HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2019.05.08 - 31365#19152
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION
BY: Commissioner Adam Kochenderfer, District #15 and Commissioner Thomas Kuhn, District #11
IN RE: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS — PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL
YEAR 2019 APPROPRIATION — CITY OF ROCHESTER HILLS -- RECONSTRUCT EAST AUBURN
ROAD -- PROJECT NO. 2019-19
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson; Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has authorized the Pilot Local Road Improvement
Program to assist Oakland County's cities and villages with the construction, maintenance and repair of
roads under the supervision, direction and control of cities and villages; and
WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution #16103 provides that any Oakland County appropriation in support
of the Pilot Local Road Improvement Program shall be distributed only after completion of all of the
following:
1. The municipality has fully completed and returned the standard project application form approved
by the Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee; and
2. The municipality has submitted a statement detailing that the project will fulfill the requirement of
encouraging and assisting businesses to locate in the county, as required in MCL 123.872; and
3. The municipality has agreed to comply with the provisions of MCL 123.872 that requires a report
shall be submitted to the Board of Commissioners outlining the project activities and, the degree
that the municipality has met the stated purpose of the project; and
4. The municipality has agreed to comply with policies and procedures of the program as approved
by the Board of Commissioners including supplementary policies approved by the Local Road
Improvement Program Special Committee; and
5. The Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee has reviewed and recommended
approval of the application; and
6. The Commissioner(s) representing the city or village requesting the project submits a resolution
authorizing the appropriation of the County's maximum 50% share of the project from the General
Fund Assigned Fund Balance for Pilot Local Road Improvement Program. The resolution shall be
approved by the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee and the full Board; and
7. A public hearing on the proposed project is conducted during a meeting of the Board of
Commissioners; and
8. The municipality has approved and executed a cost participation agreement prepared by
Corporation Counsel in accordance with requirements provided in the policies and procedures of
the program as approved by the Board of Commissioners including supplementary policies
approved by the Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee; and
9. The municipality submits an invoice to the county in accordance with the conditions included in the
cost participation agreement; and
WHEREAS the City of Rochester Hills has identified a project and submitted an application detailing the
goals and outcomes of the project; and
WHEREAS the City of Rochester Hills has demonstrated that it has available funding equal to a minimum
of 50% the project costs; and
WHEREAS Oakland County's share of the Fiscal Year 2019 authorized amount of the Local Road
Improvement Program funding for Project No. 2019-19 in the City of Rochester Hills is $132,415; and
WHEREAS funding of $132,415 is available in the General Fund Assigned Fund Balance for Local Road
Improvement Matching Program (#383465) for Project No. 2019-19; and
WHEREAS a public hearing regarding the project has been held before the Board of Commissioners in
accordance with the requirements of MCL 123.872; and
WHEREAS upon review of the project application, the Board of Commissioners has determined that the
completion of the project will encourage and assist businesses to locate in Oakland County.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby approves
the project submitted by the City of Rochester Hills and authorizes the release of Local Road Improvement
Program funds from the Oakland County Assigned Fund Balance (#383465).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute
the cost participation agreement with the City of Rochester Hills prepared by Corporation Counsel for the
Pilot Local Road Improvement Program Project No. 2019-19.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that th& Oakland County Clerk is requested to forward copies of this
resolution to Oakland County Fiscal Services and1he City of Ro hester Hills.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the FY2019 budget will be amended as follows -
Revenue
90101=01-196030-665882
so MW
Planned Use of BalanceJIM415
Total Revenue
1=05
Local Road Funding Program
$132,415
Total Expenditures
132 415
Chairperson, I move the adoption of the foregoing Resolution.
Commissioner Adam >416henderfer
District #15
Commissioner Thomas Kuhn
District #11
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PILOT PROGRAM
COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Reconstruct East Auburn Road
City of Rochester Hills
Board Project No. 2019-19
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2019, by and between the
Board of Commissioners of the County of Oakland, Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the
BOARD, and the City of Rochester Hills, hereinafter referred to as the COMMUNITY, provides
as follows:
WHEREAS, the BOARD has established the Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program, hereinafter the PROGRAM, for the purposes of improving economic development in
Oakland County cities and villages. The terms and policies of the PROGRAM are contained in
Attachment A. The BOARD intends the PROGRAM to assist its municipalities by offering limited
funds, from state statutory revenue sharing funds, for specific, targeted road maintenance and/or
improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction of cities and villages; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD shall participate in a city or village road project in an amount not
exceeding 50% of the cost of the road improvement, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT, and
also not exceeding the Preliminary Distribution Formula as it relates to the COMMUNITY,
(Attachment B); and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has identified the PROJECT as the Reconstruct East Auburn
Road, as more fully described in Attachment C, attached hereto, and made a part hereof, which
improvements involve roads under the jurisdiction of and within the COMMUNITY and are not
under the jurisdiction of the Road Commission for Oakland County or state trunk lines; and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed to the BOARD's policies regarding
the PROGRAM, Attachment A, and further acknowledge and agree that the PROJECT's purpose
is to encourage and assist businesses to locate and expand within Oakland County and shall
submit a report to the BOARD identifying the effect of the PROJECT on businesses in the
COMMUNITY at the completion of the PROJECT. In addition, the COMMUNITY acknowledges
that the program is meant to supplement and not replace funding for existing road programs or
projects; and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed that the PROGRAM is expressly
established as a pilot program and there is no guarantee that the PROGRAM will be continued
from year to year. The BOARD anticipates that most PROJECTS funded under the PROGRAM
will be completed by the end of calendar year 2020. There is no obligation on behalf of the
BOARD to fund either the PROJECT or the PROGRAM in the future; and
WHEREAS the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed that the COMMUNITY shall
assume any and all responsibilities and liabilities arising out of the administration of the PROJECT
and that Oakland County shares no such responsibilities in administering the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the PROJECT is $12,229,179; and
WHEREAS, said PROJECT involves certain designated and approved Local Road Improvement
Matching Funds in the amount of $132,415, which amount shall be paid to the COMMUNITY by
the BOARD; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD and the COMMUNITY have reached a mutual understanding regarding
the cost sharing of the PROJECT and wish to commit that understanding to writing in this
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and in conformity
with applicable law and BOARD resolution(s), it is hereby agreed between the COMMUNITY and
the BOARD that:
1. The BOARD approves of the PROJECT, and in reliance upon the acknowledgements
of the COMMUNITY, finds that the PROJECT meets the purpose of the PROGRAM.
