HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2025.03.18 - 41954
AGENDA ITEM: Grant Application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the Building
Resilient Infrastructure and Communities Project
DEPARTMENT: Emergency Management & Homeland Security
MEETING: Board of Commissioners
DATE: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 9:30 AM - Click to View Agenda
ITEM SUMMARY SHEET
COMMITTEE REPORT TO BOARD
Resolution #2025-5011
Motion to approve the grant application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the
Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities Project in the amount of $43,136,607.15, with a
County match of $10,784,151.79, for the period of October 2025 through October 2028.
ITEM CATEGORY SPONSORED BY
Grant Penny Luebs
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
FEMA offers the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant program to support
mitigation projects that reduce disaster risk and improve long-term sustainability of infrastructure.
The Oakland County Emergency Management Division is committed to enhancing the safety and
resilience of the community by addressing hazards, improving infrastructure, and mitigation the
impacts of disasters.
The FEMA BRIC grant for FY 2024 is a competitive funding opportunity designed to encourage
proactive hazard mitigation measures across communities, supporting projects that align with the
county’s disaster preparedness, recovery, and risk reduction priorities. The Oakland County
Emergency Management Division recommends the submission of an application to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the Building Resilient Infrastructure in Communities
(BRIC) Grant to help significantly reduce the County costs associated with the construction of a new
EOC/911 Center.
On September 20, 2020, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approved Miscellaneous
Resolution (MR) #20325 funded a feasibility study for a new combined Emergency Operations
Center (EOC)/911 Dispatch Center which estimated the cost of that facility at $125,000,000.
The total grant project is $43,136,607.15 which includes a County match of $10,784,151.79. The
purpose of the program is to assist the County in reducing or eliminating future property damages
and loss of life from natural hazards such as floods, tornadoes, and storms in a facility that must be
staff regardless of the type of hazard.
POLICY ANALYSIS
The State of Michigan will apply and receive funding for the BRIC grant. Oakland County will be a
sub-recipient of the state's award. This request for application approval allows the state to apply on
the county's behalf. The department noted, that if awarded, they would not expect to receive funding
until late 2025 or 2026. They would have a minimum of 3 years, and up to 5, to expend the funds.
This is a federally funded grant and is subject to any Federal funding issues that may arise in the
future. Acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment and
continuation of this program is contingent upon continued future levels of grant funding.
Oakland County has previously been awarded a BRIC grant, via MR #2022-2156 to complete
scoping for a resilient Emergency Operations Center (EOC). This grant focused on evaluating the
feasibility of enhancing the proposed new EOC building to include structural upgrades with
redundant power infrastructure. The grant is currently in progress but will result in construction and
design documents for the construction of a new EOC. BRIC project funding would be utilized to
construct the hardened elements of the new EOC. This would allow the new building to withstand
severe weather conditions, including tornadoes and high wind events. Integration of secondary
power sources to ensure continuity of operations for the new construction is also part of the
proposed BRIC project. Facilities such as this are complex and technologically sophisticated, and
more importantly, designed and engineered to withstand high wind velocities resistant to airborne
debris.
FISCAL IMPACT: No Budget Amendment Needed
Committee members can contact Barbara Winter, Policy and Fiscal Analysis Supervisor at
248.821.3065 or winterb@oakgov.com or the department contact persons listed for additional
information.
CONTACT
Thom Hardesty, Director Emergency Management & Homeland Security
ITEM REVIEW TRACKING
Aaron Snover, Board of Commissioners Created/Initiated - 3/20/2025
AGENDA DEADLINE: 03/18/2025 9:30 AM
ATTACHMENTS
1. Grant Review Sign-Off
2. 2024 BRIC NOI Doumentation
3. BRIC FY24 - Oakland County - Project - Saferoom Application v1.0 (002)
COMMITTEE TRACKING
2025-03-11 Public Health & Safety - Recommend to Board
2025-03-18 Full Board - Adopt
Motioned by: Commissioner Robert Hoffman
Seconded by: Commissioner Ann Erickson Gault
Yes: Marcia Gershenson, Yolanda Smith Charles, Charles Cavell, Ann Erickson Gault, Linnie
Taylor, Robert Smiley, David Woodward, Michael Spisz, Penny Luebs, Kristen Nelson, Christine
Long, Robert Hoffman, Philip Weipert, Gwen Markham, Angela Powell (15)
No: None (0)
Abstain: None (0)
Absent: Michael Gingell, Karen Joliat, William Miller III, Brendan Johnson (4)
Passed
GRANT REVIEW SIGN-OFF – Emergency Management and Homeland Security
APP00209
GRANT NAME: FY 2025 Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities Grant (2024 BRIC)
FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan State Police
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Robert Seeley / (248) 858-5080
STATUS: Application (Less than or Equal to $50,000)
DATE: 03/10/2025
Please be advised that the captioned grant materials have completed the internal grant review. Below are the returned
comments.
You may now obtain the Board Chair’s signature for the submittal of the application. The grant application package
(which should include this sign-off and the grant application with related documentation) as well as the Report from
Fiscal Services to the Board Chairperson should be submitted to the Board of Commissioners for placement on the next
agenda(s) of the appropriate Board of Commissioners’ committee(s).
