Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2021.04.29 - 34369MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #21161 April 29, 2021 BY: Commissioner Penny Luebs, Chairperson, Public Health & Safety Committee IN RE: PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS - MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND GRANT APPLICATION FOR FY 2022 To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the State of Michigan offers grant funding to local communities under PA 511; and WHEREAS this funding is targeted to divert felony offenders from prison into local jails or other sentencing options; and WHEREAS Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since 1994; and WHEREAS the total amount of funding requested in the application is $1,922,553 for the grant period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks funding for twelve (12) full-time eligible (FTE) positions #07425, #07426, #07429, #07432, #07433, #09243, #09247, #09291, #09295, #09648, #09649, #11772 and two (2) part-time non -eligible (PTNE) positions #9292 and #12230 within the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS the grant application also seeks partial funding fortwo (2) positions, #07834 and #09396, within the Community Corrections Division, whereby the Slate will fund 50% of the costs for these two (2) positions, and the County will match the remaining 50%; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks funding for three (3) FTE positions, #07418, #07419, #07420 within the Sheriff's Office - Correction Services Division; and WHEREAS any programs created through these funds become part of the County's Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan; and WHEREAS the grant application and the County's Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan have completed the Grant Review Process in accordance with Board of Commissioners Grant Procedures at their January 21, 2021 meeting; and WHEREAS PA 511 of 1988 requires that the "County Board or Boards of Commissioners of the County shall approve the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by their advisory board " NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes the Oakland County Community Corrections Advisory Board's application to the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) requesting funding in the total of $1,922,553 for the grant period of October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2022, which is detailed on Schedule A (attached). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant will continue tofund twelve (12) full-time eligible (FTE) positions #07425, #07426, #07429, #07432, #07433, #09243, #09247, #09291, #09295, #09648, #09649, #11772 and two (2) part-time non -eligible (PTNE) positions #9292 and #12230 within the Community Corrections Division. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant will also continue to fund three (3) FTE positions #07418, #07419, #07420 within the Sheriff's Office -Correction Services Division. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no County match is required; however, the FY 2022 budget of this grant application will also continue to partially fund two (2) General Fund/General Purpose FTE #07834 and #09396 whereby the State will fund 50% of the costs and the County will match 50% of the costs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the proposed County's Comprehensive Community Correction Plan prepared by the Community Corrections Advisory Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment and continuation of the Special Revenue positions in the grant are contingent upon continued future levels of grant funding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED a budget amendment is not required at this time. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Health & Safety Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. l� Commissione Penny Luebs,District#18 Chairpers blic Health & Safety Committee PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried on a roll call vote with Gingell absent, FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. GRANT REVIEW SIGN -OFF — Community Corrections GRANT NAME: FY 22 Michigan Department of Corrections / Office of Community Corrections Grant FUNDING AGENCY: State of Michigan DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Barb Hankey/248 4512306 STATUS: Grant - Application (Greater than $50,000) DATE: 4/15/2021 Please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The Board of Commissioners' liaison committee resolution and grant application package (which should include this signoff and the grant application with related documentation) may be requested to be placed on the agenda(s) of the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Management and Budget: Approved by M & B—4/14/21. - Lynn Sonkiss 4/14/2021 See comments below: • Fiduciary contact on application should be updated from Sean Carlson to Kyle Jen, Director of Management & Budget. Address is the same. Work cell phone is 248-221-0652 and email is jenk@oakgov.com • Do you need to Include the COVID-19 pandemic as a reasons for reduced incarceration for 2020? It seems like that would have been a contributing factor. • PDF page 5—sectlon A-2 of the application document — add the missing % to 17.8 (s/b 17.8%) • Did the comp study get factored in the personnel costs for the 2022 application? The summary notes that the application amount is the same as the prior year funding. I know that there was discussion on making sure to include comp study and a placeholder for 2022 wages. • Draft resolution needs to be updated to change last sentence from Public Safety & Social Justice Committee to Health, Safety & Human Services Committee o No budget amendment is required at the application stage. Human Resources: Approved by HR. Continues positions, so no HR action needed. — Heather Mason 4/15/2021 Risk Management: Application approved by Risk Management. R.E. 4/15/2021 Corporation Counsel: There are no unresolved legal issues at this time. —Heather Lewis 4/15/202t MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS "Committed to Protect, Dedicated to Success" Office of Community Corrections Community Corrections Plan and Application Fiscal Year 2022 CCAB Name: Oakland County Email the application to: 1. MDOC-OCC@michiean.eov 2, Community Corrections Specialist DUE DATE: May 1, 2021 SECTION I: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADVISORY BOARD INFORMATION B Name of CCAB: odlddnd County Federal I.D. Number: e3-386004P7r A: General Contact Information: CCAB Manager CCAB Manager's Direct CCAB Chairperson Agency Serving as Fiduciary Supervisor of Award & Contact Person { Name: Barbara Hankey Rudolph Hobbs Phyllis McMillen Kyle len Title: Manager Deputy County Circuit Court Judge Executive Address: 250 Elizabeth Lake Road, 2100 Pontiac Lake Road, 1200 N. Telegraph 2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Suite 1520 EOB Dept. 409 EOB Dept. 409 City: Pontiac Waterford Pontiac Waterford State: MI MI MI MI Zip: 48341 48328-0409 48341 48328-0409 Phone: 248 451 2306 248 975 9636 248 858 0339 248 221-0652 _ Fax: Email: 248 452 2230 - hankeyb@oakgov.com hobbsr@oakgov.com— mcmillenp@oakgov.com jenk@oakgov.com lII F f Comunity Corrections Board: County Advisory Board es/Cities Participating in the CCAB: Oakland County pplication was approved by the local CCAB: April 22, 2021 pplication was approved by county board(s) of commissioners and/or city council: April 29, 2021 Date application was submitted to OCC: May 1, 2021 B: CCAB Membership Representing: Name Email County Sheriff: Lt. Darren Ofiara ofiarad@oakgov.com Chief of Police: Chief Tom Lindberg tlindberg@Milfordpolice.com I Circuit Court Judge: Phyllis McMillen mcmillenp@oakgov.com District Court Judge: Kelley Kostin kostink@oakgov.cogov.com 1 Court Judge: vacant VProbate County Commissioner(s): Charles Cavell cavellc@oakgov.com Service Area (Up to 3): Christina Nicholas nicholasc@oaklandchn.org Earl Burton earl@miliberation.org I County Prosecutor: Karen McDonald mcdonaldk@oakgov.com Criminal Defense: lack Holmes jackholmesjratt@aol.com Business Community: Fred Mester judge@judgemester.com Communications Media: Shell Weisberg sweisberg@aclumich.org Circuit/District Probation: Britain Washington washingtonb@michigan.gov City Councilperson: N/A Workforce Development: Mona Defransisco mdefran@oakparkcareercenter.org 1. Does your CCAB have Bylaws? Yes If yes, have they been revised within the last 2 years? No 2. What steps does your CCAB take to orientate new CCAB members ensuring the understanding of their roles and responsibilities? There is no formal process. 2 SECTION II: ANALYSIS & COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIONS PLAN Introduction and Instructions for vour Comprehensive Corrections Plan: Michigan Public AM 511, also known as the Community Corrections Act, was established In 1988 in an effort to improve the State's prison commitment rates (PCR) through the development and utilization of evidence -based, community corrections programming that targets Group 2 straddle cell offenders, OUR-3rd offenders, and probation violators assessed as moderate to high in risk and or needs. Counties and regions establishing a Community Corrections Advisory Board (CCAB) appoint member stakeholders as required by PA-511 to identify and target local criminogenic needs that impact prison commitments and recidivism. CCABs are obligated to abide by PA-511 and Michigan Office of Community Corrections (MOCC) requirements when receiving MOCC funding, including but not limited to data tracking and analysis, as well as minimum program eligibility andutilization requirements. This Application serves as your CCAB's Comprehensive Corrections Plan. To be considered for funding, it must include specific and detailed explanation as to how your plan will impact State Board Priorities, local prison commitment rates, recidivism, and local priorities/initiatives through identified key objectives. Strategies to obtain key objectives as well as performance measures must also be identified. For the purpose of this application, the following terms and definitions apply: 1) Kev Objectives —Overall PCR Objective, Group 2 Straddle Objective, and Recidivism Objective(s) -your CCAB may identify other objectives in addition to these required objectives. 2) Supportive Strateaies — Proposed OCC funded programming and/or services that are intended to support the objectives Identified. 3) Performance Measures— Identified in each proposed program description, these are the specific methods your CCAB will utilize to measure outcomes of programming and their impact on State Board Priorities. Felonv Data Analvsis: OCC will provide CCABs with relevant felony dispositional data to complete the application. CCASs must analyze this data along with local CCIS data (reports run locally from COMPAS Case Manager) and develop key objectives and supportive strategies that will help attain local goals and support State Board Priorities. A thorough analysis of the data should include: • Overall PCRs, rates within sentencing guideline ranges, PCRs within Group 1 and Group 2 offense categories, status at time of offense and recidivism of probation violators, both new sentence and technical • Reference to changes in PCRs compared to prior years Other changes in your CCAB/area that influence changes (new stakeholders, new or changing policies and/or procedures, emerging crimes, offender characteristics, etc.) • Review your past OCC funding proposals for ideas Your data analysis forms the basis of your objectives and strategies. A weak link between them may result in denial of, or conditional revisions to, your Comprehensive Corrections Plan. Therefore, it is important to demonstrate a solid connection between your data, objectives, and supportive strategies. Example: Objective #1 is intended to impact the overall prison commitment rate (PCR). To address this, your CCAB should analyze local felony dispositional & CCIS data and identified trends or changes that impacted that data. For example, trends and changes may include: I • CCAB stakeholder changes • New judicial, probation, or CCAB staff or other personnel Issues that impact referrals, screenings, or programming • Service provider changes or issues • Trends in local criminality (example: increase in drug related offenses, decrease in probation violations, etc.) • Development or changes in local court services or programming (example: new Specialty Court programming, changes to court programming eligibility, etc.) Your CCAB must then determine its proposed Overall PCR based on this analysis, with consideration given to the average of the last 3 years. Your CCAB must then identify the strategies that will impact its Overall PCR. All strategies that you are requesting funding for must be also be listed on the Budget Cost Description and have a completed Program Description. If you request funding for a program or service that is not identified as a strategy impacting any objective, It will not be considered for funding. SAMPLE OBJECTIVE: To reduce the County's Overall Prison Commitment Rate (PCR) to 16%or less. SAMPLE STRATEGY: C01 Cognitive Programming, G18 Outpatient Treatment Services, and B15 Employment Skills. 125 Gatekeeper will be utilized to screen all offenders for eligibility. A-1: Using OMNI Felony Disposition data supplied by OCC for the previous two fiscal years: 1. Are overall felony dispositions increasing, decreasing, or stable? Decreasing 2. In the two charts below, please fill in the rates and number of dispositions for the previous two fiscal vears. For CCABs with correctional facilities, please remove those dispositions with prisoner status (OMNI Report 3). Describe changes within Sentencing Guideline (SGL) categories identified below, including prison and non -prison dispositions, for State Board Target Populations. Any additional pertinent information necessary to establish a trend beyond 2 years must be included.: It should be noted that the following data for FY20 is a reflection of our local justice system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the suspension of jury trials for all of FY20 and most of FY21, there is a backlog of cases tied to serious offenses that have delayed adjudications of many presumptive prison individuals. As courts return to normal dockets in FY22, Oakland will likely see an increase in our PCR possibly above FY19 numbers. In FY22, we hope to maintain the FY19 PCR of 17.8%. The total number of felony dispositions has decreased once again for FY20. This is a continuing overall trend for Oakland County since FY13. The total felony dispositions for FY19 were 2,908 a 1,320 reduction from FY19. Our prison commitment rate (PCR) for FY20 was 16.0%which is 1.8% lower than in FY19 and 4.1% lower than the statewide average for FY20. It is our lowest PCR in the last seven years. The intermediate, straddle and presumptive categories all experienced a reduction in both dispositions and the prison commitment rate (PCR). As a result, the PCR for the straddle cell category is now at 14.7% a 5.1% reduction from FY19 and 9.8% below the statewide average. The SGL N/A category also saw a decrease in dispositions and PCR from FY19 to FY20. The PCR for SGL N/A is 18.6%, a 5.6% reduction. This category has been problematic for the last several years and seems to fluctuate the most of all the categories. It is often difficult to determine what offenders are being placed into this category (mix of PV with new sentences) and therefore hard to target for services. We are above the statewide average for the presumptive prison category (4.5%1, but that group has never been a target population for Oakland County. The DWI III PCR had increased in FY19, but fell significantly in FY20. It should be noted that the number of dispositions also decreased by 191 offenders. The FY19 PCR was 21.5% and fell to 16.3% in FY20. While this reduction continues a trend of reducing the DWI III PCR, it is still higher than the statewide average of 15.1%. Felony drunk drivers will continue to be a priority target population. FY 2019 19.7% Group 2 Rate: 12.9% Straddle Cell 24.0% Group 2 23.0% State PCR: _ Rate: -Straddle Rat Overall PCR:_17.8%- 752 prison dispositions out of 4,228 felony dispositions Group 1: 1 28.8% - 403 prison dispositions out of 1,397 felony dispositions Group 2: 12.3% Straddle PCR: Group 1: Group 2: i FY 2020 State PCR: Overall PCR: Group 1: Group 2: Straddle PCR: 349 prison dispositions out of 2,831 felony dispositions 19.8%- 222 prison dispositions out of 1,124 felony dispositions 21.0%- 66 prison dispositions out of 314 felony dispositions 19.3%- 156 prison dispositions out of 810 felony dispositions 20.1% Group 2 Rate: 13.8% Straddle Cell 24.5% Grou 2 23.7% T Rate: �� Straddle Rate_�_ 16.096- 464 prison dispositions out of 2,908 felony dispositions 26.3%- 268 prison dispositions out of 1,018 felony dispositions 10.4%- 196 prison dispositions out of 1,890 felony dispositions 14.7%- 112 prison dispositions out of 764 felony dispositions Group 1: 1 12.8%- 30 prison dispositions out of 235 felony dispositions Group 2: 1 15.5%- 82 prison dispositions out of 529 felony dispositions 3. Provide information regarding policies, procedures, program operations, pertinent issues or opportunities which emerged, or other factors which have positively/negatively affected the achievement of objectives --for example, local changes regarding early jail release, implementation of required program fees, stakeholders--CCAB manager or staff, judges, magistrates, prosecutor, sheriff, contractor/service providers. Briefly describe the impact and, if negative, how it was addressed, In January of FY21, our new Prosecutor (Karen McDonald) took office and joined our CCAB. After initial meetings we anticipate her role on the CCAB and policy changes within her own office will reduce the use of financial bail and financial conditions of release by the courts. This could impact the utilization in Pretrial Services EM along with the introdcution of bail reform legislation that emphasizes ability to pay findings by judicial officers when setting financial bail or conditions of release that require money, like electronic monitoring or drug testing. Additional legislative changes will require the use of citation in lieu of arrest, along with the use of summons by the court in lieu of issuing bench warrants. These changes may reduce the number of people in -custody thus reducing the utilization for Pretrial Assessments. Legislation reducing the maximum length of probation and allowing offenders opportunities for early discharge could impact utilization for Case Management Step Forward. Besides our new prosecutor, we have a new Commissioner (Charles Cavell), new MDOC Region Manager (Britain Washington), new County Sheriff Representative (Lt. Darren Ofiara), and a BOC addition of ACLU Political Director (Shell! Wiesberg). These changes may lead to policy initiatives that improve communication and utilization. In FY21, Oakland County will complete a criminal justice mapping exercise that will conclude with recommendations for improvement in deflection, diversion and deincarceration throughout the system. We hope to review / implement recommendations for FY22. This information along with the Praxis Validation and the Step Forward program evaluation reports (both to be completed in FY21) will provide valuable information about changes or improvemnts that could benefits the programs and reduce disparate outcomes. The continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic through FY20 and for most of FY21 will create a PCR statistical outlier in our reporting. Due to jury trials being suspended for almost all of FY20 and FY21, there is a backlog of serious charges that will likely be adjudicated in FY22. As courts return to setting trials and increasing their dockets / sentencings, the more serious offenses that have been set for trials will finally be sentenced. This backlog of cases has increased our programs length of stay, and will likely result in a surge in the PCR rate for FY22. It may also increase utilization numbers for programming In our post adjudication programming. A-2: Felony Analysis - Key Objectives and Strategies NOTE: Key Objectives should be measurable and provide sufficient detail so progress can be monitored. • Strategies are the local programs that will be used to impact your Key Objectives. Only proposed programs that impact at least one Key Objective will be considered for funding. 1. Key Objective #1 is intended to impact the Overall Prison Commitment Rate —please state the Objective: To maintain or lower the prison commitment rate from FY19 rate of 17.8% List OCC Programs in support of Objective #1: 1) Use Probation Residential Centers as part of a structured sentencing option (jail followed by PRC) in lieu of prison. 2) Assess defendants through Pretrial Services to identify defendants who may be safely released into the community during the pretrial period by the least restrictive means. 3) Provide pretrial supervision for those defendants who can be safety managed within the community rather than being detained in jail through conditions designed to mitigate risk of failing to appear or rearrest. 4) Provide electronic monitoring through pretrial supervision for those defendants who can be managed in the community rather than being detained in jail but require a higher level of supervision or monitoring due to a risk of flight (GPS) or risk of rearrest for assault or drunk driving (GPS, alcohol monitoring). 5) Utilize Step Forward Case Management to work with moderate to high risk offenders to implement their supervision plan Including setting goals and objectives for each criminogenic need identified and reinforcing what is presented in groups using targeted Carey Guides in order to reduce the risk of recidivism. 6) Assign high risk, gang affiliated offenders under the age of 25 to the Youthful Offender's group within Step Forward to address the criminogenic needs of antisocial peers and criminal thinking as determined by COMPAS scores 7) Assign the Thinking Matters group within Step Forward as part of an offender's supervision plan to address criminal attitudes and thinking for those who scored moderate or high an these criminogenic needs. 8) Provide on -site mental health and substance abuse assessments to ensure proper diagnosis and appropriate level of care for offenders to prevent relapse that may result in new criminal behavior. 9) Meet the statutory requirement of PA 657 by assessing all felony drunk drivers to determine eligibilty for medication assisted treatment (MAT). Assessment helps to ensure the proper level of care in order to prevent subsequesnt relapse and recidivism. 10) Use Thinking Matters within the jail for moderate to high risk felony and high -risk misdemeanor offenders (according to COMPAS scores) serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences to address criminogenic needs. 11) Use the Jail Reentry (case management) program for moderate to high risk felony and high risk misdemeanors to target criminogenic needs, other than criminal thinking, for offenders serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences. List Non-OCC funded Programs in support of Objective #1 Non-OCC funded programs that are available to judicial officers as sentences that support objective #1 include the 61h Circuit Court's Adult Treatment Court that focuses on reducing substance use related criminal behavior through intense court supervision and utilization of various recovery and counseling services. Felony offenders must score moderate to high overall risk on the COMPAS and graduation requires the completion of all four program stages. The Sheriff's Office Work Release Electronic Monitoring Program allows misdemeanor and felony offenders the opportunity to serve their jail sentence at home while maintaining employment. The use of electronic monitoring provides accountability to the offender's whereabouts when allowed out of the home for work. The Sheriff's Zero Tolerance Program is designed to enforce abstinence from controlled substances through the use of random urine screens. Felony and misdemeanor offenders sentenced to Zero Tolerance are released from the jail to serve their sentence at home, however their community living is contigent upon their abstenance. Positive or missed urine screens are met with graduated jail sanctions that can result in the offender's return to the jail to serve their original sentence. The Sheriff's Jail Alliance With Support Program provides inmates with mental heath needs and treatment readiness curriculm with the goal of setting up an aftercare treatment program. Inmates completing the program are may request a jail diversion from the sentencing judge. Our PIHP (Oakland County Health Network) has partnered with the Oakland County Jail and created a Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) program to address the high rate of overdose upon release from incarceration. MAT combines individualized treatment planning, recovery coaches, and therapeutic services to address a person's opiate use disorder both at the jail and upon release. This MAT program allows for the use of vivitrol, methadone or suboxone which ever best suits the needs of the offender. The county also funds the alternative to incarceration (ATI) program which is similar to the probation residentail program for felons, except it is for misdemenaor offenders. Judges may use ATI to sentence misdemeanor offenders to structured sentences, involving some jail time followed by services in a supervised setting. The Weekend and Weekday Alternative for Misdemeanors (WWAM) is available for misdemeanor offenders in lieu of a jail sentence. Offenders perform work at non profit sites around the county while being supervised by an employee of Community Corrections. This opens jail beds to house more felony offenders locally. 