HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2024.07.18 - 41373
AGENDA ITEM: Approving Language for an Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission
Millage to Appear on the November 5, 2024 Ballot
DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation
MEETING: Board of Commissioners
DATE: Thursday, July 18, 2024 6:00 PM - Click to View Agenda
ITEM SUMMARY SHEET
COMMITTEE REPORT TO BOARD
Resolution #2024-4191 _ 24-59
Motion to adopt the attached suggested resolution.
ITEM CATEGORY SPONSORED BY
Resolution Brendan Johnson
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The resolution authorizes the placement of a question on the November 5, 2024 ballot that would
replace the existing voter approved .35 millage levy authorized through 2029 with a new millage
levy of .65 mills authorized through 2043. The purpose of this proposal is to provide voters with an
opportunity to consider increasing funding to support the operations and activities of Oakland
County Parks (OCP) and to enhance recreational opportunities in Oakland County. Under the
"Great Parks for All" plan, increased revenues will be utilized to:
• Fund an estimated $100 million comprehensive revitalization plan within the Oakland County
Parks System and ongoing capital improvement needs;
• Eliminate general park entry fees (not including pay-to-play services like golf, campgrounds,
ORV, and waterparks);
• Expand partnerships with local governments to develop and revitalize parks and enhance
recreational opportunities;
• Acquire and protect high-priority sensitive natural areas and native habitats;
• Support the development and maintenance of regional trailways;
• Establish recreational corridors centered on Oakland County's major rivers;
• Create universal access for Oakland County students to participate in high-quality outdoor
educational programs and experiences;
• Enhance accessibility for individuals of all abilities and backgrounds to participate in
recreational activities.
If approved, the millage would generate approximately $24 million annually (a total of $52 million
combined with the existing .35 levy) before reductions due to local tax capture and delinquencies.
The impact of the increase would be $40 a year for a homeowner with the average residential
taxable value of real property in Oakland County ($134,002). Extending the duration of the millage
to a 20-year period would allow Oakland County Parks to access low-interest bond financing for
major capital improvement projects and provide for better long-term financial planning.
Oakland County Parks engaged a respected independent polling firm, Glengariff Inc., to conduct a
statistically accurate and representative survey of Oakland County voters in April. The results of this
survey indicate there is strong voter support for the proposal in all regions of Oakland County and
stronger support to provide voters with an opportunity to consider this proposal by placing it on the
ballot.
POLICY ANALYSIS
The request is to authorize the language stated in the resolution to be placed on the November 4,
2024, ballot to approve a .65 mill for 20 years to support the County Parks, which is an increase of
.30 mills. It is estimated that the millage would generate $52,191,139 in 2024. If the millage is
approved, all County residents would receive free general park admission at all County parks. In
addition, the funding would help with costs to operate, improve, expand, maintain, and acquire
parks, recreational facilities, open spaces, lakes, rivers, water areas, and trailways, which would
help achieve the County's sustainability objectives. The funding would also support educational and
health programs for county residents. This request addresses Board of Commissioner DEI
objectives by enhancing accessibility of recreation for individuals of all abilities and backgrounds.
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: No
Committee members can contact Michael Andrews, Policy and Fiscal Analysis Supervisor at
248.425.5572 or andrewsmb@oakgov.com or the department contact persons listed for additional
information.
CONTACT
Chris Ward, Director Parks & Recreation
ITEM REVIEW TRACKING
Aaron Snover, Board of Commissioners Created/Initiated - 7/24/2024
David Woodward, Board of Commissioners Approved - 7/24/2024
David Coulter, Executive's Office Approved - 7/24/2024
Lisa Brown, Clerk/Register of Deeds Final Approval - 7/24/2024
AGENDA DEADLINE: 07/18/2024 6:00 PM
ATTACHMENTS
1. OCPRMillageSurveykeyfindings
2. GrtParksforAll
3. 2024-07-09 scan LAGO P&R Millage support Info sheet and letters
COMMITTEE TRACKING
2024-07-09 Legislative Affairs & Government Operations - Recommend to Board
2024-07-18 Full Board - Adopt
Motioned by: Commissioner Brendan Johnson
Seconded by: Commissioner Yolanda Smith Charles
Yes: David Woodward, Michael Gingell, Penny Luebs, Kristen Nelson, Christine Long, Philip
Weipert, Gwen Markham, Angela Powell, Marcia Gershenson, William Miller III, Yolanda Smith
Charles, Charles Cavell, Brendan Johnson, Ajay Raman, Ann Erickson Gault, Linnie Taylor (16)
No: Michael Spisz, Karen Joliat, Robert Hoffman (3)
Abstain: None (0)
Absent: (0)
Passed
July 18, 2024
RESOLUTION #2024-4191 _ 24-59
Sponsored By: Brendan Johnson
Parks & Recreation - Approving Language for an Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Commission Millage to Appear on the November 5, 2024 Ballot
Chair and Members of the Board:
WHEREAS it is the mission of the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission (“OCPRC”) to
create and operate accessible, welcoming, and sustainable parks and public spaces, provide
recreational and educational opportunities, preserve open space and environmental stewardship, to
help all people be healthier and build resilient, connected communities; and
WHEREAS OCPRC’s vision is that everyone in Oakland County has access to a park, public space,
or recreational opportunity to relax, be active, socialize and connect with nature; and
WHEREAS high-quality parks and recreational opportunities have been proven to contribute to
economic prosperity, support increased property values and improve quality of life for residents; and
WHEREAS in the last two years, OCPRC has provided more than $2 million in financial assistance
and direct services, benefitting 30 local governments and non-profit agencies, to support local
recreation projects and natural resources stewardship; and
WHEREAS chronic inadequate capital funding has limited OCPRC’s ability to keep pace with needed
repairs, renovations, and replacement of facilities and amenities throughout the park system; and
WHEREAS OCPRC currently lacks the ability to access low-interest financing tools typically utilized
by governments for capital improvements due to the limited duration of its millage levy; and
WHEREAS additional millage revenues will allow OCPRC to eliminate all general park entry fees,
providing residents with free access to nearly 7200 acres of parkland at 17 locations throughout the
County; and
WHEREAS additional millage revenues will be utilized to finance an estimated $100 million
comprehensive park system revitalization and modernization plan to meet the needs of guests now
and in the future. Funding will be utilized to update and enhance facilities, including trailways,
waterparks, golf courses, campgrounds, playgrounds, dog parks, gathering spaces, athletic fields,
farmers markets, and general park infrastructure; and
WHEREAS additional millage revenues will be utilized to ensure people of all abilities, ages, and
backgrounds have access to high-quality recreational experiences; and
WHEREAS additional millage revenues will allow OCPRC to continue to pursue collaborative efforts
and partnerships that result in improved recreational opportunities for residents and expanded
services in all areas of the County; and
WHEREAS additional millage revenues will be utilized to actively pursue the acquisition,
conservation, and stewardship of wetlands, green spaces, wildlife habitats, and waterways that are at
risk from development and destruction; and
WHEREAS OCPRC will utilize additional millage revenues to invest in new and expanded
recreational opportunities for residents, including regional trailways, river recreational corridors,
outdoor education programming, new and expanded parks, and more; and
WHEREAS extending the duration of OCPRC’s millage to 20 years will facilitate improved long-term
fiscal management and provide access to low-interest financing to sustain continual improvements to
the park system; and
WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the Board of
Commissioners provide the voters of Oakland County with an opportunity to consider a proposal to
replace the current millage with an increased levy and extend its duration at the November 5, 2024,
General Election.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes
the placement of the following question on the November 5, 2024, General Election ballot:
OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MILLAGE
The Oakland County Parks System includes 17 park locations with nearly 7,200 acres of public
park and recreational lands, 80 miles of trails, campgrounds, dog parks, golf courses, aquatic
recreation facilities, and nature education centers.
To continue to provide revenue to the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission, shall
the current millage, which has been reduced by required rollback, be replaced, and increased to
.65 mills for 20 years from 2024 to 2043. The .65 mills is equal to 65 cents per $1,000.00 of
taxable value. The millage, if approved and levied, shall generate approximately $52,191,139 in
2024. The purpose of the millage is to expand, improve, operate, maintain, and acquire parks,
recreational facilities, open spaces, lakes, rivers, water areas, and trailways; to support nature
education, recreational, and outdoor educational and health programming; to support partnerships
for access to and awareness of recreational lands and facilities; to promote the conservation and
restoration of high-quality natural and wildlife habitats; and to allow free general park admission to
all county parks for residents. Revenue from this millage shall be disbursed only to the County of
Oakland to be used solely for the purpose of funding the Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Commission and shall be subject to oversight by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners and
to an independent audit.
Should this proposal be adopted?
Yes ____
No
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Clerk’s Office is directed to perform all action required for the
placing of this question on the ballot as required by law.
Chair, the following Commissioners are sponsoring the foregoing Resolution: Brendan Johnson.
Date: July 24, 2024
David Woodward, Commissioner
Date: July 24, 2024
David Coulter, Oakland County Executive
Date: July 24, 2024
Lisa Brown, County Clerk / Register of Deeds
COMMITTEE TRACKING
2024-07-09 Legislative Affairs & Government Operations - Recommend to Board
2024-07-18 Full Board - Adopt
Motioned by Commissioner Brendan Johnson seconded by Commissioner Yolanda Smith Charles to
adopt the attached Resolution: Approving Language for an Oakland County Parks and Recreation
Commission Millage to Appear on the November 5, 2024 Ballot.
Yes: David Woodward, Michael Gingell, Penny Luebs, Kristen Nelson, Christine Long, Philip
Weipert, Gwen Markham, Angela Powell, Marcia Gershenson, William Miller III, Yolanda Smith
Charles, Charles Cavell, Brendan Johnson, Ajay Raman, Ann Erickson Gault, Linnie Taylor (16)
No: Michael Spisz, Karen Joliat, Robert Hoffman (3)
Abstain: None (0)
Absent: (0)
Passed
ATTACHMENTS
1. OCPRMillageSurveykeyfindings
2. GrtParksforAll
3. 2024-07-09 scan LAGO P&R Millage support Info sheet and letters
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July
18, 2024, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Circuit Court at
Pontiac, Michigan on Thursday, July 18, 2024.
Lisa Brown, Oakland County Clerk / Register of Deeds
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
1
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN PARKS SURVEY
APRIL 2024 SURVEY
500 SAMPLE
APRIL 25, 2024
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Topic
2 Methodology
3 Key Findings
14 Aggregate Survey Results
29 Cross-tabulation Report
85 Appendix A: Question 3/ Unsatisfied Towards Parks
86 Appendix B: Question 9/ Park Activities
93 Appendix C: Question 28/ Why Yes
104 Appendix D: Question 28/ Why No
108 Appendix E: Question 28/ Undecided
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
3
METHODOLOGY
The Glengariff Group, Inc. conducted a survey of November 2024 likely general election voters in Oakland County, Michigan. The
500 sample, live operator telephone survey was conducted on April 20-22, 2024 and has a margin of error of +/-4.4% with a 95% level
of confidence. 19% of respondents were contacted via landline telephone. 81% of respondents were contacted via cell phone
telephone. This survey was commissioned by the Crimson Agency.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
4
KEY FINDINGS
Voters Say Oakland County on Right Track / Overwhelming Satisfaction with Parks
* Respondents were asked if Oakland County was on the right track or wrong track. By a margin of 68.4%-13.9%, Oakland
voters believe the county is on the right track. 17.6% of respondents did not have an opinion.
The sharpest distinctions came by party affiliations where Democratic voters were far more optimistic than Republican voters.
But even a majority of Republican voters believe Oakland County is on the right track.
Party Affiliation Right Wrong
Strong Democratic 81.2% 6.8%
Lean Democratic 87.2% 5.1%
Independent 69.4% 10.2%
Lean Republican 53.5% 25.6%
Strong Republican 52.5% 27.3%
* Respondents were asked if they were satisfied or unsatisfied with Oakland County’s outdoor parks and other outdoor
recreation opportunities.
89.0% of respondents were satisfied compared to only 3.3% that were unsatisfied. 7.6% of respondents could not offer an
opinion.
55.1% -- a majority of Oakland voters – are VERY SATISFIED. 33.9% of voters are SOMEWHAT SATISFIED.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
5
Safe, Well-Maintained Parks High Priority for Oakland County Voters
* Respondents were asked to rank on a one to ten scale how important it was to them personally for Oakland County to have
safe, well-maintained parks. The higher the number, the greater the importance.
Respondents rated safe, well-maintained parks at an 8.0 on a ten-point scale reflecting a strong level of importance.
Voters in all demographic groups rated their importance between 7.2 and 8.5 reflecting consistency across all demographics.
There was only one exception to this range; Leaning Republican voters rated their importance at only 6.5. Strong Republican
voters, however, rated their importance within the range of other groups at 7.3.
Of note is how Independent and Democratic voters look consistent in their ranking.
Party Affiliation Rank
64.7% Have Used an Oakland County Park in Past Six Months
* 64.7% of respondents said in the past six months they have been to an Oakland County park. 33.9% said they have not been
to a park in the past six months.
These respondents were asked what they specifically did at the park. [Note: Multiple answers were accepted.]. All responses
totaling greater than one percent are listed below:
Strong Democratic 8.5
Lean Democratic 8.0
Independent 8.3
Lean Republican 6.5
Strong Republican 7.3
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
6
57.6% Walking/ Hiking the trails
15.5% Walking the dog
13.3% Used the playgrounds/ Let the kids play
8.8% Biking/ Used the biking trails
6.1% Golfing
5.5% Played/attended sports
4.2% Picnic/ lunch
3.9% Beach/water fun
3.9% Relaxed/ Hanging out
3.6% Running
2.7% Fishing
1.8% Farmers market
1.2% Attended a family activity
1.2% Winter sports/ sledding/skating
Parks Millage Proposal Begins at 66% Support Driven By Park Users
* Respondents were asked if they would vote yes or no on a potential millage proposal to replace and increase existing funding
for parks, trailways and recreational programs in Oakland County that would replace the existing .35 property tax millage with
a .65 millage that would expire in 2044.
