Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolutions - 2024.05.22 - 41227
AGENDA ITEM: Application to the U.S. Department of Justice for the 2024 DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Program DEPARTMENT: Sheriff’s Office MEETING: Board of Commissioners DATE: Friday, June 7, 2024 8:55 PM - Click to View Agenda ITEM SUMMARY SHEET COMMITTEE REPORT TO BOARD Resolution #2024-4074 Motion to approve the submission of the FY 2024 DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Program grant application to the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance in the amount of $448,139 from October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2026. ITEM CATEGORY SPONSORED BY Grant Penny Luebs INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Oakland County Sheriff’s Office is applying for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction (CEBR) Program Grant funding for $448,139 from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). The grant period is October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2026. The Oakland County Sheriff’s Office (OCSO) provides forensic laboratory services to Oakland County and its neighboring communities. Grant funding is requested to continue three (3) Full-Time Eligible (FTE) Special Revenue (SR) Forensic Laboratory Analyst positions (#4030901-12173, 12450, and 12451) in the Sheriff's Office Investigative & Forensic Services Division, Forensic Services Unit. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: No Committee members can contact Michael Andrews, Policy and Fiscal Analysis Supervisor at 248.425.5572 or andrewsmb@oakgov.com or the department contact persons listed for additional information. CONTACT Curtis Childs, Undersheriff Gaia Piir, Sheriff Fiscal Officer ITEM REVIEW TRACKING Aaron Snover, Board of Commissioners Created/Initiated - 5/22/2024 AGENDA DEADLINE: 06/07/2024 6:00 PM ATTACHMENTS 1. Grant Application Sign-Off FY24 2. BJA FY24 Formula DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction (CEBR) Program 3. Brief Applicant Questionnaire 4. DOJ Financial Managment Questionnaire 5. Form SF424_4_0-V4.0_A-486962_OCSO 6. Form SFLLL_2_0-V2.0_A-486962_OCSO 7. FY 2024 CEBR_Formula_Baseline Metrics_OCSO 8. FY 2024 CEBR_JustGrants Application Printout_DRAFT 9. FY 2024 CEBR_NEPA Checklist_OCSO 10. FY 2024 CEBR_Program Budget Breakdown_OCSO 11. FY 2024 CEBR_Program Eligibility Certification_OCSO 12. FY 2024 CEBR_Program Income Declaration_OCSO 13. FY 2024 CEBR_Proof of Accreditation_OCSO 14. FY 2024 CEBR_Proposal Narrative_OCSO 15. FY 2024 CEBR Formula_Budget_OCSO_Redacted COMMITTEE TRACKING 2024-05-14 Public Health & Safety - Recommend to Board 2024-05-22 Full Board - Adopted Motioned by: Commissioner Penny Luebs Seconded by: Commissioner Robert Hoffman Yes: David Woodward, Michael Spisz, Penny Luebs, Kristen Nelson, Christine Long, Robert Hoffman, Philip Weipert, Gwen Markham, Angela Powell, Marcia Gershenson, Yolanda Smith Charles, Charles Cavell, Brendan Johnson, Ajay Raman, Ann Erickson Gault, Linnie Taylor (16) No: None (0) Abstain: None (0) Absent: Karen Joliat, Michael Gingell (2) Passed GRANT REVIEW SIGN-OFF – Sheriff’s Office GRANT NAME: FY 2024 DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction (CEBR) Program FUNDING AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice (US DOJ), Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Kent Gardner / (248) 858-5018 STATUS: Grant Application (Greater than $50,000) DATE: 04/29/2024 Please be advised that the captioned grant materials have completed the internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The Board of Commissioners’ liaison committee resolution and grant application package (which should include this sign-off and the grant application with related documentation) should be downloaded into Civic Clerk to be placed on the next agenda(s) of the appropriate Board of Commissioners’ committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Management and Budget: Approved – Sheryl Johnson (04/29/2024) Human Resources: Approved. Approved by Human Resources. Continues 3 FTE positions with no changes. HR action not needed. –Heather Mason (04/24/2024) Risk Management: Approved. No insurance requirements identified. – Robert Erlenbeck (04/24/2024) Corporation Counsel: Approved– Sharon Kessler (04/25/2024) fe ;U.S.DEPARTMENTOF JUSTICE Approved:OMB No.1121-0329 eZ OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS Expires 12/31/2023 Background Recipients’financial management systemsand internal controls must meet certain requirements,including those set out in the “Part 200 Uniform Requirements”(2.C.F.R.Part 2800). Including at a minimum,the financial management system of each OJP award recipient must provide for the following: (1)Identification,in its accounts,of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received.Federal program and Federal awardidentification mustinclude,as applicable,the CFDAtitle and number,Federal award identification number and year,and the name of the Federal agency. (2)Accurate,current,and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program. (3)Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for Federally-funded activities.These records mustcontain information pertaining to Federal awards,authorizations,obligations,unobligated balances,assets,expenditures,income,and interest,and be supported by source documentation. (4)Effective control over,and accountability for,all funds,property,and other assets.The recipient must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. (5)Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. (6)Written procedures to document the receipt and disbursementof Federal funds including procedures to minimize the time elapsing between thetransfer of funds from the United States Treasury and the disbursement by the OJP recipient. (7)Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with both the terms and conditions of the Federal award and the costprinciples to apply to the Federal award. (8)Other important requirements related to retention requirements for records,use of open and machine readable formats in records,and certain Federal rights of access to award-related records and recipient personnel. 