Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2008.07.17 - 9472F July 17, 2008 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #08132 BY: Public Services Committee, Jeff Potter, Chairperson IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPLICATION FOR FY 2009 To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the State of Michigan offers funding to local communities under PA 511; and WHEREAS this funding is targeted to divert non-violent offenders from prison into local jail or sentencing alternatives; and WHEREAS Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since 1994; and WHEREAS the application has been completed and is requesting funding in the amount of $4,198,092 for plans and services and probation residential services; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time fuming for positions 7424, 7425, 7426, 7427, 7428, 7429, 7430, 7431, 7432, 7433, 7434, 9003, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9295, 9648. 9649; .5 of full-time positions 7834 & 9396, and PINE position 9292 within the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time funding for positions 7419, 7420, 7418, 7421, 10393, and PTNE funding for positions 7417 & 9397 within the Sheriff's Department; and WHEREAS any programs created through these funds become part of the County's Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan; and WHEREAS PA 511 of 1988 requires that the "County Board or Boards of Commissioners of the County shall approve the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by their advisory board." NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the application to request $4,198,092 from the State Office of Community Corrections for the purpose of continuing programs contained within the Office of Community Corrections FY 09 grant application for offenders who meet PA 511 eligibility is hereby approved BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by the Community Corrections Advisory Board. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE -- Public Services Committee Vote: . Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Gingen absent GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Community Corrections GRANT NANTE: FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Cornrnuaity Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Department of Corrections . . DEPARTMENT cONTACT PERSON: Barb Hankey 248 451-2306 . STATUS: Application — Resolution rec .-LT.0d DATE: June 1 .2, 2008 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal -ant review. Below are the returned comments. • The captioned grant materials. and grant applicatiorl package (winch should include an application Report from Fiscal Services to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners', the grant application, and this Sign. Off email containing grant review comments) may be submitted to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners for review and signature, with informational. copies to the approPriate Board of CommiSsianers' committee(s). DEPARTMEN3' REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: ApproVed (with the notation that the form should reflect the revised 4pplicatio4 amount). —Laurie Van Pelt (6/5/2008) Department of Haman Resources: Approved. — Cathy Shalial (6/11/2008) • Risk Management and Safety: Approved By Risk Management 8z. Safety. — Theresa Easterling (6/5/2008) • Corporation Counsel: • Even though an amended budget has been circulated, there are no unresolved legal issues that require actionet this time. 7 Karen Agacinslci (6/6/200.8) •I' M.n3•11.11 siammern•1 nitre 1 01 • Gaia Piir From: Laurie VanPelt [vanpeltl@oa(gov.comj Sent: Thursday, June 05; 2008 3;32 PM To: 'Phi, Ga; 'Davis, Patricia': 'Secontine, 'SheHai, Cathy' Cc: 'Barb Hankey 1 ; 'Nancy Falardeatf Subject: RE: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and ApOication - Grant Application kpproved (with the notation that the below form should reflect the revised application amount). Original Message----- From: Piir, Gaia [mailto:plirg©oakgov,corni • Sent; Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:22 PM • • To: 'Gaia Piir';,'VanPelt, Laurie'; 'Davis, Patricia'; 'Secontine, Shailal, Cathy • Cc: 'Barb liankey; 'Nancy Falardeaul Subject: RE: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community CorrectiOns Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant Application Importance: High Please see the attached budget revision for this grant review. It has been updated to reflect inflationary increases. The revised amount is $4,198,093, an increase of $397,708. P.S. Please disregard the previous blank email - (2-ec V. Piir ' Ooldond County nscal 5ervites Oivision Phone (248) 858-1037 Fox (248)-856-9724 ir_g9_1)A9,2nI.com Original Message---- • From: Gaia Piir [mailto:piirg@oal<gov.corni Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 3:13 PM • To: 'VanPelt, Laurie'; 'Davis, Patricia`; Secontine, Julie'; Shalial, Cathy Cc: 'Barb Flan key'; 'Nancy Falerdeau' • • Subject: Grant Review: Community Corrections,- FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community • Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant Applfcation G.RANT .REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt — Cathy Secontine Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE —Community Corrections FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: [June 13, 2008] 1n4 GRANT INFORMATION Date: [May 30, 2008j Operating Department: E cominimity correctiom ] 6/5/.2008 111 J • Page 1 of 2 Gala Piir From:. Snallal, Cathy ishalialc@oakgov.eom! Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 6:14 PM • To: 'Piir, Gaia'; 'VanPelt, Laurie'; 'Davis, Patricia'; 'Secontine, Julie • cc: 'Barb Hankey'; 'N.ancy Falardeau' Subject: .RE: Grant Review; Community Corrections- FY 2009 ivIDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Apoliation - Grant Application Approved --Original Message-- From: Pitr, Gala [maitte:Piirg@oakgov.corn] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:22 pm To: 'Gala 'VanPelt, Laurie'; Patricia'; 'Secontine, Julie'; Shallai, Cathy Cc: 'Barb Hankeyr; 'Nancy Falardeatf Subject: RE: Grant Review: Community CorrectiOns - FY 2009 MDOC, Offce of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and AppliCation - Grant Application Importance: High Please see the attached budget revision for this grant review. It has been updated to reflect inflationary increases. The revised amount is $4,198,093, an increase of 8397,708. • • P.S. Please disregard the previous blank email. . . Oakland nd Covnty Fiscai Services Division - Phone. (248) 855-1037 Fax (24E) 858-9724 . . piirg& •Dokgov.corn -----Original Message-- • from: Gala liir [maiito:piirg@oakgrly.com ] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 3;13 PM To: 'VanPelt, Laurie'; 'Davis, Patricia'', 'Secontine, Shallal, Catty • Cc: 'Barb Hankey'; 'Nancy Falardeau' Subject: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt — Cathy Shallal — Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVLEW .RESPONSE — Community Corrections FY 2009 IVEDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application -Michigan Depar=ent of Corrections Attached to this enmil please End the grant documen*) to be reviewed. Please provide your review staling your APPROVAL, APPROVA.L WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this mail Time Frame for Returned Cornments: [lane 13, 200 Wn1014 GRANT INFORMATION Date: [May 30, 200.81 OperatinF, Department: [ Community Corrections ] 6/121200S Page I ot. Gala Pr From: Easterling, Theresa ieasterlingt©oakgov.cornj Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:56 PM . - To: 'Piir, Gala'; nVanPelt, Laurie; Davis, Patdcia'; 'Secontine, Julie': 'Sheilah Cathy' Cc: 'Barb hanicey'; 'Nancy Falartieau` Subject: RE: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2009 TVIDOC. Office of.Community Corrections, Community . CorreotionS Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant .Application Approved by Risk Management & Safety. —"Original Message From Piir, Gala [mailto:piirg@oakgov.comi • Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:22 PM To: 'Gala Pk'', 'VanPelt, Laurie'; 'Davis, Patricia';'Secontine, Julie'; ShaHal, Cathy Cc: 'Barb Harkey'; 'Nancy Falardeaut Subject: RE: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant Application Importance; High Please see the attached budget revision for this grant review. It has been updated to reflect inflationary increases. The• revised amount is $4,198,093, an increase of $397,708. P.S. Please disregard the previous blank email, ellic V. pilr OakkArd Cautify Fisco; Services b 'vision Phone. ("2.45) e56-1.037 fag (248) 858-9721 • • piirg@ockgov.corn Original Message---- From: Gala Piir cmailto:piirg@oakgov.corni Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 3:13 PM To: VanPelt, Laurie', 'Davis, Patricia'; 'Secentirier Shaildl, Cathy Cc: 'Barb Hankey% 'Nancy Falardeau' Subject: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2009 MDCC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Layne Van Pelt — Cathy — Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections FY 2009 MDOC, Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application Michigan Department of Con-cctions Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time, Frame for Returned Comments: [June 13, 2008] GRANT INFORMATION Date: [May 30, 2008 1- 6/5/7008 Gaia Piir rage orz From Agacinski, Karen [agacinsXik©oakgev.corn] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:19 AM To: 'Laurie VanPelf; 'Julie Secontine'; 'Catherine Shallar Cc: 'Barb Hankey'; 'Nancy Falardean'; Gaia Plir; 'Pat Davis' Subject: R Grant Review: Community Correct:oils - FY 2009 MDOC Office of Community