HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2020.06.04 - 33289MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION _#20176 June 4, 2020
BY: Commissioner Penny Luebs, Chairperson, Health, Satety-and Human Services Committee
IN RE: SHERIFF'S OFFICE — 2020 LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM ACCEPTANCE
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Sheriff's Office has been awarded $41,948.72 from the Michigan Department of Treasury,
Michigan Justice Training Fund for January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021; and
WHEREAS the funds will be used for criminal justice in-service training of Michigan Commission on Law
Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) licensed law enforcement officer training costs; and
WHEREAS the $41,948.72 payment is the first of two disbursements the Sheriff's Office will receive for
2020, with the second disbursement accepted in a separate resolution; and
WHEREAS this grant award has completed the Grant Review Process in accordance with Miscellaneous
Resolution #19006.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the grant
funding from the Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice Training Fund, in the amount of
$41,948.72 with no County match required for January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute
the grant agreement and to approve any grant extensions or changes, within fifteen percent (15%) of the
original award, which are consistent with the original award as approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future
commitment, and continuation of the grant program is contingent upon future levels of grant funding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a budget amendment is not required at this time.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Health, Safety and Human Services Committee, I move the adoption of the
foregoing resolution.
Commissioner enny Luebs, District #16
Chairperson, ealth, Safety and Human Services
Committee
HEALTH, SAFETY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Kochenderfer and Gingell absent.
GRANT REVIEW SIGN -OFF — Sheriffs Office
GRANT NAME: 2020 Law Enforcement Distribution Registration
FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES)
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Dena Dawkins/(248) 858-4990
STATUS: Grant Acceptance (Greater than $10,000)
DATE: 5/4/20
Please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments.
The Board of Commissioners' liaison committee resolution and grant acceptance package (which should include this sign -
off and the grant agreement/contract with related documentation) may be requested to be placed on the agenda(s) of the
appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Management and Budget:
Approved by M&B — Sean Carlson (5/1/20)
Human Resources:
HR Approved —No HR Implications — Lori Taylor (4/30/20)
Risk Management:
Approved by Risk Management. —Robert Erlenbeck (4/30/20)
Corporation Counsel:
Approved by Corp Counsel (no legal issues). —Nicole Tabin (5/4/20)
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 1 of 1 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Law Enforcement Distribution Summary
Distribution Period: Spring 2020
Court Revenue:
Cash Earnings:
Carryover from Previous Distribution:
Refunds:
Less Special Payments:
Available LED Revenue
Per Capita Payments:
Per Capita Amount
Number of Agencies
Number of FTEs
Per Capita Distribution:
Minimum Payments:
Officer Cutoff
Number of Agencies
Number of FTEs
Minimum Distribution
Total Distribution:
$1,235,580.36
$15,429.25
$132.28
$2,720.91
-$2,470.91
$1,251,391.89
$71.83
422
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYAWA
$1,232,387.31
4
76
148
$19,000.00
$1,251,387.31
Carry Forward to Next Distribution: $4.58
W I.6 t c..•. 11 I a L..(•.. .. 4. ,., i
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 1 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Report Period: Spring 2020 Oakland County Distribution Payment $41,948.72 see page 13
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
ADRIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
29
2,083.07
ADRIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
AKRON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
ALBION DPS
16
1,149.28
ALCONA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
12
861.96
ALGER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
9
646.47
ALLEGAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
63
4,525.29
ALLEGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
ALLEN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
40
2,873.20
ALMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
11
790.13
ALMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
ALPENA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
18
1,292.94
ALPENA POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
1,149.28
ANN ARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
119
8,547.77
ARENAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
14
1,005.62
ARGENTINE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
ARMADA POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
AU GRES POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
AUBURN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
50
3,591.50
BAD AXE POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
BARAGA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
6
430.98
BARAGA POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
BARODA-LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
BARRY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
29
2,083.07
BARRY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
BATH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
BATTLE CREEK POLICE DEPARTMENT''
104
7,470.32
� itx"
IC01 --S
AJr4'Cnr.rrrs
.r l+.rn ,r..,.l: •i
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 2 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
BAY CITY DPS
50
3,591.50
BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
41
2,945.03
BEAVERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
BELDING POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
BELLAIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
BELLEVUE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
BENTON HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
21
1,508.43
BENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
20
1,436.60
BENZIE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
17
1,221.11
BERKLEY DPS
27
1,939.41
BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
79
5,674.57
BERRIEN SPRINGS-ORONOKO TOWNSHIP POLICE
8
574.64
DEPARTMENT
BEVERLY HILLS DPS
24
1,723.92
BIG RAPIDS DPS
18
1,292.94
BIRCH RUN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT
32
2,298.56
BISHOP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
10
718.30
BLACKMAN TOWNSHIP DPS
38
2,729.54
BLISSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
BLOOMFIELD HILLS DPS
24
1,723.92
BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
69
4,956.27
BOYNE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
BRANCH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
15
1,077.45
BRIDGEPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
BRIDGMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
BRIGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
BRONSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
BROWN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT2
250.00
o''
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 3 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
30
2,154.90
BUCHANAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
BUENA VISTA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
933.79
BURTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
34
2,442.22
CADILLAC POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
80
5,746.40
CAMBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
CANTON TOWNSHIP DPS
89
6,392.87
CAPAC POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
CARLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
CARO POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
CARROLLTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
CARSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
CASEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
CASS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
CASS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
32
2,298.56
CASSOPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
CENTER LINE DPS
18
1,292.94
CENTRAL LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
23
1,652.09
CHARLEVOIX COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
CHARLEVOIX POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
CHARLOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
22
1,580.26
CHEBOYGAN DPS
7
502.81
CHELSEA POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
CHESANING POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT41
2,945.03
''
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 4 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
CHIKAMING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
CHIPPEWA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
18
1,292.94
CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
CLARE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
26
1,867.58
CLAWSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
1,149.28
CLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
18
1,292.94
CLAYTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
CLINTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
30
2,154.90
CLINTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
CLINTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
92
6,608.36
