HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgendas/Packets - 2021.04.07 - 40405� AW, 10� O1�J■�i"1Ws1;Ilip
''v✓ % Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
f' Oakland County Board of Commissioners Auditorium
1200 N. Telegraph Road Pontiac, MI 48341
Wednesday, April rill 2021
2:00 PM
AGENDA
Page #'S
Action Reauired
Presenter/Phone #
1.
Call Meeting to Order
------
G. McGillivray
2.
Roll Call
------
«
3.
Pledge of Allegiance
------
1-9
4.
Approval of Agenda
Approval
G. McGillivray/S. Wells 858.4634
10-20
5.
Approval of Minutes: Meeting of March 3, 2021
Approval
V. Valko 858.4603
6.
Public Comments:
G. McGillivray
7.
PRESENTATIONS/RECOGNITIONS:
21-22
A.
Brad Lowe, Long-term OCPR Part Time Employee
J. Dunleavy 248.343.6224
8.
REVIEW OF PROPOSED FY 2022-2024 OCPR BUDGET (Part I ):
Information
S. Wells 858.4634/J. Phelps 858.5319/
P. Castonia 858.0909
23-24
A.
FY 2022 Proposed Capital Equipment Budget
Information
J. Dunleavy 343.6224/S. Wells
B.
Proposed Maintenance Management Plan Budget
25-45
1. FY2022-FY2026 Proposed Maintenance Management Plan (MMP) Operating Budget
Information
M. Donnellon 343.6290/S. Wells
2. FY2022 Proposed Natural Resource Management Plan (NR) Operating Budget
Information
M. Donnellon/S. Wells
C.
FY2022-FY2026 Capital Improvement Program Plan (CIP) Net Position
Information
M. Donnellon/S. Wells
9•
COMMUNICATIONS:
46
A.
Capital Improvement Expense Summary
Receive & File
J. Phelps/S. Wells
10.
CONSENT AGENDA:
47-48
A.
OCPR Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Budget to Actual Report for Month Ending
Receive & File
02/28/2021 (FM 05 FY 21)
J. Phelps/S. Wells
49
B.
Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Comparison Report for Month Ending
Receive & File
02/28/2021 (FM 05 FY 21)
J. Phelps/S. Wells
50-54
C.
Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Report by Line Item for Month Ending
02/28/2021 (FM 05 FY 21)
Receive & File
J. Phelps/S. Wells
55
D.
Monthly Capital Equipment Report for Month Ending 02/28/2021 (FM 05 FY 21)
Receive & File
J. Phelps/S. Wells
3/31/2021
7:26 PM
1
56
E Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Average Comparison Report for Month Ending
02/28/2021 (FM 05 FY 21)
Receive & File
J. Phelps/S. Wells
57
F.
Capital Improvement Projects Budget to Actual Report & Statement of Net Position
For Month Ending 02/28/2021 (FM 05 FY 21)
Receive & File
J. Phelps/S. Wells
58
G.
Maintenance Management Plan Budget
Receive & File
M. Donnellon/S. Wells
59-62
H.
Monthly Purchasing Reports for Month Ending 01/31/2021 (FM 04 FY 21)
Receive & File
P. Castonia/S. Wells
63-68
L
Natural Resources Invasive Species Control
Information/Approval
S. Cook Maylen 343.1353/M. Donnellon
69-81
J.
Springfield Oaks ARC Flash Study and Labeling Project
Information/Approval
M. Donnellon/C. Gibbs/ S. Wells
82-90
K.
Pending Capital Improvement Project Report
Receive and File
M. Donnellon/S. Wells
91-101
L.
Springfield Oaks Mill Pond Dam Contract Increase Change Order
Information/Approval
M. Donnellon/S. Wells
11.
REGULAR AGENDA:
A.
New Millage Initiatives (Informational)
102-104
1. Proposed Policy for New OCPR Millage Initiatives
Informational
S. Wells/M. Prowse
105-110
2. Proposed Criteria for Trailways and Park Development Grant Programs
Information
S. Wells/M. Prowse
111-170
B.
Fiscal Sustainability Work Group Report and Presentation on Waterford Oaks Waterpark
Receive and File
S. Wells/D. Folland/J. Dunleavy/M. Donnellon
171
C.
Discussion on Facilities and Waterparks Openings for 2021 - Verbal
Information
S. Wells
172-182
D.
Proposed OCPR Sponsorship Policy Revisions
Information/Approval
M. Prowse 249.2801/S. Wells
183-185
E.
2021 MDNR Off Road Vehicle Trail Improvement Fund Grant Application
Information/Approval/BOC
M. Prowse/S. Wells
F.
Holly Oaks ORV Park Requests for Proposals
186-187
1. ORV Rental Maintenance RFP
Information/Approval
M. Prowse/S. Wells
188-189
2. ORV Feature Design RFP
Information/Approval
M. Prowse/S. Wells
190-194
G.
Potential Rose Township Property Donation
Information/Approval
M. Prowse/S. Wells
12.
REPORTS:
195-203
A.
Fiscal Sustainability Work Group
Receive and File
S. Wells
204
B.
ORV Park Update
Receive and File
M. Prowse/S. Wells
C.
Park Planning
205-208
1. FY2020 Dashboard and Data Book
Receive and File
M. Prowse/D. Folland/S. Wells
3/31/2021 7:26 PM
2
209-211 D. OCPR Volunteer Update Receive and File J. Whatley 975.9717
212-251 E. Executive Officer Report Receive and File S. Wells
F. Executive Committee Update G. McGillivray
13. OLD BUSINESS G. McGillivray
14. NEW BUSINESS G. McGillivray
CLOSED SESSION:
15.
A. Property Acquisition and Management Update
16. ADJOURN
NEXT MEETING: 2:00 PM Wednesday, May 5, 2021
OC BOC Auditorium 1200 N. Telegraph Road, Pontiac, MI 48341
* NOTE: All phone numbers are area code (248) unless otherwise noted.
As a reminder, if you have not already done so, please turn your cellular phones off or to a silent or vibrate mode for the duration of the meeting.
This will allow the meeting to proceed without distractions or interruptions. Thank you for your cooperation.
A walk in nature walks the soul back home - Mary Davis
3/31/2021 7:26 PM
3
Q4KLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission
Aqenda Summary for Wednesdav, April 7, 2021
The agenda is summarized below. Commission Members can contact Vicky Valko, 248.858.4603 or valkov(uD.oakgov.com
(email), or the contact persons listed for additional information.
7. PRESENTATION/RECOGNITION:
Brad Lowe, Long-term OCPR Part-time Employee
8 REVIEW OF PROPOSED FY 2022-2024 OCPR BUDGET (Part 1 ):
8 A. Proposed FY2022 Capital Equipment Budqet
The Oakland County Parks Operations staff is providing the proposed FY2022 Capital Equipment list for budget approval.
The proposed Capital Equipment consists of maintenance equipment, kitchen equipment and recreation equipment over
$5,000. The proposed Capital Equipment is for existing parks and does not include equipment that would be necessary
for potential future park developments or acquisitions.
Commission Action: Informational
Budget: $607,500
Approval Timeline: Conceptual Approval 4/2021
Budget Approval 9/2021
Contact: Thomas Hughes 248-343-1011
8 B & C. FY2022 Capital Improvement Program Plan (CIP) Net Position (Informational)
FY2022 Maintenance Management Plan (MMP) Operating Budget (Informational)
FY2022 Natural Resource Manaqement Plan (NR). Operatinq Budqet (Informational)
These preliminary FY2022 program/project lists have been developed by staff and Commission for capital improvement,
facility maintenance and natural resource management of over 230 Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission
(OCPRC) assets, buildings, natural areas and recreational features within 13 park locations, beginning the FY2022
budgetary review process.
Commission Action: Informational
Budget: FY2022 Budget Review Process
Approval History:
Staff Recommendation: FY2022-FY2026 Preliminary project list and forecast is open for discussion.
i. CIP Programs/Projects subtotal $ 4,406,000
ii. MMP Programs/Projects subtotal $ 684,800
iii. NR Programs/Projects Subtotal $ 866,000
iv. TOTAL PROJECTS $ 5,956,800
Contact: Michael J. Donnellon, Jr. 248-343-6290
4
9. COMMUNICATIONS:
9 A. Capital Improvement Expense Summary
Communication item lists the capital project agenda items requiring approval and the financial impact on the
Amount Available for Capital Improvement and Capital Equipment.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10. CONSENT AGENDA:
10 A. Revenue and Expenditure Budget to Actual Report by Budget Center
Monthly comparison of budgeted vs. actual revenue and expense by budget center. Available after month -end
closing.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10 B. Revenue and Expenditure Comparison Report by Budget Center
Monthly comparison of actual revenue and expense by budget center. Available after month -end closing.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10 C. Revenue and Expenditure Report by Line Item
Monthly actual revenue and expense for entire Parks & Recreation fund. Available after month -end closing.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10 D. Monthly Capital Equipment Report
Monthly comparison of budgeted vs. actual capital equipment purchases. Available after month -end closing.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10 E. Monthly Average Comparison Report
The `Monthly Average Comparison Report' compares monthly revenue and expense activity to a
five-year average.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10 F. Capital Improvement/Illustrative Net Position-Unrestricted/Planned Use of Balance
The `Active Capital Improvement/Illustrative Net Position-Unrestricted/Planned Use of Balance' report presents a
budget -to -actual comparison of active capital improvement projects, an illustrative representation of the Net Position -
Unrestricted accounts reflective of the Parks and Recreation Commission's Net Position policy, the current year
adjustments made to the Planned Use of Balance account, and detail of operating enhancement projects.
Contact: J. Phelps 248-858-5319
10 G. Maintenance Management Plan Budget - FY 2021
Monthly budget report for the FY2021 Maintenance Management Plan.
Contact: M. Donnellon, Jr. 248-343-6290
10 H. Monthly Parks Purchasing Reports — December 2020 - Month Ending 113112021 (FM 04, FY 21)
Monthly status reports on the OCPR Purchasing Activity. Reports included are:
• Monthly Contract Activity Log for January 2021
• Monthly Purchasing Expenditure Report — January 2021
Staff Recommendation: Approve the Monthly Parks Purchasing Reports for January 2021
(FM 04, FY 21) as presented.
Contact: P. Gastonia 248-858-0909 o/ 248-343-0368 c
5
10 I. Natural Resources FY2021 Contracted Invasive Species Treatments
As part of the budgeted Oakland County Parks & Recreation — Natural Resources Management (NR) program, staff plans
to invest $129,000 in budgeted funds for approximately 400 acres of invasive species treatments in cost centers that
exceed $20,000 and therefore require OCPRC approval. The proposed work will be completed at Addison, Highland,
Independence and Orion Oaks by annual blanket contractor Cardno of West Olive, MI.
Commission Action: Approval
Budget: Approved Funding $350,000
Approval History: FY2021 OCPR Budget Approval 9/2020
March 2021 OCPRC Meeting (Prescribed burning) 3/2021
Staff Recommendation: Commission approval to award Cardno of West Olive, MI the priority invasive species control
work for a not to exceed project amount of $129,000 as part of the budgeted FY2021 Natural
Resources Maintenance Program.
Contact: Sarah Cook-Maylen 248-343-1353
10 J. Sprinpfield Oaks — Arc Flash Studv and Labelinq
A phased electrical engineering compliance study of all existing electrical panels at all county park locations, beginning
in 2017.
Commission Action: General Approval
Budget: $50,000
Approval History: FY2021 Maintenance Management Plan 9/2020
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval to proceed with the arc flash electrical compliance study with
Berbiglia Associates, Inc. of Farmington Hills, Michigan in the amount of $32,500.
Contact: Michael J. Donnellon Jr./Colin Gibbs 248-343-6290/248-431-3556
10 K. Pending Capital Improvement Proiect Report
Monthly written project status report on OCPR Pending Capital Improvement Program Projects.
Contact: Michael J. Donnellon, Jr. 248-343-6290
10 L. Sprinpfield Oaks - Davisburp Mill Pond Dam Removal & Restoration — Davisburp Road Engineering Design
Change order request to AECOM Contract #5528 for necessary design/engineering work related to the additional
Davisburg road improvements that Springfield Township is funding through their available tri-party funds and general
fund. Charter Township of Springfield will be 100% responsible for this change order request to AECOM contract.
Commission Action: General Approval
Budget: SAC Millpond Dam Removal & Restoration $0
Contact: Mike Donnellon 248-343-6290
11. REGULAR AGENDA:
11 A-1. 2021 — 2029 Millape New Initiatives Funding Policy
This policy identifies that the new millage initiatives require dedicated annual funding to implement and solidifies that the
initiatives are consistent with OCPR's mission and goals. The policy identifies the annual budget process as the annual
opportunity for the Parks Commission to set budget targets for each new initiative (except for Free Annual Vehicle Passes)
based on evaluation of OCPR's overall budgetary needs.
Contact: Melissa Prowse
248-249-2801
6
11 A-2. Millage Grant Programs Draft Criteria and Process
With the approval and passage of the millage increase in November 2020, two new grant programs were indicated to
provide funding to Oakland County cities, villages and townships for trail and park development projects. Staff has
developed draft criteria and a timeline for the first round of funding. Staff is requesting that the Commission review and
discuss the draft criteria at the April 7, 2021 OCPRC meeting so staff can make any necessary changes and bring a
revised document to the May 5, 2021 OCPRC meeting for approval. A timeline for program implementation is also
included.
Contact: Melissa Prowse
248-249-2801
11 B. Fiscal Sustainabilitv Committee Report and Recommendation on Waterford Oaks Waterpark Alternatives
The Fiscal Sustainability Committee has reviewed multiple alternatives for the future of the Waterford Oaks Waterpark,
and the costs and benefits of each. The Committee makes the follow recommendation:
■ Open Waterford Waterpark in 2021 as is feasible under COVID-19 restrictions. Staff will have the waterpark
ready, with essential repairs completed, to open on May 1. The boardwalk/bridge will be closed to the public.
■ Re -imagine the future of Waterford Waterpark guided by public engagement and based on knowledge of
existing conditions and the costs associated with correcting issues and/or adding recreational features.
■ Planning staff to prepare draft public engagement plan for Fiscal Sustainability Committee review.
Contact: Susan Wells / Donna Folland / Michael J. Donnellon, Jr. 248-858-4634/248-736-9087/248-343-6290
11 C. Discussion on Facilities and Waterpark Openings for 2021
Staff will be prepared to have a discussion with the Commission on the proposed Facilities and Waterpark Openings
for 2021.
Contact: Susan Wells 248-858-4634
11 D. Proposed Revised Sponsorship Policy
In 2018 the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Sponsorship Policy was largely re -written to provide staff
with additional guidance on seeking sponsorships for OCPRC facilities, events and programs. With the new relationship
with Marx Layne & Co. who was brought on contract to help staff solicit, value, manage and maintain sponsors, the policy
needed some updates to reflect the current situation and to provide some flexibility for staff and the Marx Layne team to
engage with and secure new sponsors for the park system.
Contact: Melissa Prowse
248-249-2801
11 E. 2021 Michiqan Department of Natural Resources Off -Road Vehicle Trail Improvement Fund Grant Proqram
Application
Staff are applying to the Michigan DNR ORV Trail Improvement Fund for $200,000 for the construction of the 2nd half of
the Dixie Ledge Parking Area at Holly Oaks ORV Park. This grant program provided a grant of $199,000 in 2020 for the
first half of the parking lot construction, which begin in March. If successful, this 2nd grant will fund the remainder of the
project, which could be completed in 2022.
With the new Board of Commissioners process requiring approval of grant applications over $50,000, this application will
go to the Board of Commissioners for their approval.
Contact: Melissa Prowse 248-249-2801
11 F-1.Request for Proposals: Off -Road Vehicle Park Rental Maintenance
As we prepare for the 2nd year (first full -year) of operations at Holly Oaks ORV Park, and as we continue to talk to
corporations and their marketing teams about potential rental of the park for corporate use, staff has realized the need for
a contract with a company that can provide quick, high -quality maintenance work at the site to meet different rental
needs. There were several requests for this type of specific, short-term maintenance/earthwork projects last year, and
more such requests are anticipated going forward. Providing this service will allow our staff to be nimbler with accepting
requests for corporate rental at the park, which will increase revenue.
Contact: Melissa Prowse 248-249-2801
7
11 F-2.Request for Proposals: Off -Road Vehicle Feature Desiqn
As we prepare for the 2nd year (first full year) of operations at Holly Oaks ORV Park, and as we continue to talk to sponsors
about potential projects, staff realized the need for a contract with a company that specializes in the design of off -road
vehicle features. In the past we have utilized an existing vendor who has sub -contracted to a nationally recognized ORV
feature designer and builder. Staff are recommending the creation of a contract directly with someone that specializes in
this arena to save time and costs.
Contact: Melissa Prowse
248-249-2801
11 G. Potential Propertv Donation — Rose Township
The proposed donation parcel is 32 acres and is known as the "Water Road Parcel." The property is adjacent to and looks
out over the Michigan Nature Association's Big Valley Preserve. The parcel is along the rail corridor that runs adjacent to
both Rose Oaks and Highland Oaks County Parks. The property has been well -managed and maintained. Natural
Resources staff estimate is approximately $10,000 annually to manage the property. In addition to the property being
donated, the property owners have expressed an interest in donating cash to cover the due diligence and closing costs
for the County to accept the parcel (survey, Phase I, etc.). The property owners wish to restrict development of the property
at the time of donation. The proposed property restrictions include allowance for development of a trail and other
associated amenities.
Staff recommends the following:
Work with Oakland County Corporation Counsel and the landowners and a land conservancy to draft a
conservation easement that includes the attached proposed restrictions and allowed uses and bring it to the Parks
Commission for review
Draft donation agreements (land and funds) for Parks Commission review
Continue to work with RCOC to clarify present and future uses of the uncertified Water Road for property access
Contact: Melissa Prowse/Donna Folland. 248-249-2801 / 248-736-1649
12. REPORTS:
12 A. Fiscal Sustainabilitv Work Group/Financial Activitv Monthly Comparison
The Financial Activity Monthly Comparison report compares the most recently closed fiscal month with the same
month of the previous year.
Staff will also provide an update on the work of the Fiscal Sustainability Work Group.
Contact: S. Wells 248-858-4634
12B. Hol/v Oaks ORV Park Update
Staff will provide a brief report on Holly Oaks ORV Park, scheduled to re -open April 10, 2021.
Contact: Melissa Prowse
248-249-2801
12 C. Planninq and Resource Development Update — Annual Dashboard and Databook
Report on the 2021 Workplan for the Planning and Resource Development Unit and link to the Annual Dashboard and
Databook.
Contact: Melissa Prowse 248-249-2801
12 D. OCPR Volunteer Update
Staff has provided reports for FY 2020 Oakland county Parks and Recreation Volunteer Services and also OCPR
Volunteer Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAA's).
Contact: Jess Whatley
248-975-9717
8
12 E. Interim Executive Officer Report
Update on current Oakland County Parks and Recreation matters by the Interim Executive Officer.
Contact: S. Wells 248-858-4634
Executive Committee Update
Update on discussions from the previous month's OCPR Commission Executive Committee meeting.
Contact: S. Wells 248-858-4634
13. OLD BUSINESS
14. NEW BUSINESS
15. CLOSED SESSION:
A. Potential Property Acquisition and Management Update
16. ADJOURN
9
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission
Regular Meeting
March 3, 2021
Chairman McGillivray called the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 2:03 p.m.
via teleconference.
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Gary R. McGillivray from Madison Heights, Vice Chairman J. David VanderVeen from Waterford
Township, Secretary Ebony Bagley from Farmington Hills, Executive Committee Member Christine Long from
Commerce Township, Yolanda Charles from Southfield, Amanda Herzog from Royal Oak, Andrea LaFontaine
from Richmond, Jim Nash from Farmington Hills, Nancy Quarles from Southfield, E. Lance Stokes from
West Bloomfield (10)
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT:
None (0)
ALSO PRESENT:
Parks and Recreation
OC Fiscal Services/P & R
OC Corporation Counsel
Groveland Township
Holly Township
Golf Convergence
GovHR USA
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Daniel Stencil, Executive Officer
Sue Wells, Manager of Parks and Recreation Operations
Carol Bacak-Egbo, Historian
Mike Boyd, Waterford Oaks Park Supervisor
Phil Castonia, Chief — Business Operations
Sarah Cook-Maylen, Natural Resources Coordinator
Mike Donnellon, Chief — Park Facilities Maint. & Development
Sandy Dorey, Recreation Programs Supervisor
Jim Dunleavy, Chief - Park Operations & Maint. - N. District
Tom Hughes, Chief — Park Operations & Maint. - S. District
Steve Langlois, Groundskeeper II
Kelley Moss, Recreation Programs Supervisor
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning
Brandy Sotke-Boyd, Chief -Recreation Programs and Services
Desiree Stanfield, Supervisor — Marketing & Communications
Aaron Stepp, Business Systems Supervisor
Jeff Phelps, Fiscal Services Coordinator
Jody Hall, Financial Attorney
Robert DePalma, Supervisor
George Kullis, Supervisor
James Keegan
Jaymes Vettraino
Moved by Ms. Quarles, supported by Mr. VanderVeen to approve the agenda with the following
changes:
Add under REGULAR AGENDA:
H. Approval of Consultant Firm for OCPR Executive Officer Search
I. Appointment of Interim OCPR Executive Officer
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, Kostin, LaFontaine, Long, McGillivray, Nash, Quarles, VanderVeen (10)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.
10
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Moved by Ms. Herzog, supported by Ms. Bagley to approve the minutes of the Oakland County Parks and
Recreation Commission Regular Meeting of February 3, 2021, as submitted.
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, Kostin, LaFontaine, Long, McGillivray, Nash, Quarles, VanderVeen (10)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW APPOINTMENT TO OCPR COMMISSION
Chairman McGillivray introduced E. Lance Stokes of West Bloomfield. Mr. Stokes was recently appointed as the new
OCPR Commission member, replacing Robert E. Kostin. Mr. Stokes is a Research Scientist and Environmental
Engineering Consultant. He advised he is very pleased to have been appointed to the Oakland County Parks and
Recreation Commission.
PRESENTATIONS/RECOGNITIONS:
mParks 2021 Local Elected Officials
Executive Officer Daniel Stencil introduced Groveland Township Supervisor Bob DePalma, and Holly Township
Supervisor George Kullis. These two individuals were presented the mParks 2021 Local Elected Officials Award and
were recognized for making a significant contribution toward enhancing resident quality of life in Oakland County,
through their promotion of parks and recreation, and their efforts in establishing Holly Oaks ORV Park.
Oakland Countv Parks and Recreation 2021 mParks Awards
Executive Officer Daniel Stencil also presented the following mParks Awards to Oakland County Parks and
Recreation staff. These awards were presented at the 2021 mParks Virtual Conference in early February.
2021 Park Resources Leadership Award
Mike Boyd, Park Supervisor in charge of Waterford Oaks, Rose Oaks, and Highland Oaks county parks, received the
mParks 2021 Park Resources Leadership Award. Mike was recognized for his commitment to and enthusiasm for
mParks' Parks Resource Focus Group. Through his leadership the group hosts events for parks and recreation
professionals such as the Mowdeo, chain saw workshops, and annual MIOSHA training days.
Innovative Award: Quest for Adventure
OCPR Recreation Program Supervisor Kelley Moss won the mParks 2021 Innovative Programming Award for her
program Quest for Adventure. Kelly developed themed scavenger hunts for communities during the COVID-19
pandemic as a creative way to challenge families to get outdoors. In 2020, her program logged 2,650 participants
in 10 communities and received enthusiastic feedback from families.
11
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 3
COVID-19 Engagement Award: I Sov Program
Recreation Program Supervisor Sandy Dorey, Natural Resource Project Coordinator Sarah Cook-Maylen, and OC
Parks Historian Carol Bacak-Egbo received the mParks 2021 COVID-19 Engagement Award for their I Spy Program.
Participants were invited to explore Oakland County Parks in a virtual or physical game of I Spy which featured history
and natural features of the parks. The program ran from June -September 2020.
Recognition of Steve Lanqlois, Lonq-term OCPR Part Time Emplovee
Executive Officer Daniel Stencil presented a plaque to Steve Langlois, Groundskeeper II and long-term part-time
employee for Oakland County Parks and Recreation for the past 38 years. His wealth of knowledge and hard work
have been invaluable to the parks system. Langlois worked primarily for the Mobile Recreation Unit and recently
operated heavy equipment for projects at the Holly Oaks ORV Park. He has been key to the set-up and operations of
recreation activities for the annual Fire & Ice event in downtown Rochester and the World Championship of BMX
hosted at the Waterford Oaks BMX Track. In addition, he also represented OCPR at the annual Michigan Senior
Olympics, hosted by the Older Persons Commission, and has also served on the Board of Directors for the Michigan
Senior Olympics.
Mr. Stencil also acknowledged and thanked all the OCPR part-time staff. OCPR would not exist without the
support, efforts, variety of skills and abilities that part-time staff provide every day. Their efforts really make the
park system go - especially in the summer.
OCPR Commissioner Recognition - Robert E. Kostin
This item was postponed until the April 7, 2021 OCPR Commission meeting.
Recognition of OCPR Executive Officer Daniel Stencil
Chairman McGillivray advised the Commission the March 3, 2021 OCPR Commission meeting is Executive Officer
Daniel Stencil's last Commission meeting before he retires. In recognition of his many years of dedicated service to
Oakland County Parks and Recreation, Chairman McGillivray presented Mr. Stencil with the following proclamation:
WHEREAS, Daniel J. Stencil has served Oakland County Parks and Recreation for more than 43 years, and
WHEREAS, Daniel J. Stencil has held various positions within the organization since 1977, until he became
promoted to Executive Officer in 2006, and
WHEREAS, Daniel J. Stencil's leadership has helped create and provide outdoor, positive recreation
experiences for 2 million visitors to the Oakland County Parks each year and an additional 1.6 million
residents via its outreach services, and
WHEREAS, Daniel J. Stencil has developed professional relationships with local, state and national
organizations that emphasize community collaborations so that all residents of all abilities have access to
quality recreation experiences that enhance quality of life, and
WHEREAS, Daniel J. Stencil has served in leadership roles in parks and recreation professional organizations
for the benefit of all individuals working in the field, including mParks, the Michigan Recreation and Park
Association; the Michigan Association of County Parks and Recreation Officials; the National Recreation and
Park Association; and the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration, and
WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission and staff work toward the expansion of
trails in Oakland County, protection of natural resources and support economic prosperity through the
provision of seasonal jobs, part-time and full-time jobs and business operations that support Oakland County.
NOW, THEREFORE, I Gary R. McGillivray, Chairman of the Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Commission of Oakland County, Michigan do hereby proclaim that Daniel J. Stencil is honored for his 43 years
of service to the residents of Oakland County.
12
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 4
COMMUNICATIONS:
Capital Improvement Expense Summary
Moved by Ms. Herzog, supported by Ms. Bagley to receive and file the Communications Capital Improvement
Expense Summary Report.
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, Kostin, LaFontaine, Long, McGillivray, Nash, Quarles, VanderVeen (10)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.
CONSENT AGENDA:
Moved by Ms. Quarles, supported by Mr. Stokes to approve Items 10 A through 10 M under Consent
Agenda, as follows:
A. OCPR Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Budget to Actual Report for Month
Ending 01/31/2021 (FM 04 FY 21)
B. Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Comparison Report for Month Ending
01/31/2021 (FM 04 FY 21)
C. Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Report by Line Item for Month Ending
01/31/2021 (FM 04 FY 21)
D. Monthly Capital Equipment Report for Month Ending 10/31/2020 (FM 01 FY 21)
E. Monthly Revenue and Expenditure Average Comparison Report for Month Ending
01/31/2021 (FM 04 FY 21)
F. Capital Improvement Projects Budget to Actual Report & Statement of Net Position
For Month Ending 01/31/2021 (FM 04 FY 21)
G. Maintenance Management Plan Budget
H. Monthly Purchasing Reports for Month Ending 12/31/2020 (FM 03 FY 21)
I. FY 2021 1st Quarter Contributions Report
J. FY 2021 Fiscal Services 1 st Quarter Financial Forecast and Budget Amendments
K. FY 2020 1st Quarter FY 2021 Uncollectible Debt Write -Offs
L. Pending Capital Improvement Project Report
M. CIP/Maintenance Project Approvals:
1. Americans With Disabilities (ADA) Mini Grant Program & Budget Amendment
2. Pavement Maintenance Program
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, Long, McGillivray, Nash, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (10)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
REGULAR AGENDA:
Presentation by Golf Convergence on Results and Recommendation on OCPR Golf Operations
Manager of Parks and Recreation Operations Sue Wells thanked the Commission, Chiefs, Supervisors and Staff
for all their efforts and hard work in compiling this information for the Golf Course Operations presentation.
JJ Keegan, consultant from Golf Convergence, provided a presentation on the results and his recommendation
on OCPR Golf Course Operations. Items covered in the presentation included:
• OCPR Golf Course Ballot Reference Sheet
• Appendix A — Data Analysis
13
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 5
• Appendix B — Golf Workshop Employee Survey
• Appendix C — Customer Survey
• Average Financial Analysis for Golf Courses
• Revenue/Expenditure Projections
• Impacts on Golf Courses due to COVID-19
• Online Reservation System
• Operations and Financial Goals
• Allocation of Resources
• Golf Course Fees & Charges
• Proposed Recommended Changes
• Annual Opening Date Timeline
• Future of OCPR Golf Courses
• Possible Future Use Alternatives
• Golf Course Operations Administrative Principal Contact
Chairman McGillivray advised Mr. Keegan the Commission would like to take all the information presented under
advisement, review everything, get a report and recommendation from the OCPR Administration staff, and move
forward after that report is presented. There was concern from the Commission about the timeline for implementing
any changes, and also some of the items included in the Ballot Reference Sheet.
Sue Wells advised staff has a meeting scheduled on Monday, March 8, 2021, on Golf Course Operations
implementations, including the items presented, to discuss fine tuning specifics and assignments. A lot of these items
presented have already been started and/or have already occurred. The most urgent item to address, and the most
time sensitive, is the golf course fees. Staff can bring back the implementation plan to the next Commission meeting.
Moved by Mr. VanderVeen, supported by Ms. Charles to accept the report and work toward it as a final
goal, and get a report back from the Administration at the next meeting as far as all the other items
included in the report.
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, Long, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (9)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
OCPR 2021 Proposed Rules and Regulations
Moved by Ms. Herzog, supported by Ms. Quarles to adopt the following resolution on the proposed 2021
revisions to the Oakland County Parks and Recreation General Information/Rules and Regulations and
forward it to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners for final approval:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission was established by the Oakland County
Board of Supervisors in 1966 under Public Act (P.A.) 261; and
WHEREAS P.A. 261 includes a provision to allow county parks commissions to make rules for the protection,
regulation and control of all its facilities and areas with the approval of the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners; and
WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has established rules and regulations for
this protection, regulation and control; and
WHEREAS revisions for clarification purposes are requested, which have been reviewed and approved bythe
Oakland County Corporation Counsel.
14
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 6
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission approves
the revisions to the 2021 General Information and Rules and Regulations as reviewed by Oakland County
Corporation Counsel.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised 2021 Oakland County Parks and
Recreation General Information and Rules and Regulations be forwarded to the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners for approval.
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (8)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
Recommendation from OCPR/OC BOC Committee on Request from Food and Beveraae Vendors for Waiver of
Debt
Staff provided an update on the status of the outstanding debt for Fuller Oaks Management (FOM) for Addison Oaks
and Glen Oaks Conference Centers. OCPR Staff, Chairman McGillivray and OC BOC Chairman Woodward have met
a few times to discuss the FOM outstanding debt. FOM had previously requested the Commission waive all past due
utility and contract payment amounts for 2020. There has not been any negotiation or settlement on this matter. No
payments have been received from FOM and the debt continues to increase. Currently FOM is in the arrears as of
January 1, 2021 about $68,000 in utilities, and the fixed fees and equipment fees for FY 2020 is $147,518.
The Commission directed staff to work with Fuller Oak Management to enter into an agreement on the outstanding
debt, work out a payment plan and possible waiver of past due amounts, and report back to the Commission at the
next Commission meeting.
FY 2021 OCPR Fees and Charaes Update (New Items):
Proposed Hollv Oaks ORV Park Fees and Charaes
Moved by Ms. Herzog, supported by Ms. Quarles to approve the proposed 2021 Fees and Charges for Holly
Oaks ORV Park listed below:
Dailv Vehicle Entry Rates:
2021 Daily Vehicle Rate: $15 online, $20 at the gate
2021 Corporate Rental Rates (Same as 2020):
Closed Park Days:
Peak: June — August: $2,000/day
Shoulder: April/May, September/October: $1,500/day
Winter: December - March: $1,000/day
Open Park Days:
$500/day
Additional Hourly Fees:
Commission authorizes the Executive Officer to approve hourly rates for any rentals of the park that
extend past the agreed -upon rental timeframe as documented in the Facility Use Agreement. These
rates would cover the cost of staff having to stay later in the evening to oversee the park being
cleared out and locked up and could potentially vary over the course of the year depending on park
hours and staff availability.
15
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 7
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (8)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
Proposed Recreation Programs & Services - Additional Item
Moved by Ms. Quarles, supported by Ms. Herzog to approve the proposed 2021 Rental Fees and Charges for
the OCPR Archery Range at Independence Oaks County Park listed below:
Archery Range Rental Fees:
• Two-hour rental with equipment and 3 range staff - $375
• Each additional Hour - $75
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (8)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
Proposed 2021 Golf Course Fees
Moved by Ms. Herzog, supported by Mr. Quarles to approve the proposed 2021 Oakland County Parks and
Recreation Golf Course Fees and Charges listed below:
2021 OCPR Golf Course Fees and Charges
2021
Rate
GOLF:
Glen Oaks - Senior Weekday - 18 Holes
$24.00
Glen Oaks - Senior Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
Glen Oaks - Senior Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$10.00
Glen Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 18 Holes
$24.00
Glen Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
Glen Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$10.00
Glen Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 18 Holes
$24.00
Glen Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
Glen Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$10.00
Lyon Oaks - Senior/Military/Adaptive/Veteran - Weekday - 18 Holes
$45.00
Lyon Oaks - Senior/Military/Adaptive/Veteran - Weekday - 9 Holes
$27.00
Lyon Oaks - Senior/Military/Adaptive/Veteran - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$18.00
Lyon Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 18 Holes
$45.00
Lyon Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 9 Holes
$27.00
Lyon Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$18.00
Lyon Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 18 Holes
$45.00
Lyon Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 9 Holes
$27.00
Lyon Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$18.00
Springfield Oaks - Senior Weekday - 18 Holes
$24.00
16
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 8
Springfield Oaks - Senior Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
Springfield Oaks - Senior Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$10.00
Springfield Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 18 Holes
$24.00
Springfield Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
Springfield Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$10.00
Springfield Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 18 Holes
$24.00
Springfield Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
Springfield Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$10.00
White Lake Oaks - Senior Weekday - 18 Holes
$22.00
White Lake Oaks - Senior Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
White Lake Oaks - Senior Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$8.00
White Lake Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 18 Holes
$22.00
White Lake Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
White Lake Oaks - Military/Veteran - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$8.00
White Lake Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 18 Holes
$22.00
White Lake Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - 9 Holes
$14.00
White Lake Oaks - Adaptive - Weekday - Extra 9 Holes
$8.00
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (8)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
CIP/Maintenance Project Approvals:
Proposed 2021 OCPR Prescribed Burn Program and Budget Amendment
Moved by Ms. Charles, supported by Ms. Quarles to approve an increase in the current Natural Areas
Stewardship Program (FM -General Program Admin) budget to complete the previously scheduled and
postponed FY2020 Prescribed Burns, in the amount of $70,000 from Unrestricted Net Position.
Expenses: FY2021
50800-5060910-160431-730789 General Program Administration $70,000
50800-5060101-160000-796500 Budgeted Equity Adjustments ($70,000)
$-0-
Net Position — Unrestricted:
50800-5060910-160430-730789 General Program Administration $70,000
Net Position Unrestricted ($70,000)
$-0-
And, as required by OCPR Commission policy and included within the previously recommended increase,
approve the following estimated prescribed burn areas:
• Addison Oaks $21,000
• Highland Oaks $22,000
• Independence Oaks $22,000
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (8)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
17
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 9
2021 Double Uo Food Bucks Program - Fair Food Network Grant Acceptance
Moved by Mr. VanderVeen, supported by Ms. Charles to adopt the following resolution for the 2021 Double Up
Food Bucks Grant Agreement from the Fair Food Network requesting the OC Board of Commissioners
authorize and accept the grant award of $25,000:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has been notified of the award of $25,000
from the Fair Food Network through its Double Up Food Bucks Program; and
WHEREAS the Double Up Food Bucks Program helps to improve the nutrition of low-income families while
promoting local farmers; and
WHEREAS encouraging healthy lifestyles is a main component of the mission of the Oakland County Parks
and Recreation Commission; and
WHEREAS the Double Up Food Bucks Program award provides matching dollars for SNAP benefits
recipients to spend on fresh fruits and vegetables at the Oakland County Farmers Market; and
WHEREAS a budget amendment is not required as the funds are accounted for in general ledger account
228100 Deposits Reconciliation.
NOW THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission hereby
recommends the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorize and accept the award of $25,000 from
the Fair Food Network's Double Up Food Bucks Program.
AYES: Bagley, Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (8)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
Proposed COVID-19 Memorial Event at Waterford Oaks Countv Park
Moved by Mr. VanderVeen, supported by Ms. Quarles to approve the proposed Partnership Agreement with
Glenlore Trails Company for the proposed COVID-19 Memorial Event at Waterford Oaks County Park with the
expense of $14,000.00 to be deducted from the Recreation Programs and Services special event line item.
AYES: Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (7)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
Approval of Consultant Firm for OCPR Executive Officer Search
Moved by Ms. Charles, supported by Mr. VanderVeen to approve and authorize the payment in the amount of
$21,500 to GovHR USA for their services for the national search for the position of Oakland County Parks and
Recreation Executive Officer/Director.
AYES: Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (7)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
18
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 10
Chairman McGillivray advised he would form a subcommittee of OCPR Commission members to work with
Jaymes Vettraino of GovHR USA on the interviews for the OCPR Executive Officer position and will announce the
members of that committee at the April 7, 2021 OCPR Commission meeting.
Appointment of Interim OCPR Executive Officer
Moved by Mr. VanderVeen, supported by Mr. Stokes to adopt the following resolution approving the
appointment of Susan M. Wells as Interim Executive Officer of Oakland County Parks and Recreation and
forward it to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners for final approval:
WHEREAS after decades of service to the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission ("OCPRC"),
the current OCPRC Executive Officer, Daniel J. Stencil, is retiring on March 15, 2021; and
WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners in Miscellaneous Resolution #12232 re-classified
the Executive Officer position so as to be excluded from the Oakland County Merit System pursuant to Merit
Rule 1.1.3; and
WHEREAS the OCPRC is responsible for hiring and appointing the new Executive Officer; and
WHEREAS OCPRC and Oakland County will conduct a search for a new Executive Officer; and
WHEREAS during the search for the new Executive Officer, OCPRC will require an Interim Executive Officer;
and
WHEREAS Susan M. Wells, the existing OCPRC Manager of Parks and Recreation Operations, has agreed
to fill the OCPRC Executive Officer position on an interim basis, until a new Executive Officer is hired and
appointed by the OCPRC.
NOW THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission hires and
appoints Susan M. Wells as the Interim Executive Officer beginning March 8, 2021 until a permanent
Executive Officer is hired and appointed by the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that once a permanent Executive Officer is hired and appointed by the Oakland
County Parks and Recreation Commission, Susan M. Wells shall be transferred to her previous position of
Manager of Parks and Recreation Operations.
AYES: Charles, Herzog, LaFontaine, McGillivray, Quarles, Stokes, VanderVeen (7)
NAYS: (0)
Motion passed on a roll call vote.
REPORTS:
Fiscal Sustainabilitv Work Group
Manager of Parks and Recreation Operations Sue Wells advised the Fiscal Sustainability Workgroup will present a
recommendation to the Commission on Waterford Oaks Waterpark at the April 7, 2021 OCPR Commission meeting.
ORV Park Update
Staff provided a brief update on Holly Oaks ORV Park. Topics covered in the update included: 2021 proposed ORV
park opening - April 10, 2021; new personnel positions at the park; parking lot construction project; track
upgrades/modifications; new requirement for vehicle flags; Holly Power Sports rental vehicles onsite for patrons to rent;
and new potential sponsorships.
19
OCPR Commission Meeting
March 3, 2021
Page 11
Executive Officer Report
In addition to the Executive Officer's Report filed in the agenda packet, Executive Officer Daniel Stencil provided an
update on the following items:
• The next OCPR Commission meeting will be Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.
• The next OCPRC Executive Committee meeting is scheduled on Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. via
teleconference.
• Proposed FY 2022-2024 OCPR Budget process and schedule.
• Applications and hiring process for 2021 Summer Jobs at Oakland County Parks and Recreation.
Mr. Stencil advised he will be part of the new OCPR Commissioner orientation scheduled on Monday, March 15, 2021,
which will be his last day of employment with Oakland County Parks and Recreation. He also expressed his
appreciation to the Commission for the proclamation and recognition of his years of service at Oakland County Parks
and Recreation.
Executive Committee Update
Chairman McGillivray advised the discussion at the last OCPRC Executive Committee meeting included
the golf course consultant, the golf course information compiled by the consultant and staff, and the request from
Fuller Oak Management Co. to waive its delinquent debt from the OCPR Conference Centers.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to report.
NEW BUSINESS
Commissioner Herzog advised the Commission the OC Board of Commissioners approved a Climate Emergency
Resolution in the fall of 2019. This will affect OCPR and the decisions the Commission will make in the future. This
spurred other communities such as Royal Oak to have a similar climate resolution. Royal Oak has also done a
Greenhouse Gas Inventory, made reduction goals and is currently working on a sustainability plan. She understands
the County will be conducting an audit, have a campus and countywide plan, and create an Office of Sustainability.
The state and other communities in Michigan have a goal of net zero by 2050, and she believes the Countywill have a
similar goal. OCPR could be very valuable for the County in the visibility and promotion of these sustainability projects
or public engagement, buy -in, and educational purposes, especially in communities that are not doing sustainability
climate planning and implementation just yet. There will be more discussions, information and plans that will go
through to achieve these goals. She wanted to call attention to this now as decisions are made for the parks system,
and to make sure these decisions are viewed through a 2050 and environmental lens.
Commissioner Charles requested the Commission have on the radar a discussion on deer culling, including the
jurisdiction, the reach and the scope of the parks. Chairman McGillivray requested staff present a report on this matter
at the April Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at 4:40 p.m.
Ebony Bagley, Secretary
Vicky Valko, Recording Secretary
20
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7
COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Submitted: March 22, 2021
Subject: Recognition of Brad Lowe
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Brad Lowe has worked part-time for Oakland County Parks and Recreation for 44 years. His creativity and
enthusiasm have entertained park visitors of all ages.
Brad Lowe is currently the supervisor of the Campground Recreation program at Addison Oaks Campground
and County Park. He and his staff provide crafts, games, music, and other entertainment. Many campers say
they return to Addison Oaks specifically for the Campground Recreation program.
Prior to his current position, Brad designed, created, and acted in puppet shows for the parks system. He was
the Master Puppeteer who constructed his own puppets and props. He is also credited with creating the park
system's mascot, Oakie the Squirrel, and an Oakie Jr. puppet.
Join us in recognizing Brad Lowe, for his dedication and service to the residents of Oakland County. He is one
of the parks system's `unsung heroes' whose efforts and contributions deserve to be noticed.
21
Staff Recognition
009
April 2021 Commission Meeting Great Parks for Great People QAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 A
PARK OPERATIONS
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Thomas J. Hughes, Chief of Park Operations — South District
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Capital Equipment
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
The Oakland County Parks Operations staff is providing the proposed FY2022 Capital Equipment list. Capital
Equipment consists of maintenance equipment, kitchen equipment and recreation equipment over $5,000.
The proposed Capital Equipment is for existing parks and does not include equipment that would be
necessary for potential future park developments or acquisitions. The FY2022 Capital Equipment Power
Point which has information regarding existing equipment that will be replaced along with the proposed
equipment information. Proposed Capital Equipment budget for FY2021 is $607,500
ATTACHMENTS
- FY2022 Proposed Capital Equipment List
- FY2022 Proposed Capital Equipment Power Point
23
BUDGET CENTER
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT
ESTIMATED COST
Addison Oaks Park
ADD
Zero Turn Mower
Zero Turn Mower
$
19,000
Addison Oaks Park
ADD
Utility Vehicle (2)
Utility Vehicle (2)
$
18,000
Facilities Maintenance
FM
Loader
Loader
$
125,000
Facilities Maintenance - NR
FM
Dump Trailer
Dump Trailer
$
8,000
Glen Oaks Golf Course
GLG
Toro Sidewinder
Surrounds Mower
$
35,000
Groveland Oaks Park
GRV
Utility Vehicle (2)
Utility Vehicle (2)
$
18,000
Groveland Oaks Concessions
GRC
Taylor Ice Cream Machine
Ice Cream Machine
$
17,000
Lyon Oaks Golf Course
LYG
Rough Mower
Rough Mower
$
68,000
Orion Oaks
ORN
Truckster / Club Car Cart
Utility Vehicle - Light Duty
$
13,000
Recreation Section
REC
Stage
Stage
$
130,000
Red Oaks Golf Course
RDG
Fairway Mower
Fairway Mower
$
62,000
Red Oaks Waterpark
RWP
John Deere Gator
Utility Vehicle - Light Duty
$
12,500
Springfield Oaks Golf Course
SPG
Greens Mower
Greens Mower
$
33,000
Springfield Oaks Golf Course
SPG
EZGO
Beverage Cart
$
15,000
Waterford Oaks Park
WTR
Zero Turn Mower
Zero Turn Mower
$
15,000
White Lake Oaks Golf Course
WLG
Greensmower
Roller
$
19,000
TOTAL
$
607,500
24
0�11IA A,1\I11111WO-915J►1\1 �_1;i ►�
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 B & C
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Michael J. Donnellon, Jr., Chief of Park Facilities Maintenance & Development
Donna Folland, Senior Planner
Submitted: March 8, 2021
Subject: FY2022-FY2026 Capital Improvement Program Plan (CIP) Net Position (Informational)
FY2022-FY2026 Maintenance Management Plan (MMP) Operating Budget (Informational)
FY2022=Natural Resource Management Plan (NR), Operating Budget (Informational)
PROJECT CATEGORIES
Agenda Type:
Approval Type:
Project Type:
SUMMARY
Consent Agenda
Conceptual Approval
Capital Improvement
Regular Agenda
Construction Approval
✓ Maintenance
✓ Reports
General Approval
✓ Receive & File ✓
1. Preliminary FY2022 CIP, MMP & NR:
a. This preliminary FY2022 program/project lists has been developed by staff and Commission for
capital improvement, facility maintenance and natural resource management of over 230 Oakland
County Parks and Recreation Commission (OCPRC) assets, buildings, natural areas and recreational
features within 14 park locations, beginning the FY2022 budgetary review process. See Attachment
A for the preliminary program/project lists and a preliminary 5-year forecast.
i. Beginning in FY2022, the NR program will be separated from the MMP.
ii. The preliminary FY2022 program/project lists have been adjusted since they were submitted to
the Commission in January 2021. Attachment B compares the current lists with the previously
submitted lists.
This plan and forecast are guided by the following Strategic Action Plan goal to manage assets and
infrastructure: Sustainably reinvest in existing assets and infrastructure, make new investments when
supported by fiscal resources, recreational trends, public engagement, and usage data'.
i. The list represents a 100% reinvestment in existing assets and facilities
ii. Park system assets have an estimated total replacement value of $119,814,3301.
Calculated reinvestment rate in FY2022 is 4.97%.3
' The Strategic Action Plan was approved by OCPRC on 1/10/2018 and adopted by OC Board of Commissioners on 1/2/2018 as part
of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2018-2022.
2 Oakland County Parks' Annual Dashboard and Data Book for Fiscal Year 2020, page 25.
3 According to both the "National Research Council — Building Research Committee", and the "Association of Physical Plant
Administrators (APPA), Capital Renewal and Deferred Maintenance Programs Report, 2009, Harvey Kaiser", an estimated 2% - 4%
reinvestment (capital renewal) of the current replacement value of facilities is recommended.
25
Page 2
c. Past budget constraints have resulted in deferral of reinvestment in existing assets. Attachment C
identifies the estimated amounts of deferred investment by each of (12) general asset improvement
types.
i. A minimum of $26,325,228 in deferred asset management reinvestments have been identified.
ii. Condition assessments of existing assets and facilities to quantify needed reinvestment is a
continuing process.
iii. With the passage of the 2020 millage, the preliminary FY2022 program/project lists begin to
address this deferred reinvestment.
iv. Based on recent discussions for consideration of a Park Infrastructure Improvement Bond (PIIB),
a potential bond would address (12) general asset improvement types, that include specific
previously identified projects of (1) Health and safety, (2) Regulatory and (3) Customer Service -
Operational Efficiencies/Savings. Implementing groups of similar projects through the PIIB may
potentially result in cost savings compared to implementing individual projects.
d. The proposed FY2022 budget recommended amounts include:
i. CIP Programs/Projects subtotal $ 4,406,000
ii. MMP Programs/Projects subtotal $ 684,800
iii. NR Programs/Projects Subtotal $ 866,000
iv. TOTAL PROJECTS $ 5,956,800
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A — Preliminary FY2022 CIP, MMP, NR Program/Project Lists
htti)s://www.oakaov.com/parks/aetinvolved/Pages/cii).asi)x.
Attachment B — Preliminary 5-Year Forecasts
Attachment C — Project List Adjustments
Attachment D — Park Infrastructure Improvements
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
FY2022-FY2026 Preliminary project list and forecast is open for discussion.
MOTION
No motion required at this time.
26
GAKLAND Attachment A. Preliminary FY2022 Project Lists
COUNTY PARKS February 22, 2021
For full documentation of project lists, including project scopes,
general budget/plan information and definitions:
visit: httiDs://www.oakgov.com/parks/qetinvolved/Pages/cir).asr)x.
