Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInterlocal Agreements - 2024.03.14 - 41316Lake Angelus City Council Minutes February 13, 2024 Present: Mayor, Leslie DeSimone; Mayor Pro Tem, Christine Fietsam; Council members, George Drake, Tony Messina, Mark Symonds; Treasurer Julie Frakes; City Attorney Gerry Fisher; Police Chief, Mike Farley; Building Official, Brian Keesey; Clerk, Sarah Razzaque Absent: NA Visitors, Residents: Michele Drake, Dan Hemphill, Toni Cusmano, Lisa Kozemchak, Mike Damman, Tim Huemiller, John McNew Visitors, Non-Residents: Boris Usztan, Usztan Construction. 1.Moment of Silence for David Haines Leslie DeSimone calls for a moment of silence honoring the passing of long time lake resident and Council Person, Doctor David Haines. 2.Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Leslie DeSimone opened the meeting at 7:00 pm. 3.Roll Call Leslie DeSimone – Present George Drake -Present Chris Fietsam – Present Tony Messina -Present Mark Symonds -Present 4.Public Comments Regarding Non-Agenda Items Public comments regarding each agenda item shall be heard after presentation and Council discussion, if any, and prior to a Council vote, if any. NA 5.Consent Agenda Sarah Razzaque asks if anyone wants to remove or add any items on the consent agenda. Sarah also notes that the minutes for a meeting are not meant to be a transcript and are a summary of what occurred at a meeting. Sarah is happy to take change requests from City Council members and those will noted and changed. Items on the consent agenda are as follows: a. January ’24 Minutes (modified per Jim Cortez’s request submitted by Chris Fietsam) b. January ’24 General Fund Financial Reports: Target= 58%, Actual= 42.2% c. CD Maturing 2/27/2024 CIBC Renewal 1 d. AEW Inv# 148594, $1,555: Boat Ramp engineering review Mark Symonds motions to approve the consent agenda as amended. Tony Messina seconds. The motion passes unanimously. 6.Vote on New Police Station / Tony Messina Tony Messina reviews what led to including a possible vote on a new police station to tonight’s agenda. Tony would like to thank the previous Councils and Planning Commission, and residents over the last several years for establishing our project scope and budget, commissioning the Request for Proposal and securing bids. In the December Council meeting, Tony volunteered to work with Dan Hemphill and Carl Matisse, who are builders and subject matter experts in construction and the building process. He also worked with Boris Usztan from Usztan Construction, the City’s low and preferred bidder. Value engineering meetings were held between Dan, Carl, and Boris, were held in order to obtain a list of items that would not impact the intent and objectives of the overall build but could lower the project cost. Usztan’s initial bid was 1.3M, second was $975,000. The new number is a roadmap for a building that would be $775,000. This number is not final and would need to be considered at each step. For example, after reviewing the list, our City Attorney has indicated bond is required, feedback has been that vinyl siding may not be preferred, fill dirt may not be needed, a gable could be excluded. Julie Frakes submitted a list of 18 questions regarding cost. Julie’s goal is to get a complete number for what it will take to have a fully working facility. Tony spoke to Boris Usztan regarding payment schedule and timeline. A monthly draw would be required. Tony’s general conclusion is that none of the numbers from Julie’s list are “consequentially significant” or unmanageable to the overall number. Julie would like to understand costs for the following: ○Low voltage requirements for the lighting and IT and computer systems through Oakland County CLEMIS -Boris Usztan does not deal with these things often. Chief states that CLEMIS would need to be involved in who can handle them. ○Security cameras can be handled with a fairly small system that is inexpensive and can be moved from the current station. ○Civil engineering is something that would generally be provided by a third party. AEW estimated approximately $10,000. ○There will be no need for a field office ○Building permit will be at cost from McKenna, approximately $8,000. It was pointed out that in other communities building permits are waived. That is not possible in Lake Angelus because we outsource our Building Department, however it will be less expensive because the work will be completed at cost instead of via regular permit fees. ○We will need to look into office furniture and come up with a price. ○The well will be existing but the equipment will be new. ○Demolition -the proposed demolition cost is for just the Police Station, we will need to get costs for the rest. ○Julie clarifies with Boris Usztan that we would not need “winter condition” charges if we begin in April. Mike Damman asks about vinyl siding and its durability. Mike Damman asks about the concrete reduction, that was for the driveway, that is 4 inches of crushed concrete. George Drake mentions that plowing a gravel driveway can be very difficult to plow and we may get caught with some extra snow services. If it is limestone, that is a great base. Mike Damman also mentions that 8 foot ceilings are quite low and the 9 foot ceiling in the 2 previous design would be much better. Mike knows we want to save money but wants to make sure that we are making the best long term decision. The proposed project is April -October. With the changes that were just discussed, the project would be $850,000, that includes a $10,000 contingency. Tony Messina feels that there will not be 100% predictability, and we need to have trust in our processes and people. Decisions will need to be made during construction, all decisions will be subjected to Dan and Carl’s experience and the approval of council may be required. Mike Damman notes that you need to make sure no changes are made to avoid overruns. Dan Hemphill and Carl Matisse have volunteered to be site supervisors and should be trusted to do the right things for the City. Tony notes that our financial audit shows that this City has rock solid financials and that is because of Julie Frakes. Chris Fietsam so appreciates the due diligence that Juile provides. Tim Huemiller feels that there are a lot of problems with the design that was submitted including questions of if the officer shower is ada compliant. Brian Keesey, the building official, notes that the building inspector reviewed the plans and believes that the plans are ADA compliant but can have them reexamined to confirm. Tim also feels that it is a problem that the building is farther away from the road. Tim also feels that the overhangs are too short. Sarah Razzaque asks if removing the garage had been considered. There was general discussion and it was decided that it should stay. The garage was not heated through value engineering. George Drake notes that he is most concerned about budget. George is going to present spillway reengineering for $88,000 and in a few years, will need an additional $300,000. There is currently only $25,000 in the budget for the dam, and $300,000 scheduled in 8 years. John McNew asks about the process that has taken place since Tony has taken over. John asks about community buy in and if the community understands what is proposed. Julie Frakes asks about access to the dam (in reference to George Drake’s proposed dam project). John McNew has done research regarding the deeds and dam access. He would like to discuss his thoughts