1.Name of Organization and Address: State: Zip Code: 5.Email: 6.Year Established: J 9.a)Is the applicant entity a nonprofit organization (including a nonprofit institution of higher education)as described in 26 U.S.C.501(c)(3)and exemptfrom taxation under 26 U.S.C.501(a)?[ClYes I]No If "No"skip to Question 10. If "Yes",complete Questions 9.b)and 9.c). Page 1 of 4 U.S.DEPARTMENTOF JUSTICE Approved:OMB No.1121-0329 OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS Expires 12/31/2023 AUDIT INFORMATION 9.b)Does the applicant nonprofit organization maintain offshore accounts for [yes cl No the purpose of avoiding paying the tax described in 26 U.S.C.511(a)? 9. c)With respect to the most recent year in which the applicant nonprofit organization was requiredto file a tax return,does the applicant nonprofit [yes Cc]No organization believe (or assert)that it satisfies the requirements of 26 C.F.R. 53.4958-6 (which relate to the reasonableness of compensation of certain individuals)? If "Yes",refer to “Additional Attachments”under “What An Application Should Include”in the OJP solicitation (or application guidance)underwhich the applicant is submitting its application.If the solicitation/guidance describes the “Disclosure of Process related to Executive Compensation,”the applicant nonprofit organization must provide —as an attachment to its application —a disclosure that satisfies the minimum requirements as described by OJP. For purposesof this questionnaire,an “audit”is conducted by an independent,external auditor using generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS)or Generally Governmental Auditing Standards (GAGAS),and results in an audit report with an opinion. 10.Has the applicant entity undergone any ofthe following typesof audit(s)(Please checkall that apply): “Single Audit”under OMB A-133 or Subpart F of 2 C.F.R.Part 200 [@]Financial Statement Audit [1]Defense Contract Agency Audit (DCAA) [IZ]None (if none,skip to question 13) 11.Most Recent Audit Report Issued:[a]Within the last 0 Within the last 0 Over 2 years ago A N/A 12 months 2 years Name of Audit Agency/Firm: AUDITOR'S OPINION 12.On the most recent audit,what was the auditor's opinion? [=]Unqualified Opinion [F]Qualified Opinion [7]Disclaimer,Going Concern [[]N/A:No audits as _or Adverse Opinions described above Enter the number of findings (if none,enter "0". Enter the dollar amountof questionedcosts(if none,enter "$0")1§ Were material weaknesses noted in the report or opinion?Byes 0 No 13.Which of the following best describes the applicant entity's accounting system: 0 Manual [Automated (Mi|Combination of manual and automated 14.Does the applicant entity's accounting system have the capability to Ves oO Nis identify the receipt and expenditure of award funds separately for each Federal award? Cl Not Sure 15.Does the applicant entity's accounting system have the capability to |Yes |No 0 Not SurerecordexpendituresforeachFederalawardbythebudgetcostcategories shownin the approved budget? 16.Does the applicant entity's accounting system have the capability to Mi Yes [JNo [JNotSurerecordcostsharing("match")separately for each Federal award,and maintain documentation to support recorded match or cost share? Page 2 of 4 U.S.DEPARTMENTOF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS Approved:OMB No.1121-0329 Expires 12/31/2023 17.Does the applicant entity's accounting system have the capability to accurately track employees actual time spent performing work for each federal award,and to accurately allocate charges for employee salaries and wages for each federal award,and maintain records to support the actual time spent and specific allocation of charges associated with each applicant employee? Mi Yes [INo [J NotSure 18.Does the applicant entity’s accounting system include budgetary controls to preclude the applicant entity from incurring obligations or costs that exceed the amount of funds available under a federal award (the total amountof the award,as well as the amountavailable in each budget cost category)? Yes [J]No []NotSure 19.Is applicant entity familiar with the "cost principles"that apply to recent and future federal awards,including the general and specific principles set out in2C.F.R Part 200? Ml Yes [No []NotSure PROPERTY STANDARDS AND PROCUREMENT STANDARDS 20.Doesthe applicant entity's property management system(s)maintain the following information on property purchased with federal award funds (1)a description of the property;(2)an identification number;(3)the source of funding for the property,including the award number,(4)who holds title;(5) acquisition date;(6)acquisition cost;(7)federal share of the acquisition cost; (8)location and condition of the property;(9)ultimate disposition information? Yes [[]No []Not Sure 21.Does the applicant entity maintain written policies and procedures for procurementtransactions that —(1)are designed to avoid unnecessary or duplicative purchases;(2)provide for analysis of lease versus purchase alternatives;(3)set out a process for soliciting goods and services,and (4) include standards of conduct that address conflicts of interest? Yes 0 No |Not Sure 22.a)Are the applicant entity’s procurement policies and procedures designed to ensure that procurements are conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition to the extent practicable,and to avoid practices that restrict competition? MM Yes [No []Not Sure 22.b)Do the applicant entity's procurementpolicies and procedures require documentation of the history of a procurement,including the rationale for the method of procurement,selection of contract type,selection or rejection of contractors,and basis for the contract price? Ml Yes [No []NotSure 23.Does the applicant entity have written policies and procedures designed to prevent the applicant entity from entering into a procurementcontract under a federal award with any entity or individual that is suspended or debarred from such contracts,including provisions for checking the “Excluded Parties List”system (www.sam.gov)for suspended or debarred sub-grantees and contractors,prior to award? Yes [J]No []Not Sure TRAVEL POLICY 24.Does the applicant entity: (a)maintain a standard travel policy?