No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2020.11.19 - 33890MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #20571 November 19, 2020 BY: Commissioner Penny Luebs, Chairperson, Health, Safety and Human Services Committee IN RE: SHERIFF'S OFFICE — 2020 LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM AMENDMENT OVER 15% To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Sheriff's Office has received the second of two disbursements in the amount of $32,686.48 from the Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice Training Fund for January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021; and WHEREAS the first disbursement in the amount of $41,948.72 was approved by Miscellaneous Resolution # 20176; and WHEREAS the total amount received for the 2020 annual distribution is $74,635.20 and must be spent within two calendar years; and WHEREAS the funds are used for criminal justice in-service training of Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) licensed law enforcement officer training costs; and WHEREAS this grant amendment has completed the Grant Review Process in accordance with Miscellaneous Resolution #19006. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the second disbursement for the 2020 Law Enforcement Distribution Program from the Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice Training Fund, in the amount of $32,686.48 with no County match required for January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the grant agreement and to approve any grant extensions or changes, within fifteen percent (15%) of the original award, which are consistent with the original award as approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment, and continuation of the grant program is contingent upon future levels of grant funding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a budget amendment is not required at this time. Chairperson, on behalf of the Health, Safety and Human Services Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. P [A_A� Commissione Penny Luebs, District #16 Chairperson, ealth, Safety and Human Services Committee HEALTH, SAFETY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried on a roll call vote with Gingell absent. GRANT REVIEW SIGN -OFF — Sheriffs Office GRANT NAME: 2020 Law Enforcement Distribution Registration FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (M.C.O.L.E.S.) DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Dena Dawkins / (248) 858-4990 STATUS: Grant Amendment #1 (Greater than or Equal to 15% Variance from Current Award) DATE: 10/24/20 Please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The Board of Commissioners' liaison committee resolution and grant amendment package (which should include this sign -off and the grant amendment with related documentation) may be requested to be placed on the agenda(s) of the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant amendment by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Management and Budget: Approved by M & B. Update the draft resolution to include any necessary budget amendment. —Lynn Sonkiss (10/21/20) Human Resources: 1IR Approved —No ER Implications —Lori Taylor (10/16/20) Risk Management: Amendment approved by Risk Management. —Robert Erlenbeck (10/16/20) Corporation Counsel: Approved by Corporation Counsel (no legal issues). — Sharon Kessler (10/19/20) Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended :•q lfyy'L m Em =!S) fl" _y Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards 2020 LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION GUIDELINES STATE OF MICHIGAN Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards 927 Centennial Way Lansing, MI 48917 Effective January 2020 through December 2020 Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards 2020 Law Enforcement Distribution Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 StatutoryAuthority....................................................................................................1 ExecutiveOrder.......................................................................................................1 PURPOSE............................................................................................................... 2 IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES....................................................................................3 Records Maintenance, Access, and Retention.........................................................3 Annual Reporting Requirements..............................................................................4 AllowableExpenditures............................................................................................4 IneligibleExpenditures.............................................................................................5 TravelRegulations...................................................................................................7 Scheduleof Travel Rates.........................................................................................8 SelectCities.............................................................................................................9 Dispositionof Equipment..... ............... ................................................................... 10 V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS....................................................................................10 Out of State Special Use Requests.......................................................................A0 Equipment Special Use Requests..........................................................................11 Special Use Request Approval Process................................................................. 11 APPENDIXA - DEFINITIONS.......................................................................................12 I. INTRODUCTION Statutory Authority The Michigan Justice Training programs are regulated by state law, administrative rule, and executive order. Public Act 301 of 1982, created the Michigan Justice Training Fund (MJTF). Revenue to the Michigan Justice Training Fund is generated through Justice System Assessments that are levied and collected by the courts and submitted to the Michigan Department of Treasury for deposit into the Justice System Fund (JSF). The MJTF receives 11.84% of the JSF balance on a monthly basis. Both the JSF and the MJTF are interest -bearing accounts. Interest is posted to each account quarterly. The Michigan Justice Training Fund is a restricted fund. These funds may be used only for the criminal justice in-service (active duty) training of eligible trainees or such purposes as designated by legislative mandate. Public Act 302 of 1982 created the Michigan Justice Training Commission (MJTC) and set forth the responsibilities of that Commission. Section 3 of the Act directs the Commission to annually distribute 60% of the Justice Training Fund to eligible entities under the law enforcement distribution. The Act allows the Commission to use the remaining balance to award grants and pay for staff services to the Commission for administering and enforcing the statutory requirements of 1965 P.A. 302, as amended, and 1965 P.A. 203, MCL 28.601 to 28.615. The two funding programs are referred to as the Law Enforcement Distribution (LED) and the Competitive Grant Program, respectively. This document addresses the Law Enforcement Distribution. The administrative rules that prescribe the procedures by which the Commission shall distribute money from the fund were developed under the authority conferred on the Commission by section 10 of 1982 P.A. 302, as amended, by section 9 of 1965 PA 380, and by Executive Reorganization Order 2001-2, MCL 18.423, 16.109, and 28.621. With Executive Order 2001-5, Governor John Engler ordered the merger of the Michigan Justice Training Commission with the Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (COLES) to form the new Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) and transferred the responsibilities of P.A. 302 to the MCOLES. Executive Order 2001-5 also directed the Commission to focus its activities in order to accomplish the following objectives involving law enforcement organizations and officers: • increase professionalism, • increase the number of law enforcement organizations that offer formal in-service training