The parks millage proposal starts with 66.1% YES to 23.7% NO. 10.2% of voters were undecided.
* There were very limited differences in support levels by region of the county, age or gender.
The largest statistical difference in support was based on whether respondents had been to a park in the past six months. Park
users support the millage at 76% while only a plurality of non-park users support the millage at 47.4%.
Park Yes No Undecided
Park User 76.4% 16.7% 7.0%
Not Park User 47.4% 36.4% 16.2%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
7
* Democrats and Independents are strongly supportive of the millage proposal. But even a small majority of base Republican
voters support the millage. The chart below compares initial support for the millage by party affiliation alongside each party
affiliation’s use of Oakland County parks in the past six month. There is a statistical link between affiliation and use of the
parks in determining support for the millage proposal.
Party Affiliation Yes No Park User Non Park User
Strong Democratic 81.2% 9.9% 71.2% 28.8%
Lean Democratic 82.1% 15.4% 79.5% 20.5%
Independent 65.3% 17.3% 68.4% 30.6%
Lean Republican 34.9% 55.8% 46.5% 51.2%
Strong Republican 53.5% 40.4% 57.6% 40.4%
* Republican voters that have visited the parks support the millage 63.6%-31.2%. Republican voters that have not visited the
parks oppose the millage 30.6%-61.3%.
Independent voters that have visited the parks support the millage 73.1%-13.4%. Independent voters that have not visited the
parks support the millage 50.0%-23.3%, with 26.7% undecided.
Democratic voters that have visited the parks support the millage 85.6%-9.6%. Democratic voters that have not visited the
parks support the millage 69.8%-14.3%.
Scaled Down Millage Proposal Has No Difference in Support
* Respondents were asked if they would support a scaled down millage proposal that would levy an additional .20 mills until
2034 while continuing the current millage which expires in 2030.
66.1% would vote yes on this millage while 26.5% would vote no. 7.3% of voters were undecided.
There is no statistical difference between the initial millage proposal and the scaled down millage proposal.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
8
Voters More Likely to Support Park Millage Candidates By Better Than 2-1 Margin
* Respondents were asked if they would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate that supported an increase in property
taxes to support parks and recreation in Oakland County.
48.0% of voters said they would be more likely to support that candidate. 20.2% would be less likely to support that candidate.
26.9% said it would make no difference to them.
24.9% of voters would be MUCH MORE LIKELY to support that candidate while 13.9% would be MUCH LESS LIKELY to
support that candidate.
* Democratic and independent voters are strongly supportive of candidates that support the property tax increase for parks.
Republican voters are split.
Party Affiliation More Less No Difference
Strong Democratic 63.3% 7.3% 26.2%
Lean Democratic 66.7% 15.4% 17.9%
Independent 47.0% 19.4% 25.5%
Lean Republican 14.0% 37.2% 46.5%
Strong Republican 34.4% 35.4% 24.2%
* As with support for the millage itself, there is a stark difference based on whether or not the voter has visited a park in the past
six months.
Park Usage More Less No Difference
Park User 58.1% 14.9% 23.3%
Non-Park User 30.0% 29.5% 33.5%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
9
Voters More Likely to Support Candidate That Placed Issue on the Ballot By Better Than 3-1 Margin
* Respondents were asked if they would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate that placed the park millage on the ballot.
57.4% would be more likely to support that candidate. 17.3% would be less likely to support that candidate. 22.0% said it
would make no different to them.
34.1% would be MUCH MORE LIKELY to support that candidate. 9.8% would be MUCH LESS LIKELY to support that
candidate.
Special Needs Access/ Preservation of Natural Areas Top List of Important Reasons to Support Millage
* Respondents were read nine different ways the money from the millage would be used in Oakland County Parks. For each,
respondents were asked to rate how important that was to them personally on a one to ten scale. The list below ranks those
options from most important to least important for respondents.
8.6 To improve access to recreational facilities for people with special needs.
8.5 To preserve wetlands, forests, wildlife habitats and other sensitive nature areas.
8.1 To revitalize public recreational facilities that are outdated, deteriorating or costly to operate.
8.0 To provide free park access to all Oakland County residents.
8.0 To fund school field trips and summer camp programs that expose children to nature and other outdoor recreational
experiences.
7.8 To enhance recreational enjoyment and access to lakes, rivers and other waterways.
7.6 To improve and expand public parks, trailways and recreational facilities.
7.2 To develop new and improved recreational facilities and parks in close proximity to where you live.
6.3 To increase the number of pickleball courts, athletic fields and fitness-oriented activities.
Five priorities ranked above an 8.0 – a very high level of importance to respondents. Three priorities ranked from 7.0-8.0, a
good level of importance. One priority rated from 6.0-7.0 – a middling level of importance.
Surprisingly, none of the priorities ranked below six – which would indicate a low level of importance.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
10
* All party affiliations chose the same two priorities as their most important: Improving access to those with special needs and
preserving wetlands, forests, and other sensitive areas.
The lowest priority for all demographic groups was increasing the number of pickleball courts and athletic fields.
Parks are ‘Essential Part of a Good Life in Oakland County’ Top Rated Message
* Respondents were read eight different messages for and against the millage proposal and asked to rank them on a one to ten
scale for how important that message was to them personally. The four positive messages all rated from 7.4 to 7.9. showing a
solid level of importance. The three negative messages rated from 3.2 to 5.9 showing a low level of importance.
These messages are rated below from most important to least important.
7.9 The Oakland County Parks system is one of the best in the state of Michigan. With 7000 acres of parkland at
seventeen locations throughout the county and more than 80 miles of trails, our parks are an essential part of a good life
in Oakland County and help to increase our property values. We need to protect our investment in them.
7.6 The Oakland County Parks system has been around for nearly sixty years and many of their parks and facilities have
not been updated since they were built in the 1970’s and 1980’s. By passing a twenty-year millage and increasing how
much the parks get, they can focus on improving the parks for the long term and modernize them for how people live
today. That includes improving and expanding trails, playgrounds, bathroom facilities, outdoor fitness equipment,
meeting spaces, golf courses, campgrounds, aquatic recreation, farmers markets, pickleball, and athletic fields and
courts.
7.4 By extending the millage to twenty years, Oakland Parks Commission can plan for long term projects and for the first-
time issue low interest municipal bonds. By paying lower interest rates by using municipal bonds, taxpayers will get
more bang for their buck with more of their tax dollars going directly into upgrading the parks system in Oakland
County and less going into paying interest. This plan is just good financial management.
7.4 Great parks and recreational facilities are important to maintain our quality of life, physical and mental well-being and
our property values. The relatively small millage increase in this proposal would be a smart investment in our future.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
11
5.9 The proposed millage is an 85% increase from the current Oakland County Parks millage and lasts twice as long.
Taxpayers are already struggling with high prices, we don’t need to add to our tax burden right now to improve parks.
5.6 Voters are being asked too many times for millage increases. Oakland County just passed a new transit millage in
2022. Local government and schools are constantly asking for increases. We just need to take a break on the millage
increases.
4.6 Funds from the Oakland County parks millage will not be utilized to improve parks, recreational facilities and trails in
the community I live in.
3.2 I don’t use the parks. So, I get nothing out of paying more to improve or maintain them.
* The top-rated message was ranked above 7.1 among all but one demographic group (Leaning GOP voters at 6.8). It was
consistently the most important and effective message to respondents coming in at 8.5 among Strong Democratic voters, 7.9
among independent voters, and 7.2 among Strong Republican voters.
* Strong Republican voters rated three messages above 7.0: One positive (as mentioned above) and two negative messages.
7.2 The Oakland County Parks system is one of the best in the state of Michigan. With 7000 acres of parkland at
seventeen locations throughout the county and more than 80 miles of trails, our parks are an essential part of a good life
in Oakland County and help to increase our property values. We need to protect our investment in them.
7.2 The proposed millage is an 85% increase from the current Oakland County Parks millage and lasts twice as long.
Taxpayers are already struggling with high prices, we don’t need to add to our tax burden right now to improve parks.
7.0 Voters are being asked too many times for millage increases. Oakland County just passed a new transit millage in
2022. Local government and schools are constantly asking for increases. We just need to take a break on the millage
increases.
Independent voters did not rank any negative message above a 6.4 while they ranked their top-ranking message at 7.9 -- and
all positive messages above 7.1.
Democratic voters did not rank any negative message above 4.9. All positive messages were ranked above 8.1.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
12
Final Ballot Test: 68%-23% Support
* After reading all of the pro and con messages about the proposal, respondents were asked at the conclusion of the survey if
they would vote yes or no on the proposed millage increase.
68.0% would vote yes. 23.3% would vote no. 7.8% were undecided.
There was no statistical movement on the millage proposal after hearing pro and con arguments. The very minor increase
from 66.1% to 68.0% came from respondents who were undecided in the initial ballot test. There was no change in the ‘no’
vote from the initial ballot test to the final ballot test.
Position Initial Ballot Test Final Ballot Test
Yes 66.1% 68.0%
No 23.7% 23.3%
Undecided 10.2% 7.8%
* Respondents who voted yes were asked why in an open-ended question:
17.9% I enjoy and use the parks.
13.8% The parks need to be improved and updated.
11.0% For children/ Children need parks
10.4% To enhance and improve the community.
8.9% To improve quality of life and mental health.
6.6% Preservation of green space and nature.
6.6% Parks are a good idea.
6.3% We need to maintain parks and keep them clean.
5.2% So everyone can enjoy them/ Recreational value.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
13
* Respondents who voted no were asked why in an open-ended question:
59.7% I don’t want to pay more taxes/ It is too much
10.1% They mismanage the funds they have.
8.4% There are more important things to focus on.
6.7% I don’t use them.
4.2% I don’t trust the money would go to the parks.
3.4% The parks are fine as they are.
3.4% The time frame is too long.
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
14
OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN SURVEY
APRIL 2024
Hello, my name is . I’m not selling anything. I’m doing a quick survey of resident attitudes in Oakland County. It
should take approximately six minutes.
A. Are you registered to vote at the address I am calling?
1. Yes…..CONTINUE 100.0%
2. No….TERMINATE 0.0%
B. In November, Michigan voters will go to the polls to vote in the Presidential election. Would you say you are definitely going
to vote, probably going to vote, probably not going to vote or definitely not going to vote?
1. Definitely vote…CONTINUE 93.5%
2. Probably vote…CONTINUE 6.5%
3. Probably not vote…TERMINATE
4. Definitely not vote…TERMINATE
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
15
1. And could you tell me in what city or township in Oakland County you vote in?
1. Addison T, Brandon T, Groveland T, Highland T
Holly T, Oakland T, Orion T, Oxford T, Rose T
Springfield T, White Lake T
17.3%
2. Auburn Hills, Rochester, Rochester Hills, Troy 13.5%
3. Clarkston, Independence T, Lake Angelus, Pontiac
Waterford T
11.2%
4. Northville, Novi, South Lyon, Walled Lake, Wixom
Commerce T, Lyon t, Milford T, Novi T
13.9%
5. Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Keego Harbor, Orchard Lake
Sylvan Lake, Bloomfield T, West Bloomfield T
12.9%
6. Farmington, Farmington Hills, Lathrup Village,
Southfield, Southfield T
15.3%
7. Berkley, Clawson, Ferndale, Hazel Park, Huntington Woods
Madison Heights, Oak Park, Pleasant Ridge, Royal Oak,
Royal Oak T
15.9%
2. Would you say things in Oakland County are on the right track? Or would you say things in Oakland County are on the wrong
track?
1. Right Track 68.4%
2. Wrong Track 13.9%
3. Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 17.6%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
16
3. Would you say you are satisfied or unsatisfied with Oakland County’s outdoor parks and other outdoor recreation
opportunities? ASK: WOULD THAT BE VERY SATISFIED/UNSATISFIED OR JUST SOMEWHAT
SATISFIED/UNSATISFIED?
1. Very satisfied 55.1% SATISFIED 89.0%
2. Somewhat satisfied 33.9%
3. Somewhat unsatisfied…
ASK; AND WHY ARE YOU UNSATISFIED?
3.1%
[RECORD AS STATED/ CODE RESPONSE]
4. Very unsatisfied…
0.2%
UNSATISFIED
3.3%
ASK: AND WHY ARE YOU UNSATISFIED?
[RECORD AS STATED/ CODE RESPONSE]
5. Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 7.6%
They aren't updated
3
17.6 %
They aren't maintained 4 23.5 %
There aren't enough available/near me 2 11.8 %
There isn't enough for kids to do 4 23.5 %
They aren't handicapped accessible 1 5.9 %
Not enough are dog friendly 1 5.9 %
There are too many 1 5.9 %
Misc 1 5.9 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
17
4. This November, voters may be asked to vote on a proposal to replace and increase existing funding for parks, trailways and
recreational programs in Oakland County. If approved, the proposal would replace the point three five property tax millage
already approved by voters to support Oakland County parks with a point six five millage that would expire in 2044. This
proposal would result in an increase in property taxes equal to thirty cents per $1000 in taxable value, approximately $39 per
year to the average Oakland County homeowner. Would you vote yes or no on this millage proposal?
1. Yes 66.1%
2. No 23.7%
3. Don’t Know…DO NOT OFFER 10.2%
4. Refused…DO NOT OFFER 0.0%
5. Let me tell you a little more about this millage proposal. Oakland County Parks operates seventeen parks located in every
region of Oakland County that feature walking trails, nature preserves, golf courses, waterparks, playgrounds, dog parks,
campgrounds, the county farmers market and many other recreational amenities. Many of these facilities have become dated,
are costly to operate or are deteriorating due to historic underfunding. This proposal would provide funding to modernize and
revitalize these facilities and add new parkland and trails in the future. Does hearing this make you more or less likely to vote
for this proposal? ASK: WOULD THAT BE MUCH MORE/LESS LIKELY TO JUST SOMEWHAT MORE/LESS
LIKELY?
