HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2024.11.21 - 41740
AGENDA ITEM: Grant Amendment #1 from the Michigan Department of Treasury for the 2024
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards Distribution Program
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff’s Office
MEETING: Board of Commissioners
DATE: Thursday, November 21, 2024 1:46 PM - Click to View Agenda
ITEM SUMMARY SHEET
COMMITTEE REPORT TO BOARD
Resolution #2024-4653
Motion to amend the grant agreement with the Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice
Training Fund, for the Law Enforcement Distribution Program Grant in the amount of $123,196.39
for a total of $225,680.09, for the period of January 1, 2024 through December 21, 2026 with no
county match required; further, authorize the Chair of the Board of Commissioners to execute the
grant amendment agreement; further, amend the FY 2025 budget as detailed in the attached
Schedule A.
ITEM CATEGORY SPONSORED BY
Grant Penny Luebs
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The Sheriff’s Office has received the second distribution in the amount of $123,196.39 from the
Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice Training Fund for the program period January
1, 2024 through December 31, 2026. The total distribution for the 2024 Michigan Commission on
Law Enforcement Standards program is $225,680.09.
The purpose of the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) law
enforcement distribution (LED) program is to distribute justice training funds to eligible agencies for
in-service criminal justice training of their MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers.
POLICY ANALYSIS
Acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment and the
continuation of the grant program is contingent upon future levels of grant funding.
The original grant agreement of $102,483.70 was approved on June 7, 2024, via MR #2024-
4082.
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes
Committee members can contact Barbara Winter, Policy and Fiscal Analysis Supervisor at
248.821.3065 or winterb@oakgov.com or the department contact persons listed for additional
information.
CONTACT
Curtis Childs, Undersheriff
Gaia Piir, Sheriff Fiscal Officer
ITEM REVIEW TRACKING
Aaron Snover, Board of Commissioners Created/Initiated - 11/21/2024
AGENDA DEADLINE: 11/21/2024 9:30 AM
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2024 MCOLES Grant Acceptance Schedule A- 2nd Distribution
2. Grant Review Sign-Off
3. 2024 Law Enforcement Distribution Guidelines
4. Fall 2024 LED Semi-Annual Distribution Report_w
5. Fall 2024 LED Summary Report_w
COMMITTEE TRACKING
2024-11-12 Public Health & Safety - Forward to Finance
2024-11-13 Finance - Recommend to Board
2024-11-21 Full Board - Adopt
Motioned by: None
Seconded by: None
Yes: None (0)
No: None (0)
Abstain: None (0)
Absent: (0)
Oakland County, Michigan
SHERIFF'S OFFICE - 2024 MICHIGAN COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS (MCOLES) LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM over 15% (2nd Distribution)
Schedule "A" DETAIL
R/E Fund Name Division Name
Fund #
(FND)
Cost Center
(CCN) #
Account #
(RC/SC)
Program #
(PRG)
Grant ID
(GRN) #
Project ID #
(PROJ)
Regio
n
(REG)
Budget
Fund
Affiliate
(BFA)
Ledger
Account
Summar
y Account Title
FY 2025
Amendment
FY 2026
Amendment
FY 2027
Amendment
R Law Enforcement GrantsEmergency Response & Prep FND11005 CCN4030501 RC615571 PRG110110 GRN-1004411 615000 State Operating Grants $123,196 $123,196 $-
Total Revenues $123,196 $123,196 $-
E Law Enforcement GrantsEmergency Response & Prep FND11005 CCN4030501 SC731304 PRG110110 GRN-1004411 730000 Officers Training $123,196 $123,196 $-
Total Expenditures $123,196 $123,196 $-
GRANT REVIEW SIGN-OFF – Sheriff’s Office AWD00481
GRANT NAME: 2024 Law Enforcement Distribution Program
FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES)
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Paul Workman, 248-858-5474
STATUS: Grant Amendment (Greater than 15% or $10,000)
DATE: 10/30/2024
Please be advised that the captioned grant materials have completed the internal grant review. The returned comments are
below.
The Board of Commissioners’ liaison committee resolution and grant acceptance package (which should include this sign-
off and the grant agreement/contract with related documentation) should be downloaded into Civic Clerk on the next
agenda(s) of the appropriate Board of Commissioners’ committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Management and Budget:
Approved – Shannon Lee (10/28/2024)
Human Resources:
Approved by Human Resources. No position impact. – Hailey Matthews on behalf of Heather Mason (10/25/2024)
Risk Management:
Approved. No County insurance requirements. – Robert Erlenbeck (10/30/2024)
Corporation Counsel:
Approved. No legal issues –-Sharon Kessler (10/28/2024)
Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended
2024
LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION
GUIDELINES
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
927 Centennial Way
Lansing, MI 48917
Effective January 2024 through December 2024
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
2024 Law Enforcement Distribution Guidelines
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
Statutory Authority .................................................................................................... 1
Executive Order ....................................................................................................... 1
II. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................... 2
III. ELIGIBILITY ............................................................................................................. 2
Determinations ......................................................................................................... 2
Non-Discrimination ................................................................................................... 3
Non-Compliance ...................................................................................................... 3
IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................... 3
Records Maintenance, Access, and Retention ......................................................... 3
Annual Reporting Requirements .............................................................................. 4
Allowable Expenditures ............................................................................................ 4
Ineligible Expenditures ............................................................................................. 5
Travel Regulations ................................................................................................... 7
Schedule of Travel Rates ......................................................................................... 8
Select Cities ............................................................................................................. 9
Disposition of Equipment ........................................................................................ 10
V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS .................................................................................... 10
Out of State Special Use Requests ........................................................................ 10
Equipment Special Use Requests .......................................................................... 11
Special Use Request Approval Process ................................................................. 11
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................... 12
- 1 -
I. INTRODUCTION
Statutory Authority
The Michigan Justice Training programs are regulated by state law, administrative rule, and
executive order.