CLIO POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
COLDWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
COLOMA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
COLON POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
CONSTANTINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
CORUNNA POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
COVERT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
16
1,149.28
CROSWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
CRYSTAL FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
DAVISON POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
DAVISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
18
1,292.94
DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
78
5,602.74
DEARBORN POLICE DEPARTMENT
189
13,575.87
DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
7
502.81
DELTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
15
1,077.45
vIC-01
--S
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 5 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
DENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
248
17,813.84
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT
2,341
168,154.03
DEWITT POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
DEWITT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
933.79
DICKINSON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
12
861.96
DOUGLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
DOWAGIAC POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
DRYDEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
DUNDEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
DURAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
EAST GRAND RAPIDS DPS
27
1,939.41
EAST JORDAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
EAST LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT
49
3,519.67
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
34
2,442.22
EASTPOINTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
40
2,873.20
EATON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
62
4,453.46
EATON RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
EAU CLAIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
ECORSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
18
1,292.94
ELKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
EMMET COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
26
1,867.58
EMMETT TOWNSHIP DPS
14
1,005.62
ESCANABA DPS
31
2,226.73
ESSEXVILLE DPS
8
574.64
EVART POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
FAIRHAVEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
FARMINGTON DPS
23
1,652.09
N: ]COL --S
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 6 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
FARMINGTON HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
106
7,613.98
FENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
FERNDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
41
2,945.03
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY DPS
13
933.79
FLAT ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
18
1,292.94
FLINT POLICE DEPARTMENT
99
7,111.17
FLINT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
39
2,801.37
FLUSHING POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
FLUSHING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
FORSYTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
FOWLERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
FRANKENMUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
FRANKLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
FRASER DPS
29
2,083.07
FREMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
FRUITPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
GAINES TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
GARDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
31
2,226.73
GARFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
GAYLORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
GENESEE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
18
1,292.94
GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
119
8,547.77
GENESEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
GERRISH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
GIBRALTAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
GLADSTONE DPS
10
718.30
GLADWIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
15
1,077.45
GLADWIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 7 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
GOGEBIC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
16
1,149.28
GR FORD INTNATL AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
1,149.28
GRAND BEACH-MICHIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
GRAND BLANC POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
1,149.28
GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
40
2,873.20
GRAND HAVEN DPS
32
2,298.56
GRAND LEDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE
13
933.79
GRAND RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT
292
20,974.36
GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
67
4,812.61
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY DPS
20
1,436.60
GRANDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
24
1,723.92
GRAIIOTCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
28
2,011.24
GRAYLING POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
GREEN OAK CHARTER TOWNSHIP POLICE
15
1,077.45
DEPARTMENT
GREENVILLE DPS
16
1,149.28
GROSSE ILE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
GROSSE POINTE DPS
22
1,580.26
GROSSE POINTE FARMS DPS
30
2,154.90
GROSSE POINTE PARK DPS
32
2,298.56
GROSSE POINTE WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT
28
2,011.24
HAMBURG TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
HAMPTON TOWNSHIP DPS
9
646.47
HAMTRAMCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
28
2,011.24
HANCOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
HARBOR BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
HARBOR SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
HARPER WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT29
2,083.07
.ACo++
S
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 8 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
HART POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
HASTINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
933.79
HAZEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
35
2,514.05
HESPERIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
HIGHLAND PARK DPS
27
1,939.41
HILLSDALE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
22
1,580.26
HILLSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
HOLLAND DPS
57
4,094.31
HOLLY POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
HOUGHTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
HOUGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
HOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
1,149.28
HUDSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
HUNTINGTON WOODS DPS
16
1,149.28
HURON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
HURON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
21
1,508.43
IMLAY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
INGHAM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
72
5,171.76
INKSTER POLICE DEPARTMENT
25
1,795.75
IONIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
25
1,795.75
IONIA DPS
15
1,077.45
TOSCO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
5
359.15
IRON MOUNTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
IRON RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
IRONWOOD DPS
10
718.30
ISABELLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
ISHPEMING POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
50
3,591.50
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 9 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
46
3,304.18
JONESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
KALAMAZOO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
135
9,697.05
KALAMAZOO DPS
233
16,736.39
KALAMAZOO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
30
2,154.90
KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
9
646.47
KALKASKA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
17
1,221.11
KALKASKA DPS
2
250.00
KEEGO HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
KELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
5
359.15
KENT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
251
18,029.33
KENTWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
64
4,597.12
KEWEENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
8
574.64
KINGSFORD DPS
18
1,292.94
KINGSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
KINROSS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
LAINGSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
LAKE ANGELUS POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
LAKE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
15
1,077.45
LAKE LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
LAKE ODESSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
LAKE ORION POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
LAKEVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
LANSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
LANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT
202
14,509.66
LANSING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
LAPEER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
48
3,447.84
i A-®1 ;=s
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 10 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
LAPEER POLICE DEPARTMENT
18
1,292.94
LAPEER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
LATHRUP VILLAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