1. Much more likely 46.1% MORE 73.2%
2. Somewhat more likely 27.1%
3. Somewhat less likely 2.0%
4. Much less likely 8.6%
5. No change/ Neutral…DO NOT OFFER 15.1% LESS 23.7%
6. Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 1.2%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
18
6. An alternative, scaled back version of this proposal is under consideration. Under this proposal, voters would be asked to levy
an additional point two zero mills until 2034 while continuing the current millage of point three five mills which expires in
2030. If approved, this funding would be used to address critical repairs and renovations of existing recreation facilities but
would not be enough to develop new and expanded parks, trails and recreational facilities. This proposal would amount to an
increase of twenty six dollars a year to the average Oakland County homeowners. Would you vote yes or no on this millage
proposal?
1. Yes 66.1%
2. No 26.5%
3. Don’t Know…DO NOT OFFER 7.3%
4. Refused…DO NOT OFFER 0.2%
7. Would you be more or less likely to support a candidate that supported a proposal to increase property taxes to support parks
and recreation in Oakland County? ASK: WOULD THAT BE MUCH MORE/LESS LIKELY OR JUST A LITTLE
MORE/LESS LIKELY?
1. Much more likely 24.9%
2. Little more likely 23.1%
3. Little less likely 6.3%
4. Much less likely 13.9%
5. Would not influence/ Neutral….DO NOT OFFER 26.9%
6. Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 4.9%
8. On a scale of one to ten, with one being very low and ten being very high, how important is it to you that Oakland County have
safe, well maintained and welcoming public parks and trails? You can choose any number between one and ten.
SCORE: 8.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
3.1% 0.4% 1.4% 1.2% 7.6% 3.9% 15.5% 22.4% 6.3% 37.8% 0.4%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
19
9. In the past six months, would you say you have been to an Oakland County park?
1. Yes…ASK: AND WHAT SPECIFICALLY DID YOU DO? 64.7%
[ACCEPT MULTIPLE ANSWERS]
[RECORD AS STATED/ CODE RESPONSE]
2. No 33.9%
3. Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 1.4%
AND WHAT SPECIFICALLY DID YOU DO? Number Percent
Walking/Hiking the trails 190 57.6 %
Biking/ Using biking trails 29 8.8 %
Used the playground/ Let the kids play 44 13.3 %
Walking the dog 51 15.5 %
Golfing 20 6.1 %
Running/ Exercising 12 3.6 %
Played/attended sports 18 5.5 %
Had picnics/lunch 14 4.2 %
Attended family events 4 1.2 %
Camping 2 0.6 %
Fishing 9 2.7 %
Beach/ Water fun 13 3.9 %
Winter sports like sledding and skating 4 1.2 %
Relaxed sightseeing/ Hanging out 13 3.9 %
Farmer's market 6 1.8 %
Social gatherings 3 0.9 %
I drove around 3 0.9 %
I did some work there 4 1.2 %
Misc 1 0.3 %
Don't know/Refused 3 0.9 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
20
I am going to read you several different ways the money from this millage is going to be used in the Oakland County Parks. For
each, please tell me on a one to ten scale how important that is to you. One means it is not at all important. Ten means it is
extremely important. You can use any number between one and ten.
10. To provide free park access to all Oakland County residents.
SCORE: 8.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
7.1% 1.6% 0.8% 1.2% 8.8% 3.9% 6.1% 13.3% 6.7% 50.6% 0.0%
11. To improve access to recreational facilities for people with special needs.
SCORE: 8.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
3.1% 0.6% 0.0% 1.2% 6.9% 2.2% 6.7% 13.5% 4.9% 60.8% 0.2%
12. To improve and expand public parks, trailways, and recreational facilities.
SCORE: 7.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
5.3% 3.1% 2.0% 1.0% 8.8% 4.3% 12.0% 18.6% 8.6% 36.1% 0.2%
13. To fund school field trips and summer camp programs that expose children to nature and other outdoor recreational
experiences.
SCORE: 8.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
5.1% 1.2% 3.1% 1.4% 6.1% 6.1% 5.9% 15.9% 7.6% 47.6% 0.0%
14. To revitalize public recreational facilities that are outdated, deteriorating or costly to operate.
SCORE: 8.1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
5.7% 1.8% 1.0% 2.2% 7.1% 2.5% 11.8% 16.5% 7.3% 44.1% 0.2%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
21
15. To enhance recreational enjoyment and access to lakes, rivers and other waterways.
SCORE: 7.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
5.7% 1.8% 1.0% 2.2% 7.1% 2.5% 11.8% 16.5% 7.3% 44.1% 0.2%
16. To preserve wetlands, forests, wildlife habitats and other sensitive natural areas.
SCORE: 8.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
3.1% 1.6% 1.4% 1.0% 4.7% 3.1% 7.1% 13.9% 7.8% 56.1% 0.2%
17. To develop new and improved recreational facilities and parks in close proximity to where you live.
SCORE: 7.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
9.0% 2.4% 2.0% 2.4% 9.8% 8.0% 9.6% 14.9% 7.1% 34.5% 0.4%
18. To increase the number of pickleball courts, athletic fields and fitness-oriented activities.
SCORE: 6.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
12.7% 4.5% 3.5% 4.5% 15.7% 8.6% 8.2% 13.5% 6.7% 21.8% 0.2%
I am going to read you several arguments you may hear for and against this millage proposal. For each, please tell me on that one to
ten scale how important that argument is to you personally. One means it is not important. Ten means it is very important. And
you can choose any number between one and ten.
19. By extending the millage to twenty years, Oakland Parks Commission can plan for long term projects and for the first-time
issue low interest municipal bonds. By paying lower interest rates by using municipal bonds, taxpayers will get more bang for
their buck with more of their tax dollars going directly into upgrading the parks system in Oakland County and less going into
paying interest. This plan is just good financial management.
SCORE: 7.4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
7.6% 1.8% 2.2% 2.4% 8,8% 6.3% 10.6% 16.3% 9.0% 33.7% 1.4%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
22
20. The proposed millage is an 85% increase from the current Oakland County Parks millage and lasts twice as long. Taxpayers
are already struggling with high prices, we don’t need to add to our tax burden right now to improve parks.
SCORE: 5.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
12.2% 7.5% 8.4% 4.9% 13.7% 6.3% 9.4% 11.6% 5.3% 20.0% 0.8%
21. Funds from the Oakland County parks millage will not be utilized to improve parks, recreational facilities and trails in the
community I live in.
SCORE: 4.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
28.4% 6.9% 5.5% 4.5% 16.3% 4.9% 6.3% 9.2% 3.7% 11.0% 3.3%
22. The Oakland County Parks system is one of the best in the state of Michigan. With 7000 acres of parkland at seventeen
locations throughout the county and more than 80 miles of trails, our parks are an essential part of a good life in Oakland
County and help to increase our property values. We need to protect our investment in them.
SCORE: 7.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
3.3% 1.4% 1.8% 1.4% 9.0% 6.1% 12.0% 16.1% 11.2% 37.6% 0.2%
23. The Oakland County Parks system has been around for nearly sixty years and many of their parks and facilities have not been
updated since they were built in the 1970’s and 1980’s.. By passing a twenty-year millage and increasing how much the parks
get, they can focus on improving the parks for the long term and modernize them for how people live today. That includes
improving and expanding trails, playgrounds, bathroom facilities, outdoor fitness equipment, meeting spaces, golf courses,
campgrounds, aquatic recreation, farmers markets, pickleball, and athletic fields and courts.
SCORE: 7.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
6.7% 2.0% 2.4% 1.2% 7.8% 5.1% 12.4% 16.5% 8.4% 36.1% 1.6%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
23
24. Voters are being asked too many times for millage increases. Oakland County just passed a new transit millage in 2022.
Local government and schools are constantly asking for increases. We just need to take a break on the millage increases.
SCORE: 5.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
15.7% 6.7% 6.1% 5.3% 18.8% 5.3% 9.4% 5.5% 4.9% 21.0% 1.4%
25. Great parks and recreational facilities are important to maintain our quality of life, physical and mental well-being and our
property values. The relatively small millage increase in this proposal would be a smart investment in our future.
SCORE: 7.4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
8.6% 2.0% 1.8% 2.7% 10.2% 3.7% 9.0% 16.7% 7.8% 35.7% 1.8%
26. I don’t use the parks. So, I get nothing out of paying more to improve or maintain them.
SCORE: 3.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
50.2% 12.2% 5.5% 3.5% 7.5% 2.7% 3.7% 3.5% 1.0% 9.6% 0.6%
27. Elected officials may be asked to support placing this proposal on the ballot this November. Would you be more or less likely
to support a candidate that voted to place this issue on the ballot? ASK: WOULD THAT BE MUCH MORE/LESS LIKELY
OR JUST A LITTLE/MORE LESS LIKELY?
1. Much more likely 34.1% MORE: 57.4%
2. Little more likely 23.3%
3. Little less likely 7.5% LESS: 17.3%
4. Much less likely 9.8%
5. Have no impact/ Makes no difference…DO NOT OFFER 22.0% NO IMPACT: 22.0%
6. Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 3.3%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
24
28. Now that you’ve heard a little bit more for and against this millage, would you vote yes or no on this millage that would renew
the existing park millage of point three five mills for another twenty years, and add point three mills in additional revenue?
1. Yes ..................................................................................................................68.0%
ASK: AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON YOU WOULD VOTE YES?
[RECORD AS STATED/ CODE RESPONSE]
2. No…. 23.3%
ASK: AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON YOU WOULD VOTE NO?
[RECORD AS STATED/ CODE RESPONSE]
3. Don’t Know…DO NOT OFFER/ 7.8%
ASK: AND WHAT WOULD YOU NEED TO KNOW TO VOTE FOR THIS MILLAGE?
[RECORD AS STATED/ CODE RESPONSE]
4. Refused…DO NOT OFFER 0.8%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
25
AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON YOU WOULD VOTE YES? Number Percent
I enjoy/use the parks 62 17.9 %
For the kids/ Children need them 38 11.0 %
To enhance and better the community 36 10.4 %
To improve quality of life and mental health 31 8.9 %
We need to maintain parks and keep them clean 22 6.3 %
Parks need to be improved and updated 48 13.8 %
It will increase our property taxes 8 2.3 %
Preservation of green space and nature 23 6.6 %
So everyone can enjoy them/ Recreational value 18 5.2 %
Handicapped accessibility is important 9 2.6 %
People need outdoor activities and exercise 10 2.9 %
It's not a lot of money/ It's a reasonable budget 9 2.6 %
Everything will cost more later 3 0.9 %
This is better than other stuff the government spends on 3 0.9 %
Parks are important/ General good idea 23 6.6 %
Misc 2 0.6 % Don't know/Refused 2 0.6 %
AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON
YOU WOULD VOTE NO? Number Percent
I don't want to pay more taxes/ It's too much 71 59.7 %
I don't trust that the money would go to parks 5 4.2 %
I don't use them 8 6.7 %
They mismanage the funds they have 12 10.1 %
There are more important things to focus on 10 8.4 %
The parks are fine as they are 4 3.4 %
This just isn't a good time 3 2.5 %
The language is confusing so I'm distrustful 2 1.7 % The time frame is too long 4 3.4 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
26
AND WHAT WOULD YOU NEED TO
KNOW TO VOTE FOR THIS MILLAGE? Number Percent
I need more information 10 25.0 %
I want to fact check and read the actual language 6 15.0 %
How much my taxes will go up 3 7.5 %
I just need time to think 3 7.5 %
If the smaller proposal was an option 5 12.5 %
Where exactly the money will be spent 2 5.0 %
What other proposals are on the ballot 5 12.5 %
Who are the people behind it 1 2.5 %
I'm just not sure about the timeframe 1 2.5 %
Misc 0 0.0 %
Don't know/Refused 4 10.0 %
Now just a few questions for statistical purposes.
29. Generally speaking, would you say you tend to vote mostly for Republican candidates, do you vote mostly for Democratic
candidates, or would you say you vote equally for both Republican and Democratic candidates? IF VOTE EQUALLY ASK:
WOULD YOU SAY YOU LEAN MORE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ORMORE TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY,
OR WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE AN INDEPENDENT VOTER?
1. Strongly Democratic 37.5% DEMOCRATIC 45.1%
2. Lean Democratic 7.6%
3. Independent 19.2% INDEPENDENT 19.2%
4. Lean Republican 8.4%
5. Strong Republican 19.4% REPUBLICAN 27.8%
6. Other/ Refused/ Don’t Know….DO NOT OFFER 7.8%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
27
30. In November 2024, Michigan voters will go to the polls to elect a President and United States Senator. On a scale of one to
ten, how motivated are you to vote in November’s Presidential Election? One means you are not motivated at all. Ten means
you are very motivated. You can choose any number between one and ten.
SCORE: 9.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK/Ref
1.2% 2.0% 1.4% 0.2% 4.1% 0.6% 1.8% 3.5% 2.4% 81.6% 1.4%
31. What would be the last year of schooling you completed?
1. High school graduate or less 15.7%
2. Vocational Training/ Some Community College/ Some College 21.8%
3. College Graduate 61.0%
4. Don’t Know/ Refused….DO NOT OFFER 1.6%
32. Could you please tell me in what year you were born?
1. 18-29 (1995-2006) 10.4%
2. 30-39 (1985-1994) 17.4%
3. 40-49 (1975-1984) 20.6%
4. 50-64 (1960-1974) 31.2%
5. 65+ (1959 and before) 17.6%
6. Don’t Know/ Refused….DO NOT OFFER 2.5%
33. And what is your race or ethnic background?
1. Caucasian 74.3%
2. African American 10.8%
3. Hispanic/ Puerto Rican/ Mexican American 1.6%
4. Asian 2.9%
5. Mixed Race….DO NOT OFFER 1.8%
6. Native American 0.0%
7. Other/ Don’t Know/ Refused…DO NOT OFFER 8.6%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
28
34. Gender: BY OBSERVATION
1. Male 48.2%
2. Female 51.8%
35. Telephone
1. Cell 81.0%
2. Landline 19.0%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
29
2. Would you say things in Oakland County are on the right track? Or would you say things in Oakland County are on the wrong
track?