and increase the number of law enforcement officers who receive formal in-service training, • institute law enforcement in-service training standards applicable to all law enforcement in- service training in Michigan, • implement a Web -based information system that will allow the Commission to accomplish its goals and communicate with Michigan law enforcement organizations in a more efficient manner. - 1 - mran-,111•1yy As mandated by the Act, the purpose of the LED program is to annually distribute Justice Training Funds to eligible agencies for in-service criminal justice training of their MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers. For the purposes of the LED program, criminal justice in-service training means a criminal justice educational program presented by an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to the Act or by a contractual service provider hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to the Act, including a course or package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment of a fee or tuition, or education or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, in which the program, education, or training is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of criminal justice services by eligible employees of the agency or entity. III. ELIGIBILITY Any governmental agency of the executive branch of this state or a subdivision of this state that is established and maintained in accordance with the laws of this state and authorized by the laws of this state to employ or appoint law enforcement officers licensed under section 9 and 9 (a) of the MCOLES Act, 1965 P.A. 203, MCL 28.609 and 28.609 (a) is eligible to receive LED funding. This includes any Michigan city, village, township, county, community college, state supported college or university, state department, or authority formed by the joinder of two or more eligible municipalities that meets the requirements. Only MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers, employed by an eligible entity, are eligible trainees under this program. The Act also requires that an eligible agency shall submit an annual registration to establish or maintain eligibility to receive a distribution of justice training funds. Annual eligibility is determined by several factors. 1) Reaistration: A complete and accurate registration shall be submitted, in the manner prescribed by the Commission, on or before the established deadline. 2) Report of Expenditures: A complete accounting of expenditures charged to LED funds during the prior calendar year shall accompany the annual registration in the manner prescribed by the Commission. You must report regardless of whether LED funds were used or not. 3) Maintenance of Effort (MOE): It is the intent of the Act to provide supplemental funding, not replace local funding, for in-service criminal justice training. To ensure compliance with this intent, the amount of local funds budgeted annually by the local unit of government for in-service training shall be equal to, or greater than, the amount budgeted for in-service training on October 12, 1982, or the first year of program participation. This initial figure is referred to as the agency's "base year" amount. 4) Roster of Officers: The law enforcement agency shall employ a minimum of one full-time equated (FTE) officer for the calendar year prior to the year in which the registration is submitted. A roster of licensed officers shall be provided in a manner prescribed by the Commission. LED payments will only be authorized for MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers named on the agency roster. -2- 5) Two-vear Expenditure Period: Recipient agencies are required to expend their entire annual distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. For example, LED funds received during 2018 must be expended by December 31, 2020. If the distribution is not expended within this time frame, the agency will be ineligible to receive any additional LED funding until the balance is expended and reported to the Commission. Licensure is issued by the Commission under 1965 P.A. 203, as amended. Any officer found not to be in compliance with the requirements shall be ineligible for the law enforcement distribution. Therefore, it is the law enforcement agency's responsibility to verify that each law enforcement officer registered for the law enforcement distribution meets the requirements of Act 203 in one of the following manners: • current election to the office of sheriff. • current employment by a law enforcement agency as a fully -empowered MCOLES-licensed law enforcement officer. Non -Discrimination Government units receiving money distributed under the Act, and any person or contractor performing services funded by such money, shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, or marital status in violation of Act 453 of the Public Acts of 1976, as amended. Upon certification of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission that a violation of these nondiscrimination requirements has occurred, a government unit's right to receive money under the Act may be suspended, terminated, or conditioned in any appropriate way that is consistent with the circumstances of the case. Non -Compliance Non-compliance with the provisions of these guidelines shall result in a forfeiture of law enforcement distribution funding. IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES All recipients of LED funds agree to maintain records documenting annual calendar year LED expenditures in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, to permit inspection of these records, and to cooperate with any audit requested or authorized by the local unit of government, the Commission, or the State of Michigan auditor general. All LED funds and expenditures shall be recorded in a fund or account separate from other funds or accounts. Recipients of LED funds must ensure that LED funds and expenditures are not comingled with any other funds. All financial records and supporting documentation for LED expenditures shall be retained by the agency for seven years following the calendar year in which the funds were expended. Recipients are obligated to protect these records adequately against fire or other damage. Records may be retained in an automated format. State and local governments may impose record retention and maintenance requirements in addition to those prescribed. -3- An agency receiving funds under this Act shall report annually to the Commission on the forms and in the manner prescribed by the Commission. Failure to report the required information shall result in ineligibility to receive LED funds. Beginning with the 1990 distribution, amendments to the Act require that each agency expend the entire annual distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. Therefore, training costs, supplies, and equipment purchases shall be assigned to the oldest funds available regardless of the year expended. The amended Act requires that if funds remain unexpended after the end of the second calendar year, the agency shall be ineligible for future funds until the remaining balance has been expended and reported. Beginning in 2017, amendments to the Act require that agencies return law enforcement distribution funds to the Michigan Justice Training Fund for redistribution if the funds have not been expended within five calendar years after the year in which they were received. After each annual registration, invoices will be created for agencies that have not expended their law enforcement distribution funds within this five-year timeline. Agencies must report closure or consolidation initiatives to MCOLES for close out processing. A final LED expenditure report may be submitted to report eligible expenditures incurred but not yet reported. Upon review and approval of the expenditures, an invoice will be generated for the return of any remaining unexpended funds. If a final expenditure report is not submitted, the agency will be invoiced for the full amount of unexpended funds as reported during the most recent annual registration. Funds returned will be deposited to the Michigan Justice Training Fund and will be re- distributed in a future Law Enforcement Distribution. The following expenditures are eligible for LED funding. All training courses being provided to in- service law enforcement officers in Michigan must be registered in the MCOLES Information and Tracking Network prior to the training being conducted, whether being provided by a Michigan based or out-of-state private or public vendor, as well as training offered by an agency for specific, in-house agency purposes. Allowable Expenditures: • Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training, subject to the supplanting restrictions. • In -state travel expenses for training programs outside of a 50-mile radius from the worksite or home (whichever is closer). Travel expenditures must not exceed the allowable travel rates outlined on page 8. • Expenditure of LED funds for tuition costs for out-of-state training courses is allowable provided that the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out -of -State Special Use Request to the Commission and the course was registered through the MCOLES Information and Tracking Network prior to the training dates. • Expenditure of LED funds for reaistration oniv for out-of-state conferences or conventions providing the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out -of -State Special Use Request to the Commission and is granted approval prior to attending the conference or convention. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be covered by other funds. -4- • A consortium fee for law enforcement training attended. Consortium fees paid shall be reported per year. • The reasonable rental costs for the use of a training facility for in-service training, if facilities owned or occupied by an eligible entity are either not available or are inappropriate due to the nature of the training. • The cost of purchasing or leasinq traininq materials used to assist trainees in understanding in-service training topics. This includes items such as training manuals, tests, evaluations. Materials must be used exclusively for the direct delivery of criminal justice in- service training. • The reasonable rental cost or purchase price of equipment used exclusively for the direct delivery of in-service training; however, expenditures for purchase shall not be more than the total of 10% of the annual distribution, nor may any single item be more than $5,000.00, without prior approval of the Commission. Equipment that costs less than $300 shall be reported as a Supplies and Operating expense. o The Equipment Special Use Request form is available on-line. Additional information regarding equipment is outlined on page 11. • A flat rate or tuition paid to a contractual traininq provider hired by an eligible entity. The payment shall be in compliance with policies established by the Commission. • The cost of web -based programs, digital or analoq media, or other such instructional media that are based upon interactive learning. • The cost of automated firearms training systems that simulate deadly force decision - making circumstances. Ineligible Expenditures: 1. Expenditures for salaries of trainees. 2. Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training if the instructors are assigned to perform in-service training as part of their regular function with an eligible agency. 3. Meal and lodging expenditures that exceed the allowable rates outlined on page 8. In cases where charges for meals and lodging exceed the allowable rate, the grantee may utilize other funding sources to cover the additional charge. o The Commission will not authorize the use of justice training funds for travel costs to participate in criminal justice training unless the criminal justice training program is for the sole purpose of training or offers not less than 6 hours of qualifying training within any 24-hour period. 4. Criminal justice training not located in this state, unless the training event has first been approved by the Commission and is registered in MITN, as noted above. 5. Criminal justice training in another country. -5- 6. The purchase of firearms. 7. The purchase of alcoholic liquor. 8. The purchase of refreshments. 9. The publication of a newsletter. Law Enforcement Distribution Travel Regulations Lodging and Meals: Actual lodging and meal expenditures paid, including taxes, are allowable and shall not exceed the maximum allowance indicated in the current Schedule of Travel Rates. For LED purposes, there is not a daily per diem or allotment. In those cases where charges for lodging or meals exceed the allowable rate, the trainee or agency may utilize other funding sources to cover the additional charge. Trainee meals will only be allowed when training occurs both before and after the meal or the trainee is otherwise eligible for meals due to lodging. Select Cities: Specific meal rates have been established for select cities. The lodging rate for select cities is equivalent to the rate for all other cities. The list of select cities is displayed on page 9. Vehicle Mileage: Mileage expenses will be allowed at a rate not to exceed the allowable rate specified in the current Schedule of Travel Rates. Mileaae and Lodaina Restriction: Travel expenses shall not be charged for mileage or lodging where training occurs within 50 miles, by standard mileage charts, of the home or work site, whichever is closer. An exception may be allowed for those persons who work or reside within a radius exceeding 25 miles of the training site when a minimum of two hours of training occurs following the evening meal. Mileage costs between the home or work site to an airport is not an allowable expense. Air Travel: The use of commercial airlines is permitted when it is advantageous based on comparative travel costs and the time of the traveler. Justice Training Funds may not be used to purchase first-class airfare. Baggage fees for one piece of personal luggage is allowed. Overweight or additional baggage fees are not allowed. Toll Charges: Toll charges and bridge fees are allowable. Taxi: Necessary taxicab fares between an airport terminal and meeting site are allowable. Car Rental: Charges for car rental are allowable. Parking: Parking charges at the most economical rate available is allowable. -7- Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards Law Enforcement Distribution Schedule of Travel Rates Effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Michigan Select Cities Breakfast $10.25 Lunch $10.25 Dinner $24.25 Lodging $85.00 Michigan All Other Cities Breakfast $8.50 Lunch $8.50 Dinner $19.00 Lodging $85.00 Out -of -State Select Cities Breakfast $13.00 Lunch $13.00 Dinner $25.25 Lodging $85.00 Out -of -State All Other Cities Breakfast $10.25 Lunch $10.25 Dinner $23.50 Lodging $85.00 Standard Mileage Rate $.340 per mile 0 SELECT CITIES MICHIGAN SELECT CITIES AND COUNTIES CITIES COUNTIES Ann Arbor, Auburn Hills, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Holland, All of Grand Traverse, Oakland, and Wayne Leland, Mackinac Island, Petoskey, Pontiac, South Haven, Traverse City OUT-OF-STATE SELECT CITIES SELECT CITY OR STATE SELECT CITY OR COUNTY STATE COUNTY Arizona Phoenix, Scottsdale, Sedona Massachusetts Boston (Suffolk), Burlington, Cambridge, Woburn, Martha's California Los Angeles (Los Angeles, Orange, Vineyard Mendocino & Ventura Counties, and Edwards AFB), Eureka, Arcata, Minnesota Duluth, Minneapolis/St. Paul Mckinleyville, Mammoth Lakes, Mill (Hennepin and Ramsey Valley, San Rafael, Novato, Monterey, Counties) Palm Springs, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, Santa Nevada Las Vegas Monica, South Lake Tahoe, Truckee, Yosemite National Park New Mexico Santa Fe New York Lake Placid, Manhattan Colorado Aspen, Breckenridge, Grand Lake, (boroughs of Manhattan, Silverthorne, Steamboat Springs, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, and Telluride, Vail Staten Island), Riverhead, Ronkonkoma, Melville, Suffolk Connecticut Bridgeport, Danbury County, Tarrytown, White Plains, New Rochelle District of Washington DC (also the cities Columbia of Alexandria, Falls Church and Ohio Cincinnati Fairfax, and the counties of Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia; Pennsylvania Bucks County, Pittsburgh and the counties of Montgomery and Prince George's in Maryland) Rhode Island Bristol, Jamestown, Middletown/Newport (Newport Florida Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Jupiter, Fort County), Providence Lauderdale, Key West Georgia Brunswick, Jekyll Island Texas Austin, Dallas, Houston, L.B. Johnson Space Center Idaho Sun Valley, Ketchum