Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2021.10.13 - 34913frOAKLANDF- COU N T Y M IC H IGAN BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS October 13, 2021 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #21-389 Sponsored By: William Miller Ili IN RE: Oakland County EDA CARES Act Recovery Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Plan Chairperson and Members of the Board: WHEREAS M.R. #20577, on November 19, 2020, approved the preliminary acceptance of award as Economic Development was notified by the U.S. Economic Development Administration (U.S. EDA) that the application was reviewed for merit and selected for consideration; and WHEREAS M.R. #20577, dated November 19, 2020, authorized Oakland County to provide an unencumbered, committed $1,000,000 match from assigned fund balance to awarded RLF capital, in addition to $300,000 for oversight and administrative costs of CEED Lending; and WHEREAS M.R. 421196, dated May 26, 2021, accepted the CARES Act Recovery Assistance Grant from the U.S. EDA in the amount of $3,000,000 for the period of April 12, 2021, through April 12, 2024, and WHEREAS M.R. 421196, dated May 26, 2021, established that the Board Chairperson is authorized to execute the grant agreement and to approve grant changes and extensions which are consistent with the original agreement; and WHEREAS M.R. #21196, dated May 26, 2021, also established that the Board Chairperson is authorized to execute the agreements with the Great Lakes Women's Business Council and its CEED Lending program and to approve grant changes and extensions which are consistent with the original agreement; and WHEREAS M.R. #21196, dated May 26, 2021, affirmed that a budget amendment is not required as M.R. #20577 authorized the one-time funding of $1,300,000 to be appropriated from the General Fund Assigned Fund Balance titled Investing in Oakland County's Economy (GL Account #383457) to Economic Development's Administration Division (#1090101). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves and adopts the Oakland County EDA Cares Act Recovery Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Plan (see attachment A). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no additional budget amendment is required. Chairperson, the following Commissioners are sponsoring the foregoing Resolution: William Miller III. duDate: October 13, 2021 David Woodward, Commissioner Uh Jou l • Date. October 14, 2021 Hilarie Chambers, Deputy County Executive II l PI Date: October 15, 2021 Lisa Brown, County Clerk / Register of Deeds COMMITTEE TRACKING 2021-10-06 Economic Development & Infrastructure - recommend to Board 2021-10-13 Full Board VOTE TRACKING Motioned by Commissioner Gary McGillivray seconded by Commissioner Christine Long to adopt the attached Resolution: Oakland County EDA CARES Act Recovery Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Plan. Yes: David Woodward, Michael Spisz, Karen Joliat, Kristen Nelson, Eileen Kowall, Christine Long, Philip Weipert, Gwen Markham, Angela Powell, Thomas Kuhn, Charles Moss, Marcia Gershenson, Adam L. Kochenderfer, Yolanda Smith Charles, Charles Cavell, Penny Luebs, Janet Jackson, Gary McGillivray, Robert Hoffman (19) No: None (0) Abstain: None (0) Absent: Commissioner Miller III, Commissioner Gingell (2) The Motion Passed. ATTACHMENTS Oakland County EDA CARES Act Recovery Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Plan STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on October 13, 2021, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seat of the Circuit Court at Pontiac, Michigan on Friday, October 13, 2021. I 1/ Lisa Brown, Oakland County Clerk/Register of'Deeds Mjj,F!,9r -94 LEND Ili An Intrnb:e afwPat Lukas 'A%nme,/s Buaness 6uerzcil Oakland County EDA CARES Act Recovery Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Plan Amended: January 4, 2021 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................... PART I. Revolving Loan Fund Strategy............................................................ A. Summary of the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. 1. Economic Adjustment Problem ...................................................... 2. Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy.......... 3. Area Resources............................................................................... 4. Organizational Structure and Program Administration ................. B. Business Development Objectives...................................................... 1. Objectives....................................................................................... 2. Targeted Business Characteristics.................................................. 3. Types of Assistance........................................................................ C. Financial Strategy, Policy and Portfolio Standards ............................ 1. Financing Strategies and Policies ................................................... 2. Portfolio Standards and Targets ..................................................... 3. Loan Selection Criteria................................................................... PART H. REVOLVING LOAN FUND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES ................... A. Organizational Structure.. ............................ ...................................... 1. Administration................................................................................ 2. RLF Loan Advisory Committee....................................................... 3. Standard Loan Application Requirements ..................................... 4. Credit Reports................................................................................ S. Appraisals....................................................................................... 6. Loan Write-ups............................................................................... 7. Procedures for Loan Decisions....................................................... 8. Loan Closing and Disbursement Procedures .................................. 9. Loan Servicing Procedures............................................................. 10. Loan Agreement Provisions........................................................... 11. Administrative Procedures............................................................. B. Environmental Review Process.......................................................... C. Conflict of Interest.............................................................................. i Introduction Oakland County, Michigan and Great Lakes Womens' Business Council dba CEED Lending are applying for a $3.0 million grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce's Economic Development Administration (EDA) to establish a revolving loan program in Oakland County, MI. The RLF will be used to provide gap financing to small businesses that cannot access funding from conventional sources such as banks and credit unions as well as improve quality of life in underserved markets by providing access to capital to minorities, women, and others who are underserved in mainstream financing. The RLF can be used by small businesses as the primary lender for their capital needs as well as for gap financing. The RLF will coordinate with small business lenders who, without RLF funding support, would decline the loan request and establish a reliable referral source for loan applicants. The RLF will issue loans primarily for equipment and real estate purchases between $50,000 and $200,000. This allows the traditional lender to have an improved loan to value and less exposure on a loan that they would historically decline. Incorporated in 1820, Oakland County covers approximately 910 square miles in southeast Michigan. With a population of 1,257,584 (2019 estimate) and the County seat in Pontiac, Oakland County is home to a mix of urban and rural communities, encompassing 62 cities, villages and townships, including thirty-two (32) downtown areas and many scenic natural settings, providing a good quality of life for any lifestyle. Measuring per capita income, the County ranks as the sixth (6th) wealthiest county in the nation among counties with populations between 900,000 and 1,600,000 as cited in an April 2019 report by University of Michigan economists. Oakland County has enjoyed a world -class reputation due to its renowned business environment and its many attributes that contribute to an excellent quality of life. Oakland County is also Michigan's employment hub with nearly 745,000 workers and more than 39,000 businesses. The County is home to more than 1,000 foreign -owned firms from 39 countries with nearly $54 billion in goods exported from the area, ranking the Metro Detroit region 4tt' nationally for total exports. In 2018, Oakland County accounted for 21.4% of the entire state's GDP and has an increasingly diverse economy with the top three employment sectors being Professional and Business Services (26%); Trade, Transportation, and Utilities (18%), and Private Education and Health Services (16%). In 2019, the University of Michigan economists expected Oakland County to see a 1.4 percent increase in job growth in each of the next three years, 2019-2021, resulting in a total increase of 31,600 jobs. The economists also expected the unemployment rate to drop to 2.6 percent by 2021 compared to 3.3 percent in 2018. The emergence COVID-19 and resulting economic injury, however, have significantly altered the economic outlook in this and other surrounding communities. Michigan has been hit hard and consistently ranks among the states with the highest number of unemployed workers. As of April 2020, Oakland County's unemployment rate ballooned to 19.8% with approximately 113,351 Page 2 unemployed according to the Michigan Bureau of Labor Market Information and Strategic Initiatives. This rate is up from a low of 3.4% in 2019. While the County has diversity in its business sectors, 97% of the establishments have 100 employees or less. The small business community is more vulnerable to economic swings than the larger private -sector employers. PART I. Revolving Loan Fund Strategy A. Summary of the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1. Economic Adjustment Problem Oakland County, Michigan has a long tradition of manufacturing, research & development, and engineering -based companies because of the concentrated presence of automotive manufacturers and their suppliers located in Southeast Michigan. Close ties to the automotive industry cause Michigan to be one of the first states to encounter downward economic pressure when the United States enters a recession and one of the last to recover. Metropolitan Detroit's location quotient for Motor Vehicle Manufacturing is 9.56 which represents 29,174 jobs and Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing location quotient is 10.11 which represents 77,957 jobs. Typically strong and prosperous during "normal" economic times, the automotive industry is highly cyclical and downturns can cause wide economic swings in Oakland County and the State of Michigan as a whole, leaving local interconnected economies vulnerable. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic shuttered the automotive industry and its expansive network of suppliers, rippling through the depths of the community. Oakland County alone saw its unemployment rate increase from 3.4% in 2019 to 19.8% in April 2020. The automotive industry's impact on the business community cannot be understated. Southeast Michigan will struggle to regain the strength it had just months before the pandemic. Access to a revolving loan fund will provide vital gap financing to businesses whose access to funding has been compromised by deteriorated financial statements, as many traditional lenders have tightened their lending requirements. The Oakland County RLF will help the manufacturing, retail, and service companies survive the financial crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 2. Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Oakland County's RFL plan will align with the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for Southeast Michigan titled Partnering for Prosperity Economic Development Strategy for Southeast Michigan. Created in 2016 by SEMCOG, the Page 3 Southeast Michigan Council of Governments and Metropolitan Affairs Coalition (MAC), Partnering for Prosperity encompasses the seven -county Southeast Michigan region, which includes Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties and includes 48% of the State's population. The economic development strategy spans the region's community assets, business climate, and talent, and innovation. It reflects Southeast Michigan's current and future needs and identifies opportunities for building on its strengths and assets and addressing its challenges, to grow investment, businesses, jobs, and create economic opportunity for residents. The strategic plan outlines four business climate strategies related to creating an environment that is conducive to business growth and job creation. Partnering for Prosperity specifically concentrates on expanding trade and investment; supporting business growth; increasing capital funding; and growing entrepreneurship. Capital investment action steps include: • Advancing initiatives that attract consistent funding sources and increase access to capital across the continuum of business finance sources, including venture, angel, and other investment capital to help start-up and growing businesses. o Create funding collaboratives between business, government, foundations, and others to creatively fund projects. o Encourage quicker loan decisions by the banking industry. o Increase the number of microloan programs and other seed capital sources to address the need for funding by start-ups and existing small businesses, which provide alternatives to conventional sources. • Boosting follow-on funding for growing start-up companies expanding to the second stage. • Increasing the availability and ease of obtaining capital, particularly with gap financing, especially for smaller projects. • Cultivating non-traditional funding mechanisms to support entrepreneurial endeavors. o Support emerging financial instruments that provide small businesses with new opportunities to raise capital by allowing private citizens to invest. (e.g., crowdfunding). o Lower barriers to accessing financial capital by finding methods to reduce the Page 4 risk for capital investors in small business start-ups. • Demonstrate a product/service's market demand at the front end through the enterprise's social capital (i.e., collective value of all social networks). • Connect entrepreneurs and small businesses receiving funding with financial counseling and other mentorship opportunities to help increase their prospects as a going concern and continued growth as a second stage business. • Advocate at federal and state levels for actions that address ongoing business financing concerns. These strategies are to be met, in part, by matching businesses with the appropriate sources of financial capital needed to launch and operate their enterprise. This includes connecting business owners with financing sources, including those located in economically distressed and underserved communities. 3. Area Resources Oakland County: Oakland County has over 1,200,000 residents and 39,250 businesses. The Oakland County Economic Development and Community Affairs (EDCA) Division of Oakland County operates the Oakland County One Stop Shop, a business center which provides no -cost business counseling and services such as financial analysis, loan package preparation, drivetime analysis, GIS mapping, access to the ESRI database of consumer spending habits, and process mapping. EDCA also provides business development services which include site searches, incentive coordination with state and local governments, assistance with access to capital, workforce development assistance, and a host of other services. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG): SEMCOG is a regional planning partnership of governmental units serving 4.7 million people in the aforementioned seven -county region of Southeast Michigan striving to enhance the region's quality of life. SEMCOG supports local planningthrough its technical, data, and intergovernmental resources. The work SEMCOG does improves the quality of the region's water, makes the transportation system safer and more efficient, revitalizes communities, and spurs economic development. According to the organization's website, its stated functions are to: • Promote informed decision -making by improving Southeast Michigan and its local governments through insightful data analysis and direct assistance to members; • Promote the efficient use of tax dollars for infrastructure investment and Page 5 governmental effectiveness; • Develop regional solutions that go beyond the boundaries of individual local governments; and • Advocate on behalf of Southeast Michigan in Lansing and Washington. Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC): The Michigan Economic Development Corporation, in collaboration with more than 100 economic development partners, markets Michigan as the place to do business, assists businesses in their growth strategies, and fosters the growth of vibrant communities across the state. The mission of the MEDC is to achieve long-term economic prosperity for Michiganders by investing in communities, enabling the growth of good jobs and promoting Michigan's strong image worldwide. MEDC's strategic focus aims to position Michigan at the leading edge of economic development in the nation. Automation Alley: Automation Alley is the World Economic Forum's Advanced Manufacturing Hub (AMHUB) for North America and a nonprofit Industry 4.0 knowledge center with a global outlook and a regional focus. The organization facilitates public - private partnerships by connecting industry, education and government to fuel Michigan's economy and accelerate innovation. Its programs are designed to give businesses a competitive advantage by helping them along every step of their digital transformation journey. Oakland University: Oakland University is recognized as a student -centered, doctoral research institution with a global perspective. A public institution, OU engages nearly 20,000 graduate and undergraduate students in distinctive educational experiences that connect to the unique and diverse opportunities within and beyond our region. Oakland provides a distinct educational experience with flexible class schedules and state-of-the-art facilities, student services, classroom technologies, research labs, internships, and research opportunities with corporate partners. Oakland University also operates two technology incubator facilities serving technology starts and small businesses, one with a historical focus on environmental sciences and information technology. Located in the heart of Oakland County, the university has forged hundreds of partnerships with hospitals, Fortune 500 companies, cities, government agencies, and educational institutions. Lawrence Technological University: Lawrence Technological University (LTU) is a private university in the City of Southfield, MI, 15 miles from Detroit. LTU offers more than 100 majors across four colleges with an emphasis on the STEAM fields (science, technology, Page 6 engineering, arts, and mathematics). LTU also operates the recently dedicated Centrepolis Accelerator, a high-tech prototyping and virtual reality equipment space to help entrepreneurs, designers, and dreamers create the next generation of hardware. The mission of Centrepolis is to accelerate the growth of small manufacturers and hardware entrepreneurs. Oakland Community College: Oakland Community College (OCC) is a five -campus public community college in Oakland County. OCC is one of the largest community colleges in Michigan and has the state's third -largest undergraduate enrollment of almost 30,000 students. OCC's Department of Economic and Workforce Development works with companies - big and small - to provide a full spectrum of state-of-the-art training'courses and services and manages multiple state and federal grants. 4. Organizational Structure and Program Administration The ability of enterprises to obtain funding through an Oakland County RLF would be a vital piece of the overall strategy to promote economic recovery, business development, and expansion in Oakland County during a period of economic hardship caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Oakland County employs a unique "executive" form of government that ensures accountability and efficiency in its services and encourages cooperation with its communities to address issues of mutual concern. The County Executive has committed $1.0 million in matching funds to supplement the RLF funds made available by the EDA. Within the County, the Oakland County Economic Development and Community Affairs (EDCA) department will provide administrative and programmatic oversight and manage the required grant reports. County staff will assist with marketing, outreach to the business community, and outreach to commercial lenders to generate leads. Outreach to the business community will be accomplished through three of EDCA's business -specific units; the One Stop Shop Business Center, Business Development, and Business Finance Corporation. This network of business units will generate RLF leads as they provide business counseling services, business visits, and review SBA 504 loan applications. Oakland County One -Stop Business Center provides business counseling, business consultation, and workshops. The Business Center's nine staff members provide process mapping, financial analysis, loan package development, engages with commercial lenders to assist business gain access to capital, search engine optimization, drivetime analysis, business performance assessments, ESRI database analysis of retail customers, organize workshops and provide counseling Page 7 to company leaders. As a result of the loan package development services, the Business Center has developed relationships with virtually every commercial bank with a facility in Oakland County. The Business Center's "Walk-in Thursdays' enables individuals to talk to a business counselor without an appointment. There were 277 unscheduled counseling sessions in 2018 and 2019. During that same time, the Business Center met with 796 unique business owners in 2019. Oakland County Business Development conducts traditional business retention and attraction services. The Business Development staff of eight are engaged with companies in start-up mode to Fortune 500 companies. Business Development staff conducted 415 business retention visits and 35 international and domestic attraction trips in 2019. Oakland County Business Finance Corporation (BFC) is a Certified Development Corporation which makes SBA 504 loans to business across Michigan. The BFC's staff of five review loan applications, assemble loan packages and close loans on behalf of the Small Business Administration. Since 1982, BFC has approved 553 loans, created 22,256 jobs, and invested over $620,000,000. The Oakland County Economic Development Corporation (OCEDC) administers loans for capital expenditures for qualified manufacturing businesses and non- profit 501(c)(3) organizations through its Tax -Exempt Revenue Bond Program. Since 1980, the OCEDC has funded 113 projects, created 14,945 jobs, and invested $743,825,000. In addition to financing expertise, Oakland County has received and administered many federal grants. EDCA's Community & Home Improvement Division informs residents of federal, state, and county housing and community development programs at work throughout Oakland County. For more than 40 years, the division has promoted equal opportunity and access to housing, community development, and public service programming. As a HUD entitlement county, Oakland County receives funds on a formula basis to meet the national objectives of four federal grants: the competitive Comprehensive Housing Counseling Grant, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG). These programs have invested over $336 million in Oakland County communities since the program began more than 44 years ago. The Great Lakes Women's Business Council (GLWBC), dba CEED Lending: GLWBC, herein referred to as CEED Lending, will be the co -applicant for the EDA RLF grant. CEED Lending is a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) and provides access Page 8 to capital to underserved and distressed markets including women and men business owners, and minority business owners. CEED Lending currently manages Oakland County's Small Business Loan Program and will be the RFL program administrator. For over 35 years, CEED Lending has made more than $7 million in microloans which created more than 1,800 jobs. CEED has the capacity and infrastructure to oversee the financial management of the program, develop and maintain loan documents, and to organize and facilitate a Loan Advisory Committee (LAC). The LAC will review loan applications and meet periodically to assess and amend, as necessary, the goals and targets for the RLF program. LAC members will be appointed by Oakland County and CEED Lending. With support from Oakland County's Corporation Counsel, executive leadership, Board of Commissioners, and partnership with the GLWBC, Oakland County and CEED Lending are well situated to administer, implement, and maintain the Oakland County RLF. B. Business Development Objectives 1. Objectives The business development objectives for the Oakland County RLF are to: • Assist businesses that have been negatively affected by the ongoing economic impact of COVID-19; • Strengthen local businesses as they bring back their staff due to COVID-19 Stay Home/Stay Safe executive orders; • Increase the economic viability of existing small business companies; • Assist commercial business start-ups, expansion and preservation; • Encourage the relocation of firms that add value to the local primary industries; • Attract businesses that will provide additional capital and jobs to the area; • Support economically distressed targeted areas; • Improve the quality of life in underserved markets by providing access to capital to minorities, women, and others who are underrepresented in mainstream financing; • Leverage additional resources and expertise to create greater economic stability; • Target small businesses with growth potential and management insight but lack sufficient collateral or owners' equity to qualify for mainstream financing; • Encourage the development of higher -skill, higher -wage jobs; and • Diversify the types of industries in Oakland County. Page 9 2. Targeted Business Characteristics The entire Oakland County business community has experienced dramatic economic hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Oakland