Right Wrong
1. North 58.0% 19.3%
2. Rochester 75.4% 8.7%
3. Pontiac 59.6% 19.3%
4. Southwest 59.2% 15.5%
5. Bloomfield 66.7% 16.7%
6. Farm/South 84.6% 6.4%
7. Southeast 74.1% 12.3%
Parks/ Yes 72.4% 10.0%
Parks/ No 63.0% 20.8%
Strong Dem 81.2% 6.8%
Lean Dem 87.2% 5.1%
Independent 69.4% 10.2%
Lean GOP 53.5% 25.6%
Strong GOP 52.5% 27.3%
No College 61.3% 18.3%
College 72.3% 11.3%
18-29 79.2% 5.7%
30-39 72.2% 2.2%
40-49 62.9% 10.5%
50-64 65.4% 22.6%
65+ 61.5% 23.1%
White 66.8% 15.0%
Black 87.3% 9.1%
Asian 66.7% 0.0%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
30
Male 67.1% 14.2%
Female 69.7% 13.6%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
31
3. Would you say you are satisfied or unsatisfied with Oakland County’s outdoor parks and other outdoor recreation
opportunities? ASK: WOULD THAT BE VERY SATISFIED/UNSATISFIED OR JUST SOMEWHAT
SATISFIED/UNSATISFIED?
Very
Satisfied
Somewhat
Satisfied
Somewhat
Unsatisfied
Very
Unsatisfied
1. North 68.2% 27.3% 1.1% 0.0%
2. Rochester 63.8% 23.2% 2.9% 0.0%
3. Pontiac 47.4% 33.3% 8.8% 1.8%
4. Southwest 52.1% 32.4% 4.2% 0.0%
5. Bloomfield 36.4% 48.5% 3.0% 0.0%
6. Farm/South 59.0% 34.6% 2.6% 0.0%
7. Southeast 53.1% 39.5% 1.2% 0.0%
Parks/ Yes 64.2% 31.8% 2.7% 0.3%
Parks/ No 38.7% 37.0% 4.0% 0.0%
Strong Dem 60.2% 33.0% 1.6% 0.5%
Lean Dem 51.3% 35.9% 5.1% 0.0%
Independent 58.2% 25.5% 5.1% 0.0%
Lean GOP 51.2% 32.6% 4.7% 0.0%
Strong GOP 47.5% 41.4% 2.0% 0.0%
No College 50.8% 35.6% 2.1% 0.0%
College 58.6% 33.1% 3.5% 0.3%
18-29 45.3% 49.1% 1.9% 0.0%
30-39 57.8% 36.7% 3.3% 0.0%
40-49 53.3% 34.3% 3.8% 1.0%
50-64 52.2% 34.0% 3.1% 0.0%
65+ 66.7% 22.2% 1.1% 0.0%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
32
White 57.8% 34.0% 1.8% 0.0%
Black 52.7% 32.7% 5.5% 1.8%
Asian 26.7% 33.3% 6.7% 0.0%
Male 50.4% 37.0% 3.7% 0.0%
Female 59.5% 31.1% 2.7% 0.4%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
33
4. This November, voters may be asked to vote on a proposal to replace and increase existing funding for parks, trailways and
recreational programs in Oakland County. If approved, the proposal would replace the point three five property tax millage
already approved by voters to support Oakland County parks with a point six five millage that would expire in 2044. This
proposal would result in an increase in property taxes equal to thirty cents per $1000 in taxable value, approximately $39 per
year to the average Oakland County homeowner. Would you vote yes or no on this millage proposal?
Yes No Undecided
1. North 61.4% 29.5% 9.1%
2. Rochester 62.3% 29.0% 8.7%
3. Pontiac 68.4% 19.3% 12.3%
4. Southwest 67.6% 16.9% 15.5%
5. Bloomfield 72.7% 19.7% 7.6%
6. Farm/South 65.4% 25.6% 9.0%
7. Southeast 66.7% 23.5% 9.9%
Parks/ Yes 76.4% 16.7% 7.0%
Parks/ No 47.4% 36.4% 16.2%
Strong Dem 81.2% 9.9% 8.9%
Lean Dem 82.1% 15.4% 2.6%
Independent 65.3% 17.3% 17.3%
Lean GOP 34.9% 55.8% 9.3%
Strong GOP 53.5% 40.4% 6.1%
No College 61.8% 33.0% 5.2%
College 68.5% 18.0% 13.5%
18-29 66.0% 26.4% 7.5%
30-39 68.9% 17.8% 13.3%
40-49 70.5% 18.1% 11.4%
50-64 64.2% 29.6% 6.3%
65+ 65.6% 22.2% 12.2%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
34
White 68.3% 22.7% 9.0%
Black 54.5% 30.9% 14.5%
Asian 53.3% 33.3% 13.3%
Male 68.3% 24.0% 7.7%
Female 64.0% 23.5% 12.5%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
35
5. Let me tell you a little more about this millage proposal. Oakland County Parks operates seventeen parks located in every
region of Oakland County that feature walking trails, nature preserves, golf courses, waterparks, playgrounds, dog parks,
campgrounds, the county farmers market and many other recreational amenities. Many of these facilities have become dated,
are costly to operate or are deteriorating due to historic underfunding. This proposal would provide funding to modernize and
revitalize these facilities and add new parkland and trails in the future. Does hearing this make you more or less likely to vote
for this proposal? ASK: WOULD THAT BE MUCH MORE/LESS LIKELY TO JUST SOMEWHAT MORE/LESS
LIKELY?
MML SML SLL MLL No Change/Neutral Undecided
1. North 48.9% 19.3% 5.7% 10.2% 13.6% 2.3%
2. Rochester 46.4% 21.7% 0.0% 13.0% 15.9% 2.9%
3. Pontiac 49.1% 29.8% 0.0% 12.3% 8.8% 0.0%
4. Southwest 53.5% 23.9% 1.4% 1.4% 18.3% 1.4%
5. Bloomfield 47.0% 22.7% 3.0% 6.1% 19.7% 1.5%
6. Farm/South 46.2% 32.1% 0.0% 7.7% 14.1% 0.0%
7. Southeast 33.3% 39.5% 2.5% 9.9% 14.8% 0.0%
Parks/ Yes 53.9% 27.6% 1.2% 5.2% 11.8% 0.3%
Parks/ No 32.4% 25.4% 2.9% 15.0% 21.4% 2.9%
Strong Dem 60.2% 24.1% 0.5% 3.7% 11.5% 0.0%
Lean Dem 61.5% 20.5% 0.0% 7.7% 7.7% 2.6%
Independent 41.8% 32.7% 0.0% 6.1% 15.3% 4.1%
Lean GOP 25.6% 23.3% 4.7% 14.0% 30.2% 2.3%
Strong GOP 32.3% 29.3% 6.1% 16.2% 16.2% 0.0%
No College 44.0% 24.1% 1.6% 15.2% 14.1% 1.0%
College 46.6% 29.6% 2.3% 4.5% 15.8% 1.3%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
36
18-29 52.8% 26.4% 0.0% 11.3% 9.4% 0.0%
30-39 46.7% 33.3% 1.1% 4.4% 14.4% 0.0%
40-49 47.6% 26.7% 0.0% 8.6% 17.1% 0.0%
50-64 45.3% 27.7% 4.4% 5.7% 16.4% 0.6%
65+ 45.6% 20.0% 2.2% 14.4% 13.3% 4.4%
White 46.4% 27.7% 2.4% 7.9% 14.8% 0.8%
Black 43.6% 32.7% 0.0% 10.9% 10.9% 1.8%
Asian 33.3% 13.3% 0.0% 26.7% 26.7% 0.0%
Male 45.9% 25.6% 1.6% 8.5% 16.7% 1.6%
Female 46.2% 28.4% 2.3% 8.7% 13.6% 0.8%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
37
6. An alternative, scaled back version of this proposal is under consideration. Under this proposal, voters would be asked to levy
an additional point two zero mills until 2034 while continuing the current millage of point three five mills which expires in
2030. If approved, this funding would be used to address critical repairs and renovations of existing recreation facilities but
would not be enough to develop new and expanded parks, trails and recreational facilities. This proposal would amount to an
increase of twenty six dollars a year to the average Oakland County homeowners. Would you vote yes or no on this millage
proposal?
Yes No Undecided
1. North 60.2% 33.0% 6.8%
2. Rochester 59.4% 30.4% 10.1%
3. Pontiac 59.6% 36.8% 3.5%
4. Southwest 67.6% 21.1% 11.3%
5. Bloomfield 75.8% 18.2% 4.5%
6. Farm/South 70.5% 23.1% 6.4%
7. Southeast 69.1% 23.5% 7.4%
Parks/ Yes 73.6% 21.8% 4.2%
Parks/ No 53.8% 35.3% 11.0%
Strong Dem 79.1% 19.4% 1.6%
Lean Dem 74.4% 15.4% 10.3%
Independent 58.2% 28.6% 13.3%
Lean GOP 53.5% 39.5% 7.0%
Strong GOP 57.6% 35.4% 7.1%
No College 54.5% 38.2% 7.3%
College 73.0% 19.3% 7.4%
18-29 81.1% 17.0% 1.9%
30-39 67.8% 25.6% 6.7%
40-49 67.6% 24.8% 7.6%
50-64 61.0% 32.1% 6.9%
65+ 67.8% 22.2% 8.9%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
38
White 68.3% 24.8% 6.6%
Black 63.6% 29.1% 7.3%
Asian 53.3% 33.3% 13.3%
Male 69.1% 25.6% 5.3%
Female 63.3% 27.3% 9.1%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
39
7. Would you be more or less likely to support a candidate that supported a proposal to increase property taxes to support parks
and recreation in Oakland County? ASK: WOULD THAT BE MUCH MORE/LESS LIKELY OR JUST A LITTLE
MORE/LESS LIKELY?
MML LML LLL MLL No Influence Undecided
1. North 22.7% 22.7% 6.8% 19.3% 25.0% 3.4%
2. Rochester 20.3% 26.1% 4.3% 15.9% 30.4% 2.9%
3. Pontiac 22.8% 24.6% 12.3% 12.3% 22.8% 5.3%
4. Southwest 25.4% 15.5% 4.2% 15.5% 32.4% 7.0%
5. Bloomfield 30.3% 24.2% 3.0% 12.1% 22.7% 7.6%
6. Farm/South 24.4% 26.9% 10.3% 10.3% 24.4% 3.8%
7. Southeast 28.4% 22.2% 3.7% 11.1% 29.6% 4.9%
Parks/ Yes 30.3% 27.9% 5.8% 9.1% 23.3% 3.6%
Parks/ No 15.0% 15.0% 7.5% 22.0% 33.5% 6.9%
Strong Dem 36.1% 27.2% 4.2% 3.1% 26.2% 3.1%
Lean Dem 28.2% 38.5% 10.3% 5.1% 17.9% 0.0%
Independent 19.4% 27.6% 6.1% 13.3% 25.5% 8.2%
Lean GOP 4.7% 9.3% 7.0% 30.2% 46.5% 2.3%
Strong GOP 19.2% 15.2% 7.1% 28.3% 24.2% 6.1%
No College 25.1% 15.7% 8.9% 18.8% 22.5% 8.9%
College 24.8% 27.0% 4.8% 10.9% 30.2% 2.3%
18-29 22.6% 26.4% 3.8% 13.2% 34.0% 0.0%
30-39 21.1% 34.4% 8.9% 7.8% 24.4% 3.3%
40-49 31.4% 20.0% 6.7% 12.4% 27.6% 1.9%
50-64 21.4% 23.9% 5.7% 14.5% 30.8% 3.8%
65+ 32.2% 13.3% 5.6% 18.9% 18.9% 11.1%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
40
White 26.6% 23.7% 5.0% 13.5% 26.4% 4.7%
Black 21.8% 18.2% 16.4% 10.9% 30.9% 1.8%
Asian 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 335% 26.7% 0.0%
Male 21.5% 28.5% 5.3% 14.6% 24.4% 5.7%
Female 28.0% 18.2% 7.2% 13.3% 29.2% 4.2%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
41
8. On a scale of one to ten, with one being very low and ten being very high, how important is it to you that Oakland County have
safe, well maintained and welcoming public parks and trails? You can choose any number between one and ten.
