HomeMy WebLinkAboutElection Canvasses - 1996.08.06 - 4153CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND
CANVASS OF VOTES CAST
AT THE PRIMARY ELECTION
HELD ON
AUGUST 6, 1996
(DATE OF ELECTION)
AND CANVASSED BY THE BOARD OF CANVASSERS
OF OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
.
m
CI m C m --i --J c vi .. N.) 1-, K o
> m - r- I rn z i n
- ------ICILL 13K TINAL II 1111 1161 Ini II "11 1 iir.
• in
1 l
f 1"II 4" le iir im Nid:,:: ::NELFAVY
ull I 161. 111 pip NVIRsial ;T:::; I
11 II I I I I 1 'y 1 . - 11111 (3\11 (D) a I sh dallis IITO dillt {NAL I 0 P 111111 I 1 0 . 1 op 0 I
1 . I" r ur mil j 1, rime 616 1 1 6 paNi......."7,0(R),ILL BRIAN
I III II menp al e rk' zrc E di it MIMI II J11
- 41 11 p I rope,' ii- . c NAL il Mill_ L 111 I II . 1 _ I II
I I liD Iii.] I I ICnnrY - KIM 1'1'174 ANVLIT>irl
STATEMENT OF VOTES,
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND
PRIMARY ELECTION - AUGUST 6, 199
,
TREASURER TRUSTEE - VOTE FOR FOUR
.-D 1 CC
I
LL,
I . = PRECINCT • ICA ci . NUMBER
`,._jj
...... :
< 1
1 IMMIIIIIIMIN11110 j .,_53 /5 //51M,wrimillisirjo
2 13°----Mliffill1111 ? WITAILESECIERINEWEIffill
3 ,,...9g .. jR a_ .2.5-k, /511 I ge) Is3 `17 3 A,i0 9 4 ,?..5-/ 51 / / /7i .26.7,4,11, / E.R ,R2.3 1 7 0
5 .3.5.6 .3-' 3 - 3 3% 2/7 .2/7 2W 450 ,;zel .1 ) 6 •5 . ,5- L 3Zi/8 „zx) /97 17 ' -247 •=q __, 7 IMMIMMIM 70 larEEVAMIMMIll
8 imam i I' c7 6 _3 rill 01. e,e.fraill i MI
MN 1.111i111.11•1 TOTAL rag 1/1111111111FM/ A 1 2 Eggrearnig.rgigarini•
,
i ,. _ _ , ,
_
r I -
' -
1 1 l
- _
, ,
-
I _ i
1
- -
1
_ _ _
I,
1 .P, G
8 IA I LIVitN I OF VUTES,
PRECINCT
NUMBER
1.P, G
1
STATEMENT OF VOTES, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND
PRIMARY ELECTION - AUGUST 6, 19
1POLICE MILLAGE POLICE MILLAGE I
RENEWAL lINCREASE I
i'
PRECINCT
1 NUMBER
1
Yes No Total Yes No Total Yes No Total Yes . No Total
.4,..6- J7(0., ,...1 MIMI /.? If ;30,7 /5V'57 1111 111111 /7,5r 22A,, if5/ 1 1003 -2-3 L37,6 ;'..733 P go
4 .5F. /9c3 OS 111)41 oo ..s:39 1
3 s--.,1, 5 1 I :
6 ' --5-e /3 '(-0 15- a7 77y9J
LL H ' .23a ,Th. IsZ. /'/F /7 33 ,
1 ,
i
TOTAL 23!7--
1
1
1 I
I
i
--
MI
1
I
I
I 1
No Yes No Yes
STATEMENT OF VOTES,
PRECINCT
NUMBER
Yes No Total Total No Total Total Yes No Total
_
2.P
61AK I th( I UWNJHIV Uh HIGHLAND
PRIMARY ELECTION - AUGUST 6, I9S
STATEMENT OF VOTES
Put figures
The whole number of votes given by the REPUBLICAN Party for candidates for the office of SUPERVISOR in this column
VOTE FOR ONE was rkze ad-aa," 30 i 3
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN ORDS
t THOMAS P. DUNLEAVV I Li 0 liu .4"7.ezn_Azidzilej
.
2. JOHN P. STAKOE //a. jzo40.4 49.7.te I 7 I /Zeta& i
3. &
7:f...12, 2..
4-
5.
6.
TOTAL 30 i
The whole number of votes given by the DEMOCRATIC Party for candidates for the office of SUPERVISOR
VOTE FOR ONE was
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1. No Candidate Filed -
3.
4.
5.
6.