with Gerry Fischer because he believes there is an easement for maintaining the dam. He also notes that regardless of a written easement, any court would allow access via prescriptive easement. John notes he would rather get all the projects done with City funds instead of only the Police Station. Julie Frakes was surprised because at the last meeting we discussed renovation and new build and felt that Tony would be coming back with the cost comparison for both. Tony reiterated that when the submitted bids did not support a new building within our budget, renovation was reintroduced as a possibility of staying within our budget. The value engineering work by Carl, Dan and Boris established a roadmap to meet budget AND deliver the plan recommended by the PAC and established and pursued by the city to build a new police station. Tony also reiterated that the stated goal in working with Carl, Dan and Boris was to support a project that delivered a building that corrected all current code violations and achieved compliance, was free from safety and security issues, achieved structural reliability over a reasonable term and was fit for use regardless of rebuild or renovate. Chris Fietsam feels that the way Carl and Dan and Tony value engineered the project with Boris Usztan, it made it so that we are able to meet the budget, which is excellent. Tony introduced that the State of Michigan requires all municipalities to maintain a Fund Balance, i.e, an amount within their budget that may or may not be freely available. The state also requires that each city determines its appropriate Fund Balance percentage. Lake Angelus established a policy that targets a 20% Fund Balance. The state and the GFOA (Government Finance Officers Association) authorizes each city’s governing body to 3 recommit or reassign its established fund balance, especially in cases of upcoming known and significant spending, like that facing Lake Angelus over the next few years for the dam, spillway, boat ramp, police station, city hall roof and others. Tony did not recommend that Lake Angelus recommit our level of Fund Balance. Tony pointed out that going forward, it is a common municipal practice, along with others, that is available to the city, as a temporary, perhaps one year, measure, to accommodate atypical, but necessary spending, should the city council deem it proper and responsible. Tony believes we can find solutions to upholding our financial discipline while accomplishing what’s necessary with our assets that are currently in need. Tony believes a policy target of 20% is right and proper for our city. Leslie DeSimone asks if Tony is willing to find an estimate for renovation, and if it is $450,000, would it really be better to choose to build new, at double the cost? Leslie asks that we do our due diligence. She would like to have Boris look at both options. Tony asks what led the PAC to select a new build. Michele Drake states the chairman of the previous PAC presented their decision and stated it was a “split vote” to renovate when in fact it was 1 for new build, and all of the rest of the members voted to renovate. Leslie DeSimone notes that the Police Station Committee examined renovate, new, or modular. The modular came back at $800,000, a trailer for $800,000 was a non-starter. Then the estimates for new build were thought to be $700,000 so they went in that direction. John McNew, who was previously on the PAC explains the process with new build vs renovation started many years ago. Quotes for renovations were between $150,000 to $400,000. Because it is much easier to cost out a new build using a per square foot cost, it was the most recent decision that new build be considered. The Police Station Committee toured 3 community police stations, including Addison Oaks (a small community) serving a few thousand people. The new build costs needed an RFP, but the cost of architecture was so high that originally the Police Station Committee didn’t pursue it. Once AEW was contracted, it cost $80,000, so you can see why the original PAC was hesitant to contract an architect too early. For 1,340 square feet, the cost was expected to be $400 per square feet max, the original bids came back between 1.3-1.9M, clearly far over the per square foot estimate. John asks, if you could get all of the capital expenses done (dam, City Hall roof, and renovation) if you renovated, for the cost of just one new police station, or could just get the new police station completed, which would you choose? Tony believes the city should abide by its adopted plan as this was the path established and recommended by the PAC, decided upon and invested in by the city and we now have line of sight to maintaining the project budget. John states we have quotes for the dam $388,000, $60,000 for the roof of City Hall and he states we have gotten renovation numbers before. Boris Usztan feels that you have an older building and it will be difficult to continue to maintain and keep up instead of just going with a new building that has everything covered and is completely up to code etc. Boris also notes that it would cost money to move. Dan Hemphill feels if you want to go down the path of renovation, he is out of the discussion. There is discussion regarding a basement and necessity for a garage. Mark Symonds feels if we can swallow $850,000, then we assign a team to manage that. Mark feels that is a well vetted approach. George would like to know if we can swing $88,000 for the spillway. It needs to be reviewed in terms of the budget. Mike Damman suggested we might need to consider a bond. Chris Fietsam suggests we be open minded and strategic in considering financing options. Chris Fietsam feels that you have no idea what you are going to get with renovation. Chris also feels we should recognize Carl and Dan for the huge value and cost savings they are offering. 4 Julie Frakes states that we should reexamine the priorities. Julie advises against a bond as according to MML a bond will cost nearly double whatever you take out. Chris Fietsam feels we should consider a bond. George Drake feels that residents were up in arms over the mention of a bond. Leslie DeSimone feels that we should be maintaining any asset we have and truly take care of it to avoid getting into issues of buildings in disrepair later. Tony Messina speaks to the need for maintenance as well. Julie Frakes notes that Heidi and Mike have done a huge amount of work to bring the City up to date and maintain it. George Drake makes a motion to establish a contract with Usztan Contract with a not to exceed $825.000.00. Chris Fietsam seconds. The motion passes unanimously. Chris Fietsam and Mark Symonds thank Tony Messina, Dan Hemphill, and Carl Matisse for helping get to this point. 7.LAPD/Chief Michael Farley Report Nothing significant to report. Chief is processing 2-3 officers to begin in March. Preparing for the lien audit in summer. Annual registration for mcoles is ongoing. Oldest police car is going to be up for auction within the next month. 8.Building and Permits/McKenna Associates & Planning Commission Updates/Mark Symonds Update No January meeting took place. The Planning Commission meeting is next Tuesday -lighting and setbacks will be discussed. Project at 2455 Lake Angelus is going to be finished by a new contractor and the building department will be working on paperwork with that. 160 Gallogly work is ongoing and a restoration plan will be submitted. A new addition will be coming in for 915 Lake Angelus Road that will be reviewed in March. 