SCORE
1. North 8.1
2. Rochester 7.7
3. Pontiac 8.5
4. Southwest 8.2
5. Bloomfield 7.8
6. Farm/South 8.0
7. Southeast 7.8
Parks/ Yes 8.4
Parks/ No 7.2
Strong Dem 8.5
Lean Dem 8.0
Independent 8.3
Lean GOP 6.5
Strong GOP 7.3
No College 7.8
College 8.1
18-29 7.8
30-39 7.9
40-49 8.2
50-64 7.9
65+ 8.2
White 8.0
Black 8.1
Asian 7.3
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
42
Male 7.9
Female 8.1
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
43
9. In the past six months, would you say you have been to an Oakland County park?
Yes No Undecided
1. North 63.6% 35.2% 1.1%
2. Rochester 63.8% 33.3% 2.9%
3. Pontiac 63.2% 33.3% 3.5%
4. Southwest 60.6% 38.0% 1.4%
5. Bloomfield 60.6% 39.4% 0.0%
6. Farm/South 67.9% 30.8% 1.3%
7. Southeast 71.6% 28.4% 0.0%
Parks/ Yes
Parks/ No
Strong Dem 71.2% 28.8% 0.0%
Lean Dem 79.5% 20.5% 0.0%
Independent 68.4% 30.6% 1.0%
Lean GOP 46.5% 51.2% 2.3%
Strong GOP 57.6% 40.4% 2.0%
No College 55.5% 43.5% 1.0%
College 70.1% 28.3% 1.6%
18-29 73.6% 26.4% 0.0%
30-39 77.8% 22.2% 0.0%
40-49 75.2% 21.9% 2.9%
50-64 61.0% 37.7% 1.3%
65+ 41.1% 56.7% 2.2%
White 64.4% 33.8% 1.8%
Black 69.1% 30.9% 0.0%
Asian 46.7% 53.3% 0.0%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
44
Male 70.7% 28.0% 1.2%
Female 59.1% 39.4% 1.5%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
45
10. To provide free park access to all Oakland County residents.
SCORE
1. North 7.6
2. Rochester 8.0
3. Pontiac 7.5
4. Southwest 8.1
5. Bloomfield 8.0
6. Farm/South 8.6
7. Southeast 8.1
Parks/ Yes 8.3
Parks/ No 7.5
Strong Dem 8.7
Lean Dem 8.5
Independent 8.0
Lean GOP 7.6
Strong GOP 6.8
No College 7.9
College 8.1
18-29 8.2
30-39 8.0
40-49 8.2
50-64 7.7
65+ 8.3
White 7.9
Black 8.7
Asian 7.8
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
46
Male 7.8
Female 8.2
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
47
11. To improve access to recreational facilities for people with special needs.
SCORE
1. North 8.5
2. Rochester 8.7
3. Pontiac 8.9
4. Southwest 8.6
5. Bloomfield 8.4
6. Farm/South 8.9
7. Southeast 8.6
Parks/ Yes 8.9
Parks/ No 8.2
Strong Dem 9.2
Lean Dem 9.2
Independent 8.7
Lean GOP 7.7
Strong GOP 7.6
No College 8.5
College 8.7
18-29 8.2
30-39 8.8
40-49 8.7
50-64 8.6
65+ 8.8
White 8.6
Black 9.3
Asian 8.9
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
48
Male 8.3
Female 9.0
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
49
12. To improve and expand public parks, trailways, and recreational facilities.
SCORE
1. North 7.3
2. Rochester 7.6
3. Pontiac 8.2
4. Southwest 8.0
5. Bloomfield 7.6
6. Farm/South 7.7
7. Southeast 7.4
Parks/ Yes 8.0
Parks/ No 6.9
Strong Dem 8.2
Lean Dem 8.2
Independent 7.9
Lean GOP 6.4
Strong GOP 6.7
No College 7.5
College 7.6
18-29 7.6
30-39 7.5
40-49 8.0
50-64 7.5
65+ 8.0
White 7.7
Black 7.5
Asian 6.8
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
50
Male 7.6
Female 7.7
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
51
13. To fund school field trips and summer camp programs that expose children to nature and other outdoor recreational
experiences.
SCORE
1. North 7.9
2. Rochester 7.2
3. Pontiac 8.8
4. Southwest 8.3
5. Bloomfield 7.4
6. Farm/South 8.4
7. Southeast 8.2
Parks/ Yes 8.4
Parks/ No 7.4
Strong Dem 8.5
Lean Dem 9.1
Independent 8.2
Lean GOP 6.7
Strong GOP 7.1
No College 7.8
College 8.1
18-29 8.0
30-39 8.2
40-49 8.3
50-64 7.7
65+ 8.3
White 8.0
Black 8.9
Asian 7.3
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
52
Male 7.9
Female 8.1
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
53
14. To revitalize public recreational facilities that are outdated, deteriorating or costly to operate.
SCORE
1. North 7.9
2. Rochester 7.9
3. Pontiac 8.5
4. Southwest 7.9
5. Bloomfield 8.1
6. Farm/South 8.3
7. Southeast 7.9
Parks/ Yes 8.4
Parks/ No 7.4
Strong Dem 8.7
Lean Dem 8.2
Independent 8.3
Lean GOP 6.9
Strong GOP 7.2
No College 7.8
College 8.2
18-29 8.0
30-39 7.9
40-49 8.4
50-64 7.8
65+ 8.5
White 8.1
Black 8.5
Asian 7.2
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
54
Male 7.8
Female 8.3
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
55
15. To enhance recreational enjoyment and access to lakes, rivers and other waterways.
SCORE
1. North 7.5
2. Rochester 7.9
3. Pontiac 8.2
4. Southwest 8.0
5. Bloomfield 7.7
6. Farm/South 8.5
7. Southeast 7.9
Parks/ Yes 8.4
Parks/ No 7.1
Strong Dem 8.5
Lean Dem 8.6
Independent 8.1
Lean GOP 6.9
Strong GOP 7.2
No College 7.7
College 8.1
18-29 8.2
30-39 7.8
40-49 8.3
50-64 7.7
65+ 8.0
White 7.9
Black 8.5
Asian 6.8
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
56
Male 7.9
Female 8.0
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
57
16. To preserve wetlands, forests, wildlife habitats and other sensitive natural areas.
SCORE
1. North 8.4
2. Rochester 8.9
3. Pontiac 8.6
4. Southwest 8.3
5. Bloomfield 7.9
6. Farm/South 8.8
7. Southeast 8.5
Parks/ Yes 8.8
Parks/ No 7.9
Strong Dem 9.1
Lean Dem 9.2
Independent 8.5
Lean GOP 7.5
Strong GOP 7.7
No College 8.4
College 8.6
18-29 8.6
30-39 8.3
40-49 8.7
50-64 8.4
65+ 8.7
White 8.6
Black 8.5
Asian 8.1
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
58
Male 8.3
Female 8.7
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
59
17. To develop new and improved recreational facilities and parks in close proximity to where you live.
SCORE
1. North 6.6
2. Rochester 6.8
3. Pontiac 7.7
4. Southwest 7.5
5. Bloomfield 7.0
6. Farm/South 7.9
7. Southeast 7.3
Parks/ Yes 7.8
Parks/ No 6.3
Strong Dem 7.9
Lean Dem 7.7
Independent 7.6
Lean GOP 5.6
Strong GOP 6.6
No College 7.1
College 7.4
18-29 7.1
30-39 7.2
40-49 7.7
50-64 7.1
65+ 7.1
White 7.2
Black 8.1
Asian 6.6
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
60
Male 7.0
Female 7.4
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
61
18. To increase the number of pickleball courts, athletic fields and fitness oriented activities.
SCORE
1. North 5.5
2. Rochester 6.3
3. Pontiac 6.7
4. Southwest 6.5
5. Bloomfield 6.1
6. Farm/South 6.8
7. Southeast 6.1
Parks/ Yes 6.6
Parks/ No 5.6
Strong Dem 6.7
Lean Dem 6.7
Independent 6.2
Lean GOP 5.4
Strong GOP 5.9
No College 6.3
College 6.2
18-29 6.4
30-39 6.1
40-49 6.2
50-64 6.4
65+ 6.3
White 6.2
Black 7.5
Asian 4.9
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
62
Male 5.9
Female 6.6
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
63
19. By extending the millage to twenty years, Oakland Parks Commission can plan for long term projects and for the first-time
issue low interest municipal bonds. By paying lower interest rates by using municipal bonds, taxpayers will get more bang for
their buck with more of their tax dollars going directly into upgrading the parks system in Oakland County and less going into
paying interest. This plan is just good financial management.
SCORE
1. North 7.2
2. Rochester 7.7
3. Pontiac 8.0
4. Southwest 7.1
5. Bloomfield 7.5
6. Farm/South 7.3
7. Southeast 7.4
Parks/ Yes 7.8
Parks/ No 6.7
Strong Dem 8.1
Lean Dem 7.4
Independent 7.3
Lean GOP 6.7
Strong GOP 6.8
No College 7.2
College 7.6
18-29 7.5
30-39 7.5
40-49 7.9
50-64 7.3
65+ 7.3
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
64
White 7.5
Black 7.8
Asian 5.7
Male 7.4
Female 7.4
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
65
20. The proposed millage is an 85% increase from the current Oakland County Parks millage and lasts twice as long. Taxpayers
are already struggling with high prices. We don’t need to add to our tax burden right now to improve parks.
SCORE
1. North 6.0
2. Rochester 5.8
3. Pontiac 5.2
4. Southwest 5.1
5. Bloomfield 6.3
6. Farm/South 6.5
7. Southeast 6.1
Parks/ Yes 5.6
Parks/ No 6.5
Strong Dem 4.9
Lean Dem 5.2
Independent 6.1
Lean GOP 7.0
Strong GOP 7.2
No College 6.6
College 5.5
18-29 6.6
30-39 5.4
40-49 5.4
50-64 6.1
65+ 6.0
White 5.6
Black 7.3
Asian 6.9
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
66
Male 5.8
Female 5.9
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
67
21. Funds from the Oakland County parks millage will not be utilized to improve parks, recreational facilities and trails in the
community I live in.
SCORE
1. North 4.4
2. Rochester 4.5
3. Pontiac 4.3
4. Southwest 4.9
5. Bloomfield 4.8
6. Farm/South 4.8
7. Southeast 4.7
Parks/ Yes 4.3
Parks/ No 5.2
Strong Dem 3.9
Lean Dem 4.9
Independent 4.9
Lean GOP 5.5
Strong GOP 5.3
No College 5.0
College 4.5
18-29 4.7
30-39 3.9
40-49 4.7
50-64 4.9
65+ 4.6
White 4.3
Black 5.3
Asian 5.9
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
68
Male 4.5
Female 4.7
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
69
22. The Oakland County Parks system is one of the best in the state of Michigan. With 7000 acres of parkland at seventeen
locations throughout the county and more than 80 miles of trails, our parks are an essential part of a good life in Oakland
County and help to increase our property values. We need to protect our investment in them.
SCORE
1. North 7.7
2. Rochester 7.8
3. Pontiac 8.3
4. Southwest 7.7
5. Bloomfield 7.6
6. Farm/South 8.1
7. Southeast 8.1
Parks/ Yes 8.3
Parks/ No 7.1
Strong Dem 8.5
Lean Dem 8.1
Independent 7.9
Lean GOP 6.8
Strong GOP 7.2
No College 7.8
College 8.0
18-29 8.1
30-39 7.8
40-49 8.0
50-64 7.7
65+ 8.2
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
70
White 7.9
Black 8.3
Asian 7.1
Male 7.9
Female 7.8
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
71
23. The Oakland County Parks system has been around for nearly sixty years and many of their parks and facilities have not been
updated since they were built in the 1970’s and 1980’s.. By passing a twenty-year millage and increasing how much the parks
get, they can focus on improving the parks for the long term and modernize them for how people live today. That includes
improving and expanding trails, playgrounds, bathroom facilities, outdoor fitness equipment, meeting spaces, golf courses,
campgrounds, aquatic recreation, farmers markets, pickleball, and athletic fields and courts.
SCORE
1. North 7.1
2. Rochester 7.3
3. Pontiac 8.3
4. Southwest 7.2
5. Bloomfield 7.8
6. Farm/South 8.1
7. Southeast 7.6
Parks/ Yes 8.1
Parks/ No 6.7
Strong Dem 8.5
Lean Dem 8.0
Independent 7.3
Lean GOP 6.7
Strong GOP 6.8
No College 7.3
College 7.8
18-29 7.9
30-39 8.1
40-49 7.8
50-64 7.3
65+ 7.5
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
72
White 7.6
Black 8.1
Asian 6.6
Male 7.4
Female 7.8
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
73
24. Voters are being asked too many times for millage increases. Oakland County just passed a new transit millage in 2022.
Local government and schools are constantly asking for increases. We just need to take a break on the millage increases.
SCORE
1. North 5.7
2. Rochester 5.9
3. Pontiac 5.1
4. Southwest 5.2
5. Bloomfield 5.7
6. Farm/South 6.0
7. Southeast 5.9
Parks/ Yes 5.2
Parks/ No 6.5
Strong Dem 4.3
Lean Dem 4.9
Independent 6.4
Lean GOP 7.3
Strong GOP 7.0
No College 6.5
College 5.1
18-29 5.6
30-39 4.5
40-49 5.1
50-64 6.2
65+ 6.2
White 5.4
Black 6.5
Asian 6.0
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
74
Male 5.9
Female 5.4
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
75
25. Great parks and recreational facilities are important to maintain our quality of life, physical and mental well-being and our
property values. The relatively small millage increase in this proposal would be a smart investment in our future.
SCORE
1. North 7.1
2. Rochester 7.0
3. Pontiac 7.7
4. Southwest 7.1
5. Bloomfield 7.4
6. Farm/South 7.6
7. Southeast 7.9
Parks/ Yes 7.8
Parks/ No 6.6
Strong Dem 8.5
Lean Dem 7.8
Independent 7.1
Lean GOP 6.0
Strong GOP 6.4
No College 7.1
College 7.6
18-29 7.6
30-39 7.6
40-49 7.8
50-64 7.2
65+ 7.3
White 7.4
Black 8.2
Asian 6.4
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
76
Male 7.3
Female 7.5
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
77
26. I don’t use the parks. So, I get nothing out of paying more to improve or maintain them.
SCORE
1. North 3.2
2. Rochester 3.4
3. Pontiac 2.7
4. Southwest 2.8
5. Bloomfield 3.5
6. Farm/South 3.8
7. Southeast 2.8
Parks/ Yes 2.3
Parks/ No 4.9
Strong Dem 2.5
Lean Dem 2.6
Independent 3.6
Lean GOP 4.7
Strong GOP 3.7
No College 3.7
College 2.9
18-29 2.8
30-39 2.5
40-49 2.4
50-64 3.8
65+ 3.9
White 3.0
Black 4.0
Asian 4.4
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
78
Male 3.2
Female 3.2
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
79
27. Elected officials may be asked to support placing this proposal on the ballot this November. Would you be more or less likely
to support a candidate that voted to place this issue on the ballot? ASK: WOULD THAT BE MUCH MORE/LESS LIKELY
OR JUST A LITTLE/MORE LESS LIKELY?