2. Key Objective #2 is intended to impact the Group 2 Straddle Cell Rate — please state the Objective: To maintain at or lower the straddle cell group 2 prison commitment rate at 19.3% List OCC Programs in support of Objective #2: 1) Use Probation Residential Centers as part of a structured sentencing option (jail followed by PRC) in lieu of prison. 2) Assess defendants through Pretrial Services to identify defendants who may be safely released into the community during the pretrial period by the least restrictive means. 3) Provide pretrial supervision for those defendants who can be safety manages within the community rather than being detained in jail through conditions designed to mitigate risk of failing to appear or rearrest. 4) Provide electronic monitoring through pretrial supervision for those defendants who can be managed in the community rather than being detained in jail but require a higher level of supervision or monitoring due to a risk of flight (GPS) or risk of rearrest for assault or drunk driving (GPS, alcohol monitoring). 5) Utilize Step Forward Case Management to work with moderate to high risk offenders to implement their supervision plan including setting goals and objectives for each criminogenic need identified and reinforcing what is presented in groups using targeted Carey Guides in order to reduce the risk of recidivism. 6) Assign high risk, gang affiliated offenders under the age of 25 to the Youthful Offender's group within Step Forward to address the criminogenic needs of antisocial peers and criminal thinking as determined by COMPAS scores 7) Assign the Thinking Matters group within Step Forward as part of an offender's supervision plan to address criminal attitudes and thinking for those who scored moderate or high on these criminogenic needs. 8) Provide on -site mental health and substance abuse assessments to ensure proper diagnosis and appropriate level of care for offenders to prevent relapse that may result in new criminal behavior. 9) Meet the statutory requirement of PA 657 by assessing all felony drunk drivers to determine eligibilty for medication assisted treatment (MAT). Assessment helps to ensure the proper level of care in order to prevent subsequesnt relapse and recidivism. 10) Use Thinking Matters within the jail for moderate to high risk felony and high -risk misdemeanor offenders (according to COMPAS scores) serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences to address criminogenic needs. 11) Use the Jail Reentry (case management) program for moderate to high risk felony and high risk misdemeanors to target criminogenic needs, other than criminal thinking, for offenders serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences. List Non-OCC funded Programs in support of Objective #2 Non-OCC funded programs that are available to judicial officers as sentences that support objective #1 include the 6th Circuit Court's Adult Treatment Court that focuses on reducing substance use related criminal behavior through intense court supervision and utilization of various recovery and counseling services. Felony offenders must score moderate to high overall risk on the COMPAS and graduation requires the completion of all four program stages. The Sheriff's Office Work Release Electronic Monitoring Program allows misdemeanor and felony offenders the opportunity to serve their jail sentence at home while maintaining employment. The use of electronic monitoring provides accountability to the offender's whereabouts when allowed out of the home for work. The Sheriff's Zero Tolerance Program is designed to enforce abstinence from controlled substances through the use of random urine screens. Felony and misdemeanor offenders sentenced to Zero Tolerance are released from the jail to serve their sentence at home, however their community living is contigent upon their abstenance. Positive or missed urine screens are met with graduated jail sanctions that can result in the offender's return to the jail to serve their original sentence. The Sheriff's Jail Alliance With Support Program provides inmates with mental healh needs and treatment readiness curriculm with the goal of setting up an aftercare treatment program. Inmates completing the program are may request a jail diversion from the sentencing judge. Our PIHP (Oakland County Health Network) has partnered with the Oakland County Jail and created a Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) program to address the high rate of overdose upon release from incarceration. MAT combines individualized treatment planning, recovery coaches, and therapeutic services to address a person's opiate use disorder both at the jail and upon release. This MAT program allows for the use of vivitrol, methadone or suboxone which ever best suits the needs of the offender. The county also funds the alternative to incarceration (ATI) program which is similar to the probation residentail program for felons, except it is for misdemenaor offenders. Judges may use ATI to sentence misdemeanor offenders to structured sentences, involving some jail time followed by services in a supervised setting. The Weekend and Weekday Alternative for Misdemeanors (W WAM) is available for misdemeanor offenders in lieu of a jail sentence. Offenders perform work at non profit sites around the county while being supervised by an employee of Community Corrections. This opens jail beds to house more felony offenders locally. B: Recidivism Analysis Public Act 511 mandates that CCABs "Provide improved local services for individuals involved in the criminal justice system with the goal of reducing the occurrence of repeat criminal offenses that result in a term of incarceration or detention in jail or prison." As such, CCABs are required to address recidivism within their comprehensive plan, with a specific emphasis on how the plan is intended to impact the local recidivism rates. The State Board has defined recidivism as "Probation Violations, either technical or new sentence, resulting in prison," and has identified Probation Violators as being indicative of performance in this area: i. Probation Violators with anew felony conviction resulting in a prison sentence (PVNS) ii. Technical Probation Violators resulting in a prison sentence (PVT) Based on OMNI Report 3, please use the following table to report the number of Probation Violators that resulted in a prison disposition for each listed category. Regional CCABs should list the Probation Violation Data for each County separately and provide a total, regional rate at the end of each row. B-1: Using OMNI Felony Disposition data provided by OCC for: Previous Fiscal Year Recidivism Rates County Name Oakland FV16 fY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 TRegi nor Probation Violation - New Sentence to Prison f Total 138 127 121 108 78 Probation Violation —Technical to Prison Total 158 210 167 128 63 B-2: Using OMNI Felony Disposition data supplied by OCC for the previous fiscal years: 1. Are overall felony Probation Violations dispositions increasing, decreasing, or stable? Decreasing 2. Describe changes within the Probation Violation disposition data for the previous two fiscal years, including prison and non -prison dispositions. Report rates with detailed explanation: The total PV new sentence category saw an overall reduction of 113 offenders from 392 to 279. In addition 30 fewer PVNS offenders were sent to prison from last year. Despite these reduction the PCR for this category increased from 14.4%to 16.9% due to the significant decrease in overall prison commitments (752 to 464). The total number of probation technical violators decreased for the fifth concesutive year, this time by 122 offenders from 571 to 449. There were also 65 fewer of these individuals sent to prison, this combination resulted in the PVT PCR being lowered from 17% in FY19 to 13.6% in FY20. The use of non - prison dispositions (jail) for all violators increased again in FY20 to 81% up from 76% in FY19. This was mainly driven by 86% of PV technicals being given a non -prison disposition in FY20 compared to only 78% in FY19. The use of jail in lieu of prison as a sanction for violators is helping to maintain an overall PCR that is beow the statewide average. 3. Provide information regarding policies, procedures, program operations, pertinent issues or opportunities which emerged, or other factors which have positively/negatively affected the achievement of objectives --for example, local changes regarding early jail release, implementation of required program fees, stakeholders--CCAB manager or staff, judges, magistrates, prosecutor, sheriff, contractor/service providers. Briefly describe the impact and, if negative, how it was addressed. Legislation passed in 2017 (PA 9 771.4b) seems to have had little effect on capping the jail terms for technical probation violators. PA 9 capped the term in jail for a PVT at 30 days. Our records show that there were 381 offenders who served jail terms in FY20 as a PVT. Only 27% (82) of those offenders served sentences of 30 days of less. In fact 36% served jail sentences of 180 days or longer and 63 offenders served terms of 360 days. The newly passed legislation effective April 1, 2021 amends this section and attempts to limit the use of jail even further for PVTs. The new caps for felony PVTs start at 15 days for the 151 violation. We will continue to monitor the situation as the use of jail for PVTs continues to rise. Education for both the bench and MDOC staff around this new legislation may be in order. B-3: Recidivism Key Objectives and Strategies NOTE: • Key Objectives should be measurable and provide sufficient detail so progress can be monitored. • Strategies are the local programs that will used to impact your Key Objectives. Only proposed programs that impact at least one Key Objective will be considered for funding. 1. Objective #1 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Probation Violators with a new sentence State the Objective: To further reduce from 16.8%, the PCR of probation violators with a new sentence. List OCC Programs in support of Objective #1: 1) Use Probation Residential Centers as part of a structured sentencing option (jail followed by PRC) in lieu of prison. 2) Utilize Step Forward Case Management to work with moderate to high risk offenders to implement their supervision plan including setting goals and objectives for each criminogenic need identified and reinforcing what is presented in groups using targeted Carey Guides in order to reduce the risk of recidivism. Utilize Step Forward and affiliated groups (cognitive behavioral therapy, dual diagnosis, anger management, etc) for new arrest violators to address criminogenic needs that result in criminal behavior. 3) Assign high risk, gang affiliated offenders under the age of 25 to the Youthful Offender's group within Step Forward to liI address the criminogenic needs of antisocial peers and criminal thinking as determined by COMPAS scores 4) Assign the Thinking Matters group within Step Forward as pan of an offender's supervision plan to address criminal attitudes and thinking for those who scored moderate or high on these criminogenic needs 5) Provide on -site mental health and substance abuse assessments to ensure proper diagnosis and appropriate level of care for offenders to prevent relapse that may result in new criminal behavior 6) Conduct a substance use assessment on all felony drunk drivers to determine the appropriate level of care and eligibility for MAT to reduce the likelihood of offenders recidivating 7) Use Thinking Matters within the jail for moderate to high risk felony and high -risk misdemeanor offenders (according to COMPAS scores) serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences to address criminogenic needs 8) Use the Jail Reentry (case management) program for moderate to high risk felony and high risk misdemeanors to target criminogenic needs, other than criminal thinking, for offenders serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences 9) Offender mentoring program designed to address the criminogenic need of non-compliance. Mentors will reinforce prosocial behaviors and attitudes thereby reducing the chance of recidivism. List Non-OCC funded Programs in support of Objective #1 Non-OCC funded programs that are available to judicial officers as sentences that support objective #1 include the 6th Circuit Court's Adult Treatment Court that focuses on reducing substance use related criminal behavior through intense court supervision and utilization of various recovery and counseling services. Felony offenders must score moderate to high overall risk on the COMPAS and graduation requires the completion of all four program stages. The Sheriff's Office Work Release Electronic Monitoring Program allows misdemeanor and felony offenders the opportunity to serve their jail sentence at home while maintaining employment. The use of electronic monitoring provides accountability to the offender's whereabouts when i allowed out of the home for work. The Sheriff's Zero Tolerance Program is designed to enforce abstinence from controlled substances through the use of random urine screens. Felony and misdemeanor offenders sentenced to Zero Tolerance are i released from the jail to serve their sentence at home, however their community living is contigent upon their abstenance. Positive or missed urine screens are met with graduated jail sanctions that can result in the offender's return to the jail to serve their original sentence. The Sheriff's Jail Alliance With Support Program provides inmates with mental healh needs and treatment readiness curriculm with the goal of setting up an aftercare treatment program. Inmates completing the program are may request a jail diversion from the sentencing judge. Our PIHP (Oakland County Health Network) has partnered with the Oakland County Jail and created a Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) program to address the high rate of overdose upon release from incarceration. MAT combines individualized treatment planning, recovery coaches, and therapeutic services to address a person's opiate use disorder both at the jail and upon release. This MAT program allows for the use of vivitrol, methadone or suboxone which ever best suits the needs of the offender. 2. Objective #2 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Technical Probation Violators State the Objective: To maintain or reduce from 13.5%the PCR of technical probation violators. List OCC Programs in support of Objective #2: 1) Use Probation Residential Centers as part of a structured sentencing option (jail followed by PRC) in lieu of prison. 2) Utilize Step Forward Case Management to work with moderate to high risk offenders to implement their supervision plan including setting goals and objectives for each criminogenic need identified and reinforcing what is presented in groups using targeted Carey Guides in order to reduce the risk of recidivism. Utilize Step Forward and affiliated groups (cognitive behavioral therapy, dual diagnosis, anger management, etc) for new arrest violators to address criminogenic needs that result in criminal behavior. 3) Assign high risk, gang affiliated offenders under the age of 25 to the Youthful Offender's group within Step Forward to address the criminogenic needs of antisocial peers and criminal thinking as determined by COMPAS scores 4) Assign the Thinking Matters group within Step Forward as part of an offender's supervision plan to address criminal attitudes and thinking for those who scored moderate or high on these criminogenic needs 5) Provide on -site mental health and substance abuse assessments to ensure proper diagnosis and appropriate level of care for offenders to prevent relapse that may result in new criminal behavior 6) Conduct a substance use assessment on all felony drunk drivers to determine the appropriate level of care and eligibility for MAT to reduce the likelihood of offenders recidivating 7) Use Thinking Matters within the jail for moderate to high risk felony and high -risk misdemeanor offenders (according to COMPAS scores) serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences to address criminogenic needs 8) Use the Jail Reentry (case management) program for moderate to high risk felony and high risk misdemeanors to target criminogenic needs, other than criminal thinking, for offenders serving time at OCJ in lieu of short prison sentences 9) Offender mentoring program designed to address the criminogenic need of non-compliance. Mentors will reinforce prosocial behaviors and attitudes thereby reducing the chance of recidivism. List Non-OCC funded Programs in support of Objective #2: Non-OCC fundd programs that are available to judicial officers as sentences that support objective N1 include the 6th Circuit Court's Adult Treatment Court that focuses on reducing criminal behavior through intense court supervision and utilization of various recovery and counseling services. Felony offenders must score moderate to high overall risk on the COMPAS and graduation requires the completion of all four program stages. The Sheriff's Office Work Release Electronic Monitoring Program allows misdemeanor and felony offenders the opportunity to serve their jail sentence at home while maintaining employment. The use of electronic monitoring provides accountability to the offender's whereabouts when allowed out of the home for work. The Sheriff's Zero Tolerance Program is designed to enforce abstinence from controlled substances through the use of random urine screens. Felony and misdemeanor offenders sentenced to Zero Tolerance are released from the jail to serve their sentence at home, however their community living is contigent upon their abstenance. Positive or missed urine screens are met with graduated jail sanctions that can result in the offenders return to the jail to serve their original sentence. The Sheriff's Jail Alliance With Support Program provides inmates with mental healh needs a treatment readiness curriculm with the goal of setting up an aftercare treatment program. Inmates completing the program are requested for a jail diversion from the sentencing judge. Our PIHP (Oakland County Health Network) has partnered with the Oakland County Jail and created a Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) program to address the high rate of overdose upon release from incarceration. MAT combines individualized treatment planning, recovery coaches, and therapeutic services to address a person's opiate use disorder both at the jail and upon release. C: COMPAS Criminogenic Needs Profile 1. Please list the top 3 needs scales for men as identified within the COMPAS Criminogenic Needs and Risk Profile provided by OCC. Additionally, identify both the local and OCC strategies that will impact the identified needs scales: The top 3 needs scales (combining moderate and high COMPAS scores) for probationers in Oakland County were identified as substance abuse 55%, history of non-compliance 52%, and criminal personality 46%. We were also able to pull information from 732 COMPAS assessments that were performed by the Stepo Forward intake and jail staff. The 3 highest needs in our data mimiced the State data. Sustance abuse was the higest need with 70% of the individuals being assessed citing it as probable or highly probable. The was followed by History of non-compliance at 54% and criminal personality at 51%. The substance abuse issue has been problematic here for the past several years. One of the main reasons cited in the FY19 application was that offenders may not have been receiving the proper level of care because of Inadequate screening and assessment for proper level of care. The requirement that all probationers be assessed through the PIHP may help to correct this situation and ensure more offenders receive the proper level of care. Having an onsite MH/SA screener has helped to resolve some of this issue as well, especially for those offenders who have not been 'officially' violated but may need intervention. Providing a MAT assessments for OWI 3rd offenders as required by PA 657 prior to sentencing is also helping to ensure offenders receive the proper level of care and reducing substance use. The non-compliance need is being directly addressed by the Step Forward case managers. While they use the Carey Guides to address all criminogenic needs, there is one guide entitled "Effective Responses to Non -Compliant Behavior" which deals with a variety of noncompliance issues and helps staff develop techniques in order to redirect offender behavior. In addition, the Carey Guide "Responding to Violations" is required for use on all probation violators referred to Step Forward. We will also be instituting (if approved) a peer mentoring program which we believe will directly impact this need as well. As a new initiiative to combat this need we are proposing the addiiton of a offender mentoring program. We believe this program will significantly impact offender resistance and boost compliance and success. Offenders who score high on the need scale Criminal Personality AND are reffered to the Step Forward program are directed into the Thinking Matters group. If they receive a jail only sentence they are screened for placement into the jail Thinking Matters group, if not already part of their sentence. The criminal personality need is more of an indicator or driver. As we receive offenders who have increased criminal involvement, staff need to be cognizant that these offenders may require more intensive services and dosage. It appears the interventions employed by Community Corrections are working as the overall number of probation violators, either new sentence or technical has continued to drop. 2. Please list the top 3 needs scales for women as identified within the COMPAS Criminogenic Needs and Risk Profile provided by OCC. Additionally, identify both the local and OCC strategies that will impact the identified needs scales: The only data provided for the women was a statewide view. The women and men were combined in the county level 10 data. It is important to note that the women's second rated need was 'Experience of abuse as an adult'. We have already begun to address the differences that men and women offenders face. All of our groups are gender specific and we have groups that are specifically targeted for women (women's support group) which utilizes the Moving On curriculum. Last year we also began conducting the ACE (Adverse Childhood Experience) assessment on everyone referred to Step Forward. We are hoping that the information gathered from these assessments will be enough to support having our PIHP (OCHN) consider funding a trauma group. The COVID pandemic sidelined this effort for a short time, but it will be taken up again prior to FY22. 