LAURIUM POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
LAWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
LEELANAU COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
19
1,364.77
LENAWEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
37
2,657.71
LEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
LINCOLN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
45
3,232.35
LINCOLN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
LITCHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
LIVINGSTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
64
4,597.12
LIVONIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
125
8,978.75
LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
LUCE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
5
359.15
LUDINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
MACKINAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
12
861.96
MACKINAC ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
MACKINAW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
278
19,968.74
MADISON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
47
3,376.01
MADISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
MANISTEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
16
1,149.28
MANISTEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
MANISTIQUE DPS
8
574.64
MANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
MARENISCO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 11 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
MARINE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
MARLETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
MARQUETTE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
24
1,723.92
MARQUETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
32
2,298.56
MARSHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
MASON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
19
1,364.77
MASON POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
MATTAWAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
MAYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
MECOSTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
MELVINDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
21
1,508.43
MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
MENOMINEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
16
1,149.28
MENOMINEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
38
2,729.54
METAMORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
METRO POLICE AUTHORITY OF GENESEE COUNTY
24
1,723.92
MICHIGAN STATE POLICE
1,919
137,841.77
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
81
5,818.23
MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY DPS
13
933.79
MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
41
2,945.03
MIDLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
48
3,447.84
MILAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
14
1,005.62
MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
19
1,364.77
MILLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
MISSAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
16
1,149.28
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
74
5,315.42
'
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 12 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT
39
2,801.37
MONTAGUE POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
MONTCALM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
16
1,149.28
MONTMORENCY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
14
1,005.62
MONTROSE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
MORRICE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
20
1,436.60
MOUNT MORRIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
MOUNT MORRIS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
29
2,083.07
MOUNT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT
28
2,011.24
MUNISING POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
MUSKEGON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
52
3,735.16
MUSKEGON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
23
1,652.09
MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT
71
5,099.93
MUSKEGON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
933.79
NAPOLEON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
NEGAUNEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
NEW BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
1,149.28
NEW BUFFALO POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
NEW ERA POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
NEW LOTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
NEWAYGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
31
2,226.73
NEWAYGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
NILES POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
NORTH MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE
21
1,508.43
DEPARTMENT
NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 13 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
NORTHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
NORTHVILLE TOWNSHIP DPS
32
2,298.56
NORTON SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT
29
2,083.07
NORWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
NOVI POLICE DEPARTMENT
70
5,028.10
OAK PARK DPS
48
3,447.84
OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
22
1,580.26
OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
584
41,948.72
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
21
1,508.43
OCEANA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
OGEMAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
15
1,077.45
OLIVET POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
ONTONAGON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
4
287.32
ON WA TOWNSHIP-EDWARDSBURG POLICE
7
502.81
DEPARTMENT
ORCHARD LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
21
1,508.43
OSCODA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
10
718.30
OSCODA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
790.13
OTISVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
OTSEGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
12
861.96
OTSEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
OTTAWA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
141
10,128.03
OWOSSO POLICE DEPARTMENT
18
1,292.94
OXFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
PAW PAW POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
PENTWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
PERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
PETOSKEY DPS
19
1,364.77
1
q�^�-}�
1"�.t _=S
9A_LJI
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 14 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
PINCKNEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
PINCONNING POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
PITTSFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS
39
2,801.37
PLAINWELL DPS
8
574.64
PLEASANT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
28
2,011.24
PORT AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
PORT HURON POLICE DEPARTMENT
54
3,878.82
PORTAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
54
3,878.82
PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
POTTERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
PRAIRIEVILLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
PRESQUE ISLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
14
1,005.62
QUINCY POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
RAISIN TOWNSHIP DPS
5
359.15
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
REDFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
57
4,094.31
REED CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
REESE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS
5
359.15
RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
RIVER ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
23
1,652.09
RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
22
1.580.26
MI•L•+i�r,��,il•i,el it�.vv.: i.�alu�V
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 15 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT
22
1,580.26
ROCKFORD DPS
11
790.13
ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
ROGERS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
ROMEO POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
ROMULUS POLICE DEPARTMENT
40
2,873.20
ROOSEVELT PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
ROSCOMMON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
26
1,867.58
ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
67
4,812.61
ROYAL OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT
77
5,530.91
SAGINAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
60
4,309.80
SAGINAW POLICE DEPARTMENT
57
4,094.31
SAGINAW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
43
3,088.69
SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE
8
574.64
SALINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
933.79
SANDUSKY POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
SANILAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
30
2,154.90
SAULTSTE MARIE POLICE DEPARTMENT
22
1,580.26
SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
17
1,221.11
SCOTTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
SEBEWAING POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
SHELBY POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
SHELBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
70
5,028.10
SHEPHERD POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
SHIAWASSEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
26
1,867.58
SILVER CREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
SOMERSET TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
SOUTH HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT19
1,364.77
'(- 11:J.4Ln..,.
nl."