2. The BOARD approves of a total funding amount under the PROGRAM for the
PROJECT in an amount not to exceed $132,415. The COMMUNITY shall submit an invoice to
the COUNTY in the amount of $132,415.
a. The Invoice shall be sent to:
Lynn Sonkiss, Manager of Fiscal Services
Executive Office Building
2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Building 41 West
Waterford, MI 48328
3. Upon receipt of said invoice and upon execution of this Agreement, the BOARD shall
pay the COMMUNITY the sum of $132,415 from funds available in the PROGRAM.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and date first
written above.
OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
LIM
Its:
COMMUNITY
It's:
Attachment "A"
PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Oakland County Government recognizes that Michigan law places the primary responsibility for
road funding on the State and non -county local units of government. However, the County also
recognizes that the law does permit a limited, discretionary role for the County in assisting a road
commission and local units within a county by supporting some road maintenance and
improvement efforts.
Accordingly, for many years Oakland County has voluntarily provided limited assistance to its
cities, villages and townships (CVT's) and to the Road Commission of Oakland County (RCOC)
by investing in a discretionary Tri -Party Road Program. Authorized under Michigan law, the
County's tri -party funding contributions primarily facilitate safety improvement projects on CVT
roads under the jurisdiction of the RCOC. By law, tri -party funds cannot be used to fund projects
on roads solely under the jurisdiction of CVT's.
Recognizing a continuing need to better maintain local CVT streets and roads, yet being ever
mindful of the County's limited responsibility for and jurisdiction over non -County roads and
streets, Oakland County Government wishes to pilot a discretionary program that is more flexible
than the current Tri -Party Road Program, one that will allow Oakland County to assist its cities
and villages with maintenance and safety projects on non -County roads.
Not being the funding responsibility of County government, local CVT roads generally cannot be
maintained or improved using County funds because doing so would be considered to be the
"gifting" of County resources. However laudable the purpose, Michigan law generally forbids the
gifting of government resources. To avoid application of the constitutionally -based gifting
restriction, the state legislature must, and in this arena has, determined that a public benefit results
from a taxpayer investment, one that provides a quid pro quo sufficient to avoid application of the
gifting prohibition. Here, the legislature has determined that the economic development benefit
presumed to accrue to a county as a result of local street and road investments can provide a
sufficient quid pro quo to county taxpayers justifying a discretionary county investment in a non -
county road, a benefit that constitutes a fair exchange for value and not a gift.
This legislative determination is set forth in 1985 P.A. 9, which amended 1913 P.A. 380, by adding
a new section 2, which in pertinent part provides:
"(1)...A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village or city located within that
county for the purpose of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand
within the county...
(2) A loan or grant made under subsection (1) may be used for local public improvements
or to encourage and assist businesses in locating or expanding in this state, to preserve
jobs in this state, to encourage investment in the communities in this state, or for other
public purposes."
Communities that wish to attract, retain and grow business, retain jobs and encourage community
investment, needs a safely maintained road infrastructure. This road infrastructure must include
both residential and commercial roads as workers and consumers need to get to and from work,
shopping, schools and recreation. In a fiscally prudent and limited manner, the County wishes to
help its cities and villages accomplish this objective by test -piloting a new local road improvement
matching fund program.
Any such program must be mindful of the limits imposed under Public Act 9. One important
restriction Public Act 9 imposed on grants or loans made pursuant to Subsection 2 of the Act is
the mandate that, "A grant or loan under this Subsection shall not be derived from ad valorem
taxes except for ad valorem taxes approved by a vote of the people for economic development."
This means that funding for an expanded local road assistance program cannot utilize proceeds
from any of Oakland County's ad valorem tax levies since no levy has been approved by voters
specifically for economic development.
Given this limitation, it appears that the state statutory revenue sharing appropriated to the County
can provide a non -ad valorem source of funds that legally can be used to support the pilot
program. Competition for those funds, which are limited in amount, is fierce and their yearly
availability is subject to the state legislative process. In the recent past, the State stripped all of
those funds away from Michigan counties. Understanding that reality, it shall be the policy of the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners that the Board shall not appropriate any County funds
for a local road improvement matching fund program for non -County roads in any year where the
State of Michigan fails to appropriate statutory revenue sharing funds to Oakland County in an
amount sufficient to allow the County to first prudently address its core functions.
Act 9 imposes additional conditions on grants and loans. These include requirements that the
loan or grant shall be administered within an established application process for proposals; that
any grant or loan shall be made at a public hearing of the county board of commissioners and
that the Board shall require a report to the county board of commissioners regarding the activities
of the recipient and a report as to the degree to which the recipient has met the stated public
purpose of the funding.
Understanding all of the above, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby establishes
the following Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program:
PROGRAM SUMMARY
The Board of Commissioners establishes a Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program for the purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and
villages. The County intends this Program to assist its municipalities by offering limited matching
funds for specific, targeted road maintenance andfor improvement projects on roadways under
the jurisdiction of cities and villages.
A city or village participating in the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program shall match
any fund authorized by the Board of Commissioners in an amount equal to a minimum of 50% of
the cost of the total project award. County participation shall be limited to a maximum of 50% of
the cost of the total project budget. Funding shall be utilized to supplement and enhance local
road maintenance and improvement programs. Funding is not intended to replace existing
budgeted local road programs or to replace funding already committed to road improvements.
PROJECT GUIDELINES
Program funding shall be utilized solely for the purposes of road improvements to roads under
the jurisdiction of local cities and villages. Road improvements may include, but not be limited to,
paving, resurfacing, lane additions or lengthening, bridges, or drainage as such improvements
relate to road safety, structure or relieving congestion.
Program funding:
May be utilized to supplement a local government's matched funding for the purposes of receiving
additional federal transportation funding;
May not be utilized to fulfill a local government's responsibility to fund improvements to state
trunklines;
Shall be limited to real capital improvements to roadways and shall not be utilized for other
purposes, such as administrative expenses, personnel, consultants or other similar purposes;
Shall not be utilized for non -motorized improvements, unless these improvements are included in
a project plan for major improvements to a motorized roadway;
Shall be utilized for projects that will result in a measurable improvement in the development of
the local economy and contribute to business growth. Recipients shall be responsible for providing
an outline of the economic benefits of the project prior to approval and for reporting to the Board
of Commissioners after the completion of the project on the benefits achieved as a result of the
projects.
IT]TTiZ1&30aF3K9liL
Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program projects may be appropriated by the Board of
Commissioners in compliance with the County budget process. The amount of funds to be
dedicated for the Pilot Program shall be determined by the Board of Commissioners on an annual
basis. Program funding may be reduced or eliminated based upon the ability of the County
government to meet primary constitutional and statutory duties. The Board of Commissioners
expressly reserves the right to adjust the County matching funds share at any time based upon
County budget needs.
In accordance with MCL 123.872, funds dedicated to the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program shall not be derived from ad valorem tax revenues. Program funding shall be limited to
funds derived from the County's distribution from the Michigan General Revenue Sharing Act.