Update:3/23/2021
27
ND
COUNTYPMKS
KIL Preliminary Project Lists: Capital Improvement Program
Budget Project Project
Center ID Asset Name: Project Name Priority FY2022
Capital Projects
Park System Programs
ADM
123 Accessibility
Addison Oaks
ACC
3 Conference Center
ACC
5 Conference Center
ADD
281 Addison Playgrounds
ADD
1819 House 1480 W Romeo Road
ADD
17 Maintenance Building
ADD
1735 Site and Grounds
Glen Oaks
GLC, G
1616 Clubhouse
GLC, G
1809 Clubhouse
GLG
34 Golf Course Irrigation System
Groveland Oaks
GRV
153 Cabins
GRV
160 Firewood Shed
GRV
1034 Group Area 1 Pavilion
GRV
1035 Group Area 10 and 11 Pavilion
GRV
1036 Group Area 12 and 13 Pavilion
GRV
1037 Group Area 2 and 3 Pavilion
GRV
1038 Group Area 4 and 5 Pavilion
GRV
1039 Group Area 6 and 7 Pavilion
GRV
1040 Group Area 8 and 9 Pavilion
GRV
157 Park House 6000 Grange Hall
GRV
1224 Pines Playground
Holly Oaks
HRV
1936 Proposed New
HRV
1937 Proposed New
Independence
Oaks
IND
161 Boathouse
IND
163 Concession and Bathhouse
IND
53 Dock and Boardwalk
IND
1058 Lakepoint Pavilion
IND
56 Moraine Knoll Playground
IND
1980 Park Entrance Boulavard
IND
1979 Park Entrance Road
IND
1982 Park Road North
IND
1983 Park Road South
Red Oaks
RDP
1315 Nature Center
RDP
1917 Nature Center
RWP
181 Waterpark Bathhouse
4,406,000
ADA Transition Program
1
50,000
Garden Room AC Replacement
3
12,000
Restroom Furnace Replacement
3
10,000
Improvements
1
80,000
Conversion to Park Offices
3
75,000
Water Softener Replacement
3
15,000
Group Area 3 & 4 Repurposing
4
45,000
Electrical Improvements
1
140,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
42,500
Upgrade Phase II
3
500,000
Decking Replacements
3
84,000
Replacement
3
15,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
5,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
17,000
Replacement
1
80,000
Parking Lot
3
200,000
Parking Lot Grant Reimbursement
3
-200,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
18,500
Site and Building Improvements
3
25,000
Replacements
3
200,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
6,000
Replacement
1
80,000
Park Entrance Boulevard Paving
3
287,500
Park Entrance Road Paving
3
438,000
Park Road Paving, North
3
487,500
Park Road Paving, South
3
337,500
Site and Landscape Improvements
3
40,000
Site and Landscape Improvements Reimbursement
3
-17,500
Roof Replacement Metal
3
120,000
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Project Lists: Capital Improvement Program
28
Budget Project
Center
ID Asset Name:
Project Name
RWP 825
Waterpark Maintenance
Main Wave Pool Boiler Replacement
Building
RWP 187
Waterpark Pavilion
Roof Replacement Metal
RWP 79
Waterpark River Ride
ADA Entrance Railing
Springfield Oaks
SPG 100
Maintenance Building North
HVAC Replacement
Waterford Oaks
ADM 105
Administration Building
Boiler Replacement
ADM 108
Facilities Maintenance Building
HVAC Replacement
WTR 110
Paradise Peninsula Landing
Boiler Replacement
Building
WTR 112
Platform Tennis Courts (2)
Tube Heater Replacements
White Lake Oaks
AL
WLG 1179
Golf Course Irrigation System
Replacements Phase II
Capital Projects Budget Target
vnpw��
1750
Budget Target
Capital Improvement Program
Grand Total (Amount over (<0) or under (>0) Budget Target)
Project
Priority FY20,
3 100,000
3 200,000
2 65,000
MM:3 15,000
3 462,000
3 100,000
3 10,000
3 5,000
3 220,000
-4,358,300
-4,358,300
47,700
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Project Lists: Capital Improvement Program
29
CAKLAN
COUNTYPARKSS Preliminary Project Lists: Maintenance Management Plan
Budget Project
Center ID Asset Name:
Maintenance Projects
Park System Programs
ADM
122 Accessibility
ADM
126 Boundaries
ADM
1531 Building Roofs
ADM
1923 Park Assets
ADM
1524 Park Assets
ADM
125 Pavement and Drainage
ADM
127 Signs
ADM
124 Utilities and Infrastructure
Addison Oaks
ACC
6 Conference Center
ADD
1820 Cabin 1
Glen Oaks
GLC
25 Clubhouse
GLG
959 Northeast Steel Bridge
GLG
960 Northwest Steel Bridge
GLG
32 Southeast Steel Bridge
GLG
958 Southwest Steel Bridge
GLG
961 Wood Pedestrian Bridge
Groveland Oaks
GRV
38 Cabin 5
GRV
41 Cottage Island Bridge
GRV
45 Mathews Island Bridge
GRV
42 Paradise Island Long Span Bridge
Independence Oaks
IND
1201 Nature Center Bridge
IND
1511 Trail G Habitat Trail
Red Oaks
RWP
228 Waterpark Bridge
Waterford
Oaks
WTR
1517 Activity Center
WTR
1534 Fridge Toboggan Tower
Maintenance Projects
Budget Target
Project Name
Project
Priority FY2022
684,800
ADA Maintenance Program
2
50,000
Fenceline Repair Program
3
33,000
Roof Repair Program
3
33,000
Professional Services Program
3
50,000
Removal Program
3
50,000
Pavement Maintenance Program
3
150,000
Signage Replacement Program
3
50,000
ARC Flash Compliance Program
2
60,000
Stucco Repair
3
10,000
HVAC Replacement
3
4,500
Exterior Stone Repair
3
10,000
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
Structural Inspection
1
2,350
Structural Inspection
1
2,350
HVAC Replacement
3
4,500
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
Structural Inspection
1
2,350
Repair
Improvements
Structural Inspection
Flooring Replacement
Stair Tower Removal
1751 Budget Target Maintenance Management Plan
Grand Total (Amount over (<0) or under (>0) Budget Target)
1 30,000
2 50,000
1 2,500
4 16,000
1 65,000
-690,700
-690,700
-5,900
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Project Lists: Maintenance Management Plan
30
CAKLAND
MUM PAW Preliminary Project Lists: Natural Resources Management
Budget Project Project
Center ID Asset Name: Project Name Priority FY2022
Natural Resources Projects
Park System Programs
FM 1199 Natural Resources
FM 130 Natural Resources
FM 1198 Natural Resources
FM 134 Natural Resources
FM 138 Natural Resources
FM 137 Natural Resources
Natural Resources Projects Budget Target
i
Forestry Program
Freshwater Stewardship Program
Land Management Program
Storm Sewer Maintenance Program
Trail Enhancement Program
Wildlife Management Program
1830 Budget Target Natural Resources Management
Grand Total (Amount over (<0) or under (4) Budget Target)
866,000
3 232,000
3 98,OOO
3 501,OOO
2 5,OOO
3 10,000
i
20,000
-866,000
0
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Project Lists: Natural Resources Management
31
GAKLAND Attachment B. Preliminary 5-Year Forecast
COUNTY PARKS February 22, 2021
For full documentation of project lists, including project scopes,
general budget/plan information and definitions:
visit: https://www.oakgov.com/parks/qetinvolved/Pages/cir).asr)x.
Update:3/23/2021
32
COUNTY WKS Preliminary Forecast:
Capital Improvement Program
Budget Project
Project
Center ID
Asset Name:
Project Name
priority
Y2022
FY2023
FY2024 Y2025
FY2026
Capital Projects
4,406,000
4,407,500
4,960,500 5,143,920 4,559,800
Park System Programs
ADM 123
Accessibility
ADA Transition Program
1
50,000
50,000
50,000 50,000
50,000
Addison Oaks
ACC 1
Conference Center
Boiler Replacement
3
126,000
ACC 3
Conference Center
Garden Room AC
3
12,000
Replacement
ACC 2
Conference Center
Replacement
1
53,000
ACC 5
Conference Center
Restroom Furnace
3
10,000
Replacement
ACC 8
Conference Center
Renovation
5
175,000
Garden and Entrance
ACC 1655
Conference Center
Improvements
3
200,000
Parking Lot North
ACC 1656
Conference Center
Improvements
3
200,000
Parking Lot South
ADD 1638
Adams Lake Lodge
Air Conditioning
4
25,000
Installation
ADD 281
Addison Playgrounds
Improvements
1
80,000
ADD 141
Buhl Lake Boathouse
Restroom Construction
3
70,000
ADD 1642
Cabin 5
Flooring Replacement
3
10,000
ADD 1643
Cabin 6
Flooring Replacement
3
10,000
ADD 1819
House 1480 W Romeo
Conversion to Park Offices 3
75,000
Road
ADD 17
Maintenance Building
Water Softener
3
15,000
Replacement
ADD 145
Maintenance Yard and
Maintenance Yard
3
104,400
Parking Lot
Improvements
ADD 144
Park Entrance Drive
Dump Station Road
3
100,000
Realignment
ADD 1658
Section C Restroom
Water Softener Installation
3
15,000
ADD 1735
Site and Grounds
Group Area 3 & 4
4
45,000
Repurposing
ADD 142
Site and Grounds
Section A Campsite
4
75,000
Concrete Pads
ADD 1720
Yurt 1 North
HVAC/Ductless Split
4
6,000
Replacement
ADD 1721
Yurt 2 South
HVAC/Ductless Split
4
6,000
Replacement
Catalpa Oaks
CAT 147
Pavement and Drainage
Parking Lot and Storm
2
1,000,000
Water Improvements
CAT 22
Playground North (1-5
Relocation and Landscape
3
30,000
yrs age)
Improvement
Glen Oaks
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
33
Budget Project
Center ID Asset Name:
GLC 26 Clubhouse
GLC 29 Clubhouse
GLC,
1616
Clubhouse
GLC,
1809
Clubhouse
GLC,
30
Main Entrance
GLG
1808
Clubhouse
GLG
33
Fenceline
GLG
150
Golf Course Irrigation
Pond
Project
Project Name Priority
FY2022
Deck Replacement
3
Grill Room Patio
3
Renovation
Electrical Improvements
1 140,000
Roof Replacement Shingle
3 42,500
Sign Replacement
5
ProShop HVAC
3
Replacement
3
Irrigation Pond Relocation
3
GLG 34 Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade Phase II
System
GLG 272 Maintenance Building Maintenance Heater
Replacement
GLG 149 Maintenance Chemical Replacement
Mixing
Groveland Oaks
FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
40,000
80,000
3 500,000
3 15,000
3 25,000
GRV
152
Proposed New
Dumpstation Queuing 3
Road and Trailer Parking
GRV
153
Cabins
Decking Replacements 3
GRV
1578
Concession
Air Conditioner Installation 3
GRV
151
Concession
Building and Courtyard 3
Renovation
GRV
1579
Concession
Generator Installation 3
GRV
1821
Concession
Roof over Water Softeners 3
GRV
242
Contact Station
Update or Replacement 3
GRV
160
Firewood Shed
Replacement 3
GRV
1034
Group Area 1 Pavilion
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
GRV
1035
Group Area 10 and 11
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Pavilion
GRV
1036
Group Area 12 and 13
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Pavilion
GRV
1037
Group Area 2 and 3
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Pavilion
GRV
1038
Group Area 4 and 5
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Pavilion
GRV
1039
Group Area 6 and 7
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Pavilion
GRV
1040
Group Area 8 and 9
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Pavilion
GRV
1527
Mathews Island Bridge
Replacement 1
GRV
1526
Paradise Island Long
Replacement 1
Span Bridge
GRV
1584
Park House 6000 Grange
Air Conditioner Installation
Hall
GRV
157
Park House 6000 Grange
Roof Replacement Shingle 3
Hall
GRV
1585
Park House 6000 Grange
Water Supply Generator 3
Hall
20,000
40,000
152,000
84,000
25,000
25,000
20,000
170,000
15,000
5,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
90,000
500,000
25,000
17,000
15,000
50,000
224,400
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
34
Budget
Project
Project
Center
ID
Asset Name:
Project Name
Priority
GRV
1577
Pavement and Drainage
Entrance Drive Repair or
3
Replacement
GRV
1224
Pines Playground
Replacement
1
GRV
155
Recreation Pavilion
Roof Replacement Shingle
3
GRV
158
Section A Restroom
Interior Renovation
3
GRV
1927
Septic Field
Parkwide Sanitary
3
Improvements
Holly Oaks
HRV 1936 Proposed New Parking Lot
HRV 1937 Proposed New Parking Lot Grant
Reimbursement
Independence Oaks
IND
161
Boathouse
Roof Replacement Shingle
IND
1623
Camp Wilderness
Roof Replacement
Pavilion 1 North
IND
1624
Camp Wilderness
Roof Replacement
Pavilion 2 South
IND
163
Concession and
Site and Building
Bathhouse
Improvements
IND
53
Dock and Boardwalk
Replacements
IND
1058
Lakepoint Pavilion
Roof Replacement Shingle
IND
54
Maintenance Cold
Pole Barn Addition
Storage
IND
1630
Maintenance Cold
Roof Replacement
Storage
IND
56
Moraine Knoll Playground
Replacement
IND
1980
Park Entrance Boulavard
Park Entrance Boulevard
Paving
IND
1979
Park Entrance Road
Park Entrance Road Paving
IND
49
Park House 9489
HVAC Replacement
Sashabaw
IND
1982
Park Road North
Park Road Paving, North
IND
1983
Park Road South
Park Road Paving, South
IND
58
Pine Grove Playground
Replacement
IND
59
Sensory Garden and Pond
Improvements
IND
376
Twin Chimneys Pavilion
Roof Replacement Shingle
IND
1071
Twin Chimneys Restroom
Roof Replacement Shingle
IND
1230
Waters Edge Playground
Replacement
Lyon Oaks
LYC, L
60
Clubhouse
Interior Renovation
LYC, L
63
Pavement and Drainage
Parking Lot Replacement
LYC, L
61
Pavement and Drainage
Entrance Drive
Replacement
LYG
404
Golf Driving Range
Improvements
LYG
164
Hole #11 Boardwalk
Replacement
LYG
62
Hole #17 Boardwalk
Replacement
LYP
166
Pavement and Drainage
Sports Field Parking Lot
Expansion
FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
3 200,000
3-200,000
3 18,500
3
3
3 25,000
330,000
3 200,000
3 6,000
3
3 23,000
1 80,000
3 287,500
3 438,000
3 10,000
3 487,500
3 337,500
1 80,000
3 20,000
3
3
1 80,000
c
4
3
3
3
924,000
556,000
70,000
75,000
ME
. M
FY2025 FY2026
140,000
40,500
1,500,000
21,770
6,650
132,000
180,000
25,000
165,000
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
35
Budget
Project
Project
Center
ID
Asset Name:
Project Name
Priority FY2022
LYP
165
Proposed New
Dog Park and Sports Field
5
Restroom
LYP
1535
Woods Edge Playground
Replacement
1
Orion Oaks
ORN
1636
Boundaries
Boundary Fence
3
Replacement (ROW)
ORN
170
Entrance Signs (3)
Replacement
5
ORN
65
Lake 16 Boat Ramp and
Replacement
3
Dock
ORN
168
Lake 16 Fishing Pier
Replacement
3
ORN
223
Maintenance Yard
Cold Storage Design
3
ORN
1550
Utilities and
Water and Electrical to
3
Infrastructure
Maintenance Shed
Red Oaks
RDD 711 Dog Park Contact Station Replacement with Security 3
Shed
Cameras
RDG
1683
Boundaries
Golf Netting Replacement 3
RDG
171
Golf Cart Barn
Expansion 3
RDG
69
Golf Cart Tunnel
Replacement 3
RDG
172
Golf Course Irrigation
Irrigation Improvements 3
System
RDG
173
Park Maintenance
Cold storage expansion 3
Building
RDP
333
Proposed New
Pavilion at Tent Site 4
RDP
177
Boundaries
Fenceline Management 3
RDP
1918
Boundaries
Fenceline Management 3
Reimbursement
RDP
71
Nature Center
HVAC replacement 3
RDP
1730
Nature Center
HVAC Replacement 3
Reimbursement
RDP
1315
Nature Center
Site and Landscape 3
Improvements
RDP
1917
Nature Center
Site and Landscape 3
Improvements
Reimbursement
RDP
179
Nature Center Parking Lot Improvements 3
RDP
1731
Nature Center Parking Lot Improvements 3
Reimbursement
RDP
176
Signs
Hales Street Monument 3
Sign Replacement
RDP
1732
Signs
Hales Street Monument 3
Sign Replacement
Reimbursement
RDP
175
Vernal Pond Deck
Replacement 3
RDP
1916
Vernal Pond Deck
Replacement 3
Reimbursement
Red
694
Park Maintenance
Network update 3
Building
40,000
-17,500
FY2023
FY2024
FY2025 FY2026
275,000
80,000
351,500
45,000
25,000
190,000
10,000
30,000
25,000
30,000
110,000
100,000
90,000
242,000
75,000
170,000
-82,500
348,000
-171,500
300,000
-147,500
10,000
-2,500
50,000
-22,500
25,000
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
36
Budget
Project
Project
Center
ID
Asset Name:
Project Name Priority
FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
Red
174
Park Maintenance Yard
Expansion and
3
407,000
Improvement
RWC
1813
Waterpark Concession
Improvements
3
188,000
RWP
186
Proposed New
Pavilions (4)
4
160,000
RWP
182
Boundaries
Berm Security Fencing
1
40,000
RWP
75
Boundaries
Replacement
3
90,000
RWP
184
Signs
Sign Replacement
5
50,000
RWP
384
Site and Grounds
Waterpark Irrigation
3
144,000
System Replacement
RWP
1678
Waterpark Bathhouse
Exterior Renovation
3
85,000
RWP
181
Waterpark Bathhouse
Roof Replacement Metal
3
120,000
RWP
185
Waterpark Former
Improvements
3
20,000
Entrance
RWP
825
Waterpark Maintenance
Main Wave Pool Boiler
3
100,000
Building
Replacement
RWP
189
Waterpark Maintenance
Roof and Storage Extension
3
130,000
Building
RWP
1106
Waterpark Maintenance
Roof Replacement
3
30,000
Building
RWP
187
Waterpark Pavilion
Roof Replacement Metal
3
200,000
RWP
79
Waterpark River Ride
ADA Entrance Railing
2
65,000
RWP
1173
Waterpark Wave Pool
Wavepool Improvements
3
150,000
and Waterslide
Springfield
Oaks
SAC
1528
Activity Center
EMS Upgrade
1
50,000
SAC
194
Activity Center
Siding Replacement
3
240,000
SAC
84
Barn Pavement and
Replacement
3
100,000
Storm Sewer
SAC
85
Barns
Siding Replacement
3
60,000
SAC
1607
Goat Barn
Siding Replacement
3
15,000
SAC
197
Modular Restrooms (2)
Replacements
3
825,000
SAC
1314
Stormwater
Improvements Phase 1
2
560,000
Management System
SPG
98
Fenceline
Replacement
3
104,000
SPG
201
Golf Cart Barn
Building Expansion
3
80,000
SPG
202
Golf Course Drainage
Replacement
3
75,000
System
SPG
99
Golf Course Irrigation
Replacement
3
280,000
System
SPG
100
Maintenance Building
HVAC Replacement
3
15,000
North
SPG,
96
Clubhouse
Renovation
3
550,000
SPG,
200
Entrance Blvd
Clubhouse Area and
3
605,000
Parking Lot Site
Improvements
Waterford Oaks
ADM
105
Administration Building
Boiler Replacement
3
462,000
ADM
1555
Administration Building
Deck Replacement
3
15,000
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
37
Budget
Project
Center
ID
Asset Name:
Project Name
HVAC Replacement
Project
Priority
3
FY2022
100,000
3
5
3
3
3
3
3
3 10,000
5
3
FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
33,000
75,000
1,754,000
640,000
40,000
15,000
13,000
2,000
3 10,500
3 5,000
3 36,000
3 250,000
c
3
3
3
System
WLG 472 Hole #13 Fairway Culvert Replacement 1
WLG 470 Hole #18 Fairway Culvert Replacement 1
WLG 1529 Hole #18 Pond Dredge and Drain Cleanout 1
WLG 269 Hole #18 Pond Culvert Replacement 1
WLG 471 Hole #9 Culvert Replacement 3
WLG 121 Maintenance Building HVAC Replacement 3
WLG 1530 Maintenance Culvert Replacement 1
WLG 1676 Site and Grounds First Tee Renovation 5
Capital Projects Budget Target
1750 Budget Target Capital Improvement
Program
Grand Total (Amount over (<0) or under (>0) Budget Target) i
52,000
20,000
220,000
75,000
110,000
40,000
85,000
30,000
75,000
50,000
9,500
11,000
� 125,000
-4,358,300_dL4,402,466-4,447,515-4,493,466-4,540,335
-4,358,300 1-4,402,466 1-4,447,515-4,493,466-4,540,335
5,034 512,985 650,454 19,465
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
38
52,000
20,000
220,000
75,000
110,000
40,000
85,000
30,000
75,000
50,000
9,500
11,000
� 125,000
-4,358,300_dL4,402,466-4,447,515-4,493,466-4,540,335
-4,358,300 1-4,402,466 1-4,447,515-4,493,466-4,540,335
5,034 512,985 650,454 19,465
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Capital Improvement Program
38
Preliminary Forecast: Maintenance Management Plan
COUNTY WKS
Budget Project Project
Center ID Asset Name: Project Name Priority FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
Maintenance Projects 684,800 704,050 645,200 608,338 703,250
Park System Programs
ADM
122
Accessibility
ADA Maintenance Program
2
50,000
50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000
ADM
126
Boundaries
Fenceline Repair Program
3
33,000
34,000
34,000 35,000 36,000
ADM
1531
Building Roofs
Roof Repair Program
3
33,000
34,000
34,000 35,000 36,000
ADM
1923
Park Assets
Professional Services
3
50,000
50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000
Program
ADM
1524
Park Assets
Removal Program
3
50,000
50,000
51,000 53,000 54,000
ADM
125
Pavement and Drainage
Pavement Maintenance
3
150,000
151,000
154,000 158,000 161,000
Program
ADM
127
Signs
Signage Replacement
3
50,000
50,000
50,000 10,000 10,000
Program
ADM
124
Utilities and
ARC Flash Compliance
2
60,000
Infrastructure
Program
Addison Oaks
ACC
6
Conference Center
Stucco Repair
3
10,000
10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000
ADD
14
Adams Lake Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
1,500
ADD
13
Adams Lake Dam
Structural Inspection
1
2,500
ADD
1192
Adams Lake Lodge Deck
Structural Inspection
1
2,500
ADD
956
Buhl Lake Dam
Structural Inspection
1
1,500
ADD
957
Buhl Lake Steel Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
3,500
ADD
1820
Cabin 1
HVAC Replacement
3
4,500
ADD
1920
Cabin 2
HVAC Replacement
4,500
ADD
1921
Cabin 3
HVAC Replacement
4,500
ADD
1922
Cabin 4
HVAC Replacement
4,500
ADD
143
Disc Golf Course
Upgrade
5
ADD
1532
Sewage Lagoon
Liner Inspection (7 years)
3
3,500
ADD
301
Water Tower
Structural Inspection
1
5,000
Glen Oaks
GLC
25
Clubhouse
Exterior Stone Repair
3
10,000
10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000
GLG
959
Northeast Steel Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
GLG
960
Northwest Steel Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
GLG
32
Southeast Steel Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
GLG
958
Southwest Steel Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
2,350
GLG
961
Wood Pedestrian Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
2,350
Groveland
Oaks
GRV
38
Cabin 5
HVAC Replacement
3
4,500
GRV
40
Cabin 7
HVAC Replacement
3
4,500
GRV
946
Cabin 8
HVAC Replacement
3
4,500
GRV
41
Cottage Island Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
GRV
45
Mathews Island Bridge
Structural Inspection
1
1,850
1,850
1,850 1,850
GRV
42
Paradise Island Long
Structural Inspection
1
2,350
2,350
2,350 2,350
Span Bridge
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory;
3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings;
4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary
Forecast: Maintenance Management Plan
39
Budget
Project
Center
ID
Asset Name:
GRV
43
Paradise Island Short
Span Bridge
GRV
218
River Loop East Bridge
GRV
46
Septic Field
Independence Oaks
IND
277
Camp Wilderness Bridge
IND
275
Hidden Springs Dam
IND
217
Hidden Springs Parking
Lot
IND
1201
Nature Center Bridge
IND
276
Nature Center Bridge
IND
1511
Trail G Habitat Trail
Lyon Oaks
LYG
221
Golf Restrooms
Orion Oaks
ORN
245
Trail D Dragon Loop
Red Oaks
RDD
1692
Utilities and
Infrastructure
RDG
817
Park Maintenance
Building
Red
818
Park Maintenance
Building
RWP
1814
Utilities and
Infrastructure
RWP
1190
Waterpark Bridge
RWP
228
Waterpark Bridge
RWP
80
Waterpark River Ride
Springfield
Oaks
SAC
1202
Activity Center
SAC
226
Ellis Barn
SAC
1193
Rotary Park Bridge
SAC
92
Water Tower
Waterford Oaks
ADM
1499
Administration Building
WCM
493
Market Pavilion
WTR
1517
Activity Center
WTR
1534
Fridge Toboggan Tower
WTR
235
House 1580 Scott Lake
(Ernst)
WTR
1194
Lookout Lodge
WTR
265
Trail A Loop
WWP
273
Waterpark Children's
Play Structure
Maintenance Projects Budget Targei
Project Name
Structural Inspection
Structural Inspection
Inspection
Project
Priority FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
1 1,850
Structural Inspection
Structural Inspection
Storm Sewer Maintenance
Repair
Structural Inspection
Improvements
Floor Resurfacing
1
2 5,000
1
1
3
1 30,000
1
2 50,000
3
Accessibility Enhancements 5
Drinking Fountains
HVAC Replacement with
Split System
Water heater replacement
Drinking Fountain
Replacements
Structural Inspection
Structural Inspection
Repair and Painting
Siding Painting
Painting
Structural Inspection
Inspection
Carpet Replacement
Structural Inspection
Flooring Replacement
Stair Tower Removal
Window Replacements
Deck Structural Inspection
Improvements
Structural Inspection
3
190,000
3,000
3,000
4,500
3,000
6,000
7,500
FY20
5,000
1,500
1 I 10,000
1 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
3 125,000
3 120,000
3 135,000
1 1,250
1 5.000
5 46,138
1
4 16,000
1 65,000
3 40,000
1
5 150,000
1 3,500
5,000
2,500
-690,700-686,634-681,807-676,223-671,888
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Maintenance Management Plan
40
Budget Project
Center ID Asset Name: Project Name
1751 Budget Target Maintenance
Management Plan
Grand Total (Amount over (<0) or under (>0) Budget Target)
Project
Priority FY2022
-690,700
FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
-686,634-681,807-676,223-671,888
-5,900 17,416-36,607-67,885 31,362
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Maintenance Management Plan
41
COUNTY WKS Preliminary Forecast:
Natural Resources
Management
Budget Project
Project
Center ID Asset Name:
Project Name
Priority
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
FY2025
FY2026
Natural Resources Projects
I
866,000
882,000
899,000
917,000
934,000
Park System Programs
FM 1199 Natural Resources
Forestry Program
3
232,000
160,000
198,000
170,000
107,000
FM 130 Natural Resources
Freshwater Stewardship
3
98,000
208,000
80,000
89,000
100,000
Program
FM 1198 Natural Resources
Land Management
3
501,000
471,000
564,000
621,000
694,000
Program
FM 134 Natural Resources
Storm Sewer Maintenance 2
5,000
5,000
35,000
15,000
10,000
Program
FM 138 Natural Resources
Trail Enhancement
3
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Program
FM 137 Natural Resources
Wildlife Management
3
20,000
28,000
12,000
12,000
13,000
Program
Natural Resources Projects Budget Target
-866,000
-882,000
-899,000
-917,000
-934,000
1830 Budget Target
Natural Resources
-866,000
-882,000
-899,000
-917,000
-934,000
Management
Grand Total (Amount over (<0) or under (>0) Budget Target)
0
0
0
0
0
Project Priority Legend
1= Health and Safety; 2 = Regulatory; 3 = Efficiency and Operational Savings; 4 = Revenue Generation; 5 = Facility Enhancement
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Preliminary Forecast: Natural Resources Management
42
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Attachment C. Project List Adjustments
February 22, 2021
The Preliminary Project Lists for Fiscal Year 2022 were submitted for Parks Commission Review on January 19,
2021. The table below is a comparison of the list submitted on January 19th with the FY2022 lists submitted in this
Preliminary Management Plan FY2022-FY2026.
Prelim
Prelim
FY2022
FY2022
Budget
1/19/2021
3/22/2021 Comparison
Capital Improvement
4,334,500
4,406,000 Net change = $71,500 increase
Program FY2022
Addition:
Preliminary Project List
0 Addison Oaks Campground Group Area 3 & 4
Repurposing ($45,000)
■ Independence Oaks Park Entrance Boulevard
Paving ($287,000), North Park Road Paving
($487,500), and South Road Paving ($337,500)
■ Proposed Holly Oaks ORV Parking Lot ($200,000)
and grant (-$200,000)
Change:
■ Independence Oaks Entrance Drive Replacement
($344,000) updated cost estimate ($438,000)
Removal/Postponement:
■ Addison Oaks Conference Center Boiler
Replacement ($126,000)
■ Red Oaks Nature Center HVAC Replacement
($348,000) and City of Madison Heights (CMH)
reimbursement (-$171,500)
■ Groveland Oaks bridge replacements ($90,000
and $500,000)
■ Red Oaks Nature Center Office Space Remodeling
($165,000) and CMH reimbursement (-$80,000)
■ Red Oaks Nature Center Parking Lot
Improvements ($300,000) and CMH
reimbursement (-$147,500)
■ Springfield Oaks Clubhouse Circulation and
Accessibility Study ($50,000)
Maintenance
684,800
684,800 No change
Management Plan
FY2022 Preliminary
Project List
Natural Resources
856,000
866,000 Net change = $10,000 increase
Management Plan
Addition:
FY2022 Preliminary
Trail Enhancement Program ($10,000/year)
Project List
ALL FY2022 Preliminary
$5,875,300
$5,956,800 Total net change = $81,500 increase
Project Lists
DRAFT Update: 3/22/2021 Page 1 of 1
43
GAKLAND Attachment D. Park Infrastructure Improvements
COUNTY PARKS March 22, 2021
List Description
Park Instructure Improvements include:
■ Capital Projects
o Assets and asset components are at the end of their life cycle and need replacement
o Issues have been identified and/or deferred
o Costs have been estimated
o For approximately 5 projects, costs have not been estimated ($1 placeholder)
o Does not include any projects for the Waterford Oaks Waterpark.
■ Project Priorities 1, 2 or 3
1. Health and Safety
2. Regulatory
3. Efficiency and Operational Savings
Number of Total
Identified Estimated
Capital Cost
Projects Capital
Asset Type
Projects
Boardwalk, Dock & Decks:
Replacement, renovation or improvements of existing or new boardwalks, docks, or
11 759,500
timber -framed decks.
Boundaries:
Replacement or improvement of existing or new fencing within or around our park
10 795,000
boundaries
Bridges:
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new pedestrian or vehicle
3 690,000
bridges
Buildings/Structures:
• Building Entire: Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or
new buildings or facilities.
■ Building Equipment: Replacement of existing or new fixed facility
equipment, such as HVAC, boilers, softeners, freezers etc.
■ Door & Window: A comprehensive large-scale replacement, renovation or
improvement of existing facility doors or windows
■ Exterior: Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing exterior
building or facility envelope, with siding/trim long -life materials, reducing
89 10,223,423
maintenance and operational expenses, such as prefinished metal or
aluminum, etc.
■ Interior: A comprehensive replacement, renovation or improvement of
existing interior d6cor within an existing facility.
■ Kitchen Equipment: Replacement of existing commercial kitchen specific
equipment that can be easily disconnected from its utility and moved
■ Roof: Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing facility roof
with similar or alternative roofing material, including substrate decking,
facia, soffit and gutter to provide a watertight structure
Drainage:
Replacement or improvement of existing or new stormwater conveyances systems
9 1,026,000
and other drainage infrastructure, not directly related to other asset types
Irrigation:
7 1,726,400
DRAFT Update: 3/22/2021
Page 1 of 2
44
GAKLAND Attachment B. Park Infrastructure Improvements
COUNTY PARKS March 22, 2021
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new irrigation systems for
golf courses and other managed landscapes.
Pavements:
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new paved parking,
27 7,749,901
pathway, pool deck, patio or other hard surface, including all associated storm water
infrastructure.
Playgrounds:
7 510,000
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new terrestrial playgrounds.
Pools:
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new pools, zero -depth splash
3 215,001
pads and associated water play structures.
Signs:
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new vehicle and pedestrian
2 27,500
directional/locational signage.
Site & Landscapes
■ Replacement, renovation or improvements to other existing or new
recreational sites and landscapes of one or more features within a larger
space, such as campgrounds and golf courses, that do not fit into one of the
5 997,500
other categories
■ Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing of landscape spaces,
such as planting beds, material and mulches
Utilities:
Replacement, renovation or improvement of existing or new supporting site/building
7 1,605,003
utilities, such as storm water conveyance, electrical, gas, water supply, etc.
180 $ 26,325,228
DRAFT Update: 3/22/2021 Page 2 of 2
45
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Sue Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Jeffrey Phelps, Parks and Recreation Fiscal Coordinator
Submitted: March 23, 2021
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9
ADMINISTRATION
Subject: COMMUNICATION ITEM — Capital Improvement Expense and Planned Use of Balance Summary
and Unrestricted Net Position Projection Report
INTRODUCTION
There are no agenda items on today's agenda requiring Unrestricted Net Position funding.
The balance of Unrestricted Net Position as of February 28, 2021 is $28,321,403.51. This is an increase of
$6,235,657 from the January 31, 2021 balance of $22,085,746.67, the result of February 2021 Property Tax
Levy collections. The FY2021 amended budget is $28,108,720.
The Unrestricted Net Position policy sets a recommended balance of funds to be set at 50% of the operating
budget. The revised requirement of Unrestricted Net Position funds is $14,054,360. The Parks and Recreation
fund is currently $14,267,044 above the policy requirement.
46
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10
FISCAL SERVICES - P&R ACCOUNTING
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Jennifer Adcock, Fiscal Services Supervisor II
Jeffrey Phelps, Fiscal Services Coordinator
Submitted: March 19, 2021
Subject: OCPR Monthly Financial Reports (February 2021, FY2021)
10. A. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT BY BUDGET CENTER
February 2021 (FM 5, FY 2021)
10. B. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE COMPARISON REPORT BY BUDGET CENTER
February 2021 (FM 5, FY 2021)
10. C. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT BY LINE ITEM
February 2021 (FM 5, FY 2021)
10. D. CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REPORT
February 2021 (FM 5, FY 2021)
10. E. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE AVERAGE COMPARISON REPORT
February 2021 (FM 5, FY 2021)
10. F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT AND STATEMENT OF NET
POSITION
February 2021 (FM 5, FY 2021)
47
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REVENUE AND EXPENSE BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT
Consent Agenda Item 10 A
FM 5 FY 2021
FOR MONTH ENDING 02/28/2021
2021
YEAR TO
(OVER)
% OF
REVENUE
BUDGET
DATE
UNDER BUDGET
BUDGET
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: Millage Tax
13,765,000.00
17,150,121.82
(3,385,121.82)
124.6%
Capital Contributions
0.00
46,675.00
(46,675.00)
0.0%
Other
924, 083.00
114, 528.07
809, 554.93
12.4%
GLEN OAKS GOLF COURSE
816,700.00
80,463.36
736,236.64
9.9%
LYON OAKS GOLF COURSE
1,202,000.00
111,898.92
1,090,101.08
9.3%
RED OAKS GOLF COURSE
350,000.00
37,548.21
312,451.79
10.7%
SPRINGFIELD OAKS GOLF COURSE
737,561.00
69,375.79
668,185.21
9.4%
WHITE LAKE OAKS GOLF COURSE
755,300.00
60,646.94
694,653.06
8.0%
ADDISON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
152,000.00
0.00
152,000.00
0.0%
GLEN OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
128,145.00
0.00
128,145.00
0.0%
GROVELAND OAKS CONCESSIONS
58,500.00
181.84
58,318.16
0.3%
LYON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
43,000.00
1,074.82
41,925.18
2.5%
LYON OAKS RESTAURANT SVS
199,000.00
14,470.83
184,529.17
7.3%
RED OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
221,015.00
0.00
221,015.00
0.0%
SPRINGFIELD OAKS RESTAURANT SV
140,000.00
2,519.43
137,480.57
1.8%
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
113,000.00
0.00
113,000.00
0.0%
WHITE LAKE OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
78,000.00
0.00
78,000.00
0.0%
WHITE LAKE OAKS RESTAURANT SVS
140,500.00
1,932.89
138,567.11
1.4%
OAKLAND COUNTY MARKET
190,250.00
32,455.00
157,795.00
17.1%
ADDISON OAKS PARK
744,906.00
173,714.90
571,191.10
23.3%
GROVELAND OAKS PARK
1,170,968.00
215,361.34
955,606.66
18.4%
HIGHLAND OAKS PARK
12,550.00
3,745.00
8,805.00
29.8%
INDEPENDENCE OAKS PARK
303,346.00
83,330.00
220,016.00
27.5%
LYON OAKS PARK
165,000.00
44,372.50
120,627.50
26.9%
ORION OAKS PARK
136,200.00
25,346.00
110,854.00
18.6%
RED OAKS DOG PARK
48,000.00
23,355.00
24,645.00
48.7%
RED OAKS PARK
8,300.00
30.00
8,270.00
0.4%
ROSE OAKS PARK
6,600.00
0.00
6,600.00
0.0%
SPRINGFIELD OAKS PARK
232,000.00
63,129.31
168,870.69
27.2%
WATERFORD OAKS PARK
86,800.00
17,089.00
69,711.00
19.7%
HOLLY OAKS ORV PARK
573,000.00
104,605.00
468,395.00
18.3%
RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES
315,000.00
17,593.15
297,406.85
5.6%
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE
0.00
311.00
(311.00)
0.0%
CATALPA OAKS PARK
30,250.00
2,210.00
28,040.00
7.3%
RED OAKS WATERPARK
1,470,600.00
43,558.59
1,427,041.41
3.0%
WATERFORD OAKS BMX
500.00
169.00
331.00
33.8%
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK
378,600.00
0.00
378,600.00
0.0%
TOTAL REVENUE
25,696,674.00
18,541,812.71
7,154,861.29
72.2%
EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
6,349,115.00
2,065,854.61
4,283,260.39
32.5%
PARKS PARTNERSHIP
276,320.00
0.00
276,320.00
0.0%
AUDITING
40,385.00
1,671.69
38,713.31
4.1 %
FISCAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
147,801.00
58,612.22
89,188.78
39.7%
FISCAL SERVICES PARKS & REC
454,021.00
159,711.68
294,309.32
35.2%
GLEN OAKS GOLF COURSE
888,472.00
333,837.25
554,634.75
37.6%
LYON OAKS GOLF COURSE
1,353,041.00
459,033.06
894,007.94
33.9%
RED OAKS GOLF COURSE
602,017.00
183,035.76
418,981.24
30.4%
SPRINGFIELD OAKS GOLF COURSE
736,354.00
268,845.85
467,508.15
36.5%
WHITE LAKE OAKS GOLF COURSE
689,135.00
306,257.88
382,877.12
44.4%
ADDISON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
241,873.00
87,123.04
154,749.96
36.0%
GLEN OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
239,200.00
76,553.18
162,646.82
32.0%
GROVELAND OAKS CONCESSIONS
78,706.00
3,477.56
75,228.44
4.4%
LYON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
195,914.00
84,444.31
111,469.69
43.1%
LYON OAKS RESTAURANT SVS
292,440.00
16,303.68
276,136.32
5.6%
RED OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
269,634.00
24,456.07
245,177.93
9.1%
SPRINGFIELD OAKS RESTAURANT SV
241,396.00
28,528.56
212,867.44
11.8%
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
100,964.00
2,339.56
98,624.44
2.3%
WHITE LAKE OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
184,291.00
76,634.89
107,656.11
41.6%
WHITE LAKE OAKS RESTAURANT SVS
268,650.00
21,155.35
247,494.65
7.9%
OAKLAND COUNTY MARKET
205,890.00
67,086.73
138,803.27
32.6%
ADDISON OAKS PARK
1,608,840.00
539,886.73
1,068,953.27
33.6%
GROVELAND OAKS PARK
1,440,150.00
393,694.28
1,046,455.72
27.3%
HIGHLAND OAKS PARK
67,050.00
23,050.58
43,999.42
34.4%
INDEPENDENCE OAKS PARK
1,178,626.00
367,499.00
811,127.00
31.2%
LYON OAKS PARK
304,201.00
107,435.32
196,765.68
35.3%
ORION OAKS PARK
185,430.00
64,629.95
120,800.05
34.9%
RED OAKS DOG PARK
138,466.00
47,824.05
90,641.95
34.5%
RED OAKS PARK
184,114.00
68,842.51
115,271.49
37.4%
ROSE OAKS PARK
67,050.00
29,563.81
37,486.19
44.1 %
SPRINGFIELD OAKS PARK
573,887.00
222,262.31
351,624.69
38.7%
WATERFORD OAKS PARK
698,672.00
290,511.35
408,160.65
41.6%
HOLLY OAKS ORV PARK
691,359.00
174,172.10
517,186.90
25.2%
RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES
1,724,188.00
495,116.35
1,229,071.65
28.7%
CATALPA OAKS PARK
212,176.00
53,957.90
158,218.10
25.4%
RED OAKS WATERPARK
1,565,922.00
267,882.78
1,298,039.22
17.1 %
WATERFORD OAKS BMX
11,800.00
4,276.61
7,523.39
36.2%
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK
680,776.00
82,334.37
598,441.63
12.1 %
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE
2,920,394.00
546,822.32
2,373,571.68
18.7%
INTERNAL FUND CHARGES *
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
TOTAL EXPENSE
28,108,720.00
8,104,725.25
20,003,994.75
28.8%
REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENSE
(2,412,046.00) 10,437,087.46
* Internal Fund YTD Expense: Internal Service and other funds payments in transit
48
Consent Agenda Item 10 B
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REVENUE AND EXPENSE COMPARISON REPORT FOR MANAGEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
FM 5 FY 2021
FOR MONTH ENDING 02/28/2021
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
EXPENSE
(UNDER) EXPENSE
BUDGET CENTER
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER) EXPENSE
W/O DEPRECIATION
W/O DEPRECIATION
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
17,311,324.89
2,065,854.61
15,245,470.28
2,057,107.76
15,254,217.13
PARKS PARTNERSHIP
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AUDITING
0.00
1,671.69
(1,671.69)
1,671.69
(1,671.69)
FISCAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
0.00
58,612.22
(58,612.22)
58,612.22
(58,612.22)
FISCAL SERVICES PARKS & REC
0.00
159,711.68
(159,711.68)
159,711.68
(159,711.68)
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUB -TOTAL
17,311,324.89
2,285,850.20
15,025,474.69
2,277,103.35
15,034,221.54
GOLF:
GLEN OAKS GOLF COURSE
80,463.36
333,837.25
(253,373.89)
267,321.94
(186,858.58)
LYON OAKS GOLF COURSE
111,898.92
459,033.06
(347,134.14)
310,278.55
(198,379.63)
RED OAKS GOLF COURSE
37,548.21
183,035.76
(145,487.55)
122,691.85
(85,143.64)
SPRINGFIELD OAKS GOLF COURSE
69,375.79
268,845.85
(199,470.06)
228,930.85
(159,555.06)
WHITE LAKE OAKS GOLF COURSE
60,646.94
306,257.88
(245,610.94)
258,975.49
(198,328.55)
GOLF SUB -TOTAL
359,933.22
1,551,009.80
(1,191,076.58)
1,188,198.68
(828,265.46)
FOOD SERVICES:
ADDISON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
0.00
87,123.04
(87,123.04)
48,734.64
(48,734.64)
GLEN OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
0.00
76,553.18
(76,553.18)
26,380.48
(26,380.48)
GROVELAND OAKS CONCESSIONS
181.84
3,477.56
(3,295.72)
1,307.41
(1,125.57)
LYON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
1,074.82
84,444.31
(83,369.49)
48,123.66
(47,048.84)
LYON OAKS RESTAURANT SVC
14,470.83
16,303.68
(1,832.85)
16,021.93
(1,551.10)
RED OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
0.00
24,456.07
(24,456.07)
22,960.27
(22,960.27)
SPRINGFIELD OAKS RESTAURANT SV
2,519.43
28,528.56
(26,009.13)
20,926.06
(18,406.63)
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
0.00
2,339.56
(2,339.56)
859.71
(859.71)
WHITE LAKE OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
0.00
76,634.89
(76,634.89)
41,979.34
(41,979.34)
WHITE LAKE OAKS RESTAURANT SVC
1,932.89
21,155.35
(19,222.46)
20,362.85
(18,429.96)
FOOD SERVICES SUB -TOTAL
20,179.81
421,016.20
(400,836.39)
247,656.35
(227,476.54)
COUNTY MARKET:
OAKLAND COUNTY MARKET
32,455.00
67,086.73
(34,631.73)
65,593.28
(33,138.28)
COUNTY MARKET SUB -TOTAL
32,455.00
67,086.73
(34,631.73)
65,593.28
(33,138.28)
PARKS:
ADDISON OAKS PARK
173,714.90
539,886.73
(366,171.83)
401,327.56
(227,612.66)
GROVELAND OAKS PARK
215,361.34
393,694.28
(178,332.94)
256,086.84
(40,725.50)
HIGHLAND OAKS PARK
3,745.00
23,050.58
(19,305.58)
7,424.33
(3,679.33)
INDEPENDENCE OAKS PARK
83,330.00
367,499.00
(284,169.00)
272,353.50
(189,023.50)
LYON OAKS PARK
44,372.50
107,435.32
(63,062.82)
79,639.92
(35,267.42)
ORION OAKS PARK
25,346.00
64,629.95
(39,283.95)
49,673.26
(24,327.26)
RED OAKS DOG PARK
23,355.00
47,824.05
(24,469.05)
36,391.15
(13,036.15)
RED OAKS PARK
30.00
68,842.51
(68,812.51)
62,707.45
(62,677.45)
ROSE OAKS PARK
0.00
29,563.81
(29,563.81)
14,873.41
(14,873.41)
SPRINGFIELD OAKS PARK
63,129.31
222,262.31
(159,133.00)
137,568.83
(74,439.52)
WATERFORD OAKS PARK
17,089.00
290,511.35
(273,422.35)
229,226.85
(212,137.85)
HOLLY OAKS ORV PARK
104,605.00
174,172.10
(69,567.10)
171,142.03
(66,537.03)
PARKS SUB -TOTAL
754,078.05
2,329,371.99
(1,575,293.94)
1,718,415.13
(964,337.08)
RECREATION:
RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES
17,593.15
495,116.35
(477,523.20)
476,756.82
(459,163.67)
CATALPA OAKS PARK
2,210.00
53,957.90
(51,747.90)
20,539.98
(18,329.98)
RED OAKS WATERPARK
43,558.59
267,882.78
(224,324.19)
146,718.89
(103,160.30)
WATERFORD OAKS BMX
169.00
4,276.61
(4,107.61)
3,491.31
(3,322.31)
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK
0.00
82,334.37
(82,334.37)
57,481.27
(57,481.27)
RECREATION SUB -TOTAL
63,530.74
903,568.01
(840,037.27)
704,988.27
(641,457.53)
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE:
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE
311.00
546,822.32
(546,511.32)
522,623.08
(522,312.08)
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE SUB -TOTAL
311.00
546,822.32
(546,511.32)
522,623.08
(522,312.08)
OTHER:
INTERNAL FUND CHARGES *
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
OTHER SUB -TOTAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL
18,541,812.71
8,104,725.25
10,437,087.46
6,724,578.14
11,817,234.57
* Internal Fund YTD Expense: Internal Service and other funds payments in transit
See the Oakland County website's "Transparency in Government" monthly reports to view the latest monthly financial report detail by budget center:
1. Log on to www.oakciov.com/mqtbud/fiscal/Pages/info pub/parks.aspx
2. Click on each of the Parks and Recreation monthly financial reports you are interested in viewing
'Disclaimer: These columns are for management purposes only to show the budget center's status without depreciation. The
Parks & Recreation Fund is classified as an Enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are used to report any activity for which a fee is
charged to an external source for goods or services. Depreciation is a method of allocating the cost of a tangible asset over its
useful life and is a true operating expense.