Public Act 301 of 1982, created the Michigan Justice Training Fund (MJTF). Revenue to the
Michigan Justice Training Fund is generated through Justice System Assessments that are levied
and collected by the courts and submitted to the Michigan Department of Treasury for deposit into
the Justice System Fund (JSF). The MJTF receives 11.84% of the JSF balance on a monthly basis.
Both the JSF and the MJTF are interest-bearing accounts. Interest is posted to each account
quarterly.
The Michigan Justice Training Fund is a restricted fund. These funds may be used only for the
criminal justice in-service (active duty) training of eligible trainees or such purposes as designated
by legislative mandate.
Public Act 302 of 1982 created the Michigan Justice Training Commission (MJTC) and set forth the
responsibilities of that Commission. Section 3 of the Act directs the Commission to annually
distribute 60% of the Justice Training Fund to eligible entities under the law enforcement distribution.
The Act allows the Commission to use the remaining balance to award grants and pay for staff
services to the Commission for administering and enforcing the statutory requirements of 1965 P.A.
302, as amended, and 1965 P.A. 203, MCL 28.601 to 28.615. The two funding programs are
referred to as the Law Enforcement Distribution (LED) and the Competitive Grant Program,
respectively. This document addresses the Law Enforcement Distribution.
The administrative rules that prescribe the procedures by which the Commission shall distribute
money from the fund were developed under the authority conferred on the Commission by section
10 of 1982 P.A. 302, as amended, by section 9 of 1965 PA 380, and by Executive Reorganization
Order 2001-2, MCL 18.423, 16.109, and 28.621.
With Executive Order 2001-5, Governor John Engler ordered the merger of the Michigan Justice
Training Commission with the Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (COLES) to form the
new Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) and transferred the
responsibilities of P.A. 302 to the MCOLES. Executive Order 2001-5 also directed the Commission
to focus its activities in order to accomplish the following objectives involving law enforcement
organizations and officers:
• increase professionalism,
• increase the number of law enforcement organizations that offer formal in-service training
and increase the number of law enforcement officers who receive formal in-service training,
• institute law enforcement in-service training standards applicable to all law enforcement in-
service training in Michigan,
• implement a Web-based information system that will allow the Commission to accomplish its
goals and communicate with Michigan law enforcement organizations in a more efficient
manner.
- 2 -
II. PURPOSE
As mandated by the Act, the purpose of the LED program is to annually distribute Justice Training
Funds to eligible agencies for in-service criminal justice training of their MCOLES licensed law
enforcement officers.
For the purposes of the LED program, criminal justice in-service training means a criminal justice
educational program presented by an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to the Act or
by a contractual service provider hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to
the Act, including a course or package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment
of a fee or tuition, or education or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, in
which the program, education, or training is designed and intended to enhance the direc t delivery of
criminal justice services by eligible employees of the agency or entity.
III. ELIGIBILITY
Any governmental agency of the executive branch of this state or a subdivision of this state that is
established and maintained in accordance with the laws of this state and authorized by the laws of
this state to employ or appoint law enforcement officers licensed under section 9 and 9 (a) of the
MCOLES Act, 1965 P.A. 203, MCL 28.609 and 28.609 (a) is eligible to receive LED funding. This
includes any Michigan city, village, township, county, community college, state supported college or
university, state department, or authority formed by the joinder of two or more eligible municipalities
that meets the requirements. Only MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers, employed by an
eligible entity, are eligible trainees under this program.
The Act also requires that an eligible agency shall submit an annual registration to establish or
maintain eligibility to receive a distribution of justice training funds. Annual eligibility is determined
by several factors.
1) Registration: A complete and accurate registration shall be submitted, in the manner prescribed
by the Commission, on or before the established deadline.
2) Report of Expenditures: A complete accounting of expenditures charged to LED funds during the
prior calendar year shall accompany the annual registration in the manner prescribed by the
Commission. You must report regardless of whether LED funds were used or not.
3) Maintenance of Effort (MOE): It is the intent of the Act to provide supplemental funding, not
replace local funding, for in-service criminal justice training. To ensure compliance with this intent,
the amount of local funds budgeted annually by the local unit of government for in-service training
shall be equal to, or greater than, the amount budgeted for in-service training on October 12, 1982,
or the first year of program participation. This initial figure is referred to as the agency’s “base year”
amount.
4) Roster of Officers: The law enforcement agency shall employ a minimum of one full-time equated
(FTE) officer for the calendar year prior to the year in which the registration is submitted. A roster of
licensed officers shall be provided in a manner prescribed by the Commission. LED payments will
only be authorized for MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers named on the agency roster.
- 3 -
5) Two-year Expenditure Period: Recipient agencies are required to expend their entire annual
distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. For example, LED funds received
during 2021 must be expended by December 31, 2023. If the distribution is not expended within this
time frame, the agency will be ineligible to receive any additional LED funding until the balance is
expended and reported to the Commission.
Licensure is issued by the Commission under 1965 P.A. 203, as amended. Any officer found not to
be in compliance with the requirements shall be ineligible for the law enforcement distribution.
Therefore, it is the law enforcement agency’s responsibility to verify that each law enforcement
officer registered for the law enforcement distribution meets the requirements of Act 203 in one of
the following manners:
• current election to the office of sheriff.
• current employment by a law enforcement agency as a fully-empowered
MCOLES-licensed law enforcement officer.
Non-Discrimination
Government units receiving money distributed under the Act, and any person or contractor
performing services funded by such money, shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant
for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or a
matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, height, weight, or marital status in violation of Act 453 of the Public Acts of 1976, as
amended.
Upon certification of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission that a violation of these nondiscrimination
requirements has occurred, a government unit's right to receive money under the Act may be
suspended, terminated, or conditioned in any appropriate way that is consistent with the
circumstances of the case.
Non-Compliance
Non-compliance with the provisions of these guidelines shall result in a forfeiture of law enforcement
distribution funding.
IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES
All recipients of LED funds agree to maintain records documenting their annual calendar year LED
expenditures in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, to permit inspection of
these records, and to cooperate with any audit requested or authorized by the local unit of
government, the Commission, or the State of Michigan auditor general. All LED funds and
expenditures shall be recorded in a fund or account separate from other funds or accounts.
