Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1979.05.17 - 7396286 OAKLAAD COUNTY Board Of Commissioners MEETING May 17, 1979 Meeting called to order by Chairperson Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., at 10:10 A.M. in the Court House Auditorium, 1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, Michigan. Invocation given by Robert A. McConnell. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Roll called. PRESENT: DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kasper, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth. (25) ABSENT: Aaron, Wilcox. (2) Quorum present. Moved by Peterson supported by Gorsline the agenda be amended to remove Item "B" Coalition of Youth Services Agencies Grant Application UCS from the Health and Human Resources Committee and move Item "H" Resolution 1/8976, Community Development 312 Administration from the Personnel Committee to the Public Services Committee. Also, a resolution by Mrs. Moffitt - Commendation to the City of Southfield - "All American City", be added to the agenda. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by Patterson supported by Roth the minutes of the previous meeting be approved as printed. AYES: McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kasper, Kelly. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. The Chairperson vacated the Chair to present a Proclamation for Vietnam Veterans' Week, Vice Chairperson Lillian V. Moffitt took the Chair. Misc. 8982 By Mr. Gabler IN RE: VIETNAM VETERANS' WEEK To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS members of the United States Armed Forces serving during the Vietnam Era met their Nation's calling with valor and courage: and WHEREAS those loyal Americans serving in Southeast Asia during that time displayed the same bravery and made the same sacrifices as their American counterparts in preceding wars; and WHEREAS because of the strong national divergence of opinion on the Vietnam War, these Veterans have never fully received the thanks and the gratitude of their County. NOW THEREFORE, I Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., Chairperson of the Oakland County Board of Commis- sioners, do hereby proclaim the week of May 28 to June 3, 1979, Vietnam Veterans' Week in Oakland County in honor of the many fine Americans of this County who served their Nation with distinction and merit during the Vietnam Era.. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature and caused the Seal of the County of Oakland to be affixed this 17th Day of May, 1979. Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., Chairperson Oakland County Board of Commissioners The resolution was unanimously adopted. 287 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., Chairperson, Daniel T. Murphy, County Executive and Carl Pardon, Manager Veterans Services presented plaques to the following veterans: Ivan Brown Dennis Hai ,er Johnny Childers Charles Hail Douglas Fader Jane ,> Kavanaugh Phillip Guilliams Richard Mathews Thomas Tkachuck Susan Mooney The Chairperson returned to the Chair. The Chairperson made the following statement: 'At this time a Public Hearing is now called on Miscellaneous Resolution #8900 - Submission of Merit System Rule Changes, Rules 1 - 8. Legal Notice of the Hearing was published in the Oakland Press". The Chairperson asked if any person wished to speak. No one requested to be heard and the Public Hearing was declared closed. The Chairperson made the following statement: "At this time a Public Hearing is now called on Miscellaneous Resolution #8947 - County Executive Reorganization Proposal - Establishing Computer Services as a Separate Department. Legal Notice of the Hearing was published in the Oakland Press". The Chairperson asked if any person wished to speak. No one requested to be heard and the Public Hearing was declared closed. Clerk read letter of thanks from Alexander C. Perinoff. (Placed on file.) Clerk read letter from Henry W. Hoot stating that at the last Board Meeting on May 3, 1979 he had abstained on the vote for Resolution #8980 - Request Accounting of Lawsuit by the Drain Commissioner and the Road Commission. (Placed on file.) Clerk read letter from Edward W. Kane of the Department of Treasury with a report of the State Tax Commission presenting the proposed state equalized valuation for each county in the state. (Referred to Finance Committee) Clerk read two resolution from the Iron County Board of Commissioners regarding legal action by certain Wayne County elected officials and the rapidly rising values of residential property. (Referred to General Government Committee) Clerk read letter from Chairperson Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., appointing Richard R. Wilcox to serve as Board of Commissioner member of the Lakeville Lake Board. (Placed on file.) Clerk read letter from Chairperson Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., appointing Thomas Weidman to the Comprehensive Health Planning Council representing Oakland County for a term ending 1981. (Placed on file.) Clerk read letter from Chairperson Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., appointing Jack Olsen as a member of the Oakland County Cultural Council to fill an unexpired term ending December 31, 1979. Moved by Gorsline supported by Roth the appointment be confirmed. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the appointment was confirmed. Clerk read letter from John Pagen, President of Oakland County Association of School Superintendents to emphasize their full support for the plan between the public school district of Oakland County and Oakland County Health Department to move toward full immunization of the young people enrolled in public schools. (Referred to Health and Human Resources Committee) Clerk read resolution from the Royal Oak City Commissioners urging Governor William G. Milliken to declare a "State of Disaster" for the City of Royal Oak and surrounding communities affected by the ice storm that occured on April 8, 1979. Referred to General Government Committee) Clerk read resolution from the Van Buren County Board of Commissioners in opposition to House Bill 4199 - changes in the form for requesting absentee voter ballots. (Referred to General • Government Committee) Clerk read resolution from the Cheboygan County Board of Commissioners in support of the Consumer Price Index factor for 1979 Taxing Year which computes to 7.7%, any roll back necessary be 288 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 affected from last year's spreading rate and the Legislature be advised that any increase in new mandated services be funded by state funds and not local funds. (Referred to General Government Committee) Clerk read letter from Chairperson Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., stating he had signed the CETA Title 11-B On-the-Job Training Contracts, Phase 9C. (Placed on file.) Misc. 8983 By Mrs. Moffitt IN RE: CITY OF SOUTHFIELD - ALL AMERICAN CITY" To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the City of Southfield, Michigan has been named a 1979 All American City" by the National Municipal League, being the only recipient in Michigan and one of 11 across the country to achieve this honor; and WHEREAS Southfield gained this National recognition for its innovative and people-oriented housing and neighborhood programs implemented with joint participation and cooperation of the South- field government and city residents; and WHEREAS Southfield was also cited for civic competence, pride and citizen involvement in resolving people-oriented neighborhood issues. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby expresses commendation and extends congratulations to the City of Southfield on the occasion of being designated a 1979 "All American City." We, Wallace F. Gabler, Lillian V. Moffitt, john J. McDonald, Ralph W. Moxley, Lawrence R. Pernick and Alexander C. Perinoff, move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., Chairperson Lillian V. Moffitt, Vice Chairperson John J. McDonald, Ralph W. Moxley Lawrence R. Pernick, Alexander C. Perinoff Moved by Moffitt supported by Perinoff the resolution be adopted. The resolution was unanimously adopted. The Chairperson stated John King had requested to address the Board. The Chairperson vacated the Chair. Vice Chairperson Lillian V. Moffitt took the Chair. Mr. King addressed the Board. The Chairperson returned to the Chair. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8977 - LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AGREEMENT AND FUNDING FOR OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8977 and finds the necessary $350,000 to fund subject project available from the Capital Program - Law Enforcement Training Center item. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8977 By Mr. Moxley IN RE: LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AGREEMENT AND FUNDING FOR OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and 'Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has made a prior moral commitment to assist the Oakland Community College in providing an on-going criminal justice training program; and WHEREAS the college is currently ready to begin construction of its Madison Heights campus which will provide a centralized criminal justice program; and WHEREAS three hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($350,000.00) has been included in the proposed 1979 capital program for the purpose of assisting the college in their construction program; and WHEREAS in consideration of the three hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($350,000.00) the college has agreed to provide a twenty percent (201 tuition discount for all courses, taken by County employees, within the criminal just:ice program. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that three hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($350,000.00) be and is hereby allocated to Oakland Community College for purposes of constructing their Madison Heights campus. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners enter into an agree- 289 Commissioners Minutes Continuted. May 17, 1979 ment with Oakland Community College providing for employee tuition discount in accordance with the attached agreement. Mr. Chairperson, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Ralph W. Moxley, Commissioner - District 7/22 Dennis M. Aaron, Kenneth E. Roth, James A. Doyon William T. Patterson, Henry W. Hoot" AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 1979, by and between THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT OF PARTS OF THE COUNTIES OF OAKLAND, WASHTENAW, LIVINGSTON AND LAPEER (OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE), a Michigan Charter Authority, hereinafter referred to as "College", and THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND, a Michigan Constitutional Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "County"; 1. In consideration of the College providing an ongoing criminal justice program at its Madison Heights Campus and making said program available at a discount to County employees, the County shall remit to the College by , 1979, the sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand ($350,000.00) Dollars. 2. In consideration of the receipt of the sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand ($350,000.00) Dollars, the College will provide an educational program in criminal justice at the Madison Heights Campus leading to a degree or certificate. County employees shall receive a tuition discount equal to twenty percent (203) for all courses taken by them at the College within the Criminal Justice Program. 3. This Agreement shall terminate on the day of , 1989. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and date first above written. WITNESSES: THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT OF PARTS OF THE COUNTIES OF OAKLAND, WASHTENAW, LIVINGSTON AND LAPEER (OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE) By Lila R. Johnson, Chairman By Helen S. Kaiser, Secretary COUNTY OF OAKLAND, A Michigan Constitutional Corporation By: Wallace F. Gabler, Jr., Chairman Oakland County Board of Commissioners Moved by Murphy supported by Perinoff the report be accepted and Resolution #8977 be adopted. AYES: Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kasper, Kelly, McConnell, McDonald. (22) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8977 was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8979 - REQUIRING OUTSIDE AGENCIES TO DOCUMENT APPROPRIATION REQUEST To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen The Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8979 and finds it is sound and reasonable financial policy to require necessary documentation of all funding requests. The Finance Committee recommends adoption of Miscellaneous Resolution 7/8979. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8979 By Mrs. Moffitt IN RE: REQUIRING OUTSIDE AGENCIES TO DOCUMENT APPROPRIATION REQUESTS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the County has in 1979 provided in excess of $314,392 in support of outside agencies; and WHEREAS the cost to support these agencies has increased faster than the County's departmental budgets; and WHEREAS it is necessary to perform the same review of outside requests as the County's own operation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that outside agences be required to submit budget information and necessary back-up as deemed necessary by the Finance Committee and the County Executive. Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 290 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no funds be approved for outside agencies unless sufficient documentation of the request is provided. Mr. Chairperson, we move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Lillian V. Moffitt, Commissioner - District #15 Anne M. Hobart, Betty Fortino, Patricia A. Kelly" Moved by Murphy supported by Moffitt the report be accepted and Resolution 118979 be adopted. Discussion followed. Moved by Price supported by Moore the resolution be amended in the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph by inserting the words "County General" before the word 'funds be approved'. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Discussion followed. Moved by Price supported by Pernick the resolution be referred back to the Finance Committee for further study. Mrs. Moffitt objected to the referral. Vote on referral: AYES: Moore, Pernick, Price, Doyon. (4) NAYS: Montante, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Peterson, Roth, DiGiovanni, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt. (19) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion failed. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Pernick, Peterson, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante. (21) NAYS: Perinoff, Price. (2) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8979 as amended, was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 113980 - REQUEST ACCOUNTING OF LAWSUIT BY THE DRAIN COMMISSIONER AND THE ROAD COMMISSION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution 118980 and recommends its adoption. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson 'Misc. 8980 By Mrs. Moffitt IN RE: REQUEST ACCOUNTING OF LAWSUIT BY THE DRAIN COMMISSIONER AND THE ROAD COMMISSION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS it has come to the attention of the Board of Commissioners that the Drain Commis- sioner and the Road Commission have expended funds from their budgets for legal action against the Act 139 form of government; and WHEREAS both of these agencies sources of funds are from user taxes and user fees; and WHEREAS such hinds are levied or collected, only for specific purpose, program or function; and WHEREAS the expenditure of such funds by the Drain Commissioner and the Road Commission for legal action against a voter-approved form of government appears to be inconsistent with the purpose for which these funds are collected; and WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners has an overall responsibility to monitor the proper expenditure of any such funds. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Drain Commissioner and the Road Commission submit a written report within thirty (30) days to the Board of Commissioners on the source and amount of funds expended for legal action against the Act 139 form of government. Mr. Chairperson, we move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Lillian V. Moffitt, Commissioner - District 1115 Robert H. Gorsline, John J. McDonald Robert A. McConnell, Dennis L. Murphy Mat J. Dunaskiss, John H. Peterson Anne M. Hobart, Paul E. Kasper" 291 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 Moved by Murphy supported by Moffitt the report be accepted and Resolution #8980 be adopted. Moved by Doyon supported by Lewand the resolution be amended as follows: In the Title, 1st and 4th WHEREAS paragraphs and the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraphs add the words "County Executive" before the words "Drain Commissioner". In the 1st and 4th WEREAS paragraph delete the word 'against and insert the word "concerning". In the 2nd WHEREAS paragraph, delete the word 'both' and insert the word "all". In the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph add the words "Finance Committee" after the words 'Board of Commissioners' . A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Discussion followed. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Pernick, Peterson, Roth, Doyen, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore. (19) NAYS: Perinoff, Price, DiGiovanni, Fortino. (4) ABSTAIN: Hoot. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8980 was adopted. The Chairperson stated he had requested and received an opinion from Civil Counsel .regarding the legality of the funding of the law suit by the Road Commission and Drain Commissioner with public funds. Opinion referred to the Finance Committee, Road Commissioner and Drain Commis- sion. Misc. 8984 By Mr. Murphy IN RE: AWARDING OF CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING FURNITURE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS by Miscellaneous Resolution #8149 the Board of Commissioners authorized the Department of Central Services to receive bids for the renovation of the Executive Office Building; and WHEREAS in accordance to bidding procedures established in Miscellaneous Resolution #7133, bids were received and opened February 27, 1979 for furniture for the Executive Office Building; and WHEREAS the Central Services Department has reviewed the three (3) bids submitted and recommends the low bidder, the D. L. Walts Company, be awarded the contract in the amount of $170,857.25; and WHEREAS funding for the Executive Office Building furniture is provided in the Capital Program in the amount of $200,000; and WHEREAS furniture for all agencies. except Probation, is included in the bid price; and WHEREAS furniture for the Probation Division is estimated to cost $39,000. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED as follows: I. That the contract proposal of D. L. Walts Company, in the amount of $170,857.25 be accepted and the contract awarded in concurrence with the Planning and Building Committee recommenda- tion of April 26, 1979, 2. That funding be provided in the amount of $170,857.25 to cover the total project cost, 3. That the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners be and hereby is authorized and directed to execute a contract with D. L. Waits Company on behalf of the County of Oakland, 4. That this award shall not be effective until the awardee has been notified in writing by the County Executive's Department of Central Services, Facilities and Operations Division, 5. That pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee finds the total project sum for project 76-8 of $170,857.25 available in the recommended 1979 Capital Improvement Fund. The Finance Committee, by Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson, and with the concurrence of the Planning and Building Committee, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson Moved by Murphy supported by Roth the resolution be adopted. AYES: Murphy, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Petersen, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Kelly, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley. (19) NAYS: Pernick, Doyon, Fortino, Hoot, Lewand. (5) Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 292 A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Misc. 8985 By Mr. Murphy IN RE: BREAST CANCER SCREENING GRANT ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution 0584, authorized application for the Breast Cancer Screening Grant; and WHEREAS the subject grant covers a period of July 1, 1978 to June 30, 1979 and is in the amount of $245,320, which is $2,606 or 1Z greater than the grant as applied for; and WHEREAS funding for said program consists of $128,639 County funds and $116,681 Michigan Cancer Foundation funds; and WHEREAS the County portion of this program has been provided for in the 1978 and 1979 Budgets and requires no additional County funds. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accept the Breast Cancer Screening Grant. The Finance Committee, by Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson Moved by Murphy supported by Fortino the resolution be adopted. AYES: Page, Patterson, Perinoft, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Misc. 8986 By Mr. Peterson IN RE: 1979 FUNDING FOR THE SANCTUARY To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Sanctuary continues to provide shelter, counseling and crises intervention services for runaway youths and is the only such program in Oakland County; and WHEREAS the 1979 fiscal year will bring the Sanctuary into a major expansion effort in order to respond to community needs; and WHEREAS the Sanctuary is requesting an increase in County support from the present level of $1,500.00 per year to $5,000.00 per year; and WHEREAS the Health and Human Resources Committee recommends that the work of the Sanctuary be supported in part by Oakland County. NOW THEREFORE BE 1T RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners provide 1979 funding for the Sanctuary in the amount of $5,000.00 to be disbursed in accordance with the agree- ment between the Sanctuary and the Oakland County Juvenile Division. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such funding be included in the 1979 Oakland County Juvenile Division budget. The Health and Human Resources Committee, by John H. Peterson, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE John H. Peterson, Chairperson PROBATE COURT COUNTY OF OAKLAND CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 19 , between the PROBATE COURT for the COUNTY OF OAKLAND, hereinafter called "Court," and THE SANCTUARY, situated at 249 West Ten Mile Road, Pleasant Ridge, Michigan. WHEREAS The Sanctuary, a community based, private, non-profit licensed child institution, exists to provide shelter and counseling to young people in crisis. While services are targeted to Oakland County residents, we will serve any youth who meets our eligibility requirements. THE SANCTUARY seeks to provide a voluntary community based program for runaways, throwaways, and young people in crisis. Our primary goals include preventing court involvement of youth, and re- conciling young people and their families. Services are provided without cost to families, and include emergency sheltercare for up to fifteen days (with parental consent), daily group counseling, and in- dividual and family counseling, and information and referral. WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners is supportive of the Sanctuary's service availability to Oakland County residents, and has a history of support for the Sanctuary's program, the Board of Com- missioners chooses to increase the Sanctuary's fund allocation to $5,000.00, to be disseminated through DATE: DATE: 293 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 the Juvenile Court budget this year. IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT the Sanctuary shall be reimbursed at the rate of $11.19 per day, per child that has been referred by the Oakland County Juvenile Court program, up to $5,000.00 during the current County budget period. This rate is applicable regardless of the client's wardship status. This reimbursement shall be retroactive to the County's beginning of the budget year. THE SANCTUARY maintains the right to determine eligibility of clients for its program, and to terminate clients from services if deemed necessary. • IT IS recognized that the Sanctuary will continue to provide services to clients referred by Oakland County Juvenile Court if the $5,000.00 available for payment is exhausted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and date first above written. WITNESSES: John E. Dowsett Director of Juvenile Services Oakland County Juvenile Court Lisa Kaichen, M.S.W. ACSW Director, the Sanctuary Moved by Peterson supported by Roth the resolution be adopted. The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections. Misc. 8987 By Mr. Peterson IN RE: EXTENSION OF THE 1978 ALTERNATIVE TO SECURE DETENTION GRANT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Health and Human Resources Committee has reviewed the proposed extension of the Alternative to Secure Detention Grant; and WHEREAS unutilized funds totaling 994,740 are available from the 1978 grant period and could be used to fund the 1979 Alternative to Secure Detention program through approximately June 15, 1979; and WHEREAS the 1979 grant period could begin when 1978 funding is exhausted on approximately June 16, 1979 and continue through June 15, 1980. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorize the extension of the 1978 grant period for the Alternative to Secure Detention Grant for a period of approximately five and one-half (5-1/2) months or until June 15, 1979. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Alternative to Secure Detention program be continued at current levels through June 15, 1979. The Health and Human Resources Committee by John H. Peterson, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE John H. Peterson, Chairperson Moved by Peterson supported by Patterson the resolution be adopted. AYES: Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Misc. 8988 By Mr. Peterson IN RE: CHILDRENS VILLAGE SCHOOL - ADDITIONAL STAFF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 1979-80 SCHOOL YEAR To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the new Childrens Village School is tentatively scheduled for completion by late May of 1979; and WHEREAS the design of the new school allows Childrens Village School administration to plan more of a comprehensive program than is possible in the current facility; and WHEREAS the new school has an automotive shop and a gym; two rooms not available in the current facility; and WHEREAS to staff the new facility properly will require, by late August 1979, the addition of one automotive teacher, one gym teacher and one gym teacher aide; and WHEREAS the actual cost of adding these staff to the Childrens Village School program will depend on the outcome of negotiations pursuant to the 1979-80 school year but can be anticipated to Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 294 cost approximately an additional $37,000 to $80,000 per year with fifty percent (509) to be reimbursed by the Child Care Fund. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorize the addition of one automoLive teacher, one gym teacher and or gym teacher aide to the present staff complement at the Childrens Village School commencing with the start of the 1979-80 school year in the Fall or 19/9. Costs to be allocated from the 1980 budget. The Health and human Resources Committee, by John H. Peterson, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE John H. Peterson, Chairperson Moved by Peterson supported by Roth the resolution be adopted. The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8942 - OAKLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE (4C) PROGRAM To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8942 and recommends the $6,000 budget request be reviewed with all other budget requests in the 1980 budget review. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8942 By Mr. Peterson IN RE: OAKLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE (4c) PROGRAM To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Health and Human Resources Committee has reviewed a presentation by the Oakland County Community Coordinated Child Care Program (known as 4C); and WHEREAS your Committee has determined that the work of the Oakland County Community , Coordinated Child Care Council, begun in 1974, should continue, and WHEREAS this effort includes training, coordination and technical assistance to child care providers intended to reinforce and strengthen the family; and WHEREAS the 4C Council, through the Oakland Livingston Human Service Agency, is requesting that $6,000 be included in the 1980 County budget; and WHEREAS the requested amount is a portion of the total needed for local match for the State agency purchase Of service agreement through the State 4C Council; and WHEREAS 4C will be securing the balance of monies needed from other community resources. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners recommend that funding in the amount of $6,.000 be included in the 1980 budget for the Oakland County Community Coordinated Child Care (4C) Program. The Health and Human Resources Committee, by John H. Peterson, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE John H. Peterson, Chairperson" Moved by Peterson supported by Fortino the report be accepted and Resolution #8942 be adopted. AYES: Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8942 was adopted. "Misc. 8900 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: SUBMISSION OF CHANGES IN MERIT SYSTEM RULES 1 THROUGH 3 To the Oakland County Bbard of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Section Iv_ Subsection A. of the Merit System Resolution requires that all changes in the rules and regulations of the Merit System shall be submitted to the Board of Commissioners at a regular meeting of the Board and shall become effective thirty (30) days after such meeting unless objection is received in writing by the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners, in which case the objection shall become a matter of business at the next meeting of the Board; and WHEREAS a subcommittee of the Personnel Committee has been reviewing the rules of the Merit System since January of 1978 and has conducted hearings inviting public, employee, management and commissioner input on the rules and numerous work sessions to develop revisions; and 295 Commissioners Minutes Con[inued. May 17. 1979 WHEREAS it has become desirable to make certain changes in the wording of Rules 1 through 8, as spelled out in the attachments to this resolution. and WHEREAS your Personnel Committee has reviewed and approved these changes at its meeting of March 21, 1979, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the reading of this notice and the distribution of this notice and the attached document labeled "Proposed Changes in the Merit System Rules" to all Commis- sioners present and absent to be considered as the official submission to the Board of Commissioners, of the described changes in Rules 1 through 8.. The Per Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, .Chairperson" Copy of RulesI through 8 see pages 177 thru 213. - Moved by McDonald supported by Fortino that Resolution #8900 be adopted. Moved by Gorsline supported by Fortino the resolution he amended by striking "Rule 1" and inserting "Rule 2". A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Page, Patterson, Perinoff. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Resolution #8900 as amended, was adopted. The Chairperson stated a Substitute Resolution #8900-A - Amendment to Rule I would be Laid Over to the next regular Board meeting. There were no objections. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8947 - COUNTY EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION PROPOSAL ESTABLISHING COMPUTER SERVICES AS A SEPARATE DEPARTMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution 118947 and finds no additional funds are required to fund subjoct reorganization. A budget amendment to transfer funds previously committed to the Division of Computer Services to the Department of Computer Services is required. The Finance Committee, pursuant to Rule XI-C recommends transfer of the entire budget and 1979 expenditures to the newly 'established Department of Computer Services. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8947 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: COUNTY EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION PROPOSAL ESTABLISHING COMPUTER SERVICES AS A SEPARATE DEPARTMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Section 14(a) of Act 139 of the Public Acts of 1973, as amended, permits the transfer and consolidation of departments upon the affirmative recommendation of the County Executive and following a public hearing; and WHEREAS the Computer Services Division of the Department of Central Services has grown in size and complexity which requires management by highly technical personnel; and WHEREAS the County Executive and the Board of Commissioners are concerned about increasing the efficiency, effectiveness and benefits of the data processing service delivered to the County; and WHEREAS the realignment of the Computer Services Division to departmental status, within the County Executive's organizational structure, in accordance with the Elmer Fox report, will improve the communication and accountability to the County Executive and the Finance Committee; and WHEREAS the County Executive affirmatively recommends the creation of this Department, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that a Department of Computer Services be established within the County Executive's organizational structure and the entire budget and personnel of the Division of Computer Services be transferred to that newly established Department. The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson" Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 296 Moved by McDonald supported by Gorsline the report be accepted and Resolution #8997 be adopted. AYES: Peterson, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson. (19) NAYS: Price, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino, Kelly, Lewand, Moore, Pernick. (8) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8947 was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 7/8948 - PROBATE COURT - EMPLOYEE IN-SERVICE TRAINING FUNDS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, tho Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution 118948 and finds the subject training is the result of State ordered changes in the Probate Code and will cost approximately $750. The Finance Committee finds $750 available from the 1979 Contingent Fund; said funds are to be transferred to the In-Service Training line item in the Personnel's Division's budget. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8948 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: PROBATE COURT - EMPLOYEE IN-SERVICE TRAINING FUNDS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS on January 11, 1979, Governor William G. Milliken signed House Bill No. 4975 which revises the Probate Code and procedures; and WHEREAS these changes in the Probate Code and procedures are effective on July 1, 1979; and WHEREAS it is necessary in order to affect these changes that the Probate Court staff be given intensive instruction in the revised Probate Code and procedures; and WHEREAS your Personnel Committee has reviewed this request and concurs, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Probate Court be allocated $750 to retrain their staff in the new Probate Code and procedures required by House Bill No. 4475, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $750 be transferred from the Contingency Fund or other appropriate source of funds to the Employee In-Service Training line item in the Personnel Department's budget earmarked for this purpose, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Personnel Committee recommend to the Finance Committee that other ways of handling the daily workload that will be backlogged while the staff is being retrained be worked out other than by use of overtime. The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson" Moved by McDonald supported by Doyon the report be accepted and Resolution 118948 be adopted. AYES: Price, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Pernick. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution 118948 was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 118949 - DISTRICT COURT JUDGES' SALARIES To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8949 and finds $11,672 necessary to fund said salary increases. The Finance Committee finds no funds available for this purpose at this time. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson 'Misc. 8948 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: DISTRICT COURT JUDGES' SALARIES To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS during the fall budget review the District Court Judges requested that the County paid portion of each District Court Judge's salary be increased to the maximum allowed by the State ($18,510); and 297 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 WHEREAS the Cc rd of Commissioners approved increasing the County paid portion of District Court Judges' salarie for 1979 from S13,388 to $14,593; and WHEREAS in 'rear- 1979 the District Court Judges requested the Personnel Committee to reopen discussions rc, ding the County paid portion of District Court Judges' salaries; and WHEREAS the F-rsonnel Committee formed a subcommittee to review the District Court Judges salaries; and WHEREAS the subcommittee proposed a ten per cent (101 increase to the County paid portion of District Court Judges' s:daries retroactive to January 1, 1979; and WHEREAS your Personnel Committee has reviewed this proposal and concurs; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County paid portion of District Court Judges salaries be increased as shown below: FROM TO STATE PORTION $27,765 927,765 L_ COUNTY PORTION 14,593 --T6052 I TOTAL $42,358 $43,817 The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson" Moved by McDonald supported by Patterson the report be accepted and Resolution #8949 be adopted. Moved by Pernick supported by Fortino the resolution be amended to read, the resolution will become effective on May 17, 1979 if adopted, and that the Funds of $11,672 come from the Contingency Funds". Vote on amendment: AYES: Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino, Hobart, Kelly, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Patterson, Pernick, Price. (13) NAYS: Dunaskiss, Gabler, Corsline, Hoot, Lewand, McConnell, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Peterson. (10) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: DiCiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Patterson, Pernick, Price. (13) NAYS: Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, McConnell, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Roth. (10) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the resolution was not adopted. Misc. 8989 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: SALARY RATE FOR MR. KENNETH PATTERSON To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Mr. Patterson was displaced from his position of Manager - Data Processing Systems and Programs when it was decided to utilize a partial Facilities Management concept in the Computer Services Division; and WHEREAS a review of numerous positions where Mr. Patterson's extensive data processing background could be utilized to the benefit of the County was conducted; and WHEREAS an other sources Systems Analyst 11 position in the Employment and Training Division has recently become vacant: and WHEREAS Mr. Patterson is very familiar with the data processing needs in this Division to comply with the reporting and system design requirements set forth by the Federal Government; and WHEREAS Mr. Patterson's experience and training make him exceptionally qualified to immediately assume the duties of this position: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Mr. Kenneth Patterson's salary in the Systems Analyst 11 position in the Employment and Training Division be established at the annual rate of $23,218 until such time that the Salary range of the Systems Analyst 11 classification equals or exceeds this amount. The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution, PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 298 Moved by McDonald supported by Moffitt the resolution be adopted. - Moved by Moore supported by Fortino the resolution be amended in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph by reducing the salary from "$23,218" to read "$21,699". Discussion followed. Vote on amendment: AYES: Doyon, Fortino, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, Moore, Pernick, Roth. (8) NAYS: Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Price, DiGiovanni. (15) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the amendment failed. Vote on resolution: AYES: Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Price, DiGlovanni. (16) NAYS: Fortino, Kelly, Lewand, Moore, Pernick, Roth, Doyon. (7) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Misc. 8990 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: PROBATE COURT - JUVENILE - ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY SALARIES To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Juvenile Division of the Probate Court has experienced a higher than anticipated usage of emergency salaries since January I, 1979; and WHEREAS emergency salaries have been exhausted leaving no means for providing temporary, non-eligible help to perform essential work in the absence of employees on extended sick leave and maternity leave; and WHEREAS your Personnel Committee has reviewed the circumstances of the Juvenile Court and determined that emergency salaries is the most economical and effective way of meeting current temporary workload demands; and WHEREAS there is a salaries surplus from personnel turnover in the Juvenile Court in excess of the amount requested in emergency salaries, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that an additional $3,508 in emergency salaries be granted to the Probate Court - Juvenile Division for the balance of 1979, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Personnel Committee recommends the funds for this purpose be transferred from the Probate Court - Juvenile Division's salary surplus. The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections. REPORT By Mr. McDonald IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8981 - REQUESTING A REPORT ON ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Personnel Committee, having reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8981, recommends that said resolution be adopted with the following amendments: 1.•''Public Compensation" should be changed to read "County Compensation". 2. "Current calendar/fiscal year" should be inserted before County Compensation noted in 1. above. On behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing roper PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson "Misc. 8981 By Mrs. Moffitt IN RE: REQUESTING A REPORT ON ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners has the statutory responsibility to set the salaries for all County officials and employees. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that all elected and appointed officials be requested to submit, within 30 days, a written report to the Personnel Committee and the Personnel Department as to any public compensation paid to themselves or their subordinates, which is in addition to the compensation authorized by the Board of Commissioners. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it shall be the policy of the Board of Commissioners that the 299 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 above information also be submitted to the Personnel and Finance Committees and their liaison departments at the time of the annual budget review. Mr. Chairperson, we move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Lillian V, Moffitt, ComMissioner - District 1/15 Robert H. Gorsline, John J. McDonald Robert A. McConnell, Mat J. Dunaskiss John H. Peterson, Dennis L. Murphy Paul E. Kasper" Moved by Moffitt supported by Fortino the report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by McDonald supported by Moffitt that Resolution :8981 be adopted. Moved by Pernick supported by Moffitt the resolution be amended in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph by striking the words "Public Compensation" and add "County Compensation" paid during the past 12 months from the adoption of this resolution. Also, in the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph to delete the word "personnel". A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Moved by Pernick supported by Moore the report include all benefits paid to these individuals. Discussion followed. Vote on amendment: AYES: Fortino, Gabler, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, Moore, Pernick, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss. (12) NAYS: Gorsline, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson. (9) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino. (19) NAYS: Patterson, Dunaskiss. (2) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Resolution #8981 as amended, was adopted. Misc. 8991 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: SUBMISSION OF CHANGES IN MERIT SYSTEM RULES 2, 3, AND 4 To.the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Section IV., Subsection A. of the Merit System Resolution requires that all changes in the rules and regulations of the Merit System shall be submitted to the Board of Commis- sioners at a regular meeting of the Board and shall become effective thirty (30) days after such meeting unless objection is received in writing by the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners, in which case the objection shall become a matter of business at the next meeting of the Board; and WHEREAS it has become desirable to make certain changes in the wording of Rules 2, 3, and 4, as spelled out in the attachments to this resolution; and WHEREAS your Personnel Committee has reviewed and approved these changes at its meeting of May 9, 1979, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the reading of this notice and the distribution of this notice and the attached document labeled "Proposed Changes in the Merit System Rules" to all Commis- sioners present and absent to be considered as the official submission to the Board of Commissioners, of the described changes in Rules 2, 3, and P. The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson 300 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 PROPOSED CHANCES IN TEE MERIT SYSTEM RULES PDOPOSED WORDING RULE/SCTION ,,', ' at ,'OING - CHAF(, SHOWN IN BRACKETS. [ I 1. Rule 2 Depai , , Deputy [Departn- t Directors and Division Sec :ion X.A.1, Department Heads and Managers] are excluded from this delini- Assistant Department tion. Heads are excluded from this definition. ?.. Rule 2 The first payday of each [None. Language should be deleted as Section XII.a, year is the third Friday it is not always the case with our of January. current system.] - 3. Rule 3 The Personnel. Department The Personnel Department shall respond Section II.A.4.b. shall respond within 30 within 30 calendar days [after receipt calendar days of receipt of the request from the department head) of the requested classi- regardless of whether or not a study is fication study regardless warranted... of whether or not a study is warranted... - 4. Rule 3 .None • [e. The Personnel Department shall Section II.A.4.e. complete the classification study within 120 days of the date the position questionnaire completed by the employee is returned to the Personnel Office.] 