49
Consent Agenda Item 10 C
11 PARKS AND REC DEPART
Run On: 03/18/2021 at 05:31 PM
Account Account Title
REVENUES
TAXES
601208 Delinquent Tax Prior Years
601637 Property Tax Levy
TOTAL TAXES
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FEDERAL GRANTS
TOTAL FEDERAL GRANTS
STATE GRANTS
615572 State Capital Grants
TOTAL STATE GRANTS
OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
620573 Local Comm Stabilization Share
TOTAL OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
630084
Antenna Site Management
630301
Commission Contracts
630308
Commission Food Services
630469
Deck Tennis
630644
Entrance Fees Gen Admission
630651
Entrance Fees Swimming Class
630693
Fees Camping
630700
Fees Day Use
630707
Fees Driving Range
630847
Greens Fees
631001
Interest on Delinquent Taxes
631127
Maintenance Contracts
631253
Miscellaneous
631330
NSF Check Fees
631743
Refunds Miscellaneous
631771
Reimb 3rd Party
631799
Reimb Contracts
631911
Rent House
631918
Rental Equipment
631925
Rental Facilities
631932
Rental Golf Carts
631946
Rental Units or Events
632037
Sales Retail
632128
Special and Sanctioned Races
632135
Special Contracts
632261
Temporary Licenses
632443
Water Feature Ride
632471
Weekly Races
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES
EXT ISF CHARGES FOR SERVICES
TOTAL EXT ISF CHARGES FOR SERVICES
INDIRECT COST RECOVERY
TOTAL INDIRECT COST RECOVERY
CONTRIBUTIONS
650104 Contributions Operating
650105 Contributions -State Grants
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
February, Fiscal Year 2021 Monthly Report
REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT
As of Date: 02/28/2021
Fund: 50800 - Parks and Recreation
2021
Adopted
Budget
25,000.00
13,740,000.00
13, 765, 000.00
2021
Amended
Budget
25,000.00
13,740,000.00
13, 765, 000.00
- 199,000.00
199,000.00
2021
YTD Actuals
5,830.48
17,144,291.34
17,150,121.82
Variance with
Amended
Budget
(19,169.52)
3,404,291.34
3,385,121.82
(199,000.00)
(199, 000.00)
Percentage
23.32%
124.78%
124.59%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
250,000.00
250,000.00
-
(250,000.00)
0.00%
250, 000.00
250, 000.00
-
(250, 000.00)
0.00%
66,306.00
66,306.00
67,679.98
1,373.98
102.07%
40,750.00
40,750.00
448.00
(40,302.00)
1.10%
78,495.00
78,495.00
1,507.30
(76,987.70)
1.92%
4,000.00
4,000.00
6,710.00
2,710.00
167.75%
1,825,000.00
1,825,000.00
-
(1,825,000.00)
0.00%
13,000.00
13,000.00
-
(13,000.00)
0.00%
1,554,000.00
1,554,000.00
311,349.00
(1,242,651.00)
20.04%
1,092,100.00
1,092,100.00
287,887.00
(804,213.00)
26.36%
93,000.00
93,000.00
5,483.00
(87,517.00)
5.90%
2,436,500.00
2,436,500.00
191,728.00
(2,244,772.00)
7.87%
(1,000.00)
(1,000.00)
(37.16)
962.84
3.72%
8,000.00
8,000.00
-
(8,000.00)
0.00%
3,815.00
3,815.00
311.50
(3,503.50)
8.17%
25.00
25.00
-
(25.00)
0.00%
4,900.00
4,900.00
487.62
(4,412.38)
9.95%
200.00
200.00
-
(200.00)
0.00%
278,100.00
278,100.00
307.00
(277,793.00)
0.11 %
71,125.00
71,125.00
24,898.00
(46,227.00)
35.01 %
79,400.00
79,400.00
7,449.50
(71,950.50)
9.38%
649,700.00
649,700.00
89,509.50
(560,190.50)
13.78%
1,152,000.00
1,152,000.00
139,774.00
(1,012,226.00)
12.13%
173,000.00
173,000.00
1,650.00
(171,350.00)
0.95%
1,095,500.00
1,095,500.00
40,039.17
(1,055,460.83)
3.65%
-
-
8.00
8.00
0.00%
172,500.00
172,500.00
4,255.00
(168,245.00)
2.47%
7,000.00
7,000.00
22,000.00
15,000.00
314.29%
6,000.00
6,000.00
-
(6,000.00)
0.00%
-
-
161.00
161.00
0.00%
10,903,416.00
10,903,416.00
1,203,605.41
(9,699,810.59)
11.04%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
800.00
800.00
1,780.00
980.00
222.50%
30,000.00
30,000.00
-
(30,000.00)
0.00%
50
Consent Agenda Item 10 C
11 PARKS AND REC DEPART
Run On: 03/18/2021 at 05:31 PM
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
February, Fiscal Year 2021 Monthly Report
REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT
As of Date: 02/28/2021
Fund: 50800 - Parks and Recreation
2021
2021
Variance with
Adopted
Amended
2021
Amended
Account Account Title
Budget
Budget
YTD Actuals
Budget
Percentage
650305 Sponsorships
82,500.00
82,500.00
-
(82,500.00)
0.00%
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS
113,300.00
113,300.00
1,780.00
(111,520.00)
1.57%
INVESTMENT INCOME
655077 Accrued Interest Adjustments
40,000.00
40,000.00
(18,350.51)
(58,350.51)
-45.88%
655385 Income from Investments
400,000.00
400,000.00
74,665.94
(325,334.06)
18.67%
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME
440,000.00
440,000.00
56,315.43
(383,684.57)
12.80%
OTHER REVENUE
670114 Cash Overages
-
-
44.50
44.50
0.00%
670456 Prior Years Adjustments
-
-
43,563.89
43,563.89
0.00%
670570 Refund Prior Years Expenditure
-
-
2,326.63
2,326.63
0.00%
670741 Sale of Scrap
-
-
539.13
539.13
0.00%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES
-
-
46,474.15
46,474.15
0.00%
GAIN(LOSS) EXCHANGE OF ASSETS
675660 Gain on Sale of Vehicles
-
-
10,882.90
10,882.90
0.00%
TOTAL GAIN(LOSS) EXCHANGE OF ASSETS
-
-
10,882.90
10,882.90
0.00%
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
690189 Capital Asset Contributions
-
-
46,675.00
46,675.00
0.00%
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
-
-
46,675.00
46,675.00
0.00%
INSURANCE RECOVERIES
TOTAL INSURANCE RECOVERIES
-
-
-
-
0.00%
PROCEEDS ISSUANCE OF BONDS
TOTAL PROCEEDS ISSUANCE OF BONDS
-
-
-
-
0.00%
TRANSFERS IN
695500 Transfers In
-
25,958.00
25,958.00
-
100.00%
TOTAL TRANSFERS IN
-
25,958.00
25,958.00
-
100.00%
PLANNED USE OF FUND BALANCE
665882 Planned Use of Balance
2,611,046.00
2,412,046.00
-
(2,412,046.00)
0.00%
TOTAL PLANNED USE OF FUND BALANCE
2,611,046.00
2,412,046.00
-
(2,412,046.00)
0.00%
TOTAL REVENUES
28,082,762.00
28,108,720.00
18,541,812.71
(9,566,907.29)
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES
702010
Salaries Regular
10,773,462.00
10,773,462.00
2,529,719.56
8,243,742.44
23.48%
702030
Holiday
-
-
203,096.18
(203,096.18)
0.00%
702050
Annual Leave
-
-
106,225.95
(106,225.95)
0.00%
702080
Sick Leave
-
-
46,860.88
(46,860.88)
0.00%
702100
Retroactive
-
-
802.44
(802.44)
0.00%
702110
Per Diem
9,500.00
9,500.00
1,530.00
7,970.00
16.11%
702140
Other Miscellaneous Salaries
-
-
44,062.53
(44,062.53)
0.00%
702190
Workers Compensation Pay
-
-
506.79
(506.79)
0.00%
702200
Death Leave
-
-
2,980.26
(2,980.26)
0.00%
702300
Disaster Non -Prod Salaries
-
-
29,276.26
(29,276.26)
0.00%
712020
Overtime
179,900.00
179,900.00
31,804.83
148,095.17
17.68%
712040
Holiday Overtime
1,000.00
1,000.00
4,412.31
(3,412.31)
441.23%
712090
On Call
30,300.00
30,300.00
28,278.85
2,021.15
93.33%
TOTAL SALARIES
10, 994,162.00
10, 994,162.00
3, 029, 556.84
7, 964, 605.16
27.56 %
FRINGE BENEFITS
51
Consent Agenda Item 10 C
11 PARKS AND REC DEPART
Run On: 03/18/2021 at 05:31 PM
Account Account Title
722740 Fringe Benefits
722750 Workers Compensation
722760 Group Life
722770 Retirement
722780 Hospitalization
722790 Social Security
722800 Dental
722810 Disability
722820 Unemployment Insurance
722850 Optical
722900 Fringe Benefit Adjustments
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS
TOTAL CONTROLLABLE PERSONNEL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
730037
Adj Prior Years Exp
730044
Adj Prior Years Revenue
730072
Advertising
730114
Auction Expense
730121
Bank Charges
730198
Building Maintenance Charges
730240
Cash Shortage
730247
Charge Card Fee
730373
Contracted Services
730429
Custodial Services
730562
Electrical Service
730611
Employees Medical Exams
730646
Equipment Maintenance
730653
Equipment Rental
730786
Garbage and Rubbish Disposal
730789
General Program Administration
730814
Grounds Maintenance
730926
Indirect Costs
731059
Laundry and Cleaning
731073
Legal Services
731115
Licenses and Permits
731136
Logos Trademarks Intellect Prp
731143
Mail Handling -Postage Svc
731213
Membership Dues
731241
Miscellaneous
731269
Natural Gas
731339
Periodicals Books Publ Sub
731346
Personal Mileage
731388
Printing
731500
Public Information
731577
Refund Prior Years Revenue
731626
Rent
731633
Rental Property Maintenance
731689
Security Expense
731780
Software Support Maintenance
731836
Sponsorship
731878
Sublet Repairs
731941
Training
732018
Travel and Conference
732020
Travel Employee Taxable Meals
732039
Twp and City Treas Bonds
732046
Uncollectable Accts Receivable
732102
Water and Sewage Charges
732165
Workshops and Meeting
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
February, Fiscal Year 2021 Monthly Report
REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT
As of Date: 02/28/2021
Fund: 50800 - Parks and Recreation
2021 2021
Adopted Amended
Budget Budget
3,842,419.00 3,842,419.00
5,656.00
3,848,075.00
14, 842, 237.00
105,000.00
5,000.00
556,450.00
161, 750.00
99,900.00
25,250.00
590, 750.00
1,170.00
460, 500.00
107,290.00
48, 900.00
918,450.00
1,069,550.00
1,023,000.00
16,895.00
500.00
33,275.00
5,025.00
18, 520.00
25,550.00
179,650.00
850.00
15,400.00
68,050.00
50,835.00
54,415.00
13,600.00
1,172,942.00
16,480.00
8,700.00
600.00
45,925.00
50, 500.00
600.00
2,500.00
274,250.00
1,750.00
7, 229, 772.00
5,656.00
3, 848, 075.00
14, 842, 237.00
105,000.00
5,000.00
556,450.00
161,750.00
99,900.00
25,250.00
590,750.00
1,170.00
460,500.00
107,290.00
48,900.00
944,408.00
1,069,550.00
1,023,000.00
16,895.00
500.00
33,275.00
5,025.00
18,520.00
25, 550.00
179,650.00
850.00
15,400.00
68,050.00
50,835.00
54,415.00
13,600.00
1,172,942.00
16,480.00
8,700.00
600.00
45,925.00
50,500.00
600.00
2,500.00
274,250.00
1,750.00
7, 255, 730.00
2021
YTD Actuals
57,383.67
4,715.29
619,771.27
376,608.65
179,918.91
36,827.98
34,676.43
2,984.99
3,520.83
1,316,408.02
4,345,964.86
3,603.39
4,670.92
20,438.10
268.76
1,292.47
150,228.13
213.00
51,791.26
16,730.75
7,833.60
133,779.49
128,619.93
50,744.88
9,562.29
432,222.21
218,964.50
3,604.73
180.00
9,264.44
233.76
4,263.00
3,137.02
63,518.29
47.05
1,935.62
6,355.48
5,248.08
726.00
1,962.26
395,915.29
5,227.22
550.00
10,816.37
3,918.99
418.00
80,163.78
60.57
1, 828, 509.63
Variance with
Amended
Budget
3,842,419.00
(57,383.67)
(4,715.29)
(619,771.27)
(376,608.65)
(179,918.91)
(36,827.98)
(34,676.43)
(2,984.99)
(3,520.83)
5,656.00
2, 531, 666.98
10,496, 272.14
(3,603.39)
(4,670.92)
84, 561.90
(268.76)
3,707.53
406,221.87
(213.00)
109,958.74
83,169.25
17,416.40
456,970.51
1,170.00
331, 880.07
56,545.12
39,337.71
944,408.00
637, 327.79
804, 035.50
13,290.27
320.00
24,010.56
5,025.00
(233.76)
14,257.00
22,412.98
116,131.71
802.95
13,464.38
61,694.52
45, 586.92
(726.00)
54,415.00
11,637.74
777, 026.71
11,252.78
8,700.00
50.00
35,108.63
46,581.01
600.00
2,500.00
(418.00)
194,086.22
1,689.43
5,427,220.37
Percentage
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
34.21 %
0.00%
0.00%
19.46%
0.00%
25.85%
27.00%
0.00%
32.02%
16.75%
31.02%
22.65%
0.00%
27.93%
47.30%
19.55%
0.00%
40.41 %
21.40%
21.34%
36.00%
27.84%
0.00%
0.00%
23.02%
12.28%
35.36%
5.54%
12.57%
9.34%
10.32%
0.00%
0.00%
14.43%
33.75%
31.72%
0.00%
91.67%
23.55%
7.76%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
29.23%
3.46%
25.20%
52
Consent Agenda Item 10 C
11 PARKS AND REC DEPART
Run On: 03/18/2021 at 05:31 PM
Account Account Title
NON DEPARTMENTAL
TOTAL NON DEPARTMENTAL
COMMODITIES
750063 Custodial Supplies
750140 Employee Footwear
750154 Expendable Equipment
750287 Maintenance Supplies
750385 Merchandise
750392 Metered Postage
750399 Office Supplies
750448 Postage -Standard Mailing
750476 Recreation Supplies
750504 Small Tools
750511 Special Event Supplies
750581 Uniforms
TOTAL COMMODITIES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPRECIATION
761042 Depreciation Park Improvements
761084 Depreciation Buildings
761121 Depreciation Equipment
761156 Depreciation Vehicles
TOTAL DEPRECIATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
762011 Transfer to Municipalities
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
BENEFIT PAYMENTS - RETIREMENT
TOTAL BENEFIT PAYMENTS - RETIREMENT
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
TOTAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
INTEREST ON DEBT
TOTAL INTEREST ON DEBT
PAYING AGENT FEES
TOTAL PAYING AGENT FEES
PYMT TO REFUND BOND ESCROW AGENT
TOTAL PYMT TO REFUND BOND ESCROW AGENT
DISCOUNT ON BONDS ISSUED
TOTAL DISCOUNT ON BONDS ISSUED
TOTAL CONTROLLABLE OPERATING
INTERNAL SERVICES
771639
Drain Equipment
773630
Info Tech Development
774636
Info Tech Operations
774637
Info Tech Managed Print Svcs
774677
Insurance Fund
775754
Maintenance Department Charges
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
February, Fiscal Year 2021 Monthly Report
REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT
As of Date: 02/28/2021
Fund: 50800 - Parks and Recreation
2021 2021
Adopted Amended
Budget Budget
2021
YTD Actuals
Variance with
Amended
Budget
Percentage
0.00%
79,550.00
79,550.00
3,952.59
75,597.41
4.97%
7,140.00
7,140.00
1,777.06
5,362.94
24.89%
134,400.00
134,400.00
9,956.22
124,443.78
7.41 %
3,300.00
3,300.00
750.63
2,549.37
22.75%
487,600.00
487,600.00
20,252.67
467,347.33
4.15%
8,000.00
8,000.00
1,313.76
6,686.24
16.42%
47,400.00
47,400.00
7,767.83
39,632.17
16.39%
-
-
11.00
(11.00)
0.00%
113,800.00
113,800.00
7,201.22
106,598.78
6.33%
119,975.00
119,975.00
23,209.66
96,765.34
19.35%
143,400.00
143,400.00
7,847.24
135,552.76
5.47%
68,850.00
68,850.00
9,345.19
59,504.81
13.57%
1,213,415.00
1,213,415.00
93,385.07
1,120,029.93
7.70%
0.00%
1,746,537.00
1,746,537.00
824,736.12
921,800.88
47.22%
841,250.00
841,250.00
375,510.15
465,739.85
44.64%
248,610.00
248,610.00
173,757.94
74,852.06
69.89%
38,400.00
38,400.00
6,142.90
32,257.10
16.00%
2,874,797.00
2,874,797.00
1,380,147.11
1,494,649.89
48.01%
276,320.00
276,320.00
-
276,320.00
0.00%
276, 320.00
276, 320.00
-
276, 320.00
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
11,594,304.00
11,620,262.00
3,302,041.81
8,318,220.19
27,000.00
27,000.00
21,538.25
5,461.75
79.77%
25,000.00
25,000.00
7,729.50
17,270.50
30.92%
573,327.00
573,327.00
149,957.78
423,369.22
26.16%
28,950.00
28,950.00
3,103.92
25,846.08
10.72%
252,050.00
252,050.00
58,044.93
194,005.07
23.03%
78,500.00
78,500.00
14,016.56
64,483.44
17.86%
53
Consent Agenda Item 10 C
11 PARKS AND REC DEPART
Run On: 03/18/2021 at 05:31 PM
Account Account Title
776659 Motor Pool Fuel Charges
776661 Motor Pool
778675 Telephone Communications
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES
TOTAL INTERNAL SUPPORT
TRANSFERS OUT
788001 Transfers Out
TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGETED EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL BUDGETED EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
February, Fiscal Year 2021 Monthly Report
REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT
As of Date: 02/28/2021
Fund: 50800 - Parks and Recreation
2021
2021
Variance with
Adopted
Amended
2021
Amended
Budget
Budget
YTD Actuals
Budget
89,820.00
89,820.00
16,609.95
73,210.05
410,754.00
410,754.00
129,779.25
280,974.75
130,820.00
130,820.00
55,938.44
74,881.56
1,616,221.00
1,616,221.00
456,718.58
1,159,502.42
1,616,221.00
1,616,221.00
456,718.58
1,159,502.42
30,000.00
30,000.00
-
30,000.00
30, 000.00
30, 000.00
-
30, 000.00
28, 082, 762.00
28,108, 720.00
8,104, 725.25
20, 003, 994.75
Percentage
18.49%
31.60%
42.76%
28.26%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
54
Consent Agenda Item 10 D
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
Capital Equipment Report
Fiscal Month 5, FY2021, as of 2/28/2021
*** Please inform Fiscal Services of any planned changes in budgeted purchases ***
Date
Budget
Actual Projected
Approved
Qty. Center Item
Category Budget
Expense Expense
06/03/20
1 ADD Zero Turn Mower
P EQP 14,000.00
18,116.00 -
06/03/20
1 ADD Utility Vehicle
P_EQP 9,500.00
9,781.99 -
ADD Total
23,500.00
27,897.99 -
07/01 /20
07/01 /20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
06/03/20
1 FM
Boat Wash Station
P_EQP
35,662.50
36,705.00
1 FM
Boat Wash Station
P_EQP
35,662.50
36,705.00
1 FM
Generator
P
EQP
27,000.00
28,163.00
FM Total
98,325.00
101,573.00
1 CAT
Utility Vehicle w/top
P_EQP
12,000.00
12,814.36
CAT Total
12,000.00
12,814.36
1 GLG
Utility Vehicle
P_EQP
9,500.00
7,828.55
1 GLG
Utility Vehicle
P_EQP
9,500.00
7,828.55
1 GLG
Turbine Blower
P
EQP
8,000.00
7,964.66
GLG Total
27,000.00
23,621.76
1 GRV
Zero Turn Mower
P_EQP
14,000.00
13,629.00
1 GRV
Dump Trailer
P_EQP
9,000.00
7,201.00
GRV Total
23,000.00
20,830.00
1 LYG
Fairway Mower
P_EQP
58,000.00
62,074.68
1 LYG
Greens Mower
P_EQP
38,000.00
-
LYG Total
96,000.00
62,074.68
1 ORN
Zero Turn Mower
P_EQP
14,000.00
13,127.00
ORN Total
14,000.00
13,127.00
1 REC
Trailer
P_EQP
11,000.00
-
REC Total
11,000.00
-
1 SPG
Turbine Blower
P
EQP
8,000.00
7,964.66
SPG Total
8,000.00
7,964.66
1 WTR
Utility Vehicle
P_EQP
9,000.00
-
WTR Total
9,000.00
-
1 WLG
Greens Mower
P_EQP
32,000.00
-
WLG Total
32,000.00
-
Grand Total
353,825.00
269,903.45
38,944.91
38,944.91
11,000.00
11,000.00
9,000.00
9,000.00
33,532.42
33, 532.42
92,477.33
(Over)/Under
Budget Comments
(4,116.00) V#1488914 Asset ID# 13384
(281.99) V#1499915 Asset ID# 13433
(4,397.99)
V#1479392 Asset ID#13346.
(1,042.50) V#1490227 Addition to asset (cover).
V#1479392 Asset ID#13365.
(1,042.50) V#1490227 Addition to asset (cover)
(1,163.00) V#1507016 Asset I D# 13484
(3,248.00)
(814.36) V#1499917 Asset ID# 13434
(814.36)
1,671.45 V#1500579 Asset ID# 13440
1,671.45 V#1500579 Asset ID# 13458
35.34 V#1499918 Asset ID# 13435
3,378.24
371.00 V#1506140 Asset ID# 13473
1,799.00 V#1491490 Asset ID# 13396
2,170.00
(4,074.68) V#1507014 Asset ID# 13483
(944.91) Bid - Spartan Distributors
(5,019.59)
873.00 V#1499920 Asset ID# 13436
873.00
35.34 V#1495975 Asset ID# 13412
35.34
(1,532.42) Bid - Spartan Distributors
(1,532.42)
(8,555.78)
55
Consent Agenda Item 10 E
REVENUES:
5-YEAR AVERAGE REVENUE
Percentage of Total
Amended Budget/Alottment
Planned Use of Balance
Amended Budget
Actual Revenues by Controllable Cateeorv:
Taxes
Intergovernmental Revenues
Charges for Services
Contributions
Investment Income
Other Revenue
Tranfsfers In
Total Actuals
Avg. Monthly Revenue Over/(Under)
EXPENSES:
5-YEAR AVERAGE EXPENSE
Percentage of Total
Amended Budget/Alottment
Actual Expenses by Controllable Cateeorv:
Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Contractual Services
Commodities
Depreciation
Internal Services
Intergovernmental
Transfers Out
Actuals
Avg. Monthly Expenses (Over)/Under
Total Avg Monthly Favorability/(Unfavorability)
TOTALS:
Monthly Actual Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses
Cumulative Actual Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses
Unrestricted Net Position
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission
Monthly Average Comparison Report
(Comparison of FY 2021 Actuals with 5-Year Average Actuals)
As of February 28, 2021
Unrestricted Net 112021Amended I
Position 10/1/20 Budget
October
November
December January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August September
YEAR TO DATE
$436,459
$161,009
$1,079,094 $7,393,102
$2,459,070
$1,876,231
$1,498,218
$1,329,199
$1,753,125
$1,983,312
$1,697,718 $1,544,654
1.88%
0.69%
4.65% 31.85%
10.59%
8.08%
6.45%
5.73%
7.55%
8.54%
7.31% 6.65%
$ 25,696,674
$483,195
$278,250
$1,194,645 $8,184,765
$2,722,390
$2,077,140
$1,658,649
$1,471,531
$1,940,852
$2,195,697
$1,879,512 $1,710,058
$25,696,674
$ 2,412,046
$28,108,720
$1,629
$2,067
$91,051 $9,512,453
$7,542,922
$17,250,222
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$552,943
$220,447
$94,934 $202,916
$132,365
$1,203,605
$0
$100
$1,500 $180
$0
$1,780
$15,338
$12,830
$10,393 $9,726
$8,028
$56,325
$10,529
$2,032
$17,948 $26,843
$46,680
$104,032
50
$0
$25,958 $0
$0
$25,958
$580,439
$237,477
$241,784 $9,752,118
$7,729,995
$0
$0
0
0
0
$0 $0
$18,541,813
$97,244
$59,227
($952,861) $1,567,353
$5,007,605
$5,778,568
$1,553,168 $1,545,894 $1,853,026 $1,550,459 $1,433,759 $1,993,708 $1,790,165 $2,149,129 $2,881,255 $2,590,014 $2,586,843 $3,085,707
6.21% 6.18% 7.41% 6.20% 5.73% 7.97% 7.16% 8.59% 11.52% 10.35% 10.34% 12.34%
$28,108,720 $1,745,386 $1,737,212 $2,082,354 $1,742,342 $1,611,199 $2,240,447 $2,011,713 $2,415,102 $3,237,835 $2,910,551 $2,906,988 $3,467,590 $28,108,720
612,263.93
641,710.25
523,114.96
727,308.33 $
525,159.37
$3,029,557
216,201.60
246,566.54
237,539.55
365,811.09
250,289.24
$1,316,408
42,465.30
488,408.96
555,537.37
424,868.65
317,229.35
$1,828,510
37,585.58
13,147.64
15,653.03
10,957.33
16,041.49
$93,385
273,070.30
273,070.29
273,651.27
278,317.65
282,037.60
$1,380,147
64,669.92
56,823.56
234,191.86
49,262.72
51,770.52
$456,719
-
-
$0
$0
$1,246,257
$1,719,727
$1,839,688
$1,856,526
$1,442,528
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,104,725
$499,129 $17,485 $242,666 ($114,184) $168,672 $813,767
$596,373 $76,711 ($710,195) $1,453,169 $5,176,277 $6,592,335
($665,817) ($1,482,251) ($1,597,904) $7,895,592 $6,287,467 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,437,087
( 665,817) (2,148,068) (3,745,972) $4,149,620 $10,437,087
18,603,825 $ 18,130,809 $ 16,549,558 $ 14,242,676 $ 22,085,747 $28,321,404
Prepared by Fiscal Services 3/31/2021
Monthly Average Comparison Rep"151 ,CR)
Parks and Recreation Commission
ACTIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
BUDGET TO ACTUAL EXPENSE REPORT
(as of March 19, 2021)
Consent Agenda Item 10 F
Project ID
Description
Start Date
Last Transaction
Budget
Expenses to Date
Remaining Budget
Percentage
Date
Completion
1 I 100000002821
CAT Storage Electrical
7/12/2018
10/4/2019
$52,056.00
$27,200.00
$24,856.00
52.25%
2 I 100000002853
SPG Clubhouse Renovation
9/25/2018
2/11/2021
$75,000.00
$47,481.55
$27,518.45
63.31%
3 I 100000002856
SPR Clubhouse Renovation
9/25/2018
10/12/2020
$75,000.00
$47,327.54
$27,672.46
63.10%
4 I 100000002880
RWP Wave Pool Duct Work
10/9/2018
7/22/2019
$19,140.00
$18,915.00
$225.00
98.82%
5 I 100000002915
IND Bailey House Conv Mitigat
11/30/2018
2/28/2021
$40,000.00
$50,849.36
($10,849.36)
127.12%
6 I 100000002958
RWP Child Wtr Struct Repl
3/25/2019
3/3/2021
$1,599,540.00
$1,566,700.21
$32,839.79
97.95%
7 I 100000002959
SAC Stormwater Imp
3/25/2019
10/22/2019
$27,027.00
$24,789.00
$2,238.00
91.72%
8 I 100000003070
SAC HVAC Replacement
11/13/2019
3/15/2021
$28,235.00
$219,167.67
($190,932.67)
776.23%
9 I 100000003071
GRV Ped Bridge Repl (150')
11/13/2019
10/19/2020
$18,352.00
$18,352.00
$0.00
100.00%
10 I 100000003076
LYC Drain System Rpl
11/19/2019
10/31/2020
$10,000.00
$10,108.60
($108.60)
101.09%
11 I 100000003093
ACC Electrical Improvements
1/13/2020
1/20/2021
$375,783.00
$204,291.50
$171,491.50
54.36%
12 I 100000003128
SAC Millpond Dam Restoration
3/26/2020
3/3/2021
$168,530.00
$97,008.95
$71,521.05
57.56%
13 I 100000003160
RWP San. Pump Station
4/28/2020
2/19/2021
$268,464.00
$252,109.00
$16,355.00
93.91%
14 I 100000003168
IND Network Upgrade
5/4/2020
9/30/2020
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$0.00
100.00%
15 I 100000003171
HRV Contact Station
5/4/2020
12/31/2020
$20,000.00
$705.30
$19,294.70
3.53%
16 I 100000003172
HRV Parking Lot Dev
5/4/2020
1/20/2021
$226,244.00
$25,547.00
$200,697.00
11.29%
17 I 100000003227
SAC Network Upgrade
6/25/2020
12/31/2020
$15,000.00
$6,064.70
$8,935.30
40.43%
18 I 100000003258
LYG Irrig. Well Replacement
9/10/2020
9/23/2020
$35,000.00
$34,506.64
$493.36
98.59%
19 I 100000003259
RWP Shade Structure
9/10/2020
2/19/2021
$39,357.00
$35,369.00
$3,988.00
89.87%
20 I 100000003302
RDP Emergency HVAC Repl
11/13/2020
11/13/2020
$16,900.00
$0.00
$16,900.00
0.00%
21 I 100000003324
RWP Spl Pad Family Restroom
12/9/2020
3/3/2021
$277,021.00
$173,938.83
$103,082.17
62.79%
22 I 100000003357
SAC Water System Well Replc
1/25/2021
3/15/2021
$223,202.00
$18,815.58
$204,386.42
8.43%
23 I 100000003363
SPG Park House Roof Rpl
1/27/2021
1/27/2021
$7,000.00
$0.00
$7,000.00
0.00%
24 I 100000003411
ADD Maint Yard Paving
3/19/2021
3/19/2021
$29,106.00
$0.00
$29,106.00
0.00%
25 I 100000003412
GRV Bball Court Paving
3/19/2021
3/19/2021
$14,652.00
$0.00
$14,652.00
0.00%
$3,690,609.00
$2,909,247.43
$781,361.57
FY2021 Projects Closed to
Date:
Closed/Capitalized:
CIP Proiect #
Description
Amount
100000002754
CAT Perimeter Path
$
161,622.70
100000002755
CAT Sports Field Grading Irr
$
480,670.00
100000003170
HRV Mt Magna Dev
$
86,420.19
100000002532
SAC Water Quality Impr.
$
926,195.01
$
1,654,907.90
Prepared by Fiscal Services: 3/31/2021
57
Consent Agenda Item 10 G
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission
FY2021 Maintenance Management Plan
BUDGET TO ACTUAL EXPENSE REPORT
As of March 31, 2021
Cost Title Adopted Adjusted Expended Budget -
Center Budget Budget Amount Balance
ADM
ADA Maintenance Program
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
ADM
Fenceline Repair Program
$20,000
$20,000
$0
$20,000
ADM
Roof Repair Program
$20,000
$20,000
$0
$20,000
ADM
Asset Removal Program
$30,000
$59,796
$28,273
$31,523
IND
Oakhill Residence
$30,000
$295
WTR
Greenhouse Demolition
$8,850
$10,050
WLG
Rental Home Demoltion
$20,946
$17,928
ADM
Pavement Maintenance Program
$90,000
$46,242
$0
$46,242
ADD
Buhl Trail Asphalt Repairs
$6,600
SPG
Cart Barn Asphalt Repairs
$13,365
GRV
Skate Park Resurfacing
$2,673
GRV
Trail Asphalt Repairs
$15,422
IND
River View/Hawks View Asphalt Repairs
$7,700
ADM
Contingency
$482
ADM
Signage Replacement Program
$15,000
$15,000
$0
$15,000
ADM
Arc Flash Compliance Program Phase IV
$50,000
$50,000
$0
$50,000
FM
NR Forestry Program
$125,000
$125,000
$25,550
$99,450
FM
NR Freshwater Stewardship Program
$40,000
$40,000
$2,200
$37,800
FM
NR Natural Area Stewardship Program
$280,000
$280,000
$56,526
$223,474
FM
NR Wildlife Management Program
$2,750
$2,750
$2,750
FM
NR Aerial Deer Survey (2021)
$0
$6,480
$6,480
$0
ACC
Conference Center Stucco Repair
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
ADD
Adam's Lake Lodge Deck - Structural Inspection
$2,500
$2,500
$2,500
ADD
Disc Golf Course Upgrade
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
GLC
Window and Door Replacement
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
GRV
Cabin 5 - HVAC Replacement
$4,000
$4,000
$4,000
GRV
Matthews Island Bridge - Structural Inspection
$1,850
$1,850
$1,850
Paradise Island Long Span Bridge - Structural
GRV
Inspection/Repair
$2,350
$2,350
$2,350
IND
Maintenance Yard Screening and Landscaping
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
IND
River Loop Bridge - Structural Inspection
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
ORN
Dog Wash Station - Concrete Expansion
$2,500
$2,500
$2,500
RWP
Waterpark Bridge - Structural Inspection
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
SAC
Ellis Barn Painting
$110,000
$110,000
$32,566
$77,434
SAC
Rotary Park Bridge - Structural Inspection
$1,250
$1,250
$1,250
WCM
Market Pavilion - Structural Inspection
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
WTR
Lookout Lodge Deck - Structural Inspection
$2,500
$2,500
$2,500
WWP
Waterpark Bridge - Structural Inspection
$2,500
$2,500
$2,500
Totals
$952,200
$918,238
$151,595
$773,123
Note: Program amounts may be allocated to multiple project locations.
58
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 H
ADMINISTRATION - BUSINESS OPERATIONS
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Phil Castonia, Chief of Business Operations
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Parks Purchasing Activity Reports
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Staff will present a monthly status report on the Purchasing Activity from Month 4 of Fiscal Year 2021
(January 2021) for Parks and Recreation.
ATTACHMENTS
- Monthly Purchasing Expenditure Report — January 2021
- Monthly Contract Activity Log Expenditure Report — January 2021
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission receive and file the Purchasing Activity from Month 4 of Fiscal Year 2021
(January 2021) for Parks and Recreation.
MOTION
Move to receive and file the Purchasing Activity from Month 4 of Fiscal Year 2021 (January 2021) for
Parks and Recreation.
59
Contract Activity Log Expenditure Report - January 2021
Awarded Vendor
a
Xk
3
"O 7
m
m
CO
0
d o Z C
E
w
a)
Description -o �?
a)m
-O
0
m a
m�
m
Name City State ¢ V o
? U
CO
as
O
a
09/25/20
5049
10/21
Parks Mobile Generator Ramsey-Biese Corp dba Leete Generators Santa Rosa CA 01/13/21 362777 $
28,163.00
Consent Agenda Item 10 H
O .—
Z
�+ Y
c
c NO
E
U o
o
Z�
��V
y dZ
m
cc 0
° T
0 CO
N c�i
E E O
Z m S N
LL
O o
_
�j Or
Cc<i
}
Z
CO N
y
a
AJK Yes
60
OCPR Purchasing Report - January 2021
Consent Agenda Item 10 H
FM
Department Title
Account Title
Trans. Amount
Vendor Name
Additional Accounts Payable Info.
4
Addison Oaks Conference Ctr
Depreciation Buildings
6,787.41
Not Vendor Related
4
Addison Oaks Park
Grounds Maintenance
5,886.25
Bedrock Express Ltd
Bedrock Express Pricelist date
4
Addison Oaks Park
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
9,781.99
Spartan Distributors Inc
TORO WORKMAN GTX GASOLINE
4
Capital Improvement
Capital Improvement Program
16,842.42
Not Vendor Related
Capital Improvement Program
4
Capital Improvement
Capital Improvement Program
5,289.60
Not Vendor Related
V1494356(HRC ENGINEERS)
4
Catalpa Oaks Park
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
12,814.36
Spartan Distributors Inc
TORO WORKMAN GTX ELECTRIC
4
Catalpa Oaks Park
Depreciation Park Improvements
6,987.26
Not Vendor Related
4
Facilities and Maintenance
Equipment Rental
5,021.00
MacAllister Machinery Co Inc
Rental Equipment per quote
4
Facilities and Maintenance
Motor Pool
7,056.40
Not Vendor Related
Motor Pool
4
Glen Oaks Conference Center
Depreciation Buildings
7,277.31
Not Vendor Related
4
Glen Oaks Golf
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
7,828.55
Not Vendor Related
4
Glen Oaks Golf
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
7,964.66
Spartan Distributors Inc
TORO PRO FORCE TURBINE BLOWER
4
Glen Oaks Golf
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
15,657.10
Midwest Golf and Turf Acquisition LLC-
Club Car Carryall 300 Turf Gas
4
Glen Oaks Golf
Depreciation Park Improvements
7,076.36
Not Vendor Related
4
Groveland Oaks Park
Depreciation Park Improvements
17,602.45
Not Vendor Related
4
Groveland Oaks Park
Depreciation Buildings
6,796.25
Not Vendor Related
4
Independence Oaks Park
Depreciation Park Improvements
9,827.81
Not Vendor Related
4
Independence Oaks Park
Depreciation Buildings
6,398.25
Not Vendor Related
4
Lyon Oaks Conference Center
Depreciation Buildings
7,132.51
Not Vendor Related
4
Lyon Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
7,740.60
Rentokil North America Inc
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
4
Lyon Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
5,481.44
Rentokil North America Inc
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
4
Lyon Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
5,326.07
Rentokil North America Inc
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
4
Lyon Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
8,197.46
Rentokil North America Inc
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
4
Lyon Oaks Golf
Depreciation Buildings
5,475.00
Not Vendor Related
4
Off -Road Vehicle Park
Equipment Rental
7,906.63
MacAllister Machinery Co Inc
Oakland County Parks ORV Park
4
Off -Road Vehicle Park
Grounds Maintenance
14,040.00
Fortress Foundations LLC
ORV Park Earthwork and Mainten
4
Orion Oaks Park
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
13,127.00
D and G Equipment Inc
EXMARK LAZER Z X-SERIES MODEL
4
Rec Programs and Services
Insurance Fund
6,782.83
Not Vendor Related
Insurance Fund
4
Red Oaks Golf
Depreciation Park Improvements
8,474.01
Not Vendor Related
4
Red Oaks Waterpark
Building Maintenance Charges
6,645.00
Kennedy Industries Inc
DeZURIK and APCO valves, parts
4
Springfield Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
6,573.67
Rentokil North America Inc
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
Page 1 of 2
61
OCPR Purchasing Report - January 2021
Consent Agenda Item 10 H
FM
Department Title
Account Title
Trans. Amount
Vendor Name
4
Springfield Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
7,337.95
Rentokil North America Inc
4
Springfield Oaks Golf
FA Proprietary Equipment Exp
7,964.66
Spartan Distributors Inc
4
Springfield Oaks Park
Depreciation Park Improvements
10,979.14
Not Vendor Related
4
Springfield Oaks Park
Depreciation Buildings
5,010.74
Not Vendor Related
4
Waterford Oaks Park
Depreciation Park Improvements
9,948.93
Not Vendor Related
4
White Lake Oaks Conf Center
Depreciation Buildings
6,650.03
Not Vendor Related
4
White Lake Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
7,084.51
Rentokil North America Inc
4
White Lake Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
6,618.34
Rentokil North America Inc
4
White Lake Oaks Golf
Grounds Maintenance
17,928.00
Allied Building Service Co of Detroit
Additional Accounts Payable Info.
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
TORO PRO FORCE TURBINE BLOWER
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
Fertilizers and Landscape Chem
Parks General Construction per
Page 2 of 2
62
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 I
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Michael J. Donnellon. Jr., Chief of Facilities, Maintenance and Development
Sarah Cook-Maylen, Natural Resources Coordinator
Submitted: March 8, 2021
Subject: Natural Resources FY2021 Contracted Invasive Species Treatments
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As part of the Oakland County Parks & Recreation — Natural Resources Management (NR) program, staff plan
to invest $129,000 in budgeted funds for approximately 400 acres of invasive species treatments at Addison,
Highland, Independence and Orion Oaks. Proposed work in each of these parks will exceed $20,000 and
therefore require OCPRC approval.
The proposed treatments are for populations of Phragmites, Swallowwort spp., Reed Canary Grass and Asian
Bittersweet in high quality wetland habitats, forests, and grassland restoration areas. These areas have been
managed as part of an ongoing natural area restoration program since 2007. Cardno will also treat 160 acres of
invasive species at Groveland, Lyon, Rose, and Waterford Oaks for amounts that total less than $20,000 per
park and therefore do not require OCPRC approval.
The proposed work will be completed by annual blanket contractor Cardno of West Olive, MI.
FUNDING
NR has $350,000 budgeted for Natural Areas Stewardship, including prescribed burning and invasive species
spraying, in 2021. $70,000 of that $350,000 was approved for additional prescribed burning at the March 2021
OCPRC meeting. Approval is requested for cost centers that exceed $20,000 and are outlined below:
Invasive Species Treatments: Addison Oaks
$40,000
Invasive Species Treatments: Highland Oaks
$23,000
Invasive Species Treatments: Independence Oaks
$31,000
Invasive Species Treatments: Orion Oaks
$35,000
ATTACHMENTS
• Attachment A — Addison Oaks Treatment Map
• Attachment B — Highland Oaks Treatment Map
• Attachment C — Independence Oaks Treatment Map
• Attachment D — Orion Oaks Treatment Map
��
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval to award Cardno of West Olive, MI the priority invasive species control work for a
not to exceed project amount of $129,000 as budgeted in the FY2021 Natural Resources Maintenance Program,
as follows:
Addison Oaks $40,000
Hiqhland Oaks $23,000
Independence Oaks $31,000
Orion Oaks $35,000
Total $129,000
MOTION
Move to award Cardno of West Olive, MI the priority invasive species control work for a not to exceed
project amount of $129,000 as budgeted in the FY2021 Natural Resources Maintenance Program, as
follows:
Addison Oaks
$40,000
Hiqhland Oaks
$23,000
Independence Oaks
$31,000
Orion Oaks
$35,000
Total
$129,000
Qw."A'KLAND
COUNTY PARKS
o
Addison Oaks
1480 W Romeo Road
Leonord, MI 48367
-- Cardno FY2021 Treatment Areas --
Q Park Boundary
Species to Treat
Bittersweet
Cattails
- All Non -Natives
2017 Aerial Photo N
I I t I I
p 1 nnn 2 nnn Fnnr
Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Dan Stencil, Executive Officer
2800 Watkins Lake Road
Waterford, MI 48328
248-858-0906
www.OaklandCountyParks.com
Revision Dote, 3/10/2021
"The Information that has been provided herewith has been compiled from recorded
deeds, plats, tax, surveys and public records. It is not a legally recorded map or
rvey and is not intended to be used as one Users should consult the ingg
sources marooned above when quesbons anse "
_ovation: \\OAKFS03\K_Drive\ParksRe6General\Natura1 Resouroes\03_NaturalAreas\Herbicide Treatments\_GIS_Data\Contractor_ Herbicide_Treatments.apm
Qw.'AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Independence Oaks
9501 Sashabaw Road
Clarkston, MI 48348
-- Cardno FY2021 Treatment Areas --
= Park Boundary
Species to Treat
= Bittersweet
Swallow -worts
2017 Aerial Photo N
I I I I I J�
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Dan Stencil, Executive Officer
2800 Watkins Lake Road
Waterford, MI 48328
248-858-0906
www.OaklandCountyParks.com
Revision DUM: 3/10/2021
"The Information that has been provided herewith has been compiled from recorded
deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys and public records. It is not a legally recorded map or
rvey and is not intended to be used as one Users should consult Me inf/ g
sources marooned above when questions anse"�u
_ovation: \\OAKFS03\K_Drive\ParksRe6General\Natura1 Resources\03_NaturalAreas\Herbicide Treatments\_GIS_Data\Contractor_ Herbicide_Treatments.apm
Qw.'AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Highland Oaks
6555 Milford Road
Highland MI 48442
-- Cardno FY2021 Treatment Areas --
Q Park Boundary
Species to Treat
Cattails
Swallow -worts
2017 Aerial Photo N
I f t f t
0 490 980 Feet
Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Dan Stencil, Executive Officer
2800 Watkins Lake Road
Waterford, MI 48328
248-858-0906
www.0a klandCou ntyPa rks.com
Revision-311012021
"The Information that has been provided herewith has been compiled from recorded
,heads, plats, tax maps, surveys and public records. It is not a legally recorded map or
rvey and is not intended to be used as one Users should consult Me inf/Qryn
sources mentioned above when queebons ones "u'
_ovation: \\0AKFS03\K_Drive\ParksRe6General\Natural Resourms\03_NaturalAreas\Herbicide Treatments\_GIS_Data\Contractor_ Herbicide_Treatments.apm
Qw.'AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Orion Oaks
2301 W Clarkston Road
Lake Orion, MI 48360
-- Cardno FY2021 Treatment Areas --
Q Park Boundary
Species to Treat
Bittersweet
Reed canary grass
2017 Aerial Photo N
I I I I
0 725 1,450 Feet
Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Dan Stencil, Executive Officer
2800 Watkins Lake Road
Waterford, MI 48328
248-858-0906
www.0a klandCou ntyPa rks.com
Revision-311012021
"The Information that has been provided herewith has been compiled from recorded
,heads, plats, tax maps, surveys and public records. It is not a legally re..died map or
rvey and is not intended to be used as one Users should consult the inf/�yjpn
sources mentioned above when quesbons anse"u�
_ovation: \\0AKFS03\K_Drive\ParksRec\General\Natura1 Resourms\03_NaturalAreas\Herbicide Treatments\_GIS_Data\Contractor_ Herbicide_Treatments.apm
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 J
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman Fisher and Commission Members
From: Susan Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Michael J. Donnellon, Jr. Chief of Park Facilities Maintenance & Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Springfield Oaks — ARC Flash Study and Labeling
PROJECT CATEGORIES
Agenda Type: ✓ Consent Agenda Regular Agenda
Approval Type: Conceptual Approval Construction Approval ✓ General Approval
Project Type: Capital Improvement ✓ Maintenance Enhancement
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Scope
A phased electrical engineering compliance study of all existing electrical panels at all county park
locations, beginning in 2017. Independence Oaks requires Commission approval and is part of the fifth
phase of this compliance study.
a. This phase compliance study is expected to be completed in FY2022.
b. Refer to the Schedule Section of the Planning Review for parks that have been completed and are
scheduled for FY2021 and FY2022.
2. Need
This compliance study is required to meet the National Electric Code 2014 (NEC) requirements for
labeling electrical equipment as referenced in National Fire Protection Agency standard NFPA 70E
2015 section 130.5 to provide the proper safety information to electrical maintenance staff, preventing
electrical injuries and/or death.
3. Review and approval history
Date Description
9/2021 FY2021 Maintenance Management Plan
4. Funds requested
a. Current FY budgeted amount: $50,000.00
b. Recommended total amount:
i. Springfield Oaks Activity Center $26,500.00
ii. Springfield Oaks Golf Course $ 2,600.00
iii. Springfield Oaks Clubhouse $ 3,400.00
(1) Total FY2020 $32,500.00
iv. As proposed and to be completed by Berbiglia Associates, Inc, Farmington Hills, MI, Annual
Contract #5204.
Page 2
ATTACHMENTS
1. Attachment A — Planning Review/Park Maps
2. Attachment B — Electrical Engineering Proposal
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve proceeding with the ARC Flash Electrical Compliance Study with
Berbiglia Associates, Inc. of Farmington Hills, Michigan in the amount of $32,500, as listed below:
Asset Amount
Independence Oaks $26,500
Orion Oaks $2,600
White Lake Oaks $3,400
Total $32,500
MOTION
Move to approve proceeding with the ARC Flash Electrical Compliance Study with Berbiglia Associates,
Inc. of Farmington Hills, Michigan in the amount of $32,500, as listed below
Asset Amount
Independence Oaks $26,500
Orion Oaks $2,600
White Lake Oaks $3,400
Total $32,500
70
Contents
ProjectIdentification.............................................................................................................................................................. 2
StaffRecommendation........................................................................................................................................................... 2
ProjectDescription..................................................................................................................................................................2
❑X Current Conditions and Project Need........................................................................................................................2
❑X Proposed Project Scope............................................................................................................................................. 2
❑X Proposed Schedule.....................................................................................................................................................2
❑X Proposed Project Funding..........................................................................................................................................2
❑X Project Location Images— Independence, Orion, White Lake Oaks..........................................................................3
❑X Alternatives................................................................................................................................................................ 6
ProjectImplementation Plans.................................................................................................................................................6
❑X Park Operations and Facilities Maintenance — NA..................................................................................................... 6
X❑ Natural Resources Management — NA....................................................................................................................... 6
X❑ Access and Inclusion — NA.......................................................................................................................................... 6
❑X Public Engagement — NA............................................................................................................................................ 6
❑X Communications and Marketing — NA....................................................................................................................... 6
❑X Recreation Programming — NA...................................................................................................................................6
Compliance and Permitting Reviews...................................................................................................................................... 6
❑X Environmental Regulations — NA............................................................................................................................... 6
❑X Building Regulations...................................................................................................................................................6
❑X Grant Compliance......................................................................................................................................................6
❑X Other Property Restrictions....................................................................................................................................... 6
❑X Standards and Practices.............................................................................................................................................7
PlanningBackground..............................................................................................................................................................7
❑X 5-Year Park Statistics — NA......................................................................................................................................... 7
❑X Planning History.........................................................................................................................................................7
❑X Historical Significance — NA........................................................................................................................................ 7
❑X Public Engagement History........................................................................................................................................7
❑X Other Service Providers — NA..................................................................................................................................... 8
References..............................................................................................................................................................................8
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.docx
71
Project Identification
Park: Park -System Programs: Independence, Orion and White Lake Oaks
Budget center: IND, ORN, WLR, WLG
Asset name: Utilities and Infrastructure OCPR Asset ID: ProUtility
Project Name: Arc Flash Compliance Program
Project ID: 124
Planning Review coordinated bv: Donna Folland, Senior Planner, follandd@oakgov.com
Contributors: Mike Donnellon, Chief of Facilities; Bob Lissner, Maintenance Supervisor
Date Created:12/9/2019
Date of Last Update: 12/9/2019
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends implementing the arc flash study and labeling program as part of an overall program of inspections,
maintenance, repairs and replacement of building equipment to protect OCPR's building assets and infrastructure, avoid
a buildup of deferred maintenance, and to provide safe and enjoyable facilities to our visitors.
Project Description
❑X Current Conditions and Project Need
This compliance study is required to meet the National Electric Code 2014 (NEC) requirements for labeling electrical
equipment as referenced in National Fire Protection Agency standard NFPA 70E 2015 section 130.5 to provide the
proper safety information to electrical maintenance staff, preventing electrical injuries and/or death.
❑X Proposed Project Scope
Implement 5-year engineering analysis program, based on the updated NEC for the evaluation and Arc Flash Hazard and
Safety Equipment labeling of all existing electrical panels located throughout the park system.
❑X Proposed Schedule
■ FY2017 Compliance Study (completed): Groveland, Waterford (Waterpark and Admin building)
■ FY2018 Compliance Study (completed): Red, Catalpa
o FY2019 Compliance Study (completed): Addison, Glen
■ FY2020
o Compliance Study (scheduled): Independence, Orion, White Lake
o Electrical improvements based on compliance study (conceptually approved): Addison
■ FY2021 Compliance Study (forecast): Springfield and Lyon
■ FY2022 Compliance Study (forecast): Waterford (FM, Sheriffs, WBX, WCM, Activities center, Paradise Peninsula,
and Lookout lodge)
❑X Proposed Project Funding
The Arc Flash Compliance Study has annual funding forecast ($60,000) identified FY2020 through FY2024 in the current
Capital Improvement Program and Maintenance Management Plan (OCPR, 9/4/2019, p. 47).
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.docx
72
�RIM
+l H M�N H Approximate area with facilit
=. y�
9501 SashahawRnad
Clarkstc,n, NY 48343
0
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.docx
73
OAKLAND PLANNING REVIEW
COUNTY PARKS Arc Flash Compliance Program (#124) Page 4 of 8
- Mi
Approximate area with facilities
subject to Arc Flash Compliance study
W 4 f
-
took, A
.,, •.. u ap-d.TBa
f
* f
N
� ITS'
«z,
a �
Y,
White LakeCKakriCounty Park
991 Williams Lake Road
White Lake, MI493BG
11
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.docx
75
❑X Alternatives
X❑ No alternatives were considered: The arc flash program is required for compliance with the National Electric
Code; alternatives were not explored.
❑ The following alternatives were considered: NA
❑ Alternatives Study is attached
Project Implementation Plans
❑X Park Operations and Facilities Maintenance — NA
❑X Natural Resources Management — NA
❑X Access and Inclusion — NA
❑X Public Engagement — NA
❑X Communications and Marketing — NA
❑X Recreation Programming — NA
Compliance and Permitting Reviews
❑X Environmental Regulations — NA
❑X Building Regulations
Summary: This compliance study is required to meet the National Electric Code 2014 (NEC) requirements for labeling
electrical equipment as referenced in National Fire Protection Agency standard NFPA 70E 2015 section 130.5
❑X Grant Compliance
❑ There are no grant agreements related to this asset
X❑ Proposed project complies with grant agreements. Grant agreements were not researched for this program.
Implementation of the program will not affect the recreation purpose of the facilities studied.
❑ Further review with granting agencies is required. NA
❑X Other Property Restrictions
❑ There are no known property restrictions or encumbrances related to this asset
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.dou
76
X❑ Proposed project complies with documented property restrictions or encumbrances. Property agreements
were not researched for this program. Implementation of the program will not affect the uses of the facilities
studied.
❑ Communication with easement holder or other entity is required. NA
❑X Standards and Practices
The project shall comply with the following standards and practices (check all that apply and provide detail as needed):
X❑ National standards (CAPRA): CAPRA Standard 7.5.2: PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN —There shall be a
comprehensive preventative maintenance plan to provide periodic, scheduled inspections, assessment and
repair, and replacement of infrastructure systems and assets. This includes certifying, checking or testing for
optimum operation based on applicable industry standards, local guidelines, city requirements and/or
manufacturer's recommendation for maintenance and replacement of parks, with the intent to ensure that park
assets are maintained for optimum use and safety and have the ability to reach or extend its full life cycle and
expected return on investment. (CAPRA, 2014)
X❑ Other standards: NA
Planning Background
❑X 5-Year Park Statistics — NA
❑X Planning History
X❑ Mission and Strategic Goals: MANAGE ASSETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE — Sustainably reinvest in existing assets
and infrastructure, make new investments when supported by fiscal resources, recreational trends, public
engagement, and usage data (OCPR, 2/1/2018, p. 9.3)
❑X Historical Significance — NA
❑X Public Engagement History
X❑ 2017 Oakland County Needs Assessment Survey: Respondents to the 2017 survey were supportive of
investing tax dollars to maintain older structures (an example being the Addison Oaks Conference Center). They
were asked to indicate how supportive they would be of having Oakland County Parks and Recreation use their
tax dollars to fund 18 different investments. Based on the sum of "very supportive" and "somewhat supportive"
responses the four most supportive investments were: fix up and repair older structures and playgrounds
(76%), fix up and repair roads and parking lots (75%), make facilities accessible for persons of all abilities (68%),
and new trails and boardwalks (67%). Respondents were then asked to indicate which four actions would they
be most willing to fund with their tax dollars. Based on the sum of respondents' top four choices, the three most
supported investments were: fix up and repair older structures and playgrounds (35%), fix up and repair roads
and parking lots (31%), and new trails and boardwalks (29%). (ETC, September 2017)
❑ Park or Facility -Specific Public Engagement: NA
❑ Project -Specific Public Engagement: NA
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.docx
77
❑X Other Service Providers — NA
References
CAPRA. (2014). Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies National Accreditation Standards.
Washington DC: National Recreation and Parks Association.
ETC. (September 2017). Oakland County Parks and Recreation Community Needs Assessment Survey. Waterford MI:
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission.
OCPR. (2/1/2018). 5-Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2018-2022. Waterford MI: Oakland County Parks and
Recreation Commission.
OCPR. (9/4/2019). Approved FY2020 Capital Improvement Program and Maintenance Management Plans. Waterford MI:
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission.
K:\ParksRec\General\Planning Workspace\Planning Reviews\ADM Arc Flash Compliance\PR ADM Update: December 9, 2019
Arc Flash Compliance.docx
78
7
BERBIGLIA ASSOCIATES, INC.
r']CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSAL
Date: December 18, 2020
To: Oakland County Parks and Recreation
2800 Watkins Lake Road
Waterford MI
Attn: Mr. Colin Gibbs, Maintenance Supervisor
Project Name: Springfield Oaks, Arc Flash Study
WE PROPOSE TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A. Arc Flash Power study of the electrical distribution system at Springfield Oaks County
Park. The project is divided into three budget centers as follows:
SAC Activity Center (Entire Park)
SOGC Golf Course
SPR Roadhouse Pub and Grille
B. The park includes the Activity Center, Water Tower, Fair Office, Ellis barn, numerous
animal barns, maintenance, etc.
C. The project includes arc flash modeling for approximately 238 electrical distribution
points (transformers, panels, meters, disconnects, wireway, etc.) and 158 vehicle
pedestals for a total of approximately 396 labels.
SCOPE OF SERVICES:
A. Electrical engineering services.
WORK INCLUDED:
A. Preparation of an arc flash power study related to electric service and power distribution.
B. Site visit to verify existing conditions.
C. Review existing drawings.
D. DTE Energy electric service fault current to be provided for our use where transformer
kVA rating is not indicated on transformer. Oakland County to request transformer size
information from their DTE Energy account representative or we will use an estimated
transformer fault current based on service size.
E. The study results will include the following:
(248) 489-3100
36400 W. 12 Mile Rd.
Farmington Hills, MI 48331
79
December 18, 2020
Springfield Oaks Park
Arc Flash Study Proposal
Page 2
Prepare Power One Line Diagrams for all electrical distribution. Power One Line
Diagram to include DTE Energy electric service continuous to all circuit breaker
panelboards or large motor loads.
2. Available fault current at the electric service point of connection and all distribution
panels and panelboards.
3. Suggested Amps Interrupting Capacity (AIC) ratings for electrical distribution
equipment where existing ratings are not adequate.
4. Overcurrent protective device time current curves.
5. Suggested overcurrent device revisions where required to improve electrical
coordination or reduce available fault current or improve safety.
6. Suggested electrical distribution system revisions where required to improve safety.
7. Suggested electrical distribution equipment labeling revisions where required to
improve safety.
8. Arc flash labels for all electrical distribution equipment and pedestals. Arc flash
labels to include equipment designation, available energy, PPE requirements,
hazard warning, etc.
9. We will have all labels printed and provided to Oakland County. Labels will be
installed by Oakland County.
10. Two (2) hard copies and one electronic copy of studies will be provided.
WORK NOT INCLUDED:
A. Preparation of construction documents to revise any existing conditions.
ENGINEERING FEES:
A. Compensation for the above listed services is proposed to be an hourly not to exceed
amount as follows:
SAC Activity Center (entire park) $ 26,500
SOGC Golf Course $ 2,600
SPR Roadhouse Pub and Grille $ 3,400
Total $ 32,500
ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
A. Additional services, if requested, will be performed on an hourly basis. Additional
services will be performed only at the direction of Oakland County Parks.
B. Our hourly rates for performing additional services are in accordance with our blanket as
follows:
80
December 18, 2020
Springfield Oaks Park
Arc Flash Study Proposal
Principal $109.97/ hour
Designer $ 71.22 / hour
PAYMENT:
Engineer $97.40 / hour
Draftsperson $60.75 / hour
Page 3
A. In accordance with the terms of Berbiglia Associates, Inc. blanket contract.
REIMBURSABLE&
A. Printing charges for arc flash labels will be billed without markup.
We greatly appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this proposal and look forward to
working with you and your staff on this project. If I can answer any questions or be of
assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
John L. Berbiglia, P.E., LEED AP
If the above services and terms are acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal.
Agreed upon by:
Oakland Cou y Parks and Recreat n
12/21 /2020
Date
81
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 K
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Michael J. Donnellon, Jr, Chief of Park Facilities, Maintenance & Development
Submitted: March 8, 2021
Subject: Pending Capital Summary Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. A report/listing of all Capital Improvement Program Projects indicating project titles, descriptions and status, based
upon the most current Management & Budget Report of `Projects — Budget to Actual Expense Report'.
A. Newly Listed Projects:
1. Addison Oaks — Maintenance Well Replacement
2. Springfield Oaks Activity Center — Well Replacement
3. Springfield Oaks — Park House Roof Replacement
2. No funds requested with this report.
3. Receive and File
ATTACHMENTS
1. Attachment A — Pending Capital Project Summary Report
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission receive and file the Pending Capital Summary Report.