Reduction or elimination of the County's distribution of revenue sharing funds may result in the
elimination or suspension of the program.
Funding availability shall be distributed based upon a formula updated annually. The formula will
consist of:
1. A percentage derived from the number of certified local major street miles in each city and
village divided by aggregate total of certified local major street miles of all cities and
villages in the County.
2. A percentage derived from the population of each city and village as determined by the
last decennial census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau divided by the aggregate
total population of cities and villages in the County.
3. A percentage derived from the three-year rolling total of the number of crashes on city and
village major local streets divided by the aggregate three-year rolling crash numbers for
all city and village major local streets, using the most recent data available. The crash data
will be supplied by the Road Commission for Oakland County using data from the Traffic
Improvement Association.
Each city and villages percentage allocation shall be determined by adding each factor
percentage and dividing that total by three. The amount of funds available for match shall be
determined by the total amount of funds allocated by the Board of Commissioners added to an
equal amount representing the match provided by local cities and villages.
The Chairman of the Board of Commissioners shall establish a Special Committee on the Local
Road Improvement Program. This Special Committee shall consist of three members, with two
members representing the majority caucus and one member representing the minority caucus. It
shall be the responsibility of the Special Committee to direct the administration of this program,
receive applications for program funding and make recommendations of acceptance to the Board
of Commissioners. The Special Committee may consult with County departments, staff and the
Road Commission for Oakland County in the conduct of its business.
DISBURSEMENT
The Special Committee shall forward recommendations for approval of Local Road Improvement
Matching Fund Program projects to the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. This
recommendation shall include a cost participation agreement between the County and
participating municipality. Minimally, cost participation agreements shall include: responsibility for
administering the project, the project location, purpose, scope, estimated costs including
supporting detail, provisions ensuring compliance with project guidelines, as well as disbursement
eligibility requirements. The cost participation agreement shall also require the maintenance of
supporting documentation to ensure compliance with the following provisions:
1. Any and all supporting documentation for project expenditures reimbursed with appropriated
funding shall be maintained a minimum of seven years from the date of final reimbursement for
actual expenditures incurred.
2. The Oakland County Auditing Division reserves the right to audit any and all project
expenditures reimbursed through the program.
Upon receipt of recommendation of project approval from the Special Committee, the County
Commissioner or Commissioners, representing the area included in the proposed project, may
introduce a resolution authorizing approval of the project and the release of funds. Resolutions
shall be forwarded to the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee of the Board of
Commissioners, who shall review and issue a recommendation to the Board on the adoption of
the resolution. The Chairperson of the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee shall
schedule a public hearing before the Board of Commissioners prior to consideration of final
approval of the resolution.
The deadline for projects to be submitted for consideration shall be established by the Special
Committee. The Special Committee may work with participating municipalities to develop a plan
for projects that exceed that municipality's annual allocation amount. This may include a limited
plan to rollover that municipality's allocation for a period of years until enough funding availability
has accrued to complete the project, subject to funding availability.
upon completion of project plans and execution of the local participation agreement by the County
and governing authority of the local municipality, the participating municipality shall submit an
invoice in accordance with the terms and conditions included in the agreement. The Oakland
County Department of Management and Budget Fiscal Services Division shall process payments
in accordance with policies and procedures as set forth by the Department of Management and
Budget and the Oakland County Treasurer.
In the event an eligible local unit of government chooses not to participate in the Local Road
Improvement Matching Fund Program, any previously undistributed allocated funding may be
reallocated to all participating local units of government at the discretion of the Local Road
Improvement Program Special Committee.
At the completion of each project, the participating local government shall provide a report to the
Board of Commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the
recipient has met the stated public purpose of the funding as required by MCL 123.872.
P"
ATTACHMENT C
Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program
Reconstruct East Auburn Road
City of Rochester Hills
Board Project No. 2019-19
Reconstruction of East Auburn Road between Culbertson and Dequindre roads, including
asphalt pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer improvements, signage, and
alleyway and side street improvements.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
LAP Roadway Project Improvements $6,262,268
Local Project Improvements $2,317,702
Entry Features and Plaza Project $2,000,000
Utilities, Demolition, Dumpsters, Acquisition, Design, Testing, etc. $3,323,748
Additional Outside Funding $(1,674,539)
Total Estimated Project Costs $12,229,179
COST PARTICIPATION BREAKDOWN:
COMMUNITY
COUNTY
TOTAL
FY2019 LRIP Program
$130,384
$130,384
$260,768
Additional Contribution
$11,966,380
$2,031
$11,968,411
TOTAL SHARES
1$12,096,764
$132,4151
$12,229,179
IF� -
I I 1 11
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341.0475
phorw* {248)858.0100
Fax; (248) 858-1572
I III I ill �
To- T(M I F N i i
UTOUM-11=4 Mfmn. #TOLMTrammrimuliw*T-.lqFrir*Ko "m mum; Wat 1111ims
Jill l�� iiiiiiiiiii � lli�l �1111111!11
■
R� -1,115
1'7 119 0 "P4,11''I'MAW01
MUNlICIPAILITY
CONTACT R,SON -
TELEPHONE NUMBER
City of Rochester Hills
Allan E. Schneck, P.E.
248.841.2497
STREET ADDRESS
CITYIZIP
E-MAIL. ADDRESS
19007 Rochester Hills Drive
Rochester Hills, MI 48309
schnecka@rochesterhills,org
PROJECT INFORMATION
Reconstruct E. Auburn Road between Culbertson and Dequindre roads, including asphalt
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer improvements, signage, and alleyway and side
street improvements.
City File No, E16-015
E. Auburn Road from Culbertson Ave. to Hessel Rd.
The Auburn Rd. corridor reconstruction involves revitalizing the road from Culberston Ave. to
Hessel Rd, into a new downtown for Rochester Hills. While commercial development throughout
Rochester Hills has modernized the City, this district has consistently remained unchanged and is
prime for redevelopment. The goal of the project is strengthen the overall district brand as a unique
destination within Oakland County, calm traffic around neighborhoods, increase safety for drivers
and pedestrians with new crossings, create a more walkable environment, stimulate business
development, incorporate green elements, and promote city and property owner collaboration for
reinvestment.
PROJECT BUDGET
MAX COUNTY MATCH LOCAL MATCH TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
$132,415.00 $132,415.00 $12,229,179.14
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Local road improvements are currently estimated at: $6,309,887.50
Please refer to attached documents for break down of project costs.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF PROJECT
The Local Road improvement Pilot Program has been established under MCL 123.872, the Gifts of Property Act, which
provides that "A county ma rant or loan funds to a township, village, or city located within that count for the purpose
of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand within the county."
DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT OF ENCOURAGING AND ASSISTING BUSINESS TO LOCATE AND
EXPAND IN THE COUNTY
The City of Rochester Hills has earned national recognitions as one of the best 2014 Top 10 Best
Places to live in America and ranked number 1 in Michigan by Money Magazine. Rochester Hills
has a population of over 70,000 and is home to a variety of industries including tool and die,
manufacturing and distribution, computer technology, and electronic research. Being an attractive
community increases the demand to improve infrastructure within the city. Therefore, it is essential
for Rochester Hills to improve and maintain its roadways in order to meet the needs of the city's
residents and businesses that reside here.
Local road improvements are an important part of our infrastructure as they assist employees and
consumers get to and from their destination safely and conveniently. Improving the roads increases
safety and longevity as we can bring them to moderns standards (install edge drains, increase
pavement thickness, add 6 -inch aggregate base). In particular for the Auburn Rd. corridor the
amenities being incorporated into the road project, such as rain gardens, will be a tremendous
improvement to overall aesthetics. New local parks and business exteriors are also some of the
many ideas that are to be integrated into the project. With this in -mind it is expected that this area
will become a very attractive destination for prospecting businesses and residents.
The Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has been
tasked with managing this program and making recornmenclations for project approval. Please supply any additional
Information you believe may be helpful In the consideration of your application.
REPORT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT
IVICL 123,872 requires that "the grant or loan contract made by a county shall require a report to the county board of
commissioners regardingtheactivities of the recipient and the degree to which the recipient has met the stated public
purpose of the funding",
., on behalf of the City of Rochester Hills , have been provided with a copy of tht
Policies and Procedures of the Local Road Improvement Program (Attachment "A") and agree to comply with these
terms and conditions,
1, on behalf of tit City of Rochester Hills understand and agree to comply with the
requirement to provide the Claidand County Board of Commissioners with a report following the completion of an
approved project outlining the degree to which the project met the stated purpose of thefunding,
Signature of Authorized Party
Allan E. Schneck, P.E. Department of Public Services Director
Printed Name and Title
Please return completed application to:
A pdf copy of application can be emailed to;
0. -
Local Road Improvement Special Committee
Oakland County Board of Commissioners
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, IMI 48341-0475
Amy Aubry, Analyst AHhntg@g2kgq)t=
tinail addressabove orbypbone at(248)858-1067.
OPINION OF PROBABLE
OHM PROJECT COST
ORCHARD, HILTc &McCLIMENT, INC.
34000 Plymouth Road, Livonia, Michigan, 40150 Telephone: (734) 522-6711 FAX; ¢734) 522-6427
PROJECT Auburn Road Corridor Improvements - Contract 111, 1121 & 113 DATE: April d, 2018
LOCATION. Auburn Road - Rochester Hills PROJECT fl: 0190-17-0020
WORK: Full -depth HMA pavt reconstruction, storm sewer, alley Improvements, ESTIMATOR: ML
sidewalk, lighting, pavement markings, and signing farm Culbertson to Hassel CHECKED BY: ML
CURRENT ENR:
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT
CODE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
COST
Contract #
LAF ROADWAY PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL FOR CONTRACT #1
$
6,262,267.04
Contract #2
LOCAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL FOR CONTRACT #2
$
2,476,702.00
ITEMS OF WORKED REMOVED.FROM CONTRACT 2 (CHARGING STATIONS/DUMPSTERS/A&S SIGN)
$
(1591,000,00)
REVISED SUBTOTAL FOR CONTRACT #2
$
2,317,702.00
Contract #3
ENTRY FEATURES AND PLAZA PROJECT
ESTIMATED TOTAL FOR CONTRACT #3
SUBTOTAL ALLCONTRACTS
$ 2,OOft,004.00
$' 10,57,9, 969.94
OTHER CITY COST
FRANCHISE UTILITY RELOCATIONS
$
50,000.00
STREET LIGHTING
$
351,748.20
ROW ACQUISITION
$
150,000.00
HOME DEMOLITION
$
51,000.00
CHARGING STATION/DUMPSTERS/A&S SIGN WORK (ASSUMED TOTAL)
$
100,000.00
ROW ;ACQUISITION SERVICES
$
90,000,00
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (251)
$
2,259,000,00
MATERIAL TESTING (2.5%)
$
269,000.00
SUBTOTAL
3,323,748.20
TOTAL PROJECT COST
13,9034718.14
POTENTIAL OUTSIDE FUNDING,
MDOTTURNBACK MONIES
$
(600,000.00)
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (TAP GRANT)
$
(481,318,00)'
STPD FEDERAL AID
$
(593,221.0[7)
SAFETY GRANT'
TOTAL OUTSIDE FUNDING
$
(1,674,539,00)
TOTAL CITY COST
$ 12,229,179.14.1
1 of
OH M
ORCHARD, HILTZ & MoCLIMENT, INC.
34000 Plymaulh Road, Uvonin, Michigan, 46160
PROJECT: Auburn road Reconstruallon
LOCATION! Auburn Road - Culbertson to Dequindre
WORK: Auburn Road Sireoisoapa improvements>
" +!
Telephone: (734)622-671.1
DATE: January
PROJECT 11: 0190.1'
CHECKEC BY: BW
CURRENT ENR: ML
ITEM
CODE
DESCRIPTION :::��TOTAL
I
UNIT PENCE
COST
CATEGORY I:® Participating
15000011 Mobikatlon, Max
LSUM
0.38
$ 558,000.00
212,040.00
20570021 Earth, Rain Gardens, 12 Inch depth
Cyd
569
$
20.00
$
11,380.01
_Excavation,
8030046 Sidewalk, Conc, 6 inch.
Sit
61446
$
5.50
$
337,953.00
8037010 Colored Exposed Aggregate Concrete, Nonreinf, 6 inch
Sit
1:5895
-$
10.00
$
158,950.00
8037010 _Colored Exposed Aggregate Concrete, Nonreinf, 8 Inch
Sft
15324
$
12,00
$
183,888.00
8037010 Conc, 8 inch
Sft
910
$
7.00
$
6,370.00
_Sidewaik,
8150001 Site Preparation; Max
LSUM
1
$110,000.00
$
110,000.00
8150603 CalamaRrostis x: acutiflorn'Karl Foerster', #i 1 cont.
Ea
458
$
15.00
$
6,870.00
8152496 Nepeta x faassenil'Walkers Low', 01 cont,
Ea
169
$
1.5.00
$
2,535.00
8153167 Rhus eromatica'Gro-Low'; 113 cont?
Ea
82 $
55,00
$
4,510,00
8153279 Rudbeckla fuldiga'Goldsturm', ##1 cant.
Ea
751
$
15.00
$
13,265.00
8153421 Sedum'Autumn Joy', ##1 cont;
Ea
710
$
15.00
$
10,650.00
8153644 ISporobolus heterolepis, #1 cont:
Ea
692
$
15.00
$
10,380,00
8153811 IThuja occidental is 'Emerald', 6 foot
Ea
17
$
300,00
$
5,100,00
8157050 °Green Mnuntain', 3 Inch
Ea
5
$
550.00
$
2,750.00
_Acersaccharum
8157050 _Amelanchler laevis'Spririg Flurry', 8 foot
Ea
12
$
300,00
$
3,600,00
8157050 _Glnkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry', 3 Inch
8157050 _Gymhoclaclus dialcus `Espresso', 3 inch
8157050 _Iris Orglnica, I#1 cont
8157050 _Juniperus chinensis var. sargentil, 43 cont.