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Management and Budget:
Approved – Shannon Lee (03/10/2025)
Human Resources:
Approved by Human Resources. No position impact. – Heather Mason on behalf of Hailey Matthews (02/27/2025)
Risk Management:
Approved. No County insurance requirements. – Robert Erlenbeck (03/03/2025)
Corporation Counsel:
Approved. I didn’t identify any legal issues with the grant application documents, so “approved”– Sharon Kessler
(03/05/2025)
Page 1 of 35
BRIC FY24 – Oakland County
Project - Saferoom
BUILDING RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITIES (BRIC) AND FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE
(FMA)
Page 2 of 35
Contents
SUBAPPLICANT INFORMATION .............................................................................................................3
CONTACT INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................4
COMMUNITY ...........................................................................................................................................5
MITIGATION PLAN ..................................................................................................................................7
SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................................................................8
SCHEDULE .............................................................................................................................................13
LOCATION .............................................................................................................................................15
Project Location ...................................................................................................................................15
Project Benefiting Area..........................................................................................................................15
Project Impact Area..............................................................................................................................16
BUDGET .................................................................................................................................................21
COST EFFECTIVENESS .........................................................................................................................24
ENVIRONMENTAL / HISTORIC PRESERVATION (EHP) REVIEW INFORMATION .................................25
A. National Historic Preservation Act - Historic Buildings and Structures.................................................25
B. National Historic Preservation Act - Archeological Resources.............................................................26
C. Endangered Species Act and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act.........................................................27
D. Clean Water Act, Rivers and Harbors Act, and Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands)............28
E. Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management)...............................................................................29
F. Coastal Zone Management Act..........................................................................................................29
G. Farmland Protection Policy Act.........................................................................................................29
H. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (Hazardous and Toxic Materials) ............................................29
I. Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice for Low Income and Minority Populations ......................30
J. Other Environmental/Historic Preservation Laws or Issues..................................................................30
K. Summary and Cost of Potential Impacts ............................................................................................30
EVALUATION .........................................................................................................................................31
ASSURANCE AND CERTIFICATIONS....................................................................................................33
Page 3 of 35
SUBAPPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of Federal Agency
FEMA
Type of Submission
Application
STATE OF MICHIGAN
7150 HARRIS DR
DIMONDALE, MI 48821 United States
State UEI-EFT DUNS #EIN #
MI TF1BX14XKTY6 024178035 386000134
Subapplicant type
Local Government
Is the subapplicant subject to review by Executive Order 12372 Process?
•Yes - This Pre-application/application was made available to the Executive Order 12372 Process for
review on:
•No, Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.
•No, Program has not been selected by state for review.
Is the subapplicant delinquent on any federal debt?
•Yes
•No
Page 4 of 35
CONTACT INFORMATION
Subrecipient Authorized Representative (SAR)
•Name: Michael Kamenec
•Email: Kamenecm@oakgov.com
•Primary Phone: 248.858.1598
•Mailing Address: 1200 N. Telegraph Bld 47W, Pontiac, MI 48341
Point(s) of Contact
•Name: Mr. Michael Kamanec
•Title: Emergency Management Specialist
•Email: kamaenec@oakgov.com
•Primary Phone: 248.858.1598 (Work)
•Additional Phone: 248.648.0652 (Mobile)
•Mailing Address: 1200 N. Telegraph, Building #47W, Pontiac MI 48341
•Name: Mr. Thom Hardesty
•Title: Director
•Email: hardestyt@OakGov.com
•Primary Phone: 248.452.9578 (Work)
•Additional Phone: 248.343.0863 (Mobile)
•Mailing Address: 1200 N. Telegraph, Building #47W, Pontiac MI 48341
Page 5 of 35
COMMUNITY
Community
Please provide the following information. If the Congressional district number for your community does not
display correctly, please contact your State NFIP coordinator.
Add Communities
Please find the community(ies) that will benefit from this mitigation activity by clicking on the Find
communities button. If needed, modify the Congressional District number for each community by entering
the updated number under the U.S. Congressional District column for that community. When finished, click
the Continue button. NOTE: You should also notify your State NFIP coordinator so that the updated U.S.
Congressional District number can be updated in the Community Information System (CIS) database.
Community name County
code
CID
number
CRS
community
CRS
rating
U.S.
Congressional
District
DETROIT, CITY OF 163 260222 Y 7 Delete
MACOMB COUNTY 099 261890 N Delete
MONROE
COUNTY*
115 260956 N Delete
OAKLAND
COUNTY*
125 261041 N Delete
ST. CLAIR, CITY OF 147 260279 N Delete
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
161 261898 N Delete
WAYNE COUNTY 163 261821 N Delete
Please provide any additional comments below (optional).
St. Clair County did not populate on the tool. In addition to the City of St. Clair, it should be the county.
Waterford Township is the primary location where the project will take place.
Commented [LM1]: Submitted ticket to FEMA Go
about adding St. Clair County
Page 6 of 35
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Southeast MI
UASI MOU.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin@i-
s-
consulting.com
731 KB Southeast Michigan
Mutual Aid Agreement.
Under this agreement,
Oakland County's EOC
will serve as a
backup/alternate EOC
to the indicated
counties and their
respective
municipalities.
Delete
Page 7 of 35
MITIGATION PLAN
Please provide your plan information below.
Is the Subapplicant entity that will benefit from the proposed activity covered by the current FEMA approved
multi-hazard mitigation plan in compliance with 44 CFR Part 201?
•Yes
•No
Please provide plan detail
•Plan name: Oakland County Hazard Mitigation Plan
•Plan type: Local Multijurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
•Plan approval date: 12/07/2023
•Proposed activity description: Volume II, page 15: Oakland County EOC Saferoom and Secondary
Power Oakland County has completed the planning phase of constructing a new, state-of-the-art,
Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The EOC will also house the county's 911 dispatch center,
and a public meeting space. BRIC project funding would be utilized to enhance and harden the
structural integrity of the designed EOC to withstand severe weather conditions, including
tornadoes and high wind events. Integration of secondary power sources to ensure continuity of
operations for the new construction is also part of the proposed BRIC project. Facilities such as this
are complex and technologically sophisticated, and more importantly designed and engineered to
withstand high wind velocities resistant to airborne debris.