|Yes Oo No (b)adhere to the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)?Yes Cl No SUBRECIPIENT MANAGEMENTAND MONITORING 25.Does the applicant entity have written policies,procedures,and/or guidance designed to ensure that any subawards made by the applicant entity under a federal award —(1)clearly documentapplicable federal requirements,(2)are appropriately monitored by the applicant,and (3) comply with the requirements in 2 CFR Part 200 (see 2 CFR 200.331)? MM Yes [I]No [[]Not Sure [7]N/A -Applicant does not make subawards under any OJP awards Page 3 of 4 U.S.DEPARTMENTOF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS©Approved:OMB No.1121-0329 Expires 12/31/2023 26.Is the applicant entity aware of the differences between subawards under federal awards and procurement contracts under federal awards,including the different roles and responsibilities associated with each? Yes [[]No []Not Sure N/A -Applicant does not make subawards under any OJP awards 27.Does the applicant entity have written policies and procedures designed to prevent the applicant entity from making a subaward under a federal award to any entity or individual is suspended or debarred from such subawards? MM Yes [[]No []Not Sure [7]N/A -Applicant does not make subawards under any OJP awards DESIGNATION AS 'HIGH-RISK'BY OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES 28.Is the applicant entity designated “high risk”by a federal grant-making agencyoutside of DOJ?(High risk includes any status under which a federal awarding agency provides additional oversight due to the applicant's past performance,or other programmatic or financial concerns with the applicant.) If "Yes",provide the following: (a)Name(s)of the federal awarding agency: (b)Date(s)the agency notified the applicant entity of the "high risk"designation: (c)Contactinformation for the "high risk"point of contact at the federal agency: Name: Phone: Email: (d)Reason for "high risk"status,as set out by the federal agency: EE]Yes MNo []NotSure CERTIFICATION ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT ENTITY (Must be madeby the chief executive,executive director,chieffinancial officer,designated authorized Tepresentative ("AOR"),or otherofficial with the requisite knowledge and authority) On behalf of the applicant entity,|certify to the U.S.Department of Justice that the information provided aboveiscompleteandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledge.|havethe requisite authority and information to makethiscertificationonbehalfoftheapplicantentity—? eh BEY-ZN Page 4 of 4 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 11/30/2025 * 1. Type of Submission:* 2. Type of Application: * 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier: 5a. Federal Entity Identifier:5b. Federal Award Identifier: 6. Date Received by State:7. State Application Identifier: * a. Legal Name: * b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN):* c. UEI: * Street1: Street2: * City: County/Parish: * State: Province: * Country: * Zip / Postal Code: Department Name:Division Name: Prefix:* First Name: Middle Name: * Last Name: Suffix: Title: Organizational Affiliation: * Telephone Number:Fax Number: * Email: * If Revision, select appropriate letter(s): * Other (Specify): State Use Only: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: d. Address: e. Organizational Unit: f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Preapplication Application Changed/Corrected Application New Continuation Revision 04/12/2024 County of Oakland 38-6004876 HZ4EUKDD7AB4 1200 N. Telegraph Rd. Pontiac MI: Michigan USA: UNITED STATES 48341-1032 Sheriff's Office Forensic Science Laboratory Abby Meyer Grant Management Consultant Oakland County Sheriff's Office 517-325-5307 abby@redmittenllc.com Funding Opportunity Number:O-BJA-2024-172062 Received Date:Apr 12, 2024 12:55:18 PM EDTTracking Number:GRANT14123498 * 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: * Other (specify): * 10. Name of Federal Agency: 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: CFDA Title: * 12. Funding Opportunity Number: * Title: 13. Competition Identification Number: Title: 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): * 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions. Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 B: County Government Bureau of Justice Assistance 16.036 Comprehensive Forensic DNA Analysis Grant Program O-BJA-2024-172062 BJA FY24 Formula DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction (CEBR) Program FY 2024 CEBR Formula: Oakland County Sheriff's Office View AttachmentsDelete AttachmentsAdd Attachments View AttachmentDelete AttachmentAdd Attachment Funding Opportunity Number:O-BJA-2024-172062 Received Date:Apr 12, 2024 12:55:18 PM EDTTracking Number:GRANT14123498 * a. Federal * b. Applicant * c. State * d. Local * e. Other * f. Program Income * g. TOTAL . Prefix:* First Name: Middle Name: * Last Name: Suffix: * Title: * Telephone Number: * Email: Fax Number: * Signature of Authorized Representative:* Date Signed: 18. Estimated Funding ($): 21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) ** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representative: Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 * a. Applicant Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. * b. Program/Project * a. Start Date:* b. End Date: 16. Congressional Districts Of: 17. Proposed Project: MI-011 MI-011 1234-MI_AllDistricts_byCounty_Oakland.pdf Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment 10/01/2024 09/30/2026 448,139.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448,139.00 a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. Yes No Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment ** I AGREE David T. Woodward Chairperson, Board of Commissioners 248-858-0100 woodwardd@oakgov.com Katie West * 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? 