what efforts have been taken to apply for these permits. Attach any letters to or from permitting other documentation of the efforts taken. Type of Permit Perrnittinabency Efforts Taken to Obtain Permit or Determine Permit Reauiremanb If the applicant has determined that no permits are needed, indicate so below. •Appropriate research has been done and it has been determined that no local, state or federal permits are needed for this project. IMPORTANT It is the responsibility of the Applicant/Grantee to determine the need for and obtain all required permits. Approval of a grant does not indicate that the project will receive needed permits from the DNR or any other state a .encies. 4. Have any costs been incurred toward construction of the proposed project? •Yes •No If Yes, explain - SECTION B - LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS 1. Has landowner been contacted regarding availability of parcel(s)? (check one) CI Yes • N 2. Has landowner indicated parcel(s) is available for purchase? (check one) IS Yes • No 3. Has any formal offer to purchase been extended or a purchase agreement or option been executed? (check one) Yes .' No IF YES, include a completed and signed Disclosure and Certification Statement for Purchase Agreements and Options form (PR 1923-1) and a copy of the offer, agreement, or option. 4. Has any payment been made toward the acquisition? (Check One) Yes ., No If YES, these costs cannot be included as part of the total acquisition costs and are not eligible for reimbursement with grant funds, or as match toward the grant. 5. Parcel information tables lte • -sti at-. ,..1 . •.... •• .,“ . •. - • ••_ -• • . -,.. - - - - - (1) (2) STATE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED EQUALIZED APPRAISED RELOCATION LANDOWNER ACREAGE VALUE VALUE (5) COSTS ($) _,... Wayne Samuel 56 . 93 $157,280 $850,000 TOTALS 56.93 $157,280 $850,000 (3) ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS Prorated Taxes $ 4,000 Recording Fees $ , 100 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE (1) $4, 850, 000 Transfer Tax $ 2. 600 TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS (2)4 0 Title insurance$ 2 000 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS (3) $ 5 0 , 000 Appraisal Feed 16, 200 I TOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS $ 900, 000 Plaque$ 60 , Closing Fees$ 1 0 , 000 I [ Environmental Assessment Costs$ , 1 5 , 000 1 i TOTAL$ l 50,000 6. Interest acquired will be (check all that apply) 0 Fee Simple • Easement •Other Explain "Easement" or "Other" as appropriate. Describe the specific rights in land that will be acquired, such as development or access rights. Also, list all liens, encumbrances, leases, restrictions, or rights to be reserved and describe by whom. Page 6 PR5750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) Yes ONo 8. Are there any non-recreational uses currently on the site or planned for the future? Yes ON° IMPORTANT Applications to purchase rights in land less than fee simple should include a draft of the proposed easement or deed. Applications for less than fee simple title that will include public outdoor recreation access on land that will remain in private ownership should include a letter of intent from the landowner (or the party that will hold title to the land), indicating they are willing to sell rights in the land that include public access. 7. Are there any buildings or improvements on the land proposed for acquisition? Briefly describe the intended use or demolition of buildings or improvements See Attached If yes, describe these uses and indicate when they will be terminated See Attached Page 7 PR5750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) PART IV PROJECT SUMMARY AND NEED STATEMENT Attach two copies of a narrative that provides the following information, using the headings shown below (in bold type). Refer to the specific guidance included in Chapter 3 of the 2006 MNRTF Application Guidelines booklet on the information that should be included in each section. 1) Project Description and Purpose 2) Need for the Project a) Site Description 3) Past Grant Performance b) Resource Protection/Recreation Opportunities Provided by the Project 4) Additional Information/Special Initiatives of the c) Baffler-Free Compliance MNRTF Board d) Economic Benefits of the Proposed Project e) Further Information on Acquisition Projects that will result in a Purchase of less than Fee Simple Title f) Estimated Additional Costs Associated with the Proposed Project PART V ATTACHMENTS Please check the boxes below for items included with this completed application. Land Development Acquisition Attachments Projects Projects 0 uired CI uired Two Pro'ect Summa and Need S -t- -I 1- I - . - El If ui 0 if Liked A...ndix A Ex.lanation of Match • z ' • uirml 12 uired Two 8-1/2"x 11" .roect local. DI uired 12 uired Two 8-1/2" x 11" •relimina sit- . - - • •11 - 1 . .1 G) (required) 0 8-1/2" 11" I a I del b • t I I b u of t k t . MI (required) Two 8-112" x11" Plat or Parcel maps. 0 uired a uired One co. of certified resolution fr• 1 - .• z.,',• •... 0 uired ISI uired One co. each of advan . l• ' - -I• 11 .1 • as.:-..t• a - . • ..- a • . •naa,. as ost -•......i•A 0 uired El uired One ... af letter transmit • .,,.,- • . .:,. mu. -: .9 . r.:,.... ,- . ' - _ .. .. - ... . ..- ..... - - . ..... Ei uired El If rewired Letters or other documentation r- • ' -. ..•1 .10 .1 .NII..• i a .* .• I .."' - ••• 0 (required) A One copy of preliminary floor plans and elevation drawin.s for an .ro.osed buildin.s or other structures. 0 (required) One copy of Documentation of Site Contro/ form (PR 5750-4 . 0 (If required) 0 (If required) One copy of the Environmental Report. • 0 (If required) One copy of the Disclosure and Certifications Statements for Purchase Agreements & Options form (PR1923-1) with a copy of any executed Agreement or Option. PART VI CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION SIGNATURE Must be by an official of the applicant agency or an individual designated by official resolution to act on the applicant agency's behalf. I certify that all statements on this application and the attachments hereto are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. NAME (Printed/Typed) Bill Bullard, Jr. Chairman, Board of Commissioners TITLE SIGNATURE DATE Send this application package by MAIL to GRANTS MANAGEMENT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PO BOX 30425 LANSING MI 48909-7925 OR OVERNIGHT or EXPRESS MAIL to GRANTS MANAGEMENT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES STEVENS T. MASON BUILDING 6th FLOOR 530 W ALLEGAN LANSING MI 48933 Mailed applications must be postmarked by the US Postal Service no later than midnight April 1, 2006 for primary deadline, or August 1, 2006, for secondary deadline (acquisitions only). << PLEASE Do NOT FAX APPLICATION MATERIALS >> Page 8 13135750 (Rev. 01/04/2006) 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION #3: Brief Description of Proposal Acquisition Target Description — Samuel Farm The 57-acre Samuel Farm has been owned and operated by the Samuel Family since 1845. The Samuel property is separated from Springfield Oaks by Hall Road (a lightly traveled, two lane gravel road) and features a historic farmstead, a wooded natural area, wetlands and several fields under agricultural production. Oakland County Parks and Recreation (OCPR) staff and members of the Oakland County 4-H Fair Board are recommending the acquisition of the Samuel Farm as it offers the last opportunity to significantly expand Springfield Oaks before the park becomes bounded by residential development. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm will significantly add to the Springfield Oaks facilities and the continued viability of the County Fairgrounds. #9: Recreation Programs Budget: OCPR has a 2006 Operating Budget of $21,862,863. Of this amount, $4,310,943 is the Operating Budget for Recreational Programs and Facilities excluding golf course and park operations. Oakland County Parks and Recreation also expends $597,467 of its total Budget for the operation of its Nature Centers and Educational Outreach Programs. OCPR has an additional $23,920,734 for current and future Capital Outlay. #18c: Oakland County Park Access — Entrance Fee Program Similar to the national and state park systems, OCPR maintains a vehicle permit program to offset the cost of maintaining a high quality parks system for Oakland County residents and visitors. Of the 11 county parks, 6 require permits for vehicular access. The remaining 5 parks do not require vehicle permits because of the presence of additional on-site recreation facilities (such as golf courses and waterparks) that subsidize their operation. All 11 county parks do not require permits for pedestrian and bike access. OCPR offers discounted rates to Oakland County residents in appreciation of the continued support of parks through the 'A mil levy. Discounts are available to all senior citizens (62 and over) on weekday entrance. Discount rates and special programs are available to school and community groups and lower income residents can receive park passes upon verification of financial status. - 1 - 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 If acquired, the Samuel Farm will be incorporated into the existing facilities managed by the Oakland County 4-H Fair Board. Vehicular permits are not required to access Springfield Oaks. The rate schedule for Vehicle Entry and Annual Vehicle Permits are as follows: _ Oakland County Parks Fee Daily Permit Regular Rate: $10/car/day Discount Rate: $5/car/day (Oakland County residents) All Senior Citizens: (62 & over— weekdays only) $3/car/day _ Oakland County Parks Fee Annual Vehicle Permit _ Regular Rate: $46 Discount Rate: $28 (County Residents) _ _ Senior Citizens: $23 (62 & over— weekends only) Parks Perks Pass: (Dual pass — Oakland County Parks $43 and Huron-Clinton Metroparks #18d: Oakland County Park Access — Public Access If acquired, the Samuel Farm would have easy vehicular access via the lightly traveled Hall Road, which connects Scott and Andersonville roads and has been identified as a rural connector road in Oak Routes — the Oakland County Trail Network. Public access to the Samuel Farm will be readily available to pedestrians, bicyclists and equestrians because of the rural nature of the surrounding area. Connector roads currently host multi-modal trail use with the Ellis Barn serving as a trailhead landmark at Springfield Oaks. Being immediately opposite from the Ellis Barn, the Samuel Farm, could tie into this trail system and provide access to - 2 - 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 an addition of 3.5 miles of park trails and gravel roads currently proposed for the site. It should be noted that general public transportation is not available in Springfield Township; however, a free Senior Citizen Transport is available and has access to the recreational facilities at Springfield and Independence Oaks County Parks. #19a: Preservation and Access to Significant Natural Resources The acquisition of the Samuel Farm will preserve, provide public access to and allow for the stewardship of 15 acres of wooded natural areas including 4 acres of wetlands. Although has not be identified as a significant natural area by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) it represents the westernmost point of a wildlife corridor that extends through Springfield Oaks down to Indian Springs Metro Park. The restoration of the Samuel Farm woodlots, meadows and tree rows (as indicated in the acquisition site concept) further local efforts to create a Green Infrastructure linkage between the County Park and the Shiawassee Basin Preserve owned and managed by Springfield Township. #19b: Preservation and Access to Significant Natural Resources — Public Access/Education OCPR has proposed the creation of a 20-acre preserve and the construction of 1.5 miles of accessible trails. The agricultural history of the Samuel Farm, and Springfield Oaks in general, have limited the quality of the Natural Communities that remain on the site but have provided significant opportunities to expose the general public to the stewardship of privately managed natural areas. Springfield Township has already taken the lead in this effort by working with residents and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Landowner Incentive Program (LIP) coordinating the ecological assessment and prescribed burning of the Shiawassee Preserve and surrounding private wetlands. OCPR is fostering a relationship with the Oakland County Conservation District, 4-H Groups and MSU Extension to develop stewardship demonstration areas at Springfield Oaks and to build on the work of Springfield Township/LIP. OCPR proposes to broaden these cooperative efforts through the acquisition and management of the Samuel Farm. #19c: Preservation of and Access to Significant Natural Resources — Wildlife Corridors The Samuel Farm is not a linear strip of land and it has not been identified as containing significant natural resources by MNFI because of its small size and agricultural use. The Samuel Farm is, however, an important link in a wildlife corridor that extends to Indian Springs Metro Park through Springfield Oaks (identified by MNFI as Priority One and Two sites respectively). This corridor - 3 - 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 could be extended to the Shiawassee Basin Preserve (a MNFI Priority One site that hosts a significant population of the Eastern Massasauga Rattlesnake) with the acquisition of