2382 & 2384 Lake Angelus Lane seawall replacement is ongoing. 9.Treasurer Report/ Julie Frakes Financial Report Updates Unemployment has increased by a small amount ~$300.00 Budget Leslie DeSimone would like to appoint Tom McGinnis to the Budget Committee. Audit Report 5 6 7 Tony Messina asks about the comment regarding accounting practices. Julie notes the note Tony is referring to in our audit is related to the difference from cash to accrual practices. She also notes that our auditor felt we were doing a great job. Updates Options to transfer LGIP funds to CDs to enhance performance Julie has looked into other options for investments. State bank CD’s and a state investment pool called CLASS, investments are diversified, and participants are municipalities in the State etc. The rate is variable monthly. Chris Fietsam asks if this will impact accessing funds. The answer is no, the funds are able to be withdrawn in a day. Mark Symonds motions to approve the MIClass Participation and Signers Certified Resolution. Leslie DeSimone seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously. DTE Street Light Upgrades DTE will be upgrading our street lights to LEDs, if we participate now, the overall cost will only be $347.00. Police Dispatch Agreement Chris Fietsam motions to approve the Police Dispatch Agreement. Tony Messina seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously. 10.Mayoral Comments Grievance Commission Response Response from Sean Walsh was received late February 12, 2024. The letter was dated January 31, 2024 and the deadline for our response was February 14. We requested an extension and it was granted until Feb 29. Gerry. and Leslie will work on a response. 8 11.Environmental Quality Board / Leslie DeSimone Goosebusters The contract was approved previously and goose egg / nest destruction will occur in the spring. Vote to Approve Lake Management Recommendations Leslie DeSimone reviews the environmental contracts: herbicide from AquaWeed, harvesting from Superior Hoist, and reports from RLS. The Environmental Board recommended the contracts provided a City Attorney reviewed them. Our attorney Kristin Kolb reviewed them and all concerns were resolved and approved by Kristin. The overall costs are: ●$9,000 lake management (RLS) ●$125 per pdu (previously 8 acres) ●$135 per square acre ●$1,632 EGLE permits ●$50 insurance coverage ●$580 per acre for harvesting (last year was $6,000) ●$275 per hour for cleanup We are currently seeking to eradicate the milfoil. We have seen that milfiol is showing up more now where people are bubbling to leave in docks. That is an issue we are keeping an eye on. If we do more than 10 acres of milfoil treatment, we will get a warranty. Mark Symonds makes a motion to extend the meeting by 30 minutes. Leslie DeSimone seconded the motion. The motion passes unanimously. Mark Symonds motions to approve the Superior Hoist, RLS, and AquaWeed contracts. Chris Fietsam seconds. The motion passes unanimously. Fish stocking of pan fish is being followed up on by the EB. Stocking would occur in the fall as that is the recommended time for stocking. Stocking in the fall will allow the fish time to acclimate and grow without ongoing fishing occurring. Generally, pan fish will be the type of fish that is being stocked. 12.Boat Ramp & Spillway Update / George Drake Boat Ramp Update Contract was approved and work is ongoing. Updates on timing will happen over the coming months. Spillway Update 1980 is the last time that the dam was replaced. George reviews the plan created by AEW. The life of the newly proposed spillway would be over 25 years. George Drake is contacting several firms to get estimates for this work, as is AEW. The estimate is $88,000. Replacement of the seawall in the “dam area” could take place later but overall the recommendation is to use steel. The cost would be just under $200,000 to replace the seawall but additional work is needed so overall it would be approximately $300,000. AEW felt the seawall should be replaced in approximately 5 years. That 5 year replacement does seem to track with the previous estimates of extension. 9 There is also discussion of getting an inspection every 5 years. We are now entering the timeframe for our next inspection. George Drake feels we might be able to have AEW complete that as they have just done inspections. There is discussion regarding if the “dam” is a state regulated dam. 13.Road Update / Chris Fietsam Shores Road Fence Update A quote for repair of the fence was provided by the Property Management Committee. Mike Tierney and Chris Fietsam plan on meeting with Oakdale Academy to reset the relationship and explore fence and tree options. Mark Symonds asks about preferences for Oakdale remediation. The preference of the Shores Assn as of now is tree replacement. Communication for Downed Trees There was an incident on Grey Woods Lane with a downed tree and it raised a question about designated contacts for the roads. Chris is proposing and is going to explore identifying point people on each road/area along with a communication text chain. This will also provide the Chief with contacts. RCOC Meeting Update Leslie, Sarah, Julie and Chris met with our RCOC contacts that maintain our roads. We discussed the need for gravel between Rhor and Clintonville on North Lake Angelus Road and at either end of Gallogly Road. There was also important discussion regarding helping maintain the roads including snow plowing, speed, drainage, etc. Chris will put information in the Angelus. Mark Symonds makes a motion to extend the meeting by 15 minutes. Leslie DeSimone seconds. The motion passes unanimously. 14.Clerk’s Report Election -February 27, 2024 Presidential Primary The Presidential Primary will be held on February 27th. There will be 9 days of early voting, we are partnered with Waterford, you should have received a postcard with dates/times. Early voting will be held at the Waterford Library. Day of voting will be held at City Hall. There will also be at least 2 additional elections in 2024 so it will be a busy year! 15.Property Management Property Management Report PMT Report – February 13, 2024 Completed projects December 12 thru January 9: 1. Monitoring, discussing and remedying Snow Removal Services with Ultra. Upcoming Projects: 1. City Hall Roof Replacement – 10 ●Three (large/boards) color samples of DaVinci were delivered to our City Clerk by Jim Mullins of D&W for Councils’ evaluation. https://www.davinciroofscapes.com/ ●DaVinci has nine color and five width options. ●DaVinci synthetic roofing shakes feature a thick 5/8" inch butt end. ●Three (small) color samples of CeDUR Composite were delivered to our City Clerk by Marc Renner for Councils’ evaluation. https://www.cedur.com/ ●CeDUR has 4 color and 3 width options. ●CeDUR synthetic roofing shakes feature a thick 3/4" inch butt end. ●Both composite roofing brands DaVinci & CeDUR, have Class A Fire Resistance (better than real wood shake), Class 4 Impact Resistance (the highest) and 110 MPH Wind Resistance. ●Both synthetic products will shift color upon exposure to the Sun to mimic the aging of real cedar (or so they say), but won’t change color significantly. ●Both products have a 50 Year Lifetime Limited Warranty. ●Both products are resistant to rotting, cracking, and pests. ●Both products can be installed using multi width shingles, in a staggered fashion, much like the roof we have today. ●A synthetic roof makes it possible to keep the intended architectural wood shake look of historic structures while meeting modern day performance requirements. It also provides ~ 20% greater insulation value than natural heavy cedar shakes. ●A real cedar roof maintains the historic value of City Hall using natural materials as were available at the time it was constructed. ●An estimate for a single cedar shake treatment with an oil based liquid for our City Hall roof is ~ $6-8 K which needs to be applied approximately every 5 years. ●We were told that there would be a price increase on roofing materials sometime in March. A. Butcher and Butcher (Noah Patrick/Mark Dalrymple) i. $59,900 for pressure treated with preservative, cedar shake – CCA Chromated Copper Arsenate)Cedar Perfection (50 year limited warranty) ii. $59,900 for DaVinci Multi Width Synthetic shingles B. Renner Brothers Construction, Inc. (Marc Renner) i. $60,176 for pressure treated with preservative, cedar shake (most comprehensive quote) ii. $50,968 for DaVinci Multi Width Synthetic shingles iii. $56,749 for CeDUR Shake Roof System Synthetic shingles a.Adder options include: ●Fabricate and install rain diverter above main entrance door using 16 oz copper, to be installed 2 courses above gutters to remain; eliminate gutter at eave of same -$1,912.00 ●Install copper drip edge around perimeter of roof -$2,768.00 ●Installation of copper strips every 6 feet for algae control -$4,113.00 (this may eliminate the need to clean and teat the real cedar shingles) C. D&W (Jim Mullins) i. $46,050 for Alaskan Yellow cedar shake – non-treated ii. $48,250 for pressure treated with preservative, cedar shake iii. $41,950 for DaVinci Multi Width Synthetic shingles 11 2. Mosquito Joe Contract for mosquito/tick spraying of our City Recreation space around the tennis courts and golf tee box - ●City Council has the choice of spraying with a botanical product which was applied last year in 2023, or a synthetic chemical which we used the year before in 2022. ●Each product is the same price per application. However, as the residents noticed last year, the botanical did not keep the mosquitos away. Mosquito Joe also confirmed that they found that spraying the botanical every 3 weeks did not resolve the mosquito issue. They are now recommending that the botanical be applied every 2 weeks, and the synthetic can be applied every 3 weeks to keep the mosquitos at bay. ●The Botanical will need 15 treatments, making it more expensive. ●The Synthetic will need 12 treatments. ●We have the option to prepay by March 31 st to save 10%. ●Treatments begin at the beginning of April and conclude at the end of October. ●Mosquito Joe works with us to split our “prepayment” into two payments, one prior to March 31 and the second the first week of July splitting our payments into our fiscal years in which the treatments take place. ●Botanicals are used more often when you have children and pets playing on the treated surface. ●City Council will need to make a decision on the treatment plan in the February or March Council meeting so that we can begin treatments in April and to take advantage of the prepay discount. ●The pricing is as follows, and the below figures DO include the 10% prepay discount. i. 15 Botanical treatments grand total $3,050.85 ●$1,627.12 (8 treatments for April thru June) ●$1,423.73 (7 treatments for July through October) ii. 12 Synthetic treatments grand total $2,711.88. ●$1,220.35 (6 treatments April thru June) ●$1,220.35 (6 treatments July through October) Open Ended/Future Projects: 1. Boat Ramp Repair/Replacement – Contract awarded to Advanced Lakefront Services and will begin in the Spring when Advance Concrete Products manufactures the engineered concrete slabs per AEW recommendations. 2. Boat Ramp Signage – will order approved signs in the Spring. 3. City Hall Roof Replacement – Contractor TBD 4. Work with Gary Parlove and Brad Rachwal to get the bell installed in the Spring when it’s warm. 5. City Courts 2024 Crack Repair to take place in late spring – contract signed with Goddard coatings. 6. Fence Repair: Shores Road Oakdale Academy – Project Go -No Go/Contractor TBD 7. City Hall Staircases Repair -Project Go – No Go/Contractor TBD 8. Barn Window Replacement and Siding Repair/Painting – Project Go – No Go/Contractor TBD 9. Other Projects ??? 12 NOTE:The PMT will not be attending the Jan – Apr, 4 months, of City Council meetings. We will be corresponding via email and phone calls only. Mosquito/Tick Spraying The Property Management Team recommended approving a tick/mosquito treatment this meeting. Leslie DeSimone looked into Synthetics and she notes that they will kill butterflies, larvae and more. Leslie would like to see some MSDS sheets on these chemicals if we use them. The botanicals are more peppermint oils etc. Julie Frakes points out that we began treating the recreation area (tennis courts, garden, golf range) originally to resolve a tick issue. She did see a big reduction in the amount of ticks and mosquitos as a result. Chris Fietsam makes a motion for Mosquito Joe contract for botanicals. Leslie DeSimone seconds. The motion passes unanimously. City Hall Roof Discussion Postponed due to time constraints. At 9:37 pm Chris Fietsam moved to adjourn the meeting. Leslie DeSimone seconded the motion. The motion passes unanimously. The next Council meeting will be March 12, 2024, at 7pm in person. Respectfully Submitted, Sarah Razzaque, Clerk 13 AGENDA ITEM: Police Dispatch Service Agreement with the City of Lake Angelus, April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2027 DEPARTMENT: Sheriff’s Office MEETING: Board of Commissioners DATE: Thursday, March 14, 2024 9:30 AM - Click to View Agenda ITEM SUMMARY SHEET COMMITTEE REPORT TO BOARD Resolution #2024-3835 Motion to approve the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office 2024-2027 Police Dispatch Services Agreement with the City of Lake Angelus and authorize the Chair of the Board of Commissioners to execute the attached agreement. ITEM CATEGORY SPONSORED BY Interlocal Agreement Penny Luebs INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND For several years, the Oakland County Sheriff has contracted with the City of Lake Angelus for dispatch services. The current dispatch services agreement (M.R. 21118) expires on March 31, 2024. The City of Lake Angelus has requested Police Dispatch services from the Oakland County Sheriff for the period of April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2027. The police dispatch agreement rates were established for the period of: - April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025 are $8,216 per Full Time Eligible (FTE) or $25,248 annually (including $20.00 per warrant) - April 1, 2025 – March 31, 2026 are $8,487 per FTE or $26,079 annually (including $20.60 per warrant) - April 1, 2026 – March 31, 2027 are $8,767 per FTE or $26,938 annually (including $21.22 per warrant) The City of Lake Angelus has agreed to the attached Agreement which incorporates the current rates as established by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners. POLICY ANALYSIS The annual revenue and expenditures for these contracts are reflected in the budget amendment for FY 2024 – FY 2027 included with Resolution 2024-3818 titled Sheriff’s Office – Establishment of Dispatch Services Contract Rates – April 1, 2024 through March 31, 2027 and Positions Creation. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: No Committee members can contact Michael Andrews, Policy and Fiscal Analysis Supervisor at 248.425.5572 or andrewsmb@oakgov.com or the department contact persons listed for additional information. CONTACT Curtis Childs, Undersheriff Gaia Piir, Sheriff Fiscal Officer ITEM REVIEW TRACKING Aaron Snover, Board of Commissioners Created/Initiated - 3/14/2024 AGENDA DEADLINE: 03/14/2024 9:30 AM ATTACHMENTS 1. 2024-2027 Lake Angelus Police Dispatch Agreement w.warrant COMMITTEE TRACKING 2024-03-05 Public Health & Safety - Recommend to Board 2024-03-14 Full Board - Adopt Motioned by: Commissioner Penny Luebs Seconded by: Commissioner William Miller III Yes: David Woodward, Penny Luebs, Kristen Nelson, Gwen Markham, Angela Powell, William Miller III, Yolanda Smith Charles, Charles Cavell, Ajay Raman, Ann Erickson Gault, Linnie Taylor (11) No: Karen Joliat, Christine Long, Robert Hoffman, Philip Weipert (4) Abstain: None (0) Absent: Michael Spisz, Marcia Gershenson, Brendan Johnson, Michael Gingell (4) Passed 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 1 of 8 2024 – 2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2027 This Agreement is made and entered into between the COUNTY OF OAKLAND, a Michigan Constitutional and Municipal Corporation, whose address is 1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, Michigan 48341 (COUNTY), and the CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS, a Michigan Constitutional and Municipal Corporation, whose address is 45 Gallogly Road, Lake Angelus, Michigan 48326 (MUNICIPALITY). In this Agreement, the COUNTY shall also be represented by the OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFF, in their official capacity as a Michigan Constitutional Officer, whose address is 1200 North Telegraph Road, Bldg. 38 E., Pontiac, Michigan 48341 (SHERIFF). In this Agreement, whenever the COUNTY and the SHERIFF are intended to be referred to jointly, they shall be referred to as the "OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE" (O.C.S.O.). INTRODUCTION WHEREAS, the MUNICIPALITY is authorized by law to provide police protection service for its residents; and WHEREAS, to provide effective police protection services for its residents, the MUNICIPALITY must also provide municipal police department communication and dispatch functions; and WHEREAS, the O.C.S.O. provides police communication and dispatch functions and has the capability to provide fire dispatch for the MUNICIPALITY but, absent this Agreement, is not obligated to provide POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE for the MUNICIPALITY; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY may enter into a contract by which the O.C.S.O. would provide POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE for the MUNICIPALITY; and WHEREAS, the MUNICIPALITY has concluded that it is more cost effective for the MUNICIPALITY to contract for POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE with the O.C.S.O. than to equip and staff its own police communication and dispatch center; and WHEREAS, the O.C.S.O. agrees to provide POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE for the MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL, under the following terms and conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. The COUNTY, with the cooperation and approval of the SHERIFF, shall, in conjunction with its existing O.C.S.O. police communication functions, provide POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE to POLICE PERSONNEL for the MUNICIPALITY. 2. For all purposes and as used throughout this Agreement, the words and expressions listed below, whether used in the singular or plural, within or without quotation marks, or possessive or non-possessive, shall be defined, read, and interpreted as follows: 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 2 of 8 a. "POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE" shall be defined to include: any emergency or non- emergency telephone call or notice, of any kind, received by the O.C.S.O., which either requests, requires or, in the sole judgment of the O.C.S.O. or designated COUNTY AGENT(S), appears to request or require the presence, attention, or services of any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL to address, respond, or attend to any issue, event, or circumstance involving public safety, a breach of peace, public health, an accident or accidental injury, the protection of property, or any emergency (including, but not limited to criminal, medical, fire, health, civil disputes, and/or civil infractions), which results in any O.C.S.O. or designated COUNTY AGENT(S) radio communication, or any attempted radio communication, to any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL. Said services shall also include the entry of warrants into the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN) at the request of MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL, the storage by O.C.S.O. of said warrants after entry into LEIN, the updating of information stored in LEIN upon timely notification by the MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL of any changes to the status or continued validity of a warrant entered into LEIN, and the confirmation, when requested, of the existence and continued validity of said warrants upon request by authorized law enforcement officers and agents. b. "MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL" shall be defined to include: any and all uniformed, non-uniformed, civilian, command, volunteer, administrative and/or supervisory personnel employed and/or contracted by the MUNICIPALITY either to provide, supply, support, administer, or direct any MUNICIPALITY police or law enforcement services and/or any persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with any of them; or any other MUNICIPALITY official, officer, employee or agent whose MUNICIPALITY job duties may include the receipt of any O.C.S.O. POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE(S). c. "COUNTY AGENT(S)" shall be defined to include the OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFF and any and all other COUNTY elected and appointed officials, commissioners, officers, boards, committees, commissions, departments, divisions, volunteers, employees (including any SHERIFF'S DEPUTY or SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES), agents, representatives, contractors, predecessors, successors, assigns, attorneys, or auditors (whether such persons act or acted in their personal, representative, or official capacities), and any and all persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with any of them. COUNTY AGENT(S) as defined in this Agreement shall also include any person who was a COUNTY AGENT(S) at any time during the term of this Agreement but, for any reason, is no longer employed, appointed, or elected in his/her previous capacity. d. "CLAIM(S)" shall be defined to include any and all losses, complaints, demands for relief or damages, lawsuits, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, deficiencies, penalties, and costs and expenses, including, but not limited to, any reimbursement for reasonable attorney fees, witness fees, court costs, investigation and/or litigation expenses, any amounts paid in settlement, or any other amount for which either party becomes legally and/or contractually obligated to pay, or any other liabilities of any kind whatsoever whether direct, indirect or consequential, whether based upon any 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 3 of 8 alleged violation of the constitution (federal or state), any statute, rule, regulation, or the common law, whether in law or equity, tort, contract, or otherwise, and/or whether commenced or threatened. 3. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that under the terms of this Agreement, except for the POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE(S) expressly contracted for herein, neither the O.C.S.O. nor any COUNTY AGENT shall be obligated, in any other way, to provide or assist the MUNICIPALITY or any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL with any other direct, indirect, backup, or supplemental support or police or emergency-related service or protection, of any kind or nature whatsoever, or required to send any COUNTY AGENT(S) to respond, in any way, to any call for MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL services. 4. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that it shall, at all times and under all circumstances, remain solely and exclusively responsible for all costs and liabilities associated with providing available on-duty MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL to receive and respond to any POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE in a timely and professional manner. 5. The MUNICIPALITY acknowledges that there may be circumstances when, despite all reasonable O.C.S.O. or COUNTY AGENT efforts, an O.C.S.O. or COUNTY AGENT attempt to communicate or provide POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE for MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL may be unsuccessful and, as a result, MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL'S timely response to a call for MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL assistance may not be forthcoming. 6. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that this Agreement does not, and is not intended to, include any O.C.S.O. warranty, promise, or guaranty, of any kind or nature whatsoever, concerning the provision of POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE(S) to the MUNICIPALITY except that the COUNTY will make a reasonable effort to provide POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE(S) for MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL consistent with existing O.C.S.O. communication and dispatching policies, procedures, orders, and standards. 7. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that under the terms of this Agreement the MUNICIPALITY shall be solely and exclusively responsible for all fees, costs, expenses, and liabilities, including any connectively costs, associated with the purchase, lease, operation, and/or use of any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL radio or other communication equipment, and that the O.C.S.O. shall not be obligated to provide any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL with any radio or other communication equipment of any kind. Similarly, the COUNTY agrees that the MUNICIPALITY shall not be obligated under the terms of this Agreement to supply or provide the O.C.S.O. with any additional telephones, telephone lines, radios, or other communications equipment or property. 8. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that this Agreement does not, and is not intended to, obligate or require the O.C.S.O. to change, alter, modify, or develop any different dispatch related codes, policies, practices or procedures; purchase or use any special or additional equipment; or, alternatively, prohibit the O.C.S.O. from implementing any future communication-related changes that the O.C.S.O., in its judgment and discretion, believes to be in its best interest. 9. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that it shall be solely and exclusively responsible, during the term of this Agreement, for guaranteeing that: (a) all MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL radios and/or other communication equipment will be properly set and adjusted to receive any 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 4 of 8 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE(S) from the O.C.S.O. and/or COUNTY AGENT(S) and otherwise maintained in full and proper working order; (b) all MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL will be adequately trained and will comply with all applicable O.C.S.O. communication codes, practices, policies and procedures, as well as any applicable state or federal (FCC) communication requirements; (c) the MUNICIPALITY and all MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL shall, at all times, promptly and properly notify the designated COUNTY AGENT(S) of any on-duty or off-duty status and/or availability or unavailability of MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL to receive POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE(S) from the O.C.S.O.; and (d) all MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL radio and communication equipment, policies, practices and procedures shall conform to those of the O.C.S.O. as they now exist or may be changed in the future. 10. Subject to the following Paragraph, and unless canceled as provided for in this Paragraph, this Agreement shall become effective on April 1, 2024 and shall remain in effect continuously until it expires, without any further act or notice being required of any party, at 11:59 P.M. on March 31, 2027. The COUNTY, the SHERIFF, or the MUNICIPALITY may cancel this Agreement, for any reason, including the convenience of any party, and without any penalty, before its March 31, 2027 expiration by delivering a written notice of the cancellation of this Agreement to the other signatories to this Agreement, or their successors in office. Such written notice shall provide at least a ninety (90) calendar day notice of the effective date of cancellation, and such cancellation of this Agreement shall be effective at 11:59 P.M. on the last calendar day of the calendar month following the expiration of the 90 calendar day notice period. 11. This Agreement, and any subsequent amendments, shall not become effective prior to the approval by concurrent resolutions of the COUNTY Board of Commissioners and the MUNICIPALITY’s Governing Body. The approval and terms of this Agreement shall be entered into the official minutes and proceedings of the COUNTY Board of Commissioners and the MUNICIPALITY’s Governing Body and also shall be filed with the Office of the Clerk for the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY. In addition, this Agreement, and any subsequent amendments, shall be filed by a designated COUNTY AGENT(S) with the Secretary of State for the State of Michigan and shall not become effective prior to the filing of this Agreement with the Secretary of State. 12. In consideration of the COUNTY'S promises and efforts under this Agreement, the MUNICIPALITY agrees to pay to the COUNTY $2,104.00 per month for the months of April 1, 2024 through March 31, 2025; $2,173.25 per month for the months of April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026; and $2,244.80 per month for the months of April 1, 2026 through March 31, 2027. Said payments shall be made as follows: a. The COUNTY shall send an invoice to the MUNICIPALITY each month for services rendered the previous month. The MUNICIPALITY shall have 30 days from the date of each invoice to make payment. b. All Monthly payments shall be due and payable by the MUNICIPALITY without any further notice or demand from the COUNTY. 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 5 of 8 c. Each such payment shall clearly identify that it is a monthly payment being made pursuant to this Agreement and identify the calendar month for which the MUNICIPALITY intended the payment to apply. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that the COUNTY, in its discretion, may apply any monthly payment received from the MUNICIPALITY to any past due amount or monthly payment then due and owing to the COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement. 13. If the MUNICIPALITY fails, for any reason, to pay the COUNTY any moneys due when and as due under this Agreement, the MUNICIPALITY agrees that unless expressly prohibited by law, the COUNTY or the County Treasurer, at their sole option, shall be entitled to setoff from any other MUNICIPALITY funds that are in the COUNTY’S possession for any reason. Funds include but are not limited to the Delinquent Tax Revolving Fund (DTRF). Any setoff or retention of funds by the COUNTY shall be deemed a voluntary assignment of the amount by the MUNICIPALITY to the COUNTY. The MUNICIPALITY waives any CLAIMS against the COUNTY or its Officials for any acts related specifically to the COUNTY’S offsetting or retaining such amounts. This paragraph shall not limit the MUNICIPALITY’s legal right to dispute whether the underlying amount retained by the COUNTY was actually due and owing under this Agreement. If the COUNTY chooses not to exercise its right to setoff or if any setoff is insufficient to fully pay the COUNTY any amounts due and owing the COUNTY under this Agreement, the COUNTY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHARGE UP TO THE THEN- MAXIMUM LEGAL INTEREST ON ANY UNPAID AMOUNT. Interest charges shall be in addition to any other amounts due to the COUNTY under this Agreement. Interest charges shall be calculated using the daily unpaid balance method and accumulate until all outstanding amounts and accumulated interest are fully paid. Nothing in this paragraph shall operate to limit the COUNTY’S right to pursue or exercise any other legal rights or remedies under this Agreement against the MUNICIPALITY to secure reimbursement of amounts due to the COUNTY under this Agreement. The remedies in this paragraph shall be available to the COUNTY on an ongoing and successive basis if the MUNICIPALITY at any time becomes delinquent in its payment. Notwithstanding any other term and condition in this Agreement, if the COUNTY pursues any legal action in any court to secure its payment under this Agreement, the MUNICIPALITY agrees to pay all costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and court costs, incurred by the COUNTY in the collection of any amount owed by the MUNICIPALITY. 14. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that all MUNICIPALITY representations, liabilities, payment obligations, and/or any other related obligations provided for in this Agreement with regard to any acts, occurrences, events, transactions, or CLAIM(S), either occurring or having their basis in any events or transactions that occurred before the cancellation or expiration of this Agreement, shall survive the cancellation or expiration of this Agreement. The parties agree that the expiration, cancellation, or termination of this Agreement shall be without prejudice to any rights or claims of either party against the other and shall not relieve either party of any obligations which, by their nature, survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 15. Each Party shall be responsible for any CLAIM made against that Party and for the acts of its employees or agents. 16. In any CLAIM that may arise from the performance of this Agreement, each Party shall seek its own legal representation and bear the costs associated with such representation, including any attorney fees. 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 6 of 8 17. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, neither Party shall have any right under any legal principle to be indemnified by the other Party or any of its agents or employees in connection with any CLAIM. 18. This Agreement does not, and is not intended to, impair, divest, delegate or contravene any constitutional, statutory, and/or other legal right, privilege, power, obligation, duty, or immunity of the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of governmental immunity for either Party. 19. The MUNICIPALITY and the COUNTY agree that neither the COUNTY nor any COUNTY AGENT(S), by virtue of this Agreement or otherwise, shall be considered or asserted to be employees of the MUNICIPALITY and further agree that, at all times and for all purposes under the terms of this Agreement, the COUNTY and/or any COUNTY AGENT(S) legal status and relationship to the MUNICIPALITY shall be that of an Independent Contractor. The parties also agree that no MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL or any other MUNICIPALITY employee shall, by virtue of this Agreement or otherwise, be considered or asserted to be an employee, agent, or working under the supervision and control of the COUNTY and/or any COUNTY AGENT(S). 20. The MUNICIPALITY and the COUNTY agree that, at all times and for all purposes relevant to this Agreement, the MUNICIPALITY and the O.C.S.O. shall each remain the sole and exclusive employer of each of their respective employees. The MUNICIPALITY and the COUNTY each agree to remain solely and exclusively responsible for the payment of each of their respective employees' wages, compensation, overtime wages, expenses, fringe benefits, pension or retirement benefits, training expenses, or other allowances or reimbursements of any kind, including, but not limited to, workers' disability compensation, unemployment compensation, Social Security Act protection(s) and benefits, employment taxes, or any other statutory or contractual right or benefit based, in any way, upon employment of any COUNTY AGENT(S) or any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL or any other MUNICIPAL employee. 21. This Agreement does not, and is not it intended to, create, change, modify, supplement, supersede, or otherwise affect or control, in any manner, any term(s) or condition(s) of employment of any COUNTY AGENT(S), any applicable O.C.S.O. employment and/or union contract(s), any level(s) or amount(s) of supervision, any standard(s) of performance, any sequence or manner of performance, and/or any O.C.S.O. rule(s), regulation(s), training and education standard(s), hours of work, shift assignment(s), order(s), policy(ies), procedure(s), directive(s), ethical guideline(s), etc., which shall, solely and exclusively, govern and control the employment relationship between the O.C.S.O. and/or all conduct and actions of any COUNTY AGENT(S). 22. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that neither the MUNICIPALITY nor any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL shall provide, furnish or assign any COUNTY AGENT(S) with any job instructions, job descriptions, job specifications, or job duties, or, in any manner, attempt to control, supervise, train, or direct any COUNTY AGENT(S) in the performance of any COUNTY or COUNTY AGENT(S) duty or obligation under the terms of this Agreement. 23. The MUNICIPALITY agrees that it shall promptly deliver to the O.C.S.O. written notice and copies of any CLAIM(S), complaint(s), charge(s), or any other accusation(s) or allegation(s) of negligence or other wrongdoing, whether civil or criminal in nature, that the MUNICIPALITY becomes aware of which involves, in any way, the O.C.S.O. or any COUNTY AGENT(S). The 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 7 of 8 MUNICIPALITY agrees to cooperate with the O.C.S.O. in any investigation conducted by the SHERIFF of any act(s) or performance of any duties by any COUNTY AGENT(S). 24. All correspondence and written notices required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and sent to each of the signatories of this Agreement, or any signatory successor in office, to the addresses shown in this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided for herein, all correspondence or written notices shall be considered effective: (a) the next business day, if personally delivered; (b) the third business day, if sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; (c) the next business day, if sent by a nationally recognized overnight express courier with a reliable tracking system; or (d) the next business day with a written response or receipt of confirmation, if sent by e- mail or fax. 25. This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of Michigan and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of Michigan. The language of all parts of this Agreement is intended to and, in all cases, shall be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not construed strictly for or against any party. As used in this Agreement, the singular or plural number, possessive or non-possessive, shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so suggests or requires. 26. Absent an express written waiver, the failure of any party to pursue any right granted under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that right regarding any existing or subsequent breach or default under this Agreement. No failure or delay on the part of any party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall a single or partial exercise of any right, power or privilege preclude any other or further exercise of any other right, power or privilege. 27. The COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY acknowledge that this Agreement shall be binding upon each of them and, to the extent permitted by law, upon their administrators, representatives, executors, successors and assigns, and all persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with any of them. 28. The MUNICIPALITY acknowledges that it has reviewed all of its current or proposed contracts, including any and all labor or union contracts with any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL, and hereby warrants that the MUNICIPALITY does not have and will not have at any time during the term of this Agreement, any other contractual agreements that will in any manner restrict, interfere with, or prohibit the MUNICIPALITY and any MUNICIPAL POLICE PERSONNEL, or any other person from complying with the MUNICIPALITY’s obligations and duties as set forth in this Agreement and/or the MUNICIPAL POLICE DISPATCH SERVICES as described herein. 29. This Agreement sets forth the entire contract and understanding between the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY and fully supersedes any and all prior oral or written understandings, communications, or contracts between the Parties related to the subject matter hereof. It is further understood and agreed that the terms of this Agreement are contractual and are not a mere recital and that there are no other contracts, understandings, or representations between the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY in any way related to the subject matter hereof, except as expressly stated herein. This Agreement shall not be changed or supplemented orally. This Agreement may be amended only by concurrent resolutions of the COUNTY Board of Commissioners and the MUNICIPALITY’s Governing Body in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. 2024-2027 POLICE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS Page 8 of 8 30. For and in consideration of the mutual promises, acknowledgments, representations, and agreements set forth in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY hereby agree and promise to be bound by the terms and provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Leslie DeSimone, Mayor of the City of Lake Angelus, hereby acknowledges that he has been authorized by a resolution of the MUNICIPALITY’s Governing Body (a certified copy of which is attached) to execute this Agreement on behalf of the MUNICIPALITY and hereby accepts and binds the MUNICIPALITY to the terms and conditions of this Agreement on this _____ day of __________, 2024. WITNESS: ____________________________________ Name: Title: CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS, a Michigan Municipal Corporation BY: ________________________________ Leslie DeSimone Mayor, City of Lake Angelus IN WITNESS WHEREOF, David T. Woodward, Chairperson, Oakland County Board of Commissioners, hereby acknowledges that he has been authorized by a resolution of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners (a certified copy of which is attached) to execute this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and hereby accepts and binds the COUNTY to the terms and conditions of this Agreement on this ______ day of _______________, 2024. WITNESS: ____________________________________ Name: Title: COUNTY OF OAKLAND, a Michigan Municipal Corporation BY: ________________________________ David T. Woodward Chairperson, Oakland County Board of Commissioners IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Michael J. Bouchard, in his official capacity as SHERIFF, hereby concurs and accepts the terms and conditions of this Agreement on this ______ day of _______________, 2024. WITNESS: ____________________________________ Name: Title: OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFF, a Michigan Constitutional Officer BY: _______________________________ Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland County Sheriff July 16, 2024 Michigan Department of State Office of the Great Seal Richard H. Austin Building, 1st Floor 430 W. Allegan Lansing, MI 48918 Dear Office of the Great Seal: On March 14, 2024, the Board of Commissioners for Oakland County entered into an agreement per BA #2024-3835 – Sheriff’s Office – 2024-2027 Police Dispatch Service Agreement between County of Oakland and City of Lake Angelus. As required by Urban Cooperation Act 7 of 1967 - MCL 124.510(4), a copy of the signed agreement with the County of Oakland and the City of Lake Angelus, and the authorizing Board of Commissioners Resolution are enclosed for filing by your office. Send confirmation of receipt of this agreement to: Mr. Joseph Rozell, Director of Elections Oakland County Clerk/Register of Deeds County Service Center, Building #14 East 1200 N. Telegraph Rd. Pontiac, MI 48341 (Please include our Miscellaneous Resolution or Board Action number on the confirmation of receipt letter for filing purposes.) Contact our office at (248) 858-0564 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, COUNTY OF OAKLAND Joseph J. Rozell, CERA Director of Elections Cc: Pat Davis, Corporation Counsel, Oakland County Donna Dyer, Corporation Counsel, Oakland County Liz Skwarczewski, Tech Specialist, Oakland County Sarah Razzaque, Clerk, City of Lake Angelus Enclosures David T. Woodward (May 28, 2024 14:48 EDT)