Corrections, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application -Grant Application Z.ven thoug.L an amended budget has been circulated, there are no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. Char& you, :K....arm P. Agacinski, Assistant Corporation Counsel iione Nuniber (248) 855-8677 7-ax Number: (246) 858-1003 auao.inskiloakgov.com • PRIY1LEGFD AND CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY CLIENT CgiVitilltiNiGATM This e-mail is intended only for those persons to whom it is specificelly addressed. It Is corOdential and is protected by The attomey-client orfvilegc -end work product doctrine. This privilege belongs to the County of Oakland, and individual addressees are nOt authorized to %valve or modify this privilege in anyway. Individuals are advised that arty dissemination, reproduction or unauthorized reVieiv of this information by persons [tier than • those listed above may constitute a waiver of this privilege and is therefore prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. if you have any questions, please contact the Department of Corporation Cot:noel at (248) 858-0550. Thank you far your cooperation, • . Original Message---- From: Karen Aga dnski [rnaitto:agacInskik@oakgov.com ] Sent: Thursday; June 05, 2008 5:09 PM To: 'Laurie VanPelt; 'Julie Secontine'; 'Catherine Shallar • Cc: 'Barb Hankey'r 'Nancy Falardeau'; Gaia Piir (piirg@oakgov•com); 'Pat Davis' Subject: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2909 iviDOC Offce of Community Correctjon, Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application - Grant Application GRANT INFORMATION Operating Department: Community Corrections . . . Department Contact: Barb Eiatikey Contact Phone: 451-2306 Funding Period: October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009 New Facility / Add,itional Office Space Needs; no IT Resources (New Computer Elardware / Software Needs or Purchases): no Ivi/WBE Requirements: No Funding: Continuation Application Total Project Amount; 3,800,384.50 Prior Year Total Funding: 3,800,384 New Grant Funded Positions Request: 0 Changes to Current Positions: Continuation of the following positiou.: 7424, 7425,. 7426, 7427, 7428, 7429, 7430, 7432, 7432, 7433, 7434, 7834 (.5):, 9003, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9292 (PTNE), 9295, 9648, 9649, 9396 (.5), 7417 (PTNE), 7418, 7419, .7420, 7421, 9397 (FINE), 10393 - Grantor .Funcls: 3,-800,384.50 Total Budzet: 3,800,384,50 Match and Source: none required PROJECT SYNOPSIS This is the application for th.e annual /,../IDOC grant for Community CO:7=tiOlIS pro,garris. A resolution approving the applieatiou by the governing board of the county is required as part of Public Act 511. REVIEW Ste-Vii'LIS: Application — requires resolution Ailey reviewing this grant application, appear to be no -tzlzesoived legal issues that. require additional ae(iou at this time 616/2008 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS "Expecting Excellence Every Day" Planning and Community Development Administration Office of Community Corrections Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Fiscal Year 2009 CCAB Name: Oakland County Email the application to: and Send one copy of the application to; MDOC-OCC@michigan.gov DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Planning and Community Development Administration Office of Community Corrections Grandview Plaza Building, 1 st Floor PD. Box 30003 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Due Date: May 30, 2008 Note: Counties with multi-year contracts are required to complete Section 1, Introduction, and a new Comprehensive Plans and Services Program Description Plan tor any program proposed to be changed. Barbera M HanKe_y Contact Person Manager Address City Stets: 7io 2. Fiscal Agent 2300 Di)6e Hwy Ste 200 Waterford Ml 48328 Laurie V:-.31Pe:t 243 451- 2360 Fax Niimitier:248 451 2339 E-Maii.!HorakeyinDoeonv.conl Phone Number: ISECTONJ IKTR,ODLICtION IA. General Information 1. Name of CCAB !Oakland County Contact Perso:-. Address City State Zip 1 Federal ID. Number 4. CCAB Chairperson: Address City State 2100 Portac Lake Rd De;-,t 409 Waterford MI 48328 Fred Master 1200 N. Teipgrav7 8x2 Pontiac :MI 48341 Tit,E;I Director of Budget Phone Number: 248 858-2163 Fax Numbe;:i 248452-9172 E-Ma ;vanpeltioaKonv.com Titie-lC4cuit Court Judge Pnone N1!rnoe.r:i248 858 0355 Fax N:Jrnuer:1 E-Mai':;mesjgDcQrn r:L Type of Community Corrections Board: Cour.ty City/County[ City IReoional i iCak.and County 6. Units of Government Represented: 7. Date of Submission: 3. Date Application Approved by CCABI 9, Date Application Approved Py Government Unit: Pend ng July 8th approve. Only 1 BOG meeting in June 5/16/2008 S. CCAB Membership Representing Name County Sheriff Ann Russell Chief of Police ivacant Circuit Court Judge !Fred PAester District Court Judge Phyl:is McMiNen [Probate Courl Judge Rebecca Schenlz County Commissioner