MOTION
Move to receive and file the Pending Capital Summary Report.
82
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
Description of Project
Project Status
Percent
Complete
Emergency remove and replace existing well
head/pump within the existing well that supplies water
Addison Oaks - Maintenance Well Replacement
to the maintenance building and park residence.
Administratively Approved - Dec 2020
3396
(FY2021 - 9,720)
Existing 1970's installed well failed and is needed as a
Completed January 2021
100%
potable water source for the maintenance building and
park residence.
Remove and replace electrical components within the
Conference Center, originally construction in 1929, in
order to address electrical code and functionality issues
identified in the 2019 Arc Flash Study.
Conceptually Approved - Dec 2019
Addison Oaks Conference Center -Electrical
3093 Improvements (FY2020 - $33,308)
Upon completing the budgeted FY2019 Arc Flash
Construction Approval - April 2020
85%
electrical compliance assessment for the facility, it was
In Progress
discovered that the electrical system has several code
deficiencies and functionality issues that required
immediate attention.
Installation of two (2) campground -style electrical
pedestals. Pedestals will be located where they can
best support events held at the park.
Completed in conjunction with the
Perimeter Pathway and Sports Field
Catalpa Oaks - Storage & Electrical Pedestals
Programs and events in southeast Oakland County are
Grading & Irrigation Projects
2821 (FY2018/FY2019 - $54,916)
frequently held at Catalpa Oaks. The pedestals are
Conceptually Approved - June 2018
o
90%
intended to increase the capacity for large recreational
Construction Approved - March 2019
events by providing electricity for mobile units and
Construction Begins - Spring 2019
stages.
83
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
Groveland Oaks - Pedestrian Bridge Replacement
3071 (FY2020 - $15,000)
(FY2022 - $500,000)
Holly Oaks ORV Park - Contact Station
(MDNR Funded - $20,000)
3171
Holly Oaks ORV Park - Parking Lot Development
3172 Design/Engineering
(MDNR Funded - $41,490)
(MDNR Funded - $199,000)
Independence Oaks - Nature Center Network
3168 Upgrade
(FY2020 - $30,000)
Description of Project
Engineering/Design for the replacement of the existing
150' steel arch frame pedestrian bridge
Pedestrian bridge was installed in 1979; last inspected
in 2013 and 2018. Regular inspections have identified
structural issues with the existing steel frame and
concrete abutments that need to be addressed in the
near future. Refer to structural engineering report.
Structural inspections not needed until 15 years after
replacement is completed.
Installation of a 10'x20' movable contact station
located at the controlled entrance to the ORV Park,
including the electrical service.
Contact station to provide a controlled park entrance
for staff and guests.
Design/Engineering for construction of a gravel parking
lot located along the Dixie Hwy road frontage,
conforming to municipal site plan requirements, storm
water management and vehicle/pedestrian circulation.
To provide a safe and secure parking area for guests
and visitors.
Replacement of the existing outdated network system
with a high speed network.
To Provide increased customer service for the Point of
Sale and provide network reliability for staff.
Project Status
Conceptual Approval -June 2020
Construction Approval -
Postponed until FY2022
Bids have been received pending
Administrative approval by the MDNR
Percent
Complete
10%
20%
Engineering Approval - January 2020 50%
Construction Approval - April 2020 50%
84
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
Red Oaks Waterpark - Sanitary Pump Station
3160 Design/Engineering
(FY2020 - $28,664)
Description of Project
Design/Engineering for a sanitary pump station located
within the existing lazy river area to serve the
replacement project for the Children's Water
Playground Pumphouse.
Pump station will correct an existing illicit discharge of
pool water into the existing storm system and serve a
future family restroom facility.
Project Status
Design/Engineering Approval - May 2020
Construction Approval - August 2020
Red Oaks Waterpark -Shade Structure Design/Engineering Approved - February
3259 (FY2020 - $39,357) Installation of a new shade structure bid as an 2019
alternate to the Children's Water Playground Conceptual Approval - December 2019
Replacement Project. Construction Approval -July 2020
Red Oaks Waterpark - Splash Pad Family Restroom
(FY2020 - $277,021.00) Design/engineering and construction for a new 16'x18'
masonry, family changing/restroom building with a
metal roof, similar to the existing waterparks Commission Approval -October 2020
3324 (Contingent on Millage Approval)
structures, immediately adjacent to the new splash pad
Construction Authorized -Nov. 5, 2020
that is currently under construction. This building will
have (2) changing/restrooms and a
janitorial/mechanical room
Percent
Complete
95%
95%
50%
85
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
Red Oaks Waterpark
Children's Water Playground Replacement
(FY2019 - 80,000)
(Proposed FY2020 - $800,000)
(Proposed FY2021 - $500,000)
P413.7
Description of Project
Project Status
Design/Engineering for the Replacement of the water
structure with similar -size structure, updating to Design/Engineering Approved - February
current recreational and accessibility standards. 2019
Water structure was installed in 2003. Metal bases and Conceptual Approval - December 2019
structural components are rusting and starting to fail. Construction Approval -July 2020
Percent
Complete
90%
86
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
Springfield Oaks - Mill Pond Dam Removal &
Restoration (Engineering - $168,530)
3128
Description of Project
Scope: Design, engineer and implement removal of the
Mill Pond Dam and restoration of the upstream and
downstream areas. Apply for identified grant
programs to off -set project costs. Project is in
collaboration with Springfield Township, pursuant to
existing inter -local agreement.
Need: Dam was re -constructed circa 1972, culvert
installed at that time is undersized for upstream flow,
requiring armoring of dam. Maintenance and
structural issues were identified in 2011, which led to
development of the interlocal agreement. Dam cannot
be repaired due to deformation of spillway outlet pipe.
Options were to replace or remove. Township Board
and OCPRC agreed on removal as most appropriate
action (and most likely to receive grant funding).
Project Status
Engineering Approval December 2019
Conceptual Approval - Sept 2020
Replace the HVAC air handler, condenser unit and
other equipment installed in 1971 used for building
heating, cooling and ventilation located in the Activity
Center. A new data drop and an Energy Management
Springfield Oaks Activity Center - HVAC System upgrade will be included in this project. Conceptual Approval -January 2020
3070 Replacement Construction Approval - August 2020
(FY2020 - $275,000) Project is part of the park system -wide management of Postponed Until October 2020
building equipment. Replacement is scheduled when
warranted by the age and condition of equipment and
is intended to reduce unscheduled replacement and
increase efficiencies.
Percent
Complete
20%
45%
87
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
3357
Springfield Oaks Activity Center - Well
Replacement
(FY2021$830,558)
Springfield Oaks Activity Center
Storm Water Improvements
2559 (FY2019 - $27,027)
(FY2020 - $100,000)
Description of Project
Abandoning and redrilling of a new potable well for the park
buildings and ground, including the removal and
reinstallation of the well pump, downpipe, all necessary
connections, testing and cleaning of the new water
distribution system.
After completing the new water distribution system,
including the previous testing of the existing well, it was
discovered by the contractors that the existing well was now
failing, due to fine sand particles within the new water
distribution system.
Scope; Create a Stormwater Management Master Plan for
the entire Springfield Oaks Property.
Need: A stormwater management master plan is needed for
both the SAC and SPG portions of Springfield Oaks. Major
needs in SAC include addressing high volume storm volumes
and scouring at the N end of the property, extending into
the drainage ditches along Andersonville Rd, planning for
future paving requests by the OC Fair Board, animal waste
pollution prevention BMPs in the CBs associated with the
barns. Issues on the golf course side involve storm system
planning for clubhouse renovations, preventative and
reactionary culvert replacements,
Project Status
Conceptually Approved - Nov 2020
Construction Approved -January 2021
Commission Approved
Design/Engineering - March 2019
Postponed
Percent
Complete
25%
15%
88
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
3005 Springfield Oaks Clubhouse - Exterior ADA
Improvements (FY2019 - $9,600)
Description of Project
Project Status
In-house design/engineering for the installation of an
accessible ramp from the parking lot to the upper In-house design/engineering is 95%
clubhouse entrance as well as (3) accessible parking complete.
May require Commission Approval
spaces located near the same entrance.
pending construction quotations from
Proposed as part of the FY2019 system -wide program annual contractors.
to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Postponed due to COVID-19
(ADA) for facilities and programs. Closed March 2021
Percent
Complete
20%
Springfield Oaks Golf - Park House Roof Remove and replace the existing 25+ year old asphalt shingle
3363 Replacement roof by Facilities Maintenance staff, including all necessary Administratively Approved - Jan 2020 0%
plywood decking, underlayments, facia, soffit and gutters.
(FY2021 $7,000) Existing roof has been repaired numerous times for leaks.
89
3/31/2021 Pending FY2017 - FY2021 Capital Project Summary Consent Agenda Item 10 K
(Source; Budget to Actual Report Dated 3/9/2021)
Cost Center Description
CIP # Capital Improvement Program
Project Name
Description of Project
Previously Reported Projects that are 100% complete and are in the process of closure.
CIP Project Names
2915 Independence Oaks Bailey House Mitigation
3076 Lyon Oaks Conference Center - Sanitary Drain System Replacement
3258 Lyon Oaks Golf Course - Irrigation Well Replacement
3302 Red Oaks Nature Center - Emergency HVAC Replacement
2880 Red Oaks Waterpark - Wave Pool Duct Work Replacement
2853
2853 Springfield Oaks Roof Replacement
3227 Springfield Oaks Activity Center - Network Upgrade
2532 Springfield Oaks Activity Center Water Quality Improvements
Project Status
Percent
Complete
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7 2021 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 L
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Michael J. Donnellon, Jr., Chief of Park Facilities Maintenance & Development
Zach Crane, Project Manager
Submitted: March 29 2021
Subject: General Approval — Springfield Oaks - Davisburg Mill Pond Dam — Davisburg Road Engineering
Design
PROJECT CATEGORIES
Agenda Type: ✓ Consent Agenda Regular Agenda
Approval Type: Conceptual Approval Construction Approval ✓ General Approval
Project Type: ✓ Capital Improvement Maintenance Enhancement
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission (OCPRC) owns and jointly manages the
Davisburg/Mill Pond Dam with the Charter Township of Springfield (CTS). The agreement, executed in
July 2015, calls for cost -sharing between the two parties for repair and maintenance of the dam. OCPRC
is responsible for fifty-five percent (55%) of the financial obligation, and CTS is responsible for forty-five
percent (45%). Rotary Park, located on the outfall side of the dam is owned, operated and maintained by
OCPRC while the Mill Pond Park located upstream from the dam is owned, operated and maintained by
CTS. Information from previous studies and inspections indicate a need for a significant investment into
the dam, based on deficiencies and associated safety/liability issues.
In October 2018 the Commission awarded a contract to AECOM to complete the Davisburg Mill Pond
Dam Feasibility Study for the purpose to develop a recommendation for the future of the Davisburg Mill
Pond Dam — replacement or removal, which concluded on July 10, 2019 with CTS and the Commission's
conceptual approval to remove the dam and restore the area.
At the October 2, 2019 OCPR commission meeting, the commission approved change order to the
AECOM contract #5528 to complete design/engineering, public outreach and grant writing assistance for
the removal and restoration of the Davisburg Mill Pond Dam.
At the March 111" 2021 Springfield township board meeting, the board approved funding to make additional
roadway improvements as part of the overall dam removal and restoration project, utilizing the township's
available tri-party 2019-2022 funds with any additional expenses covered by the township's general fund. This
funding is for Davisburg Road scope of work that was not included in the original dam removal and restoration
project, including widening road shoulders and resurfacing four miles of Davisburg Road.
Page 2
This change order request presented today is for necessary design/engineering work related to the additional
Davisburg road improvements that Springfield Township is funding through their available tri-party funds and
general fund. This change order amount to the AECOM contract will be not be part of the executed agreement
and OCPRC will not be responsible for cost sharing of this design/engineering work. Charter Township of
Springfield will be 100% responsible for this change order request to AECOM contract.
1. Funds requested
a. FY2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) $0
b. Current AECOM Contract #5528 $233,530
c. AECOM Change Order Request $56,010*
Recommended Total
$289,540
Charter Township of Springfield will reimburse OCPRC 100% of the change order amount of
$56,010
ATTACHEMENTS
- Attachment A — AECOM Contract #5528 Change Order 03 Request
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval to increase AECOM's existing contract #5528, Southfield, MI in the amount of
$56,010 for the Davisburg Road Engineering Design scope of work, with this change order amount being
reimbursed in full from Charter Township of Springfield, as approved at the March 11 t" 2021 Springfield Township
board meeting.
MOTION
Move to approve an increase to the AECOM of Southfield, MI existing contract #5528, in the amount of
$56,010 for the Davisburg Road Engineering Design scope of work, with this change order amount being
reimbursed in full from the Charter Township of Springfield, as approved at the March 11, 2021
Springfield Township Board meeting.
Inagineit Oakland County
A.='OM Delivery¢ March 24, 2021
AECOM Project Number 60594641
AECOM Project Name Mill Pond Dam Removal and Restoration Design/Engineering Services
Change Order No.: 3
CHANGE ORDER
In accordance with the Design Engineering Services Agreement, Contract NO. 5528, dated October 18, 2018
between Oakland County ("Client"), and AECOM Great Lakes, a Michigan corporation, ("AECOM"), this
Change Order, with an effective date of March 31, 2020 modifies that Agreement as follows:
1. Changes to the Services:
Add Task 14 for Engineering Services
Davisburg Road at Davisburg Mill Pond Dam Removal
See attached detailed Scope of Work
2. Change to Deliverables:
Add Task 14 — Davisburg Road Engineering Design
3. Change in Project Schedule (attach schedule if appropriate):
Push back 100% design from June 16 to July 7.
4. Change in CONSULTANT'S Compensation:
The Services set forth in this Change Order will be compensated on the following basis:
[ ] No change to Compensation
[ ] Time & Material (See EXHIBIT B for the Hourly Labor Rate Schedule)
[ ] Time and Materials with a Not- to -Exceed amount of ($). The Hourly Labor Rate Schedule is set forth
in EXHIBIT B (if applicable). Reimbursable expenses are included in the overall Not to Exceed cap.
[X ] Lump Sum $ 56,010
Milestone/Deliverable & Date
Payment Amount
Detailed Road and ROW Survey April 29, 2021
$6,500.00
Geotechnical Fieldwork (Somat) April 29, 2021
$9,220.00
Preliminary Plans May 14, 2021
$28,150.00
Final Plans July 7, 2021
$9,825.00
Proposal Bid Package- With Dam Removal Bid
$2,315.00
Package
[ ] Cost Plus Fixed Fee: [Cost $ and Fee $]
Therefore, the total authorized Compensation, inclusive of this Change Order is $ 289,540
5. Project Impact:
Change Order Form
U.S. Design Engineering Services Agreement —Rev. March 19, 2018
93
.=COM I eliVeF �.
jrj� Deliv�rW
Oakland County
March 24, 2021
Recommend Pushing back 100% deliverable to to incorporate road design into one design
planset and construction staging/maintenance of traffic schedules. Final Design pushed from Jun
16 to July 7. If public input is completed in July and August no further schedule impacts are
needed.
6. Other Changes (including terms and conditions):
NONE
7. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.
8. Each Party represents that the person executing this Change Order has the necessary legal authority to
do so on behalf of the respective Party.
AECOM Great Lakes CLIENT:
Oakland County
Signature Signature
Troy Naperala
Printed Name Printed Name
Project Director
Printed Title Printed Title
3/24/2021
Date Date
Address Address
10850 Traverse Hwy, Suite 3365
Traverse City_ MI 4%84
[End of Change Order]
Change Order Form
U.S. Design Engineering Services Agreement Rev. March 19, 2018
94
AXOM
March 24, 2021
Zach Crane
Project Manager, Oakland County Parks
2800 Watkins Lake Rd
Waterford, MI 48323
Reference: Proposal for Engineering Services
Davisburg Road at Davisburg Mill Pond Dam Removal
Dear Mr. Crane,
AECOM is pleased to sub mitthis pro posal f orthe above ref erenced project. We understand that Springfield
Township and Oakland County would like to move forward with design of road geometrics and configuration
improvements based on the preliminary engineering study.
AECOM will perform engineering services for approximately 700 feet of road improvements along
Davisburg Road at Davisburg Mill Pond Dam Removal. Road improvements will consist of (2) 12-foot lanes,
(1) approximate 6.5-foot pavement widening, curb and gutter, and guardrail as depicted on the previously
provided typical pavement section and sketch of road improvements.
AECOM will coordinate with RCOC regarding other projects in the area and incorporate that information
into the plans as necessary. Information regarding this project will also be provided to those developing
plans forotherwork adjacent to the project area.
The following tasks will be completed forthe project and are not necessarily sequential in nature:
Task 1— Survey
Survey will be full topo pickup from ROW to ROW along Davisburg Road for 1000 feet including the
longitudinal pavement joints, inverts, railroad, driveways, roadside parking, building corners, and slopes.
All survey will use the Road Commission's provided survey codes.
Task Cost = $6,500
Task 2 — Geotechnical
Please see the attached scope from Somat.
Task Cost = $9,220
Task 3 — Engineering Services
Task Cost = $40,290.00
• Utility Coordination
AECOM will prepare plans and use the MISSDIG system to request Utility
Company information for their facilities within the project area. The provided utility
information will be added to the plans and a utility coordination matrix with color
coded plans will be prepared and used to track identified conflicts and associated
resolutions. A utility meeting will be held as needed. AECOM will coordinate with
the utility companies on necessary relocations. If in conflict, timely relocations by
the utility companies will be critical to moving construction forward next year.
• Pre — Preliminary Plans
The initial road assessment and consultation with the County, Township, and
RCOC served as the pre -preliminary plan phase.
• Preliminary Plans
Incorporating the information obtained from the above tasks, a preliminary plan
set (80%) will be prepared in accordance with Road Commission requirements.
This submittal will include items such as the typical cross sections, SESC
measures, removal, construction, profile plans, construction staging plans
including any temporary signal staging plans, materials/quantities and details.
AECOM Great Lakes, Inc.
27777 Franklin Road, Suite2000
Southfield, MI 48034
Tel: 248.204-5900
Fax: 248.204.5901 95
AXOM
March 24, 2021
Page 2
AECOM will prepare the materials needed for the Road Commission to apply for
any permits required forthis project. EGLE permitting has been included in the
dam removal portion of the project. Road improvement items will be incorporated
into the Dam Removal Proposal Book and a preliminary updated cost estimate
will also be prepared and submitted. These will be submitted to the Road
Commission and Township for review and a meeting to discuss comments will be
held if required. Preliminary Plan submittal — May 14, 2021. Review meeting May
28, 2021.
Final Plans and Proposal Bid Package
Comments from the Road Commission and Township from the Preliminary Plan
submittal and review will be incorporated, and AECOM will develop the final
plans submittal, including the plan set, Proposal Book, and cost estimate.
ROW
Existing ROW will be confirmed from Oakland County information provided by
the Road Commission. If there are any Consent to Grades or ROW acquisition,
AECOM will prepare the drawing and legal descriptions that are required forthe
Road Commission to obtain it for up to 2 easements.
• Final Deliverables
AECOM will submit the Final Deliverables to the Road Commission, and they
will be incorporated into the Dam Removal final plans for advertisement. The
Final Deliverables will include the plans, proposal book, cost estimate, Civil 3D
cad files, related electronic files and correspondence.
Schedule:
Road design will be concurrent with final design for the dam removal project. As such, final
plans and cost estimate will be completed by July 7, 2021, provided there are no delays in
geotechnical or survey work. Construction specifications and the proposal book forbidding will
be completed in line with the Dam Removal specification and bid tasks (not yet approved by
County and Township, estimated for October 2021 — May 2022).
Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this submittal.
Sincerely,
AECOM Great Lakes, Inc.
Sean Kelsch, PE
Vice President
AECOM Great Lakes, Inc.
27777 Franklin Road, Suite2000
Southfield, MI 48034
Tel: 248.204-5900
Fax: 248.204.5901
5omat Engineering,
INCORPORATED
March 1, 2020
P210064A
Mr. Nate Buning, PE
AECOM
3950 Sparks Drive SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546
RE: Proposal to Perform Geotechnical Investigation
Broadway/Davisburg Road Pavement Reconstruction
Davisburg (Springfield Township), Michigan
Dear Mr. Buning,
We are pleased to provide this proposal to perform a geotechnical investigation for the pavement
reconstruction along Broadway/Davisburg Road in Davisburg, Michigan. This proposal has been
prepared based on our review and understanding of the information provided by AECOM on
February 24, 2021, subsequent e-mail correspondence, and our experience with similar projects.
The following sections outline our understanding of the project and present our proposed scope of
services, our professional fee, and estimated time frame to complete the work.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
As we understand, the existing dam at the north end of Mill Pond is currently being designed to be
replaced with a culvert connecting the pond to the Shiawassee River. As a separate but related
project, the pavement and alignment of the sections of road east and west of the new culvert are
proposed to be rehabilitated (both a full depth HMA reconstruction section and HMA overlay
sections). To the east, the project section extends from the new culvert west to the railroad tracks
just past the entrance to the Mill Pond Park (approximately 275 feet). To the west, approximately
325 feet of roadway west of the new culvert is proposed to be rehabilitated.
This roadway currently supports two lanes of traffic, with one lane in each direction. Based on
aerial photography, it appears that the existing pavement is asphaltic cement concrete surfaced.
SCOPE OF WORK
For this investigation, we propose to perform four (4) soil borings to characterize the subsurface
conditions for pavement design reconstruction. Each of the soil borings will extend to a depth of
about 5 feet below existing grade. Split spoon SPT sampling will be performed at semi -continuous
intervals to the termination depth of the borings. Additionally, we propose to perform two (2)
hand augers on the northside of Broadway/Davisburg Road within the area of the proposed
roadway widening, each extending to a depth of 5 feet below the existing grade.
4039 40th Street SE, Suite 4, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512 web: www.somateng.com phone: (616) 575-9230
Infrastructure Engineering Solutions
97
PROPOSAL TO PERFORM GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MARCH 1, 2021
BROADWAYIDAVISBURG ROAD PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION P210064A
DAVISBURG (SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP), MICHIGAN PAGE 2
ASSUMPTIONS
Our proposal is also based on the following observations and assumptions:
• We anticipate a Road Commission of Oakland County (RCOC) right-of-way permit will be
required for the fieldwork. We have included labor and fees to prepare the permit request
package, permit workplan and certificate of insurance, and to secure the RCOC permit.
• All fieldwork will be performed during weekday, daylight hours.
• Somat will stake the soil boring locations prior to the start of work.
• One (1) mobilization with a truck -mounted drill rig will be needed to perform all the soil
borings and hand augers.
• Soil borings will require the pavement to be cored prior to the commencement of drilling.
Pavement cores will be 6 to 8 inches in diameter. We assume the existing pavement thickness
is less than 12-inches. The cores will be measured and photographed, but not retained.
• Traffic control will be required to drill the soil borings. We have assumed one (1) day of
fieldwork using two-way flagging closure in accordance with MDOT Typical M0140a.
• Hand augers will be performed using two -man crew, with access by foot.
• For the purpose of staking, we will estimate the coordinates of the soil boring and hand auger
locations in the field with a hand-held GPS unit with an accuracy of ±3 meters. Ground surface
elevations and coordinates at the as -drilled boring locations will be provided by the project
surveyor or estimated from existing topographic drawings.
• We estimate one (1) day will be required to complete the fieldwork.
• All fieldwork will be supervised full-time by a Somat field engineer or coordinator.
• No offsite disposal of material is included. Any excess soil cuttings will remain on -site in the
adjacent grass areas at the location of the soil borings.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
Preparatory Work
• Obtain a RCOC right-of-way permit.
• Review site utility plans.
• Stake the soil boring locations in the field.
• Clear soil boring locations for underground utilities through MISS DIG System.
• Coordinate with AECOM and RCOC for fieldwork scheduling.
Fieldwork
• Mobilize traffic control crews and equipment to the site.
• Mobilize a portable core machine and operator.
• Core the existing pavement prior to drilling for a total of four (4) pavement cores. Upon
completion of each pavement core and after the cores are measured and photographed.
• Measure the base material thickness, if any, in each borehole and collect one bulk sample.
98
PROPOSAL TO PERFORM GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MARCH 1, 2021
BROADWAYIDAVISBURG ROAD PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION P210064A
DAVISBURG (SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP), MICHIGAN PAGE 3
• Perform a total of four (4) soil borings, each extending to a depth of 5 feet below existing
grade, for a total of 20 lineal feet of drilling. Obtain split spoon samples at 2 1/2 ft intervals for
the full boring depth, per ASTM D1586.
• Observe groundwater levels in the boreholes, both during drilling and upon completion of
drilling.
• Backfill the borings with soil cutting to near the surface, replace the core and cap with
asphalt patch. The cores will be placed back in the hole and the surface will be patched with
cold asphalt patch.
• Perform two (2) hand augers extending to a maximum depth of about 5 feet below grade, or
auger refusal or borehole collapse, whichever occurs first. Hand augers may terminate due to
obstruction (such as gravel, cobbles or roots), or due to cave-in within granular soils below
the water table. If the desired depth is not achieved, we will re -attempt at one offset location.
• Obtain samples from the hand augers using bulk sampling procedures at each visual change
in soil type, or at 2'/2 feet intervals, whichever is more frequent.
• Spread any excess soil cuttings evenly on grass areas around the site.
Laboratory Testing
• Visually classify soil samples in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System.
• Perform natural moisture content determinations on portions of cohesive soil samples, per
ASTM D2216.
• Estimate unconfined compressive strength by performing pocket penetrometer tests on
samples of cohesive soils.
• Perform Loss -On -Ignition (LOI) tests on any soils appearing to or suspected to contain
excessive organic material, per ASTM D2974.
Deliverables
• Analyze field data, and prepare a geotechnical recommendation report, including the
following:
— A description of the field investigation and laboratory testing procedures,
— A description of the site, soil, and groundwater conditions,
— Soil boring and hand auger location diagram,
— Logs of the soil borings and auger probes,
— Tabulation of the thickness of the pavement based on the pavement cores,
— Observed aggregate base thickness at borehole locations,
— Results of geotechnical laboratory test results,
— Discussion on suitability of subgrade soils for support of new pavement and drainage
recommendations,
— Estimated subgrade design parameters to be used in pavement analysis (by others);
including estimated California Bearing Ratio and modulus of subgrade reaction,
— Earthwork and site preparation recommendations for pavement, including subgrade
preparation, subgrade testing and observations, and construction methods,
— Engineered fill recommendations, and
99
PROPOSAL TO PERFORM GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MARCH 1, 2021
BROADWAY/DAVISBURG ROAD PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION P210064A
DAVISBURG (SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP), MICHIGAN PAGE 4
— Construction considerations related to the soil and groundwater conditions encountered
in our soil borings.
LIMITATIONS
Our scope of work is strictly geotechnical and will not include any environmental exploration for
the presence or absence of wetlands, contamination, hazardous or toxic materials in the air, surface
water, groundwater or soil, in or around the site area. Should the observations of our field crew
indicate the presence or likelihood of contamination, we will notify your office as soon as
practically possible. We will also take necessary measures to protect human health, safety and the
environment.
PROFESSIONAL FEE
We propose to perform the above geotechnical scope of work for a Lump Sum of $9,220.
This fee is valid for 90 days from the date of this proposal.
We will obtain prior authorization before performing any additional work.
SCHEDULE
We estimate the following schedule, after receipt of the notice to proceed.
Preparatory Work:
Fieldwork:
Laboratory Testing
Engineering & Report:
GENERAL
4 weeks, pending permit approval
1 day
1 week
1 week
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal for your review and consideration and we
look forward to providing geotechnical engineering services to you on this project. Upon your
review, should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
Somat Engineering, Inc.
Jennifer S. Schmitzer
Project Manager
SC/CJW/JSS/sc
Jonathan D. Zaremski, P.E.
Geotechnical Services Manager
100
Somat Engineering,
CORPORATED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PRIME CONSULTANT NAME: AECOM
Somat Proposal No. P210064A
SUMMARY OF DIRECT LABOR:
Classification
LABOR
Sr. Project Manager
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Senior Staff Engineer
Project Coordinator- Engineer
Field Engineer
Laboratory Supervisor
Clerical
SUMMARY OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Vehicle Rental
RCOC Permit
DERIVATION OF TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
(DESIGN PHASE SERVICES)
BroadwaylDavisburg Road Pavement Reconstruction
BASE SCOPE OF WORK
Title Rate (2020)
$
160.00
hour
$
135.00
hour
$
110.00
hour
$
90.00
hour
$
85.00
hour
$
75.00
hour
$
90.00
hour
$
50.00
hour
Total Hours
Unit Rate
Unit
$
75.000
days @
$
100.000
lump
SUMMARY OF SUBCONTRACTOR EXPENSES:
Drilling, Truck rig, daily rate 8AM - 5 PM
Traffic Control
Subtotals per Task $
$2,300.00 day
$1,800.00 day
� U
Y d
(q O
d
0
1
4
16
4
25
6
2
58.0
w
Total Hours = Labor Cost
0
$
0.00
1
$
135.00
4
$
440.00
16
$
1,440.00
4
$
340.00
25
$
1,875.00
6
$
540.00
2
$
100.00
58.0
Subtotal Labor and Overhead $
4,870.00
Total Quantity
2
$
150.00
1
$
100.00
Subtotal Direct Expenses $ 250.00
Total Quantity
1 2,300.00
1 1,800.00
Subtotal Subcontractor Expenses $ 4,100.00
TOTAL COSTS $ 9,220.00
101
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 A-1
PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning + Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: 2021-2029 Millage Initiatives Funding Policy
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
With the passing of the millage increase in November 2020, several new initiatives were planned to be
implemented during the current 10-year millage cycle. These initiatives are:
1. Free Annual Vehicle Permits for seniors (62+), active military, veterans and persons with permanent
disabilities
2. Increased funding for invasive species management throughout Oakland County
3. Increased funding for Recreation Programs and Services activities throughout Oakland County
4. Development of a Trailways Grant Program to support trail development throughout Oakland County
5. Development of a Park Improvements Grant Program to support local community park development
projects throughout Oakland County
The first initiative does not require any additional funding and has been implemented since November 9, 2020.
The invasive species, recreation programs and services, and two grant programs do require that funding be
allocated for these programs annually.
The Parks and Recreation Commission adopted a "Recreation Partnership Policy" on February 6, 2019, following
the contribution to Normandy Oaks park development in Royal Oak. The 2021-2029 Millage Initiatives Funding
Policy will supersede and replace that policy.
The goal of the policy is to identify that these initiatives need dedicated annual funding to implement, and to
solidify that the initiatives are consist with OCPR's mission and goals. The policy identifies the annual budget
process as the annual opportunity for the Parks Commission to set budget targets for each new initiative (except
for Free Annual Vehicle Passes) based on evaluation of OCPR's overall budgetary needs.
ATTACHMENTS
• 2021-2029 Millage Initiatives Funding Policy
• Recreation Partnership Policy (2019)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission review and discuss the draft policy. If there are no significant changes
required, the Commission can vote to implement the policy, or staff can bring it back with any proposed changes
to the May 2021 meeting.
MOTION
Move to approve the proposed 2021-2029 Millage Initiatives Funding Policy.
102
C=GAKLANQ
COUNTY PARKS
I. BACKGROUND:
Date Adopted: Dated Revised: Policy #
Page 1 of 1
2024-2029 Millage Initiatives Funding
Policy
v
On February 6, 2019 the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission (OCPRQ adopted a
Recreation Partnership Policy to guide decision -making on partnering with local communities on
recreation projects. This policy supersedes and replaces the Recreation Partnership Policy adopted on
February 6, 2019.
On November 3, 2021, Oakland County voters approved a Parks and Recreation Millage at .35 mills. The
millage passed by 76%, demonstrating broad support among County residents. The millage, an increase
from the rolled -back .2310 mills, will allow OCPRC to perform/construct deferred capital improvement
projects and reinvest in parks and facilities across the County park system. The ballot language identified
several new initiatives to be developed and implemented, including: (1) Free annual vehicle passes for
seniors 62+, veterans and active military, and persons with permanent disabilities; (2) a Trailways Grant
Program to fund trail development throughout Oakland County; (3) a Park Improvements Grant Program to
fund local community park development projects; (4) increased programmatic outreach through the
Recreation Programs and Services Unit; and (5) dedicated funding for invasive species management
county -wide.
IL INTENT AND PURPOSE:
Except for the free annual pass initiative, the new initiatives, set forth above, require dedicated annual
funding to implement. The Trailways and Park Improvements Grant Programs require cash funding for
distribution, via a competitive grant process, to local communities for trail and park projects. The
programmatic outreach and invasive species initiatives also require dedicated funding to implement.
Fiscal Sustainability: These initiatives will support and be consistent with OCPRC's mission to provide
quality recreation experiences that encourage healthy lifestyles, support economic prosperity and promote
the protection of natural resources. These initiatives will also support OCPRC's goals of enhancing
communities and improving access to recreation. The new initiatives will not create an unreasonable
budgetary stress on fulfilling the existing and projected capital improvement and maintenance needs of
OCPRC, as measured in relation to the OCPRC Unrestricted Net Asset Policy. Unreasonable budgetary
stress is not created by the millage increase and new initiative development.
On an annual basis in conjunction with the budget development process, OCPRC staff will recommend
budget targets for each millage initiative (except for the Free Annual Passes), based on evaluation of
OCPRC's overall budgetary needs including, but not limited to, capital improvement, maintenance, capital
equipment, and operations.
Grant Program Criteria and Procedures: Criteria, procedures, and documents for the Trailways and
Park Improvements Grant Programs will be developed, approved, and implemented by OCPRC. The
criteria and procedures will ensure that funded projects align OCPRC goals as identified in the Five -Year
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and/or the most recent county -wide recreation needs assessment.
OCPRC will select and approve the awards for the Grant Programs and the OCPRC Chairperson shall
execute the Grant Program Agreements.
103
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
I. INTENT AND PURPOSE
Date Adopted: Dated Revised: Policy #19-
2/6/2019 Page 1 of 1
Recreation Partnership Policy
Recognizing the statutory limitations on the activities and expenditures of the Oakland County
Parks and Recreation Commission ("OCPRC"), and also considering the number of local
facilities that could be proposed for OCPRC partnership, prior to proceeding with detailed
review of a proposal made by a local government to OCPRC, it is determined that, as a matter of
policy, the OCPRC must first make a determination that the facility in question meets all the
following criteria, as found in its discretion:
Fiscal Sustainability: The proposed partnership would be consistent with the long-term ability
to provide high -quality parks, recreation facilities and programs to the residents of Oakland
County, and would not create an unreasonable budgetary stress on fulfilling the existing and
projected capital improvement and maintenance needs of OCPRC, as measured in relation to the
OCPRC Unrestricted Net Asset Policy.
Recreational Need: Based on OCPRC survey and/or other evidence deemed reliable by
OCPRC, there is a demonstrated need for the type of proposed park/facility that is not currently
being provided in the County, and the proposal is considered a priority project type identified by
the most recent OCPRC survey or an official OCRPC Plan.
Draw: The proposed project would attract residents/users from the entire county, or at minimum
residents from multiple jurisdictions.
Size: The proposed project meets at least one of the following criteria:
• The area of the facility is a minimum of 100 acres so as to conform to the
recognized definition of "regional" facility.
• The area of the facility is less than 100 acres, but there is a present extraordinary
need for the type of park/facility proposed, and such need is not being met.
Recreational Asset Connectivity/Catalyst: The proposed project would serve as a catalyst or
provide key connectivity to existing local, county, state or federal recreational assets deemed to
be of County importance, recognizing that trails have the highest nrioritv.
Local Community Partnership: The local community has requested OCPRC to partner with
regard to the facility in question, and a resolution has been passed by the local governing
body(ies) to this effect. Such resolution must clarify that the planned partnership will result in a
facility that is consistent with the local community's official park master plan.
Timing: OCPRC has not entered into an arrangement for partnership with a local government
during the past 5 years.
104
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 A-2
PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning + Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: New Grant Programs — Draft Criteria and Process
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
With the passing of the millage increase in November 2020, two new grant programs were indicated to provide
funding to Oakland County cities, villages and townships for trail and park improvement projects.
Staff have developed the attached draft criteria and timeline for the first round of funding. In general, criteria are
similar to that of Michigan Department of Natural Resources grant programs. One goal of the programs is for
local communities to utilize the county grant funds to match state and federal grant programs, so it is important
for criteria to be somewhat similar.
As part of the development of this draft, staff received input from the head of the grants section at the DNR, as
well as staff from Oakland County Economic Development (OCED), who works more regularly with local
communities on trail development projects. Input from both MDNR and OCED is incorporated into the attached
d raft.
Staff is requesting that the Commission review and discuss the draft criteria at the April 7th meeting so that staff
can make any necessary changes and bring a revised document to the May 51h Commission meeting for
approval. Below is the proposed timeline for implementation of these 2 grant programs.
Proposed Grant Process/Timeline for 2022:
• April 2021: OCPRC review and discuss Millage Initiatives Funding Policy, grant program criteria and
process, provide feedback for staff
• May 2021: OCPRC approve Millage Initiatives Funding Policy, grant program criteria and process
• May — June 2021: On -board Project Advisor — Community Outreach & Grant Management
• June — July 2021: Develop digital application process with Oakland County IT
• August — September 2021: Community Outreach —set up a grant web page and provide links to grant
materials and information to local communities.
• October 1, 2021: Beginning of FY2022 budget year
• October 15, 2021: Release Request for Proposals, post grant information, documents, resources
• November 15, 2021: Hold webinar or meeting for potential grantees to review grant programs and
answer questions
• December 15, 2021: Grant applications due into Laserfiche by 5:00 p.m.
• Grants reviewed by staff — January/February 2022
105
Page 2
• Review and award recommendations made to AMT — March 2022
• AMT recommends awards to Parks Commission — April 2022
• OCPRC Approval and Execution — May 2022
• Grant agreements sent out — May/June 2022 — Grant periods would be June 1 — May 31
ATTACHMENTS
• Trailways and Park Improvements Grant Programs Criteria
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission review and discuss the draft criteria and process. If there is no discussion
the criteria could be approved by the Commission at the April meeting. Staff are also prepared to make any
necessary edits or additions and bring back a revised document for Commission approval in May.
MOTION
Move to approve the proposed Trailways and Park Improvements Grant Programs Criteria and Process
and direct staff to develop grant materials based on these criteria.
106
Trailways and Park Improvements Grant Programs Criteria
March 16, 2021
The Oakland County Parks and Recreation Millage was passed by voters in November 2020. A portion of
these funds will be used to support local outdoor recreation, non -motorized trails and park
improvement projects that will benefit residents and communities in Oakland County. The following
competitive grants are available to cities, villages, and townships in Oakland County.
1. OCPR Trailways Program to assist local communities with planning, preliminary
engineering/design, and construction costs directly related to non -motorized trail projects
located in Oakland County. "Trail" means the following in the OCPR Trailways Program: "a non -
motorized trail, path, pathway, shared -use path, pathway connector, on -road bike facility, water
trail, and trail -related amenities including, but not limited to, trailheads, bike racks, bike repair
stations, wayfinding signs, bridges, boardwalks, and benches.
2. OCPR Park Improvements Program to provide cash assistance to local communities for local
park improvements, including design/engineering as well as park improvement/construction.
This fund will also increase the capacity of the Recreation Assistance Partnership Program,
increasing recreation outreach, mobile recreation units and local event support.
Oakland County Trailways Program (OCTP)
Goals:
• Fund Trail planning/design/engineering (pre -development)
• Fund Trail development/construction, with a priority of closing gaps within the Oak Routes Trail
Network and/or one of the two cross -state trails in Oakland County — Great Lake -to -Lake Trail or
the Iron Belle Trail Biking Route and a priority of connectivity to the countywide trail network (or
a larger community network—i.e., no stand -along projects, unless they are part of a larger
coordinated effort).
Criteria
• Eligibility:
o The Trail must be located in Oakland County, Michigan
o The Grant application must be submitted by a city, village, or township in Oakland
County. The State of Michigan, school districts, regional authorities, federally
recognized Native American tribes, colleges, universities, private recognition providers,
and conservation districts are NOT eligible.
o The Trail must be identified in an approved/adopted plan including, but not limited to, a
5-year Parks and Recreation Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Community Master Plan,
Complete Streets Plan, or Trailway Master Plan.
o Each city, village or township is only able to receive funding for Trails in their jurisdiction
every 3 years (communities receiving a grant, or receiving benefits from that grant as a
partner, will be ineligible to apply for the following two grant cycles).
• Eligible Projects:
o Pre -development Grants involve activities prior to construction of the Trail including,
but not limited to design, engineering, public engagement, and construction drawings
o Development Grants involve activities commencing with construction of the Trail.
107
• Ineligible Projects: Funding will not be provided for the following: (1) ongoing Trail operations
and maintenance, (2) grant administration fees, or (3) a project where a majority of public input
received by the applicant does not support the project.
• Public Input: Applicants must hold at least one public meeting (advertised in a manner that
would satisfy the Michigan Open Meetings Act) to receive public input about the project. This
can be a regularly scheduled board/commission meeting or a separate stakeholder our public
input meeting. Support for the project will need to be demonstrated in the application.
• Financial Need: This Program will have a point system for median household income, similar to
the Department of Natural Resources --Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund, where more
points will be awarded for communities in lowest 1/3 median income. This way any community
can apply, but funding will be weighted more toward communities with lower average
household income.
• Long -Term Grant Obligations:
o Pre -Development Grants: No long-term grant obligations.
o Development Grants: Trails that are awarded must remain open to the public for a
minimum of 15 years.
• Grant Size and Match Funding:
o Pre -Development Grants — 25% match required. Grants range from $5,000 - $25,000
(may fluctuate depending on annual funding available).
o Development Grants - 50% match required. Grants range from $5,000 - $200,000 (may
fluctuate depending on annual funding available).
o Match can be cash, other awarded grants, or donation of goods and services.
• Maintenance Plan: Applicant shall specify how the Trail will be maintained long-term.
• Fees: No fees shall be collected for public use of the grant -funded Trail.
• ADA: Projects must meet accessibility requirements of the ADA — 2010 ADA Design Standards.
Projects not covered under the ADA should follow the US Access Board Outdoor Developed
Areas Accessibility Guidelines. Additional points will be awarded for projects that use Universal
Design principles.
• Final Grant Report: All awarded projects are required to submit a final grant report.
Oakland County Park Improvements Program (OCPIP)
Goals:
• Fund city, village, or township park planning/design/engineering projects (pre -development)
throughout Oakland County.
• Fund city, village, or township park improvements projects throughout Oakland County that
encourage outdoor recreation.
• Fill gaps in recreation needs identified in OCPR recreation needs assessment or local needs
assessments and plans.
Criteria
• Eligibility:
o Improvement Projects must be located in Oakland County, Michigan
o The Grant application must be submitted by a city, village, or township in Oakland
County. The State of Michigan, school districts, regional authorities, federally
recognized Native American tribes, colleges, universities, private recognition providers,
and conservation districts are NOT eligible.
108
o Improvement Projects must be identified in an approved/adopted plan including, but
not limited to, a 5-year Parks and Recreation Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, or
Community Master Plan.
o Each city, village, or township is only able to receive funding for projects in their
jurisdiction every 3 years (communities receiving a grant, or receiving benefits from that
grant as a partner, will be ineligible to apply for the following two grant cycles).
• Eligible Projects:
o Improvement Projects can create new facilities, parks or programs, or can renovate
existing facilities (so long as the need for renovation is not due to poor maintenance,
design, or construction).
o Improvement Projects must promote fishing, hunting, beaches, boating access, picnic
areas, winter sports areas, playground equipment, ball fields, tennis courts, skate parks,
soccer fields, disc golf, park trails, or support/improve the user experience, including be
not limited to nature interpretive buildings, visitor centers, restrooms, trailheads,
parking areas, or maintenance/equipment storage buildings
• Ineligible Projects: Funding will not be provided for the following improvement projects: (1)
Indoor recreation facilities (except those that support outdoor recreation), (2) land acquisition,
(3) stadiums for professional sports, (4) art displays, (5) decorative fountains, (6) facilities for
historical interpretation, (7) projects that would create an unfair competitive situation with
private enterprise, and (S) invasive species removal, shoreline stabilization, or erosion control
that are not directly related to the improvements of recreation facilities at the project site.
• Recreational Need: Applicants must demonstrate that there is a demonstrated need for the
proposed Improvement Project based on OCPR Recreation Needs Assessment Survey Results
and/or other local survey or public engagement.
• Public Input: Applicants must hold at least one public meeting (advertised in a manner that
would satisfy the Michigan Open Meetings Act) to receive public input about the project. This
can be a regularly scheduled board/commission meeting or a separate stakeholder our public
input meeting. Support for the project will need to be demonstrated in the application.
• Financial Need: This Program will have a point system for median household income, similar to
the Department of Natural Resources --Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund, where more
points will be awarded for communities in lowest 1/3 median income. This way any community
can apply, but funding will be weighted more toward communities with lower average
household income.
• Long -Term Grant Obligations: The project must remain open to the public for a minimum of 15
years. The project cannot be for "members only" or "community residents only."
• Grant Size and Match Funding:
o Pre -Development Grants — 25% match required. Grants range from $5,000 - $25,000
(may fluctuate depending on annual funding available).
o Development Grants - 50% match required. Grants range from $5,000 - $100,000 (may
fluctuate depending on annual funding available).
o Match can be cash, other awarded grants, or donation of goods and services.
• Maintenance Plan: Applicant would need to specify how the project/facility/program will be
maintained long-term.
• Fees: No fees shall be collected for public use of the grant -funded project/park.
• ADA: Projects must meet accessibility requirements of the ADA — 2010 ADA Design Standards.
Projects not covered under the ADA should follow the US Access Board Outdoor Developed
Areas Accessibility Guidelines. Additional points could be awarded for projects that use
Universal Design principles.
109
Grant Process and Timeline
(Same for both Trailways and Park Improvements Programs)
• Grant applications will be received one time per year from eligible cities, villages and townships
seeking funding. A call for applications will be released by mid -fall (approximately October 15),
after the start of the new Fiscal Year (October 1). Applications would be due December 15.
• Grant applications would be reviewed and scored by OCPR grant evaluation staff, with support
from Oakland County Economic Development (OCED). OCPR grant evaluation staff shall include
Supervisor— Planning and Resource Development, Project Advisor— Community Outreach/Grant
Management. Additional staff may be needed to assist with grant application review depending
on number of applications submitted. Initial grant review will take place in January/February.
• Grant applications will be reviewed and scored by an agreed -upon points system, like the
Department of Natural Resources --Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund. The scoring criteria
and points system will be developed prior to the release of a call for applications. OCPR grant
evaluation staff will write up a brief summary of each application to be included with scoring.
• After review and scoring, the OCPR grant evaluation staff will develop a recommendation for
OCPR staff leadership (Administrative Management Team — AMT) in March. AMT will then make
recommendations to the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission (April) for approval
of awards.
• Awards will be announced by May 1.
• Grant Agreements will be processed by ORPC staff and executed by OCPR Chairperson and the
grant recipient.
• Funding will be awarded as reimbursement and will require grant agreements indicating
monitoring/reporting periods, financial recordkeeping requirements, and information required
for reimbursement. (Corporation Counsel, Risk Management, and Fiscal Services will assist with
development of standard grant agreement language.
• Grant agreement terms should be no more than 1 year for predevelopment grants, 3 years for
construction grants (grantees could apply for an extension, if needed)
High Level Grant Process/Timeline for 2022:
• April 2021: OCPRC review and discuss Millage Initiatives Funding Policy, grant program criteria
and process, provide feedback for staff
• May 2021: OCPRC approve Millage Initiatives Funding Policy, grant program criteria and process
• May —June 2021: On -board Project Advisor — Community Outreach & Grant Management
• June —July 2021: Develop digital application process with Oakland County IT
• August — September 2021: Community Outreach —set up a grant web page and provide links to
grant materials and information to local communities.
• October 1, 2021: Beginning of FY2022 budget year
• October 15, 2021: Release Request for Proposals, post grant information, documents, resources
• November 15, 2021: Hold webinar or meeting for potential grantees to review grant programs
and answer questions
• December 15, 2021: Grant applications due by 5:00 p.m.
• Grants reviewed by staff — January/February 2022
• Review and award recommendations made to AMT— March 2022
• AMT recommends awards to Parks Commission —April 2022
• Grant agreements sent out — May 2022 — Grant periods would be June 1— May 31
110
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 B
PLANNING & RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Michael J. Donnellon, Jr., Chief of Park Facilities Maintenance & Development
Donna Folland, Senior Planner
Submitted: March 24, 2021
Subject: Fiscal Sustainability Committee Recommendation: Waterford Oaks Waterpark Alternatives
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
After 43 years of operation, Waterford Oaks Waterpark's buildings, recreational features, and underground infrastructure
have deteriorated with time and are outdated. The quantity of recreational opportunities has declined as features reach
the end of their useful lives (as indicated by results of structural inspections), are removed and not replaced.
Operationally, there has been a consistent difficulty in maintaining sufficient staff to keep the park open for the entire
season. As seen below, these factors have resulted in significant declines in attendance and revenue. See Attachment A
for history of operating outcomes and investment at the waterpark.
The OCPR Fiscal Sustainability Committee recommends consideration of an updated and more sustainable concept for
the waterpark area that is integrated into the overall vision for Waterford Oaks. The Committee has reviewed multiple
alternatives for the future of the Waterford Oaks Waterpark, and the costs and benefits of each (See Table 2 below).
OCPR contracted with JFR Architects and Frank Rewold and Sons Construction Management to develop a Facility
Condition Assessment to visually review, assess and confirm the facility conditions at the Waterford Oaks Waterpark and
estimate costs for alternative investments into the waterpark. See Attachment B for the full report.
Waterpark Facilitv Condition Assessment — prioritized actions and costs
The Facility Condition Assessment resulted in a list of issues, actions and estimated costs prioritized by 3 priority levels.
■ Level 1: Repairs and improvements should be made immediately
o Within this priority level several items were identified that should be completed prior to opening (see
Table 3 below)
■ Level 2: Repairs and improvements should be made within 1 to 3 years
■ Level 3: Repairs and improvements should be made within 3 to 5 years
Code Compliance: within each priority level, specific repairs and improvements are needed to comply with building codes.
TABLE 1: Cost estimates by priority level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Immediately 1-3 Years 3-5 Years Totals
A. Mechanical Building 983,984 27,414 128,793 1,140,191
B. Wave Pool 444,698 116,735 - 561,433
C. Pedestrian Bridge and Boardwalk 119,951 81,920 25,346 227,217
D. Bathhouse Building 134,628 843,959 - 978,586
E. Concession Building 64,323 79,915 39,409 -
F. Children's Activity Pool 88,120 48,705 - 136,825
G. Parking Lots 620,099
TOTAL 1,851,295* 1,158,142 774,237 3,783,674
*Funding for Level 1 repairs are not included in the proposed FY2022 budget, pending public engagement, Fiscal
Sustainability Committee recommendation and Parks Commission decision on the future of the Waterpark (see Fiscal
Sustainability Committee Recommendation below).
ill
Page 2
Waterpark potential alternatives
The Facility Condition Assessment analysis made possible comparison of the costs of six potential alternatives as seen in
the table below.
TABLE 2: Waterpark alternatives cost comparison
Alternative
Total Estimated Cost
Update existing waterpark; repair bridge
$3,783,674
Update existing waterpark; remove bridge
$3,600,810
Update existing waterpark and add two new water features
$6,783,674
Remove waterpark and restore site
$ 1,142,932
Remove waterpark and add spray park at waterpark location
$ 3,542,932
Remove waterpark and add spray park at Paradise Peninsula
$ 2,642,932
Minimum repairs prior to 2021 facilitv openinq
The Facility Condition Analysis determined minimum repairs required in order to safely open the waterpark in June 2021
(provided COVID regulations allow opening). These high priority items and estimated costs are shown in the table below:
TABLE 3: Items to be completed prior to facility opening
Waterpark
Issues and contracted costs identified by FCA
Area
Wave Pool
0 Replacement of elevated lifeguard chairs and
and Concrete
concrete footing pad
Deck
0 Repair of exposed steel repair at concrete gutter
and drain curb around pool edge
■ Repaint and epoxy repair to concrete walls above
and below gutters
Pedestrian
0 Replace pedestrian bridge deck boards that are
Bridge and
rotted or damaged
Boardwalk
E Check and tighten all loose bolts, washer and nuts
below boardwalk deck
■ Additional nailing to handrail framing above
boardwalk deck
In-house actions and estimated costs
■ Purchase 2 lifeguard chairs
■ Bolt into concrete so they can be moved and re-
used
■ Repair and repaint concrete as part of routine
annual maintenance preparation for facility
opening
■ Close bridge and boardwalk from public use
■ Install lockable gate at east end (by pool)
■ Remove stairs and build rail at west end
Total Wave Pool and Concrete Deck Repairs $52,000 2 lifeguard chairs $9,000
Estimated Pedestrian Bridge and Boardwalk Repairs $24,560 Materials and supplies $7,500
Costs Staff labor cost $41,250
Total Estimated Contracted Cost $76,560 Estimated Total from Operating Budget $57,750
Park staff noted, except for lifeguard chairs, that materials, supplies and estimated labor costs are all budgeted within the
FY2021 operating budget. No additional funds are requested at this time.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) (PowerPoint)
B. Waterford Oaks Waterpark FCA Full Report & Data Tables (Weblink)
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Fiscal Sustainability Committee recommends the following:
■ Open Waterford Oaks Waterpark in 2021 as is feasible under COVID-19 restrictions. Staff will have the waterpark
ready, with essential repairs completed, to open on May 1. The boardwalk/bridge will be closed to the public.