County RLF will aim for small to medium-sized businesses interested in locating or expanding across the County, especially those in economically distressed areas. Special consideration will be given to businesses that create and retain full-time, high -skill, high -wage jobs. Projects that involve the redevelopment of unused or vacant buildings are especially attractive, as well as projects that will assist in revitalizing downtown areas. Oakland County is committed to supporting its 32 downtowns which were greatly affected by COVID-19. Retail and restaurant businesses were required to close due to the State of Michigan's Stay Home/Stay Safe executive orders. The executive orders adversely affected smaller businesses, especially those with fewer than 5 employees, which strongly contribute to the stabilization and growth of downtowns. The County will continue to work with downtown organizations through its Main Street Oakland County program which focuses resources on priority businesses and services appropriate to maintaining and enhancing the downtown area. 3. Types of Assistance Identifying the types of business assistance needed will be a coordinated effort by Oakland County, CEED Lending, Oakland County's 62 municipalities, and other partners including but not limited to Oakland University, Lawrence Technological University, Oakland County Michigan Works, Automation Alley, and multiple Chambers of Commerce. These partnerships are strongly established in Oakland County. Any new needs will be addressed by the partners. The types of assistance provided through the partnerships include but are not limited to: • Business financial review and loan package assistance • Business mentoring • Business planning • Workforce development • Education and Training: Certification and continuing education C. Financial Strategy, Policy and Portfolio Standards 1. Financing Strategies and Policies a. Financing Needs Page 10 RLF funds will provide an immediate, flexible, and accessible source of financing for small businesses affected by COVID-19 that currently have few funding resources available. Small businesses have fewer lending options as many were closed from mid -March to early June due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Those that were able to open often had to operate with new social distancing requirements for staff and customers. These businesses have experienced dramatic declines in revenue coupled with new expenses to keep staff and customers safe. These small businesses are experiencing greater difficulty in securing loans from traditional lenders. The RLF can help supplement traditional loans and borrower's equity. Private equity can and should be included in the loan package. Borrowers: RLF funds will be available primarily to private sector, for -profit, businesses. Small and medium-sized businesses should be the primary recipients of the funds. b. Financing Niche Financing will be provided for the purchase of assets such as machinery and equipment, leasehold improvements, non-residential real estate, and working capital. The RLF will close the lending gap for businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. c. Standard Lending Terms i. Interest rates: Loans will be made to eligible borrowers at interest rates determined to be most appropriate to achieve the goals of the RLF. Interest rates should be designed to assist firms with special credit problems. Such loans may involve greater risks and lower interest rates. These rates will be determined by the RLF Loan Advisory Committee (LAC) based on EDA guidelines. The minimum interest rate will be four percentage points below the lesser of the current money center prime interest rate quoted in the Wall Street Journal, or the maximum interest rate allowed under state law. In no event shall the interest rate be less than the lower of four percent or 75 percent of the prime interest rate listed in the Wall Street Journal. ii. Equity or cash injections required: The LAC can be flexible with project -specific equity or cash infusions requirements. A minimum of 10% borrower equity will usually be required in the form of cash, machinery and equipment, inventory and receivables, real estate, or other assets. Some startups may require higher than standard equity injections, which will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis by the LAC. The standard guidelines, which are normal in Page 11 most loans, are as follows: • Fixed asset loans 10% new equity • Real Estate 10% new equity iii. Standard repayment terms: The term of the loans will not exceed the useful life of the assets being financed. The ability of the borrower to repay will also be of prime importance. If possible, short terms rather than longer terms will be set in an effort to recycle funds faster and make more loans. Under certain circumstances, the LAC may grant deferral of principal payments for up to one year when necessary for the success of the project. Balloon payments may be utilized in the RLF program. The following are normal loan terms, but could have longer amortizations: • Equipment: Up to 7 years • Real Estate: Up to 10 years • Working Capital: Up to 5 years d. Collateral Policy The RLF will secure each loan to the maximum extent possible in the judgment of the LAC. Security interests will be taken on available assets, both business and personal. These may include liens on fixed assets (land, real estate, machinery and equipment, etc.), inventory, receivables, assignment of patents and licenses, and other available assets of the borrower. Personal guarantees will also be required from principal owners, as appropriate. In general, the "abundance of caution" approach will be used regarding collateral. Each loan will be secured to the greatest extent possible to obtain a secondary source of repayment. The RLF will obtain not only a perfected interest in the borrower's assets but also in available outside assets of related parties, personal guaranties, and assignment of life insurance, as appropriate. Hazard and flood insurance, as necessary, naming CEED Lending as loss payee, will be required to protect against loss of collateral. The amount and type of collateral will be negotiated with the borrower. The required loan -to -value ratio will be determined on a case by case basis depending on the strength of the financial position of the borrower and the strength of the project. The financing that this program generally will be providing often requires the RLF to lend more than the typical traditional lender on physical assets so the borrower has Page 12 adequate cash holdings to meet working capital requirements. Because RLF loans will most often be in a subordinate lien position, sufficient debt service coverage is considered to be of greater importance than the loan -to -value ratio, and, depending on circumstances, the LAC may allow an exception to this policy. The RLF policy is that loans will normally have a minimum of one-to-one collateral value coverage. This is a standard minimum, and in most cases, attempts will be made to obtain higher coverage. The program will seek to obtain optimum coverage. Discounted collateral coverage is as follows: • Real Estate 90% • Equipment, furniture, and fixtures 80% • Leasehold improvements 60% (term -limited to less than period of the lease) Current assets such as accounts receivable are not usually considered the best collateral for long-term debt. However, these assets may be used for collateral to provide additional strength in the case of a loan with less than optimum coverage by fixed assets. Methods of valuation of assets used for collateral will be objective. Real estate will be valued by an approved licensed appraiser, by staff valuation utilizing the most current State Equalized Value, or some other method as approved by the LAC. If a lead lender obtains an appraisal, generally (but at its option) the LAC will accept valuation from such appraisal rather than requiring another (use of an appraisal is subject to approval by the lender). Other asset types will be valued by methods that will adequately show market value by use of objectively obtained market comparisons, appraisals by qualified and approved persons, or by staff valuation. In all cases, the valuation will need to show due diligence and objective evidence in addition to values provided by the borrower. Documentation of collateral values will be required in the loan file. e. Loan Size The target size of RLF loans is $100,000 and may range from $50,000 to $200,000. Loans below the ranges will be evaluated on a case -by -case basis by the LAC. f. Loan Fees and Other Charges The following fees are typically used to cover the costs of RLF program administration. They may also be invested in the RLF for re -lending. These packaging Page 13 and servicing fees may be charged or waived as appropriate to meet the goals and objectives of this RLF Plan. i. A loan packaging fee of between 0% and 4% of the total amount of the RLF loan may be charged. ii. A loan servicing fee of no more than 1% per year on the declining principal balance of the RLF loan may be charged to the borrower. iii. An application fee of no more than $200. iv. The amount of these fees may be included in the RLF loan. V. Charges may be made for delinquent payments. The RLF will have a solid but flexible payback policy. After an evaluation of specific circumstances, the LAC may approve a temporary moratorium on the loan payment. 