HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2019.05.23 - 31762REPORT IMISC, #191381 May 23, 2019
BY: Commissioner William Miller, Chairperson, Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee
IN RE: MR #19138 - BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS — PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2019 APPROPRIATION — CITY OF FARMINGTON — REPAIR AND
RESURFACING OF LOCAL ROADS — PROJECT NO. 2019-05
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee, having reviewed the above -referenced resolution on
May 14, 2019, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee, I move the acceptance of
the foregoing report.
Commissioner William Miller, District #14
Chairperson, Economic Growth and
Infrastructure Committee
ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE VOTE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Spisz absent.
#19138
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION
BY: Commissioner William Miller, District #14
IN RE: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS -- PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL
YEAR 2019 APPROPRIATION — CITY OF FARMINGTON — REPAIR AND RESURFACING OF LOCAL
ROADS — PROJECT NO. 2019-05
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has authorized the Pilot Local Road Improvement
Program to assist Oakland County's cities and villages with the construction, maintenance and repair of
roads under the supervision, direction and control of cities and villages; and
WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution #16103 provides that any Oakland County appropriation in support
of the Pilot Local Road Improvement Program shall be distributed only after completion of all of the
following:
1. The municipality has fully completed and returned the standard project application form approved
by the Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee; and
2. The municipality has submitted a statement detailing that the project will fulfill the requirement of
encouraging and assisting businesses to locate in the county, as required in MCL 123.872; and
3. The municipality has agreed to comply with the provisions of MCL 123.872 that requires a report
shall be submitted to the Board of Commissioners outlining the project activities and the degree
that the municipality has met the stated purpose of the project; and
4. The municipality has agreed to comply with policies and procedures of the program as approved
by the Board of Commissioners including supplementary policies approved by the Local Road
Improvement Program Special Committee; and
5. The Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee has reviewed and recommended
approval of the application; and
6. The Commissioner(s) representing the city or village requesting the project submits a resolution
authorizing the appropriation of the County's maximum 50% share of the project from the General
Fund Assigned Fund Balance for Pilot Local Road Improvement Program. The resolution shall be
approved by the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee and the full Board; and
7. A public hearing on the proposed project is conducted during a meeting of the Board of
Commissioners; and
8. The municipality has approved and executed a cost participation agreement prepared by
Corporation Counsel in accordance with requirements provided in the policies and procedures of
the program as approved by the Board of Commissioners including supplementary policies
approved by the Local Road Improvement Program Special Committee; and
9. The municipality submits an invoice to the county in accordance with the conditions included in the
cost participation agreement; and
WHEREAS the City of Farmington has identified a project and submitted an application detailing the goals
and outcomes of the project; and
WHEREAS the City of Farmington has demonstrated that it has available funding equal to a minimum of
50% the project costs; and
WHEREAS Oakland County's share of the Fiscal Year 2019 authorized amount of the Local Road
Improvement Program funding for Project No. 2019-05 in the City of Farmington is $17,760; and
WHEREAS funding of $17,760 is available in the General Fund Assigned Fund Balance for Local Road
Improvement Matching Program (#383465) for Project No. 2019-05; and
WHEREAS a public hearing regarding the project has been held before the Board of Commissioners in
accordance with the requirements of MCL 123.872; and
WHEREAS upon review of the project application, the Board of Commissioners has determined that the
completion of the project will encourage and assist businesses to locate in Oakland County.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby approves
the project submitted by the City of Farmington and authorizes the release of Local Road Improvement
Program funds from the Oakland County Assigned Fund Balance (#383465).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute
the cost participation agreement with the City of Farmington prepared by Corporation Counsel for the Pilot
Local Road Improvement Program Project No. 2019-05.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Clerk is requested to forward copies of this
resolution to Oakland County Fiscal Services and the City of Farmington.
BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED the FY 2019 budget will be amended as follows:
GENERAL FUND #10100 FY 2019
Revenue
9010101-196030-665882 Planned Use of Balance $17,760
Total Revenue UZ=7PD
Expenditures
9010101-153000-740085 Local Road Funding Program $17,760
Total Expenditures 1 76
Chairperson, i move the adoption of the foregoing Resolution.
Commissioner William Miller
District #14
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PILOT PROGRAM
COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Repair and Resurfacing of Local Roads
City of Farmington
Board Project No. 2419-05
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2019, by and between the
Board of Commissioners of the County of Oakland, Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the
BOARD, and the City of Farmington, hereinafter referred to as the COMMUNITY, provides as
follows:
WHEREAS, the BOARD has established the Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program, hereinafter the PROGRAM, for the purposes of improving economic development in
Oakland County cities and villages. The terms and policies of the PROGRAM are contained in
Attachment A. The BOARD intends the PROGRAM to assist its municipalities by offering limited
funds, from state statutory revenue sharing funds, for specific, targeted road maintenance and/or
improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction of cities and villages; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD shall participate in a city or village road project in an amount not
exceeding 50% of the cost of the road improvement, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT, and
also not exceeding the Preliminary Distribution Formula as it relates to the COMMUNITY,
(Attachment B); and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has identified the PROJECT as the Repair and Resurfacing of
Local Roads, as more fully described in Attachment C, attached hereto, and made a part hereof,
which improvements involve roads under the jurisdiction of and within the COMMUNITY and are
not under the jurisdiction of the Road Commission for Oakland County or state trunk lines; and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed to the BOARD's policies regarding
the PROGRAM, Attachment A, and further acknowledge and agree that the PROJECT's purpose
is to encourage and assist businesses to locate and expand within Oakland County and shall
submit a report to the BOARD identifying the effect of the PROJECT on businesses in the
COMMUNITY at the completion of the PROJECT. In addition, the COMMUNITY acknowledges
that the program is meant to supplement and not replace funding for existing road programs or
projects; and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed that the PROGRAM is expressly
established as a pilot program and there is no guarantee that the PROGRAM will be continued
from year to year. The BOARD anticipates that most PROJECTS funded under the PROGRAM
will be completed by the end of calendar year 2020. There is no obligation on behalf of the
BOARD to fund either the PROJECT or the PROGRAM in the future; and
WHEREAS the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed that the COMMUNITY shall
assume any and all responsibilities and liabilities arising out of the administration of the PROJECT
and that Oakland County shares no such responsibilities in administering the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the PROJECT is $3,804,791; and
WHEREAS, said PROJECT involves certain designated and approved Local Road Improvement
Matching Funds in the amount of $17,760, which amount shall be paid to the COMMUNITY by
the BOARD; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD and the COMMUNITY have reached a mutual understanding regarding
the cost sharing of the PROJECT and wish to commit that understanding to writing in this
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and in conformity
with applicable law and BOARD resolution(s), it is hereby agreed between the COMMUNITY and
the BOARD that:
1. The BOARD approves of the PROJECT, and in reliance upon the acknowledgements
of the COMMUNITY, finds that the PROJECT meets the purpose of the PROGRAM.
2. The BOARD approves of a total funding amount under the PROGRAM for the
PROJECT in an amount not to exceed $17,760. The COMMUNITY shall submit an invoice to the
COUNTY in the amount of $17,760.
a. The Invoice shall be sent to:
Lynn Sonkiss, Manager of Fiscal Services
Executive Office Building
2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Building 41 West
Waterford, MI 48328
3. Upon receipt of said invoice and upon execution of this Agreement, the BOARD shall
pay the COMMUNITY the sum of $17,760 from funds available in the PROGRAM.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and date first
written above.
OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
go
Its:
COMMUNITY
in
It's:
Attachment 'W
PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Oakland County Government recognizes that Michigan law places the primary responsibility for
road funding on the State and non -county local units of government. However, the County also
recognizes that the law does permit a limited, discretionary role for the County in assisting a road
commission and local units within a county by supporting some road maintenance and
improvement efforts.