04/12/2024 If "Yes", provide explanation and attach Funding Opportunity Number:O-BJA-2024-172062 Received Date:Apr 12, 2024 12:55:18 PM EDTTracking Number:GRANT14123498 10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant: 9. Award Amount, if known: $ * Street 1 * City State Zip Street 2 * Last Name Prefix * First Name Middle Name Suffix DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C.1352 OMB Number: 4040-0013 Expiration Date: 02/28/2025 1. * Type of Federal Action: a. contract b. grant c. cooperative agreement d. loan e. loan guarantee f. loan insurance 2. * Status of Federal Action: a. bid/offer/application b. initial award c. post-award 3. * Report Type: a. initial filing b. material change 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: Prime SubAwardee * Name County of Oakland * Street 1 1200 N. Telegraph Rd. 38E Street 2 * City Pontiac State MI: Michigan Zip 48341-1032 Congressional District, if known: 5. If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: 6. * Federal Department/Agency: DOJ/Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) 7. * Federal Program Name/Description: Comprehensive Forensic DNA Analysis Grant Program CFDA Number, if applicable: 16.036 8. Federal Action Number, if known: N/A N/A N/A N/A b. Individual Performing Services (including address if different from No. 10a) Prefix * First Name Middle Name * Street 1 * City State Zip Street 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 11. * Last Name Suffix Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when the transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. * Signature: 04/12/2024 Katie West *Name:Prefix * First Name David Middle Name T. * Last Name Woodward Suffix Title:Chairperson, Board of Commissioners Telephone No.:248-858-0100 Date: Federal Use Only: Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL (Rev. 7-97) Funding Opportunity Number:O-BJA-2024-172062 Received Date:Apr 12, 2024 12:55:18 PM EDTTracking Number:GRANT14123498 1. Number of approved (vacant and filled) full-time equivalents (FTEs) in the biology section as of December 31, 2023:9 2. Number of filled (non-vacant) FTEs in the biology section as of December 31, 2023:9 3. Staff Retention: Number of FTEs identified in Question 2 that were in the biology section as of January 1, 2023.7 Number of untested/not completed forensic biology/DNA cases on hand on January 1, 2023: 416 Number of untested/not completed forensic biology/DNA cases more than 30 days old (backlogged) on January 1, 2023:349 Please estimate percentage of the backlogged cases that were from property crimes: 91.40% Number of new cases for forensic biology/DNA received in 2023:701 Please estimate percentage of these cases that were from property crimes 58.8% Total number of forensic biology/DNA cases completed in 2023:545 Please estimate percentage of these cases that were property crimes. 49.35% Forensic biology/DNA cases closed by administrative means in 2023:52 Number of untested/not completed forensic biology/DNA cases on hand on December 31, 2023:521 Number of untested/not completed forensic biology/DNA cases more than 30 days old (backlogged) on December 31, 2023:481 The average number of days needed to complete (including peer review and report) nonpriority forensic DNA cases for calendar year 2023. Please indicate violent crime time with a “V” and the nonviolent crime time with “NV.” If the applicant cannot separate violent and nonviolent cases, give the number with no other markings. 387.92 NV 72.06 V BASELINE DATA: Casework BASELINE BACKLOG DATA: Casework FY 2024 CEBR Formula Application: Oakland County Sheriff's Office The Bureau of Justice Assistance Grants Programs Checklist Instructions: 1.Complete the following information below: Applicant Name, Point of Contact Name, POC signature, Date Submitted, Application/Grant Number, and Grant Program. 2.Complete the Grants Programs Checklist, starting on page 2. 3.Return this document in electronic format with your application. Applicant Name: Point of Contact Name: POC signature: Date Submitted: Application/Grant Number: Grant Program: TCG Technical Recommendation: BJA Approval: Bureau of Justice Assistance Grants Program Checklist Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Air Quality Does the project comply with state air quality standards for all criteria pollutants? Is the project located in an area designated by the EPA as in attainment for the seven criteria pollutants? Would the action produce minimal emissions (100 tons per year or less for each of the seven criteria pollutants and/or does not exceed 10% of an area’s total emissions)? Would potential exposure to chemical emissions in a laboratory be controlled through the use of a biological hood? Would the project only produce emissions that do not impede the area’s conformity with the State Implementation Plan under the Clean Air Act? Significance Criteria An impact would be considered significant if pollutant emissions result in exposure of people, wildlife, or vegetation to ambient air that does not meet the standards established under the Clean Air Act, or interfere with state ambient air quality standards. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Geology, Topography, Soils (includes Farmland Protection) Would there be compliance with local soil erosion mitigation measures in construction and renovation projects? Would the project avoid erosion and deposition, compacting soils in fragile environments, or altering the character of soils over a large area? Would the project comply with the Farmland Protection Policy Act? Significance Criteria An action would cause a significant impact if soil erosion produced gullying, damage to vegetation, or a sustained increase in sedimentation in streams. This includes a substantial loss of soil, and/or a substantial decrease in soil stability and permeability. Also, significant impacts can occur when soils are substantially disrupted, displaced, compacted or covered over. An action would also constitute a significant impact if the action caused ground fracturing, folding, subsidence, or instability. Impacts associated with soil contamination would be significant if the affected area was no longer able to support its current function or vegetative cover. Page 2 of 8 Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Water Resources (Water Quality, Surface Water, Wetlands, Floodplains, Coastal Barrier Resources, Wild and Scenic Rivers) Would project activities avoid contamination, sedimentation, or otherwise significantly affecting the water quality or hydrology of a nearby surface water body? Would changes to surface water quality or hydrology be confined to the immediate project area? Does the project ensure that local and state regulations concerning stormwater runoff are followed? During