the Samuel Farm and continued outreach to neighboring property owners. Whereas the Samuel Farm does not directly protect significant natural areas, its preservation could help insure the viability of wildlife populations within those areas through the maintenance and enhancement of ecological connectivity. #20a-c: Access to Inland Water Resources The Samuel Farm contains a small farm pond (1/3-acre) that will be explored for use a fishing pond accessible to park guests for fishing (similar to that of other parkland waters). If viable, the pond would be maintained (and stocked) as a demonstration feature according to recommendations from the DNR Private Lands Working Group. OCPR considers a fishing pond to be a programmatic element with significant educational, cultural and historical value; however, it may not represent a significant new access to fishing inland waters. #2 la-c: Opportunities for Wildlife Recreation — Hunting and Fishing In addition to the potential of creating access to a managed fishing pond, park visitors will be encouraged to take self guided walks through the 20 acres of forest, wetlands and meadows. 1.5 miles of accessible trails have been proposed to lead visitors through the nature preserve, as indicated in the site concept. Including the proposed cropland and orchard of the heritage farm, over half of the Samuel Farm would be eligible for an open archery deer hunt similar to that at Lyon, Orion and Addison Oaks. This would provide the first hunting opportunity at Springfield Oaks and would play a key role in the active management of the wildlife corridor. #22: Economic Benefits The 4-H Fair Board and their volunteers offer a variety of educational attractions at the County Fair that feature animal husbandry and agricultural practices. The Fair Board has promoted the acquisition of the Samuel Farm for the purpose of creating a demonstration farm at the Fairgrounds which would provide additional attractions for the Fair and increase opportunities for 4-H Youth Activities. Such a program would complement the use of the Ellis Barn and provide unique recreational experiences for park guests. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm would also provide much need parking for the County Fair which draws 90,000 visitors annually. Additional parking would -4- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 also make the facilities better able to meet the needs of other large recreation events such as the annual Holly Cross-Country Meet that draws over 5,000 participants from 200 schools across the United States and Canada. PART III: SECTION B — LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS #7-8: Farmstead The Samuel Farm contains a single family home currently occupied by a member of the Samuel Family. Several out-buildings including an old stone barn and a metal Quonset hut are also on the site in various states of disrepair. The negotiated price for this parcel will include these structures and has been included in the projected acquisition budget. Depending on a structural analysis, OCPR would utilize these structures to facilitate recreational opportunities at the Fairgrounds including the development of a demonstration farm. OCPR anticipates that no relocation costs (for the current tenant) will be included in purchase agreement for the Samuel Farm as the parcel has a willing seller and the sales proposal includes the disposition of the house. The Samuel Farm is an operating family owned business that engages in the commercial sale of agricultural products (corn and hay) and field stone. The commercial and residential use of the property will cease upon the acquisition of the property by Oakland County. 0140 emit Mearoein mireaweraterg Iftrapiseon for Anis Ninth' Mishipse Nairel =tit Ana lotillapger usounn.Staes /14rwel Fano silowl yiaoririN1110n1•Corew Pot sapiellosmooll *Pam* 6011n11or et Oeilinil Om* POW 40 passle mamelim . now siiilviroxl siewO womb he lonvon • +May to Oleisid Owasy Ask* rani% Ms Wan* Spig$0110.4. lismothenwhomilisn Topa WNW rZ3bsetislkovtiromon 1..PCO A apes woo foraINNYJIMAII1 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 PART IV: SECTION B — PROJECT SUMMARY AND NEED STATEMENT 1) Project Description and Purpose A) Site Description — Samuel Farm The 57-acre Samuel Farm has been owned and operated by the Samuel Family since 1845. The Samuel property is separated from Springfield Oaks by Hall Road (a lightly traveled, two lane gravel road) and features a historic farmstead, natural areas and several large fields. The Samuel Farm is bounded by Scott Road to the south, a 60-acre farm to the west and a residential development to the north. The farm remains in active agricultural production (corn and hay), although this activity has dropped off over the past several years as the family members have aged. The Samuel farmstead, which consists of an old farmhouse and several out buildings, is centrally located on the property directly off Hall Road. The northern half of the farm is relatively flat and divided into 4 fields separated by tree rows with many mature hardwoods. The southern half of the farm rolls slightly and features 15 acres of wooded natural areas (including 4 acres of wetlands) that are contiguous with a wildlife corridor through Springfield Oaks. -6- The Samuel Farm offers the last opportunity to significantly expand Springfield Oaks before the park becomes bounded by residential development. 2006 MNRIF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 A) Site Description — Acquisition Proposal Oakland County Parks and Recreation (OCPR) proposes the acquisition of the Samuel Farm and its development as a demonstration farm, recreational fields/event parking and natural area preserve to increase recreational opportunities and help insure the continued viability of the County Fairgrounds. -7- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 A) Site Description — Acquisition Proposal (Continued) Heritage Farm The volunteers and staff of the 4-H Fair Board have recommended the addition of a demonstration farm to the number of agricultural displays that are highlighted at the County Fair. OCPR intends to utilize the Samuel Farmstead to create a Heritage Farm that would demonstrate farming practices and incorporate the recent investment in the relocation and rehabilitation of the Ellis Barn. The 9-acre demonstration farm could feature: •A livestock pasture -Rotational crops • A farm pond • A 1800's homestead -Heirloom gardens The Heritage Farm could serve as a possible future location for the historic Davis House (owned by OCPR and maintained on the Springfield Oaks Golf Course) in order to increase public access to this locally significant cultural resource. The farm would be maintained by local 4-H Clubs, Fair Board volunteers and