Utah Park City (Summit County) Illinois Chicago (Cook and Lake Counties) Vermont Manchester, Montpelier, Stowe, Kentucky Kenton Lamoille County Louisiana New Orleans Virginia Alexandria, Falls Church, Fairfax Maine Bar Harbor, Kennebunk, Kittery, Rockport, Sanford Washington Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Seattle Maryland Counties of Montgomery & Prince Wyoming Jackson, Pinedale Games. Baltimore City, Ocean Citv Disposition of Equipment For the purposes of LED funding, to be defined as "equipment" an item shall: 1) be directly involved in the delivery of in-service criminal justice training; 2) be personal property (as distinguished from real property), such as machines, audio/video and computer hardware, etc.; 3) have a normal useful life of more than one year; 4) not become a fixed part of a building or structure; and 5) have a purchase price of $300 or more. Equipment purchases approved by the Commission may be retained by the recipient agency as long as the equipment is used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training. When equipment is no longer used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training, the recipient agency shall notify the Commission to request disposition. The Commission may select one of the following actions: Transfer of the equipment to another training program. Costs of the transportation of the equipment will be borne by the receiving agency. Approve the sale of the equipment, with the arrangements for the sale to be made by the agency possessing the equipment. The agency will be allowed to retain 10% of the receipts from the sale; the remainder shall be returned to the Justice Training Fund. c. Dispose of the property in any other manner consistent with the purposes of the Act, as amended. V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS Out -of -State Special Use Requests The Act contains specific mandates relative to the expenditure of Justice Training Funds for out-of- state training. The intention is, of course, that justice training funds be expended primarily within the state of Michigan to purchase services and materials from Michigan vendors whenever possible. The policy states that the Commission will not fund any out-of-state criminal justice training program, unless all reasonable efforts to locate a similar training program in this state have been exhausted, and the Commission is satisfied that a similar training program is not available in this state. It is the eligible entity's responsibility to make every reasonable effort to locate a Michigan based provider. At a minimum, the applicant shall contact a statewide provider (e.g., the Michigan State Police or the Michigan Municipal League), local or regional providers (e.g., community colleges or universities), and consult the MCOLES Schedule of Training Courses. The Schedule contains information about in-service criminal justice training programs offered in Michigan and is published on the MCOLES web site (www.michigan.gov/mcoles). If the required in-service training is not available in Michigan, the agency shall submit an Out -of -State Special Use Request that must include a detailed explanation of the contacts made and justification for selection of the out-of-state training program. Out -of -State Special Use Requests are categorized for Commission action into the following two groups: r� • Agency Approval. An individual agency requests approval to send eligible trainees to out-of- state training. These requests will be acted upon individually. Blanket Approval. The Commission will give blanket approval, when requirements are met, for attendance by all agencies at annual conferences, e.g., NSA, and IACP. It is the responsibility of the Commission staff to publicize these approvals, and to monitor compliance with the policy regarding the 6:24 ratio for actual hours of training. These approvals will be for the payment of reaistration fees only. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be paid by other funds. Equipment Special Use Requests The Administrative Rules for Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended, state that the expenditure of funds under this Act for the purpose of equipment purchases must be approved by the Commission when total annual equipment purchases will exceed 10% of the agency's annual distribution, or when the purchase price of a single equipment item equals or exceeds $5,000. Special Use Request Approval Process The forms used to request Commission approval for the special use of LED funds, as outlined above, are the Out -of -State Special Use Request (MJT-511) and the Equipment Special Use Request (MJT-512). These forms are available on the MCOLES web site. Both types of requests require prior approval. Written notification of Commission action will be returned to the requesting agency. Each approval is assigned a unique special use request processing number, and this number is noted on the written notification. Definitions Conference - A prearranged formal meeting of a group of people from an organization, association, or profession, for the purpose of discussion or consultation of a specific topic. Convention - A prearranged, periodic assembly of a group of people from an organization, association, or profession, for the purpose of exchanging information Group Meetina - A prearranged meeting of a group of people for the purposes of conducting training, workshops, or seminars. - 11 - APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS "Act" means Act No. 302 of the Public Acts of 1982, as amended. "Commission" means the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) "Consortium" means a public or quasi -public entity established to provide in-service training to criminal justice entities that obtain consortium membership through payment of fees to the consortium. "Criminal justice education program" means a learning experience that generates competency through reading, listening, observing, performing, problem -solving, or interacting with others, the object of which is the introduction or enhancement of knowledge, skills, or judgment related directly to the performance of professional criminal justice tasks currently assigned or assignable. "Direct delivery of criminal justice services" means the execution of the duties of line law enforcement officers provided to the general public (e.g., traffic enforcement, first aid, investigation, community policing and problem solving) and the execution of administrative tasks that enhance the abilities of line officers to provide direct delivery of criminal justice services. "Distribution" means the amount distributed to law enforcement agencies, in two payments, from the Fund within one calendar year, under the provisions of Section 3 of the Act. "Equipment" means, for the purposes of the Act, durable products used only for the direct delivery of in-service training, and is personal property (as distinguished from real property) that is non - expendable and intended for repeated use with a normal useful life of more than one year, and has a single unit purchase price of $300 or more. Equipment may include items such as audio/video equipment, computer hardware, projectors, defensive tactics protective gear, etc. "Full-time equated officers" or "FTEs" means the count to be used for distributions as determined in Section 3 (4) of the Act. "Fund" means the Michigan Justice Training Fund. "In-service criminal justice training" means a criminal justice educational program presented by an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act or by a contractual service provider hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act, including a course or package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment of a fee or tuition, or education or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, in which the program, education, or training is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of criminal justice services by eligible employees of the agency or entity. "Law enforcement officer" means an individual who is continuously employed and paid by a police force as a law enforcement officer who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and empowered to enforce all of the general criminal laws of this State. "MCOLES licensed officer" means a person who has met all of the selection, employment, training, or recognition of