construction activities, would all state, local, and tribal regulations concerning erosion controls, runoff abatement, and vegetation removal be followed? During construction activities, would proper hazardous spill procedures be in place to minimize impacts of spills on water quality? Would the project avoid affecting a designated Wild and Scenic River in any manner? Would the project avoid affecting any portion of a 100- year or 500-year floodplain or jurisdictional wetland? Significance Criteria Impacts on water resources would be considered significant if effluent or pollutant emissions result in exposure of people, wildlife, or vegetation to surface or ground waters that do not meet the standards established under the Clean Water Act, or interfere with state water quality standards. An action would cause a significant impact on wetlands and floodplains if the soil structure, hydrology or the vegetation of more than ¼ acre (1/10 ha) of a wetland would be altered, or a floodplain area is altered enough to present a reasonable flood danger to the area, causes the degradation or loss of habitat for populations indigenous to the floodplain area, or prohibits farming activities. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Natural Environment (Wildlife, Wildlife Habitat, and Vegetation) Would the project avoid causing more than a short-term change in the composition, structure, or density of vegetation? Would the project avoid causing more than temporary disturbance or relocation of wildlife? Would the project avoid impacting current or future wildlife or vegetation biodiversity or species composition? Page 3 of 8 Would the project insure that the potential for the establishment of non-native plant species within disturbed areas created by this project would be minimal? Would project construction occur in an area other than a unique or sensitive plant community? Would the project avoid extirpating any plants or animals from the project area? Significance Criteria An action would cause a significant impact if any changes to native vegetation extend beyond a small area and affect the viability of a plant species population or vegetation community. Full recovery would not occur in a reasonable time, considering the size of the project and the affected resource’s natural state. An action would cause a significant impact if any changes affect a large portion of a wildlife population and the viability of that population. Full recovery would not occur in a reasonable time, considering the size of the project and the affected species’ natural state. An action would cause a significant impact if the degradation or loss of habitat is sufficient to cause native wildlife populations to leave or avoid the area. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Endangered Species Would the project avoid impacts on T&E species or critical habitat? Is the project area free of any Federal or state listed T&E species or critical habitat, as determined by consultation with FWS or NMFS? Would the project avoid impacting any areas in or adjacent to habitat for rare, threatened, or endangered species? If the project is expected to adversely affect a listed species, would mitigation measures be employed that would successfully avoid such effects? Significance Criteria Any effect to a federally listed species or its critical habitat would be so small that it would not be of any measurable or perceptible consequence to the protected individual or its population. This effect would equate to a “no effect” or “not likely to adversely affect” determination in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service terms. Anything else would be considered significant. Page 4 of 8 Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Historic Preservation Is the project site free of any historic structures, archeological concerns, or other cultural resource issues, as determined by consultation with the SHPO? Would the project avoid affecting any NRHP listed properties, or properties that are eligible for listing? Would the project occur within an existing facility that is not considered historic, as determined by consultation with the SHPO? If project activities are determined to impact cultural resources as defined by Section 106, would mitigation steps as outlined in Section 106 be followed? Would renovation projects exclude historic buildings? Significance Criteria An impact would be significant if an effect occurs that may diminish the integrity of, cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of, or directly or indirectly destroy a cultural resource. This effect would equate to an “adverse effect” determination for purposes of Section 106. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Land Use Would the project comply with local zoning and development ordinances (apply for rezoning if needed)? Would the project comply with local comprehensive and development plans? Would the project obtain necessary building and occupancy permits from local authorities? Significance Criteria An impact would be significant if a proposed action conflicts with any Federal, regional, State, or local land use plans. If land use patterns are changed in the immediate project area due to a proposed action, the impact would also be considered significant. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Human Population (Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice) Would the project avoid appreciably changing the total population or demographics of the population, housing demand or employment levels, or property values? Would the project avoid increasing human infrastructure requirements (i.e., new workers need housing and consume additional community resources such as water, electricity, roadways, open space, etc.)