Recipients of LED funds must ensure that LED funds and expenditures are not comingled with any
other funds. All financial records and supporting documentation for LED expenditures shall be
retained by the agency for seven years following the calendar year in which the funds were
expended. Recipients are obligated to protect these records adequately against fire or other
damage. Records may be retained in an automated format. State and local governments may
impose record retention and maintenance requirements in addition to those prescribed.
- 4 -
An agency receiving funds under this Act shall report annually to the Commission on the forms
and in the manner prescribed by the Commission. Failure to report the required information shall
result in ineligibility to receive LED funds.
Beginning with the 1990 distribution, amendments to the Act require that each agency expend the
entire annual distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. Therefore, training
costs, supplies, and equipment purchases shall be assigned to the oldest funds available regardless
of the year expended. The amended Act requires that if funds remain unexpended after the end of
the second calendar year, the agency shall be ineligible for future funds until the remaining balance
has been expended and reported.
Beginning in 2017, amendments to the Act require that agencies return law enforcement distribution
funds to the Michigan Justice Training Fund for redistribution if the funds have not been expended
within five calendar years after the year in which they were received. After each annual
registration, invoices will be created for agencies that have not expended their law enforcement
distribution funds within this five-year timeline.
Agencies must report closure or consolidation initiatives to MCOLES for close out processing. A final
LED expenditure report may be submitted to report eligible expenditures incurred but not yet
reported. Upon review and approval of the expenditures, an invoice will be generated for the return
of any remaining unexpended funds. If a final expenditure report is not submitted, the agency will be
invoiced for the full amount of unexpended funds as reported during the most recent annual
registration. Funds returned will be deposited to the Michigan Justice Training Fund and will be re-
distributed in a future Law Enforcement Distribution.
The following expenditures are eligible for LED funding. All training courses being provided to in-
service law enforcement officers in Michigan must be registered in the MCOLES Information and
Tracking Network prior to the training being conducted, whether being provided by a Michigan based
or out-of-state private or public vendor, as well as training offered by an agency for specific, in-house
agency purposes.
Allowable Expenditures:
• Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training,
subject to the supplanting restrictions.
• In-state travel expenses for training programs outside of a 50-mile radius from the worksite
or home (whichever is closer). Travel expenditures must not exceed the allowable travel
rates outlined on page 8.
• Expenditure of LED funds for tuition costs for out-of-state training courses is allowable
provided that the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out-of-State Special Use
Request to the Commission and the course was registered through the MCOLES Information
and Tracking Network prior to the training dates.
• Expenditure of LED funds for registration only for out-of-state conferences or conventions
providing the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out-of-State Special Use
Request to the Commission and is granted approval prior to attending the conference or
convention. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be covered
by other funds.
- 5 -
• A consortium fee for law enforcement training attended. Consortium fees paid shall be
reported per year.
• The reasonable rental costs for the use of a training facility for in-service training, if
facilities owned or occupied by an eligible entity are either not available or are inappropriate
due to the nature of the training.
• The cost of purchasing or leasing training materials used to assist trainees in
understanding in-service training topics. This includes items such as training manuals, tests,
evaluations. Materials must be used exclusively for the direct delivery of criminal justice in-
service training.
• The reasonable rental cost or purchase price of equipment used exclusively for the direct
delivery of in-service training; however, expenditures for purchase shall not be more than the
total of 10% of the annual distribution, nor may any single item be more than $5,000.00,
without prior approval of the Commission. Equipment that costs less than $300 shall be
reported as a Supplies and Operating expense.
o The Equipment Special Use Request form is available on-line. Additional information
regarding equipment is outlined on page 11.
• A flat rate or tuition paid to a contractual training provider hired by an eligible entity.
The payment shall be in compliance with policies established by the Commission.
• The cost of web-based programs, digital or analog media, or other such instructional
media that are based upon interactive learning.
• The cost of automated firearms training systems that simulate deadly force decision-
making circumstances.
Ineligible Expenditures:
1. Expenditures for salaries of trainees.
2. Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training if the
instructors are assigned to perform in-service training as part of their regular function with an
eligible agency.
3. Meal and lodging expenditures that exceed the allowable rates outlined on page 8. In cases
where charges for meals and lodging exceed the allowable rate, the grantee may utilize other
funding sources to cover the additional charge.
o The Commission will not authorize the use of justice training funds for travel costs to
participate in criminal justice training unless the criminal justice training program is for
the sole purpose of training or offers not less than 6 hours of qualifying training within
any 24-hour period.
4. Criminal justice training not located in this state, unless the training event has first been
approved by the Commission and is registered in MITN, as noted above.
5. Criminal justice training in another country.
- 6 -
6. The purchase of firearms.
7. The purchase of alcoholic liquor.
8. The purchase of refreshments.
9. The publication of a newsletter.
- 7 -
Law Enforcement Distribution Travel Regulations
Lodging and Meals: Actual lodging and meal expenditures paid, including taxes, are
allowable and shall not exceed the maximum allowance indicated in the current Schedule
of Travel Rates. For LED purposes, there is not a daily per diem or allotment. In those
cases where charges for lodging or meals exceed the allowable rate, the trainee or
agency may utilize other funding sources to cover the additional charge. Trainee meals
will only be allowed when training occurs both before and after the meal or the trainee is
otherwise eligible for meals due to lodging.
Select Cities: Specific meal rates have been established for select cities. The lodging
rate for select cities is equivalent to the rate for all other cities. The list of select cities is
displayed on page 9.
Vehicle Mileage: Mileage expenses will be allowed at a rate not to exceed the allowable
rate specified in the current Schedule of Travel Rates.
Mileage and Lodging Restriction: Travel expenses shall not be charged for mileage or
lodging where training occurs within 50 miles, by standard mileage charts, of the home or
work site, whichever is closer. An exception may be allowed for those persons who work
or reside within a radius exceeding 25 miles of the training site when a minimum of two
hours of training occurs following the evening meal. Mileage costs between the home or
work site to an airport is not an allowable expense.