..max• s.r.lni:
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 16 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
SOUTH LYON POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
SOUTH ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
SOUTHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
122
8,763.26
SOUTHGATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
38
2,729.54
SPARTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
SPRING ARBOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
SPRINGPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
ST. CHARLES POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
ST. CLAIR CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
ST. CLAIR COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
89
6,392.87
ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT
81
5,818.23
ST. IGNACE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
ST. JOHNS POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
25
1,795.75
ST. JOSEPH DPS
21
1,508.43
ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
10
718.30
ST. LOUIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
7
502.81
STANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
150
10,774.50
STOCKBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
STURGIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
19
1,364.77
SUMPTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
SYLVAN LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
TAYLOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
76
5,459.08
TECUMSEH POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
933.79
THETFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
THOMAS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
THREE OAKS POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
NAC01
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 17 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
THREE RIVERS POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
TITTABAWASSEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
TRAVERSE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
29
2,083.07
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
34
2,442.22
TROY POLICE DEPARTMENT
107
7,685.81
TUSCARORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
TUSCOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
26
1,867.58
UBLY POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
UNADILLA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
250.00
UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN DPS
12
861.96
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DPS
63
4,525.29
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT DPS
18
1,292.94
UTICA POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
861.96
VAN BUREN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
59
4,237.97
VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
40
2,873.20
VASSAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT
1
250.00
VICKSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
WALKER POLICE DEPARTMENT
36
2,585.88
WALLED LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
1,077.45
WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT
202
14,509.66
WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
6
430.98
WASHTENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
139
9,984.37
WATERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
57
4,094.31
WATERVLIET POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
WAYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY DPS
113
8,116.79
i" IC®
L=s
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 18 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency
FTEs
Distribution
WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
541
38,860.03
WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT
21
1,508.43
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY DPS
65
4,668.95
WEST BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
78
5,602.74
WEST BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
32
2,298.56
WESTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
77
5,530.91
WEXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
23
1,652.09
WHITE CLOUD POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
WHITE LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
26
1,867.58
WHITE PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT
4
287.32
WHITEHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
WILLIAMSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
6
430.98
WIXOM POLICE DEPARTMENT
20
1,436.60
WOLVERINE LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
574.64
WOODHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
29
2,083.07
WYANDOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
34
2,442.22
WYOMING POLICE DEPARTMENT
83
5,961.89
YALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
359.15
YPSILANTI POLICE DEPARTMENT
26
1,867.58
ZEELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
646.47
ZILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2
250.00
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
Page 19 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Summary Totals
Available LED Revenue 1,251,391.89
Per Capita Payments
Per Capita Value
71.83
Number of Agencies
422
Number of FTEs
17,157
Per Capita Distribution
1,232,387.31
Minimum Payments
Number of Agencies 76
Number of FTEs 148
Minimum Distribution 19,000.00
Total Disbursed 1,251,387.31
Total Number of Agencies 498
Total Number of FTEs 17,305
i qtr^ i cotes
Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended
UL�
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
KI"
LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION
GUIDELINES
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
927 Centennial Way, P.O. Box 30633
Lansing, MI 48909
Effective January 2019 through December 2019
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
2019 Law Enforcement Distribution Guidelines
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1
StatutoryAuthority, .................................................. __ ............................................. I
ExecutiveOrder......................................................... ............................. ........... 1
II. PURPOSE................................................................................................. ...........2
III. ELIGIBILITY......................................................................................................2
Determinations .................................................. 2
Non -Discrimination ........................................................................................ ........ 3
Non -Compliance ...................................................................................................3
IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES .................................. ...............................................3
Annual Reporting Requirements....................................................
.......... ........3
AllowableCosts.......................................................................
.................. 4
IneligibleCosts.........................................................................................................5
TravelRegulations.............................................................................................7
Schedule of Travel Rates.........................................................................................8
SelectCities...........................................................................................
...............9
Disposition of Equipment ............... ............... ......................
........... .......... 10
V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS.................................................................................... 10
Out of State Special Use Requests........................................................... ............ 10
Equipment Special Use Requests ... ................ ........................... ................. 11
Special Use Request Approval Process................................................................. 11
APPENDIX A- DEFINITIONS ....... .......................................... ............... .........12
I. INTRODUCTION
Statutory Authority
The Michigan Justice Training programs are regulated by state law, administrative rule, and
executive order.
Public Act 301 of 1982, created the Michigan Justice Training Fund (MJTF). Revenue to the
Michigan Justice Training Fund is generated through Justice System Assessments that are levied
and collected by the courts and submitted to the Michigan Department of Treasury for deposit into
the Justice System Fund (JSF). The MJTF receives 11.84% of the JSF balance on a monthly basis.
Both the JSF and the MJTF are interest-bearing accounts. Interest is posted to each account
quarterly.
The Michigan Justice Training Fund is a restricted fund. These funds may be used only for the
criminal justice in-service (active duty) training of eligible trainees or such purposes as designated
by legislative mandate.
Public Act 302 of 1982 created the Michigan Justice Training Commission (MJTC) and set forth the
responsibilities of that Commission. Section 3 of the Act directs the Commission to annually
distribute 60% of the Justice Training Fund to eligible entities under the law enforcement distribution.
The Act allows the Commission to use the remaining balance to award grants and pay for staff
services to the Commission for administering and enforcing the statutory requirements of 1965 P.A.
302, as amended, and 1965 P.A. 203, MCL 28.601 to 28.615. The two funding programs are
referred to as the Law Enforcement Distribution (LED) and the Competitive Grant Program,
respectively. This document addresses the Law Enforcement Distribution.
The administrative rules that prescribe the procedures by which the Commission shall distribute
money from the fund were developed under the authority conferred on the Commission by section
10 of 1982 P.A. 302, as amended, by section 9 of 1965 PA 380, and by Executive Reorganization
Order 2001-2, MCL 18.423, 16.109, and 28.621.
With Executive Order 2001-5, Governor John Engler ordered the merger of the Michigan Justice
Training Commission with the Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (COLES) to form the
new Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) and transferred the
responsibilities of P.A. 302 to the MCOLES. Executive Order 2001-5 also directed the Commission
to focus its activities in order to accomplish the following objectives involving law enforcement
organizations and officers:
• increase professionalism,
• increase the number of law enforcement organizations that offer formal in-service training
and increase the number of law enforcement officers who receive formal in-service training,
• institute law enforcement in-service training standards applicable to all law enforcement in-
service training in Michigan,
• implement a Web -based information system that will allow the Commission to accomplish its
goals and communicate with Michigan law enforcement organizations in a more efficient
manner.
II. PURPOSE
As mandated by the Act, the purpose of the LED program is to annually distribute Justice Training
Funds to eligible agencies for in-service criminal justice training of their MCOLES licensed law
enforcement officers.
For the purposes of the LED program, criminal justice in-service training means a criminal justice
educational program presented by an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to the Act or
by a contractual service provider hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to
the Act, including a course or package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment
of a fee or tuition, or education or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, in
which the program, education, or training is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of
criminal justice services by eligible employees of the agency or entity.
III. ELIGIBILITY
Any governmental agency of the executive branch of this state or a subdivision of this state that is
established and maintained in accordance with the laws of this state and authorized by the laws of
this state to employ or appoint law enforcement officers licensed under section 9 and 9 (a) of the
MCOLES Act, 1965 P.A. 203, MCL 28.609 and 28.609 (a) is eligible to receive LED funding. This
includes any Michigan city, village, township, county, community college, state supported college or
university, or state department that meets the requirements. Only MCOLES licensed law
enforcement officers, employed by an eligible entity, are eligible trainees under this program.