2. Portfolio Standards and Targets a. Business Types The RLF partners have a goal of achieving the following mix of businesses. • New business 50% b. Loan Purpose • Existing business 50% The anticipated percentage of investments by the purpose of the loan: Y Fixed Assets 80% c. Leveraging • Working Capital 20% Oakland County will leverage an additional investment of at least two (2) dollars for every one (1) dollar of RLF loans. This leveraging requirement applies to the RLF portfolio as a whole rather than to individual loans and is effective for the duration of the RLF's operation. To be classified as leveraged, the additional investment must be made within twelve months of approval of an RLF loan, as part of the same business development project, and may include: i. Capital invested by the borrower or others including crowdfunding and non- federal grant dollars; ii. Financing from financial institutions such as banks and credit unions; iii. The non -guaranteed portions and ninety (90) percent of the guaranteed portions of any Federal loan; or Page 14 iv. Loans from other State and local lending programs. d. CostperJob The RLF will prioritize projects that emphasize higher -skilled, higher -wage jobs in businesses and industries that have been negatively affected by COVID-19. Every project shall contain a job component and the borrower must provide an estimated number of jobs created/retained along with a justification for the estimate. Job creation claims will be reviewed as part of the underwriting process by CEED Lending. At the end of each year, loan recipients will be required to provide proof that the stated targets for job creation/retention have been met. The RLF portfolio will seek a cost per job ratio of one (1) job for every $40,000 loan. With a maximum loan size of $200,000, the goal would be set at 5 jobs. 3. Loan Selection Criteria a. Eligible Applicants To be eligible, an applicant should meet some of these factors: i. A private for -profit firm, preferably a small business (generally defined by the Small Business Administration) and not dominant in its field. ii. Demonstrate that the funds are not otherwise available or are not taking the place of private financing. iii. Show a reasonable assurance of repayment of loans. Among other things, this will be judged by standards of character, capacity, collateral, conditions and capital. iv. The project should be consistent with the RLF plan. V. The applicant should be able to capitalize and build upon local assets, assist in advancing innovation, or increase productivity in economically distressed areas. vi. Assist in building a regional cluster. vii. Maximize private sector investment that would not otherwise come to fruition without the RLF's investment. viii. Support the creation or retention of high skill and high wage jobs. b. Eligible Projects Eligible projects may be for expansion, startup or retention of a business that will meet the goals of the RLF program. Rules for each business stage loan will remain consistent. Loans may be for fixed assets or working capital. Page 15 i. Eligible fixed assets loans may include: • Acquisition and improvements of real estate for non -speculative projects • New construction or renovation of existing facilities • Demolition and site preparation • Facility modernization and expansion • Acquisition of new or used machinery, equipment, and assets in accordance with 13 CFR 307.17 ii. Eligible working capital loans may include: • Inventory purchases • Accounts receivable financing • Operating expenses • Other non -capitalized assets c. Ineligible Loan Activities Ineligible loan activities include the following and as outlined in 13 CFR 307.17: • Loans outside the EDA-approved lending area of Oakland County, MI; • Loans for the purpose of investing in accounts, publicly traded securities, real estate or any other investment not related to job creation/retention; • Speculative activities such as land banking and construction of speculative buildings that do not have a specific job -creating tenant committed; • Loans to businesses that engage in any activity that is illegal under federal, state or local law; • Loans that would create a conflict of interest as defined by the Standard Terms and Conditions Part II Section C; • Acquire an equity position in a private business; • Subsidize interest payments on an existing RLF loan; • Provide a loan to a borrower for the purpose of meeting the requirements of equity contributions under another Federal Agency's loan programs; • Enable borrowers to acquire an interest in a business either through the purchase of stock or through the acquisition of assets, unless sufficient justification is provided in the loan documentation. Sufficient justification may include acquiring a business to save it from imminent closure or to acquire a business to facilitate a significant expansion or increase in investment with a significant increase in jobs. The potential economic benefits must be clearly consistent with the strategic objectives of the RLF; Page 16 • Provide RLF loans to a borrower for the purpose of investing in interest - bearing accounts, certificates of deposit, or any investment unrelated to the RLF; • Refinance existing debt, unless: a. Recipient sufficiently demonstrates in the loan documentation a "sound economic justification" for the refinancing (e.g., the refinancing will support additional capital investment intended to increase business activities). For this purpose, reducing the risk of loss to an existing lender(s) or lowering the cost of financing to a borrower shall not, without other indicia, constitute a sound economic justification; or b. RLF funds will finance the purchase of the rights of a prior lien holder during a foreclosure action which is necessary to preclude a significant loss on an RLF loan. RLF funds may be used for this purpose only if there is a high probability of receiving compensation from the sale of assets sufficient to cover an RLF's costs plus a reasonable portion of the outstanding RLF loan within a reasonable time frame approved by EDA following the date of refinancing. • Serve as collateral to obtain credit or any other type of financing without EDA's prior written approval; • Support operations or administration of the RLF Recipient; or • Undertake any activity that would violate the requirements found at part 13 CFR § 314.3 ("Authorized Use of Property") and § 314.4 ("Unauthorized Use of Property"). Page 17 PART II. REVOLVING LOAN FUND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES The RLF will be operated using Prudent Lending Practices. The program will follow generally accepted underwriting and lending practices for public loan programs, based on sound judgment to protect Federal and lender interests. Prudent Lending Practices include loan processing, documentation, loan approval, collections, servicing, administrative procedures, collateral protection, and recovery actions. Prudent Lending Practices provide for compliance with local laws and filing requirements to perfect and maintain a security interest in RLF collateral. A. Organizational Structure 1. Administration Oakland County and CEED Lending will work together to manage the administrative requirements of the RLF plan and EDA grant. The County will primarily provide oversight and guidance while CEED Lending will manage the day-to-day program administration. Both entities will use their network of resources for marketing and program outreach. 2. RLF Loan Advisory Committee a. Authority CEED Lending will be the administrator of the RLF program, under contract to Oakland County, the program's co -grantee. CEED Lending leadership will appoint a Loan Advisory Committee (LAC) consisting of not more than thirteen individuals. The LAC makes loan policies and operating procedures, and all major loan decisions. Changes and other delegations may be made as deemed necessary. The principal activities of the Committee are as follows: • Accepts grants to capitalize the RLF; • Reviews, amends and submits an RLF Plan to Oakland County and Committee for approval; • Recommends to Oakland County and CEED Lending potential persons to fill committee vacancies; • Provides overall policy guidance to the program and staff; • Makes decisions on final applications for loans; • Decides whether to call delinquent loans; and • Decides whether to liquidate loans. Page 18 b. Basic Procedures The LAC members will elect a chair and vice -chair who will be responsible for coordinating with CEED Lending staff to set the date, time, place, and agendas of committee meetings. A quorum to conduct business is five (5) members, with a simple majority of a quorum sufficient to make decisions. In the case of a tie vote, CEED Lending will cast a vote to break the tie. 3. Standard Loan Application Requirements All applicants for loans from the RLF shall be required to fill out a separate standard RLF application form and supply the additional items as indicated in the application. 