TOTAL
The whole number of votes given by the REPUBLICAN Party for candidates for the office of CLERK _
VOTE FOR ONE wa / A f /1 ,I Ar . ; 11
1 and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1. BILL BRIAN rto,e4,40,0,40-4446/A,64-44.1 ,2. a
2. Z21-4„..te 77
3. _ '
4.
5-
6.
TOTAL 2 2 4. if
:1•P
3 VOTE FOR ONE was
STATEMENT OF VOTES
Put figures
in this column The whole number of votes given by the DEMOCRATIC Party for candidates for the office of CLERK
and they were g iven for the followin g named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1 . No Candidate Filed 5 C.
3.
4.
! 5.
6.
TOTAL 3 6 ,
The whole number of votes given by the REPUBLICAN Party for candidates for the office of TREASURER
1
VOTE FOR ONE was 16:..eit47Zekz4,11Zier. ei..zz, 2 Z 2
and they were given for the followin g named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1. PATRICIA L. WOODS 7:14,21.1--.11.idt"..4.4 1./ . 2 liff g
2. i,/,/,) i.zr t4..g.e.6 Z 3
3.
4.
5.
6.
TOTAL Z 2. Z i
The whole number of votes given by the DEMOCRATIC Party for candidates for the office of TREASURER
VOTE FOR ONE was I—le:4,4(4../ Z 7
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1. No Candidate Filed
2. Z7t16‘0, ra.A-444.2.61-e/"L 2 7
3.
1
4.
5.
i
6.
TOTAL
3.P
STATEMENT OF VOTES
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND
PRIMARY ELECTION — AUGUST 6, 19
Put figures
The whole number of votes given by the REPUBLICAN Party for candidates for the office of TRUSTEE j in this column
VOTE FOR FOUR i / /
was Ai .. .-.1 ' ' ...L.0 i .r.‘ , ,/ :... .
i
., 9 2. 2, ti
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
t RUN COLASANTI _At ,, Ar_ ., ,Maikri 23 9 /
2. CHARLES L. COOPER, JR. or if_ / 3 0 6
3. RICH GRUBER 1 3 8 6
4. KENNETH G. HURST I 4 2 7 -
6. DAVE JANKA / ,Ij 8
6. NANCY E. SHARP I 75-0 ..:-
TOTAL 1 92 2
The whole number of votes given by the DEMOCRATIC Party for candidates for the office of TRUSTEE
VOTE FOR FOUR was
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS IIIII
1. No Candidate Filed MI
2. Al ilutej 41/4.11111111111111111 55
MI
4. .
5.
6. Ill
TOTAL
The whole number of votes given by the Party for candidates for the office of
was 111111
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TOTAL
.P
STATEMENT OF VOTES
Put figures
The whole number of votes given by the
Party for candidates for the office of in this column
was
and they were given for the following named persons: f PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1.
2. .
3.
4.
5.
6.
TOTAL _
The whole number of votes given by the Party for candidates for the office of
was
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TOTAL
The whole number of votes given by the Party for candidates for the office of
was
and they were given for the following named persons:
PERSONS RECEIVING THE VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES WRITTEN IN WORDS
1. _
2. . 1
3.
4. _
5.
6. 1
TOTAL
3-P
STATEMENT OF VOTES CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND
PRIMARY ELECTION — AUGUST 6, I
Put figures
The whole number of votes given for and against the POLICE MILLAGE RENEWAL in this column
THIS PROPOSAL WILL PERMIT THE TOWNSHIP TO CONTINUE TO LEVY 1.172 MILLS FROM
1996 THROUGH 2002 (7 YEARS) FOR POLICE SERVICES.
SHALL THE PREVIOUS VOTED POLICE MILLAGE IN THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND,
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN, AS REDUCED BY THE REQUIRED MILLAGE ROLLBACK WHICH
LAST RESULTED IN A LEVY OF 1.172 MILLS ($1.172 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE)
ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TOWNSHIP BE RENEWED FOR LEVY IN THE YEARS
1996 THROUGH 2002 INCLUSIVE FOR TOWNSHIP POLICE SERVICES, WHICH LEVY WILL RAISE
IN THE FIRST YEAR OF LEVY THE ESTIMATED SUM OF $452,500.
was Z y i
,
of which number 7T /
/ 38 z .... _.-
L votes were marked YES
and Ee4ibiAa/A,4/744 ...471W-,07.6 . 5 c- i
votes were marked NO
TOTALVOTES, 3 2.
_
The whole number of votes given for and against the POLICE MILLAGE INCREASE
THIS PROPOSAL WILL PERMIT THE TOWNSHIP TO LEVY AN ADDITIONAL 1.828 MILLS FROM
1996 THROUGH 2002 (7 YEARS) FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESTORING AND MAINTAINING POLICE
SERVICES IN THE TOWNSHIP.
SHALL THE LIMITATION ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAXES WHICH MAY BE LEVIED ON ALL i
TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND, OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN,
BE INCREASED BY 1.828 MILLS ($1.828 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE) FOR LEVY IN III
THE YEARS 1996 THROUGH 2002 INCLUSIVE FOR TOWNSHIP POLICE SERVICES, WHICH LEVY
, WILL RAISE IN THE FIRST YEAR OF LEVY THE ESTIMATED SUM OF $705,800. III
was i.'., , / ..., _...,' I All6iLif 3 Z 59
of which number
votes were 'marked YES 1
Or and / / / if 11 - - I 3
votes were marked NO III 1111
TOTAL VOTES, Ill Z Ili
The whole number of votes given for and against the Put figures
in this column
STATEMENT OF VOTES
was
of which number
votes were marked YES
and
votes were marked NO
TOTAL VOTES,
The whole number of votes given for and against the
was
of which number
votes were marked YES
and
votes were marked NO
TOTAL VOTES,
6.P
having AsCertained and Canvassed the Votes of said
TI Wt. at the Primary Election, held on the day of AUGUST
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND
(c cmirerv CITY, TOWNSHIP OR VILLAGE)
That
candidate by the
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
DEMOCRATIC Party for the office of SUPERVISOR
That
candidate by the REPUBLICAN Party for the office of CLERK
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the REPUBLICAN Party for the office of
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
TREASURER
candidate b
That
OCRATIC
YEA: I
CLERK rtyor e
That
the office of
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
TREASURER candidate by the
REPUBLICAN Party for the office of TRUSTEE
DEMOCRATIC candidate by the
That
candidate by the DEMOCRATIC Party for the office of TRUSTEE
-
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated That
That
candidate by the
CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION
STATE OF MICHIGAN. }
COUNTY OF OAKLAND ss.
COUNTY OF
The Board of Canvassers of the COUNTY of OAK I AND (COUNTY, CITY, TOWNSHIP OR VILLAGE) t COUNTY. CITY, TOWNSHIP OR VILLAGE)
one thousand nine hundred and NJNETY—SIX
Do Hereby,06Flb y ancrPetermi
That 14. ftl having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the PUBLICAN Party for the office of SUPERVISOR
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
That
candidate by
That
candidate by the
That
candidate by-th
That
candidate by the
• PUBLICAN P. 4 for the office of TRUSTEE
mF1PUBLI
v
BLI
/AM I I rj the aloe of
ice of RUSTEE
TRUSTEE
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the DEMOCRAT IC Party for the office of TRUSTEE
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
Party for the office of TRUSTEE
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the DEMOCRATIC Party for the office of TRUSTEE
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That
having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
Party for the office of
7.P
Having
Having
Having
Sufficient votes was
Sufficient votes was
Sufficient votes was
Sufficient votes was
Sufficient votes was
Sufficient votes was
Pass=
ANeggratuE1=--
--Peeseet-
featea--)
Passed
Defeated
Passed
Defeated
Passed
Defeated
Passed
Defeated
cAdorm.
---/ w
n j 41r
-CHAIRMAN • F BO RD F CANV ASSERS.
ATTEST:
CLERK OF BOARD OF CANVASSERS.
8.13
of COUNTY OAKLAND the
OR VILLAGE
this day of
(COUNTY, CITY. TOWNSHIP OR VILLAU•
AHOST
BOARD OF
CANVASSERS
ICOUNTY. CITY. VIRRN
2 6
in,: ear/ 4,:" thousand ni uved and
Airly, !fp ; f ,
r OrrAgglang Jr/4
CHAIRMAN.
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
• That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
That having received sufficient number of votes is nominated
candidate by the Party for the office of
Do Further Hereby Determine:
That the following Propositions or questions were passed or defeated as indicated below:
Having
Having
Having
NAME OF PROPOSITION
1
NAME OF PROPOSITION
2 POLICE MILLAGE INCREASE
NAME OF PROPOSITION
3 NONE
NAME OF PROPOSITION
4 NONE
NAME OF PROPOSITION
5 NONE
NAME OF PROPOSITION
6 NONE
CNot Received)
Received
Not Received
Received
Not Received
Received
Not Received
Received
Not Received
POLICE MILLAGE RENEWAL
In Witness Whereof, We have hereunto set our hands and affixed the Seal of