prior training and experience standards of Public Act 203 of 1965, as amended, and who is licensed by the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards. -12- "Paid" means monetary compensation at not less than the federal minimum wage established in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended; 29 U.S.C. §206. "Report period" means the calendar year, beginning January 1, through December 31, during which reported activity occurred. -13- Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 1 of 1 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Law Enforcement Distribution Summary Distribution Period: Fall2020 Court Revenue: $964,606.82 Cash Earnings: $14,100.05 Carryover from Previous Distribution: $4 58 Refunds: $1,555.92 Less Special Payments:-$215.49 Available LED Revenue $980,051.88 Per Capita Payments: Per Capita Amount $55.97 Number of Agencies 402 Number of FTEs 17,080 Per Capita Distribution: $955,967.60 Minimum Payments: Officer Cutoff 5 Number of Agencies 96 Number of FTEs 228 Minimum Distribution $24,000.00 Total Distribution: $979,967.60 Carry Forward to Next Distribution: $84.28 1V1CC7L-=S u�iaal¢enan v._a l.a Ylk. ro a,w Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 1 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Report Period: Fall 2020 Oakland County Distribution Payment $32,686.48 see page 13 Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution ADRIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 29 1,623.13 ADRIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 AKRON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 ALBION DPS 16 895.52 ALCONA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 12 671.64 ALGER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 9 503.73 ALLEGAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 63 3,526.11 ALLEGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 ALLEN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 40 2,238.80 ALMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 11 615.67 ALMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 ALPENA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 18 1,007.46 ALPENA POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 895.52 ANN ARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 119 6,660.43 ARENAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 14 783.58 ARGENTINE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 ARMADA POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 AU GRES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 AUBURN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT 50 2,798.50 BAD AXE POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 BARAGA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 6 335.82 BARAGA POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 BARODA-LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 BARRY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 29 1,623.13 BARRY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 BATH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 BATTLE CREEK POLICE DEPARTMENT 104 5,820.88 @Ivlc=�s 4f 14Wt ....IIF m forfW, mc' 'Ita Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 2 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution BAY CITY DPS 50 2,798.50 BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 41 2,294.77 BEAVERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 BELDING POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 BELLAIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 BELLEVUE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 BENTON HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 21 1,175.37 BENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 20 1,119.40 BENZIE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 17 951.49 BERKLEY DPS 27 1,511.19 BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 79 4,421.63 BERRIEN SPRINGS-ORONOKO TOWNSHIP POLICE 8 447.76 DEPARTMENT BEVERLY HILLS DPS 24 1,343.28 BIG RAPIDS DPS 18 1,007.46 BIRCH RUN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT 32 1,791.04 BISHOP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY 10 559.70 BLACKMAN TOWNSHIP DPS 38 2,126.86 BLISSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 BLOOMFIELD HILLS DPS 24 1,343.28 BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 69 3,861.93 BOYNE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 BRANCH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 15 839.55 BRIDGEPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 BRIDGMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 BRIGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 BRONSON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 BROWN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 +. COLES 4/�1[alrin flli+w {M('4iVd.»f4!xxWil Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 3 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 30 1,679.10 BUCHANAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 BUENA VISTA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 727.61 BURTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 34 1,902.98 CADILLAC POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 80 4,477.60 CAMBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 CANTON TOWNSHIP DPS 89 4,981.33 CAPAC POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 CARLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 CARO POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 CARROLLTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 CARSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 CASEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 CASS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 CASS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 32 1,791.04 CASSOPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 CENTER LINE DPS 18 1,007.46 CENTRAL LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 23 1,287.31 CHARLEVOIX COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 CHARLEVOIX POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 CHARLOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 CHEBOYGAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 22 1,231.34 CHEBOYGAN DPS 7 391.79 CHELSEA POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 CHESANING POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 41 2,294.77 COLES yI"'.ca,�W , a LHIx0.d q Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 4 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution CHIKAMING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 CHIPPEWA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 18 1,007.46 CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 CLARE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 26 1,455.22 CLAWSON POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 895.52 CLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 18 1,007.46 CLAYTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 CLINTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 30 1,679.10 CLINTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 CLINTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 92 5,149.24 CLIO POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 COLDWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 COLOMA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 COLON POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 CONSTANTINE POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 CORUNNA POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 COVERT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 16 895.52 CROSWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 CRYSTAL FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 DAVISON POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 DAVISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 18 1,007.46 DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 78 4,365.66 DEARBORN POLICE DEPARTMENT 189 10,578.33 DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS 7 391.79 DELTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 15 839.55 r�,, @l�(--.©L S 1M+1{n+i:1.n:+Yir+w 4wC+lvxw.a P,rluM Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 5 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution DENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 248 13,880.56 DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT 2,341 131,025.77 DEWITT POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 DEWITT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 727.61 DICKINSON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 12 671.64 DOUGLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 DOWAGIAC POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 DRYDEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 DUNDEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 DURAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 EAST GRAND RAPIDS DPS 27 1,511.19 EAST JORDAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 EAST LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT 49 2,742.53 EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 34 1,902.98 EASTPOINTE POLICE DEPARTMENT 40 2,238.80 EATON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 62 3,470.14 EATON RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 EAU CLAIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 ECORSE POLICE DEPARTMENT 18 1,007.46 ELKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 EMMET COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 26 1,455.22 EMMETT TOWNSHIP DPS 14 783.58 ESCANABA DPS 31 1,735.07 ESSEXVILLE DPS 8 447.76 EVART POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 FAIRHAVEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 FARMINGTON DPS 23 1,287.31 C0L :S u+liW ICi:n+++li� i� N+Cu'atwda trya•Irn, Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 6 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution FARMINGTON HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT 106 5,932.82 FENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 FERNDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT 41 2,294.77 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY DPS 13 727.61 FLAT ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT 18 1,007.46 FLINT POLICE DEPARTMENT 99 5,541.03 FLINTTOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 42 2,350.74 FLUSHING POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 FLUSHING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 FORSYTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 FOWLERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 FRANKENMUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 FRANKLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 FRASER DPS 29 1,623.13 FREMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 FRUITPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 GAINES TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 GARDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 31 1,735.07 GARFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 GAYLORD POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 GENESEE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 18 1,007.46 GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 119 6,660.43 GENESEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 GERRISH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 GIBRALTAR POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 GLADSTONE DPS 10 559.70 GLADWIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 15 839.55 GLADWIN POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 C{[NW 0. 111.11p � C 1l.1svt46'nvlpUl Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 7 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution GOGEBIC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 16 895.52 GR FORD INTNATL AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 895.52 GRAND BEACH-MICHIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 GRAND BLANC POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 895.52 GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 40 2,238.80 GRAND HAVEN DPS 32 1,791.04 GRAND LEDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE 13 727.61 GRAND RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 292 16,343.24 GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 67 3,749.99 GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY DPS 20 1,119.40 GRANDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 24 1,343.28 GRATIOT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 28 1,567.16 GRAYLING POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 GREEN OAK CHARTER TOWNSHIP POLICE 15 839.55 DEPARTMENT GRAENVILLE DPS 16 895.52 GROSSE ILE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 GROSSE POINTE DPS 22 1,231.34 GROSSE POINTE FARMS DPS 30 1,679.10 GROSSE POINTE PARK DPS 32 1,791.04 GROSSE POINTE WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT 28 1,567.16 HAMBURG TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 HAMPTON TOWNSHIP DPS 9 503.73 HAMTRAMCK POLICE DEPARTMENT 28 1,567.16 HANCOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 HARBOR BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 HARBOR SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 HARPER WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT 29 1,623.13 y g�- °arr�@ 1 CO L;--S Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 8 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution HART POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 HASTINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 727.61 HAZEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 35 1,958.95 HESPERIA POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 HIGHLAND PARK DPS 27 1,511.19 HILLSDALE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 22 1,231.34 HILLSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 HOLLAND DPS 57 3,190.29 HOLLY POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 HOUGHTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 HOUGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 HOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 895.52 HUDSON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 HUNTINGTON WOODS DPS 16 895.52 HURON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 HURON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 21 1,175.37 IMLAY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 INGHAM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 72 4,029.84 INKSTER POLICE DEPARTMENT 25 1,399.25 IONIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 25 1,399.25 IONIA DPS 15 839.55 IOSCO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 5 279.85 IRON MOUNTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 IRON RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 IRONWOOD DPS 10 559.70 ISABELLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 ISHPEMING POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 50 2,798.50 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 9 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT 46 2,574.62 JONESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 KALAMAZOO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 135 7,555.95 KALAMAZOO DPS 233 13,041.01 KALAMAZOO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 30 1,679.10 KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS 9 503.73 KALKASKA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 17 951.49 KALKASKA DPS 2 250.00 KEEGO HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 KELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS 5 279.85 KENT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 251 14,048.47 KENTWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT 64 3,582.08 KEWEENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 8 447.76 KINGSFORD DPS 18 1,007.46 KINGSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 KINROSS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 LAINGSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 LAKE ANGELUS POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 LAKE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 15 839.55 LAKE LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 LAKE ODESSA POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 LAKE ORION POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 LAKEVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 LANSE POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 LANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT 202 11,305.94 LANSING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 LAPEER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 48 2,686.56 MCOL ; = S W+111n :+IeS,II/5«leY P54+Y'+rv4a .IMW Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 10 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution LAPEER POLICE DEPARTMENT 18 1,007.46 LAPEER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 LATHRUP VILLAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 LAURIUM POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 LAWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 LEELANAU COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 19 1,063.43 LENAWEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 37 2,070.89 LEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 LINCOLN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 45 2,518.65 LINCOLN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 LITCHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 LIVINGSTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 64 3,582.08 LIVONIA POLICE DEPARTMENT 125 6,996.25 LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 LUCE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 5 279.85 LUDINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 MACKINAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 12 671.64 MACKINAC ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 MACKINAW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 278 15,559.66 MADISON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 47 2,630.59 MADISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 MANISTEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 16 895.52 MANISTEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 MANISTIQUE DPS 8 447.76 MANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 MARENISCO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 MCOLES 4F kw C�. I rvWo. wY t A. 4-1'tx.lYnl Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 11 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution MARINE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 MARLETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 MARQUETTE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 24 1,343.28 MARQUETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT 32 1,791.04 MARSHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 MASON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 19 1,063.43 MASON POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 MATTAWAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 MAYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 MECOSTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 MELVINDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT 21 1,175.37 MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 MENOMINEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 16 895.52 MENOMINEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 38 2,126.86 METAMORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 METRO POLICE AUTHORITY OF GENESEE COUNTY 24 1,343.28 MICHIGAN STATE POLICE 1,919 107,406.43 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 81 4,533.57 MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY DPS 13 727.61 MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 41 2,294.77 MIDLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 48 2,686.56 MILAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 783.58 MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT 19 1,063.43 MILLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 MISSAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 16 895.52 MONROE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 74 4,141.78 w' �CQL'""�.S w1141n1 a im. 1A. e m YRY.iW, Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 12 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT 39 2,182.83 MONTAGUE POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 MONTCALM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 16 895.52 MONTMORENCY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 14 783.58 MONTROSE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 MORRICE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS 20 1,119.40 MOUNT MORRIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 MOUNT MORRIS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 29 1,623.13 MOUNT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT 28 1,567.16 MUNISING POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 MUSKEGON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 52 2,910.44 MUSKEGON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 23 1,287.31 MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT 71 3,973.87 MUSKEGON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 727.61 NAPOLEON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 NEGAUNEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 NEW BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 895.52 NEW BUFFALO POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 NEW ERA POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 NEW LOTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 NEWAYGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 31 1,735.07 NEWAYGO POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 NILES POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 NORTH MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE 21 1,175.37 DEPARTMENT NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 MCQL=-s Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 13 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution NORTHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 NORTHVILLE TOWNSHIP DPS 32 1,791.04 NORTON SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT 29 1,623.13 NORWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 NOVI POLICE DEPARTMENT 70 3,917.90 OAK PARK DPS 48 2,686.56 OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS 22 1,231.34 OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 584 32,686.48 OAKLAND UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 21 1,175.37 OCEANIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 OGEMAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 15 839.55 OLIVET POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 ONTONAGON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 4 250.00 ONTWA TOWNSHIP-EDWARDSBURG POLICE 7 391.79 DEPARTMENT ORCHARD LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 21 1,175.37 OSCODA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 10 559.70 OSCODA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 615.67 OTISVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 OTSEGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 12 671.64 OTSEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 OTTAWA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 141 7,891.77 OWOSSO POLICE DEPARTMENT 18 1,007.46 OXFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 PAW PAW POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 PENTWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 PERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 PETOSKEY DPS 19 1,063.43 r{COL-=s 4Seiyxt Clan+gp•an lrca(d.e.-,=u 0.a.tra Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 14 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 PINCKNEY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 PINCONNING POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 PITTSFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS 39 2,182.83 PLAINWELL DPS 8 447.76 PLEASANT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 28 1,567.16 PORT AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 PORT HURON POLICE DEPARTMENT 54 3,022.38 PORTAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 54 3,022.38 PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 POTTERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 PRAIRIEVILLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 PRESQUE ISLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 14 783.58 QUINCY POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 RAISIN TOWNSHIP DPS 5 279.85 READING POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 REDFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 57 3,190.29 REED CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 REESE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS 5 279.85 RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 RICHLAND TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 RIVER ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 23 1,287.31 RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 1,231.34 I'�Ql��'S uellw�Ge,..,Ar, �.. ta+t;civ.«.re'✓.+de+m Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 15 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 1,231.34 ROCKFORD DPS 11 615.67 ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 ROGERS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 ROMEO POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 ROMULUS POLICE DEPARTMENT 40 2,238.80 ROOSEVELT PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 ROSCOMMON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 26 1,455.22 ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 67 3,749.99 ROYAL OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT 77 4,309.69 SAGINAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 60 3,358.20 SAGINAW POLICE DEPARTMENT 57 3,190.29 SAGINAW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 43 2,406.71 SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE 8 447.76 SALINE POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 727.61 SANDUSKY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 SANILAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 30 1,679.10 SAULTSTE MARIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 1,231.34 SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 17 951.49 SCOTNILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 SEBEWAING POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 SHELBY POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 SHELBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 70 3,917.90 SHEPHERD POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 SHIAWASSEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 26 1,455.22 SILVER CREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 SOMERSET TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 SOUTH HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT 19 1,063.43 i q0L=--S Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 16 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution SOUTH LYON POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 SOUTH ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 SOUTHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 122 6,828.34 SOUTHGATE POLICE DEPARTMENT 38 2,126.86 SPARTA POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 SPRING ARBOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 SPRINGPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 ST. CHARLES POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 ST. CLAIR CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 ST. CLAIR COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 89 4,981.33 ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT 81 4,533.57 ST. IGNACE POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 ST. JOHNS POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 25 1,399.25 ST. JOSEPH DPS 21 1,175.37 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 559.70 ST. LOUIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 391.79 STANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 150 8,395.50 STOCKBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 STURGIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 19 1,063.43 SUMPTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 SYLVAN LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 TAYLOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 76 4,253.72 TECUMSEH POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 727.61 THETFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 THOMAS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 THREE OAKS POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 bflhln QWn 1110 m t,[ 4v1a 1%wsIVul Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 17 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution THREE RIVERS POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 TITTABAWASSEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 TRAVERSE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 29 1,623.13 TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 34 1,902.98 TROY POLICE DEPARTMENT 107 5,988.79 TUSCARORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 TUSCOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 26 1,455.22 UBLY POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 UNADILLA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 250.00 UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN DPS 12 671.64 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DPS 63 3,526.11 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT DPS 18 1,007.46 UTICA POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 671.64 VAN BUREN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 59 3,302.23 VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 40 2,238.80 VASSAR POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 250.00 VICKSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 WALKER POLICE DEPARTMENT 36 2,014.92 WALLED LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 839.55 WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT 202 11,305.94 WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS 6 335.82 WASHTENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 139 7,779.83 WATERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 57 3,190.29 WATERVLIET POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 WAYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY DPS 113 6,324.61 MC©L=S W.It [n.ryle•r..l hhiY x.i `.u.lnn Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 18 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 541 30,279.77 WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT 21 1,175.37 WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY DPS 65 3,638.05 WEST BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 78 4,365.66 WEST BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 32 1,791.04 WESTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 77 4,309.69 WEXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 23 1,287.31 WHITE CLOUD POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 WHITE LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 1,455.22 WHITE PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 250.00 WHITEHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 WILLIAMSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 6 335.82 WIXOM POLICE DEPARTMENT 20 1,119.40 WOLVERINE LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 447.76 WOODHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT 29 1,623.13 WYANDOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT 34 1,902.98 WYOMING POLICE DEPARTMENT 83 4,645.51 YALE POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 279.85 YPSILANTI POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 1,455.22 ZEELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 503.73 ZILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 250.00 4.i:wr n.�..tq.� a tus t,E.�„•.n gb,i.ro, Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 19 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi -Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Summary Totals Available LED Revenue 980,051.88 Per Capita Payments Per Capita Value 55.97 Number of Agencies 402 Number of FTEs 17,080 Per Capita Distribution 955,967.60 Minimum Payments Number of Agencies 96 Number of FTEs 228 Minimum Distribution 24,000.00 Total Disbursed 979,967.60 Total Number of Agencies 498 Total Number of FTEs 17,308 COL;=S urily.�iinneaar y�lM+t+�e�.rlx�nivn, Resolution #20571 November 19, 2020 Moved by Long seconded by Luebs the resolutions on the Consent Agenda be adopted. AYES: Gingell, Hoffman, Jackson, Kochenderfer, Kowall, Kuhn, Long, Luebs, Markham, McGillivray, Middleton, Miller, Nelson, Powell, Quarles, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Woodward, Zack, Gershenson. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions on the Consent Agenda were adopted. 4D/;Az 3k I HEREBY APPROVE THIS EiESOLUTION CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE ACTING PURSUANTTO MCL 45.559A (7) STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on November 19, 2020, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Circuit Court at Pontiac, Michigan this 19th day of November, 2020, Lisa Brown, Oakland County