participants in the Oakland County Corrections' Weekend and Weekday Alternative for Misdemeanants (VVWAM) Program. Parks staff have also received interest on the part of the Oakland Conservation District and Michigan State University Extension to explore educational opportunities created by the Samuel Farm and the development of agricultural and land management demonstration areas. -Samuel Farm Barns -Ellis Barn viewed from the Samuel Farm -Samuel Farm Stone Barn -8- The Samuel Property offers the following opportunities to support recreational events at Springfield Oaks: -The creation of Event Parking "Pods" that could double as recreational fields for sports such as Soccer, Football, Field Hockey and Lacrosse -Samuel Farm Field -Samuel Farm Field -Hall Road Access 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 A) Site Description — Acquisition Proposal (Continued) Recreational Fields/Event Parking As interest in the County Fair grows and as demand for recreation opportunities in a rural setting increase, the limited parking at Springfield Oaks becomes a potential barrier. Facility improvements at Springfield Oaks have exacerbated the situation by increasing park attendance while removing areas designated for parking. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm would provide significant opportunities to address parking needs at Springfield Oaks. 'The addition of 2 miles of one way gravel park roads that would provide easy access to recreation events and trail opportunities for bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian use •The creation of parking access from Hall Road and the ability to safely control vehicle traffic during large recreational events 'The provision of safe access across Hall Road to the Fairgrounds through pedestrian crossings and temporary road closures during large recreational events (proposed and supported by the local township officials) 'The enhancement of existing tree rows and vegetative buffers to lessen the impact of park events on the surrounding community -9- -Proposed Natural Area Preserve -Samuel Old Stone Sam -10- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 A) Site Description — Acquisition Proposal (Continued) Natural Area Preserve The Samuel Farm has 15 acres of existing natural areas including oak forests, forested wetlands and marshes. The restoration of an additional 5 acres of fallow farm fields could create a 20-acre natural area preserve that could provide interesting recreational and educational experiences for park guests including: •A self-guided nature walk along 1.5 miles of multi-purpose trails and boardwalks • Forest and wetland stewardship demonstration areas -Grassland restoration plots B) Project Opportunities — Recreation The acquisition of the Samuel Farm and the proposed development of a Heritage Farm, Recreation Fields/Event Parking and a Natural Area Preserve would substantially enhance OCPR's ability to offer a diverse range of educational and recreational experiences at Springfield Oaks. Heritage Farm The 4-H Fair Board and its volunteers offer a variety of educational attractions at the County Fair that feature animal husbandry and agricultural practices. For many years the Fair Board has been interested in developing a demonstration farm at the Fairgrounds to promote 4-H youth activities and expose the County Fair's 90,000+ visitors to farming practices that are becoming increasingly rare in southeast Michigan. The acquisition of the Samuel would provide such an opportunity. -4-H Livestock Demonstration -Relocated Ellis Elam -1 1- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 B) Project Opportunities — Recreation Continued The existing farm house, stone barn and several out buildings will be investigated for use in park educational programs and 4-H activities. Parks staff have utilized the existing layout to propose a 9-acre demonstration farm that simulate a 1800s homestead complete with heirloom garden and the recently relocated Ellis Barn. The Samuel Farm buildings would expand upon the activities and educational programs that are currently being developed for the recently relocated Ellis Barn. Parks staff are working with 4-H Clubs, Michigan State University Extension (MSUE), the Fair Board, Master Gardeners and Oakland County Corrections' VVVVAM Program to propose the creation and maintenance of a livestock pasture, rotational crops, farm pond, orchard and heirloom garden. The proposed Heritage Farm could offer: -4-H Group activities including gardening, animal husbandry, horticulture practices and cultural preservation -Hands-on activities for Fair Visitors -Educational resources for school groups and conservation organizations including the Oakland Conservation District, MSUE and Shiawassee Headwaters Conservancy -Unique facilities for local interest groups including clog dancers, gardeners and historic preservationists -Hall Road 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 B) Project Opportunities — Recreation Continued Recreational Fields/Event Parking The Samuel Farm Recreational Fields/Event Parking area would enhance the recreational opportunities provided by Springfield Oaks and the Oakland County Fairgrounds by meeting the need for additional parking, fulfilling the demand for local field sport facilities and creating 2 miles of park roads which would be available for a variety of trail use groups. Recreational Fields/Event Parking would allow Springfield Oaks to: -Encourage even greater attendance at the County Fair -Continue to promote large recreational events such as running meets, bike rallies and horse shows -Offer greater access to park trails/roads for runners, skiers, bikers and equestrians -Host a variety of township recreational programs administered through the Springfield Parks and Recreation Department including Soccer (whose popularity has outpaced the number of available facilities) Natural Area Preserve The Samuel Farm proposed natural area preserve would provide access to a variety of habitats that are indicative of northern Oakland County. Recreational opportunities include: -A self-guided nature walk along 1.5 miles of multi-purpose trails and boardwalks -Hands-on stewardship demonstration areas -Hands-on grassland restoration plots -Scenic backdrop for Heritage Farm activities -Open archery hunting (including the fields and orchard of the heritage farm) and access to the farm pond which may support fish stocks -Pond as viewed from the Farm House -12- -Natural Areas Map Um* Pon. mows. TOW 1.6•04 a. 010.44.. 1.1400... 