MML LML LLL MLL No Impact
1. North 28.4% 25.0% 6.8% 12.5% 23.9%
2. Rochester 27.5% 24.6% 2.9% 13.0% 29.0%
3. Pontiac 42.1% 19.3% 5.3% 8.8% 19.3%
4. Southwest 29.6% 19.7% 4.2% 7.0% 35.2%
5. Bloomfield 39.4% 25.8% 9.1% 9.1% 16.7%
6. Farm/South 35.9% 20.5% 14.1% 7.7% 16.7%
7. Southeast 38.3% 27.2% 8.6% 9.9% 13.6%
Parks/ Yes 41.5% 25.5% 5.5% 6.1% 18.5%
Parks/ No 20.2% 20.2% 11.6% 15.6% 28.3%
Strong Dem 49.7% 24.1% 5.8% 4.2% 14.7%
Lean Dem 41.0% 35.9% 0.0% 2.6% 15.4%
Independent 31.6% 21.4% 7.1% 9.2% 23.5%
Lean GOP 11.6% 11.6% 11.6% 25.6% 39.5%
Strong GOP 20.2% 26.3% 9.1% 15.2% 25.3%
No College 35.1% 17.8% 7.9% 12.6% 20.4%
College 34.1% 26.0% 6.8% 8.4% 23.2%
18-29 34.0% 39.6% 1.9% 5.7% 18.9%
30-39 35.6% 30.0% 8.9% 4.4% 20.0%
40-49 36.2% 21.9% 5.7% 6.7% 26.7%
50-64 37.1% 21.4% 7.5% 13.8% 17.6%
65+ 30.0% 12.2% 7.8% 14.4% 27.8%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
80
White 33.5% 26.1% 6.1% 10.8% 20.8%
Black 45.5% 12.7% 14.5% 7.3% 12.7%
Asian 33.3% 6.7% 0.0% 13.3% 46.7%
Male 30.5% 26.4% 7.3% 11.4% 21.5%
Female 37.5% 20,5% 7.6% 8.3% 22.3%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
81
28. Now that you’ve heard a little bit more for and against this millage, would you vote yes or no on this millage that would renew
the existing park millage of point three five mills for another twenty years, and add point three mills in additional revenue?
Yes No Undecided
1. North 62.5% 29.5% 6.8%
2. Rochester 63.8% 30.4% 4.3%
3. Pontiac 78.9% 15.8% 5.3%
4. Southwest 63.4% 16.9% 16.9%
5. Bloomfield 72.7% 19.7% 7.6%
6. Farm/South 70.5% 25.6% 3.8%
7. Southeast 67.9% 22.2% 9.9%
Parks/ Yes 77.3% 16.7% 5.8%
Parks/ No 51.4% 35.3% 11.6%
Strong Dem 84.3% 10.5% 4.2%
Lean Dem 82.1% 7.7% 7.7%
Independent 62.2% 21.4% 16.3%
Lean GOP 39.5% 51.2% 9.3%
Strong GOP 56.6% 39.4% 4.0%
No College 61.8% 29.3% 7.9%
College 72.0% 19.3% 8.0%
18-29 71.7% 20.8% 7.5%
30-39 75.6% 17.8% 6.7%
40-49 76.2% 18.1% 5.7%
50-64 69.2% 25.2% 3.8%
65+ 54.4% 30.0% 14.4%
White 71.0% 21.1% 6.9%
Black 67.3% 27.3% 5.5%
Asian 53.3% 46.7% 0.0%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
82
Male 68.7% 24.0% 7.3%
Female 67.4% 22.7% 8.3%
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
83
30. In November 2024, Michigan voters will go to the polls to elect a President and United States Senator. On a scale of one to
ten, how motivated are you to vote in November’s Presidential Election? One means you are not motivated at all. Ten means
you are very motivated. You can choose any number between one and ten.
SCORE
1. North 9.8
2. Rochester 9.4
3. Pontiac 9.1
4. Southwest 9.3
5. Bloomfield 9.3
6. Farm/South 9.2
7. Southeast 8.6
Parks/ Yes 9.3
Parks/ No 9.1
Strong Dem 9.5
Lean Dem 8.8
Independent 8.6
Lean GOP 8.8
Strong GOP 9.8
No College 9.2
College 9.3
18-29 8.5
30-39 9.1
40-49 9.2
50-64 9.3
65+ 9.8
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
84
White 9.4
Black 8.9
Asian 7.7
Male 9.3
Female 9.2
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
85
APPENDIX A: QUESTION 3
WHY ARE YOU UNSATISFIED
AND WHY ARE YOU UNSATISFIED? Number Percent
I think there are too many of them. 1 5.9 %
I can do more updating then. 1 5.9 %
They're not updated or up to par. 1 5.9 %
There's not enough dog friendly parks. 1 5.9 %
Macomb county parks are better and more well
equipped. 1 5.9 %
They're closing all the recreation centers for the kids. 2 11.8 %
Not enough parks. 1 5.9 %
The services at the parks have declined. 1 5.9 %
There should be more things for the kids. 1 5.9 %
We don't have community pools, only private clubs for
a pool. 1 5.9 %
There's a need for more availability handicapped
accessibility such as wheelchairs. 1 5.9 %
There aren't enough parks close enough to us to drive
or walk to them in a timely manner. 1 5.9 %
The safety and maintenance with traffic control. 1 5.9 %
Dirty parks. 1 5.9 %
We need a low fee outdoor gun range. 1 5.9 %
They haven't been open or are under construction. 1 5.9 %
Total 17 100.0 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
86
APPENDIX B: QUESTION 9
AND WHAT SPECIFICALLY DID YOU DO AT OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS?
AND WHAT SPECIFICALLY DID YOU DO? Number Percent
Hiking. 27 8.2 %
Skiing. 1 0.3 %
Hike. 2 0.6 %
Farmers market. 2 0.6 %
Walking. 19 5.8 %
Trails. 5 1.5 %
Disk golf. 1 0.3 %
I went to the dog park. 1 0.3 %
Walked and hiked. 1 0.3 %
Walking trails. 14 4.2 %
Walk the trails. 7 2.1 %
Camping. 2 0.6 %
Hiked. 2 0.6 %
Rode bikes. 1 0.3 %
Swam. 1 0.3 %
Played on the playground. 1 0.3 %
Walked the trails. 3 0.9 %
Golfing. 6 1.8 %
Boating. 1 0.3 %
Biking. 2 0.6 %
Picnics. 6 1.8 %
To walk. 1 0.3 %
Looks at birds. 1 0.3 %
Taking my son to the park to play on the playground. 1 0.3 %
I play golf. 1 0.3 %
Mountain biking. 2 0.6 %
I walked at the park. 1 0.3 %
Picnicking. 1 0.3 %
Walk trails. 2 0.6 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
87
Ride bikes. 4 1.2 %
Paddle boarded. 1 0.3 %
Walking the trails. 1 0.3 %
Bike riding. 5 1.5 %
I helped a buddy with a project there. 1 0.3 %
We attended a sporting event. 1 0.3 %
Picnic. 2 0.6 %
Walk my dogs. 2 0.6 %
Hammocking. 1 0.3 %
Photography. 1 0.3 %
Walk. 14 4.2 %
Fishing. 7 2.1 %
Run. 4 1.2 %
Walk dog. 2 0.6 %
Playground equipment. 2 0.6 %
I went to take my son to use the equipment. 1 0.3 %
Soccer. 2 0.6 %
Played on the equipment. 1 0.3 %
My son and daughter used the golf course. 2 0.6 %
Dog walking. 6 1.8 %
Walking with grandkids. 2 0.6 %
Walking dogs. 5 1.5 %
Seeing nature. 2 0.6 %
Golf courses. 1 0.3 %
Walk around. 5 1.5 %
Trail walks. 2 0.6 %
Kayaking. 1 0.3 %
Walk the trail. 4 1.2 %
Soccer teams. 1 0.3 %
Children's play. 1 0.3 %
Hanging out to walk the trails. 1 0.3 %
Walking and hiking. 7 2.1 %
Family events. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
88
A soccer game. 1 0.3 %
Walk on trails. 1 0.3 %
Walk our dogs. 2 0.6 %
Hiking around the park. 1 0.3 %
My son plays sports. 1 0.3 %
Went to the nature center and walked around. 1 0.3 %
I took my kids to play on the playground equipment. 1 0.3 %
I went to an outdoor class. 1 0.3 %
Hiking at Troy Nature Center. 2 0.6 %
Golf. 7 2.1 %
Go for a walk. 1 0.3 %
Golfing at the Troy golf course. 1 0.3 %
Played soccer with my daughter. 1 0.3 %
Walking the dog. 3 0.9 %
Trail walking. 3 0.9 %
Beach. 2 0.6 %
Playground. 10 3.0 %
Ran. 1 0.3 %
Used nature trails. 1 0.3 %
Use the trails. 1 0.3 %
To drive through them. 1 0.3 %
I went to a soccer game. 1 0.3 %
Hike the nature center. 1 0.3 %
Don't know. 3 0.9 %
Hikes. 1 0.3 %
We played on the playground. 1 0.3 %
I walked my dog. 3 0.9 %
Walked our dogs. 1 0.3 %
Walked dogs. 1 0.3 %
We went on a hike. 1 0.3 %
Let kids play on playgrounds. 1 0.3 %
Walks. 1 0.3 %
Walks and hiking. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
89
Bike trails. 1 0.3 %
The beach. 1 0.3 %
Playgrounds. 1 0.3 %
Use the paved walking trails. 1 0.3 %
Exercising. 1 0.3 %
Having fun with family. 1 0.3 %
The mountain bike trails. 1 0.3 %
Play on the playground. 1 0.3 %
My kids played there. 1 0.3 %
We went to the dog park. 2 0.6 %
Farmer's market. 4 1.2 %
Walking or hiking. 4 1.2 %
We walked around with the dog. 1 0.3 %
Enjoyed the outdoors. 1 0.3 %
Walked. 8 2.4 %
Walked around. 2 0.6 %
Taking pictures. 2 0.6 %
Riding side by side. 2 0.6 %
Biking in Kensington. 1 0.3 %
I took my kids to the playground. 1 0.3 %
Trails for hiking. 1 0.3 %
Biking trails. 2 0.6 %
Ride my bike. 1 0.3 %
Disc golf. 1 0.3 %
Family picnic. 1 0.3 %
Pickleball. 1 0.3 %
Youth activities. 1 0.3 %
Company party. 1 0.3 %
Rode mountain bikes. 1 0.3 %
I had a picnic. 1 0.3 %
The DNR shooting range. 1 0.3 %
Played on the playground with my niece and nephew. 1 0.3 %
Snowmobiling. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
90
Walked my dog. 1 0.3 %
I took my kids to play on the playground. 1 0.3 %
Tennis. 2 0.6 %
Walking hikes. 1 0.3 %
Hiking trails. 2 0.6 %
Sporting. 1 0.3 %
Ride through. 2 0.6 %
Take my doggies. 2 0.6 %
I drove around. 1 0.3 %
Looking at the scenery. 1 0.3 %
Walk my dog. 2 0.6 %
Running. 2 0.6 %
I go to play golf almost every week. 1 0.3 %
Sledding. 1 0.3 %
Walk the nature trail with my family. 1 0.3 %
Walking on trails. 1 0.3 %
Hanging out. 2 0.6 %
Cooking out. 2 0.6 %
Kids to the playground. 1 0.3 %
Played golf. 1 0.3 %
Went to Dodge Park Beach. 1 0.3 %
I walked to get my steps. 1 0.3 %
Take dogs to enjoy. 1 0.3 %
Used the tennis courts. 1 0.3 %
Play with kids. 1 0.3 %
I walked. 3 0.9 %
Used the playground for my kids. 3 0.9 %
Studied. 1 0.3 %
Went on a hike. 2 0.6 %
Went swimming. 1 0.3 %
Walking around. 1 0.3 %
Skating. 1 0.3 %
Events. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
91
I went to have lunch. 1 0.3 %
Family reunion. 1 0.3 %
Nature trails. 1 0.3 %
Walked the trail. 4 1.2 %
Kids play at the playground. 1 0.3 %
Walking around the trails. 1 0.3 %
Let my son play. 1 0.3 %
Bike rides. 1 0.3 %
Dog walks. 1 0.3 %
I used the dog park. 2 0.6 %
Enjoying outdoors with animals. 1 0.3 %
Kids playing. 1 0.3 %
Hung out with family. 1 0.3 %
We have 3 kids and let them run around. 1 0.3 %
Let the kids play. 2 0.6 %
Let my kids play. 1 0.3 %
Drive around. 1 0.3 %
Water scenes for the kids. 1 0.3 %
Take kids walking. 1 0.3 %
I'm on the trails running. 2 0.6 %
Walked the dog. 1 0.3 %
Swimming. 2 0.6 %
Hike trails. 1 0.3 %
Walk through the woods. 2 0.6 %
Walk dogs. 6 1.8 %
I used the Red Oak walking trail. 1 0.3 %
Play on the playgrounds. 1 0.3 %
Walking on the way to synagogue. 1 0.3 %
I rode my bike. 1 0.3 %
Walking with my wife. 1 0.3 %
Walking trail. 4 1.2 %
I teach martial arts there. 1 0.3 %
Dog park. 2 0.6 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
92
Basketball. 2 0.6 %
I took photos of a couple. 1 0.3 %
Leisure. 1 0.3 %
Exercise. 1 0.3 %
Biked. 2 0.6 %
Waterpark. 2 0.6 %
Walk the dog. 1 0.3 %
Played disc golf. 1 0.3 %
Walking on the trails. 1 0.3 %
I go for walks. 1 0.3 %
Took kids. 1 0.3 %
Just sat and relaxed. 1 0.3 %
Off leash dog park. 1 0.3 %
Walked and hiked trails. 1 0.3 %
Taking nieces and nephews to the playgrounds. 1 0.3 %
I've walked past or through. 1 0.3 %
Fished. 2 0.6 %
I walked around. 1 0.3 %
Just walked. 2 0.6 %
Enjoy walking. 1 0.3 %
Walk through nature. 1 0.3 %
Jogging. 1 0.3 %
Grandkids. 2 0.6 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
93
APPENDIX C: QUESTION 28
AND WHY WOULD YOU VOTE YES
AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON
YOU WOULD VOTE YES? Number Percent
I use the parks. 6 1.7 %
We have kids. 1 0.3 %
We used the parks for our kids. 1 0.3 %
To keep the community nice. 1 0.3 %
Better trails. 1 0.3 %
I don't want things outdated. 2 0.6 %
I use parks often. 1 0.3 %
A need to maintain parks we have. 1 0.3 %
Good experience with parks. 1 0.3 %
For the kids of the new generation. 1 0.3 %
They are very important to me even though I don't use
them, other people need them. 2 0.6 %
To keep quality of life better. 1 0.3 %
It's important for people to have outdoor activities. 1 0.3 %
I work in the school system. 1 0.3 %
To keep that as an option and benefit in the area. 1 0.3 %
I enjoy those parks. 1 0.3 %
More opportunities for people to enjoy the area. 1 0.3 %
It's important to improve the parks for our future
generations. 1 0.3 %