Please provide any additional comments below (optional)
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
OaklandCounty2023
.HMP.Volume II-
Saferoom Mitigation
Project.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin@i-
s-consulting.com
217 KB This is the
mitigation
project that
was identified
for this project.
Delete
Page 8 of 35
SCOPE OF WORK
The project Scope of Work (SOW) identifies the eligible activity, describes what will be accomplished and
explains how the mitigation activity will be implemented. The mitigation activity must be described in
sufficient detail to verify the cost estimate. All activities for which funding is requested must be identified in
the SOW prior to the close of the application period. FEMA has different requirements for project, planning
and management cost SOWs.
Subapplication title (include type of activity and location): BRIC FY24 - Oakland County - Project -
Saferoom
Do any of the following apply for this project?
o Hazard Eligibility and Local Projects (HELP) Act funding
o None
Activities
Primary activity type: Saferoom/shelter
Primary sub-activity type: Tornado - saferoom
Secondary activity type (Optional): Generator
Secondary sub-activity type: Permanent
Tertiary activity type (Optional): Other
If Other please specify: While the generator is one component of the secondary power
that the EOC will utilize, there are other long-term sustainable and utility-hardening
elements related to ensuring the continuity of electrical power, such as hookups and
battery backup/supply.
Geographic areas description: The current EOC address is 1200 N Telegraph Road #47W, Pontiac,
Michigan 48341. It is located at approximately Lat. 42.65454, Long. -83.33152. The existing Admin. Annex 1
facility is scheduled to be demolished following the construction of the new facility. The decision to build a
new facility rather than remodel the existing facility is that the current building would need significant
renovations, would not be cost-effective, is undersized, and the current Admin. Annex 1 facility was built in
1928. The removal of the outdated facility permits construction of the new facility within the County’s
facility complex with close adjacency to the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office, Oakland County Information
Technology Department, and other critical Oakland County functions.
Community Lifelines
Primary community lifeline: Safety and security
Primary sub-community lifeline: Community Safety
Secondary community lifeline (Optional): Food, water, shelter
Secondary sub-community lifeline: Shelter
Tertiary community lifeline (Optional): Communications
Tertiary sub-community lifeline: 911 and dispatch
Page 9 of 35
Hazard Sources
Primary hazard source: Tornado
Secondary hazard source (optional) : Severe Storm
Tertiary hazard source (optional): Winter storm
Is this a phased project?
•Yes
•No
Are you doing construction in this project?
•Yes
•No
Percentage of population impacted: 100%
Provide detailed description of population impacted:
The surrounding area served by the EOC is comprised of other government offices, local residences, and a
farmers’ market in operation multiple times per week. An analysis was performed based upon FEMA
Tornado Safe Room standards of 5-minute walk or 1/2 mile radius. Facilities A, B, and C are all within a 5-
minute walk; other government offices and surrounding residences are located within the 1/2 mile radius.
The attachment includes analyses on occupancies and adjusted population figures for the
saferoom/shelter function of the facility.
The Oakland County facility will serve as the alternate location of emergency management functions for
surrounding jurisdictions per a Mutual Aid Agreement. Oakland County, Macomb County, Monroe County,
St. Clair County,
Washtenaw County, Wayne County, as well as the City of Detroit. The mutual aid agreement is attached.
The attachment includes approximate occupancy load surcharge data from each surrounding EOC facility.
In addition, it should be noted that all populations from these counties will indirectly benefit by having a
functioning EOC in times of disaster.
•Macomb County: 881,217
•Monroe County: 154,809
•St. Claire County: 160,383
•Washtenaw County: 372,258
•Wayne County: 1,793,561
•City of Detroit: 639,111
Source: 2020 U.S. Census
Furthermore, the Oakland County EOC and Dispatch will serve as an alternate EOC site for the State of
Michigan. The indirect benefit to all residents in the State of Michigan is 10,077,331 (2020 US Census).
Page 10 of 35
Provide a clear and detailed description of your proposed activity:
Oakland County has taken on the mission of building a new Emergency Operations Center (EOC) /
Emergency Communications Center (ECC) in Waterford Township, Michigan. The facility will be housed in a
new state-of-the-art “hardened” facility designed to FEMA P-361 EF-5 Tornado standards. The facility will
be sited in the same vicinity as the existing Oakland County EOC. The new facility will consolidate other
Oakland County public safety functions with the intent to streamline delivery of emergency services for the
County. The site is intended to serve as the primary shelter for the government campus and surrounding
area.
Another major critical function is that it will serve as the alternate location for the EOCs from the
surrounding counties and for the State of Michigan.
How will the mitigation activity be implemented?
The saferoom and shelter will be housed in a new state-of-the-art “hardened” facility designed to FEMA P-
361 EF-5 Tornado standards. All aspects of the facility, including secondary power, will be incorporated to
not only serve as the primary shelter for the surrounding area, but to also ensure EOC and emergency
dispatch operations can maintain continuity of operations.