■ Re -imagine the future of Waterford Oaks Waterpark guided by public engagement and based on knowledge of
existing conditions and the costs associated with correcting issues and/or adding recreational features.
■ Planning staff to prepare draft public engagement plan for Fiscal Sustainability Committee review.
MOTION
Move to receive and file Fiscal Sustainability Committee recommendation regarding Waterford Oaks
Waterpark Alternatives and the Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment.
112
Attachment A. Waterford Oaks Waterpark Data Tables
Table A. Fiscal History
FY2013
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
WWP Revenue
$541,130
$489,018
$687,746
$704,909
$539,547
$558,928
$364,508
$728
WWP Expense
$895,144
$996,008
$861,561
$795,676
$822,063
$905,895
$669,560
$163,462
NET
($354,014)
($506,991)
($173,815)
($90,767)
($282,516)
($346,967)
($305,052)
($162,734)
WWC Revenue
$150,016
$153,440
$115,838
$119,515
$81,444
$299
WWC Expense
$127,774
$105,667
$122,035
$130,216
$95,320
$26,499
NET
$22,242
$47,773
($6,197)
($10,701)
($13,876)
($26,200)
Table B.Attendance History
FY2013
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
TOTAL
71,587
62,623
78,290
73,902
57,115
62,195
42,684
Closed due
Individual Sales
68,263
49,174
53,357
38,626
to COVID-
Group Sales
5,639
7,941
8,838
4,058
19
Table C. Investment History
Year
Investment
Amount
Adjusted
1980
Waterpark development
$
1,695,678
$
5,492,559
1984
Entrance modifications
$
7,617
$
18,838
1987
Picnic area fencing
$
12,550
$
28,441
1993
Pavilion and fencing
$
12,837
$
22,686
1995
Waterslide buildings renovation
$
9,654
$
16,187
1995
Deck replacement and renovation
$
197,005
$
330,316
1996
Signs
$
10,911
$
17,808
1998
Waterpark complex renovation
$
3,369,873
$
5,255,126
1998
Parking lot
$
124,914
$
194,797
1999
Ticket booth #2
$
7,063
$
10,833
2000
Storage building
$
10,899
$
16,271
2002
Group ride tunnel
$
28,640
$
40,754
2003
Waterslide renovation
$
60,000
$
83,216
2003
Wavepool renovation
$
1,090,504
$
1,512,457
2012
Removal of Matt Slide
NA
NA
2015
Concession remodeling
$
105,549
$
113,813
2018
Removal of Raft Ride
NA
NA
2018
Walk-in freezer
$
36,521
$
36,521
TOTAL 1980-2018 (2018 dollars)
$
13,190,623
113
g—.A-.KLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Water-
ord Oa<s Water:)ar<
=aci ity Condition Assessment
Adapted from JFR Architects Report - January 19, 2021
Presentation prepared March 12, 2021 by OCPR Staff
114
Fiscal Sustainability Committee
Recommendation
The Fiscal Sustainability Committee reviewed the Waterford Oaks
Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment on January 13, 2021 and
recommends the following:
• Open Waterford Waterpark in 2021 as is feasible under COVID-19 restrictions.
Staff will have the waterpark ready, with essential repairs completed, to open
on May 1. The boardwalk/bridge will be closed to the public.
• Re -imagine the future of Waterford Waterpark guided by public engagement
and based on knowledge of existing conditions and the costs associated with
correcting issues and/or adding recreational features.
• Planning staff to prepare draft public engagement plan for Fiscal Sustainability
Committee review.
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
115
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
PRIORITY LEGEND
0 June 2021: Repairs should be
made prior to facility opening in
June 2021
Code Compliance: Repairs and
improvements are needed to
comply with building codes
and/or ADA
Level 1: Repairs and
improvements should be made
i immediately
Level 2: Repairs and
improvements should be made
within 1 to 3 years
Level 3: Repairs and
improvements should be made
within 3 to 5 years
116
Alternative A:
Alternative B:
Remove and
Remove and
Update
Add Spray
Add Spray
Update
Existing +
Update
Park at
Park at
ALL ALTERNATIVES
Existing
Remove
Existing
+ 2
Remove
Waterpark
Paradise
Waterpark
Bridge
New
Features
Waterpark
Location
Peninsula
A. Mechanical Building
$
1,140,191
$
1,140,191
$
1,140,191
$
313,834
$ 313,834
$ 313,834
B. Wave Pool
$
561,433
$
561,433
$
561,433
C. Pedestrian Bridge and Boardwalk
$
227,217
$
44,353
$
227,217
See Miscellaneous Site Features
D. Bathhouse Building
$
978,586
$
978,586
$
978,586
$
152,681
$ 152,681
$ 152,681
E. Concession Building
$
119,324
$
119,324
$
119,324
F. Children's Activity Pool
$
136,825
$
136,825
$
136,825
$
90,125
$ 90,125
$ 90,125
G. Waterpark Parking Lots
$
620,099
$
620,099
$
620,099
$
326,174
$ 326,174
$ 326,174
Miscellaneous Site Features
NA
NA
NA
$
260,118
$ 260,118
$ 260,118
Update BMX Parking Lot
NA
NA
NA
NA
$ 800,000
NA
Repurpose BMX Concession Restrooms
NA
NA
NA
NA
$ 100,000
NA
New Spray Park
NA
NA
NA
NA
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
2 New Waterpark Features
NA
NA
$
3,000,000
NA
NA
NA
$ 3,783,674 $ 3,600,811 $ 6,783,674 $ 1,142,932 $ 3,542,932 $ 2,642,932
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
117
Update Existing
Waterpark: Cost
Estimates by Priority Level
A. Mechanical Building
B. Wave Pool
C. Pedestrian Bridge and
Boardwalk
D. Bathhouse Building
E. Concession Building
F. Children's Activity Pool
G. Parking Lots
Total
fts 0 0
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TOTAL June 2021 Removal
9831984 271414 1281793 1,1401191
444,698 116,735 - 561,433 52,000
119,951 81,920 25,346 227,217 231560 44,353
134,628 843,959 - 978,586
79,915 39,409 - 119,324
881120 481705 - 136,825
6201099 620,099
11851,295 1,158,142 774,237 31783,674 75,560
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
118
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
The original building was constructed in 1976 with
the construction of the wave pool and is built in two
sections, the west end of the building holds the
WaveTEK air generator equipment for the wave pool
which is a completed concrete structure. The east
end of the building is the filter equipment for the
wave pool. In 1997 an addition to the building was
constructed at the North East corner to house the
new pump and filter equipment for the family water
slide (now removed) and the children's activity pool
playground. The mechanical and electrical pool
equipment is not specifically included in this
analysis. It should be noted that staff indicated the
WaveTEK equipment has been replaced in 2005 and
general maintenance is continuously going on with
this equipment. Also, staff noted the pool sand filters
and pumps are currently in good working condition
as of the 2019 summer season and when pumps
need to be replaced or rebuilt, they are addressed
on an as need basis.
Priority Level
1JLevel 1: Immediately
Level 2: 1-2 years
4 Leve 13 : 3-5 years
Estimated Costs
TOTAL $ 1,140,191
June 2021: Prior to facility opening -
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
119
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
1. Exterior Stairs
South Side
The exterior stairs on the south side
of this building leading to the
maintenance access doors has
several loose nosing sections,
deteriorated concrete steps and the
handrail / guard rail is not sufficient
for stability and fall protection.
CODE COMPLIANCE: Staff access
stairs and handrails do not meet
current code for riser and tread
sizes and pitch angle, the handrail
and guard rail do not meet code,
this completed stair system should
be removed and rebuild per current
codes.
Photo MB-1, MB-5 (inset)
V
boo
2
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
120
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
2. Concrete Building
Walls
Reinforced concrete building walls
are showing signs of cracking and
efflorescence from many of the
cracks. These areas need to be tuck -
pointed and repaired throughout.
Photo MB-6, MB-7 (inset)
PO
T h
i
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
121
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
3. Concrete Walking
and Roof Deck
Concrete walking deck and roof deck
have several east / west thru cracks.
Many of these cracks have been tuck
pointed repaired in areas on the roof,
2 or 3 locations have not been
repaired on the roof. Almost all the
locations on the walking deck have not
been repaired and look to be aligned
with about where the roof cracks are
seen. These locations are required to
be tuck pointed and repaired. On the
interior of the concrete building wall
cracks were visual in several areas.
The entire reinforced concrete
structure should be inspected by
structural engineer on an annual basis
for structure integrity.
Photo MB-12, MB-11 (inset)
�r
/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
122
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
4. Concrete Building
Interior
Interior of the concrete building
needs general maintenance for
painting of surfaces and cleaning of
corroded metal brackets and rust
stains.
Photo MB-14, MB-15 (inset)
It
• Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
123
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
5-6. Asphalt Shingle
Slope Roof East Side !40�
S. Asphalt shingle slope roof east -
side of the building has different - f
edge step flashing details and
appears to be not sitting tight and
sealed in several areas which may
be causing moisture to leak in the
building.
Photo MB-17
6. Mid points of the asphalt shingle
roofing are showing signs of
"warping" where the substrate deck
appears to be wet and damaged.
Photo MB-18 (inset)
! F
'wf
rMr
4'
Fl
'rF.
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
124
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
7. Exterior Shed Roof
Exterior shed roof over the outdoor heater boilers
is "sagging" and adding stress to the existing roof.
This structure appears to be adding extra loads to
the roof which may not be able to support. The
post holding this structure do not be in good
condition. The boiler flues thru the wood structure
do not appear to be code compliant for fire ratings
and non-combustible construction.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The mechanical flues through
the combustible roof of the shed do not meet
current code requirements for fire rating, this roof
and flue system should be removed and rebuild to
current codes.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The existing roof system,
flashing and shed lean to roof is failing and do not
meet current code for structural framing and load
supports, this completed roof covering, decking
and possibly all the framing should be removed
and rebuild per current codes.
Photo MB-19
/15/202:
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
125
A. MECHANICAL BUILDING
8. 1997 Building
Foundation
1997 building foundation shows
signs of cracking and the South
CMU block walls are showing signs
of step cracking, possibly caused to
lack of control / expansion joints.
Photo MB-21
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
126
A. MECHANICAL BUIL
9. Interior Original
Building
Interior of the original building
sloped roof areas of sagging and
water damaged gypsum board
ceiling, areas where the underside
has started to fall and needs to be
repaired.
Photo MB-23, MB-25,26 (insets)
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
127
A. MECHANICAL BUILDI
10. 1997 Building
Addition Equipment
The 1997 building addition hold the
sand tank equipment and electrical
switch gear. These items are showing
large amount of rust and corrosion
and may need to be replaced soon.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The electrical
equipment, panels and main
disconnect equipment are severely
corroded. Some of this equipment
has been disconnected and
abandoned in place and is no longer
used. All this equipment should be
updated and replaced if used for new
corrosion resistance electrical
equipment and removed if not used,
this equipment all needs to be
installed per current codes.
Photo MB-27, MB-28 (inset)
/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
128
B. WAVE POOL
The wave pool is the original water feature of the
park built in 1975 for the park opening in 1976. The
wave pool went through a significant renovation
project in 2003 for restoration of the pool floor,
repairs in the gutters and perimeter caissons. Also,
in 2003 was the construction of added concrete
peninsula and accessories palm tree, boulders, and
perimeter rope features.
According to staff the pool is inspected, and
damaged cracks are bondo repaired every year
before the park opening. Staff indicated they are
not seeing any water loss through operations and
therefore believe that since the 2019 season there
were no pool leaks to report.
3/15/2021
Priority Level
Level 1: Immediately
Level 2: 1-2 years
41-evel 3
: 3-5 years
TOTAL
June 2021: Prior to facility opening
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
Estimated Costs
444,698
116,735
$ 561,433
52,000
129
B. WAVE POOL
1. Lifeguard Station
Lifeguard Station need to be
removed and replaced, these are
the original equipment from over
45 years ago and are rusted,
deteriorating and not to be
considered safe for staff use.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The lifeguard
stations are original and dangerous
for safety of the employees sitting
on these platforms. The base is
rusting, the concrete surround is
cracking, and the access stars are
not current design or style, and the
platforms of plywood sheathing are
delaminating. This equipment
should be replaced with new
models that are current in code and
safety requirements.
Photo W-1, MB-2 (inset)
IddElkhL IddElkhL
0
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
130
B. WAVE POOL
2. Perimeter Access
Panels
Access panels and grates on the
perimeter of the pool can be seen
with rusted frames and some
damaged concrete deck surrounds.
Photo W-5, W-6 (inset)
i
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
131
B. WAVE POOL
3. Deck Concrete
and Sidewalk
Surrounding deck concrete / sidewalk
area is generally in good conditions, a
few joints locations appeared to be
unleveled and could present a trip
hazard, these few joints should be
leveled out or replaced.
Photo W-13, MB-10 (inset)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
132
B. WAVE POOL
4. Post Inserts
Metal and wood post inserts aroi
the West end of the pool deck ar
showing rusted damaged concrel
these areas should be repaired,
replaced, and cleaned.
Photo W-15, W-16 (inset)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
133
B. WAVE POOL
S. Pool Floor Wa
System Inserts
Pool floor water system inset
showing signs of damage an(
around perimeter and acros!
pool floor from North to Sou
these do not appear to be st
cracks but more surface crac
Photo W-17, W-18 (inset)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
134
B. WAVE POOL
6. Concrete Gutters
Precast reinforced concrete gutter system
has many areas where the joints need to be
repaired or the edges are of the concrete
gutter have broken away and the rebar is
rusting and exposed which will be required
to be repaired.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The pre -cast concrete
gutters are built in 4"41 sections and many
of these sections are exposing the rusted
steel reinforcement causing for the concrete
to be cracking and chipping away, leaving
these edges rough is dangerous for
swimmer to be holding on to in the pool.
The gutters should be replaced and rebuilt
per current safety and code requirements.
Photo W-21, W-19 (inset)
3/15/2021 Waterfoi
135
B. WAVE POOL
7. Concrete Wall
Edges
The concrete wall edges above and
below the precast gutter system has
areas of cracks and areas where
previous bondo repairs have been
made which are falling apart. These
areas will need to be repair
replaced before next opera
season.
Photo W-24, W-23 (inset)
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
136
B. WAVE POOL
8. Pool Floor
Pool Floor has a few hairline cracks
across the full floor surface area,
one location about 8'-0" from the
deep end at the South side has a
large crack through the floor and
running up the wall. This appears to
be significant in size and may need
major repair soon.
Photo W-26, W-27 (inset)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
137
B. WAVE POOL
9. Wave Ducts
Concrete surface inside the wave
ducts at the East end which is part
of the reinforced concrete structure
of the mechanical building on the
inside of the walls has areas of
exposed steel rebar and other areas
of checked concrete from previous
repairs, this needs to be pa and
repaired.
Photo W-30, W-32 (inset)
4 ti
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
138
C.
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE AND
BOARDWALK
The Pedestrian bridge and boardwalk has most
recently been inspected by NTH Consultants, Ltd on
October 2, 2019, report number 62-190239-02.
Analysis and recommendation from this previous
report are still applicable per this November 2020
review assessment. Base on our site visit and
observations we have highlighted the following
areas of importance that require repairs or
replacement for deficiencies. We recommend that
annual yearly visual inspections of the existing
bridge and board walk system continue until all
outstanding items are repaired or replaced as
required for safety and maintenance.
Priority Level
Level 1: Immediately
*Level 2 : 1-2 years
41-evel 3 : 3-5 years
TOTAL
June 2021: Prior to facility opening
ALTERNATIVE: Remove bridge/boardwalk
Estimated Costs
1191951
81,920
25,346
227,217
23,346
44,353
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
139
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK _„
1. East End
Boardwalk and Deck t
Open boardwalk deck area at the
East end where the old double
flume slide was located has several
deck boards that have come apart i
or open gaps, creating trip hazards,
these boards should be immediately'
repaired and replaced.
1
Photo PBB-1, PBB-3 (inset)
Jog,-
_ — -
-0
ti
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
140
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK
2. East End
Boardwalk and Deck
Provide general maintenance of
cleaning and staining the deck
boards, the existing boards have
weathered and are checking in all
locations.
Photo PBB-4
X
_ At y
67
7 WCF A
--
ire} AL lb-
__.r6
t• �Iy r s �
* A'
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
141
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWA
3. East End
Boardwalk and Deck
The guardrail and top handrail wood
system is checked and splintering in
many locations, these top boards
should be replaced in similar
maintenance details as has been at
the West end of the boardwalk.
Photo PBB-5, PBB-6 (inset)
f �
r- _ y - _ - y �• .
.� • r a
* XX f '
f
41
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
142
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK
4. East End
Boardwalk and Deck
The guardrail system in some areas
show to be `shacky" these
guardrails can be easily shifted and
moved from side to side, which
appears to not be providing the
proper load resistance of 200 Ibs
point load applied in a lateral
position.
Photo PBB-7
r x
r
rrrt,.r
F zx..a
I
'
'
T
4we
�
r
�
Or
{�
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
143
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOAR
5. East End
Boardwalk and Deck
The lower -level rim / fascia boards
are showing sings of deterioration
and "cupping" or "warping" of the
boards and need to be replaced.
Photo PBB-8, PBB-9 (inset)
DWALK
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
144
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK
6-8. East End
Boardwalk and Deck
6. Below metal joist hangers are
showing signs of 50% corrosion, these
hangers may have rusted nails or may
be getting to the point of failure, they
should be individually inspected and
replaced as needed.
Photo PBB-10 (Top Left)
7. Several locations for loose bolts and
washers were seen between
connections, these bolts/
connections need to be inspected and
tightened.
PBB-11 (Top Right)
8. Some decking boards are showing
signs of water damage and rotting
from the underside, these boards
should be replaced as needed.
PBB-13 (Bottom)
/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
145
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK
9-10. West End
Boardwalk
9. 2" x 8" deck boards need
replacing in several locations,
previously boards have been
replaced and visually other boards
are now due for replacement.
10. Re -stain / paint all exposed
wood surfaces on deck, to preserve
and extend the life span of the
existing wood members
Photo PBB-14
h
1W
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
146
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK i� 1. ",��
11-12. East End
Boardwalk
11. Some intermediate wood brackets and
supports at the side guard rails are broken
or missing. Also, the guardrail system in
some areas show to be `shacky" these
guardrails can be easily shifted and
moved from side to side, which appears
to not be providing the proper load
resistance of 200lbs point load applied in
a lateral position.
Photo PBB-15 (Top)
12. Main wood timber support beams are
beginning to show signs of water damage,
these beams should be checked annually
for rot and replacement due to excessive
water damage.
Photo PBB-16 (Bottom)
/15/202:
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
147
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK
13-14. Steel Truss Bridge
13. Some intermediate wood brackets and
supports at the side guard wails are broken
or missing. Also, the guardrail system in some
areas show to be `shacky" these guardrails
can be easily shifted and moved from side to
side, which appears to not be providing the
proper load resistance of 200lbs point load
applied in a lateral position. The lower -level
rim / fascia boards are showing sings of
deterioration and "cupping" or "warping" of
the boards and need to be replaced.
Photo PBB-17 (Top)
14. Main wood timber support beams are
beginning to show signs of water damage,
these beams should be checked annually for
rot and replacement due to excessive water
damage.
Photo PBB-18 (Bottom)
AW
h t 4t
IAJ
/15/202:
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
148
C. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK
15. Guard Rails and Handrails
Provide additional closure or replace and redesign
guard rails to current code requirements of the
maximum 4" spacing.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The existing guard rails do not
meet current MBC code requirements for lateral
load support at the board walk areas for 2001bs
point load, the bridge appears to be within code.
Also, the guard rail "opening limitations" do not
meet the current MBC code for maximum of 4"
sphere passing through at both the boardwalk area
and the bridge area. These guardrails should be
rebuilt, or coverings added for code compliance.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The handrail system in non -
code compliant in the size of the top rail for grasping
for the code, more important the handrail system in
many locations the wood is slitting and presents a
dangerous condition for hands running along the rail
system, this full handrail system should be
redesigned and replaced per current code
requirements.
/15/202:
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
149
D. BATH HOUSF�BUILDING
The Bath House Restroom Building is one of the
original 1976 structures from when the water park
opened. This building is CMU wall construction with
concrete foundations and floors and with wood
laminate beam roof structure and wood decking
with membrane roofing system. No major
renovations have been undertaken on this building.
There have been some minor projects completed
since 1976 for the entry roof trusses, first aid offices
and ticket both entries. The restroom building has
undergone some other minor renovations for
equipment, accessible toilet fixtures and
accessories. The building does not have a family
changing room and some of the accessible toilet
room fixtures are not up to current code
requirements and specifications. The proposed
interior renovations project and family changing
room form 2018 are still needed and should be
completed as a future project.
3/15/2021
Priority Level
1: Immediately
41-evel 3
: 3-5 years
TOTAL
June 2021: Prior to facility opening
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
Estimated Costs
134,628
843,959
$ 978,586
150
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING j r 1
1. Wood Beams
Lamination
The wood glue laminated beams on
the building and surrounding
canopies are noted as having some
signs of delamination. The layers of
lamination themselves are visually
"leaking" glue / sap of some type
and may be compromise the
structural integrity of the beam.
These should be investigated more
for testing and recondition as
needed for preservation.
Photo BH-1, BH-2 (inset)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
151
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING
2-3. Wood Beams
Connections
2. Various steel bracket connections
of the wood beams to other beams
and columns are showing signs of
stress and breaking. Broken
connection should be investigated
in more detail by testing structural
engineer. These connections need
to be repaired and provided with
additional support for secured
structural.
Photo BH-5 (Right)
3. Several of the steel brackets
connecting the wood beams inside
and outside are showing signs of
rust/corrosion, these areas need to
be cleaned and painted.
Photo BH-6 (Left)
L
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
152
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING
4-5. Wood Roof
Structure
4. Wood fascia and soffit boards
along the south side of the building
show signs of water penetration,
these wood boards should be
replaced and refinished.
Photo BH-7 (Top)
5. Wood decking from the
underside show signs of damage,
this decking should be repaired /
replaced at several locations.
Photo BH-10 (Bottom)
r�
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
153
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING
6. Glass Block at
Entry Doors
Glass block and masonry joints at
entry doors into each restroom, this
is general maintenance to replace
cracked glass block units, several
units have been replaced in the past
and a few were noted as cracked
currently.
Photo BH-11
111L.
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
154
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING
7. Membrane
Roofing
Membrane roofing on the building
appears to be at the later stages of
its life span. Several areas were
seen to be have debris and puddling
water spots, at the skylight and
flashing corners.
Photo BH-12, BH-13 (inset)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
155
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING
8. Entry Truss
Syste m
The entry truss roof system wood
appears to be nearly deteriorated in
several areas and most of the wood
supports on the roof of both
building are rotted, splitting, and
damaged beyond repair.
Photo BH-16 (Top), BH-17 (Bottom)
R
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
156
D. BATH HOUSE BUILDING
9. Interior
Renovations
CODE COMPLIANCE: The interior
renovation project from 2018
should be reconsidered and
completed on the existing restroom
building to create new ADA family
changing rooms and to renovate
the existing restroom areas of the
men's and women's restrooms for
ADA requirements and features
throughout.
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
YNATAIF01RP 0A" C41UwTr PARK
FAMILY CHAN C I NC TOILET ROOMS
INTERIOR RENOVATIONS
em P" C0" LW nh PM T*"
ii i W al..l. rrrr NLL�r �r
LLa.L.Lr•tiLrnttr arl�w�
.�.....�..,.. n.. •......vim
rat wn.• _ _
rar T.L•L r
t�•' I J.1..7C.•S+ tiT9�4
�1 ih.I•..YI� ;GY•i1�ti�1..Y
M l:J✓.1 n�a!/i_ll .L Wti� ��y.y. .vL u'
J.Y iS�v�-L.lII.IWF�IY a!
UOMIEk
0..aI'k- .WN
:�lzAN},M
Mm*aQ o�
rn,a.vrrac.a �
*$,*P.M) % We'.
4TG �1FG 11;rA I -S. VI+r.V
'j[L14W4117
IE12UJ02AL d ELECTR!"Jl 803MEFt
u '.. rlLr.. k; n;n
isvuft rha m " m
L-11it¢I k& V
PLUM U4fFJ- HA 11J 1L! L.RLIRJ a I11111
rLI. L..n�r.n ■ rr.o
aLoiao ai iri.LiL�..ari ■a�wi
Wh_�� L.r L5141.41
.L L.`.n•v.A .' .. r
W r.Fx 11,=Pr q"nr
wvn..�La.L l
Y: rvsuL. a:•r�L•nv nL.
LL LLL Lr��_NVaL
ar.t�..
w� lua�cuo-.-o �x
.a yc wrn �.Ll.
1 JhT9CY
li .R�4V�n4{
'i .Jr�4T.CY4T
YJL •ti 4l•�L+Y ti4
COMMISSION
cicmnly EA
' � iS.NA•i I.n Ana
! Y
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
157
E. CONCESSION BUILDING
The Concession Building is one of the original 1976
structures from when the water park opened. This
building is CMU wall construction with concrete
foundations and floors and with wood laminate
beam roof structure and wood decking with
membrane roofing system. No major renovations
have been undertaken on this building. There has
been some minor project completed since 1976 for
the entry roof trusses, kitchen equipment upgrades
and changes of layout for additions and deletions.
This building is the same as the Bath House
Restroom and many of the same structural
concerns with the beams, brackets and roof exist on
this building.
Priority Level
Level 1: Immediately
Level 2: 1-2 years
41-evel 3
: 3-5 years
TOTAL
June 2021: Prior to facility opening
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
Estimated Costs
79,915
39,409
$ 11%324
158
E. CONCESSION BUILDWC
1. Wood Beams
Lamination
The wood glue laminated beams on
the building and surrounding
canopies are noted as having some
signs of delamination. The layers of
lamination themselves are visually
"leaking" glue / sap of some type
and may be compromise the
structural integrity of the beam.
These should be investigated more
for testing and recondition as
needed for preservation.
Photo C-1
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
159
E. CONCESSION BUILDING
2-4. Wood Beams
Connections
2. Fiberglass column enclosure is
damaged, splitting at the seam in
several areas, this could be due to
water damage or wear of the years.
Photo C-2 (Left)
3. Several of the steel brackets
connecting the wood beams inside
and outside are showing signs of
rust / corrosion, these areas need to
be cleaned and painted
Photo C-3 (Upper Right)
4. A few locations of the glue
laminated wood beams appear to
be water damaged and at the
beginning stages of delamination.
Photo C-4 (Lower Right)
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
160
E. CONCESSION BUILDIN`�
S. Metal Roof
Metal standing seam roof has signs
of damaged finish which is causing
rusting and exposure to weather.
Photo C-5
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
161
4
Ik
S& r.•1111r 'la IL
jo
-21
�r
..- �art ���rs •�..w.m��'�� ���� .a�'"��
UL
R
_ �: "`ate
w logo
Y '
4w Air�r�i Rrr�r i��� yr i i
Jft ; ar i 1� i
UM
~iv arw
i Z6 � i ` i`�a��l*i� ` ��ilril�l �i � 'air 1
i
it ,m i �i sisi is i
s eMi! i Ml■ rLis as Sri ILV
Br ie �!! ■ i =a m a M 1 �
r� ■ ARM �
w■` ors ,c s !� o m . m m ■ lie ■ ■ Zia eta z� �
! � �_w■ �s■� f0 ' , ■OO ■ ■ ■��. a i laws
MW .rs a +r ! !.■i MOOR Ma ■ man
E. CONCESSION BUILDING
7. Glazing
CODE COMPLIANCE: The glass
windows between the waiting area
of the interior space and the
outdoor seating area are not
marked as safety glazing for
hazardous locations. Per the
current MBC glass next to doors
and within 18" of the floor need to
be safety glazing, all of this glass
should be replaced with new
glazing.
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
163
E. CONCESSION BUILDIN`�
8. Interior Finishes
CODE COMPLIANCE: Food service
building where cooking is to be
prepared should not have exposed
wood construction and the
exposed surfaces should be
washable surfaces per heath
department requirements. The
entire concession building is mostly
all original construction except for
minor equipment renovations
performed over the years, this
entire building should be planned
for a full interior renovation to
upgrade code deficiencies and
health department requirements.
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
164
F. CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY POOL
The children's activity pool was added to the water
park in 1997 along with the addition to the
mechanical pump building to hold the filters and
pumps for this pool. The Pool is about 18" depth at
the center is near the main "big bucket" water
feature, the water feature has over 2 dozen play
activities. Overall, the structure and playground are
in good shape with some minor corrosion
deterioration on the steel structure. The pool floor
has been maintained and patched the cracks as
needed, additional cracks and spalling have
developed.
The Children's Activity Pool has most recently been
inspected by NTH Consultants, Ltd on September
18, 2018, report number 62-180177. Analysis and
recommendation from this previous report are still
applicable per this November 2020 review
assessment.
3/15/2021
Priority Level
Level 1: Immediately
Level 2: 1-2 years
41-evel 3
: 3-5 years
TOTAL
June 2021: Prior to facility opening
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
Estimated Costs
88,120
48,705
$ 136,825
165
F. CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY POOL
1-2. Concrete Deck
and Pool Floor
1. Few minor areas of needed
concrete repair around the
perimeter of the activity pool on the
concrete deck, general maintenance
of joints
Photo CAP-1 (Top)
2. Pool concrete floor has been
patched and repaired in various
areas over the years, some new
areas of cracks have developed and
areas of spalling concrete the play
structure support columns.
Photo CAP-4 (Bottom Left), CAP-5
(Bottom Right)
I ,t
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
166
F. CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY POOL
3. Big Bucket Wood
Deck
Wood plank decking under the "Big
Bucket' is showing signs of water
damage and rotting, these boards
need to be replaced.
Photo CAP-6
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
167
F. CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY POOL
4-S. Play Features
and Structure
4. Several areas of rust and
corrosion are present in the steel
piping and support framing of the
activity structure.
Photo CAP-7 (Right)
5. Several small areas of cracked
and split fiberglass play features
were noted, these areas are
showing hairline cracks, flaking and
will need to be maintained soon.
Photo CAP-10 (Left)
N
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
168
F. CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY POOL
6-7. Play Features
and Structure
6. Some small areas of the steel
framing are showing signs of paint
flaking and chipping, repaint of the
structure will soon be needed.
Photo CAP-13
7. Piece of the swing bracket is
missing; all the hanging activity toys
need to be checked and general
maintenance as needed.
Photo CAP-15
M
3/15/2021
Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
169
G. PARKING LOTS
Mill to 4" depth and repave.
Priority Level
Level 1: Immediately
Level 2: 1-2 years
Level 3: 3-5 years
TOTAL
June 2021: Prior to facility opening
Estimated Costs
620,099
$ 620,099
-, OF,
4 ?
T
r �
3/15/2021 Waterford Oaks Waterpark Facility Condition Assessment
170
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 C
PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Facilities and Waterpark Openings for 2021
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Staff will be prepared to have a discussion with the OCPR Commission regarding the Oakland County Parks
and Recreation Facilities and Waterpark Openings for 2021 at the meeting on April 7, 2021.
171
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 D
PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning + Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Proposed Revised Sponsorship Policy
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
In 2018, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Sponsorship Policy was largely re -written to
provide staff with additional guidance on seeking sponsorships for OCPRC facilities, events and programs. With
the new relationship with Marx Layne & Co. who was brought on contract to help staff solicit, value, manage and
maintain sponsors, the policy needed some updates to reflect the current situation and to provide some flexibility
for staff and the Marx Layne team to engage with and secure new sponsors for the park system.
The main change proposed by staff is removal of the provision that OCPR go out to bid for any sponsorship over
$5,000. With Marx Layne on contract to help secure sponsors, it is no longer necessary to have to bid out
individual sponsorship opportunities. Rather staff is proposing that OCPR build out a Web page on the parks
Web site that contains information on sponsorship opportunities within the park system that is always available
to anyone seeking to sponsor activities at OCPRC. The page would have information on the process, potential
opportunities, contact information, and recognition of current sponsors. Staff is also recommending an annual
(or semi-annual) press release that both recognizes current sponsors and invites new potential sponsors to reach
out to us.
The previous policy indicated that staff would annually create a list of potential industries under consideration for
sponsorship. Staff recommends that this be modified to simply include industries with which the Commission
does not want to be considered (currently entities including tobacco products, those with an adverse reputation
in the county for environmental or community stewardship, and alcoholic beverages — with the exception that for
adult -only events, this may be acceptable). The policy also indicates that sponsorships will not be considered
where a sponsorship creates a conflict of interest for OCPR or requires high expenditures in relation to the level
of benefit received.
With the revised draft of the policy, the Commission will still approve any new sponsorship (with any company
we have not worked with before), any sponsorships that span more than one calendar year, or any sponsorship
that totals more than $20,000 annually. Any sponsorships not requiring Commission approval will be placed on
the next regular Commission agenda as Consent agenda items for Receive and File.
Staff is also proposing to streamline the process for any imminent sponsorship opportunity requests that require
Commission approval but where approval is needed prior to the next regularly scheduled Commission meeting.
The revised policy provides the authority for the Chairperson to review and approve the sponsorship and have it
placed on the next regular agenda as a Receive and File item.
172
Page 2
ATTACHMENTS
• Proposed Revised Sponsorship Policy — Redlined
• Proposed Revised Sponsorship Policy - Clean
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission review and approve the revised OCPR Sponsorship Policy.
MOTION
Move to approve the proposed revised OCPR Sponsorship Policy.
173
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
OZAKLAND Commission05-06-09 09-05-18 Page 1 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
INTENT AND PURPOSE
A. To guide Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission (OCPR),Staff and, Oakland
County vendors/contractors in the development and management of sponsorships for
OCPR,
B. To enhance revenues and in -kind benefits within the scope of use specified in this
Policy.
C. To build positive relationships with persons and entities serving Oakland County.
D. To improve the quality and value of Oakland County living.
II. DEFINITION
A. SPONSORSHIP. Sponsorship shall be defined as the relationship between OCPF,
and an entity in which the entity pays a fee in return for access to various benefits
(marketing, advertising, and other) associated with OCPIZ as documented in a
written agreement,
III. SCOPE AND CHARACTER OF SPONSORSHIPS
A. Sponsorships shall have any or all the following scope and character:
1. Events. Sponsorship of events, one-time or ongoing, e.g., family
fireworks events.
2. Programs. Sponsorship of programs, e.g., community outreach.
3. Products. Sponsorships to provide products for use in park facilities,
e.g., bags provided along trails for cleaning -up after pets.
4. Amenities. Sponsorships to provide park amenities, e.g., acquisition
and maintenance of benches in dog parks.
5. Naming Rights to Park Features. Sponsorships to name existing
features or structures within a park or to provide features or
structures within a park, e.g., a waterpark feature, playground, or
pavilion.
6. Other. Other sponsorships found by OCPF, in its discretion, to be
consistent with the intent and purpose of this Policy.
B. Sponsorships shall not have the following scope and character:
1. Sponsorship by persons or entities that derive a substantial portion of
their revenue from the sale or manufacture of tobacco products or
have an unfavorable/negative reputation in the �ounty for
environmental or community stewardship as determined by OCPR, in
its discretion.
2. Sponsorship by persons or entities commonly known to be associated
with the sale or manufacture of alcoholic beverages, provided, if a
sponsorship relates to an adult event or program, this prohibition
shall not apply,
3. There will not be special consideration given to any persons or
entities that,are participating in the County bid process or is seeking a
contract/agreement with the County. All bid evaluations will be
handled using the process set forth in the Oakland County Purchasing
Deleted: s
Deleted: c
Deleted: -contracted
Deleted: Oakland County Parks and Recreation.
Deleted: the Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Commission (OCPRC) and an entity in which the entity
Deleted: C
Deleted:
Deleted: <#>NAMING RIGHTS. Naming Rights shall
be defined as a type of sponsorship in which as a
relationship between OCPR and an entity pays a
sponsorship fee that provides them within which the entity
purchases the right to name (with OCPRC approval a
facility or event for a defined period of time as a form of
advertising as documented in a written agreement.¶
. I Deleted: playground
Deleted: the
I Deleted: C
Deleted: products, or
Commented [HJSI ]: Should this qualifier be limited to
the "County"? I am thinking we just end the sentence after
"reputation."
Deleted: adverse
Deleted: C
I Deleted:
Deleted: OCPRC partner
Deleted: is
174
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
OZAKLAND Commission 05-06-09 09-05-18 Page 2 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
Policy and Procedures manual.
{ Deleted: the J
4. Sponsorships that would result in a conflict of interest or otherwise
Deleted: the
conflict with other policies of JJCPR or Oakland County as
{Deleted: county of Oakland J
determined by OCPR,.
{Deleted: c
5. Sponsorships that would require high OCPR expenditures for
operating maintenance in to the level of benefit to be
p g or maenance cosn relation eveene
Deleted: <#>Naming Rights and Large -Scale Sponsorships:
received.
<#>Proposals for naming rights and/or sponsorships
Deleted: <#>totaling more than¶
C. Exclusion from Policy: This Policy is not intended to apply to:
$5,000 annually will be accepted through a Request for
1. Gifts or donations made to the County earmarked for OCPIZ use.
Proposal process, Request for Qualifications process, or
another process approved by the Oakland County
Gifts and donations to the County are governed by the "OAKLAND
Purchasing Office. These processes shall be governed by
COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF A GIFT DONATION AND/OR
the Oakland County Purchasing Policies and Procedures.¶
GIFT ITEM FROM PRITATE SOURCE PROCEDURE" approved
<#>Proposals or qualifications for sponsorship will be
reviewed pursuant to the Oakland County Purchasing
in Board of Commissioners MR #83204 (Procedure). This policy is
Policies and Procedures with the OCPRC Marketing
not intended to supplement or supersede such Procedure. If there are
Committee making recommendations to the OCPRC. The
any conflicts between the Procedure and this Policy, the Procedure
OCPRC may accept or reject any sponsorship or proposal
for naming rights, at its sole discretion.¶
shall control; and
2. Naming rights or sponsorship made through the Commemorative
Deleted: C
Progran 1.
Commented [HJS2]: When we refer to the
"commemorative program" are we referring to the OC BOC
IV. SPONSORSHIP PRIORITIES
Procedure set forth in MR #00230 (Naming/renaming
Geographical Sites/Features)? I think we should reference
A. Duration/Time Frame: Jong -term sponsorship is preferred to one-time
this BOC MR.
Deleted:..
sponsorship.
B. Amount/Value: Sponsorships determined to have a higher value are preferred.
Commented [HJS4R3]: It is my opinion that this Section
C i
(Section C) needs to stay in the policy.
Deleted: In general terms, sponsorships involving fewer
V. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES AND POLICY REOUIREMENTS
signs, structures and the like, with higher sponsorship
amounts, are deemed to be desirable
A. General procedure
Deleted:.
1. (Sponsorships are procured via two mechanisms, either via OCPIZ
county to
,Staff efforts, or the efforts of vendors contracted with the coup
Deleted: <#>A sponsorship proposal shall be submitted
to the Supervisor —Planning for review at an
provide sponsorship valuation, ✓solicitation, or management services.
Administrative Management Team (AMT) meeting. If
Sponsorships will be sought through the following: (1) efforts of
approved by AMT, the proposed sponsorship shall then¶
OCPR Staff, (2) efforts of Oakland County vendors/contractor that
be presented to the OCPRC. The OCPRC shall consider
and approve the following sponsorships:¶
have a contract to provide sponsorship valuation, solicitation or
<#>Sponsorships with an estimated value of $ 10,000 or
management services; or (3) requests directly from persons or entities
greater and/or sponsorships with a term longer than one
seeking sponsorship opportunities from OCPR or (4) solicitaions
(1) year. Those sponsorships shall be presented on the
consent agenda at a regular OCPRC meeting for
prepared by contractor and /orOCPR and issued by Oakland County
Commission approval.¶
Purchasing,
Deleted: C
2. OCPR Staff will annually publish and maintain a list of OCPR
l Deleted: s
sponsorship opportunities on the OCPR website with an open call for
{ Deleted: solicitation J
sponsorship inquiries from interested persons or entities. This list
( Deleted:. {
may be updated from time to time by OCPR as additional
sponsorship opportunities arise.,
Deleted: OCPRC staff will maintain a page on the
3. The OCPR website will include procedures to contact OCPR Staff to
OCPRC web site that has an open call for sponsorship n
inquire about obtaining and receiving sponsorships.
Deleted: C
4. OCPK will issue an annual press release, recognizing the past year's
Deleted: put out a press release annually,
sponsors, and soliciting new sponsors to contact OCPK to inquire
Deleted:,
about sponsorship opportunities.
Deleted: C
175
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
OZAKLAND Commission05-06-09 09-05-18 Page 3 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy Sponsorship Policy
5. Sponsorships with the following characteristics must be presented to
and reviewed and approved by OCPR: (1)xiew sponsorships, (2) any
sponsorship that totals more than $20,000 annually, or (3) any
sponsorship that spans more than one calendar year. All other
sponsorships will be reviewed and approved by the OCPR Executive
Officer,
6. OCPF, may direct staff to utilize a Request for Proposal process (or
other Oakland County Purchasing approved process) for any specific
large-scale or naming rights sponsorships,
7. As appropriate and timely or as requested by OCPR,,OCPR Staff will
provide updates to ACPR on sponsorship activity and potential
upcoming sponsorship agreements by reporting at regularly
scheduled meetings.
8. All sponsorships must be documented and/or codified in a written
agreement.
9. New sponsorships that are imminent in nature and require ratification
prior to the next scheduled OCPIZ meeting will be summarized and
sent via e-mail to the OCPR Chairperso4 The Chairperson may
approve the sponsorship via phone or e-mail, and the sponsorship
agreement will be placed on the next regularly scheduled OCPI�
meeting as a "Receive and File�tem."
10. Unless otherwise provided herein, sponsorship agreements shall be
reviewed and approved byj0CPP,
I Deleted: N
Deleted: will be reviewed and approved by the Parks
Commission. J
Deleted: C
Deleted: within the park system.
Deleted: s
Deleted: the Commission
Deleted: OCPRC
Deleted: and naming rights
Deleted: C
Feleted: of the OCPRC
Deleted: C
Deleted: i
- Deleted: the
Deleted: C
176
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
OZAKLANDCommission 05-06-09 09-05-18 Page 4 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
11. OCPIZ,Staff shall prepare a quarterly report of sponsorship revenue
received by OCPRC, with a brief description of the sponsorship
B. details and present it to,0CP1?,
B. Policy Requirements for All Sponsorships: The following requirements apply to
all sponsorships.
1. In general, considering such things as size, placement, duration and
overall appearance, sponsorship recognition shall not be displayed in
a location or in a manner that would result in undue commercialism
in a park. Sponsorship recognition must respect the physical beauty
of park spaces and viewsheds. The conditions of the sponsorship
shall not compromise the design standards or visual integrity of
OCPP, facilities or the experience of park users.
2. No physical sponsorship recognition shall be placed in a passive or
natural area of a park. This provision does not prohibit a recognition
adjacent to a picnic or active recreational area which is not within a
passive or natural area of a park.
3. Vehicles provided in whole or part by sponsors may display
sponsorship recognition; however, such recognition shall tot be
larger or more prominent that OCPR identification on the vehicle.
4. A sponsorship agreement may be approved authorizing a sponsor to
use the OCPR logo in a manner specifically authorized and limited in
the agreement, provided such authorization shall be consistent with
any and all intellectual property policies established by the County or
as otherwise approved by Corporation Counsel.
C. Creation and Maintenance of Sponsorship Asset Inventory:
1. Staff shall create and maintain a Sponsorship Asset Inventory that
will contain a listing of OCPIZ assets with example benefits available
to sponsors in return for sponsorship. Examples include, but are not
limited to, a sign or booth conforming to this Policy, or identification
in written materials, and/or pictures displayed and/or distributed by
OCPR,
2. The Sponsorship Asset Inventory shall be updated annually by OCPIZ
,Staff and shall be annually reviewed and approved by OCPR.
3. When creating, maintaining, reviewing, and approving the
Sponsorship Asset Inventory all provisions of this, Policy must be
considered and followed by OCPIZ Staff and OCPR,
Deleted: C
Deleted: s
Deleted: the J
Deleted: C
Deleted: <#>During the time of each quarterly report,
OCPRC shall pass a resolution
F
ed: <#> of thanks for all sponsors committing (via
rsbip¶on Date
Deleted: C
Deleted: be clearly secondary in prominence and size to
l the OCPR identification on the vehicle
Deleted: C
Deleted: C
l Deleted: C
Deleted: s
Deleted: reviewing
Deleted: e
Deleted: C
Deleted: C
177
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
OZAKLAND Commission 05-06-09 09-05-18 Page 5 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
08-10-16 M. Prowse II. Added definitions section
III.C. Added Naming Rights and Large -
Scale Sponsorships to clarify
sponsorships greater than $5,000
III.D. Clarified Exclusions to clarify
governance of Board of Commissioners
MR#83201 acceptance of gifts.
V.A. 5 & 6 Added reporting guidelines
V.B. Clarified Exceptions
V.C. Clarified Policy Requirements
V.D. Added section for creation and
Maintenance of Sponsorship Asset
Inventory
08-21-18 M. Prowse III.B. Added language to clarify
Commission's determination and
Oakland County Purchasing
requirements.
VA. Added language regarding
OCPRC approval process
09-05-18 M. Prowse/Commission 8-21-28 Changes approved by OCPRC
2/25/2021 M. Prowse Updates to incorporate use of contracted
vendors to procure sponsorship for
OCPRC, adjusted approval process,
178
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
GAKLAND Commission 05-06-09 09-05-4 s Page 1 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
INTENT AND PURPOSE
A. To guide Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission (OCPR) Staff and Oakland
County vendors/contractors in the development and management of sponsorships for
OCPR.
B. To enhance revenues and in -kind benefits within the scope of use specified in this
Policy.
C. To build positive relationships with persons and entities serving Oakland County.
D. To improve the quality and value of Oakland County living.
II. DEFINITION
A. SPONSORSHIP. Sponsorship shall be defined as the relationship between OCPR
and an entity in which the entity pays a fee in return for access to various benefits
(marketing, advertising, and other) associated with OCPR as documented in a
written agreement.
III. SCOPE AND CHARACTER OF SPONSORSHIPS
A. Sponsorships
shall have any or all the following scope and character:
1.
Events. Sponsorship of events, one-time or ongoing, e.g., family
fireworks events.
2.
Programs. Sponsorship of programs, e.g., community outreach.
3.
Products. Sponsorships to provide products for use in park facilities,
e.g., bags provided along trails for cleaning -up after pets.
4.
Amenities. Sponsorships to provide park amenities, e.g., acquisition
and maintenance of benches in dog parks.
5.
Naming Rights to Park Features. Sponsorships to name existing
features or structures within a park or to provide features or
structures within a park, e.g., a waterpark feature, playground, or
pavilion.
6.
Other. Other sponsorships found by OCPR, in its discretion, to be
consistent with the intent and purpose of this Policy.
B. Sponsorships shall not have the following scope and character:
1. Sponsorship by persons or entities that derive a substantial portion of
their revenue from the sale or manufacture of tobacco products or
have an unfavorable/negative reputation in the County for
environmental or community stewardship as determined by OCPR, in
its discretion.
2. Sponsorship by persons or entities commonly known to be associated
with the sale or manufacture of alcoholic beverages, provided, if a
sponsorship relates to an adult event or program, this prohibition
shall not apply.
3. There will not be special consideration given to any persons or
entities that are participating in the County bid process or is seeking a
contract/agreement with the County. All bid evaluations will be
handled using the process set forth in the Oakland County Purchasing
Policy and Procedures manual.
179
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
GAKLAND Commission 05-06-09 09-05-I8 Page 2 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
4. Sponsorships that would result in a conflict of interest or otherwise
conflict with other policies of OCPR or Oakland County as
determined by OCPR.
5. Sponsorships that would require high OCPR expenditures for
operating or maintenance costs in relation to the level of benefit to be
received.
C. Exclusion from Policy: This Policy is not intended to apply to:
1. Gifts or donations made to the County earmarked for OCPR use.
Gifts and donations to the County are governed by the "OAKLAND
COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF A GIFT DONATION AND/OR
GIFT ITEM FROM PRITATE SOURCE PROCEDURE" approved
in Board of Commissioners MR #83204 (Procedure). This policy is
not intended to supplement or supersede such Procedure. If there are
any conflicts between the Procedure and this Policy, the Procedure
shall control; and
2. Naming rights or sponsorship made through the Commemorative
Program.
IV. SPONSORSHIP PRIORITIES
A. Duration/Time Frame: Long-term sponsorship is preferred to one-time
sponsorship.
B. Amount/Value: Sponsorships determined to have a higher value are preferred.
C. In general terms, sponsorships involving fewer signs, structures and the like, with
higher sponsorship amounts, are deemed to be desirable.
V. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES AND POLICY REQUIREMENTS
A. General procedure
1. Sponsorships are procured via two mechanisms, either via OCPR
Staff efforts, or the efforts of vendors contracted with the county to
provide sponsorship valuation, solicitation, or management services.
Sponsorships will be sought through the following: (1) efforts of
OCPR Staff, (2) efforts of Oakland County vendors/contractor that
have a contract to provide sponsorship valuation, solicitation or
management services; or (3) requests directly from persons or entities
seeking sponsorship opportunities from OCPR or (4) solicitations
prepared by contractor and /or OCPR and issued by Oakland County
Purchasing.
2. OCPR Staff will annually publish and maintain a list of OCPR
sponsorship opportunities on the OCPR website with an open call for
sponsorship inquiries from interested persons or entities. This list
may be updated from time to time by OCPR as additional
sponsorship opportunities arise.
3. The OCPR website will include procedures to contact OCPR Staff to
inquire about obtaining and receiving sponsorships.
4. OCPR will issue an annual press release recognizing the past year's
sponsors and soliciting new sponsors to contact OCPR to inquire
about sponsorship opportunities.
180
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
GAKLAND Commission 05-06-09 09-05-48 Page 3 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
5. Sponsorships with the following characteristics must be presented to
and reviewed and approved by OCPR: (1) new sponsorships, (2) any
sponsorship that totals more than $20,000 annually, or (3) any
sponsorship that spans more than one calendar year. All other
sponsorships will be reviewed and approved by the OCPR Executive
Officer.
6. OCPR may direct staff to utilize a Request for Proposal process (or
other Oakland County Purchasing approved process) for any specific
large-scale or naming rights sponsorships.
7. As appropriate and timely or as requested by OCPR, OCPR Staff will
provide updates to OCPR on sponsorship activity and potential
upcoming sponsorship agreements by reporting at regularly
scheduled meetings.
8. All sponsorships must be documented and/or codified in a written
agreement.
9. New sponsorships that are imminent in nature and require ratification
prior to the next scheduled OCPR meeting will be summarized and
sent via e-mail to the OCPR Chairperson. The Chairperson may
approve the sponsorship via phone or e-mail, and the sponsorship
agreement will be placed on the next regularly scheduled OCPR
meeting as a "Receive and File Item."
10. Unless otherwise provided herein, sponsorship agreements shall be
reviewed and approved by OCPR.
11. OCPR Staff shall prepare a quarterly report of sponsorship revenue
received by OCPRC, with a brief description of the sponsorship
details and present it to OCPR.
B. Policy Requirements for All Sponsorships: The following requirements apply to
all sponsorships.
1. In general, considering such things as size, placement, duration and
overall appearance, sponsorship recognition shall not be displayed in
a location or in a manner that would result in undue commercialism
in a park. Sponsorship recognition must respect the physical beauty
of park spaces and viewsheds. The conditions of the sponsorship
shall not compromise the design standards or visual integrity of
OCPR facilities or the experience of park users.
2. No physical sponsorship recognition shall be placed in a passive or
natural area of a park. This provision does not prohibit a recognition
adjacent to a picnic or active recreational area which is not within a
passive or natural area of a park.
3. Vehicles provided in whole or part by sponsors may display
sponsorship recognition; however, such recognition shall not be
larger or more prominent that OCPR identification on the vehicle.
4. A sponsorship agreement may be approved authorizing a sponsor to
use the OCPR logo in a manner specifically authorized and limited in
the agreement, provided such authorization shall be consistent with
any and all intellectual property policies established by the County or
181
Date Adopted: Date Revised: C: 09-006
GAKLAND Commission 05-06-09 09-05-I8 Page 4 of 5
COUNTY PARKS Policy
Sponsorship Policy
as otherwise approved by Corporation Counsel.
C. Creation and Maintenance of Sponsorship Asset Inventory:
1. Staff shall create and maintain a Sponsorship Asset Inventory that
will contain a listing of OCPR assets with example benefits available
to sponsors in return for sponsorship. Examples include, but are not
limited to, a sign or booth conforming to this Policy, or identification
in written materials, and/or pictures displayed and/or distributed by
OCPR.
2. The Sponsorship Asset Inventory shall be updated annually by OCPR
Staff and shall be annually reviewed and approved by OCPR.