Service Areas County Prosecutor Criminal Defense Business Community Communications Media Circuit/District Court Probation Officer General Put::0c Hugh Crawford Lisa McKay Deb Caney Doug 01:ver Mona DeFransied Fran Anderson Cheryl BrExten Donna Ficunton [C. Summary . Briefly siimmarize 'Key points of the arnmunity Corrections Cemofehens:ve Plan and provide an expatiation of how the sta.e. prison commitment rate w:II be reduced and/or how the use of the local jail will be improved as a resJit of the implementation of the plan. information included shall provide a dear understardng of local issues, long and short term goals, llocal priori ties, ano strateg es to address local ssues and the State CornrruAy Correcttns Board Priorities. Tip: Excel inaintains a 1200 character limit pei- Gel!. Once you have amered 12C0 eha,raciers "'wrap text" will rot work. Use "Alt Enter .' to create a hard return for your text. Additional Cells have becn orovioed for this pues;ion t order o avoid tne 1200 character UT:flat:07i. This is a continuation plan of orograrns that we have nad for several years. However as information from the State Office of Ccierin%nity Corrections becomes more spec;fic and drilis dowr into tie numbe7s, we are able. to :rientity and more aporooraitely target "problem" populations for existing proorams. For instance the new reports Identify intermediate sanction cet PVs as a population that are beir,g sent to orison at a rate far exceeding the statewide average. This typo of informatlon al!cv,,s Ls to fOCLIS on specific population rather than create a blanket program for all PVs. This will prove to nave a reduction on orison comm:triect Talcs, provieed that the program produces results : One of the things not aole to be seen from U-ns application ;s the inoorcortetior, of evidenced based practice into all of our programs. Tho COMPAS lc used to determine a client's risk & need5 and Lc deveisp a caseplan v,itch is activiey used with the client. The groups within the Step Forward all contain r:..19 playir,z, skill tulling arh are oenormanced oasec. In aediton to cog group has been split into 2 phases the first of whoih is dasigned to enhance interna motivation. All of these programs will not just dived. offenders from prison but assist them fi not returning in the Liture. SECTION II ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC PLAN A. INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLAN !Strategic Issues, Goals, and Priorities have been establisned by the Office of Community Corrections in accordance with Public Act 511 and State Boarc priorities, CCABs will be required to establish Key Objectives and Strategies based ,upon OMNI Felony Disposition, PIS, CCIS and loc.aI data that will support these Goals and Priorities. Strategic •Issues are identified as Felony Dispositions , Jail Utilization and Local Priorities Strategies such as! "continuum of sanctions/services" and "'public education" may be appropriate to support your objectives. For example, to l support the objective of reduced prison commtment of probation vloiators a strategy might be to improve knowledge and understanding by stakeholders of principles of risk and need and the importance of appropriate matching of offenders to programs, OCC will provide the CCABs with OMNi Felony Disposition and JFIC -i data, CCABs are to analyze this data along with local CCIS data ano develop Key Objectives and supporting Strategies that will provide for the attainment of Goals and( Priorities established by the State Board and OCC, as well as iocai objectives and priorities promoted in the comprehensive plan. Example: For the Strategic Issue of Felony Dispositions, consider the stated Goal and Priority out ined in the application and complete an analysis of your county's prison commitment rate data provided by OGG. Establish objectives related to pvison commitment rates. For example: 1. Reduce PV commitment rate to 25% 2. Reduce Straddle rate to 35% 3. This will result in an overall PCR of 22% Under "Strategies," outline in bullet form those steps to be taken, including continuing, new and revised programs, new initiatives, and revised policies or practices, that will support the attainment of the objectives you have specified. Identity ;f these .ire "new", continuation, or for short term (this fiscal year) or long term implementation. For Example: 1. Develop policy for 'structured sentencing" that allows straddle cell offenders and probation violators to serve jail time with jail based programming, followed by Residential Services or intensive supervision with continuation of programming in the community. (New, FY 08) 2. Initiate a jail and community based Cognitive Behavioral Treatment program that targets higher risk/need straddle cell and probation violators. (Now, FY 08) 3. Improve communication and sharing of information with stakeholders and referral sources so they are