Describe how the project is technically feasible and will be effective in reducing the risk by reducing
or eliminating damage to property and/or loss of life in the project area. Please include engineering
design parameters and references to the following: preliminary schematic or engineering
drawings/design; applicable building codes; engineering practices and/or best practices; level of
protection (e.g., life safety, 100-yr flood protection with freeboard, 100-yr wind design, etc.):
The new facility will contain approximately 78,300 sf distributed over two levels; a breakdown of the
program square footage for each function can be found in the attached schematic design document. The
project is being designed with the foresight of the potential need of Safe Room functionality to ensure
continuity of operations for the housed critical functions as well as serving as a Community Safe Room for
surrounding public functions and residents. The program occupancy of the building population for which
the Safe Room will secure is attached. Additional occupancy capacity is discussed as an Additional Benefit
to providing this facility. The building is designed to operate off-grid in case of emergency. The scope of the
project will also include an Emergency Backup Generator that is evaluated as a separate cost item.
FEMA 361 and the related IBC 500 have been utilized for designing the Safe Room elements of the facility.
The facility has been designed to withstand an EF-5 Tornado event.
Who will manage and complete the mitigation activity?
Oakland County Emergency Management and Homeland Security in coordination with Oakland County
Facilities Planning & Engineering will manage the project.
Page 11 of 35
Will the project address the hazards identified and what risks will remain from all hazards after
project implementation (residual risk)?
While the project will directly mitigate tornado, severe storm, and winter storm, it will also mitigate all
hazards due to the critical nature of the facility as an EOC and dispatch center.
Does the mitigation activity incorporate nature based solutions? Please select the Nature Based
Solution(s) used:
Other
If Other please specify:
The intent and goal for the EOC project is to achieve LEED certification. In fact, the county will be trying to
achieve a higher level than basic certification: LEED gold for the project, as that is the level the County has
set as the goal for new construction projects. Due to specific challenges with the redundancies related to
HVAC system, however, we will likely only achieve LEED silver.
When will the mitigation activity take place?
During construction.
Explain why this project is the best alternative. What alternatives were considered to address the risk and
why was the proposed activity considered the best alternative?
The decision to build a new facility, and incorporate the saferoom and shelter elements in the new
construction rather than remodel the existing facility is that the current building would need significant
renovations, would not be cost-effective, is undersized, and the current Admin. Annex 1 facility was built in
1928.
Please identify the entity that will perform any long-term maintenance and provide a maintenance,
schedule and cost information. The subapplicant or owner of the area to be mitigated is responsible
for maintenance (including costs of long-term care) after the project is completed?
Oakland County Emergency Management and Homeland Security in coordination with Oakland County
Facilities Planning & Engineering will perform any long-term maintenance and provide maintenance of the
project upon completion. These entities will assume full responsibility.
Additional comments (optional)
Attachments
Page 12 of 35
Filename Date
uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Population
Impacted and Key
Benefits.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin
@i-s-
consulting.co
m
274 KB Delete
OC
Presentation_202
3-
0710_DRAFT_Rev
3.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin
@i-s-
consulting.co
m
14 MB Items pertaining to this
BRIC grant include only
the ECC/EOC items
Delete
2023.06.20 -
Schematic_Desig
n_Book_ECC_EO
C.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin
@i-s-
consulting.co
m
38 MB Items pertaining to this
BRIC grant include only
the ECC/EOC items
Delete
Oakland County
EOC SD Estimate
Report 06 21 2023
Submission
FINAL.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin
@i-s-
consulting.co
m
1 MB Items pertaining to this
BRIC grant include only
the ECC/EOC items.
Costs were separated
and itemized based
only on the ECC/EOC
line items. Only those
elements that pertain to
hardening and meeting
saferoom requirements
were captured.
Delete
Page 13 of 35
SCHEDULE
Specify the work schedule for the mitigation activities.
Add tasks to the schedule
Please include all tasks necessary to implement this mitigation activity; include descriptions and estimated
time frames.
TASK NAME DESCRIPTION START
MONTH
TASK
DURATION
FOUNDATIONS Special Foundations 1 2 months
SUPER STRCTURE Floor Construction, roof
construction
3 5 months
EXTERIOR ENCLOSURE Exterior walls, exterior windows,
exterior doors
3 3 months
ROOFING Roof coverings 5 1 month
PLUMBING Plumbing Fixtures, Domestic Water
Distribution, Sanitary Waste, Rain
Water Drainage, Other Pumping
Systems
6 10 months
HVAC Heat Generating Systems, Cooling
Generating Systems, Distribution
Systems, Terminal & Package Units,
Controls & Instrumentation, Systems
Testing & Balancing, Other HVAC
Systems & Equipment
6 10 months
FIRE PROTECTION Sprinklers 6 10 months
ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING,
COMMUNICATIONS /
SECURITY & SAFETY
Electrical Service & Distribution,
Lighting & Branch Wiring
6 10 months
COMMUNICATIONS/SECURITY
AND SAFETY
Communications, Security & Safety
systems
8 8 months
DESIGN/ESTIMATE
CONTINGENCY (10% OF
BLDG. COST)
Design/Estimate Contingency (10%
of total bldg. cost)
1 16 months
ESCALATION (8.67% OF
DIRECT TRADE COSTS)
Escalation (8.67% of direct trade
costs)
1 16 months
INITIAL SITE PREPARATION Site preparation 1 1 month
Page 14 of 35
TASK NAME DESCRIPTION START
MONTH
TASK
DURATION
SITE PREPARATION: SITE,
CIVIL, MECHANICAL
UTILITIES
Site, Civil, Mechanical Utilities 1 16 months
SITE PREPARATION: SITE
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
Site Electrical Utilities 1 16 months
BUILDING PERMIT
ALLOWANCE
Building Permit Allowance (1%)1 1 month
ENGINEERING PEER REVIEW Engineering Peer Review 1 1 month
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Special Inspections 1 1 month
ADDITIONAL ESCALATIONS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
OWNER CONSTRUCTION
CONTINGENCY
Owner Construction Contingency
(5.0%)
1 16 months
ADDITIONAL ESCALATIONS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
CONSTRUCTION
CONTINGENCY
Construction Contingency (3.0%)1 16 months
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT: CM
CONSTRUCTION STAFF
CM Construction Staff (i.e. this is not
a government employee)
1 16 months
Estimate the total duration of your proposed activities (in months): 16
Proposed project start and end dates
Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/01/2025
End Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/01/2027
Page 15 of 35
LOCATION
Project Location
Provide a detailed description of the proposed project's location.