Air Travel: The use of commercial airlines is permitted when it is advantageous based on
comparative travel costs and the time of the traveler. Justice Training Funds may not be
used to purchase first-class airfare. Baggage fees for one piece of personal luggage is
allowed. Overweight or additional baggage fees are not allowed.
Toll Charges: Toll charges and bridge fees are allowable.
Taxi: Necessary taxicab fare between an airport terminal and meeting site is allowable.
Car Rental: Charges for car rental are allowable.
Parking: Parking charges at the most economical rate available is allowable.
- 8 -
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
Law Enforcement Distribution
Schedule of Travel Rates
Effective January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024
Michigan Select Cities
Breakfast $11.75
Lunch $11.75
Dinner $28.00
Lodging $85.00
Michigan All Other Cities
Breakfast $9.75
Lunch $9.75
Dinner $22.00
Lodging $85.00
Out-of-State Select Cities
Breakfast $15.00
Lunch $15.00
Dinner $29.00
Lodging $85.00
Out-of-State All Other Cities
Breakfast $11.75
Lunch $11.75
Dinner $27.00
Lodging $85.00
Standard Mileage Rate $.440 per mile
- 9 -
SELECT CITIES
MICHIGAN SELECT CITIES AND COUNTIES
CITIES COUNTIES
Ann Arbor, Auburn Hills, Beaver Island, Detroit, Grand
Rapids, Holland, Leland, Mackinac Island, Petoskey,
Pontiac, South Haven, Traverse City
All of Grand Traverse, Oakland, and Wayne
OUT-OF-STATE SELECT CITIES
STATE SELECT CITY OR COUNTY STATE
SELECT CITY OR
COUNTY
Alaska
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of
Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
All locations
Phoenix, Scottsdale, Sedona
Los Angeles (Los Angeles, Orange,
Mendocino & Ventura Counties, and
Edwards AFB), Eureka, Arcata,
Mckinleyville, Mammoth Lakes, Mill
Valley, San Rafael, Novato, Monterey,
Palm Springs, San Diego, San
Francisco, Santa Barbara, Santa
Monica, South Lake Tahoe, Truckee,
Yosemite National Park
Aspen, Breckenridge, Grand Lake,
Silverthorne, Steamboat Springs,
Telluride, Vail
Bridgeport, Danbury
Washington DC (see also Maryland and
Virginia)
Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Jupiter, Fort
Lauderdale, Key West, Miami
Brunswick, Jekyll Island
All locations
Sun Valley, Ketchum
Chicago (Cook and Lake Counties)
Kenton
New Orleans
Bar Harbor, Kennebunk, Kittery,
Rockport, Sanford
Counties of Montgomery & Prince
George, Baltimore City, Ocean City
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Nevada
New Mexico
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Wyoming
Boston (Suffolk), Burlington,
Cambridge, Woburn, Martha’s
Vineyard
Duluth, Minneapolis/St. Paul
(Hennepin and Ramsey
Counties)
Las Vegas
Santa Fe
Lake Placid, Manhattan
(boroughs of Manhattan,
Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, and
Staten Island), Riverhead,
Ronkonkoma, Melville, Suffolk
County, Tarrytown, White Plains,
New Rochelle
Cincinnati
Bucks County, Pittsburgh
All locations
Bristol, Jamestown,
Middletown/Newport (Newport
County), Providence
Austin, Dallas, Houston,
L.B. Johnson Space Center
Park City (Summit County)
Manchester, Montpelier, Stowe,
Lamoille County
Alexandria, Falls Church, Fairfax
(Arlington and Fairfax Counties)
Port Angeles, Port Townsend,
Seattle
Jackson, Pinedale
- 10 -
Disposition of Equipment
For the purposes of LED funding, to be defined as “equipment” an item shall: 1) be directly involved
in the delivery of in-service criminal justice training; 2) be personal property (as distinguished from
real property), such as machines, audio/video and computer hardware, etc.; 3) have a normal useful
life of more than one year; 4) not become a fixed part of a building or structure; and 5) have a
purchase price of $300 or more.
Equipment purchases approved by the Commission may be retained by the recipient agency as long
as the equipment is used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training.
When equipment is no longer used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training, the
recipient agency shall notify the Commission to request disposition. The Commission may select
one of the following actions:
a. Transfer of the equipment to another training program. Costs of the transportation of the
equipment will be borne by the receiving agency.
b. Approve the sale of the equipment, with the arrangements for the sale to be made by the
agency possessing the equipment. The agency will be allowed to retain 10% of the receipts
from the sale; the remainder shall be returned to the Justice Training Fund.
c. Dispose of the property in any other manner consistent with the purposes of the Act, as
amended.
V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS
Out-of-State Special Use Requests
The Act contains specific mandates relative to the expenditure of Justice Training Funds for out-of-
state training. The intention is, of course, that justice training funds be expended primarily within the
state of Michigan to purchase services and materials from Michigan vendors whenever possible.
The policy states that the Commission will not fund any out-of-state criminal justice training program,
unless all reasonable efforts to locate a similar training program in this state have been exhausted,
and the Commission is satisfied that a similar training program is not available in this state.
It is the eligible entity’s responsibility to make every reasonable effort to locate a Michigan based
provider. At a minimum, the applicant shall contact a statewide provider (e.g., the Michigan State
Police or the Michigan Municipal League), local or regional providers (e.g., community colleges or
universities), and consult the MCOLES Schedule of Training Courses. The Schedule contains
information about in-service criminal justice training programs offered in Michigan and is published
on the MCOLES web site (www.michigan.gov/mcoles). If the required in-service training is not
available in Michigan, the agency shall submit an Out-of-State Special Use Request that must
include a detailed explanation of the contacts made and justification for selection of the out-of-state
training program. Out-of-State Special Use Requests are categorized for Commission action into
the following two groups:
• Agency Approval. An individual agency requests approval to send eligible trainees to out-of-
state training. These requests will be acted upon individually.