more knowledgeable and comfortable with available programs and principles of risk/need. (New, FY 08) 4. Reduce number of pretrial and misdemeanant offenders in jail so additional straddle cell offenders and probation violators can be housed and treated in the county jail. (Long term) 5. Target Straddles and Probation Violators for Resclential Services. (Modification) Page 1 - 1. Felony Disposition Analysis (Note: MuIt County CCABs are to complete an analysIs for each county.) Strategic Issue: Felony Dispositions Public Act 511 of 1988 stipuiates that counties shall develop a community corrections comprehensive plan and provide an explanation of how the county or counties prison commitment rate wil be reduce: .ay divort.ng non-violent offenders, and promote recidivism reduction while public safety is maintained. The Act is intended to eneaJroge me participation in community corrections programs of offenders who would likeiy be sentenced tc irnprisonmerit ir a state correctional facility or jai:, who would not increase the risk to GOAL.: Reduced demand for prison resources and related budgetary requirements. PRIORITY: Reduce prison commitment of offenders who can be safely and effectively sanctioned and treated in the community by following the princiales of effective intervention (risK, need, responsivity), Using OMNI Felony Disposition data supplied by 003 for Calendar Year 2005 and 2007 provide an analysis of felony dispositions ini you.- county(s) and hew local policies, practices and programs are having an impact. Include information on the "offender target pooul2tio.-." and "offender e:igibility crteria" that identify offenders suitable for community corrections programs which have ben approved by your local un.t of government; and how available sanctions and services as well as the MDOC Special Alternative to Incarceration program, electronic monItariag program for probationers and the County jail Reimbursement Program, will be utilized to support your local objectives and priorities. Consider such issues as increase/decrease in the total number of fe:ony dispositions, changes in law enforcement, prosecutoria or juclicia practices, trends in prison commitment rates, in general and for specific SG- categories, and offender characteristics. • Note: Attach a copy of your local definition of "pattern of violence and general "offender eligibility criteria" that have been approved Total felony disspositons dropped by 148 from 7,076 in CY '06 to 6,928 in CY '07. The OtvIt\il reports experienced some cnanges - from CY 08 to CY07 moving PVs that hoc: been included In the 3GL N/A category to their original SGL oatergory. As a result the total InurnPer of offenders (and FOR) within the Intermediate and straddle cell groups increased. Of course the SGL N/A categroy 'decreased, however the presumptive prison croup also experienced a 5.5% decrease in the number of offenders and a 2.3% -decrease in the PCR. This decrease helped to maintain the PCR at virtually the samc rate, 22.3%, as last year. We had suspected for some time that the PV teens were a major area of concern, but we were unaole to illustrate that point because they were burriec . within the SGL N/As. The new OMNI report shows very clearly trial. Oakland County is above the state average in every guideline group for PV tech violators, with the overall PCR for this group 9.3% higher than the state average. For CY 07 there were 90 offenders sent to prison with guidleine scores in the intermediate group. If we are successfu, in diverting this group from prison we would lower the PCR for PV teals to 21.9%, the PCR for Intermediate cell offenders to .8%, and the .overall PCR to 21%. Pa-ge 2 a. Key Objective(s): Note: Use numbered outline rcrrnat Example: Reduce ?V commitment rate to 28%, i Objective II Objective Reduce PV comrrAmont rve to 25% from 29.3% (divertin;;:. 54 offenders from that calegpry) 1 Reduce the OM li; pCR for intermediate sanction Lel. to 3,4% (divert 14 addItonal ofenders) which. will tower 2 the OUIL Ili FOR to 24,3% and the overalt. POPOP.to 22 1%. .. 3 . 5 b. Strategies: Note: include all current or modified pel_cies/practir.-:esiorcgrarns that support reduced prison commitment rates as well as new lir. itiatives tong numbered outine format. i Example: Promote repeated commitments to residential services for probation violators rather than using incremental sanctions SUC71 ; as jaii and prison (Modification, FY 08). Strategy # Strategy To request from 000 the name O. the 90 offenders who were sent to orison that had ortgiani SGL scores in— the intermediate sanaton cell group (new) I . Create a committee to review all V. offenders to determine the causes for their resulticg prison commitment (new) 2 Develop new progi-am (T. inliative aimed at proviiihg an alternative to prison that would meet the needs of 3 these offe:iders. (new) I Use the CDMPAS to aF.,sess risk and needs