The Act also requires that an eligible agency shall submit an annual registration to establish or
maintain eligibility to receive a distribution of justice training funds. Annual eligibility is determined
by several factors.
1) Reaistration: A complete and accurate registration shall be submitted, in the manner prescribed
by the Commission, on or before the established deadline.
2) Report of Exoenditures: A complete accounting of expenditures, charged to LED funds during the
prior calendar year, shall accompany the annual registration in the manner prescribed by the
Commission. You must register your expenses regardless of whether funds were used or not.
3) Maintenance of Effort (MOE): It is the intent of the Act to provide supplemental funding, not
replace local funding, for in-service criminal justice training. To ensure compliance with this intent,
the amount of local funds budgeted annually by the local unit of government for in-service training
shall be equal to, or greater than, the amount budgeted for in-service training on October 12, 1982,
or the first year of program participation.
4) Roster of Officers: The law enforcement agency shall employ a minimum of one full-time equated
(FTE) officer for the calendar year prior to the year in which the registration is submitted. A roster of
licensed officers shall be provided in a manner prescribed by the Commission.
5) Two-vear Expenditure Period: Recipient agencies are required to expend their entire annual
distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. For example, LED funds received
during 2017 must be expended by December 31, 2019. If the distribution is not expended within this
-2-
time frame, the agency will be ineligible to receive any additional LED funding until the balance is
expended and reported to the Commission.
Licensure is issued by the Commission under 1965 P.A. 203, as amended. Any officer found not to
be in compliance with the requirements shall be ineligible for the law enforcement distribution.
Therefore, it is the law enforcement agency's responsibility to verify that each law enforcement
officer registered for the law enforcement distribution meets the requirements of Act 203 in one of
the following manners:
current election to the office of sheriff;
current employment by a law enforcement agency as a fully empowered law
enforcement officer prior to January 1, 1977, with no break in employment in excess
of two years, since January 1, 1977; or
current employment by a law enforcement agency as a fully empowered law
enforcement officer after January 1, 1977, having complied with all the
selection, employment, training, or waiver of training standards of Public Act
203 of 1965, as amended, which were in place at the time of initial
employment, and with no break in employment in excess of the time periods
permitted under section 9 of Act 203.
Non -Discrimination
Government units receiving money distributed under the Act, and any person or contractor
performing services funded by such money, shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant
for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or a
matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, height, weight, or marital status in violation of Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976, as
amended.
Upon certification of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission that a violation of these nondiscrimination
requirements has occurred, a government unit's right to receive money under the Act may be
suspended, terminated, or conditioned in any appropriate way that is consistent with the
circumstances of the case.
Non -Compliance
Non-compliance with the provisions of these guidelines shall result in a forfeiture of law enforcement
distribution funding.
IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES
All recipients of LED funds agree to maintain records documenting annual calendar year LED
expenditures in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, to permit inspection of
these records, and to cooperate with any audit requested or authorized by the local unit of
government, the Commission, or the State of Michigan auditor general. An agency receiving funds
under this Act shall report annually to the Commission on the forms and in the manner prescribed by
the Commission. Failure to report the required information shall result in ineligibility to receive LED
funds.
A separate accounting of LED funding and expenditures independent of local in-service training
funds must be maintained and reported for each calendar year. Beginning with the 1990
-3-
distribution, amendments to the Act require that each agency expend the entire annual distribution
within two calendar years of the year of distribution. Therefore, training costs, supplies, and
equipment purchases shall be assigned to the oldest funds available regardless of the year
expended. The amended Act requires that if funds remain unexpended after the end of the second
calendar year, the agency shall be ineligible for future funds until the remaining balance has been
expended and reported.
Beginning in 2017, the amended Act requires that agencies return law enforcement distribution
funds to the Michigan Justice Training Fund for re -distribution if the funds have not been expended
within five years after the year in which they were received. After each annual registration, invoices
will be created for agencies that have not expended their law enforcement distribution funds within
this five-year timeline.
Agencies must report closure or consolidation initiatives to MCOLES for close out processing. A final
LED expenditure report may be submitted to report eligible expenditures incurred but not yet
reported. Upon review and approval of the expenditures, an invoice will be generated for the return
of any remaining unexpended funds. If a final expenditure report is not submitted, the agency will be
invoiced for the full amount of unexpended funds as reported during the most recent annual
registration. Funds returned will be deposited to the Michigan Justice Training Fund and will be re-
distributed in a future Law Enforcement Distribution.
The following expenditures are eligible for LED funding. All training courses being provided to in-
service law enforcement officers in Michigan must be registered in the MCOLES Information and
Tracking Network prior to the training being conducted, whether being provided by a Michigan based
or out-of-state private or public vendor, as well as training offered by an agency for specific, in-house
agency purposes.
Allowable Expenditures:
• Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training,
subject to the supplanting restrictions.
• In-state travel expenses for training programs outside of a 50 -mile radius from the worksite
or home (whichever is closer). Travel expenditures must not exceed the allowable travel
rates outlined on page 8.
• Expenditure of LED funds for tuition costs for out-of-state training courses is allowable
provided that the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out -of -State Special Use
Request to the Commission and the course was registered through the MCOLES Information
and Tracking Networkrp for to the training dates.
• Expenditure of LED funds for reSiistration oniv for out-of-state conferences or conventions
providing the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out -of -State Special Use
Request to the Commission and is granted approval prior to attending the conference or
convention. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be covered
by other funds.
• A consortium fee for law enforcement training attended. Consortium fees paid shall be
reported per year.