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 B) Project Opportunities — Resource Protection The Samuel Farm has been under agricultural production since 1845 which has limited the quality of the remaining natural areas. MNFI has not identified the Samuel Farm as containing significant natural areas, however, the acquisition of the Samuel Farm would protect resources by promoting ecological, cultural, historical and aesthetic connectivity. Ecological Connectivity The southern portion of the Samuel Property contains 15 acres of forest and wetland that are at the western tip of a wildlife corridor extending through Springfield Oaks down to and including Indian Springs Metropark. Restored grasslands along the southern fallow fields as well as the enhancement of vegetative buffers/tree rows could create a valuable linkage to existing public lands including the Shiawassee Basin Preserve. Cultural Connectivity Northern Oakland County has been transitioning away from agricultural to residential land use for several years. Oakland County Planning and Economic Development noted in its compilation of Master Plans that no Oakland County city, village or township has maintained agricultural zoning. OCPR and the Fair Board recognize that Oakland County residents are rapidly losing their cultural connections to the landscape. The acquisition of the Samuel Farm and its use as a demonstration farm will help to protect a significant cultural resource and provide public access in perpetuity. -4-H Shoeing Demonstration -13- -Ellis Barn under Reconstruction -4-H Framing Demonstration 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 B) Project Opportunities — Resource Protection Continued Historical Connectivity The acquisition of the Samuel Farm and its use as a demonstration farm also protects a valuable historical resource that will enhance the investment that OCPR, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and the Road Commission for Oakland County (RCOC) has made in the relocation and rehabilitation of the Ellis Barn. OCPR will attempt to salvage as many of the Samuel Farm structures as possible. Their use or replacement will allow OCPR to simulate a 1800s farmstead and to promote hands-on activities in historic interpretation. Aesthetic Connectivity The aesthetic value is an often overlooked resource in rural Oakland County. The acquisition and use of the Samuel Farm as parkland will protect the aesthetic quality of Springfield Oaks and the surrounding landscape. This will help to ensure character of the park and viability of recreational activities that rely on a rural setting. Parks staff are sensitive to the aesthetic value of the Samuel Farm and have integrated the design of the recreational facilities into the existing agricultural layout. The design of the recreational fields/event parking, for example, have incorporated into the existing crop rotation pattern and vegetative buffers will follow existing tree and fence rows. -Residential Development as viewed from the Ellis Barn prior to relocation -14- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 C) Barrier-Free Compliance OCPR considers issues of universal access in every development project it initiates. All buildings are barrier- free and every park has significant portions of the site fully accessible to all visitors. When OCPR does develop the property according to the proposed site concept included in this application, the roads, parking lots, buildings and trails will be barrier-free. This application does not involve the construction of roads, buildings or trails MNRTF financial assistance. D) Economic Benefits of the Proposed Project with Springfield Oaks hosts the 4-H County Fairgrounds which are managed through a cooperative partnership between OCPR and the 4-H Fair Board (a local not-for-profit group that manages the Fairground facilities and events for the purpose of ensuring the annual presentation of the Oakland County Fair). To increase the year-round use of the Fairgrounds and in turn its economic viability, OCPR and the 4-H Fair Board have continued to expand the Fairground facilities including the recent addition of two new livestock barns and the historic Ellis Barn. Septic system improvements and the construction of a modern livestock arena are planned for 2006-2007 which will better enable the Fairground facilities to attract and host major rural-recreational events including horse shows and agricultural demonstrations. The acquisition and development of the Samuel Property will continue to promote the economic viability of the 4-H Fairgrounds and in turn will bring economic benefits to the surrounding community. E) Purchase of less than Fee Simple Title: Not Applicable F) Additional Costs Associated with the Project: Not Applicable -15- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 2) Need for the Project Need for the Project as documented in the Community Recreation Plan Oakland Coun Parks and R-cre. I' • •• •• • • : - 1- . • • • - • 1 1 2-2006, submitted to MDNR, highlights a number of issues confronting Oakland County in the next five years. The single largest issue predicted is the continuing development of the County (p.49). We are experiencing growth rates that exceed that of the rest of the State. This has resulted in open land disappearing even as the growing population increases demand for recreation. OCPR puts the highest priority on acquiring parkland for the future, with the goal of "increas[ing] by 2,400 acres over 1997 levels the park land acres owned by 2007" (p.77). Applicant's Existing System OCPR manages more than 6,000 acres of parkland in 11 parks distributed throughout the County. Five parks are larger and more natural, including Rose, Independence and Orion Oaks. Others are more focused on active recreation, like Waterford and Red Oaks. Nearby Springfield Oaks features the Oakland County 4-H Fairgrounds and Groveland Oaks offers a variety of recreational offerings including RV camping, swimming and mini-golf. Need for the Project in Relationship to Existing Facilities As indicated above, OCPR is committed to acquiring parkland for the future. While OCPR already preserves the majority of its acreage as natural areas, there is a persistent wish from the public for more lands to be set aside for conservation. This is demonstrated by the 1996 Nordhouse Survey, where 59% of the survey group listed acquisition of property to protect wildlife/natural habitat as the most important priority for OCPR. The acquisition of the Samuel Property would protect natural areas and would add to a significant wildlife corridor that extends through Springfield Oaks. OCPR recognizes the need for the facilities at Springfield Oaks to grow in order to accommodate increasing interest in the County Fair and the growing population of Oakland County. The Samuel Farm has been identified in the Springfield Oaks Master Plan as a potential acquisition target as it represents the last opportunity to significantly increase the park's size before it is bounded by residential development. -16- C6briTy*Ks 11, RIDEatiTHE RC)SE CRUISE THE CON:IF,C70P, 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 3) Past Grant Performance Over the years, OCPR has benefited from many MNRTF and LWCF grants from the MDNR. Grants have been accepted in good faith, and every effort has been made to comply with all MDNR stipulations. OCPR is confident that future grants agreements will continue to be carried out in this spirit. 