Accordingly, for many years Oakland County has voluntarily provided limited assistance to its
cities, villages and townships (CVT's) and to the Road Commission of Oakland County (RCOC)
by investing in a discretionary Tri -Party Road Program. Authorized under Michigan law, the
County's tri -party funding contributions primarily facilitate safety improvement projects on CVT
roads under the jurisdiction of the RCOC. By law, tri -party funds cannot be used to fund projects
on roads solely under the jurisdiction of CVT's.
Recognizing a continuing need to better maintain local CVT streets and roads, yet being ever
mindful of the County's limited responsibility for and jurisdiction over non -County roads and
streets, Oakland County Government wishes to pilot a discretionary program that is more flexible
than the current Tri -Party Road Program, one that will allow Oakland County to assist its cities
and villages with maintenance and safety projects on non -County roads.
Not being the funding responsibility of County government, local CVT roads generally cannot be
maintained or improved using County funds because doing so would be considered to be the
"gifting" of County resources. However laudable the purpose, Michigan law generally forbids the
gifting of government resources. To avoid application of the constitutionally -based gifting
restriction, the state legislature must, and in this arena has, determined that a public benefit results
from a taxpayer investment, one that provides a quid pro quo sufficient to avoid application of the
gifting prohibition. Here, the legislature has determined that the economic development benefit
presumed to accrue to a county as a result of local street and road investments can provide a
sufficient quid pro quo to county taxpayers justifying a discretionary county investment in a non -
county road, a benefit that constitutes a fair exchange for value and not a gift.
This legislative determination is set forth in 1985 P.A. 9, which amended 1913 P.A. 380, by adding
a new section 2, which in pertinent part provides:
"(1)...A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village or city located within that
county for the purpose of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand
within the county...
(2) A loan or grant made under subsection (1) may be used for local public improvements
or to encourage and assist businesses in locating or expanding in this state, to preserve
jobs in this state, to encourage investment in the communities in this state, or for other
public purposes."
Communities that wish to attract, retain and grow business, retain jobs and encourage community
investment, needs a safely maintained road infrastructure. This road infrastructure must include
both residential and commercial roads as workers and consumers need to get to and from work,
shopping, schools and recreation. In a fiscally prudent and limited manner, the County wishes to
help its cities and villages accomplish this objective by test -piloting a new local road improvement
matching fund program.
Any such program must be mindful of the limits imposed under Public Act 9. One important
restriction Public Act 9 imposed on grants or loans made pursuant to Subsection 2 of the Act is
the mandate that, "A grant or loan under this Subsection shall not be derived from ad valorem
taxes except for ad valorem taxes approved by a vote of the people for economic development."
This means that funding for an expanded local road assistance program cannot utilize proceeds
from any of Oakland County's ad valorem tax levies since no levy has been approved by voters
specifically for economic development.
Given this limitation, it appears that the state statutory revenue sharing appropriated to the County
can provide a non -ad valorem source of funds that legally can be used to support the pilot
program. Competition for those funds, which are limited in amount, is fierce and their yearly
availability is subject to the state legislative process. In the recent past, the State stripped all of
those funds away from Michigan counties. Understanding that reality, it shall be the policy of the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners that the Board shall not appropriate any County funds
for a local road improvement matching fund program for non -County roads in any year where the
State of Michigan fails to appropriate statutory revenue sharing funds to Oakland County in an
amount sufficient to allow the County to first prudently address its core functions.
Act 9 imposes additional conditions on grants and loans. These include requirements that the
loan or grant shall be administered within an established application process for proposals; that
any grant or loan shall be made at a public hearing of the county board of commissioners and
that the Board shall require a report to the county board of commissioners regarding the activities
of the recipient and a report as to the degree to which the recipient has met the stated public
purpose of the funding.
Understanding all of the above, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby establishes
the following Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program:
PROGRAM SUMMARY
The Board of Commissioners establishes a Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program for the purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and
villages. The County intends this Program to assist its municipalities by offering limited matching
funds for specific, targeted road maintenance and/or improvement projects on roadways under
the jurisdiction of cities and villages.