-4-
• The reasonable rental costs for the use of a trainina facility for in-service training, if
facilities owned or occupied by an eligible entity are either not available or are inappropriate
due to the nature of the training.
• The actual cost of ourchasina or leasing trainina materials used to assist trainees in
understanding in-service training topics. This includes items such as training manuals, tests,
evaluations. Materials must be used exclusively for the direct delivery of criminal justice in-
service training.
The reasonable rental cost or purchase price of eauipment used exclusively for the direct
delivery of in-service training; however, expenditures for purchase shall not be more than the
total of 10% of the annual distribution, nor may any single item be more than $5,000.00,
without prior approval of the Commission. Equipment that costs less than $300 shall be
reported as a Supplies and Operating expense.
o The Equipment Special Use Request form is available on-line. Additional information
regarding equipment is outlined on page 11.
• A flat rate or tuition oaid to a contractual training orovider hired by an eligible entity.
The payment shall be in compliance with policies established by the Commission.
• Web -based oroarams, digital or analog media, or other such instructional media that are
based upon interactive learning. Funding is limited to $1,000 or 10% of the annual
distribution, whichever is less.
• Automated firearms training systems that simulate deadly force decision-making
circumstances.
Ineligible Expenditures:
1. Expenditures for salaries of trainees.
2. Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training if the
instructors are assigned to perform in-service training as part of their regular function with an
eligible agency.
3. Meal and lodging expenditures that exceed the allowable rates outlined on page 8. In cases
where charges for meals and lodging exceed the allowable rate, the grantee may utilize other
funding sources to cover the additional charge.
o The Commission will not authorize the use of justice training funds for travel costs to
participate in criminal justice training unless the criminal justice training program is for
the sole purpose of training or offers not less than 6 hours of qualifying training within
any 24-hour period.
4. Criminal justice training not located in this state, unless the training event has first been
approved by the Commission and is registered in MITN, as noted above.
5. Criminal justice training in another country.
6. The purchase of firearms.
-5-
7. The purchase of alcoholic liquor.
8. The purchase of refreshments.
9. The publication of a newsletter.
M-2
Law Enforcement Distribution Travel Regulations
Mileaae Restriction: Travel expenses shall not be charged for mileage or lodging where
training occurs within 50 miles, by standard mileage charts, of the home or work site,
whichever is closer. An exception may be allowed for those persons who work or reside
within a radius exceeding 25 miles of the training site when a minimum of two hours of
training occurs following the evening meal. Mileage costs between the home or work site
to an airport is not an allowable expense.
Vehicle Mileaae: Mileage expenses will be allowed at a rate not to exceed the allowable
rate specified in the current Schedule of Travel Rates.
Air Travel: The use of commercial airlines is permitted when it is advantageous based on
comparative travel costs and the time of the traveler. Justice training funds may not be
used to purchase first-class airfare. Baggage fees and related air travel costs are
allowed.
Toll Charaes: Toll charges and bridge fees are allowable.
Taxi: Necessary taxicab fares between the workstation, terminal, and meeting site are
allowable.
Parking: Parking charges at the most economical rate available is allowable.
Lodaina and Meals: Actual lodging and meal expenditures paid, including taxes, are
allowable and shall not to exceed the maximum allowance indicated in the current
Schedule of Travel Rates. In those cases where charges for lodging or meals exceed the
allowable rate, the trainee or agency may utilize other funding sources to cover the
additional charge. Trainee meals will only be allowed when training occurs both before
and after the meal or the trainee is otherwise eligible for meals due to lodging.
Select Cities: Specific meal rates have been established for select cities. The lodging
rate for select cities is equivalent to the rate for all other cities. The list of select cities is
displayed on page 9.
-7-
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
Law Enforcement Distribution
Schedule of Travel Rates
Effective January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019
Michigan Select Cities
Breakfast
$10.25
Lunch
$10.25
Dinner
$24.25
Lodging
$85.00
Michigan All Other Cities
Breakfast
$8.50
Lunch
$8.50
Dinner
$19.00
Lodging
$85.00
Out -of -State Select Cities
Breakfast
$13.00
Lunch
$13.00
Dinner
$25.25
Lodging
$85.00
Out -of -State All Other Cities
Breakfast
$10.25
Lunch
$10.25
Dinner
$23.50
Lodging
$85.00
Standard Mileage Rate $.340 per mile
no
SELECT CITIES
MICHIGAN SELECT CITIES AND COUNTIES
CITIES COUNTIES
Ann Arbor, Auburn Hills, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Holland, Grand Traverse, Wayne, Oakland
Leland, Mackinac Island, Petoskey, Pontiac, South
Haven, Traverse City
OUT-OF-STATE SELECT CITIES
SELECT CITY OR
STATE
SELECT CITY OR COUNTY
STATE
COUNTY
Arizona
Phoenix, Scottsdale, Sedona
Massachusetts
Boston (Suffolk County),
Burlington, Cambridge,
California
Los Angeles (Counties of Los
Woodburn, Martha's Vineyard
Angeles, Orange, Mendocino &
Ventura), Edwards AFB, Eureka,
Minnesota
Duluth, Minneapolis/St. Paul
Arcata, Mckinleyville, Mammoth
(Hennepin and Ramsey
Lakes, Mill Valley/San
Counties)
Rafael/Novato, Monterey, Palm
Springs, San Diego, San
Nevada
Las Vegas
Francisco, Santa Barbara, Santa
Monica, South Lake Tahoe,
New Mexico
Santa Fe
Truckee, Yosemite National Park
New York
Lake Placid, Manhattan
Colorado
Aspen, Breckenridge, Grand Lake,
(boroughs of Manhattan,
Steamboat Springs, Telluride, Vail
Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens,
and Staten Island), Melville,
Connecticut
Bridgeport, Danbury
New Rochelle, Riverhead,
Suffolk County, Ronkonkoma,
District of
Washington DC (also the cities
Tarrytown, White Plaines
Columbia
of Alexandria, Falls Church and
Fairfax; the counties of
Ohio
Cincinnati
Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia;
and the counties of Montgomery
Pennsylvania
Bucks County, Pittsburgh
and Prince George's in Maryland)
Rhode Island
Bristol, Jamestown,
Florida
Boca Raton, Delray Beach
Middletown/Newport
Jupiter, Fort Lauderdale, Key West
(Newport County),
Providence
Georgia
Brunswick, Jekyll Island
Texas
Austin, Dallas, Houston,
Idaho
Sun Valley, Ketchum
L.B. Johnson Space Center
Illinois
Chicago (Cook and Lake Counties)
Utah
Park City (Summit County)
Louisiana
New Orleans
Vermont
Manchester, Montpelier,
Stowe, Lamoille County
Maine
Bar Harbor, Kennebunk, Kittery,
Rockport, Sanford
Virginia
Alexandria, Falls Church,
Fairfax
Maryland
Montgomery & Prince George
Counties, Baltimore City, Ocean
Washington
Port Angeles, Port Townsend,
City
Seattle
Wyominq
Jackson, Pinedale
Disposition of Equipment
For the purposes of LED funding, to be defined as "equipment" an item shall: 1) be directly involved
in the delivery of in-service criminal justice training; 2) be personal property (as distinguished from
real property) such as machines, audio/video and computer hardware, etc.; 3) have a normal useful
life of more than one year; 4) not become a fixed part of a building or structure; and 5) have a
purchase price of $300 or more.