5. Rule 3 . None [f. If the classification study results Section II.A.4.f. in a determination that the employee's position is reclassified upward the re- classification will be effective on the beginning of the pay period closest to the date the employee returned the completed questionnaire to the Personnel Department.] C, Rule 3 ...up to five calendar ...up to five [work] days after receipt Section III.A.1. days after receipt of of the notice. the notice... 7 . Rule 3 ,None 3. The Personnel Committee shall hold Section III.A.3. classification appeal hearings within. 30 days of the notification by the Director of Personnel of the appeals,/ --- ----- ...., •-.- 8, Rule 4 Such appointmens should be Such appointments should be made only Section IX made only in those circum- in those ,ircumstances where permanent stances where permanent part- part-time help is required on a year time help is required on a around basis for the most effective year around basis for the and efficient utilization of personnel most effective and efficient [and where it is anticipated employment utilization of il:rsonnel, would he for more than 520 hours in a calendar year.] 301 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 Mr. McDonald requested a Public Hearing be held on June 21, 1979 at 10:00 A.M. There were no objections. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 0845 - CREATION OF A CLASSIFICATION AND POSITION OF PROGRAM EVALUATION OFFICER To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8845 and finds $27,461 necessary to fund the subject position for the remainder of 1979. The Finance Committee finds $27,461 available in the Contingent Fund. Said funds are to be trans- ferred to the County Executive's Administration budget - Salaries line-item. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8845 By Mr. McDonald IN RE: CREATION OF A CLASSIFICATION AND POSITION OF PROGRAM EVALUATION OFFICER To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the need for a systematic evaluation of the many County programs and services has been recognized for some time; and WHEREAS prior efforts to achieve such a systematic or comprehensive evaluation through existing resources have only been partially successful; and WHEREAS the methodology and technology for comprehensive program evaluations has been developed and tested by numerous agencies of the federal government as well as many local units across the country; and WHEREAS the benefits to the County in terms of certainty of decision regarding program efficiency and effectiveness will more than justify the proposed program evaluation concept, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RE OLVED that the classification of Program Evaluation Officer be established with the following lary range: BASE 1 Y1L\R 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 0/T 2T,-6-5 29,745 30,926 32,105 33,278-6 No and that one budgeted position of Program Evaluation Officer be created. The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson" Moved by McDonald supported by Patterson the report be accepted and Resolution #8845 be adopted. Moved by Fortino supported by Moore the resolution be amended in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph by adding the words "under the Board of Commissioners" after he established". Discussion followed. AYES: Kelly, Lewand, Moore, Pernick, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Fortino. (9) NAYS: Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Dunaskiss, Gabler. (13) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the amendment failed. Moved by Hoot supported by Fortino the resolution be amended in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph by reducing the salary range as follows :The one year and 2 year steps be the same; 3 year be $31,097 and the 4 year be eliminated with no overtime". AYES: Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, Moore, Pernick, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino. (12) NAYS: McDonald, Moffitt, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline. (10) A sufficient majority • having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: Hoot, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Roth, DiGiovanni, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart. (15) NAYS: Kelly, Lewand, Moore, Pernick, Price, Doyon, Fortino. (7) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8845 as amended, was adopted. Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 302 FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8951 - SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY DISPOSAL SYSTEM - CAMP, DRESSER AND MC KEE AGREEMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI -C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8951 and finds the subject agreement: 1) Covers a nine month period from approximately June I, 1979 through February 28, 1980, 2) The agrepment calls for payment of time and material cost, plus expenses, 3) Total project cost for this phase is estimated to be $418,000, 4) Of the $418,000, approximately $224,000 is expected to be paid in 1979 with the remainder to be paid in 1980. Pursuant to Rule XI-C the Finance Committee finds $224,000 available from funds encumbered for this purpose. The Finance Committee further recommends the remaining balance of $154,000 be considered in the 1980 Budget, along with other expenses that may be incurred in connection with this program in 1980. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8951 By Mr. Wilcox IN RE: SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY DISPOSAL SYSTEM - CAMP, DRESSER AND MC KEE AGREEMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution 118544, adopted July 6, 1978, authorized the County Executive to receive consulting engineering proposals for a Phase 1 financial feasibility study and to have the proposals evaluated by an Evaluation Committee comprised of Mr. James B. Meenahan, P.E., Chairman of the Solid Waste Advisory Group, Mr. Harold A. Meininger, appointed by the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners, and Mr. William M. Spinelli, appointed by the County Executive; and WHEREAS an advertisement was placed in the August 3, 1978 issue of Engineering News -J Record for proposals; and WHEREAS sixty-five (65) national consulting engineering firms requested information of which twenty-three (23) firms submitted "Statement of Qualifications" proposals on or before September 5, 1979; and WHEREAS the Evaluation Committee reviewed the twenty-three (23) "Statement of Qualifications" proposals of which the top six (6) candidates were personally interviewed; and WHEREAS the Evaluation Committee selected the consulting engineering firm of Camp, Dresser and McKee of Boston, Massachusetts and Detroit, Michigan; and WHEREAS the County Executive staff has negotiated an agreement for consulting engineering services at a. reasonable cost; and WHEREAS the program anticipates four (4) distinct phases estimated at a cost of 61,643,000 of which $418,000 is for Phase IA as out in the attached agreement; and WHEREAS the solid waste supply must be secured before a resource recovery disposal system can be implemented; and WHEREAS upon completion of Phase IA, sufficient information will be developed per contracts to be prepared and executed between the County and each participating municipality in order to secure the solid waste supply; and WHEREAS the Solid Waste Advisory Group has reviewed the agreement. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Oakland County Board of Commis- sioners is hereby authorized and directed to execute the said agreement for engineering services by and between the County of Oakland and Camp, Dresser and McKee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the maximum fee for Phase IA shall not exceed $418,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Executive is hereby authorized and directed to act as the County's representative with respect to the work performed under this agreement. The Planning and Building Committee, by Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson" OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of the day of in the year Nineteen Hundred and Seventy-Nine by and between the County of Oakland, Michigan Thereinafter called COUNTY), and Camp Dresser and McKee, One Center Plaza, Boston, Massachusetts, a partnership (hereinafter called ENGINEER). The COUNTY desires the professional services of the ENGINEER for: the collection and development of technical, economic, and institutional data and the analysis of those data such that the COUNTY can make a knowledgeable decision regarding the implementation of a county-wide solid waste management system; assistance to the COUNTY in the area of public information; the evaluation of specific equipment and systems for use in the county solid waste management system; assistance in obtaining confirmation of the waste supply and energy/materials marketing agreements; support to county activities in public relations, contract preparation, and financial analysis as required for 303 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 successful imi h niewation of the county system: and assistance in the implementation of the county solid waste rl-,a • system, The EduNly and he EN'INrr , in consideration of their mutual covenants herein agree in respect to th, erformat of ra io• al engineering services by the ENGINEER and the payment for those services by th, t alaCY, • s• • for in below. The ENGINE,' 1 II rye the COUNTY'S professional engineering representative in those phases of the project in which this Agreement applies, and will give consultation and advice to the COUNTY during the perfomnance of his services. SECTION 1 - BASIC SERVICES OF ENGINEER 1.1 General 1.1.1 The ENGINEER shall perform professional services as hereinafter stated which include normal civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and normal architectural services required for the completion of a solid waste management study program. 1.2 PRELIMINARY PLANNING PHASE (FNASE IA) It is mutually recognized that the work described in Appendix A is the first of several engineering and study efforts preceding implementation by COUNTY of a solid waste management system. 1.2.1 The ENGINEER shall conduct a study and investigation in accordance with the scope of services attached as Appendix A. The study shall, in general, include the following: 1.2.1.1 Evaluate technical, physical, and demographic data required to complete the program. 1.2.1.2 Identify and evaluate the alternative waste disposal systems for feasible for application within the COUNTY in consideration of technical, economic, and environmental factors. 1.2.1.3 Assi:tt, in selection of a specific solid waste management system. 1.2,1.4 Di' lop A public information and participation program. 1.2.1.5 fr•H, e i report with appropriate exhibits describing the methods utilized in identification, faln,Lion, and selection of the solid waste management system and describing in detail the system • i Emd for the County and the recommended implementation strategy. 1.3 A su'• IA planning effort (Phase 1B) may be implemented to provide greater detail and confirmation c, :!1( t,chnical and economic featuresof the proposed COUNTY system. SECTION 2 - 1PECIAL SERVICES 2.1 General If authorized in writing by the COUNTY, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others - Special Services of the following types which are not considered normal or customary Basic Services; these will be paid for by COUNTY as indicated in Section 5. 2.1.1 Assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of the project. 2.1.2 Services to investigate existing conditions of facilities and to verify the accuracy of data and other information furnished by COUNTY, as required, other than that specified under Basic Services in Appendix A. 2.1.3 Services resulting from changes in general scope of the project, including but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, or COUNTY'S schedule and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or contract documents when such revisions are due to causes beyond ENGINEER's control. 2.1.4 Providing renderings or models for COUNTY's use. 2.1.5 Furnishing the services of special consultants for other than the normal civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering and normal architectural design incidental thereto, unless specifically identified herein as being covered under Basic Services. 2.1.6 Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for COUNTY in any litigation, public hearing or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project not included in Basic Services. 2.1.7 Additional services in connection with the project, including services normally furnished by COUNTY and services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. SECTION 3 - COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITIES The COUNTY shall: 3.1 Provide full information as to its requirements for the Project. 3.2. Assist ENGINEER by placing at his disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design and construction of the Project. 3.3. Furnish to ENGINEER, as required by him for performance of his services, data prepared by or services of others, such as core borings, probings and subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment, appropriate professional interpretations of all of the foregoing; property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys and property descriptions; zoning and deed restriction; land use and zoning maps; utility locations; population estimates and forecasts; and other special data; except where ENGINEER has specifically agreed to provide the same under Basic Services. All of which ENGINEER may rely upon in performing his services. 3.4 If ENGINEER is not successful in obtaining permission to enter upon public and private property as required to perform his services under Appendix A, the COUNTY will assist in obtaining such permission as may be required. 3.5 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents presented by ENGINEER, obtain advice of consultants as COUNTY deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time seas not to delay the services of ENGINEER. Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 304 3.6 Provide such legal, accounting, insurance, financial, and other counseling services as COUNTY may deem necessary for the project. 3.7 Designate in writing a person to act as COUNTY's representative with respect to the work to be peformed under this Agreement. 3.8 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever COUNTY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project. SECTION It - PERIOD OF SERVICES 4.1 ENGINEER shall proceed with the performances of the services called for in the AGREE- MENT in accordance with the following schedule: Data Base Report (Activity B.9 of Appendix A) shall be delivered within 150 days of receipt of written notice to proceed. Draft Final Report shall be delivered within 120 days of receipt of written approval of the Data Base Report. 