3. When creating, maintaining, reviewing, and approving the
Sponsorship Asset Inventory all provisions of this Policy must be
considered and followed by OCPR Staff and OCPR.
08-10-16 M. Prowse II. Added definitions section
III.C. Added Naming Rights and Large -
Scale Sponsorships to clarify
sponsorships greater than $5,000
III.D. Clarified Exclusions to clarify
governance of Board of Commissioners
MR#83201 acceptance of gifts.
V.A. 5 & 6 Added reporting guidelines
V.B. Clarified Exceptions
V.C. Clarified Policy Requirements
V.D. Added section for creation and
Maintenance of Sponsorship Asset
Inventory
08-21-18 M. Prowse III.B. Added language to clarify
Commission's determination and
Oakland County Purchasing
requirements.
VA. Added language regarding
OCPRC approval process
09-05-18
3/16/2021
M. Prowse/Commission 8-21-28 Changes approved by OCPRC
M. Prowse Updates to incorporate use of contracted
vendors to procure sponsorship for
OCPRC, adjusted approval process,
182
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 E
PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning + Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Off -Road Vehicle Trail Improvement Fund 2021 Grant
Program Application
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Staff are applying to the Michigan DNR ORV Trail Improvement Fund for $200,000 for the construction of the 2nd
half of the Dixie Ledge Parking Area at Holly Oaks ORV Park. This grant program provided a grant of $199,000
in 2020 for the first half of the parking lot construction, which begin in March. If successful, this 2nd grant will
fund the remainder of the project, which could be completed in 2022.
With the new Board of Commissioners process requiring approval of grant applications over $50,000, this
application will go to the Board of Commissioners for their approval.
ATTACHMENTS
• Michigan DNR ORV Trail Improvement Fund 2021 Grant Application
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve the proposed application to the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources Trail Improvement Fund for $200,000 for the Dixie Ledge Parking Area project, and forward it to the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners for final approval.
MOTION
Move to approve the proposed application to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Trail
Improvement Fund for $200,000 for the Dixie Ledge Parking Area project, and forward it to the Oakland
County Board of Commissioners for final approval.
183
S���o� NaTUgq �mN Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Parks and Recreation Division
W DNR{ OFF -ROAD VEHICLE (ORV) TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
o MpH�pH .y GRANT APPLICATION
This information is required by authority of Part 811, 1994 PA 451, as amended, to be considered for a grant.
Type of Application Type of Projects
❑ New ® Renewal I ❑ Damage Restoration ❑ Existing Facility Maintenance ® ORV Facility Development
(APPLICATION INFORMATION (Please print or type) APPLICATION COST SUMMARY
Sponsor Organization/Agency Type of Request Dollar Amount
Oakland County Parks and Recreation
P
mary Contact Person (Name and Title) Trail Maintenance/Grading $ 199, 000
lissa Prowse, Supervisor - Planning Damage Restoration $
�Address Special Projects/Equip. Rental $
2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford MI 48328 Leases $
City, County, State, ZIP Liability Insurance $
Contingency $ 1, 000
Telephone FAX TOTAL GRANT REQUEST $ $200, 000
( 248 ) 249-2801 ( 248 ) 858-0916
Federal I.D. Number E-mail
38-6004876 prowsem@oakgov.com
PROJECT(S) DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE (Attach additional sheets If necessary).
Maintenance of Existino Facilities: Location(s) must be shown on DNR ORV trail maps. Describe what type of maintenance is needed
and show the estimated cost of each project item (show specific items involved in each project).
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ITEM(S)
TRAIL NAME MILES ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST
❑ MCCT $73.00 ❑ Maint. $73.00 ❑ Route $55.00 $
❑ MCCT $73.00 ❑ Maint. $73.00 ❑ Route $55.00 $
❑ MCCT $73.00 ❑ Maint. $73.00 ❑ Route $55.00 $
❑ MCCT $73.00 ❑ Maint. $73.00 ❑ Route $55.00 $
❑ MCCT $73.00 ❑ Maint. $73.00 ❑ Route $55.00 $
TRAIL NAME
MILES
TRAIL GRADING
❑ $131.00
❑ MDOT C
❑ Contract
$
❑ $131.00
❑ MDOT C
❑ Contract
$
❑ $131.00
❑ MDOT C
❑ Contract
$
❑ $131.00
❑ MDOT C
❑ Contract
$
SPECIAL MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
1.Development of the Dixie Ledge
at Holly Oaks Off -Road
Vehicle Park
$ 199,000
2.
$
3.
$
4.
$
5.
$
6.
$
TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST
199,000
1 of 2 PR3601 (Rev.01/31/2019)
184
OFF -ROAD VEHICLE (ORV) TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION (CONTINUED)
Damage Restoration: Repair of ORV-damaged areas on public lands. Location(s) must be shown on project area map(s). Describe
each item needed to complete the restoration and show the estimated cost of each item. Provide site plan of proposed improvements
according to specifications mentioned in the instructions.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ITEM(S) COST
$
2. $
3. $
4. $
5. $
6. $
TOTAL RESTORATION COST
Proiect(s) Area Mao(s): Applicant must provide a map of the project area, using Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
ORV trail maps for existing trail maintenance projects located on State or federal forest and county plat book maps as a base for all
new trail proposals.
Documentation of Site Control: The sponsor shall certify, to the DNR, that appropriate written permission has been secured for a public
trail, route, or use area right-of-way. In addition, the sponsor shall furnish the DNR with the following:
1. Documentary proof establishing to the DNR's satisfaction, that the sponsor possesses, for the entire term of the contract, the right to
enter, occupy, use and maintain the trail, route or area which is the subject of this application. Such documentary evidence may
include deeds, leases, licenses, easements or use permits. This evidence must be number coded to correspond to the project area
map(s).
2. A detailed map identifying the specific location of the entire trail, route or area which is the subject of this application and the specific
location of each leased section. A list of names and addresses of all landowners involved must be attached to this map. Within 60
days of receiving lease payment, the sponsor must furnish documentary proof of lease payment made to each landowner.
Miles to be leased =
MAXIMUM PAYABLE = $300/mile or $75/acre.
Number of parcels =
Rate adjustments may be considered on a case -by -case basis.
Total Cost of Leases = $
Authorized Signatures (two required): At least one signatory must be an officer, employee, or designated representative of the sponsor
organization. Sponsor's signatures certify that appropriate written permission has been secured for a public right-of-way for the trail.
Please list the first person to contact concerning the application, project agreement or day-to-day operations as the primary contact person.
SPONSOR SIGNATURES
PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON
Name (Print) Title
Melissa Prowse Sup. Planning
Address
2800 Watkins Lake Road
City, State, ZIP
Waterford, MI 48328
Telephone (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) FAX
( 248 ) 249-2801 ( 248 ) 858-0916
E-Mail address
prowsem@oakgov.com
Signature
Date
SECONDARY CONTACT PERSON
Name (Print) Title
Jon Noyes Principal Planner
Address
2800 Watkins Lake Road
City, State, ZIP
Waterford, MI 48328
Telephone (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) FAX
( 248 ) 7 6 0 - 8 3 6 0
E-Mail
noyesj@oakgov.com
Signature
Return completed application no later than Mav 1 to local DNR Rec. Specialist
After review, application will be forwarded by May 30, to:
PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PO BOX 30257
LANSING MI 48909
Date
2of2
PR3601 (Rev.01/31/2019)
185
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 F-1
PLANNING & RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor, Planning & Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Request for Proposals — Off -Road Vehicle Rental Maintenance
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Holly Oaks ORV Park is open for general riding Thursday through Sunday and on holidays from Memorial Day
through Labor Day. The park is open for general riding three days a week on the shoulder seasons, and
weekends only for most of the winter (as staffing allows). When the park is not open to general riding, it will be
available for corporate rentals unless park maintenance or construction projects make private access
impractical. Such corporate rentals are a critical part of the sustainable operation of the park. The revenue
provided by corporate rentals helps to subsidize the daily entry rates of the general public to ensure that the cost
is not a barrier to accessing the park.
One of the challenges faced by operational staff is the unpredictable nature of corporate rentals and the need to
quickly respond to address the needs of the renting organization and/or to restore the park to an operational
condition_prior to the park being open to the general public. Rental activity during the 2020 season showed that
sometimes park staff has less than twelve hours to restore the park ... and, in some cases, to remove equipment
and/or refuse left behind by the rental company.
For this reason, OCPRC staff are requesting the establishment of one or more ORV Park Rental Maintenance
blanket contracts that can cover the work that has been identified in the scope below. Prospective vendors are
not required to provide every service within the identified scope. Bidders will submit unit pricing for only those
services that they are prepared to provide at Holly Oaks for the 2021 season. Bidders should also identify if
advanced notification is required before services can be rendered.
Any and all work done through this contract would be pre -approved by staff. If work being done is beneficial
overall to the park, it may be left in its new state after the rental is over. However, it is also anticipated that this
contract would be used to return the park to its original state after rentals are finished (which would also be billed
back to the company renting the park).
Bids will be brought back to the Commission for approval in June.
186
Page 2
RFP SCOPE
Landscaping and Site Restoration
• Modification of trails using earthmoving equipment
• Construction/modification of ORV challenge elements including, but not limited to, the
manipulation or addition of boulders, berms, logs, and water crossing elements
• Restoration and revegetation through reseeding and the installation of erosion control blankets
or similar materials
• Installation of trees/shrubs
• Installation/removal of signage or artistic elements in the landscape
Guest Services and Equipment Supply
• Opening/securing of gates and monitoring rental activities as appropriate
• Provision and set-up of tents, tables, chairs, pedestrian control gates/guides etc.
• Provision and set-up of traffic control devices, parking signs, flagging, and cones
• Provision, set-up, and service of sanitary equipment including portable toilets, flush toilet
trailers, and handwashing stations
• Provision, set-up, and service of generators, light towers, and other electrical equipment as
requested
Refuse Disposal
• Provision, set-up, and service of garbage cans during rental activities
• Removal of refuse generated by rental activities using including hand-picking of litter/trash as
appropriate
• Provision, set-up, and service of dumpsters to aid in the removal of refuse generated by rental
activities
*Prospective bidders will be asked to submit unit pricing for all equipment (including operators, transportation,
and fuel charges) and laborers necessary to accomplish the scope as described. Unit cost are to be
delineated by time -in-service no less than '/2 hour increments.
**Unit pricing for materials under the Landscaping and Site Restoration category are only requested for
seeding and erosion control blankets. All other materials will be arranged by OCPRC through existing
contracts.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve the Request for Proposals (RFP's) scope for Off -Road Vehicle Park
Rental Maintenance and direct staff to work with Oakland County Purchasing to release the RFP.
MOTION
Move to approve the Request for Proposals (RFP's) scope for Off -Road Vehicle Park Rental Maintenance
and direct staff to work with Oakland County Purchasing to release the RFP.
187
0�11I,I A,1\Ile—olo\I&i�_1;i►�
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 F-2
PLANNING & RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor, Planning & Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Request for Proposals — Off -Road Vehicle Feature Design
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Holly Oaks ORV Park is a joint venture between the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Oakland
County Parks and Recreation Commission. Approximately 240 acres has been acquired, by the State of
Michigan, for the purpose of creating a park open to all off -road vehicles and drivers/rides of all skill
levels. Located less than 90 minutes from downtown Detroit, and immediately adjacent to 1-75, Holly Oaks is
the ORV riding area with the most direct access to population centers in the Midwest. Use of the park has
already been intense, and there is significant need to design, build, repair, and modify the current landscape to
maximize ORV use while minimizing the amount of routine maintenance.
For this reason, OCPRC is seeking the assistance of skilled professionals with significant experience in the
design, construction, and use of ORV features. Once hired, design professionals will work with park staff and
OCPRC contracted engineers to design (and in some cases to participate in the construction of) ORV features
that will shape the overall experience of the site and enjoyment of the park.
It is important to note that Oakland County will likely establish more than one design contract in order to capitalize
on the areas of expertise of various design professionals and their teams. Prospective vendors are asked to
describe their experience designing and building features for various off -road vehicles and the type of
driving/riding of which each are capable. (For example, a design professional may have a background in
designing/building motocross tracks, enduro courses, and back -country trails, each of which provides a different
aspect of the motorcycle riding experience.)
Features could range from shotcrete features such as Mt. Magna, to technical trails and obstacles to tracks
designed for one -direction travel and speed. Such a contract will be helpful for OCPR's annual operation and
maintenance of the park but will also assist when sponsors want to work with us to create specific features or
experiences within the park. The contract could be utilized for small-scale maintenance work within the park's
existing operating budget, or would be utilized for sponsor -funded projects, with the sponsor paying for the cost
of the design.
Bids will be brought back to the Commission for approval in June.
188
Page 2
RFP SCOPE
Holly Oaks is divided into a series of Adventure Areas based on terrain and the type of ORV experiences that
are possible in each (or that we have chosen to accentuate). Each Adventure Area is uniquely theme and signed
according to the vehicle types that may enter. The design contracts that will be established will help park staff
to evaluate each Adventure Area, propose means of enhancing the ORV experience, and design/develop
appropriate features using any and all methods of construction that may be appropriate.
Examples of features that have been built, or shaped from the features left by previous mining activity, include:
challenge trails with rocks, logs, berms, and water crossings; closed course trails/tracks with stepped jumps; hill
climbs; shotcrete rock simulations; boulder crawls; bi-direction trails; and rubble crawls.
*Bidders will be asked to provide:
• hourly pricing associated with design professionals and members of the design team (rates for the same
individual may differ based on the type of work performed such as field work/construction vs. design
consultation)
• travel allowances/rates
• brief biography/resume describing the experience of team members
• hourly/daily rates of any equipment utilized in the design/survey process (if applicable)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve the Request for Proposals (RPF's) for Off -Road Vehicle Feature
Design, and direct staff to work with Oakland County Purchasing to release the RFP.
MOTION
Move to approve the Request for Proposals (RFP's) for Off -Road Vehicle Feature Design and direct staff
to work with Oakland County Purchasing to release the RFP.
189
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 G
PLANNING & RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning and Resource Development
Submitted: March 1, 2021
Subject: Potential Property Donation — Rose Township
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
The Parks Commission discussed the options available for this property at its meeting on August 5, 2020 and
recommended postponing action to a later meeting. The Commission also requested staff provide any
information available on possible restrictions the property owners would place on the parcel such as mineral
rights, easements, etc.
The proposed donation parcel is 32 acres and is known as the "Water Road Parcel." The property is adjacent to
and looks out over the Michigan Nature Association's Big Valley Preserve. The parcel is along the rail corridor
that runs adjacent to both Rose Oaks and Highland Oaks County Parks. The property has been well -managed
and maintained. Natural Resources staff estimate is approximately $10,000 annually to manage the property.
In addition to the property being donated, the property owners have expressed an interest in donating cash to
cover the due diligence and closing costs for the County to accept the parcel (survey, Phase I, etc.).
The property owners wish to restrict development of the property at the time of donation. Their preferred
instrument is a conservation easement to be held by a land conservancy who will provide oversight and
enforcement of restrictions. As requested by the Commission on August 5, see Attachment A for a list of existing
and proposed property restrictions.
The proposed property restrictions include allowance for development of a trail and other associated amenities.
See Attachment B for a map of the proposed trail route within the Water Road Parcel.
The parcel is accessible via the uncertified Water Road. Per the Road Commission of Oakland County (RCOC),
the uncertified Water Road is a public right-of-way (ROW) but is not maintained by RCOC. Staff is communication
with RCOC on potential future use of a portion of this ROW as a managed trail. Public access to the property
depends on access via Water Road from the north — approximately 1 mile from the Rose Township Hall to the
northeast corner of the Water Road parcel via Water Road. See Attachment B for a map of potential connectivity
with Rose Center.
Planning for eventual connectivity with Rose Oaks further to the north is not feasible at this time because safe
travel along Milford Road and Buckhorn Lake Roads would be required.
190
Page 2
Future connectivity with Highland Oaks to the south would depend on a 0.5-mile access via Water Road from
the south and development of a 1-mile trail and boardwalk system through the northern strip of Highland Oaks.
This would potentially be a high investment due to steep slopes and wetlands in this area. See Attachment C for
a map of potential connectivity with Highland Oaks.
If the Parks Commission decides to accept the property donation, staff proposes the following timeline for project
development:
■ 2021: Complete property donation with conservation easement, natural resources management
plan and trail plan.
■ 2022: Manage natural resources; mark boundaries; confirm locations of trail route and overlook
and conduct 3-season natural resource observations; confirm pedestrian/equestrian public
access route via Water Road and location of parking at Rose Center or other location; include
actions in Recreation Plan/Strategic Action Plan 2023-2027.
■ 2023: Manage natural resources; establish/construct trail, overlook, and public access
■ 2024 and after: Continue natural resource management; continue to develop permitted uses as
funding permits; continue to build connectivity
ATTACHMENTS
A. List of Property Restrictions
B. Preliminary Trail Plan — North
C. Preliminary Connectivity with Highland Oaks
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the following:
■ Work with Oakland County Corporation Counsel, the landowners and a land conservancy to draft a
conservation easement that includes the attached proposed restrictions and allowed uses and bring it to
the OCPR Commission for review
■ Draft donation agreements (land and funds) for OCPR Commission review
■ Continue to work with the Road Commission for Oakland County (RCOC) to clarify present and future
uses of the uncertified Water Road for property access
MOTION
Move to direct staff to begin drafting a conservation easement and donation agreements for the
potential Water Road property donation in Rose Township, and to continue communication with the
Road Commission for Oakland County (RCOC) to confirm access to the property and report back to the
OCPR Commission.
191
QAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Proposed Conservation Easement
Water Road Parcel
Attachment A: List of Property Restrictions
Property owners Kurt and Maura Jung were previously in conservation easement (CE) negotiations with a land conservancy, which
form the basis for this discussion. If the Parks Commission confirms it wants the property and will accept a conservation easement on
it, we propose proceeding with negotiation among 3 parties (lungs, OCPR, land conservancy) and executing the CE at the some time
as the property donation. The following is non -exhaustive list of a proposed rights that Oakland County Parks might have under a
proposed conservation easement.
Right to convey.
Right to maintain, renovate, and replace existing roads, trails, fences and gates in same size and location.
Pursuant to an approved, written Trail Plan, the right to install a new trail system:
■ Location: Potentially from southeast corner northward, with spurs into the woods towards wetlands and to the overlook on
the western portion and looping back toward Water Road
■ Uses: Non -motorized use only, with the exception of personal mobility devices; Bicycle and equestrian use permitted.
■ Construction: Maximum width of 8'; unpaved with permeable or mowed surface; no grading is permitted: permitted minor
improvements may include horse ties, bike racks, benches, interpretive and directional signs, and a garbage can.
Right to construct, use, maintain, renovate, and replace storage shed on southeastern corner of property. Maximum footprint of 30'
x 30' and maximum height of 20'. No utilities permitted. No other structures permitted. Right to construct a platform at the overlook
to Big Valley Preserve.
Right to authorize and manage public access to the property consistent with conservation values. This does not include public
parking for access to property.
Pursuant to an approved, written Management Plan, the right to:
■ Steward property and conduct ecological restoration;
■ Manage timber and vegetation;
■ Manage hayfield to continue hay production;
■ If haying ceases, right to restore fields to natural community.
Vehicle access: emergency access; on -road vehicles on lane or any unpaved parking area in conjunction with managing; stewardship
vehicles per Management Plan; farm vehicles for haying; personal mobility devices on trail system.
Right to place and replace signs.
Existing Easements and Rights -of -Way'
■ Road ROWS: Water Road and Perry Road
■ Detroit Edison
■ Comcast Cable and Detroit Edison
■ Consumers Energy Pipeline
• Michigan Gas Storage Company
■ Legal right of ingress and egress to and from railroad ROW
• Pedestrian easement on northernmost 4 feet of property to MNA propertyz
Grant Agreements
There will be no grant agreements related to donation of the Water Road Property. If the donation is accepted and the property
considered part of Highland Oaks, any future grant agreements for Highland Oaks may require additional approvals from the CE
holder, if the grant agreement causes the additional encumbrance of the Water Road property.
1 See Title Commitment Exceptions Schedule 11/18/2005
z Verbal information from Jungs; not listed in title commitment document
Update: 2/10/2021
Page 1 of 1
192
�r
Rose Township
..r � fa
F� Hall parking lot
M
0
L
v
M
Scenic overlook
approximate
location
1)%
Water Road
Parcel
06-27-377-001
L
Attachment B:
Water Road Preliminary
Trail Plan
PRELIMINARY ACCESS
ROUTE: Approximately 1-
mile route from Rose
Township Hall parking lot to
NE corner of Water Road
parcel via Franklin Street,
Milford Road, Water Road,
and uncertified Water Road
Uncertified Water Road
Approximately 1-mile trail
loop within Water Road
parcel — exact route TBD
Approximately 0.5-mile
spur trail within Water Road
parcel — exact route TBD
Entry point from
Water Road to
parcel
193
Water Road Attachment C:
Parcel Water Road Preliminary
06-27-377-001 Connectivity with Highland k
Oaks (N1.5-mile route)
�i
o0G
i
�a
Munger Road:
+.j
M
r
UNCERTIFIED WATER ROAD:
Approximately 0.4 miles
from SE corner of Water
Road property to
maintained Water Road
WATER ROAD:
Approximately 0.1 mile of
Water Road as a maintained
local road ending at
Munger Road
HIGHLAND OAKS:
Approximately 1 mile of
trail and boardwalk
required to link existing
trails with Munger Road
(potentially high investment
due to steep slopes and
wetlands)
1110W &�` - _
;A
0�1.AI,I Al\IDlel9111111i►1\1�_1;i►�
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2020
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Fiscal Sustainability Work Group Update
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 A-1
ADMINISTRATION
Staff will provide an update to the Commission on the work of the OCPRC Fiscal Sustainability Work Group.
For your information we have attached the following reports:
• FY2021/2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison - February 28, 2021
• FY2021/2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison — (Charges for Services Revenue) -
February 28, 2021
• FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison by Program/Department - (with Depreciation) -
February 28, 2021
• FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison by Program/Department - (without Depreciation) -
February 28, 2021
• FY2020 Year End Agenda COVID19 Financial Activity Report
195
Parks and Recreation Commission
FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison
As of February 28, 2021
Through February 28
FY2021 FY2021
Amended Amend. Budget FY2021 FY2020 FY2021/FY2020 Percentage
Budget % of Total Actuals Actuals Comparison Change
Activitv by Controllable Catesory
REVENUES:
Taxes
$
13,765,000.00
49.02%
$
17,150,121.82
$11,439,672.71
$
5,710,449.11
49.92%
Other Intergovernmental Revenues
250,000.00
0.89%
$
140,492.78
$
(140,492.78)
0.00%
State Grants
199,000.00
0.71%
$
-
$
-
100.00%
Charges for Services
10,903,416.00
38.83%
$
1,203,605.41
1,076,075.72
127,529.69
11.85%
Operating and Capital Contributions
113,300.00
0.40%
$
48,455.00
71,355.10
(22,900.10)
-32.09%
Investment Income
440,000.00
1.57%
$
56,315.43
177,550.99
(121,235.56)
-68.28%
Other Revenue
-
0.00%
$
57,357.05
29,499.51
27,857.54
94.43%
Transfers In
0.00%
$
25,958.00
25,958.00
0.00%
Planned Use of Balance
2,412,046.00
8.59%
$
-
-
0.00%
$
28,082,762.00
100.00%
$
18,541,812.71
$
12,934,646.81
$
5,607,165.90
43.35%
EXPENSES:
Salaries
$
10,994,162.00
39.15%
$
3,029,556.84
$3,039,697.34
$
(10,140.50)
-0.33%
Fringe Benefits
3,848,075.00
13.70%
$
1,316,408.02
1,411,859.00
(95,450.98)
-6.76%
Contractual Services
7,229,772.00
25.74%
$
1,828,509.63
1,784,698.34
43,811.29
2.45%
Commodities
1,213,415.00
4.32%
$
93,385.07
149,744.86
(56,359.79)
-37.64%
Intergovernmental
276,320.00
0.98%
$
-
1,333,069.09
(1,333,069.09)
0.00%
Depreciation
2,874,797.00
10.24%
$
1,380,147.11
-
#VALUE!
0.00%
Internal Services
1,616,221.00
5.76%
$
456,718.58
521,079.58
(64,361.00)
-12.35%
Transfers Out
30,000.00
0.11%
$
-
37,901.00
(37,901.00)
0.00%
$
28,082,762.00
100.00%
$
8,104,725.25
$
8,278,049.21
(173,323.96)
-2.09%
$
Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses
$
10,437,087.46
$
4,656,597.60
124.14%
$
5,780,489.86
Prepared by Fiscal Services 3/31/2021
196
Parks and Recreation Commission
FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison
As of February 28, 2021
Through February 28
FY2021
FY2021
Amended
Amend. Budget
FY2021
FY2020
FY2021/FY2020
Percentage
Budget
% of Total
Actuals
Actuals
Comparison
Change
Activitv by Program
Program #
REVENUES:
Administration
160000
$
14,464,125.00
51.51%
$
17,311,635.89
$11,817,987.70
$
5,493,648.19
46.49%
Golf
160010
3,861,561.00
13.75%
$
359,933.22
222,502.00
137,431.22
61.77%
Conference Centers
160044
1,273,160.00
4.53%
$
20,179.81
69,393.21
(49,213.40)
-70.92%
Parks
160070
2,914,670.00
10.38%
$
649,473.05
619,141.28
30,331.77
4.90%
Recreation
160210
2,767,950.00
9.86%
$
168,135.74
165,394.16
2,741.58
1.66%
County Market
160500
190,250.00
0.68%
$
32,455.00
39,113.95
(6,658.95)
-17.02%
Planned Use of Balance
160666
2,611,046.00
9.30%
$
-
-
0.00%
Capital Improvements
160900
1,114.41
$
28,082,762.00
100.00%
$
18,541,812.71
$12,934,646.71
$
5,608,280.41
43.35%
EXPENSES:
Pandemics
133095
$
0.00%
$
4,278.73
$
-
$
4,278.73
100.00%
Administration
160000
5,625,595.00
20.03%
$
1,858,963.23
$1,971,713.72
$
(112,750.49)
-5.72%
Communications & Marketing
160001
723,520.00
2.58%
204,894.16
232,980.18
(28,086.02)
-12.06%
Parks Partnerships
160102
276,320.00
0.98%
-
-
-
0.00%
Golf
160010
3,698,456.00
13.17%
1,452,376.21
1,352,900.01
99,476.20
7.35%
Golf Pro Shop
160015
570,563.00
2.03%
98,414.80
99,868.08
(1,453.28)
-1.46%
Conference Centers
160044
2,113,068.00
7.52%
421,375.09
498,536.55
(77,161.46)
0.00%
Parks
160070
6,446,486.00
22.96%
2,155,677.42
2,073,011.41
82,666.01
3.99%
Recreation
160210
4,886,221.00
17.40%
1,074,840.97
1,110,501.70
(35,660.73)
0.00%
Facilities and Maintenance
160430
1,695,730.00
6.04%
527,276.51
633,215.25
(105,938.74)
-16.73%
Natural Resources
160431
1,198,706.00
4.27%
19,545.81
-
19,545.81
0.00%
County Market
160500
205,890.00
0.73%
67,086.73
80,729.82
(13,643.09)
-16.90%
Audit and Compliance
181010
40,385.00
0.14%
1,671.69
17,182.63
(15,510.94)
0.00%
Fiscal Services - Admin
182040
147,801.00
0.53%
58,612.22
59,254.52
(642.30)
-1.08%
Fiscal Services - Transaction Proc
182050
231,756.00
0.83%
80,241.94
87,578.97
(7,337.03)
-8.38%
Fiscal Services - Financial Rep.
182080
222,265.00
0.79%
79,469.74
60,576.37
18,893.37
0.00%
$
28,082,762.00
100.00%
$
8,104,725.25
$
8,278,049.21
$
(173,323.96)
-2.09%
Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses
$
10,437,087.46
$
4,656,597.50
124.14%
$
5,781,604.37
Prepared by Fiscal Services 3/31/2021 J
197
Parks and Recreation Commission
FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison - Charges for Services Revenue
As of February 28, 2021
Through February 28
FY2021
FY2021
Adopted
Amended
FY2021
FY2020
FY2021/FY2020
Percentage
Activity by Controllable CateRory
Budget
Budget
Actuals
Actuals
Comparison
Change
REVENUES:
Account
Account Title
630084
Antenna Site Management
66,306.00
66,306.00 $
67,679.98
65,708.72
$ 1,971.26
3.00%
630301
Commission Contracts
40,750.00
40,750.00
448.00
11,735.66
$ (11,287.66)
-96.18%
630308
Commission Food Services
78,495.00
78,495.00
1,507.30
16,238.43
$ (14,731.13)
-90.72%
630469
Deck Tennis
4,000.00
4,000.00
6,710.00
2,600.00
$ 4,110.00
0.00%
630644
Entrance Fees Gen Admission
1,825,000.00
1,825,000.00
-
186.00
$ (186.00)
-100.00%
630651
Entrance Fees Swimming Class
13,000.00
13,000.00
-
$ -
0.00%
630693
Fees Camping
1,554,000.00
1,554,000.00
311,349.00
228,686.75
$ 82,662.25
0.00%
630700
Fees Day Use
1,092,100.00
1,092,100.00
287,887.00
169,356.25
$ 118,530.75
69.99%
630707
Fees Driving Range
93,000.00
93,000.00
5,483.00
4,106.00
$ 1,377.00
33.54%
630847
Greens Fees
2,436,500.00
2,436,500.00
191,728.00
116,874.34
$ 74,853.66
64.05%
631001
Interest on Delinquent Taxes
(1,000.00)
(1,000.00)
(37.16)
(37.45)
$ 0.29
-0.77%
631127
Maintenance Contracts
8,000.00
8,000.00
-
$ -
0.00%
631253
Miscellaneous
3,815.00
3,815.00
311.50
25,436.29
$ (25,124.79)
0.00%
631330
NSF Check Fees
25.00
25.00
-
$ -
0.00%
631743
Refunds Miscellaneous
4,900.00
4,900.00
487.62
4,858.88
$ (4,371.26)
0.00%
631771
Reimb 3rd Party
200.00
200.00
-
$ -
0.00%
631799
Reimb Contracts
278,100.00
278,100.00
307.00
38,944.89
$ (38,637.89)
0.00%
631911
Rent House
71,125.00
71,125.00
24,898.00
32,277.00
$ (7,379.00)
0.00%
631918
Rental Equipment
79,400.00
79,400.00
7,449.50
2,344.50
$ 5,105.00
217.74%
631925
Rental Facilities
649,700.00
649,700.00
89,509.50
153,975.00
$ (64,465.50)
-41.87%
631932
Rental Golf Carts
1,152,000.00
1,152,000.00
139,774.00
80,699.16
$ 59,074.84
73.20%
631946
Rental Units or Events
173,000.00
173,000.00
1,650.00
47,975.00
$ (46,325.00)
-96.56%
632037
Sales Retail
1,095,500.00
1,095,500.00
40,039.17
31,097.30
$ 8,941.87
28.75%
632128
Special and Sanctioned Races
-
-
8.00
77.00
$ (69.00)
0.00%
632135
Special Contracts
172,500.00
172,500.00
4,255.00
32,801.00
$ (28,546.00)
-87.03%
632261
Temporary Licenses
7,000.00
7,000.00
22,000.00
10,000.00
$ 12,000.00
120.00%
632443
Water Feature Ride
6,000.00
6,000.00
-
-
$ -
0.00%
632471
Weekly Races
-
-
161.00
135.00
$ 26.00
0.00%
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES
$ 10,903,416.00 $
10,903,416.00 $
1,203,605.41 $
1,076,075.72
$ 127,529.69
11.85%
Prepared by Fiscal Services 3/31/2021 198
Parks and Recreation Commission
FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison
(Includes DEPRECIATION)
FY2021
FY2020
Through February 28
Through February 28
FY2021/FY2020 Comparison
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER)EXPENSE
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER)EXPENSE
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER)EXPENSE
BUDGET CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
17,311,635.89
2,065,854.61
15,245,781.28
11,817,987.70
2,204,693.90
9,613,293.80
5,493,648.19
(138,839.29)
5,632,487.48
PARKS PARTNERSHIPS
0.00
0.00
_
_
_
_
_
_
AUDITING
0.00
1,671.69
(1,671.69)
-
17,182.63
(17,182.63)
-
(15,510.94)
15,510.94
FISCALSERVICES ADMINISTRATION
0.00
58,612.22
(58,612.22)
-
59,254.52
(59,254.52)
-
(642.30)
642.30
FISCAL SERVICES PARKS & REC
0.00
159,711.68
(159,711.68)
-
148.155.34
(148.155.341
-
11,556.34
(11,556.34)
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUB -TOTAL
17,311,635.89
2,285,850.20
15,025,785.69
11,817,987.70
2,429,286.39
9,388,701.31
5,493,648.19
(143,436.19)
5,637,084.38
GOLF:
GLEN OAKS GOLF COURSE
80,463.36
333,837.25
(253,373.89)
40,018.92
278,783.87
(238,764.95)
40,444.44
55,053.38
(14,608.94)
LYON OAKS GOLF COURSE
111,898.92
459,033.06
(347,134.14)
73,184.24
461,187.13
(388,002.89)
38,714.68
(2,154.07)
40,868.75
RED OAKS GOLF COURSE
37,548.21
183,035.76
(145,487.55)
18,095.09
196,124.29
(178,029.20)
19,453.12
(13,088.53)
32,541.65
SPRINGFIELD OAKS GOLF COURSE
69,375.79
268,845.85
(199,470.06)
60,498.62
297,965.28
(237,466.66)
8,877.17
(29,119.43)
37,996.60
WHITE LAKE OAKS GOLF COURSE
60,646.94
306,257.88
(245,610.94)
30.705.13
218.707.52
(188.002.391
29,941.81
87,550.36
(57,608.55)
GOLF SUB -TOTAL
359,933.22
1,551,009.80
(1,191,076.58)
222,502.00
1,452,768.09
(1,230,266.09)
137,431.22
98,241.71
39,189.51
FOOD SERVICES:
-
-
-
ADDISON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
0.00
87,123.04
(87,123.04)
15,650.18
101,757.77
(86,107.59)
(15,650.18)
(14,634.73)
(1,015.45)
GLEN OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
0.00
76,553.18
(76,553.18)
14,013.54
91,572.16
(77,558.62)
(14,013.54)
(15,018.98)
1,005.44
GROVELAND OAKS CONCESSIONS
181.84
3,477.56
(3,295.72)
4,032.50
7,883.92
(3,851.42)
(3,850.66)
(4,406.36)
555.70
LYON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
1,074.82
84,444.31
(83,369.49)
12,026.05
106,238.53
(94,212.48)
-
-
10,842.99
LYON OAKS RESTAURANT SV
14,470.83
16,303.68
(1,832.85)
10,244.04
27,524.47
(17,280.43)
-
-
15,447.58
RED OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
0.00
24,456.07
(24,456.07)
725.00
27,750.01
(27,025.01)
-
-
2,568.94
SPRINGFIELD OAKS RESTAURANT SV
2,519.43
28,528.56
(26,009.13)
5,431.74
41,794.44
(36,362.70)
(2,912.31)
(13,265.88)
10,353.57
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
0.00
2,339.56
(2,339.56)
299.00
2,952.80
(2,653.80)
(299.00)
(613.24)
314.24
WHITE LAKE OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
0.00
76,634.89
(76,634.89)
2,447.67
69,227.85
(66,780.18)
(2,447.67)
7,407.04
(9,854.71)
WHITE LAKE OAKS RESTAURANT SVC
1,932.89
21,155.35
(19.222.461
4,523.59
21.834.60
(17,311.01)
(2.590.70)
(679.25)
(1.911.45)
FOOD SERVICES SUB -TOTAL
20,179.81
421,016.20
(400,836.39)
69,393.31
498,536.55
(429,143.24)
(49,213.50)
(77,520.35)
28,306.85
COUNTY MARKET:
OAKLAND COUNTY MARKET
32,455.00
67,086.73
(34,631.73)
39,113.95
80.729.82
(41,615.87)
(6.658.951
(13.643.09)
6.984.14
COUNTY MARKET SUB -TOTAL
32,455.00
67,086.73
(34,631.73)
39,113.95
80,729.82
(41,615.87)
(6,658.95)
(13,643.09)
6,984.14
PARKS:
-
-
ADDISON OAKS PARK
173,714.90
539,886.73
(366,171.83)
154,636.45
503,093.22
(348,456.77)
19,078.45
36,793.51
(17,715.06)
GROVELAND OAKS PARK
215,361.34
393,694.28
(178,332.94)
143,034.06
351,772.17
(208,738.11)
72,327.28
41,922.11
30,405.17
HIGHLAND OAKS PARK
3,745.00
23,050.58
(19,305.58)
3,712.77
23,256.88
(19,544.11)
32.23
(206.30)
238.53
INDEPENDENCE OAKS PARK
83,330.00
367,499.00
(284,169.00)
56,564.68
375,862.67
(319,297.99)
26,765.32
(8,363.67)
35,128.99
LYON OAKS PARK
44,372.50
107,435.32
(63,062.82)
27,562.00
109,968.32
(82,406.32)
16,810.50
(2,533.00)
19,343.50
ORION OAKS PARK
25,346.00
64,629.95
(39,283.95)
40,715.00
48,333.37
(7,618.37)
(15,369.00)
16,296.58
(31,665.58)
RED OAKS DOG PARK
23,355.00
47,824.05
(24,469.05)
20,320.00
57,249.24
(36,929.24)
3,035.00
(9,425.19)
12,460.19
RED OAKS PARK
30.00
68,842.51
(68,812.51)
6,700.17
68,911.03
(62,210.86)
(6,670.17)
(68.52)
(6,601.65)
ROSE OAKS PARK
0.00
29,563.81
(29,563.81)
22.24
22,501.80
(22,479.56)
(22.24)
7,062.01
(7,084.25)
SPRINGFIELD OAKS PARK
63,129.31
222,262.31
(159,133.00)
103,730.29
230,621.86
(126,891.57)
(40,600.98)
(8,359.55)
(32,241.43)
WATERFORD OAKS PARK
17,089.00
290,511.35
(273,422.35)
62,143.62
281,440.85
(219,297.23)
(45,054.62)
9,070.50
(54,125.12)
HOLLY OAKS ORV PARK
104,605.00
174,172.10
(69,567.10)
70,000.00
61.752.40
8.247.60
PARKS SUB -TOTAL
754,078.05
2,329,371.99
(1,575,293.94)
689,141.28
2,134,763.81
(1,445,622.53)
64,936.77
194,608.18
(129,671.41)
RECREATION:
-
-
-
RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES
17,593.15
495,116.35
(477,523.20)
79,038.89
604,596.02
(525,557.13)
(61,445.74)
(109,479.67)
48,033.93
CATALPA OAKS PARK
2,210.00
53,957.90
(51,747.90)
3,855.34
60,380.49
(56,525.15)
(1,645.34)
(6,422.59)
4,777.25
RED OAKS WATERPARK
43,558.59
267,882.78
(224,324.19)
10,203.56
299,825.73
(289,622.17)
33,355.03
(31,942.95)
65,297.98
WATERFORD OAKS BMX
169.00
4,276.61
(4,107.61)
1,804.34
5,603.04
(3,798.70)
(1,635.34)
(1,326.43)
(308.91)
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK
0.00
82,334.37
(82,334.37)
492.03
78,344.02
(77.851.99)
(492.03)
3,990.35
(4,482.38)
RECREATION SUB -TOTAL
63,530.74
903,568.01
(840,037.27)
95,394.16
1,048,749.30
(953,355.14)
(31,863.42)
(145,181.29)
113,317.87
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE:
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE
0.00
546,822.32
(546.822.32)
-
633.215.25
(633,215.25)
-
(86.392.93)
86,392.93
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE SUB -TOTAL
-
546,822.32
(546,822.32)
-
633,215.25
(633,215.25)
-
(86,392.93)
86,392.93
OTHER:
INTERNAL FUND CHARGES *
-
-
-
1.114.41
-
-
(1.114.41)
-
OTHER SUB -TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
S 14,541,812, 1
S 8.1043 S S
10,437,087.46
S 12,934,646.81
S 8,278,049.21 5
4.656.597.60 5
5-608.280.31 S
1173,323,961 S
5J81.604.27_
Prepared by Fiscal Services 3/31/2021
199
Parks and Recreation Commission
FY2021/FY2020 Financial Activity Monthly Comparison
For Management Purposes Only - WITHOUT DEPRECIATION
FY2021
FY2020
Through February 28
Through February 28
FY2021/FY2020 Comparison
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
REVENUE OVER
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER)EXPENSE
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER)EXPENSE
REVENUE
EXPENSE
(UNDER)EXPENSE
BUDGET CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
17,311,635.89
2,057,107.76
15,254,528.13
11,817,987.70
2,195,947.05
9,622,040.65
5,493,648.19
(138,839.29)
5,632,487.48
PARKS PARTNERSHIPS
-
0.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AUDITING
-
1,671.69
(1,671.69)
-
17,182.63
(17,182.63)
-
(15,510.94)
15,510.94
FISCAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
-
58,612.22
(58,612.22)
-
59,254.52
(59,254.52)
-
(642.30)
642.30
FISCAL SERVICES PARKS & REC
-
159,711.68
(159.711.68)
-
148,155.34
(148,155.34)
11,556.34
(11,556.34)
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUB -TOTAL
17,311,635.89
2,277,103.35
15,034,532.54
11,817,987.70
2,420,539.54
9,397,448.16
5,493,648.19
(143,436.19)
5,637,084.38
GOLF:
-
-
-
-
-
GLEN OAKS GOLF COURSE
80,463.36
267,321.94
(186,858.58)
40,018.92
217,780.28
(177,761.36)
40,444.44
49,541.66
(9,097.22)
LYON OAKS GOLF COURSE
111,898.92
310,278.55
(198,379.63)
73,184.24
310,036.92
(236,852.68)
38,714.68
241.63
38,473.05
RED OAKS GOLF COURSE
37,548.21
122,691.85
(85,143.64)
18,095.09
132,893.27
(114,798.18)
19,453.12
(10,201.42)
29,654.54
SPRINGFIELD OAKS GOLF COURSE
69,375.79
228,930.85
(159,555.06)
60,498.62
258,969.64
(198,471.02)
8,877.17
(30,038.79)
38,915.96
WHITE LAKE OAKS GOLF COURSE
60,646.94
258,975.49
(198,328.55)
30.705.13
176,347.71
(145,642.58)
29,941.81
82,627.78
(52,685.97)
GOLF SUB -TOTAL
359,933.22
1,188,198.68
(828,265.46)
222,502.00
1,096,027.82
(873,525.82)
137,431.22
92,170.86
45,260.36
FOOD SERVICES:
-
-
-
-
ADDISON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
-
48,734.64
(48,734.64)
15,650.18
63,369.37
(47,719.19)
(15,650.18)
(14,634.73)
(1,015.45)
GLEN OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
-
26,380.48
(26,380.48)
14,013.54
48,349.62
(34,336.08)
(14,013.54)
(21,969.14)
7,955.60
GROVELAND OAKS CONCESSIONS
181.84
1307.41
(1,125.57)
4,032.50
6,080.97
(2,048.47)
(3,850.66)
(4,773.56)
922.90
LYON OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
1,074.82
48,123.66
(47,048.84)
12,026.05
69,917.88
(57,891.83)
(10,951.23)
(21,794.22)
10,842.99
LYON OAKS RESTAURANT SV
14,470.83
16,021.93
(1,551.10)
10,244.04
27,242.72
(16,998.68)
4,226.79
(11,220.79)
15,447.58
RED OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
-
22,960.27
(22,960.27)
725.00
26,254.21
(25,529.21)
(725.00)
(3,293.94)
2,568.94
SPRINGFIELD OAKS RESTAURANT SV
2,519.43
20,926.06
(18,406.63)
5,431.74
34,191.94
(28,760.20)
(2,912.31)
(13,265.88)
10,353.57
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK CONCESSIONS
-
859.71
(859.71)
299.00
1,472.95
(1,173.95)
(299.00)
(613.24)
314.24
WHITE LAKE OAKS CONFERENCE CENTER
-
41,979.34
(41,979.34)
2,447.67
34,572.30
(32,124.63)
(2,447.67)
7,407.04
(9,854.71)
WHITE LAKE OAKS RESTAURANT SVC
1,932.89
20.362.85
(18,429.96)
4,523.59
21,042.10
(16,518.51)
(2,590.70)
(679.25)
(1,911.45)
FOOD SERVICES SUB -TOTAL
20,179.81
247,656.35
(227,476.54)
69,393.31
332,494.06
(263,100.75)
(49,213.50)
(84,837.71)
35,624.21
COUNTY MARKET:
-
-
-
-
-
OAKLAND COUNTY MARKET
32,455.00
65,593.28
(33,138.28)
39,113.95
79,236.37
(40,122.42)
(6,658.95)
(13,643.09)
6,984.14
COUNTY MARKET SUB -TOTAL
32,455.00
65,593.28
(33,138.28)
39,113.95
79,236.37
(40,122.42)
(6,658.95)
(13,643.09)
6,984.14
PARKS:
-
-
-
-
-
ADDISON OAKS PARK
173,714.90
401,327.56
(227,612.66)
154,636.45
368,713.33
(214,076.88)
19,078.45
32,614.23
(13,535.78)
GROVELAND OAKS PARK
215,361.34
256,086.84
(40,725.50)
143,034.06
229,535.75
(86,501.69)
72,327.28
26,551.09
45,776.19
HIGHLAND OAKS PARK
3,745.00
7,424.33
(3,679.33)
3,712.77
7,630.63
(3,917.86)
32.23
(206.30)
238.53
INDEPENDENCE OAKS PARK
83,330.00
272,353.50
(189,023.50)
56,564.68
281,749.13
(225,184.45)
26,765.32
(9,395.63)
36,160.95
LYON OAKS PARK
44,372.50
79,639.92
(35,267.42)
27,562.00
81,256.12
(53,694.12)
16,810.50
(1,616.20)
18,426.70
ORION OAKS PARK
25,346.00
49,673.26
(24,327.26)
40,715.00
35,456.17
5,258.83
(15,369.00)
14,217.09
(29,586.09)
RED OAKS DOG PARK
23,355.00
36,391.15
(13,036.15)
20,320.00
45,816.34
(25,496.34)
3,035.00
(9,425.19)
12,460.19
RED OAKS PARK
30.00
62,707.45
(62,677.45)
6,700.17
65,746.63
(59,046.46)
(6,670.17)
(3,039.18)
(3,630.99)
ROSE OAKS PARK
-
14,873.41
(14,873.41)
22.24
7,811.40
(7,789.16)
(22.24)
7,062.01
(7,084.25)
SPRINGFIELD OAKS ACTIVITY CENTER/PARK
63,129.31
137,568.83
(74,439.52)
103,730.29
149,015.71
(45,285.42)
(40,600.98)
(11,446.88)
(29,154.10)
WATERFORD OAKS ACTIVITY CENTER/PARK
17,089.00
229,226.85
(212,137.85)
62,143.62
218,232.28
(156,088.66)
(45,054.62)
10,994.57
(56,049.19)
HOLLY OAKS ORV PARK
104,605.00
171,142.03
(66,537.03)
70,000.00
61,752.40
8,247.60
34,605.00
109,389.63
(74,784.63)
PARKS SUB -TOTAL
754,078.05
1,718,415.13
(964,337.08)
689,141.28
1,552,715.89
(863,574.61)
30,331.77
56,309.61
(25,977.84)
RECREATION:
-
-
-
-
-
RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES
17,593.15
476,756.82
(459,163.67)
79,038.89
583,283.51
(504,244.62)
(61,445.74)
(106,526.69)
45,080.95
CATALPA OAKS PARK
2,210.00
20,539.98
(18,329.98)
3,855.34
34,526.24
(30,670.90)
(1,645.34)
(13,986.26)
12,340.92
RED OAKS WATERPARK
43,558.59
146,718.89
(103,160.30)
10,203.56
178,635.33
(168,431.77)
33,355.03
(31,916.44)
65,271.47
WATERFORD OAKS BMX
169.00
3,491.31
(3,322.31)
1,804.34
4,817.74
(3,013.40)
(1,635.34)
(1,326.43)
(308.91)
WATERFORD OAKS WATERPARK
-
57,481.27
(57,481.27)
492.03
53,490.82
(52,998.79)
(492.03)
3,990.45
(4,482.48)
RECREATION SUB -TOTAL
63,530.74
704,988.27
(641,457.53)
95,394.16
854,753.64
(759,359.48)
(31,863.42)
(149,765.371
117,901.95
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE:
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE
-
522,623.08
(522,623.08)
-
609,212.80
(609,212.80)
(86,589.72)
86,589.72
FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE SUB -TOTAL
-
522,623.08
(522,623.08)
-
609,212.80
(609,212.80)
-
(86,589.72)
86,589.72
OTHER:
INTERNAL FUND CHARGES*
-
-
-
-
-
-
OTHER SUB -TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
S 18.541.812.71
S 6.724.579.14 5
11.817.234.57
S 12.933.532.40
S 6.944.980.12
S 5.988.552.28
S 5.573.675.31 S
(329.791.611 S
5.903.466.92
Prepared by Fiscal Services 3/31/2021 200
Parks and Recreation Commission
Financial Activity Comparison for
Fiscal Months 6 (March) thru 12 (September) by Fiscal Year
March -September
March -September
March -September
March -September
FY2020/FY2019
FY2020 Staff
Account Type Program - Description
Cost Center
- Description
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
Difference
Projections
Revenues: 160000 General Services Admin Svcs
5060101
Administrative Services
$
2,749,937.73
$ 4,633,821.77
$ 2,810,508.10
$ (1,823,313.67) $
(381,400.00)
133095 Pandemics
5060101
Administrative Services
$ 98,100.39
General Services Admin Svcs Total
$
2,749,937.73
$ 4,633,821.77
$ 2,908,608.49
$ (1,725,213.28) $
(381,400.00)
160010 General Services Golf
5060326
White Lake Oaks Golf
$
651,410.77
$ 718,525.46
$ 571,718.19
$ (146,807.27) $
(166,235.00)
5060327
Glen Oaks Golf
$
776,078.04
$ 774,342.52
$ 623,715.42
$ (150,627.10) $
(206,410.27)
5060328
Red Oaks Golf
$
318,810.64
$ 341,246.22
$ 298,290.08
$ (42,956.14) $
(114,545.88)
5060330
Springfield Oaks Golf
$
669,793.13
$ 670,755.44
$ 576,988.17
$ (93,767.27) $
(197,982.00)
5060356
Lyon Oaks Golf
$
1,026,716.30
$ 1,121,322.60
$ 974,875.39
$ (146,447.21) $
(249,940.00)
General Services Golf Total
$
3,442,808.88
$ 3,626,192.24
$ 3,045,587.25
$ (580,604.99) $
(935,113.15)
160044 General Services Food Services
5060226
White Lake Oaks Restaurant Svc
$ 131,025.36
$ 24,419.44
$ (106,605.92) $
(68,819.26)
5060256
Lyon Oaks Restaurant Svc
$ 189,654.00
$ 101,870.82
$ (87,783.18) $
(93,713.50)
5060417
Addison Oaks Conference Ctr
$
143,490.22
$ 125,922.37
$ 102,581.55
$ (23,340.82) $
(90,825.17)
5060420
Groveland Oaks Concessions
$
70,380.10
$ 46,357.63
$ 4,107.26
$ (42,250.37) $
(65,043.00)
5060426
White Lake Oaks Conf Center
$
126,635.23
$ 1,209.71
$ 12.00
$ (1,197.71) $
(59,552.33)
5060427
Glen Oaks Conference Center
$
116,604.00
$ 123,559.45
$ 97,467.21
$ (26,092.24) $
(48,045.00)
5060430
Springfield Oaks Restaurant Sv
$
128,928.14
$ 138,570.72
$ 67,651.52
$ (70,919.20) $
(50,000.00)
5060431
Red Oaks Wtrpk Concessions
$
182,678.70
$ 224,440.91
$ -
$ (224,440.91) $
(200,290.00)
5060437
Waterford Oaks Wpk Concessions
$
119,514.95
$ 80,936.07
$ -
$ (80,936.07) $
(138,000.00)
5060456
Lyon Oaks Conference Center
$
195,544.88
$ 18,651.83
$ 6,386.42
$ (12,265.41) $
(10,000.00)
General Services Food Services Total
$
1,083,776.22
$ 1,080,328.05
$ 404,496.22
$ (675,831.83) $
(824,288.26)
160070 General Services Parks
5060715
Addison Oaks Park
$
589,142.23
$ 652,489.35
$ 486,321.56
$ (166,167.79) $
(203,130.52)
5060720
Groveland Oaks Park
$
1,105,472.95
$ 1,045,754.83
$ 637,166.83
$ (408,588.00) $
(442,000.00)
5060724
Orion Oaks Park
$
105,777.61
$ 92,676.00
$ 86,214.00
$ (6,462.00) $
(60,500.00)
5060725
Independence Oaks Park
$
869,394.83
$ 243,400.25
$ 213,124.73
$ (30,275.52) $
(50,000.00)
5060729
Red Oaks Dog Park
$
31,727.00
$ 38,018.00
$ 36,074.00
$ (1,944.00) $
(9,985.00)
5060732
Springfield Oaks Park
$
162,141.28
$ 210,958.85
$ 43,538.95
$ (167,419.90) $
(53,000.00)
5060735
Waterford Oaks Park
$
84,267.29
$ 103,020.01
$ (7,502.80)
$ (110,522.81) $
(11,000.00)
5060751
Red Oaks Park
$
41,446.10
$ 98,579.66
$ 11,109.83
$ (87,469.83) $
(23,321.83)
5060755
Lyon Oaks Park
$
113,528.00
$ 148,482.00
$ 83,599.90
$ (64,882.10) $
(70,000.00)
5060760
Rose Oaks Park
$
5,400.48
$ 7,460.00
$ 9,134.00
$ 1,674.00 $
5060765
Highland Oaks Park
$
7,734.48
$ 23,990.00
$ 10,702.00
$ (13,288.00) $
General Services Parks Total
$
3,116,032.25
$ 2,664,828.95
$ 1,609,483.00
$ (1,055,345.95) $
(922,937.35)
160210 General Services Rec
5060722
Off -Road Vehicle Park
$ 245,101.45
$ 245,101.45 $
(325,000.00)
5060805
Rec Programs and Services
$
247,080.58
$ 231,412.55
$ (5,095.93)
$ - $
(249,070.00)
5060831
Red Oaks Waterpark
$
1,465,638.65
$ 1,515,003.62
$ 1,580.00
$ (1,513,423.62) $
(1,309,532.44)
5060837
Waterford Oaks Waterpark
$
558,323.22
$ 364,507.86
$ 236.00
$ (364,271.86) $
(403,500.00)
5060845
Waterford Oaks BMX
$
10,618.40
$ 12,387.00
$ 11,626.00
$ (761.00) $
(5,000.00)
5060870
Catalpa Oaks Park
$
23,864.51
$ 9,371.76
$ 11,930.00
$ 2,558.24 $
(18,000.00)
General Services Rec Total
$
2,305,525.36
$ 2,132,682.79
$ 265,377.52
$ (1,867,305.27) $
(2,310,102.44)
160500 General Services County Market
5060540
Oakland County Market
$
154,197.35
$ 144,323.63
$ 105,996.20
$ (38,327.43) $
General Services County Market Total
$
154,197.35
$ 144,323.63
$ 105,996.20
$ (38,327.43)
160900 Capital Improvements
5060201
Capital Improvement
$ (1,114.41)
$ (1,114.41) $
Capital Improvements Total
$ (1,114.41) $
(1,114.41) $
Revenues Total
$
12,852,277.79
$ 14,282,177.43
$ 8,338,434.27
$ (5,943,743.16) $
(5,373,841.20)
C:\Users\phelpsj\Documents\$Data\Parks and Recreation\Monthly Reporting\COVID19 Monthly\12 FY2020 YE Agenda COVID19.xls
201
Account Type
Expenditures:
Parks and Recreation Commission
Financial Activity
Comparison for
Fiscal Months 6 (March) thru 12 (September) by
Fiscal Year
March -September
March -September
March -September
March -September
FY2020/FY2019
FY2020 Staff
Program - Description
Cost Center
- Description
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
Difference
Projections
133095 Pandemics
5060101
Administrative Services
34,986.34
34,986.34
$
5060226
White Lake Oaks Restaurant Svc
$ 1,252.48
$ 1,252.48
$
5060256
Lyon Oaks Restaurant Svc
$ 234.92
$ 234.92
$
5060326
White Lake Oaks Golf
$ 4,292.19
$ 4,292.19
$
5060327
Glen Oaks Golf
$ 3,589.08
$ 3,589.08
$
5060328
Red Oaks Golf
$ 4,096.94
$ 4,096.94
$
5060330
Springfield Oaks Golf
$ 3,299.64
$ 3,299.64
$
5060356
Lyon Oaks Golf
$ 1,742.56
$ 1,742.56
$
5060417
Addison Oaks Conference Ctr
$ 137.93
$ 137.93
$
5060426
White Lake Oaks Conf Center
$ 1,806.63
$ 1,806.63
$
5060430
Springfield Oaks Restaurant Sv
$ 2,263.82
$ 2,263.82
$
5060540
Oakland County Market
$ 3,136.00
$ 3,136.00
$
5060715
Addison Oaks Park
$ 2,531.39
$ 2,531.39
$
5060720
Groveland Oaks Park
$ 4,738.63
$ 4,738.63
$
5060722
Off -Road Vehicle Park
$ 255.00
$ 255.00
$
5060724
Orion Oaks Park
$ 1,931.34
$ 1,931.34
$
5060725
Independence Oaks Park
$ 8,323.05
$ 8,323.05
$
5060729
Red Oaks Dog Park
$ 450.27
$ 450.27
$
5060732
Springfield Oaks Park
$ 1,346.86
$ 1,346.86
$
5060735
Waterford Oaks Park
$ 1,130.63
$ 1,130.63
$
5060751
Red Oaks Park
$ 820.35
$ 820.35
$
5060755
Lyon Oaks Park
$ 893.72
$ 893.72
$
5060805
Rec Programs and Services
$ 10,064.29
$ 10,064.29
$
5060831
Red Oaks Waterpark
$ 610.00
$ 610.00
$
5060837
Waterford Oaks Waterpark
$ 75.00
$ 75.00
$
5060845
Waterford Oaks BMX
$ 470.00
$ 470.00
$
5060870
Catalpa Oaks Park
$ 1,272.00
$ 1,272.00
5060910
Facilities and Maintenance
$ 2,349.33
$ 2,349.33
Pandemics Total
$
98,100.39
98,100.39
$
160000 General Services Admin Svcs
5060101
Administrative Services
$
3,123,380.09
$ 3,447,530.66
$ 3,138,857.52
$ (308,673.14)
$ (746,638.16)
General Services Admin Svcs Total
$
3,123,380.09
$ 3,447,530.66
$ 3,138,857.52
$ (308,673.14)
$ (746,638.16)
160001 ADM Communications & Marketing
5060101
Administrative Services
$
411,995.35
$ 398,563.91
$ 425,325.57
$ 26,761.66
$ (159,584.25)
ADM Communications & Marketing Total
$
411,995.35
$ 398,563.91
$ 425,325.57
$ 26,761.66
$ (159,584.25)
160010 General Services Golf
5060326
White Lake Oaks Golf
$
614,842.37
$ 409,249.07
$ 440,056.07
$ 30,807.00
$ (58,641.43)
5060327
Glen Oaks Golf
$
527,871.55
$ 525,576.38
$ 642,595.80
$ 117,019.42
$ 51,295.06
5060328
Red Oaks Golf
$
427,022.75
$ 339,615.92
$ 352,817.17
$ 13,201.25
$ (76,833.78)
5060330
Springfield Oaks Golf
$
518,915.29
$ 497,904.43
$ 424,748.79
$ (73,155.64)
$ (31,500.00)
5060356
Lyon Oaks Golf
$
818,489.81
$ 850,414.19
$ 831,572.91
$ (18,841.28)
$ (18,101.43)
General Services Golf Total
$
2,907,141.77
$ 2,622,759.99
$ 2,691,790.74
$ 69,030.75
$ (105,064.09)
160015 Golf Pro Shop
5060326
White Lake Oaks Golf
$
67,447.83
$ 79,052.17
$ 103,119.55
$ 24,067.38
$
5060327
Glen Oaks Golf
$
103,353.04
$ 90,886.58
$ 104,525.11
$ 13,638.53
$
5060328
Red Oaks Golf
$
69,682.62
$ 75,419.95
$ 75,441.26
$ 21.31
$
5060330
Springfield Oaks Golf
$
91,244.36
$ 94,338.02
$ 148,986.29
$ 54,648.27
$
5060356
Lyon Oaks Golf
$
74,667.51
$ 70,919.49
$ 89,191.84
$ 18,272.35
$
Golf Pro Shop Total
$
406,395.36
$ 410,616.21
$ 521,264.05
$ 110,647.84
$
C:\Users\phelpsj\Documents\$Data\Parks and Recreation\Monthly Reporting\COVID19 Monthly\12 FY2020 YE Agenda COVID19.xls
202
Account Type
Expenditures Total
Parks and Recreation Commission
Financial Activity Comparison for
Fiscal Months 6 (March) thru 12 (September) by
Fiscal Year
March -September
March -September
March -September
March -September
FY2020/FY2019
FY2020 Staff
Program - Description
Cost Center
- Description
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
Difference
Projections
160044 General Services Food Services
5060226
White Lake Oaks Restaurant Svc
$
-
$ 78,998.86
$ 46,517.29
$ (32,481.57) $
(86,298.00)
5060256
Lyon Oaks Restaurant Svc
$ 108,564.00
$ 100.31
$ (108,463.69) $
(105,766.29)
5060417
Addison Oaks Conference Ctr
$
147,374.72
$ 153,325.47
$ 120,693.63
$ (32,631.84) $
(15,117.84)
5060420
Groveland Oaks Concessions
$
63,045.45
$ 61,651.88
$ 10,274.26
$ (51,377.62) $
(72,946.00)
5060426
White Lake Oaks Conf Center
$
276,415.05
$ 225,199.79
$ 92,823.94
$ (132,375.85) $
(39,307.26)
5060427
Glen Oaks Conference Center
$
142,537.75
$ 146,127.13
$ 124,066.78
$ (22,060.35) $
(16,586.36)
5060430
Springfield Oaks Restaurant Sv
$
199,843.87
$ 206,084.37
$ 97,706.97
$ (108,377.40) $
(25,500.00)
5060431
Red Oaks Wtrpk Concessions
$
215,993.97
$ 225,723.77
$ 41,866.82
$ (183,856.95) $
(213,549.70)
5060437
Waterford Oaks Wpk Concessions
$
126,343.54
$ 92,398.90
$ 23,546.20
$ (68,852.70) $
(100,730.00)
5060456
Lyon Oaks Conference Center
$
361,927.46
$ 251,171.83
$ 149,408.98
$ (101,762.85) $
7,065.47
General Services Food Services Total
$
1,533,481.81
$ 1,549,246.00
$ 707,005.18
$ (842,240.82) $
(668,735.98)
160070 General Services Parks
5060715
Addison Oaks Park
$
1,207,560.91
$ 1,307,079.57
$ 1,062,850.94
$ (244,228.63) $
(105,064.09)
5060720
Groveland Oaks Park
$
1,190,389.99
$ 1,157,187.41
$ 901,785.41
$ (255,402.00) $
(124,000.00)
5060724
Orion Oaks Park
$
175,962.62
$ 196,048.77
$ 145,812.13
$ (50,236.64) $
(5,000.00)
5060725
Independence Oaks Park
$
1,135,259.06
$ 908,425.77
$ 709,778.25
$ (198,647.52) $
(11,000.00)
5060729
Red Oaks Dog Park
$
92,541.51
$ 87,417.70
$ 74,414.91
$ (13,002.79) $
(22,173.43)
5060732
Springfield Oaks Park
$
356,800.51
$ 529,998.06
$ 316,599.50
$ (213,398.56) $
(16,000.00)
5060735
Waterford Oaks Park
$
484,959.66
$ 522,639.99
$ 511,612.86
$ (11,027.13) $
(20,500.00)
5060751
Red Oaks Park
$
102,154.36
$ 189,786.77
$ 103,403.42
$ (86,383.35) $
(4,217.72)
5060755
Lyon Oaks Park
$
212,273.13
$ 228,974.13
$ 166,577.65
$ (62,396.48) $
(37,148.61)
5060760
Rose Oaks Park
$
52,816.99
$ 66,572.24
$ 47,419.71
$ (19,152.53) $
(10,000.00)
5060765
Highland Oaks Park
$
78,696.68
$ 82,894.11
$ 58,831.69
$ (24,062.42) $
(5,000.00)
5060845
Waterford Oaks BMX
$
34,493.56
$ 44,055.27
$ 29,315.96
$ (14,739.31) $
General Services Parks Total
$
5,123,908.98
$ 5,321,079.79
$ 4,128,402.43
$ (1,192,677.36) $
(360,103.85)
160210 General Services Rec
5060722
Off -Road Vehicle Park
$
-
$ -
$ 293,735.76
$ 293,735.76 $
(110,000.00)
5060805
Rec Programs and Services
$
1,096,910.46
$ 1,126,878.46
$ 804,234.76
$ (322,643.70) $
(341,400.00)
5060831
Red Oaks Waterpark
$
1,411,499.58
$ 1,300,568.97
$ 521,251.41
$ (779,317.56) $
(801,282.88)
5060837
Waterford Oaks Waterpark
$
712,555.88
$ 546,650.07
$ 85,117.58
$ (461,532.49) $
(341,000.00)
5060845
Waterford Oaks BMX
$
4,059.63
$ 7,244.73
$ 600.03
$ (6,644.70) $
(10,000.00)
5060870
Catalpa Oaks Park
$
117,639.44
$ 114,207.47
$ 134,142.75
$ 19,935.28 $
(13,542.70)
General Services Rec Total
$
3,342,664.99
$ 3,095,549.70
$ 1,839,082.29
$ (1,256,467.41) $
(1,617,225.58)
160430 General Services Fac and Maint
5060910
Facilities and Maintenance
$
973,760.46
$ 1,025,282.58
$ 753,774.57
$ (271,508.01) $
(985,750.30)
General Services Fac and Maint Total
$
973,760.46
$ 1,025,282.58
$ 753,774.57
$ (271,508.01) $
(985,750.30)
160500 General Services County Market
5060540
Oakland County Market
$
121,958.25
$ 120,722.48
$ 120,820.51
$ 98.03 $
General Services County Market Total
$
121,958.25
$ 120,722.48
$ 120,820.51
$ 98.03 $
181010 General Audit Services
1010205
Auditing
1
23,902.83
20,655.17
17,101.08
$ (3,554.09) $
General Audit Services Total
$
23,902.83
$ 20,655.17
$ 17,101.08
$ (3,554.09) $
182040 Financial Planning
1020601
Fiscal Services Administration
1
82,326.81
82,675.33
84,794.39
$ 2,119.06 $
Financial Planning Total
$
82,326.81
$ 82,675.33
$ 84,794.39
$ 2,119.06 $
182050 Transaction Processing
1020658
Fiscal Services Parks and Rec
1
140,865.59
129,045.14
124,754,59
$ (4,290.55) $
Transaction Processing Total
$
140,865.59
$ 129,045.14
$ 124,754.59
$ (4,290.55) $
182080 Financial Reporting
1020658
Fiscal Services Parks and Rec
1
91,634.99
128,797.97
121,152,8
$$ (7,645.15) $
Financial Reporting Total
$
91,634.99
$ 128,797.97
$ 121,152.82
$ (7,645.15) $
$
18,283,417.28
$ 18,352,524.93
$ 14,772,226.13
$ (3,580,298.80) $
(4,643,102.21)
C:\Users\phelpsj\Documents\$Data\Parks
and Recreation\Monthly Reporting\COVID19 Monthly\12 FY2020
YE Agenda COVID19.xls
203
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 B
PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor of Planning + Resource Development
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Holly Oaks ORV Park Monthly Report
HOLLY OAKS ORV PARK UPDATE
The park is scheduled to open on April 10. Staff will provide a brief report on changes to the park for the season
and update the commission on construction projects at the site.