Equipment purchases approved by the Commission may be retained by the recipient agency as long
as the equipment is used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training.
When equipment is no longer used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training, the
recipient agency shall notify the Commission to request disposition. The Commission may select
one of the following actions:
a. Transfer of the equipment to another training program. Costs of the transportation of the
equipment will be borne by the receiving agency.
b. Approve the sale of the equipment, with the arrangements for the sale to be made by the
agency possessing the equipment. The agency will be allowed to retain 10% of the receipts
from the sale; the remainder shall be returned to the Justice Training Fund.
c. Dispose of the property in any other manner consistent with the purposes of the Act, as
amended.
V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS
Out -of -State Special Use Requests
The Act contains specific mandates relative to the expenditure of Justice Training Funds for out-of-
state training. The intention is, of course, that justice training funds be expended primarily within the
state of Michigan to purchase services and materials from Michigan vendors whenever possible.
The policy states that the Commission will not fund any out-of-state criminal justice training program,
unless all reasonable efforts to locate a similar training program in this state have been exhausted,
and the Commission is satisfied that a similar training program is not available in this state.
It is the eligible entity's responsibility to make every reasonable effort to locate a Michigan based
provider. At a minimum, the applicant shall contact a statewide provider (e.g., the Michigan State
Police or the Michigan Municipal League), local or regional providers (e.g., community colleges or
universities), and consult the MCOLES Schedule of Training Courses. The Schedule contains
information about in-service criminal justice training programs offered in Michigan and is published
on the MCOLES web site (www.michiaan.00v/mcoles). If the required in-service training is not
available in Michigan, the agency shall submit an Out -of -State Special Use Request that must
include a detailed explanation of the contacts made and justification for selection of the out-of-state
training program. Out -of -State Special Use Requests are categorized for Commission action into
the following two groups:
Agency Approval. An individual agency requests approval to send eligible trainees to out-of-
state training. These requests will be acted upon individually.
-10-
• Blanket Approval. The Commission will give blanket approval, when requirements are met, for
attendance by all agencies at annual conferences, e.g., NSA, and IACP. It is the responsibility of
the Commission staff to publicize these approvals, and to monitor compliance with the policy
regarding the 6:24 ratio for actual hours of training. These approvals will be for the payment of
reaistration fees only. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be
paid by other funds.
Equipment Special Use Requests
The Administrative Rules for Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended, state that the expenditure of
funds under this Act for the purpose of equipment purchases must be approved by the Commission
when total annual equipment purchases will exceed 10% of the agency's annual distribution, or
when the purchase price of a single equipment item equals or exceeds $5,000.
Special Use Request Approval Process
The forms used to request Commission approval for the special use of LED funds, as outlined
above, are the Out -of -State Special Use Request (MJT-511) and the Equipment Special Use
Request (MJT-512). These forms are available on the MCOLES web site. Both types of requests
require prior approval. Written notification of Commission action will be returned to the requesting
agency.
Each approval is assigned a unique special use request processing number. This number is noted
on the written notification and is also required as proof of approval on the annual LED expenditure
report. All host approval numbers are published for reference on the MCOLES web site.
Definitions
Conference - A prearranged formal meeting of a group of people from an organization, association
or profession, for the purpose of discussion or consultation of a specific topic.
Convention - A prearranged, periodic assembly of a group of people from an organization,
association or profession, for the purpose of exchanging information
Group Meeting - A prearranged meeting of a group of people for the purposes of conducting training,
workshops, or seminars.
11-
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS
"Act" means Act No. 302 of the Public Acts of 1952, as amended.
"Commission" means the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES)
"Consortium" means a public or quasi -public entity established to provide in-service training to
criminal justice entities that obtain consortium membership through payment of fees to the
consortium.
"Criminal justice education program" means a learning experience produced through reading,
listening, observing, performing problem -solving, or interacting with others, the object of which is the
introduction or enhancement of knowledge, skills, and judgment related directly to the performance
of professional criminal justice tasks currently assigned or assignable.
"Direct delivery of criminal justice services" means the execution of the duties of line law
enforcement officers provided to the general public (e.g., traffic enforcement, first aid, investigation,
or community policing and problem solving) and the execution of administrative tasks which
enhance the abilities of line officers to provide direct delivery of criminal justice services.
"Distribution" means the amount distributed to law enforcement agencies, in two payments, from
the Fund within one calendar year, under the provisions of Section 3 of the Act.