3. Provide information regarding policies, procedures, program operations, pertinent issues or opportunities which emerged, or other factors which have positively/negatively affected the achievement of objectives --for example, local changes regarding early jail release, implementation of required program fees, stakeholders--CCAB manager or staff, judges, magistrates, prosecutor, sheriff, contractor/service providers. Briefly describe the impact and, if negative, how it was addressed. The decision by MDOC to use the local PIHP for all substance use placements may significantly help with reducing the sustance use need. Often probation agents were making referrals to agencies without knowing the proper level of care. Inadequate levels of care can lead to relapse or discontinuation of treatment by the client. While this decision may impact referrals into some Community Corrections programs, overall it is the best decision, at least for Oakland County. Probation agents are beginning to understand that treating criminogenic needs may require more than a refferal to only a SUD provider. Not all treatment providers are versed in addressing criminogenic needs. It is hoped that the results from the Step Forward evalutation will provde additional incentive for agents to increase utilization to this program. D: Local Practices to Address Probation Violators Please explain in detail how the CCAB is targeting the needs of felony probation violators, both new sentence and technical. I Include both local and OCC funded practices. All of our programs include probation violators, both new sentence and technical, as target populations. We rely on the supervising agent to identify and refer these individuals into the programs. In order to assist agents in selecting the program that best fits the needs of the offenders, we developed the Criminogenic Need Resource Guide. This guide lists all the crimiogenic needs (broken out by male and female) and provides programs which address the listed need. In additon to programs funded through community corrections , programs funded through other sources are also included in the guide. We also publish the Bench Guide about every other year which is widely distributed to the courts and practicing attorneys. This guide helps attorneys to determine for which programs their clients might be eligible. The referral form for the Step Forward program does contain a check box which is marked if the offender is a violator. In this way we are able to track PV participants as well as ensure that certain Carey Guides are added to their supervision plan as indicated in C1 above. During the intake process for Step Forward a COMPAS is completed so that a supervison plan targeting the offenders criminogenic needs can be deveoped (see program description). The Thinking Matters staff at the jail routinely review inmates being sentenced to the jail. Any inmate who is a violator and has not been sentenced to the Thinking Matters program will have their sentencing judge approached for possible amendment of sentence. E: Local Vocational/Educational Practices Please explain in detail what is being done locally to address the local vocational/employment needs of offenders. Remember to consider trade schools, community colleges or universities who offer training to our offenders. Include both local and OCC funded practices. For FY19 the unemployment scales for females is 16% and 24% for males. The data for FY20 shows a combined (female and male) percentage of 37%. Due to the expanded opportunites to collect unemployment with the COVID pandemic and stimulus money, it may be that offenders still have some type of income and therefore are not rating (at this time) employment as a high need. We continue to see a lack of emphasis placed on this criminogenic need as a conditon of probation. Agents often allow offenders to simply be employed In any job, even if it is low paying and not a living wage. Until offenders are required to engage in a pathway that leads to jobs that pay a sustainable living wage, no employment programs will be successful at addressing this need. Having stated that, Community Corrections has taken advantage of the change in Executive Leadership here at the county. In the past our workforce development program has been less than enthusiastic about working with our offenders. This administration has different priorities and this is working to our advantage. We have been asked to participate -in an initiative to expand the Workforce Development Registered Apprenticeship program. As part 11 of that initiative we will be a member of the Regional Implementation Consortia (RIC). It is hoped this partnership will lead to expanded opportunites for our offenders. We are also pursuing the idea of establishing a felony friendly consortium of employers. This will allow us to refer offenders to employers who we know are willing to hire individuals with convictions / prior records. _ F: Local Practices to Address Persons with Substance Use Disorder(s) 1. How do defendants and offenders get screened for substance use services in your area (regardless of funding source)? Defendants and offenders may be screened for substance use services by a variety of means. In custody defendants are screened for substance use through the pretrial interview process. Offenders who are referred to Community Corrections programs are screened through the COMPAS assessment. Offenders who are not in Community Corrections programs may be screened by their probation agent (through the COMPAS). 2. How do defendants and offenders get referred for a substance use assessment in your area (regardless of funding source)? Offenders who are screened as potentially having a substance use issue are referred directly to the PIHP by the probation agent. This happens through a smart sheet which is availalbe to all MDOC probation agents. If the offender is in a Community Corrections program she will be referred to the access liaison worker embedded in our office. If the offender is charged with a felony impaired driving charge the referral for a MAT assessment comes directly from the bench as part of the PSI order to Community Correcitons. 3. After screening, how do defendants and offenders get referred to appropriate ASAM level of care treatment in your area? After an offender is referred to the PIHP she is contacted and set up with an appointment to determine eligibility for funding under the PIHP. The Addiction Severity Index (AS]) is used to assess for substance use disorders along with the Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS) for Psychiatric and Addiction Services Adult Version 2010 through the American Association of Community Psychiatrists. This tool is mandated by the State for clients found eligible to receive Oakland County Health Network services. OCHN will then coordinate an appointment / placement with an approved agency picked by the offender to ensure proper level of care. Offenders who have insurance are referred to their carrier for assessment. However, if the person is under -insured, OCHN will fund and or assit in those instances a well. 4. Are there any barriers or gaps in service to obtaining an assessment and treatment that your CCAB is requesting OCC funding to fill? not at this time If so, please describe in detail: 5. What non -PA 511 funded services are available in your area? Be sure to include treatment court services. There are so many non -PA 511 funded services in our area. Within Oakland County there are 10 drug / sobriety courts operating at the District Court level, 1 offical mental health court, 3 veteran's courts and the drug court operating at the Circuit Court. There are plans to start a felony sobriety court at Circuit Court as well, however those plans are on hold due to COVID. Oakland Community Health Network funds a large number of programs which have already been mentioned numerous times in this document. In addition to the MAT program at the jail, they fund the sober support unit located at the crisis center on the county campus. This unit will house any individual who is seeking treatment and awaiting a bed / placemnt. This has increased the number of placements into residential as people don't go home and change their mind about getting services. The placements from the sober support unit are supposed to happen with 24 hours. G: Comprehensive Corrections Plan Summary 1. Please explain how the Comprehensive Corrections Plan, in coordination with the local practices, will impact the State Board Priorities, and ultimately offender success: The Comprehensive Plan coupled with the local priorities above are working to create a culture of evidenced based programming and recidivism reduction. The stakeholders within our criminal justice system need to be confident that the programs to which offenders are being referred actually reduce recidivism. The programs offered through the comprehensive plan follow the eight principles of effective interventions or evidenced based principles. Research indicates that when programs follow these principles that reductions in recidivism will be achieved and offenders will be more successful. However, it is not enough to just have the programs. 12 There must be continual education, training, and information about the programs distributed to the stakeholders. If the probation agents and judges are not using or referring to the programs, then those programs really serve no purpose. Our local priorities are largely aimed at information distribution and to help boost referrals to the programs. Having more offenders referred to and involved in the programs means lower returns to prison and more offender success. 2. What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives, or your strategies are not being implemented as planned? If we find we are not meeting our objectives, we will take steps to first discover why that j may be happening. We will attempt to determine which strategy(ies) are not being effective and make changes as necessary. This process general starts at a CCAB meeting and then breaks into a smaller work groups with the relevant stakeholders. Depending on the findings of the workgroup a variety of solutions may be implemented. It may range from education, training, development of materials or adjusting of policies / referral processes. 3. Program eligibility overrides may be requested in writing to the assigned OCC Specialist. Please document any additional override procedures your CCAB has approved. The CCAB has not approved any override procedures. However, the county supports Community Corrections with a budget that is almost three times the budget granted by MDOC. Therefore, individuals who may be outside the official eligiblity criteria are covered through the county budget. 13 znnm.,v vwvmk�w..rv+� SlyM:mm o, +aj Program Cost Descriptions FY2022 Oakland County (Salary & Wage Costs Position 1 TitledManager,Chlef, User I Name of Individual: Barb Hankey, Edc Schmidt,Diana Carver, Anita Lindsay � Support Specialist II, Worked Par Year I 8320.00I FTE Equivalent) 1111II 4.00 1NMrMM,.fHMsrs IFWI Time 112,01nl Funding. Sources 8, Cost Alloca Ion i1 Program Code/Name cps Loe.11011er Fee R.v.nuo Total. Domemd T.ml. of Relmh...... t I Manager -Responsible for managing all aspects of the CC Division. Comp(ah" l l resulted reports. 1 Develops and maintains the budget for both the State MDOC grant and the caun"'P/GF. Cultivates Administration 198,344 198,344 relationships hatween CCand Its partners on the Inca), state and federal levels Chief -Responsible for overall day to day .pennons. Attends meson's or other functions as necessary and1 Administration 159,467 159,467 acts in the capacity of Manager in her absence 1 Acts as administrative aniftant to the Manager, rah. compl.t.. Payroll, personnel requisitions and bulling Administration 88,419 88,419 duties. III User Support specialist -Mal morl ng and updates all databases within CC. Sends monthly CCIS data and Administration 60,027 60,028 120,055 maintains the integrity of the data. Updates all brochures, newsletters, and other prinitsd information. 1 I Totals 60,027 506,258 - 566,285 (Position 2 Title: supervlam community I Name of Individual: Karen Peterson, Michelle Weed, Lisa Lea, Janet Yosick I Numberof Hours Worked Per Year. I 8320.00 RE I\ 1l1III I 4,00 (Full Tlm. is 2,080) Equivalent Fandlmg ounces as Alloca Ipn l Program Code Cps Leesport., Fee Revenue Tom[. Duties and Term..fgeMbureement , The Step Forward supervisor oversees day to day operations of the Step Forward Program. Responsible for procedures, employee Issues and works as a liaison between OCC staff, MDOCstaff and adminlstra,Ion. Administration 70,880 70,880 141,760 Conducts Intakes, provides case managementcr facilitates groups when staff are off. 1 There Is one superviscrfor both the District Court and ]all assessment staff. The supervisors handle staffing F22 -Pretrial Assessment 141,760 141,760 Issues, conduct work evaluations, daft policy and fill staffing gaps as needed. The supervisor is responsible for defendants on standard supervislor She is responsible for procedures, 1 F23- Pretrial Supervision 132,179 132,119 staff Issues and performance appraisals. She also carries a caseload and provides coverage as needed This supervisor oversees the electronic monitoring unit of pretrial supervlslon. She is responsible for 1 ID08- Electronic Monitoring 137,135 137,135 procedures, staffissues, and performance appraisals. She carries a caseload and provides coverage as needed l 1 1 I I � i TOtalsl ]O,BSo 481,954 I - l 552,834 ; IPositlon S Title: 101gce Assistant 1 & II Name of Individual:IBobm Waller, Autumn Childers, Nancy Murray, Sandy Ballard, Cod McCarthy I'Numhel. Howe Wmkad Per Yea. FTE (Fell lime is 2,0001 I 932000 Equivalent 448 Funding Sources Is Cost Allocation -- - IProgram code cps I LOsallOther Fee Revenue Tarn. Duties and Terms Of Reimbursement Sorts and enters supervision and EM referrals as they are received. Enters all Information Into our database F23-Pmtdal Supervision 97,809 9Je09 tastartdcase. 5ecuresand enters next court dates and d mg testing results, Sends letters and performs other Formal clerical duties as needed. 1 FTE and 1 PTNE. eecieves reterrals end enters them Into C'SMr for CCIS data, Starts hard copy file for asecomagers, sets up 124-Step Forward 80,BJ8 80,878 161,756 appomaments for cllents, tracks referrals, answers phones, sorts mall. Other general Cledcal Duties 2FTEs 1 Admin¢tratlOn 78,542 78,542 Schedules offenders for the WWAM program and assists In data entry for all programs. l FTE fl I I 1 1 I I l I 1 j I Totalsl - 60,878 257,229 - 338,10] I (Position 4 T1tk,,jG0MMurfy Crnmete ns (Heather Gullcm, Jill Bam, Jeff Rector, Glenn. Central, Hon Short, Steven Denver, Linda Mglter- Soecla mt III I Name of IndivII CPrmean, Shannon Carter, Barb Baal NumhereI 2,G8 Worked Per Veac I 18]20 Colf"F Foul 1 I 900 bull timer: 2,o807 I Fueding Sources& Cost Allocation Program Code I CPS ( 4ocailelher I Fee Revenue I Twols I Duties Add Term. of Reimbursement F22 -Pretrial Assess me tit F23- Pretrial Supervision I008-Electronic Monitoring I124-Stop Forward Administration (Position 6 )NumberofHours Worked Per Year, )full Time is 2,080) I Program Code F22- Pretrial Assessment OOa - Electronic Monitoring FP. - Pretrial Supervmon 124 -Step Forward Monitors dal ly activities of thellne staff within the Pretrial assessment unit. Sets work priorities based on 484,692 484,692 evallable resources, checks work, and acts as a liaison for staff. There are 4 FTEs who cover all the staffat the courts and in the fall Responsible for the day to day operation or the standard supervisim uoil and of the Offender Link system. 121,353 121,353 Monitors caseloads of line staff and carries a caseload as well Responsible for the day to day operation of the EM unit and of the offender Link system Monitors 116,979 116,979 caseloads of line staff and caries a caseload as well. Carries a smaller caseload but Is also responsible for making sure groups ate covered, helps line staff with 260,646 260,646 difficult dlents and acts a Lord. to the courts There are 2 FTEs one at each of our locations Responsible for the smooth operation of the intake unit Completes 2-3 intakes daily, tracks clients to 121,173 121,1A ensure they are heing schedled timely Han, othemotake scaffto complete bazkgtound check,etc Totals) - 1,104,843 I - Title; Cammumfy Orc ec6on5 1 Nor Speciabsts I & h 64480 00IFTE Egulvnlani. CPS I CooeVOner I Fee Revenue 396,300 1,410,Wo IC01-Thinking Matters -Community I122 - Felony drunk driver MAT assessment Administration 84,880 119,951 127,445 496,659 455,492 271,651 61,087 31,667 14]J59 1,104,843 FTEs -Rogers, Finley, Sloops, Unbe, Kidder, Dutcher, Fails,Sommervllle, Allen, Bama, Edward., of Individual: Lane, Desch, Byrd, Wnght, Shocker, Kulakowskk Miles, Jensen,Twomey, Dean, Nash, Sodden, (Lawson, Dew, Wolf, Rude, Haas; PTEs Zoss, Mickley, Armen, Fanning, Cemy, and Toepper 31.00 Funding Sources& Cost Allocation Trans goods and Terms of Reimbursement Interview In custody defendants and completes a creme) risk assessment (including cnmianl history) and report All information is vented through third parties as often as possible Staff also calculate SGts for bap I,e06,440 consideration, and present ball recommendations in court Includes 14 FTEs Responsible for defendants placed on EM. These may be defendants on loaction tracking (G PS J or alcohol Monitoring (trans dermal) Staff is responsible for scheduling defendants to be tethered, monitonngof 20d,e3] alarms, and responding to drinking and/ drotherelmorcons Completes progress reports forevery court event 3 FIT, 1 grant& 2 county Monitors pretrial defendants on supervision for rompliance with mndlnons of band ordered by the court 624,104 Completes progress reports on defendant c,molurse Bravery court appearance. This is for 4 FTEt said PTEs Case managers have caseloads of about70, for Which they coordinate treatment and supervision plans 1 733,143 Meet with offenders to ensure rompllance with plans which are based onthe COMPAS Utll@e the Carey (III Across with the offenders to reinforce what Is being learned In group and to address cdminogenic needs. This Is EVA of ) FTEs time and 1 PTNE Each case manager conduct at least l sessions of the Thinking Matters groups perweek. Responsible for all aspects of group, check In, group fadhtatlon and progress reports to referral mount. This is 20% of their 61,087 time J FTEs split between Thinking Matters and case management and 1 PTNE 1 PTNE Is responslble for conducting eligibility assessments for Medically assisted trespro nton feenly 31,667 drunk drivers In accordence wth PA 667. Conducts assessemnts On individuals referred by the court who are either In custody at the tall or -In the community, I FTE & 1 PUI These positions are responsible forconducting Intakes for individuals referred to the Step Forward pFogram. Intakes consist of an Interview, completing the COMPAS, POI forms and other paperwork 147,759 related to the program. A supervision plan is developed a rid the participant is assigned a Case manager. Totals 1,156,961 t 2,452,070 - 3,609,031 Position 6 I iTdle:i Inmate Casa worker I Name ofladlvMualaAnthony Riley, Paula Goodman, Lon Warholak i INumberof Hours Worked Per Year. FTE IFuIITIme152,080t I 6240.001EqulValent I I 3_00 _ _ Funding Sources&Cost Allocation Program Cod¢ CPB Looe40a1er I Fee Revenue Tomb DaOee and Term@ot Reimpure Peart i COI -Thinking Matter -Jail 183,131 I I ]03,131Facilitates all sessions ofthe Thinking Matters in the Jail. 3 FTEs split 50/ 50 between programs I¢4-loll Peentry 163,131 1 I I 183, 131 1Facilitates groups on reentry topics like employenq etc. Meets lndlviduallay with all offenders,develops Ij rentry plans whmh provide refers is and aftercare olans. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total$ 366,262 I - - I 366,262 Position 7 LTitte l Name of Individual] INumher of Hours Worked Par Year. FTE 0.00 if uhVoo, is2,0a01 I IEqulVaienC Funding Sources & Cost Allocation Program Code CPS I Loaa80iher I Fee Revenue I Total@ I I I I I I i l I I I I! I I I I I I I i I i i I I I I I Totals) Codes end Terms .Beimbumement Position 8 Tltlo,l I Name of Individual! Number of flours Waked Per Year, FTE I(Full Time is 2,0eo) OOC IEquIvalent, I CCCI I Funding Sources IS Cost Allocation f Program Code CPS 1.0movother Fee Roven4e Toads Codes and Terms of Reimbursement I Totals !tII I Position 9 I 710. I Name ofmaividVal:I INumberofNo4rs Worked Per. Yoar. o.00 I IFTE 000 I (Full1mg N2,080) Equivalent I` Faading Sources & CMAllocsllam Program Cede CPS LeeePolhar Fee Pawed. Toblc Cause and Terms of Reimbursement I Totalsl - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 (Position 10 7117e:I ( I Name of Individual:Numb, r Per 4eac ((Full O.nOI I 08pWorked TlmeN2,080) I qulValenC [ OOoI I Funding Sources & Cost Allocation 1 Program Coda I CPS I Loe.dC@er I F.e Revenue I Total. I areas end Term. of Reimbursement I I Totals - - - - IPosition 11 Tfla, Name of Individual: I Numher of Hours Worked Per Year. FTE (Full Time is 2,080) OOO Equivalent. o00 ( Funding Sources & Cost Alioeatton Program Code OPB LocollOthor Fee Revenue Tell l Totais - - - Position 12 Tlta] Name of Individual:NumberofHour) ((Full Time N 20088s0Warked Par Year. I O.00IFTC Equlvelenil I I O.00I )))Funding Sources & Cast Allocation Program Code OPe LeeallOtber Fee Revenue Tend. Duties and Term%of Reimbursement DUYos and Terms of Reimbursement I I I I I 1 Totals[ - I I I I f I II► - - I I I � ► I IPosition 13 I Title: I Name of IndivlduaCl Number of Hoer. Woded Per Year. TFT E fFull Time is Z,0801 OO,IFEqui v.(art I I 0.00I runding Sources &Cost Allocation Program Code CPS I + Loc.gCtior I Fee Review. T.W. I I ! 1 I I I I I I Totals) I I I I I I I I I I (Position 14 1 Title:l Name of Indlyldual: Numberof H.ms Worked Per Year, (FW)TImeh$ow) OOOIFTE Eq&alent: I O.00I Fnedma $ee6e. & Cost Allocation Program Code I i CP& I I Le.elrosger I Fee R.aimim Tehb I I I I I I I I I Doti.. and Term. of Reimbursement hide. and T.M. o/Relmber.ement Position 15 (Number of Hours Woked Per Year. (Pull Time E 2,O80) Program code Totals Tifle: Name of Individual:I FTE 00o Equivalent a.00 unding 5ources & Cast Blloca ion CPS LesallOther Fee Revenue To&& Trials Position 16 TIIIe: (Numberef Haas Worked Pervear. (Fultnunais2,O8O) Program code INamls Lines of Individua 0.00 0.00IEquive6Ot: \oodles Sourcels&Cost Flloalloe CPS LmO.U0ther Fee Revenue FFF Tolelc Totals - - - - Salary&Wage Totals1 1,735O081 4,802,3551 - 6,537,362 contractual services Contract 1 more and Term, of RelmbYnement Dunes and Terms of Relmbursement Name of Provides I Oakland County Information Technology, Oakland County Facilities Maintalnance and operations Computers, support, development of IT .,collection, and phone Imes; Support and rental of phone, and fax Imes, Services provitled; euddlng space rental Terms of Relmburser IT Serivices and Costs $374/quarter or$1,500/ year for computer rental and $10,000 for development, $1,100 for phone usage, $50/monthfc, fax/copier/scanner maintenance and repalrs; Facilities space cast: $11.00 / square foot %83T feet of space Funding Sources& Cost Allotatlon - - - - - Program Code ]Administration lAdministratlon I I I (Contract 2 CPS ""fly lher Fa. Ravenue Toni. 13,200 541,238 554,438 1 9,20) 9,207 l I I I Sub-Toit1 22,4071 541,238I - I 563,6451 Name of Provider; ETRS Serylces provitled; Fadlltation of groups for youthful male offenders In the Step Forward Program TOMS of Fb lmbUn emenfRelmbursement is on a per group basis There is a flat fee of $250 per group, this includes air materials for group pe rUnpants. There will be 2 groupe per week, one at each of our Iocations.There must beat least 3 attendees to be considered a group I Program Code ]GOO. young Males Group ) I I I I ] Contract 3 Name of Provider. IOakland Commmty Health Network Services Provided: Screening for Mental Health and Substance Use Services, and preeldl ng short term situational counseling for offenders In Step Forward Terms of Reimbursement $45,0001 half of a salary to be split with OCN HI per year for a full-time employee, $3,750 per month. Services will mdurs at lest 2 groups per week and a minimum of 4 new enrollments per month I Funding Sources & Cost Allotatlon Program Code cps L.e9e00e1 I Fee Ravenue Tonle I122-Step Forward MH&SA assessment 45,000 45,000 90,000I I I I I ] I Sub Natal 45000] 45.000 90,0001 IContract 4 CPS I Lgepuolluf Fee Revenue 26,000 I I I Sub-Tatall 26,000 Funding sources& Cost Allocation Tonle 26P00 I I I I 26,000 Name of Provider; ADE, Inc NEEDS assessments for off enders that require a substance abuse assessment according to the COMPAS and/or the TCU. Also required for recent Services provided: legislation that mandates a MAT eligibility assessment Terms of RelmbUreeme0b $600 per test I iProgram Cod. I122 - Felony drunk driver MAT assessment I I I I I I I IContract 6 I Funding Sources & CORAllocatlon cps Logeunder Fee Has.... Toni I 2,600 2,600 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Sub-Tenll 2,6001 - I - 2,6001 Name of PrOVIQBr, Moms Confinement & Total Court SeNic.s Program Lode D08 - Electronic Momtorim I I I I I I I (Contract6 I 1 Program Code II24-Step Forward I I I I I I I IContract 7 Program Code 1124 - Step Forward If24 -jail Reentry I I I I I sub - Total IContract 6 Services Provide l: Electronic Monitoring services for pretrial defendants who are unable to afford the monthly fees Terms of RaimbuBemarit. average cost $13.00/day plus $100 Installation fee CPS Lrca80ther Fee Revenue So,000 Sub - Total 50,000 Name of Provider: Oakland County Sheriff's Office Funding Sources & Cost Allocation Tolelc I- -- - 50,000 I I I I 50,000 Services Provided: Drug Testing for sentenced offenders and pretrial defendants In the Step Forward program who are unable to afford it Terms of Relmbumement: $15 00 per test urm he drug screen, $4 00 PBT CPS LocagOther Fee Revenue 5,000 Sub - Total 5,000 funding Sources & Cost Allocation Toole 5,000 5,000 Name of Provider: SMART Bus Services Provided: Bus passes provided to offenders In the Step Forward program or in the P11 through the jail reentry program Terms of Reimbursement:I Passes vary in price generally we purchase 100 @ $2.00 and 40 Is $22.00 Funding Sources & Cost Alteration Toule