4) Additional Information/Special Initiatives of the MNRTF Board State Trail System OCPR is committed to promoting trail access across southeast Michigan including links to Oakland County parklands and other public recreational areas. OCPR funds a Trail Coordinator position and hosts the Oakland Trails Advisory Council that works with County Government, statewide recreational groups and 29 local municipalities to create, maintain and promote the use of 6 major public trails. Hall Road has been identified as a Rural Connector Road by the Oakland County Trail Network — Oak Routes with access to the recently relocated Ellis Barn as the landmark for a multi-modal trailhead. The facilities at Springfield Oaks make the Ellis Barn trailhead equestrian friendly and in 2005 supporters held the "Ride the Rose" trail ride as its inaugural event. The Samuel Farm will directly connect with this trailhead creating additional parking, 3.5 miles of additional trail/park road access and a substantially larger facility for hosting trail- related events. -17- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 4) Additional Information/Special Initiatives — Continued Community Recreation As Oakland County undergoes rapid development, preserving large, contiguous tracts of land for recreation is a crucial community and county-wide goal. The immediate area served by the acquisition of the Samuel Farm is growing at a rate that is over twice that of Oakland County as a whole. OCPR has received the support of Springfield Township officials for the acquisition and development of the Samuel Farm for the purpose enhancing the facilities of Springfield Oaks County Park. The Samuel Farm would create a number of recreational opportunities for the residents of Springfield Township and surrounding communities. The trails that will be constructed on the property, the proposed demonstration farm and the recreational fields will be easily accessed by the local community with ample parking and rural road connectors identified as part of the Oak Routes network. The proposed provision of recreation fields/event parking at the Samuel Farm would dramatically assist Springfield Township in meeting the demand for additional sports fields. OCPR staff is exploring a partnership whereby Springfield Township could program the use of the sports fields in cooperation with the 4-H Fair Board while assisting in the maintenance and care of those areas. -18- 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 4) Additional Information/Special Initiatives — Continued Community Recreation — Local Community Demographics Community 1990 2000 Census % Growth Census Commerce Township 26,955 34,764 29% Groveland Township 4,705 6,150 31% Highland Township 17,941 19,169 7% Holly Township 8,852 10,037 13% Holly Village 5,595 6,135 10% Milford Township 12,121 15,271 26% Milford Village 5,511 6,272 14% Rose Township 4,926 6,210 26% Springfield Township 9,927 13,338 34% White Lake Township 22,608 28,219 25% Oakland County (in total) 1,083,592 1,194,156 10% 10 Communities directly served by the property acquisition. 145,565 Population total: Average Growth for Local Communities: 21% Projected Population of Local Communities for 2010: 176,818 -19- Samuel Farm Property Acquisition 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 4) Additional Information/Special Initiatives — Continued Water Access OCPR considers a fishing pond to be a programmatic element with significant educational, cultural and historical value; however, it may not represent a significant new access to fishing inland waters. Urban Recreation The acquisition of the Samuel Farm to enhance the facilities of Springfield Oaks would, along with the other County Parks, serve as regional resource for the large urban population of Metropolitan Detroit, Pontiac and Flint. Access to such a resource will become even more important as the Metro Detroit population continues to shift outward and formerly rural/suburban portions of the county take on an increasingly urban character. Oakland County Parks are less than an hour drive for a majority of residents in Southeast Michigan. OCPR facilities help create unique recreational experiences for over 1.6 million visitors annually. OCPR is looking to the Trust Fund to continue to assist Oakland County with this effort. 2006 MNRTF GRANT APPLICATION - Springfield Township Property Acquisition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION — FORM PR 5750 PART V: ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Location Maps • Springfield Property Acquisition Target — Location Map • Samuel Farm — Aerial Photo and Parcel Overlay • Samuel Farm — Site Description 2. Preliminary Site Development Map • Samuel Farm Acquisition — Site Development Concept • Samuel Farm Natural Areas Context 3. Land Atlas and Plat Book — Oakland County Michigan 1998 -OrAKLAND [(flu ;I [0 Samuel Farm Property Acquisition IMEMI1131" 5I Q 111M61741 CAI 116111114111.4 1111111111111%1"11 INEL imar—ipiot gm lit 4liformati Oakland County Oakland County Parks and Recreation staff is recommending the application for matching funds from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund for the purpose of acquiring the 57 acre Samuel Farm adjacent to Springfield Oaks County Park. This acquisition would significantly add to - the ability of Oakland County Parks to promote recreation in a rural setting and would help assure the long term viability of. the Oakland County Fair by expanding the ' facilities at Springfield Oaks. 0 1,000 Feet 1,000 500 MI MN A Samuel Farm Aguisition Target Legend 4.7 Land Acquisition Target - I Open Water 11:3 County Park Boundary M.7.1 Swamp or Marsh 0 800 400 111=11111 111111= 800 Feet 9 Samuel Farm Aquisition Target Parcel Overlay --AKLAND Legend " :Land Acquisition Target — Parcel Boundaries [ 11. I 11 ;1..11 ;ft.] 6County Park Boundary gm Swamp or Marsh FM=F:=IM 600 KEE= 600 Feet Samuel Farm Acquisition Concept Legend 4, Samuel Farm Property g' Existing Structures =I Springfield Oaks Park ••••nn• Existing Vegetation Edge 7 Contour Lines Ell Existing Park Buildings =1= i;a1EffrA , • \ q2:.4 V.::11111? _!" I giAL, Samuel Farm Acquisition Concept Samuel Farm Property II N Maintenance Access Road IIMI= Springfield Oaks Perk 0 0 Multi-Purpose Trail 2' Contour Lines I I I Park Road Existing Structures Grass Parking / Recreation Fields •••n••n Existing Vegetation Edge + + Rustic Fencing Existing Park Buildings Significant Natural Areas MI Priority One Priority Two Priority Three 0 4,000 Feet 2000 4,000 q-AKLAND ii;1[0 Samuel Farm Natural Area Context The Samuel Farm is located at the western tip of a wildlife corridor that extends though Springfield Oaks to Indian Springs Metropark and Pontiac Lake State Recreation area. The acquisition and stewardship of the Samuel Farm may help to create an Important connection with the Spring- field Township Shiawassee Basin Preserve. The Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) has identified significant natural areas within these cooridors. Promoting connectivity among these natural areas may insure the long term viablity of resident wildlife populations. Samuel Farm Natural Area Context Legend _1 Land Acquisition Target E,171 Recreational Lands 11= County Park Boundary D VVildlife Corridors ,,T,iV.THWE" SPRINGFIELD 84 SEE PAGE 82 Atrr.. on ,•1!'i..:4 * '..,wcrAlia.