The current EOC address is 1200 N Telegraph Road #47W, Pontiac, Michigan 48341. It is located at
approximately Lat. 42.65454, Long. -83.33152. The existing Admin. Annex 1 facility is scheduled to be
demolished following the construction of the new facility. The decision to build a new facility rather than
remodel the existing facility is that the current building would need significant renovations, would not be
cost-effective, is undersized, and the current Admin. Annex 1 facility was built in 1928. The removal of the
outdated facility permits construction of the new facility within the County’s facility complex with close
adjacency to the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office, Oakland County Information Technology Department,
and other critical Oakland County functions.
Latitude: 42.654540
Longitude: -083.331520
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Project Benefiting Area
Provide a detailed description of the proposed project's benefiting area.
The surrounding area served by the EOC is comprised of other government offices, local residences, and a
farmers’ market in operation multiple times per week. An analysis was performed based upon FEMA
Tornado Safe Room standards of 5-minute walk or 1/2 mile radius. Facilities A, B, and C are all within a 5-
minute walk; other government offices and surrounding residences are located within the 1/2 mile radius.
The attachment includes analyses on occupancies and adjusted population figures for the
saferoom/shelter function of the facility.
The Oakland County facility will serve as the alternate location of emergency management functions for
surrounding jurisdictions per a Mutual Aid Agreement. Oakland County, Macomb County, Monroe County,
St. Clair County,
Washtenaw County, Wayne County, as well as the City of Detroit. The mutual aid agreement is attached.
The attachment includes approximate occupancy load surcharge data from each surrounding EOC facility.
In addition, it should be noted that all populations from these counties will indirectly benefit by having a
functioning EOC in times of disaster.
•Macomb County: 881,217
•Monroe County: 154,809
•St. Claire County: 160,383
•Washtenaw County: 372,258
Page 16 of 35
•Wayne County: 1,793,561
•City of Detroit: 639,111
Source: 2020 U.S. Census
Furthermore, the Oakland County EOC and Dispatch will serve as an alternate EOC site for the State of
Michigan. The indirect benefit to all residents in the State of Michigan is 10,077,331 (2020 US Census).
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Population
Impacted and
Key Benefits.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin@i-
s-
consulting.com
274 KB Delete
Project Impact Area
Provide a detailed description of the proposed project's impact area.
The surrounding area served by the EOC is comprised of other government offices, local residences, and a
farmers’ market in operation multiple times per week. An analysis was performed based upon FEMA
Tornado Safe Room standards of 5-minute walk or 1/2 mile radius. Facilities A, B, and C are all within a 5-
minute walk; other government offices and surrounding residences are located within the 1/2 mile radius.
The attachment includes analyses on occupancies and adjusted population figures for the
saferoom/shelter function of the facility.
The Oakland County facility will serve as the alternate location of emergency management functions for
surrounding jurisdictions per a Mutual Aid Agreement. Oakland County, Macomb County, Monroe County,
St. Clair County,
Washtenaw County, Wayne County, as well as the City of Detroit. The mutual aid agreement is attached.
The attachment includes approximate occupancy load surcharge data from each surrounding EOC facility.
In addition, it should be noted that all populations from these counties will indirectly benefit by having a
functioning EOC in times of disaster.
•Macomb County: 881,217
•Monroe County: 154,809
•St. Claire County: 160,383
•Washtenaw County: 372,258
•Wayne County: 1,793,561
•City of Detroit: 639,111
Source: 2020 U.S. Census
Page 17 of 35
Furthermore, the Oakland County EOC and Dispatch will serve as an alternate EOC site for the State of
Michigan. The indirect benefit to all residents in the State of Michigan is 10,077,331 (2020 US Census).
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
2023.06.20 -
Schematic_Design_Book
_ECC_EOC.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin@i-
s-consulting.com
38 MB Delete
OC Presentation_2023-
0710_DRAFT_Rev3.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin@i-
s-consulting.com
14 MB Delete
Project Site Inventory
Does this project subapplication propose to mitigate a property/structure(s)? ( Examples: residential
home, commercial building, bridge, fire station, levee, pumping station, wastewater treatment
plant, telephone pole, electric line, etc.)
•Yes
•No
Do you know the location of the structure?
•Yes
•No
Enter the location of the property/structure.
Select a method for adding property/structure(s).
•Manually add property/structure(s) to the project site inventory
List of location(s) (1 location)
Status Location
ID Address Inventory
type
Structure
type
Mitigation
action Action
✓106949 1200 N Telegraph RD,
Building 47W ,
Pontiac, MI, Oakland,
48341
Building Government Tornado
saferoom,
Wind
retrofit
Edit Delete
Page 18 of 35
Location Details
Mitigation Information
Primary Mitigation Action: Tornado saferoom
Secondary Mitigation Action: Wind Retrofit
Primary Hazard to be mitigated: Tornado
Secondary hazard(s) to be mitigated: Severe Storm
Location Information
Address: 1200 N Telegraph Road, Building 477, Pontiac MI 48341
Latitude: 42.654540
Longitude: -0.83.331520
Structure Attributes
Structure type: Government
Foundation type: Slab on Grade (not split-level)
Structure type primary indicator; Emergency Response
Structure type secondary indicator: Emergency Operations Center
Building size (square feet): 78,300
Year built : 2026
Property tax identification number: n/a
Legal description: Emergency Operations Center (EOC) / Emergency Communications
Center (ECC)
Flood zone: C
Base flood elevation (feet) : [Left blank]
Estimated cost of mitigation ($): $43,136,607.15
Is this structure currently rented/leased?