I 1,000 1,000 I I I 2,000 CPS LooalfOthor Fee Revenue 1,000 1,000 2,000 Name of Provider: TBD Services Provided: Offender mentering ports Tentatively $20/ per Ind car weal session once per week (usually 1 hour $20a26weekc,30 offenders), $2,000 allocation for reimbursement costs of pro"a' Tefine Of Reimbursement: activities, $210 per group once per week, $5,478 for training of new mentors. It is estimated that the RFP, recultment and training 0f new mentors will take about 6 months. Therefore the program will only be running for about 26 weeks this Rscual year These budget costs are sl mply illustrative at This point, and may change slightly depending on the selected vendor and terms of the contract. -unding Sources & Cost Allocation I Program Code CPS Lo uKther Fee Revenue Toule IG00- Offender venturing Program 2$538 28,538� ) I ( Sub-Totell 28,538 - 28,538 IContract 9 Name of Pmvlder.ITarrdng Point, Samarras, New Paths Services Provided: Probational residentlal serrvices formisdemeanors Terms of Remhufsemenl:$55/perday _ - Fubtl108 gqufGeS$lffoiiAifd[e11on -- _-'- Program Cade UPS Locawmaer Fee Revenue Totals lAdministfatlon 320,000 320,00011 I 1 { I i I i { I f �. sub -Total - 370,000 - 320,000 (Contract 10 I- Name of Provider: Services Provided: Terms of Reimbursement: i. Funding Sources& Cost Allocation Program Code cps Lace110mor Fee Revenue Torals { I { I i I i I i I { I 1 I 1 I sob -Torah - Total) 181,545 I 906,238 I - I 1,08],783 Equipment PYogrem [otle Cps—-LaaallOtpar Fee Revenue Totals Oeeedp8an Adminlstration 5,125 5,125 expendible equipment, chair; cabinets, etc I l I I I I Total - 5,125 r 5,125 ISupplies ^ Program Cade OPS Le..I[Othef Fee Revenue T.W. OewdpBon 22,845 22,845 Office, custodial and supplies fortheWWAMprogrsm Total - '22,845 - 22,845 - Travel I Program Code CPS L.WhOther Fee Revenue I Totals 0... "Pope Administration 500 9,000 1 9,500 Forin-stateconferenceandtravelcosts Total 500 9,000 1 9,500 I (Training Program Code CPS L... 00ther Fee Revenue Totals - DesMptien IAdminlstratlon 3,500 For staff trolning such as Thinking Matters, etc. � � 3,500 I I I I I Total 3,500 - 3,500 I I Board Expenses Program code I oP8 -...Vetter Fee Revenue Total.' Den101.a pdministratlon I 1,000 I Boa of expenses throughout the Year I Ifl 7, I 1,0oa - 1,000 I I (Other Program Code. CPS WWA)thar I Fee Revenue I Total. Description [Administration 1,00012070 13,070 Membershipdues to APPA, NAPSA and printing expenses for the Bench Gulden,etc. IAdminlstratlon I I 23628 I I I I I 23,82E Motor pool farWWAM program I [ I - Totall - 1,000 .35,081 .l 36,898 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FY 2022 FUNDING PROPOSAL Oakland County Comprehensive Plans & Services Program Program Code Funding Request Approved Funding Reserved Funding Total Funding Recommeodatlon Group -Based Programs Education BOO Employment B15 Cognitive C01 ,Domestic Violence Cos Sex Offender. C06 Outpatient Services G18 Other Group Services 600 Sub -Total Supervision Programs Intensive Supervision D23 Electronic Monitoring D08 .Pretrial Supervision F23 Sub -Total Assessment Services Actuarial Assessment Pretrial Assessment Sub -Total Gatekeeper Gatekeeper Sub -Total Case Management Substance Abuse Testing Other 5 Day Housing Program Total Administration Salary & Wages Contractual Services Equipment Supplies Travel Training Board Expenses Other Administration Total Total Comprehensive Plans & Services 122 F22 125 124 G17 700 Z02 244,218 54,538 298,756 134,880 127,445 262,325 79,267 396,390 475,657 726,501 1,763,239 130,907 22,407 Soo 3,500 1,000 1,000 159,314 1,922,5531 (E) FY: 22 CCAB: Oakland County Administration is defined as those activities and related costs that have been incurred for the overall executive and administrative functions of the local office or other expenses of a general nature that do not relate solely to the operation of a specific program as defined/approved within the local plan. They are costs, that bytheir nature, are administrative in support of the overall duties and functions of the local OCC. This category must also include its share of fringe benefits, costs, operations (utilities, office supplies, travel, etc.), and maintenance expenses. NOTE: • No more than one hour may be billed for eligibility screening under Administration. CCABs receiving 125 Gatekeeper funds may not bill for this service under Administration. • ASUPPLY has a life expectancy of less than a year (paper, toner, folders, drug testing supplies, etc.) while EQUIPMENT has a life expectancy of more than a year (fax machine, PBT, computer). 1. Local/other contributions to Administrative functions per fiscal year: $ 1,047,495, this amount is only reflective of money budgeted under adminsitration and not the entire general county budget for Community Corrections which is in excess of $5,000,000 for FY22 *this amount must be reflected in your budget documents within the OCC Funding Application. 2. How frequently are CCAB meetings held? Once per month with the exception of the summer months or as needed. What is included on CCAB meeting agendas? Typical agenda items include: Public Comment; Approval of Minutes; Manager's Report (which covers items such as budget, prison commitment rate, and utilization rates); Program updates or isssues; Other Business; and Adjournment. 3. Describe how expenditure reports are processed and verified then forwarded to OCC in Lansing: All expenditures are tracked within the Oakland County financial management system. Each expenditure requires a funding code (identifies it as being a grant expenditure), division code (identifies it as a Community Corrections expenditure), a program code (tracks expenditures by program; pretrial services for example) and line item code (the type of expenditure; supplies, salaries, etc). Reports can be generated by fund, program or type of expenditure. The fiscal analyst assigned to Community Corrections runs these reports and groups the expenditures within the cooresponding grant line items. The monthly expendiutres are transferred to the FSR which is then forwarded to the manager with the necessary backup via email, A hard copy of the FSR follows in the mail with the analyst's signature. The FSR is reviewed by the manager for any inconsistencies, overages, or potential problem areas and then signed. A copy is sent via email to MOCA for reimbursement. 4. When and how are utilization and expenditures monitored? The expenditures are monitored through the monthly FSR and back up is provided by fiscal services to the manager. Reports, that have the ability to drill down expenditures by program, are also available to the manager if needed. Utilization is reported by the respective progam supervisors via their monthly reports (generated from C*Star) and that is checked against the CCIS. Page 1 of 3 (Z) 5. As a contractual requirement, how often does the CCAB manager meet with, visit, and evaluate contracted programs? All vendors of residential services for Oakland County are audited at least yearly. Even though the state now holds the contracts for the felony offenders, we still have contracts for misdemeanor offenders. Two of our contracted vendors actually perform their duties within the Community Corrections building. Therefore we have directly contact with these providers several times per week, if not everyday. Our other vendors (for electronic monitoring) are evaluated almost daily, as we are constantly reviewing alarms, etc. for accuracy. 6, How often does the CCAB manager meet with program referral sources? (probation supervisors/agents, prosecutor, defense attorney, judges, etc.)? As needed. Explain: While there is no set interval, the regional probation supervisor, Oakland County Prosecutor, defense attorney representative, and district and circuit judges are part of the CCAB which meets monthly. System stakeholders and judges are in communication with our office regarding various topics on a regualr basis. Our newly elected Prosecutor (Karen McDonald) has accepted an appointment to our CCAB and we have already begun meeting with her and her staff on a number of issues. In addition, we provide training to new defense attorneys, new judicial officers, and on occasion present at district and circuit judicial meetings. If there is a pressing matter, we will contact the stakeholder directly. 7. How often is program utilization reviewed? Explain: Program utilization is reviewed monthly. Community Corrections is submitting the monthly utilization reports as required by contract. Completing these reports ensures that program utilization is reviewed monthly. 8. What actions are taken when programs are under or over -utilized? If a program Is over or under utilized within a month, no immediate action is taken, as flucations do occur. For instance, referrals tend to dip in Januanry due to lost docket / sentencings from the Holiday season. However, if the trend continues over 2-3 months, action will then be taken. The form of action may depend on the program, but a typical starting point would be to contact the area manager. I may also contact the Chair of the CCAB (Circuit Judge) so she may bring concerns to the monthly judge's meeting. 9. Describe when and how the comprehensive corrections plan is developed: The plan and application is developed by the manager and presented to the CCAB for approval. It involves reviewing the midyear numbers to estimate projections for the coming year. Reviewing salary forecasts and expenditure information for budget, and reviewing objectives from the previous year to determine where changes might be needed. The planning for the grant application and developing of the plan really occurs all year long. Throughout the year areas of concern or potential new program areas are discussed and either worked into the current plan through a budget amendment or are included as a new initiative in the next year's plan. 10, Describe the involvement of other stakeholders or subcommittees in data analysis or comprehensive corrections plan/program development. There really is no involvement on the part of the stakeholders in the data analysis as that is seen as the responsibility of the manager. However, the analysis is shared with the stakeholders to support plan development, establishment of new programs or to make changes to existing programs. Stakeholders are constantly polled for program Ideas and /or gaps in service. 11. What is your plan to provide orientation and to educate all stakeholders? Explain: Our best educational piece for all system stakeholders continues to be our Bench Guide, which was last updated in 2018 and will be again before the start of FY22. The Bench Guide provides Page 2 of 3 (9) infromation about general eligibility for Community Corrections programming, as well as the program specific eligibility criteria. It also contains information about cost, contact inforamtion and locations. The Bench Guide contains all programs funded through Community Corrections as well as those available through MDOC probation. This is by far our most widely asked for and distributed publication. In additon to the Bench Guide we are routinely asked to be a part of the training agenda for attorneys who are being added to the court appointment list. As the manager I take every opportunity to speak or educate all stakeholders about community corrections within Oakland County specifically. Page 3 of 3 Program Description Pretrial Risk Assessment Services CCAB: Oakland County N FY: 22 Local Program Name: Pretrial Services Service Provider: Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: F22 - Pretrial Assessment Total Projected Number of New Assessments (enrollment): 9000 For Regional CCABs, total projected number of new assessments by member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: © Community: ❑ Program Status: Continuation If modification, describe here: PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT SERVICES - Provides for risk assessment of pre -adjudicated defendants: • Validated assessment for pretrial services supervision eligibility. Funding under assessment may include the following: the interview with the defendant, criminal history investigation, verification of interview information, and conducting the PRAXIS and subsequent report to include presentation at arraignment. Enrollment projections should also include an appropriate calculation of staffs time. The total amount of time spent per projected enrollee should balance with the requested funding amount. (ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM 11 1. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? ®Pretrial 2. Describe the program: a. Describe eligibility criteria, including exclusionary criteria, for an assessment: Under MCR 6.106 all defendants are entitled to bail, therefore no charges are excluded from the assessment process. Pretrial assessments will be conducted seven days per week on all in -custody defendants charged with a misdemeanor or felony offense, including those dendants who are already serving a sentence, have been brought to Oakland County on a writ, or who have an MDOC detainer. We will not assess defendants arrested solely for a violation of probation or bench warrant for failing to pay fines and costs. b. What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? A pretrial assessment is not required to determine eligibility for Oakland County's locally funded programs. However, the risk assessment does drive the recommendation for pretrial supervison. The Pretrial assessment may also help to identify those defendants that are eligible for alternate court programming like treatment court c. What assessment instrument is proposed? The Praxis pretrial risk assessment d. Is the assessment completed through an interview with the defendant or would the defendant fill out a questionnaire for later scoring? A interview is conducted with the defendant to obtain needed information. However, if the defendant is Page 1 of 4 Program Description Pretrial Risk Assessment Services unavailable due to a medical or other condition staff will attempt to gain the information from other sources to complete score the Praxis. e. Is the assessment completed prior to arraignment? Yes f. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them — include dates of training/certification and who conducted the training: Community Corrections Specialists who are conducting pretrial assessments are trained by their Supervisor and Lead staff on interviewing techniques, verification methods, criminal history checks, bail statutes, and the various standards on Pretrial Release published by multiple organizations. (National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies, National District Attorneys Association, American Bar Association, Federal Criminal Code Title 18). Each staff member is a certified LEIN operator, has completed assessment training, and is a certified Pretrial Services Professional Level One Practitioner via the National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies (NAPSA). g. How much time is anticipated to score one pretrial risk assessment (not including subsequent development of a recommendation or plan)? The scoring of the Praxis is automated in our system. As the required information is entered the score is tallied. Therefore the actual scoring of the tool is very fast about 5 minutes, it is the collecting of the information that takes the time. h. How much time is estimated to interview the defendant? 15-20 minutes Explain your response. Because individuals are held in a custodial setting, laptops or computers are generally not allowed. Therefore, the interview answers are all written long hand on preprinted interview sheets. There may also be time spent waiting for deputies / police to pull prisoners so they may be interviewed either in - person or for virtual before a camera. i. How much time is estimated to complete a criminal history investigation on the defendant? 10-30 minutes Explain your response. This really depends on the length of the criminal history and how complete it is. If there are many unknown dispositions, the staff person may need to spend a significant amount of time making calls and tracking down dispositions and researching prior fail to appear history. Staff may also need to call probation / parole agents to confirm community supervision status. Entering this information into the database can be time consuming. j. How much time is estimated to verify interview information? 10-20 minutes Explain your response. Verifying information as with every other function can take very little time or a lot of time. Often times references ask questions about what happens next in the process; when will the defendant be arraigned, at what court, how do they post bond, etc. These questions can add to the time it takes to verify inofrmation but is an essential public service. k. How much time is estimated to complete the subsequent report, including the presentation at arraignment/court? 15-20 minutes Explain your response. Once the information is entered into the database much of the report is automated. Once the Praxis has been scored, the pretrial investigator must provide a written recommendation that includes a solid justification that supports the recommendation. The investigator must also determine if the recommenditon is in Page 2 of 4 Program Description Pretrial Risk Assessment Services accordance with MCL 765.6a or whether there may be grounds for a deviation from the Praxis score. Any recommended conditons of release must be the least restrictive and mitigate pretrial misconduct. I. What is the total amount of time required to complete the assessment process? (add the time responses to questions i. through m.) 50-90 minutes m. Is subsequent verification of information attempted prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? Yes n. Is the recommendation written? Yes i o. For defendants who do not gain release, does your County utilize a review process (sequential review)? Choose an item. Explain: Defendants who are not able to have an assessment completed for the arraignment and are detained at the county jail will have a bail report sent for their next court appearance, Reports for defendants who remain detained in the jail after their arraignment are reviewed to determine if there was information lacking or material changes in their circumstances. For instance the defendant may have had charges reduced or dismissed. These are changes in circumstance that would prompt us to send a revised report to the court for the next court appearance. p. Is information about the number of completed assessments entered in COMPAS Case Manager and tracked for CCIS purposes? Yes, all pretrial assessments are generated through our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as the COMPAS case manager, in that each enrollment requires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when a pretrial bond report is generated, it is also saved as an F22. We can query the database at any time for the number of F22s completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to Equivant. q. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, face to face interviews have been suspended. However, we have been able to interview defendants at the jail through their video visitation system by IC Solution. We have been interviewing defendants held at local lock -ups either through an existing poly-com system or via phone. All pretrial staff are provided with NetMotion computers on which they are able to access LEIN information while working from home. Staff also have access to their work towers and are able to generate reports that are then faxed or emailed to the court for arraignment. Staff are attending court arraignments via Zoom invite. 3. Percentage of OCC-funded defendants screened whose release decision matches the pretrial risk assessment? (Concurrence rate) The overall concurrence rate where the release decision matches the pretrial risk assessment is 51%. The Praxis provides recommendations for "release", "release with conditions", "release on recognizance not recommended", and "bond denied". Of the 51% of cases in which the court followed the recommendation the concurrence rate for release is 32%. The concurrence rate for release i with conditions is 14%. The concurrence rate for release on recognizance not recommended is 53%. The concurrence rate for bond denied is 1%. However it should be noted that of the total cases completed staff recommended release in 38% of the cases, J Page 3 of 4 Program Description °« Pretrial Risk Assessment Services release with conditions in 27% of the cases, release on ROR not recommneded in 34%of the cases and bond denied in 1% of the cases. For CCABs requesting a new initiative provide the expected or current concurrence rate as defined above. 4. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: Pretrial programs must be cognizant of the legal and evidenced base principles that apply to defendants. b. Assess risk / needs. This program uses a validated risk tool to assess risk of flight and rearrest c. Target Interventions. The bail recommendation is individualized to address the defendant's specific risks identified while being the least restrictive to ensure appearance and safety d. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding all aspects of the bail process e. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the bail process and the effectiveness of interventions. f. Program key performance measure(s): All data is tracked through our C*Star database. Staff record the outcome of the bail determination for entry into C*Star. Some data may be received through the data warehouse which captures jail information for reporting. g. % of staff recommendations that are consistent with Praxis score h. % of Judicial concurrence with recommendation i. % of low -moderate defendants who are released on PR bond % of low -moderate defendants who don't make release within lday (a of defendants assessed divided by those who don't make release within 1 day) Page 4 of 4 Logic Model Program Name: Pretrial Assessment Goal: to maximize release in order to avoid negative outcomes associated with pretrial detention for as little as 48 hours. Negative outcomes include increased recidivism before and after the pretrial period, increased likelihood of accepting a non -favorable plea deal, increased likelihood of incarceration in prison or jail as well as length of incarceration. Inputs d Pretrial Staff MDOC funding County GP/GF funding Praxis Assessment tool In custody defendants Interviewing the defendant # of bail recommendation reports Conducting Criminal History check Scoring the Praxis Verification of gathered information Writing / compiling the bail report Testimony in court The bail decision • # of assessed defendants released . # of assessed defendants detained % of staff recommendations that are consistent with Praxis score % of Judicial concurrence with recommendation % of low -moderate defendants who are released on PR bond % of low -moderate defendants who don't make release within 1day (# of defendants assessed divided by those who don't make release within 1 day) How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: Pretrial programs must be cognizant of the legal and evidenced base principles that apply to defendants. • Assess risk / needs. This program uses a validated risk tool to assess risk of flight and rearrest • Target Interventions. The bail recommendation is individualized to address the defendant's specific risks identified while being the least restrictive to ensure appearance and safety • Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding all aspects of the bail process • Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the bail process and the effectiveness of interventions. �t` Program Description "�`Y" p' Pretrial Supervision Services 'Nr„ CCAB: Oakland County U FY: 22 Local Program Name: Pretrial Supervision Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: F23 — Pretrial Supervision Services Total Projected New Enrollment: 3500 For Regional CCABs, total projected new enrollment by member county: Projected Length of Stay in Days: 94 pre -pandemic and 125 since July 2020 Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: ❑ Residential: ❑ Community: Program Status: Continuation If modification, describe here: SUPERVISION SERVICES— Pretrial supervision should utilize the least restrictive means while working to promote court appearances and public safety. • Funding under Pretrial Supervision Services may include the following: court reminders (if not available through other means), report methodology and frequency that comports with the assessed level of risk and written compliance reports to the Court. • Electronic monitoring is supported for the following: those charged with an OUIL III, victim cases, high risk misdemeanors and non-violent felonies scoring 6 or higher (PRAXIS) and/or a violent felony scoring 3 or higher (PRAXIS). • Supervision programs are not intended to simply provide access to substance abuse testing absent other supervision activities. • You are required to complete a G17 Substance Abuse Testing program description if you are requesting funds for pretrial substance abuse testing, as part of your pretrial supervision plan. • OCC requires that an objective pretrial assessment be used before defendants are referred for pretrial supervision. NSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.I 1. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? XPretrial 2. Describe the program: a. A Pretrial risk assessment is mandatory for pretrial supervision services. What are your eligibility criteria based on the assessed risk levels? Be sure to include assessment scores. The target poplution for supervision (scores that will generate a recommendation of supervision) is defendants that score 0-2 and are charged with a violent felony, defendants that score 3-5 and are charged with high severity misdemeanor or non violent feloy, and defendants that score 6-9 and are charged with a misdemenaor. However, a judge or magistrate may order any defendant onto pretrial supervision regardless of score. b. If using electronic monitoring (GPS and/or SCRAM) answer and clearly explain the following questions (use NA if not applicable to your program): "Refer to the first page for information on pretrial EM eligibility information. Page 1 of 4 (Z) Program Description Pretrial Supervision Services L What kind of equipment/system: The following questions are covered in the DO8 program description ii. Vendor for equipment/service: iii. Cost assessed by the vendor per unit/defendant/day (clearly describe): iv. Who does the equipment installation/retrieval? v. Who sets up schedules and/or monitors compliance? c. What are your supervision reporting requirements, i.e. frequency and type of reporting? Due to the short amount of time a defendant is on supervised release, differential levels of reporting are not realistic. Reporting is scheduled at twice per month for all individuals on supervision. All reporting is done via phone through a system by Fieldware called OffenderLink. Defendants are assigned a PIN which allows them to enter the system and report. A defendant may however, be connected with a case manager should there be a crisis or questions. Reporting by phone means the defendant can report at a time which is convenient for them. It is the least restrictive means of reporting. d. What is your average daily caseload per full time equivalent position (FTE) for pretrial supervision? Based on our pre-COVID ALOS of 94 days multipled by projected enrollments of 3,500 and divided by 365 our ADP is 901. based on our current ALOS (125) and projected enrollments of 3,500 our ADP is 1,198. These ADPs support 9 - 11 FTE postions. However we only have 3 FTEs working regular supervision which breaks down to caseloads of 300 - 400 each. To assist the case managers we have one FTE that enrolls all new referrals and 3 PTNEs that help with entering information regarding drug testing and court dates. There is also a supervisor assigned to the program that assists all staff in completing work and carries / covers a caseload when necessary. e. What happens during a typical "check -in" and how long is it estimated to take? Court date reminder: ® Verification of address: ® New criminal contact: Verification of bond conditions: 0 Referrals to programs: X Other (describe): A typical "report" is a 3 minute automated telephone call that is designed to specifically review the defendant's conditions of bail and provide notification of next appearance. A defendant may, at any time, be connected with a case manager should there be a crisis or questions. If defendants are required to submit verification of a condition, they may do this via fax, text, or our general email. Case managers receive notifications from the system if a defendant has not reported or has not provided required verification. In these instances, case managers need to follow up with defendants or other service providers to obtain the needed information. The automated system also makes outbound, court reminder telephone calls to the defendant. Research has shown that reminding defendants of their court date is the single most effective action a program can take to enhance court appearance Time per check in (including the time to complete compliance report documentation) The calls last about 3 minutes. However, the time it takes to complete a compliance report may be significantly longer. The case manager needs to check and ensure Page 2 of 4 Program Description (Z) Pretrial Supervision Services that the defendant has complied with all conditions. If information is missing, such as drug testing results, the case manager must locate that information. We are also beginning to include information regarding new criminal behavior while on bond. A PTNE checks various databases for this information. A typical compliance report takes between 15-20 minutes to compile but some are more time consuming. Compliance reports are required for every court appearance f. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? Yes g. This program does not use PA-511 funds for drug/alcohol testing. If you select "uses PA-511 funds" then you are required to complete a G17 Substance Abuse Testing program description. h. Pretrial release conditions which include drug/alcohol testing should be limited. Describe the County's plan should a defendant test positive for a controlled substance. What interventions are available and presented to the court and/or defendant: Interventions are available and offered to defendants that test positive for alchol or drugs. Most often the defendant is referred to our on -site PIHP access screener (assessmet SUD & MH) or directly to the PHIP for screening. Either of these options may result in the defendant's immediate placement into an appropriate level of care. If the defendant does not qualify for PIHP funding, felony defendants may be placed into a probation residental center under State funding. Misdemeanor defendants may be placed into a probation residential center under county funding. However, not all positve tests require residential or DIOP treatment. Some individuals may be referred to outpatient treatment services and some may refuse any type of intervention. It should also be noted that for many courts, testing positive is a violation of bail and requires an immediate show casue hearing. I. How is the County's plan mentioned in (h.) documented per defendant? All interaction with a defendant is required to be documented through our C*Star case management system. This includes all conversations with the defendant including referrals. If a defendant is sent to treatment, appropriate releases are acquired so information can be relayed to the case manager. j. Are compliance reports shared with MDOC PSI writers? Compliance reports are available to any probation agent that would like them. All probation agents are given access to our C*Star database, so they only need to access the information. k. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic all staff are working from home. Since we have always utilized phone reporting there has been no interruption of services. Case managers have been making personal calls to all defendants on their caseload to provide support, and offer additional referrals to food panteries, employment services, etc. It should be noted that caseloads are increasing due to the small number of cases being docketed. However the projected enrollments for this year have decreased in anticipation of legislation that will be introduced reforming bail practices. Page 3 of 4 (Z) Program Description Pretrial Supervision Services 3. Provide the following information: (For CCABs requesting a new initiative, provide the expected or current appearance and public safety rates as defined below) a. What is the appearance rate for those enrolled in pretrial supervision funded through OCC? For the first quarter of FY21 the appearance rate for defendants on pretrial supervision was 90%. (The percentage of OCC-funded supervised defendants who make all scheduled court appearances.) b. What is the public safety rate? The public safety rate for the same time frame was 95%. (The percentage of released defendants on OCC-funded supervision who are not charged with a new criminal offense before adjudication.) 4. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: Pretrial programs must be cognizant of the legal and evidenced base principles that apply to defendants. b. Assess risk / needs: Conditions are based on assessed risks c. Target Interventions. This program uses court reminder calls which research shows is one of the most effective methods to increase appearance rates. d. Risk Principle: This program uses the least restrictive means in order to assure compliance e.g., remote / telephone reporting. e. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the supervision process. f. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the supervision process and the effectiveness of interventions. g. Program key performance measure(s): All data is tracked through our C*Star database. Staff enter termination codes in accordance with State definitions. This information can be queried by termination codes to calcuate key performance measures. h. Safety rate L Appearance rate j. ALOS from referral to enrollment Page 4 of 4 Logic Model Program Name: Pretrial Supervision Goal: To increase appearance and safety rates through targeted conditions that address assessed risks. Defendants who are able to gain release are less likely to accept a non -favorable plea bargain, are able to continue positive social supports such as employment and are able to actively participate in their own defense. Inputs Pretrial Staff MDOC funding County GP/GF funding Referrals Court orders 4tivities u KPIs ^ Intake / Enrollment Making referrals for drug testing, other social services Court reminder calls Monitoring / Supervising New criminal activity checks # of referrals # of defendants enrolled # of court reminder calls # of supervised conditions Caseload #s (ADP=# of referrals / LOS / 365) # of Activity Report(s) • Reports per staff (# of reports / unit staff / business days) # of terminations • Successful • unsuccessful Safety rate Appearance rate ALOS from referral to enrollment Caseload ratio How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: Pretrial programs must be cognizant of the legal and evidenced base principles that apply to defendants. • Assess risk / needs: Conditions are based on assessed risks • Target Interventions. This program uses court reminder calls which research shows is one of the most effective methods to increase appearance rates. c Risk Principle: This program uses the least restrictive means in order to assure compliance e.g., remote / telephone reporting. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the supervision process. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the supervision process and the effectiveness of interventions. (Z) Program Description Supervision Services CCAB: Oakland County FY: 22 Local Program Name: Pretrial Supervision Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: D08 - Electronic Monitoring Total Projected New Enrollment: 700 u For Regional CCABs, total projected new enrollment by member county: u Projected Length of Stay in Days: 112 prepandemic and 121 since July 2020 Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: ❑ Residential: ❑ Community: Z Program Status: Continuation If modification, describe here: SUPERVISION SERVICES — • Supervision programs include Electronic Monitoring and Intensive Supervision. • PA511 funds cannot be used to provide Electronic Monitoring Services for MDOC probationers unless it is for pretrial supervision of a probationer with a new charge (call your Community Corrections Specialist for exceptions), • You are required to complete a G17 Substance Abuse Testing program description if you are requesting funds for pretrial substance abuse testing, as part of your supervision services. �ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR 1. Supervision is an expected function of MDOC Probation. Please explain how this existing service is inadequate for your Comprehensive Corrections Plan and why Supervision Services are needed: This program description is specific to defendants ordered to electronic monitoring. MDOC does not supervise pretrial defendants. N 2. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? N❑Sentenced Felons ©Other: All pretrial defendants that are at high risk of new criminal behavior during the pretrial period or of failure to appear for a court appearance. 3. Describe the program: a. What is the referral process to this service/program? Defendants ordered to the program by the judicial officer are enrolled and typically installed prior to their release from jail and may or may not require the posting of finanical bail. b. P.A. 511 states eligibility for programming must include moderate to high risk. Please select which needs the program will impact (probable to highly probable). A minimum of 4 scales are required for Intensive Supervision eligibility. ❑ Criminal Involvement ❑History of Non -Compliance ❑Crimina I Opportunity ❑Criminal Personality ❑Cognitive Behavior ❑Leisure and Recreation ❑History of Violence ❑Family Criminality ❑Current Violence El Residential Stability ❑Substance Abuse ❑Criminal Associates/Peers ❑Vocational/Ed Page 1 of 5 Program Description (9) Supervision Services ❑Social Isolation Gender Responsive Scales: ❑Experiences of Abuse as an Adult ❑Experiences of Abuse as a Child El Relationship Dysfunction ❑ Parental Stress [-]Social Environment D08 Electronic Monitoring Pretrial Only: © Risk of Non-appearance ®Risk of Re -arrest c. If different from the COMPAS assessment, identify the name of the assessment used to determine eligibility and provide eligibility criteria: In order to be eligible for EM the defendant must have EM ordered as a condition of bail. Defendants who have a Praxis risk score of 6-9 and are charged with a non-violent felony or high severity misdemeanor OR who score 3-5 and are charged with a violent felony are eligible. Pretrial defendants charged with a felony impaired driving charge are also eligible for an alcohol monitoring device. d. Are offenders supervised through (select all that apply): Office Visits: ❑ EMS: ❑ TX Reporting: ❑ TX System (e.g. OffenderLink): F3 Field Contacts: ❑ Other (describe): e. If using electronic monitoring or othertechnology (including phone systems) answer and clearly explain the following (use NA if not applicable to your program): i. What kind of equipment/system: A variety of equipment is used depending on the requirements of the court. Active GPS tracking is used in cases involving victims or when inclusion and exclusion zones are necessary. In alcohol cases a transdermal device such as SCRAM or TAD may be used. We also have the option of portable breath testing through equipment like the soberlink. We do not use RF except in extreme cases of 24 hour lock down. Access to applicable software for EM systems, mapping software, and case management software systems (In-house C-Star and OffenderLink) are used. ii. Vendor for equipment/service: We have contracts with two vendors Home Confinement Inc and Total Court Services. These vedors are used for all defendants who are unable to afford EM services. On occasion we use a third vendor EMS for defendants who self pay. iii. Cost assessed by the vendor per unit/participant/day (clearly describe): The costs associated with the electronic devices are mostly incurred by the defendant. There is a line item for defedants who qualify for EM under the Praxis but can not afford it. If the cost hinders their release from jail then Community Corrections will pay. If a defendant is on a fixed income, disability or currently has no inclome they may qualify for community Page 2 of 5 Program Description tion Supervision Services corrections to pay a portion of their EM costs. The costs vary depending on the type of equipment and vendor. Prices are as follows for HCI; Enrollment Fee - GPS and TAD $75.00, GPS Tether $13.00 per day, BI Land Line TAD $11.00 per day, BI Cellular TAD $13.00 per day; Enrollment Fee - Soberlink $50.00, Soberlink 2 $6.50 per day, GPS Tether & BI TAD (Landl-ine) $22.00 per day, GPS Tether & BI TAD (Cellular) $24.00 per day, GPS Tether & Soberlink $19.50 per day: Prices for TCS are:Enrollment Fee - GPS and SCRAM CAM $75.00, GPS Tether $9.00 per day SCRAM CAM Landline $10.00 per day, SCRAM CAM Ethernet $11.00 per day, SCRAM CAM Cellular $12.00 per day; Enrollment Fee - Remote Breath and Soberlink $50.00, SCRAM Remote Breath $5.50 per day, Soberlink $6.50 per day iv. Who does the equipment installation/retrieval? The vendor is responsible for all installation and retieval of equipment. v. Who sets up schedules and/or monitors compliance? Compliance is monitored by both the vendor and Oakland County Community Corrections staff. A defendant's compliance with schedules, travel restrictions and equipment issues (le. Battery charging, downloading) is continuously monitored by the vendor. OCCCD staff review all alarms and violations to ensure the vendors are following established protocol. Schedules are developed on a case by case basis depending on the defendant's conditions of bail. They may only be allowed to and from work or school, or they may have a more flexiable schedule as long as they don't violate exclusion zones. What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the participant? Defendants who are on EM are required to report weekly by phone through the OffenderLink system. However, due to the nature of this caseload, case managers often speak with these defendants several times per week. Case managers are required to discuss violations and alarms with the defendants for resolution. Defendants may also have scheudle changes, problems with the equipment or other issues that createopportunities for contact with the case manager. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined? All defendants on EM are required to report one time per week via OffenderLink because all defendants on EM are considered high risk. g. What happens during a typical "report?" A typical "report" is an automated telephone call that is designed to specifically review the defendant's conditions of bail and provide notification of next appearance. A defendant may, at anytime, be connected with a case manager should there be a crisis or questions. If defendants are required to submit verification of a condition, they may do this via fax or our general email. Case managers receive notifications from the system if a defendant has not reported or has not provided required verification. In these instances, case managers need to follow up with defendants or other service providers to obtain the missing information. The automated system also makes outbound, court reminder telephone calls to the defendant. Research has shown that reminding defendants of their court date is the single most effective action a program can take to enhance court appearance How long is it estimated to take? The calls last Page 3 of 5 Program Description (Z) Supervision Services approximately 3 minutes but can take longer if the defendant needs to report a new address, police contact, or to leave a message for his/her case manager. In. What does this program provide that is different from MDOC Probation Supervision? These services are conducted during the pretrial phase of the case, provide compliance reports for each scheduled court date regarding conditional release adhearance, violations of conditional release, and provide appropriate interventions to enhance pretrial success. Interventions are available and offered to defendants that test positive for alchol or drugs. Most often the defendant is referred to our on -site PIHP access screener (assessmet SUD & MH) or directly to the PHIP for screening. Either of these options may result in the defendant's immediate placement into an appropriate level of care. If the defendant does not qualify for PIHP funding, felony defendants may be placed into a probation residental center under State funding. Misdemeanor defendants may be placed into a probation residential center under county funding. However, not all positve tests require residential or DIOP treatment. Some individuals may be referred to outpatient treatment services and some may refuse any type of intervention. It should also be noted that for many courts, testing positive is a violation of bail and requires an immediate show casue hearing. i. This program does not use PA-511 funds for drug/alcohol testing. If you select "uses PA-511 funds" you are required to complete a G17 Substance Abuse Testing program description. j. How are delivered services and individual progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes, case notes and/or group notes) All interaction with a defendant is required to be documented through our C*Star case management system. This includes all conversations with the defendant including referrals, alarms reported by the service provider, and their case notes. Program staff then further question the defendant and document alarms/violations. Compliance reports are made available to the referring court of jurisdiction and made available to probation agents that would need them for a PSI. All probation agents are given access to our C*Star database, so they only need to access the information. . k. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic all staff are working from home. Since we have always utilized phone reporting there has been no interruption of services. Case managers have been making in -person calls to all defendants on their caseload to provide support, offer additional referrals to food panteries, employment services, etc. It should be noted that caseloads are increasing due to the small number of cases being docketed and no trials. However the projected enrollments for this year have remained the same in anticipation of legislation that will be introduced reforming bail practices. 4. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. Page 4 of 5 (Z) Program Description Supervision Services a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: Pretrial programs must be cognizant of the legal and evidenced base principles that apply to defendants. b. Assess risk / needs: Conditions are based on assessed risks. c. Target Interventions. This program uses court reminder calls which research shows is one of the most effective methods to increase appearance rates. d. Risk Principle: This condition / intervention is reserved for high -risk defendants. e. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the supervision process. f. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the supervision process and the effectiveness of interventions. g. Program key performance measure(s): All data is tracked through our C*Star database. Staff enter termination codes in accordance with State definitions. This information can be queried by termination codes to calcuate key performance measures. h. Safety rate i. Appearance rate j. # of individuals who are unable to pay and funded through the program Page 5 of 5 Logic Model Program Name: Electronic Monitoring Goal: To increase appearance and safety rates through targeted conditions that address assessed risks. Defendants who are able to gain release are less likely to accept a non -favorable plea bargain, are able to continue positive social supports such as employment and are able to actively participate in their own defense. Inputs Activities Supervision Staff MDOC funding County GP/GF funding Referrals Court orders EM Vendors Intake! Enrollment Making referrals for drug testing, other social services Court reminder calls Monitoring / Supervising New criminal activity checks Financial ability to pay review # of referrals # of defendants enrolled # of court reminder calls # of supervised conditions Caseload #s (ADP=# of referrals / LOS / 365) # of Activity Report(s) Reports per staff (# of reports / unit staff / business days) # of terminations • Successful • Unsuccessful # of individuals unable to pay cost of EM Safety rate Appearance rate # of individuals who are unable to pay and funded through the program to gain release How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: Pretrial programs must be cognizant of the legal and evidenced base principles that apply to defendants. • Assess risk / needs: Conditions are based on assessed risks. • Target Interventions. This program uses court reminder calls which research shows is one of the most effective methods to increase appearance rates. o Risk Principle: This condition I intervention is reserved for high -risk defendants. • Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the supervision process. • Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the supervision process and the effectiveness of interventions. (Z) Program Description Case Management CCAB: Oakland County N FY: 22 Local Program Name: Step Forward Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: J24 — Community Based Case Management Total Projected New Enrollment: 690 Projected Length of Stay in Days: 200 For Regional CCABs, projected enrollment by member county: NProgram Location (select all that apply): Jail: ❑ Community: Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: CASE MANAGEMENT — • P.A. 511 states eligibility for programming must include moderate to high risk in a State approved assessment. For the purposes of case management, a minimum of 3 needs, scoring probable to highly probable, must be identified in the participant file documentation. • Must include the development of a case plan based on the identified needs, linking to services and resources, and possible advocacy. • Clearly explain why additional case management beyond what is provided by probation supervision is necessary to help achieve your objectives. • Case Management is not used to simply do data entry for offender enrollment and termination. • If you have questions about what form to use or if your program really is "case management" please contact your Community Corrections Specialist. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.II 3. "don your objective(s), what is your target population? I ©Sentenced Felons ®Other: The target population is felony offenders who are at high risk for reoffending or violence.This includes straddle cell offenders, probation violators, and felony drunk driving offenders. 2. Describe the pro a. What is your referral process to this program? Referrals can come from a variety of sources but generally come from the supervising probation agent. The Step Forward program may be the program choosen bythe agent or it may be specifically listed in the sentencing order. The agent sends the referral form to the Step Forward location of the offender's choice (Troy or Pontiac). All referrals are sent to the intake unit for screening an eligibility for the Step Forward program. b. Identify the name of the assessment used to determine eligibility: The case managers receive the COMPAS results and a bio/psych/social narrative from the intake staff, they may also receive a NEEDS assessment if the client was identified as Page 1 of 4 0 having a probable substance use issue. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) score is also included. This information is used to create the supervision plan for the offender. c. Explain how case management addresses the identified needs scales and establishes goals and objectives; The case manager establishes a supervision plan with each client based upon the COMPAS assessment. The case managers will focus on the four highest RISK/NEED categories and add goals, tasks and activities which will address those specific RISK/NEEDS. All of the groups offered throurgh Step Forward, the Carey Guides and other community resources are contained within our database as goals and tasks. For instance if a client has a criminogenic need of Criminal Opportunity the goal would be: Reduce opportunities for criminal conduct. A series of tasks that are associated with that criminogenic need is availalbe in a pull down menu for the case manager to choose as approriate. In this case the tasks are: Enroll in the Cognitive Behavioral program; Enroll in the Experiential Learning group; Explore hobbies and interests; Increase involvement with positive peers; and Increase positive interactions with the community. Carey Guides that could be identified as tasks are; Complete/Process Moral Reasoning exercises; Complete/Process Overcoming Family Challenges exercises; Complete/Process Prosocial Leisure Activities exercises; Complete/Process Engaging Prosocial Others exercise; Complete/Process Anti -Social Peers exercises; Complete/Process Motivating Offenders to Change exercises; Complete/Process Maximizing Strengths exercises. Task and goals are entered for each of the identified criminognic needs. Each client must also complete the general Step Forward tasks which include: Attend case management appointments; Pay enrollment fee; Provide written verification of...; Provide medication verification; Obtain drivers license; Obtain Michigan Identification; Obtain birth certificate; Obtain social security card; Complete/Process Responding to Violations exercises. d. What is the frequency of contact with the individual? The case managers meet individually with the offenders at a minimum of onetime per month. However, this can be increased based upon the offenders RISK/NEEDS. Additionally, offenders attend groups 1-3 times per week while in the Step Forward program. Therefore they are often seeing their case manager multiple times per week. e. What happens during a typical session with an individual and how long is it estimated to take? During the offenders initial one on one meeting (typically scheduled for 1 hour) with their case manager they are assigned to any appropriate groups, they are given a start date and provided rules of the program / groups. In subsequent meetings (scheduled for 30 minutes) the case managers assist the client by linking them with services in the community (housing, employment etc). The case managers also target the needs of the offender and work with them on a 1-1 basis using the Carey Guides aimed at specific criminogenic areas. Carey guides may inicude homework or role playing on the part of the offender and the case manager. The case manager will also address any crisis situations that may arise or other situations that may cause a change to the supervision plan (unforseen loss of a job). The main responsibility of the case manager Is to ensure that the offender is following and completing the goal and tasks contained in their supervision plan. During the stay at Page 2 of 4 Program Description Case Management home EO, all case management activities were carried out via telephone. Step Forward already utilized the Carey Guides 'Tools on Device' which allowed case managers to continue with homework assignements, etc. f. Does the program design include contacts with social supports such as: family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? Explain: Yes, the case managers work with the offenders on issues relating to their family relationships, employment, referrals to educational institutions and linking them with additional treatment providers in the community if required. The case managers and the providers in the community communicate so that they can effectively share information and Incorporate the progress, or areas of concern, Into the offenders supervision plan. Proper Release of Information Forms are signed for all entities with whom we share or receive information. g. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services such as health care or clothing assistance? Explain: YES case managers connect the offender to services in the community that they may need in order to be successful. The referrals may include assistance in obtaining birth records, social security cards, State ID or their Drivers License. Additionally, the case managers utilize community agencies that have clothing assistance, food pantries, or free medical services. h. Case plans are required for all enrolled participants. How are delivered services and progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes or case notes)? Referral sources receive an Intake status report as well as copies of the case plan and COMPAS assessment. They are also provided monthly progress reports from the case managers. Additionally, the referral source receives a completion/termination report upon completion and are notified promptly if the offender is non -compliant. I. How does this program differ from the services provided by the probation department? This program is designed to address the underlying criminogenic needs which have contributed to the offender's invoivment in the criminal justice system. At this time, probation has very few agents that are trainined in the Carey Guides in order to provide this level of service. j. Why can probation agents NOT provide this level of service? Probation Agents are not able to meet with the offenders at this level of intensity primarily due to high caseloads. The case managers at Step Forward are able to focus strictly on completing activities related to the offender's criminogenic needs. They are able to tie what is being discussed within the various groups into the offender's 1-1 sessions. k. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Add the supervision review process.Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the Step Forward staff all began teleworking. All groups are running through the County's Skype for Business platform. Case managers are conducting all 1-on-1s via phone or Skype. Case managers are also making contact with their entire caseload on a regular basis to provide support, resources and / or referrals. The Step Forward program will return to in person reporting when it is safe to do so. Page 3 of 4 0 Program Description Case Management 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. Assess risk/ needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. Target Interventions: Supervision plans are individualized to each participant. Groups and Carey Guides are assigned based on assessed criminogenic needs. --Risk principle: This program is target at moderate and high risk / high need offenders. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: All staff assigned to this program have been trained in motivation interviewing techniques. Participants are engaged during theirfirst on -on -one session to pickthe needs on which they would like to work to enhance motivation. Increase positive reinforcement: Participants are rewarded for engaging in positive behaviors such as completion of homework, obtaining employment, testing negative, or achieving other program milestones. Skill train with directed practice: Many of the groups within this program require role-playing or other directed practice as they are cognitive behaviorally based. Natural community: In addition to the various groups this program offers the case managers also utilizes Carey Guides. Several of these guides focus on developing or improving pro -social ties with family and community members. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the case management process. Program key performance measure(s): All data Is tracked through our C*Star database. COMPAS data is merged with C*Star data in order to determine the following key performance measures. The TCU criminal thinking scale will be used within COMPAS, to determine if there has been a reduction in the criminogenic needs. The OMNI data will be used to determine if there has been a reduction in PVs. of participants placed in an Intervention addressing an assessed criminogenic need % of participants with reduced criminogenic needs Reduction in violators • # of technical • # of new sentence Page 4 of 4 Logic Model Program Name: Case Management —Step Forward Goal: To address an offender's assessed criminogenic needs. Research indicates that addressing criminogenic needs will reduce factors associated with criminal involvement which in turn reduces the likelihood of violations and ]or recidivism. Inputs Staff Development of supervision plans # of progress reports MDOC funding Group facilitation # of groups conducted County GP/GF funding One-on-one meetings # of one-on-one meetings COMPAS assessment Monitoring compliance with # of terminations supervision plan Referrals from court and probation Utilization of Carey Guides • Assignment of homework • Review of homework Writing progress / participation reports % of participants placed in an intervention addressing an assessed criminogenic need % of participants with reduced criminogenic needs Reduction in violators • #of technical • # of new sentence How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. • Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. • Target Interventions: Supervision plans are individualized to each participant. Groups and Carey Guides are assigned based on assessed criminogenic needs. o Risk principle: This program is target at moderate and high risk / high need offenders. • Enhance Intrinsic motivation: All staff assigned to this program have been trained in motivation interviewing techniques. Participants are engaged during their first on -on -one session to pick the needs on which they would like to work to enhance motivation. • Increase positive reinforcement: Participants are rewarded for engaging in positive behaviors such as completion of homework, obtaining employment, testing negative, or achieving other program milestones. • Skill train with directed practice: Many of the groups within this program require role-playing or other directed practice as they are cognitive behaviorally based. Natural community: In addition to the various groups this program offers the case managers also utilizes Carey Guides. Several of these guides focus on developing or improving pro -social ties with family and community members. t: ,r Plr agr am Descril piti coin Group Progl��J��l��ing CCAB: Oakland County FY: 22 Local Program Name: Thinking Matters -Community Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: C01- Cognitive Total projected number of new enrollments: 400 For Regional CCABs, projected number of new enrollments per member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: ❑ Residential: ❑ Community: Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING — • This form is for program activities delivered through a group or class -type structure. • Groups that are cognitive in nature must be separate for both male and female populations. • When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristics in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. • Cognitive, Employability Skills, Education and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. • If this form is utilized for an Employability Skills group, the County must clearly identify how it is not a duplication of services provided through the Michigan Works Agency or other local workforce development agencies in (3.h.). • G00 is an option for "other" group -type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). WEIR ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRA 1. What is your target population? ®Sentenced Felons ❑Pretrial ®Other: Our target population also includes probation violators both new sentence and technical 2. Describe the program: a. What is your referral process to this program? Referrals can come from a variety of sources but generally come from the supervising probation agent. The Step Forward program may be the program choosen by the agent or it may be specifically listed in the sentencing order. The agent sends the referral form to the Step Forward location of the offender's choice (Troy or Pontiac). All referrals are sent to the intake unit for screening an eligibility for the Step Forward program. Entry into the Thinking Matters group is determined by the identified criminogenic needs. b. What assessment is used, identify the tool: COMPAS c. Who completes the assessment? The Step Forward Intake staff complete the COMPAS in order to develop a supervison plan. However the COMPAS bar charts are also received from probation to determine eligibility. Page 1 of 4 i, p'rugra m 'bes}cr ip- t, o,n Group Ploglmttming d. P.A. 511 states eligibility for programming must include moderate to high risk. Please select which needs the program will impact (probable to highly probable). Then, identify the number of scales required for eligibility: 1 ®Criminal Involvement ❑X History of Non -Compliance ❑X Criminal Opportunity ®Criminal Personality ❑x Cognitive Behavior ❑Leisure and Recreation ❑Social Isolation Gender Responsive Scales: ❑Experiences of Abuse as an Adult ❑Experiences of Abuse as a Child ❑Relationship Dysfunction ❑Parental Stress ®History of Violence ❑Vocational/Ed []Family Criminality ❑Current Violence ❑Residential Stability ❑Substance Abuse ®Criminal Associates/Peers ©Social Environment ® Felony Probation Violator, regardless of COMPAS Assessment Score e. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum: Thinking Matters ii. Identify what skills are taught in this program: Participants are taught to identify anti -social thinking patterns that lead to repeated, illegal, negative, or destructive behaviors and to develop new thinking patterns that establish new core attitudes and beliefs through thinking reports and role rehearsals. iii. Is the group open or closed? Open 'I iv. What is the minimum/maximum number of participants per group, as identified in the curriculum? There will be a maximum of 1S per group and a minimum of 3 v. Minimum number of group sessions attended for successful completion: The minimum number of sessions for an offender to successfully complete is 15. All of our groups are progess based, therefore some offenders will be in the program longer than others. There is no defined number of sessions. vi. If the group occurs in various locations, (jail/residential/community) identify how participants transition between them: Offenders will be able to transition form the jail Thinking Matters program into the!_ Forward Thinking Matters program. Offenders will be able to continue with their ,situations' as both programs use the same database for tracking purposes. f. Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: Instructors are case managers within the Step Forward Page 2 of 4 (Z) P r�o�g�ra i Dle�s�cru,p t va Group progral11mnrg program. They have attended the facilitator training for Thinking Matters and / or the advanced Thinking Matters training. g. How are delivered services and individual progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes, case notes and/or group notes) All offenders participating in the program are entered into C*star where their enrollment and completion information is stored. The staff also maintain an individual client folder containing class and progress notes. There are no billing issues as Step Forward staff deliver this program. Referring agents receive monthly progress reports on the status of each of their offenders. In addition, agents may access the C*Star database at anytime to see how clients are doing. Case managers and agents work closely together especilly in circumstances involving sanctions, responses to positive drug tests, and non-compliance. h. Provide any other pertinent information you feel is necessary: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the Step Forward staff are all teleworking. The Thinking Matters groups (actulfy all Step Forward groups) are now being conducted via the County's Skype meeting platform. Through this application the group facilitator can see who has called in and from which number and is also able to share screen content with the participants. The beginning and the end of the meetings are recorded for attendance purposes. The entire meeting is not recorded due to confidentiality concerns. The groups while functional are not ideal and will be returning to an in person as soon as we are safely able to do so. 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure forthis program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles:: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. b. Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. c. Target Interventions: Participants are placed in the group based on the assessed criminogenic needs. d. oRisk principle: This program is target at moderate to high risk / high need offenders. e. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: All staff assigned to this program have been trained in motivation interviewing techniques, as well as in the Thinking Matter curriculum. f. Increase positive reinforcement: Incentives (verbal praise, etc.) given for completion of homework, going to next phase. g. Skill train with directed practice: This program is cognitive behavioral based and requires participants to create thinking error reports, talk through situations and practice new ways of thinking and handling issues h. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. i. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. Page 3 of 4 (9) rro�g mi o i �� 1e�sicirii��p�ti o�n. Group Progl,1111ming Program key performance measure(s): All information is tracked though our C*Star database. We will use the offender's supervison plan which tracks criminogenic needs and the groups (tasks) into which the offender has been placed. We will use the TCU Criminal Thinking Scale as a measure of reduced criminogenic need. of participants placed in group with an assessed criminogenic need of criminal involvement, criminal personality, history of non-compliance, history of violence, criminal opportunity, criminal associates / peers, social environment, or cognitive behavior. I. % of participants with reduced criminogenic need. Page 4 of 4 Logic Model Program Name: Group —Thinking Matters -Community GoaL To address the specific criminogenic need of criminal thinking. Research indicates that addressing criminogenic needs will reduce factors associated with criminal involvement which in turn reduces the likelihood of violations and )or recidivism. Inputs � d o rt' ' ants laced in Staff MDOC funding County GP/GF funding Participants Curriculum Training Group facilitation Group check -in Assignment of Homework Review of homework Reporting group attendance # of groups conducted # of progress reports # of terminations • Successful • Unsuccessful # of groups attended per participant ALOS to complete !n of pa rcrpp group with an assessed criminogenic need of criminal involvement, criminal personality, history of non- compliance, history of violence, criminal opportunity, criminal associates / peers, social environment, or cognitive behavior. % of participants with reduced criminogenic need (# or % of participants with a lower supervision review) How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. Target Interventions: Participants are placed in the group based on the assessed criminogenic needs. o Risk principle: This program is target at moderate to high risk / high need offenders. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: All staff assigned to this program have been trained in motivation interviewing techniques, as well as in the Thinking Matter curriculum. oin to next hose. Increase positive reinforcement: Incentives (verbal praise, etc.) given for completion of homework, g g P Skill train with directed practice: This program is cognitive behavioral based and requires participants to create thinking error reports, talk through situations and practice new ways of thinking and handling issues Meaure proces& This program captures • P ovistatistical regarding de Feedback. TThisprogram shares d tawith s akeholdersgard ng the assessment process. (z) Program Description Case Management CCAB: Oakland County a FY: 22 Local Program Name: Jail Reentry Service Provider: Oakland County Sheriff's Office CCIS Service Type: 124 — Community Based Case Management Total Projected New Enrollment: 285 Projected Length of Stay in Days: 42 For Regional CCABs, projected enrollment by member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: © Community: ❑ Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: CASE MANAGEMENT — • P.A. 511 states eligibility for programming must include moderate to high risk in a State approved assessment. For the purposes of case management, a minimum of 3 needs, scoring probable to highly probable, must be identified in the participant file documentation. • Must include the development of a case plan based on the identified needs, linking to services and resources, and possible advocacy. • Clearly explain why additional case management beyond what is provided by probation supervision is necessary to help achieve your objectives. • Case Management is not used to simply do data entry for offender enrollment and termination. • If you have questions about what form to use or if your program really is "case management" please contact your Community Corrections Specialist. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.11 1. Based on your objective_ (s), what is your target population? ®Sentenced Felons MOther: Misdemeanors that have 3 or more prior misdemeanor convictions or 1 or more priorfelony conviction which deems them "high" risk and eligible for services / funding. 