It's not a lot of money. 1 0.3 %
To have somewhere and be able to go enjoy it. 1 0.3 %
The trail expansion. 1 0.3 %
We use the parks a lot. 2 0.6 %
I care a lot about parks and people having access to
them. 1 0.3 %
For the community. 2 0.6 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
94
To improve the parks so everyone can enjoy them. 1 0.3 %
Increase in property values. 1 0.3 %
I enjoy having parks. 1 0.3 %
Parks are important. 4 1.2 %
Quality of life. 5 1.4 %
The parks haven't been kept up with so I know they
could use it. 1 0.3 %
I'm a big fan of parks and keeping them updated. 1 0.3 %
It's the right thing to do. 2 0.6 %
I think park benefit everyone like families so yes, take
care of them. 1 0.3 %
They're beneficial to the community. 1 0.3 %
I enjoy the parks, they're very nice. 1 0.3 %
Improvement to the parks. 2 0.6 %
It will benefit the community. 2 0.6 %
I have a grandson who I take to the parks. 2 0.6 %
To update facilities and trails. 1 0.3 %
If it was frozen for 20 years it seems like a reasonable
budget. 1 0.3 %
It's important to the well being of my children. 2 0.6 %
The tax increases aren't the major source of our
problems but the parks are one of the last places you
can go that don't change you. 2 0.6 %
It's important to keep up public works around your
community. 1 0.3 %
I think the parks need improvement and it helps with
mental health. 1 0.3 %
Parks are important to people's well being. 1 0.3 %
I go there a lot. 2 0.6 %
It's important to invest in parks. 1 0.3 %
I use the parks and keeping them in good shape is a
good idea. 1 0.3 %
I like going to the parks. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
95
Conservation is number 1. 1 0.3 %
Parks and recreational areas need improvement. 2 0.6 %
Make sure Oakland doesn't turn into trash. 1 0.3 %
To support more activity around Oakland. 1 0.3 %
I use the parks a lot. 2 0.6 %
Access to improved outdoor areas. 2 0.6 %
To provide access to outdoor activities. 1 0.3 %
Enjoy the parks. 1 0.3 %
Parks are important to the community. 1 0.3 %
I'm an outdoorsman. 1 0.3 %
I feel like it's a lot more bang for your buck. 2 0.6 %
I think it's important to take care of. 1 0.3 %
It's important to have access to good parks. 1 0.3 %
The parks are an important part of our quality of life. 1 0.3 %
Parks need updating. 1 0.3 %
Improving parks is important to our well being. 1 0.3 %
I'm a science teacher so I'm pro environment. 1 0.3 %
Parks are available natural resources to preserve the
ecosystem. 1 0.3 %
To update parks and make it more accessible to the
handicapped.
1
0.3 %
I want to see the parks improve. 1 0.3 %
Improving parks is important. 2 0.6 %
I like parks. 1 0.3 %
We need our parks. 1 0.3 %
I use the parks to I want to keep them up and going. 1 0.3 %
Taking care of the handicapped. 1 0.3 %
They'll fall apart if we don't maintain them. 2 0.6 %
I would use the parks. 1 0.3 %
I feel there's a big problem with our development and
little public access to nature. 1 0.3 %
The parks are important and we need to preserve them. 1 0.3 %
It's important to maintain them. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
96
It's a better use of money than most things the
government spends on. 1 0.3 %
Keep parks updated. 1 0.3 %
Just for the renewal. 1 0.3 %
The parks are one of the most important parts of the
county. 1 0.3 %
To think about other people. 1 0.3 %
Have kids enjoy parks. 1 0.3 %
People need more outdoor activities. 1 0.3 %
I use parks. 1 0.3 %
I use parks quite a bit. 1 0.3 %
Nature to our community will make it better. 1 0.3 %
It's an asset to the community. 1 0.3 %
Parks are important to our mental health. 1 0.3 %
It promotes outdoor activities in a safe environment. 1 0.3 %
Community, you have to love where you live. 1 0.3 %
Improving the parks. 1 0.3 %
It improves and enhances the community. 1 0.3 %
I'm a big outdoors person. 1 0.3 %
For quality of life of residents. 1 0.3 %
So the people have more things to do here. 2 0.6 %
Keeping parks in good shape. 1 0.3 %
More pickleball courts. 1 0.3 %
For the kids. 4 1.2 %
I know my family uses the parks so it would benefit
them to improve it. 1 0.3 %
We need the parks updated for the sake of
handicapped people. 2 0.6 %
I value having the parks near by and want people to
have access to them. 1 0.3 %
For overall park improvements. 1 0.3 %
We need to have long term planning for the parks and
fix them.
1
0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
97
I go to the park with my kids and want the parks kept
up. 1 0.3 %
Parks are very important to keep updated for my kids
to play on and their kids and their kids' kids like my
grandpa did years ago. 1 0.3 %
I have a 7 year old and dog so we spend a lot of time
outside and utilize the parks a lot so having them
updated would be nice. 2 0.6 %
Parks are important part of Oakland County. 1 0.3 %
It's important. 1 0.3 %
It's important for the community. 1 0.3 %
I like being active and healthy. 2 0.6 %
Our parks really need updating for the community. 1 0.3 %
I value outdoor spaces and what it provides for people
physically and mentally. 1 0.3 %
I use the parks every week. 2 0.6 %
Parks are important to me, it needs to be done. 1 0.3 %
Parks are a good thing for everyone's mental health. 1 0.3 %
Maintaining parks means having nice recreational areas
for our kids which is important. 1 0.3 %
Keep parks safe and up to date. 1 0.3 %
A lot of people will benefit from it even if I don't. 1 0.3 %
I love our parks, it's why I moved. 2 0.6 %
The need for parks and nature. 1 0.3 %
Enhance the community. 1 0.3 %
Quality of life for us. 1 0.3 %
Good investment for my community. 1 0.3 %
Parks are important to me, I love to walk my dog. 2 0.6 %
It's good for the community. 1 0.3 %
Access for everybody. 1 0.3 %
My family and I live close so we use them often. 1 0.3 %
For the benefits to the community. 1 0.3 %
Pressing for the quality of life. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
98
It helps property values. 1 0.3 %
It's not that much in taxes. 1 0.3 %
It's important to maintain their parks. 1 0.3 %
I like the parks. 2 0.6 %
We need money for parks. 1 0.3 %
For my enjoyment for my family. 1 0.3 %
Don't know. 2 0.6 %
The access issues. 1 0.3 %
We need to improve it or get rid of it because
everything costs more as it gets older. 1 0.3 %
I use the park. 1 0.3 %
For the quality of life. 1 0.3 %
Parks are very important to our communities. 1 0.3 %
We need to constantly be upgrading all things but parks
for sure. 1 0.3 %
To increase parks and upkeep the parks we have now. 1 0.3 %
It makes sense we waste a lot of money in the country
on stupid stuff so this is way better to spend on. 1 0.3 %
I like the outdoors. 1 0.3 %
I'm a big believer in the park system. 1 0.3 %
I do think it's important to preserve our parks regularly. 1 0.3 %
It will be a quality of life. 1 0.3 %
It's important to have them upgraded for the
communities. 1 0.3 %
People need things to do and things need to be
available.
1 0.3 %
Parks are an important part of Oakland county. 1 0.3 %
Because I want to supply the youth with parks, they're
so invested in machines they need to get outside. 1 0.3 %
To enhance our community and provide access to
parks for our kids. 1 0.3 %
I'd like things to improve and I know you don't get
anything unless you pay taxes. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
99
I love parks, keep them updated. 1 0.3 %
It's long term improving stuff. 1 0.3 %
I have kids. 2 0.6 %
This is my home this is where I live, it will impact that. 1 0.3 %
I support everything that has to do with outdoors. 1 0.3 %
The net good it would bring for our county. 1 0.3 %
It's good for the community and property values. 1 0.3 %
I value parks and the benefits they provide. 1 0.3 %
Support our community for the youth. 2 0.6 %
Parks are important, they're one of the reasons I moved
to Oakland. 1 0.3 %
It's important to maintain the parks. 1 0.3 %
Improves the quality of life in our country. 1 0.3 %
It would cause more people to use them. 1 0.3 %
To improve parks. 1 0.3 %
It will improve the community. 1 0.3 %
Improve the quality of life. 1 0.3 %
To enhance quality of the country. 1 0.3 %
It's important for everyone to be outside and exercise. 1 0.3 %
Parks are important for the community. 1 0.3 %
I love the park. 1 0.3 %
It's good for the value of the community. 1 0.3 %
Property taxes. 1 0.3 %
Help property values go up. 1 0.3 %
Improvement to park facilities. 1 0.3 %
Improve parks. 2 0.6 %
I use the parks often. 3 0.9 %
The parks are nice. 1 0.3 %
Not a substantial increase in tax. 1 0.3 %
The parks and wildlife are important things to maintain. 2 0.6 %
I use the parks with my children. 1 0.3 %
It's important for kids to know they can get outdoors
too. 2 0.6 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
100
We need clean parks. 1 0.3 %
Parks need to be maintained. 1 0.3 %
Parks are good things. 1 0.3 %
It's good for humanity. 1 0.3 %
It just makes sense. 1 0.3 %
I've got to keep stuff updated. 1 0.3 %
They need to be improved because a lot of kids and
older people use them. 1 0.3 %
I like clean bathrooms. 1 0.3 %
We need parks for the community. 1 0.3 %
I utilize the parks. 2 0.6 %
It would bring a gain in house values. 1 0.3 %
It's needed for mental health. 1 0.3 %
I love our park. 1 0.3 %
Quality of life for the community. 1 0.3 %
Good long term planning. 1 0.3 %
It's important for kids to have parks. 1 0.3 %
Natural habitat needs to be protected. 1 0.3 %
Needs to go to the parks being clean. 1 0.3 %
More quality outdoor time. 1 0.3 %
It's important to preserve outdoor spaces and make
them accessible for as many as possible. 1 0.3 %
I have 2 dogs and we go to the park weekly. 2 0.6 %
The parks are important. 1 0.3 %
We need parks and recreational opportunities for
everyone. 1 0.3 %
I want the improvements because I use the parks. 1 0.3 %
I have kids and we enjoy will kept parks. 2 0.6 %
It's an investment in the kids. 1 0.3 %
To maintain the quality of life in my area. 1 0.3 %
I have children and will use the parks. 1 0.3 %
To improve the parks and make our community nicer. 1 0.3 %
I believe in the value and importance in parks and
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
101
outdoor activities. 1 0.3 %
It's important to improve what we already have. 1 0.3 %
It's important to have them in our community. 2 0.6 %
Having parks well maintained is important to the
community. 1 0.3 %
We need improvements in our parks for our community. 2 0.6 %
The value it would bring to the community and property
values. 1 0.3 %
It's gonna help preserve and make our parks better. 2 0.6 %
Having more access to outdoor activities for the youth. 1 0.3 %
We need parks and nature. 2 0.6 %
Better parks. 1 0.3 %
Everything costs more. 1 0.3 %
Sounds good all around which would help our
community. 1 0.3 %
I enjoy being outside and having parks to go to. 1 0.3 %
Michigan is beautiful and we need to preserve wildlife. 1 0.3 %
I think parks are very important. 1 0.3 %
The preservation of wetlands and nature. 1 0.3 %
I want to see my tax dollars going to work for the
community. 1 0.3 %
I like the part about expanding for special needs, it's
great.