4. Credit Reports Credit reports will be obtained on applicants or other evidence of creditworthiness documented at the time of the application. 5. Appraisals Appraisals will be required on real estate purchased using the RLF and when the financing amount is greater than $150,000. If the financing is less than $150,000, a real estate valuation may be substituted. In most cases, a copy of the appraisal or collateral analysis done by a participating bank will be available. Generally, appraisals are valid for one year unless the LAC decides otherwise. 6. Loan Write-ups A loan request summary will be produced by CEED Lending staff for initial review and discussion by the LAC. Following the initial discussion, any conflicts of interest shall be disclosed and discussed by the LAC, as necessary. If appropriate, the party with a perceived or real conflict will remove themselves from the discussion. Final discussions regarding a loan request will be based on the full loan package. The contents of the loan package will be shared with the LAC. The package will include confidential and proprietary information as necessary to make the loan decision. The loan package will include: • Overview — The company's history, product(s), capacity and management; a discussion and analysis demonstrating the need for RLF funds and how the RLF is not replacing private lending sources; and job creation. 6 Include a bank denial letter and/or denial of credit supporting documents as Page 19 available. • Principals —Background and experience of owners. • Market —A discussion of the business's market. • Financing — Sources, amounts, and uses of project financing. • Collateral and its assigned value. • Credit Summary or Financial Analysis — An analysis of the business and personal financial condition, credit reports, and repayment ability. • Summary — Emphasizes the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed loan. • Recommendation — CEED Lending staff recommendation to the LAC including terms and conditions. • Credit Reports for principles and guarantors. • Summary of three-year financial history for existing firms (balance sheet and income statement) if the applicant has been in business for three years or greater. 7. Procedures for Loan Decisions A quorum of the LAC (simple majority) will review the loan write-ups, discuss the proposal, and vote on the application which must receive a majority vote of the quorum to be approved. The minutes of the meeting must be taken and kept in a permanent file. The decision of the LAC will be communicated to the applicant as soon as is practical via commitment letter specifying the terms of the loan and time period of the commitment, or a letter of declination. If a loan application is declined, the applicant has thirty (30) calendar days to submit a written appeal to the LAC, requesting the LAC to reconsider the application. The appeal should include the rationale for the reconsideration to be reviewed by the LAC. The committee will meet within 30 days of the receipt of the appeal, if possible. If not possible, a reasonable explanation will be provided to the applicant. If the LAC, after the meeting, declines the loan application, that decision is final. If necessary, the committee may take a vote using an electronic means to facilitate a final review and decision without discussion. Staff will develop and present loan information forthe LAC review. The full LAC will make the final loan decisions. The LAC will follow the procedures outlined in this plan when evaluating applications and making final decisions. Minutes of all meetings will be kept as part of the permanent record and shall document the vote taken to approve or deny loan applications. Page 20 8. Loan Closing and Disbursement Procedures a. General Closing Requirements The actual provisions for the RLF loan closing and servicing may vary from that outlined here. Loan servicing from closing to loan repayment may be carried out by CEED Lending or an organization designated by CEED Lending. The borrower will provide to lending staff, on a quarterly basis, copies of current company and personal financial statements, tax returns, bank statements, and any supplemental information on financial condition and operation requested. CEED Lending staff and legal representative will prepare closing documents and all back-up materials of the RLF loan. Closing meetings will have all relevant parties attending to close a deal. b. Loan Closing Documents Required on all loans will be the Loan and Security Agreement and Note. For loans secured with real estate, a mortgage will be required. For loans using other collateral, a UCC filing will be required along with lien searches both before and after filing showing the CEED Lending as lien holder in the desired position approved by the LAC. For licensed vehicles, a title showing the CEED Lending as a lienholder will be required. c. Loan Disbursements Prior to disbursement of RLF loan proceeds, the borrower must provide evidence that the purpose for which the loan was made is what the proceeds are being used for. In the case of the purchase of physical assets, invoices, orders, or delivery documentation will be acceptable types of evidence. In loans for construction, the loans are usually for permanent financing and a construction lender will provide evidence that the project is complete. Title insurance is required showing that there are no construction/mechanics liens on the property. The size of, and disbursement schedule for, working capital loans will normally be determined by the LAC based on schedules provided by the borrower prior to loan closing. 9. Loan Servicing Procedures a. Loan Payment and Collection Procedure For all approved loans, CEED Lending will require ACH transfers for all monthly Page 21 payments. Borrowers will have loan payments automatically withdrawn via ACH on the due date. All payments are posted to the borrower's Payment Record Ledger showing the date and amount of the payment together with the breakdown of principal and interest and the remaining balance. Payment records can be provided to the borrower upon request. b. Audits, Accounting The Oakland County RLF is subject to an annual audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F and Compliance Supplement. Oakland County and CEED will ensure that the Oakland County RLF appears on the Oakland County Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) as part of the Oakland County, Michigan Annual Audit. CEED Lending financial audits are conducted annually consistent with EDA audit requirements of all program transactions and a written report shall be provided to the Oakland County.. Oakland County and CEED Lending shall employ recommended standard accounting procedures to record and report all financial transactions. c. Loan Monitoring Procedure Specific language will be included in the RLF loan agreement requiring the borrower to comply with the provisions of appropriate federal laws, regulations, and executive orders regarding Civil Rights, Environmental Compliance, and Flood Hazard Insurance. Specific language will ensure that the loan will be in default and will be called if the business is moved outside of Oakland County. Applications may be disapproved by the LAC if the proposed project adversely impacts, without appropriate mitigation: floodplains, wetlands, significant historical or archeological properties, drinking water resources, or non-renewable natural resources. Lending staff shall do the following: • Counsel with the borrower as appropriate to address any problems which may be foreseen. • Assess appropriate late charges for delinquency in the payment schedule. • Recommend other management actions by the borrower to resolve potential or actual problems. • Carry out other appropriate actions, as needed, including a declaration of default and recall of the RLF loan, to protect the interest of the RLF loan, while still responding to the legitimate needs of the borrower. The borrower will provide reports to the LAC as requested and per this schedule that Page 22 will be presented to them at closing. • A yearly Job Report • An updated fiscal year-end federal business income tax returns within ninety days of completion • An updated fiscal year-end federal personal income tax returns within ninety days of completion • Annual personal financial statement • Any additional financial information identified based on the conditions of loan approval d. Late Payment Follow-up Procedure CEED Lending