•Yes
•No
Is this a critical facility as identified in your hazard mitigation plan?
•Yes
•No
Is this structure identified as an alternate structure?
•Yes
•No
Is this structure substantially damaged?
•Yes
Page 19 of 35
•No
Insurance Information
Is this structure insured?
•Yes
•No
Cost-Effectiveness Information
How cost-effectiveness was determined? BCA completed in FEMA's BCA toolkit
Benefit-cost ratio (BCR): 1.32
Did you incorporate Nature Based Solutions for this location? Please select the
Nature Based Solution(s) used: Other
Please explain other Nature Based Solutions incorporated for this location
The intent and goal for the EOC project is to achieve LEED certification. In fact, the county
will be trying to achieve a higher level than basic certification: LEED gold for the project, as
that is the level the County has set as the goal for new construction projects. Due to
specific challenges with the redundancies related to HVAC system, however, we will likely
only achieve LEED silver.
Acreage Turned to Green Space
What is the proposed area, in acres, to be converted to green space for this site? 0
Owner Information
Owner type: Government
Company name: Oakland County
First name: David
Last name: Coulter
Suffix:
Primary contact phone number: 248.858.5400
Secondary contact phone number:
Email:
Is the owner's mailing address the same as the location address?
•Yes
•No
Enter Owner's mailing address: 2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Building 41W, Waterford, Michigan
48328
County: Oakland
Page 20 of 35
Does the structure have other co-owners or holders of recorded interest?
•Yes
•No
Provide additional comments about the location below. (Optional)
Page 21 of 35
BUDGET
Budget cost estimate should directly link to your scope of work and work schedule. You must add at least
one item(s) greater than 0 for your cost estimate. As necessary, please adjust your federal/non-federal cost
shares, and add the non-federal funding source(s) you are planning to use this project. Once you have
completed this section, please click the Continue button at the bottom of this page to navigate to the next
section.
Add Budget Cost Types and Item(s)
First, click the Add cost type button below to add cost type cost estimate and then click the Add item(s)
button to add the item(s) for the cost estimate.
Budget type: Construction
Cost type: Cost estimate $43,136,607.15
Cost estimate is the line item(s) budget to support the scope of work for the execution and completion of the
project. Be sure to include the cost associated with revisions/formal adoption. To add a line item, Please
click on the Add an item button. Click anywhere within each row or the arrow to edit or delete the line item(s)
Cost Items
Item: Foundation $1,142,625.00
Item: Site, Civil, Mechanical Utilities $513,505.00
Item: Site Electrical Utilities $358,293.00
Item: Escalation $2,606,618.00
Item: Communications/Security and Safety $3,581,926.76
Item: Fire Protection $248,507.00
Item: Plumbing $1,656,044.60
Item: Initial Site Preparation $722,978.00
Item: Design/Estimate Contingencies $3,006,480.00
Item: Electrical, Lighting, Communications/Security $3,099,745.05
Item: Soil Test $44,195.00
Item: Super Structure $5,335,917.00
Item: Special Inspections $160,000.00
Item: HVAC $6,013,998.74
Item: Exterior Enclosure $7,957,535.00
Item: Roofing $1,028,500.00
Page 22 of 35
Item: Construction Contingency $901,944.00
Item: Engineering Peer Review $25,000.00
Item: Building Permit Allowance $300,648.00
Item: Construction Management Staff (Contracted) $2,928,907.00
Item: Owner Construction Contingency $1,503,240.00
Program income (optional) $0.00
Cost Share
Cost share or matching means the portion of project costs not paid by federal funds.
Proposed federal vs. non-federal funding shares
Hazard mitigation assistance (HMA) funds may be used to pay up to 75% federal share of the eligible activity
costs. Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), Economically Disadvantaged Rural
Communities (EDRCs) and Community Disaster Resilience Zones (CDRZs) may be eligible for up to 90%
federal share. Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) and severe repetitive loss (SRL) properties may be eligible
for up to 100% federal share. Repetitive loss (RL) properties may be eligible for up to 90% federal share.
Cost estimate
Is this an Economically Disadvantaged Rural Community or Community Disaster Resilience Zone? This
determines your federal/non-federal share ratio.
•Yes
•No
% Percentage $ Dollar amount
Proposed federal share 75.00 $32,352,455.36
Proposed non-federal share 25.00 $10,784,151.79
Based on total budget cost: $43,136,607.15
Non-federal funding sources here
That portion of the total costs of the program provided by the non-federal entity in the form of in-kind
donations or cash match received from third parties or contributed by the agency. In-kind contributions must
be provided and cash expended during the project period along with federal funds to satisfy the matching
requirements.
Page 23 of 35
Funding source % Non-federal share by source Funding amount
Funding source: General Fund 100.00% $10,784,151.79
Please provide any additional comments below (optional).
Attachments
•No file chosen
Page 24 of 35
COST EFFECTIVENESS
Cost-Effectiveness
How was cost-effectiveness determined for this project? BCA completed in FEMA's BCA toolkit
What are the total project benefits? ($) $57,186,248
What is the total project cost? ($) $43,234,609
What is the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) for the entire project? 1.32
Was sea level rise incorporated into the flood elevations in the BCA?