4.2 If the COUNTY has requested significant modifications or changes in the scope of the Project, the time of performance of ENGINEER's services shall be adjusted appropriately. 4.3 If ENGINEER's services for any portion of this Project are delayed or suspended in whole or in part by the COUNTY for more than three months for reasons beyond ENGINEER's control, the ENGINEER shall, on written demand to the COUNTY (but xithout termination of this Agreement), be paid in Full for all services rendered to date of delay or suspension. If such delay or suspension extends for more than three months for reasons beyond the ENGINEER's control, the various rates of com- pensation and limits of cost provided for elsewher'e in this Agreement shall be subject to renegotiation. SECTION 5 - PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER 5.1 Methods of Payment for Services and Expenses of ENGINEER 5.1.1 Services. The COUNTY shall pay the ENGINEER for services and expenses rendered under Sections 1 and 2 as described in the attached Appendix B. 5.2 Times of Payment • 5.2.1 The Engineer shall submit monthly statements for services rendered. The COUNTY shall make Monthly payments in response to ENGINEER's monthly statement within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. 5.2:2 If the COUNTY fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses within sixty (60) days after receipt of ENGINEER's bill therefor, the amounts due ENGINEER shall include a charge at the rate of one percent (1%) per month from said sixtieth day, and in addition ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days written notice to the COUNTY, suspend services under this Agreement until he has been paid in full all amounts due him for services and expenses. SECTION 6 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 6.1 Termination This Agrement may be terminated by either party upon ten (10) days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party .to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminatinu party. If the COUNTY terminates His Aqreement under the tel of this paragraph and it is later determined that the ENGINEER had not so failed, the ENGINEER shall be paid for service s performed to the termination notice date plus reasonable related costs incurred due to termination. 6.2 Reuse of Documents All documents including reports, drawings, and specifications furnished by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of his services in respect of the Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the COUNTY (or others) on extensions of the Project or any other project. The reuse without specific written verification Of adaptation by the ENGINEER will be at the COUNTY's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to the ENGINEER and the COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless the ENGINEER from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle the ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the COUNTY and the ENGINEER. 6.3 Estimates of Cost 6.3.1 Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, or equipment, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Cost or Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent his best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry, but ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or the Construction Cost will not vary fromopigiqps of probable cost prepared by him. 6.4 Successors and Assigns The COUNTY and the Engineer each binds himself and his partners, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement, except as above, neither the COUNTY nor the ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer his interests in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be constructed as creating any personal liability on the party of any officer or agent of any public body which may be a party hereto, nor shall it be construed as giving any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than the COUNTY .and the ENGINEER. SECTION 7 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS The COUNTY and the ENGINEER agree that this Agreement is subject to the following special provisions which together with the provisions hereof and the appendices hereto represent the entire Agreement between the COUNTY and the ENGINEER; they may only be altered, amended or repealed by a duly executed written instrument. 305 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1970 7.1 Resident Engineering Services are not included in the Aereernt. 7.2 Each phasE cr subphase listed in SECTION 1 of this Agr ,vent cannot be started until the ENGINEER is author'- r- proceed in writing by the COUNTY. Reccitet of an executed copy of this Agreement by the ENGIN7 .d11 constitute a Notice to Proceed with to PHASE A. 7.3 While it the intent of the COUNTY and the ENGINEER . • • utract for furl', r phases or subphases of work in reaching implementation of a selected solid w . ta an syst net (PHASES 18, 11 and 111), the specifics of SECTION 1 with regard to these phi are to be devel I aid this Agreement may need to be amended in this regard. Further, SECTIONS .nd 3 may also nc, 'ao be amended, and SECTIONS 4 and 5 need definition with regard to PHASES IB. 11 and 111 upon ,ompletion of the preceding phase. 7.4 The ENGINEER will be utilizing the following firms as subconsultants FOR SECTION 1, PHASE IA work as delineated in Appendix A: Battelle Memorial Institute, Charles T. Main, and Wehran Associates. It is expressly understood that execution of this Agreement constitutes the COUNTY's permission to the ENGINEER to utilize these subconsultants for Basic . Services for SECTION 1, PHASE IA Work as defined in Appendix A. 7.5 This Agreement is valid if executed prior to June 1, 1979. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. COUNTY: ENGINEER: PARTNER APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK - PHASE lA OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN BASIC SERVICES A. COLLECT, COMPILE, AND EVALUATE DATA 1, Population Projections. The ENGINEER will review available, existing population estimates and census data. These data will be amended as required to display population estimates for each municipality in the COUNTY for the year 1979, 1980, 1985, 1990, and 2000. The estimates, projections, and census data will be provided to the ENGINEER by the COUNTY. 2. Exising Maas and Plans. The ENGINEER will review all available maps and plans which" shall be deemed appropriate upon mutual agreement between the COUNTY and the ENGINEER to be of assistance in estimating future waste quantities and characteristics, and in determining the effectiveness and feasibility of existing and future solid waste transfer, processing, and disposal sites. lese maps and plans will include, but not be limited to, zoning and land use plans; census tracts; existing and projected transportation systems; urban renewal project boundaries; residential, commercial, and industrial developed; solid waste transfer, processing and disposal sites; and utility district plans which must be analyzed for solid waste facility planning purposes. These maps and plans shall be provided to the ENGINEER by the COUNTY. 3. Compile taws. The ENGINEER will assist the COUNTY in compiling, for review, all Federal, State, and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations which bear on the feasibility of implementation of resource recovery facilities in Oakland County. ENGINEER will review this information and identify the legal/institutional structures through which a solid waste management plan could be implemented. The ENGINEER will prepare out to describe the State and local permit processes and regulatory schedule requirements for existing, noncomplying facilities and proposed facilities. 4. Determine Solid Waste Quantities and Characteristics, The ENGINEER will develop estimates of existing quantities and characteristics and project future quantities and characteristics for the residential, commercial and institutional solid waste streams. Light industrial and factory housekeeping waste quantities (e.g., those wastes which can be easily landfilled without extra ordi- nary handling) will also be estimated. These wastes which may be termed "Hazardous" or "Special" shall not be included in this activity. The ENGINEER will review existing available data from area industrial waste generators. These data will be provided to the ENGINEER by the COUNTY if available. To address any significant gaps in the data provided, personal visits and interviews, and telephone interviews, will be carried out by the ENGINEER with representative public and private waste haulers as appropriate. Each municipality in the service area andmajor private refuse haulers will be contacted by the ENGINEER regarding the weights or volumes of refuse which they collect, the schedule for its collection, the character of the refuse (residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial), the industries and major institutions serviced, and the identification of all disposal facilities used and their locations. Using data compiled above, and current census information, residential commercial, and institutional waste generation rates can be estimated; the rates will then be applied to the entire service area to determine current and estimated future solid waste quantities. Industrial quantities will be estimated to the extent of readily available data. 5. Special/Industrial Wastes Survey. Early in the project the ENGINEER will undertake a survey of representative industries- in the —s-errvice area to estimate the categories and total quantities of special wastes generated by the industrial sector. The "special" waste stream is defined as those wastes which may require extraordinary handling, but may be disposed at a permitted and well-operated sanitary landfill. In conjunction with the COUNTY, the ENGINEER will determine a list of 25 representative industries of varying sizes from the Standard Industrial Codes (S.I.C.) listing for the COUNTY's communities. These representative industries will then be contacted by the ENGINEER by telephone or personally, as deemed appropriate. These data, along with existing data compiled in earlier Oakland County studies and by ENGINEER during the study of other, similar service areas Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 306 will be used to estimt.ite the wa ,te types and generation rates for the investigted industry ceAegories. In turn, the rates will be applied fc the overall service area to develop the totul special waste quantitit generated in Oakland County. These quantitie will asbist the COUNTY and the ENGINEER in evalui Hug 'he impact of these wasios eh alternative solid waste management systems which shall be consiik r I c the COUNTY. At the conclusion of this portion ol the Project, ENGINEER will meei with represent tives of the coomry to arrive uf a decision regarding the need to modify the Project of Work td. incorporate lull considerotion or the special waste stream beyond the pr i liminary problem definition sura y described hr l iidn. ENCINIER will iirepare a preliminary oi• neat or the potential kr , eincinerztion ; .ludge siith refube in COUNTY Hcilitics. ludue gudntities and characteristics will he C. . • , existine data developed for treatment plant f cilities located in the COUNTY. A preliminary • • ir lint and economic assessment of the feasibility of co-incineration will be developed. This asses ient will provide the basis for a decision by ENGINEER and the COUNTY regarding the need to modify the Project Scope of Work to incorporate full consideration of co- incineration as a part of the initial phase of implementation of the COUNTY solid waste management system. 7. Evaluate Existing Landfills. Existing landfills judged by the ENGINEER to be considered as part of the COUNTY's management svbtem will be inspected and evaluated. To assist this effort, the COUNTY shall provide available data which may be required. including the name of the operator or responsible agency, size, location, boundaries, permit status, violations of record, available cover material estimates, records of monitoring wells and surface water sampling, and all available hydrogeoloqic and climatological data for each site. Based on these data, and contact with site operations, the ENGINEER will develop estimates of remaining site capacity, (assuming the COUNTY proceeds toward implementation of resources recovery systems) and site operating costs for the remainder of the site life. The feasibility of extending the life of the site by acquisition of additional property and/or changes in operating procedures will be addressed. 8. Evaluate Existing_Transfer Stations. The ENGINEER will evaluate the transfer stations now in use in Oakland which can be expected to become part of the Countywide management system. Available information for each station provided by the COUNTY will be reviewed. This information shall include site boundaries, type of equipment, capacity, average throughout and maintenance records (spare parts inventory and maintenance costs). The ENGINEER will inspect each such station, observe its operation, and interview facility personnel. An evaluation will be made of the records provided. Access to each station, relative to areas of concentrated waste generation (as determined under Task A.4), will be appraised. The ENGINEER will determine the general effectiveness and efficiency of the operation of each facility. The requirements, if any, for upgrading each station will be outlined, including estimated costs for increasing station capacity, if such a need is anticipated. The physical condition of each facility and its spare parts inventory will be evaluated during this investigation. B. IDENTIFY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS I. Investigate Refuse Enerad Markets. The ENGINEER will conduct an investigation or potential refuse-derived energy consumers within the Oakland County service area to determine the current market potential for energy derived from solid waste. The 1976 study work by Midwest Research Institute (MRI), and related studies, will be reviewed and updated to provide additional data on an energy marketing opportunity changes which may have developed in the interim period. Solid waste processing systems associated with supplying energy to these markets will be evaluated on the basis of current data on reliability and cost. Energy forms to be recovered from solid wastes will be limited to steam and electric power. Based on these available data, the ENGINEER will identify potential private and public purchasers of refuse-derived energy (steam and electricity). Additional available data, to be pro- vided by the COUNTY for this evaluation, shall include utility company records, air pollution control permit records, and the nature and the size of the identified industries. Total daily and annual patterns of energy demand will be determined for those markets judged by the ENGINEER to be of significant potential interest. The ENGINEER will meet with the interested maior potential energy consumers to discuss the energy load profile, specifications, systems requirements, and economics of energy purchase, with the objective of obtaining written expressions of interest. The results of this effort shall be documented under the Activity B.9 Report. 2. investigate Markets for Recovered Materials. The ENGINEER will investigate the markets and general systems for materials recovery For a proposed resource recovery system for Oakland County. The 1976 MR1 study report on materials recovery shall be reviewed to identify potential purchasers of ferrous metals and aluminum. Representative local purchasers will be contacted to determine prices for materials and potential commitment to purchase. Based upon these data, experience from other studies, and in-house information, the ENGINEER will estimate potential receipts from these materials, net of transportation cost. Required product quality outline specifications From potential purchasers or secondary (recovered) materials will be obtained. An analysis of the feasibly recovered materials. the general recovery systems, and the potential markets will be tabulated in the report under Activity 0.9. The materials recovery effort will be limited to those systems associated with pre- paration of a refuse-derived fuel (ROE) for firing of a suspension-fired or spreader-stoker incinerator boiler. 