Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgendas/Packets - 2022.05.04 - 40422OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Regular Monthly Meeting Agenda Parks Commission Room - 2800 Watkins Lake Rd, Waterford 48328 Wednesday, May 4, 2022 @ 2:00 pm Gary McGillivray, Chairperson Call Meeting to Order Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes - April 6, 2022 Public Comment PRESENTATIONS/RECOGNITIONS: A Mtegrf &T Heakh & AWtupe Teresa Penbrooke (Bar....nunn G,.... uki � COMMUNICATIONS/REPORTS: BA FY2022 Q2 Contributions Report C-B Springfield Oaks Mill Pond Dam Removal & Restoration REGULAR AGENDA: 1 Independence Oaks - Asphalt Road Improvements 2 Indepence Oaks - Hidden Spring Beach - Building and Site Improvements 3 2023 Campground Fees (Addison Oaks & Groveland Oaks) 4 Ernst Barn Bill of Sale - Holly Township UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS 5 Director's Report 6 Executive Committee Update ACTION REOUIRED PRESENTER(S) / PHONE # Informational Chris Ward / 858-4944 ACTION REOUIRED PRESENTER(S) / PHONE # Approval Melissa Prowse / 249-2801 Informational Zachary Crane / 240-1079 ACTION REOUIRED PRESENTER(S) / PHONE # Approval Zachary Crane / 240-1079 Approval Mark Adams / 762-3822 Approval Jim Dunleavy / 343-6224 Approval Melissa Prowse / 249-2801 ACTION REOUIRED PRESENTER(S) / PHONE # ACTION REOUIRED PRESENTER(S) / PHONE # Informational Chris Ward / 858-4944 Informational Gary McGillivray / 709-0359 ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT TO: May 20, 2022 (Budget Study Session) at 12:00 p.m. or to the Call of the Chair RETURN TO AGENDA OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2800 WATKINS LAKE ROAD, WATERFORD, MICHIGAN 48328 Telephone: (248) 858-0906 Christine Long J. David VanderVeen REGULAR MEETING Yolanda Charles Vice Chairman Gary R. McGillivray, Chairman Amanda Herzog Andrea LaFontaine Ebony Bagley Jim Nash Secretary April 6, 2022 Nancy Quarles Lance Stokes Chairman McGillivray called the meeting of the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission to order at 2:00 p.m. in the Oakland County Parks Activity Center. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Gary R. McGillivray, J. David VanderVeen, Ebony Bagley, Yolanda Charles, Amanda Herzog, Jim Nash, Nancy Quarles, Lance Stokes COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT WITH NOTICE: Christine Long, Andrea LaFontaine OTHERS PRESENT: PARKS AND RECREATION Chris Ward, Director Phil Castonia, Manager -Operations & Maintenance Melissa Prowse, Manager -Planning & Community Services Mike Donnellon, Chief -Facilities Maintenance & Development Jim Dunleavy, Chief -Park Operations & Maint. — North District Tom Hughes, Chief -Park Operations & Maint. — South District Zachary Crane, Project Manager Engineer Mark Adams, Architectural Engineer Donna Folland, Supervisor -Planning Stephanie Mackey, Supervisor -Organizational Development Kate Pardy, Supervisor -Addison Oaks Aaron Stepp, Supervisor -Business Systems Kegan Schildberg, Parks Crew Chief Jami Monte, Executive Secretary Ashley Jenkins, Central Employee Records Coordinator Shannon Kenny, Technical Office Specialist Kristen Kittell, Technical Office Specialist COUNTY EXECUTIVE Robin Carter -Cooper, Chief Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Officer Erin Quetell, Environmental Sustainability Officer FISCAL SERVICES Jeff Phelps, P&R Fiscal Coordinator PURCHASING Andy Krumwiede, Buyer SEMCOG Tyler Klifman, Planner APPROVAL OF AGENDA Quarles moved to recommend approval of the agenda, as presented. Seconded by Nash. Motion carried on a voice vote with Long, Charles and LaFontaine absent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Quarles moved to recommend approval of the minutes of March 2, 2022, as presented. Seconded by VanderVeen. April 6, 2022 Page 2 Motion carried on a voice vote with Long, Charles and LaFontaine absent. PUBLIC COMMENT None. PRESENTATIONS/RECOGNITIONS A. Introduction of Ashlev Jenkins Stephanie Mackey introduced Ashley Jenkins as the new Central Employee Records Coordinator. B. Introduction of Kristen Kittell Mike Donnellon introduced Kristen Kittell as a new Technical Office Specialist. COMMUNICATIONS/REPORTS C. Springfield Oaks — Mill Pond Dam Removal & Restoration Update D. Asset Prioritization Evaluation Model Donna Folland provided an overview of the Asset Prioritization Evaluation Model. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Multiple Park Locations — Invasive Species Management Nash moved to recommend approval of the Multiple Park Locations — Invasive Species Management, as presented. Seconded by Stokes. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 2. Independence Oaks — Site Access Aareement — Verizon Wireless Cell Tower Bagley moved to recommend approval of the Independence Oaks — Site Access Agreement — Verizon Wireless Cell Tower, as presented. Seconded by Stokes. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 3. Waterford Oaks — 2022 License Aareement with O.C. BMX Herzog moved to recommend approval of the Waterford Oaks — 2022 License Agreement with O.C. BMX, as presented. Seconded by Quarles. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 4. Natural Resources Stewardship Proaram — Proiect Recommendations Nash moved to recommend approval of the Natural Resources Stewardship Program — Project Recommendations, as presented. Seconded by Herzog. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 5. Community Grant Proaram — Parks and Trails — Proiect Recommendations Stokes moved to recommend approval of the Community Grant Program — Parks and Trails — April 6, 2022 Page 3 Project Recommendations, as presented. Seconded by Charles. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 6. FY2022 Capital Eauipment Amendment and ADA Golf Cart Purchases Charles moved to recommend approval of the FY2022 Capital Equipment Amendment and ADA Golf Cart Purchases, as presented. Seconded by VanderVeen. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 7. Eauinment Purchases Charles moved to recommend approval of the Equipment Purchases, as presented. Seconded by Quarles. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 8. Holly Oaks — Free DNR Weekend at Holly Oaks — ORV Park Quarles moved to recommend approval of the Holly Oaks — Free DNR Weekend at Holly Oaks — ORV Park, as presented. Seconded by Herzog. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS 9. Director's Report Director Ward provided an overview of his report, and distributed a memo titled "Seasonal Employee Salary and Incentive Changes" for approval. Stokes moved to recommend approval of the Seasonal Employee Salary and Incentive Changes, as presented. Seconded by Bagley. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and LaFontaine absent. 10. Executive Committee Update Chairman McGillivray provided an update from the Executive Committee meeting that was held on March 14, 2022. A brief recess was held from 2:58 p.m. to 3:07 p.m. 11. Parks Commission Visioninq Workshop Donna Folland facilitated discussion as a first step in developing the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission's strategic vision and goals for the 5-Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Additional panel members facilitating this discussion included Robin Carter -Cooper, Erin Quetell and Tyler Klifman. The discussion will be continued at the May 4, 2022 Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission April 6, 2022 Page 4 Regular meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS/ADJOURNMENT At 4:29 p.m., there being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned to April 20, 2022 (Budget Study Session) or to the Call of the Chair. Ebony Bagley, OCPRC Secretary Jami Monte, Recording Secretary NOTE: The foregoing minutes are subject to Commission approval. RETURN TO AGENDA Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item Memo Agenda #: A Department: Planning & Resource Development From: Melissa Prowse — Manager — Parks and Recreation Subject: FY2022 2Q Contributions Report INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY Attached is the FY2022 2nd Quarter Contributions report for donations received January 1, 2022 through March 31, 2022. ATTACHMENTS FY2022 2nd Quarter Contributions Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommends the Commission approve the FY2022 2nd Quarter Contributions Report, which will be forwarded to Oakland County Fiscal Services for their reporting. MOTION Move to approve the FY2022 2nd Quarter Contributions Report. OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FY 2022 2Q Report for Contributions (Donations) - January 1, 2022 - March 31, 2022 .•et Center Project / Program Source Amount REC Contribution - Sensory Garden Paul Niezguski $5,000.00 Recreation Programs and Services -Total $5,000.00 IND Contribution - General Linda Engler $5.00 IND Contribution - Tuning Your Tot CD Rise Frendberg $5.00 Independence Oaks -Total ORN Contribution - Comemmorative Bench Site Development Inc. $2,000.00 Orion Oaks - Total $2,000.00 RNC Contribution - General Anonymous $20.00 RNC Contribution - General Boy Scout Troop $550.00 RNC Contribution - General Anonymous $1.00 Red Oaks NatuAME Grand Total $7,581.00 RETURN TO AGENDA Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item Memo Agenda #: B Department: Facilities Maintenance & Development From: Michael J. Donnellon, Jr. Subject: Springfield Oaks — Davisburg Mill Pond Dam — Removal & Restoration Project Update INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY Staff received project conceptual approval at the September 1st, 2021 OCPR Commission Meeting to proceed with final construction drawings and specifications for bidding the mill pond dam removal and restoration project. Bids were released through Oakland County Purchasing on February 22nd, 2022 and an on -site pre -bid meeting was conducted on March 2nd 2022 with nine vendors attending. A total of four bids were submitted to Oakland County Purchasing on March 22nd, 2022. Bid summary below; DESCRIPTION I VENDOR Anglin Civil Superior VIL Construction Z Contractors Livonia, MI Contracting Almont, MI Sterling Heights, MI Shelby Twp., MI Base Bid #1 — Dam Removal & River $3,821,075.11 $3,823,337.00 $2,991,000.00 $4,605,001.00 Restoration Base Bid #2 — Davisburg $946,303.62 $724,688.70 $735,110.27 $742,456.27 Road Reconstruction TOTAL BASE BID #1& #2 $4,767,378.73 $4,548,025.70 $3,726,110.27 $5,347,457.27 The above submitted pricing was 40-55% percent higher than the budget/engineers estimate of cost approved at the September 2021 OCPR commission meeting. Staff and consultants reviewed the above submitted bid packages and found the following conclusions; o After a post -bid evaluation, it was determined the lowest bid is not a qualified bidder due to an incomplete and unresponsive bid. The remaining 3 bids were within a 17.5% range of the next lowest bid. o During the post -bid review of the bids, the qualified vendors identified a scheduling concern over procurement and delivery of the pre -cast concrete culvert that could result in a winter road closure of Davisburg Rd. RCOC staff have experience longer than normal lead time for pre -cast culvers with many of their projects, in which they have had to postpone several culvert projects. o AECOM has reviewed the bid tabs in detail and nothing in the unit prices provided raises alarm as excessive costs or a non-competitive bid process. In general, the bids received are consistent with another similar construction project AECOM recently bid in 2022 and in discussion with other AECOM engineers and construction professionals, bids in 2022 have been coming back 15% - 50% higher than expected. This appears to be majorly factored by the current economic state, fuel prices, and busy contractor schedules with a large backlog of construction work. While rebidding this project in the Fall 2022 will likely alleviate issues with contractor schedules it is likely construction prices will remain nearly the same or increase over time due to current inflation rates. Due to the potential delay in vendor procurement and delivery of the pre -cast concrete culvert that could result in a winter road closure, staff and our partners are proposing to rebid the construction contract with a new schedule beginning in the Page 2 spring of 2023. Additionally, to address increases in costs, staff are proposing to budget the increases in the FY2023 Capital Improvement Program Budget. Since this project is contingent on community and road funding, Springfield Township (CTS) and the Road Commission for Oakland County (RCOC) are currently reviewing the increase costs and are considering additional funding. Upon confirmation, staff is proposing the following revised schedule. • Rebidding • Contract Award • Construction Commence • Substantial completion • Final Closeout PROPOSED FUNDING UPDATE • FY2020 CIP Budget • FY2021 CIP Budget • Proposed FY2023 Budget Total Project (Engineering/Construction) • Local Match (Springfield Township) • Current Grant Funding • Road Commission for Oakland County • OCPRC Balance Estimate (Out -of -Pocket) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Informational August/September 2022 November 1st, 2022 May 15th, 2023 November 1st, 2023 June 1st, 2024 $110,000 $1,650,000 $3,340,000 $5,100,000 (based on qualified vendor bids) ($1,539,750) ($901,135) ($816,000) $1,843,115 RETURN TO AGENDA Oakland Couny Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item Memo Agenda #: 1 Department: Facilities, Maintenance & Development From: Zach Crane, Project Manager Subject: Construction Approval — Independence Oaks Asphalt Road Improvements PROJECT CATEGORIES Agenda Type: Consent Agenda ✓ Regular Agenda Approval Type: Conceptual Approval ✓ Construction Approval General Approval Project Type: ✓ Capital Improvement Maintenance Enhancement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scope The entirety of this project includes the following scope items; • Resurfacing of the existing 2.18-mile interior asphalt roadway system and Wint Nature Center parking lot. (60 parking spaces) Resurfacing scope of work includes crushing, grading and shaping of the existing hot mix asphalt (HMA) or aggregate surfaces; and construction of a new 3.5-inch HMA surface layer • Installation of 7100 square foot rain garden between parking bays at the Wint Nature Center parking lot; for stormwater infiltration best management practices (BMP) • Installation of 3200 LF of Bio-retention drainage swales with native plantings within the existing roadway ditches for stormwater infiltration best management practices (BMP) • Replacement of approximate 1,110 LF of concrete curb on Independence Blvd. entrance drive. • Installation of ADA accessible sidewalk ramp slope at 2 trail crosswalk locations • Placement of new pavement markings and associated permanent signs o Please refer to Attachment A Planning Review for additional information related to environmentally sustainable alternatives. • Construction Schedule Notes: All park facilities will be open during construction activity, with contractor utilizing traffic regulator control during construction. Traffic control shall be removed at the end of each workday and the roads re -opened to two-way traffic. 1. Need Original asphalt entrance boulevard was installed in the 1970's and requires annual pavement maintenance repair work including asphalt patching and crack filling. Additional sections of road system were installed in 1998 and require the same annual pavement maintenance repair work. The entire Independence Oaks road system is at a critical point were annual pavement maintenance repair work is not adequality addressing the asphalt and stormwater infrastructure issues. 2. Review and approval history Date Description Sept 2021 Approved within the FY2022 Capital Improvement Program Budget Dec 2021 Approved Award for Design/Engineering Contract Page 2 3. Funding a. Current FY2022 budgeted amount: b. IND Park Entrance Boulevard $287,500 c. IND Park Entrance Road $438,000 d. IND Park Road North $487,500 e. IND Park Road South $337,500 i. Total Project Budget: $1,550,500 Recommended total project amount: i. Design/Engineering Award ii. Giffels-Webster Engineers $ 36,620 iii. Construction Award (1) Base Bid #1 $1,020,000 (2) Base Bid #22t $419,400 (3) Alt # 1-A $124,480 (4) Alt # 1-B $33,210 (5) 10% Construction Contingency $117,769 Total Project Cost Recommendation: $1,332,079 *Base Bid #1 is for resurfacing entire Independence Oaks internal Roadway System and Wint Nature Center Parking Lot. Base Bid #2 is to complete Independence Blvd. ONLY. ATTACHMENTS 1. Attachment A — Planning Review 2. Attachment B — Project Plan Set 3. Attachment C — Bid Summary 4. Attachment D — Project Site Photos STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends contract award to Hutch Paving Inc. for the Independence Oaks Internal Road System and Wint Nature Center Parking Lot for a not to exceed total contract amount of $1,177,690 as described in solicitation Base Bid #1, Alt # 1-A and Alt #1-B for a not to exceed total project cost of $1,332,079 MOTION Move to award contract award to Hutch Paving Inc. for the Independence Oaks Internal Road System and Wint Nature Center Parking Lot for a not to exceed total contract amount of $1,177,690 as described in solicitation Base Bid #1, Alt # 1-A and Alt #1-B for a not to exceed total project cost of $1,332,079 Contents ProjectIdentification.............................................................................................................................................................. 2 StaffRecommendation........................................................................................................................................................... 2 ProjectDescription..................................................................................................................................................................2 ❑X Current Conditions and Project Need........................................................................................................................2 ❑X Proposed Project Scope............................................................................................................................................. 2 ❑X Project Location Image...............................................................................................................................................3 ❑X Proposed Schedule.....................................................................................................................................................3 ❑X Proposed Project Funding..........................................................................................................................................3 ❑X Alternatives................................................................................................................................................................4 ProjectImplementation Plans.................................................................................................................................................4 ❑X Park Operations and Facilities Maintenance.............................................................................................................4 ❑X Natural Resources Management...............................................................................................................................4 X❑ Access and Inclusion..................................................................................................................................................5 ❑X Public Engagement.....................................................................................................................................................5 ❑X Communications and Marketing................................................................................................................................5 ❑X Recreation Programming...........................................................................................................................................5 Compliance and Permitting Reviews...................................................................................................................................... 5 ❑X Environmental Regulations........................................................................................................................................5 ❑X Building Regulations...................................................................................................................................................6 ❑X Grant Compliance......................................................................................................................................................6 ❑X Other Property Restrictions....................................................................................................................................... 6 ❑X Standards and Practices.............................................................................................................................................6 PlanningBackground..............................................................................................................................................................7 ❑X 5-Year Park Statistics..................................................................................................................................................7 ❑X Planning History.........................................................................................................................................................7 ❑X Historical Significance................................................................................................................................................ 7 ❑X Public Engagement History........................................................................................................................................7 ❑X Other Service Providers — NA..................................................................................................................................... 8 References.............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Update: April 21, 2022 Project Identification Park: Independence Oaks Budget center: IND Asset name OCPR Asset ID Maintenance Entrance Road H12698 Nature Center Parking Lot H12237 Park Entrance Boulevard H12659 Park Entrance Road MJD007 Park Road North H12559 Park Road South H12505 Project Name: Independence Oaks Asphalt Road Improvements Project ID: 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983, 2042, 2043 Plannine Review coordinated bv: Donna Folland, Senior Planner, follandd@oakgov.com Contributors: Zach Crane, Project Manager Engineer, cranez(a)oakeov.com Approvals: Design/Engineering Approval November 2021; Construction Approval March 2022 Date Created: 10/16/2021 Date of Last Update: 4/21/2022 Staff Recommendation Implementing the following asphalt pavement capital improvements in FY2022 will support vehicle access and continued popularity of the park for trail and facility use: ■ 2042 IND Maintenance Entrance Road Paving ■ 2043 Nature Center Parking Lot Paving ■ 1980 Park Entrance Boulevard Paving ■ 1979 Park Entrance Road Paving ■ 1982 Park Road North Paving ■ 1983 Park Road South Paving Project Description ❑X Current Conditions and Project Need Original asphalt surfaces were installed in 1970's through 2001 and require annual pavement maintenance including cut and patch repairs and filling of pavement cracks. ❑X Proposed Project Scope Mill and repave identified asphalt surfaces. Update: April 21, 2022 ❑X Project Location Image 0 �a �A 1� ® Proposed Schedule Pavement projects are identified for Independence Oaks in FY2022. Design/Engineering completed in winter FY22 and construction scheduled for Summer FY22. Substantial completion by September 2022 ❑X Proposed Project Funding The Asset Management Plans identify a total of $1,550,500 for paving at Independence Oaks in FY2022. (OCPR, 2021) Update: April 21, 2022 ® Alternatives ❑X The project engineer and staff reviewed pervious pavement options. See attached engineers' opinion of cost for pervious pavement options compared to conventional asphalt pavement. Milling and repaving is needed to resolve these deferred asset management issues. Project Implementation Plans © Park Operations and Facilities Maintenance Summary: The Asphalt Road Improvements will reduce the need for maintenance and repairs to deteriorating asphalt surfaces. Details: M Attendance or facility usage: Maintenance of paved surfaces will help support current attendance levels. Park attendance increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. See Park Statistics table. This was observed in other OCPR parks and documented nationally. Maintaining vehicle access to the parking areas and to park trails will be an important element in retaining new users. 0 Revenue: Maintenance of paved surfaces will help support current revenue levels 0 Cost recovery: Maintenance of paved surfaces will help support current cost recovery levels 0 Staffing needs: No changes in staffing are anticipated 0 Annual maintenance budget: No changes in annual maintenance budget are anticipated ❑ Annual operations budget — other line items: NA ❑ Long-term maintenance costs: Project is an important investment in the long-term maintenance of facilities ❑ Other: NA ® Natural Resources Management Summary: If all projects stay within current footprints there are no significant NR concerns other than timing recommendations. However, the addition of new pavement, re -grading, shoulder maintenance or soil excavation close to trees should be brought to NR's attention to implement appropriate remediation or protection steps. Details: 0 Wildlife emergence: To protect Eastern Massasauga Rattlesnake populations construction should be avoided August -October when young snakes are migrating to their winter hibernacula. Ideally construction would also not occur in March, April or early May when mature snakes are emerging from hibernacula. Some of our roads bisect wetland and upland areas and EMR move between these areas in the shoulder seasons. Also, construction should implement BMPs previously provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for project construction (erosion control fencing, snake movement, etc.) 0 Tree or plant materials removal: As scoped there are no tree or plant materials, if this does occur, NR should be consulted. 0 Tree disease (e.g. oak wilt): NA as currently scoped 0 Invasive species: Any roadside trimming should be communicated to NR to determine follow up or advise on trimming practices. 0 Equipment staging: Equipment should be staged in already paved or gravel areas (parking lots, etc.) when possible. If equipment is staged along roads, NR should be consulted on locations. 0 Topsoil and seeding: NR will provide seed recommendations for any restoration or re -seeding that needs to occur. 0 Long-term maintenance: NA as currently scoped Update: April 21, 2022 ❑ Other: NA Reviewer: Sarah Cook-Maylen, Natural Resources Coordinator, 2/3/2021 ❑X Access and Inclusion Summary: Improvement of paved surfaces may provide opportunities to bring those surfaces into compliance with ADA or to go further by providing universal access This may include adjustments to slopes, curbs, etc. Individual projects should be cross-checked with ADA Transition Plan for that park. Details: ZI Actions required by ADA Transition Plan: Road pedestrian ADA crosswalks ❑ Universal Access recommendations: NA ❑ Inclusion recommendations: NA ❑X Public Engagement Summary: Improvement of existing surfaces will not require input from the public or park users. ❑X Communications and Marketing Summary: Traffic/wayfinding signage will be provided during project construction phase. Oakland County Parks website will have updated information on any interior park road/parking lot closures ❑X Recreation Programming Summary: Recreation program staff should review the list of individual projects to make sure project schedules and programs schedules are not in conflict. Compliance and Permitting Reviews ❑X Environmental Regulations Summary: SESC and EGLE should be pursued for all paving projects since most park lands fall within 500 feet of a waterbody. Park specific maps are available in the 2018 NR Permitting Guide. Details: Compliance with the following environmental regulations and permits is required (check all that apply): X❑ US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Eastern Massasauga Rattlesnake Implementation Plan (EMRIP) compliance: NR staff will update USFWS staff regarding actual paving locations but no additional permissions are necessary as scoped. Please see the Wildlife Emergence section of Natural Resources Management for more information. X❑ Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE) wetland regulations: Most park lands fall within 500 feet of a waterbody so staff should consult with EGLE staff if necessary. ❑Road Commission of Oakland County (RCOC) right of way permitting: NA❑X Oakland County Water Resources Commission (WRC) soil erosion and sedimentation control (SESC) permitting: All projects should apply for SESC permits and use best practices and EGLE permits should be discussed with WRC staff to determine if they are necessary. ❑X Oakland County Water Resources Commission (WRC) soil erosion and sedimentation control (SESC) permitting: All projects should apply for SESC permits and use best practices and EGLE permits should be discussed with WRC staff to determine if they are necessary. ❑ Other: NA Reviewer: Sarah Cook-Maylen, Natural Resources Coordinator, 2/3/2021 Update: April 21, 2022 ❑X Building Regulations Summary: Projects will comply with all relevant building regulations and codes. ® Grant Compliance ❑ There are no grant agreements related to this asset X❑ Proposed project complies with grant agreements. Individual projects may be implemented in a park with grant agreements. If the current pavement is compliant with the grant agreement, then replacement of existing paved surfaces will also be considered compliant. ❑ Further review with granting agencies is required. NA ❑X Other Property Restrictions ❑ There are no known property restrictions or encumbrances related to this asset ❑X Proposed project complies with documented property restrictions or encumbrances. Individual projects may be implemented in a park encumbered with property restrictions. If the current pavement is compliant with the restrictions, then replacement of existing paved surfaces will also be considered compliant. ❑ Communication with easement holder or other entity is required. NA ® Standards and Practices The project shall comply with the following standards and practices (check all that apply and provide detail as needed): X❑ National standards (CAPRA): 7.5.2 Preventative Maintenance Plan: There shall be a comprehensive preventative maintenance plan to provide periodic, scheduled inspections, assessment and repair, and replacement of infrastructure, systems and assets. This includes certifying, checking or testing for optimum operation based on applicable industry standards, local guidelines, city requirements and/or manufacturer's recommendation for maintenance and replacement of parks, with the intent to ensure that park assets are maintained for optimum use and safety and have the ability to reach or extend its full life cycle and expected return on investment. (CAPRA, 2014) ❑ Other standards: NA Update: April 21, 2022 Planning Background ® 5-Year Park Statistics FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Park Visits Day use** 134,656 132,953 152,746 236,213 244,812 Revenue TOTAL 334,454 947,550 311,353 269,689 351,454I Fees Camping 6,757 4,326 4,902 1,705 5,537 Fees Day Use 224,312 231,306 218,348 235,190 268,984 Rent House 25,582 11,548 10,533 10,746 10,962 Rental Facilities 49,309 51,918 46,241 15,725 53,430 Other revenue 28,494 * 48,452 31,329 6,324 12,541 Expense TOTAL 1,394,967 2,089,095 1,326,548 1,093,987 1,090,593I Salaries 371,836 404,624 385,156 347,380 371,817I Fringe 126,718 150,282 157,294 164,593 141,814 Building Maintenance 33,924 31,663 51,075 44,445 23,679 Grounds Maintenance 428,513 * 1,052,478 232,863 128,967 127,041 Rental Property Maint. 4,112 568 2,190 3,195 1,252 Total Depreciation 194,936 208,611 224,339 225,995 228,532 Other expense 234,929 240,869 273,631 179,412 196,459 * Revenue and Expense in FY2018 increased by approximately $500K due to construction of the Sashabaw Road connector trail with the local match and construction processed through the operations budget. ** Note increase during the COVID-19 pandemic in FY2020 and FY2021. ® Planning History 0 Strategic Goal/Rec Plan: MANAGE ASSETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Sustainably reinvest in existing assets and infrastructure, make new investments when supported by fiscal resources, recreational trends, public engagement, and usage data. (OCPR, 2/1/2018, p. 9.3) ® Historical Significance 0 The asset is not considered historically significant ❑ Historical Significance Evaluation has been completed and is attached ❑ The asset is considered historically significant, and evaluation has resulted in the following recommendations: NA ® Public Engagement History 0 2017 Oakland County Needs Assessment Survey: Respondents to the 2017 survey were supportive of investing tax dollars to "fix up and repair roads and parking lots". They were asked to indicate how supportive they would be of having Oakland County Parks and Recreation use their tax dollars to fund 18 different investments. Based on the sum of "very supportive" and "somewhat supportive" responses the four most supportive investments were: fix up and repair older structures and playgrounds (76%), fix up and repair roads Update: April 21, 2022 and parking lots (75%), make facilities accessible for persons of all abilities (68%), and new trails and boardwalks (67%). Respondents were then asked to indicate which four actions would they be most willing to fund with their tax dollars. Based on the sum of respondents' top four choices, the three most supported investments were: fix up and repair older structures and playgrounds (35%), fix up and repair roads and parking lots (31%), and new trails and boardwalks (29%) (ETC, September 2017) ❑ Park or Facility -Specific Public Engagement: NA ❑ Project -Specific Public Engagement: NA ❑X Other Service Providers — NA References CAPRA. (2014). Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies National Accreditation Standards. Washington DC: National Recreation and Parks Association. ETC. (September 2017). Oakland County Parks and Recreation Community Needs Assessment Survey. Waterford MI: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission. OCPR. (2/1/2018). 