- 11 -
• Blanket Approval. The Commission will give blanket approval, when requirements are met, for
attendance by all agencies at annual conferences, e.g., NSA, and IACP. It is the responsibility of
the Commission staff to publicize these approvals, and to monitor compliance with the policy
regarding the 6:24 ratio for actual hours of training. These approvals will be for the payment of
registration fees only. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be
paid by other funds.
Equipment Special Use Requests
The Administrative Rules for Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended, state that the expenditure of
funds under this Act for the purpose of equipment purchases must be approved by the Commission
when total annual equipment purchases will exceed 10% of the agency’s annual distribution, or
when the purchase price of a single equipment item equals or exceeds $5,000.
Special Use Request Approval Process
The forms used to request Commission approval for the special use of LED funds, as outlined
above, are the Out-of-State Special Use Request (MJT-511) and the Equipment Special Use
Request (MJT-512). These forms are available on the MCOLES web site. Both types of requests
require prior approval. Written notification of Commission action will be returned to the requesting
agency. Each approval is assigned a unique special use request processing number, and this
number is noted on the written notification.
Definitions
Conference - A prearranged formal meeting of a group of people from an organization, association,
or profession, for the purpose of discussion or consultation of a specific topic.
Convention - A prearranged, periodic assembly of a group of people from an organization,
association, or profession, for the purpose of exchanging information
Group Meeting - A prearranged meeting of a group of people for the purposes of conducting training,
workshops, or seminars.
- 12 -
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS
"Act" means Act No. 302 of the Public Acts of 1982, as amended.
"Commission" means the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES).
“Consortium” means a public or quasi-public entity established to provide in-service training to
criminal justice entities that obtain consortium membership through payment of fees to the
consortium.
“Criminal justice education program” means a learning experience that generates competency
through reading, listening, observing, performing, problem-solving, or interacting with others, the
object of which is the introduction or enhancement of knowledge, skills, or judgment related directly
to the performance of professional criminal justice tasks currently assigned or assignable.
“Direct delivery of criminal justice services” means the execution of the duties of line law
enforcement officers provided to the general public (e.g., traffic enforcement, first aid, investigation,
community policing and problem solving) and the execution of administrative tasks that enhance the
abilities of line officers to provide direct delivery of criminal justice services.
"Distribution" means the amount distributed to law enforcement agencies, in two payments, from
the Fund within one calendar year, under the provisions of Section 3 of the Act.
"Equipment" means, for the purposes of the Act, durable products used only for the direct delivery
of in-service training, and is personal property (as distinguished from real property) that is non-
expendable and intended for repeated use with a normal useful life of more than one year, and has
a single unit purchase price of $300 or more. Equipment may include items such as audio/video
equipment, computer hardware, projectors, defensive tactics protective gear, etc.
“Full-time equated officers” or “FTEs” means the count to be used for distributions as determined
in Section 3 (4) of the Act.
"Fund" means the Michigan Justice Training Fund.
“In-service criminal justice training” means a criminal justice educational program presented by
an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act or by a contractual service provider
hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act, including a course or
package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment of a fee or tuition, or education
or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, in which the program, education, or
training is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of criminal justice services by
eligible employees of the agency or entity.
"Law enforcement officer" means an individual who is continuously employed and paid by a police
force as a law enforcement officer who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and
empowered to enforce all of the general criminal laws of this State.
"MCOLES licensed officer" means a person who has met all of the selection, employment, training,
or recognition of prior training and experience standards of Public Act 203 of 1965, as amended, and
who is licensed by the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards.
- 13 -
"Paid" means monetary compensation at not less than the federal minimum wage established in the
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended; 29 U.S.C. §206.
"Report period" means the calendar year, beginning January 1, through December 31, during
which reported activity occurred.
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 1 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
ADRIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADRIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
AKRON POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALBION DPS
ALCONA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ALGER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ALLEGAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ALLEGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALLEN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
ALMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALPENA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ALPENA POLICE DEPARTMENT
ANN ARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
ANTRIM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ARGENTINE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
ARMADA POLICE DEPARTMENT
AUBURN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
AUGUSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
BAD AXE POLICE DEPARTMENT
BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
BARAGA POLICE DEPARTMENT
BARODA-LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
BARRY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
BARRY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
BATH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
BATTLE CREEK POLICE DEPARTMENT
BAY CITY DPS
30
3
1
15
12
10
74
8
38
12
7
16
15
106
20
7
5
48
1
7
6
2
7
31
2
11
116
53
5,990.10
599.01
250.00
2,995.05
2,396.04
1,996.70
14,775.58
1,597.36
7,587.46
2,396.04
1,397.69
3,194.72
2,995.05
21,165.02
3,993.40
1,397.69
998.35
9,584.16
250.00
1,397.69
1,198.02
399.34
1,397.69
6,189.77
399.34
2,196.37
23,161.72
10,582.51
Report Period: Fall 2024
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 2 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
BEAVERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
BELDING POLICE DEPARTMENT
BELLEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
BELLEVUE POLICE DEPARTMENT
BENTON HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
BENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
BENZIE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
BERKLEY DPS
BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
BERRIEN SPRINGS-ORONOKO TOWNSHIP POLICE
DEPARTMENT
BEVERLY HILLS DPS
BIG RAPIDS DPS
BIRCH RUN POLICE DEPARTMENT
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT
BISHOP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
BLACKMAN TOWNSHIP DPS
BLISSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
BLOOMFIELD HILLS DPS
BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
BOYNE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRANCH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
BRIDGEPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRIDGMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRIGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRONSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
BROWN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
40
4
8
8
1
18
13
19
29
78
9
23
19
7
33
13
39
5
23
64
7
16
9
5
17
4
3
35
7,986.80
798.68
1,597.36
1,597.36
250.00
3,594.06
2,595.71
3,793.73
5,790.43
15,574.26
1,797.03
4,592.41
3,793.73
1,397.69
6,589.11
2,595.71
7,787.13
998.35
4,592.41
12,778.88
1,397.69
3,194.72
1,797.03
998.35
3,394.39
798.68
599.01
6,988.45