will monitor receipt of loan payments and confirm delinquency at 15 days. If the payment has not been received a note to the borrower will be sent reminding them of the payment deadline and requesting a meeting if the borrower is anticipating additional late payments. If the payment has not been received the following schedule will be followed. Every effort will be made to work with the borrower to resolve the delinquency. Modification of the terms of the loan will be used only when it can be demonstrated that the modification will improve the ability of the borrower to repay. Schedule i 10 days late — Personal call to or communication with the borrower. Y 20 days late — Send letter of delinquency. • 30 days late — Notify guarantors and inform the LAC. • 40 days late — Send a second letter of delinquency and notify guarantors. CEED Lending staff will review security interest. • 50 days late — Notify guarantors and inform the LAC, staff and CEED Lending legal counsel will review security interest and prepare for action as needed. • 60 days late — Initiate process outlined below in section e. Procedure for Handling Loans Over 60 Days in Arrears. Payments will be reported to the credit bureau when made, any late or defaulted loans will be reported as such. e. Procedure for Handling Loans Over 60 Days in Arrears If a loan becomes 60 days delinquent, staff will make a recommendation to the LAC Page 23 on actions to be taken such as repossession of collateral, foreclosure, etc. The LAC will make the final decision on all such actions. CEED Lending and its attorney will make sure all documentation is in order and file paperwork as determined by the LAC. This includes confirming security interests are in place. Notification will be sent to all guarantors indicating their liability. Borrower's senior lien holders will be notified of default. • 15 Days — call to principal • 30 days — default letter issued with copies to any guarantors • 90 days — Start procedures f. Write-off Procedure If a loan or portion of a loan remaining after the liquidation of collateral is determined to be uncollectable, it will be written off. The direct write-off method of accounting is used. However, collection efforts will continue until it is determined by the LAC that such efforts are no longer cost-effective. g. Priority of Payments on Defaulted Loans When receiving proceeds on defaulted loans not subject to liquidation pursuant to federal regulations, as amended, such proceeds shall be applied in the following order of priority: • Any costs of collection; • Outstanding penalties and fees; • Any accrued interest to the extent due and payable; and Y Any outstanding principle balances. h. Administrative Costs Oakland County will fund the initial start-up administrative costs. Once the RLF can support itself, administrative costs will be taken from RLF program income. 10. Loan Agreement Provisions The loan agreement will specify the purpose of the loan. The Document will protect and hold the Federal government harmless from and against all liabilities that the Federal government incur as a result of providing an RLF Grant to assist directly or indirectly in site preparation or construction, as well as the direct or indirect renovation or repair of any facility or site. The LAC may require such paperwork of all borrowers, consultants Page 24 or contractors to certify their understanding and compliance with all federal salutatory and regulatory requirements for the loan funds. 11. Administrative Procedures a. Procedure for Loan Files and Loan Closing Documentation The loan file must contain all the documentation for that loan. Included in each file are copies of the Loan and Security Agreement, Note, Trust Deeds, and collateral. Originals of these documents will be stored in a fireproof vault at the headquarters for CEED Lending. UCC filings and searches, the original loan application, business plan and/or other documents submitted with the application, private lender commitment, write-up, approval, insurance certificates, financial statements, job reports, correspondence, servicing/site visit notes and any other documentation regarding the loan will be kept in a fireproof filing cabinet at the offices of CEED Lending. b. Procedure for Complying with EDA Reporting Requirements CEED Lending staff is responsible for preparing the required EDA semi-annual reports. The staff accountant prepares the required financial reports to EDA as well as ensuring that an independent audit is sent to EDA annually. CEED Lending will also provide such audit to Oakland County. Each RLF fund is accounted for separately. Income and expense line items are accounted for separately from principal repayments and loans made. c. Grantee Control Procedure for Ensuring Compliance with All Grant Requirements and for Monitoring the RLF Portfolio CEED Lending staff keeps a grantee file with copies of all required reports, audits and EDA compliance manuals, guidelines, and Standard Terms and Conditions. The forms used for documentation of RLF loans will be reviewed by CEED Lending attorney. d. Non -Discrimination CEED Lending, Oakland County, and the partners will market the RLF program to all eligible potential borrowers including targeting prospective minority and women borrowers. The lending staff will make personal calls to current minority borrowers, other minority entrepreneurs, bankers, and economic development organizations for assistance in spreading the word about the program and for ideas for marketing the RLF. Press releases and personal contacts will emphasize the opportunities that Page 25 the RLF can bring to small businesses including those owned by women and minorities. RLF funds will be made available on a nondiscriminatory basis and no applicant will be denied a loan on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, handicap, or sex. A provision is included in the RLF loan documents that prohibit borrowers from discriminating against employees or applicants for employment or providers of goods and services. CEED Lending will monitor borrower compliance with civil rights laws periodically by reviewing the job reports that will be submitted to CEED Lending for subsequent reporting to EDA. e. Confidentiality Confidentiality regarding financial information will be guarded at all times. No Oakland County or CEED Lending staff or LAC member will use their official position or office to obtain confidential information or in any other way obtain financial gain for themselves other than salary and/or reimbursement of expenses, or for any member of their household, or for any business with which they, or a member of their household, is associated. B. Environmental Review Process The RLF will be operated to follow applicable environmental laws and other regulations, including 13 CFR § 307.10 and parts 302 and 314 of the same chapter. Procedures to comply and ensure that potential borrowers comply are included as part of this Plan. Prospective borrowers, consultants, or contractors will be made aware of and are required to comply with the Federal statutory and regulatory requirements that apply to activities carried out with RLF loans. Loan documents and agreements will include applicable Federal requirements to ensure compliance. The policies in this plan include the requirement for annual compliance reporting by each borrower and corrective actions available to the LAC in the case on non-compliance. Prior to closing any RLF, the applicant shall provide evidence that environmental permits, if any, have been issued. The closing documents will include certifications by the borrower to comply with 13 CFR § 307, 13 CFR § 302, and 13 CFR § 314. The LAC will monitor the loan recipients for environmental compliance through a self - reporting program. CEED Lending shall ensure that prospective borrowers comply with all applicable environmental regulations for the business and its activities. RLF loan agreement papers shall include applicable federal requirements to ensure compliance. The recipients will complete a yearly self -certification regarding their environmental compliance. The LAC Page 26 will consider loan call stipulations as necessary if a recipient fails to meet the environmental permit requirement or otherwise fail to comply with environmental standards. The RLF Administrator with the assistance of appropriate staff, shall assess the significance of all environmental impacts of activities to be financed in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and other Federal environmental mandates, as per the Assurances (SF 424D as revised) executed with the Economic Development Administration. No activity shall be financed which would result in a significant adverse environmental impact unless the impact is to be mitigated to the point of insignificance. When necessary to ensure compliance, any required mitigation shall be made part of the loan conditions. No project shall be approved which would result in the alteration of or have