5-Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2018-2022. Waterford MI: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission. OCPR. (2021). Approved FY2022 Asset Management Plan. Waterford MI: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission. Update: April 21, 2022 giffiels Webster Conventional Pavement Section Engineer's Opinion of Cost Independence Oaks Pavement Improvement March 17, 2022 Independence Township Oakland County, Michigan Pervious Asphalt Cost Comparison Pay Item Description Aggregate Base, Conditioning, Modified Unit Syd Quantity 11,200.00 Unit Price $ 5.00 Amount $ 56,000.00 HMA Base Crushing and Shaping Syd 21,500.00 $ 7.00 $ 150,500.00 HMA Surface, Rem Syd 11,200.00 $ 7.00 $ 78,400.00 HMA, 3C Ton 50.00 $ 125.00 $ 6,250.00 HMA, 4EML Ton 3,600.00 $ 100.00 $ 360,000.00 HMA, 5EML Ton 2,750.00 $ 100.00 $ 275,000.00 Conventional Pavement Construction Cost: $ 926,150.00 Pervious HMA Pavement Section DescriptionPay Item Excavation, Earth Cyd Quantity 10,900.00 $ 20.00 $ 218,000.00 Open -Graded Dr Cse, CIP Cyd 10,900.00 $ 36.00 $ 392,400.00 HMA Surface, Rem Syd 32,700.00 $ 7.00 $ 228,900.00 Pervious HMA Pavement Ton 6,400.00 $ 200.00 $ 1,280,000.00 Pervious HMA Pavement Construction Cost: $ 2,119,300.00 Note: These costs represent those items associated with the pavement corss section only. All other items associated with soil erosion control, drainage repairs, etc. are not included in this comparison H 0 J N LL 0 a� N 0 0_ E C Q) IZ U) 0 U a� a� 0_ a) co c0 M 00 c0 U N 0 06 0 ca 0 M co (D 0 0 00 c0 OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ACT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, PART 91 OR ACT 451, OF THE PUBLIC ACTS OF 1994 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF OAKLAND COUNTY. 2. A SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FROM OAKLAND COUNTY WRC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER AND OBTAIN THE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT OPERATIONS IN A MANNER THAT WILL REDUCE ACCELERATED EROSION TO THE PRACTICAL MINIMUM AND PREVENT DAMAGING SILTATION TO EX. SEWERS AND WATER COURSES LEADING FROM THE WORK SITE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT WORK IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT THE ENTRY OF FUELS, OILS, BITUMINOUS MATERIALS, CHEMICALS, SEWERAGE OR OTHER HARMFUL MATERIALS INTO NEARBY LAKES AND STREAMS. 5. WASTE DISPOSAL AREAS SHALL BE SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH FULL CONSIDERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, SELECTION OF DISPOSAL SITE, CONTROL OF OPERATIONS AND THE RESTORATION OF SAID AREAS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 6. EXCAVATION FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, CHANNELS, OR OTHER MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE DEPOSITED IN OR NEAR RIVERS, STREAMS OR PONDS WHERE IT MAY ENTER THE WATERWAY. 7. AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH DAY'S CONSTRUCTION, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT MINIMAL EROSION WILL OCCUR IN TRENCHES AND TO STOCKPILED MATERIALS UNTIL RESUMPTION OF WORK. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE OPERATIONS TO THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WORKING SPACE PRACTICAL TO MINIMIZE SOIL EROSION. 9. THE PROJECT WILL BE CONTINUALLY INSPECTED FOR EROSION CONTROL COMPLIANCE. DEFICIENCIES WILL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY UPON NOTICE OF SUCH DEFICIENCIES. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE DEFICIENCIES MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A STOP WORK ORDER AND THERE WILL BE NO CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION GRANTED FOR THIS TYPE OF STOPPAGE. 10. INLET FILTERS OR SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT AND SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE PERMANENT SOIL EROSION MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 11. STREET SWEEPING OR MUD REMOVAL SHALL BE PERFORMED DAILY FOR MUD TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. 12. THE OWNER SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND WORK IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT BEING MET BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IF CONDITIONS INDICATE THAT ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES ARE WARRANTED, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 14. THE SOIL EROSION CONTROLS WILL BE MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY STORM EVENT BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCE 1. INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES. 2. INSTALL TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES. 5. CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 6. REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. 5. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER. 6. PULVERIZE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT. 7. PLACE NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT. 8. RESTORE ADJACENT LAWN AREAS. 9. REMOVE TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES. GENERAL PROVISIONS: 1. THE IMPROVEMENTS COVERED BY THESE PLANS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2020 STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 2. THE LOCATIONS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS TAKEN FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE DATA. PURSUANT TO ACT 174 OF THE PA OF 2013, NOTICE SHALL BE GIVEN TO MISS DIG A MINIMUM OF THREE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO ANY UNDERGROUND WORK BEING PERFORMED. CONTACT (800)482-7171 OR 811. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW TOWNSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITTING. AN OAKLAND COUNTY WRC SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. INDEX OF SHEETS: PAGE TITLE SHEET 1 GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL DETAILS 2 CROSS SECTIONS 3-4 PAVEMENT CORES 5-6 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 7 BEACH DR 8 - 11 INDEPENDENCE BLVD - 222+00 - 253+50 12 - 16 WINT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT 17 - 20 INDEPENDENCE BLVD - 00+00 - 43+28 21 - 26 SASHABAW APPROACH DETAIL 27 ACCESS DR 28 WRC SOIL EROSION DETAILS 29 DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE: ZACH CRANE PHONE: (248) 240-1079 INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS SECTIONS 09 & 10) T4N., R9E. INDEPENDENCE TWP, OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN Is 9alrJ rnyleLake#IrJ m 6 pn h,ll FW KiEk Rdl ' m Aukt}mraylu p, 4;nnr PAl 5hepherd'� }:. linWuldIl�h Leak E401 Rd Rplla'F u0k-Rd 4 r F �'!'11Huar Lake Re, = of y x W 1 D l X F r r t art SITE 1S � Villlage Df EL Oak Hill fld. 5tan�wl fl� 1¢ _ peen a r` yyIridlniIwoacl Rd { ranvpaod[d. wtl.ppleIel( FIrL k.&IRfV W R a IW;.yyc?' a fir VJ _ � C�g�kSrd a• a � �- x Gr�4H,4rtr{, n• � Clarknr Rd u DTEEnergy `� Wdepen-fence charfe\:Rd _ r Walclud, Rd 1Alsld r of � LOCATION MAP SCALE: NONE 7m' w DI nhn ti '� L'.I�rkifUll K� S On -Ur? GakS COLkily � Professional Seal: i �OF MICA, co JUSTIN R. *' WELLMAN : ENGINEER w rn : No. : w ZcP', 50041 ? R�FES S IONP� PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF 50041 JUSTIN R. WELLMAN, PE REGISTRATION No g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive, S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 TITLE SHEET INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 01 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 Q J N L.L 0 CD Q) 0 Q E Q) r U) M 0 U a� a� Q a) c0 M 00 U a0 0 ry 06 r 0 Cz M 0 M co 0 0 00 c0 AJ W11A-2, MODIFIED (YELLOW -GREEN REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND) 15" W16-7P . (YELLOW -GREEN REFLECTIVE 3C 11 BACKGROUND) POST, STEEL, 3 LB FINISHED GRADE 7' 3.5' (MIN) r 4' TYPICAL 1(8' AT WINT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT) 1 — TOPSOIL SURFACE, 3 INCH, FURN SEEDING, MIXTURE NR RIPARIAN RAI II I-LJ 01 AAIIICT TOPSOIL SURFACE, 2 INCH, FURN AND HYDROSEED (DISTURBED AREAS) I1 I I1 11 1 I I1 I I1 z CROSSWALK SIGN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE AUTHORIZED N VEHICLES N Lf") 00 ONLYN 000, N � Lq 10 1 8.4 1 1.8 1.8 3.7 4.6 3.7 I� 7.8 —I 2.1 2.1 12 SS-1; 1.5" Radius, 0.4" Border, 0.4" Indent, Green on White; "AUTHORIZED", B 2K specified length; "VEHICLES", B 2K; "ONLY", B 2K; Double Headed Arrow Custom - 7.8" 0°; NOTE: SEEDING, MIXTURE NR RIPARIAN SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING SEEDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER THE PROPORTIONS (BY WEIGHT) FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. COMMON NAME SOUTHERN BLUE FLAG IRIS BLACK-EYED SUSAN SWAMP MILKWEED BONESET IRONWEED PURPLE MEADOW RUE NEW ENGLAND ASTER O = PERENNIAL PLANT (ALTERNATE #1 B) z o = (REMOVE POT AND ALL PLASTICS) LU N W - Of 0 co = — z � — N — _— N —_ r r /r — —ICIICIICIICIICII�I�I�I—ICI ICI GEOTEXTILE, SEPARATOR — COMPACTED SUBGRADE BIO-RETENTION DETAIL (ALTERNATE #1A) NOT TO SCALE T - rn N 00 N ch �8J6 14 ►I, 8� U) 00 30 1.1" Radius, 0.4" Border, 0.4" Indent, Black on Yellow; 11.6 J, 9.2 J,11.6Standard Arrow Custom 15.0" X 10.2" 210°; I 32.4 I W 11 A-2 STD; 24.0" across sides 1.9" Radius, 0.8" Border, 0.5" Indent, Black on Yellow; POST, STEEL, 3 LB SS-1 (SEE ABOVE) 14' � 25' T //> \ 17' 20' im 10, TYP LO N SIGN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 8' LONG x 8" WIDE CONCRETE BUMPER BLOCK, TYPICAL ►� 40' sol 18' TYP 5� 4" WHITE, TYPICAL CONTACT STATION PARKING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 5BLU 2 BOTANICAL NAME IRIS VIRGINICA RUDBECKIA HIRTA ASCLEPIAS INCARNATA EUPATORIUM PEFOLIATUM VERONIA MISSURICA THALICTRUM DASYCARPUM SYMPHYOTRICHUM NOVAE-ANGLIAE PERCENTAGE 10% 20% 20% 5% 5% 20% 20% TYPICAL SWALE PLANTING (ALTERNATE #1 B) 24x36: 1 " = 10' 11x17: 1" = 20' PLANT LIST: XXX PERENNIALS: X NO. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 2 BIG BLUESTEM RED OCTOBER GRASS ANDROPOGON GERARDII RED OCTOBER 2 GLOWING DREAM CONEFLOWER ECHINACEA'GLOWING DREAM' 2 GARDENVIEW SCARLET BEE BALM MONARDA GARDENVIEW SCARLET NOTE: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION STAFF TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL SIZE SYMBOL 1 GAL. POT BLU 1 GAL. POT CON 1 GAL. POT BEB NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE THE PLANTING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 815 OF THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2020 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. GRADE TRANSITION (AS SPECIFIED) PROPOSED 5EML, 1.5 INCH PROPOSED 4EML, 2 INCH d�Hlj EXISTING ASPHALT - - PULVERIZED HMA BASE GRADE TRANSITION AREA DETAIL g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive; S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 GENERAL NOTES & DETAILS INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 02 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O Q J N U- C6 i N a� E_ a� 0 Q 0 E_ a� co n U) co O U a) a) Q a� M 00 U a� 06 0 O co co co 0 0 co c0 4 MAX 1F-- g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road INBOUND THRU LANE BOULEVARD OUTBOUND THRU LANE Suite 100 VARIES (15- TO 24') VARIES (0' TO 18') VARIES (15' TO 20') � No—amNo—am� Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com 2.5% EXISTING HMA, 3 INCH ± 1 INCH EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE — REMOVE 3 ± 1 INCHES OF EXISTING TOPSOIL PER 205.03.A.1 OF THE 2020 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION INBOUND LANE VARIES (15- TO 24') s �s 2.5% m o!)> !%// (Vlf! HMA, 5EML, 1 1/2 INCH, TYPICAL HMA, 4EML, 2 INCH, TYPICAL HMA, 3C, 3 INCH, TYPICAL _ (PLACE ONLY IN R.C.O.C. RIGHT -OF- WAY STA. 13+95 TO STA. 14+17) GRADE AND SHAPE EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE — EXISTING CROSS SECTION STA 00+24 TO 14+ 17 BOULEVARD VARIES (0' TO 18') PROPOSED CROSS SECTION STA 00+24 TO 14+ 17 2.5% oo��oco��0000-- HMA SURFACE, REM, TYPICAL AGGREGATE BASE, CONDITIONING, MODIFIED _ CURB AND GUTTER, REM, TYPICAL (LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS) Ny)1M OUTBOUND THRU LANE VARIES (15' TO 20') CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION ALONG EXISTING CURB, TYPICAL 2.5% IN— ))))))P)lfl/r r N/t 4 MAX 1 TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH HYDROSEEDING, TYPICAL CURB AND GUTTER, CONC, DET E2 AGGREGATE BASE, 4 INCH EMBANKMENT, CIP TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH HYDROSEEDING (LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS) 0 3' 6' 24x36: 1" = 3' 11x17: 1" = 6' Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 CROSS SECTIONS (1 OF 2) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 03 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 Q J N L.L C6 i N N F= a� 0 0- 0 F- 0 r U) 0 U W Q 0 co M 00 co U N 0 ry cz 1-1 Cu 0 M CID 0 00 co ±11' THRU LANE ±11' THRU LANE s GIs 2.5% 1 2.5% s — EXISTING HMA, 3 INCH ± 1 INCH — EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE — PULVERIZE, GRADE AND SHAPE EXISTING HMA REMOVE 3 ± 1 INCHES OF EXISTING TOPSOIL PER 205.03.A.1 OF _ THE 2020 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION EXISTING CROSS SECTION STA 14+ 17 TO STA 34+48 STA 100+00 TO STA 107+90 STA 200+00 TO STA 235+25 STA 239+51 TO STA 252+50 ±11' THRU LANE ±11' THRU LANE s a}s 2.5% 1 2.5% HMA, 5EML, 1 1/2 INCH — HMA, 4EML, 2 INCH PULVERIZED HMA BASE I -- PLACE EMBANKMENT, CIP PER 205.03.1-1 OF THE 2020 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (ENGINEER APPROVED BORROW OR CLASS II GRANULAR MATERIAL) PROPOSED CROSS SECTION STA 14+ 17 TO STA 34+48 STA 100+00 TO STA 107+90 STA 200+00 TO STA 235+25 STA 239+51 TO STA 252+50 TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH HYDROSEEDING, TYPICAL ±11' THRU LANE ±11' THRU LANE s GIs 2.5% 1 2.5% s � EXISTING HMA, 3 INCH ± 1 INCH EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE — CURB FROM STA 235+75 TO 239+51 HMA SURFACE, REM AGGREGATE BASE, CONDITIONING, MODIFIED N— CURB AND GUTTER, REM, TYPICAL _ (LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS) CURB FROM STA 235+25 TO 238+56 EXISTING CROSS SECTION STA 235+25 TO 239+51 ±11' THRU LANE ±11' THRU LANE s a+s 2.5% 2.5% s — HMA, 5EML, 1 1/2 INCH — HMA, 4EML, 2 INCH GRADE AND SHAPE EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE CURB AND GUTTER, CONC, DET F4 AGGREGATE BASE, 4 INCH EMBANKMENT, CIP TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH HYDROSEEDING (LOCATION SHOWN ON PLANS) PROPOSED CROSS SECTION STA 235+25 TO 239+51 V 0 3' 6' 24x36: 1" = 3' 11x17: 1" = 6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 CROSS SECTIONS (2 OF 2) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 04 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. CJ) 0 J N LL O cu s✓ (D E_ a� 0 Q E E Ca n Cn CB 0 U C9 IZI- co 00 co 06 a 0 C Ca Ca 0 IZI- CC) C0 CIO 0 co Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-01 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard 2 CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.781153* Longitude:-83.395131' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3-1/4 inches) 0.3 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (9-3/4 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Dark Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt End of Boring @ 2 ft AS-1 2.0 AS-2 23 Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Nature Center Drive Parking Lot Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Drilling Method: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 3-inch diameter hand auger Figure No. 1 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-05 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP G Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.782535' Longitude:-83.393572' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- (ft) FILE GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (2-3/4 inches) 0.2 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt AS-1 (8-1 /4 inches) 0.9 Fill: Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble 2.0 AS-2 34 End of Boring @ 2 ft Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-02 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and 2 Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 () Latitude: 42.781070' Longitude:-83.395714* SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE ' DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) ■ Bituminous Concrete (2-1/2 inches) az AS-1 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (11-1/2 inches) 1.2 Fill: Medium Compact Dark Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt 2.0 AS-2 28 End of Boring @ 2 ft Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Nature Center Drive Parking Lot Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Drilling Method: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 3-inch diameter hand auger Figure No. 2 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-06 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard Independence Township, Michigan 2 CONSULTING GROUP G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.783926` Longitude:-83.392022` SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- (ft) FILE GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. ( ft) TYPE/NO. L75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) EBituminous Concrete (4 inches) Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (11 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble End of Boring @ 2 ft 0A AS-1 2.0 AS-2 27 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-03 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Q Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.780916* Longitude:-83.395451' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. (ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) ■ Bituminous Concrete (2-3/4 inches) az AS-1 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (1 1 -1 /4 inches) 1.2 Fill: Medium Compact Dark Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt 2.0 AS-2 21 End of Boring @ 2 ft o Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. m Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Nature Center Drive Parking Lot U ° Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Drilling Method: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; w 3-inch diameter hand auger a Figure No. 3 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-07 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard 2 CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.782053' Longitude:-83.391053' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- ( ft) FILE GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. (ft) TYPE/NO. 195-INCHES CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (2-1/2 inches) 0.2 Natural Aggregate Base: AS-1 Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (9-1/2 inches) 1.0 Fill: Medium Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt End of Boring @ 2 ft 2.0 AS-2 18 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-04 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and 2 Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 () Latitude: 42.781086' Longitude:-83.39491 3' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3-1/2 inches) 0.3 AS-1 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (9-1 /2 inches) 1.1 Fill: Medium Compact Dark Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt 2.0 AS-2 22 End of Boring @ 2 ft giffelsor webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: DATE: ISSUE: Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Nature Center Drive Parking Lot Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Drilling Method: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL 3-inch diameter hand auger REVIEW Figure No. 4 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-08 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard Independence Township, Michigan CONSULTING GROUP G G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.780536` Longitude:-83.389041 SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- ( fU FILE GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A DEPTH SAMPLE (ft) TYPE/NO. DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. L75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3 inches) 0.3 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Sand and Gravel with trace silt (9 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Dark Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt End of Boring @ 2 ft Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: 2 Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: 2 Total Depth: 2 ft Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: M Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: M Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: M Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Natural Center Drive Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Natural Center Drive Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Independence Boulevard Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Excavation Backfilling Procedure: U ° Excavation Backfilling Procedure: U ° Excavation Backfilling Procedure: U ° Drilling Method: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch o Drilling Method: g Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch o DrillingMethod: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch o u DrillingMethod: 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 3-inch diameter hand auger w 3-inch diameter hand auger w 3-inch diameter hand auger w 3-inch diameter hand auger Figure No. 5 a Figure No. 6 a Figure No. 7 a AS-1 1.0 2.0 AS-2 19 Water Level Observation: Dry during and upon completion Notes: Independence Boulevard Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch Figure No. 8 Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 PAVEMENT CORES (1 OF 2) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 05 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. CJ) 0 J N LL O cu i t� (D E_ a� 0 Q E_ Ca n U) CB 0 co IZI- M 00 co 06 a 0 !_ Ca Ca 0 IZI- CC) C0 CIO 0 co Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-09 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard 2 CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.778698' Longitude:-83.390287' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (2-1/2 inches) 0.2 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt 7 (6-1/2 inches) AS-1 Fill: Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble End of Boring @ 2 ft Total Depth: 2 ft Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Drilling Method: 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 3-inch diameter hand auger 0.9 2.0 AS-2 35 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-10 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and 2 Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 () Latitude: 42.776244' Longitude:-83.390442' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE ' DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (2-3/4 inches) 0.2 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt AS-1 7 (8-1 /4 inches) Fill: Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble End of Boring @ 2 ft 0 Q 0 z 0 0 V 0 0 v Water Level Observation: 2 Total Depth: 2 ft Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Notes: m Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Beach Drive Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. U Excavation Backfilling Procedure: ° Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch ° Drilling Method: z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; w 3-inch diameter hand auger Figure No. 9 a Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-13 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Independence Boulevard G CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.777271' Longitude:-83.382945` SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A (ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3-1/2 inches) 0.3 AS-1 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt (10-1/2 inches) 1.2 Fill: Medium Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble 2.0 AS-2 28 End of Boring @ 2 ft 0.9 2.0 AS-2 32 Water Level Observation: Dry during and upon completion Notes: Beach Drive Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch Figure No. 10 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-14 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and 2 Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.7761 71 ` Longitude:-83.383978` SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (ft) FILE (f[) TYPE/NO. I.75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3 inches) 0.3 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt AS-1 (8 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble End of Boring @ 2 ft 0.9 2.0 AS-2 27 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-1 1 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and Q Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.774529' Longitude:-83.391551' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. (ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (2-3/4 inches) 0.2 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt AS-1 7 (8-1/4 inches) Fill: Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble End of Boring @ 2 ft Total Depth: 2 ft Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. m Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. U 0 Drilling Method: z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; w 3-inch diameter hand auger a 0.9 2.0 AS-2 38 Water Level Observation: Dry during and upon completion Notes: Beach Drive Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch Figure No. 11 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-15 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and 2 Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.774120* Longitude:-83.383649` SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 195-INCHES CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3-1/2 inches) 0.3 Natural Aggregate Base: AS-1 Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt (8-1/2 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Brown Silty Sand with trace gravel End of Boring @ 2 ft 1.0 2.0 AS-2 17 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-12 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and 2 Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 () Latitude: 42.778049' Longitude:-83.385899' SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. ( ft) FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. 1.75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3-1/4 inches) 0A Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt AS-1 7 (6-3/4 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Brown Gravelly Sand with trace silt and cobble End of Boring @ 2 ft Total Depth: 2 ft Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Drilling Method: 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 3-inch diameter hand auger 0 R 2.0 AS-2 25 Water Level Observation: Dry during and upon completion Notes: Independence Boulevard Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch Figure No. 12 Project Name: Independence Oaks County Park Pavement Soil Boring No. B-16 Improvements Project Location: Nature Center Drive, Beach Drive, and G Independence Boulevard CONSULTING GROUP Independence Township, Michigan G2 Project No. 213737 Latitude: 42.771 549` Longitude:-83.382771 SUBSURFACE PROFILE SOIL SAMPLE DATA DEPTH PRO- DEPTH SAMPLE DCP BLOWS/ MOISTURE DRY UNCOF. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A CONTENT DENSITY COMP. ST. ( fU FILE (ft) TYPE/NO. L75-INCHES (%) (PCF) (PSF) Bituminous Concrete (3-3/4 inches) 0.3 Natural Aggregate Base: Brown Gravel and Sand with trace silt (8-1 /4 inches) Fill: Medium Compact Brown Silty Sand with trace gravel End of Boring @ 2 ft Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: 2 Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: Total Depth: 2 ft Water Level Observation: 2 Total Depth: 2 ft Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Dry during and upon completion Drilling Date: November 19, 2021 Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Inspector: J. Hayball, P.E. Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: M Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: M Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Notes: M Contractor: G2 Consulting Group, LLC Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Independence Boulevard Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Independence Boulevard Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Independence Boulevard Driller: DJ Radich, P.E. Excavation Backfilling Procedure: U Excavation Backfilling Procedure: U Excavation Backfilling Procedure: U Drilling Method: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch o Drilling Method: 9 Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch o DrillingMethod: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch o u DrillingMethod: 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; z 4-inch diameter diamond tipped core barrel; 3-inch diameter hand auger w 3-inch diameter hand auger w 3-inch diameter hand auger w 3-inch diameter hand auger Figure No. 13 a Figure No. 14 a Figure No. 15 a AS-1 1.0 2.0 AS-2 15 Water Level Observation: Dry during and upon completion Notes: Independence Boulevard Excavation Backfilling Procedure: Auger cuttings and capped with cold patch Figure No. 16 giffelsor webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 PAVEMENT CORES (2 OF 2) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 06 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. H O Q J N U_ c6 0 Cn a� F= a� 0 Q F= a� F= a� co n U) co O U a) a) Q a� M 00 U a� ry 06 0 ca O co CID co 0 0 CID c0 KEY T TRAFFIC REGULATOR 0 0 0 CHANNELIZING DEVICES LIGHTED ARROW PANEL (CAUTION MODE) 4m- TRAFFIC FLOW 6, D AND L VALUES "B" VALUE - 33 FT "D" VALUE - 200 FT "L" VALUE - 115 FT <*x W20-7a 11� ry" w w ont o co 00 ROAD WORK AHEAD W20-1 50' TO 100' MAXIMUM W20-1 NOTE: ROADWAY SHALL BE RETURNED TO TWO-WAY TRAFFIC AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. TRAFFIC REGULATOR CONTROL DETAIL N I' �R STA. 253+50 q Ck SFcT7� F�� N STA 00 y li n '; 0 STAGE 1 B 7 STAGE 2B LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION STA. 200+00 NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE TRAFFIC REGULATOR CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY AND THE ROAD RE -OPENED TO TWO-WAY TRAFFIC. THE WORK SHALL BE STAGED AS FOLLOWS: r-- STAGE 3 1 ACCESS DR x x X X X X X X x TAG E 2A g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW STAGE 1A: INBOUND HALF OF BEACH DR / OUTBOUND HALF OF INDEPENDENCE BLVD Developed For: (STA. 200+00 TO STA 253+50) INCLUDING THE SOUTH HALF OF THE WINT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT. OAKLAND COUNTY -------- STAGE 1 B: OUTBOUND HALF OF BEACH DR / INBOUND HALF OF INDEPENDENCE BLVD PARKS & (STA 200+00 TO STA 253+00) INCLUDING THE NORTH HALF OF THE WINT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT RECREATION — — — STAGE 2A: INBOUND HALF OF INDEPENDENCE BLVD (STA 09+02 L TO STA 43+28 L) INCLUDING PERFORMING THE CRACK SEALING FROM STA 00+00 TO 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD STA 09+02) ------------ STAGE 2B: OUTBOUND HALF OF INDEPENDENCE BLVD (STA 09+02 R TO STA 43+28 R) WATERFORD, MI 48328 x x x x x x x STAGE 3A: INBOUND HALF OF ACCESS DRIVE (STA 100+00 TO STA 107+90) (248)858-0906 STAGE 3B: OUTBOUND HALF OF ACCESS DRIVE (STA 100+00 TO STA 107+90) (MUST MAINTAIN ACCESS TO PARK PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT FOR STAGE 3) GENERAL SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION 1. INSTALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND COORDINATE TRAIL CLOSURE WITH OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION (OCPR) MANAGEMENT. 2. INSTALL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES. 3. COMPLETE ALL CULVERT REPAIRS AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 4. CONSTRUCT ALL RAIN GARDENS / DITCH IMPROVEMENTS, AS DIRECTED BY OCPR MANAGEMENT. 5. REMOVE EXISTING CROSSWALK PATHWAY ASPHALT AND PLACE CONCRETE RAMPS AS SPECIFIED FOR EACH STAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 6. PULVERIZE / REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE AS SPECIFIED FOR EACH STAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. GRADE AND SHAPE PULVERIZED / AGGREGATE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH THE PROPOSED ROAD BASE AS SPECIFIED FOR EACH STAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 8. PLACE EMBANKMENT ALONG EDGE OF ROADWAY AS SPECIFIED FOR EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION. 9. PLACE LEVELING COURSE ASPHALT AS SPECIFIED FOR EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. PLACE TOP COURSE ASPHALT AS SPECIFIED FOR EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION. 11. RESTORE ALL LAWN AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 12. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ONCE VIGOROUS GROWTH HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 13. PLACE PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS 14. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 07 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. LEGEND MWAVA rMAWAW.. O J U) a� LL c6 CD E a) 0 Q E E Q) r U) (a O U Q a) M 00 (fl U a0 ry 06 r O U (13 M co 0 0 00 cfl 0 EXISTING CULVERT EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 444 FT AGGREGATE SURFACE (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) _CSE - 0.24 CYD MAWMA' EXISTING CULVERT - = OVY�� HMA SURFACE, REM - 139 SYb ♦�♦�� x. PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, HMA APPROACH - 28 TON 50' HMA 4 INCH, YELLOW - 500 FT TRANSITION `s NO B-11 HMA - 2.75" 4' WIDE RAIN AGGREGATE - 8.25" GARDEN - 250 FT ON SAND BASE TRANSITION HMA TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION HMA SURFACE, REM - 640 SYD CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION ALONG EXISTING HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE 1038 1037 1036 1035 1034 1033- 1032 1031 1030 1029 1028(.0 N � 1027 co co 0 0 1026 X X w w 1025 O O O O N N M co _0 X w N O M co _0 X w kk LEROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 270 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) 91 EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 FT' (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3) EXISTING CULVERT NOTE: REFER TO THE CORRESPONDING CATALOG OF WORK FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. • EMBANKMENT, CIP • EXCAVATION EARTH • AGGREGATE BASE, CONDITIONING, MODIFIED • AGGREGATE BASE, 4 INCH • AGGREGATE BASE, 6 INCH • HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING • GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR • JOINT AND CRACK CLEANOUT • OVERBAND CRACK FILL • HMA APPROACH • HMA, 4EML • HMA, 5EML • TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH • HYDROSEEDING • BIO-RETENTION MEDIA, MODIFIED URFACE CSE EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 78 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) I 1 O 1 O + co IVA OVA O nAmw NVAoT. CV w Z 1 1 I .0 Q 1 N 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION I 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD >oo _ 1 O WATERFORD, MI 48328 o M o 1 O 248 858-0906 -. o 0 �> a�M ( l Q W + o \ / W o N > Q J LU 50 HMA �, w PR POSED > o 0 TRANSITION CE JTERLINE O BEACH DR Now - EXISTING N > 1 CV CENTERLINE Q W 0.52% � w � w P.O. B.-206+00 ( 1= INDEPENDENCE U OAKS PAVEMENT N N N� N CO O U ti N Cr' CM O (0 N M L!7 O O I- co It I, N CO � ti N O O Cr (D (O co O O N O 01) O 00 O r_ O Lo O �� Cr. (9 � O 00 (M (D L0 O CO O N ti N (fl N Ln O M I- N (O (O O 00 IMPROVEMENTS N M N M N M N N N N C� N N N N N N N N C O O O O M M co M co M co M co M (I: co M co co M M 'M M 'M M M M .M—co M—co M—co (M co 'M or, M M co co M M 'M 00 00 00 00 00 C O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C O 00 00 00 INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP 1 u� X W X W X W X W X Of X� X� X W X W X Of X of X W X W X Of X W X Of X� X� X W 0- wa wa wa wa w0- wa_ wa_ w12 wa W0- W0- wa wa wa w12 wa_ wa_ wa_ wa 1 OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN o NO MO 0 0 o Date: 02.24.22 N N N N N N Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 08 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O Q J U) a� LL c6 0 a� E_ a) 0 0- E C E a) r U) M O U C a� a� 0- co C 0 M 00 N U N ry 0 1-1 O M 0o (.9 0 C) 00 cfl LEGEND OMR—M- HMA SURFACE, REM ..WAWA... HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING ,.q�� AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE I1030 OI O I 1037 + 103E 103E NI 1034 LIJ 1 1033 Z 1032 J 1 1031 -0.80% 1 1030 ZI ---- U 1029 o 1028 ,� .o IR rn � oM 1027-°N' .0 O � O 1026-X la- 0� w a F-1 02E co 0 N a AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE - 0.24 CYD INCH, YELLOW - 525 FT CUT, REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW 12 INCH CSP AND CONNECTED WITH HUGGER BANDS OR APPROVED ALTERNATE. CULV, REM, LESS THAN 24 INCH - 1 EA CULV, CL A, CSP, 12 INCH - 24 FT @ 2.92% INV. E - 1,027.01 / INV. W - 1,026.31 _ PROPOSED CErJTERLINE EXISTING CENTERLINE 0.00% 0 0 >oIt O0 N + O O � Qw J �w +n-32% O 00 O O COO r 0 cc 0 q 0 M O N O N O N O co O NT O N co (fl M Nt O N � O co 00 N Cn O N 00 7 CD C It 6 It C, It 01) It 6) 19T 6) It O It M Nt 6) NT O N L.0 N (0 cM rl- Lo 00 (0 00 0 0 aj 0-) C 6 00 0c o6 o6 00 o6 o6 o6 66 6.6 a a7 6i 6i 6 6 ,O N M ,O N M ,o) N N ,o) N N C` N .6 N N ,6 C\ N .6i N N ,O NNNNN ,O .o) N .o) N N .6 N N N N N N n N .6 N N .O� N N N N O O O O O O O O C O C O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O C O O O O O X0� X0� X0� X W h� k� X� X� X W X WX W X W X W X W X W k W X W X� X Wwa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa Zia wa wa wa u. a- LL 0- w0- wa wa O CD O O O 0 0 0 0 0 rl- 00 rn o O O O N N N N N I 1� IN + r r IN 1 w Z J i= U N N O �y CC XI G w I 004:: N 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 BEACH DR 1 (206+00-211+25) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 09 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O Q J U) a� U- c6 0 a� E_ a� 0 Q 0 a� co n U) co O U C a) a) Q 0 M 00 co N U a� 0 06 0 O co 00 co 0 CD co co LEGEND NATATATA rAWAWAWAU HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE I1030 Lo N 1 1037 + 103E 103` N 1 1034 LIJ 1 1033 Z 1032 — J 1031 1_-1030— _ = 1 U 1029 o 1028 9 �o C 1027-0 ,Mo 1r 1026- 1- 1- I102E EXITING CENTERLINE +0.32% CD co d O o0 00 O M N � w w PRO'OSED CENTERLINE lqt N co O 'Ct 00 CO CO �1�t t. V N o co 00 00 Co "t co f� M O N N � O f— 00N 0)N O M N� N CO NCfl Nti cM00 co Nf— (0 LO O 0 M M 01 C)O C)O C C:)C O O O O O C:)O C:)O C:)O N 'COO ,O N M ,O N M cM M M CO c" CO .O c^ co ,O co M ,O co M ,O co M M 'co —co M c7 CO —co co O O O O O O O O O O C O C O O O O O O O O O O O O CQ O O 1 r 1-7-1-11— r 1—r r r r r r r r I r I ,- I r r � 1—r 77 X of X� X� X0� X0� >�Of .r X� ,r X Of ,r X� X� X W X� X X W �0- wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa LU wa o CD o 0 0 0 0 0 N co LO N N N N EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 287 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) • 0�0 0000 y0�0000—�.:. "0 -'0 a. ,0"O"oODODODODODODOo� ,00 O O 0000000000000000." 0� �0000000000 O O 00C 0000000 , '00��o000000000000oo 0-00000000000� O-o000000 0, _00 I lO 1LO + O.1 (V O 6) +o o� W N > � J Z �w _ -0.44% J U M O 00 CO CO In V O N O0 f-_ 0 CO d') "t O0 M rn.O rn.o a o rn.rn 0') O O co C —0) C _rn l C C C C C wa wa LL a_ wa_ wa C 0 I + O T- N -N 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 BEACH DR (211+25-216+50) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 10 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. LEGEND O J N Cll LL O1 C6 i N CD E_ Cu O 0- E E a) r U) M O U CU 0- a) Cfl M 00 Cfl N U Cll ry 1-1 O M co 0 C) Coo C0 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN -AA FT HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE I1030 c) 1 LO 1037 + 1030 103E N 1 1034 1 LI J 103-' Z 1032 — 1031 �1030 = r 1029 U 1028 N � 0 1027-0 1� 0 1026-X 0� la- I1025 w a - 4 INCH, YELLOW - 550 FT ION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3) HMA SURFACE, REM - 115 SYD HMA APPROACH - 23 TON EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 F- (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3 EXITING CENTERLINE 0.00% aC) v o O O� +o M N J �w PROPOSED CENTERLINE +0.44% co "t CC 1:T cc 1:T NT 'tT N19T N It 00 It LO It M It �'It O LO r-- CO N ti I— 00 � CA LC) O N � O N M ti Cr I— CY" I— ti LC) I-- LO I- LO � I-- Nt ti � � 00 LO M rI- O CO O N N LO M Cfl C5� 0 CS Oi O) M m C5� C5� C5� M CA a' M M 6i C) C) C) 66 ,a) N N C\ N ,M N N ,M N N ,C� N N ,CA N N ,M N N .ai N N .ai N N ,CA N N ,M N N ,CA N N C\ N .0 N co .o N co co co,C) ,O co M ,C) cM M cM M C) C) c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C) C) co 00 00 00 00 00 00 X0� XQ� XQ� Xof Xof X0� X0� X0� Xor_ Xor_ XW X X XW X X X X� wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa Lua wa wa wa wa wa wa wa- wa wa wa 0 0 0 0 0 r- 00 rn o 7- 7- 7- N N N N N N N 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' I lO 1 0 g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION + (V 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD CV WATERFORD, MI 48328 1 N (248)858-0906 1W Z 000% BEACH DR , J (216+50-222+00) U O CD h 66 co C)1- y INDEPENDENCE w a- wl ::> OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS N N INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 11 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. H:116\16800\16834 Oakland County P & R projects116834.66 Independence Oaks Pavement ImprovementsTrawing Files\LAYOUT.dwg r _ m Mon m OUR z m x m x x D = E�: D 0 = E�: _ E�: MATCH_ LINE 222+00 O Cn� O z O D v m D oo D cn 222+07 PR 1,030.62 _ Oz Oz 0 z M D m -n �I O O� Z O m n D N N N CD CD CD r'1 O p CD CD W CD CD CD CD CD � rC j v Z Z z M � M M v M Co EX 1,030.23 N rrOO Cal O O = PR 1,030.62 r T_n z m K m m z 7 � 0 m EX 1,030.21 m CCi) PR 1,080.62 M � I cn z 0 EX 1,030.33 O PR 1,080.62 I I m 223+00 EX 1,030.45 PR11,030.62 Ex 1 ngr).52 PR 1,030.62 EX 1 030.58 PR 1,030.62 EX 1,030.50 PR 1,030.62 a CD CD 224+00 EX 1,030.43 PR 1,080.62 EX 1,030.36 PR 1,030.62 EX 1,030.30 PR 1,030.62 EX 1,030.36 I 1 PR 1,030.67 I 225+00 _X 1,030.42 PR 1,030.80 EX 1,030.70 PR 1,031.03 EX 1,030.99 PR 1,081.34 EX 1,031.30 PR 1,031.70 226+00 EX 1 m i .60 PR 1,032.06 EX 1.031.90 PR 1,032.42 STA 224+ EL V 1.0 STA mX �C/) mZ �G) z m V 1.0; STA Z ELEV PVI 1,031 rr T C) 0 M D r n C �J m A T III m ;U �0 �O inzi ' U) r � D zj Z� C0 � T7. C U) U x. Tl D m r Z U) 0 �m EX �1,032-21 I I PR 1,032.78 EX 1,032.58 l PR 1,033.14 I EX 1,032.95 I D D 227+00 PR 1,033.50 > Cn c EX 1,033.36 u: 0 n m PR 1,033.86 I_ m W EX 1,033.77 '` w PR 1,084.22 Cn I 0 EX 1,034.16 PR 1,084.58 I I EX 1,034.55 228+00 PR 1,084.94 EX 1,034.91 PR 1,085.30 I BVC I EX �O3C �7 STA 228-50 00 ELEV 1L5.66 � — MATCH LINE 228+50 i 0C )00 0°( 000C 0000 100c 00 ,00 00 0 0 00 00, goo 0000 000 °0000 ° goo°oo ° / Oo000 00000 00 °0000 �0000 00p I" IV N 4�h X X NW -0 2 2 N N II II W a) W O 00 _ = 0 =2 00 -. o°oo 0o J OOo 000OC 0 00000 00000 0000 00o0 ° 0 � o00 0 O ° 0 0000 00000000 , 00 0°0000 00000 > X > D cn U) z mC> ZZ D00 m�D CC n�z X C D D t m DD oDo�m n nn. mOD mi=_ �„-a m zN O OD a'>0 G)G) znm oo inn m zn oU) z< OO 0z "0 DO (A 0 C7 �� C: U) Z�" I� CC. :U _4 DD �� mm. DoC mn o' 0�'`DD 0C) 0 D= ^m �� tea, :mcn z �0; D� `zn oC M Cn ;U C n = -n 0 _ _ „� m nz �m �n. cnn mD �O• 0 O z 0 � v 00 *D c `fir`. Dr z< pCn U) F o _ _M I � �: 0 m �z � O X M� �� _ 1 0Cn -UM z M �W z 0 0 D .. �. � Cn C w D m < m� 0 r �m z m 7q m' CD CD y C(:) < C) � m O CD CD C7 0 c� 0 m cD xO CD m — O—N 00 5- N N N �--F T D C) /T�J CD N r) /� C� C T m rn �\ m I- � N N - i G O CD CD N rn O \ V z m rn � � � Cs o O r 0 iC7 C/� T y 00 D m m C� _ o = N Q o n Z m O W T1 D z < C 'C1 C• p W c= = Z3 �D v ry Z M O r rn oo O N m m c7 m a a, fl, cn07CD =N D = O n D z Cn z M 0 0 0 C,� co Z3 o Cn O m C C Z � 0 „ C O cD ,,, N D CD `< CD N N n m p N D n o z C- o CD 3 cD � O = N D m f l� N p O r 'o � L L L� � o - � �o N C/) V/ ID ON zzO z�z co rn > 0 C_- z o ® o o n N r_+ om �z --j + z wm Z z D �• �� `� Q rn�� CD �o� mot„ cn�m o No M `� `LJ■■ _ z `� CD m__� rn Cn 0 J U) LL cu L a� Q) 0 0_ E C r U) M 0 U C O a� 0_ a) co 00 U N 06 r 0 M 0 M co 0 0 00 c0 c'i PA 4 41, REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT AND REPLACE WITH PROPOSEDIc ;'.;_r.tU� . ►G'► �, <►�P 12 INCH CULVERT AND 4 INCH DIASTRUCTURE.4 a , z _ ►�►.! ,. CULV REM LESS THAN 24 INCH 1 EA _ ,., .. � .' _ :,, w CULV END SECT, METAL, 12 INCH 1 EA � a-' Z!' 'Ah{ :V J Y .(vr I _ x'�' d Nye r ,► �►,► 4 INV. N 1 035.78 t. 0 I t►t►t►r PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL ►�►,�►�► DR STRUCTURE COVER, TYPE E - 1 EA CULV, CL A, CSP, 12 INCH - 55 FT @ 2.72/o r~ a,►��►� 3 d p INCH, YELLOW - 712 FT►j►�► j► DR STRUCTURE, 48 INCH DIA - 1 EA < , ,�. 12" INV. S - 1,037.28►►�� ►�► �► ,, «',;. t►t►fit►/�/► , FS R 0 1, WN 0 13 N � t►t►t► t► .i t►t►t►t►t►t►-. . . wF... t►WE t►t►t►t►t►t►taw!►sir► t►t►t►t►t►�►i► hi V, ov, HMA SURFACE REM - 21 SYD>..>:. t►t►t►t►t►t►.�►.!�..vvr►t►/►/►ol►t►,t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►t►/►/►.4►�►�►�► HAND PATCHING - 4.3 TON (1.5" OF HMA, 5EML ON 2" OF HMA, 4EML) EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 237 F1 (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2 � Lv 3, F• .i I 4' WIDE RAIN,.-. GARDEN - 43 FT . ` w C), 's �j • t'' X r t y° 6 o �* 1-1 Z, 425VERTICAL CURVE 1051 I1050 1040 c) 1 1048 + 1047 104E • i► HMA SURFACE, R 04 - 1,260 S 44' HMA TRANSITION `EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 171 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) r M 44' HMA N 1 104E TRANSITION W 1 1044 0 >o a+ z 1040 >�q L1J � M co J 1042 �� co N > LLJ l U) 1 1041 w T 1 1 1040 U � 1030 - — 1038 �L1.037�0 �(0 0LO �O 000 do 10 't"_ 0)� C+Mt0 00 C) N� ti t` r� ti 00 00 O r, 1036-M .M—co ,t` M ,o6 M M .o6 cM co ,O co M .O _ cM cM IO C) C) C) C:) C) C) C:) C:) CD C) C:) O- -1035-1 .1 1 1- 1_1 1_ 1_1 X� X W X X X� X X X0� 0- wa wa wa wa wa wa —1034 O o 0 0 � O co co N N CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION ALONG EXISTING EDGE OF META DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE CB 1 4' DIA W/ 2' SUMP COVER E PR RIM: 1,039.28 12" INV. S 1,037.28 PROPOSED CENTERLINE `+ o N > Qw J w MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION EXISTING CENTERLINE +2.48% NE�240+00 lit►t►t �OG►'G►� • ; EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 FT �•►/►/►/, i ' `(PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) O N b- O LO'IT +o MCD 00 > O 0) M N > m0 V ♦—J y � ►_Itl N > Qw 00 t0 00 t0 u CO N CO O CO 0) CO N 00 c0 O c0 N r Nt � C0 N 00 ti11�_ N N r__ r1_ N N r,- r` N 00 00 �t In O CO ti M M O o') d� O C O Nj N C'M qt � 6.6 CO ,O ,O co M � � d ' � � � � ,N N � ,N � Nt ,CM � � ,� Nt Nt ,qt "t � � .I� ,Lo qt C:) C) O C)C C:)C CD C)O O O O O O O O O O O O O O X X ><Q� h XQ� XQ� X X X X X X wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa 0- wa wa wa O O o O o 0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE — + � + 00 + O STRUCTURE WITH 2' SUMP M M M N N N i2bmjjmqMW,r AGGREGLATE SURFACE CSE - 0.49 CYD o c0 r L0 ti c0 00 CO Lt' Nt d M co r ti oc 00 .(0 O O O O C C w w a- w a- a- g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners �� I N Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road 0 30' 60' Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 24x36: H - 1" = 30' / V - 1" = 3' p (248) 852-3100 11x17: H - 1" = 60' / V - 1" = 6' f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. AM HMA SURFACE, REM rAWMAW1S HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE _ HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 NDEPENDENCEI BLVD (234+50-240+00) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 14 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. C z C a v a L.L cc 0 Q E a� E a� Ca CC O U a� Cv Q c co co 00 U a� 0 ry 06 O C7 (a Iiii CC O co CC) co i O 0 C0 C0 n s LEGEND ) r is is 5 ry: ..g�. x« , x. W. < r.. , _ . .. _ d ,.;5�, ,3 ... .3,. ,, :. ♦ .y. .,. ...... :act .. .. c � � !.. , k.. .. �' - K4- F 4 , ...... -> � 4 :a - . • - - tsn r' . _ , AI sib _ .- a "7 - - - • - .R a l loll �l ; t a tfT ' } Z r r OOJ 000 Oou,ry `r --- OOOO OOuu��^�00 000u .•■,�■ _ 0000 000 0000 0000 0000 0000000000 000000000u pp0000000� )UbU�Vuo ++V My� Ou �� oohSU . ° o000o p0000 0000o p0000 00000 00000 0000 00000 000b oob�� Ooo o """""" 0 000 00000 00000 0000 00000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00000 000000 000000 00000000 000000bUab °00000000000000000000000 000000- pO 00000`o00 pp00000000w�-000000v v� ovd� ° 'd _ 000000000 p0000000 001,U 000 0 0000 00o pot Coo, o ppp0000000 000000 °° o00 0000 0000 000��-- ■�+�' - 0 00 000 000 00 00 000 000 00000000000 0000000000o p0000000000 00000000000 yy��Y.��y _ 00 000 000 000 000 000 000 00 0000 000 p000 000 00000000000000 0000000000, 000 ppp000000000SbU V" 000 000 000 O 000 000 00 O 000 000 000 00 p0000000000000000 p0 00 00 O 00 00 00 O 00 00 00 00 00 00000000000000000000 00 O 00 00 p0 00 00 00 00 00 O 00 O 0000000 0000000'00000000000 00 000 000 00 00 00 000 000 00 000 000 000 000 000 0000 00000000000000000000000000000 �RJVrJW 000 000 000 �000 000 000 000 .000 000 000 000 000 0000 000 0000 0000 000000000000 0000000000� 000 0000 0000 000 00000 0000 00 00 00000 ov,+ 000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 000000 0000000000000000000000 O 000 00 00 000 pp0 p0 00 000 000000000 p0000 .0 000000 O O p0 00 00 000 000 00 00 000 00000000000 M...... 00 O O O 00 00 0000 0000 O pp00000000000000 � 00000000000000 0000000000000000000 U pp0000000000000o p00000000000000000000000000 p oov p o o � oo ? o0 000 o000 0000000000 0000000000 00000o O° o00000000000000000000000000000000000� °0 00000000000000000 o00 000o p0000000 0 00000000 OOppoo00 p000000 pp00000ao 00000 0000 0000a ��,we' �iO , p o0000 o00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 .-.P. •: 00000 p0000 0000 O 0000 00000 pp00 G OGOOI� p 000 00 00 00 O • pp0000000 O °Q 0000000 O00 00000� 000000000000000 - 0000000 00000000 p00000000 000000000 - 00000000 00000000 p0000000 °Opppp00 - �� OOOOOOOg� ppppp00000 00000000000000000 0000 0000 0000 000 00000 00000 00000 p 00000000°pp000000000 00000000000 000000000000 - p00000000 00000000000 p00000000000 0000000 1�' /p�/p •00,00000000000� 00000000000000 p0000 00000 p0000 00000 - 00000 00000 00000 , 00000 VO�"'�� 00 000 000 p00 00 000 p00 000000000-ppp000000 0000000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000 0000000000 00000000000 p00000000 p000000000 000000000000000000000 0000 0000 000 0000 0000 0000 000 000 0000 0000 �o��®� 00 O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000 �� - p 00000000000 GG p00 p00 GG GG GG GGG GGG GG GG 000 0000000 - OOOOOOOOOOOOdO O p0 0000 00 GG GG GG G GG GG GG GG GGGGGGGGGG 00000000000000000000- 00O 00 00 00 O 00 O 00 00 O O 000000000000 00000000000 000000000000000000 O O 000 0 000 000 000 0000 000 000 000 000 000 00 000 p0000 0000000000000000000000000 nn00 0000p00 00 00 0000 nn00000 000 00 00 000 p00 00 00 000000000000000 - 00000000000000 - 0000000000000 pp000000000000000 nn000 _ -0-0- nnn000 __,. nnn000 ,, nn000 _ _ nnn _ _,, ,, nn00 _ _,, .,nn0000 ^^„ ^^ 0000000000000 0000000000000000 - p0000000000000 pOp 00000000000 - -- - -- -__ nnn0000__ nn0000.0_ nn000000 nn000000�0 nn000000000 n000000000� n000000�0�000000000000000000°000000000000000pO00 00000 000000 p000 000000000 • O 00000000 ' '� �. �^ 00 000 00 21 N SAND BASE L an - - nn00000000 nn00000�00000 pp0000000000 p00000000000 no000.00000000000 n00000000 n000000000000 n00000:000000000000 fi00000000000000000 n000000,0000000000000cpi000.000 _ .: „ F w �a4 - t � r e - a V; - s 'kit. •:l'. l� �� .tea �#. >t �. .. 1 � i , s„ . .. ,. � y- 1 Ask .. w -- -.. -fir- .. �.. __...`. .. `". a..:: ;. �. >.;r: ..:,;.... ,. :�_- �_Y .�mS Ju s ..._c—.� _.1�^ c; 2: HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION r1057 1 1 105C Q 105E I ;oOR 00 —1054 UJ N UJ N 1 105' 1 10 2 W 5 Z1051300,o I{I�- 50 J 1 1049 = 1 U 104F oo 1047—" LO Cp C) 1046-0 .o o 'o — 1,- 1045-1- `- W � ld 1044 N 225' VERTICAL CURVE t , Z�, - -1--- --- --- --- -4- _ --r- 4-92I I I h JC'JQ w I I I I+ � I I I alines I I I >I��I 50' HMA I TRANSITION 00 Nt r- N .N M O .M O O O r T r r wa- x.a O O It N �LO 'iI00 r � �O �� C0� NN �rn cn rn C O O O O O O O O O O O x Of XOf Xof X[if X.of wa wa wa wa wa X.X w13- O 0 N IZI- 7 S>8 I I- N I. I-- N N 00 O LO LO LO lV)' � O O C1 O r T- 1-1- wa wa 0 0 co It N PROPOSED CENTERLINE O coo N O O O O w0- X of wa O Np LMr� c . LO Ln Lr) Lr.', L O O C O wa Wa_ O O + tt tt N 1 -0.80%LO I A, CV >LU I 0') (14 Lr) �(N C1' O O Lr) Lr) L0 Lo O O O O wa X IX wa EXISTING CENTERLINE 0000 N rO O L 00 "t ti O O p p p CD 0 C) 17 ,r 17 ,V 1� 1- wa wa ,V wa wa 0 0 + Ln N M LO N cam- cM .M ai CM LO LO L010 O O O O wa wa O O + CD N a) N a �� L� 0o C O wa X Of wa N 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-it' =3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-if' =6' I 1 0 0 1 P1 W oLo z LE N > ar~nw' (NO C) It 000 cN (0 N C) a 0 0 C) O wa wa wa 1` C I O + r- d- N giffels�: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 INDEPENDENCE BLVD (240+00-247+50) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 15 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright© 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. LEGEND O J U) a� LL c6 0 CD E_ a) 0 0- E (D E Q) I..L U) (B O U C a� O 0- a) M 00 N U N _O ry 0 1-1 (13 O M co 0 C) 00 c0 HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE 1000000 00000 ' o 000001 °'0.o"43�m 000 000000c 000000 I1057 0 1 1 Lo 1050 + 1051 1054 Nt 1053 - LI J 1 1052 — — Z 1051 — J 1050 1 1049 Z 1 UN 104C 1047-65-N Lq '7 LO UN)0 1046-0 LcN 0 1045-X � la- w a- 1044 , lI— L.\ vvr\ ..w)Ir%I, 4s ; r EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 10 (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) LO C)LO � N (V N (V In .LO .LO In O O O O wa wa CD CD 00 N 0.00% LID N a N O LO C In N C N ,(V LIDLf) U L(i O O C O �� wa wa EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 57 FT' (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) - a ' EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE 103 FT . Ot- at POST, STEEL, 3 LB - 14 FT, ��:, � f W�., . SIGN, TYPE IIIB - 6 SFT x (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP 2) (CROSSWALK SIGNS) _ 4' WIDE RAINS :GARDEN - 48 FT..' :OL SILT FENCE - 262 FT ��y.. w. lig '.TANinAPn rIFTOII Cp-71 (11 N O? N r- LO T-- LO (11 N (1\ N L[ U-) LC: U-) C O O O wa wa C) C) It N 000c a o o�o�oo c O N O Lo O N O O N aU)w 15' WIDE PROPOSED CENTERLINE 2 ,EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 92 FT J(PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' dN V '1� O O I� O Cl) d O �n t N > co LO w EXISTING < J CENTERLINE C/) w -- ; --- r -1.16% 0.00% C 9V co CDo^ oco Lo o� �o �M N > V p L U Q W �- > H J acnW N> SQ J N N cfl, 00(nw W(nW NO N >�J acnw (0 N r- N (0 N CO N Ln N CO N I� N O It � a) � CO � 0) O O 00 0) I` O I— CO I— N In 't I` LO a) I,- O M LO co I` 00 O I` M In O N O M ti N LO N LO N LO N N N N i N i M M M c M cv' cr N N N N N ,N Lo U-) .CV LID LO ,N Lo LO ,c LO LO ,c LO LOLO ,M LO1.0 ,M LOLn ,M LOIJ LC) .M Lf, LC) ,M 1.0 LC) ,M 1.0 LC) ,N Ln LO .N U-) LO .N Ln LO .N U-) Lo O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O C O O O O O O C O O O O O O x13� xor_ x(If x01f x01f x01f x01f xOf > IY XOf x01� xor_ xcIf xW xW xW Wa- Wa- Wa- Ua- Wa- WIZ WIZ WIZ LI a_ wa_ wa_ WIZ Wa Wd Ud III C) C) C) C) 0 0 0 0 O N M LO LO LO LO N N N N I 1 0 1L0 + LO IN 1 w Z J 1 1 Z U g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 NDEPENDENCE BLVD (247+50-253+50) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 16 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 J N a� LL. cu N 0 CDL E CU CU 0 co IZI- M 00 co N U ry 06 0 C CU 0 NT M 0 0 co co I 1� 1LO - - - - - - + - co EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 357 FT _ + 1052.2 ,,,_,1p5 3'F + 1050.9 LO (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) - �1052.9� 1053.5 T�BANK 1 N - 1050g.�{--� g + 1051.9 _ 1052.67 1 1 ' - 72 1051- '� ,voZ.051 ii+ �' 1052. _ 1052.2 , 5 �105�.80 +1052_� ------ /-riapn�u 1UbL.'io 8 0 1052,99 1052.42 1052.42 � 1053. 9 � - -1053. 5317" 1052.6+ 10 I 11052.87 _ � 1052.43 - - 10,)3.07 1053.16 �1053.13 1052.9E _ 1 I + 10 33.52 1053.13 _ _ + -W524 - + 1054.1 1 / . 1053.55 11053.59 _ 405 - 105267 T I I / 5 • r 1053.80 � - 10521 v + 1053.8 � 1053 80 - - �051.6 1 1053.1 +1053.04 � 1052.7E � 1053.44 ^� J - 1054.1b _ _ 1053.48 I co 1054.10 `9 + 1051.7 X _ -1 - 1054.14 _,� 1054.2 � - _ 1053 45 1052.8+--- \ ` \ \ 1052,43 711"q% 1054.14 _ _ 1 1054,6 1054 33 N;i 1054.20 -(- 1052.3 1 _ / - 1 1054.32 I 1053.13 1 1054 44 1050.E 1 1052•59 - 1053.24 1053.1 �'��1051.2 1 hti 0/ 1052. 154.7 + 54RE� + A054.19 *1 54 r-R 105�39� ��,�° � / 1054.34 1052 / 1052.4 1054.36 I A053.54 10536g 0 53.2 + --'' 052.2 ohs + 1052 3� �1052.69 h`y � �o + --- -A05 + 1054.0 1054 p7 1053. �O� 1053 88 1053.5 _ _ - - 1054.04 1053.83 - --- 1052 9 1052.g7 � I G 1052 97 � �,-' � 11053.03 �°52EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 FT 1054.00 0 + 1053.8 1052.9E (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3) 1052.9� / 1 3.2� 1053 98 1053 60 1054 01 +> 1 + 1054.04 % 1053.5E EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 59 FT 1 ♦ PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2 1053.71 1053.52 ( ) 1053.E \ 1053.53 1053 6/ 1 _ � 0�� 1053.7 T 1053.64 -+ 1052.6� 1053.6 1053.59 \, 1 �52•g9 1052. �60 060 1053.63 �- A 1052.71 / i uos.65. 1052.65 5N + 0� iuoo.00 I 1053.17 0 NObO 1053.3E 1053. 1052g8 1 2.85 � 0 _ _+ 1052.9 �05 3 3 - EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 297 FT � 1053.38 (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) 0 - 053.2� 1053.0 0 � ` 1053.03 t 1053.1 105�i.34 ` �vos 1052.4 + 1052.87 U 1052.90 /OS - + ?93 1053.03 1052.64 1052.90 11052.68 1052.61 � + 1052.78 + 1052.64 + 1052.9 1052.8+ 1052.79 EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 64 FT 1052.70 1052.73 1052.64 (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (THIS SHEET) EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE N owes 0 20' 40' I I 24x36: 1" = 20' 11x17: 1" = 40' giffelsor Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 SOIL EROSION CONTROL PLAN WINT NATURE QTY UNIT CENTER PARKING 795 FOOT 15 FOOT LOT INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 17 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 J U) a� LL cu CD Q) 0 0- E E r U) M 0 U 0- a) c0 M 00 c0 U a0 0 ry 1-1 0 M co 0 0 00 c0 STAGE 1 B STAGE 1 A SAW CUT CLEAN EDGE CULV, REM, LESS ' THAN 24 INCH - 1 EA 1 O NO. B-01 HMA - 3.25" DITCH CLEANOUT - 85 FT 1 LO AGGREGATE - 9.75" + ON SAND BASE — — CO LO NO. B-02 HMA - 2.5" AGGREGATE - 11.5" \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ u \ \ ON SAND BASE \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ - \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ NO. B-04 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ Vim\ \ HMA-3.5" X \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ - \ AGGREGATE - 9.5" \ \ \ \ \ ;A �I \ \ ON SAND BASE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ El T1 \ \\ \ \ \ I \\ \ HMA BASE CRUSHING AND \ \ \ \ SHAPING - 3,077 SYD HMA SURFACE, REM - 22 SYD HMA SURFACE, REM SAW CUT - 16 SYD CLEAN EDGE NO. B-03 HMA - 2.75" AGGREGATE - 11.25" ON SAND BASE BUMPER BLOCK, SALV AND REPLACE - 55 EA ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (THIS SHEET) CULVERT, REM, LESS THAN 24 INCH BUMPER BLOCK, SALV AND REPLACE DITCH CLEANOUT EXCAVATION, EARTH HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING HMA SURFACE, REM N 0 20' 40' 24x36: 1" = 20' 11x17: 1" = 40' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 REMOVAL QTY UNIT 1 EACH PLAN 55 EACH 85 FOOT 84 CUBIC YARD 3,075 SQUARE YARD 38 SQUARE YARD WI NT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 18 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O Q J N U- 0 a� F= a� 0 Q 0 F- 0 co n U) co O U a) a) Q a� c0 M 00 c0 U N 06 0 ca O co co co 0 0 co c0 HMA, 4EML - 370 TON HMA, 5EML - 280 TON AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE - 0.17 CYD OHO 7' WIDE RAIN GARDEN - 10 FT PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, 4 INCH, YELLOW - 66 FT CULV END SECT, METAL, 12 INCH - 1 EA @ 0.3% I NV. 1051.00 CULV, CL A, CSP, 12 INCH - 49 FT ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND HATCH SHALL USE BLUE PAINT, TYPICAL — PLACE SALVAGED BUMPER BLOCKS 2% MAX SLOPE 2% MAX SLOPE PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, ACCESSIBLE SYM, BLUE, TYPICAL PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, YELLOW PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, BLUE PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, BLUE, TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE SPACE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL �00 — — CULV END SECT, METAL, 12 INCH - 1 EA INV. 1051.15 7' WIDE RAIN GARDEN - 10 FT PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, WHITE — 1.5 INCH HMA, 5EML 2 INCH HMA, 4EML PULVERIZED HMA EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE PARKING LOT CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (THIS SHEET) AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE CULV END SECT, METAL, 12 INCH CULV, CL A, CSP, 12 INCH HMA, 4EML HMA, 5EML PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, WHITE PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, BLUE PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, ACCESSIBLE SYM, BLUE PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, 4 INCH YELLOW N 0 20' 40' 24x36: 1" = 20' 11x17: 1" = 40' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 QTY UNIT 0.17 CUBIC YARD 2 EACH PAVING 49 FOOT 355 265 TON TON PLAN 1,197 FOOT 260 FOOT 5 EACH 66 FOOT WINT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 19 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O J N a) i7 0 a� F= a� 0 Q E 0 F- 0 r U) O U Q 0 co M co co U a0 0 ry 06 r 0 M O M co co 0 0 00 co *IR OIR oho PLANT NOTES: 1. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE SOUND, HEALTHY VIGOROUS, FREE FROM PLANT DISEASES AND INSECTS OR THEIR EGGS, AND SHALL HAVE NORMAL, HEALTHY ROOT SYSTEMS. CALIPER MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE TAKEN 6: ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL. ALL OTHER MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" (ANSI Z-60.1 + A3002004.) 2. PLANTING BED SOIL FOR ANNUALS SHALL BE SCREENED TOPSOIL. TO DETER WEED GROWTH DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANNUAL, & PERENNIAL BED, APPLY A PRE -EMERGENT ('PREEN' OR EQUAL) AFTER PLANTING 2-3 TIMES PER GROWING SEASON, AT A RATE PER RECOMMENDATION OF PRODUCT MANUFACTURER. 3. PLANTING POCKETS SHALL BE NO DEEPER THAN THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOT BALL, SAUCER SHALL BE MADE ON THE EDGES OF THE PLANT POCKET. 4. ALL TREE WRAP SHALL BE REMOVED UPON PLANTING. 5. MULCH SHALL BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK, FREE FROM DELETERIOUS MATERIALS AND SUITABLE AS A TOP DRESSING OF PLANTING BEDS AND INDIVIDUAL TREE PLANTINGS. 6. TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH MINIMUM OF 3" DEEP HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. 7. GRASS SEED SHALL BE CERTIFIED TURF GRASS SEED COMPLYING WITH A.S.P.A. SPECIFICATIONS, AND FREE OF WEED SEEDS AND UNDESIRABLE NATIVE GRASSES. SEEDED AREAS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO DRY OUT. ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND WATERED AS REQUIRED DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON TO MAINTAIN A DENSE AND VIGOROUS GROWING LAWN. 8. PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASONS (24 MONTHS). DEAD MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED AS NEEDED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN WRITING A LIST OF RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES FOR THE FIRST TWO (2) GROWING SEASONS. 10. REMOVE TOP 3 OF BURLAP ON ROOT BALL OR ALL IF WRAPPED IN PLASTIC COVERING AND/OR NYLON CORD. 11. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE USED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE LOCAL ORDINANCE AND SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASES, HARDY IN THIS COUNTY, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, AND SHALL HAVE PASSED INSPECTIONS REQUIRED UNDER STATE REGULATIONS. IN ADDITION, PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD OF THE COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE. N 0 20' 40' 24x36: 1" = 20' 11x17: 1" = 40' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. BLU Manager: J.R.W. 35 Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. 'CON' ,25, NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE THE PLANTING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 815 OF THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2020 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. PLANT LIST: xxx PERENNIALS: X NO. COMMON NAME 35 BIG BLUESTEM RED OCTOBER GRASS 25 GLOWING DREAM CONEFLOWER 25 GARDENVIEW SCARLET BEE BALM BOTANICAL NAME ANDROPOGON GERARDII RED OCTOBER ECHINACEA'GLOWING DREAM' MONARDA GARDENVIEW SCARLET SIZE SYMBOL 1 GAL. POT BLU 1 GAL. POT CON 1 GAL. POT BEB NOTE: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION STAFF TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (THIS SHEET) MULCH BLANKET SEEDING, MIXTURE NR RIPARIAN TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH BIO-RETENTION MEDIA, MODIFIED QTY UNIT 795 SQUARE YARD 15 SQUARE YARD 795 SQUARE YARD 15 CUBIC YARD Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 RAIN GARDEN PLANTING PLAN WINT NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 20 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O Q J U) a� c6 0 a� E_ a) 0 Q E E r U) M O U a� Q a) M 00 cfl U N ry O 1-1 O M co 0 0 ono cfl LEGEND PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THEIR MOPL, 4 INCH, WHITE - 659 FT W^ . h ' f a s iTTTAX HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE 0 HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE 1038 1037 1036 1035 1034 1033 1032 NOTE: CRACK SEALING SECTION FROM STA. 00+39 TO 09+02 1031 EXISTING 1030 - — CENTERLINE 1029 1 028 00 N Co 0') N Co 00 O O N LO Co f� LO co 00 O O c0 N f� co O rl— Co co co co N co co Lid r- Co Lid co N Co 00 1027 0 c7 0')6 N N 6i N o6 N o6 N o6 N o6 N o6-o6 N N ao N ao N ao N o6 N o6 N o6 N oo N ao N ao N oo N ao N ao N 00 N o6 N O O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 1026 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Lu w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 1025 0 0 0 0 0 O N O co O O LO O •1 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' 1 10 C: 1 10 1 w z _-J 1 U 00 C r N N N OM O O O O 1 w w w 1 O 0 + O ti O O g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 NDEPENDENCE BLVD (P.O.B. - 07+00) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 21 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O Q J N ILL cu 0 CD E_ a) 0 0- E 0 E a) ca r U) M O U a� a� 0- N M 00 U N 0 U 1-1 O M co 0 0 00 cfl [ SC -�r l F 1 4 � G 6 T� r; w yyf A u. r: t : is �e v, ,�<+. a S.Y. t.• A_i: ': F PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL,' All a4 a, _. _,fv -_"v -u�0 --=ao --tea I" .,00 uo0 000 000 00 00 00 v0 - 00 - v000 "000 "u00 - "00 - .,u0•.' uc \ °O°p°000°O°Op Oo°O O° ��°°°°°O°O o°°°°o°O°Oo°° .00�0°.O.�oo0°O°O°Oo°°°°OD°Oo°°O°O°o0°O00°Oho°°00°O°00�°00°O°Oo0000°00`OOi °O°00°oo o°O o°po°o°000°Opoo°O 0000°o°n�p�o ovoO°ppop000�°4OO°OQ6op�o�o,�o�o°4Q6OOp�, 0000°pO po oo°OpOo°o°o° °000°011O1pwop�0%0o°pp�o�,00-000-o--0-000o 0p°0�0�00°000°°000° 0000 °p000°O °0000 O°°o000 000000°p 00000° 0000 �0000p°0000 0000 O°OOOoo� 00 • - 000 00000 °00000 000000 000000 0000°O°0°000000°pO000°0 Doo°°°00000° 000000 00000000000000p0p0 00p00000 oC OOOn��O-OOOn��o OWV,Op 00n n, Ho OOn ��000n„�O.00On �Qo00n _000 OO n°po00 n��00.000°n�00-OOO n°n��QOOon��0 Y _ _ _ _ a ..4 r _` • • Z." LEGEND ►fivivc HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING -,4N AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE _ HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE t x - :. u0 u0000"00o0 °00p0p °p O0,0 �p O°�O 0o V V. vu ,..u0p ,.u00-00 °p0000°p 00000 °OOOo°Op0000 °00000 °pO°pY,a'6 00 000000 --- 00°p0000 °00000 O00000°p0000°o°000000°Op0000°Op0000 °Op000°Op0000°000000°oo° o0p0p0p°0p°°° o ° o0p0p a 1000 °pO000 °pOo-00°0p0 °00000 000000 00 O00o°p 00000 °p0000 °pO000 °p0000°Op0000°OpO000°p 000 O.ao 0000p°Opoopo.: 000p0p °000000 °pOp000 °p0o0000°O �Op00 00 °00 °O°p °O0o--000p00°0 OO °po00pO °Op 00 �0p0p 0Op OO00000poo O 000 O o pop 00 Opo pop O Op O p°Op '0 °Oo p°0p °0000°o°o°000000°00000 0000p0°° o 000a°0000 °o00p0o°p° 00000 oo°�°°oo oo°°00000°°°oo oo° 00000°o°O o0 ° ° o0 00 00 °° o0 00 00 00 °° °° 00 �O ,--0 p0°n°p OOo o°p0p00 °Op000 °p0O00°p Opo00°0000000-0 000 O p00n°p�-00° 00 O _ O t » EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 171 FT g (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2), 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN - 141 FT 0 30' 60' 1 2436: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION I 103C I 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD 1 _ PROPOSED � - - - �- -- � -- - 1 CENTERLINE WATERFORD, MI 48328 �1 1037 50'HMA ------_ -0.680/, 1 TRANSITION _ — _-- — — -- — __ _ __ p o.00io (248)858-0906 103E _ + _ EXISTING +1.20% o O + 103E CENTERLINE CD c ' r- � ° M r` O + O O • 1034 — — — > "> >--¢= _ � + �o INDEPENDENCE 1 >�� acnw =c~i>w wc~nw C0 1 w 1 1032 — -- S� mcnw v; 1 W ` oo L;Ot 5<W BLVDZ 1032 — _-- z . o > J —1031 c, a rn w J (07+00— 14+50) oC:S co +C:� T1 1030 0; co a W 1� INDEPENDENCE 1 U 1029 1 U OAKS PAVEMENT 102C co N N � CO N 67 � � LO O T � � N � N � N � f� � N � CO � LO LO O I` Ln 00 CO ti cfl O f� cM 00 CO � 07 � N f� LO LO 00 f� 00 O) o N 0 0C\I o co � � � " � L � c � C0 co � c � co 0') 6 6 IMPROVEMENTS 1027-� co .LO M .LO M .LO co .LO co .Q0 co (,� M .co M .ti M—co .ti � .ti � .ti .ti .ti .� .� .� .� .� .� .� Q c1 G co 0 co 0 1 co 0 1 co 0 1 co 0 1 co 0 1 co 0 1 co M 00 1� co M 00 1� co 00 �V- M 00 �� c�' � 0 � cM C0 �� M �0 �� co 00 �� co 00 �� co 00 �� cM 00 �� co co 00 �V- co M 00 l� co co 00 I� co co 00 l� M co 00 11 co co 00 1� M co 00 �1 M M 00 �� M M 00 �� M M 00 �� M M 00 �� co �C G INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP 1026-� X X X X X X X X� X� X W X W > Of X 11 X IY X W X W X W X� X� X� X� X� X� X� X� X� X X� X� X 1 Of OAKLAND COUNTY w w w w w w w wa wa wa wa ua_ wa_ wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa ILL 0- w0- wa wa wa wa wa w1 102E g 0 0 0 0 0 g I MICHIGAN 0 0 Date: 02.24.22 CD Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 22 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 J N a� LL c6 0 CD E_ a) 0 Q E E a) ca r U) M 0 U Q N CO M 00 Cfl U Cll 0 ry 06 r 0 0 M 0 M co 0 0 00 cfl oQ000�00000c � - . - . • . . � - • . � , o ° ,0 000 00p00 � .. w: aft a vo _�".h- , ti . .:, . . • .- =. . - ; • +;�.� m ;.-. OpO0O, °0O0Opoo00Op0p0 0 o 00p00oO00 O O0pOpDOO . O O ' �. -. : - � .- • . , . 0 7 ti r O O O O - - - - 0 0p0 000 Opoo 00pop O - I . - - • • 0000 00 00 00000, - • ;0OO 00o OOO OOO 000000 pO pOOOp OHO • - 000 00000 000 000 0G, • O O O 00 O oo ° .a Q O 0 0 0000 000 00 O O 0 O Op .xc �, ,00 pop 01(),11010000000 O op0o0opo'0Qp QoO O �. 000 000 0p000 0p000 000p0 000p . - 1 1 . 1 • • - '00 o Q0000 OpO 000 000 OOOO OOQpO OOOOp Q 000oopoo0p00-400 O O o Opo O6pO0oQO0p0OQ00p�,�p 1� p0 O O O O 00 QO 0p '. OQQ OOQ 00 Op po OQ QQ0 pQ pQ • - • • . , • ,,+-`00000 0p00 0p000 000ppp0°O0p 00p0p pOpOppQQ °ppp °0p 00p0 __ O 00 O O 00 Op 00 000 000 000 R)Op p p0o0O000p00 00p00 00p00 000 0000 000p 00p00 00p00 00p00 00p00 00p00 0000 1 Y ...' . - 1 • O V0000 00 000000 p0p00 0 00 0000 Q0 ppp0O DO°p °Op °Op OOpOp OOpOpO °pO 0p00p 000,0 0°00 Q�000p OpO 4�.y • O 0p�00 ��0000p 000 00� 00 00 000 0�000 pQ0000°p00000 p000p0 �D00 �� 000p00 00000 00pQ000 0pp0 ° �00000p °O pO°O�OO O° OD O 000�0 DO°0n�`00 o ^�0i0 0 n.. _00[,0n�� 00[f0n� OO n-�1 0n0� OO n��Q00^��00 °0n��00 o^��0oon�� Oo^��OOOrf�� OOe��O 00n��Op •. Op 00p p000 o°n��0. /� is a 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN - 32 FT 4 PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 46 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) LEGEND ►ivivlli HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE 0 HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE Aie PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, YELLOW, 4 INCH - 700 FT w 50' HMA ^z as T 1-1 A A I [1 1 T 1 f-% A I 1!: N a D 0 30' 60' 1 1 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-111=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION I 104� I 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD 1 > o col n WATERFORD, MI 48328 1041 a M o 4 01 O LO 'o� oo N� LO (248)858-0906 —1040 0� aoo o co aCDLO �w + 103�J CD 00 �Oco CD co �Nco >ov o� H J Q> 0) LO +o _ Q> r 103F w (nJ +o �� +o �� +o �� o ..r> �w W TPANSITION cv INDEPENDENCE 1 EXISTING F J PROPOS -D F J F J C0 w +1.00% w1 1037 CENTERLIfJE w _ CENTERLI �E ) w C0 w , , z 0.00% U��, — - — ----- z BLVD —'I 1 1031S, (14+50 - 21+50 1 1034 50' HMA 1 = INDEPENDENCE 1 TRANSITION 1 U 1033 U OAKS PAVEMENT co103� 00 co co C 00 cc co �00 �00 LO 00 0) 00 0000 000 coo Moo �co Lr 0 C~;0 �0 00 LO (0 CD (0 0 U')(0 LO U')co C\ 000 00M cc 00 I� O CC M M 00 It ti co co N In O M M M M CO N co M't co "t �'t M M LO (0(0 CD co co O O cY co CD O 00 04 IMPROVEMENTS 1031-M .M M _A M _A Lr _M,co M 'M M M M M M M M M M M M Lr co � co 6 —6 M 'CO M M 'M M .ccn M M M 'M M 'M CID co c cc .M M M M Q co C O G1l-1030- 00 00 1� 00 I ��' a c co O 1 00 �1 00 �1 CM 00 1� co CM 00 1� 00 1� 00 1� 00 1� 00 1� 00 � I � c O 1 c 11 O 00 17 "_ co.M 00 �� 00_ �� co 00 1� 0�0_ 1V- �00 00 17 00 �1 00 17 c CO O r 00 �� 00 17.1 I C G INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP � X X X —I- X X X X X X X X X X —1 X X X� X� X X W X X W X X W X h 0' X� X� X Iw of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of of of of Of of O' O' Of Of Of Of OAKLAND COUNTY wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa ww w0- wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa ww w1 1029 MICHIGAN I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 I °' o N Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 23 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. POST, STEEL, 3 LB - 14 FT SIGN, TYPE IIIB - 6 SIFT (CROSSWALK SIGNS) EXISTING CULVERT HAND PATCH 2' ADJACENT TO CONCRETE TO ENSURE SMOOTH TRANSITION HAND PATCHING - 0.5 TON LEGEND MAVAMA rAWMAW.. O Q J U) C� ILL c6 0 CD E_ C) 0 Q E E r N M O U C= C� C� Q N M 00 U N ry O U 1-1 O M co 0 0 00 co HMA SURFACE, REM - 12 SYD CURB RAMP, CONC, 4 INCH - 105 SIFT DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE - 10 FT EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE- 95 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2) 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN -77 FT HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE \ 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN_ - 493 FT �4 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0� - - - - - DATE. ISSUE. ♦ EXISTING CULVERT '�- Y 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL k POST, STEEL, 3 LB - 14 FT *,; t REVIEW ♦ SIGN, TYPE IIIB - 6 SIFT CROSSWALK SIGNS) "Nb 1043 _ EXISTING CE VTERLINE 1042 -- A --- ---- -- 1041 1040-- L —1030— o +1 + o —10 38 �- CD CD d(n W Ni �1037 W —1030 mU)w 1031r. 1034 op1033(poo M00 M00 OWN N00 NCO 000 OHO N00 NIt LO1�t LO00 OM r,- (0 (0 00M 00� MLO Oa) elf) r C O (D ~ '` ti 00 00 a� 6 o C o M 1032 M M .00 M M .00 M M .ai M M .rn M M .a) M M .o M It .o M� .o M .o O C. O C)O C)O C) C) CD C) CD C) CD C)O C) C) CD C) C) C: C)1031-�1 1-�1 �� V- �� I1 � X� X� X� X Of X of X of X of X Of X W X Of X� 0- w a w a w a w 0- w a_IJ a w a w a w d w d ILL 0- -1030 0 0 0 N co N N N oLO � I 00 X Q� wa PROPOSED CENTERLINE -1.12% Ln co 04 -----_ N � J Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 NDEPENDENCEI BLVD (20+50 - 27+50) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT NN O� � CON CO N (0M CD O co 00 � (0 00 N Itd� a)N � cc00 CO o0 00 (0 M � N � N It CD o0 O (0N � I� C)6.0 IMPROVEMENTS 6i 6i 6 .ai 6 .ai Oo .ai Oo .o0 00 .00 a' oo r' oo r .r` ti M Nt .0 M� .ai M M M cM M M M M M M M M 01 M M M M M M O O O C)O C) C) O C) O C) CD C) CD CD CDC O 17 O O O O INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP X Of X Of X Of X of X Of X Of X01f X01f >10� X0� X0� X OAKLAND COUNTY wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa wa ILL a_ ww w o CD MICHIGAN 0 o LO co N Date: 02.24.22 N N Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 24 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. LEGEND 0 J N a� ILL c6 0 CD E_ a) 0 0_ E 0 Q) r U) M 0 U 0_ a) co M 00 U a0 06 0 M 0 M co 0 0 00 co aR PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, 4 INCH, WHITE 450 FT�A m 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN 120 FTC`s R 4h r 0� PAVT MRKG SPRAYA BLE THERMOPL, TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH - 185 SYD � - ` 0 X 4 INCH, WHITE - 360 FT HYDROSEED - 185 SYD; / ►�► �►f�►i►►t�!►►�►�/ Pa&POST, STEEL, 3 LB - 14 FT. i► ►0j►� SIGN, TYPE IIIB - 2SFT ►o(AUTHORIZED VEHICLE SIGNS) .►i►��►!►�163►� PLACE AGGREGATE BASE FOR PROPOSED 12' x 48' `" �..►.►.►�►.►.►.►.R / Z HMA - 3.5" - ,. - ..►.►.► �:.►.►.►.► AGGREGATE - 8.5" PARKING BUMP OUT ...►.►.►.►.►.►.► - ;- .. EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE - 757 FT • � �►�►.►.►.►.►.►.► -� 2 - 1 ' x 1 ' PARKINSPACES/ ` �j►�►�►!�/►t►�►�►► w OG►�'I�� • PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP-2 ( 0 8 G ) .►.►.►.��.►.►.►.► .►.►.► - ' • ' • ' • • • O N SAND BASE ( ) � - � � � �►.►.►.► .►.►.►.►. k .►.►.►.r, • EXCAVATION, EARTH - 17 CYD ��►G►�Oi►'0►�►�►G►► o .►.►G►►�►�► • ' • ' • ' • ' 4 WIDE RAIN L AGGREGATE BASE, 6 INCH - 98 SYD �PIP GARDEN 524 FT HMA APPROACH - 20 TON ' .►.►.►�►..►�►.►.►.►.►.►.►.► .►.►.►.►.► X .►.►.► ►.►.►.►.►.►.►.►.a .►.►.►.►.► •.•.•.•.;.;.;Xw,;,;,;;;;;;;,,:., ,:..: � BUMPER BLOCK, PRE NC, 8 - �►►/►�►/�►�►�►►/►�►�►�►/►�►.► ��►�►�►�►�►�►�►t►.�► • B CAST CO FOOT 2 EA (J_\ .► ►.►.► .►.►.►.1 ► ,. ,...► ►.►.►.►.►.►.► .►. .►.►.►.►.►. .►.►.► ►►►►►' eSPIN HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE I1042 �1 1042 Lo 1041 + 1040 n o 'ROPOSED ri + o ',ENTERLINE CV 103�J _ EXISTING J CENTERLINE w W 1030 25' HMA Z —1037 __ _ -1. TRANSITION 12ojo J 103E -- — -- -- -- 103E U � 1034 ,zj- 103-. co (.0 rnao LOo N o� c co � o Q j 00 1032-`coo i V� O m .co N O M .co O M .co f* O M .co r NT'ZI, M M � c chi C M o 1— C 0 -1031-- � 00 1 V- 00 � � 00 � � 00 � M- c o c � c o I � X� X� X� X� XOf >Of X� 10- Lu a Lu a Lu a Lu a Lu a u 0-Lu a —1030 I 0 0 00 N N o .►/►/►� ► + �► �► i ►.►ram .� � .,::' .:- �- �►/►./►./►./►/►./►/1,. '. o .►.►PIPa AFor's OEM ►.►.►•►.► .►.►.►.►.►.►.►. INS PAR RM I�ROR i/� /►�►�►�►�► 3>idEL ��.►.►._►.►�Y f.►/►.►„► .►.►�.►.►.►t� ►� I►.►.►.► _ /► �► /►►1 k .►.��►��►��►` PAVT MRKG POLYUREA, STOP 1 EA � /►/►/►/►/►/► r" - PIP a PIP ►�►��► PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 1►►h►�RIM �►��►.=. 4 18 INCH, STOP BAR - 10 FT :. PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 4 INCH, WHITE - 51 FT CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION ALONG EXISTING CURB I DITCH CENTER LINE 7' 7' PROPOSED HYDROSEEDING PARKING BAY TOPSOIL SURFACE, FURN, 3 INCH 1 2' MIN CROSS SECTION A -A NOT TO SCALE i:xxmi1►[elmaism FI N 0 30' 60' 24x36: H-1"=30'/V-1"=3' 11x17: H-1"=60'/V-1"=6' g iffels:: Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 NDEPENDENCEI BLVD (27+50 - 34+50) INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 25 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 Q J U) LL cu 0 CD Q) 0 Q E a� E_ a) r U) M 0 U Q M 00 U N 06 0 M 0 M co 0 0 00 c0 EXISTING CULVERT �b EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3) EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE - 620 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL SP 2) Ai 'z _ 4' WIDE RAIN GARDEN - 258 FT ✓ter'!' x `EROSION CONTROL, CHECK D ;,AM, STONE - 15 FT (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3) �►�►i►.3►�►�EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE - 15 FT �►0►0►0�'�,�� '��►'O►`��►'�� ►�►�► 1��►►�►�► (PER WRC STANDARD DETAIL E-3) +ho r: CURB REM - 10 FT �gap,"". 4' WIDE RAIN �►�►.�► a .LANE TIE, EPDXY ANCHORED - 4 EA t►RN: ►1� , :G►► o°►t►t►t► CURB, CONC, DET E2 - 10 FT' GARDEN - 297 FT IONIC at►/►/►►�►��►/► .R L '� - ►t►t►•t►t►�►t►•► ►,►'►k �'�'raz� �►�►/► .®9►.IF, t►/►fir R R ��►�►►�.►►��►► HMA - 3.75 ►�►�►�►►�►.��►�► y AGGREGATE - 8.25"►i1 .. �►�he so ,►P,a ON SAND BASE ►��►� ;rt w►/►�►t o►/► t►/►/� REM ►�►PE►M �►�►�►'tip CURB, REM - 10 FT ,t.. ,LANE TIE, EPDXY ANCHORED -4 EA CURB, CONC, DET E2 - 10 FT b $ f CyF LEGEND RAVAMA FAWMA... 0 HMA SURFACE, REM HMA BASE CRUSHING AND SHAPING AGGREGATE SURFACE CSE HMA PAVING RAIN GARDEN EROSION CONTROL, SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL, CHECK DAM, STONE �► ''MR N IN G0�►': � 1aPeN i it N 111110 es.. webster Q� Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects I34► 0 30' 60' IN A G�G� I 1025 East Maple Road ►t►1W G►XFIN 24x36: 1" = 30' Suite 100 0iiN014 o 11x17: 1" = 60' ►,► Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 �� ► www.giffelswebster.com ►,,��,�►�►�►► SAW CUT CLEAN EDGE Executive: S.A.R. ,✓ ... Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 12 INCH, CROSSWALK - 104 FT PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 18 INCH, 1. -,- STOP BAR - 23 FT PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, LT TURN ARROW SYM - 1 EA PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, RT TURN ARROW SYM - 1 EA PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, LT TURN ARROW SYM - 1 EA PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, RT TURN ARROW SYM - 1 EA PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, 4 INCH, WHITE - 83 FT PAVT MRKG, SPRAYABLE THERMOPL, 4 INCH, WHITE - 626 FT NOTE: ROAD COMMISSION FOR OAKLAND COUNTY(R.C.O.C.) RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT REQUIRED FOR WORK LOCATED WITHIN R.C.O.C. RIGHT-OF-WAY Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 NDEPENDENCE BLVD (34+50 - P.O.E. INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 26 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. 0 J N LL cu N CD E_ a) 0 0- E 0 E_ N ca r U) M 0 U 0- M 00 U N ry 1-1 0 M co 0 0 00 c0 N g iffels:: KEY Webster 0 0 0 CHANNELIZING DEVICES LIGHTED ARROW PANEL (CAUTION MODE) Amm TRAFFIC FLOW I t ROAD WORK T AHEAD W20-1 B, D AND L VALUES WORK "B" VALUE - 33 FT ZONE T "D" VALUE - 200 FT BEGINS "L" VALUE - 115 FT R5-18c 0 r O o PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 18 INCH, STOP BAR - 23 FT O R.C.O.C. RIGHT-OF-WAY c u) c w O j c� Lau AGGREGATE BASE, CONDITIONING, MODIFIED - 230 SYD Q HMA SURFACE, REM - 230 SYD '1 c c 0 /�/►/ WORK ZONE / BEGINS I R5-18c RIGHT V r) W21-5bR r ROAD WORK AHEAD W20-1 of ry w w C,lt � 0 0 _ _ C0 SHOULDER CLOSURE DETAIL SASHABAW Ross 0 30' 60' "?n=" 24x36: 1 " = 30' 11x17:1"=60' Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. PAVT MRKG, POLYUREA, 12 INCH, CROSSWALK - 104 FT 1►1►1► � �'►'►, ' �► HMA, 5EM, 1.5 INCH - 21 TON ON Know what's below. I „1,1' ► 2 INCH - 28 TON ON HMA, 4EML, Call before you dig. `r`►�► HMA, 3C, 3 INCH - 42 TON ►/►/►/► SET UP SHOULDER CLOSURE DURING ►,►,► '//�/��/�/► CONSTRUCTION IN R.C.O.C. RIGHT-OF-WAY DATE: ISSUE: -- ---- I ---- ------ ---- 03110/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS - --- SAW CUT CLEAN EDGE 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL i REVIEW l SASHABAW APPROACH DETAIL Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 SASHABAW APPROACH DETAIL INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 27 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. O J V) LL. cu 0 CDL (D > CU n U) CU O U Q co IZI- 00 co i N U _O Q ^6 I..L O C 1 CU O IZI- O 0 co co EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS RIP -RAP: CHANNELS AND SLOPESE-10 ) RIP -RAP, AND TURF MAT LINING (E-9) ( ) CHECK DAMS (E-3) CHECK DAMS ALTERNATIVE "A" (E-3A) CHECK DAMS ALTERNATIVE ' B ' (E-3B) LEVEL SPREADER (E-4 OO MATERIAL: ENVIROBERM OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL: NILEX GEORIDGE OR TRIANGULAR SILT DIKE OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE A END SECTION AND BAR SCREEN DETAIL (E-7) A y! C C y� A E O / D y B �� FLOW I1 EROSION MATTING yyyyFIL ERPABRCUNDERRIP-RAP ISA ao HIGHWAY A C B LIMITS OF RIP -RAP LIMITS OF SOD °Oo IAR TOP EDGE OF CUT STAKED IN PLACE RIP -RAP ROCK `I C� F/ r FRAGMENT c ® a,:..00l u--- //////7'" ��` / , QC c� o o°� 9o�°v"g; Es oP I I E yyyyyy S- -- I aF--FLOW SLOPING DITCH I� M\ 2. y l yr ::7^'. Y. r' ly % // U yy y a`xs'cU° ° 0 0 8O& •4'0..� AC L E I \ A C �/ FLOW.,. - A -- >H f ♦ylyy�.:;l_, ,:'h / I yy \\/i %//./ y yy 8 �� " •�3� a L�JI I I I I II�L \ S\OIR \ -- -- ,� y •.t' y1' \\ O y °o P,q�B e o "a p� ebb' yyy o "tB64° LLLL� '4 A I \ \\\� \ \ II _ \f.. . PLAN VIEW _ �.�`: (2) /%4 RE -BARS E "i::+t� `, <�i:<:>Y yJ,l ! 'i\\ / go �� g 8 sag a s8 y PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW `>' ` ��q �o�o� CONCRETE OR ASPHALT ��y X -t•• •; . t. + 1 \` / °88 - o a-v v y ANCHOR PINS VARIES �3000 P.S.I. _ y L = DISTANCE BETWEEN CHECK DAMS, :>y:.�•:f ; :Y'%-:i� J J• %��/� \ \ ` a `QS y yy B L = DISTANCE BETWEEN CHECK DAMS, SUCH THAT POINTS A AND B ARE AT DEFLECTOR BERM B LIP AT O% GRADE CONCRETE tiM y O SUCH THAT POINTS A AND B ARE AT - I EQUAL ELEVATIONS. PLAN VIEW END HEADER EOR QUAL .f J •L �� \ 8 ��a____ y EQUAL ELEVATIQI NS. TOP EDGE OF RI RAP APPROVED EQUAL :'7 C; '�s�,1::.-^'.?,,.. J \\\// gti y y _ SPACING: 131' / SLOPE % - - 1 END VIEW 4" DRAINAGE PIPE RIP -RAP) \//\//\ PER CHART CHANNELS ��/� I �, I I (FLOW FLOW I 9" TO 12" 1 WITH RIP -RAP B O/ 1 I : 4? I A I i B / / (A `� �� IIIII111111111111111 I�I (1 �� -FLOW .._:.: , !:: ', ..t-. :_:_•. -: -w. � I /- ------- III 1111111111111 I I I I 1 - :.. :.:.. B \\.\\.\� w...aa_ I ' 'i B o-a° I III 1 - ___= MI STAKED IN PLACE .: :. - � FLOW 1 I I P(y.,`"' T)-V_---------- / �I - -- ---- - 1-1TI 3 L1J1111 1111 11 11 11111111 11 1 11 (I j l 111 1 11 B •f I op ga°pp ��I��-.�.I � � - NIMUN 4' SOD till,, I I 1 I Ilgl" " TOE IN FABRIC 2' RIP -RAP CHECK SLOTSEVERY yK y y�yyyyyyy �yy 4yyy yyyyy�yy yyy AVG.ROCKI TYPICAL RUNOFF STRUCTURE SPACING RIP -RAP PER MANUFACTURER'S CHANNELS 25'-40' 6" MIN. y y'yyyy yyyyyyyy y yy yy yyyy /�_7'/% VELOCITY SIZE TOE PLATE L RECOMMENDATION MINIMUM 8" TO 15" -OVERLAPS ARE A MINIMUM OF y y y y yyyy yy�,yy y SLOPE TYPICAL RUNOFF STRUCTURE SPACING SECTION A -A RIP -RAP ROCK S•:'. yy y y 6 fps 5 IN. I SLOPE SEED AND MULCH RE -PART FRAGMENT UNDISTURBED VEGETATION 6"OR PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. o.4 . o p�1Q ',ao CROSS-SECTION 8 fps 10 IN. I CROSS-SECTION 3- GEOTEXTILE '/A/ ��yy yyyy.:yyyyyyyy�yy SECURE PAUSING ANAPPROPRIATE A o �y_�§06g• W��+ 1D fps 14 IN. I TONE ''W Wy W "`b DESIGN WATER ELEV. GEOTEXTILE MAX o SEED AND MULCH 9" TO 12 FABRIC 8". _ PINNING PATTERN PER , d, w RIP -RAP PER CHART CROSS-SECTION � ATE g 3/16 2" W yy_,y �y y yy y y y�y ��y yy yy MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. g�3 pO�a�e �' RIP -RAP PER CHART 12 fps 20 IN. y W T 4 4 wY 4 ) o o P I BACKSLOPE HOLDER I CRUSHED S FLOW yyy - - y1V y� y y y y�y y y yy y y FLOW PIPE _ ..- (BEDDWG) LL yw y 4" MIN. SPACING 1 © yy y NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE D aogopo o e "° NDN-wovEN 'M' PINS FROM TOP OF DAM M' PIN N.+• I_IhII @IE�u BEDDING - IesHestles 3 es-1It�I FILTER FABRIC UNDER RIP -RAP °a^-°ab�s"�•-� NON-WOVEGEOTEXTILOVERLAP \BACKFILL AND COMPACT 6"x6" MIN. - 91 42z, ......TOE IN FABRIC s»� 'lily' y y CS��B"o- g FILTER FABRIC -------- ROAD RM STAPLES I PER MANUFACTURER'S 6" MIN. .� ° I - - - CONCRETE ^y, I EN S S I `\ -OVERLAPS ARE AMINIMUM OF A ----" _ y JO•"- Q �p]' ° UNDER RIP -RAP I 1 '^'_- �qo 6" 11 --_ EROSION II / POROUS EROSION 3' _ _2' I `RIP -RAP (2) #4 RE -BARS 6" OR PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. 6" y vo 6 - 2 ,�®� oo° I -eo o�o -- LLLL [[[((( FLOW _w. 1 12" RECOMMENDATION y '♦V B ° e- _ e g �. V _„o°o'mo°o®°mf8° 000� oo°o1 PANELS - x • J MATTING EXISTING @'_ o I MATTING \\ OR ASPHALT .6. o 0 I o t VEGETATION OR SOD MIN 1 _ E O y'y ,y�,JI,, 1°oc 49c 2' MAX. • a9 c IT - .1�:, yvv y+ `� °°O SIDESLOPE l`=`'= I ANCHOR PIN -SECURE BY USING AN APPROPRIATE �- VELOCITY AVG. ROCK y'y'il, yy y y W Wy co �' PINNING PATTERN PER I SIZE may% yy y'y'yy �4 yy,,,,dy_ _ 0,°oo8�eooe o,.oan�/� / SECTION B—B y y y y y y 3 x OD OF PIPE MINIMUM 3000 P.S.I. MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. �' 1 6 fps 5 IN. y�yyy'y'�'�'y�'y� y y yyy y ��/� /�� DITCH CONCRETE C 18 fps 1 O IN. yyyyyyy yy y yJ4yy y y y y y TOE TOE STAPLE DEFLECTOR END HEADER OR II - -�-II yy y SECTION A -A NOTE: CHECK DAMS GREATER THAN TWO FEET SECTION B—B BERM ,,� _= "/ PROFILE VIEW APPROVED EQUAL ll- I I TTf1 1 10 fps 14 IN. IN DEPTH MAY SERIOUSLY IMPACT THE FLOW BACKFILL & COMPACT 6'k6" MIN. STAPLES STAPLES �`%j1- -I 1 /� CHECKSLOTSEVERY 12 fps 20 IN. SLOPES CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DITCH. SECTION B—B ° ALL FABRIC TRENCHING (A, B, D, E) ARE TO BE 6"D x VW MINIMUM Ip) 25'.40' 1 p SECTION A -A SIDE VIEW SECTION A -A 1 21- NOTE: ALL FABRIC TRENCHING(A, B, D, EI ARE TO BE 6"Dx 6"W MINIMUM �r -BAR SCREEN DETAILS PER MDOT ROAD & BRIDGE STANDARD PLANS, STEEL GRATES SLOPES -DEPENDING ON THE VELOCITY $LOPE AND SOILS, USE THE PROPER SIZED RIP -RAP TO HANDLE THE SECTION C-C FOR END SECTIONS. BARS ARE TO BE CUT OFF AT EDGE OF END SECTION, DEPENDING ON THE VELOCITY, SLOPE AND SOILS, USE THE PROPER SIZED RIP -RAP AND NON -WOVEN SHEER STRESS OF THE SLOPE/CHANNEL. �2- I RIP -RAP DEPENDING ON THE VELOCITY, SLOPE, SOILS, USE PROPER BLANKET OR TURF MAT LINING PER -FOR SLOPE AND/OR CHANNEL PROTECTION SEE OTHER BMP'S ON THIS SHEET OR IN -FOR SLOPE AND/OR CHANNEL PROTECTION SEE OTHER BMP'S ON THIS SHEET OR IN -FOR SLOPE AND/OR CHANNEL PROTECTION SEE OTHER BMP'S ON THIS SHEET OR IN -'1 -FOR SLOPE AND OR CHANNEL PROTECTION SEE OTHER BMP'S ON THIS SHEET OR IN MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS TO HANDLE THE SHEER STRESSES OF THE SLOPE/CHANNEL. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO HANDLE THE SHEER STRESS OF THE SLOPE/CHANNEL. THE WRC SOIL EROSION MANUAL. THE WRC SOIL EROSION MANUAL. THE WRC SOIL EROSION MANUAL. THE WRC SOIL �ROSION MANUAL. VEGETATIVE BUFFER ZONE SP-1 SILT FENCE ALTERNATIVE "A" (SP-2A) RYCB INLET FILTER (SI-3) RYCB INLET FILTER ALTERNATIVE "A" (SI-3A) RYCB INLET FILTER ALTERNATIVE "B" (SI-3B) ( ) SILT FENCE (SP-2) (MATERIAL: SILT SHIELD OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) WINTER/FROZEN GROUND SILT FENCE (SP-2W) �A (MATERIAL: AMOCO PRO PEX 2130 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 1/2" X 30" MATERIAL: AMOCO PRO PEX 2130 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) , . " MATERIAL: SILT SAVER OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE THE GRAPH SHOWN BELOW IS USED TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF AN EXISTING VEGETATIVE BUFFER FIBER GLASS SPACING 6' MAX. ( 1/2 x 1/t HARDWOOD STAKES GEOTEXTILE BRACING RODS DRIVEN INTO GROUND 1' MIN. FILTER FABRIC ZONE FOR USE AS A SEDIMENT FILTER. THIS GRAPH IS ONLY APPLICABLE IF THE VEGETATION IS 90% RIVET 5/8" DIA. MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) SHEET ADD METAL STAKE AS DENSE AND AT LEAST 1" IN LENGTH OVER EVERY SQUARE FOOT OF DISTURBED SOIL. AN AREA SHEET COMPACTED EARTH FASTENERS DRAINAGE B I SHEET PEASTONE SHEET REINFORCEMENT. PEASTONE SILT SAVER HAT GEOTEXTILE COVERED WITH WEEDS, OR BUSHES AND TREES WITHOUT A GOOD GROUND COVER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. SILT FENCE JOINT FLOW FABRIC FLOW ® ® ® ® HOLES ® ® ® ® SILT FENCE JOINT FLOW FABRIC FLOW + \ • STAPLES/NAILS / FILTER FABRIC 'SECTION B-B GEOTEXTILE FILTER lyq _ / / / SECTION B-B GEOTEXTILE FILTER �� S / y •W •w •« •« .N) 6" MIN. SPACING <o PER MANUFACTURERS EXAMPLE [ �N w A ) )'I wovEN GEOTEXTILE /\A� RECOMMENDATION -STREET ^� �]� -----� --- \ \ (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) •w r. NN) 0 4d ® ® ® •r. •« - FILTER FABRIC -ADJACENT PROP. "" / / pE (UNDISTURBED VEGETATION �'•" ® ® ® r •,N •w (UNDISTURBED VEGETATION `"' "•' I`" .X 1T PLACED OVER GRATE LO f DISTURBED = = BUFFER ZONE _ _ -STREAM ""' w 1 A - �I,,, W • A r. 1 �� -LAKE Nr "��"" 20" 4d- 4d ® ® : ® "+� w Nu `/ ) AREA + + s" ay"� -1R�., ,.5- _.~-Ir•• .:.::• I~,: PLAN VIEW w• ` ` SUPPORT FENCE "'I" SUPPORT FENCE "" SPACING / •.!A \ 1 /2" x 1/t" STAKES 30^ 5" ® GRADE 1 x 1ti/t" STAKES 6' MAX • • / ; +"•'::' LINE PLAN VIEW :°' ", - a� soD oR sEED WTH 6" ANCHOR TRENCH `ti r 'x- iK'4i.?t? x!:`'ory;rY ;•-Y -+ r _ ;�> - rs� 1 %" x 1 %" HARDWOOD STAKES I + " , ` �,• • e-',`%="•?^"e%-`..�•` 'i:4;a?rS:.» .?'.<^:`?<`> x;* SPACING 6' MAX. EROSION CONTROL I :•I' I 1/z x 1/i HARDWOOD STAKES _�„ ij.-. ��•�.;;, _ I _ _ DRIVEN INTO GROUND 1' MIN. • BLANKETS. i WITH SAND WEIGHTS } ._`jr .q i!:'.: 3 y J`irn r,!sk`i%'^�.?.•:�^��e-f'.•2 wG Y '�`i' _ - I _ ? = L4• ny0 = SPACING 6' MAX. _ DRIVEN INTO GROUND 1 MIN. 't "r"'^''`J` ^"'"x`"^'- `� WRAP f 'I I y vI.4 J 4',��'Y-� �IN FLAP WRAP LATH � Salvaged edges (typ.) o - MIN. I I�? LATH Salvaged edges (typ.) y•y y yM11 y yLENGTH OF BUFFER ZONE ? MIN./LrYP) I P p,i (T�•) �/i y y� SCARIFY THE% OF SLOPE OF BUFFER ZONE = 5% ��COMPACTED)PLAN VIEW I I I - I y yy FINISH GRADE' I, y y yyyy PERPENDICULARWHAT IS THE ACCEPTABLE LENGTH OF THE BUFFER ZONE?"I1 - 11 EARTH I I I '' 1 I yyy y TO THE SLOPE A� III )! I! < I I I GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC I I I I L`+ MIN 10 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) ma's III GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC II II I I ( I I I S( PLOT IN GRAPH BELOW d. III (MIN 10 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) .!I I I 1 QF' SILT SAVER yII I EXTRUDED SEDIMENT BUFFER ZONE IS ACCEPTABLE AT 65' jII 1 II It FILTER FENCE I'- LATH STRIP 9" q I 1 )I UNDISTURBED FLOW RACING ROD COMPACTED SHEER ( 7YP. 100 iIi I I I 5/8" DIA. SHEET EARTH FLOW PEASTONE SUPPORT FENCE PLAN VIEW INTO GROUND I 6" ANCHOR TRENCH DRAINAGE HOLES 2,J•• / 6" ANCHOR TRENCH 90 .. -- - - --- ---- (IF REQUIRED) ---------- ------ (----�-- VEGETATION Sheet Flow GRADE UNE y----- �. C( l l 1' MIN. w 80 l � 11—A 1' MIN. SUPPORT FENCE � r-'�. �� \-': �- _� ) ) � l ACCEPTABLE _ 1)/ (IF REQUIRED) )/ `"p�. COMPACTED ��r r. o hI+ o r of _, J A ED RTH IS FENCE 8 TOTAL LENGTH 70 BUFFER ZONE . V ( V „^ 6EgX 6„ GJODI TT SECTON BETA TION)L B GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC OF VEGETATED - -J '�'-= - FRONT VIE LATH STRIP (TAP.) �N� `" FRONT VIE TMTM�L WRAPPED IN �'x' LATH STRIP (TYP) SILT ---------------� j,,7 SILT B��.ft r, •„ W 60 " (FEET) l 1J= -ffil `\ E aID. DIE / \I PEASTONE GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC PRAP THE ENDS TRENCH FASTENED ON UPHILL SIDE, / II OF THE SILT FENCE EX. GROUND SILT FENCE A MWND EACH 1' MIN. 50 �- - "- ��FASTENED ON UPHILL SIDE, SILT FENCE A 1 2" X 30" FIBERGLASS TOWARDS EARTH DISRUPTION mHER nece. REAR YARD CATCH BASIN 6" ANCHOR TRENCH (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) _ "°TM SECTION B—B / TOWARDS EARTH DISRUPTION e e r" INLET FILTER••�'s'- i PIT PIT 40 j % 11 i'^ BRACING RODS PLACE FILTER FABRIC FLAP I ON THE GROUND AND PLACE - 4 POST CONSTRUCTION "•1• COMPACTED EARTH 30 - : j.��-- �,� NDISTURBED ON UPHILL SIDE OF FILTER �' `2% GRADE MAXIMUM SLOPE NDISTURBED j FLAPASSHOWN ON � WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC NOT ACCEPTABLE\' VEGETATION IFABRIC ,\\U VEGETATION I (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SO FT) 20 BUFFER ZONE 1 �� SHEET FLOW sLr FENCE A Splicin Wp �r I� i \, SHEET FLOW i� P 9 L�ZIRL��tD SEDIMENT FILTER FENCE 's achieved beg n g with an \ 6" I �� SILT FENCE A� SILT FENCE B overlap of a min. of 8" of the EXTRUDED SEDIMENT FILTER FENCE ends /I(=1=++1 TILT FENCE a FINISH GRADE /I(_/II \ cured with six of our plastic retches r gt push -in fasteners. Locate 10 //1/''//' 11��;:1 D three, evenly spaced, vertically, at least �2" from each edge of the splice. /II/�' �//l� ��e� II `•y 16^ x 6^ Oational Heat Spina: 1' N. 6^ �. �— - ANCHOR TRENCH SILT FENCE JOINT Overlap u f eight i hea. Melt thin layer of EXTRUDED SEDIMENT FILTER FENCE withntorch from top to bottom. Immediately I SILT FENCE JOINT INLET/CB STORM DRAIN 2% 4% 6% 8% VERTICAL WALL SECTION B—B Gresa both layers together for a minimum f s second. Check for total NOTE: MATERIAL IS NOT SILT FENCE MATERIAL RISER PIPE (2' OR 4'0) SLOPE OF VEGETATED SLOPE SECTION A —A amInation from tap a bottom of material. (Do notapplyheat to filter) SECTION A -A SECTION B-B SECTION A -A (NOTE: NO PIT REQUIRED WHEN FRAME AND COVER OR GRATE AND COVER ARE IN PLACE.) EARTH DIVERSION BERM WITH EARTH DIVERSION BERM E-2 LOW POINT INLET FILTER (SI-2) LOW POINT INLET FILTER ALT. "A" (SI-2A) SILT FENCE GRAVEL FILTER (SP-3) DITCH SEDIMENT TRAP (SO-4) STONE OUTLET FILTER (SP-4) ( ) GRAVEL INTERCEPTOR DIKE (SP-6) ALTERNATIVE INLET FILTER MUST BE USED IN AREAS THAT MAY BECOME A SAFETY HAZARD DUE TO MATERIAL: CATCH-ALL, ULTRA -URBAN FILTERS, A UNDISTURBED FLOODING OR FREEZING. FLOGARD +PLUS OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE SWALE TO DIRECT FLOW VEGETATION ON FLOW FLOW DO NSLO E SIDE \ TO THE STONE FILTER MOOT 6A STONE (NATURAL) STONE FILTER MATERIAL _ - S / Q� =LOW _ - 2 ON 1 OR FLATTER CO O FLOW _ SEED AND MULCH SIDE SLOPES GRADED A� / \ 5� FL I OR SOD ON THE BERM RIGHT OF WAY p A � CROSS SECTIONAL I � 2' MIN. � AREA OF FLOW STONE FILTER MATERIAL / 3' TO 5' WOVEN GEOTEXTILE . I�III / FILTER FABRIC 7TAK x 1�"HARDWOOD '= •, ::;�:MDOT 6A STONE 7.;�; MDOT 22A GRAVEL(NATURAL) • OR EQUIVALENT _(MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT)A \ A ES DRIVEN � - /e ' .... ..... . 'TONE FILTER MATERIAL' / \ SILT FENCE (SP-2) 2' MIN. - - / INTO GROUND 1' MIN. MDOT 6A STONE i I (NATURAL) PLAN VIEW ............. 1 fe' TO 2' ///� / SCARIFY THE GRADE I I I �--' I / / PERPENDICULAR T O I i� M T � IJ CO PAC ED I I I 3 ON 1 OR FLATTER THE SLOPE WHEN SPACING + " + " ., V V EARTH � � SCARIFY THE GRADE I 1/1 x 1/1 HARDWOOD V I I GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC NO PAVEMENT / I SIDE SLOPES �. -i / PERPENDICULAR TO CROSS - SECTION GRATE THE SLOPE WHEN\1\ / _ 6' MAX. I 3' STAKES DRIVEN CROSS—SECTION \ \ / NO PAVEMENT y l I~� INTO GROUND 1' MIN. S\ GRATE \ GEOTEXT00 ILE FILTER FABRIC PLAN VIEW p�// PLAN VIEW A (' SCREENIING STO Ft.) APPROX. 6' CONCAVE WEIR \ \/ 5�'/ `O'�F. / �- -�- �, T BRACING (NP.) IN PLACE \S ,_, ... 2x4 OR EQUAL FILTER MATERIAL F15" MIN. FLOW FLOW SECTION A -A ----- ----- � � � 1 MIN.----F-- I FRONT VIEW 1__GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEED AND MULCH • OR SOD ON BERM +- L2 ON 1 OR FLATTER I7•�— SIDE SLOPES ISOMETRIC VIEW _ -PLACE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER STONE WITH 6 INCH MIN. OVERLAP AND TRENCHED IN 6 INCH MIN. CURB AND GUTTER INLET FILTER (SI-4) (BEFORE AND AFTER PAVING) ALTERNATIVE INLET FILTER MUST BE USED IN AREAS THAT MAY BECOME A SAFETY HAZARD DUE TO FLOODING OR FREEZING. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PLAN VIEW SECTION A -A FINISHED PAVEMENT CURB AND GUTTER INLET TE WRAPPED IN WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) PROPOSED/FINISHED PAVEMENT SUB -BASE GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) PLAN VIEW UNDISTURBED VEGETATION ON DOWN SLOPE SIDE CURB AND GUTTER INLET FILTER ALTERNATIVE "A" (SI-4A) (BEFORE AND AFTER PAVING) MATERIAL: CATCH-ALL, ULTRA -URBAN FILTERS, FLOGARD +PLUS OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FINISHED PAVEMENT _ 1 A A CURB AND GUTTER INLET PLAN VIEW PROPOSED/FINISHED PAVEMENT _Ill�ll_lll�ll-ll /• OVERFLOW N •• • • ' • • • •' �• (MUST EQUAL U� _ • •••`••••'•• GRATE CAPACITY) + SUB -BASE INLET FILTER INSERT GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SECTION A -A (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) PLAN VIEW 6" ANCHOR 18"-24 GEOT FINISH TRENCH (MIN 1 TILE FILTER FABRIC 1:7••••f •••• PAVEMENT GRATE WRAPPED IN (MIN 0 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) } 2' MIN. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC FINISHED PAVEMENT FRONT VIEW STONE FILTER MATERIAL END VIEW TOP OF BANK RIGHT-OF-WAY FLOW '\ (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) MDOT 6A STONE (NATURAL) LIMITS I+.i •e�� — _ + -%// ///-%// ///-% ~ 1' MIN. I _ _ A2 -3 -��•.,; " OVERFLOW (MUST EQUAL °•, I A GRATE CAPACITY) 1 FLOW 11 _ 20' - I + I a INLET FILTER INSERT FLO �r L //jI y - PIT AREA 12._18. IIy'E f " GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC I - A �':� 1' MIN. ( 6 x s" SECTION A-� PLAN VIEW %OUTLET TO A SECTION A -A ), .�; .� GEOTEXTILE FILTER ANCHOR TRENCH STABILIZED AREA �- FABRIC VERTICAL WALL (MIN 100 GAL/MIN/SQ FT) CROSS SECTION NOTE: -PLACE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER STONE WITH 6 INCH MIN. OVERLAP AND TRENCHED IN 6 INCH MIN. PROFILE VIEW' FOR SLOPE AND/OR CHANNEL PROTECTION SEE OTHER BMP'S ON THE SHEET OR IN -FOR SLOPE AND/OR CHANNEL PROTECTION SEE OTHER BMP'S ON THIS SHEET OR IN THE WRC SOIL EROSION MANUAL. -PLACE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER STONE NTH 6 INCH MIN. OVERLAP AND TRENCHED IN 6 INCH MIN. THE WRC SOIL EROSION MANUAL. SOD INLET FILTER (SI-1) TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN OUTLET TEMPORARY STONE ACCESS DRIVE (SP-9) SURFACE ROUGHENING NOTE: STONE FILTER (SO-2) AND WHILE PERFORMING WORK INVOLVING GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SEED AND SCARIFICATION (E-8) AND/OR THE CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE OF ANY DEFINITION SOD INLET FILTERS ARE PADS OF SOD PLACED AROUND A ;x.. MULCH 7 �SOD� 6" MIN.INFRASTRUCTURE, INCLUDING ROADS, WATER MAINS, STORM DRAIN INLET OR CATCH BASIN. (/ THIS IS AN EASY AND ECONOMICAL WAY TO REDUCE SOIL EROSION. IT IS SIMPLY THE PLACING OF SANITARY SEWERS, STORM DRAINS AND STORM WATER BEST },,`.. ` `.HORIZONTAL GROOVES IN A SLOPE PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF RUNOFF. THIS CAN BE DONE BY PURPOSE SOD INLET FILTERS ARE INSTALLED TO SLOW THE FLOW OF SECONDARY OVERFLOW 1 WATER INTO AN INLET OR CATCH BASIN AND TO FILTER OUT EITHER DISC HARROWING, BACK BEADING OR JUST RUNNING THE TREADS OF A CRAWLER TRACTOR MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS), CONTRACTORS SHALL PRIMARY OVERFLOW STRUCTURE - - CONCENTRATIONSOFTHEY ARE BEST USED AFTERPERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE AS SHOWN BELOW. 4 SEDIMENT IN THE PROCESS. STRUCTURE ROADWAY MINIMIZE POLLUTION FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF THAT CAN WHERE APPLICABLEFILTERS SHOULD SEDIMENT• LIGHT I , •-\/\\\\/\\\/\/\\\/\\\\\\�\\\�\\\� AFFECT WATER QUALITY RELATED TO WORK ACTIVITIES. $ FINAL GRADING IS COMPLETE AND DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT I I WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RECOMMENDED POLLUTANTS THAT COULD IMPAIR WATER QUALITY MAY OF A VEGETATIVE COVER. / L- UNDISTURBED VEGETATION INCLUDE FUEL, GREASE AND OIL, NUTRIENTS, BACTERIA AND 6 BAR BAR FLARED GRATE - GRATE END -SECTION CROSS SECTION A—& � PATHOGENS, LITTER AND DEBRIS, AND SOIL EROSION AND WITH RIP -RAP FLOW SEDIMENTATION. APPLICABLE BMPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED �-DIVERSION BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE sE 25' MIN. OR USE VEGETATIVE NOTE: EXTREME CARE MUST BE EXERCISED TO INSURE TO PROTECT WATER QUALITY AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. €E \ BUFFER ZONE DETAIL CHART (SP-1)_\ PLAN VIEW THAT THE OUTLET HOLES IN THE STANDPIPE, DO NOT BECOME CLOGGED WITH SEDIMENT. ^ 's — SOD 3 SOIL EROSION BACK FILL WITH 3" WASHED 'A o A 1 "-3" (50-75mm) STONE, THEN CHOKE WITH p CRUSHED CONCRETE OR •' / •. MOOT 6A STONE (NATURAL) SEED AND MULCH �i AND CRUSHED LIMESTONE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ` G / dbi ♦ �..le.� PRIMARY OVERFLOW SECONDARY OVERFLOW STRUCTURE MIN. 6" (150mm) THICK N �.• o �� y � STRUCTURE � DOZER TREADS RESTRICTED CREATE GROOVES '110- FLOW FLOW DESIGNED ORIFICE —_ PERPENDICULAR To .� DETAILS DESIGNED BASIN ELEVATION CMP R +' MIN.//i REVISION BLOCK SLOPE DIRECTION f " / 1 -YR STORM ELEVATION 1 Data source I So°rce Data: IwA [' 1 \� - % �® Rev. Rev. Rev. a _• / / Description: DIVERSION RIDGE �'��` i No.: BY: Date: FLOW -� SLOPE /��/b�d' 2 Iz 22609 STANDARDS COMMITTEE APPROVAL I NAME CHANGES BOTTOM OF BASIN •` -/�//= OUTLEf PIPE ---�- _///�'/= �I _ 50 FT. MINIMUM OR TO THE BUILDING ENVELOPE _ �0 �' ;� Ds s+t SILT VENCE ALTERNATIVE 'A'DETAIL (SP-2A) ADDED DS -6-t3 STANDARDS COMMITTEE APPROVAL I NOTE CHANGES % THE OUTLET HOLES MUST BE PLACED AT THE 1' SUMP J BOTTOM OF THE BASIN AND THEIR CAPACITY ` ORIG. DATE: 01/01/01 ^ ONE PUBLIC WORKS DRIVE, BLDG 95 WEST MUST BE SUCH THAT A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 48 `�� W R ( WATERFORD, MICHIGAN CONCRETE BASE HOURS WILL BE REQUIRED TO OUTLET A 1-YEAR PLAN VIEW SCALE: NONE \'v „V ISOMETRIC VI1' •.r STORM VOLUME. SEE OAKLAND COUNTY WATER UNVEGETATED SLOPE SHOULD BE TEMPORARILY 48328-1907 RESOURCES COMMISSIONER'S SEpp)JM�.ry�Rq$I SCARIFIED TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF VELOCITIES PROFILE VIEW DESK:. CRITERIA FOR NUMBER OF UUTL61 HOLES DESIGNED BY: WRC WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONEn REQUIRED. /,,,, \a,,; SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 NOE: NOT TO SCALE DRAWN BY: Mapping I giffelsor Webster Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1025 East Maple Road Suite 100 Birmingham, MI 48009 p (248) 852-3100 f (313) 962-5068 www.giffelswebster.com Executive: S.A.R. Manager: J.R.W. Designer: J.P.K. Quality Control: J.R.W. Know what's below. Call before you dig. DATE: ISSUE: 03/10/2022 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 03/16/2022 ISSUED FOR FINAL REVIEW Developed For: OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION 2800 WATKINS LAKE RD WATERFORD, MI 48328 (248)858-0906 WRC SOIL EROSOIN DETAILS INDEPENDENCE OAKS PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN Date: 02.24.22 Scale: AS SHOWN Sheet: 29 of 29 Project: 16834.66 Copyright © 2022 Giffels Webster. No reproduction shall be made without the prior written consent of Giffels Webster. Oakland County Purchasing Division Bid Tabulation Independence Oaks Paving Event #005467 Bidder #1 Bidder #2 Bidder #3 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION I VENDOR Asphalt Best Asphalt Inc Hutch Paving Specialists LLC Romulus, MI Warren, MI Pontiac, MI 1 Base Bid #1 - Independence Oaks Internal Roadway System and Wint Nature $1,092,000.00 $1,084,175.50 $1,020,000.00 Center Parking Lot Pavement Improvements 2 BASE BID #2 — Independence Blvd Road Improvements ONLY $408,000.00 $238,592.25 $419,400.00 3 ALTERNATE 1-A— Installation of Bio-Retention Areas $160,000.00 $181,120.00 $124,480.00 4 ALTERNATE 1-B — Placement of Bio-Retention Plants $36,900.00 $30,750.00 $33,210.00 5 Total Base Bid #1 +Alt 1-A+Alt 1-B $1,288,900.00 $1,296,045.50 $1,177,690.00 4/21 /2022 Mup c� `+., Yam' �t '-'�WNW "��°`L`�'w�,��'�-r $ �- wry �, �t�,_ �'.y,,, �• _, 5 " # s• ,ark '°,�` . ��c - t a �� -`� a ?tip✓:' � a� - � ra a�^� +r r �� } s RETURN TO AGENDA Oakland Couny Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item Memo Agenda #: 2 Department: Facilities Maintenance & Development From: Mark Adams, Jr. Architect/Project Manager Subject: Independence Oaks — Hidden Springs Beach — Building and Site Improvements (RFP Approval) PROJECT CATEGORIES Agenda Type: Consent Agenda ✓ Regular Agenda Approval Type: ✓ Conceptual Approval Construction Approval General Approval Project Type: ✓ Capital Improvement Maintenance Enhancement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Scope The original scope for this project proposed developing concepts to improve the beach area, surrounding buildings and updates to make the site ADA accessible through phased improvements. Upon beginning the project last fall, the project management team was informed of operational issues with managing water quality for swimming, which have closed the beach area for most of the past few summers due to elevated E-coli readings. Determining the source of the E-coli and developing a potential procedural program for remediation will need to occur before proceeding with the overall site and building improvements. The recommended scope of work will be completed in 2 possible phases. Phase I will be to determine the source/cause of the elevated E-coli contamination and look at potential methods of remediating the problem. If a solution is found that the Commission agrees to fund, we will then work on Phase II which will be implementing the E.Coli solution and designing improvements to the beach area for continued beach use. If a solution cannot be found (or costs more than the Commission wants to invest), Phase II may be re -visioning this area of the park for other, non -beach use. 2. Need a. The masonry restroom and concession structure, along with the man-made beach and site was originally built in 1986. The structure is surrounded by to earthen mounds originally designed to allow park guests to picnic and walk on the roof of the structure. The roof area has been closed to the park guests for well over 25 years. b. The interior concession area of the structure has been used for storage for more than a decade with both the restroom and concession interiors experiencing several issues related to water infiltration and mildew. c. Additional ADA-compliant updates for both the building and site will be required. d. The very popular man-made beach water level is controlled by an unregulated dam, with water supplied by a pumping system from Crooked Lake. With no procedural records or regulation for water pumping operations, the water quality monitoring by our Water Resource Commissioner's Office and analysis scope of work for this project staff will assist staff in making determination if water quality can be improved for continued operation as a beach. e. The site is also served by a 202-space gravel parking lot that is drained directly into the existing wetland through a series of storm water catch basins, that do not meet today's current storm water standards. Page 2 3. Review and Approval History Date Description 9/2021 FY2022 Capital Improvement Program 4. Funding a. Current FY2022 budgeted amount: $25,000 b. Recommended total amount i. With the assistance of the Oakland County Purchasing Department staff issued a Request for Proposals were received from current county contracted vendors for engineering and design. i. Giffels-Webster Topographical Survey $14,800 ii. ECT, Proposal $55.870 iii. Total Design Engineering Cost $70,670 c. The additional $45,670 is funded within the approved FY2022 Capital Improvement Program. ATTACHMENTS 1. Attachment A — Planning Review 2. Attachment B — Proposal Summary 3. Attachment C — ECT, Inc Proposal STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a contract change order to ECT, Inc, Detroit, MI, (Contract #6183) in the amount of $55,870 for professional environmental and design engineering services for the redevelopment of the Hidden Springs Beach area at Independence Oaks. MOTION Move to approve a contract change order to ECT, Inc, Detroit, MI, (Contract #6183) in the amount of $55,870 for professional environmental and design engineering services for the redevelopment of the Hidden Springs Beach area at Independence Oaks. Contents Project Identification and Management.................................................................................................................................1 StaffRecommendation........................................................................................................................................................... 2 ProjectDescription..................................................................................................................................................................2 ❑X Current Conditions and Project Need........................................................................................................................2 ❑X Proposed Project Scope............................................................................................................................................. 2 ❑X Project Location Image...............................................................................................................................................2 ❑X Proposed Project Funding and Schedule...................................................................................................................2 ❑X Alternatives................................................................................................................................................................3 ProjectImplementation Plans.................................................................................................................................................3 Compliance and Permitting Reviews...................................................................................................................................... 3 PlanningBackground..............................................................................................................................................................3 ❑X 5-Year Park Statistics.................................................................................................................................................. 3 © Planning History.........................................................................................................................................................3 © Historical Significance................................................................................................................................................ 3 X❑ Public Engagement History........................................................................................................................................3 X❑ Other Service Providers..............................................................................................................................................4 References..............................................................................................................................................................................4 Project Identification and Management Park: Independence Oaks Budget center: IND Asset name: Hidden Springs Beach OCPR Asset ID: IndSite Concession and Bathhouse 1336 Project Name: Beach Site and Buildings Improvements Project ID: 163 File Name: Hidden Springs Bathhouse Improvement File ID: IND 2022.105 Proiect Manager: Mark Adams, Architect Engineer, adamsmaj@oakgov.com Planning Review coordinated bv: Donna Folland, Supervisor— Planning, follandd@oakgov.com Date Created:4/26/2022 Date of Last Update: 4/26/2022 Update: April 26, 2022 Staff Recommendation Evaluate the feasibility of continuing to operate Hidden Springs as a public beach and develop alternatives and costs based on this evaluation. Project Description ® Current Conditions and Project Need Concession and bathhouse were built in 1986. Beach area is very popular and in need of updates to retain current users and attract new visitors. Several problems exist in the area: ■ Pond has circulation issues ■ Beach has been closed multiple times for E.coli. ■ Buildings are outdated and not ADA compliant ■ Bathhouse is subject to leaking and mildew ■ Concession building is unused and there are no plans to restart on -site concessions ■ Landscaping is worn and has accessibility issues ■ Gravel parking lot needs to be evaluated for compliance with ADA and stormwater regulations ❑X Proposed Project Scope Develop project scope based on results of water quality evaluation and study of alternatives. ❑X Project Location Image Figure A: Hidden Springs Beach area (20221magery) ❑X Proposed Project Funding and Schedule Funding for initial evaluation is identified in FY2022 (OCPR, 2021) Update: April 26, 2022 ® Alternatives Alternatives will be considered based on the sustainability of the pond and beach and determination if it is feasible to continue its operation as a swimming area. Project Implementation Plans These sections will be completed post -evaluation and based on comparison of alternatives. Compliance and Permitting Reviews These sections will be completed post -evaluation and based on comparison of alternatives. Planning Background ® 5-Year Park Statistics FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Park Visits Day use 134,656 132,953 152,746 236,213 244,812 Revenue TOTAL 334,454 947,550 311,353 269,689 351,454 Fees Camping 6,757 4,326 4,902 1,705 5,537 Fees Day Use 224,312 231,306 218,348 235,190 268,984 Rent House 25,582 11,548 10,533 10,746 10,962 Rental Facilities 49,309 51,918 46,241 15,725 53,430 Other revenue 28,494 * 48,452 31,329 6,324 12,541 Expense TOTAL 1,394,967 2,089,095 1,326,548 1,093,987 1,090,593 Salaries 371,836 404,624 385,156 347,380 371,817 Fringe 126,718 150,282 157,294 164,593 141,814 Building Maintenance 33,924 31,663 51,075 44,445 23,679 Grounds Maintenance 428,513 * 1,052,478 232,863 128,967 127,041 Rental Property Maint. 4,112 568 2,190 3,195 1,252 Total Depreciation 194,936 208,611 224,339 225,995 228,532 Other expense 234,929 240,869 273,631 179,412 196,459 ❑X Planning History ❑X Park Vision/Rec Plan: MANAGE ASSETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Sustainably reinvest in existing assets and infrastructure, make new investments when supported by fiscal resources, recreational trends, public engagement, and usage data. (OCPR, 2/1/2018) ❑X Historical Significance ❑X The asset is not considered historically significant ❑X Public Engagement History X❑ 2017 Oakland County Needs Assessment Survey: Beaches ranked highest on the Priority Investment Rating (PIR=194), followed by trails and nature centers. (ETC, September 2017) Update: April 26, 2022 X❑ 2017 Oakland County Needs Assessment Survey: Respondents to the 2017 survey were supportive of investing tax dollars to "fix up and repair roads and parking lots". They were asked to indicate how supportive they would be of having Oakland County Parks and Recreation use their tax dollars to fund 18 different investments. Based on the sum of "very supportive" and "somewhat supportive" responses the four most supportive investments were: fix up and repair older structures and playgrounds (76%), fix up and repair roads and parking lots (75%), make facilities accessible for persons of all abilities (68%), and new trails and boardwalks (67%). Respondents were then asked to indicate which four actions would they be most willing to fund with their tax dollars. Based on the sum of respondents' top four choices, the three most supported investments were: fix up and repair older structures and playgrounds (35%), fix up and repair roads and parking lots (31%), and new trails and boardwalks (29%). (ETC, September 2017) ® Other Service Providers Public beaches are provided at the following locations in northern Oakland County 1. Bald Mountain State Recreation Area Lower Trout Lake Beach in Orion Township 2. Bay Court Park in Independence Township 3. Deer Lake Beach in Clarkston 4. Green's Park in Lake Orion Village 5. Groveland Oaks County Park Stewart Lake Beach in Groveland Township 6. Holly State Recreation Area Heron Lake Beach in Holly 7. Oxford Park Beach in Oxford r— References Rose f I - L� . Brandon i I N Addison ^9kland CAPRA. (2014). Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies National Accreditation Standards. Washington DC: National Recreation and Parks Association. Update: April 26, 2022 ETC. (September 2017). Oakland County Parks and Recreation Community Needs Assessment Survey. Waterford M I: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission. OCPR. (2/1/2018). 5-Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2018-2022. Waterford MI: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission. OCPR. (9/4/2019). Approved FY2020 Capital Improvement Program and Maintenance Management Plans. Waterford MI: Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission. Update: April 26, 2022 ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 Oakland County Purchasing Division Bid Tabulation Independence Oaks Bathhouse Improvements Design, Engineering And Environmental Analysis RFP DESCRIPTION I VENDOR Environmental Site Analysis Schematic/Conceptual Designs Reimbursable/Miscellaneous Costs Construction Documents JFR Archtects w/ ETC, Inc. Rowe Engineering and ASTI Environmental $18,590.00 TBD $30,300.00 $25,680.00 $6, 980.00 n/a TBD $39,604.00 TOTAL $55,870.00 $65,284.00 4/18/2022 > Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Response to Request for Proposal #P22WR-0017 Independence Oaks Hidden Springs Beach Area W5 Wi ;nq mpt" V_ h March 14, 2022 > ectinc.com 1155 Brewery Park Blvd., Ste. 115 1 Detroit I Michigan Table of Contents SCOPE OF SERVICES .......................................... COST OF SERVICES ................................................... .................................................. 4 ........................................................ 6 SCHEDULE........................................................................................................................................7 RESUMES................................................................................... PROJECTPROFILES............................................................................................................................ ectinc.com > 313-963-6600Mc� 1 2 March 14, 2022 ECT No. P22WR-0017 Mr. Mark Adams Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission 2800 Watkins Lake Road Waterford, MI 48328 Re: Design and Engineering Services for Hidden Springs Beach Area Redevelopment at Independence Oaks County Park Dear Mr. Adams, Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. (ECT) thanks you for the opportunity to propose our services for this project. ECT is excited about the prospect of working with the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission on this important assignment. The scope is broken into the phases requested in the RFP: Site Evaluation and Analysis; Schematic/Conceptual Design Development; and Final Design Development & Procurement. Costs are proposed for the first two phases. Costs for the third phase will be negotiated with the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission based upon ECT's hourly rates after completion of Schematic Design as suggested in the Commission's response to bidders' questions. We hope you'll agree that the ECT team has a unique blend of disciplines that are perfect for an assignment such as this. Our environmental scientists have the technical experience to address the water quality issues at the beach and our landscape architects have a deep resume of award -winning park and recreation projects. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal. If you have questions regarding it, please contact me at 630-559-2011 or iac000er@ectinc.com. Sincerely, Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. Jason Cooper, PLA, LEED AP Senior Manager, Landscape Architecture jac �C� ectinc.com > 313-963-6600 13 Scope of Services Based on our understanding of the project, ECT proposes the following scope of work below. TASK 1.0 - SITE EVALUATION & ANALYSIS 1. Coordinate a strategy Kick-off meeting for the purpose to review initial scope, owner information, site data, record operational concerns/ideas, and develop a project schedule 2. As necessary, coordinate with the owner's representative and conduct on -site visit(s) for the purpose to familiarize yourself with the existing system, including the operation, maintenance a frequency of pumping water into the existing swimming beach 3. Review, analyze and synthesize all information and data provided during the discovery phase of this project, including any notes, observations, etc. a. Particular attention should be given to potentially develop a sustainable methodology to improved and maintain water quality for public swimming, since this may result in repurposing the area into something other than a public swimming beach. 4. Deliverables/Meetings a. (1) Design Kick-off Meeting (Virtual) b. (2) site visits, including operational reviews c. Preliminary Findings Report and Recommendations TASK 1.1 - COORDINATION WITH OAKLAND COUNTY WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION (ADDED SCOPE) ECT will coordinate with the Oakland County Water Resources Commission in their assessment of Crooked Lake as a potential source of E-Coli. In addition, ECT recommends that monitoring wells be installed between the lake and the septic field and between the lake and the lake and septic tank to determine if there is untreated E-Coli leaching from these systems. Finally, ECT will coordinate with Oakland County Parks and Recreation to assess goose populations as a potential source. Depending on the findings of the WRC and PARC, ECT will outline potential strategies to address the source(s). ectinc.com > 313-963-6600 A /4 TASK 2.0 - SCHEMATIC/CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1. Coordinate a review meeting with the owner's representative and operational staff for the purpose of reporting preliminary findings and recommendations, discuss options, reviewing progress and document owner direction for Schematic design development. 2. Provided schematic design development options (up to two) and budgets for owner review. 3. Coordinate a schematic design development meeting with the owner's representative and operational staff for the purpose of reviewing various recommendations, options and determining direction for the design. 4. Revise schematic design for the purpose of creating the final Conceptual design, report and budget. Assist with a presentation to the OCPR Commission for the approval of the final recommendation based on the final conceptual design, report and budget 5. Deliverables/meetings a. (3) Design Development Meetings b. (1) Commission Review Meeting c. Schematic design development drawing options and budgets d. Conceptual Design drawings, report and budget TASK 3.0 - FINAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT & PROCUREMENT 5. Upon Commission approval of the concept design drawings, Prepare and revise draft construction documents including drawings, specifications and adjusted budgets for bidding and procurement for owner review and comment, including the establishment of regular progress review meetings a. Coordinate, Organize and lead design progress meetings 6. With the assistance of the owner's representative, finalize Construction documents for bidding and procurement. 7. Assist owner representative during the bidding and procurement process with Oakland County Purchasing, including but not limited to pre -bid meeting, review of vendor questions and drafting addendums. 8. Assist owner representative with the bid evaluation and final recommendation. 9. Assist with the presentation and OCPR Commission approval of the final conceptual design and opinion of costs, for the purpose of continuing the design engineering process for construction documents. 10. Deliverables/Meetings a. (3) Owner Progress Meetings b. (1) Pre -bid Meeting c. (1) Commission approval Meeting TASK 4.0 - REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Expenses will include reimbursable costs as outlined in ECT's Master Services Agreement as well as the costs to install approximately 4 monitoring wells per Task 1.1. �C� ectinc.com > 855.737.0444 , 5 Cost of Services FEE PROPOSAL Task Task Description 1.0 Site Evaluation & Analysis 2.0 Schematic/Conceptual Design Development 3.0 Final Design Development & Procurement Total Type $ 18,590 T&M - NTE $ 30,300 T&M - NTE TBD T&M - NTE Total Fee $ 48,890 4.0 Reimbursable Expenses $ 6,980 T&M - NTE Total Fee plus Reimbursable Expenses $ 55,870 T&M - NTE T&M - NTE = Time and Materials - Not to Exceed Our team is available to commence work immediately following receipt of proposal acceptance. TERMS AND CONDITIONS Work under this proposal will be conducted according the Master Services Agreement that ECT has with the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission including the agreed upon hourly rates. The fee proposal is valid for 60 days from the date of this proposal. Mc� ectinc.com > 313-963-6600 , 6 Schedule Site Evaluation and Analysis 1.1 Kickoff Meeting 1.2 Data Gathering - Site Visits 1.3 Analysis & Report Schematic/Conceptual Design Development I2.1 Review Meeting j 2.2 Schematic Design Options & Costs 2.3 Review Meeting 2.4 Final Conceptual Design & Costs 2.5 Presentation to OCPR Commission Final Design Development & Procurement 13.1 Progress Design Meetings 3.2 Construction Documents 3.3 Presentation to OCPR Commission 3.4 Bidding Process 3.5 Construction Start Date TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD ectinc.com > 313-963-6600 Mc� , 7 Resumes Please refer to the attached resumes for individuals that would be assigned to this project. ectinc.com > 313-963-6600 C 18 Jason Cooper, PLA, LEED AP Senior Manager, Landscape Architecture Mr. Cooper's work as a landscape architect has expanded the integration of green infrastructure systems and restorative design principles around the Great Lakes region and beyond. His design portfolio is comprised of headquarters for Fortune 500 companies, more than 50 park and recreation facilities, numerous downtown streetscapes, and many natural area restoration projects. Mr. Cooper is versed in a broad range of green technologies, with significant practice in applications such as bioretention, rainwater harvesting systems, permeable paving, LED lighting, and clean energy delivery systems. Mr. Cooper is a recognized authority on the design of green and complete streets, green roofs, green infrastructure, and green schoolyards and is a frequent presenter at conferences and workshops. His work has been recognized with awards of excellence from the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) - Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa Chapters, Wisconsin Landscape Contractors Association (WLCA), 1000 Friends of Iowa, and the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). EXPERIENCE [Landscape Architect & Project Manager; Prior]Wise Water Use Guidelines University of Chicago, IL Served as landscape architect and project manager on this 2012 project for the University of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois. Water is essential to the functioning of the University of Chicago's campus and especially to its evolution as a botanic garden. Management of this natural resource has enormous financial, cultural, and environmental implications. In 2012, ECT developed guidelines to expand upon the University's commitment to water conservation and identified opportunities for reducing consumption and harvesting rainfall. Blossom Heath Activity Pier Expansion I St. Clair Shores, MI ECT developed the preliminary design and construction documents to reconstruct and extend the pier at Blossom Heath Park in St. Clair Shores, Michigan. The design includes a renovated fishing pier which will extend an additional 400 feet into Lake St. Clair, an elevated boardwalk which will hover over the Lake, a converted boathouse which will be transformed into a flex -use recreation facility, seawall replacement, road rehabilitation, bicycle/scooter lanes, new pedestrian lighting, and several site amenities. The site amenities include shade structures, benches, bicycle/Scooter parking, picnic tables, and floating treatment islands. Fresh Coast Protection Partnership Community Based Green Infrastructure Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District I Milwaukee Area, WI Principal Landscape Architect responsible for the design and development of green infrastructure for Muskego Senior Housing Center and River Hills Conservancy Constructed Wetlands. Green infrastructure practices included naturalized wetland basins, permeable paving, and bioretention and resulted in over 3.5 million gallons of captured stormwater. Waukegan Beachfront Master Plan I City of Waukegan, IL Served as landscape architect and project manager on this 2007 project for the City of Waukegan. The Master Plan for the beachfront incorporates 3,800 lineal feet of bike and pedestrian trails, boardwalks, and elevated walkways which take advantage of Waukegan's unique dune ecosystem coastline. The plan preserves the remnant dune landscape and restores plant and animal habitats while offering access and educational opportunities for visitors. EDUCATION Master of Landscape Architecture University of Michigan B.A., Anthropology University of Illinois CREDENTIALS Landscape Architect, FL, IL, IA, NY, OH, VA LEED Accredited Professional AREAS OF EXPERTISE Landscape Architecture Green Infrastructure Systems & Restorative Design Parks and Recreation Facilities Green Technologies Bioretention Rainwater Harvesting Systems Permeable Paving LED Lighting Clean Energy Delivery Systems �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Jason Cooper, PLA, LEED AP Senior Manager, Landscape Architecture Page 2 Marquette Park Fieldhouse I Chicago Park District Chicago, IL Served as project manager on this 2007 project for the Chicago Park District in Chicago, Illinois. Redeveloped Marquette Park with a focus on the healing and celebratory power of water. The design for the fieldhouse's plaza incorporated various water systems, including cisterns, hand - pumps, runnels, interactive weirs, water follies, and other garden -scale systems. This sustainable water -focused approach to the plaza was the first of its type in the City of Chicago. Parsons Park I Chicago Park District I Chicago, IL Served as landscape architect and project manager on this 2009 project for the Chicago Park District in Chicago, Illinois. Parsons Park blends structured play environments with naturalized ones. The park has two distinct areas - one for youth and the other for seniors. Features include a splash pad, swings, and several climbing structures. The senior area contains game tables and a bocce ball court. A centrally located rain garden collects water runoff and reuses it for irrigation. Hawk Prairie I Oregon Park District I Oregon, IL Served as principal landscape architect and project manager on this 2010 project for the Oregon Park District in Oregon, Illinois. Improvements at Hawk Prairie include the restoration of an intermittent stream with native plantings and cross -vane weirs. The restored stream serves as a habitat corridor between two adjacent prairies. A new multi -use trail and boardwalk immerse visitors in the landscape and limit impacts to the sensitive ecosystem. Park West Redevelopment I Oregon Park District Oregon, IL Served as principal landscape architect and project manager on this 2011 project for the Oregon Park District in Oregon, Illinois. The plan for this flagship park balances both active and passive uses. By reorganizing some of the athletic fields and centralizing pedestrian access, several new facilities were able to be introduced into this already heavily programmed park. These included a new street -style skatepark and splash pad. Fountainview Recreation Center I Carol Stream Park District I Carol Stream, IL Served as principal landscape architect and project manager on this 2013 project for the Carol Stream Park District in Carol Stream, Illinois. Carol Stream's newest recreation center is one of the biggest developments for the Carol Stream Park District To improve the quality of rainwater leaving the site, ECT installed permeable pavers in the parking lot and vegetated bioswales filter and treat runoff from the building's roof. The landscape plan includes a hearty combination of flowering perennials, shrubs and shade trees. Davis Park Master Plan I City of Rockford, IL Served as principal landscape architect and project manager on this 2015 project for the City of Rockford, Illinois. Davis Park sits at the heart of downtown Rockford on the Rock River. ECT designed a master plan that capitalizes on the park's central location and integrates a number of recreational and civic based improvements. These include three presentation stages, a sculpture garden, a combination splash pad and skating rink, a pedestrian promenade, a skatepark, fishing piers, and playgrounds. Westhaven Park I Chicago Park District I Chicago, IL Served as principal landscape architect on this 2016 project for the Chicago Park District in Chicago, Illinois. One of Chicago's newest parks was built over a site with contaminated soil. The design for the park elevates the grade in order to minimize costly excavation and haul off. New paving and imported soil serve as a permanent cap to the site. Rolling hills cleverly mask the alteration of the terrain and invite children to explore isolated play pods which feature a variety of fun play components. Eat to Live I Princeton Avenue Farm I Chicago, IL Served as principal landscape architect and project manager on this 2015 project for Princeton Avenue Farm in Chicago, Illinois. Evolving out of efforts to improve health and food access in the Englewood neighborhood, the Eat to Live Initiative was launched as an urban farm project providing skills training to youth and adults. The Princeton Avenue Farm was developed to provide dedicated growing space for the initiative and to serve as a center where new farmers can go for guidance and assistance. RECENT AWARDc 2021 ASLA, Wisconsin Chapter. Award of Merit. Plant Selection Tool for Green Infrastructure 2020 ASLA, Indiana Chapter. Award of Merit. The Cardinal Campus, Green Office 2017 Storm Water Solutions. Top Project. Space to Grow Schoolyard Transformations. 2016 National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management. Green Infrastructure Award. Space to Grow Schoolyard Transformations. RECENT CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS 2020 "Is Green Infrastructure Right for You?" Illinois Association of Park Districts Conference, Presenter. Chicago, Illinois. �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Annette DeMaria, P.E. Principal Engineer Ms. DeMaria, P.E., is a principal engineer in ECT's Detroit office with 24 years of consulting experience. Her areas of technical specialization include: • Certified Project Management Professional (PMP) with $9.2 million in revenue; • Stormwater management - oversees the design of green infrastructure retrofit projects; • Stormwater management in Detroit - saving non-residential property owners millions in drainage fees; • Storm and water quality monitoring - projects totaling more than $2 million; • Beach sanitary surveys and E. coli source identification - oversees the restoration of beaches for water quality improvements; • Municipal stormwater permitting - manages permits for more than 20 communities; • Illicit discharge elimination - oversees and conducts the identification illicit connections - more than 200 identified; and • Grant preparation - where she has secured more than $10.5 million in funding for various water resources projects EXPERIENCE St. Aubin Stormwater Design I Kemp Building and Development I Detroit, MI Achieved approval of the first stormwater management plan that complied with Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD)'s new stormwater management standards. Oversaw the development of a green infrastructure design at a redeveloped industrial site, which included negotiations with DWSD, scoping and analysis of alternative compliance options, cost estimating, engineering calculations, and design. Chandler Park Wetland I Chandler Park Conservancy I Detroit, MI Oversaw the design of a constructed wetland to manage stormwater and create habitat at Chandler Park in Detroit. This included the development of plans and specifications, federal approvals in compliance with the National Environmental Protection Act, approvals through the City of Detroit, public outreach efforts, development of grant applications, construction oversight, and grant administration. Rouge and Chandler Park Golf Course Irrigation Feasibility Study I City of Detroit I Detroit, MI Oversaw the preparation of a feasibility study to evaluate alternative sources of irrigation water for two golf courses in Detroit. The goal of the study was to reduce irrigation costs to the city. Evaluated both stormwater and surface water as viable alternatives to tap water. The study included preliminary engineering calculations, cost estimate, and payback period for the needs of each golf course. Based on the costing information, it was feasible to use surface water at one of the sites. Lake St. Clair Metropark Beach Restoration Planning I Macomb County Public Works Office I Harrison Township, MI Developed a conceptual design to reduce bacteria levels at an urban beach on one of the Great Lake Connecting Channels in the greater Detroit area. Reviewed existing scientific studies to determine the causative factors associated with the beach closures. Developed a conceptual design and cost estimate that incorporates the desired uses of the beach and developing a grant application to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to secure funding for the project. The design included beach nourishment, bioretention, vegetation, and acoustic seagull B.S., Environmental Health Oakland University B.S., Chemical Engineering Wayne State University CREDENTIALS Project Management Professional. No. 2272949 Professional Engineer, Michigan. No. 6201056031 OSHA HAZWOPER 40-hour and 8-hour refresher training Certified Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Supervisor, Michigan Certified Confined Space Entry Supervisor, Entrant, and Attendant Certified Industrial Stormwater Operator, Michigan Certified Construction Stormwater Operator, Michigan AREAS OF EXPERTISE Municipal Stormwater Permitting Water Quality Monitoring TM DL Assessments Illicit Discharge Detection Grant Preparation Green Infrastructure Planning Detroit Drainage Charge Assessments �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Annette DeMaria, P.E Principal Engineer Page 2 Chandler Park Site Restoration Design/Build I Chandler Park Conservancy and Wayne County Parks I Detroit, MI Oversaw site restoration efforts for the new football field and tennis courts. This included design and installation of sidewalks and benches, site grading, and rain garden plantings. Chandler Park Site Master Plan I Wayne County Parks Detroit, MI Oversaw the development of a preliminary site plan to address recreational and stormwater improvements at Chandler Park in Detroit. The Chandler Park Conservancy took on the project to provide better recreational and educational opportunities to residents by sustainably redeveloping a 100- acre city park. Led client outreach efforts to gain input into the preliminary design to have a plan that is well supported by the community. Also oversaw the design for a 5-acre marshland at the site and assisted in preparation grant applications to fund various elements of the project. Chrysler Beach Stormwater and Recreation Improvements City of Marysville I Marysville, MI Oversaw the development of a master plan to revitalize a post-industrial site along the St. Clair River. Prepared grant applications and secured $500,000 in federal grant funding to install green infrastructure (rain gardens, trees and native plantings) to improve water quality at a beach impacted by stormwater runoff and excessive Canada goose populations. Oversaw quality assurance project plan development, engineering design, permitting, grant administration, and construction. Conducted public outreach efforts to gain support for the design. Oversaw the development of a grant application to secure $239,900 in state funding. Provided design and construction oversight for the recreational elements of the master plan, including a fish cleaning station, bathroom remodel, playscape, cell phone charge station, and picnic area. Sherman Park Beach Restoration I Chippewa County Sault Ste Marie, MI Oversaw the design, permitting, and construction of various green infrastructure practices (raingardens, infiltration trenches, and curb cuts) and beach naturalization measures (dune installation) to improve the water quality at an urban beach. Negotiated a scope of work change with the EPA and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) when design efforts at a second site were cancelled by the landowner. Led outreach efforts with the local agencies to gain support for the project. E. coli TMDL Development for Illinois' Lake Michigan Beaches I EPA/RTI International Inc. I Chicago, IL Assisted RTI in the development of TMDLs to address the E. coli impairments at 51 Lake Michigan shoreline segments. This included oversight of data collection efforts that describe existing conditions, completion of a source assessment, development of beach -specific implementation plans with local input, and leading stakeholder meetings to gain local buy -in for the TMDL. Anchor Bay E. coli TMDL Implementation Plan I St. Clair County Health Department I St. Clair County, MI Prepared an implementation plan to address the bacteria impairments associated with a rural watershed. This included oversight of field reconnaissance activities to identify point and nonpoint sources, collaboration with local stakeholders, and recommendation of various best management practices to address the identified sources. Field activities included an E. coli sediment assessment, surveys of various open drains, and source investigations. Investigative Monitoring for E. coli TMDL Implementation ARC I Southfield, MI Developed and implemented a sampling plan to identify sewage sources in two small urban subbasins. Interpreted E. coli and bacterial source tracking data (Human Bacteroidetes IDT"4 and Human Enterococcus IDT^"), which indicated that seepage from failing septic systems and illegal dumping of recreational vehicle waste was impacting the streams. Led outreach efforts with the local communities to address the suspected sources. Water Quality Monitoring I ARC I Southeast Michigan Oversaw a year -long water quality monitoring effort in the Rouge River watershed. This included development of a sampling plan, 20 weeks of data collection, and sampling for dissolved oxygen, bacteria, and suspended solids. Provided technical review of the final report and prepared the executive summary and conclusions. Stormwater Utility Financing Methods I ARC I Southeast Michigan Developed a report that analyzed the options for allocating municipal stormwater management costs to property -owners in three communities in the Rouge River watershed. Compared three strategies for cost allocation: impervious area, hydraulic area, and equivalent stormwater unit methods. Prepared a public outreach plan to gain support for a stormwater utility. Identified legal constraints for assessing stormwater fees that are relevant in the state of Michigan. �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 Patrick Judd, PLA Group Manager Landscape Architecture/Green Infrastructure Studio As group manager of ECT's Landscape Architecture/Green Infrastructure Studio, Mr. Judd's work experience includes site master -planning, design and construction administration of corporate and commercial sites, public recreation land design and non -motorized trail planning and development, and whole farm planning, including stream and wetland restoration. He is well versed with Midwest native plant communities, rainwater management, and land sculpting, which allows ecosystem services integration for projects. Mr. Judd's diverse site master - planning project experience is comprised of natural areas, corporate campuses, Native American lands, large-scale regional parks, residential/ commercial districts, farmland, and streetscapes. He brings a pragmatic eye to the design and planning process. Mr. Judd's combination of knowledge about native plants habitats, site programming and social interfaces leads to an ability to translate that knowledge into design criteria for the preparation of site master plans and construction documents -- critical for a project that must respond to the needs of both the environment and people. EXPERIENCE Great Lakes Maritime Waterfront Park I Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary I Alpena, MI Completed the schematic design and engineering phase of a $4.3 million park development along the Thunder Bay River in Alpena, Michigan. The park will expand the outdoor experience for visitors to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center and provide the destination for year-round events. Managing a team of landscape architects, civil engineers, biologists, and ecologists to design a sustainable park. The park's design will incorporate bioinfiltration gardens, permeable pavement, and above ground cisterns for irrigation; a 4,000-sf solar powered pavilion built from local materials; shoreline restoration with native plantings; a shipwreck themed natural playground; and engaging local artisans and craftspeople to create marine -style amenities. 2021 construction completion. Green Infrastructure for Water Resilient Greenways on Detroit's Eastside Detroit, Michigan I Alliance for the Great Lakes I Detroit, MI Green Infrastructure for Water Resilient Greenways on Detroit's Eastside Detroit, Michigan I Alliance for the Great Lakes I Detroit, MI Developed GSI guidelines and design standards for managing stormwater within the Conner Creek Greenway in the City of Detroit. Work included; comprehensive site assessments on thirty parcels, and feasibility evaluations, conceptual and engineering designs for ten preferred sites to support the GSI for Water Resilient Greenways on Detroit's Eastside projects. The document will contribute to ongoing GSI planning in the City of Detroit and help achieve on -the ground results and policy improvements while inspiring citizen engagement. Swift Run GSI I Huron River Watershed Council I Ann Arbor, MI Provided design and engineering oversight for five selected sites to implement GSI within the Swift Run watershed. Work also included construction administration services for three of the projects that were implemented. EDUCATION M.L.A., Landscape Architecture University of Michigan, 1992 B.L.A., Landscape Architecture Michigan State University CREDENTIALS Licensed Landscape Architect, Michigan, No. 3901001096 AREAS OF EXPERTISE Sustainable Sites; Biophilic & Regenerative Design; Green Stormwater Infrastructure; Natural Systems Restoration; Whole Systems Farm Planning; Non -motorized Trail Planning BOARDS AND COMMITTEES Great Lakes Commission: Great Lakes Stormwater Collaborative: Leadership Team (Co -Chair) 2018—Current Great Lakes Commission: Green Infrastructure Champions Program: Technical Advisor 2018—Current American Society of Landscape Architects, Michigan Chapter: President 2020—Current American Society of Adaptation Professionals: 2020—Current Southeast Michigan Sustainable Business Forum: Board member 2007-2020 Michigan Wildflower Association: Board Member 1987-2000 �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 Patrick Judd, PLA Group Manager Landscape Architecture/Green Infrastructure Studio Page 2 Norton Creek GSI Planning Project I Huron River Watershed Council Collaborating with the HRWC to identify and evaluate thirty sites with assistance of municipalities within the Norton Creek watershed for optimizing installation of GSI technologies and practices. Five sites were selected to design conceptual plans as pilot projects. The effort is a part of an overall watershed management plan completed by the HRWC to implement GSI projects to improve water quality and provide educational opportunities to the general public. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2018-2022 Update I City of St Clair Shores, MI Managing the five-year recreation plan update for a community of 60,000 citizens to identify recreation deficiencies, including Americans with Disability Act compliance, needs, desires, and an action plan for future capital improvement projects. The recreation plan allows the city to qualify and apply for state recreation grant programs. Border -to -Border Non -Motorized Trail Summary Report Update - 2016 1 Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission I Washtenaw County, MI Managed the master planning document and laid out the preferred trail alignment based on natural and cultural resource influences. The eight -mile trail traversed the Huron River nine times along a high-speed Amtrak corridor. The project coordination included meetings with the Michigan Department of Transportation- Rail (Amtrak), county agencies, Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)- Natural Rivers Program, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ)Water Resources Division, several local municipalities, as well as public workshops. Work included historical landscape and cultural research of the river valley, plant and animal inventories, design standards, cost estimating, funding sources, implementation phasing, and maintenance requirements. Galloway Creek Restoration I Auburn Hills, MI Developed the grading and planting design for the riparian, wetland meadows, and upland areas to restore and stabilize 3,900 feet of Galloway Creek. The comprehensive plan was to re -meander the creek to improve water quality, channel stability, spawning habitat, and aquatic diversity within Clinton River watershed's Area of Concern. The $4 million project funded in part by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and Consumers Energy is located within the Katke-Cousins Golf Course on Oakland University's campus. Pocket -Park Rain Garden I City of Ann Arbor, MI Managed and designed a pocket -park rain garden on a former residential site within the Allen Creek floodplain. The project was supported by a Federal Emergency Management Agency mitigation grant and funds from the city's Art Commission. Collaborated with a Denver artist to create sculpture pieces reflecting the Huron River's blue-ribbon fishery as environmental interpretive discovery about water quality as a playful art feature. River Terrace Trail I Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission I Washtenaw County, MI Managed, designed, and provided construction documentation for a 1.75-mile non -motorized trail from Dexter -Huron Metropark to the city of Dexter. Included in the project scope was a 174-foot single -span pedestrian bridge, a total of 850 feet of timber boardwalks, and native plant restoration along the trail after construction. Provided construction administration and oversight and coordinated with state MDEQ and MDNR offices and local agencies for permitting. Rolling Hills County Park Site Master Plan I Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission I Washtenaw County, MI Managed and coordinated both staff and subconsultants to plan and design a year -around user experience in one of the county's largest parks. Work included both passive and active recreation activities such as an expanded disc golf course, five youth/adult soccer and softball fields, expansion of an existing waterpark, 6 miles of non -motorized and leisure pathways, a par three golf course, and a restored prairie and wetlands. Designed several green infrastructure techniques that included bioswales, raingardens, and infiltration basins with each integrated into the natural topography and landscape character of the park setting. Independence Lake County Park Master Site Plan Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission Managed and coordinated staff to provide an updated site master plan for the county's first park. The project included expanding the park visitor's experience through a multitude of recreational activities year-round amongst diverse habitats of wetlands, prairies, and mature stands of oaks. Designed for active and passive uses. Program elements included expanding trails, along with boardwalks and observation decks for hiking, biking and cross-country skiing; a new water park; overnight and day camps, as well as expanding the disc golf course. �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 Jonathan Lawrence, PLA, LEED AP Senior Landscape Architect/Horticulturist Mr. Lawrence is a registered landscape architect with 15 years' experience in parks, commercial site design, planning, and premier residential landscape design. As a project manager, he is actively involved with the design process from the initial client ideation through detailed design development and construction. Mr. Lawrence has worked through the bid process preparing and analyzing documents and serves as a significant link between the client and contractor. Mr. Lawrence is passionate about incorporating integrative processes into projects as a critical component to delivering value added systems that foster human and environmental health. His work is driven by fundamental ecological principals, based on a thorough understanding of regional flora/fauna and soil/water relationships, in order to develop project specific strategies that are both regenerative and restorative. With exposure to a wide range of construction practices, Mr. Lawrence places a strong emphasis on details. He has an extensive knowledge of plant and building materials, site structures and amenities. Mr. Lawrence's responsibilities include client coordination, design consultation, contract documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration. EXPERIENCE Robert Crown Community Center I Chicago, IL Woodhouse Tinucci Architects EDUCATION B.S., Landscape Architecture Michigan State University The Robert Crown Community Center is a 95,000 square foot building and outdoor B.S., Horticulture, Landscape Design, facility situated on 16-acres within a Chicago north shore residential neighborhood. Construction & Management The community center features indoor ice rinks and gymnasiums and outdoor athletic turf fields. The community focused project also includes a community branch library, preschool and afterschool center. Outdoor areas include flexible open space for picnicking and frisbee, a reading garden, pop-up event space and a circuit walking and biking trail. Strategic planting areas of Midwest native grasses including Little Bluestem, Side Oats Grama, Prairie Dropseed and Purple Lovegrass were used primarily for their pollinator value and drought tolerance. Custom turfgrass mixes of tall fescue was selected for standard mowed lawn areas to reduce water consumption, fertilizer and maintenance. Similarly, a drought tolerant fescue mix was selected for topographic mound features, created from unused spoil piles, to stabilize steep, dry side slopes evocative of ecological landforms, Mima mounds, theorized throughout the West and Plains to be the work of pocket gophers over hundreds of years. Lake Ellyn Park Boathouse & Playground I Glen Ellyn, IL Glen Ellyn Park District Boathouse - a complete renovation of the iconic and historic building and the surrounding landscape that included a feature stone masonry wall to protect against flooding and help delineate public and private space. Green infrastructure techniques of bioretention landscapes and permeable pavers were used to infiltrate and pretreat rainwater prior to entering the adjacent Lake. Native landscape plantings that are pollinator and low input friendly are irrigated with source water from the Lake, a stormwater detention basin. Playground - Paramount to the playground design was the preservation of an existing heritage oak/hickory tree community. The new playground layout was sensitive to potential impacts to critical tree root zones as well as the surrounding topography. Michigan State University CREDENTIALS Landscape Architect - IL, WI, TN LEED Accredited Professional AREAS OF EXPERTISE Ecological Based Site Design & Planning Multi -Use Integrated Landscape Systems - Design Construction Detailing Planting Design Project Management SELECT PRESENTATIONS "Bringing Nature Back to the Neighborhood: Not Just a Slide and Swing Set", IAPD / IPRA Soaring to New Heights Conference, 2020 �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Jonathan Lawrence, PLA, LEED AP Senior Landscape Architect/Horticulturist Page 2 Elgin Math & Science Academy I Elgin, IL Wheeler Kearns Architects A charter school nestled within a remnant woodland that is surrounded by a County Forest Preserve. The site is part of an ecological complex unlike any other found in the state that includes calcareous groundwater seeps and groves of old growth Bur Oak trees. The campus improvements are the rehabilitation of existing buildings, a few historic prairie style buildings, proposed cabin classrooms and site circulation updates to blend the former school assets with current growth expectations. The main site objective is to improve both pedestrian and vehicular circulation while prioritizing tree, groundcover, soil and hydrologic health. Site improvements include asphalt drive lanes with permeable paver parking stalls to allow water to infiltrate into the subbase gravel below the pavement surfaces and ultimately into the highly permeable sandy subsoils below. The infiltration -based strategy allows for maximum groundwater recharge that in turn benefits the sensitive, interconnected hydrology of the site and adjacent Forest Preserve. Surface runoff is eliminated as all water is treated directly at the source. With the combination of this unique approach and advantageous soils, the stormwater design eliminated the need for any stormwater pipes. Eugene Field Elementary School I Chicago, IL Chicago Public Schools The existing site condition of Eugene Field School like many schools was covered almost entirely by vast expanses of impervious asphalt pavement. Specifically, one area of pavement served function as car parking, play space and the school's main entrance. All stormwater immediately left the site either through the storm sewer system or overland flow both of which contributed to localized flooding and overburden of the city's combined sewer system. Through extensive community outreach, student input and a thorough design process the school has been dramatically transformed. Children now have opportunities for play with an athletic field, running track, playground, basketball court, game tables and to learn within an outdoor classroom environment. Robert Bernas Park I Westmont, IL Westmont Park District Site development plans that included a playground, pavilion, restrooms, 19-car permeable paver parking lot, boardwalk, fishing pier and walking paths. The site provided many challenges not only from the wetland and private residence but also because most of the buildable portion of the property contained up to 20' depth hydric peat soils that was the historical remnant of a spoil pile landfilled at the site to build a nearby road. A combination of large gravel and geogrid to provide structural support for the parking lot, concrete slab footings for the playground equipment and helical piers to minimize site disturbance for the buildings and boardwalk footings. Subsurface water depths were also a design concern and approached levels within 2 to 3 feet of the surface. Lake Ellyn Park Stabilization I Glen Ellyn, IL Glen Ellyn Park District The projects ambitious goal is to intercept all stormwater runoff through various pre-treatment systems prior to entering the lake's open water while providing a strong recreation value to park visitors and the community. The main treatment area is a biological, lagoon -style series of floating vegetated islands (1,500 sf) combined with diffused aeration throughout the lake's sedimentation forebays to capture high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus. Through regrading the shoreline to develop flat transitional zones an emergent, vegetative wetland shelf will act to stabilize the edges and provide habitat for a variety of aquatic wildlife. Westerman Nature Play Space I Ann Arbor, MI Ann Arbor Public Schools Westerman envisions a preschool play space surrounded by the natural world. The existing site is a degraded wooded area dominated by woody invasive species. The play area is strategically set in upland areas to minimize disturbance to adjacent wetland areas. Natural play elements include playmounds, log/boulder scramble, stick teepee, timber balance beam, stepping stumps, and outdoor kitchen. Mastics -Moriches -Shirley Community Library I Shirley, NY Sandpebble Builders Develop a master plan and restoration management plan for the entire 100-acre former golf course property, including a 5 acre parcel for a new library. Three public workshops were held to engage the community in the visioning process, with broad -based support for a public complex that would enhance the quality of life for all users - intellectually, physically, and socially. Key program elements include: access to nature and a garden, multi -modal transportation access, renewable and efficient use of energy, recreational opportunities, and a cultural program space for the arts. Douglas Park Artificial Turf Field I Chicago, IL Chicago Park District The Chicago Park District hired ECT to prepare design and bid documents for the rehab of an artificial turf field in historic Douglas Park. The existing artificial turf field had exceeded its lifespan, one of CPD's first artificial turf installations, and threatened to pose a risk to athletes and park visitors. The new field is striped for both football and soccer and updated to current design standards including ADA compliance. Additional upgrades include new sports lighting and controls, bleachers, and site amenities. �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Thomas H. Price, P.E. Senior Manager, Civil and Water Resource Engineering Tom has been involved in a wide variety of stormwater and water quality improvement assignments. These have included watershed plans; planning, designing, and implementing stormwater best management practices; and teaching courses on best management practices (BMPs). A significant emphasis of his work has been addressing the hydrologic impacts of development through integration of green stormwater infrastructure. Tom is responsible for the oversight of engineering aspects of ECT's green stormwater infrastructure team. Working closely with other design professionals, his team designs innovative stormwater management techniques to prevent and mitigate the impacts of urban development. Tom routinely presents at workshops, conferences, and seminars on sustainable development topics. EXPERIENCE Chicago River Master Plan I Chicago Park District (CPD) I Chicago, IL Integrated stormwater design and streambank restoration into preparation of a Master Plan for the District's parks along the Chicago River. The Master Plan identified over $50 million in shoreline restoration and related improvements for 24 current and proposed CPD parks along the River and was intended to aid the Park District in budgeting, prioritizing, and coordinating park development projects. Fish Lake Drain Watershed Management Plan I Lake County Stormwater Management Commission I Lake County, IL Led the field work, analysis, and plan development for the Fish Lake Drain watershed management plan and its update to address the nine elements as required for Watershed -Based Management Plans. Stormwater Blackberry Creek Alternative Futures Analysis I U.S. EPA, Illinois DNR, Kane County I Kane County, IL Led modeling and assessment of the Blackberry Creek watershed on the urban fringe of the Chicago metropolitan region. Green infrastructure development templates were prepared and HSPF continuous simulation modeling was conducted. Alternative land use scenarios that deployed the templates were evaluated to assess watershed impacts on aquatic habitat and flooding. Kildeer Creek Stream Restoration I Lake County Forest Preserve District Lake County, IL Led a team to develop a stream restoration plan for Kildeer Creek for the Lake County Forest Preserve District. The plan included installation of gravel riffles, rootwads, cross vane weirs, and stone bank protection to improve habitat and stabilize the stream. The scope of work included hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, plan development, construction. Madison Green Infrastructure Practices I Mead & Hunt (Prime) to University of Wisconsin I Madison, WI Led the team in creating a green infrastructure program with Mead & Hunt to assist the University of Wisconsin in meeting statewide standards for urban runoff, as well as the total maximum daily load standards for Lake Mendota. Collaborated in creating a plan to retrofit the West Campus with permeable paving systems, bioretention rain gardens, native landscapes, and naturalized ponds to meet required standards. EDUCATION M.S., Civil Engineering University of Wisconsin, 1985 B.S. Civil Engineering University of Wisconsin, 1983 CREDENTIALS Professional Engineer, IL, IA, IN, MI, MO, WI AREAS OF EXPERTISE Stormwater & Non -Point Source Pollution Management Watershed Management Plan Preparation Design & Implementation Best Management Practices Wetland Restoration & Professional Engineering Services �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Kenneth Johnson Botanist/Restoration Ecologist Mr. Johnson has an extensive background in botany, plant ecology, and an in- depth knowledge of native plant species. He regularly performs botanical inventories, natural features surveys, wetland and restoration monitoring, and threatened and endangered plant species surveys. Ken uses these skills to assist the planning and design team in the preparation of natural features inventories, landscape assessments, restoration management plans, site development plans, and monitoring reports. As a Botanist / Restoration Ecologist, Project Manager, and former Principal at CDF, Ken is responsible for managing a variety of projects, including restoration management plans, natural features studies, floristic inventories, wetland delineations, and wetland / restoration monitoring. Ken was a key editor to the Flora of the Chicago Region, A Floristic and Ecological Synthesis, and he is the principal contributor to the Flora's associated plant database for the Universal Floristic Quality Assessment Calculator computer program. EXPERIENCE Kane County FPD-Aurora West Preserve I Kane County, IL Patch -burn Grazing Vegetation Sampling and Reporting. Vital Farms Naturalized Landscape Consulting I Springfield, MO De novo Prairie Vegetation Sampling and Reporting. 'DUCATION M.S., Botany Eastern Illinois University B.S., Biology North Park College Oakton Community College Ecological Landscape Restoration Consulting I Des CREDENTIALS Plaines, IL Society of Wetland Scientists - Certified Preparation of a Restoration Management Plan; Preparation of an Operations Manual; Vegetation Monitoring and Reporting. Lake Forest Cemetery Wetland Monitoring I Lake Forest, IL Annual Monitoring and Reporting. 6420 Thurlow St Wetland Delineation I Willowbrook, IL Wetland Delineation and Report. Bernas Park Wetland Monitoring I Westmont Park District, IL Annual Monitoring and Reporting. Danada Wetland Mitigation Monitoring I Illinois Annual Monitoring and Reporting. Rock River Ravines Watershed Plan I Iowa Vegetation Inventories and FQA; Plant Community Mapping. Sycamore Hill Estates Wetland Delineation Wetland Delineation and Report Roselle, IL Preparation of a Mitigation Restoration Management Plan. Astronics Wetland Monitoring I Kane County, IL Annual Monitoring and Reporting. Wetland Specialist International Society of Arboriculture - Certified Arborist AREAS OF EXPERTISE Conservation Design Restoration Monitoring Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Surveys Project Management Restoration Management Plans Natural Features Studies Floristic Inventories Wetland Delineations, Wetland Restoration & Monitoring �c � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 = 4 1 Project Profiles Please refer to the attached profiles for ECT assignments that represent our experience with projects similar to this one. �C� ectinc.com > 313-963-6600 19 Sherman Park Beach Green Infrastructure Improvements Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan DESCRIPTION Sherman Park Beach, located along the St. Mary's River, experienced periodic closures due to elevated levels of E. coli. Modeling through U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Virtual Beach program indicated that stormwater runoff was the likely source of the bacteria. Conditions at this site included: parking lot runoff flows onto the beach via newly -constructed sidewalks, runoff from the beach is trapped between two jetties, and the low profile of the beach results in saturated sand that is more likely to harbor bacteria as compared to drier sand. Chippewa County Health Department secured a federal grant to mitigate these impacts using green infrastructure best management practices (BMPs). ECT designed the stormwater BMPs, which included installing rain gardens, curb cuts, native plantings, removal of the downstream jetty to improve circulation and soil stabilization. In addition with the assistance of Miller Engineers and Scientists, a beach nourishment plan was prepared to raise the profile of the beach, restore the sand dunes and help infiltrate runoff. Soil borings and a topographical survey were completed to inform the design. After ECT submitted the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality- (MDEQ) Army Corp permit application, a severe storm created four -foot gullies at Sherman Park undermining one of the sidewalks. As a result, an additional 200 cubic yards of sand was brought to the site and a portable mat installed to replace the damaged sidewalk and maintain wheelchair access to the lower beach while still allowing infiltration. ECT carried out construction services including, preparation of plans and specifications, selection of the contractor and construction oversight. ECT also designed several educational signs focused on water quality protection that were installed at the site. CLIENT Chippewa County Health Department PROJECT TIMELINE April 2013-September 2015 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Green infrastructure design Beach naturalization MDEQ-Army Corp permitting Construction oversight Educational signage �c s ectinc.com 855.737.0444 Chandler Park Marshland Establishment Detroit, Michigan DESCRIPTION ECT designed a 334,000-cu. ft. constructed wetland at Chandler Park to capture stormwater and provide wildlife habitat for the enjoyment of the community. This work was performed on behalf of the Chandler Park Conservancy (CPC), a nonprofit organization whose mission is to develop exceptional educational, recreational and conservation opportunities for youth and families on Detroit's Eastside and the region. The design included: • Sewer separation to capture parking lot and street runoff in the wetland • A boardwalk to bring park users closer to the wetland • A wet well and spillway to aerate the stormwater A circulation pump to circulate the pond water Electrical details Landscaping with thousands of native plants and hundreds of trees Habitat features to attract frogs, toads, pollinators, ducks and song birds A maintenance plan To support the design, ECT completed ICPR modeling (Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing 4.03.02) and engineering calculations to ensure adequate capacity to capture runoff from the surrounding impervious surfaces and determine the outlet elevation. ECT also completed construction documents and assisted with the bidding process. We estimated the construction costs at $1.2 million and the winning bid was within 2.6% of our estimate. ECT completed construction oversight and pre- and post -construction habitat monitoring to determine the effectiveness of the design in attracting wildlife. We also supported numerous outreach events which provided further public support of the project. To fund the project, ECT secured a $452,000 grant from the Sustain Our Great Lakes habitat restoration program, provided grant administration and reporting services. CLIENT Chandler Park Conservancy PROJECT TIMELINE September 2017—December 2020 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Design & construction documents ICPR modeling Habitat monitoring Public outreach Grant procurement and administration ectinc.com 855.737.0444 C4Ja Chicago Botanic Garden Great Basin Shoreline Restoration Glencoe, Illinois DESCRIPTION Chicago Botanic Garden (CBG) in Glencoe, Illinois, includes a 75-acre constructed lake system. Since its creation in 1967, the lakes have suffered shoreline erosion, loss of aquatic habitat and degraded visual appeal. ECT landscape architects and water resources engineers worked with the CBG to address their "The Aquatic Initiative" and restore the shorelines of the water gardens and lagoons with beautiful, healthy ecosystems. ECT provided concept design, landscape architecture, ecological restoration, and coordination for several phases of the project. ECT also worked in close partnership with the CBG staff, administration, and project partners, including Oehme van5weden Associates, Montgomery Watson Harza, and Featherstone Inc. CLIENT Chicago Botanic Garden PROJECT TIMELINE Completed 2003 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Ecological restoration Multi -phase coordination Multidisciplinary team per each project phase ectinc.com > 855.737.0444 =4Ja Mill Creek Park Restoration Dexter, Michigan DESCRIPTION ECT provided ecological support for the preparation of a Recreation Master Plan (RMP) for Mill Creek Park, a 56-acre park in the Village of Dexter, Michigan. Dexter was established in the 1820's on the banks of Mill Creek when a dam was built to generate power for several mills. By 2008, the dam no longer served its original purpose, and it was removed, providing the opportunity to reshape the landscape adjacent to Mill Creek and create an amenity for downtown Dexter and the region. The Mill Creek Park RMP articulates a new vision for Mill Creek, one in which the creek valley serves as a new focal point for downtown Dexter and as a link in a regional system of water- and land -based trails for hikers, bikers, and paddlers. The ecological features of a RMP incorporate strategies for streambank stabilization, fishery and wetland habitat enhancement, stormwater management, vegetation management and invasive species control. Other park components include a 1.8 mile long multi -use trail that links to a larger regional trail system, boardwalk trails through environmentally sensitive areas, canoe launches, fishing access and environmental interpretation opportunities. Activities included: Restoration of 1,500 feet of Mill Creek that has been partially restored by removing the Dexter Mill Pond dam in 2007. Design incorporating natural channel dimensions, plan form, and stable profiled based on survey data from a reference reach. - Natural riffles and large woody debris were incorporated to improve habitat. CLIENT Village of Dexter PROJECT TIMELINE February 2009-November 2011 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Landscape restoration Stormwater management Habitat enhancement Streambank stabilization Vegetation management �17 � ectinc.com 855.737.0444 =4 1 Lake Ellyn Boathouse Glen Ellyn, Illinois DESCRIPTION In the Fall of 2015, the Glen Ellyn Park District began construction at Lake Ellyn Park including a complete renovation of the iconic and historic Lake Ellyn Boathouse and the surrounding landscape. Glen Ellyn hired ECT to lead the design team along with team partner Farr Associates for the Lake Ellyn Park renovation project. Together, the team implemented priority improvements that were guided by the Lake Ellyn Vision Plan and identified by the community through a Master Plan process. The second phase of construction was sponsored by a grant from the Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development (OSLAD) program from the State of Illinois. ECT helped Glen Ellyn acquire the OSLAD grant. The Glen Ellyn Park District renovations were completed in 2016. The team fully renovated the boathouse, including a new floor plan reconfiguration. The renovations preserved the historical features and provided updated modern mechanical systems to optimize energy efficiency. A new solar canopy provides power to the boathouse's mechanical systems. Critical to the future survival of the old boathouse, the landscape architects designed a beautiful stone flood wall to create flood protection when the lake overtops during rain events. Bioretention rain gardens accommodate the missing gutters and provide drainage for rainwater falling within the garden and floodwall. Permeable pavement walks and parking areas reduce runoff through infiltration and pretreat stormwater prior to entering the Lake. A fully automated irrigation system pulls source water from the lake, a stormwater detention basin. The irrigation system is equipped with a rain and soil sensor monitor for optimization. The landscape renovations included updates with pollinator friendly, native plantings tailored to site conditions, architectural appropriateness, and low water requirements. Finally, the team added interpretive signage that highlight's the park's rich history, ecological significance, general park information and wayfinding as well as current Park improvements to inform patrons. CLIENT Glen Ellyn Park District PROJECT TIMELINE 2015-2016 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS LEED Gold, 2016 Solar pergola Water reuse irrigation system Permeable pavement Bioretention �c r ectinc.com 855.737.0444 =4 1 Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve Chesterton, Indiana DESCRIPTION CLIENT Coffee Creek Center encompasses 640-acres of mixeduse development and includes Lake Erie Land Development more than 160-acres of prairie, woodland, wetland, and stream restoration on the site. Corporation ECT worked with a collaborative team to provide landscape architecture, planning, and PROJECT TIMELINE ecological restoration services for the Coffee Creek Master Plan. Completed 2001 The master plan was guided by a desire to encourage diversity, promote smart growth, PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS support design flexibility, and establish strong ties to the adjacent community of Ecological Restoration Chesterton. Preservation and restoration of a stable ecology was fundamental to the Pedestrian and bike trails plan. The creek corridor serves as a unifying element of an extensive open space system based on the living landscape native to this place. The plan also includes an extensive pedestrian and bike path system that connects the parks amenities. ectinc.com > 855.737.0444 C4Ja Millennium Park Master Plan Kent County, Michigan DESCRIPTION Millennium Park is a 1500-acre park located at the intersection of four developing southwestern Michigan municipalities. Kent County retained ECT to lead the visioning and master plan. Building upon the park's water resources, ECT created a long-term plan that takes advantage of more than four miles of the Grand River shoreline, numerous lakes, wetlands, and streams. ECT discovered several exceedingly rare habitat zones with high -quality native landscapes that prior plans had overlooked. These rare landscapes exist in proximity to programs such as "The Fen," allowing for greater protection and interpretation. ECT identified specific restoration strategies for the various remnants and recommended that nearly the entire park be restored with native landscape systems. Nearly 20 miles of proposed trails are recommended within the park to expand passive recreation opportunities. The master plan planning process included extensive stakeholder interviews, public outreach, and close involvement with the County Board. The master plan update provided the county with the tools to budget and phase this gift. It also established the "Millennium Standard," a set of guiding principles for park improvements and featured seven guiding principles grounded in economics, social well-being, and environmental considerations. The plan was approved unanimously by the board and continues to be implemented today. CLIENT Kent County PROJECT TIMELINE Completed 2006 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Integrated landscape design Stakeholder coordination Ecosystem restoration Site assessment Wildlife preserve master planning Stewardship guidelines 2009 Michigan ASLA Honor Award in Planning �C� ectinc.com > 855.737.0444 Ja Park West and Hawk Prairie Master Plan Oregon, Illinois DESCRIPTION ECT worked with the Oregon Park District to prepare a master plan for their flagship park, Park West. The master plan balanced the program requirements for the park which included athletic fields and passive uses, such as hiking and bird watching. By reorganizing some of the athletic fields and centralizing pedestrian access, ECT was able to fit several new facilities into this already heavily programmed space. After completing the plan, ECT assisted the Park District with designing and constructing several of the new facilities envisioned in the master plan. These included active uses such as a splash pad, bike trail connections, and a sculptural skate park. New passive design components were also constructed and included a boardwalk through existing wetlands and a terraced outdoor amphitheater. A new multi -use trail follows a restored intermittent stream replanted with native prairie grasses and forbs. The restoration connected two existing prairies creating a wildlife corridor and greatly improving water quality downstream. ECT also developed custom interpretive signage for the park to educate visitors about the park's key sustainable features. ECT designed a natural water play area within Park West to create a unique play space. The play area is nestled into a surrounding slope and bordered by a mix of native grasses and flowering perennials. Water features such as jets and spray loops allow kids to control the movement of water, and a natural stone channel carries water from the top of the park to the bottom, reenacting the natural water cycle. CLIENT Oregon Park District PROJECT TIMELINE Completed 2011 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater management Stakeholder coordination Campus -wide master planning Interpretive signage design Habitat enhancement Habitat restoration Bike trail design Athletic field design ectinc.com > 855.737.0444 =4Ja Davis Park Master Plan Rockford, Illinois DESCRIPTION The City of Rockford retained ECT to develop a new master plan for Davis Park. The park occupies a former industrial park in the heart of the historic city. The park served as an important event space for the past 20 years; however, the city's needs have evolved as the demands for redevelopment increases. ECT's master plan balances new vibrant civic spaces with engaging recreational amenities designed to spur economic development. The design takes advantage of the park's unique riverfront location along the Rock River. All proposed new infrastructure supports healthy water systems. The primary pedestrian entrance features a water channel that cleans and recirculates captured rainwater. The cascading water guides visitors on a path into the heart of the park. Lawn terraces provide office workers with lunch-time seating and open views to the river. The base of the terrace includes a children's splash pad that doubles as an ice rink during the winter. The master plan preserved an existing warehouse building in the center of the park, designated to provide space for future concessions and rentals. The iconic, industrial building also serves as a backdrop for two temporary stages. A third permanent stage and canopy structure is located at the park's southern end. One of the most unique features of the park is an artificial beach that doubles as a stormwater filter. The beach is located at the outlet for a large regional storm sewer. By diverting a portion of the rainwater in this sewer through the lower portion of the beach sand, the water is slowed, cooled, and cleansed before it is discharged into the Rock River. A series of interpretive displays teach visitors about this unique infrastructure and raise awareness about the importance of clean water that feeds the Rock River. CLIENT City of Rockford PROJECT TIMELINE Completed 2016 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Davis Park Master Plan Artificial beach filters stormwater Children's splash pad & ice rink �C� ectinc.com 855.737.0444 =4 Ja Border -to -Border & Iron Belle Trail Heritage Bridge Program Washtenaw County, Michigan DESCRIPTION This project is a fundraising effort led by the Huron Waterloo Pathways Initiative (HWPI) and Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission (WCPARC) to accelerate implementation of an eight -mile section of the Border -to -Border (B2B)/Iron Belle Trail in Washtenaw County. Several substantial pieces of infrastructure, seven bridges and one tunnel are required to complete the B2B/Iron Belle Trail through the Huron River Valley between Ann Arbor and Dexter, Michigan. Each bridge and the tunnel can enhance the "sense of place" by being artfully integrated as a part of the natural landscape setting. The vision for each bridge or tunnel is to have a unique identity that is reflective of why the communities within Washtenaw County and along the river is an outstanding place to live, work, and play. ECT lead and managed the project with its partners, HWPI, WCPARC, the Huron River Watershed Council and Huron -Clinton Metroparks in developing the guidelines intended to outline the required parameters and make suggestions to achieve the goal of building the seven new bridges and one underpass that are cohesive, engaging, compelling, artful, and sensitive to local context. The guidelines are defined by three core components: guiding principles, technical standards, and design guidelines. To date, the first three bridges have sponsors and two of the bridges are in place. The first bridge, sponsored by the McKeachie family, will have art developed by ECTs team of landscape architects, a local architect, and artist celebrating the life and accomplishments of a world champion triathlete, Karen McKeachie from Michigan. The other two bridges were funded through an anonymous donor and the ECT team and stakeholders will be working with that entity to develop artistic themes reflecting the adjacent landscape and/or cultural historic characteristics. CLIENT Washtenaw Parks & Recreation Commission PROJECT TIMELINE August 2016—Ongoing PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Karen McKeachie Celebration Plaza Integrating art & sculpture into each bridge Art & sculpture reflecting ecology & cultural history $8 million of $25 million raised within the first year of the campaign ectinc.com 855.737.0444 C�� Rolling Hills County Park Site Master Plan & Phase 1 Site Improvements Washtenaw County, Michigan DESCRIPTION Washtenaw County Parks & Recreation Commission retained ECT to develop a Park Master Plan. The extensive planning process incorporated stakeholder meetings, a public open house, and continuing dialogue with staff and park users. The vision for Rolling Hills Park was to provide a variety of recreational amenities set amongst a beautiful backdrop offering an authentic, sustainable, safe experience. The Master Plan communicated this vision and guided on -going development and stewardship of the park. The active park programs include mountain biking, cross country skiing, fishing disc golf, baseball, soccer, and golf. Visitors seeking passive recreation can enjoy a walk through the nature trails, a picnic in a variety of restored natural settings, or improve their personal fitness. The first phase of the Site Master Plan began with a $3.2 million construction project completed in 2013. It included the 1-mile pleasure drive and a new 3-mile primary trail system encompassing the park; five soccer fields, sixty car parking lot, and two open play fields. The stormwater management system includes four large bioinfiltration basins, raingardens, permeable pavers at all crosswalks, and bioinfiltration swales. Large open areas not programmed for future recreation activities were restored to native Michigan prairies. CLIENT Washtenaw County Parks & Recreation Commission PROJECT TIMELINE 2008 -2013 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS 360+ acre park master plan Green Stormwater Management New Regional Recreation Center Expanded Recreation Activities & Programs Wildlife Habitat Enhancements 12 acres of native plantings �C� ectinc.com > 855.737.0444 =4 1 Stormwater & Recreation Master Plan for Chandler Park Detroit, Michigan RAIN 1AIN GARDEN ARf)I N Y �p f. 22 RAIN ARCEN ,r Y: i RAIN GAWkN a. � � `�^' HI I IIAIN UARDEN 4 B116WALE BIOShYkIE RAIN ^� CARI>fN 5 � IS RAIN G11R1EN b RAIN CiAHI''I N RIUSAIIIAI r I Iiiow AI r i y r-.. RAIN (HNIiFN 1 DESCRIPTION The ECT team developed a conceptual design and cost estimate for the redevelopment of Chandler Park, located on Detroit's eastside. The southern portion of the park occupies 100 acres, including historic trees in various conditions, mowed lawn, four ball fields in various states of maintenance, and a set of abandoned tennis courts. ECT worked with the project partners to develop a vision for Chandler Park as a revitalized recreation, education, and environmentally sustainable campus and continues to be engaged on -site helping to realize the full master plan implementation and community outreach. The primary goal of the Chandler Park master plan is to increase resiliency through reduced stormwater runoff to the existing combined sewer system that feeds the Detroit Water and Sewerage Departments treatment plant. ECT collected topographic and soils data, conducted a tree inventory, modeled stormwater runoff and infiltration, provided green infrastructure alternatives, and completed final design plans and specifications that fit in seamlessly with the desired recreational features. The most significant stormwater component of the plan includes the marshland project that re- routes runoff from Chandler Park to a newly -implemented marshland via sheet flow and a pump system. This marshland, and its associated conveyance system, allow 2.7 MG of urban stormwater to remain on -site and infiltrate/evapotranspire naturally. Overall green infrastructure and desired recreation features highlighted in the master plan are estimated to cost approximately $15 million and include: • 19 rain gardens/bioswales totaling 75,000 sq ft • Native urban prairie and expanded urban forest • A 3.6-acre constructed marshland • Football, soccer, baseball & softball fields, basketball & tennis courts Urban community food gardens & formal flower gardens Pathways & access roads BIUSlVALE HIUS'uVNLE b ly ` RAIN vfJJ\7.� LARMFN BIDS WALE A RAIN A � C:ARnFN 11 CLIENT Wayne County Parks Division PROJECT TIMELINE January 2015—Current PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater master planning Design & construction documents Public outreach Grant procurement Construction oversight �C� ectinc.com 855.737.0444 =4 1 Restoration/Reconnection of an Oxbow to the Rouge River Wayne County, Michigan DESCRIPTION In the 1970s, in an effort to address flooding problems in the area, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers straightened approximately six miles of the Rouge River that resulted in a four -mile concrete channel. The subsequent destruction of much of the aquatic habitat precluded the passage of most fish from the Detroit River to the upper reaches of the Rouge River. In an effort to provide habitat, resting locations for migratory fish, recreational opportunities and restored wetland areas, ECT was retained to restore the oxbow at The Henry Ford, a national historic landmark. The main objective of the project was to restore valuable fish and wildlife habitat within the Rouge River and to restore functioning riverine wetlands that were lost due to channelization of the river. Secondary objectives included improvement of water quality, increased floodplain storage, enhanced educational/interpretative opportunities, and improved aesthetics. The overall project was completed in three phases; Phase 1 - Oxbow Wetland Restoration; Phase 2 - Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Modifications; Phase 3 - Open Connection to the Rouge. An existing 60-inch storm sewer has been modified to provide river water to the oxbow during Phase 1 and a siphon provides the hydraulic connection of the wetlands on both sides of the existing CSO. ECT designed and provided construction oversight for the restored oxbow which included: • A 2,200-foot channel riverine wetland system • 3 acres of submergent & emergent wetland systems with species reflecting historic riverine wetland & that were utilized by the indigenous people Ten acres of restored upland woodlands and meadow. • Native fish species were introduced, including bass and channel catfish. • An island that became an interpretive area for educational & public programs, • A passenger railroad station. • Trails/paths. CLIENT Wayne County Department of Environment PROJECT TIMELINE June 2001 January 2005 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Restore fish and wildlife habitat Wetland restoration Construction documents Water quality ectinc.com 855.737.0444 RETURN TO AGENDA Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item Memo Agenda #: 3 Department: Administration From: Jim Dunleavy, Chief Parks and Recreation — North District Subject: 2023 Campground Fees (Addison Oaks & Groveland Oaks) INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY Attached are the proposed Oakland County Parks and Recreation Fees and Charges for 2023. These charges were proposed after extensive review and consideration of fiscal reports, fees usage study (comprised of the number of uses foreach fee listed over three years, the average where applicable, illuminating changing trends andlists cost recovery goals) and competitive market analysis. The study of a variety of data sourcesenabled staff to project while considering fluctuating usage due to unpredictable conditions such as weather and recognize where fees changes might drive down usage due to marketplace and capacity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending the Commission approve the attached proposed 2023 Fees and Charges for implementation for the 2023 Camping season. MOTION Move to approve the proposed OCPR 2023 Fees and Charges, as recommended, for the 2023 Camping season OZP"Addison Oaks County Park Addison Oaks Campine Fees — 2023 Cabins/Yurts: • 2 or 4 person $80/night • 6 Person $110/night • Yurts $110/night • Holidays/Special Events additional $5/night Campsites: • Pull Through $43/night ($37 OC Residents) • Standard (Water/Electric) $38/night ($32 OC Residents) • Holidays/Special Events additional $5/night • Oakland County Resident discount $6/night Monthly Rates: • 25% off daily rates • Includes Holiday/Special Event fee if applicable Senior/Adaptive/Military/Veteran discounts eliminated effective 2023 camping season Group Areas: • Wednesday 3pm — Tuesday Ipm (six nights) • $150 down payment at time of reservation and balance dace 14 days out • Blue (I A) and Yellow (113): 10 sites with pavilion access o $575/week • Green (2): 10 sites without pavilion access o $525/week • Orange (5) and Purple (6): 15 sites with private pavilion o $850/week Youth camping: • $50/night per area — payment due at time of booking. Supervisor approval needed for Orange and Purple group areas. 14-day cancellation like campsites. Rate not valid for holiday/special events. N-Groveland Oaks � County Park Groveland Oaks Campine Fees — 2023 Cabins/Yurts: • 2 or 4 person $80/night • 6 Person $115/night • Yurts $125/night • Holidays/Special Events additional $5/night Campsites: • Full Hook-up $53/night • Full Hook-up Pull Through $58/night • Standard Pull Through $48/night • Standard (Water/Electric) $43/night • Holidays/Special Events additional $5/night • Oakland County Resident discount $6/night Monthly Rates: • 30% off daily rates • Includes Holiday/Special Event fee if applicable ($47 OC Resident) ($52 OC Resident) ($42 OC Residents) ($37 OC Residents) Senior/Adaptive/Military/Veteran discounts eliminated effective 2023 camping season Group Areas: Wed-Tues • Group Area #1 & # 12 $1,200 20 campsites • Group Area #2 - #11 $1,000 15 campsites • $100 Holiday and Special Event in addition to the Standard Rate • $150 down payment at the time of reservation, balance due 14 days out Youth camping: • $50/night per group area — payment due at time of booking. Additional fee of. $5 per person per night. 14-day cancellation like campsites. Rate not valid for holiday/special events. Normally an off-season rental. Addison Oaks Individual Camper Nights 2023 Proposed $3 Non Resident increase FY2021 $2 Resident Increase No Senior/Mil/Adapt discnt Type of Site Fee Type 2021 Fee FY2021 # FY2021 Proposed Increase in Projected of nights revenue Fee fee Revenue Standard Res $30 3,081 $92,440 $32 $2 $98,592 Res Senior $28 877 $24,547 $32 $4 $28,064 (Non Res $35 4,433 $155,161 $38 $3 $168,4541 1 Non Res Senior $33 1,685 $55,604 $38 $5 $64,0301 Pull Through Res $35 209 $7,310 $37 $2 $7,7331 Res Senior $33 144 $4,752 $37 $4 $5,3281 Non Res $40 440 $17,600 $43 $3 $18,920 (Non Res Senior $38 426 $16,188 $43 $5 $18,3181 Holiday/SE All campers 1 $51 1,8041 $9,020 $51 $01 $9,020 Total: $382,622 $418,459 Total increase in revenue: $35,8371 Type of Site Standard Full Hookup Groveland Oaks Individual Camper Nights Fee Type Res Res Senior Non Res Non Res Senior Res Res Senior Non Res Non Res Senior Full Hookup/ Pull Res Through ResSenior Non Res Non Res Senior Holiday/SE All campers Total: Total increase in revenue: 2023 Proposed $3 Non Resident increase FY2021 $2 Resident Increase No Senior/Mil/Adapt discnt 2021 Fee FY2021 # FY2021 Proposed Increase in Projected of nights revenue Fee fee Revenue $35 3,621 $126,739 $37 $2 $133,9771 $33 1,026 $33,864 $37 $4 $37,962 $40 2,935 $117,388 $43 $3 $126,205 $38 972 $36,928 $43 $5 $41,796 $45 2,541 $114,337 $47 $2 $119,427 $43 1,150 $49,463 $47 $4 $54,050 $50 2,538 $126,892 $53 $3 $134,514 $48 1,423 $68,318 $53 $5 $75,4191 $50 151 $7,550 $52 $2 1 $7,8521 $48 93 $4,449 $52 $4 $4,8361 $55 184 $10,110 $58 $3 $10,6721 $53 147 $7,782 $58 $5 $8,5261 $51 3,108I $15,538 $5J $01 1 $15,5381 $719,358 1 $770,7741 $51,416 1 Addison Oaks 2023 Monthly Fee Changes ** Monthly prices will vary depending on number of nights per month (30 vs 31 nights) and Holiday/SE rates ADD - FY2021 numbers Type of Site Fee Type FY2021 Daily Rate x Discount FY2021 Monthly Total # in Total Revenue Daily Rate 30 FY 2021 Rate Standard Res $30 $900 22.2% $700 19 $13,300 Res Senior $28 $840 22.6% $650 60 $39,000 INon Res $35 $1,050 33.3% $700 59 $41,300 Non Res Senior $33 $990 34.3% $650 76 $49,400 Pull Through Res $35 $1,050 23.8% $800 0 $0 Res Senior $33 $990 24.2% $750 4 $3,000 Non Res $40 $1,200 33.3% $800 0 $0 Non Res Senior $38 $1,140 34.2% $750 17 $12,750 Total FY2021 235 $158,750 ADD 2023 proposed: $3 increase NR, $2 increase Res, no Senior rate - flat rate discount Type of Site Fee Type 2023 Daily Daily Rate x Discount Monthly Increase in Total Projected Rate 30 Rate fee Revenue Standard Res $32 $960 25.0% $720.00 $20 $13,680 Res Senior $32 $960 25.0% $720.00 $70 $43,200 Non Res $38 $1,140 25.0% $855.00 $55 $50,445 Non Res Senior $38 $1,140 25.0% $855.00 $105 $64,980 Pull Through Res $37 $1,110 25.0% $832.50 $133 $0 Res Senior $37 $1,110 25.0% $832.50 $183 $3,330 Non Res $43 $1,290 25.0% $967.50 $168 $0 Non Res Senior $43 $1,290 25.0% $967.50 $218 $16,448 Total with new fees $192,083 Total increase in revenue $33,333 Groveland Oaks 2023 Monthly Fee Changes ** Monthly prices will vary depending on number of nights per month (30 vs 31 nights) and Holiday/SE rates Type of Site Standard Full Hookup Total FY2021 Fee Type Res Res Senior (Non Res Non Res Senior Res Res Senior Non Res Non Res Senior GRV - FY2021 numbers FY2021 Daily Rate x Daily Rate Discount 30 $35 $1,050 28.6% $33 $990 29.3% $40 $1,200 37.5% $38 $1,140 38.6% $45 $1,350 33.3% $43 $1,290 34.1% $50 $1,500 40.0% $48 $1,440 41.0% FY2021 Total # in Total Monthly FY 2021 Revenue Rate $750 29 $21,750 $700 41 $28,700 $750 36 $27,000 $700 28 $19,600 $900 32 $28,800 $850 56 $47,6001 $900 39 $35,1001 $850 60 $51,0001 321 $259,550 GRV 2023 proposed: $3 increase NR, $2 increase Res, no Senior rate - flat rate discount Type of Site Fee Type 2023 Daily Daily Rate x Discount Monthly Increase in Total Projected Rate 30 Rate fee Revenue Standard Res $37 $1,110 30.0% $777.00 $27 $22,533 Res Senior $37 $1,110 30.0% $777.00 $77 $31,857 Non Res $43 $1,290 30.0% $903.00 $153 $32,508 Non Res Senior $43 $1,290 30.0% $903.00 $203 $25,284 Full Hookup Res $47 $1,410 30.0% $987.00 $87 $31,584 Res Senior $47 $1,410 30.0% $987.00 $137 $55,272 Non Res $53 $1,590 30.0% $1,113.00 $213 $43,407 Non Res Senior $53 $1,590 30.0% $1,113.00 $263 $66,780 Full Hookup/ Pull Res $52 $1,560 30.0% $1,092.00 $192 N/A Through ResSenior$52 $1,560 30.0% $1,092.00 $242 N/A Non Res $58 $1,740 30.0% $1,218.00 $318 N/A Non Res Senior $58 $1,740 30.0% $1,218.00 $368 N/A Total with new fees $309,225 Total increase in revenue $49,675 2023 Camping Fee Summary - additional revenue 2023 Proposed: FY2021 $3 increase NR $2 increase Res No Sr/Mil/Adapt Addison Individual $ 382,622 $ 35,837 Monthly - 25% off $ 158,750 $ 33,333 Group fee changes $ 8,900 Group to individual $ 36,000 Total increase $ 541,372 $ 114,070 Groveland Individual $ 719,358 $ 51,416 Monthly - 30% off $ 259,550 $ 49,675 Total increase $ 978,908 $ 101,091 Combined Increase $ 215,161 RETURN TO AGENDA Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item Memo Agenda #: 4 Department: Planning & Resource Development From: Melissa Prowse, Manager — Parks and Recreation Subject: Ernst Barn Bill of Sale to Holly Township INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY The barn at 1580 Scott Lake Road (referred to as the "Ernst Barn") was part of the 5.38-acre acquisition in 2010 that included the Ernst Greenhouses (removed in 2020). The weathered wood barn has a footprint of approximately 120 square feet and features original forged hardware and hand-hewn mortise and tenon heavy timber framing. The barn has been vacant since the property was acquired and is considered unsafe for use as a storage or maintenance building. In 2018 OCPR put out a Request for Proposals for contractors to move or deconstruct the barn. We did receive a bid for deconstruction (and reconstruction on another site). However, in 2019 Holly Township expressed an interest in moving the barn to a park they have been developing to showcase the Township's history (including agricultural history). The successful bidder from the RFP gladly stepped down and indicated that they'd rather see the barn go to Holly Township for their use at a public park. Holly Township has secured the funding needed and a contractor to deconstruct the barn and then reconstruct it on township property. The attached Bill of Sale is required by the county in order to transfer county -owned property to another entity — Holly Township will purchase the Ernst Barn for $1. After Parks Commission approval, it will be forwarded to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners for their approval. The Township's contractor is ready to begin work as soon as authorized, which we are anticipating in early June. ATTACHMENTS • Bill of Sale for the Ernst Barn • Ernst Barn Fixed Asset Determination Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission approved the attached Bill of Sale to transfer ownership of the Ernst Barn to Holly Township, who will deconstruct the barn and move it to property owned by Holly Township, and to forward this recommendation to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners for approval. MOTION Move to approve the Bill of Sale to transfer ownership of the Ernst Barn to Holly Township, who will deconstruct the barn and move it to property owned by Holly Township, and to forward this recommendation to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners for approval. BILL OF SALE This Bill of Sale is executed and delivered as of , 2022, by the County of Oakland, a Michigan Municipal and Constitutional Corporation, with its offices located at 1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, Michigan 48341 (the "Seller" or the "County"), to and in favor of Holly Township, 102 Civic Drive, Holly, Michigan 48442 (the "Buyer"). 1. Property Sold. Subject to Paragraph 3, Seller transfers and conveys to Buyer the Barn and personal property located therein located at 1580 Scott Lake Road, Waterford, MI 48328 and identified on Exhibit A (collectively and hereinafter the "Barn"). Exhibit A is incorporated hereto. 2. Consideration. The Buyer shall pay consideration in the amount of one dollar ($1.00) for the Barn transferred and conveyed pursuant to this Bill of Sale. The Barn is being transferred and conveyed to Buyer because the Barn must be either completely restored or removed due to its current condition. Buyer's removal of the Barn will provide value to Seller by eliminating the cost to restore the Barn or reducing the costs associated with the removal and disposal of the Barn. Furthermore, relocation and preservation of the Barn by Buyer will provide a value to Oakland County residents given the historic nature and value of the Barn. 3. Permission to Enter. Buyer and its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and/or its contractors have permission to enter the real property that is depicted in Exhibit A to remove the Barn. Permission to enter the real property shall commence when this Bill of Sale is fully executed and shall end on September 30, 2022. If Buyer does not remove the Barn by September 30, 2022, (a) this Bill of Sale is null and void, (b) the Barn shall automatically revert back to Seller, and (c) Seller may remove and dispose of the Barn, in Seller's sole discretion. 4. Warranty of Title. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that: (a) Seller is the owner of the Barn, (b) the Barn is free and clear of all liens, charges, and encumbrances, and (c) Seller has the full right, power, and authority to sell the Barn and to deliver this Bill of Sale. 5. Property "AS -IS" & Warranty Disclaimers. THE BARN IS PURCHASED BY THE BUYER "AS IS", "WHERE IS" AND "WITH ALL FAULTS," AND BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE FOREGOING WARRANTIES OF TITLE (contained in Paragraph 4), NO WARRANTIES OF ANY NATURE ARE BEING PROVIDED BY THE SELLER TO THE BUYER, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 6. Waiver & Indemnification. Buyer acknowledges that removal of the Barn has certain dangers. Buyer recognizes and accepts such dangers and assumes all responsibility for and risk of bodily injury, death, property damage, whether known or unknown, and whether caused by the Buyer's negligence or the negligence of Buyers' employees, contractors, subcontractors, volunteers, or agents. Buyer waives, releases, discharges, and covenants no to sue the County of Oakland and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers (referred to collectively herein as "the County") from all liability, damages, injuries, claims, or demands because of injury to Buyer and Buyer's employees, contractors, subcontractors, volunteers, or Page 1 of 2 Draft v 1 (04-22-22) agents, including death, arising out of or in any way connected to Buyer's removal and relocation of the Barn. Buyer shall require all Buyer contractors and subcontractors coming on Seller -owned real property to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from all Claims, incurred by or asserted against the County by any person or entity, which are alleged to have been caused directly or indirectly from the acts or omissions of Buyer's contractors or subcontractor. Seller's right to indemnification from Buyer's contractors or subcontractors is in excess and above any insurance rights/policies required by this Bill of Sale. Claims, as used in this Bill of Sale means, any loss; complaint; demand for relief or damages; lawsuit; cause of action; proceeding; judgment; penalty; costs or other liability of any kind which is imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the County or for which the County may become legally or contractually obligated to pay or defend against, whether commenced or threatened, including, but not limited to, reimbursement for reasonable attorney fees, mediation, facilitation, arbitration fees, witness fees, court costs, investigation expenses, litigation expenses, or amounts paid in settlement. 7. Insurance. Buyer shall obtain and maintain the insurance as set forth in Exhibit B while removing the Barn. Exhibit B is incorporated into this Bill of Sale. SELLER: BUYER: The County of Oakland, Holly Township C Its: Its: Page 2 of 2 Draft v 1 (04-22-22) # . ,3 �;, 'J _ f V/ IJVV�V VVII Lqf\Gfl\V. o aterford, M 48328 Y7: i. Waterford Oaks County Park Ernst Barn QExisting Tax Parcels Project Location Ernst Barn Location Exhibit A N SHT. 1 OF 1 Waterford Oaks County Park 2800 Watkins Lake Road Waterford, MI 48328 11111111111111111111111111111111111112020IMAGERY E �o o OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS a Oakland County Parks and Recreation �; a 2800 Watkins Lake Road o Y Waterford, MI 248-858Z06 - - www.OaklandCountyParks.com ' c Cc EXHIBIT B BUYER/BUYER CONTRACTORS INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS 1. Insurance Specifications. If Buyer comes on Seller -owned real property to remove and relocate the Barn, it shall obtain and maintain insurance according to the following specifications. All Buyer contractors or subcontractors coming on Seller -owned real property to remove and relocate the Barn shall obtain and maintain insurance according to the following specifications. a. Commercial General Liability - with the following as minimum requirements: $1,000,000 - Each Occurrence (Total Limit) Occurrence Form Policy Broad Form Property Damage Premises/Operations Independent Contractors Products and Completed Operations (Blanket) Broad Form Contractual Personal Injury - Delete Contractual Exclusion Additional Insured: - The County of Oakland and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers b. Workers' Compensation - as required by law and $500,000 Employer's Liability; c. Automobile Liability and Property Damage - $1,000,000 each occurrence, including coverage for all owned, hired and non -owned vehicles including No Fault coverage as required by law; 2. General Certificates of Insurance Reauirements. a. All Certificates of insurance shall contain evidence of the following conditions and/or clauses and shall be sent to: The County of Oakland, Oakland County Purchasing Division, 2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Bldg. 41 W, Waterford, MI 48328-0462 or fax 248- 858-1677 b. The County of Oakland and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, agents, employees, an d volunteers shall be named as "General Liability" Additional Insured with respect to work performed by Buyer or its contractors or subcontractors while on Seller -owned real property. c. All Certificates are to provide 30 days written notice of material change, cancellation, or non -renewal. Certificates of Insurance or insurance binders must be provided no less than ten (10) business days before commencement of work to the Oakland County Purchasing Division. Insurance carriers are subject to the approval of Oakland County. Contents PROPOSAL........ 1 LEGALREVIEW..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 GRANT COMPLIANCE REVIEW............................................................................................................................................2 HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE..................................................................................................................................................2 PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT (PAM) WORK GROUP................................................................................3 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM(AMT).................................................................................................................3 APPENDIX A: Architectural Significances............................................................................................................................4 APPENDIXB: History Timeline.............................................................................................................................................7 APPENDIX C: Holly Heritage Farm.....................................................................................................................................10 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................................................16 PROPOSAL Park: Waterford Oaks Budget center: WTR Asset name: Ernst Barn — 1580 Scott Lake Road OCPR Asset ID: 751 Fiscal Services Asset ID: 8165 Asset description: The barn at 1580 Scott Lake Road was part of the 5.38-acre acquisition in 2010 that included the Ernst Greenhouses (removed in 2020). The weathered wood barn has a footprint of approximately 120 square feet and features original forged hardware and hand-hewn mortise and tenon heavy timber framing. Associated structures include the garage (ID 749) and house (ID 750). The garage is used by Natural Resources Management and the house is being evaluated for future usage. Current conditions and need: The barn is vacant and considered unsafe for use as a storage or maintenance building. There are no Capital Improvement Program projects identified for the Ernst Barn. Proposed actions: Transfer barn to Holly Township ownership. Township will move barn to the Holly Heritage Farm located on North Holly Road, north of the Village of Holly. The Holly Heritage Farm Master Plan, developed by Oakland County Economic Develop & Community Affairs (EDCA) in January 2020, outlines the future location, restoration, and proposed public use of the Ernst Barn. Parks staff is in communication with EDCA regarding the relocation (EDCA 2020). PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 1 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Next steps: preparation of bill of sale by Corporation Counsel to transfer barn to Holly Township and scheduling of Parks Commission and BOC approvals. Site restoration: Existing barn footprint to be re -graded, topsoil and seeded to restore the site. Match seed mix used with the removal of Greenhouse complex on the site in 2020. If required, funding for site restoration identified in the FY2022 Major Maintenance Project — ADM Asset removal program ($50,000). The Ernst House is also being evaluated for Asset Future Determination. Best case scenario for barn removal/restoration timeframe would be to coordinate any major changes to the Ernst house at same time for site restoration purposes. Reviewer: Donna Folland, Senior Planner, 9/17/2021 LEGAL REVIEW Legal review: We will have to open a file for legal assistance for this matter. I will draft a bill of sale/transfer of ownership agreement to transfer ownership to Holly. This document will have to be approved by the Parks Commission and the BOC. Please remember that we can dispose of surplus property in three ways: (1) approval of BOC; (2) RFP process through Purchasing; and (3) public auction. Although we did issue a RFP in 2017 for the removal of the barn, too much time has passed to rely on the old RFP. So, I believe it would be quicker if we just have the BOC approve the Agreement. Open Matter Management file? Yes ❑X No ❑ Reviewer: Jody Hall, Assistant Corporation Counsel, 9/17/2021 /Per email on file GRANT COMPLIANCE REVIEW X❑ There are no grant agreements related to this asset: Property was not acquired with grant funds and was purchased after existing grant agreements were executed. ❑ Asset removal plan or other major changes to asset complies with grant agreements. Cite relevant grant agreements and pertinent language: ❑ Further review with granting agencies is required prior to removal or other major changes to asset. Provide details and/or cite relevant grant agreements and pertinent language: Not applicable Reviewer: Donna Folland, Senior Planner, 9/22/2021 HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Is the asset more than 50 years old? Yes ❑X No ❑ If the asset is more than 50 years old, answer the following questions to determine if it is historically significant. If one or more of the criteria below is checked, the asset is considered historically significant. Criterion A. Is the asset potentially associated with a pattern of events or a historic trend that made a significant contribution to the development of a community? Yes ❑X No ❑ Details: The barn reflects changing agricultural trends in Oakland County over time. It was built by an earlier settler and used on a small farm. Later it was used to house horses as agriculture in that area began to decline. Finally, it was used as part of a greenhouse business reflecting yet another agricultural trend. Criterion B. Can the asset be associated with individuals whose specific contributions to history can be identified or documented? Yes ❑x No ❑ Details: It was likely built by Charles Kellogg, a member of a significant pioneer family in Waterford Township of Oakland County. Later it was owned and utilized by the Vaughn family, one of the first non -Indigenous families PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 2 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 to settle in Bloomfield Township of Oakland County. In addition, it was owned for many years by the Ernst family, an immigrant German family who developed a significant greenhouse business utilizing the barn. Criterion C. Does the asset embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction? Yes X❑ No ❑ Details: The barn was likely built between 1850 and 1860 and as such remains one of the oldest barns in Oakland County. Of particular importance are the very wide boards used in its construction and the associated saw markings. Criterion D. Does the asset have, or did it formerly have, information to contribute to our understanding of human history or prehistory? Yes ❑X No ❑ Details: The barn is reflective of the rural roots of Oakland County and in particular of the importance of small farms with modest barns. Is the asset historically significant? (is one or more criterion checked?) Yes ❑X No ❑ If the asset is historically significant, does the asset have the ability to convey its historical significance? One has only to step inside the barn for a moment to appreciate its construction, its many changing functions and its importance as a historical structure. Recommendations regarding historical aspects of asset: If the barn cannot be preserved in its current location, then the best possible option would be for it to be relocated to another publicly owned site where it can be preserved and utilized for educational and other community -based purposes. Reviewer: Carol Bacak-Egbo, Historian, 9/17/2021 PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT (PAM) WORK GROUP Date of PAM Meeting: 9/22/2021 PAM recommendations to Administrative Management Team (AMT): PAM recommends continued partnership with Oakland County Economic Development & Community Affairs to accomplish relocation of the Ernst Barn to Holly Township's Holly Heritage Farm. The proposed relocation is the best solution to restore and preserve a building that represents the early agricultural history of Oakland County and make it available to the public for enjoyment and education. PAM recommends proceeding with next steps: preparation of bill of sale by Corporation Counsel to transfer barn to Holly Township and scheduling of Parks Commission and BOC approvals. After removal is complete, existing barn footprint to be re -graded, topsoil and seeded to restore the site. Match seed mix used with the removal of Greenhouse complex on the site in 2020. Documented bv: Donna Folland, Senior Planner, 9/22/2021 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM (AMT) Date of AMT Meeting: 9/28/2021 ® Confirm PAM recommendations ❑ Don't confirm PAM recommendations ❑ Confirm with the following conditions: NA ❑ AMT minutes or confirmation email to AMT are on file PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 3 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Documented by: Donna Folland, Senior Planner, 9/28/2021 APPENDIX A: Architectural Significances At first glance the "Ernst barn" would appear to be just a remnant from a long -forgotten farm. To the average person, this weathered wood building would convey little evidence of its once productive past or its unique design forthe function it served. Estimated to have been built in the antebellum period, 1850 or earlier, it is believed to be one of the oldest barns in Oakland County. American farmers built their barns with practicality in mind. But that functionality, along with regional preferences gives them a distinct look and aesthetic appeal which we enjoy today. Certain barn styles have become synonymouswith particular parts of the country; in many cases they are considered historic reminders of the area's agricultural past and reflecting the traditions of the people who built them. The Ernst Barn is a unique blend of the English barn and the Bank barn. The English barn was the first style of barn build in America. Its character can be seen in the Ernst barn with its small, simple, gabled roof rectangular footprint and unpainted vertical wood siding. The Bank barn finds its roots in the Midwest. Similar in appearance to the English barn, it differs from its English cousin with its two levels and its placement against a hillside, which gives it its name. The Ernst barn employs a modified two -level design with the traditional placement of livestock on the lower level and hay storage on the upper level. Built into the hillside, the Ernst barn uniquely placed the wagon level at mid -point between the two other levels. Also unique to the Ernst barn was the 'drive-thru'at the wagon level. This was made possible with a grade level entrance on the west and earthen ramp (no longer existing) on the east. The barn is roughly 30' X 40' comprised of three bays consisting of heavy timber framing. The North Bay provides forthe low ceiling livestock area which was built into the hillside with a higher volume hay storage above. The middle bay is the wagon level, originally with outside swing doors. Only one pair of the swing doors remain on the east elevation. A rolling door has replaced the original swings doors on the west at some time in the building's history. The third and most southern bay contains the passage door and consists of two levels utilized for storage, workshop,and tool crib. The barn is sited with the roof ridge running parallel with the hill. Maximizing the site terrain, the livestock enter the building in the northeast corner with wagons and people entering at the higher west and north corners of the barn. On the interior, the Ernst barn offers an irreplaceable window into the evolution of technology and developmental growth of the area. Nail heads from different eras are visible in a single piece of vertical siding evidence to the original blacksmith individually crafted nail to the more recent mass-produced machine nails which was used to repairand preserve history. From the hand-hewn mortise and tenon heavy timber framing to the band saw markings to the mill powered circular saw blade identifying marks the technological progress is clearly illustrated as the county was settled. Within this simple wood structure, a rich history exists, and a story waits to be told. It covers the time from the agricultural beginnings of Oakland County through settlement and early industry to the 21'Y Century. PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 4 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Photos below from left: Southeast elevation, east elevation, wagon bay (looking east) Photos below: Original door hinges The photos below demonstrate the technological advances of the construction industry in Oakland County. Left: Hand hewn timber, forged hardware, band saw and circular saw cut lumber. Right: Mortise & tenon construction. PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 5 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Ron Campbell, AIA Principal Planner / Preservation Architect 36 CFR Part 61 Federal Qualified Historic Architect Economic Development & Community Affairs Oakland County, Michigan 2100 Pontiac Lake Road Waterford, MI 48328-0412 i PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 6 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 APPENDIX B: History Timeline Ernst Barn LOCATION: SW % of the SW % of Section 13 in Waterford Township Year Event Documentation Joseph Stevenson received the original land patent for the land 1831 described as the entire 160 acres of the southwest % of Section 13 in Land Patent Waterford Township. Abstract of Title for Part of Joseph Stevenson died. He left no win and his wife, Elizabeth was 1832 the SW / of SW / of Section named administratrix of his estate. 13 of Waterford Township. Abstract of Title for Part of Inventory of Real and Personal Estate of Joseph Stevenson was 1834 the SW / of SW / of Section completed. 13 of Waterford Township. Elizabeth Stevenson was granted the right to sell the west % of the Joseph Stevenson probate 1835 southwest % of Section 13 in order to pay her late husband's debts. file. Abstract of Title for Part of Elizabeth Stevenson sold the west % of the southwest % of Section 13 to 1836 the SW % of SW % of Section Abraham Kellogg 13 of Waterford Township. Abraham Kellogg and his wife Phebe Kellogg conveyed 30 acres off the southwest corner of the southwest % of Section 13 to their son Charles P. Kellogg subject to the payment of $100 by Charles P. Kellogg to Abstract of Title for Part of 1850 1 1 the SW / of Section ofterfor Horace A. Kellogg, another of their sons, on Oct. 15, 1859 and the a further sum of $100 by Charles P. Kellogg to Webster S. Kellogg, ord Township. 13 of Waterford another son, when arrived at the age of 21. Charles P. Kellogg was likely living on the 30 acres with his wife Hannah and two daughters, Mary and Julia. The real estate was valued at $400. 1850 Neighbors included the Spencer Scott household and the Alfred Judson 1850 Census household. Given the estimated date of construction of the Ernst barn by several experts it is likely this was when the barn was built. Charles P. Kellogg owned the 30 acres and was still likely living on the land since it is the only land he appears to own. Neighboring farms are 1857 Hess map of Waterford 1857 those of his brother Daniel Kellogg (who took over their father Abram's Township. farm) and Alfred Judson. Charles P. Kellogg was likely living on the 30 acres with his wife Hannah and two daughters, Mary and Julia. The real estate is valued at $400. 1860 Neighbors include the Daniel Kellogg household and the Alfred Judson 1860 Census household. Charles P. Kellogg sold the 30 acres to Lewis. W. Mann for $1400 Abstract of Title for Part of (subject to a certain mortgage or claim of Webster S. Kellogg of $100.) the SW % of SW % of Section 1865 In 1860 Lewis M. Mann had a farm in the southwest part of Waterford 13 of Waterford Township. Township with real estate valued and $5000 and a personal estate valued at $2500. 1860 Census PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 7 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Lewis W. Mann and his wife Elvira sold the 30 acres to Richard Vaughan Abstract of Title for Part of for $1500 (subject to a certain mortgage or claim of Webster S. Kellogg the SW % of SW % of Section of $100.) 13 of Waterford Township. 1866 In 1860 Richard Vaughn was a farmer living in Bloomfield Township with his wife and 4 children. Real estate was valued at $2500 and his personal estate at $300. The 1857 Hess map shows his farm in Section 15 where Bloomfield Center was located. Bloomfield Township historical records show the Vaughn family as very early settlers in the township. Richard Vaughn and his family (wife and 4 children ranging in age from 17-30) are living in Ward 2 in Pontiac on Auburn Street. Real estate is worth $4000 and personal estate worth $2000 — The 1872 map shows 1870 him owning 2 houses next to each other on Auburn (lots 47 and 48). He is listed in the census as a retired farmer. It is unclear who was living, if anyone, on the land he had purchased in 1866 in Waterford. Richard Vaughn is shown as the owner of the land. A small square 1872 notating a residence is shown on the property in the approximate location of the current house. 1857 Hess map of Bloomfield Township 1860 Census The Afterglow, June, 1927 1870 Census 1872 map of Pontiac 1872 map of Waterford Township Richard Vaughn and family (his wife and a 33 year old son) are living in Waterford most likely on the property (30 acres) he purchased in 1866 1880 based on the neighbors listed nearby on the 1880 census including 1880 census Daniel Kellogg Richard Vaughn deeds the land in Waterford (30 acres) to Ferdinand Abstract of Title for Part of 1882 Vaughn (his son) —Records indicate a mortgage of $600. the SW % of SW % of Section 13 of Waterford Township. Discharge of Mortgage - Abstract of Titlefor Part of 1883 The land returned to Richard Vaughn when the mortgage was paid off. the SW % of SW / of Section 13 of Waterford Township. Richard Vaughn died. His heirs (excluding Ferdinand Vaughn), Sara A. Vaughan widow of Richard, Ida Vaughn, Milta Conn and her husband Abstract of Title for Part of 1883 William Conn and Louisa M. Merrill and Semon Vaughn, husband of Ida the SW % of SW % of Section Vaughn transfer the land via a Quit Claim deed to Ferdinand W. 13 of Waterford Township. Vaughan for $950.00 The 1896 map lists Fred (Ferdinand) Vaughn as the owner of the land. It is likely he was renting out the house at this time. 1896 map of Waterford 1896 A small square notating a residence is shown on the property in the Township same location as the 1872 map. The census of 1900 lists Mary Smith as the likely renter of Ferdinand 1900 Vaughn's house based on people living nearby and the 1896 map. In 1900 Census particular it lists Daniel Kellogg as living right next door. Mary is a PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 8 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 widow living with three children. Her oldest son, Harry, is listed as a farmer so it is likely they were farming the land at the time. The 1908 map lists Fred (Ferdinand) Vaughn as the owner of the land. It is likely he was still renting out the house at this time. 1908 map of Waterford 1908 A small square notating a residence is shown on the property in the Township same location as the 1896 map. William and Daisy McNutt are renting the farm. William travels 1920 Census 1920 frequently for work so Daisy is the one who must likely ran the farm. She raised horses. Abstract of Title' for Part of William and Daisy McNutt enter a land contract to purchase the farm 1920 the SW / of SW of Section from Fred (Ferdinand) Vaughn 13 of Waterford Township. Abstract of Titlefor Part of Mary Vaughn inherits the house upon the death of her husband 1928 the SW % of SW / of Section Ferdinand. 13 of Waterford Township. Mary Vaughn becomes a long-time patient at St. Joseph's Hospital in 1930 Detroit. St. Joseph's Hospital accepts the Waterford farm in exchange for the Abstract of Title for Part of 1932 large hospital Mary Vaughn is unable to pay. The hospital continues to the SW % of SW % of Section receive the money from the McNutt family who has the land contract 13 of Waterford Township. for the land. St. Joseph Mercy Hospital sells the farm to William McNutt and Daisy Abstract of Titlefor Part of 1942 the SW % of SW / of Section his wife for $1.00 when the land contract has been paid off. 13 of Waterford Township. Abstract of Title for Part of 1943 William and Daisy McNutt sell the farm to Stephen Ernst, Jr. the SW % of SW % of Section 13 of Waterford Township. Conclusions regarding the construction date of the barn: • The barn was most likely built sometime between 1850 and 1860 but perhaps as early as the 1840s. • It was likely built by Charles Kellogg, a member of a significant pioneer family in Waterford Township of Oakland County. Conclusions regarding the historical significance of the barn: • Although modified over the years the barn appears to be one of the oldest remaining barns in Oakland County. • The barn resides on historic Section 13 in Waterford Township. Waterford's first white settler family, the Oliver Williams family, purchased the northern 320 acres of this section in 1819. The southwestern quarter on which the house and barn resides has been owned by two additional early settler families, the Stevensons and the Kelloggs. PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 9 of 16 EMU Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Later in time the house and farm were owned by the Stephen Ernst family, an immigrant family from Germany, who ran a prominent greenhouse business. Submitted by: Carol Bacak-Egbo, Oakland County Parks Historian, 8/25/2021 APPENDIX C: Holly Heritage Farm The following pages are an excerpt from the Holly Heritage Farm Master Plan (EDCA 2020). i PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 10 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 a L ra m L U L 0 c a) L ra E E O U E L C6 LL L a) = L a a tA o M = 7-> OZAKLAND COUNTY PARKS r ,v m 0 Q 0 w I m 3 .-r W v 7 C O_ v rr � (D � tD Uq fD N N N N N O O N F� F, CY) ��'.�i,_ -�'4 �.'rs,-'.yf�i - w• aV4:.t ii•L. z �.i:�?, Y4_.9e+�^,�M1 � �}Y.'e 5'i _ {l � � {f+• ,r k1 i uw s .. �;' < li+:_r:i �.k �v_�'..�-r'`-ips—�-�c �i"'k4 y' r: =., „a2,.,�rb.,r�...�? '�'�—.4�.�/�.,�`iv�4.. 7ri +�;'�`-'•r. _-. Very little of the land in this area of the park is affected by flooding. The soils make it ideal for agricultural uses such asthe Community Garden, pasture land and orchard area as identified asdesirable amenities in the public survey. '- �.�.ie.�_ __�.V�;:A�,".y,-_�•,'}T'o.�",,.7.•�F.-•t'�'�.'�'r�.v_w,P._W1:%;�:��5? "�7"''t.".3%E•.°�jyry. .+�e�.z.,�.,� �r+.. 1 _,�.::. The heart of the farm activity, pastures, orchard and community garden is located within the 10B Marlette soil group, the ideal soil forthistypeof use. North HolF Fad- While being relocated further northfrom its present location the participation with future enhancements such asthe barn, educational Community Garden could still retain its current size and favorable soils. offerings, demonstrations, etc. that the Heritage Farm could provide. During stakeho I der review and program mingitwassuggestedth at the Additional enhancements such as I ow cost hoop houses can extend the current community garden could be reduced in size due to demand. growing season significantly,further attracting participation by While popularity mayvaryfromtimeto time, it couldgain distingui shing the Heritage Farm from other faci liti es. n cD z7l� a MIDH C O_ v rr � m � Uq \ cD N N N Ui N O O N F� F, Ol The antebellum Ernst Barn is envisioned to be relocated from Oakland County Parks Waterford Oaksfacility. Its proposed relocation allows it to maintain the same orientation and similar grade conditions as it did in its original location. Its use is seen as serving the community garden for equipment and supply storage. It could also serve as distribution point for seed exchanges, produce sales, etc. The community garden could maintain its current size, if desired, while staying convenient to parking ,bL REFERENCES EDCA. 2020. Holly Heritage Farm Master Plan. Waterford MI: Prepared for Holly Township by Oakland County Development & Community Affairs. Accessed September 17, 2021. https://hollytownship.org/wp- content/uploads/2014/10/Final-Holly-Heritage-Farm-Master-Plan.pdf. PLANNING REVIEW: Fixed Asset Future Determination Page 16 of 16 Waterford Oaks — Ernst Barn Update: 9/22/2021 Q M KLAND RETURN TO AGENDA COUNTY PARKS GreatBai ks for Great People Memo To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Chris Ward, Director Date: April 26, 2022 Re: Monthly Director's Report Lifeguard/Waterpark Bonuses The Board of Commissioners have approved our request to increase bonuses for Lifeguards and Waterpark staff for our upcoming season. New Lifeguards will receive $300 upon completion of training and 100 hours of service. All Lifeguards (including returning staff) will receive $500 upon completion of 100 hours of service (cumulative $800 for new Lifeguards). All waterpark employees will also receive an additional $1 per hour for work between Memorial Day to Labor Day, distributed in a lump sum at the close of the season. We have also received authority to enact additional incentives and salary adjustments up to $200,000 in fiscal impact. This provision will provide flexibility for our team to quickly adapt our strategy as the situation evolves. The new bonuses are having a measurable impact on our recruiting efforts. We have received 45 applicants for Lifeguard since the approval of the bonuses, more than doubling the number of applicants we have received. Rescue Plan Update Oakland County Parks have been invited to submit up to $10 million for improvements to our parks and $5 million for communities disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. Our team has been busy developing detailed plans for proposed projects at the three target County parks: Red Oaks, Waterford Oaks, and Catalpa Oaks. When finalized, a list of proposed projects will be presented for your consideration and prioritization within the $10 million. The County's emphasis on leveraging funds may require the Commission to consider the potential of utilizing OCPR funds to provide the necessary match. Our team has consulted with the local government leaders in the development of these proposed project plans. 2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford, MI 48328 248-858-0906 OaklandCountyParks.com Our team has also been dedicating a lot of time visiting and consulting with local leaders from the communities that would be eligible to propose projects within the $5 million portion. Members of our team have met with Pontiac, Hazel Park, Royal Oak Township, Oak Park (twice) and Southfield (three times). We are utilizing their input to develop project proposals to support the needs of their local parks and recreation systems. In the case of Southfield and Oak Park, our discussions have also led to serious discussion exploring the possibility of transferring ownership of park properties to Oakland County Parks and Recreation. Establishing a permanent presence rooted in these communities presents an incredible opportunity to address historic disparities in our park system and better serve all residents of our County. A briefing and detailed proposals will be brought to the Commission if we agree upon a conceptual framework to move forward. Proposed 9 Mile recreation and trail corridor/regional recreation collaboration among SE Oakland County municipalities Two additional proposals have been discussed during our visits with local governments Southfield City Manager, Fred Zorn, has proposed a plan to create a recreation and trailway corridor along 9 Mile Road from Southfield to Hazel Park. In concept, the objective is to establish connectivity across the municipalities in the corridor for non- motorized/pedestrian use and create a link between the numerous recreation opportunities along the route. Moving forward will require the coordinating and cooperation of multiple municipalities along the route. SEMCOG has indicated interest in providing financial support to begin the planning process. We have available budgeted funds that could also be used in support of this proposal. Many of the municipalities we met with are struggling with aging recreation facilities that are increasingly difficult to operate independently. Several of these facilities have already closed. Southfield's pool closed this year with a projected $10 million cost to re -open. Royal Oak Township's community center and pool is also closed with more than $2 million in urgent repairs needed. Multiple communities are operating ice rinks at a loss, draining resources that could be used for other recreational needs. The City Manager of Ferndale has asked that OCPR facilitate a discussion among these governments to explore options to share services, including the creation of a regional recreation authority. The objective would be to coordinate the development and operations of these facilities to improve access to recreation across municipality boundaries. We also have budgeted funds that could be used to kickstart this discussion and develop a plan. Congressional Community Project Funding for Farmers Market Improvements Oakland County was presented an opportunity to request federal funding for a priority project through the Community Project Funding process (formerly known as earmarks). Projects must be sponsored by a member of Congress who are limited to a total of 15 project proposals. Melissa Prowse did an incredible job preparing a submittal on very short notice with less than 24 2 hours to the deadline. We have proposed a request for $2 million to fund renovations and improvements at the Farmers Market. Congresswoman Haley Stevens has accepted our proposal as one of her projects. Many hurdles are ahead and there is no guarantee of success. It is great news for CCPR, and it wouldn't have been possible without Melissa's excellent work under pressure. 3 Oakland County Parks and Recreation Upcoming Events — May 2022 Active Adults May 11-14 Michigan Historical Preservation Network Annual Conference — Holly • Township and Parks • Ellis Barn and Dixie Highway • History of our Parks • The Great Road Trip of Oakland County — Bus trip Adaptive May 6 Mexica Fiesta — Southfield Parks and Recreation May 15 Disability Dirt Day at Holly Oaks ORV Groveland Oaks May 28 Memorial Day Programs: • Airbrushing 2-4 pm • Stone Portraits 2-4 pm • Festival Package 4 — 7 pm • Merge Band 8-10 pm May 29 Memorial Day Programs • Face Painter 12-2 pm • Balloon Artist 12-2 pm • Bike Decorating 2-2:30 pm • Bike Parade 2:30 pm • DJ 8-10 pm Nature/Intervretive Programs Fieldtrips & Birthday Parties May 4 Journey Early Childhood Center Fieldtrip — Wint Nature Center May 4 St. Paul Lutheran Fieldtrip — Red Oaks Nature Center May 5 Journey Early Childhood Center Fieldtrip — Wint Nature Center May 5 Giving Tree Childcare Center Fieldtrip — Red Oaks Nature Center May 7 Daphne's Birthday Party — Red Oaks Nature Center May 11 American House Lakeshore Fieldtrip — Red Oaks Nature Center May 14 Fiona's Birthday Party — Red Oaks Nature Center May 21 Clarkston Library Adult Hike Fieldtrip — Wint Nature Center May 21 Cody and Claire's 4th Birthday — Wint Nature Center May 26 Lake Orion Early Childhood Head Start Fieldtrip — Wint Nature Center Homeschool Series May 12 Stream Leaders w/CRWC — Wint Nature Center May 19 Birds — Red Oaks Nature Center Outreach May 7 4-H Discovery Day — Wint Nature Center Oakland County Parks and Recreation Upcoming Events — May 2022 May 20 Clinton River Water Festival — Red Oaks Nature Center May 20 Roosevelt Elementary School Spring Carnival — Wint Nature Center May 21 Young Birders Visit — Red Oaks Nature Center May 29 The Bloom Project — Red Oaks Nature Center Public Interpretive Programs May 6 Morning Munchkins — Red Oaks Nature Center May 7 Warble into Spring — Red Oaks Nature Center May 7 Campground Recreation at Groveland Oaks — Wint Nature Center May 13 Puddle Jumpers — Wint Nature Center May 13 Trail Hikes by Appointment — Wint Nature Center May 14 Trail Hikes by Appointment — Wint Nature Center May 14 NatureFit: Mindfulness, Naturally — Wint Nature Center May 14 Community Birding — Red Oaks Nature Center May 20 Trail Hikes by Appointment — Red Oaks Nature Center May 21 Trail Hikes by Appointment — Red Oaks Nature Center May 22 Terrific Turtles — Red Oaks Nature Center May 28 Transformation Station — Water Studies — Wint Nature Center Virtual Series & Self Led May 13 Virtual: From Table to (Flower) Bed — Red Oaks Nature Center Mobile Recreation May 4 Bus: Oxford Twp P & R Senior Trip May 4 Festival Package: City Southfield Family Fun & Safety Night May 5 Stage: Royal Oak Twp P & R Prayer Event May 6 Bus: Oxford Twp, P & R to the DSO May 7 Climbing Tower: OC 4-H MSU Extension 4 H Discovery Day Springfield Oaks May 12 Bus: OCPRC - Adaptive Rec MHPN May 14 Stage: American Cancer Society Relay for Life Clinton Twp May 14 Bus: OCPRC - Adaptive Rec MHPN May 15 Bus: OCPRC - Adaptive Rec Disability Dirt Day May 18 Obstacle Course & Archery: St. Patrick School Field May 19 Festival Package: West Bloomfield Kids Komotion Marshbank Park May 20 Bus: Independence Elementary Trip Oakland County Farmer's Market May 4 Gleaners Food Distribution May 7 Yoga at the Market May 7 Tai Chi May 8 Spring Flowers & Michigan Made Sunday May 15 Spring Flowers & Michigan Made Sunday May 18 Gleaners Food Distribution May 19 Yoga at the Market May 22 Spring Flowers & Michigan Made Sunday May 29 Spring Flowers & Michigan Made Sunday Oakland County Parks and Recreation Upcoming Events — May 2022 ORV-Holly Oaks May 15 Disability Dirt Day at Holly Oaks ORV Special Events May 7 Pet Wellness Clinic at Waterford Oaks Waterpark May 14 Pet Wellness Clinic at Orion Oaks Dog Park May 21 Pet Wellness Clinic at Independence Oaks Park Springfield Oaks May Tuesdays Dog Training May 1 Michigan Antique Festival — Park Wide May 5-6 Discovery Days — Activity Center Horse Show — Lower Arena May 12 State Historic Commission — Ellis Barn May 13-15 Private Wedding — Ellis Barn May 14 Springfield Township Cleanup - Grounds May 20-21 Horse Show — Lower Arena May 20-22 Private Wedding — Ellis Barn May 23 Flint Metro League Tournament — Golf Course May 27-28 Private Wedding — Activity Center May 27-29 Private Wedding — Ellis Barn