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 3 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
BUCHANAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
BURTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
CADILLAC POLICE DEPARTMENT
CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CAMBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CANTON TOWNSHIP DPS
CAPAC POLICE DEPARTMENT
CARLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT
CARO POLICE DEPARTMENT
CARROLLTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CASPIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
CASS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
CASS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CENTER LINE DPS
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHARLEVOIX COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CHARLEVOIX POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHARLOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CHEBOYGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHELSEA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHIKAMING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHIPPEWA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLARE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CLARE POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLAWSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
31
14
65
4
84
3
2
7
5
1
6
26
19
21
21
6
14
24
8
11
47
5
18
5
21
7
16
1,797.03
6,189.77
2,795.38
12,978.55
798.68
16,772.28
599.01
399.34
1,397.69
998.35
250.00
1,198.02
5,191.42
3,793.73
4,193.07
4,193.07
1,198.02
2,795.38
4,792.08
1,597.36
2,196.37
9,384.49
998.35
3,594.06
998.35
4,193.07
1,397.69
3,194.72
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
CLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLAYTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLINTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CLINTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLINTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLIO POLICE DEPARTMENT
COLOMA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CONSTANTINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
CORUNNA POLICE DEPARTMENT
COVERT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
CROSWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
DAVISON POLICE DEPARTMENT
DAVISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEARBORN POLICE DEPARTMENT
DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT
DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
DELTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
DENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT PD
DETROIT TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEWITT POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEWITT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
DICKINSON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
18
6
30
4
90
4
8
6
3
4
7
17
5
6
21
61
186
5
8
18
4
250
2,290
37
18
7
14
14
3,594.06
1,198.02
5,990.10
798.68
17,970.30
798.68
1,597.36
1,198.02
599.01
798.68
1,397.69
3,394.39
998.35
1,198.02
4,193.07
12,179.87
37,138.62
998.35
1,597.36
3,594.06
798.68
49,917.50
457,244.30
7,387.79
3,594.06
1,397.69
2,795.38
2,795.38
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 5 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
DOUGLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT
DOWAGIAC POLICE DEPARTMENT
DRYDEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
DURAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
EAST GRAND RAPIDS DPS
EAST JORDAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
EAST LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
EASTPOINTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
EATON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
EATON RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT
EAU CLAIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT
ECORSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
ELK RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT
ELKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
ELSIE POLICE DEPARTMENT
EMMET COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
EMMETT TOWNSHIP DPS
ERIE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
ESCANABA DPS
ESSEXVILLE DPS
EVART POLICE DEPARTMENT
FARMINGTON DPS
FARMINGTON HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
FENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
FERNDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
FLAT ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
FLINT POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
11
5
7
26
5
44
29
42
58
8
1
17
6
1
1
26
12
5
30
6
3
21
109
15
38
18
99
998.35
2,196.37
998.35
1,397.69
5,191.42
998.35
8,785.48
5,790.43
8,386.14
11,580.86
1,597.36
250.00
3,394.39
1,198.02
250.00
250.00
5,191.42
2,396.04
998.35
5,990.10
1,198.02
599.01
4,193.07
21,764.03
2,995.05
7,587.46
3,594.06
19,767.33
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 6 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
FLINT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
FLUSHING POLICE DEPARTMENT
FLUSHING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORSYTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
FRANKENMUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
FRANKLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
FRASER DPS
FREMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FRUITPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
GARDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
GAYLORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENESEE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION
GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GENESEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
GERRISH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
GIBRALTAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
GLADSTONE DPS
GLADWIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GLADWIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
GOGEBIC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GR FORD INTNATL AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRAND BEACH-MICHIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRAND BLANC POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRAND HAVEN DPS
GRAND LEDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE
GRAND RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT
36
13
9
7
9
10
26
9
11
33
12
13
128
20
7
9
9
14
6
15
18
5
16
40
30
16
13
265
7,188.12
2,595.71
1,797.03
1,397.69
1,797.03
1,996.70
5,191.42
1,797.03
2,196.37
6,589.11
2,396.04
2,595.71
25,557.76
3,993.40
1,397.69
1,797.03
1,797.03
2,795.38
1,198.02
2,995.05
3,594.06
998.35
3,194.72
7,986.80
5,990.10
3,194.72
2,595.71
52,912.55
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 7 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY DPS
GRANDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRANT POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRATIOT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GRAYLING POLICE DEPARTMENT
GREEN OAK CHARTER TOWNSHIP POLICE
DEPARTMENT
GREENVILLE DPS
GROSSE ILE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
GROSSE POINTE FARMS DPS
GROSSE POINTE PARK DPS
GROSSE POINTE SHORES DPS
GROSSE POINTE WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT
HAMBURG TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
HAMPTON TOWNSHIP DPS
HAMTRAMCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
HANCOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
HARBOR BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
HARBOR SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
HARPER WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT
HART POLICE DEPARTMENT
HARTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
HASTINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
HAZEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
HIGHLAND PARK DPS
HILLSDALE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
HILLSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
HOLLAND DPS
70
20
24
3
25
5
15
15
15
31
27
15
29
18
9
34
10
4
6
22
6
5
12
35
16
21
14
55
13,976.90
3,993.40
4,792.08
599.01
4,991.75
998.35
2,995.05
2,995.05
2,995.05
6,189.77
5,391.09
2,995.05
5,790.43
3,594.06
1,797.03
6,788.78
1,996.70
798.68
1,198.02
4,392.74
1,198.02
998.35
2,396.04
6,988.45
3,194.72
4,193.07
2,795.38
10,981.85
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 8 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
HOLLY POLICE DEPARTMENT
HOUGHTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
HOUGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
HOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
HUDSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
HUNTINGTON WOODS DPS