204
0�11I,I A,1►111111ke—olo►I&i�_1;i►�
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
APRIL 7, 2021 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 C
PLANNING & RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
To: Chairman McGillivray and Commission Members
From: Susan M. Wells, Interim Executive Officer
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor, Planning & Resource Development
Donna Folland, Senior Planner
Submitted: March 31, 2021
Subject: Report: Planning Update — Annual Dashboard and Databook
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
Included in this packet please find a 2021 Work Plan for the Planning and Resource Development (PRD) Unit.
The PRD Unit is composed of 3 full-time and 2-3 part-time staff and is responsible for coordination of all planning
and resource development activity for the park system. This includes our Five -Year Parks and Recreation Master
Plan, grant/donation/sponsorship management, new property acquisition, data management, public engagement
and more. PRD will also be overseeing the development and implementation of the 2 new grant programs
outlined in the millage — the Trailways and Park Development grant programs.
Working with staff across the system, PRD develops OCPR's annual Dashboard and Data Book, a
comprehensive reference for information about the Oakland County Parks system and individual park properties.
It compiles data that can be used to evaluate the performance of current facilities and services, as well as
potential need for additional facilities and services. In most cases, trends over the most recent three years are
shown.
The FY2020 Dashboard and Data Book is available at OaklandCountvParks.com/Planning and click on
"Dashboard and Data Book." Please note that, for some sections of the Data Book, updates are still underway.
Each of these sections is clearly identified. When updates are complete, staff will notify the Commission via a
note in the Executive Officer's Report. Staff are available to discuss and answer questions about the Data Book
at the May Commission meeting or by email at any time.
ATTACHMENTS
FY2021 Planning and Resource Development Work Plan
FY2020 Dashboard and Data Book: OaklandCountvParks.com/Plannina.; click on "Dashboard and Data
Book"
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission receive and file the FY2020 Dashboard and Data Book.
MOTION
Move to receive and file the FY2020 Dashboard and Data Book.
205
WIM% ND
COUNTY PARKS
Great ffarks for Great f>eopte
Planning and Resource Development (PRD)
2021 Work Plan
February 12, 2021
PRD Team:
Melissa Prowse, Supervisor, ADA Coordinator
Jon Noyes, Principal Planner
Donna Folland, Senior Planner
Project Advisor, Community Outreach and Millage Programs (PT) (Spring 2021)
Carol Egbo, Parks Historian (PT)
Sue Greenlee, Technical Assistant (PT)
Millage New Initiatives Program Development & Management
• Develop of BOC-approved policies for new program management
• Develop criteria and procedures for program development
• Develop application process and materials
• Work with OC Fiscal services and Corporation Counsel on fiscal and agreement development
and management
Grant Management
• Develop grant applications for projects throughout the park system, including county grant
review process and appropriate approvals per the new Board rules
• Manage open grants including reporting, communicating regularly with grant agency and
reimbursement requests
Contributions Management
• Develop formal contributions program including options for donations (bench program, animal
care program, etc.)
• Work with potential donors to recognize donations as appropriate
Sponsorship Management
• Manage contract with Marx Layne & Company to develop and manage sponsorship program
• Assist in developing sponsorship packages and proposals
• Revise Sponsorship Policy to reflect new initiative with Marx Layne and streamline process for
sponsorship procurement and approval
5-Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan (current: 2018 — 2022; next: 2023-2027)
• Review previous strategic action plan — meet with staff to propose revisions and updates as
necessary including millage commitments, organizational changes, etc.
206
• Update supporting chapters, park -specific information, statistics and data
• Contract for and manage execution of county -wide Needs Assessment Survey (1Q 2022)
• Work with staff on recommended changes/updates to the plan
• Update Commission throughout the process, including RFP/contract approval, overview of plan
chapters and Strategic Action Plan, and approval of the plan as required by MDNR
ADA Coordination
• Work with Accessibility Work Group to serve as a resource for staff on questions regarding ADA
compliance and physical and programmatic accessibility of perks and programs
• Educate staff and commission by regularly sharing videos, articles, training regarding
accessibility
• Develop plans and procedures for providing assistance to persons with disabilities including
interpreters, video and audio assistance, etc.
• Develop and propose plans for ensuring that key OCPR information is available in accessible
formats including large print, audio transcription, braille, etc.
New Park Property Acquisition (Property Acquisition & Management Team — PAM)
• Make recommendations to the Parks Commission regarding acquisition of new property for the
park system
• Evaluate acquisition opportunities using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and current
OCPRC and BOC directives and priorities
• Evaluate requests for review of property for sale/lease/easement and bring to PAM for review
and discussion
• Work with landowners as needed to gather information on properties being
discussed/considered
Holly Oaks ORV Park Planning
• Liaison with MDNR on Operating Agreement, budget, planning and operations, etc.
Communicate regularly with DNR on any issues, operational changes, etc.
• Work with Communications/Marketing to develop marketing plan for rentals and corporate use
• Work with Marx Layne to develop sponsorship packages for the park, capitalizing on the
excitement and energy around the park opening in 2020
• Work with staff on developing rental opportunities that are mutually beneficial, and help OCPR
meet budgetary goals Maintain community relations with township officials and landowners
• Continue to secure reclaimed, salvaged and donated materials for the park
• Coordinate volunteer activities at the site including:
o Support maintenance of ORV features
o Coordinate volunteer use/event days
o Coordinate support for sound testing and staff training
o Coordinate workdays for installation of signage and other landscaping needs
• Support site design and installation of infrastructure by (including parking and sound barriers)
• Develop a "sustainability/future phasing" plan/map to identify potential stages of feature
development, material dumps and borrow pits, access routes for material placement and
locations that require regular clean -out
207
Commercial film and photography
• Evaluate proposed opportunities for rental of park properties for commercial film and
photography opportunities
• Work with park supervisors and park staff to ensure mutual benefit of any park use for
corporate film and photography, and to ensure that parks is properly compensated for such use
Nature Education/Nature Center Design Planning/Nature Experience Development
• Repair and touch-up nature center exhibits as needed
• Continue maintenance of biofact permit filing and compliance
• Storybook Trail seasonal change -out
• Seasonal wall changeout at Wint
• Design concept for conversion of Wint amphitheater into seasonal classroom space and nature -
based discovery area
Pandemic Planning (increasing park usage during pandemic — new initiatives)
• Expand storybook trail installations (streamline for efficiency)
• Revamp storybook trail concept to include poetry or other various forms of education
• Experiment with new active engagement opportunities along trails (i.e. trivia, vintage games,
performance art)
• Identify opportunities for trail stewards/caretakers for installations
Asset and Data Management
• Continue to manage asset and project data and database and assist with 5-year project forecast
• Coordinate and develop project planning reviews — support CIP and MM projects as needed
• Continue to collect and manage parks data from a variety of sources
• Continue to develop (annually) and expand (as needed) the Parks Data Book to serve as a
resource for all staff and to ensure coordinated use and distribution of data
Public Engagement
• Continue to manage (or assist) public engagement efforts across the park system, including
surveys, public comment cards, direct communication (e-mails, phone, etc.)
• Develop system -wide public engagement program including protocol/procedures for the
collection and use of public engagement data
208
Volunteer Services 'W"AKLAND
Volunteer Usage- Fiscal Year Comparison COUNTY PARKS
Volunteer
I FY2015 I FY20161 FY20171 FY2018 I FY20191 FY 2020
GOLF VOLUNTEERS
Hours volunteered
13,994
13,432.00
8,899
Number of active volunteers
155
152
122
Average hours/volunteer
90
88
73
CAMPGROUND VOLUNTEERS
Hours volunteered
3,822
3,137
2,040.50
Number of active volunteers
46
30
14
Average hours/volunteer
83
105
145.75
GENERAL VOLUNTEERS
I I I I I
I
I
Hours volunteered
8,420
8,145
2768.5
Number of active volunteers
529
436
294
Average hours/volunteer
16
19
9
TOTAL•
Hours volunteered
26,035 27,771 28,817 26,235
24,713.85
13,708
Number of active volunteers
730
618
430
Number of volunteers available
1,164 1,334 1,128 1,500
1,500
1,700
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Volunteer Hours by Assignment
0
FY2018 FY2019 FY 2020
golf -0--camp general
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Total Volunteer Hours Over Time
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY 2020
After the March, 2020 shutdown, all volunteer positions were put on temporary hold. They were brought back
on a case -by -case basis with consideration for adhering to COVID-19 safety protocols. Many of the General
Volunteer positions remain on hold at this time.
The updated Volunteer Policy was approved at the January Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting. A letter
explaining the update and a list of Frequently Asked Questions was sent to active volunteers on March 2, 2021.
Those documents are attached.
209
0MAKLAND2800 Watkins Lake Road • Bldg 97W
832-
COUNTY PARKS 48 Waterford58-0, 06.1-8888t917 OCPARKS
Great/arks forGreat-People OaklandCountyParks.com
February 26, 2021
RE: Volunteer Program Change
Hello Valued Volunteer:
Thank you for your continued dedicated service as an Oakland County Parks and Recreation Volunteer. We are writing to
inform you that the Oakland County Parks Volunteer Program has recently been updated and the issuance of Recreation
Points Cards ended December 31, 2020.
The cards you were issued and points you earned in 2019 and 2020 will still be eligible for use as previously outlined and
will expire at the end of this year on December 31, 2021.
As an organization, we are extremely grateful for your service and we value the contribution you are making to Oakland
County Parks and Recreation and the community. It is our sincerest hope that you recognize the impact you have and will
continue to serve as part of our team. We will seek to show our appreciation in alternative ways, and we thank you for your
understanding as we work to better align our volunteer program with industry standards.
Many of our volunteer assignments are still on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but you may be contacted by your
park or program supervisor regarding revisions to your specific volunteer assignment. We will be reaching out as volunteer
opportunities resume.
Please know that these changes are in no way a reflection of our appreciation for your volunteer services. On the contrary,
we fully respect and acknowledge the value you bring to our programs and parks. We look forward to your continued
volunteer service to Oakland County Parks.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to Jess Whatley, Recreation Specialist- Volunteer
Services at volunteer(a)oakoov.com or 248-975-9717.
Sincerely,
Daniel J. Stencil, CPRE
Executive Officer
Encl.
S/vv The Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission:
Gary R. McGillivray -Chairman, J. David VanderVeen -Vice Chairman,
Ebony Bagley - Secretary, Christine Long - Executive Committee Member
Yolanda Charles, Amanda Herzog, Andrea LaFontaine, Jim Nash, Nancy L. Quarles, E. Lance Stokes
ftftanft _-- Daniel J. Stencil - Executive Officer
1.Why have the Recreation Points
been discontinued?
The Volunteer Agreement that is required to be
signed by all active volunteers annually states,
"As part of my participation in the Volunteer Program,
I understand that I may be eligible for free and/or
discounted passes or programs, pursuant to the rules,
policies, and expectations established for the
Volunteer Program. I acknowledge and agree that this
is provided to me solely as an incidental benefit and is
not intended as, nor does it constitute, compensation
for services. The manner and amount of free and/or
discounted passes or programs provided to
volunteers may be changed at any time and without
notice."
Oakland County Parks and Recreation's Volunteer
Program was evaluated in 2020 and revised to align
with similar volunteer programs across the nation.
Beginning in 2021, volunteer benefits will be aligned
with the facility, operation or program where
volunteers serve.
2. What happens to the remaining
balance on my 2019 and 2020 cards?
Any 2019 or 2020 Recreation Point Card balance will
expire on Dec. 31, 2021. Use of Recreation Points
are subject to the limitations and guidelines as
outlined in the 2020 Recreation Point Program letter
dated Feb. 11, 2020. To request a copy of this letter,
please email volunteer@oakgov.com. All Recreation
Point Cards from 2018 and earlier have expired.
3. What volunteer opportunities are
available moving forward?
Effective Dec. 31, 2020, the issuance of Recreation
Points for hours of service has ended. Moving
forward, volunteer benefits are specific to the facility,
operation or program where the volunteer service
occurs. Three separate volunteer programs with
individualized benefits have been outlined for 2021:
a. Golf Course Volunteers
b. Campground Volunteers
c. General Volunteers
(excluding Golf and Campground service).
■
4. Can I participate in more than one
volunteer program?
Volunteer service hours must be scheduled and
approved by a Park or Program Supervisor in
advance of service. Volunteer service hours can only
apply to one program with advance approval from the
Park or Program Supervisor to receive benefits.
Volunteers who are assigned to a Golf Course or
Campground may participate in the General Volunteer
program as needed or requested if it does not conflict
with previously scheduled volunteer service.
S. Where can I find more
information about the new
volunteer opportunities?
A separate program has been developed for Golf
Courses, Campgrounds, and General Volunteers.
You may obtain additional information from your Park
or Program Supervisor or the Volunteer Coordinator
at volunteer@oakgov.com. New opportunities will be
posted to the Oakland County Parks website as they
become available.
Q.ZAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Volunteer
For information, visit OaklandCountvParks.com.
Join the conversation on Facebook, Twitter and
Instaaram.
211
Executive Officer's Report
April 7, 2021 - Item # 12 E
1. Upcoming OCPR Commission Meeting and OCPRC Executive Committee Meeting Dates:
The next OCPR Commission meeting will be Wednesday. Mav 5. 2021 at 2:00 a.m. at the Oakland Countv
Board of Commissioners Auditorium, located at 1200 N. Telegraph Road, Pontiac, MI 48341. Please
enter throuqh the South Courthouse Entrance only.
The next OCPRC Executive Committee meeting is scheduled on Monday. April 19. 2021 at
1:00 p.m. This will be a teleconference meeting.
2. COVID-19 Vaccination Clinics at Waterford Oaks: The Oakland County Health Department is using the
Waterford Oaks Activity Center for COVID-19 Vaccination Clinics. The vaccinations are by appointment only
on Monday and Wednesday.
3. OCPR Golf Operations Implementation Plan: Following up on the discussion at the March OCPR
Commission meeting with golf consultant JJ Keegan, included is a copy of the OCPR Golf Course Operations
Implementation Plan.
4. Springfield Mill Pond Dam Removal & Restoration Project Update: Included with this report is a
comprehensive public engagement report on the 50% preliminary engineering and conceptual design phase of
the mill pond dam removal and restoration project. A total of 110 surveys were submitted along with 5 emailed
comments and 1 letter. The overwhelming majority of comments received were constructive and/or supportive
of the project. The Springfield Township Board reviewed the information at their March 11th 2021 meeting, had
no additional comments or concerns and supported proceeding with 100% design/engineering plans.
5. Golf Course Message: The following is the message for the public regarding the changes in golf course
operations for the OCPR system:
To be fiscally responsible and become aligned with comparable golf course rates, Oakland County Parks
and Recreation hired consultant Golf Convergence to evaluate its five courses.
Golf maintenance, pro shop operations, rates, staffing and more were evaluated by the golf consultant.
Information from comparable golf courses, both public and municipal, was also used as part of this
evaluation. Through this process it was determined that OCPR golf courses were underpriced, which
resulted in recommended rate changes for the 2021 golf season.
Additionally, a survey was sent to 900 asking for their input. OCPR's course conditions and customer service
were the highest positive rated responses by golfers, which also revealed the courses were underpriced.
Recommendations from the consultant have led to changes being implemented this year. The biggest
change is the implementation of online tee times, which will be accepted starting at midnight 14 days before
play at OaklandCountyParks.com. Golfers are also welcome to call the Pro Shop starting at 7 a.m. to reserve
a tee time 14 days in advance.
The golf courses will open for the 2021 season on Thursday, April 1, weather permitting.
OCPR's golf courses can be reached at: Glen Oaks Golf Course, Farmington Hills. 248.851.8356; Lyon
Oaks Golf Course, Wixom. 248.437.1488; Red Oaks Golf Course, Madison Heights. 248.541.5030;
Springfield Oaks Golf Course, Davisburg. 248.634.2261; and White Lake Oaks Golf Course, White Lake;
248.698.2700.
Seniors (62+), active military, veterans and individuals with disabilities will continue to receive discounted
rates on rounds of golf. Spring golf rates have been eliminated. And, the pricing structure has been
simplified. Reduced weekend rates (weekday rates) will be available for afternoon play this season and
times may vary at each course. To view the 2021 golf rates, go to:
httr)s://www.oakaov.com/parks/Resources/OCPR golf rates 2021.pdf
212
An additional change is that FootGolf will only be available at Red Oaks Golf Course. And, this year, two
riders will be allowed on the carts at the start of the season.
Oakland County Parks and Recreation follows Centers for Disease Control and Oakland County Health
Division protocols to help mitigate the spread of covid-19. These measures are being taken for the safety of
staff and guests.
6. Status of Waterpark Operations: The following is a recommendation from Tony Drautz from the Oakland
County Health Department regarding Waterpark Operations:
Current restrictions for pools come from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
(MDHHS). They issue new orders as Covid case data changes or orders expire. The current order is
attached to this email. It was issued March 2, 2021 and was effective March 5, 2021. It remains in
effect through April 19, 2021, unless they issue a replacement order or rescind it prior to that date. You
may refer to the MDHHS website for updates and additional information:
httos://www.michiaan.aov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98178 98455-533660--,00.html.
The new order contains the following specific information for Public Swimming Pools:
a. Gatherings at an indoor pool not otherwise prohibited by this order must not exceed 30%
of bather capacity limits described in Rule 325.2193 of the Michigan Administrative Code.
Gatherings at an outdoor pool not otherwise prohibited by this order must not exceed 50%
of bather capacity limits described in Rule 325.2193 of the Michigan Administrative Code.
In addition, according to the order, a water park is considered an "entertainment and recreational facility"
and is currently not allowed to operate as follows:
"Entertainment and recreational facility" includes: auditoriums; arenas; cinemas; concert halls;
performance venues; sporting venues; stadiums; theaters; night clubs; strip clubs; water parks;
archery ranges; amusement parks; arcades; bingo halls; bowling centers; casinos; gun ranges;
laser tag arenas; trampoline parks; and the like.
(a) Gatherings are prohibited at entertainment facilities and recreational facilities unless: (1)
Venues and activities held at those venues comply with masking and distancing
requirements in this subsection. Venues that cannot consistently adhere to these
requirements (e.g., water parks, dance floors at a nightclub, or children's indoor playgrounds
inasmuch as staff are not present to prevent physical contact) may not be open.
A definition for water park is not provided in the order, the Michigan Public Swimming Pool Rules, nor
in the Model Aquatic Health Code. A definition is provided in the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
for the March 5, 2021 order as attached and as follows:
Q: What is the distinction between a water park and a swimming pool under this Order?
A: A water park — which is not permitted to operate under this Order — is a recreational facility
with water features including pools, slides, sprinklers, and the like, which primarily serves an
entertainment or recreational purpose, and which is open for unstructured play. Swimming pools
that are permitted to operate under this Order are those which are used for individual exercise
or organized sports, such as those set up with individual lanes for lap swimming and which do
not contain large open areas of water for unstructured group play.
In addition to the capacity and water park restrictions, all persons in a pool enclosure must wear a mask
when not in the pool. Persons not from the same household should stay at least six feet (6') apart in
the enclosure, including in the pool.
213
7. Natural Resources: Included with this report is an update from staff on the OCPR Natural Resources
Management.
8. OCPR Operational Plan: Included with this report is an update on the Operational Plan for OCPR facilities
pertaining to COVID-19.
9. Communications and Marketing: Attached to this report is a Communications and
Marketing and Marketing Media Report on Oakland County Parks and Recreation from
Desiree Stanfield, Supervisor — Marketing and Communications.
214
OZ AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Public Engagement Report
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Contents
ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................................2
Background................................................................................................................................................................2
Public review of engineering plans and park conceptual designs.............................................................................2
SurveyResults................................................................................................................................................................3
In the past 12 months, how often have you visited Mill Pond Park?........................................................................4
What are the reasons you visit Mill Pond Park?........................................................................................................4
In the past 12 months, how often have you visited Rotary Park?.............................................................................5
What are the reasons you visit Rotary Park?.............................................................................................................5
Whatis your home zip code?....................................................................................................................................6
Importance rating and ranking of features and improvements................................................................................6
OpenComments............................................................................................................................................................9
Appendix A: Full Text of Comments Received by Mail or Email..................................................................................19
Appendix B: Survey Instrument...................................................................................................................................23
Figures
Figure A: Rendering of the Mill Pond Dam removal and restoration............................................................................3
Figure B: Number of visits to Mill Pond Park in past 12 months...................................................................................4
Figure C: Reasons to visit Mill Pond Park.......................................................................................................................4
Figure D: Number of visits to Rotary Park in past 12 months........................................................................................5
Figure E: Reasons to visit Rotary Park...........................................................................................................................5
Figure F: Categories of features and improvements ranked by the weighted average ratings....................................7
Figure G: Individual features and improvements ranked by the weighted average ratings.........................................8
Tables
Table 1: Residence of survey respondents....................................................................................................................6
Table 2: Summary comment analysis by topic..............................................................................................................9
Table 3: Analysis of individual comments by topic......................................................................................................10
Update: 2/24/2021 Page 1 of 24
215
OZ AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Executive Summary
Background
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Springfield Township and Oakland County have extensively explored options for
the Davisburg Mill Pond Dam. Due to the age of the dam and based on
information from a 2011 engineering study and 2015 video inspection, the Mill
Pond Dam has significant deficiencies and associated safety/liability issues.
A feasibility study was commissioned in October 2018 to identify various
alternatives for the dam. The study included two public informational meetings,
held in March and May of 2019, to present preliminary findings and receive
public input. The Feasibility Study resulted in eight viable alternatives in two
scenarios to either replace or remove the dam. During a Special Meeting held on
June 6, 2019, the Springfield Township Board carefully analyzed every alternative
based upon several factors including historical significance, effect on safety,
water wells, and real estate values, recreational benefits, environmental
considerations, and cost. The Township Board ultimately recommended dam removal and restoration of the river
corridor. The County concurred in that recommendation.
In the fall of 2019, the project moved to the preliminary engineering and conceptual park design phase. The
consultant has collected data to determine how to engineer the stream channel and arch culvert at the Davisburg
Road crossing and has prepared plans for the restoration of the river corridor. Concurrently, the consultant is
offering recommendations for future enhancement to the surrounding park properties.
The Oakland County Parks & Recreation Commission, Springfield Township Board, and Springfield Township Park
Commission reviewed the preliminary engineering plans and conceptual park designs at their meetings in October
2020 and approved presenting the plans to the public for review and comment.
Public review of engineering plans and park conceptual designs
A public outreach meeting with a presentation was planned on January 19, 2021. Unfortunately, the meeting was
hacked and had to shut down. Due to the incident, it was determined that the best way to share the preliminary
engineering and park concepts was through a recorded presentation. The video provided on the websitel is
approximately 45 minutes long and can be viewed at any time.
In place of the planned Q & A portion of the Outreach Meeting, several methods to submit comments and
questions were offered through February 11:
■ Survey online or a paper survey provided at the Library
■ Email comments
■ Voice message on a dedicated phone line
■ Written comments mailed or hand -delivered to the Supervisor's office
The public engagement survey was conducted from December 27, 2020 to February 11, 2021. The survey asked 7
questions (See Appendix B), including an opportunity for open comment. 110 surveys were collected in total: 108
online and 2 paper surveys. In addition, 5 emailed comments and one letter was received. These are attached to
the report.
1 https://www.sr)rinafield-twp.us/our communitv/mill pond dam/index.pho
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 2 of 24
216
GAKLAND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
COUNTY PARKS Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Survey Results
The first four questions asked how often people visited Mill Pond Park and Rotary Park and why they visited.
Nearly half of respondents (44%) visited Mill Pond Park at least once a month. Only 15% person of respondents
indicated they visited Rotary Park at least once a month, with a majority saying they did not visit Rotary Park.
Nature, trails and the Hart Community Center were the top reasons to visit Mill Pond Park. Out of the people who
said they visited Rotary Park, the top reasons were walking on the way to somewhere else and taking photographs.
Nearly three quarters of the survey respondents were from the Davisburg project area. Another 23% live in
adjacent communities.
Survey respondents were provided with a list of features and improvements that are a part of the project plan and
were asked to rate the importance of each item. The results show that natural resources and pedestrian
connectivity and accessibility are highly valued. Among more active types of recreation, play structures ranked the
highest.
The optional open comment section provided an opportunity for respondents to provide more nuanced input into
the project. A total of 49 comments were received including survey respondents, emails, and mailed comments. 20
people provided overall positive comments in support of the project. 10 people indicated they preferred keeping
the pond and repairing the dam preferable to the current project. Some of the other topics identified in comments
included people wanting to see more trail and water trail connectivity, concerns and suggestions about long-term
management, the environment, fiscal management, traffic issues, and the types of recreation offered.
Figure A: Rendering of the Mill Pond Dam removal and restoration
Conceptual View of Stream Culvert and Trail Crossing
Mill Pond Dam Removal and Restoration CAI<LAND
COUNrYPARKS A=COM
GmrAvlr. F+Gm.t P.�6
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 3 of 24
217
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
In the past 12 months, how often have you visited Mill Pond Park?
This question was mandatory, with 110 responses. 14 persons (13% of respondents) indicated they did not visit
Mill Pond Park.
Figure 8: Number of visits to Mill Pond Park in past 12 months
More than 5 times a week M 3%
2-4 times a week 11%
Once a week 5%
1-3 times a month
Less than once a month
I don't visit Mill Pond Park 13%
0% 5% 10% 15%
25%
44%
20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
What are the reasons you visit Mill Pond Park?
108 people responded to this question. Multiple responses were allowed; a total of 271 items were selected. The
top 3 selections were: Enjoy nature, Walk the trails, and Visit the Hart Community Center. 14 persons indicated
they did not visit Mill Pond Park.
Figure C: Reasons to visit Mill Pond Park
Enjoy nature
Walk the trails
Visit the Hart Community Center
Play court games (tennis, basketball, shuffleboard,... 10%
Use the playground 8%
Take photographs 7%
Fish from the dock 6%
Picnic with friends and family 6%
1 don't visit Mill Pond Park 5%
Other option � 4%
0% 5% 10%
11 persons (4% of selections) indicated other options:
■ Information on the progress on the project
■ Kayak
■ Used to like to swim there too
■ Ice fishing on the pond (2 respondents)
■ Turn around in the parking lot
■ 1 would like to have pathways and a more pleasant access to river edge
15%
16%
20%
25%
Update:2/24/2021
Page 4 of 24
218
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
■ Just moved to Davisburg - exploring amenities
■ its been years since I swam there, became too marshy. many other local options for recreation with much
larger acreage. Davisburg is too small to focus any additional expense on park amenity projects other than
restoring the waters back to what they once were
■ Parks & Rec events (This and the previous question aren't fair for use assessment in this covid period. I'm
answering pre- covid!)
■ Tennis courts only
In the past 12 months, how often have you visited Rotary Park?
This question was mandatory, with 110 responses. 58 persons (53% of respondents) indicated they did not visit
Rotary Park.
Figure D: Number of visits to Rotary Park in past 12 months
More than 5 times a week 0%
2-4 times a week 5%
1-3 times a month 7%
Once a week = 3%
Less than once a month
I don't visit Rotary Park
32%
53%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
What are the reasons you visit Rotary Park?
102 people responded to this question. Multiple responses were allowed; a total of 121 items were selected. The
top 3 selections were: "I don't visit Rotary Park", "Walk through on my to somewhere else", and "Take
photographs". 55 persons indicated they did not visit Mill Pond Park.
Figure E: Reasons to visit Rotary Park
I don't visit Rotary Park 45%
Walk through on my way to somewhere else 23%
Take photographs 21%
Picnic with friends and family 5%
Other option 6%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
7 persons (7% of selections) indicated other options:
■ Doesn't have curb appeal
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 5 of 24
219
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
■ Enjoy the little waterway
■ enjoy the sound of the water cascading on the "Falls"; the water wheel...
■ visit waterfall
■ again, years since ive visited. ground was always very soggy.
■ Enjoy nature, view the dam and river
■ Dog walks
What is your home zip code?
Response to this question was required. Out of 110 responses, all Zip Codes were valid. 95% of the Zip Codes (105
respondents) were from the project area or adjacent areas (Davisburg, Clarkston and Holly).
Table 1: Residence of survey respondents
Number of
Percent of
City or Village
County
State
Respondents
Respondents
Zip Codes
Davisburg
Oakland
MI
80
73%
48340
Clarkston
Oakland
MI
20
18%
43846 & 48348
Holly
Oakland
MI
5
5%
48442
Farmington
Oakland
MI
1
1%
48331
Lake Orion
Oakland
MI
1
1%
48359
Novi
Oakland
MI
1
1%
48374
Whitehall
Muskegon
MI
1
1%
49461
Hagerstown
Wayne
IN
1
1%
47346
110
100%
Importance rating and ranking of features and improvements
These six questions asked respondents to rank the importance (Very Important, Important, Somewhat Important,
and Not Important) in six categories:
6. Natural Resources (100 responses; 91% of total respondents)
■ Shiawassee River returned to its natural state
■ Restored stream corridor with native plantings
■ Improved habitat for native wildlife species
7. Passive Recreation (105 responses; 95% of total respondents)
■ Pathways, trails and boardwalks
■ Access to the water
■ Nature viewing platforms
■ Benches
■ Pavilion and picnic sites
■ Interpretive signage about history and nature
8. Accessibility and Pedestrian Safety (105 responses; 95% of total respondents)
■ Pathways that accommodate strollers, wheelchairs and other mobility devices
■ Pedestrian passage through the culvert, under Davisburg Road
■ Pathway connection from Mill Pond Park to the Civic Center
9. Active Recreation (106 responses; 96% of total respondents)
■ Basketball court
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 6 of 24
220
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
■ Tennis courts
■ Pickleball courts
■ Shuffleboard courts
■ Playground equipment
■ Swing sets
10. Davisburg Road Roadway Improvements (103 responses; 94%of total respondents)
■ Widened shoulders on roadway over culvert
■ Curbing on roadway in project area
■ Decorative roadway lighting
11. Community Center (105 responses; 95% of total respondents)
■ Windows / door walls to provide scenic views
■ Patio or deck overlooking stream corridor
■ Expanded indoor gathering space
Both the categories of features and improvements and the individual items are shown in the two figures below as
a percentage of total responses. The ratings are weighted (Very Important = 4, Important = 3, Somewhat
Important = 2, and Not Important = 1) and averaged to arrive at a ranking. The figures are shown in ranked order.
In the figure below, the "Natural Resources" category ranked highest, followed by "Passive Recreation" and
"Accessibility and Pedestrian Safety"
Figure F: Categories of features and improvements ranked by the weighted average ratings
70%
61%
60%
50% 47%
40%
30% 8%
1%
20% 7%
10%7% 8%
10%
0% ,
48 %
1 39% 40%
33%
0% 30 0
716 11 il
23%
14%13% 16%15% 14%15,76
1 1i I I I
Natural Resources Passive Recreation Accessibility and Davisburg Road Active Recreation Community Center
Pedestrian Safety Roadway
Improvements
■ Very Important ■ Important ■ Somewhat Important ■ Not Important
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 7 of 24
221
OZ AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
The figure below shows all the individual items ranked by their weighted average ratings. The top three selections are Pathways, trail and boardwalks;
Improved habitat for native wildlife species; and Restored stream corridor with native plantings.
Figure G: Individual features and improvements ranked by the weighted average ratings
80%
70%
60% —
50% -
40% —
30% —
20% — —
10%—
a1�0 aoet
tad 0'�e la°� •.ty`mil .Q� alp' �
oa eke eQ ra ,et eon got �c 5
oar Ala areel as ��a �y�a 5� o
cta\ya a�`�e t°a6 ado° ea-o Qcee ae
aAy, kot° `aot toll ti Ql ��t� 11Qoo
pry, \ate °°t� a'tey laet tte �•
Qa ilrar eat boa r0 ��,e tto�
t e
Qtoe teay�. aeoot� aet�ea �ayye `�`oo
fey CO
ayra �
Qa�r� Qa�r�
we et h ey ee °t to et�' �C. ea ti h o, 0 ce 0
ott�a oa�J J�a ��°0J coat °°�� • Ne� ��or�\�
�`4N ��la �\oo atcc a°a 1Je� e�oa tole e���5 oe�` l era0 e�`�� Data
Jre Se��o aA,\aeh t°aa Q`� t°Oa�r Jkkle�
��te ako oo*N
�a Q Jet\ e'a0 Crt0 °t to ally e`°t ea\�
�F° aaO Qoe �� 4 �a
ae° 41a ' ay�a �tr� ao°t 1+11
Qa \t`�etQ eaey�t ��oa
Q
■Very Important Important ■ Somewhat Important ■ Not Important
Update: 2/24/2021 Page 8 of 24
222
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Open Comments
49 comments of varying length and complexity were received. 39% of survey respondents (43 out of 110 total
respondents) provided additional comment. 5 comments were received by email and one comment was received
by mail. The table below shows number of comments that were identified in each category.
Table 2: Summary comment analysis by topic
Email or
Survey Mailed Total
Topic
Respondents Comments Comments
Supportive of Project
20 people expressed overall support
for the project. Several also provided
additional suggestions or had questions
17 3 20
under one of the other topics.
Keep Pond or Dam
10 people indicated they preferred to
retain the pond and/or repair the dam.
Some individuals also provided
7 3 10
additional suggestions or had questions
under one of the other topics.
Fiscal Concerns
Four people expressed concerns and
questions about project costs and use
1 3 4
of public funds.
Management and
11 people had concerns about the
Environmental
long-term management of the area
Concerns
including invasive species control,
8 3 11
habitat for wildlife, sediment in the
Shiawassee River, and potential toxicity
and contamination.
More Connectivity
Seven people indicated they would like
to see greater connectivity with
regional trails, other recreational areas,
7 0 7
and village centers.
Recreation Concerns
Six people expressed specific
recreational needs, such as pickleball
5 1 6
and kayak access.
Traffic Concerns
Four people had concerns about traffic
2 2 4
during or after the project.
Other Comment or
Seven people had comments not
Question
included in these selected topics, such
as restroom availability, events hosting,
making design compatible with local
7 1 9
architecture, preservation of the water
wheel, and noting that they had no
comment.
Update: 2/24/2021 Page 9 of 24
223
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Table 3: Analysis of individual comments by topic
E
1
1
1
1
1
1
Update: 2/24/2021
1
1
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
T
CY
C C
O Vf
�j +'
O1 d N
u
O u C
W O
t
V
C
O
U
u
�
i
E
E
O
(J O
` tA
O1
as+ 7
~ O
Comment Text
1.
Is the pickleball court necessary? Could those funds be utilized for
1
expanding the trails further or making other improvements? Is it
possible to connect to Springfield Oaks?
1
2.
Plckleball courts would be a great addition to the community.
3.
Leave the Dam in place
_
4.
Thank you for your time on working on this much needed project!
5.
1 live on Ratalee Ik rd and I'm pleased the dam is being eliminated.
Before it fails and takes out Davisburg rd. one rainy night. I also
hope this results in some improvements to the water troubles in
Downtown basements. Taking the survey makes it clear you are
attempting to plant native vegetation which hopefully means there
is a plan to prevent/combat phragmites. It would be a shame to
see them get another toe hold in the river.
6.
As you can tell by my responses, I really enjoy all of the ideas
presented and view them as very important. Although I do not
have small children now, I used to enjoy going for walks to the
rotary park and mill pond and use the play structure and tennis
courts. Having designated paths and providing a safe crossing to
the other side of Davisburg road will be very beneficial for young
families. Whlie I mourn the loss of the beach we once had, I
believe the new design that is proposed will be a big improvement.
Thank you.
7.
1 think that this is a very important project given its location near a
village center and for seniors and children to enjoy and respite.
8.
1 drive thru daily and simply would like to see the area returned to
1
its original state. I'm not supportive of chemicals being used nor
misinformation being distributed about rattlesnakes. If it is natural
Page 10 of 24
224
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o
41
OL
O
�
' O
G7
-�
a G1
C
C
E
C
N
E E Yf
r_
O
n
O
O
41
i+
0L
L
C L
U
L
U
V Q
Q N
a
Q
f0 U
U
i
V
w
y
CL p
Ol
V C
C
O
V
C
t
N d
Y
LL U
W V
cc
V
H
O Cr
1
9.
1
10
11
1
1
Update:2/24/2021
12
Comment Text
to an improved environment, then so be it. If the library to the
Hart Community Center were connected by bike trails, it
encourages our community to get out and move to stay healthy.
KEEP THE POND! That has been a treasure!
It would be nice if the water wheel could be kept somehow.
I would be more supportive of the project if the proposed mill
pond trail connected to the Shiawassee Basin Preserve Trailhead or
had future plans to do so and/or if the railroad culvert was large
enough for kayak passage.
My concern is that, while the stated goal is to return the riverbed
to its natural state, this project is not going to accomplish that. A
little research on the subject shows that, since well before any
human habitation and well into the colonization of the area by
europeans, the Shiawasse river was a mix of slow moving
wandering streams separated by thousands of beaver dams and
their associated ponds. History tells us that many of the current
dams on our river systems simply replaced the pre -exiting beaver
dams that had occupied those sites for hundreds of years. The only
way to preserve the bio-system that is being created here will be
to institute an active and ongoing beaver eradication program
along the entire corridor controlled by the township or they will
simply replace the dam we're removing and add more as they
deem necessary for their comfort and survival. To simplify, we'll be
creating an ecosystem that never existed in the river's history and
then artificially maintaining it in perpetuity. It seems that we never
learn the simplest lesson regarding our manipulation of the natural
environment around us. The least management is the best
management.
Page 11 of 24
225
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o '
cu
41
OL 4'
O a O V
G7 -� G1 C C
E
C N E E Yf r- O n O
L i+ a L C L U L U
O
V Q
Q N Q f0 U U i V w
CL p Ol V C C O V C
y
t
N d Y LL U W V d' V H
O Cr
Comment Text
13. Please keep an area to fish and all the different outside activities
1
for families such as basketball, shuffleboard, horseshoes and
volleyball. It is such a fun family outside area.
1
14. We'd like to see Spr Twp brought into THIS century Thanks
15. Please more sidewalks up and down Broadway. More pedestrian
flashing sings and children at play. Too many cars have been
1
speeding when speed limit sign is 25 mph. Special pedestrian
sidewalk going over train tracks. Lots of people walk to the parks
and not enough sidewalks or trails.
16. Yes I would like to see the Mill Pond Stay, lust fix what needs to be
1
fixed.. We will lose the Ice fishing... you say you want to return it
to it's natural state, but after almost 200 years that is it's natural
state.