---alm•-n•n=011....= .., 0 UN T) V,1111 41.,.... , 02- 'PA RK'0.0. ,4r,; asTaicz. ,01011‘.n..kland - eounrsy ( LE ,j/07 n . c74 ' Ci T. 4 N. — R. 8 E. 40. ‘ra (t PLEASA KIT Knsot_Ls Sue • 'C ict colujiLl 100.47 HUR, 207..54 sco-oas 0/9.97 achford Maio Pub/ SEE PAGE 58 0a..k /and. Coo/7,7_4y Alich SMALL TRACT LISTING LOCATED ON PAGE 128 RED CARPET° KE1M REAL ESTATE Carter - Reed, Realtors 5790 South Main Street (M-15) Clarkston, Michigan 48346 (248) 620-8777 Fax: (248) 620-3384 ER nroutor Wirt"; Each office independently owned and operated Otegr Cr solo PI- WM. MAIM SI% Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund PUBLIC HEARING OAKLAND COUNTY Springfield Township Property Acquisition Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation -Secretor sb Enclosure uf--rnission is to provide recreational, leisure and learning experiences that enhance quality of life. QAKLAND 11 'ill ;1:0 2800 Watkins Lake Road • Waterford, Michigan 48328-1917 248-858-0906 • Fax 248-858-1683 • TTY 248-858-1684 • 1-888-0CPARKS www.co.oaldand.mi.us \l \‘-n January 20, 2006 Oakland Press 48 West Huron Pontiac, MI 48436 Re: LEGAL AD The Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission would like to place an advertisement in the Legal Ads of the Oakland Press on Wednesday, January 25, 2006. Set up the ad in a two-column format if possible. The copy for the advertisement is enclosed. We will also need a signed affidavit from you indicating that the ad has appeared. Send the invoice to Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission at the - above address. Please contact me at 248-858-4621 and let me know you have received the fax of this request and/or if you have any questions.Thank you for your cooperation. Sue Ball Design and Development NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at 9:00 am WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2006 The Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission will hold a public hearing at: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Administration Office 2800 Watkins Lake Rd. Waterford, MI 48328-1917 For the purpose of receiving citizen input for consideration of the submittal of grant applications to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for: Addison Oaks Safety Path Development and Springfield Oaks Property Acquisition Comments may be addressed at the public hearing or mailed to the above address. DATE, TIME FAX NO. /NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 01/20 11:43 912483328294 00:00:55 02 OK STANDARD ECM 4 / -14+:%n 11 I TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 01/20/2006 11:44 NAME : 04KLA4D COUNTY PARKS FAX : 2488581683 TEL : 2488580906 SER.# : BF0L4J997438 116. tqp:41W / 2800WatkinsLakeRoad•Waterford,Michigan48328-1917 248-858.0906 -Fax248-838-1683•TTY248-8513.1684 -1-888-0CPARKS www.co.oakiand.mi.us KLAND govi k ce:IN ciçP January 20, 2006 Oakland Press 48 West Huron Pontiac, MI 48436 Re: LEGAL AD The Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission would like to place an advertisement in the Legal Ads of the Oakland Press on Wednesday, January 25, 2006. Set up the ad in a two-column format if possible. The copy for the advertisement is enclosed. We will also need a signed affidavit from you indicating that the ad has appeared. Send the invoice to Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission at the above address. Please contact me at 248-858-4621 and let me knnw vnit havf? n4r.sivorl thP fay Page 1 o12 Suzanne Ball From: Ward, Mary [mary.ward©newspaperclassifieds.com ] [mary.ward@newspaperclassifieds.corn] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:58 PM To: Suzanne Ball Subject: RE: Legal Ad for 1/25/06 I did receive the faxed copies and the notice will publish on January 25, 2006 Mary A. Ward Death Notice/Legal Representative - Newspaper Classifieds The Oakland Press The Daily Tribune Heritage Newspapers Tel: 248-745-4766 Fax: 248-332-8294 **Confidentiality Note** THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND CONTAINS 21ST CENTURY NEWSPAPERS INC. INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE. AND DESTROY THE ORIGINAL AND ALL COPIES. THANK YOU. From: Suzanne Ball [mailto:balls@co.oakland.mi.us] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:08 PM To: Legals at OakPress Subject: Legal Ad for 1/25/06 The attached documents were faxed to your department this morning. I have had difficulty getting confirmation that the ad can appear in the legal ads on Wednesday, January 25, 2006. 1/23/06 Page 2 of 2 Please confirm that the request for advertisement has been received and will appear on the requested date. Thank you, Suzanne J. Ball Oakland County Parks & Recreation 248-858-4621 1/23/06 e re,sPo.ne„. . „:11iii.eiv7.00à11117. taikitttiliOtatIg. 0,..i., i.,,,iiid), divindpiggiklkatiI IA • -- ,----. 91 riprioel 1 t..,! r,talte Year; ,, ' the NiPth...., '--- -kiditie bile=?Al : .,...4_..,ii„.,,, he sneaker A 1 .0 ---;n EP,U.01,1(0 ,._,, . . , -.. -am; . 0-1:Q-0.-k-i'i . EDN SuAt, ,EORDR,..-,,,), i.iiii,(5!iii4.:1(04:11,4g.r.1411210rrrii,; It'4iiiiiNi C anditeriti,Creat tyir Administration„,-rw,, of-1100 Watkins LMAIV : atitfor fi!....4%, t,...fria,r4.,It , L qr-7.' 1M1:481284.0 ... ....:, , .. OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING PUBLIC HEARING February 1,2006 Chairman Pecky Lewis called the public hearing for grant applications to order at 9:10 a.m. in the commission room of the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission's administration office. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Pecky D. Lewis, Jr., Vice Chairman Richard Skarritt, Secretary J. David VanderVeen, Vincent Gregory, Martin Knollenberg, John McCulloch, John Richards, Suzette Vogt COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Hugh D. Crawford, Charles Palmer ALSO PRESENT: Parks and Recreation Ralph Richard, Executive Officer Daniel Stencil, Administrator — Parks Operations Frank Trionfi, Administrator — Parks Administration Joe Figa, Chief of Design and Development Mike Thibodeau, Chief of Golf Clyde Herb, Chief of Parks Janet Pung, Public Communications Officer Sue Wells, Chief of Recreation Jon Noyes, Architectural Engineer I Desiree Stanfield, Public Communications Assistant Suzanne Ball, Secretary I Heather Hughes, Secretary I Oakland County Corporation Counsel Joe Pittel, Assistant Corporation Counsel Oakland County Facilities Management Mike Hughson, Property Management Specialist Oakland County 4-H Fair L.C. Scramlin, General Manager Dave Coleman, President Chief of Design and Development Joe Figa noted that the Department of Natural Resources notified staff that the deadline to submit applications to request matching Michigan Natural Resources Trust and Land and Water Conservation funds for 2006 is April 1. A public hearing is also a requirement of the DNR to qualify for funds. Notice of the hearing was advertised in area newspapers. The projects staff selected are as follows: Addison Oaks Safety Path Development Springfield Township Property Acquisition Addison Oaks Safety Path Development: This proposed safety path will link Oakland Township's Cranberry Lake Preserve on the east with Bald Mountain State Park on the west, making this link an important tie into that trailway corridor. The preliminary project total is $450,000, with a 60/40 grant match in the amount of $270,000 from the MNRTF and $180,000 from Oakland County Parks and Recreation. Springfield Township Property Acquisition: 4a - 1 (Public Hearing, February 1, 2006) This acquisition consists of the 57-acre Samuels Farm adjacent to the western boundary of Springfield Oaks. The parcel consists of open farmland, with some wetlands, one wooded section, and some buildings. Plans for use of the land would include parking, a demonstration farm in conjunction with the Ellis barn, plus possibly a trail system. The preliminary project total for this acquisition is $900,000, with a 40/60 grant match in the amount of $360,000 from the MNRTF and $540,000 from Oakland County Parks and Recreation. Grant funding through the Land and Water Conservation Fund for these projects would be a 50/50 match, those funds will be available for applications later this year. These grant projects are consistent with the goals adopted in the 2002-2006 Recreation Master Plan. L.C. Scramlin, General Manager of the Springfield Oaks Activity Center, remarked that the proposed acquisition of the 57-acre farm in Springfield Township is one of the most important things that could happen to the park. This acreage is the only clear space that could be acquired for it; it is a key thing to help that park keep growing. He also noted the community would love to see this property stay as open space, and the Parks Commission can expect to receive tremendous support from the community. No questions were asked; therefore, the public hearing was declared closed at 9:16 a.m. Lt .1 W-L) J. David VanderVeen Karen Kohn CPS/CAP Secretary Recording Secretary Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION OAKLAND COUNTY Springfield Township Property Acquisition Operating Department: Oakland County Parks and Recreation RESOLUTION APPROVAL FOR GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has been notified by the Department of Natural Resources that application for cost sharing grants from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund and Land and Water Conservation Fund may be submitted by April 1,2006; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has identified and established priorities for acquisitions and improvements within the adopted Recreation Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission recommends the filing of the following application to the Department of Natural Resources for matching grant: Springfield Oaks Property Acquisition NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission recommends submission of the above-said grant application with the appropriate matching funds to be designated frv cTe-quarter mill. Moved by: Suppo February 1, 2006 Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public in and for the County of Oakland and the State of Michigan, the I 'Sr day of February, 2006. 4) KAREN S. KOHN Notary Public, Oakland County, Michigan My Commission Expires February 1,2007 Acting in the County of Oakland _ Date: FISCAL NOTE (MISC. 106065) March 23, 2006 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, CHUCK MOSS, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION - SUPPORT FOR SUBMISSSION OF GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND TO PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP PROPERTY TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The grant application requires an approved, up-to-date recreation plan for applicant eligibility. This plan must be locally adopted and approved by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Grants Management by April 1, 2006. 2. The purpose of the grant is to provide funding for the acquisition of the Samuel Farm property in Springfield Township. 3. The grant period is from April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. 4. The total cost for the project is $900,000, with $360,000 being requested through the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trust Fund and a required local match of $540,000 from the Oakland County Parks and Recreation fund. 5. No General Fund appropriation is required. Funding is available within the Parks and Recreation Fund. FINANCE COMMITTEE FINANCE COMMITTEE Motion carried on a roll call vote with Coulter, Zack and Woodward voting no. Resolution #06065 March 23, 2006 Moved by Patterson supported by KowaII the resolution (with fiscal note attached) be adopted. Moved by Patterson supported by KowaII the Planning and Building Committee Report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the report was accepted. Discussion followed. Vote on resolution: AYES: Douglas, Gregory, Hatchett, Jamian, KowaII, Long, Melton, Middleton, Molnar, Moss, Nash, Palmer, Patterson, Potter, Rogers, Scott, Suarez, Wilson, Bullard, Coleman, Crawford. (21) NAYS: Woodward, Zack, Coulter. (3) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolution (with fiscal note attached) was adopted. I HEREBY APPROVE THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION qz 7 /4 STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Ruth Johnson, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on March 23, 2006, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 23rd day of March, 2006. Rull-PAffitstrn, County Clerk MEE al41023R01 3HT 3110}1191 YON