8157050 —Nyssa sylvatica, 3 inch
8157050 —Panicum virgatum, 4#1 cont:
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea 1
37
12
446
155
53
475
$
$
$
$
$
$
550,00
550.00
15.00
55.00
550:00
15.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
20,350.00
9,600.00=
6,690.00
8,525,00
29,150.00'
7,125.00
81.57050 _Physostegia virginiana, #71. cont;
Ea
152
$
15.00
$
2,280.00
8157050 _Platanus x acerifolla'Exclamation', 3 inch
Ea
33 $'
550.00
$
1.8,150.00
815705D —Quercus rubra; 3 inch
Ea
5
$
550.00
$
2,75D.00
81570513 Quercus x war! 'Long', 3 Inch
Ea
40 $
550.00
$
22,000.00
8157050 _Rosa tarolina,:f#3 cunt,
Ea
379 $
55.00
20,845.00
8157050 _Schizachyrlum scoparlum, ##1 cant,
Ea
379 $
15.00
$
5,685.00
8357050 _Spiraea tomentosa, 91 cant.
Ea
219
30,00
$
6,570.00
8157050 5piraea x bumalda'Goldflame', 03 cont,
'Ea
338
55;0o
$
18,590,00
8157050 _2elkova serratta'Green Vase', 3 inch
Ea
15 $
550:00
8,250.00
81.57051 _Watering and Cultivation, First Season, Modified
LSU«
1 $
55,000.00
$
55,000.00
_Watering and Cultivation, Second Season, Modified
LSUM
1 $
65,000.00
$
65,000.00
tShapedEdging
Ft
242 $
10.00
$
2,420.00
Landscape Fabric
Sft
145 $
1,00
$
145.00
L8167011_Double Shredded Hardwood Bark Mulch, 3" depth
Syd
3871 $
50:00
$
193,550.00
_Cobble Stone
Cyd
3 $
150;00
$
450.00
_Planting Mix
Cyd
1406 $
50:00
$
70,300000
8167021 _Rain Garden Planting Mix
Cyd
1137 $
60:00
$
68,220.00
8167051 _Epoxy Adhesive
LSUM
1
1,0011:00
$
1,000.00
CATEGORY 3 - Non -Participating
8087001 _Rain Garden Fence
8087050 Bench
8087050 —Bike Rack
ft
Ea
Ea
3995 $
14
25
50:00
3,200.00
500.00
$
$
$'
199,750,00
44,800.00
12,500.00
1of2.
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CODE
UNIT TOTAL UNIT PRICE
COST
8087050 Charging Station
Ea
14 $
2,000.00
$ 28,OD0,00
8087050 _litter Receptacle
Ea
14 $
2,ODO.00
$ 28,000.00
8087050 _Recycling Receptacle
Ea
14 $
2,000.00
$ 28,000.00
8087050 _Tree Grate
Ea
16 $
2,640.00
$ 41,600.00
8157051:_Underground Automatic Irr€gation System
LSUM
1 $
951000.00
$ 95,000.00
8190147 Conduit, Schedule 40, 2 inch
Ft
1067 $
15,00
$ 16,005.00
8190151 Conduit, Schedule 40, 4 inch
Ft
1067 $
12,00
$ 12,804.00
8190161 Conduit, Schedule 80 PVC, 4Inch
Ft
2266 $
30,00
$ 67,980.00
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY I - Participating
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 3 - Non -Participating
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION[ COST =
$ 1,717,886.00
$ 574,439.00
$ 2,292,325A0
2of2
,i.
OHM
ORCHARD, HILT & McCLIMENT, INC.
34000 Plymouth Road, Livonia, Michigan, 48160
PROJECT: Auburn Bond Reconstruction
LOCATION; Auburn (Toad - Culbertson to DorrWndro
WORK: RaconstruotlDn of 0.5 mics of roadway Including asphalt pavement,
curb & gutter, sidewalk, storm saWer, pavement markings, street-
seeping, signing, and modern roundabouts of rnultipls Intersections,
OPINION L
CONSTRUCTION T
Tolophane; V34) 522-5711 FAX: (734) 522-0427
I7ATC: January 31, 2010
PROJECT 0: 0100-17-0020
ESTIMATOR; 0
CNCC<ED BY; KR
CURRENT ENR. hot,
ITEM
CODS
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
TOTAL
UNIT PIaiCE
COSI
CATEGORY 1 -Roadway Participating
1077060 Reimbursed permit Fees
1500041 Mobilization, Max
Dr
LSUM
20000 $ 1.04
0.62 $ 558,000.0
$
$
20,000.00
345,960.00
2024006 Stump, Rem, 19 Inch to 36 Inch
Ea
2 $
300.00
604.00
2030001 Culv, Rem, Less than 24 Bach
Ea
2 $
350.04
$
70UD
2030011 Dr Structure, Rem
2030015 Sewer, Rem, Lefts than 24 filch
Ea
Ft
6 $
946 $
SCUO
30,40
$
$
3,000.00
28,380,00
2040020 Curb and Cutter, Rem
Ft
3701 $
10.00
37,010.00
2040021 Curb, Rem
Ft
72 $
Sm
$
360,00
2440425 Fence, Remi
Ft
30 $
10,00
$
344,40
2440050 Pavt, Rem
2444455 Sldewalk, Rem
Syd
Syd
6787 $
27571 $
10.40
7.50
$
$
67,870,04
20,677.50
2447051 Relocate Sunoco Business Sign
LSUM
1 $
20,000.40
$
24,040.00
2447451 Remove Business Sign
LSUM
I 1 $
2,400,0(1
$
2,040,40
2454010 Embankment, CIP
Cyd
1 640 $
10.40
$
6,000,40
2050016 Excavation, Earth
Cyd
10867
20.00
$
2.17,344.00
2054031 Non Naz Contaminated Materlai Handling and Disposal, LM
Cyd
1400 $
34,44
$
30,000,40'
2050041 Subgrade Undercutting, Type II
2057021 Subgrade Undercutting, Type Il, Mod€fled
2057050 Exploratory Excavation
Cyd
Cyd
Ea
2404 $
2000
30 $
30,04
30.00
540,00
$
$
$
60,000,00
64,044,04
15,040.00
2484420 Eroslon Control, Inlet Protection, Fabric Drop
Ea
100 $
144.04
$
10,000.40'