1
17. Save the mill pond !!!
18. Looking forward to a renewed and returned state of the beautiful
1
Shiawasee
19. The proposed newly designed stream corridor would give a reason
to visit Mill Pond and Rotary Park such as walking, picnics,
appreciating nature. The pathway that runs along the river to
1
downtown Davisburg and possibly the Civic Center would allow
another option for walking (other than the wonderful current park
options) and provide key destinations for gathering, shopping,
leisure (library). Thank you for proposing this exciting opportunity!
20. Why take the pond a way? area is spring feed. Pond feature part of
community. Stream will carry sediments down stream without
dam. golf course chemical run off goes into pond and settles vs
1 1
running to lake Huron. Utilizing the golf course area better location
than current project proposal. Seems like the reason to take the
dam out is so a access road can be built. Access to Golf Course is
Update:2/24/2021
Page 12 of 24
226
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o
' cu
41
OL
O
G7 -�
4'
a O
G1
E r_
V
C C
E
C
L i+ a
N E Yf
L C L U
O n O
L U
O
V Q
Q N Q
CL p Ol
f0 U U i
V C C O
V w
V C
y
t
N d Y
LL U W V
d' V H
O Cr Comment Text
ready now. Lets use the golf course area for project and leave
pond alone.
21. Pond is a beautiful social asset that has bonded the community for
1
generations. Fix the Dam.
22. Remove the dam, install culvert, nature will find the path for the
1
1
stream.
23. Returning the river to its natural state, and to a river -walk focal
center for the hamlet of Davisburg, represents a wonderful best
chance to revitalize the little hamlet, connect it to its surrounding
1
amenities and attractions, and to emphasize and celebrate the rare
and beautiful natural resources that already attract so many to our
area. Our natural resources are recognized as Springfield
Township's best assets — so why not put them front and center?!
24. Bike path to somewhere... It would be great to connect our
1
community to others in the area... Clarkston to the east, Holly to
the west.
25. Anything that makes the entire Shiawassee Corridor more
1
1
amenable to kayaking is what I'm most interested in! Thanks for
your hard work!
26. 1 feel the aesthetics of the bridge and all other hard scapes and
pavilion structures should be constructed in a fashion that honors
1
1 the historic nature of downtown Davisburg. Natural stone veneers
and stout timber frame structures in a traditional style would help
give or keep that invaluable architectural image. THANK YOU!
27. Homeowners on Eaton Rd will be impacted with excess traffic
1
during construction. Eaton Rd should be improved prior to this
project beginning to accept traffic.
Update:2/24/2021
Page 13 of 24
227
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o '
cu
41
OL 4'
O a O C V
G7 -� G1 C
E r-
E
C N E Yf O n O
L i+ a L C L U L U
O
V Q
Q N Q f0 U U i V w
CL p Ol V C C O V C
y
t
N d Y LL U W V d' V H
O Cr Comment Text
28. Make hart center and MPP a showpiece and attractive for event
1
hosting
29. My rankings are largely based only on superficial knowledge of the
project. I was counting on becoming better informed via the Zoom
meeting which, of course, ended prematurely. I moved in last
September and have not had the luxury of truly getting to know
the area. But I am nonetheless very disappointed that the pond
will become only a memory. My initial reaction is that a more
vibrant downtown - and its and the community's attendant
1
increased tax base - might have provided the funds necessary to
repair or replace the dam. I am baffled that Davisburg has not
blossomed as its neighbors Holly and Clarkston have. I have
casually been told that waste or sewage problems preclude this,
but I truly have no factual knowledge on the matter. For what it
is worth, I would be happy to provide any additional input I can.
Contact information redacted.
30. Great plan. There should be a focus on making this a destination
park. Include picnic tables, grilling, water access and kayak input
and outtake, freseebe play. A walkway along the entire length of
1
the river with stopping points. Make it family oriented. It has
potential to be the jewel of the Townships recreation and
preservation system. A place to meet and hang out with friends
and family for the day
1
31. Sidewalks from downtown to the parks.
32. please be sure to manage preventative measures for phragmites.
many wetlands within the lower half of the state are becoming
1
overgrown with it and the common cattail is beginning to become
overtaken. a simple example would be to check around many
backroads within the county and neighboring counties along
Update:2/24/2021
Page 14 of 24
228
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o '
cu
41
OL 4'
O a O V
G7 -� G1 C C
E
C N E E Yf r_ O n O
L i+ a L C L U L U
O
V Q
Q N Q f0 U U i V w
CL p Ol V C C O V C
y
t
N d Y LL U W V d' V H
O Cr Comment Text
wetlands, cattails are less and less common to see as phragmites is
taking control.
1 33. 24 / 7 restroom accessibility.
1 34. 24 / 7 restroom accessibility.
35. Yes, I would like to know if the river/stream and park will (or
could) provide access for kyaks or canoes for recreational water
exercise and enjoyment. Something like they have south of Holly.
Widened shoulder over culvert for a bicycle lane, but not shouder
1 1
parking. I would prefer for park to remain a combination of
communty activity center, playground and tennis courts as it is
now with more focus on nature enjoyment enhancement. An "All
Sports park" would be better at the township office area.
36. 1 visit the parks -- Mill Pond and Rotary -- several times a week
during the non -winter months. So I did not answer the how many
times per week during the past 12 months question. It can't be
answered as currently stated because I haven't visited either park
1
in the last few / winter months. The area between the railroad
tracks -- Mill Pond Park and Rotary Park -- need to look a whole lot
better than the river channel between Dilley Road and Mill Pond
Park. I assume it is township owned property behind the cemetery
and Karl Schultz Park, and it looks terrible.
37. 1 wish there was a way to incorporate the water wheel in the
middle of the river. I love coming down and taking pictures. I bring
1 friends down to see it. I think this is why some people are against
the plan. Putting a small cascade before the water wheel would
make a picturesque place to picnic or just relax.
38. The new park should allow for a canoe launch and the culvert
1 1
under the railway expanded to accommodate canoe passage. This
way there will be proper parking for canoe and kayak patrons
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 15 of 24
229
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o
41
OL
O
�
'
G7
G1
C
C
�
C
N
E E Yf
O
n
O
O
41
i+
0L
L
C L
U
L
U
V Q
Q N
a
Q
f0 U
U
i
V
w
y
CL p
Ol
V C
C
O
V
C
t
N d
Y
LL U
W V
d'
V
H
O Cr
1
1
1 39
40
41
1 1 42
Update:2/24/2021
Comment Text
instead of clogging up Eaton road with multiple cars from people
launching their boats. The concepts and ideas are great and it is
obvious a great deal of time and effort has already been spent
trying to restore this area to the way it was more than 100 years
ago. We applaud your efforts.
Not at this time thank you
I am pleased with the overall plan and feel that it not only will
become more visually pleasing, but will draw more people into the
surrounding areas for many recreational opportunities. I think that
this plan will be something that the residents can be proud of! I
am very supportive of the consideration for native plants, animals
and habitats. Great job to the entire team involved in the planning
process!
We only go to the Mill Pond park to play tennis. We would like to
see the new Pickleball courts installed. The Pickleball courts in the
Clintonwood park in Independence Township are packed with
seniors. Seniors play form April to end of October. They stated
with four courts, but 4 courts were not enough and now they have
eight courts. In the spring, summer, fall months these courts have
been packed. In the Master Plan for Parks and Rec, for the
Recreation Programs and Services for Adults, I see a lot of Yoga,
meditation, and for the 50+Active Adults, I see • Trips • Weekly
lunches. SO seniors are active too, as you can see by the
explosion of Pickleball throughout the United States. I think it is
time to give the seniors something too. Young people play also. I
see a lot of trail updates, baseball dugout updates, etc in the
Master Plan.
I would appreciate having a park that has hard surface pathways
and not just mowed trails. I love the idea of letting the river go
Page 16 of 24
230
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
E
o
o '
cu
41
OL 4'
O a O V
G7 -� G1 C C
C N E E Yf r_ O n O
E
L i+ a L C L U L U
U U
O
V Q
Q N Q f0 i V w
CL p Ol V C C O V C
y
t
O Cr
N d Y LL U W V d' V H
Comment Text
back to its natural state which in my opinion would mean the
Township would not have to pump in chemicals to kill the aquatic
invasives.
1
43. Thank you for the in-depth information available on this project
44. Email 1/28/2021: As much as we like the looks of today's dam and
area, it is understandable why it has to change. The presentation
was very good and you have a well thought out plan. A big
1 1
questions and concern to use is how long Davisburg Road will be
closed and whether there will be an alternate roadway and if not,
why not? (see Appendix B for full text)
45. Email 1/31/2021: 1 live on Clark Road, upstream from the dam. I
have a pond on my property that drains into a feeder stream. Will I
1 1
1 notice any change in my water level, or change in the rate of flow
when the dam is removed? Was a special assessment or tax
increase to fund the repair of the dam ever considered? (see
Appendix B for full text)
46. Email 2/1/2021: Just reviewed subject Mill Pond Conceptual
Master Plan, it looked nice. How do we make sure building the
1 1
Pickelball courts are prioritized? We already have many walking
trails, baseball diamonds and parking lots in Springfield Township
but no outdoor Pickelball courts. Please let me know. (see
Appendix B for full text)
47. Email 2/2/2021: Just watched the presentation about the removal
of the Mill Pond Dam. It looks like a great solution all around. I'm
glad there is such a strong conservation approach and there is
1 1
special attention being paid to restoring the river habitat for
species of special concern.... (re Blandings turtles) This might have
already been addressed by you and your team, but I would like to
suggest a few sandy areas be added along the river to give the
Update:2/24/2021
Page 17 of 24
231
GAKLAND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
COUNTY PARKS Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
M
o
0co
U
i
O
O
M
C O
G1
d
CN
1=
O1
-O
C
of
O GJ
E
C
O
of
O
E
O
OvO
O
c-
U
O
O_
CL p
w
VC
M
M> C
C
s
aO
fA a
`Y
U
W ui
I
Cr
U
H
O
Cr
Comment Text
turtles places to lay their eggs... increasing the areas they can nest
in might reduce the danger of road crossings for at least some of
them. (see Appendix B for full text)
1
1
1
1
148. Email 2/12/2021: (see Appendix B for full text)
1
1
1
49. Letter received 2/9/2021: (see Appendix B for full text)
Update: 2/24/2021 Page 18 of 24
232
GAKLAND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
COUNTY PARKS Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Appendix A: Full Text of Comments Received by Mail or Email
Email received January 28, 2021 from Clark and Shirley Robbins
As much as we like the looks oftoday's dam and area, it is understandable why it has to change.
The presentation was verygood and you have a well thought out plan.
A big question and concern to us is how long Davisburg Road will be closed and whether there will be an alternate
roadway and if not, why not?
Regards and best wishes for a safe and healthy future, Clark & Shirley Robbins
Email received January 31, 2021 from Jeff Bauman
1. I live on Clark Rd, upstream from the dam. I have a pond on my property that drains into a feeder stream.
Will I notice any change in my water level, or change in the rate of flow when the dam is removed?
2. Was a special assessment or tax increase to fund the repair of the dam ever considered?
Thank you.
Jeff Bauman
Email received February 1, 2021 from Jim Weibeski
Hi. Just reviewed subject Mill Pond Conceptual Master Plan, it looked
nice.
How do we make sure building the Pickelball courts are prioritized? ....
we already have many walking trails, baseball diamonds and parking lots
in Springfield Township but no outdoor Pickelball courts.
Please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Jim Weisbeski
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 19 of 24
233
OZ AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Email received February 2, 2021 from Lauren Walsh
Hi, I just watched the presentation about the removal of the Mill Pond Dam. It looks like a great solution all around.
I'm so glad that there is such a strong conservation approach and that there is speclal attention being paid to restoring the
river habitat for species of special concern. That's wonderful!
I live down Andersonville Road and there is a pond in my backyard. I am lucky to watch the wild turtles enjoy the waters
all summer long. One of the best parts of this is that we have Blanding's visitors! I have seen three different very large
Blanding's turtles over the years and it always makes me happy.
This might have already been addressed by you and your team, but I would like to suggest a few sandy areas be added
along the river to give the turtles places to lay their eggs? I've had to help turtles across Andersonville Rd and Davisburg
Rd before (even once on the dam itself!) and it would be awesome if they had a few new areas to nest in. I know that
won't stop them - they have stubborn minds of their own, ha! - but increasing the areas they can nest in might reduce the
danger of road crossings for at least some of them.
Thanks for listening,
*Lauren Walsh
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 20 of 24
234
OZAKLAND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
COUNTY PARKS Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Letter received February 9, 2021 from Dennis Omell
Mill Pond Dam E F E �'j - 2021
SPRINGFIRD
I am opposed to the Mill Pond Dam Project for the reasons listed below. I halw.bem living in
Davisburg since 1972 and I consider the Mill Pond as a beautiful part of Davisburg and residents young
and old enjoy fishing there.
I would like to make reference to what happened up north to Sanford Lake, Wixom Lake, Secord Lake
and Smallwood Lake after the Dam failure following the rain storm on May 19, 2020. The results
aren't pretty and will take several years for recovery.
At the December Park Commission meeting, Ann Loncar made an interesting comment concerning the
renewal vote for the Park and Recreation operating millage of .75 mills that expires in 2024. She was
worried the residents will blame Parks and Recreation for the dam removal and vote down the millage
renewal.
I have spoke with many residents regarding the dam removal and many are opposed and blame Parks
and Recreation for supporting the project. This would be a shame if we lost our funding. We have a
great staff, hard working and taking pride in their work. I don't think that Springfield Township will be
able to replace our $640,000 year budget. We have a lot of great programs for our residents and it
would be a shame if we lost everything.
I'm also concerned about contamination of sediment in the Mill Pond. The Hart Building used to be
used as a Oakland County Road Commission garage and they dumped a lot of unknown by products
into the Mill Pond. Also, the old gas station and car repair dumped a lot of nasty stuff in the pond. My
neighbor worked at the garage for many years and he told me so. My concern for the draining of the
Mill Pond would that the disturburance of these toxins would carry downstream and Springfield
Township would be held responsible for a massive clean-up.
Since ly,
Dennis Omell
Springfield Township Parks and Recreation Commissioner
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 21 of 24
235
OAKLAND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
COUNTY PARKS Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Email received February 12, 2021 from Dennis Strelchuk
Laura,
Due to some unexpected circumstance, I missed the deadline to comment on the presentation and provide
questions and concerns. I hope the township can provide the answers to these questions to the taxpayers:
1. How long do you anticipate shutting down Davisburg Road? There are several new businesses that
will be opening in the near future and this could put them out of business if the road shutdown
extended for a significant period.
2. What portion of the cost will come out of our local taxes and will an assessment be necessary to fund
the project.
3. The presentation mentioned that some grant money would be available. What percentage will any of
the grants cover in costs. Are there grants available to refurbish the dam and save the pond at a
lower cost and less inconvenience?
4. What is the budgeting for removal, installation of the bridgeway and restoration? How does this
compare to restoration of the dam?
5. Will there be a property tax break to local businesses or reparations for lost business?
6. My not keep the existing pedestrian path and save money. The pedestrian path suggested appears to
be very extensive and expensive. What is the cost for this?
7. Are you aware that Stony Creek in Oakland Township removed their dam and the local people are
upset because what was free water flow before dam removal resulted in muddy ditches through the
township? The local people have been upset. The examples that were in the presentation
demonstrated significant larger water volume sourcing such as traverse city.
S. It's hard to believe that the cost of the dam removal, bridgeway and restorations necessary for the
entire project are more cost efficient that the cost of restoration of the dam.
9. The pond has been a landmark for many years and will be a sorely missed. It presents an air of local
tranquility, fun and beauty.
10. Why not sleeve the existing dam?
11. The long term park area changes appear to be a very expensive project. Who will pay for these other
than the taxpayers. The Parks and Recreation Department has been spending a lot of money on
buildings, landscaping and purchase of property. Right now the taxpayers are not in a position to
keep funding these expensive project.
12. It appears that the decision has already been made regardless of local public opinion. The
presentations have presented one side but neglected to provide all the alternatives available and their
related costs. I feel like I am dealing with the elitist in Washington DC that seem to take the position
of we know better and here is the facts that we think you should know. Where is the transparency
and public approval. This should be decided by vote of the taxpayers since it is a very substantial
project cost and aesthetic impact.
13. The presentation was beautifully done but really lacked in presenting all the facts and was very
narrow in scope. The township should present all the alternatives, fund sources and costs to
taxpayers to all the taxpayers in the township by a wide variety of communications and let the
people vote on such a substantial project that will have a great impact on the community for
decades. We are still a Republic Democracy and the township should go out of its way to saturate
the taxpayers with full disclosure of all aspects of the project.
I would appreciate it if all township elected officials were provided this email. I am keeping an open mind
about the project but just haven't seen that facts necessary to make an intelligent decision. Right now it appears
to me that a decision has been made to go forward because our local officials know what is best for all the
taxpayers without full disclosure. This is a dangerous precedent.
Thank You,
Dennis
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 22 of 24
236
OZ AKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Appendix B: Survey Instrument
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
MILL POND DAM
Public Outreach Meeting Survey — page 1
Thankyou foryour interest in the Mill Pond Dam project! Springfield Township and Oakland County Parks and Recreation
have extensively studied options for the dam and ultimately recommended dam removal and restoration of the river
corridor. The project is now in the preliminary engineering and conceptual park design phase.
Understanding the priorities of township and county residents will inform project planning and help guide future park
development. We appreciate you taking the time to review the preliminary plans and tell us how you use the parks now
and what you would like to see as trails and parks are developed and improved.
1. In the past 12 months, how often have you visited MILL POND PARK?
❑ Less than once a month
❑ 1-3 times a month
❑ Once a week
❑ 2-4 times a week
❑ More than 5 times a week
❑ 1 don't visit Mill Pond Park
2. What are the reasons you visit MILL POND PARK (check all
that apply)?
Walk the trails
Fish from the dock
Enjoy nature
Picnic with friends and family
Take photographs
Use the playground
Visit the Hart Community Center
Play court games (tennis, basketball, shuffleboard, horseshoes)
Other:
I don't visit Mill Pond Park
3. In the past 12 months, how often have you visited ROTARY PARK?
❑ Less than once a month
❑ 1-3 times a month
❑ Once a week
❑ 2-4 times a week
❑ More than 5 times a week
❑ 1 don't visit Rotary Park
4. What are the reasons you visit ROTARY PARK (check all that apply)?
❑ Picnic with friends and family
❑ Walk through on my way to somewhere else
❑ Take photographs
❑ Other:
❑ 1 don't visit Rotary Park
5. What is your home zip code?
SPRINGFIELD
CHARTFR TOWNSHIP
OAKLAND COUNTYPARKS
Please fill out both sides of survey — Thank you!
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 23 of 24
237
GAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Davisburg Mill Pond Dam
Mill Pond Dam Public Outreach Meeting Survey — page 1
6. After reviewing the preliminary plans for the stream corridor, arch culvert and the concepts presented for future improvements to
the roadway and Mill Pond Park, how do you rank the following project elements?
Very
Somewhat
Not
Important
Important
important
important
NATURAL RESOURCES
Shiawassee River returned to its natural state
❑
❑
❑
❑
Restored stream corridor with native plantings
❑
❑
❑
❑
Improved habitat for native wildlife species
❑
❑
❑
❑
PASSIVE RECREATION
Pathways, trails, and boardwalks
❑
❑
❑
❑
Access to the water
❑
❑
❑
❑
Nature viewing platforms
❑
❑
❑
❑
Benches
❑
❑
❑
❑
Pavilion and picnic sites
❑
❑
❑
❑
Interpretive signage about history and nature
❑
❑
❑
❑
ACCESSIBILITY & PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Pathways that accommodate strollers, wheelchairs and other
❑
❑
❑
❑
mobility devices
Pedestrian passage through the culvert, under Davisburg
❑
❑
❑
❑
Road
Pathway connection from Mill Pond Park to the Civic Center
❑
❑
❑
❑
ACTIVE RECREATION
Basketball court
❑
❑
❑
❑
Tennis courts
❑
❑
❑
❑
Pickleball courts
❑
❑
❑
❑
Shuffleboard courts
❑
❑
❑
❑
Playground equipment
❑
❑
❑
❑
Swing sets
❑
❑
❑
❑
DAVISBURG ROAD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Widened shoulders on roadway over culvert
❑
❑
❑
❑
Curbing on roadway in project area
❑
❑
❑
❑
Decorative roadway lighting
❑
❑
❑
❑
COMMUNITYCENTER
Windows / door walls to provide scenic views
❑
❑
❑
❑
Patio or deck overlooking stream corridor
❑
❑
❑
❑
Expanded indoor gathering space
❑
❑
❑
❑
7. Do you have any other comments or suggestions?
Please fill out both sides of survey — Thank you!
Update: 2/24/2021
Page 24 of 24
238
Golf Recommendation Implementation Plan
Aeenda Item 2:
The golf season shall be established from the second Saturday in April until November 15, irrespective of
weather to facilitate the proper and efficient scheduling of labor.
Operational Plan: Golf courses to open April 1 weather permitting. Courses will open with new rates
and will not be discounted as spring rates. Lyon Oaks Senior Rates will be increased over 2-3 years
because of the large suggested increase from previous rates. All other suggested rates will be in place
for all courses in April 2021.
Aeenda Item 3:
The following rates for April 1, 2021, to October 14t" will be:
SUMMER RATES (April 1- October 14)
Glen Oaks
Won Oaks
Red Oaks
Springfield
White Lake
Oaks
Oaks
Carts
Carts
Carts
Carts
Carts
18 Holes - Cart
$16.00
$16.00
$16.00
9 Holes - Cart
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
Greens Fees
Greens Fees
Greens Fees
Greens Fees
Greens Fees
( Cart
/ Footgolf
Included)
Fees
18 Holes -
$33.00
$72.00
$33.00
$29.00
Weekends/Holidays
9 Holes -
$20.00
$45.00
$17.00
$20.00
$18.00
Weekends/Holidays
18 Holes - Weekdays
$30.00
$59.00
$30.00
$26.00
9 Holes - Weekdays
$18.00
$35.00
$15.00
$18.00
$16.00
18 Holes - Junior (17
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
and under) -
Weekdays
9 Holes - Junior (17
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
and under) -
Weekdays
239
18 Holes - Senior,
$24.00
Military, Adaptive,
Veteran Weekdays
9 Holes - Senior,
$14.00
Military, Adaptive,
Veteran Weekdays
Twilight - Weekday
$14.00
Twilight -
$14.00
Weekend/Holidays
$45.00
$24.00 $22.00
$27.00
$12.00
$14.00
$14.00
$35.00
$12.00
$14.00
$14.00
$37.00
$12.00
$14.00
$14.00
Agenda Item 4:
Rates for carts will be $10 for 9 holes and $16 for 18 holes. For those customers that prefer to ride solo,
the rate for a cart is $20 for 9 holes and $32 for 18 holes.
Operational Plan:
New cart rates being implemented April 1, 2021
Agenda Item 5:
The fee for Outings and Tournaments will pay a premium of up to $5 per round over the prevailing rate
based on the course, the time of day, and the time of the year. In 2020, Outings and Tournaments
received a discount from $1 to $4 depending on the size of the group.
Operational Plan:
New fee available April 1, 2021 and will be used as needed. Discounts will not be offered
Agenda Item 6:
Leagues will be a premium of $2 per round over the prevailing rate based on the course, the time of day,
and the time of year if the league's size dictates the simultaneous use of the 1st and 10th tees.
Operational Plan:
New fee implemented for 2022 season. Current leagues already registered for 2021.
240
Agenda Item 7:
Full-time employees are encouraged to play up to four rounds, including cart per month, whether they
be 9- or 18-holes Monday - Thursday, subject to availability on a walk-up basis. Reservations are not
permitted.
Operational Plan:
Information being sent to HR for input. Implementation in 2022 if approved
Agenda Item 8:
Part-time employees are encouraged to play based on the number of hours worked: 1 round for every
20 hours of compensation including cart per month up to 4 rounds per month whether they be 9- or 18-
holes Monday —Thursday, subject to availability on a walk-up basis. Reservations are not permitted.
Operational Plan:
Information being sent to HR for input. Implementation in 2022 if approved
Agenda Item 9:
Volunteers are encouraged to play based on the number of hours worked: 1 round for every 12 hours of
compensation, including cart per month up to 4 rounds per month whether they be 9- or 18-holes
Monday —Thursday, subject to availability on a walk-up basis.
Operational Plan:
Volunteer program has already been updated with input from Corp Counsel. No change needed
Agenda Item 10:
Online tee time reservations will be accepted at Midnight 14 days before play. Golfers are welcome to
call the Pro Shop starting at 7 a.m. to reserve a tee time 14 days in advance. A credit card on file will
secure all tee times and golfers can cancel their reservation 24 hours in advance without penalty. Should
the golfer fail/forget to cancel their reservation, their credit card will be charged the green fee for the
tee time reservation.
Operational Plan:
Online tee times will be available in April 2021. No fees will be charged for "no show or late
cancellation" at this time. A fee will be charged if it becomes an issue with no shows.
241
Agenda Item 11:
As a function of their primary golf responsibility, Golf Shop personnel will be required to enter all
golfers' names into the tee sheet for the day and time they are playing.
Operational Plan:
Being implemented April 1, 2021.
Agenda Item 12:
As a function of their primary golf responsibility, Golf Shop personnel will be encouraged to enter the
golfer's email address of the golfer s into the tee sheet for the day and time they are playing.
Operational Plan:
Being implemented April 1, 2021.
Agenda Item 13:
A preferred player prepaid card be sold for $50 that provides the golfer the ability to receive a apply a
$5 reduction in green fee on each round played. The 10th round with a cart is complimentary.
Operational Plan:
Preferred player card already in place. Will be discontinued for 2021 and a new card to be implemented
in 2022 if needed.
Agenda Item 14:
Season passes for unlimited play will NOT be offered in 2021, consistent with prior year policy.
Operational Plan:
No season passes
Agenda Item 15:
The golfer must be 65 years of age on the date they are scheduled to play to qualify for a senior rate.
The 2020 age limit was 62 years of age, consistent with the Oakland County Park policy for all activities.
Operational Plan:
Senior age to remain 62 for 2021. Recommend to the keep the same for consistency in future.
242
Agenda Item 16:
The golf POS system will be reconfigured to create uniformity in the SKUs at every golf course to
facilitate meaningful consolidated reporting. Any new SKU will be approved by central management and
adopted uniformly across all golf courses. Historically, a golf course could create its reporting system.
Operational Plan:
SKU's have been updated for all courses. Completed 2021
Agenda Item 17:
Volunteers, if utilized, can accept TIPS at Lyon Oaks when serving in the capacity as Bag Drop Attendees
or cleaning golfer's clubs upon the conclusion of the round. The adoption of this policy is subject to
review by the Fiscal Department.
Operational Plan:
Volunteers receiving tips not recommended. Volunteer program has already been updated. Tipped
positions are being reviewed by HR, Fiscal Services and Corp Counsel. Implementation in 2022 if
approved.
Agenda Item 18:
Management of Oaks Parks is directed to undertake an extensive study of Red Oaks Golf Course to
evaluate viable alternative uses for the highest and best use of this property as a proactive measure to
cure the annual operating deficit exceeding $150,000. Such study should include as one option the
removal of the incinerator and the creating of a driving range and short -game area to encourage youth
and seniors to embrace the game.
Operational Plan:
Red Oaks Golf Course evaluation to be discussed at Fiscal Sustainability
243
Executive Officers Report
Natural Resources Management Update
April 2021
Glen Oaks Green Infrastructure Grant:
In summer 2020, the Alliance for Rouge Communities (ARC) applied for a U.S. Forest Service Fiscal Year
2020 Great Lake Restoration Initiative Grant to plant trees, retrofit existing green infrastructure and
install new green infrastructure in the Rouge River watershed. Oakland County Parks and Recreation
(OCPR) previously worked with ARC at Glen Oaks golf course to install bioswales around water features
and ponds and OCPR Natural Resources (NR) has been maintaining these bioswales since their
installation. OCPR's NR and Planning units have been working with ARC over the fall and winter to
identify locations in Glen Oaks where existing swales could be improved and where new native plant
material can be installed along Pebble Creek to improve stormwater filtration, reduce erosion and
improve water quality. ARC has proposed providing OCPR with $7,500 for plant material to complete
these projects and the use of Friends of the Rouge volunteers to assist with installation of the plants.
NR will design the native plantings and provide planned, budgeted, tree installations and other on -site
work as match for the project in the amount of $5,000. Glen Oaks staff have been consulted on the
locations and scope of the project and will assist with final planting plans and location of plant material.
Oakland County Board of Commissioners Collaborations:
AIS Stations:
The Oakland County Board of Commissioners' (BOC) Invasive Species Prevention (ISP) Committee
prioritized preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species (AIS) in Oakland County waterbodies by
purchasing two mobile CD3 decontamination stations. These stations can be used on any watercraft, are
waterless, user -operated and completely self-contained. Three hand tools allow for manual removal of
non-native plants and animals and solar panels power a vacuum and air blower that prevent accidental
transport of organisms in water left on boats. The BOC requested that OCPR own and operate these
stations and provided funding for FY2021 to operate them across Oakland County. OCPR's NR unit is
coordinating this program and has developed a service contract with the Clinton River Watershed
Council to assist with educational materials and outreach. Additionally, OCPR's Recreation Programs
and Services staff will be delivering the stations across the County and Communications and Marketing
staff are assisting with promotion and outreach.
Native Plont Distribution:
The ISP Committee also allocated funding to distributing native plants to Oakland County residents in fall
2020 and spring 2021. In fall 2020, NR assisted by developing and ordering 100 plant "kits", retaining a
contractor to create and deliver the kits and develop educational materials, and Waterford Oaks and NR
staff were on -site to coordinate the event at the Oakland County Farmers Market. In spring 2021, the
BOC provided funding directly to OCPR to coordinate the spring event and NR is planning to expand the
event to 700 kits and will distribute them at both the Oakland County Farmers Market and Red Oaks
244
Waterpark. Four styles of kit will be available for the following conditions: sun/sand, sun/clay,
sun/moist, shade. Oakland County residents will be able to sign up in advance for kits using a Google
Form.
OCPR Hunting Program Background:
• Helicopter aerial deer surveys started in 1990 and transects are flown every other year (as snow
permits) to collection population trend information.
• Other deer population estimates are collected through deer exclosures that were built in 2011
and browse damage transect surveys that started in 2019.
• OCPR allows archery hunting at 6 parks. Stands and hunting must follow Michigan Department of
Natural Resources (MDNR) and OCPR rules (including 450-foot safety zones). The Oakland
County Sheriff's Deputies assist with stand compliance throughout archery season.
• OCPR began firearm hunting at Addison Oaks in 1990, and at Independence Oaks in 2003.
Managed (firearm) hunts are based on a volunteer lottery system, strictly regulated and
generally occur every two years.
• Through 2014, hunters donated the following through managed (firearm) hunts:
— 20,148 hours
— 5,468 pounds of venison /19,184 meals
— $22,320 market value
— A lack of local processors led to changes in the 2018 managed hunt, hunters kept their
meat but committed to using it to feed their families/community.
The 2018 bait ban will substantially change the format of the managed hunts and no managed
hunts will take place until OCPR NR presents a new proposed system for firearm hunting to the
OCPRC.
Deer Population and Control Information:
There is broad agreement among ecologists that white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are too
abundant throughout most of their native range, to the detriment of natural habitats. Estimates of deer
population size prior to European settlement suggest a density of as few as 1.2 to 1.6 per square mile.
During the 2021 aerial deer survey, NR observed densities in Oakland County Parks as high as 61 per
square mile, and densities were as high as 141 per square mile in the 1990s. Michigan Natural Features
Inventory recommends a density of no more than 15 to 20 per square mile; other experts suggest the
population should be reduced to below 8 per square mile for at least 10 years to allow for vegetation to
recover from over -browsing.
Although deer were overhunted in the 1800s, they reproduce quickly, and their natural predators have
been eliminated. Due to these factors and strict new regulations, populations recovered rapidly and as
early as the 1930s state biologists were already concerned about the impact of deer overabundance on
forest regeneration. However, the interests of hunters dominated state management decisions. Deer
population size peaked in the 1990s, prompting municipalities to act on calls for lethal control. Since
that time, the statewide population has slowly declined, likely due to deer suppressing their own food
supply rather than management. The Department of Natural Resources is currently trying to prevent
lethal Chronic Wasting Disease from spreading throughout the Michigan deer herd; transmission is
245
thought to be exacerbated by high population density. Oakland County also has the highest number of
deer -car accidents in Michigan; 1,928 accidents involving deer were reported in the county in 2019.
Native plants have undergone dramatic population declines as a result of deer overabundance and
continue to be suppressed by browsing. Deer are herbivorous and feed on plants most other mammals
cannot digest including leaves, twigs, fruits, nuts, grass, lichens and fungi. Studies show that when deer
are removed from natural areas, wildflower populations can recover and deer exclosures in several
County Parks demonstrate this dramatically. Deer also contribute to the abundance of invasive plants by
selectively browsing natives while ignoring distasteful invasives. Without heavy browsing by deer, native
plants may outcompete invasive species without requiring human intervention.
Lethal control is the most efficient and cost-effective method to reduce deer populations. Relocation,
contraceptives and surgical sterilization are expensive and not allowed in Michigan. A long-term study
of numerous management techniques at Cornell University concluded that only professional culls
successfully reduced deer populations. It is the opinion of Natural Resources staff that deer populatior
control is desirable and necessary for natural habitat management, and that professional firearms culls
are an appropriate method of deer control but are not currently implemented as part of OCPR's deer
management program.
246
OAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
6reat7'arks for Great People
OaklandCountyParks.com Ed V 0
Oakland County Parks and Recreation follows Centers for Disease Control and Oakland County Health Division protocols to help mitigate the
spread of covid-19. These measures are being taken for the safety of staff and guests.
Parks and Facilities Currently Open
Staffed park office locations for reservations and questions include:
° • OCPR Administration Office - 2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford 48328; Monday -Friday 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m. 248-858-0906
° OpEN • Recreation Programs and Services Office - 2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford 48328; Monday -Friday. 8 a.m.-4 p.m. 248-858-0916.
• Independence Oaks County Park Office - Monday -Friday; 9 a.m.-4 p.m.
• Glen Oaks, Lyon Oaks, Red Oaks, Springfield Oaks and White Lake Oaks golf courses are scheduled to open April 1, weather permitting.
• Holly Oaks ORV Park will open for the season April 10.
• Addison Oaks and Groveland Oaks Campgrounds are set to open April 30.
OCPR 2021 Annual Vehicle Permits and gift cards can be purchased at the following locations:
• Addison Oaks County Park contact station, 1480 West Romeo Road, Leonard, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Monday. -Thursday and 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
Friday -Sunday (may vary based on staff availability)
• Independence Oaks County Park, 9501 Sashabaw Road, Clarkston, 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday -Friday at the park office and 9 a.m.-3 p.m. Saturday -Sunday at the
contact station. Park is open 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m. As of Jan. 18. 2021, the park hours will extend to 6 p.m
• Lyon Oaks County Park, 52221 Pontiac Trail, Wixom, 10 a.m.-3 p.m. Monday -Friday at the Pro Shop and 10 a.m.-3 p.m. Saturday -Sunday at the contact station
• Orion Oaks County Park, 1335 Joslyn Road, Orion Township, 9 a.m.-3 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. Dog Park is open 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
As of Jan. 18.2021, the park hours will extend to 6 p.m.
• Red Oaks Nature Center, 30300 Hales St., Madison Heights, 10 a.m.-5 p.m. Tuesday -Saturday and noon-5 p.m. Sunday
• Recreation Program and Services office in Waterford Oaks County Park, 2800 Watkins Lake Road in Waterford, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Monday -Friday
• Now taking reservation for picnic shelters, pavilion, building and facility rentals and sports fields (soccer, cricket, baseball)
• Select Mobile Recreation Units rentals available.
• Ongoing self -led program opportunities include: community scavenger hunts
• In -person program opportunities include: public nature programs, appointment -based nature programs (field trips, scout badges)
• Virtual program opportunities include: Historical Series and Nature Education Series.
• Virtual Nature Programs with take -and -make crafts
These parks have normal operations and will remain open as long as staffing and safety allow:
• More than 80 miles of trails; daily fee or 2021 OCPR annual permit.
• Playgrounds at all parks
• Modern restrooms open at Addison Oaks Adams Lake Lodge; Catalpa Oaks, Lyon Oaks and Independence Oaks. Please bring your own drinking water; water
fountains are closed to prevent the spread of COVID
• Effective Jan. 4, 2021, the modern restrooms at the Addison Oaks Adams Lake Lodge will be open Friday -Sunday, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., staff permitting.
Portable restrooms available until April 2021:
2 - Boathouse 2 - Day Use parking lot near playground
1 - Side lot by rental house 1 - Addison Oaks -East north of parking lot
• Red Oaks Nature Center is open for restrooms and purchase of OCPR annual vehicle permits only. Tuesday -Saturday 10 a.m.-5 p.m. and Sunday noon-5 p.m.
• Oakland County Farmers Market in Waterford is open from January - April on Saturdays from 7 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.; please wear a face mask
• Disc Golf Course at Addison Oaks County Park
• Three dog parks: Lyon Oaks, Orion Oaks and Red Oaks.
The limit of individuals permitted for indoor and outdoor programs, events and gatherings is dependent upon Michigan Health and Human Services orders issued
to protect public health.
f
Currently Closed
• Dog Dock at Orion Oaks Dog Park
• Nature Center exhibits
• Waterford Oaks - BMX Track and Paradise Peninsula Playscape
• Wint Nature Center 3/19/2021
or 247
Communications • • Marketing 0MAKLAND
APRIL REPORT COUNTY PARKS
Great Darks for Great People
The following is an update provided by Desiree Stanfield, Supervisor - Marketing and Communications:
A
s
Seasonal Jobs Recruitment
Sent the OCPR Jobs Flyer via Electronic Backpack to 16 Public
School Districts in Oakland County: Avondale, Berkley,
Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Brandon, Clarkston, Ferndale, Hazel
Park, Holly, OakPark, Pontiac, Royal Oak, South Lyon, Troy, Walled
Lake and Waterford.
The flyer was also sent to the Michigan Association of Non-public
Schools (MANS) for distribution via newsletter to 49 Oakland
County non-public schools. The information was also emailed
directly to three non-public high schools in Macomb County:
DeLaSalle, Lutheran North and Regina High School.
And, the flyer was uploaded via PeachJar service to 11 Oakland
County High Schools in the Farmington, Lake Orion, Oxford,
Rochester and Troy school districts.
Finally, the jobs flyer was shared with parks staff to forward onto
their family, friends, personal sports team/activities/clubs and more.
r
Advertising Initiatives:
Placing ads to promote the Oakland County Farmers Market
in Michigan Gardener Magazine for distribution in Southeast
Michigan at independent garden centers; hardware stores; home
furnishing shops and more. Ads will runs May issue - Sunday
flower days (38,000 circulation); June issue - fresh produce
(32,000 circulation); and September/October issue- fall decor,
pumpkins (28,000 circulation).
• Creating an ad for the Oakland County Farmers Market,
promoting the 2021 Sunday Flower Markets, to appear on
the front-page on May 5. Birmingham -Bloomfield Eagle;
Farmington Press; Madison -Park News; Rochester Post; Royal
Oak Review; Southfield Sun; Troy Times; West Bloomfield Beach
and Woodward Talk. Combined circulation 255,116.
News Releases
0
a
E-marketing Messages
Wrote and distributed 18 e-marketing messages. The topics
highlighted items for the nature centers, farmers market and winter
programs. These e-marketing messages were delivered to 187,288
recipients as follows:
• First winter TrailBlazer happens Feb. 16 - 7,632
• Catch up with winter OAKNotes - 32,490 recipients
• OCPR's 2020 Annual Report ready to view - 32,400
• Let's get cooking virtually! - 5,465
• February is National Therapeutic Recreation Month - 3,753
• Chill out at the Sledding Hill - 7,560
• POSTPONED: Winter TrailBlazer rescheduled for Feb. 23 - 7,640
• OCPR is hiring! - 21,432
• Explore trails with a naturalist - 10,626
• Try snowshoeing! - 6,394
• And the winners are - 9.081
• Free food distribution Wednesday - 7,952
• Saturday trail hikes available - 7,841
• Make a moon phases craft - 7,571
• Let's get cooking online! - 5,507
• Join us for Morning Munchkins - 7.979
• Learn more about Dixie Highway - 1,471
• Explore food webs - 4,494
Design Initiatives:
• Submitted updated OCPR information for the 2021 Oakland County
Directory.
• Revised hiring seasonal flyer targeting for high school aged positions
• Revised 2021 trails kiosk poster design
• Updated neighborhood notification cards for the spring prescribed
burns
• Updated the Recreation Programs and Services brochure to reflect
current programs and opportunities for 2021
• Designed program schedules for spring 2021 nature education
• Oakland County Parks and Recreation honored with four mParks awards, Feb. 9
• Oakland County Parks and Recreation marks National Therapeutic Recreation Month, Feb. 12
• Apply now for summer jobs with Oakland County Parks and Recreation, Feb. 17
• Oakland County Parks and Recreation leader retiring after 43 years of service, Feb. 18
• Celebrate the first signs of spring at Oakland County Parks and Recreation, Feb. 25
-%I -
Primary Facebook
Follows
25,875
I
OCFM Facebook
Follows
12,025
OLLY OAKS
Holly Oaks
Facebook Follows
9,159
Of
4 n
Twitter Instagram
Followers Followers
6,945 2,695
Award Nomination Submissions
Holly Oaks ORV Park for the Park
and Recreation Areas for Facilities
award by the National Association
of County Parks and Recreation
Officials.
NACPRO's Special Award -
Marketing for the 2020 Millage
Awareness Campaign
mParks, Michigan Recreation and
Park Association, Community
Service Award nominations for
Citizens for Oakland County Parks
and Recreation and Volunteers Greg
and Michelle Petrosky.
OF
248
Social Media:
Throughout the past month, we've focused on promoting summer job opportunities on all social media platforms. Three recruitment
videos created by Volunteer Coordinator Jess Whatley are being posted on a weekly basis. We have been using graphics with general
messaging about hiring opportunities, as well as targeting specific areas of the parks system. We've been creating ads (boosting posts)
on Facebook so our posts reach more people. To create more engagement among our audience, we've been recognizing special holidays
such as National Therapeutic Recreation Month, Valentine's Day, National Love Your Pet Day, National Invasive Species Awareness
Week, Read Across America Day and World Wildlife Day. We also have promoted the events that are taking place, such as Parks
Historian Carol Bacak-Egbo's virtual Fireside Chats, nature center programs, the TrailBlazer program and more. We also have themed
weeks in the Recreation Programs and Services Facebook group, where our nature education team provides a craft, activity and
educational video for our audience, focusing on a nature topic.
GET YOUR
DAILY DOSE OF
War9c at a Golfourse this Summer
Oakland County Farmers Market
CakUrd County radaa and fi*w"Sen ...
'1rJnhrE to ArruMaSac4 SE ra
APPLICA7IONSARE OPEN! *Fledafee uut M'rgs feyN
Oakland CmAly Rarka and fteaeallan M ly+0 A401.
+ba�rr6Car�[yPanrs rrOC�r+fotrs wi7(:Prxgb rwarwrrto eU111�rIKra7k''
Wv4Ss�sh
■
QrAKLAND
COUNTY PARKS
Great Parks for Great People
Oakgov.com/jobs
248-858-0530
Oakland County Parks and Wreatfon
Published by Amanda Sable March 3. d'Ot PIA O
Happy #Wor1dWi1dkfeaay1,aVVW OaIdand County Parks are home
to a wide array ofwildlife. Our Natural Resources Management team
seeks to Conserve rare species and maintain wikfhife populations within
our park natural communities. Learn more about how our parks
function as major ecological huts within the region by suppo ng
important ecosystems, protecting air and water quality and providing
wildlife habitat: httpsJlbitJy/307QHnl.
The Oakland County Farmers Market Facebook page continues to remind shoppers of the winter market hours, and shares updates
from vendors. We continue to post about when Gleaners Community Food Bank distributes food at the market. Robin Danto of the
MSU Extension - Oakland County and Market Manager Jeremy Brown continue to record Discover Michigan Fresh videos, which
are posted to the farmers market Facebook page. The virtual Cooking with EdibleWOW series continues as well, and our Facebook
followers are interested and engaged.
IETPING 40 COMMUNITT MUG IIRCk4T TIMES Uk NEED
Eha-o_•sr 'i. -L'v r.i ,c.1}}.y.sk t.'bod
{� Ilaua�ld Yiaoxd an+4''�+Y �r'#W dvo A.Yrn pwrvi tT f�FYvlLiufrtYvr
r1+d 9w
• �JO M+wIr Ms,.rw ....r4+r.�uWa,+n�prw*, W+o-ax+.rwM-+
+ t?'4t`MFrwYkW'-1'+r^rV-r�Mr.+roLan.w i�WM.+a rr+�r.++ �
-Fr .te�.ear uria robe ii..0 r.wlrw iorb.n}�wwion,
,.rr.. f�m r� a rr.Pr.eao r.-r a. oamno row. r.a
• M+w}M�rt�rM-'rwaorw rwMiovry W�i�VrirpKa�r rlp�ym
r,t.�..ee4a
+ ra�xrSyVwr Mom' +4r+ra+L,P W r,+W A>,t•M,I+1 yw+rry#'w+W�+ rt+'+
TW rrG4rwia�"wIFaWF �rarr°r4'L
M rrrt+ss+rr V'rr++`rd mirrnw. lud Wry.
ra4 � w � ir'N i/�rwf a�4•
wa. ou..rw+nbrrsr u.
249
Holly Oaks ORV Park
As the beginning of the ORV season gets closer, we'll be sharing updates at least once a week about the park, answering many
frequently asked questions. We've also posted about the job opportunities at the ORV park this season.
Holly Oaks ORV Park updated their cover photo
Pubb5hed by Amanda Sable 411 - March 4 at 16:06 A M - Cl'
Holly Oaks CRY Park Opens for the Season on April 10! Please check
out our website for more infarrnatian_ httpsJlbit.ly13kCi0Xe9.
-We'll be open on Saturdays and Surtdays from 10a.m. to 8 p.m. to
begin the wasonr but will eventual ly 4e open on Thursdays and
Fridays as well. Our full schedule will be posted soon.
-lust like last year, online sales are encouraged.
-This year we'll be requiring all vehicles to have a dune • style Flag. The
flag must be orange and rectangularr a... Sea Mare
Broadcast news:
•WWJ (radio) - Detroit, MI, Feb. 17
0 1:18 p.m.
o OCPR summer job opportunities
•WWJ (radio) - Detroit, MI, March 8
0 5:37 a.m., 6:09 a.m., 8:03 a.m., 10:18 a.m.
o Oakland Together COVID Tribute walk at Waterford Oaks County Park
Print and Digital Media Exposure:
The Oakland Press Natalie Broda USA Mar 8 3:15 pm
Oakland County hosting COVID-19 tribute walk, public invited to join
memorial. Glenore Trails in Commerce Township. Oakland County
Parks and Recreation is co -hosting the event. "Oakland County Parks and
Recreation is
WXYZ.COM USA Mar 81:34 pm
Half -mile light trail in Oakland County to help visitors reflect on
COVID-19 pandemic
County is launching the Oakland Together COVID-19 Tribute Walk at
Waterford Oaks County Park. According to a press release, the half -mile
Oakland County Moms USA Mar 8 7:55 am
Calendar - events waterford oaks county park events west bloomfield
events west bloomfield twp events white lake events wint nature center
events
The Oakland Press Mark Cavitt USA Mar 5 2:30 pm
Oakland County planning to remove 186-year-old Mill Pond Dam as
federal lawsuit lingers
River and habitats for many species of wildlife. Oakland County Parks
and Recreation and the township jointly manage the Mill Pond and dam,
The Oakland Press Kathy Blake USA Mar 5 2:30 pm
Oakland County community calendar March 7 and beyond
at 510 W. Big Beaver Road, Troy. Nature activities/Parks • Oakland
County Parks and Recreation Historian Carol Bacak-Egbo will discuss
how a
Oakland County Times USA Feb 26 8:27 pm
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Hiring for Summer Jobs
Oakland County Times
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Hiring for Summer Jobs (Oakland
County, Feb. 26, 2021) Oakland County Parks and Recreation (OCPR) is
The Oakland Press Kathy Blake USA Feb 26 2:30 pm
Oakland County community calendar Feb. 28 and beyond
858-0916 during business hours to pick up a kit at Red Oaks Nature
Center or Independence Oaks County Park. Live Zoom instruction is 7-9
p.m
Samachar News English IND Feb 24 12:31 am
Motown gets another autumn automotive event, the Detroit 4Fest
state park jointly managed by state and county recreation agencies, in this
case Oakland County Parks and Rec and the Michigan Dept. of
The Truth About Cars Jason R. Sakurai CAN Feb 22 5:00 pm
Detroit 417est Returns to Holly Oaks ORV Park
-road event,a said Dan Stencil, Executive Officer, Oakland County Parks
and Recreation. Spectators are free, and event registration is $25
250
Oakland County Moms USA Feb 21 11:05 pm
Earth Day Events 2021 Metro Detroit
under the tent. Hosted by Oakland County Parks and Recreation.
Tuesday, April 13, 2021 from 10:30a-12:30p Oakland County Parks
Events —
Detroit Free Press (Premium) Brendel Hightower USA Feb 21 5:25
am
Detroit man known for his kindness and love of golf died of COVID-19
complications
of service in management. He worked his dream retirement job at
Glen Oaks Golf Course in Farmington Hills, where he played golf every
chance
The Oakland Press Kathy Blake USA Feb 20 5:30 am
Oakland County community calendar Feb. 21 and beyond
-it is 2-3 p.m. Feb. 27 at Wint Nature Center in Independence Oaks
County Park, 9501 Sashabaw Road, Clarkston. Participants must wear
boots.
Oakland County Times USA Feb 19 4:23 pm
After Over Four Decades, Dan Stencil Retires from Oakland County
Parks and Rec • Oakland County Times
Oakland County Parks and Rec (Oakland County, Feb. 19, 2021)
Pontiac, MI — During his long tenure at Oakland County Parks and
Recreation (
The Daily Tribune Kathy Blake USA Feb 19 2:30 pm
Oakland County accepting applications for student summer jobs
dog parks, two nature centers and Holly Oaks ORV Park, according to a
press release from Oakland County Parks and Recreation. Wages start at
The Oakland Press Mark Cavitt USA Feb 19 1:00 pm
Dan Stencil retires as longtime director of Oakland County Parks and
Recreation
disabilities; and assuming operations of the Oakland County Farmers
Market and Red Oaks Nature Center. Normandy Oaks, a cooperative
Times Online USA Feb 19 11:58 am
Oakland County is hiring
oakgovcom/jobs and search "Summer." Oakland County Parks and
Recreation also is accepting applications for summer employment. Parks
Will
San Antonio Express -News USA Feb 18 4:00 pm
Oakland County Parks and Recreation Honors Gregory Jamian for his
Service to the Community
18, 2021 Executive Officer, Daniel Stencil of the Oakland County Parks
and Recreation system recently presented area businessman and civic
Starkville Daily News - FinancialContentAmeriCare Medical USA
Feb 18 8:00 am
AmeriCare Medical CEO is acknowledged for his contributions to
Oakland County's Park system that spans over 15 years.
-- Executive Officer, Daniel Stencil of the Oakland County Parks and
Recreation system recently presented area businessman and civic leader
Detroit Legal News USA Feb 18 6:33 am
Oakland County now accepting applications for a variety of high school
and college student summer jobs
.oakgovcom/jobs and search "Summer." Oakland County Parks and
Recreation also is accepting applications for summer employment. Parks
will
The Oakland Press Monica Drake USA Feb 16 8:00 am
Oakland County Parks recognized for helping families stay active during
COVID-19
Oakland County Parks and Recreation was recognized by the Michigan
Recreation and Park Association for their innovative programming in
the
The Oakland Press Mark Cavitt USA Feb 15 5:00 am
Oakland County Parks releases annual report describing highs and lows
of 2020
home the fact that parks and recreation are most certainly essential
services" Oakland County Parks and Recreation 2020 report:
The Oakland Press Kathy Blake USA Feb 1212:45 pm
Oakland County community calendar Feb. 14 and beyond
+ Recreation, 4640 Walnut Lake Road, West Bloomfield, wbparks.org/
snowshoe.html, $6 for s two-hour rental per person.. Oakland County
Parks
automotive map Chad Kirchner USA Feb 10 11:30 am
2021 Ford Ranger Tremor Review: Snow tested, off-roader approved
location in the path of Winter Storm Orlena. A day spent at the Holly
Oaks ORV park in Holly, Michigan made it feel like I was smack dab on
Motor Authority Kirk Bell USA Feb 10 5:16 am
First drive review: 2021 Ford Ranger Tremor is a winter fun machine
a winter storm that dumped a few inches of ice and snow on the Holly
Oaks ORV Park in Holly, Michigan. A layer of ice lurks beneath a layer
The Baltimore Sun Roadshow Andrew Krok USA Feb 9 4:57 pm
2021 Ford Bronco Sport is ready to take the small -crossover market off
the beaten path
to ride shotgun in a Bronco Sport through southeast Michigan's Holly
Oaks ORV Park, and I walked away impressed.
251