an adverse impact on any wetland without prior consultation with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and, if applicable, obtaining a section 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. Consistent with E.O. 11988, no project shall be approved which would result in new above ground development in a 100-year flood plain. This determination will be made by reviewing the proposed development against FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The State Historic Preservation Officer, (SHPO) shall be notified of each loan proposal that involves significant new construction or expansion and asked to submit comments on the effect of the proposed activity on historic and archaeological resources. The RLF Administrator shall work with the SHPO and EDA in cases where the SHPO has recommended actions or has been determined an adverse impact. All loan applicants shall be requested to provide information indicating whether or not there was hazardous materials such as EPA listed (see 40 CFR 300), hazard substances, leaking underground storage tanks, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), or other hazardous materials on site that have been improperly handled and have the potential of endangering public health. If deemed necessary, loan applicants may be required to perform or provide evidence of a Phase I site assessment to identify possible sources of contamination, a Phase II site assessment to test soil and/or groundwater samples, and a Phase III site remediation involving mitigation of applicable contaminants. In cases where there are unresolved site contamination issues, the RLF Administrator shall work with the loan applicant and the appropriate state environmental agency office to resolve these outstanding issues C. Conflict of Interest The LAC will work to comply with 13 CFR 302.17 regarding conflict of interest in operating a Page 27 revolving loan fund. The policy for such is included below. 1. No officer, employee, or member of Oakland County (as RLF grant recipient), CEED Lending, LAC, or other board (hereinafter referred to as "other board") that advises, approves, recommends or otherwise participates in decisions concerning loans or the use of RLF grant funds, or person related to the officer, another employee, or any member of the Oakland County, CEED Lending or LAC by immediate family, law, or business arrangement, may receive any benefits resulting from the use of the RLF loan or grant funds. 2. An RLF applicant may not work to influence the support of officers, employees, LAC members, or others involving in the decision -making process outside of a regular advertised meeting of the LAC. 3. Immediate family is defined as parents, grandparents, siblings, children and grandchildren, but does not include more distant relatives, including cousins, unless they live in the same household. Exception: A benefit or loan may be conferred if the officer, employee, or LAC member affected first discloses to the RLF Recipient and the LAC on the public record the proposed or potential benefit and receives the RLF Recipient's and/or LAC's written determination that the benefit involved is not so substantial as to reflect adversely upon or affect the integrity of the RLF Recipient's and/or LAC's decision process or the services of the officer, employee or LAC member. 4. An officer, employee or LAC member of the RLF Recipient or the LAC must not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment or any other thing of monetary value, for himself or for another person, from any person or organization seeking to obtain a loan or any portion of the grant funds. S. An officer, employee or LAC member involved in the decisions of the LAC may not influence the vote of the LAC if they have a perceived or actual conflict of interest relating to the applicant. Any perceived or actual interest in the applicant, a competitor to the applicant, a supplier to the applicant will be disclosed to the LAC. The party should recuse themselves from the discussion and decline to review any proprietary information from the applicant. 6. Former LAC members and/or officers are ineligible to apply for or receive an RLF loan for a period of two years from the date of termination of his/her services. Exception: A benefit or loan may be conferred if the officer, or LAC member affected first discloses to the RLF Recipient and/or LAC on the public record the proposed or potential benefit and receives the RLF Recipient's and/or LAC's written determination that the benefit involved is not so substantial as to reflect adversely upon the integrity Page 28 of the RLF Recipient's and/or LAC's decision process. D. Conflicts of Interest (EDA) In order to eliminate any real or perceived conflict of interest, any transaction involving an employee, officer or board member of Recipient will require that the employee, officer or board member remove him or herself from any position of influence or authority as it pertains to the transaction. This includes abstaining from voting on loan approval and re- assignment of duties (such as Loan Summary preparation and Loan Monitoring) as they pertain to the transaction. In no case shall Recipient's relationship with an employee, officer or director provide a basis for deviating from the credit standards or repayment expectations identified in this policy. In addition, EDA requires inclusion of the following: 1. Definitions. a. An "Interested Party" is any officer, employee or member of the board of directors or other governing board of Recipient, including any other parties that advise, approve, recommend or otherwise participate in the business decisions of Recipient, such as agents, advisors, consultants, attorneys, accountants or shareholders. An Interested Party also includes the Interested Party's "Immediate Family" (defined as a person's spouse or partner in a domestic relationship, parents, grandparents, siblings, children and grandchildren, but not distant relatives, such as cousins, unless the distant relative lives in the same household as the person) and other persons directly connected to the Interested Party by law or through a business arrangement. b. A conflict of interest generally exists when an Interested Party participates in a matter that has a direct and predictable effected on the Interested Party's personal or financial interests or there is an appearance that an Interested Party's objectivity in performing his or her responsibilities under the Project is impaired. C. An appearance of impairment of objectivity could result from an organizational conflict where, because of other activities or relationships with other persons or entities, a person is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance, services, or advice. It also could result from non -financial gain to the individual, such as benefit to reputation or prestige in a professional field. 2. Conflicts of Interest Rules. Recipient must adhere to EDA conflicts of interest rules set forth at 13 CFR § 302.17, including the following rules specific to RLFs: a. An Interested Party of Recipient shall not receive, directly or indirectly, any personal or financial benefit resulting from the disbursement of RLF loans. A financial interest or benefit may include employment, stock ownership, a creditor or debtor relationship, or prospective employment with the organization selected or to Page 29 be selected for a subaward. b. Recipient shall not lend RLF funds to an Interested Party. C. Former board members of Recipient and members of their Immediate Family shall not receive a loan from the RLF for a period of two years from the date that the board member last served on the board of directors. 3. Duty to Disclose. Recipient must, in a timely fashion, disclose to EDA in writing any actual or potential conflict of interest. 4. Written Standard of Conduct. a. Recipient must maintain written standards of conduct to establish safeguardsto prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of a personal or organizational conflict of interest orpersonal gain in the administration of this RLF Award. b. Recipient must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. See Section K, Other EDA Requirements, Subsection 4., Codes of Conduct and Sub -Award, Contract and Subcontract Provisions, Subsection b), Competition and Codes of Conduct E. Allowable Cash Percentage Effective Jan. 2, 2018, EDA replaced the Capital Utilization Rate of 2S percent with region -specific Allowable Cash Percentage (ACP) that is updated annually. The ACP is the average cash available for RLFs in the Chicago EDA region and is used for risk rating RLFs according to the Risk Analysis System. Lending activity will be managed so that the cash available for lending is less than the current ACP in effect for the Chicago Region. However, if the Cash Available for Lending is greater than 50% of the RLF Capital Base for 24 consecutive months, EDA may take action to disallow the persistent excess cash. Page 30