2480436 Erosion Control, Silt Fence
Ft
540 $
1100
$
540.00
3020016 Aggregate Base, 6Inch
Syd
9943 $
9.44
$
89,127,401
3024020 Aggregate Base; -8 Inch
3020028 Aggregate Base; 11 inch
Syd
Syd
15439 $
1.354 $
12.00
14,00
$
$
185,268,114
18,956.00
3060020 Maintenance Caravel
4410047 Culv End Sect, Conc, 12 inch
Tun
Ea
1500 $:
1 $
25;00
500:40
$
$
37,54400
500.00
4010647 ICtjlv, C) F, 12 inch
Ft
42 $
50..00
2,100.40
4020987 Sewer, Cl IV, 12 inch, Tr Det 8
4020986 Sewer, Cl IV, 15 inch, Tr [let B
4420989 Sewer, Cl IV, 18 Inch, Tr Det B
Ft
Ft
Ft
2262 $
493 $
867 $
50.00
57,00
60,00
$
$
$
113,100,00
28,101.00
52,420,00
4024993 Sewer, Cl IV, 24 Inch, Tr Det B
Ft
191 $
1101.001
21,010.00'
4021230 Sewer Bulkhead, 12 inch
4021260 Trench Undercut and Backfill
Ea
Cyd
4 $
25 $
250.00
100;00
$
1,000,00
2,540.40'
4021275 Video Taping Sawer and Culv Pipe
Ft
3606 $',
1.40
$
3,606.00
40270141 Sewer, HDPE, 12 Inch, Tr Det B
Ft
1634 $
50;00
$
81,700,00'
4434405 Dr Structure cover, Adj, cased
4034006 Dr Structure Coyer, Adj, Case 2
Ea'
Ea
5 $'
1 $
500140
500.00
$
$
2,500.00'
5414.40
4030010 Dr Structure Cover, Type B
Ea
15 $
500.€10
$
7,500.00
44340115 Dr Structure Cover, Type;C'
Ea
3 $
500100
$
1,500.00
4030035 Dr Structure Cover, Type E
Ea
3 $
400.40
$
1,240.00
4430450 Dr Structure Cover, Type K
Ea
46
650.00
$
29,900.00
4030070 Dr structure Cover, Type R
Ea
5 $
620.00
$
3,100.40
4030204 Dr Structure, 24 inch dia
4030210 Or Structure, 48 inch dia
Ea
Ea
11 $
57 $
1,304:00
1,800.00
$'
$
14,340,00
142,600.00
1of4
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CODE
UNIT
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
COST
4030220 Dr Structure, 60 inch dia
Ea
4
$
3,500.00
$
14,000.00
4030230 Dr Structure, 72 inch dia
Ea
1
$
4,000.00
$
4,000,00
4030250 Dr Structure, Add Depth of 48 inch dia, 8 foot to 15 foot
Ft
4 $
150.00
$
600.00
4030280 Dr Structure, Adj, Add Depth
Ft
32
$
225.00
$
7,200.00
4030312 jDr Structure, Tap, 12 Inch
Ea
3
$
500,00
$
1,500.00
4630390 Dr Structure, Temp Lowering
Ea
11 $
500.00
$
5,500,00
4037050 Dr Structure Cover, ADA Compliant
Ea
3
$
SOD.00
$
1,500,00
4037050 Dr5tructure Cover, Adj, Case 1, OCWRC
Ea
4 $
500.00
$
2,000,00
4037050 Dr Structure Tap, OCWRC, 18 inch
Ea
1
$
1,000.OD
$
1,00D.00
4037050 Dr Structure Tap, OCWRC, 24 inch
Ea
1
$
1,500,00
$
1,500.00
4037050 Dr Structure Tap, OCWRC, 6 inch
Ea
4 $
500,00
$
2,000.00
4037050 Dr Structure, YARD BASIN, 12 inch
Ea
47
$
1,000.00
$
47,000.00
4037050 Hydrodynamic Separator Structure, 2 cfs
Ea
2
$
35,000.00
$
70,000.00
4037050 Iron Curb Opening
Ea
46
$
150.00
$
6,900,[10
4037050 Monitoring Well, Adjust
Ea
1
$
500.00
$
500,00
4037050 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Cover, Adj, Case 1
Ea
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
4037050 Sanitary Structure Manhole Cover
Ea
1
$
600.()0
$
600.00
4040073 Underdrain, Subgrade, 6 Inch
Ft
663
$
10.00
$
6,630.00
4040093 Underdrain Outlet, 6 Inch
Ft
105
$
17.00
$
1,785.00
4067001 ITrench Drain with Grate, 12 inch
Ft
184
$
50.00
$
9,200.00
5010001 1Pavt, Cleaning
LSUM
1
$
5,000,00
$
5,000,00
5010005 HMA Surface, Rem
Syd
21411
$
4,00
$
85,644.00
5010009 Edge Trimming
Ft
515
$
5.00
$
2,575.00
5010025 Hand Patching
Ton
165 $
150.00
$
24,750.00
5010045 HMA, 3E3
Ton
3041
$
70.00
$
212,870.00
5DIO051 HMA, 4E3
Ton
1219
$
75.00
$
91,425,00
5010057 HMA, 5E3
Ton
1112
$
80.00
$
88,960.00
5010061 HMA Approach
Ton
907
$
90,00
$
81,630.00
5010703 HMA, LVSP
Ton
187
$
90.00
$
16,830,00
5017031. HMA Approach, Commercial
Ton
161 $
90.00
$
14,490.DO
6027001 Joint Sealant
lFt
355
$
2.50
$
887.50
6030005 lCement
Ton
50 $
200.00
$
10,()00,00
7057050 Conc Parking Rail
Ea
7 $
700.00
$
4,900.00
7057050 Conc Parking Rall, Rel
Ea
23
$
50,00
$
1,150.00
7060092 Reinforcement, Steel, Epoxy Coated
Lb
9299
$
1.50
$
13,948,50
8020002 Curb, Conc, Det E2
Ft
220
$
22.00
$
4,840.00
8020036 Curb and Gutter, Conc, Det F2
Ft
3205
$
22.00
$
70,510.00
8020037 lCurb and Gutter, Conc, pet F3
Ft
168
$
22,00
$
3,696.00
8020038 Curb and Gutter, Conc, Det F4
Ft
5057
$
22.00
$
111,254.00
8020050 Driveway Opening, Conc, Det M
Ft
563
$
22.00
$
1.2,386,00
8027001 Curb and Gutter, Conc, Det D2, Modified
ft
352
$
22.00
$
7,744.00
8027001 Curb and Gutter, Conc, Det F4, Modified
Ft
1019
$
24.00
$
24,456.00
8027001 Curb and Gutter, Conc, Det F4, Modified, Special
Ft
575
$
2400
$
13,800.00
8030010 Detectable Warning Surface