307 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, lOPE 3, Iten• It' • te Wd-E- Incin r in Alt mativot. The ENGI h FP will identify and review in n ..y recovery fnd , • I w Oe pi , h R f l ml • titn fey stems ia • d • t st applicable to the hd lornlifiens of ... x, • p t LIE d •I 1. This will include 111 or ng waterwa 1 1 i• !, • . oR I refuse deriv d fuel 01( I pi modular comdfd, , • m, t :btu bmailc .J1 it '[ • .DF iyne steam gen. . • inn burning inc m •,• U nu,lindtionf. wil d •••1 ddd1 0 caists t, hul ,I or tetion in the Aerivi 1 , In thix cvalu i n rt. NGINLER will earr ca . work , oxf credible e b t i • lye on.sr arid d • • , oondind net ,• hniccil and • d tt revi A.' reI in r I n reached in th rt • • e, , • E l• ted nor he et r, f •I tudies 01- e 1[ Ft 0 1111 ffill inv. i indd Ed pecial roanii ,,• • tm, r„li d. tv the boil( c. This will M, prelimin, ry 1 w Eurh • as boil. . erotion, f din ,' mechanisms, grate syst , corrosion pf, 'it ii as a function ut steahi cir.Hitii.ns and moterials or constfruction, boot bl ,(p equipment, d0c1 itegral Cr I eparate ly fired ul.(ib! • ters. The ENGINEER will investigate differ , dt team cycles thich maximize energy product revenu. for alternate combinations of refuse throughput and steam usau . Alternate means of he reject:on (extraction steam, cooling towers, surface ters, groundwat .t •ir condensers) will be evaluated in light of potential energy pipnt site and enerny customer assumpt no To will be evaluated relative to the potential steaming rate of refuse-to-energy plants and the electrical in with the utility erid system. The cost impact of each alternative system combination will be quantified for review and presentation in the report. The approach to be used for the initial incineration feasibility study will include the following stages: a. Selection by the ENGINEER, based on the quantity cf refuse, and on the size and Chara- teristics of the prospective energy markets, of up to four (4) typical design sizes of compatible incineration facility capacities. It is at that these typical design sizes would be: 50 tons per day (TF0), 100 TPD, 800 TPD, and 1,200 TPD. b. For the two smaller facilities (MCU-type), the ENGINEER will draw on his experience and on consultation with the energy system subconsultants (C.T. Main and Battelle) to develop typical layouts, capital and operating cost estinates, and technical constraints associated with such units. c. For the two larger facilities, the following sequence of studies and engineering assess- ments will be carried out, i. 1 Explorations - Representatives from the ENGINEER and energy steam sub- consultants will meet. and discusR alternative furnace, boiler, and turbo-generator configurations. Also, field trips to not more than four (4) municipal refuse energy plants will be made to observe performance and evaluate technical design features. From these field investigations and the collec- tive engineering experience of the Firms, two furnace/boiler concepts and two steam conditions (saturated and superheated) will be selected for further study. ii. Preliminary Economic IfrIal_yltds - ENGINEER will develop prelimindry capital and operating costs for each combination of unit capacity, furnace/boiler type and ,team conditions (eight cases) plus the steam option using a separately fired (foRsil fuel) superheaters boilers (two capacities). Also preliminary capital and operating costs will be developed for alternative energy electrical generation, and dissipation (to cool the condenser) systems will be considered. iii. Selection of Two Candidate System Concepts - ENGINEER and the energy subconsultants will meet and select a system concept for use in this and subsequent analyses. The basis for selec- tion will include: state of technological development, capitalization requirements, and prospective net tipping fee. iv. Economic Analysis - The economic evaluation for the alternatives selected will be refined to provide an improved basis upon which to estimate the tipping fee and capitalization re- quirements. 4. Identify New Sites for Processing Solid Waste. The ENGINEER will identify suitable sites for waste processing, according, in part, to energy consumer data compiled under Activity B.1. These sites shall include those suitable for a large, centralized processing plant, as well as those for smaller (MCU) plants. The ENGINEER will develop site selection/evaluation criteria for review by the COUNTY. Upon approval of the criteria, the ENGINEER shall identify up to twelve (12) candidate sites for consideration by the COUNTY through application of the criteria to land within the COUNTY judged by the ENGINEER to be appropriate for consideration. Upon concurrence by the COUNTY, all pertinent data on these sites, including ownership, property boundaries, zoning ordinances, codes, and other local restrictions will be reviewed by the ENGINEER. Each of the twelve (12) approved sites will be analyzed for implementation of an appropriately sized processing facility; the virtues and liabilities of each site will be quantified and tabulated for presentation in the Activity 8.9 Report and in preparation for solid waste systems recommendation and selection. 5. Identify Potential New Landfill Sites in Oakland County. The ENGINEER will develop criteria for selection and evaluation of potential landfill sites in Oakland County. The criteria will include, but not be limited to, site size, geohydrologic conditions, site access as it relates to the proposed transfer haul matrix, environmental impacts, and comparative site development costs. After review of the criteria with the COUNTY, an inventory will be compiled of land areas judged by the ENGINEER to be of appropriate size and which are not readily identified as being dedicated in perpetuity to other purposes. This inventory will include those potential sites currently in the state regulatory or local permitting 'processes. From this inventory, and after application of the approved criteria, the ENGINEER will identify up to five (5) sites judged most amenable for landfill development. These selected sites will then be submitted to the COUNTY for review and approval. For the selected Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 308 and approved sites, the ENGINEER will develop preliminary site development t:chemes and estimated costs for site ci n' t rot i 10 aertion. r, n a f ,r_St cites Within rho COUNTY. Similar to Activities 13.4 and B.5, tmaUSI t • i • 1 G t and tatuat ion (rite' it will be developed and submitted to the COUNTY or , J[CW 1' Fhioneh ,phlicTti ,in of t criterid availahle land thtaaugh- out, the COUNTY, zn nv(Tm ty ()I pd(ttiol sit oill be /1( 1. Br cc the oppertunity mTy exist for implementation of morai TI in one of several solid waste HiTnihddlicnt dyst , tonligordtions. Ts com- prehensive a lidt as practicol of potential sites will he cool. lad. An ec , into andlysis oti transfer station operations will a developed for two ali rnate configurations corm t acting to two ran9es of daily throughput tonna-- . Tlose costs will ir tude capital dnd annual ctica Ling costs. 7. Pr ; ae Et l• I- of Alternative Prot, ; ing/DiLpoi lal I iht ENGINEER will review all waste quantity, technice,i, environmental, and cc( •mmic data cortpii,d under all previous at with consideration for the sensitivity of each procti ing ,yttem configuration to variations in the character and quantity of refuse available in th County for processing. An economic model for each alternative manaqment system developed by the ENGINEER will be compiled to show capital and operating costs,income from energy and recovered materials, quantity of residue requiring disposal, and other factors affecting economic feasibility. The models will be structured in a general way to reflect fluctuations (seasonal waste generation, differences in waste characteristics, etc.) in the management system. The models will also reflect an optimally-distributed transfer ttation i s will include haul costs and costs of operation of these transfer stations, and will be developed to provide a favorable tipping fee in consideration of proposed system competition (sanitary landfills). The economic modeling will be made for two levels of County responsibility: (1) disposal of the County's residential and commercial waste streams only, and (2) disposal of the residential, commercial, and conventional, or light industrial wastes. 8. Asse s Environo• atal Issues. The ENGINEER will perform an environmental inventory of the general environme ttal charac ristics of the region and/or Oakland County, specifically, the County Service Center and other pot i atrial processing sites, and other facility sites identified in Activities 11.4, B.5, and BAG Environitintal issues will be evaluated and approaches will be identified to ensure compliance with environmental regulations. Characteristics to be evaluated will include (1) Facility site - Existing land uses - Neighborhood conditions - Traffic conditions (2) Physical - Atmospheric conditions - Topography and geology - Hydrogeology (3) Biological (4) Human - Demographics - Land ownership and use patterns - Community plans and projects - Aesthetic and cultural re'sources - Archaeological and historical sites The environmental inventory will draw on the data base compiled under previous activities. The Engineer will make projections of expected trends in the areas near the selected alternative facility sites. Local, specific environmental issues will also be identified to assure legal compliance and encourage public support. These will include, but not be limited to, flood plain or wetlands considerations, impact on vacant parcels and open space, traffic and street patterns, air pollution sources and wastewater discharges, and potential noise contours.• The ENGINEER will maintain liaison with members of Federal, State regional, and local regulatory and planning agencies to continually assess the feasibility of alternative system implementation from the standpoint of environmental concerns. 9. Data Base Report. A detailed report will be prepared, with appropriate text, tables, maps, and appendices describing the work done under all preceding activities. The report will serve as a basis for decision-making in subsequent activities of this study and will tabulate and display all pertinent data. The number of copies of the report to be ;submitted to the COUNTY shall not exceed 150. The draft Table of Contents for the Data Base Report will be prepared in the early weeks of the Project and provided to the County in a loose-leaf binder. As the Project proceeds, preliminary drafts of portions of the Report will he furnished to the County to foster early awareness by the County of the direction and content of the work. Additions and revisions to the draft report will be furnished as available. C. SELECT AND RECOMMEND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Activities under Parts A and B will provide data for the selection of an optimum solid waste management system, including technical feasibility of processing/transfer/disposal systems; preliminary costs; and potential environmental consequences. Under the activities of Part C, the ENGINEER will seek to assist the COUNTY in selecting a final technical alternative, encourage public support, provide indications of required potential waste and market commitments, and select appropriate financing strategies. 309 Commissioners Minutes Continued, May 17, 1979 I. "Oystem Slelectfea. Based on review of the Activity B.9 Report, the ENGINEER and the COUNTY will prelimini, tatechnical altirnadive system, including transfer stations, pro- COS' II ites,y, energy -,d markets, ard laadFill Mollifies for n VI . !ion , , .1 0mthin nahlaid !I Becaten! sy!,.11• !,electier mte-M: include not only leciive toliii I ! I 1 I I' on experictn? and lamiliarity witl He ',NO ,/ 1 11 in up kA sisiii1 , ,As deem, I necessary. with pub I ,Ind priv I. m ,i • :• 1, interaction or 011 couceirid •:otti ,. These mee-ir - oill pr if, . I • • d pin, a comprehensli_ dnd mearline ,u1 list of Cr!- f. • m , 1 • ti on • •-•• • system concept ard will provide direction in devi eging a r • 11 i • L, I , 1 ti r, i 2. ini: I' • • a IC: 1 I ments. Becuase illtiwate system design and financing will deofde laantiry h,r , - I ble waste, an effort must he made toward identification thwe 'W firMS .s 'it: ailing waste collection and transport with- in the County and or ,-t made toward develop!,. t r• potiated contracts for delivery of the waste to the proposed faciii, s. The eeni [ Al willingness of the cities and towns of the private sector waste collection industry to haul to the County I s facilities will determined through presentation of contracts pre- pared by the COUNTY and an outline schedule of iii,ted tipping charges. The institutional and legal constraints on acquisition of waste also will bc determined from data compiled previously. For instance, a municipality may have entered into a multi-year contract for waste collection with a - private hauler. That waste may not he able to he directed to a County facility until that contract has expired. This investigation will provide information regarding the chronological availability of waste within the County. Of special importance will be discussion with the leadership of those cities and towns which have not yet signed a letter of intent to participate in the County-wide system. Since these communities can contribute large quantities of refuse, their involvement could or would (1) affect system economics, (2) affect facility siting and system optimization, and (3) make available to the system existing facilities (landfill or transfer stations) which could significantly impact on the County Program. The objective of the effort under this task will be to assess the willingness to participate by public and private sector haulers and industrial sources. 3. Prepare an Institutional, Management, Financial and Procurement Plan. The ENGINEER will work in concert with the COUNTY to delineate a potential institutional framework in which the COUNTY to delineate a potential institutional framework in which the COUNTY can operate the pro- posed solid waste management system. Such questions as: the type of contracts that should be entered into (e.g., with turnkey vendors and/or communities within the County); methods available for financing (e.g. bonds, grants, ad valorem taxation, exclusively by tees), and any limitations existing on the available financing methods, permits required (State and/or Federal): terms under which communities which decline to participate in the initial system implementation phase can enter the system in subsequent years. Compliance with environmental regulations and review procedures; all these will be addressed. The ENGINEER will develop alternative management strategies, with the concurrence of the COUNTY, and select a strategy which gives positive consideration to such factors as the flexibility of amongst the varying parties in the proposed waste management system; minimal personnel requirements which might be added to County responsibilities, and the minimizing of administrative burdens. which might also be added to County staff. Inflation impact on future operation and maintenance costs, and possible costs of future environmental constraints, will be estimated to aid in determining life cycle costs of the facilities. 