A city or village participating in the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program shall match
any fund authorized by the Board of Commissioners in an amount equal to a minimum of 50% of
the cost of the total project award. County participation shall be limited to a maximum of 50% of
the cost of the total project budget. Funding shall be utilized to supplement and enhance local
road maintenance and improvement programs. Funding is not intended to replace existing
budgeted local road programs or to replace funding already committed to road improvements.
PROJECT GUIDELINES
Program funding shall be utilized solely for the purposes of road improvements to roads under
the jurisdiction of local cities and villages. Road improvements may include, but not be limited to,
paving, resurfacing, lane additions or lengthening, bridges, or drainage as such improvements
relate to road safety, structure or relieving congestion.
Program funding:
May be utilized to supplement a local government's matched funding for the purposes of receiving
additional federal transportation funding;
May not be utilized to fulfill a local government's responsibility to fund improvements to state
trunklines;
Shall be limited to real capital improvements to roadways and shall not be utilized for other
purposes, such as administrative expenses, personnel, consultants or other similar purposes;
Shall not be utilized for non -motorized improvements, unless these improvements are included in
a project plan for major improvements to a motorized roadway;
Shall be utilized for projects that will result in a measurable improvement in the development of
the local economy and contribute to business growth. Recipients shall be responsible for providing
an outline of the economic benefits of the project prior to approval and for reporting to the Board
of Commissioners after the completion of the project on the benefits achieved as a result of the
projects.
ADMINISTRATION
Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program projects may be appropriated by the Board of
Commissioners in compliance with the County budget process. The amount of funds to be
dedicated for the Pilot Program shall be determined by the Board of Commissioners on an annual
basis. Program funding may be reduced or eliminated based upon the ability of the County
government to meet primary constitutional and statutory duties. The Board of Commissioners
expressly reserves the right to adjust the County matching funds share at any time based upon
County budget needs.
In accordance with MCL 123.872, funds dedicated to the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program shall not be derived from ad valorem tax revenues. Program funding shall be limited to
funds derived from the County's distribution from the Michigan General Revenue Sharing Act.
Reduction or elimination of the County's distribution of revenue sharing funds may result in the
elimination or suspension of the program.
Funding availability shall be distributed based upon a formula updated annually. The formula will
consist of:
1. A percentage derived from the number of certified local major street miles in each city and
village divided by aggregate total of certified local major street miles of all cities and
villages in the County.
2. A percentage derived from the population of each city and village as determined by the
last decennial census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau divided by the aggregate
total population of cities and villages in the County.
3. A percentage derived from the three-year rolling total of the number of crashes on city and
village major local streets divided by the aggregate three-year rolling crash numbers for
all city and village major local streets, using the most recent data available. The crash data
will be supplied by the Road Commission for Oakland County using data from the Traffic
Improvement Association.
Each city and villages percentage allocation shall be determined by adding each factor
percentage and dividing that total by three. The amount of funds available for match shall be
determined by the total amount of funds allocated by the Board of Commissioners added to an
equal amount representing the match provided by local cities and villages.
The Chairman of the Board of Commissioners shall establish a Special Committee on the Local
Road Improvement Program. This Special Committee shall consist of three members, with two
members representing the majority caucus and one member representing the minority caucus. It
shall be the responsibility of the Special Committee to direct the administration of this program,
receive applications for program funding and make recommendations of acceptance to the Board
of Commissioners. The Special Committee may consult with County departments, staff and the
Road Commission for Oakland County in the conduct of its business.