Ft
847
$
40,00
$
33,880,00
8030030 lCurb Ramp Opening, Conc
Ft
1245
$
25.00
$
31,125,00
8030036 Isidewalk Ramp, Conc, 6 inch
Sft
8761
$
7.50
$
65,707.50
8030044 Sidewalk, Conc, 41nch
Sft
37318
$
4.00
$
149,272.00
8030046 Sidewalk, Conc, 6 inch
Sft
187
$
5.50
$
1,028.56
8()50020 Curb Vertical, HMA
Ft
65
$
20.00
$
1,300,00
8077050 Post Mailbox, Remove and Reset
Ea
3
$
75.00
$
225.00
8680007 Fence, Protective
Ft
70001
$
5,00
$
35,000.00
8080061 Fence Gate, 16 foot, for 48 inch Chain Link Fence
Ea
1
$
2,000,00
$
2,000,00
8100340 Post Hole Through Conc for Steel Post
Ea
56 $
50.00
$
2,800,00
8100402 Sign, Type 111, Erect, Saly
Ea
34
$
75.00
$
2,550,00
8100403 Sign, Type 111, (tem
Ea
33
$
10.00
$
330,00
8100404 Sign, Type IIIA
Sft
135
$
15.00
$
2,025.00
8100405 Sign, Type 1133
Sft
486
$
1S.00
$
7,290,00
8107001 Perforated Black Steel Square Traffic Sign Post
Ft
1115
$
10.00
$
11,150.00
8110041 IPavt Mrkg, Oviy Cold Plastic, 12 Inch, Crosswalk
Ft
2562
$
5.00
$
12,510,00
8110045 Pavt Mrkg, Ovly Cold Plastic, 24 Inch, Stop Bar
Ft
33
$
10.00
$
330.00
2of4
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CODE
UNIT TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
COST
8110048 Pavt Mrkg, Ovly Cold Plastic, Yield
Ea
8
$
150.00
$
1,200.00
8110063 Pavt Mrkg, ovly Cold Plastic, Lt Turn Arrow Sym
Ea
1
$
250.00
$
250.00
81101.53 Pavt Mrkg, Sprayable Thermopl, 4 inch, White
Ft
1806
$
0.50
$
903.00
8110154 jPavt Mrkg, Sprayable Thermopl, 4 inch, Yellow
Ft
1463
$
0.50
$
731.50
8110155 Pavt Mrkg, Sprayable Thermopl, 6 inch, White
Ft
117
$
1.00
$
117.00
8110156 Pavt Mrkg, Sprayable Thermopl, 6 inch, Yellow
Ft
430
$
1.00
$
430.00
811.0159 Pavt Mrkg, Sprayable Thermopl, 12 Inch, White
Ft
132
$
2.00
$
264.00
8110204 Pavt Mrkg, Preformed Thermoplastic, Accessible Sym
Ea
1
$
300.00
$
300.D0
8110212 Pavt Mrkg, Thermopl, 12 inch, Cross Hatching, White
Ft
35
$
5.00
$
175.00
8110213 1 Pavt Mrkg, Thermopl, 12 Inch, Cross Hatching, Yellow
Ft
183
$
5.00
$
915.00
8110231 Pavt Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, White
Ft
198
$
0.50
$
99.00
8117001 Pavt Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 Inch, Blue
Ft
95
$
0.50
$
47.50
8120012 Barricade, Type ill, High Intensity, Double Sided, Lighted, Furn
Ea
65
$
85.00
$
5,525.00
8120013 Barricade, Type #II, High Intensity, Double Sided, Lighted, Oper
Ea
65
$
1.00
$
65.00
8120026 Pedestrian Type II Barricade, Temp
Ea
20
$
200.00
$
4,000.00
8120030 IChannellzlng Device, 42 inch, Furn
Ea
220
$
10.00
$
2,200.00
8120031 Channelizing Device, 42 inch, Oper
Ea
220
$
1.D0
$
220.00
8120170 MinorTraf Devices
LSUM
1
$
40,000.00
$
40,000.00
8120210 Pavt Mrkg, Longit, 6 inch or Less Width, Rem
Ft
3180
$
0.75
$
2,385.00
8120235 Pavt Mrkg, Wet Reflective, Type NR, Paint, 4 inch, White, Temp
Ft
2916
$
0.75
$
2,187.00
8120236 Pavt Mrkg, Wet Reflective, Type NR, Paint, 4 inch, Yellow, Temp
Ft
2882
$
0.75
$
2,161.50
8120245 Pavt Mrkg, Wet Reflective, Type R, Tape, 4Inch, White, Temp
Ft
2738
$
1.50
$
4,107.00
8120246 Pavt Mrkg, Wet Reflective, Type R, Tape, 4 inch, Yellow, Temp
Ft
3587
$
1.50
$
5,380.50
8120310 Sign Cover
Ea
10
$
50.00
$
500.00
8120332 Sign, Portable, Changeable Message, NTCIP-Compliant, Furn
Ea
2
$
2,000,00
$
4,000,00
8120333 Sign, Portable, Changeable Message, NTCIP-Compliant, Oper
Ea
2 $
100.00
$
200.00
8120340 Sign, Type A, Temp, Prismatic, Furn
Sft
272
$
3,00
$
816.00
8120341 Sign, Type A, Temp, Prismatic, Oper
Sft
272
$
1.00
$
272.00
8120350 Sign, Type B, Temp, Prismatic, Furn
Sft
2580
$
3.00
$
7,740.00
8120351 Sign, Type B, Temp, Prismatic, Oper
Sft
2580
$
1..00
$
2,580.00
8120352 Sign, Type B, Temp, Prismatic, Special, Furn
Sft
297
$
10.00
$
2,970,00
8120353 Sign, Type B, Temp, Prismatic, Special, Oper
Sft
297
$
1AD
$
297.00
8120370 Traf Regulator Control
LSUM
1
$
501000.00
$
50,000.00
8127001 Pedestrian Path, Temp
Ft
160 $
20.00
$
3,200.00
8127050 Pedestrian Ramp, Temp
Ea
2 $
500.00
$
1.,000.00
8167011 Turf Establishment, Performance
Syd
4323
$
6.00
$
25,938.00
8190010 Cable Pole, TS, Disman
Ea
1 $
125.00
$
125.00
8190026 Conduit, DB, 1, 11/4 inch
Ft
10
$
16.00
$
160.00
8190028 lCondult, DB, 1, 2 1/2 Inch
Ft
370
$
1.5.00
$
5,550.00
8190029 Conduit, DB, 1, 3 Inch
Ft
30
$
20.00
$
600.00
8190031 Conduit, DB, 2, 2 1/2 inch
Ft
5406
$
15.00
$
81,090.00
8190244 Hh, Adj
Ea
2
$
500.00
$
1,000,00
8190250 Hh, Potymer Conc
Ea