4. Implementation CtrateT,. The ENGINEER will develop an implementation strategy for review and approval by the COUNTY bi d en the foregoing activities. This strategy will include methods for the acquisition of firm s 't, commitments; determination of negotiating positions for contractual agreements for the purcha,, of secondary materials and recovered energy; methods for acquisition of required processing, transfer, and disposal sites; and the procurement procedures of all elements of the proposed solid waste management system. 5. Final Report. A final draft report detailing the activities of all work and the ENGINEER's recommendation and conclusions will be produced with appropriate text, tables, maps, and appendices. Within a period not to exceed sixty (60) days after receipt of the COUNTYIs review comments, the ENGINEER will deliver 500 copies of the final report to the COUNTY. The draft Table of Contents for the Final Report will be prepared in the early weeks of the Project and provided to the County in a loose-leaf binder. As the Project proceeds, pre- liminary drafts of portions of the Report will be furnished to the County to foster early awareness by the County of the direction and content of the work. Additions and revisions to the draft report will be furnished as available. 6. Public Relations. The understanding and cooperation of the general public will be critical to the success of the selected plan. To this end, the ENGINEER will develop a public information and participation program for the COUNTY. It will consist of four (4) major elements: a. Strategy Development - A framework strategy report will be prepared within the first four (4) weeks of the project detailing the public information program for the COUNTY. b. Administrative/Supervision - The ENGINEER will assist the County with assessment of the public information needs for this project, with development of an acceptable public relations Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 310 program and with in of program plans. In addition, the Engineer will also assist in co- ordinating preparation of public relations activities throughout the Phase lA portion of this Agree- ment; generallysupport thc COUNTY as may he agreed; and assist in liaison with legislators and other opinion leaders, all ; is possible within the Phase IA cost limitations of this Agreement. c. Th fiaaml af Beunty Esrimiss err 'N atm The objective of this task is to assure participation in I I a , project 6T-an info'rmed tic constituency. As part of this effort, the ENGINEER will t an orientation meeting with t Board of County Commissioners, and, if appropriate, conduct . ,cur of existing solid waste fa, iiities in the County or nearby. The ENGINEER would seek the Bo. fi County Commissioners participation in finalizing the project public relations program and will ., • i• • at up to six (6) Board of County Commissioners meetings, including those pre- viously identifii ad those for discussing the results of the program. d. Pr - Recognizing the value of a properly and fully informed news corps, the ENGINEER will L i ,arc ir1Tormational materials for use by news media personnel. These materials will comprise a "pre kit". The ENGINEER will also conduct one (1) press background briefing for face to face informational exchange; one (1) major publicity activity (if deemed appropriate); and • one (1) press conference announcing study findings. 7. Summary Report. A summary report will be produced for distribution to the public, explaining in a general way, the highlights of the foregoing work using appropriate text, tables, maps, plans, diagrams, and photographs. The report shall explain the selected management system(s), the most appropriate implementation strategy, and the estimated costs and commitments. Two thousand (2,000) copies of the summary report will be delivered to COUNTY no longer than ninety (90) days after receipt of the COUNTY's review comments of the full draft report presented under Activity 5. 8. The ENGINEER will provide advisory and consultant time to the COUNTY, up to 104 man- hours to assist in coordinating the efforts of this work with those of the COUNTY's legal, management, and financial consultants. APPENDIX B TO SECTIONS 5.1.1 AND 5.1.2 OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL STUDY AND REPORT SERVICES PHASE IA OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER BASIC SERVICES For the Basic Services performed under Section 1.2, the COUNTY agrees to Pay the ENGINEER as follows: For work done by the ENGINEER, at the actual out-of-pocket cost of such services for employees plus 125% of the salary cost for overhead and profit. Salary cost is defined as the cost of salaries (including sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto) for time directly chargeable to the project; plus unemployment, excise, and payroll taxes; and contributions for social security, employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, and medical and other group insurance benefits. Actual out-of-pocket cost of services is defined as salary cost of employees plus those expense costs other than salary costs that are incurred during the progress of the work. The actual out-of-pocket expense costs include; airfare, automobile rental if required, mileage charges, parking, tolls, taxi, meals, lodging, telephone, printing and reproduction costs, and other miscellaneous costs incurred specifically for this project. For work done by others, at the actual cost to the ENGINEER of such services plus 15% fee. The charges for in-hour computer usage will be as specified in the current "Computer Services Price Schedule", attached. The total cost of all Basic Services under Section 1.2 shall not exceed $ 418,000 . SPECIAL SERVICES For the Special Services performed under SECTION 2 as specifically authorized in writing in each instance by the COUNTY, the COUNTY agrees to pay the ENGINEER for work done by the ENGINEER or for work done by others, as shown above under BASIC SERVICES. Moved by McConnell supported by Roth the report be accepted and Resolution #8951 be adopted. AYES: Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart. (18) NAYS: None. (0) PASS: Moore. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8951 was adopted. 311 • Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8953 - OAKLAND AIRPORT'S FUND - TRANSFER OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: PurLuant to Rule XI -C of this Board, the Financd Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8953 and finds $570,000 available from the Proposed tapiial Freqram - $250,000 Air- port Improvements and $320,000 FAA District Office Buildinn items. The Finance Committee further recommends the General Fund, upon receipt of an .uta.' Land Contract, advance $61,200 less cost of sales to the Airport Capital Improvement Fund; J• id advance is to be reimbursed from the proceeds of the land contract. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8953 By Mr. Wilcox IN RE: OAKLAND AIRPORT'S FUND - TRANSFER OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the 1979 Capital Improvement Program contains $250,000 for improvement of Oakland County airports and $320,000 for a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) General Aviation District Office Building; and WHEREAS the FAA General Aviation District Office Building project did not materialize which would have produced rental revenues for the airport operation; and WHEREAS there exists an opportunity to use the funds which were to he used for the FAA General Aviation District Office Building in a similar revenue producing capacity; and WHEREAS airport property in Pontiac Township was sold for $61,200, Miscellaneous Resolution 8788 adopted February 1, 1979, of which monies will be deposited in the County General Fund; and WHEREAS the County is applying for Michigan Aeronautics Commission grants for a total of $70,000; and WHEREAS the Airport Committee has submitted a 1979 Capital Improvement Program for airports consisting of: Oakland/Pontiac Airport 1. Telephone service for northeast section of airport $ 12,000 2. Acquisition of maintenance and construction equipment 60,000 3. Runway lighting wiring 7,500 4. Runway, taxiway and ramp asphalt repairs 25,000 5. Site improvements for hangar construction - Paulsen Road area 487,000 (local share) Oakland/Troy Airport Miscellaneous airport improvements 38,000 (local share) (Water main, navigation improvements, temporary taxiway, site clearing, temporary drainage $ 629,500 WHEREAS these Capital Improvement Programs are included in the Airport Master Plans; and WHEREAS your Committee has reviewed the 1979 Airport Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS these capital improvements are required for the safety of the airports and to generate revenues to cover the cost of the operation and maintenance of the airports. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that a sum of $570,000 be transferred from the 1979 Capital Improvement Program to the Oakland Airport fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $61,200 less cost of sale be advanced from the County General fund from the sale of the airport property in Pontiac Township. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these funds are to be used for the miscellaneous capital improvements as outlined. The Planning and Building Committee, by Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson" Moved by McConnell supported by DiGiovanni the report be accepted and Resolution #8953 be adopted. Moved by Hoot supported by Roth the resolution be amended to reduce the funds to a total of "$250,000." Discussion followed. The Chairperson vacated the Chair to speak on the resolution. Vice Chairperson Lillian V. Moffitt took the Chair. Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 312 Mr. Gabler requested that J. David Vanderveen, Manager of the Airport be allowed to address the Board. There were no objections. The Chairperson returned to the Chair. Mr. Vanderveen addressed the Board. Vote on amendment: AYES: Pernick, Roth, Doyon, Fortino, Hoot. (5) NAYS: Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Price, DiGiovanni, Dupaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Kelly. (17) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the amendment failed. Vote on resolution: AYES: Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Pernick, Peterson, Price, DiGiovanni, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart. Kelly. (19) NAYS: Roth, Doyon, Hoot. (3) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8953 was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 1/8952 - FINAL FUNDING TO REMODEL EAST WING FOR CIRCUIT . COURT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI -C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8952 and finds $44,765 necessary to complete the remodeling project. The Finance Committee finds $44,765 available from the Capital Program Additional Circuit Court items; said funds are to be transferred to Work Project 306-138. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8952 By Mr. Wilcox IN RE: FINAL FUNDING TO REMODEL EAST WING FOR CIRCUIT COURT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution 1/8796, as adopted by the Boahd of Commissioners on February 1, 1979, provided $30,000.00 in initial funding for the purpose of initiating construction of a Circuit Court in the East Wing; and WHEREAS it was necessary to relocate the Reimbursement and Auditing Divison to facilitate this project; and WHEREAS the total cost of moving the above described Divisions and the renovation of the old Reimbursement area to courtroom facilities has been calculated at $74,765.00. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that an additional $44,765.00 be and is hereby allocated to the Department of Central Services to cover the remaining cost of completing this project. The Planning and Building Committee, by Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson" Moved by McConnell supported by Patterson the report be accepted and Resolution #8952 be adopted. AYES: McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Murphy., Page, Patterson, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Lewand, McConnell. (19) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8952 was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8956 - FUNDING FOR PONTIAC HEALTH DEPARTMENT RENOVATIONS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8956 and finds $15,000 necessary to fund subject alterations. The Finance Committee finds $15,000 available from the Capital Program - Miscellaneous Remodeling. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson 313 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 "Misc. 8956 By Mr. Wilcox IN RE: FUNDING FOR PONTIAC HEALTH DEPARTMENT RENOVATIONS To the Oakland County Board of Commi,,sioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen; WHEREAS the X-ray Operation was recently moved from the Oakland County Health Department (Pontiac Offic ) to the Medi, I Care Facility; and WH:0'- the vacat , aaa can now be it to relieve overcrowded office conditions, provide two ( e: ninHtion rooms and provide space for student nurses who now occupy conference rooms; and WHEkLAS this work can be accomplished by the in-house Maintenance staff. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that $15,000.00 be and is hereby allocated to the Department of Central Services to cover the cost of the above renovations. The Planning and Building Committee, by Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson" Moved by McConnell supported by Moore the report be accepted and Resolution #8956 be adopted. AYES: Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution #8956 was adopted. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8957 - ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8957 and finds subject resolution calls for $179,110.92 be added to the $3,500,000 previously appropriated for the Executive Office Building. The Finance Committee finds $179,110.92 available from the Capital Program Executive Office Building item. Said funds are to be used to cover the additional cost of construction. FINANCE COMMITTEE DennN., L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8957 By Mr. Wilcox IN RE: ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS after all major construction contracts were authorized for the renovation of the Executive Office Building, there remained sa contingency of only $3,292.00; and WHEREAS the normal contingency for a project of this magnitude would be approximately $350,000.00; and WHEREAS as work has progressed on this construction project, areas of additional unanticipated work have been identified which will result in additional costs of $179,110.92; and WHEREAS if such work is not completed, delays will result in the scheduled moves of the Friend of the Court and Prosecutor; and WHEREAS $350,000.00 has been provided for this purpose in the proposed 1979 Capital Program. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that $179,110.92 be and is hereby allocated to the Depart- ment of Central Services to cover the cost of the additional work required at the Executive Office Building. The Planning and Building Committee, by Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson" Moved by McConnell supported by Moxley the report be accepted and Resolution #8957 be adopted. Discussion followed. Moved by Price supported by Moore the resolution be amended to add: We establish a goal of 10% minority contractor participation in the renovation of the Executive Office Building for the contracts that have not been let." Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 314 Discussion followed. Vote on amendment: AYES: Moore, Pernick, Price, DiGiovanni, Doyon. Gabler, Hoot, Kelly. (8) NAYS: Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Roth, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gorsline, Hobart, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt. (13) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the amendment failed. Vote on resolution: AYES: Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Peterson, Roth, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt. (13) NAYS: Pernick, Price, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, Moore. (9) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the resolution was not adopted. Misc. 8992 By Mr. McConnell IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION- SPRINGFIELD-OAKS GRANT FOR ACQUISITION OF FIFTY ACRES To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission is desirous of accepting a grant from the Department of Natural Resources' Land and Water Conservation Fund for the acquisition of fifty (50) acres in Springfield Township adjacent to the Springfield-Oaks Youth Activities Center; and WHEREAS said grant funds in the amount of $53,700.00 have been granted to the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission on a 50/50 matching basis; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission's matching share of $53,700.00 is to be derived from the 1/4 mill ad valorem tax; and WHEREAS your Committee recommends that said grant funds be accepted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Oakland on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Commission hereby accepts the grant funds in the amount of $53,700.00 for acquisition of fifty (50) acres in Springfield Township, adjacent to the Springfield-Oaks Youth Activities Center. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized to execute the nece#sary grant agreement. The Planning and Building Committee, by Richard R. Wilcox, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Robert A. McConnell, Vice Chairperson Moved by McConnell supported by Fortino the rules be suspended for immediate consideration of the resolution. AYES: Patterson, Peterson, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly; Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Murphy. (19) NAYS: Pernick. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by McConnell supported by Fortino the resolution be adopted. AYES: Pernick, Peterson, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Murphy, Page, Patterson. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Misc. 8993 By Mr. Hoot IN RE: TORNADO SIREN PROGRAM - COUNTY/LOCAL UNITS AGREEMENTS To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution #8866 accepted the Tornado Siren Program third year grant award in the amount of $16,000 for new sirens; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners per Miscellaneous Resolution #7865 stipulated that County and Federal funds could not be allocated until signed agreements between local units of government and the County had been secured; and WHEREAS such agreements have been secured; 315 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May t7, 1979 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board ot Commissioners authorizes the purchase of three (3) additional sirens consistent with the attached budget schedule; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes an amount not to exceed $8,000 for the County's share of the cost. The Public Services Committee, by Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson Copy of Budget Schedule on file in the County Clerk's Office. Moved by Hoot supported by Patterson the resolution be adopted. The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections. Misc. 8994 By Mr. Hoot IN RE: APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL EMPLOYABILITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FUNDS FOR PONTIAC COUNSELING INTAKE AGENCY To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution No. 6546 applied for and was granted the designation by the U.S. Department of Labor or Prime Sponsor to administer the provisions of Title 1 of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973; and WHEREAS Oakland County has 107 assigned Public Service Employment positions under Title 110 and 192 positions under Title VI; and WHEREAS C.E.T.A. Title 11D and VI identifies 10% of unexpended funds as of April 1, 1979 for Employability Development Planning and Client Services; and WHEREAS 10% of the unexpended balance of C.E.T.A. Title 11D, estimated to be $494,104, and VI $970,084 as of April 1, 1579 and is designated to be used for training and employability planning (section 677.2 - Federal Register of April 3, 1979); and WHEREAS 10% of these funds for Oakland County departments based on their unexpended balance of April 1, 1979 is represented by Title 11D $69,775 and Title VI $73,530; and WHEREAS the departments of Oakland County C.E.T.A. Participants number 299 of which 85 are scheduled for termination by September 30, 1979 and the Pontiac Counseling Intake Agency will do the Employability Development Planning for Oakland County's 85 participants; and WHEREAS the Pontiac Counseling Intake Agency allocation would cover a five month period (May-September 1979) and total $18,790.00 with an equalized breakdown coming from Title 11D and Title VI 10% Employability Development Planning funds. (See Attachment A) NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approve the transfer of $18,790.00 to the Pontiac Counseling Intake Agency to do Employability Development Planning for Oakland County's 299 Public Service Employment positions. The Public Services Committee, by Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson Copy of Attachment A on file in the County Clerk's Office. Moved by Hoot supported by Roth the resolution be adopted. AYES: Pernick, Price, Roth, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Patterson. (18) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution Was adopted. REPORT By Mr. Hoot IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8889 - CITY OF HAZEL PARK YOUTH ASSISTANCE WORKER To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Public Services Committee, having reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8889, City of Hazel Park Youth Assistance Caseworker, reports with the recommendation that this resolution be adopted. The Public Services Committee, by its Chairperson Henry W. Hoot, moves the acceptance of the foregoing report. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 316 REPORT By Mr. McDonald IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8889 - CITY OF HAZEL PARK YOUTH ASSISTANCE WORKER To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Personnel Committee, having reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8889 concerning the County of Oakland assuming the cost of One Youth Assistant Caseworker position currently 415 funded by the County and assigned to the City of Hazel Park, recommends that said resolution be adopted. On behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8889 - CITY OF HAZEL PARK YOUTH ASSISTANCE WORKER To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule Xl-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8889 and finds $3,809 necessary to fund the one fifth (1/5) position. The Finance Committee finds $3,809 available from the Contingent Fund; said funds are to he transferred to the salaries line item in the Juvenile Court's Youth Assistance Unit's Budget. FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson "Misc. 8889 By Mr. Doyon IN RE: CITY OF HAZEL PARK YOUTH ASSISTANCE CASEWORKER To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the City of Hazel Park was the first to organize a "Youth Protection Committee" in Oakland County in 1954; and WHEREAS the City of Hazel Park developed their program after the "New Jersey Plan" where each city has appointed committees working with the Juvenile Court; and WHEREAS Judge Arthur E. Moore drafted a special "Youth Protection Ordinance" to enable the City of Hazel Park to gain recognition and municipal authority; and WHEREAS the present Youth Assistance Committees and Department was developed as a direct result of the positive efforts of the model developed in the City of Hazel Park; and WHEREAS the City of Hazel Park is the only municipality paying any portion of the cost of the Youth Assistance Caseworker assigned to their City; and WHEREAS due to budget constraints the City of Hazel Park has requested that the County of Oakland assume the entire cost of its assigned Youth Assistance Caseworker in consort with all the rest of the program in Oakland County. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Oakland assume the cost of the remaining 1/5 position of one Youth Assistance Caseworker assigned to the City of Hazel Park. Mr. Chairperson, we move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. James A. Doyon Commissioner - District 1110 John R. DiGiovanni, Robert H. Gorsline" Moved by Hoot supported by Doyon the reports be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by Hoot supported by Doyon that Resolution #8889 be adopted. AYES: Price, Roth, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Page, Patterson, Pernick. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Resolution 118889 was adopted. Misc. 8995 By Mr. Hoot IN RE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the City of Oak Park has requested funding through Community Development of a special pilot project dealing with neighborhood stabilization and the continued development of a positive image of the community; and WHEREAS a pilot program such as has been proposed, if successful, can be of benefit to all communities in the county; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Community Development Housing Council has recommended funding • support of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program as proposed by the City of Oak Park; and 317 Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 WHEREAS the one-year pilot program is budgeted at $28,000 for staff and supplies; and WHEREAS the City of Or Park will be devoting substantial additional city funds and services in support of the pilot program; and WHEREAS federal funds currently in the Community Development Contingency Account are available for support of the program. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Services Committee recommends approval of funding of the Oak Park Neighborhood Stabilisation Program for a one year period in an amount net to exceed S28,000. The Public Services Committee, by Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson Moved by Hoot supported by Roth the resolution be adopted. AYES: Roth, DiGlovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Page, Pernick, Price. (19) NAYS: Patterson. (I) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted .. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT By Mr. Murphy IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #8971 - SUPPORT OF WORD PROCESSING FOR VETERANS' SERVICES DIVISION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI -C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #8971 and finds the cost associated thereto can be accomodated within the Veterans' Services 1979 Budget. The Finance Committee finds the Veterans Services Division's 1979 Budget be amended as follows: INCREASE DECREASE Salaries --- 7,133 Professional Services 200 --- Soldier's Burial --- 22,230 Equipment Rental --- 637 Equipment Repairs and Maintenance 1,650 --- Office Supplies 450 --- Capital Outlay 27,700 --- 30,000 30,000 FINANCE COMMITTEE Dennis L. Murphy, Chairperson 'Misc. 8971 By Mr. Hoot IN RE: SUPPORT OF WORD PROCESSING FOR VETERANS' SERVICES DIVISION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Veterans' Services Division has made significant strides in effective public relations and communications; and WHEREAS these efforts have increased the workload of the Division; and WHEREAS this additional workload can be met by additional personnel or productivity improvement through automation; and WHEREAS the Veterans' Services Division has devised an alternative means to increase the productivity of the Division while reducing cost; and WHEREAS the alternative means requires a word processing system in order to mechanize the processing of forms and other paper; and WHEREAS through personnel savings, lower Soldiers' Burial cost, and cost containment policies, the Division could absorb the capital cost of the necessary equipment (estimated to be $30,000); NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners support the word processing concept and directs its implementation. The Public Services Committee, by Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson" Moved by Hoot supported by Moxley the report be accepted and Resolution #8971 be adopted. Commissioners Minutes Continued. May 17, 1979 318 AYES: DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline. Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Page, Patterson, Pernick, Price, Roth. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A jsufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted and Resolution 118971 was adopted. REPORT By Mr. McDonald IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS 118976 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SECTION 312 ADMINISTRATION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, having reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution 118976, reports that at the meeting of May 9, 1979, the Committee did approve the creation of two (2) Other Sources Community Development Technicians 11 in the Community Development Division of the Department of Public Works to assist local communities in the administration of the Section 312 Loan Program. On behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE John J. McDonald, Chairperson "Misc. 8976 By Mr. Hoot IN RE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SECTION 312 ADMINISTRATION To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Federal funds are available to communities participating in the Oakland County Community Development program to underwrite low interest loans for rehabilitation of homes and commercial properties through Section 312; and WHEREAS persons residing in smaller communities have not been able to take advantage of these loan opportunities; and WHEREAS the Community Development Housing Council has recommended that the Oakland County Community Development Division assist smaller communities in the administration of the Section 312 program; and WHEREAS administration of the Section 312 program requires additional staff time; and WHEREAS the Community Development program has Federal funds allocated to administration of a loans and grants program. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that two (2) additional Community Development Technician 11 staff positions be created for the purpose of administering the Section 312 program in communities participating in the Oakland County Community Development Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said positions will automatically terminate at the time the Federal program funds are no longer available. The Public Services Committee, by Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Henry W. Hoot, Chairperson Moved by Hoot supported by Pernick the report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by Hoot supported by Pernick that Resolution 118976 be adopted. AYES: Doyon, Dunaskiss, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kelly, Lewand, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Moxley, Page, Patterson, Pernick, Price, Roth, DiGiovanni. (19) NAYS: None. (0) PASS: Fortino. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Resolution 118976 was adopted .. The Chairperson declared a 3 minute recess. Quorum not present. Moved by Patterson supported by Roth the Board adjourn until June 7, 1979 at 9:30 A.M. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. The Board adjourned at 2:00 P.M. Lynn D. Allen Clerk Wallace F. Gabler, Jr. Chairperson