2, tlescidbe,the program: a. What is your referral process to this program? Offenders are referred to the program generally through a court order as part of sentencing. Jail staff also review the jail population for eligible candidates. Potential candidates are forwarded to the court for consideration of an amended sentence for participation. Offenders can also make requests to participate in the program through their inmate caseworker at the jail. Offenders must be enrolled in the jail Thinking Matters program to be eligible for this program, therefore referrals are automatically generated to this program. b. Identify the name of the assessment used to determine eligibility: The COMPAS and the Intake Assessment are completed to confirm eligibility. Page 1 of 4 Program Description Case Management c. Explain how case management addresses the identified needs scales and establishes goals and objectives: Having offenders participate in the Jail Reentry program reduces an offender's criminal activity by targeting criminogenic needs. One on one sessions address social, family, employment, educational, medical, substance abuse, and mental health history. Program topics include Community Resources, Support Systems, and Motivational Interviewing. A case plan, goals, and tasks are determined based on need with each offender. This significantly reduces the chance of additional violations or new criminal behavior that could result in a prison sentence. During FY20 the number of new sentence PVs resulting in prison sentences was reduced from 10g (FY19) to 78. d. What is the frequency of contact with the individual? Each offender is required to attend 6 group sessions per week and a minimum of 2 individual sessions during the 6 week program. The offender attends 3 classes per week of the Thinking Matters and 3 sessions on reentry related topics. The topics covered are; Addiction, criminal behavior, employment, stages of change (subsance abuse), social skills, communication, and support systems. Some topics cover more than one session. The 2 individuals sessions take place at the beginning of the program, to discuss goals, and at the end of the program to develop a discharge plan. e. What happens during a typical session with an individual and how long is it estimated to take? One on one sessions will include, social, family, employment, educational, medical, substance abuse and mental health history. Additionally participants are required to attend three session lectures per week. The topics are fixed topics that cover the following: Substance Abuse, Mental Health, Community Resources, Employment, Support Systems, and Motivational Interviewing. A plan is discussed with the participant based on needs and requirements that will be needed upon release. A follow up contact will be conducted to give referrals and specific information based on needs. Re-evaluation of goals and tasks to be accomplished upon their re-entry into the community. Intervention opportunities are available to participants post lecture if necessary. Total time meeting with individuals on one on one basis during their time in the program is 60 - 75 minutes, in some cases longer depending on need. Examples of case mangement may include issues such as psychiatric medication, death of a family members, suicidal thoughts and or other related crisis or non -crisis interventions. f. Does the program design include contacts with social supports such as: family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? Explain: Yes. Based on goals, tasks and needs, additional contacts for information may be completed by the caseworker. Gathered information would be given to the participant in 2nd follow up contact session. g. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services such as health care or clothing assistance? Explain: YES. Limited ID verification can be provided upon request if needed. Health and Mental Health service referrals are given if needed. if the participant is open with the Mental Health Provider for the county, an appointment is coordinated thourgh the OCSO liaison. Healthy Michigan information is given to the participants Page 2 of 4 Ono rogram Description Case Managem -,I so they may enroll upon release. Educational information is also given if needed for GED classes. Employment resources may also be given at this time. h. Case plans are required for all enrolled participants. How are delivered services and progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes or case notes)? Documentation is detailed in IMACS Program Services Database (Sheriff's Office information system), and a hard copyfile is also kept. Offender enrollment, termination dates, and program codes are tracked in the C*Star Database. Additional related information in the file includes: Intake/Goal Assessment, TCU Drug Screen II, Signed Program Rules, Completion Certificate, Referal Source Court Order. Probation is notified of participant completion of the program so that outdates may be adjusted. Agents are also sent a copy of the offenders discharge plan for follow up. I. How does this program differ from the services provided by the probation department? Probation does not begin until the offender is released from jail. This is a jail based program and as such, the offenders are a "captive" audience and therefore are able to participate in groups 1 to 2 times per day. Program Services staff has a close working relationship with OCSO personnel which is required for participant placement, transport and release into the community. J. Why can probation agents NOT provide this level of service? Time does not allow probation to work with offenders this intensely. k. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic movement within the jail is extremely limited. Groups have not been allowed to operate In an in -person setting. However, jail staff are preparing and distributing lecture materials to inmates. The material often requires journaling or other homework assignments which are collected, reviewed and commented on by the staff. This provides the inmates with activites since most other interaction has been eliminated. In addition, jail staff is meeting with inmates via the video visitation system by IC Solutions In order to meet with those inmates who are nearing release. Through this process inmates are still provided with referrals, resources (such as bus passes) as needed to ensure success upon their release. 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. Target Interventions: —Risk principle: This program is target at moderate to high risk / high need offenders. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: All staff assigned to this program have been trained in motivation interviewing techniques, as well as in the Thinking Matter curriculum. Increase positive reinforcement: Incentives (verbal praise, etc.) given for completion of homework, going to next phase. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. Program key performance measure(s): The county's data warehouse has a report that flags individuals who have completed a program but subsequently return to jail which Is how we will track Page 3 of 4 Program Description Cash Management if an offender returns to the jail. The TCU criminal thinking scale will be used within COMPAS to determine if there has been a reduction in the criminogenic needs, • of participants who do not return to the jail on a PVNS or PVT within 12 months. • of participants with reduced criminogenic needs according to the criminal thinking scales test Page 4 of 4 m `Og. tAodel gvni\reduce factorsassOGrated m\nogenrG need c� dTesslng t , chit Reentry t�Narch \narcasenda°aaeG aNrsm a icrPa^tsy P5 Gage manaen is —needs. hod of p°iahon �!o of P o �e jar\ oo ths. Oame' s cr n ino9en the \iKe\iM essrons iP"A w o 12 m th program ae the often hen turn reduces s & \ndrvrduai s �/o °f Part OPant ed a°°O s Goa\'.7°r�o\vemePt tic # pf 9rOued °hmino9 mina thmKm9 Sc cr\nfina\ \n comp ohs to fife `n atis \e of # of progress rep is Iron trrP take GomP e atron ds s \ address indlv\dua\ized ne of yer BQc� s u\ ottender Uns unfit ce Staff tion \s to comet �OGtunding t,rouPiacipta # of refers mental health, suhst a e and posttests &housing pr ces, ent, participants Adm\neerm9 °fi dance I Progress Teeb�se, etop 1 ended Por Padrer�nt Curr\cu\umis) FteP°rung atte of dlscnarge plan # of 9rO A�OS to comp\e1e 0009NS 0814e\oPrr,meetngs"qthe th fining a\ \ndivrdua TPfe & po gca eT eS�Gr\min o�enda\Ilea\ttr open user (limking Oootdmatkon agents ram DOG ry to this Pro9 Nof� , t.Ions to Ni weU as in the s aPP evidenced base pOO�tiP PS techniques as e 5asedprinoip\es �eedsla ei a sensed usin9igh need °ff^ motivationndefs- interviewinto next Phase mees EvOnce. p nts crjminogeniG t moderate to W9 have been yrarnad hon °{ homeWop� ces - Now thePssesgrr eNentions a . Program agggned to this PrOe etc) jrveaspe °iofOo pthe assessor • Barg°t\ e\ \np�sCT cm�c auirri Pit \nGenCNe sta vba Oatare9ardmg �h\nkngMosihvere'ntorpl seamoaPt°res \noes prorss TY is P Measu Group Prori imnting CCAB: Oakland County fl FY: 22 Local Program Name: Thinking Matters -Jail Service Provider: Oakland County Sheriff's Office CCIS Service Type: C01 - Cognitive Total projected number of new enrollments: 285 For Regional CCABs, projected number of new enrollments per member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: ® Residential: ❑ Community: ❑ Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING — • This form is for program activities delivered through a group or class -type structure. • Groups that are cognitive in nature must be separate for both male and female populations. • When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristics in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. • Cognitive, Employability Skills, Education and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. • If this form is utilized for an Employability Skills group, the County must clearly identify how it is not a duplication of services provided through the Michigan Works Agency or other local workforce development agencies in (3.h.). • G00 is an option for "other" group -type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGR, 1. What is your target population? ©Sentenced Felons ©Pretrial ©Other: Male and female inmates in the jail who receive a sentence to jail (including probation violators), are convicted of a felony offense, and have are moderate to high risk for reoffending according to the COMPAS scores. If there is room in the program misdemeanors (male or female) that are sentenced to more than 50 days in jail and have been sentenced into the program by the judge so that a time cut can be awarded. Misdemeanors would need to have 3 or more prior misdemeanors or 1 or more prior felony convictions in order to be considered "high" risk and eligible for services. 2. Describe the program: a. What is your referral process to this program? are usually ordered into the program as part of a jail sentence. Any offender sentenced into the Thinking Matters program as part of their jail sentence is flagged in the jail database. A report is generated on these indiviudals weekly. This report lists the offender's scheduled out date, so jail staff can determine the best time to have offenders start the program. The jail inmates can also refer themselves to the program and the jail staff regualry look at the jail population to find offenders who may be eligible for the program, but were not ordered into it as part of their sentence. In these cases, Page 1 of 4 (E) Fr7grailm Description, Group Prog11lmming the jail staff will seek an amended order to include the program as part of their sentence. b. What assessment is used, identify the tool: COMPAS and the Praxis for pretrial c. Who completes the assessment? The COMPAS is completed by MDOC agents form whom a copy of the COMPAS BAR chart is obtained and used. The Praxis is scored by pretrial staff and accessed through C*Star. d. P.A. 511 states eligibility for programming must include moderate to high risk. Please select which needs the program will impact (probable to highly probable). Then, identify the number of scales required for eligibility: 1 ❑x Criminal Involvement ZHistory of Non -Compliance ®Criminal Opportunity ®Criminal Personality ®Cognitive Behavior ®Leisure and Recreation ❑x Social Isolation Gender Responsive Scales: ❑Experiences of Abuse as an Adult ❑Experiences of Abuse as a Child ❑Relationship Dysfunction []Parental Stress ®History of Violence EVocational/Ed ❑x Family Criminality ®Current Violence ©Residential Stability ®Substance Abuse ®Criminal Associates/Peers ©Social Environment ®Felony Probation Violator, regardless of COMPAS Assessment Score e. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum: Thinking Matters ii. Identify what skills are taught in this program: The Thinking Matters curriculm teaches information on being able to identify anti -social thinking patterns that lead to repeated, illegal, negative, or destructive behaviors and to develop new thinking patterns that establish new core attitudes and beliefs through thinking reports and role rehearsals. iii. Is the group open or closed? Open iv. What is the minimum/maximum number of participants per group, as identified in the curriculum? There is a minimum of 3 and maximum of 15 v. Minimum number of group sessions attended for successful completion: 36 vi. If the group occurs in various locations, (jail/residential/community) identify how participants transition between them: Modules are self contained within one week series. Offenders may enter the program at the start of a new week and complete the modules in any order. All offenders enrolled in the Thinking Matters program are also required to enroll in the Jail Reentry Page 2 of 4 Gloup Pl0glol11ming program. The reentry part of the program develops a discharge/ aftercare plan (see program description for Jail Reentry). f. Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: Caseworkers have received training in the Thinking Matters programming. Additionally they have received training in Motivational Interviewing. One of the three staff also has valid Professional Counselor LTD license. g. Now are delivered services and individual progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes, case notes and/or group notes) All inmates participating in the program are entered into C*star where their enrollment and completion information is stored. The staff also maintain an individual client folder containing class and progress notes. There are no billing issues as Sheriff's Department staff positions are paid by the grant to deliver this program. The MDOC agent will be notified by program staff when an offender completes the progam as it often affects the offender's out date. h. Provide any other pertinent information you feel is necessary: A prerequisite for participation in the Thinking Matters Program is approval from the sentencing judge. With this approval and upon completion, the offender receives a 25% reduction off their jail sentence. The actual number of jail days saved is entered into C*Star and can be queried at any time. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic movement within the jail is extremely limited. Groups have not been allowed to operate in an in -person setting. However, jail staff are preparing and distributing Thinking Matters materials to inmates. The material are collected, reviewed and commented on by the staff. This provides the inmates with activites since most other interaction has been eliminated. In addition, jail staff are meeting with inmates via the video visitation system by IC Solutions who require more individualized instruction or who are struggling with understanding or completing homework. Documentation of all homework / interaction is being kept. 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: The Thinking Matters Jail program meets evidence -based principles by applying the following: b. Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. C. Targeted Interventions: Participants are placed in the group based on the assessed criminogenic needs. d. Risk principle: This program is targeted at moderate to high risk / high need offenders. e. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: All staff assigned to this program have been trained in motivation interviewing techniques, as well as in the Thinking Matters curriculum. f. Increase positive reinforcement: Incentives (verbal praise, etc.) given for completion of homework, going to next phase. Page 3 of 4 PIt 7gir�al �� �� � i le�s�csif p�tt,01(E) Group Progl,imming g. Skill train with directed practice: This program is cognitive behavioral based and requires participants to create thinking error reports, talk through situations and practice new ways of thinking and handling issues h. Program key performance measure(s): Information will be tracked by the Sheriff's Office staff delivering the program. They will use the COMPAS bar chart as well as program enrollments in C*Star. Reductions in criminogenic needs will be determined thrugh the TCU Criminal Thinking Scale. 1. % of participants placed in group with an assessed criminogenic need of criminal involvement, criminal personality, history of non-compliance, history of violence, criminal opportunity, criminal associates / peers, social environment, or cognitive behavior. j. % of participants with reduced criminogenic need according to the Criminal Thinking Scales pre and post test scores. Page 4 of 4 ors associated `Kith j,og1c Model s1n9 crimMogen tc needs wU reduce fact � fhat addles yail arch c dwsm. ed in thtnktng Moors, ermine tt lnktr o9- a for re of P wdh annasse 0eminat Group need of d of viola group o enic need na\ Name' WIC cn,nogenrc n e vyelihoo d crimtn emend, cn °n, ofi non program ddress the so h n tum reduces th pctivlties roues Gov, my°Sonancvlw • nhlstorY °t ° fiu idy, # of g orts scamp I cf inai oPp eers, Goa' j&ie"lle p tee en°e, fates I �minal rn n of Qto9tesS I mina\ n�tronment. or inputs smer&comP\etto ermlra eqs so�ntVe ,eha�Or. d Psses # o{ t Successful cog is wan r 9 Eton slut a ircrpan Jacthta OnsUcces oJs of p d aGGo u I Gtou4 d Per PatCta`Pant on0`%"Ogenl f aj 1hin� n test Staff erg In to the Cnm and post to ends GtouP oh # o{ gro ��oS to complete SCO\es pre poC funding a°ores M nnrent of Homewor analysis par{tctpants Cumculum pssi9 of bome,Notk \>te & Pnsttest Matters Neview oop attendance fhinldng egoTwg 9r fe slBme cut &ScoPppNts pre and P°st tit -tratning nfive Patlrctpantinoe COM&PosttestlCnninai thtnKtng y to this Program. Sca\es) s'a' th base pcinc` P AS needs as welt as to e ed e) pd o enrc , evldeno t;Jngh rn g 1n9 techniques crP\es -Vhe { s11ate e as sess o the ass ne d 0Re Qtvadon intervie N eXt Phase Trot teP°Ats' 1k ed prin Ic need based k I high ed \n n' ig to n K�n9 e ram rr yet a ,il Par« p an 5 -ate t P a yes at mo hes P gram have been t lot omPletton of hs panic ants to create ttun No :th PSgeSs tlsti Nenhons: P h Stpro9ra a asst9ned to e etc 19ive 1 based and teauite -. etln cl 1e_ " pol \ rats vlote Zat9 FirsicPrin mefvaton_ Stvetba P itNebeWa. rs5Ues- i o is ttve n d\rng i e lnttins rticu\urn- nt_ lncen ram \s cog and Wan jjn Ktng �nbanc otsrtive eln{ar ractroe: �eWw mays of thinKm9 Increase W ditecte d pta&ce n SkdA tt h s,kkotons an throug (;«l)`. Program Description Assessment Services CCAB: Oakland County 11 FY: 22 Local Program Name: MAT Assessment Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: 122- Actuarial Assessment Total projected number of assessments (new enrollment): 300 For Regional CCABs, projected number of assessments per member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: ® Residential: ❑ Community: ry Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: ASSESSMENT SERVICES — • All substance use disorder assessments must result in a recommended level of care per ASAM criteria • Assessments provided by different service providers will require separate program description forms • Funding under assessment may include the development of treatment plans and/or service recommendations • Assessment funding is not intended to provide for client assessment for populations already assessed by MDOC probation staff • Documentation of assessment services (with appropriate release of information) must be available during annual file reviews �INSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING " NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM u 1. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? ❑Sentenced Felons ❑Pretrial ©Other: adjudicated felons pending sentencing 2. Describe the program: a. Provide the screening criteria for an assessment: The offender must be convicted of a felony drunk or impaired driving offense. This assessment is a requirement under PA 657. b. What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? MCL 257.625 requires that an assessment be conducted for all Individuals for an offense involving felony drunk driving. PA 657 requires a MA eligibility assessment for offenders convicted of felony drunk or impaired drivingT . The results of the assessment will be utilized to complete the PSI in order to ensure that appropriate recommendations regarding treatment and level of care are made. c. What assessment instrument is proposed? The NEEDS by AIDE will be used. This assessment produces a DSM V diagnosis as well as a level of care (LOC) according to the American Society of Addiciton Medicine (ASAM) criteria. d. Is the assessment completed prior to sentencing? Yes e. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them — include dates of training/certification and who conducted the training: Assessments will be Page 1 of 2 Program Description Assessment Services completed by a certified professional counselor license #6401005849, expiration 5/31/2022. f. What is the cost of the instrument itself, per use? $6.00 for the NEEDS assessment g. How much time is anticipated to complete one assessment and the subsequent recommendations? The face-to-face interview and/or phone interview with the offender is 1.5-2 hours on average (depending on the method of communication, for example video visitation may take longer due to reliance on Sheriff Office staff). it takes an additional hour to score the assessment, develop a recommendation, write the report, and submit it to probation for use in the PSI. Total time is 2.5 -3 hours per assessment and recommendation. h. Is subsequent verification of information required prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? No i. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic all assessments are being conducted via the phone. A link to the NEEDS assessment is sent to the individual to complete prior to the phone Interview. The rest of the appointment is conducted as though the interview were in person. In jail interviews are being conducted via the jail's video visitation system by IC Solutions. While this is a workable solution it is not ideal. We will return to in person assessments when it is safe to do so. Although we may continue to use the virtual NEEDS assessment link, or conduct phone assessments if transportation or distance is a concern for an offender. Due to courts not docketing and sentencing as many offenders during FY21 the projected utliation was not met. However, we did not change the utilization numbers as we expect the courts to resume full dockets later in FY21. 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. b. Assess risk / needs: Individuals are assed using the NEEDS substance use tool. c. Target Interventions: Recommended interventions are based on the individual's ASAM diagnosis and level of care (LOC) d. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. e. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. f. Program key performance measure: All data is tracked through our C*Star database. Individuals who are referred to OCHN will be captured in that system. OCHN will povide us with an aggreate number of individuals who receive MAT services through them. g. % of eligible individuals referred to OCHN for service h. % of defendants who receive MAT services Page 2 of 2 Logic Model Program Name: Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) Assessment Goat: To ensure that individuals convicted of felony impaired (alcohol or drugs) driving are assessed to determine their eligibility for MAT in accordance with MCL. Matching individuals with the appropriate level of care reduces the likelihood of future criminal involvement, and relapse that can lead to violations. Inputs � Activities Staff MDOC funding Referrals (felony impaired drivers) Required certification Interview • In the community • In the jail Conducting / scoring the assessment tool Scheduling / appointment Performing a Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS) check Criminal History record check Compiling MAT eligible report Referrals to Oakland Community Health Network (OCHN) # of MAT assessment completed % of eligible individuals referred to OCHN for (completed report) service # eligible and ineligible for MAT % of defendants who receive MAT services How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. • Assess risk / needs: Individuals are assed using the NEEDS substance use tool. • Target Interventions: Recommended interventions are based on the individual's ASAM diagnosis and level of care (LOC) • Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. • Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. (E) Program Description Assessment Services CB: Oakland County FY: 22 CA Local Program Name: Step Forward Service Provider: Oakland County Community Health Network CCIS Service Type: 122- Actuarial Assessment Total projected number of assessments (new enrollment): 130 For Regional CCABs, projected number of assessments per member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: M Residential: ❑ Community: q Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: ASSESSMENT SERVICES — • All substance use disorder assessments must result in a recommended level of care per ASAM criteria • Assessments provided by different service providers will require separate program description forms • Funding under assessment may include the development of treatment plans and/or service recommendations • Assessment funding is not intended to provide for client assessment for populations already assessed by MDOC probation staff • Documentation of assessment services (with appropriate release of information) must be available during annual file reviews 1ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM 1. Based on your ob what is your target population? MSentenced Felons ❑Pretrial DOther: Probation violators Describe the program: a. Provide the screening criteria for an assessment: Participants must be a Step Forward client and therefore are moderate to high risk for substance use as scored by the COMPAS. These offenders are being referred because they are experiencing or displaying signs or symptoms of a mental health or substance use issue. b. What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? Access to services provided by the Oakland County Health Network (PIHP) require this assessment. c. What assessment instrument is proposed? LOCUS- The Level of Care Utilization System for Psychiatric and Addiction Services Adult Version 2010 through the American Association of Community Psychiatrists. This instrument is mandated by the State to be used for clients found eligible to receive Oakland County Health Network services. The Addicition Severity Index (ASI) is used to assess substance use disorders. d. Is the assessment completed prior to sentencing? No e. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them —include dates of Page 1 of 3 Program Description 0 Assessment Services training/certification and who conducted the training: The staff conducting the assessments is a Licensed Professional Counselor with the State of Michigan #6401013485 expiration 5/31/2022. She also has a CAADC accreditation - Certificated Advanced Alcohol and Drug Counselor (C-03930) which expires 2/1/2022. f. What is the cost of the instrument itself, per use? There is no cost. g. How much time is anticipated to complete one assessment and the subsequent recommendations? Appointments are scheduled for 1 hour to complete the assessment and 45-60 minutes to develop the subsequent recommendation and plan. When a client is found eligible for OCHN services, documentation and criteria has to be established to justify the referral to the core providers to begin care. There is a large amount of computer entry and paperwork that must be completed due to working in a dual system. h. Is subsequent verification of information required prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? Yes i. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic all assessments are being conducted via the phone. This has not been problematic as the screening unit for OCHN mainly operates via the phone already. There has been a slight issue with gaining Releases of Information but that has largely been resolved as we have begun to use Adobe Sign. This staff person has a cell phone number that can be given to clients to call and schedule an appointment or handle a crisis. This staff person is also conducting jail assessments through the video visitation system through IC Solutions. 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: The fallowing evidenced base principles apply to this program. b. Assess risk / needs: Individuals are assessed for eligibility and level of care using LOCUS- The Level of Care Utilization System for Psychiatric and Addiction Services Adult Version 2010. c. Target Interventions: Individuals are matched with the level of care at which they are assessed. d. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: Contractor has been trained in motivational interviewing techniques. e. Natural community: Individuals are placed with treatment provider of their choice (when applicable) and within their community. f. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. g. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. h. Program key performance measure: All information is tracked in C*Star to determine outcomes. OCHN provides us with the necessary information through the ROI. Page 2 of 3 Program Description p ; Assessment Services i. % of eligible individuals who engaged in services j. % of individuals placed at the assessed level of care Page 3 of 3 Logic Model Program Name: Assessment —Substance Use and Mental Health Assessment Goal: To ensure that individuals are assessed and receive the proper level of care for underlying substance use or mental health disorders. Matching individuals to the appropriate level of care reduces the likelihood of relapse which could lead to new criminal behavior or violations Inputs / Activities 4 Outrput: Contractor / vendor MDOC funding Assessment tool Certification Interviewing Determination of eligibility Determination of LOC Referrals to other agencies Setting and coordinating appointments Conducting individual situation specific counseling # of referrals # of assessments completed # eligible for OCHN funding # of individuals funded through OCHN (placed in services) # of individuals at each level of care % of eligible individuals who engaged in services % of individuals placed at the assessed level of care How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. • Assess risk / needs: Individuals are assessed for eligibility and level of care using LOCUS- The Level of Care Utilization System for Psychiatric and Addiction Services Adult Version 2010. • Target Interventions: Individuals are matched with the level of care at which they are assessed. • Enhance Intrinsic motivation: Contractor has been trained in motivational Interviewing techniques. • Natural community: Individuals are placed with treatment provider of their choice (when applicable) and within their community. • Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. • Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. Plrl,,rgara rn IDIe}scrtipbfoo Group Pro);11_J11tn1in9 CCAB: Oakland County __1_FY: 22 Local Program Name: Young Males Group Service Provider: Education Training and Research Services (ETRS) CCIS Service Type: G00 - Other Group Services Total projected number of new enrollments: 65 For Regional CCABs, projected number of new enrollments per member county: Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: ❑ Residential: ❑ Community: Program status: Continuation If modification, describe here: GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING — • This form is for program activities delivered through a group or class -type structure. • Groups that are cognitive in nature must be separate for both male and female populations. • When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristics in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. • Cognitive, Employability Skills, Education and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. • If this form is utilized for an Employability Skills group, the County must clearly identify how it is not a duplication of services provided through the Michigan Works Agency or other local workforce development agencies in (3.h.). • G00 is an option for "other" group -type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). NSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.) 1. What is your target population? ©Sentenced Felons [-]Pretrial 2. Describe the program: ©Other: Probation violators a. What is your referral process to this program? This is a group offered within the Step forward program. Offenders are referred for placement into the group based on their criminogenic needs by their case manager. b. What assessment is used, identify the tool: COMPAS c. Who completes the assessment? Step Forward Intake staff. The Intake staff complete an assessment in order to develop a supervision plan. However, the COMPAS bar charts from probation can also be used in determining eligibility. d. P.A. 511 states eligibility for programming must include moderate to high risk. Please select which needs the program will impact (probable to highly probable). Then, identify the number of scales required for eligibility: 1 [-]Criminal Involvement El History of Non -Compliance ❑Criminal Opportunity ❑History of Violence ❑Family Criminality ❑Current Violence ❑Vocational/Ed Page 1 of 3 Rro gra m Dlescriptron Group PI0glal1tl11ing ❑Criminal Personality ❑Residential Stability ❑Cognitive Behavior ❑Substance Abuse ❑Leisure and Recreation ®Criminal Associates/Peers ©Social Isolation ZSocial Environment Gender Responsive Scales: ❑Experiences of Abuse as an Adult ❑ Experiences of Abuse as a Child ❑Relationship Dysfunction ❑ Parental Stress ®Felony Probation Violator, regardless of COMPAS Assessment Score e. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum: Strategies for Self -Improvement and Change (SSC) by Wanberg and Milkman ii. Identify what skills are taught in this program: The SSC model focuses on assisting offenders in developing new thinking skills that will help them to reorganize drug related beliefs and automatic thoughts that promote criminal conduct and substance abuse. Other skills involve improving relationships with others, managing emotions, and being more responsible to the community. Throughout the group participants look at how their anti -social peers (gang ties) have influenced these areas and provide skills to change. iii. Is the group open or closed? Open iv. What is the minimum/maximum number of participants per group, as identified in the curriculum? There is a minimum of 3 and maximum of 15 v. Minimum number of group sessions attended for successful completion: The minimum number of sessions a participant must attend for a successful completion is 24. However, because our groups are progress based most participants usually attend longer. vi. If the group occurs in various locations, (jail/residential/community) identify how participants transition between them: N/A f. Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: ETRS is well known troughout the state for the educational programs they provide. They work with a variety of district courts and provide in jail services to Waye County. The current facilitator, Lonie Gray, is a Certified alcohol and drug counselor (CADC 1-03530) through the Michigan Certification Board for Addictions Professionals (MCBAP), expiration date of 5-1-2022. g. How are delivered services and individual progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes, case notes and/or group notes) Progress reports are submitted after every group to the Step Forward case manager on the client's participation. The Step Forward case managers report back to the probation department and/or Page 2 of 3 Proglra ;; bes(ciruphis it as Group PlOglallIming the court monthly on the offender's participation or lack of progress. A telephone or email contact is made if immediate attention is required due to inadequate progress. h. Provide any other pertinent information you feel is necessary: During the COVID-19 crisis this group has been conducted via the phone. Mr. Gray has been contacting each client individually to provide instruction and deliver material. Each week we receive detailed notes regarding client interaction and responses. These responses are being loaded into the C*Star database so they are available to the case managers for review. 3. Evaluation is part of evidence -based principles which you must identify in (a.). You are required to develop at least one key performance measure for this program in (b.). Be sure to include the data source, how its tracked and measured. a. Describe how this program meets evidence -based principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. b. Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. c. Target Interventions: Participants are placed in the group based on assessed criminogenic needs d. oRisk principle: This program is target at high risk / high need offenders. e. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: contractor assigned to this group has been in recovery and has lived uran experiences, therefore he can related to the group. f. Increase positive reinforcement: g. Skill train with directed practice: Participants h. Natural community: i. Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. j. Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. k. Program key performance measure(s): All data is tracked through our C*Star database and the offender's supervison plan. We will be able to determine how many offenders are placed into the program with these needs based on the tasks within the supervison plan. The reduction in need will be determined by the TCU Criminal Thinking Scale which will be administered by the Step Forward case manager as part of their program review. I. % of participants placed in group with an assessed criminogenic need of criminal associates /peers, social isolation, or social environment. m. % of participants with reduced criminogenic need according to the TCU Criminal Thinking Scale Page 3 of 3 Logic Model Program Name: Group —Young Males Goal: To address an offender's assessed criminogenic needs. Research indicates that addressing criminogenic needs will reduce factors associated with criminal involvement which in turn reduces the likelihood of violations and /or recidivism. Inputs Activities III Contractor / vendor MDOC funding Participants Curriculum Training Group facilitation Group check -in Assignment of Homework Review of homework Reporting group attendance # of groups conducted # of progress reports # of terminations • Successful • Unsuccessful # of groups attended per participant ALOS to complete. % of participants placed in group with an assessed criminogenic need of criminal associates /peers, social isolation, or social environment. % of participants with reduced criminogenic need (# or % of participants with a lower supervision level at review) How the program meets Evidenced Based Principles: The following evidenced base principles apply to this program. • Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. • Target Interventions: Participants are placed in the group based on assessed criminogenic needs c Risk principle: This program is target at high risk! high need offenders. • Enhance Intrinsic motivation: contractor assigned to this group has been in recovery (former offender) ? therefore can related to the aroulI�� • increase posit 1�o i iforcernent: • Skill train with directed practice: • Natural community: • Measure process. This program captures statistical data regarding aspects of the assessment process. • Provide Feedback. This program shares data with stakeholders regarding the assessment process. CCAB: Oakland County S FY: 22 Local Program Name: Offender Mentoring (TBD) Service Provider: TBD CCIS Service Type: Z00 - Other Total Projected New Enrollment: 30 For Regional CCABs, total projected new enrollment by member county: NProgram Location (select all that apply): Jail: ❑ Residential: ❑ Community: Program Status: New Initiative If modification, describe here: "Other" oroeramminp/services not alreadv identified by a CCIS Service Tvoe/Code — • Before requesting funding for an "Other" coded program, discuss with your Community Corrections Specialist to ensure the design cannot be funded under an existing code. • Be prepared to thoroughly justify the need for the program/service and how it clearly relates to a stated objective. • If this program description is utilized for a workforce development or a vocational program, clearly describe (if necessary) the use of Job Developers and/or Job Coaches. This should include an estimated number of job placements resulting from the Job Developer as well as a job retention measurement for the Job Coach. [ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.� probation violators both new sentence and technical. a. What is the referral process to this program? Thisprogram will be a service offered through our Step Forward program. Offenders will be referred into the program by their Step Forward case manager. b. Is an assessment required to determine eligibility? Yes c. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable. The target population is felony offenders enrolled in the Step Forward program who are at high risk for reoffending and non- compliance. This includes straddle cell offenders, probation violators, and felony operating while intoxicated offenders. To meet eligiblity for a referral to the mentoring program, offenders must score moderate to high on the COMPAS criminogenic need of history of non-compliance. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? No Page 1 of 3 0 . How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? Offenders may be reffered by other indiviudals including probation agents, but they must be a participant of the Step Forward program. This criteria may change in the future but to keep the numbers managable for the first year, we are limiting the program to Step Forward participants. e. THOROUGHLY describe this program/service: The chosen contractor(s) will provide the mentors for offenders entolled in the program. Mentors will be indiviudals who have successfully completed probation or other judicial sentence more than 5 years prior and will be hired by the contractor. Training of the mentors will be coordinated by the selected contractor, and at a minimum will include a peer support specialist certification, mentorship training and restorative justice training. Other trainings may be required as the program evolves. Community Corrections will use mentors to provide peer to peer mentorship to participants, the mentor's unique experiences will allow them to reach offenders within their communities and enhance an offender's chance at successful completion of Step Forward and all probationary requirements. Mentors will provide resource connection, support, and guidance to program participants during their involvement with Step Forward. The goal of the program is to build a sense of accountability among offenders living In the community, providing a foundation for successful revitalization of our most troubled areas ultimately impacting local PCR and recidivism rates. It is envisioned tht the mentors will meet with their assigned offenders at least weekly on an Individual basis to discuss concerns, barriers, progress etc. The offender will also meet once per week as a group. These groups will provide basic living skills as well as allow the grup to discuss discuss issues an develop as a cohort. f. Mentors will have no more than 10 offenders assigned to them at any given time (once the program is fully operational). The intial time period a Mentor can provide peer to peer mentorship to an indiviudal participant will be 6 months. Upon completion of the 6 months, a review of current compliance, needs, and progress will be completed by the case manager inconjuntion with the mentor. If an extension of peer to peer mentoriship is deemed appropriate, final approval will be given by the Manager of Community Corrections. Reviews for group participation will be completed in the same manner every 6 months. Mentors will be compensated by the contractor according to established reimbursement (tenatively $20/hour/per offender). Mentor contracts will be for a period of 1 year, mentor progress and effectiveness will be evaluated by the contractor and Community Corrections Manger for continuation in that role. g. TRAINING - (A) MENTORS - Peer Support Specialist Certification, Mentorship training, Restorative Justice training. More training requirements may be added as the program evolves. h. Due to Covid-19 services will be delivered via Zoom meetings (or other virtula platform), one-on-one phone contact, and group phone contact. I. Why is this program/service critical to your plan? This program is designed to address PVs. Individuals who are in technical violation of conditions or are boderline non compliant with community supevision can be engaged prior to a sanction that involves incarceration. Page 2 of 3 0 j. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Staff from Community Corrections will enter the referral into C*Star. Once the referral is made to the contractor, staff will enter the enrollment and subsequent termination dates and codes into the C*Star database so that it can be included in the CCIS data. k. How are delivered services and individual progress and participation documented by the service provider and provided to the probation agents and/or referral source? (i.e., progress notes, case notes and/or group notes) The mentoring contractor is responsible for the daily oversight and monitoring of all mentors. The contractor will be required to keep file documention on offender's participation, progress, and completion status. Termination, completion, and violation reports are forwarded by the contractor to the Step Forward case managers who keep documentation of the offender's progress in C*Star. Step Forward case managers complete monthly progress reports to MDOC probation agents and / or the referring judiciary. All reports include an overall compliance narrative, status of program services, and next steps in case planning. b. Assess risk / needs: Participants criminogenic needs are assessed using the COMPAS. c. Target Interventions: Participants are placed in the mentor program based on the assessed criminogenic needs. d. Risk principle: This program is targeted at moderate to high risk / high need offenders. e. Enhance Intrinsic motivation: The mentors will be able to establish and immediate connection and trust with the offender due to their shared experiencec. The mentor will encourage the offender to actively participate in their supervision plan. f. Skill train with directed practice: The mentors will act as role models to the offenders, and expose them to prosocial behaviors and attitudes. g. Measure process. This program will capture statistical data as well as participant surveys regarding aspects of the program. h. Provide Feedback. This program will share data with stakeholders and well as use the data to make necessary adjustments to the program as it develops. i. Program key performance measure(s): Decrease in PV Tech j. Decrease in PVNS k. Decrease in criminogenic need for non-compliance I. The data source for these measures will be the State ONMI data reports. The decrease in crimminogenic needs will be tracked through COMPAS and the supervision review process. Offenders will be completing the TCU Criminal Thinking Scales to determine reduction in criminogenic needs._ — Page 3 of 3 rarrr Name; ac°°ur pro9 GOat.teY\ `Pa°tm9sens uf6mat gu 9d eto "a stall step F S . 0009 a sipartrorp' ode` on of our rt1Osttroub\ed area `ogic M essfu\ rev\ta\rta cArnrnunrtl lRe among offeanae s� d v 9m ra es _.a rate CG - popt\N,aerp9 °Ontraon ctor MentOrscurr\cuWm co erctro Mentor nd data Prov\d'\n9 a fOundatron for succ �n�feasemf Vf }u�sd\obaa and Pe" to th\s Program po\roes a nnd�Pkes aP P\y needs as in the prSte ogram materials°easures ed use P pMP pS d °rimfr °gar rc rques as �e\i to\\o n3 evr s� uang tt on the a ngers. Nfew\n9 {e4nn irernents, findm9 The asses based ed ot{e na\ rote requ ocra\ d pr\nciP\e5G needs are or Program I ,b ne rnotrvatro frog °Ou, race 'PTO Base en en h r\SK \ned \n °on p\e d eMb d 6a \nog the n' to h`g e tra \s, an Ev\dence an °drrr \aced "' oderate am \\ b Iron of 9oa rn to mrm\c the Pro9rarr meets I ne ds' k0osPParti`pPan rarrr \s argeaed o th\s Progr Wen for °omP\e °oura9\n9 e N°�. Nssess agcess- e\nteK PKrr'cp\ otvarUona�\\ staff assres `verbal PrarSe' ete °de\sto the ° endersss sman ce s- R m t \ncentN m e e P Enhance knn - u\um.for°ernen etc rs \\ act as ro\ aspects oetassessment roc ss. o \rtrrns\c • met<eas gP° tt� man d Pra°bGe (he Menlo tatistrca\ a ehogdeas regarding th t, men , ecle • \ Skp\ tra n w nd atl tudes Program cahtares data wdh sta behaviors rotes - Th\s Progra Measure eedba , provide F Resolution #21161 April 292021 Moved by Long seconded by Luebs the resolutions on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted. AYES: Charles, Gershenson, Hoffman, Jackson, Joliat, Kowall, Kuhn, Long, Luebs, Markham, McGillivray, Miller, Moss, Nelson, Powell, Spisz, Weipert, Woodward, Cavell. (19) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted. i HL�'' APPROVE THE FOREGOING RESOIU"' STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on April 29, 2021, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Circuit Court at Pontiac, Michigan this 29m day of April, 2021. Lisa Brown, Oakland County