38
$
600.00
$
22,800.00
8190254 Hh, Rem
Ea
2
$
150.00
$
300,00
8190260 Ift Round
Ea
1 $
950.00
$
950,00
8190501 Wood Pole, Fit Up, TS Cable Pole
Ea
1
$
700.00
$
700.00
8197050 Light Std Unit, Rel
Ea
1
$
1,000.00
$
1,000.00
8197050 Light Std Unit, Rem
Ea
3
$
1,000.00
$
3,000.00
8200100 Pedestal, Alum
Ea
1
$
800.00
$
800,00
8200705 Pedestal, Fdn
Ea
1 $
800.00
$
800.00
8200106 Pedestal Fdn, Rem
Ea
5 $
150.00
$
750.00
8200110 Pedestal, Rem
Ea
1
$
100.00
$
100100
8200122 Pushbutton, Rem
Ea
4
$
50.00
$
200,D0
8200124 Pushbutton Pedestal, Rem
Ea
4 $
100.00
$
400.00
8200135 Sery Disconnect
Ea
1
$
900.00
$
900,00
8200136 Sery Disconnect, Rem
Ea
1
$
1.00.00
$
100,00
8200183 108blnet, Salv
Ea
1
$
350.00
$
350,00
8200184 Cabinet, Rem
Ea
1 $
125,00
$
125.00
8200425 lWireless Vehicle Sensor Node
Ea
3
$
900,00
$
2,700.00
8200426 1WIreless Vehicle Sensor Node, Rem
Ea
6 $
125.00
$
750.00
3 of 4
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CODE
UNIT
TOTAL UNIT PRICE
COST
8200427 lWireless Vehicle Sensor Node, Saiv
Ea
6 $
350.00
$
2,100,OD
8200453 ITS Head, Temp
Ea
1 $
750.00
$
750.00
8207050 Fiber Optic School Speed Limit Sign, Rem, RCOC
Ea
1 $
300,00
$
300,00
8207050 Fiber Optic School Speed Limit Sign, Salv, RCOC
Ea
11
650.00
$
650,00
8207050 TS Face, Bag
Ea
14 $
225,00
$
3,150,00
8207050 TS Face, Bag, Rem
Ea
14 $
200.00
$
2,800.00
8210010 Monument Preservation
Ea
50 $
500.00
$
25,000.00
8230091 lHydrant, Rem
Ea
9 $
300,00
$
2,700.00
8230095 lHydrant, Relocate, Case 1
Ea
1,00 $
2,000,00
$
2,000.00
8237001 Gate We4 Cover, Adj, Add Depth
Ft
20 $
SOO.00
$
10,000.00
8237001 Water Main, DI, 6 -Inch, Open Cut
Ft
411.00 $
50.00
$
20,550,00
82370SO Connect to Exist Water Main, 12 -inch
Ea
5.00 $
3,000.00
$
15,000,00
8237050 Connect to Exist Water Main, 6 -Inch
Ea
4.00 $
1,500.00
$
6,000.00
8237054 Connectto Exist Water Main, 8 -inch
Ea
5 $
2,000.00
$
10,000.00
8237050 Fire Hydrant Assembly
Ea
14 $
5,500,00
$
77,000.00
8237050 Gate Well Cover
Ea
23 $
500.00
$
11,500.00
8237050 Gate Well Cover, Adj, Case 1
Ea
16 $
500.00
$
8,000.00
8237050 Gate Wel I Cover, Adj, Case 2
Ea
2 $
500.00
$
1,000.00
8237050 Water Shutoff, Adj
Ea
31 $
200.00
$
6,200.00
CATEGORY 3 -Roadway Non -Participating
1077051 Audio -Visual Filming
LSUM
1 $
5,0o0,00
$
5,000.00
3020020 Aggregate Base, 8 Inch
Syd
120 $
12.00
$
1,440.00
3020028 Aggregate Base, 11 Inch
Syd
3228 $
14.00
$
45,192,00
5010045 HMA, 3E3
Ton
388 $
70,00
$
27,160,00
5010051 HMA, 4E3
Ton
311 $
75.00
$
23,325.00
5010057 IHMA, 5E3
'fon
233 $
80.00
$
18,640.00
8100340 Post Hole Through Conc for Steel Post
Ea
7 $
50.00
$
350.00
8100404 Sign, Type IIIA
Sft
11 $
15.00
$
165,00
8107001 Perforated Black Steel Square Traffic Sign Post
Ft
98 $
10,00
$
980.00
8110153 Pavt Mrkg, Sprayable Thermopl, 4 inch, White
Ft
1860 $
0.50
$
930.DO
8110204 Pavt Mrkg, Preformed Thermoplastic, Accessible Sym
Ea
7 $
300.00
$
2,100.04
8237001 ISprinkler Line
Ft
500 $
5.00
$
2,500.00
8237050 Sprinkler Head, Relocate
Ea
25 $
SO.00
$
11250,00
8237050 ISprinkler Head, Replace
Ea
25 $
50.00
$
1,250.00
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 1 -Roadway Participating
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 3 -Roadway Non-Partlelpating
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST =
$
$
$
3,694,595.50
130,282.00
3,824,877.50
4of4
Letting of April 05, 2099
Letting Call: 1904 046
Project: STU 63000-204658, ETC
Low Bid: $6,262,267.91
Engineer Estimate: $6,309,887,50
Local Agreement: 19-5910 Pct OvertUnder Estimate: -0,75 %
Start bate: 10 days after award Completion pate: November 16, 2021
Description:
0.45 mi of hot mix asphalt pavement, earth excavation, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm
sewer, crosswalks, landscaping, street furniture and pavement markings along Auburn Road from Culbertson
Avenue to Hesse[ Avenue in the city of Rochester Hills, Oakland County. This is a Local Agency project,
6,00 % DBE participation required
Bidder As-Submittted
Angelo lafrate Constructlon Company $6,262,267,94
- - - - - -
onstructlan , ' .._....�... ' - •", .. ; ..._.... $7 059;428.55. .. , �� ,
- -
Dan's Excavating, Inc, ..... :_. $7,442,651,37.:......... ::':...:........:. . ............ . ..._:_ . _.:_.:..,.....
Total Number of Bidders 3
Resolution #19152
May 8, 2019
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee. There
were no objections.