DISBURSEMENT
The Special Committee shall forward recommendations for approval of Local Road Improvement
Matching Fund Program projects to the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. This
recommendation shall include a cost participation agreement between the County and
participating municipality. Minimally, cost participation agreements shall include: responsibility for
administering the project, the project location, purpose, scope, estimated costs including
supporting detail, provisions ensuring compliance with project guidelines, as well as disbursement
eligibility requirements. The cost participation agreement shall also require the maintenance of
supporting documentation to ensure compliance with the following provisions:
1. Any and all supporting documentation for project expenditures reimbursed with appropriated
funding shall be maintained a minimum of seven years from the date of final reimbursement for
actual expenditures incurred.
2. The Oakland County Auditing Division reserves the right to audit any and all project
expenditures reimbursed through the program.
Upon receipt of recommendation of project approval from the Special Committee, the County
Commissioner or Commissioners, representing the area included in the proposed project, may
introduce a resolution authorizing approval of the project and the release of funds. Resolutions
shall be forwarded to the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee of the Board of
Commissioners, who shall review and issue a recommendation to the Board on the adoption of
the resolution. The Chairperson of the Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee shall
schedule a public hearing before the Board of Commissioners prior to consideration of final
approval of the resolution.
The deadline for projects to be submitted for consideration shall be established by the Special
Committee. The Special Committee may work with participating municipalities to develop a plan
for projects that exceed that municipality's annual allocation amount. This may include a limited
plan to rollover that municipality's allocation for a period of years until enough funding availability
has accrued to complete the project, subject to funding availability.
Upon completion of project plans and execution of the local participation agreement by the County
and governing authority of the local municipality, the participating municipality shall submit an
invoice in accordance with the terms and conditions included in the agreement. The Oakland
County Department of Management and Budget Fiscal Services Division shall process payments
in accordance with policies and procedures as set forth by the Department of Management and
Budget and the Oakland County Treasurer.
In the event an eligible local unit of government chooses not to participate in the Local Road
Improvement Matching Fund Program, any previously undistributed allocated funding may be
reallocated to all participating local units of government at the discretion of the Local Road
Improvement Program Special Committee.
At the completion of each project, the participating local government shall provide a report to the
Board of Commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the
recipient has met the stated public purpose of the funding as required by MCL 123.872.
■
Ta
ATTACHMENT C
Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program
Repair and Resurfacing of Local Roads
City of Farmington
Board Project No. 2019-05
To improve local and major roads within the City of Farmington, by crack sealing, joint
replacement, and full slab replacement, as well as mill & fill asphalt roads, and improve
pedestrian crossings. Potential local streets could include Chesley north of 8 Mile Road, Tree
Hill north of Freedom Road, Lilac north of Grand River, Gill Road patching project, Cass Street
patching project, Brittney Hill Patching project, Flanders Street east of Farmington, Oakland
Street reconstruction, Mayfield Street reconstruction.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
Construction Costs
Total Estimated Project Costs
COST PARTICIPATION BREAKDOWN:
019 LRIP Program
itional Contribution
COMMUNITY
$17,488
$3,769,543
COUNTY
$17,488
$272
AL SHARES I $3,787,0311$17,760
$3,804,791
$3,804,791
TOTAL
$34,976
$3,769,815
$3,804,791
BOA" OF COMMISSIONERS 120 N. Telegrapli Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-0475
P110110: (248) 8504 100
Fax: (248) 858-1572
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PILOT PROGRAM
to supplement and enhance local road maintenance arid improvement pr I ograms, Funding is not
ng already committed to
intended to p�place existing budgeted local road programs or to replace fuhdi
road improvements.
PROJECT INFORMATION
To improve local and major roads within the City of Farmington, by crack sealing, joint
replacement, and full slab replacement, as well as mill & fill asphalt roads, and improve pedestrian
crossings.
Potential local streets could include Chesley north of 8 Mile Road, Tree Hill north of Freedom Road, Lilac north
of Grand River, Gill Road patching project, Cass Street patching project, Brittney Hill Patching project, Flanders
Street east of Farmington, Oakland Street reconstruction, Mayfield Street reconstruction.
All Concrete Maintenance and HMA projects would include:
Audio/Video inspection of route prior to reconstruction. Erosion control as specified by Oakland
County Water Resource Commissioner. Barricading per MDOT and/or RCOC standards. Full
depth pavement removal, including curb and gutter where applicable. Sub -grade undercut as
needed and instructed from engineers as soil conditions dictate. Repair or reconstruct storm water
collection system as needed. Repair or reconstruct sanitary collection system as needed. Improve
water distribution system as outlined in or 2014 Water Reliability Study, Pedestrian crossing
improvements which may include rapid flashing beacons similar to the one located at Farmington
Road & State Street, pedestrian safe zone where crossing multiple lanes of traffic. Detectable
warning surface at pedestrian crossings as needed. Turf establishment and timely closeout of
Oakland County Soil Erosion Permit.
PROJECT BUDGET
MAX COUNTY MATCH LOCAL MATCH TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
$17,760 $17,760 $3,804,791
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Please see attachments
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF PROJECT
The Local Road improvement Pilot Program has been established under MCL 123,872, the Gifts of Property Act, which
provides that "A cou ity may rant or loan funds to a township, villa e or cit located within that county for the purpose
of encoura in and assistln businesses to locate and expand within the county."
1039
FXPAND IN THE COUNTY
Monthly the City of Farmington Engineers, Roads & Infrastructure Committee meet to established a
priority list of road maintenance projects. The targeted locations are highly visible and on the major
arteries entering the community. The City of Farmington Capital Improvement Committee meets
monthly to review progress and evaluate proposed road improvement and infrastructure projects.
Grand River to the east falls outside of our Downtown Development Authority; our vision is to
extend the quaint shopping district of the downtown from the Farmington DDA boundaries to
Farmington Hills as this area meets the Eight Mile Boulevard. This would expand our shopping
district and could ultimately bring more people to our community.
To our souther border with Wayne County, Chesley Drive at Eight Mile Road is a gateway to our
largest commercial district in the City of Farmington. Improvements in this area would draw a
distinct line between Wayne and Oakland Counties, welcoming people to both our county and our
Farmington community.
Grand River, being the City of Farmington's major thoroughfare and a MDOT Route, must always
be maintained as an alternate route when road construction or traffic emergencies occur on 1696.
Any traffic that is re-routed through the City of Farmington is an opportunity for the community to
show that it is a family -friendly destination with a lot to offer. Downtown Farmington consist of
many boutique -type businesses. Traffic is crucial to their success.
A key focus of Farmington City Administration is to make the community a year-round destination.
The downtown now includes an outdoor public ice rink in the winter months, summer concerts in
the park and a farmers market. Business recruitment is another component to the viability of the
community. It is critical to the success of the community that its gateways and pathways are in
keeping with the quality of the downtown, and that they are safe.
As a walkable destination, pedestrians look for a safe environment to work, play and visit local
businesses. If pedestrians do not feel safe crossing major roads, they will likely travel elsewhere. If
road surfaces are deteriorated motorist will find a different route to their destination, thus bypassing
a small town community. Existing local businesses will endure the higher cost of deliveries, due to
the fact if the roads are failing, this causes increased vehicle maintenance cost, which are passed
down to the consumer.
Pedestrians, motorist, deliveries, and businesses entering the community will see the direct efforts
of reinvestment into the community by the Local and County government's.
The Local Road improvement Program Special Committee of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has been
tasked with managing this program and making recommendations for project approval, Please supply any additional
information you believe may be helpful in the consideration of your application.
REPORT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT
MCL 123.872 requires that "the grant or loan contract made by a County
purpose of the fErndin`.
1, on behalf of City of Farmington , have been provided with a copy of the
Policies and Procedures of the Local Road Improvement Program (Attachment 'W') and agree to comply with these
terms and conditions.
1, on behalf of Its/ of Farmington understand and agree to comply with the
requirement to provide the Oakland County Board of Commissioners with a report following the completion of an
approved project outlining the degree to which the project met the stated purpose of thefunding.
Cha
r , ,
J.IV f /201
OU�Nblk
S.MuZRII-C 17 X
s, &f�(.gd,.ffi,C-V1 4/189 leslEudy
OlglW-Ch
WW,12019MAQ u-.27t1S-0,rW
Signature of Authorized Party Date
Charles J Eudy
Printed Name and Title
Please return completed application to:
Local Road Improvement Special Committee
Oakland County Board of Commissioners
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-0475
Amy Aubry, Analyst a_ubrya@oakEov.com
eirwil address a6ove or by pbone at (�48)858.1067-
September 12, 2018
1vir. Chuck Eudy
Public ��orks Superintendent
City of Farmington
23600 Liberty Street
Farmington, 14148335
RERecommendation of Award — 2018 Farmington Roads Nla ntenance & Rehabilitation Project
Dear Mr. Eudy:
Sealed bids for the 2018 Farmington Roads maintenance & Rehabilitation project were received and publicly read aloud
at 2:00 p.tn. on Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at the City of Farmington offices. Proposals were received from three (3)
bidders. Bids with as -checked results ranged from $1:459,390.20 to $476,170.10. The engineer's estimate for the project
was $435,326.50 (See bid tab).
We evaluated all three bidders, while contacting references for some that we were slat famili r with. In reviewing the bids,
all is £or nation, including bond surety, statement of qualifications, and subcontractors listing, was provided.. The lowest
hid was received from Hartwell Cement Company, located at 21650 Fern Avessue, teak Park, MI 48237 in the amount of
$459,390.20.
It is felt that Hartwell Cement Company and their subcontractors are capable of performing the work lased on past
experiences, referenced projects, and information provided with the statement of qualifications in the bid package. Based.
on the submitted information, it is recommended that the 2018 Farmington Roads Maintenance &
Rehabilitation contract be awarded to Hartwell Cement Company of Oak Park, MI in the amount of $459,390.20,,
with a contingency budget of $23,000.00 to help cover unforeseen issues. This results in a total tecommended
construction budget of $484,390.20, which is above the final engineer's estimate.
Sincerely,
01 -IM Advisors
Matthew D. parks P.E.
TNIE)P/ jlh/ abd
Eild. laid Tale
cc: David Murphy, City 2,vlaiiager
Jessica14oward., OHNE Advisors
File
P:\0101_0125\0111180020_2()18_1 arm IZds_Nlaivt_8c 4Ze1�ab\_Ctnstnicticn\100 Adm inistration\i06 Carrespcndencc;
OHM Advisors
34000 PLYMOUTH ROAD T" 734 522.6711
I..IVON9t5,MICHIGAN 4BISf3 IF 7345226427 OHM-Advi!w,� c -or,
ORCHARD, HILTZ & McCLIMENT, INC.
34000 Plymouth Road, Livonia, Michigan, 4BI50
Telephone: (734) 522-6711 FAX: (734) 522-6427
PROJECT 2018 Farmington Roads Maintenance & Rehabilitation DATE: April 4, 2018
PROJECT #: 0111-18-0021
LOCATION: City of Farmington ES-PMATOH: ALL
WORK: CHECKED BY:
CURRENT ENR:
i
m
O
N
d
m
a
v
E
m
c
m
Lti
C! n000o 00 Ir1oo
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ry o 0 o
ry
C
O O O O [V N O
O O N Nr �� N_ N
O N O m JVai N M
ul
N d1
�
N
O
di
o
p p o 0 0 0 P o 0 0 N N Li ui
0 0 oU O 00 N CyO �� m Li N
JujV
{lin)
0
O N o N 6�9 N to Ffi b~9
l6 O
Co a• o cV O
CD
000 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 n o
0
0
0
� o06vi ui000 Iri000
omv0i l°o,mrn�uOi�N_N�
ui
Qo,
L1 m
o
2y'�m
N 4
3 T
onaoln uoig000a ono
O O [O (V f° O
U �
a m
w
� w�
¢' N a
ao5) d
O n OP a 0 0 n o 0 0 P
a 0 0 n O a 0 0 a a 0 0
ao
>,
m
� 0000a0000uiodo
m �.M r�'-ova
ui
N
o not In uoi_oo�tiri ww
o
a 0 Oa N O a o n
U N
O O O pa�
p ICi N O
In e»�weaww
O
�od
c _rywul
r N O
x 7 0. w
m
0.
G
b
C
i
W
rmm�
m
Q
�
O
¢
_
O
0
015
cq v
N b U)
lo,A21
ti o o
o
C -,6O
a
v
O N� ro ro
o
t LL
I
IN
�w
�Iv<naullon_mcnorr�a
E
c
h�NU
Q
w
a
0 o n o0 0 0 0 0 o n
0000 000�nn000
o
�
fV 6 OD O YI o
P O M NP [O O P S
b c n
N 1!� N� N O
I�
yy
Opp
as
ooaoni �rnioorn000�pp
O
fA
ai°io �
C y
n
(7N�
aha`
0 0 o aO o 0 0 0 o P 0
n O O P 0 0 0 n O O n
0
D
O
�-�oww�o?rv_m� vwco
m
,y
tri cn v� iny�
U asr
o
w
oP0000Ooirr0000
CO
w O IIi N O r O [J P d O lfl
a v
Lama`
n o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O P O O. O N O O P n
0
N
ciE-
N
�
�
pO
[MOO W � Ori,
[V
p
m
of
o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
nOoo oor�a o0
.p •nMn000 �aavw
E m
mQ
O
m
_
rJ-
Z
L
oo m
Ca
n 1
oo N
f a z ¢1 A
h
ob
m()
vS C
of
C�
k o
i
W �1¢a
oc 14O
O LL
L1
0
m p
Q
w
a
no 0000000inoo 'n $SSSuoiSSgoo uni n
0000amoryo, o, ti
c o SmM�n sur vS ouni� � oniooriui ai co aa� 0 0
fQ-f C6 �m N mv�ivtimo o -7r m
'fly r,�-�i+im ml[V -7,6
M [O
v u>u>u>�n rt» t» ca��i ea en r e
EE v
p p p O N O y N O O O O D S S S ONO -
N 0 6 O S O O N u1 6
.- c N O O m� di a N ti N O N S n�y m» ilf a N Inl1
N ui O C d FR Vi N F9 �R N fR fn m fy N
c6 16
?? .pG C tl F9 f9 M N
U' N Y a ❑ a
n o oa o0 0 0 0 0 0 o a n o S S o 0 0 0 0 o a
c o0 oo�n0000 �n o �nn0000 u�
tri o nl O M O f� ci N O �Sl O N N Nl
cq (6 C,� �
J m N Q
w� po 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
p�� iSl tJ � O r d o [� 0 0 I[t O 01 O r IN fN iri o
�p 69 O t9 N �D m P �O M O fR N Ul 40 O
U 7Ff N Y d bf fR NNN rfR$N tR )� NN�y}
O
O n n 0 4 Q O n O O O n 0 0 0 Q 4 n n
00 k7 N
m O SO N [O O ui o 'd m O 6p N O t 0 SS
a 2 M
o C Mtn t» �Vi r9 N M m of vi� �N mM
19
acsb � a
m E� S 000�n000uniSS SSSS+an00000
U 11 Y P N S_ N N O_ O O OM o fV 1[[!ppi 00 0 0
� � N 0 C1 4
N Y
11 p
E m
N �
w u'
o ❑
g N Q
d o a .G ❑ 5 ❑ D
VD a N Q a ¢ D Q OR
u` Ncb
U.
y� o�
d m _ Q o v w C R m i o °' > e `�ovn a a❑ -
� �w snO W
on o oa^ yy,,
S o�0 aO v'3�a v"i C:n 'v"i L1UdF �a �4 �UUCts
m U 6
NMgNgnw n o+ Nei' -'in moo
E N"s Min 000mmm r� cvcv�v�va
F NU Xz
m