•Yes
•No
Were environmental benefits added to the project benefits?
•Yes
•No
Were social benefits added to the project benefits?
•Yes
•No
Please provide any additional comments below (optional).
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Oakland EOC
BCA Report - 12-
09-2023.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin@i-
s-
consulting.com
1 MB Delete
Page 25 of 35
ENVIRONMENTAL / HISTORIC PRESERVATION (EHP)
REVIEW INFORMATION
Introduction
An environmental/historic preservation review is required for all activities for which FEMA funds are being
requested. FEMA will complete this review with the assistance of both the state or tribal government and
the local applicant. It is important that you provide accurate information. If you are having problems
completing this section, please contact your application point of contact.
A. National Historic Preservation Act - Historic Buildings and Structures
1. Does your project affect or is it in close proximity to any buildings or structures 50 years or more in
age?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
Please confirm that you have provided the information listed below by selecting each check box.
(If you have not provided these documents in any other section of the application, please attach
the required documents below.)
✓The property address and original date of construction for each property affected (unless this
information is already noted in the Properties section).
✓A minimum of two color photographs showing at least three sides of each structure (Please
label the photos accordingly).
✓A diagram or USGS 1:24,000 scale quadrangle map displaying the relationship of the property
(s) to the project area.
To help FEMA evaluate the impact of the project, please indicate any other information you are
providing in the attachments or comment section below: (optional)
Information gathered about potential historic properties in the project area, including any
evidence indicating the age of the building or structure and presence of buildings or structures
that are listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or within or near
a National Register listed or eligible historic district. Sources for this information may include
the State Historic Preservation Officer, and/or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO/THPO), your local planning office, historic preservation organization, or historical
society.
Consideration of how the project design will minimize adverse effects on known or potential
historic buildings or structures, and any alternatives considered or implemented to avoid or
minimize effects on historic buildings or structures. Please address and note associated costs
in your project budget.
For acquisition/demolition projects affecting historic buildings or structures, any data
regarding the consideration and feasibility of elevation, relocation, or flood proofing as
alternatives to demolition.
Attached materials or additional comments.
Page 26 of 35
Please provide an explanation and any information about this project that could assist FEMA in
its review. (optional) : This is not a historical building. The building was built in 1928 and will be
demolished once the new construction is complete.
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
East1.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
4 MB Delete
East2.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
5 MB Delete
North1.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
4 MB Delete
North2.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
6 MB Delete
North3.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
6 MB Delete
South1.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
5 MB Delete
South2.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
4 MB Delete
West1.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
5 MB Delete
West2.JPG 12/12/2023 daiko.abe@i-s-
consulting.com
5 MB Delete
B. National Historic Preservation Act - Archeological Resources
Does your project involve disturbance of ground?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
Page 27 of 35
Please confirm that you have provided the information listed below by selecting each check box.
(If you have not provided these documents in any other section of the application, please attach
the required documents below.)
✓A description of the ground disturbance by giving the dimensions (area, volume, depth, etc.)
and location.
✓The past use of the area to be disturbed, noting the extent of previously disturbed ground.
✓A USGS 1:24,000 scale or other site map showing the location and extent of ground
disturbance.
To help FEMA evaluate the impact of the project, please indicate below any other information
you are providing. (optional)
Any information about potential historic properties, including archeological sites, in the
project area. Sources of this information may include SHPO/THPO, and/or the Tribe's cultural
resources contact if no THPO is designated. Include, if possible, a map showing the relation of
any identified historic properties to the project area.
Attached materials or additional comments.
Please provide an explanation and any information about this project that could assist FEMA in
its review. (optional)
100,800 SF: Approx. surface area of the ground disturbance. (Square Feet)
10 Feet: Approx. depth of deepest building foundation excavation.
1,800 CY: Approx. volume of ground excavation for new building. (Cubic Yards)
8,800 CY: Approx. volume of fill. (Cubic Yards)
10,600 CY: Excavation plus fill (Cubic Yards)
Attachments
Filename Date
uploaded Uploaded by File
size Description Action
2023.06.20 -
Schematic_Design_Book_ECC_EOC
.pdf
02/21/2025 lauren.martin
@i-s-
consulting.co
m
38
MB
Delete
C. Endangered Species Act and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
1. Are federally listed threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat present in the area
affected by the project?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
Page 28 of 35
2. Does your project remove or affect vegetation?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
Please confirm that you have provided the information listed below by selecting each check box.
(If you have not provided these documents in any other section of the application, please provide
the required documents either through attachment and/or comment box below.)
✓Description of the amount (area) and type of vegetation to be removed or affected.
✓A site map showing the project area and the extent of vegetation affected.
✓Photographs or digital images that show both the vegetation affected and the vegetation in
context of its surroundings.
To help FEMA evaluate the impact of the project, please indicate below any other information
you are providing. (optional)
Attached materials or additional comments.
Please provide an explanation and any information about this project that could assist FEMA in
its review. (optional)
Minimal vegetation will be removed as part of this construction project.
3. Is your project in, near (within 200 feet), or likely to affect any type of waterway or body of water?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
Attachments
Attach a document of Form
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
D. Clean Water Act, Rivers and Harbors Act, and Executive Order 11990
(Protection of Wetlands)
1. Will the project involve dredging or disposal of dredged material, excavation, adding fill material
or result in any modification to water bodies or wetlands designated as 'waters of the U.S' as
identified by the US Army Corps of Engineers or on the National Wetland Inventory?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
Page 29 of 35
E. Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management)
1. Does a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM), hydrologic study, or
some other source indicate that the project is located in or will affect a 1% annual chance floodplain,
a 0.2% annual chance floodplain, a regulatory floodway, or an area prone to flooding?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
2. Does the project alter a watercourse, water flow patterns, or a drainage way, regardless of its
floodplain designation?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
F. Coastal Zone Management Act
1. Is the project located in the state's designated coastal zone?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
G. Farmland Protection Policy Act
1. Will the project convert more than 5 acres of prime or unique farmland outside city limits to a non-
agricultural use?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
H. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
(Hazardous and Toxic Materials)
1. Is there a reason to suspect there are contaminants from a current or past use on the property associated
with the proposed project?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
2. Are there any studies, investigations, or enforcement actions related to the property associated with the
proposed project?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
3. Does any project construction or operation activities involve the use of hazardous or toxic materials?
Page 30 of 35
•Yes
•No
•Not known
4. Do you know if any of the current or past land-uses of the property affected by the proposed project or of
the adjacent properties are associated with hazardous or toxic materials?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
I. Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice for Low Income and
Minority Populations
1. Are there low income or minority populations in the project's area of effect or adjacent to the
project area?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
J. Other Environmental/Historic Preservation Laws or Issues
1. Are there other environmental/historic preservation requirements associated with this project
that you are aware of?
•Yes
•No
2. Are there controversial issues associated with this project?
•Yes
•No
•Not known
3. Have you conducted any public meeting or solicited public input or comments on your specific
proposed mitigation project?
•Yes
•No
K. Summary and Cost of Potential Impacts
Having answered the questions in parts A. through J., have you identified any aspects of your
proposed project that have the potential to impact environmental resources or historic properties?
•Yes
•No
Page 31 of 35
EVALUATION
Is the applicant participating in the Community Rating System (CRS)?
•Yes
•No
Is the applicant a Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP)?
•Yes
•No
Was this application generated from a previous FEMA HMA Advance Assistance or Project Scoping
award or any other federal grant award, or the subapplicant is a past recipient of Building Resilient
Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) non-financial Direct Technical Assistance?
•Yes
•No
Attach a PDF of the previous award and indicate which funding opportunity was
provided.
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Select one: BRIC Project Scoping
Has the applicant adopted building codes consistent with the international codes?
•Yes
•No
Year of building code: 2015
Please provide the building code.: 2015
Have the applicant's building codes been assessed on the Building Code Effectiveness Grading
Schedule (BCEGS)?
•Yes
•No
Select rating: 4
Describe involvement of partners to enhance the mitigation activity outcome.
The Oakland County facility will serve as the alternate location of emergency management functions for
surrounding jurisdictions per a Mutual Aid Agreement - Oakland County, Macomb County, Monroe County,
St. Clair County, Washtenaw County, Wayne County, and the City of Detroit. Furthermore, the Oakland
County EOC and Dispatch will serve as an alternate EOC site for the State of Michigan.
Discuss how anticipated future conditions are addressed by this project.
Page 32 of 35
Increased volatility of severe storms and tornadoes are anticipated for the project area. As future risks
increase, the need for saferoom and continuity of EOC and dispatch operations will be critical.
Additional comments (optional)
Attachments
Filename Date uploaded Uploaded by File size Description Action
Page 33 of 35
ASSURANCE AND CERTIFICATIONS
SF-424D: Assurances - Construction Programs
Content:
OMB Number: 4040-0009
Expiration Date: 02/28/2025
Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have any questions,
please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to
certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified.
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant:
1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial
capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure proper
planning, management and completion of the project described in this application.
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the
State, the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the assistance; and
will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting
standards or agency directives.
3. Will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest
in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record
the Federal awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property
acquired in whole or in part with Federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the
useful life of the project.
4. Will comply with the requirements of the assistance awarding agency with regard to the drafting,
review and approval of construction plans and specifications.
5. Will provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site
to ensure that the complete work conforms with the approved plans and specifications and will
furnish progressive reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance
awarding agency or State.
6. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the
awarding agency.
7. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that
constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal
gain.
8. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to
prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or
regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel
Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).
9. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which
prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.
10. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited
to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis
of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20
U.S.C.§§1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C.§794), which prohibits discrimination on
the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C.§§6101-6107),
which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of
Page 34 of 35
1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the
Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970
(P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or
alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290
ee- 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination
in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific
statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and, (j) the requirements of
any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.
11. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide
for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of
Federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property
acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases.
12. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit
the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in
part with Federal funds.
13. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7),
the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C.§874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327-333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction
subagreements.
14. Will comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to
participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction
and acquisition is $10,000 or more.
15. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a)
institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to
EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in
floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved
State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C.
§§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under
Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of
underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L.
93-523); and, (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (P.L. 93-205).
16. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to
protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
17. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of
historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-
-1 et seq.).
18. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the
Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations."
19. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations,
and policies governing this program.
Page 35 of 35
20. Will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA)
of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104) which prohibits grant award recipients or a sub-recipient from
(1) Engaging in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in
effect (2) Procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect or (3)
Using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.
SF-LLL: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
OMB number: 4040-0013, Expiration date: 02/28/2025 View burden statement
Complete only if the applicant is required to do so by 44 C.F.R. part 18. Generally disclosure is required when
applying for a grant of more than $100,000 and if any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been
paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned
shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions. Further, the recipient shall file a disclosure form at the end of each calendar quarter in which
there occurs any event described in 44 C.F.R. § 18.110(c) that requires disclosure or that materially affects
the accuracy of the information contained in any disclosure form previously filed by the applicant.
✓The applicant is not currently required to submit the SF-LLL