HURON CLINTON METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY POLICE
DEPT
HURON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
HURON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
INGHAM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
INKSTER POLICE DEPARTMENT
IONIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
IONIA DPS
IOSCO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
IRON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
IRON MOUNTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
IRON RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
IRONWOOD DPS
ISABELLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ISHPEMING POLICE DEPARTMENT
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
KALAMAZOO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
KALAMAZOO DPS
KALAMAZOO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
KALKASKA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
KEEGO HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
12
20
10
15
4
17
42
21
27
73
20
22
14
6
9
13
4
13
22
10
46
45
104
229
32
7
19
5
2,396.04
3,993.40
1,996.70
2,995.05
798.68
3,394.39
8,386.14
4,193.07
5,391.09
14,575.91
3,993.40
4,392.74
2,795.38
1,198.02
1,797.03
2,595.71
798.68
2,595.71
4,392.74
1,996.70
9,184.82
8,985.15
20,765.68
45,724.43
6,389.44
1,397.69
3,793.73
998.35
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 9 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
KENT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
KENTWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
KEWEENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
KINGSFORD DPS
KINGSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
KINROSS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAINGSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAKE ANGELUS POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAKE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
LAKE LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAKE ORION POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAKEVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
LANSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
LANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT
LANSING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAPEER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
LAPEER POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAPEER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
LATHRUP VILLAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAURIUM POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
LEELANAU COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
LENAWEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
LENNON POLICE DEPARTMENT
LESLIE POLICE DEPARTMENT
LEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
271
61
7
18
1
2
1
4
17
1
4
3
3
11
188
13
48
19
1
11
2
1
3
20
38
1
4
3
54,110.57
12,179.87
1,397.69
3,594.06
250.00
399.34
250.00
798.68
3,394.39
250.00
798.68
599.01
599.01
2,196.37
37,537.96
2,595.71
9,584.16
3,793.73
250.00
2,196.37
399.34
250.00
599.01
3,993.40
7,587.46
250.00
798.68
599.01
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 10 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
LINCOLN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
LINCOLN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
LITCHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
LIVINGSTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
LIVONIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
LUDINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
LUNA PIER POLICE DEPARTMENT
MACKINAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MACKINAC ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MACKINAW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MADISON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
MADISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
MANISTEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MANISTEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MANISTIQUE DPS
MARLETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MARQUETTE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MARQUETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MARSHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT
MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MASON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MASON POLICE DEPARTMENT
MATTAWAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
MELVINDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
42
16
7
3
64
124
6
14
2
13
6
6
28
258
45
5
13
11
8
5
24
32
14
16
25
11
5
16
8,386.14
3,194.72
1,397.69
599.01
12,778.88
24,759.08
1,198.02
2,795.38
399.34
2,595.71
1,198.02
1,198.02
5,590.76
51,514.86
8,985.15
998.35
2,595.71
2,196.37
1,597.36
998.35
4,792.08
6,389.44
2,795.38
3,194.72
4,991.75
2,196.37
998.35
3,194.72
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 11 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
MENDON POLICE DEPARTMENT
MENOMINEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MENOMINEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
METAMORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
METRO POLICE AUTHORITY OF GENESEE COUNTY
MICHIGAN STATE POLICE
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY DPS
MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MIDLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MILAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
MILLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
MISSAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTAGUE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTCALM COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MONTMORENCY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MONTROSE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
MORENCI POLICE DEPARTMENT
MORRICE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
MOUNT MORRIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUNT MORRIS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUNT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
1
15
15
33
6
25
1,949
67
11
40
49
15
20
1
12
84
35
5
22
17
9
4
1
19
6
25
26
599.01
250.00
2,995.05
2,995.05
6,589.11
1,198.02
4,991.75
389,156.83
13,377.89
2,196.37
7,986.80
9,783.83
2,995.05
3,993.40
250.00
2,396.04
16,772.28
6,988.45
998.35
4,392.74
3,394.39
1,797.03
798.68
250.00
3,793.73
1,198.02
4,991.75
5,191.42
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 12 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
MUNISING POLICE DEPARTMENT
MUSKEGON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
MUSKEGON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT
MUSKEGON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
NEW BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT
NEW BUFFALO POLICE DEPARTMENT
NEW ERA POLICE DEPARTMENT
NEW LOTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT
NEWAYGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
NEWAYGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
NILES POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORTH MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORTHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORTHVILLE TOWNSHIP DPS
NORTON SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT
NOVI POLICE DEPARTMENT
OAK PARK DPS
OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
OCEANA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
OGEMAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ONTONAGON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ONTWA TOWNSHIP-EDWARDSBURG POLICE
4
50
23
69
15
16
9
1
2
30
6
15
8
17
11
11
36
36
6
68
45
22
617
18
20
18
6
6
798.68
9,983.50
4,592.41
13,777.23
2,995.05
3,194.72
1,797.03
250.00
399.34
5,990.10
1,198.02
2,995.05
1,597.36
3,394.39
2,196.37
2,196.37
7,188.12
7,188.12
1,198.02
13,577.56
8,985.15
4,392.74
123,196.39
3,594.06
3,993.40
3,594.06
1,198.02
1,198.02
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 13 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
DEPARTMENT
ORCHARD LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
OSCODA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
OSCODA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
OTISVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
OTSEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
OTTAWA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
OVID POLICE DEPARTMENT
OWOSSO POLICE DEPARTMENT
OXFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAW PAW POLICE DEPARTMENT
PENTWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT
PERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT
PETOSKEY DPS
PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT
PINCKNEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