? Page 5 of 8 Would the project avoid displacing existing residents or workers from their homes and communities? Would the action avoid areas that have a high proportion of minority residents or residents living below the poverty level? If it does occur in such an area, would the grantee ensure that low-income households are not adversely impacted by the project? Would environmentally unsafe, unpleasant, or noxious conditions for nearby populations, including release of contaminants into air or water, increased levels of traffic or noise occur only during the period of construction? Significance Criteria A change of more than 2 percent of the previously projected level of local employment, population, or gross domestic product would be considered a significant impact on socioeconomics. Also, if school populations decrease by more than 2 percent, revenues decrease by more than 2 percent, and if vacancy rate increases by more than 2 percent, that would constitute a significant impact. A significant impact on environmental justice would occur if a disproportionate amount of minority and/or low-income populations were adversely affected by the project. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Noise Would project activities avoid noise impacts to sensitive receptors? If noise levels during construction projects exceed existing background sounds temporarily, would the project insure that they do not exceed applicable noise standards? Would operation of a newly constructed facility avoid producing noise levels that would disturb people or displace wildlife? Significance Criteria Sounds levels of 65 dBA are considered annoying to most individuals, while constant or repeated exposure to sounds of 90 dBA or higher can lead to significant impacts. Noise levels are significant if they exceed ambient noise level standards determined by the federal, state, and/or local governments. An impact would be considered significant if there is sustained exposure of sensitive receptors to a DNL of greater than 65 dBA. Page 6 of 8 Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Energy Would the demand on the region’s energy supply be negligible (for projects occurring within existing facilities that may require additional energy)? Would the project comply with regulations for electricity and gas provisions? Would the project avoid the wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy? Significance Criteria Significant impacts to energy would occur if a proposed project were to create a substantial increase in the level of demand for energy supplies and/or use energy in a wasteful, inefficient, excessive or unnecessary manner. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Solid Waste Management Would any solid (or liquid) waste that is created by the project, including hazardous waste and construction debris, be disposed of properly? Would laboratories maintain safe and adequate storage and disposal procedures for hazardous waste and chemicals? Significance Criteria An action would cause a significant impact if it would increase the generation of solid or hazardous waste beyond the capacity to safely handle and dispose of that waste. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments Transportation Would the project avoid generating new traffic over the long-term? Would the project avoid creating an additional need for parking? Would the project avoid short-or long-term decreases in the level of service of a roadway? Would the project ensure unrestrained movement of emergency vehicles? Would the project avoid conflicts with planned transportation projects or adopted public transportation policies? Page 7 of 8 Would the project avoid causing noticeable deterioration of local roadway surfaces? Significance Criteria A significant impact to transportation would be a traffic increase which is predicted to upset the normal flow of traffic, create the need for major road repair as a result of the action, or generate traffic levels requiring the expansion of existing roadways or facilities. Resource Concern Yes or No Comments State Environmental Policy Act Would the project occur in states other than Arkansas, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington, or Wisconsin? If so, the project would not require compliance with a state environmental policy act. Intergovernmental Review and Other Federal Agency Reaction to the Project Would grantees partnering with other federal agencies, or whose project may affect another federal agency consult and coordinate with that entity and conduct intergovernmental review as necessary? Cumulative Impacts Would cumulative impacts be less than significant for all resources affected by the project? Page 8 of 8 COUNTY OF OAKLAND OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF Michael J. Bouchard Forensic Science Laboratory 1200 North Telegraph 38 East • Pontiac, Michigan • 48341 • (248) 858-5018 Program Income Declaration The Oakland County Sheriff’s Office Forensic Science Laboratory does not employ a fee-for- service model or otherwise accept compensation from external organizations or jurisdictions to conduct DNA sample testing. CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION The ANSI National Accreditation Board Hereby attests that Oakland County Sheriff’s Office Forensic Science Laboratory 1200 N. Telegraph Road, Bldg 38 E., Pontiac, Michigan 48341 USA Fulfills the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 ANAB Forensic Testing & Calibration AR 3125:2019 FBI Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories:2020 In the field of Forensic Testing This certificate is valid only when accompanied by a current scope of accreditation document. The current scope of accreditation can be verified at www.anab.org. Pamela L. Sale, Vice President, Forensics Expiry Date: 31 December 2024 Certificate Number: FT-0344 9HUVLRQ,VVXHG-XO\3DJHRI 5HJHQF\3DUNZD\6XLWH&DU\1& ZZZDQDERUJ 6&23(2)$&&5(',7$7,2172 ,62,(& $1$%)RUHQVLF7HVWLQJ &DOLEUDWLRQ$5 )%,4XDOLW\$VVXUDQFH6WDQGDUGVIRU)RUHQVLF'1$7HVWLQJ/DERUDWRULHV 2DNODQG&RXQW\6KHULII¶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¶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¶V6FRSHRI$FFUHGLWDWLRQ$1$%KDVFRQILUPHGWKHFRPSHWHQFHUHTXLUHGWRGHYHORSDQGYDOLGDWHPHWKRGVDQG SHUIRUPRQJRLQJTXDOLW\DVVXUDQFHIRUDFFUHGLWHGDFWLYLWLHV)RUDOLVWHGFRPSRQHQWSDUDPHWHUWKHIRUHQVLFVHUYLFHSURYLGHUPD\DGGRUPRGLI\PHWKRGVIRU DFWLYLWLHVZLWKRXWIRUPDOQRWLFHWR$1$%IRULWHPVDQGNH\HTXLSPHQWWHFKQRORJ\OLVWHG&RQWDFWWKHIRUHQVLFVHUYLFHSURYLGHUIRULQIRUPDWLRQRQWKHPHWKRG XWLOL]HGIRUDFFUHGLWHGZRUN BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3DPHOD/6DOH 9LFH3UHVLGHQW)RUHQVLFV Agency Name: ______________________________State: ________Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 1 Description of the Issue Applicants should discuss the challenges their laboratory faces that hamper significant improvements in laboratory processing capacity or decreasing turnaround times for CODIS eligible samples. Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 2 Program Design This section should address the goals, objectives, and expected results. The 4 templates below reflect the goals of the program; select all that are applicable to the specific goals of the proposed project (at a minimum, one template must be selected). The objectives should relate to the budget items being proposed for the project. If a template is not used, enter “Not Applicable” or “N/A” to denote the section is not relevant to the proposed project. 1. PROCESS CRIME SCENE SAMPLES — A goal of this project is to process crime scene samples for CODIS entry. This will be achieved through the following objectives: In a minimum of 3-4 sentences, describe how these objectives meet the goal to process crime scene samples for CODIS entry. Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 3 2. PROCESS DATABASE SAMPLES — A goal of this project is to process database samples for CODIS entry. This will be achieved through the following objectives. In a minimum of 3-4 sentences, describe how these objectives meet the goal process database samples for CODIS entry. Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 4 3. INCREASE CAPACITY TO PROCESS CRIME SCENE SAMPLES — A goal of this project is to increase capacity to process crime scene samples for CODIS entry. This will be achieved through the following objectives: In a minimum of 3-4 sentences, describe how these objectives meet the goal to increase capacity to process crime scene samples for CODIS entry. Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 5 4. INCREASE CAPACITY TO PROCESS DATABASE SAMPLES — A goal of this project is to increase capacity to process database samples for CODIS entry. This will be achieved through the following measurable objectives: In a minimum of 3-4 sentences, describe how these objectives meet the goal to increase capacity to process database samples for CODIS entry Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 6 The expected timeline for completion of the project is as follows: Include each objective listed in the goals above in a sequential manner in the table below. Provide realistic steps in the sub-objectives column to work towards meeting each main objective of the goal. Timeframe Objectives Sub-objectives Oct.-Dec. Jan.-Mar. Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 7 Timeframe Objectives Sub-objectives April-June July-Sept. Oct.-Dec. Timeline continued Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 8 Timeframe Objectives Sub-objectives Jan.-Mar. April-June July-Sept. Timeline continued Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 9 Capabilities and Competencies Provide 1-2 sentences for each main individual who will be involved in (1) grant management including award acceptance and submission of progress reports, (2) financial management including submission of FFRs and (3) project management to include completion to technical aspects of the project. Application No.: ____________ FY 24 CEBR FORMULA APPLICATION Bureau of Justice Assistance • 10 Plan for Collecting Data What method is used for data calculation (e.g., LIMS, excel, CODIS terminal, hand counting)? For each measure, provide the mechanism for reporting/collection of the data. What is the policy name that governs validation of performance measures? If no formal policy exists, what method was used to validate accuracy of performance measures that are reported for this award? Who is responsible for collecting, calculating, quality control and storage of the data? Confirm that the data will be available for review for 3 years from the date of submission of the final federal financial report (SF-425) under the award, or as otherwise required by law. See 2 C.F.R. 200.333. Purpose Area #4 A. Personnel Name Position List each name, if known.List each position, if known. Forensic Biologist 14 yearly $102,305 $0 $102,305 Forensic Biologist 14 yearly $102,305 $0 $102,305 (OCT-MAR)Forensic Biologist 14 yearly $49,299 $0 $49,299 (APR - SEP)Forensic Biologist 14 yearly $51,153 $0 $51,153 $305,062 $0 $305,062 Narrative B. Fringe Benefits List each grant-supported position receiving fringe benefits.Show the basis for computation. B R t T t l C t Non-Federal Federal Total(s) The Oakland County Sheriff's Office (OCSO) requests continuation funding for three DNA analyst positions established with prior-year CEBR funding. Adjustments are made to account for projected FY26 cost of living increases, as appropriate, for projected salaries of $102,305 for two analysts and $100,452 for one analyst, who will receive an annual step-increase 6 months into the year. Personnel expenses are budgeted for a 12-month period (one year), through September of 2026, as accounted for in the Time Worked column. All positions remain 100% federally funded and fully dedicated to OCSO’s primary objective of analyzing DNA samples for inclusion in CODIS. A total budget of $305,062 is established for Personnel costs in the second year of the award period. Please Note: OJP template formatting rounds entries of .5 or more up to a display value of 1 in the Time Worked column. Formatting is locked for this template and cannot be edited to visually reflect the percentage of year indicated in the narrative above. The correlation in values can only be confirmed by clicking on individual cells within the Time Worked column. Name Computation $102,305.00 1 100% Show annual salary rate & amount of time devoted to the project for each name/position. Salary Rate Time Worked (# of hours, days, months, years) Percentage of Time Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request $98,598.00 1 100% $102,305.00 1 100% $102,305.00 1 100% Budget Detail - Year 2 Does this budget contain conference costs which is defined broadly to include meetings, retreats, seminars, symposia, and training activities? - Y/N No (DOJ Financial Guide, Section 3.10) Computation 1 Purpose Area #4 $47,982 $47,982 $47,982 $0 $47,982 $23,122 $0 $23,122 $23,991 $0 $23,991 $143,077 $0 $143,077 Narrative C. Travel Purpose of Travel Type of Expense Basis Indicate the purpose of each trip or type of trip (training, advisory