2
0.6 %
So people can enjoy. 1 0.3 %
I won't be here so might as well help someone on my
way out. 1 0.3 %
All parks improve quality of life. 1 0.3 %
Parks would keep the community up. 1 0.3 %
It increases the value of homes and quality of life. 1 0.3 %
I like golf and hope it improves the courses. 1 0.3 %
I have grandkids and outdoor parks are great for them. 1 0.3 %
I'm a big fan of green space. 2 0.6 %
Parks and rec are good for everyone. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
102
The quality of life and mental well being. 2 0.6 %
Having good parks is an essential part of life in the area. 1 0.3 %
It's good for people's mental health and for the
environment. 1 0.3 %
Property values. 1 0.3 %
The need for parks to be updated. 1 0.3 %
More access to outdoor activities for kids with special
needs. 1 0.3 %
Our parks are important. 1 0.3 %
Parks are an important part of the county. 1 0.3 %
Good investment for the community. 1 0.3 %
Because I live in a community that needs to keep up
with the times. 1 0.3 %
It's great for property values. 1 0.3 %
It would improve the livelihood of everyone. 1 0.3 %
Investing in our communities is critical. 2 0.6 %
I use the parks a lot so yeah, make them better. 2 0.6 %
I use the parks a lot and enjoy them. 1 0.3 %
Parks and recreation for kids. 1 0.3 %
To modernize it. 2 0.6 %
I think our parks are important. 2 0.6 %
We love to use the parks and need to support. 1 0.3 %
I'm an outdoor camper and it's important to use out
outdoor areas. 1 0.3 %
The impact of nature for mental health. 1 0.3 %
They're important to quality of life in the community. 1 0.3 %
I typically support community type things because they
aren't free. 1 0.3 %
They're going to make a lot of improvements for not a
terrible amount of money.
1
0.3 %
To better our community. 1 0.3 %
Our parks are vital to our culture and our community. 1 0.3 %
The financial aspect compelling. 1 0.3 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
103
I'm all for the parks and outdoors. 2 0.6 %
The increased accessibility for special needs. 1 0.3 %
Parks are an important part of the community and I like
to support them. 1 0.3 %
We frequently use the parks. 2 0.6 %
I'm a big advocate for parks. 1 0.3 %
I normally vote for all millages. 2 0.6 %
Because I use the park. 1 0.3 %
To maintain and keep the parks going. 2 0.6 %
We will see benefits in the community. 1 0.3 %
The parks are important to the country. 1 0.3 %
Total 347 100.0 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
104
APPENDIX D: QUESTION 28
AND WHY WOULD YOU VOTE NO
AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON
YOU WOULD VOTE NO? Number Percent
Taxes are too high. 5 4.2 %
More funding sources instead of taxpayers. 1 0.8 %
Too high taxes. 1 0.8 %
Increase in property taxes. 1 0.8 %
I'm sick of paying more taxes every year. 2 1.7 %
It's all about the taxes. 1 0.8 %
The inflation already too high. 1 0.8 %
I don't want more taxes. 1 0.8 %
There are more important things to be taken care of. 2 1.7 %
No tax increase. 1 0.8 %
We're over extended in parks. 1 0.8 %
There are more important things to focus on. 1 0.8 %
We can spend this on many different things. 2 1.7 %
Keep adding taxes. 1 0.8 %
We already pay high taxes. 2 1.7 %
The cost and additional tax burden. 1 0.8 %
The roads should come first. 1 0.8 %
The taxes are high. 1 0.8 %
No increase my taxes. 2 1.7 %
They need to better budget money they just keep
asking for more. 1 0.8 %
We pay too many taxes as it is. 1 0.8 %
Parks aren't close enough to my home. 1 0.8 %
Taxes are too high as it is. 3 2.5 %
I would only renew but not increase. 2 1.7 %
I'm not fully sure the local government will do that right. 1 0.8 %
The parks are in good shape and condition. 1 0.8 %
Taxes are too much in Troy. 1 0.8 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
105
I'm tired of being taxed to death. 1 0.8 %
We already pay more for less. 1 0.8 %
My taxes are too high as it is. 1 0.8 %
They mismanage money. 1 0.8 %
They waste money on other things. 1 0.8 %
Because of the current cost already. 1 0.8 %
They have the tax money already, they just misuse it. 1 0.8 %
Taxes are already too high. 2 1.7 %
I'm retired and on a fixed income. 1 0.8 %
I don't want to create a 15 minute city. 1 0.8 %
We are already taxes enough as it is. 1 0.8 %
They'll spend money on themselves not where they say
it's supposed to go. 1 0.8 %
We pay enough taxes. 1 0.8 %
We got bigger issues than parks. 1 0.8 %
I'm on a fixed income. 1 0.8 %
We pay enough in taxes as it is. 1 0.8 %
They already had money and they didn't do anything
with it. 1 0.8 %
I'm tired of paying for stuff. 1 0.8 %
I don't use them. 5 4.2 %
They should revisit it when the millage is actually over. 1 0.8 %
It's a lot of inflation and cost of living. 1 0.8 %
No more taxes. 1 0.8 %
Money should be reallocated instead of increasing how
much we pay. 1 0.8 %
Technically I live in Oakland county but it's on the
border so I spend more time in Wayne.
1
0.8 %
Millage increases never go away. 1 0.8 %
No new taxes at this time, it's too much right now. 1 0.8 %
The money I pay in property taxes is far well enough to
support anything they need. 1 0.8 %
To make sure there is access to them and they are
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
106
available. 1 0.8 %
People in charge aren't fiscally responsible. 1 0.8 %
It's too confusing to understand. 1 0.8 %
Lack of people doing their jobs in the country means
spending doesn't provide benefits to people in the
community. 1 0.8 %
They haven't proven responsible with money. 1 0.8 %
I don't want an increase in property taxes. 2 1.7 %
We're being taxed enough already. 1 0.8 %
Too much money. 1 0.8 %
Everything costs too much. 2 1.7 %
I don't want tax increases. 1 0.8 %
Families should be a source of entertainment and
education, not the parks. 1 0.8 %
I don't go to parks. 1 0.8 %
I'm tired of paying taxes. 1 0.8 %
Tax increases. 2 1.7 %
We're broke and taxes are too high. 1 0.8 %
I just don't trust them. 1 0.8 %
The twenty years is too long. 2 1.7 %
The tax increase. 1 0.8 %
Taxes. 2 1.7 %
I like to follow plans but let's wait a while. 2 1.7 %
My taxes are double the price of Oak Park residents. 1 0.8 %
My taxes are way too high already. 1 0.8 %
The length of time is a lot. 1 0.8 %
There's other issues more important than the parks. 1 0.8 %
I don't know how or who spends the funds. 1 0.8 %
Increase in taxes. 1 0.8 %
I'm tired of having my taxes increased. 1 0.8 %
There are other issues that can be handled besides
parks. 1 0.8 %
10% goes into the structure and the rest goes into
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
107
government jobs. 1 0.8 %
Because my taxes are high as it is. 2 1.7 %
There's too much taxes as it is. 1 0.8 %
Just not really interested in doing all of that. 1 0.8 %
It's a tax increase. 1 0.8 %
That funds are supposed to be allocated are often
reallocated. 1 0.8 %
We have enough taxes. 1 0.8 %
I like the smaller millage instead. 1 0.8 %
Pay too many taxes as it is. 3 2.5 %
I can't afford it. 1 0.8 %
Money. 1 0.8 %
Total 119 100.0 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
108
APPENDIX E: QUESTION 28
WHAT WOULD YOU NEED TO KNOW TO VOTE FOR THIS MILLAGE?
AND WHAT WOULD YOU NEED TO
KNOW TO VOTE FOR THIS MILLAGE? Number Percent
Don't know. 4 10.0 %
I need more information. 3 7.5 %
I need to know financial aspects. 1 2.5 %
More information. 1 2.5 %
What other millages are being proposed. 1 2.5 %
I might vote for a smaller millage. 1 2.5 %
If that money is really going to go to the parks. 1 2.5 %
Check if information is accurate. 1 2.5 %
I'm just not sure which proposal it's talking about, the
first or the second. 1 2.5 %
More details about current taxes. 2 5.0 %
Less money out of my pocket. 2 5.0 %
Today is the first I'm hearing about it so I'd like to do
more research. 1 2.5 %
Depends on what the real language is. 1 2.5 %
I need to look into it more. 1 2.5 %
A lot more information is needed to actually figure out
how much my taxes will go up. 2 5.0 %
To be more comfortable with the time frame of the
proposal.
1
2.5 %
I need more time to think about it. 1 2.5 %
More about the people behind the bill. 1 2.5 %
I just don't know which one to choose. 1 2.5 %
More of the fine details about the money. 1 2.5 %
More specific plans about where money goes. 1 2.5 %
More details. 1 2.5 %
I do my own research. 1 2.5 %
Have facts and figures. 1 2.5 %
Oakland County, Michigan Parks Survey
Glengariff Group, Inc.
April 2024
109
I don't know I want to read it myself. 1 2.5 %
I need to look into it and do my own research. 1 2.5 %
I need to see all the information in front of me. 1 2.5 %
I just need to think it over with all the information you
gave me.
2 5.0 %
It's a financial lean and the way the economy is right
now I'm not sure, we'll have to see come November. 2 5.0 %
I need to do more research. 1 2.5 %
Total 40 100.0 %
Great Parks for All
Millage Proposal
Why is a Millage Increase
Necessary
Estimated $100 million needed to modernize outdated, costly
and underutilized park facilities
Continue positive momentum expanding recreational
opportunities through local partnerships
Improved accessibility for people of all abilities, ages and
backgrounds.
Opportunities for greater action to pursue land conservation,
regional trailways, recreational enjoyment of our rivers, and
equitable participation in outdoor education programs.
Unique Window
of Opportunity
Last millage passed by 76%, in every community, every precinct
Presidential General Election turnout captures broad public support for recreation
No countywide tax competing proposals
Glengariff poll indicates broad public support
Low risk/high reward scenario without renewal risks
Millage Proposal Key
Facts
•November General Election
•20-year duration (access low-interest bonds)
•Increase levy from .35 to .65 mills
•Replaces existing authorized millage
•$30 a year increase for home valued at $200,000 ($100k taxable value) ($65 total tax)
Passes:Levy will increase revenues by approximately $24 million the first year
Fails:our current millage continues through 2030, facility adjustments and discretionary program adjustments
Key Glengariff Poll Results
•Initial response to proposal was 66% support, 24% no and 10% undecided
•After series of positive/negative messages the result was 68% support, 23% no and 8% undecided
•Strong support among Strong Dem, Lean Dem andIndependents. Majority support among Strong Republicans.
•No measurable change in support when asked about lower millage, shorter duration
•No measurable change in support when informed proposal is 85% tax increase at double duration
•Respondents more likely to favor candidate that supports ballot proposal by 2 – 1 margin
•Highest priorities were conservation, accessibility for special needs, modernizing outdated facilities. Pickleball scored lowest.
Great Parks for All Millage Plan
Free entry to all county parks
Refresh Oakland County parks for 21st Century
Develop and revitalize parks where people live
Improve facilities, programming to better serve people of all abilities, ages and
backgrounds
Acquisition of priority conservation lands/sensitive natural habitats
Support development and maintenance of regional trailways
Create recreational corridors along major rivers
Universal access to high quality, engaging outdoor education experiences
(school field trips) and adult enrichment programs
Free County
Park Entry
Oakland County Parks will eliminate the
Annual Vehicle Permit system, resulting
in free entry to:
•17 Oakland County Park locations
•7,000 acres of parkland and natural
spaces
•80 miles of trailways
•3 dog parks
….and more!
Refresh Oakland
County Parks for
the 21st Century
Much of the Oakland County Park system was developed in the 1970’s and early 80’s
Many facilities are aging, costly to operate and no longer responsive to public demand
The costs associated with repair, renovation or replacement of the facilities far exceed our financial means and the limited millage duration is a barrier to low-interest financing
An estimated $100 million investment in repairs and improvements throughout the park system is needed to modernize our facilities
Develop parks and trails
where people live
Partnerships with local governments to work collaboratively to develop
new and revitalize existing parks for the benefits of residents in the
region and community
Park Affiliate Partnership Agreements are poised for action for:
•Pine Lake Park, West Bloomfield Township
•Nowicki Park, City of Rochester Hills
Acquisition of recreation and conservation spaces at the OCC Highland
Lakes campus provides an extraordinary opportunity to better serve four
communities with a combined population of more than 200,000
Better serve people
of all abilities, ages
and backgrounds
Everyone deserves an equitable opportunity to
access and enjoy parks, trails, recreational
activities and programs.
Greater investments will be made to improve
recreation accessibility including:
•Updating facilities to meet universal
accessibility standards
•Acquiring specialized equipment
•Expanding adaptive programming and activities
•Partnering with advocacy and community-
based organizations
•Financial support for local park/trail
improvements
Conservation of
Sensitive Natural
Areas
Active pursuit of acquisition of priority natural
areas for conservation. Priority will be given to
lands at risk for development.
Preservation of wetlands promotes floodwater
storage to mitigate impacts of extreme weather
The Luellen Woughter Nature Reserve (right) is
proposed for residential development under
OCC’s Highland Lakes campus closure plan
River Recreation
Corridors
Partner with local governments and
watershed councils to develop greater
recreational use and stewardship of our
major river systems
Huron River project is primed for action in
partnership White Lake Twp and Six Rivers
Conservancy
Additional plans in development for the
Rouge. Clinton and Shiawasee rivers
Regional
Trailways
•Support the expansion and
connectivity of the county-wide trail
network
•Many regional trails reaching the
end of their life
•Fill void to ensure trails are
maintained, safe
•Assist with planning, design and
engineering for new and
redevelopment projects that can be
funded with state & federal grants
Universal Access to Engaging Outdoor
Education Programs
•Provide every Oakland County student with an opportunity to
visit nature and farm education centers
•Develop model outdoor education curriculum
•Closing gaps access and participation in school field trips
programs will be top priority
•A partnership with Bloomfield Hills School District and MSU
Extension at the Tollgate Center is poised for action. Planned
agreements for the Johnson Nature Center and Bowers Farms will
provide a fantastic opportunity to better serve Pontiac students.
Next Steps
Parks
Commission
recommends
ballot language
(May)
Request
approval by the
BOC and
County
Executive (June)
Public
informational
campaign
launch (July)
Any Questions?