PINCONNING POLICE DEPARTMENT
PITTSFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS
PLAINWELL DPS
PLEASANT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
PORT AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
PORT HURON POLICE DEPARTMENT
PORTAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
POTTERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
21
10
11
1
7
138
2
19
7
8
3
4
18
1
6
1
41
9
6
15
27
2
53
62
6
3
2,196.37
4,193.07
1,996.70
2,196.37
250.00
1,397.69
27,554.46
399.34
3,793.73
1,397.69
1,597.36
599.01
798.68
3,594.06
250.00
1,198.02
250.00
8,186.47
1,797.03
1,198.02
2,995.05
5,391.09
399.34
10,582.51
12,379.54
1,198.02
599.01
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 14 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
PRAIRIEVILLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRESQUE ISLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
QUINCY POLICE DEPARTMENT
RAISIN TOWNSHIP DPS
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
REDFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
REED CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
REESE POLICE DEPARTMENT
RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS
RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT
RIVER ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROCKFORD DPS
ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROGERS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROMEO POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROMULUS POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROOSEVELT PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROSCOMMON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
ROYAL OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT
SAGINAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
SAGINAW POLICE DEPARTMENT
SAGINAW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE
2
12
2
4
2
53
4
2
6
8
4
11
16
21
21
11
7
6
8
41
6
26
67
73
57
59
41
9
399.34
2,396.04
399.34
798.68
399.34
10,582.51
798.68
399.34
1,198.02
1,597.36
798.68
2,196.37
3,194.72
4,193.07
4,193.07
2,196.37
1,397.69
1,198.02
1,597.36
8,186.47
1,198.02
5,191.42
13,377.89
14,575.91
11,381.19
11,780.53
8,186.47
1,797.03
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 15 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
SALINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
SANDUSKY POLICE DEPARTMENT
SANILAC COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
SAULT STE MARIE POLICE DEPARTMENT
SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
SCHOOLCRAFT POLICE DEPARTMENT
SCOTTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
SEBEWAING POLICE DEPARTMENT
SHELBY POLICE DEPARTMENT
SHELBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
SHEPHERD POLICE DEPARTMENT
SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
SHIAWASSEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
SOMERSET TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
SOUTH HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
SOUTH LYON POLICE DEPARTMENT
SOUTH ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
SOUTHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
SOUTHGATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
SPARTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
SPRING ARBOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
SPRINGPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
ST. CHARLES POLICE DEPARTMENT
ST. CLAIR CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
ST. CLAIR COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT
ST. IGNACE POLICE DEPARTMENT
11
5
29
19
16
3
3
1
3
2
80
2
1
33
2
19
15
4
114
36
8
2
2
3
8
82
81
3
2,196.37
998.35
5,790.43
3,793.73
3,194.72
599.01
599.01
250.00
599.01
399.34
15,973.60
399.34
250.00
6,589.11
399.34
3,793.73
2,995.05
798.68
22,762.38
7,188.12
1,597.36
399.34
399.34
599.01
1,597.36
16,372.94
16,173.27
599.01
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 16 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
ST. JOHNS POLICE DEPARTMENT
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
ST. JOSEPH DPS
ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
ST. LOUIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
STANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
STOCKBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
STURGIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUMPTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
SYLVAN LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
TAWAS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TAYLOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
TECUMSEH POLICE DEPARTMENT
THOMAS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
THREE OAKS POLICE DEPARTMENT
THREE RIVERS POLICE DEPARTMENT
TITTABAWASSEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAVERSE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
TROY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TUSCARORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
TUSCOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
UNADILLA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN DPS
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DPS
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT DPS
9
27
23
11
7
3
157
2
21
17
5
3
70
14
8
2
13
11
28
33
106
8
23
2
5
12
60
20
1,797.03
5,391.09
4,592.41
2,196.37
1,397.69
599.01
31,348.19
399.34
4,193.07
3,394.39
998.35
599.01
13,976.90
2,795.38
1,597.36
399.34
2,595.71
2,196.37
5,590.76
6,589.11
21,165.02
1,597.36
4,592.41
399.34
998.35
2,396.04
11,980.20
3,993.40
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 17 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
UTICA POLICE DEPARTMENT
VAN BUREN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
VASSAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
VICKSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
WALKER POLICE DEPARTMENT
WALLED LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT
WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS
WASHTENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
WATERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
WATERVLIET POLICE DEPARTMENT
WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY DPS
WEST BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
WEST BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
WESTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
WEXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
WHITE CLOUD POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHITE LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHITE PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHITEHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT
WILLIAMSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
WIXOM POLICE DEPARTMENT
13
61
42
6
6
39
11
225
6
135
52
4
90
22
387
23
47
74
6
32
71
23
3
28
3
8
5
21
2,595.71
12,179.87
8,386.14
1,198.02
1,198.02
7,787.13
2,196.37
44,925.75
1,198.02
26,955.45
10,382.84
798.68
17,970.30
4,392.74
77,272.29
4,592.41
9,384.49
14,775.58
1,198.02
6,389.44
14,176.57
4,592.41
599.01
5,590.76
599.01
1,597.36
998.35
4,193.07
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 18 of 19
Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution
WOLVERINE LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
WOODHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
WYANDOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
WYOMING POLICE DEPARTMENT
YALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
YPSILANTI POLICE DEPARTMENT
ZEELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
8
28
34
93
5
22
10
1,597.36
5,590.76
6,788.78
18,569.31
998.35
4,392.74
1,996.70
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report
Page 19 of 19
Summary Totals
3,395,115.73
199.67
460
3,389,597.92
22
5,500.00
3,395,097.92
482
Available LED Revenue
Per Capita Payments
Per Capita Value
Number of Agencies
Per Capita Distribution
Minimum Payments
Number of Agencies
Minimum Distribution
Total Disbursed
Total Number of Agencies
Number of FTEs
Number of FTEs
Total Number of FTEs 16,998
22
16,976
Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards
MCOLES Information and Tracking Network
Law Enforcement Distribution Summary
$3,395,115.73
$199.67
460
$3,389,597.92
22
$5,500.00
$3,395,097.92
$17.81
Available LED Revenue
Per Capita Payments:
Per Capita Amount
Number of Agencies
Per Capita Distribution:
Minimum Payments:
Number of Agencies
Minimum Distribution
Total Distribution:
Carry Forward to Next Distribution:
Distribution Period: Fall 2024
16,976 Number of FTEs
Number of FTEs 22
Officer Cutoff 2
$3,207,086.11Court Revenue:
$186,934.06Cash Earnings:
$156.08Carryover from Previous Distribution:
$939.48Refunds:
$0.00Less Special Payments: