Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2026.06.11 - 42990 AGENDA ITEM: Grant Acceptance from the State of Michigan for the FY 2026 Great Lakes Management Grant Program DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation MEETING: Board of Commissioners DATE: Thursday, June 11, 2026 6:00 PM - Click to View Agenda ITEM SUMMARY SHEET COMMITTEE REPORT TO BOARD Resolution #2026-6613 Motion to accept the grant award from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Water Resources Division for the FY 2026 Great Lakes Management Grant Program in the amount of $42,000 for the period of October 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027; further, authorize the Chair of the Board of Commissioners to execute the agreement on behalf of the County; further amend the FY 2026 budget according to the attached Schedule A - Budget Amendment. ITEM CATEGORY SPONSORED BY Grant Brendan Johnson INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Oakland County Parks (OCP) has been awarded $42,000 from the Great Lakes Management Program through the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Water Resources Division (WRD) to reduce the spread and negative impacts of European Frogbit (EFB) by expanding early detection and control actions through Oakland County Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area (CISMA). OCP is a founding member of the Oakland County CISMA, which is a collaborative group of 44 townships, park services, non-profit organizations and other allied partners focused on minimizing the impacts and controlling invasive species in Oakland County. Grant funding will be used to train CISMA staff on EFB identification, detection and control, develop EFB surveillance and control workplans, conduct early detection monitoring, and control established invasive species at surveyed locations. The grant period is from October 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027. POLICY ANALYSIS This request is to approve the attached grant agreement to accept $42,000 in grant funding for work to be performed to detect and control European Frogbit in Michigan Waters. The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE) Water Resources Division (WRD) provides funding in exchange for work to be performed for the project. Financial Impact There is no grant match required for this grant. A budget amendment is required to accept the funds. Parks and Recreation Commission Approval This item is on the June 3, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission agenda for consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: Budget Amendment Attached Committee members can contact Barbara Winter, Policy and Fiscal Analysis Supervisor at 248.821.3065 or winterb@oakgov.com or the department contact persons listed for additional information. CONTACT Chris Ward, Director Parks & Recreation ITEM REVIEW TRACKING Aaron Snover, Board of Commissioners Created/Initiated - 6/11/2026 AGENDA DEADLINE: 05/28/2026 4:30 PM ATTACHMENTS 1. Schedule A - FY2026 EGLE Great Lakes Management Program Grant 2. Grant Review Sign-Off_SOM Great Lakes Management Program 3. Grant Agreement_ SOM Great Lakes Management Grant Program COMMITTEE TRACKING 2026-06-02 Legislative Affairs & Government Operations - Recommend to Board 2026-06-11 Full Board - Adopt Motioned by: Commissioner Michael Gingell Seconded by: Commissioner Robert Hoffman Yes: Charles Cavell, Ann Erickson Gault, Michael Gingell, Marcia Gershenson, Robert Hoffman, Brendan Johnson, Karen Joliat, Christine Long, Penny Luebs, Gwen Markham, William Miller III, Kristen Nelson, Angela Powell, Robert Smiley, Yolanda Smith Charles, Michael Spisz, Linnie Taylor, Philip Weipert, David Woodward (19) No: None (0) Abstain: None (0) Absent: (0) Passed Oakland County, Michigan Parks & Recreation - FY2026 EGLE Great Lakes Management Program Grant Schedule "A" DETAIL R/E Fund Name Division Name Fund # (FND) Cost Center (CCN) # Account # (RC/SC) Program # (PRG) Grant ID (GRN) # Project ID # (PROJ) Region (REG) Budget Fund Affiliate (BFA) Ledger Account Summary Account Title FY 2026 Amendment FY 2027 Amendment FY 2028 Amendment R Parks and Recreation PR Natural Resources FND50800 CCN-5060103 RC610313 PRG-160432 GRN-1004872 610000 Federal Operating Grants $42,000 $- $- $42,000 $- $- E Parks and Recreation PR Natural Resources FND50800 CCN-5060103 SC730633 PRG-160432 GRN-1004872 730000 Environmental $42,000 $- $- Total Expenses $42,000 $- $- GRANT REVIEW SIGN-OFF – Parks & Recreation FY2026 EGLE Great Lakes Management Program Grant AWD00818 United States Environmental Protection Agency Haley Hansen 248-766-9996 Grant Acceptance (Greater than $10,000) 06/01/2026 Please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The Board of Commissioners’ liaison committee resolution and grant acceptance package (which should include this sign-off and the grant agreement/contract with related documentation) should be downloaded into Civic Clerk to be placed on the next agenda(s) of the appropriate Board of Commissioners’ committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 1 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Great Lakes Management Program Grant Agreement Between the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy and the Oakland County This Grant Agreement (Agreement) is made between the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), Water Resources Division (State), and the Oakland County (Grantee). The purpose of this Agreement is to provide funding in exchange for work to be performed for the project named below. The State is authorized to provide grant assistance pursuant to the United States Environmental Protection Agency through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Legislative appropriation of funds for grant assistance is set forth in Public Act 22 of 2025. This Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions specified herein. Project Information: Project Name: Detecting and Controlling EFB in Michigan Waters Project #: AISEFB26-08 Amount of Grant: $42,000.00 % of Grant State 0 / % of Grant Federal 100 Amount of Match: $0 = 0% PROJECT TOTAL: $42,000.00 (Grant Plus Match) Start Date (executed by EGLE): 10/1/2025 End Date: 12/31/2027 Grantee Contact Information: Name and Title: Dave Woodward, Board Chair Organization: Oakland County Address: 2100 Pontiac Lake Road City, State and Zip Code: Waterford Township, Michigan 48328 Phone Number: 248-882-8643 Email Address: canniffp@oakgov.com Federal ID Number (Required for Federal Funding): 38-6004876w UEI Number (Required for Federal Funding): HZ4EUKDD7AB4 SIGMA Vendor Number: CV00172 Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 2 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) State Contact Information: Name and Title: Thomas Alwin, Aquatic Biologist Division/Office: Water Resources Division Address: P.O. Box 30458 City, State and Zip Code: Lansing, Michigan 48909-7958 Phone Number: 517-342-4069 Email Address: AlwinT@Michigan.gov The individuals signing below certify by their signatures that they are authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of their agencies and that the parties will fulfill the terms of this Agreement, including any attached appendices, as set forth herein. Dave Woodward, Board Chair Signature Name and Title Date Jerrod Sanders, Director, Water Resources Division Signature Name and Title Date Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 3 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) I. Project Scope This Agreement and its appendices constitute the entire Agreement between the State and the Grantee and may be modified only by written agreement between the State and the Grantee. (A) The scope of this project is limited to the activities specified in Appendix A and such activities as are authorized by the State under this Agreement. Any change in project scope requires prior written approval in accordance with Section III, Changes, in this Agreement. (B) By acceptance of this Agreement, the Grantee commits to complete the project identified in Appendix A within the time period allowed for in this Agreement and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Upon signature by the State, this Agreement shall be effective from the start date until the end date on page 1 of this Agreement. The State shall have no responsibility to provide funding to the Grantee for project work performed except between the start date and the end date specified on page 1. Expenditures made by the Grantee prior to the start date or after the end date of this Agreement are not eligible for payment under this Agreement. Any changes to this Agreement shall be requested by the Grantee or the State in writing and implemented only upon approval in writing by the State. The State reserves the right to deny requests for changes to this Agreement or to the appendices. No changes can be implemented without approval by the State. The Grantee shall submit deliverables and follow reporting requirements specified in Appendix A of this Agreement. (A) The Grantee must complete and submit quarterly financial and progress reports according to a form and format prescribed by the State and must include supporting documentation of eligible project expenses. These reports shall be due according to the following: January 1 – March 31 April 30 April 1 – June 30 July 31 July 1 – September 30 Before October 15* October 1 – December 31 January 31 Due to the State’s year-end closing procedures, there will be an accelerated due date for the report covering July 1 – September 30. Advance notification regarding the due date for the quarter ending Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 4 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) September 30 will be sent to the Grantee. If the Grantee is unable to submit a report in early October for the quarter ending September 30, an estimate of expenditures through September 30 must be submitted to allow the State to complete its accounting for that fiscal year. V. Grantee Responsibilities Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 5 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) any such filing may subject the Grantee, its agents, and/or employees to criminal and civil prosecution and/or termination of this Agreement. VI. Use of Material VII. Assignability VIII. Subcontracts IX. Nondiscrimination et seq.; the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act, 1976 PA 220, as amended, MCL 37.1101 et seq.; and all other federal, state, and local fair employment practices and equal opportunity laws and covenants that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment, to be employed in the performance of this Agreement, with respect to their hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment, because of their race, religion, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, marital status, or physical or mental disability that is unrelated to the individual’s ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position. The Grantee agrees to include in every subcontract entered into for the performance of this Agreement this covenant not to discriminate in employment. A breach of this covenant is a material breach of this Agreement. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 6 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) X. Unfair Labor Practices The Grantee shall comply with the State Contracts with Certain Employers Prohibited, 1980 PA 278, as amended, MCL 423.321 et seq. The Grantee will submit all digital products specifically requested by the State Contact in compliance with the federal Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in accordance with the State of Michigan Digital Standards for the purpose of adding content to one or more State of Michigan website. (A) The Grantee, not the State, is responsible for all liabilities as a result of claims, judgments, or costs arising out of activities to be carried out by the Grantee under this Agreement if the liability is caused by the Grantee or any employee or agent of the Grantee acting within the scope of their employment or agency. (B) Nothing in this Agreement should be construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity by the Grantee, the State, their agencies, or their employees as provided by statute or court decisions. No government employee; member of the legislative, judicial, or executive branches of government; or member of the Grantee’s Board of Directors, its employees, partner agencies, or their families shall benefit financially from any part of this Agreement. If all or a portion of this Agreement is funded with federal funds, then in accordance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, as appropriate, the Grantee shall comply with Title 18 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 1913, Lobbying with Appropriated Moneys, commonly known as the Anti-Lobbying Act, which prohibits the use of all project funds regardless of source, to engage in lobbying the state or federal government or in litigation against the State. Further, the Grantee shall require that the language of this assurance be included in the award documents of all subawards at all tiers. If all or a portion of this Agreement is funded with state funds, the Grantee shall not use any of the grant funds awarded in this Agreement for the purpose of lobbying as defined in the State of Michigan’s lobbying statute, Lobbyists, Lobbying Agents, and Lobbying Activities, 1978 PA 472, as amended, specifically MCL 4.415(2), which states “Lobbying means communicating directly with an official of the executive branch of state government or an official in the legislative branch of state government for the purpose of influencing legislative or administrative action.” The Grantee shall not use any of the grant funds awarded in this Agreement for the purpose of litigation against the State. Further, the Grantee shall require that language of this assurance be included in the award documents of all subawards at all tiers. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 7 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) XV. Debarment and Suspension By signing this Agreement, the Grantee certifies that it has checked the federal debarment and suspension list with the federal System for Award Management (SAM) at SAM.gov to verify that its agents and subcontractors: (1) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal or state agency. (2) Have not within a three-year period preceding this Agreement been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction, as defined in 45 CFR, Part 1185, Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement); violation of federal or state antitrust statutes; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property. (3) Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in subsection (2). (4) Have not within a three-year period preceding this Agreement had one or more public (federal, state, or local) transaction terminated for cause or default. (5) Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other state or federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program. *Federal Funds Only* Each eligible applicant must obtain a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and maintain an active registration with the federal SAM at SAM.gov. The State reserves the right to conduct a programmatic and financial audit of the project, and the State may withhold payment until the audit is satisfactorily completed. The Grantee will be required to maintain all pertinent records and evidence pertaining to this Agreement, including grant and any required matching funds, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and other procedures specified by the State. The State or any of its duly authorized representatives must have access, upon reasonable notice, to such books, records, documents, and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying. The Grantee will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. All records must be maintained for a minimum of five years after the final payment has been issued to the Grantee by the State. (A) The Grantee must maintain insurance or self-insurance that will protect it from claims that may arise from the Grantee’s actions under this Agreement. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 8 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (B) The Grantee must comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws while engaging in activities authorized under this Agreement. XVIII. Other Sources of Funding XIX. Compensation All other costs necessary to complete the project are the sole responsibility of the Grantee. XX. Closeout Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 9 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (C) The Grantee shall immediately refund to the State any payments in excess of the costs allowed by this Agreement. XXI. Cancellation XXII. Termination Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 10 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (B) If a grant is terminated, the State reserves the right to require the Grantee to repay all or a portion of funds received under this Agreement. XXIII. Iran Economic Sanctions Act Program-Specific Requirements XXIV. Disclosure of Information XXV. Advances XXVI. Quality Assurance/Quality Control XXVII. Prevailing Wage et seq., which requires that prevailing wages and fringe benefits be paid to contractors and subcontractors performing on federally funded projects over $2,000 for the construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or works. XXVIII. Preventing the Spread of Invasive Species •Avoiding infested areas when possible. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 11 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) •Conducting field work in upstream areas before downstream areas to decrease the likelihood of carrying species further up into the watershed or visiting highest quality/least invaded sites before invaded sites during a trip. •Performing basic decontamination steps such as: o Visually inspecting and removing any plants or mud from footwear (boots, hip boots, and waders). o Visually inspecting, removing, and properly disposing of any plants and mud from field equipment (nets, shovels, rakes, etc.) and vehicles (cars, boats, ATVs, etc.). o Draining all water from boats (motor, live well, bilge, and transom well) and equipment prior to leaving the site and before entering a new waterbody. o Thoroughly drying boats and equipment (5-7 days, if possible) between sites. o Disinfecting boats and equipment between sites (e.g., diluted bleach solution or heated pressure washer). Disinfection should be conducted away from surface waters, at a location where the disinfecting solution will not enter any storm sewers and/or surface waters. ▪Typical diluted bleach solution treatment is one-half cup (4 fluid ounces) bleach to 5 gallons of water applied by spraying or sponge so surface is thoroughly exposed to bleach solution for 10 minutes. ▪Typical heated pressure wash is 140⁰ water temperature sprayed for 5-10 seconds. o Thoroughly washing vehicles and boats between sites (e.g., drive-through car wash). •Using only native plants and seed for restorations and best management practices. If invasive aquatic or terrestrial plants are collected from a site, the Grantee will take steps to minimize the spread of these species. Dispose of invasive plant material by bagging and transporting to a landfill, composting, or burning, as appropriate and in compliance with local and state laws. The State is asking all grantees to be on the lookout for invasive species that have limited distribution or are not yet known to be established in Michigan. A “Watch List” of Michigan’s high priority aquatic invasive species, along with how to report sightings, can be found at Michigan.gov/AquaticInvasives. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 12 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Federally Funded Program-Specific Requirements XXIX. Federal Funding Requirements A maximum of $10,800.00 or 100% of total disbursements is funded with federal funding. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) title is Geographic Programs - Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the CFDA number is 66.469. The federal grant number is GL-00E06014. This Agreement is either partially funded with federal funds from the USEPA or used to match a federally-funded grant. The Grantee agrees to fulfill conditions that the federal government has imposed on the State as a condition of federal funding as indicated herein and in all appendices. By accepting this Agreement, the Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal statutes and regulations in effect with respect to the period during which it receives grant funding. These regulations include, but are not limited to, the following: (A) Single Audit. Grantees spending $1,000,000 or more in federal funds in their fiscal year shall have a single audit performed in compliance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Section 200.501. This audit must be performed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse at Harvester.Census.gov/FACWeb/ within nine (9) months from the end of the Grantee's fiscal year or 30 days after receiving the report from the auditors. It is the responsibility of the Grantee to report the expenditures related to this Agreement on the Grantee’s annual Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. (B) The Grantee will comply with the Hatch Political Activity Act of 1939, as amended, 5 U.S.C., Sections 7321-7326; and the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C., Section 4728, Transfer of Functions, which states that employees working in programs financed with federal grants may not be a candidate for elective public office in a partisan election, use official authority or influence to affect the result of an election, or influence a state or local officer to provide financial support for a political purpose. (C) Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. Grantees and their sub entities are prohibited from procuring or obtaining equipment, services, or systems that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). Grantees, sub entities, and borrowers also may not use USEPA funds to purchase: (a) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (b) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment. (c) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 13 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Costs incurred for telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment such as phones, internet, video surveillance, and cloud servers are allowable except for the following circumstances: Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 14 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) proposed travel in general terms in their request for approval. Requests for prior approval must be submitted to the Project Administrator on page 1 of this agreement. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 15 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Part 33, Grantees are not required to negotiate or apply fair share objectives in procurements under assistance agreements. (6) MBE/WBE Reporting; 40 CFR, Part 33, Subpart E When required, the Grantee agrees to complete and submit an “MBE/WBE Utilization Under Federal Grants and Cooperative Agreements” report (USEPA Form 5700-52A) on an annual basis. Reporting is required for agreements where funds are budgeted for construction, equipment, services, and supplies with a cumulative total that exceeds the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) (currently, $250,000; see 2 CFR, Part 200, Section 200.1), including amendments and/or modifications. When reporting is required, all procurement actions are reportable, not just the portion that exceeds the SAT. MBE/WBE reports should be sent to: EGLE-WRD-Sigma@Michigan.gov or EGLE WRD Administration P.O. Box 30458 Lansing, MI 48909-7958 The current USEPA Form 5700-52A can be found at the USEPA’s grantee forms web page at USEPA.gov/system/files/documents/2021-08/USEPA_form_5700_52a.pdf. Annual reports are due by October 30 of each year. Final reports are due 120 days after the end of the project period. This provision represents an approved exception from the MBE/WBE reporting requirements as described in 40 CFR, Part 33, Section 33.502. (7) MBE/WBE Recordkeeping; 40 CFR, Part 33, Subpart E The Grantee agrees to comply with all recordkeeping requirements as stipulated in 40 CFR, Part 33, Subpart E, including creating and maintaining a bidders list, when required. Any document created as a record to demonstrate compliance with any requirement of 40 CFR, Part 33, must be maintained pursuant to the requirements stated in this Subpart. (J) Electronic/Digital Signatures on Form(s)/Document(s). Throughout the life of this agreement, the Grantee agrees to ensure that any form(s)/document(s) required to be signed by the Grantee and submitted through any means including but not limited to hard copy via U.S. mail or express mail, hand delivery or through electronic means such as e-mail are: (1) signed by the individual identified on the form/document, and (2) the signer has the authority to sign the form/document for the Grantee. Submission of any signed form(s)/document(s) is subject to any provisions of law on making false statements (e.g., 18 U.S.C. 1001) (K) Civil Rights. The Grantee agrees to comply fully with applicable civil rights statutes. (L) Health, Safety, and Environmental Compliance. All laboratory and field activities conducted for this Agreement must be in accordance and compliance with all applicable health, safety and environmental laws, regulations and guidelines. (M) Management Practice. The recipient agrees to properly operate and maintain any best management practices implemented through this Agreement in accordance with design standards and specifications. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 16 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (N) Disposition of Wastes. The Grantee agrees to dispose of all wastes in accordance with State and Federal regulation. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 17 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) use copyrighted works or other data developed under this Agreement for federal or State purposes. Examples of federal purpose include, but are not limited to: Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 18 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (3) An estimated number of participants in the event and a description of their roles. Funding for light refreshments, meals, and space rental may not be used for any portion of an event where alcohol is served, purchased, or otherwise available as part of the event or meeting, even if the project funds are not used to purchase the alcohol. Note: United States General Services Administration regulations define light refreshments for morning, afternoon, or evening breaks to include, but not be limited to, coffee, tea, milk, juice, soft drinks, donuts, bagels, fruit, pretzels, cookies, chips, or muffins (41 CFR, Part 301, Conference Planning, Section 301-74.7). (V) Drug-Free Workplace. The Grantee organization of this Agreement must make an ongoing, good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace pursuant to the specific requirements set forth in 2 CFR, Part 1536, Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance), Subpart B. Additionally, in accordance with these regulations, the Grantee organization must identify all known workplaces under its federal awards and keep this information on file during the performance of the award. (W) Hotel-Motel Fire Safety. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C., Section 2225, Fire Prevention and Control Guidelines for Places of Public Accommodation, if applicable, the Grantee agrees to ensure that all space for conferences, meetings, conventions, or training seminars funded in whole or in part with federal funds complies with the protection and control guidelines of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, as amended. Grantees may search the Hotel-Motel National Master List to see if a property is in compliance. (X) Recycled Paper. When directed to provide paper documents, the Grantee agrees to use recycled paper and double-sided printing for all reports that are prepared as a part of this Agreement. This requirement does not apply to reports prepared on forms supplied by the State or USEPA or to standard forms that are printed on recycled paper and available through the General Services Administration. (Y) Recycled Products. Consistent with the goals of Section 6002, Federal Procurement, of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C., Section 6962, Federal Procurement, state and local institutions of higher education, hospitals, and nonprofit organization Grantees agree to give preference in procurement programs to the purchase of specific products containing recycled materials, as identified in 40 CFR, Part 247, Comprehensive Procurement Guideline for Products Containing Recovered Materials. Consistent with Section 6002 of the RCRA and 2 CFR, Part 200, Section 200.322, state agencies or agencies of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors are required to purchase certain items made from recycled materials, as identified in 40 CFR, Part 247, when the purchase price exceeds $10,000 during the course of a fiscal year or where the quantity of such items acquired in the course of the preceding fiscal year was $10,000 or more. Pursuant to 40 CFR, Part 247, Section 247.2(d), the Grantee may decide not to procure such items if they are not reasonably available in a reasonable period, fail to meet reasonable performance standards, or are only available at an unreasonable price. (Z) Trafficking in Persons. The Grantee, the Grantee’s employees, sub entities under this award, and sub entities’ employees may not – 1) Engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons; Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 19 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) 2) Procure a commercial sex act; or 3) Use forced labor in performance of the award or any subawards. This award may be unilaterally terminated, without penalty, if the Grantee or a sub entity – 1) Is determined to have violated a prohibition in this award term; or 2) Has an employee who is determined to have violated a prohibition in this award term through conduct that is either – a. Associated with performance under this award; or b. Imputed to the Grantee or sub entity using the standards and due process for imputing the conduct of an individual to an organization that are provided in 2 CFR Part 180, ‘‘OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Non- procurement),’’ as implemented at 2 CFR Part 1532. (AA) Permits. The Grantee must obtain all necessary permits prior to implementation of any activity funded under this Agreement that may fall under applicable federal, state, or local laws. The Grantee must keep documentation regarding necessary permits in their project files. (AB) Geospatial Data Standards. All geospatial data created must be consistent with Federal Geographic Data Committee endorsed standards. Information on these standards may be found at FGDC.gov. (AC) Acknowledgement on Products, Signage, and Announcements for Public or Media Events. A funding acknowledgement statement must be included on all products and is available from the State contact listed on page 1 of this agreement. Examples include digital or print materials for workshops, conferences, demonstration days, or other events as part of a project. In addition, the State Contact must be notified at least 15 working days prior to any public or media events publicizing significant events related to the project to provide the opportunity for attendance and participation by state and federal representatives. If the GLRI logos are used on websites, outreach materials, reports or publications along with logos from other participating entities, the GLRI logo must not be prominently displayed to imply that any of the Grantee’s or sub-Grantee’s activities are being conducted by the USEPA. Instead, the GLRI logo should be accompanied with a statement indicating that the Grantee received financial support from the USEPA under an Assistance Agreement. The Grantee shall ensure that a visible project identification sign (with the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative logo is erected as appropriate at each on-the-ground protection or restoration project. Each sign must give project information and credit the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and appropriate federal agencies for funding. The Grantee will determine the design, placement, and materials for each sign. The GLRI logo should be accompanied with the statement indicating that the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy received financial support in the amount of $440,000 from the USEPA. (AD) Executive Pay. Grantees whose gross income in the previous tax year was $300,000 or more will verify in writing to the State Contact that they are exempt from reporting total compensation of executives required under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, as amended (Transparency Act), as defined in 2 CFR, Part 170, Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information, Section 170.320. This verification is due by the end of the month following the month the State made the grant award. In so doing, the Grantee is stating that: Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 20 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (1) They did not in the preceding tax year receive 80 percent (80%) or more of their annual gross revenues from federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts) and federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts) and federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act. (2) The public has access to information about the compensation of executives through periodic reports filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; or Section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. (AE) Management Fees. Consistent with the USEPA’s prohibition on management fees, the Grantee will not include management fees in project budgets. Such fees or similar charges refer to expenses added to the direct costs in order to accumulate and reserve funds for ongoing business expenses, unforeseen liabilities, or for other similar costs not allowable under this Agreement. (AF) Patents and Inventions. Rights to inventions made under this Agreement are subject to federal patent and licensing regulations, which are codified at 37 CFR, Part 401, Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements; and the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, as amended 35 U.S.C., Sections 200-212. Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act, the USEPA and the State retain the right to worldwide, nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice the invention owned by this Agreement holder, as defined in the Bayh-Dole Act. To streamline the invention reporting process and to facilitate compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act, the Grantee must utilize the Interagency Edison extramural invention reporting system at iEdison.gov. Annual utilization reports must be submitted through the system. The Grantee is required to notify the State Contact when an invention report, patent report, or utilization report is filed at iEdison.gov. (AG) Human Subjects. No research involving human subjects will be conducted under this Agreement without prior written approval of the State to proceed with that research. If engaged in human subjects’ research as part of this Agreement, the Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of 40 CFR, Part 26, Protection of Human Subjects. This includes, at Subpart A, Basic USEPA Policy for Protection of Subjects in Human Research Conducted or Supported. It also includes, at Subparts B, C, and D, prohibitions and additional protections for children, nursing women, pregnant women, and fetuses in research conducted or supported by the USEPA. The Grantee further agrees to comply with the USEPA’s procedures for oversight of the Grantee’s compliance with 40 CFR, Part 26, as given in USEPA Order 1000.17 Change A1 (Policy and Procedures on Protection of Human Research Subjects in USEPA Conducted or Supported Research). As per this order, no human subject may be involved in any research conducted under this Agreement, including recruitment, until the research has been approved or determined to be exempt by the USEPA’s Human Subjects Research Review Official after review of the approval or exemption determination of the Institutional Review Board(s) with jurisdiction over the research under 40 CFR. (AH) Animal Subjects. The Grantee agrees to comply with the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, as amended, 7 USC 2131- 2156 and also agrees to abide by the “U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals used in Testing, Research, and Training.”. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 21 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (AI) Build America, Buy America. Buy America Preference. Grantees of an award for infrastructure are hereby notified that none of the funds provided under this award may be used for an infrastructure project unless: Incorporation into an infrastructure project. The Buy America Preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. As such, it does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project. Nor does a Buy America Preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desks, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project. Categorization of articles, materials, and supplies. An article, material, or supply should only be classified into one of the following categories: (i) Iron or steel products; (ii) Manufactured products; (iii) Construction materials; or (iv) Section 70917(c) materials. An article, material, or supply should not be considered to fall into multiple categories. In some cases, an article, material, or supply may not fall under any of the categories listed in this paragraph. The classification of an article, material, or supply as falling into one of the categories listed in this paragraph must be made based on its status at the time it is brought to the work site for incorporation into an infrastructure project. In general, the work site is the location of the infrastructure project at which the iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials will be incorporated. Application of the Buy America Preference by category. An article, material, or supply incorporated into an infrastructure project must meet the Buy America Preference for only the single category in which it is classified. Determining the cost of components for manufactured products. In determining whether the cost of components for manufactured products is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components, use the following instructions: Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 22 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (b) For components manufactured by the manufacturer, all costs associated with the manufacture of the component, including transportation costs as described in paragraph (a), plus allocable overhead costs, but excluding profit. Cost of components does not include any costs associated with the manufacture of the manufactured product. Construction material standards. The Buy America Preference applies to the following construction materials incorporated into infrastructure projects. Each construction material is followed by a standard for the material to be considered “produced in the United States.” Except as specifically provided, only a single standard should be applied to a single construction material. (1) Non-ferrous metals. All manufacturing processes, from initial smelting or melting through final shaping, coating, and assembly, occurred in the United States. (2) Plastic and polymer-based products. All manufacturing processes, from initial combination of constituent plastic or polymer-based inputs, or, where applicable, constituent composite materials, until the item is in its final form, occurred in the United States. (3) Glass. All manufacturing processes, from initial batching and melting of raw materials through annealing, cooling, and cutting, occurred in the United States. (4) Fiber optic cable (including drop cable). All manufacturing processes, from the initial ribboning (if applicable), through buffering, fiber stranding and jacketing, occurred in the United States. All manufacturing processes also include the standards for glass and optical fiber, but not for nonferrous metals, plastic and polymer-based products, or any others. (5) Optical fiber. All manufacturing processes, from the initial preform fabrication stage through the completion of the draw, occurred in the United States. (6) Lumber. All manufacturing processes, from initial debarking through treatment and planning, occurred in the United States. (7) Drywall. All manufacturing processes, from initial blending of mined or synthetic gypsum plaster and additives through cutting and drying of sandwiched panels, occurred in the United States. (8) Engineered wood. All manufacturing processes from the initial combination of constituent materials until the wood product is in its final form, occurred in the United States. Waivers. When supported by rationale provided in IIJA §70914, the Grantee may submit a waiver request in writing to USEPA. Grantees should request guidance on the submission instructions of an USEPA waiver request from the USEPA Project Officer for this agreement. A list of approved USEPA waivers (general applicability and project specific) is available on the USEPA Build America, Buy America website. USEPA may waive the application of the Buy America Preference when it has determined that one of the following exceptions applies: (1) applying the Buy America Preference would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) the types of iron, steel, manufactured products, or construction materials are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities or of a satisfactory quality; or (3) the inclusion of iron, steel, manufactured products, or construction materials produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 23 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) For questions regarding the Build America, Buy America Act requirements for this assistance agreement or to determine if there is an approved waiver in place, please contact the USEPA Project Officer for this agreement. Definitions. For legal definitions and sourcing requirements, the Grantee must consult the USEPA Build America, Buy America website, 2 CFR Part 184, and the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Memorandum M-24-02 Implementation Guidance on Application of Buy America Preference in Federal Financial Assistance Programs for Infrastructure (AJ) Grant funds may not be used to support or oppose union organizing, whether directly or as an offset for other funds. (AK) Reporting Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. Consistent with 2 CFR 200.113, the Grantee and any sub entities must report, in a timely manner, any violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting this award to the USEPA Project Officer and the USEPA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) Hotline. The methods to contact the OIG Hotline are: (1) online submission via the OIG Hotline Complaint Form; (2) email to OIG_Hotline@USEPA.gov; (3) by phone at 1-888-546-8740; or (4) by U.S. Mail directed to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (2410T), Washington, DC 20460. To support awareness of the OIG Hotline, Grantees and/or sub entities receiving a USEPA award or subaward of $1,000,000 or more must display OIG Hotline posters in facilities where the work is performed under the grant. OIG Hotline posters may be downloaded or printed or may be obtained by contacting the OIG at 1-888-546-8740. Grantees and sub entities need not comply with this requirement if they have established a mechanism, such as a hotline, by which employees may report suspected instances of improper conduct and have provided instructions that encourage employees to make such reports. (AL) Whistleblower Protections. This award is subject is to whistleblower protections, including the protections established at 41 U.S.C. 4712 providing that an employee of the Grantee or a sub entity may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a covered person or body information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a federal grant or subaward, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a federal grant or subaward, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a federal grant or subaward. These covered persons or bodies include: a. A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress. b. An Inspector General. c. The Government Accountability Office. d. A federal employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management at the relevant agency. e. An authorized official of the United States Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency. f. A court or grand jury. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 24 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) g. A management official or other employee of the contractor, subcontractor, or grantee who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct. Consistent with 41 U.S.C. 4712(d), the Grantee and sub entity shall inform their employees in writing, in the predominant language of the workforce or organization, of employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C., Section 4712. Additional information about whistleblower protections, including protections for such employees, may be found on the OIG’s Whistleblower Protection web page. (AM) Certifications and Consequences of Fraud. Per 2 CFR 200.415(a) Required Certifications, to assure that expenditures are proper and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Federal award and approved project budgets, the financial reports or vouchers requesting payment under this agreement will include a certification that must be signed by an official who is authorized to legally bind the Grantee which reads as follows: “By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729-3730 and 3801-3812).” Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 25 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Appendix A: Project-Specific Requirements GLRI Workplan 1. Project Title: Detecting and controlling European Frog-bit in Michigan waters 2. Project Funding Request: Federal Request $440,000 Applicant contribution $ $0 3. Bundling of Projects: N/A 4. Recipient Information and Project Manager •Organization Name: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Water Resources Division (WRD) •Organization Address: 525 West Allegan Street, Box 30458, Lansing, MI 48909-7958 Project Manager •Contact Name: Thomas Alwin •Address: 525 West Allegan Street, Box 30458, Lansing, MI 48909-7958 •Phone: 517-342-4069 •Fax: 517-241-9003 •E-mail: alwint@mi.gov 5. Project Location(s): This project will work with all interested/able Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas (CISMAs) in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. HUC8 Codes: 4100006, 4090002, 4100002, 4050002, 4070005, 4080104, 4090005, 4050005, 4080101, 4060101, 4070003, 4080206, 4060104, 4090003, 4080203, 4070006, 4090004, 4060105, 4050006, 4080102, 4080204, 4060102, 4050003, 4050001, 4080201, 4060103, 4050004, 4100003, 4070007, 4080202, 4040001, 7120001, 4100001, 4050007, 4070004, 4080205, 4080103 Potential Place(s) of Performance The Primary Place of Performance for this project is EGLE’s office in Lansing Michigan (42.7316, -84.5590). Table 1. Potential places of performance. City County Zip Code Congressional District State Primary? Y/N Many Alcona Many 1 MI N Many Allegan Many 4 MI N Many Alpena Many 1 MI N Many Antrim Many 1 MI N Many Arenac Many 1 MI N Many Barry Many 2 MI N Many Bay Many 8 MI N Many Benzie Many 1 MI N Many Berrien Many 4&5 MI N Many Branch Many 5 MI N Many Calhoun Many 4&5 MI N Many Cass Many 5 MI N Many Cheboygan Many 1 MI N Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 26 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Many Clare Many 2 MI N Many Clinton Many 7 MI N Many Crawford Many 1 MI N Many Eaton Many 2&7 MI N Many Emmet Many 1 MI N Many Genesee Many 7&8 MI N Many Gladwin Many 2 MI N Many Grand Traverse Many 1 MI N Many Gratiot Many 2 MI N Many Hillsdale Many 5 MI N Many Huron Many 9 MI N Many Ingham Many 7 MI Y Many Ionia Many 2 MI N Many Iosco Many 1 MI N Many Isabella Many 2 MI N Many Jackson Many 5 MI N Many Kalamazoo Many 4&5 MI N Many Kalkaska Many 1 MI N Many Kent Many 2&3 MI N Many Lake Many 2 MI N Many Lapeer Many 9 MI N Many Leelanau Many 1 MI N Many Lenawee Many 5 MI N Many Livingston Many 7 MI N Many Macomb Many 9&10 MI N Many Manistee Many 2 MI N Many Mason Many 2 MI N Many Mecosta Many 2 MI N Many Midland Many 2&8 MI N Many Missaukee Many 1 MI N Many Monroe Many 5 MI N Many Montcalm Many 2 MI N Many Montmorency Many 1 MI N Many Muskegon Many 2,3 MI N Many Newaygo Many 2 MI N Many Oakland Many 6,7,9,10,11&12 MI N Many Oceana Many 2 MI N Many Ogemaw Many 1 MI N Many Osceola Many 2 MI N Many Oscoda Many 1 MI N Many Otsego Many 1 MI N Many Ottawa Many 3&4 MI N Many Presque Isle Many 1 MI N Many Roscommon Many 1 MI N Many Saginaw Many 8 MI N Many Sanilac Many 9 MI N Many Shiawassee Many 7 MI N Many St. Clair Many 9 MI N Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 27 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) 6. Project Duration: October 1, 2025 - December 31, 2027 EGLE WRD will work with regional Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas (CISMAs) to perform European frog-bit (EFB or Hydrocharis morsus-ranae) surveillance and control efforts in their service area. Work will begin on October 1, 2025. Survey and control efforts will be conducted during the 2026 and 2027 growing seasons with the project ending December 31, 2027. 7. Project Abstract: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Water Resources Division (WRD) will implement a multi-year project to reduce the spread and negative impacts of European Frogbit (EFB) by expanding early detection and control actions by regional Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas (CISMAs). Activities include training CISMA staff on EFB identification, detection and control, developing EFB surveillance and control workplans, conducting early detection monitoring, and controlling established invasive species at surveyed locations. Deliverables include early detection survey activities at 20+ sites and 280+ acres of EFB invasive species control. The expected outcomes are increasing EFB surveillance and control efforts across Michigan with the goal of reducing EFB populations and slowing its spread to new locations and informing future needs for Michigan EFB control. Residents of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan will benefit from the prevention/control of EFB which will in turn improve Great Lakes ecosystem quality. Subawards will be provided to CISMAs for on-the- ground survey and management at priority sites. 8. Problem Statement: Limiting the spread of European Frog-bit (Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L.; EFB), an aquatic invasive plant, across and outside of Michigan is a priority for EGLE WRD to protect aquatic ecosystems and recreational uses. First observed in Michigan in 1996, EFB has been confirmed in new locations across the state (Fig. 1). The State of Michigan, to date, has leveraged Federal and State dollars to create an EFB collaborative that recently expanded from the State-wide to the Great Lakes regional scale, support research to close knowledge gaps, and support regional early detection and response efforts where EFB populations are known. Many St. Joseph Many 5 MI N Many Tuscola Many 8&9 MI N Many Van Buren Many 4 MI N Many Washtenaw Many 6 MI N Many Wayne Many 6,12&13 MI N Many Wexford Many 1&2 MI N Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 28 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Figure 1. Known Michigan counties with EFB (including ramge of observations). Left is from 2021 when GL00E03033 was initially funded and right is from March of 2025. Data from Midwest Invasive Species Information Network (MISIN). Catling et al. (1988, 2003) have proposed that dense floating mats of EFB may reduce light, dissolved gas, and nutrient availability and impact the growth of native submerged vegetation, invertebrates, and fish. These ecosystem changes could alter the habitat and food resources of other vertebrates, including those that are often the focus of wetland conservation (e.g., waterfowl, imperiled species). Floating mats can also reduce aesthetic values of waterbodies and interfere with recreational water usage (Catling et al. 2003). Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas (CISMAs) are partnerships of groups and individuals that work to address invasive species impacts on the environment, economy, and human health within a defined region. By collaborating across jurisdictional boundaries, CISMAs work to leverage resources and overcome challenges associated with the prevention, early detection, response, and control of invasive species. CISMAs are governed by a steering committee and priorities identified within a strategic plan. CISMAs differ in the level of EFB infestation in their service area, experience identifying EFB, and their capacity for EFB surveillance and management. Some have been working on stopping its spread for multiple years while others don’t have any known EFB populations in their service area. Therefore, subaward amounts and workplans for each CISMA will be developed independently based on their experience, capacity, and existing EFB funding. All CISMAs participating in the project will be provided with funds to conduct a minimum of 20 early detection surveys. CISMAs with known EFB populations will receive additional funding to conduct control actions. The early detection and control efforts of this project will support the Lake Action and Management Plans (LAMP)s for Lower Michigan’s three Great Lakes basins (Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, and Lake Erie). Each of the current LAMPs for these lakes address the threat of invasive species to their basin and all three mention European Frog-bit and the need to address its impact and spread. With regards to the 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA), the activities proposed would contribute to the following General Objectives: Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 29 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) (v) “support healthy and productive wetlands and other habitats to sustain resilient populations of native species” •Action 21: Early Detection and Rapid Response •Action 25: Control of Terrestrial and Aquatic Invasive Species •Action 26: Regional Efforts •Action 34: Early Detection and Rapid Response •Action 38: Control of Terrestrial and Wetland Invasive Species: •Action 11: Support prevention efforts for AIS and TIS on state Watch Lists. •Action 13: Implement rapid response actions identified in state and tribal AIS and TIS management plans. •Action 17: Utilize existing and establish new Cooperative Weed Management Areas (CWMA), Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas (CISMA) or similar locally-lead groups to address invasive species issues. 9. Proposed Work: Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 30 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Activity 1 – QAPP development and implementation •Adding specific questions to determine risk level. Each question will have yes/no response option. The previous version only asked for the final risk level. •Moving the site information from quarterly report tabs to columns in the workplan tab. This will allow for easier tracking of prioritized sites across the project (for both the CISMAs and EGLE staff). •Conduct early detection monitoring at a minimum of 20 sites. CISMAs will use the Delimitation app, developed and maintained by the EFB Collaborative to collect EFB density while conducting early detection surveys. Specifically, three types of features can be collected by the FieldMaps app: lines, polygons, and points. Differing amounts of data are submitted with each feature: lines and polygons only provide measures of EFB density and distribution, while points allow you to submit additional data about EFB and the surrounding area (e.g., waterbody name/type, the date, EFB life stage, notes, etc.). All locations where EFB is newly detected will receive a response. Response may include public engagement, delimitation, and/or control actions. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 31 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) •Conduct a minimum of two control actions if EFB is known to be present in their service area at the start of this project. Sites with the highest likelihood of being a source of EFB spread (e.g., public access sites, interconnected waterways, etc.) will be prioritized for control action. These sites may be already known sites, sites where Early Detection and Response (EDR) surveillance found EFB, or a combination. Control actions taken may include either herbicide application, physical removal, or a combination. The minimum of two sites was selected due to the wide range of possible conditions where treatment may occur (e.g., EFB infestation size, habitat type, management action type, etc.). CISMAs will be responsible for obtaining and meeting all requirements for conducting control actions (e.g., Aquatic Nuisance Control permits for herbicide applications). •Conduct management assessment. At all locations where control actions are taken CISMAs will conduct pre- and post-treatment surveys using the Frog-BATT protocol. Frog-BATT is a standardized method for collecting pre and post data where EFB control is undertaken. The data collected will help inform the EFB Collaborative’s efforts to develop best management practices for EFB control. Activity 4 – Communication and training Effective communication will be required to successfully implement this project. EGLE WRD will ensure CISMA staff are trained in and implement the existing standardized data collection methods for EFB delimitation and pre- and post-treatment surveys to ensure data is collected consistently across the project. •EGLE WRD will provide in-person training prior to the start of each field season. Training will cover the use of the Delimitation app (early detection) and pre-post treatment monitoring protocols (Frog-BATT), and QAPP implementation. •EGLE WRD will conduct routine check-ins during each field season to ensure the project objectives are being met and assist with any problems that arise. •A post-season debriefing will be held after each field season. These will likely be virtual events. •EGLE WRD will share project updates and findings at regional meetings as appropriate. Activity 5 – Semi-annual and Final Reports This grant requires semi-annual reporting as well as a final report. To ensure the project is progressing appropriately. •EGLE WRD will submit all semi-annual reports and the final report. •Reports will summarize results of all subawardee efforts during the appropriate reporting period including identifying early detection survey locations, EFB control actions undertaken (locations, # of acres, and control type), status of project spending, any obstacles encountered and how they were handled and expected activities in the next reporting period. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 32 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) The successful execution of this project will increase on-the-ground EFB surveillance and control efforts across Michigan with the goal of reducing EFB populations and slowing its spread to new locations. While EFB is considered established in Michigan, there are multiple CISMAs where EFB is not present or at low abundance making early detection and control key to keeping EFB from spreading unchecked. Previous USEPA funding provided the financial support necessary to increase EFB control and early detection by CISMAs with known occurrences. This project will ensure they can sustain this work while also expanding early detection efforts to CISMAs outside of the known EFB distribution. This will result in an increased understanding of the extent of EFB within the state, provide data to assist the EFB Collaborative’s mission to minimize impacts of EFB within the Great Lakes, standardize data collection on EFB surveillance, and strengthen CISMAs’ capacity to respond to EFB. Table 2. Potential subaward recipients for this project. CISMAs who participated in the previous project (GL00E03033) have control activities and deliverables, while CISMAs with no known EFB only have early detection activities and deliverables. * = CISMAs that participated in the last round of funding Name of Subrecipient(s) (If known) or identify TBD Summary of Subrecipient’s Unique Capability to Perform the Project Description of the types of activities (duration in months) Outputs/Deliverab les 1. CAKE CISMA Early Detection (27)20 surveys 2. Huron Heartland/Coastal ISN* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 3. Northwest Michigan ISN Early Detection (27)20 surveys 4. North Country CISMA* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 5. Central Michigan CISMA Early Detection (27)20 surveys 6. Saginaw Bay CISMA* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 7. West Michigan CISMA* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 8. Mid-Michigan CISMA* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 9. GiLLS CISMA Early Detection (27)20 surveys 10. Lake St. Clair CISMA* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 11. Oakland County CISMA* Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 12. DRWLE CWMA Early Detection (27)20 surveys 13. JLW CISMA*Early Detection + Control (27) 20 surveys + EFB acres controlled 14. BCK CISMA CISMAs are regional invasive species specialists with specific knowledge of water bodies in their geographic scope, making them best- suited for prioritizing sites and coordinating and conducting on-the- ground effort across sites in their region. CISMAs that have previously participated in USEPA-funded EFB management projects will be able to conduct this work efficiently while also serving as models for first-time participating CISMAs.Early Detection (27)20 surveys Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 33 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) 15. SMIST CISMA Early Detection (27)20 surveys 16. SW x SW CISMA Early Detection (27)20 surveys 10. Project Results & Measuring Progress: Subawardee progress will be monitored throughout the project. EGLE WRD requires quarterly reporting from subaward recipients. The required components of the reports will include a narrative summary of accomplished work and a reporting form with site-level updates on EDR surveillance and EFB acres controlled. Measure 2.2.1. Output 1. Each CISMA will identify known EFB locations in the service area, identify locations for surveillance. 2. Early detection surveillance will be conducted at identified high-risk introduction locations using standardized EFB surveillance methods. CISMAs will prioritize the aquatic invasive plant locations identified in table 2.3.3 in “Aquatic Invasive Species Interstate Surveillance Framework for the U.S. Water of the Great Lakes, 2019” in Michigan Outcome 1. CISMAs identify and conduct early detection surveillance at high-risk locations within their service area. 2. At least 20 high-risk locations will have early detection surveillance conducted within each CISMA known to have EFB. This will enable regional partners to better prioritize management efforts with the goal of stopping the spread of EFB to new waterbodies. Measure 2.2.2. Output 1. Rapid response: CISMAs will respond to all newly detected EFB populations in their service area. 2. Post-response follow-up: All CISMAs conducting control actions will conduct pre- and post- treatment monitoring. Outcomes 1. 100% of newly detected EFB populations will receive control actions 2. 100% of control action locations have pre- and post-treatment monitoring data collected Measure 2.3.1. Output 1. At least 280 acres of EFB will receive control actions during this project. Control actions will be conducted prior to seed and turion production, when feasible, to reduce propagule pressure. Treatment sites will be prioritized based on potential for spread from the site, cultural or environmental value, and ability to eradicate. Additional considerations include outlier populations and regional partner priorities. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 34 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Outcome 11. Stakeholder/Public Communication/Meetings: 12. International Activities: N/A Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 35 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) 13. The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 deliverables: N/A 14. USEPA Pillar/GLRI Action Plan: Identify how this project relates to the GLRI Action Plan IV MOP number only. TOTAL ANTICIPATEDApplicable Measure of Progress – GLRI Action Plan IV Primary MOP TOTAL PRIMARY MOP REPORTING STATUS Secondary MOP At least 1 response TOTAL SECONDARY MOP REPORTING STATUS Tertiary MOP TOTAL TERTIARY MOP REPORTING STATUS Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 36 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) 15. Collaboration and Engagement in Project Development and Related Overarching Plans: 16. Project Milestones: Table 3. Project GANTT Activity Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 17. Cooperative Agreement: N/A 18. Pre-Award Costs: N/A 19. Timely Fiscal Expenditures: Table 4. Anticipated expenditure timeline. Expenditure Period (6-month increment) Anticipated Drawdown Date Estimated Amount Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 37 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) 10/01/25-03/31/26 04/15/26 $110,000 04/01/26-09/31/26 10/15/26 $110,000 10/01/26-03/31/27 04/15/27 $110,000 04/01/27-09/31/27 10/15/27 $110,000 10/01/27-12/31/27 01/15/2028 -0- 20. Workplan Appendices and Attachments: N/A 21. GLRI Budget Narrative: $440,000 is being requested to implement this project across Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. EGLE staff will use $8,520 for staff time to write the QAPP, organize and execute the training and debriefing meetings, and compiling and submitting required grant reports. $424,700 of this grant funding will be directed to Michigan CISMAs through subawards. The amount requested for subawards is based on the estimated cost for each CISMA to implement standardized monitoring and management activities. 96.5 % of this grant funding will be directed to up to 16 Michigan CISMAs. These funds will be used to increase surveillance and management of EFB across Michigan’s Lower Peninsula using standardized survey and proven treatment methods. The remaining 3.5% will be spent by EGLE WRD to cover project administration and present project results at a regional Invasive Species conference(s). Personnel and Fringe Benefits (grant funds) EGLE WRD staff will use $8,520 for personnel and fringe costs ($6,000 for Personnel and $2,520 for Fringe). The salary rate provided in the budget template is the rate for the project coordinator (Tom Alwin). Fringe rates are calculated at 42% and include health and dental benefits, and retirement benefits. EGLE WRD staff will spend time working with CISMAs to develop workplans, review and approve all quarterly reports and reimbursement requests, help resolve issues, and plan and execute training workshops. Supplies EGLE WRD is allocating $72 to purchase supplies for this project. We anticipate using the funds to purchase materials for the annual pre-season training events which includes general office supplies and engagement materials. Travel EGLE staff will attend a minimum of one Great Lakes regional conference and present on the efforts and outcomes of this project. We are allocating $5000 to cover attendance fees, travel, meals, and lodging. The Upper Midwest Invasive Species Conference (UMISC) is a 4-day conference normally held outside of Michigan – it will be held in La Crosse, Wisconsin in 2026. EGLE plans to send 4 staff to UMISC, which will account for the airfare, lodging, meals, and taxi portions of the travel budget (Table 2). M&IE Breakdown Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Total Staff 1 $51 $68 $68 $51 $238 Staff 2 $51 $68 $68 $51 $238 Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 38 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Staff 3 $51 $68 $68 $51 $238 Staff 4 $51 $68 $68 $51 $238 $952 Table 5. Estimated costs for EGLE travel during this project. Cost category Unit Cost Quantity Extension Airfare (Conference)$562 4 people $2248 Mileage (annual training)$0.44 636 miles $280 Meals/day (Conference)$51/68 16 (4 days for 4 people)$952 Lodging (Conference)$110/night 12 (3 nights for 4 people)$1320 Car rental/Taxi ride (Conference)$100 2 (to and from airport)$200 TOTAL $5000 Other We estimate that 55% of the subaward funds will be spent on staff time to conduct standardized surveys and/or treatment, attend training, and report writing, 40% will be used to conduct EFB management actions, and the remaining 5% will be used for public engagement efforts and completing quarterly reports to EGLE. The subawards from this project will provide CISMAs with the necessary funding to increase EFB surveillance and management, which directly contributes to the goals of the Great Lakes LAMPs. Each CISMA is in a unique position regarding the level of EFB infestation as well as their experience monitoring and managing EFB. Subaward amounts will be based on individual CISMA needs and directly related to the finalized workplans. Workplans with formal budgets will be tailored to the CISMA’s capacity, known EFB extent in their service area, and the number and size of high-risk sites where early detection surveillance is needed. Due to the current uncertainty related to each CISMA’s specific financial need, specific subaward amounts are not possible to provide at this time. Each subaward will require the CISMA to submit quarterly progress reports that will be consolidated into reporting to USEPA. Subaward budgets will contain a combination of •Staff hours and fringe – field crew members and administrative staff for grant reporting •Travel – Early detection and control activities and annual training event •Supplies – waders, rain gear, kayaks, paddles, safety gear (PFDs, sunscreen, bug spray, etc.) •Contracted control actions – herbicide treatment, mechanical removal, etc. •Public engagement materials/activities – Printing, presenting to stakeholders, social media posts, etc. All subaward workplans and budgets will comply with federal Terms & Conditions, regulations and cost principles of this grant. Signed subaward workplans and budgets will be included in the appropriate semi-annual report to USEPA. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 39 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) DTMB Table 6. Project budget Expenses USEPA Funding Personnel Fringe Benefits Travel Equipment Supplies Contractual Other Indirect Charges Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 40 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Budget Below are screen captures of the budget. The actual spreadsheet is provided as a separate Excel file. Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 41 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) Michigan.gov/EGLE Page 42 of 42 EQP1030 (Rev. 1/2026) People with disabilities may request this material in an alternate format by emailing EGLE- Accessibility@Michigan.gov or calling 800-662-9278. EGLE does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, disability, political beliefs, height, weight, genetic information, or sexual orientation in the administration of any of its programs or activities, and prohibits intimidation and retaliation, as required by applicable laws and regulations. Figure 2. Illustration of European Frog-bit plant.