group meeting) Lodging, Meals, Etc.Per day, mile, trip, Etc. N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative Total(s) Indicate the travel destination.Compute the cost of each type of expense X the number of people traveling. Cost Quantity # of Staff # of Trips Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request Total(s) Fringe benefits are calculated at an average percentage of salary for each position, as follows: FICA (7.65%), Retirement (25.13%), Disability (1.76%), Unemployment (0.10%), Group Life/Accident (0.25%), Workers’ Compensation (0.28%), and Medical/Dental/Vision Insurance (11.73%) for a total of 46.90%. Total Fringe Benefits costs of $143,077 are budgeted for the second year of the award period. Location Computation Andrea Lobsinger (APR - SEP)$51,152.50 46.90% Andrea Lobsinger (OCT-MAR)$49,299.00 46.90% Tara Reinholz $102,305.00 46.90% Danielle Hankinson $102,305.00 46.90% Base Rate Total Cost Contribution Request 2 Purpose Area #4 D. Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative E. Supplies Provide a list of the types of items to be purchased with grant funds.Describe the item and the compute the costs. Computation: The number of each item to be purchased X the cost per item. Total(s) N/A Supply Items Computation List and describe each item of equipment that will be purchased Compute the cost (e.g., the number of each item to be purchased X the cost per item) # of Items Unit Cost Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request N/A Item Computation 3 Purpose Area #4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative F. Construction Purpose Provide the purpose of the construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative Total(s) Describe the construction project(s)Compute the costs (e.g., the number of each item to be purchased X the cost per item) # of Items Cost Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request Total(s) N/A Description of Work Computation # of Items Unit Cost Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request 4 Purpose Area #4 $0 $0 $0 $0 Purpose of Travel Indicate the purpose of each trip or type of trip (training, advisory group meeting) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative Total Federal RequestCost Duration or Distance # of Staff Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Total(s) Consultant Travel (if necessary) Location Type of Expense Computation Indicate the travel destination.Hotel, airfare, per diem Compute the cost of each type of expense X the number of people traveling. Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request Description Purpose Consultant? Provide a description of the activities to be carried out by subrecipients.Describe the purpose of the subaward (subgrant) Is the subaward for a consultant? If yes, use the section below to explain associated travel expenses included in the cost. N/A G. Subawards (Subgrants) 5 Purpose Area #4 $0 $0 $0 $0 Purpose of Travel Indicate the purpose of each trip or type of trip (training, advisory group meeting) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative Total Indicate the travel destination.Hotel, airfare, per diem Compute the cost of each type of expense X the number of people traveling. Cost Duration or Distance # of Staff Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request Total(s) Consultant Travel (if necessary) Location Type of Expense Computation Federal Request Provide a description of the products or services to be procured by contract and an estimate of the costs. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole source procurements in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $150,000). Describe the purpose of the contract Is the subaward for a consultant? If yes, use the section below to explain associated travel expenses included in the cost. Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution N/A H. Procurement Contracts Description Purpose Consultant? 6 Purpose Area #4 I. Other Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative J. Indirect Costs Description Computation Total(s) N/A Federal RequestQuantityBasisCostLength of Time Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution N/A Description Computation List and describe items that will be paid with grants funds (e.g. rent, reproduction, telephone, janitorial, or security services, and investigative or confidential funds). Show the basis for computation 7 Purpose Area #4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Narrative Total(s) N/A Describe what the approved rate is and how it is applied.Compute the indirect costs for those portions of the program which allow such costs. Base Indirect Cost Rate Total Cost Non-Federal Contribution Federal Request 8 Budget Summary A. Personnel $0 $0 $305,062 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $305,062 B. Fringe Benefits $0 $0 $143,077 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $143,077 C. Travel $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 D. Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 E. Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 F. Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G. Subawards (Subgrants)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 H. Procurement Contracts $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I. Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Direct Costs $0 $0 $448,139 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $448,139 J. Indirect Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Project Costs $0 $0 $448,139 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $448,139 Budget Summary Note: Any errors detected on this page should be fixed on the corresponding Budget Detail tab. No n - F e d e r a l Re q u e s t To t a l ( s ) Fe d e r a l Re q u e s t Year 1 Year 2 (if needed) Fe d e r a l Re q u e s t No n - F e d e r a l Re q u e s t Year 3 (if needed) Fe d e r a l Re q u e s t No n - F e d e r a l Re q u e s t Year 4 (if needed) Fe d e r a l Re q u e s t No n - F e d e r a l Re q u e s t Does this budget contain conference costs which is defined broadly to include meetings, retreats, seminars, symposia, and training activities? - Y/N No Year 5 (if needed) Fe d e r a l Re q u e s t No n - F e d e r a l Re q u e s t Budget Category 1