"Equipment" means, for the purposes of the Act, an item that is used only for the delivery of in-
service training, and is personal property (as distinguished from real property), such as machines,
audio/video and computer hardware, etc., and has a normal useful life of more than one year, and
has a purchase price of $300 or more.
"Full-time equated officers" or "FTEs" means the count to be used for distributions as determined
in Section 3 (4) of the Act.
"Fund" means the Michigan Justice Training Fund.
"in-service criminal justice training" means a criminal justice educational program presented by
an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act or by a contractual service provider
hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act, including a course or
package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment of a fee or tuition, or education
or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, which program, education, or training
is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of criminal justice services by eligible
employees of the agency or entity.
"Law enforcement officer" means an individual who is continuously employed and paid by a police
force as a law enforcement officer who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and
empowered to enforce all of the general criminal laws of this State.
"MCOLES licensed officer" means a person who has met all of the selection, employment, training,
or recognition of prior training and experience standards of Public Act 203 of 1965, as amended, and
who is licensed by the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards.
12-
"Paid" means monetary compensation at not less than the federal minimum wage established in the
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended; 29 U.S.C. §206.
"Report period" means the calendar year, beginning January 1, through December 31, during
which reported activity occurred.
-13-
Scalf, Bonnie L
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Fisher, Diana M
Thursday, April 30, 2020 11:06 AM
Scalf, Bonnie L
West, Catherine A; Dawkins, Dena L
FW: MCOLES Spring 2020 Law Enforcement Distribution payment
Spring 2020 Payment $41,948.72.pdf; Spring_2020_LED_Summary_Report_Web_688076_7.pdf;
Spring_2020_Semi-Annual_LED Report_Web_688079_7.pdf; 2019_LED_Guidelines.pdf; 2020 Spring
Acceptance MCOLES GRANT REVIEW FORM.docx; 2020 MCOLES MR_.docx; 2019 MCOLES
Expenditure Summary Report.pdf
Follow up
Flagged
Good Morning Bonnie,
Attached, please find the requested documents. Please note the MCOLES LED Guidelines are unchanged from 2019.
Let me know if you have questions or need additional information.
Thank you,
Diana Fisher
Accountant II
Administrative Services Division
1200 N. Telegraph Rd., Bldg. 38E I Pontiac, MI 48341
Office: 248-858-15841 Fax: 248-9759759
Email: tlsherd@oakgov.com
Web: www.oakiandsheriff.com
of 19CIA1 SKWOT i UOP.CE: Pi01f f. nn+..I s+<ldGuy Jn+H1 T nbA+v mrcKJtr le'tie[rnae:
.5ft}]::f nronntloerdl': e,trnoy uaer(,u,e!prod++'+trX or h9':'r.:d'orlvgrJ>>aanfnnmanmr �.;ar:/�u.11¢maor+x nadrnxc rn+:<�
J1N.Y'. Jr )rJ4 Orf f+u: [ce"f.T2ii t•Y'+C.rP.Y, tlliy Giti in}I:/K' [OpV'n�. p'fr1+64'IOV. X! CIIiI.Y L'SI li il}l [pnt'nft Cr:tJS f1'CIrXf Y.'a+n rR }•Pl�I'r
pyiYcGtr<: tb wn'UecLuuryo-,.au:Yge'a+.ru'or lrnt 0,c.'r. mulmnsmnrw•«vtly,;v rcce;v:thn,.rc>;rye lr.�uo;ybrvei�r,+rte,:, :c.y
Crv'x^;r.la dolroarcs o`+r fr�m}'eur gzro'a G`sreay ony fnrni mnus alNa.awn;r eYe relyd:r nwn.ese rs; d,rnrl'p cn SJlre: ep`u ,
dYUbVfa(f+(,ay}`, pb(' l'f rrpy li/p'f�rs?Gl{i1n 11q.5tr•fj;'!f YID+9r( n41 Itg4Y:el:(rrf) rK.aLlnr, r(nnr fflarltlilra5i r<II( f'm6'f in IrtTS f Ifn
halo-/o.6x16.111Fwau nedc.4iY:r aM1O nr<rsWx. AWIr4 pu..
Hours: Monday -Friday, 7:30am—4:o0pm
From: Scalf, Bonnie L <scalfb@oakgov.com>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:59 PM
To: Fisher, Diana M <fisherd @oakgov.com>
Cc: Dawkins, Dena L <dawkinsd@oakgov.com>; West, Catherine A <westca@oakgov.com>
Subject: FW: MCOLES Spring 2020 Law Enforcement Distribution payment
Hi Diana,
I hope you are doing well!
�ndards
aW En o Cr{ em Ne ork
missionpnLOv,andtracwIn ai\Report
Mi�hi9an ALES in{Orme Eoo
xpenditure p
AC Pnnua\LE
9 1 of
P 12
ORPeKpi°�pero 213112p19E
FFSO
ER\
�rooxolo-
pAD iIp191
�
Expenditure
gurnTr'aj Pnnua\ LED oVaw"
O�IZOAM
10:58
Resolution #20176
June 4, 2020
Moved by Gershenson seconded by Luebs the resolutions on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted.
Discussion followed.
Vote on Consent Agenda, as amended:
AYES: Hoffman, Jackson, KochenderPer, Kowall, Kuhn, Long, Luebs, Markham, McGillivray,
Middleton, Miller, Nelson, Powell, Quarles, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Woodward, Zack,
Gershenson. (20)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted.
P�So� JE
i G�\��p@vAgppN
lti tl655 54,oW 011NdnSbnd `QNUOV
3A11n03X3 AINnoo ua 3�3t13H 1
3*13
NOW ►loS3d SIH131"
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and
accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on June 4, 2020,
with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Circuit Court at Pontiac,
Michigan this 4th day of June, 2020.
Lisa Brown, Oakland County