for all PV s and implement ev:dericed based case 4 managetment(new) )Objective #2 Redouble the focus or, this population as to agent recommendations for longer term jail dot.ipIdd 5 (with the challenge to onahge program, followed by treatment programming,(continuatbn) Pape 3 , - C , Assessment: Note: Using JPS, OMNI, CC ,S and local data as appropriate, briefly explain how you will assess the attainment of your objectives including now frequently you will measure your objectives, ,e.g., monthly, quarteq, .4.5O1icnyel teis L,E.en ppoJecilo a -.sr:a,' As qJEstion. The OMNI reports wit be our mil-. SOurCE of cala to cleerirline how we are doing 'n ariitng goal #1. Th's oa wit oe rnoni:ored on a ouarterly basis as that is generally how often OMNi re ports are re eased Other gools und otmect yes wi:1 be measured through program uti!zation and combletion rates. Pa,;e 4 C, Jail Utilization Artelysie, (Note: Multi County CCAE.Is are to cornpiete an analysis for each ccunty. 1 . In CY 2007, how many times did the County declare am official Jail Overorewdlng State of zli Emergency per Public tivet 325 of 1982: Does your county submit JPIS data and do the quarterly reports reflect the actual j:,11 utilization? 2: If no, when wit: the data be submitted ane/or what steps have been irittated to resolve any 1..n discrepancies? , Provide an analysis of local jail Ltilizetioe using the JPIS cata (if available) tricee:Thg the average daily popelatiors, :engths of stay as well as the policies and practices (i.e., bed allocation, plans, eerned credits, and status of any jail overcrowding task forces) of local stakeholders that influence population distributions. 1 Tee ratec cepaeity for the jail rose from ),e32 in C'e 2006 to 1,822 in 0Y07 due to the adeition of some "aftercare" beds at the Sheriff's 'Boofeame. While 18 beds were added, the ADP rose by 124 which triggered the 4 jail ceelaretlons in 2507. A comparison of the first 0 montris of 2006 to the same time period in 2007 shows slight Increases across tie board for ail categoies in ALOS. Overall the ALOS rose 2,7 days from 39.2 to 41.9 days. Tee misdemeanor pcpulation continues to be a problem with the ADP for miseerneaners receevine jai: sentences after admission increaing by 60. Not only are more misdemeanors being sentenced to jail, tr ey are also recieving longer sentences with the eLOS for this population inereasing by 3.7 days. Once again the OWLS, and no cpe charges arc a "'Lige problem accounting for 5% of the ADP up from 4.2% in CS: the ALOS for this group has also increased by 4.7 days. Based on the 0 months of data it is likely that for tne year there will be 2,422 offenders in jeil for these types of criarges. If we can divert 50% or 1,211 of these offenders (1.211 X 13.6=16,470) WE,' could savesave 45 jail beds. This would be almest enough beds to meet the 54 we need for intermediate seriction cell VP offenders, We have found; vendor, LSES, that has the technology to detect unique driving =flare through the use of SRnsors and can then records illegal driving activity. The bigge problem with OWLS and no ops charges is that they contirue to drive because the odds of being caught are low, This technotoey could act as a deterrent for OWLS and could be a true alternative for this pepulaiton. The probiem is the', tne creator of the technology was bought by a 'larger company and they are not in this market. They are trying to find a buyer for the tecenology aid hopefully it will be able to come to market witein this yea' The pretrialpopulations for both felons and miseemeariors increased net only in number of delendnate but in ALOS, 3,6 aid :8 rel White this doesn't seem like muce it aeced 10, 675 jail days (3.6 x 2,285 + .8 x 3,061) over '05. We have been working diiig,ently for the past few lyears to control this situation but have not been successfel. One of the reasons is aleck of informaitoe, about these cetendants and the amount n' rr.zIt thPu nr,cia An nhie.Misrp nrpkHal ..nev.qcrruarit tnni lo,n111,1 fil.rwi, tn r,-.11nrt r,gk infrIrmnifr,-i rIrt riaforbrionte nnt ii id ihr,e. mesier.,,r,e1 T;-,:r. . - could tielp us la the future to determine rnether a new jui! is needed (based on the risk pesee oy these defendants) cr. it policy around he pretrial popu.ation needs to be addressed. Happily the first eurcee towards implementing e pretrial risk tool has been overcome. At a meeting of the District Court Judges in May there was unanimous support from tie judges in attendance to pursue an objective pretrial risk tool. The next herdle is furieleg, then development and implementation. A report conducted through the National !institute of Justice, Pretrial Services Programs: I Reseoreibitities and Potential (Washingtore D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, US. Government Printing Office, 2001) indicates that "Programs tle assess risks of pretrial misconduct in an exclusively suejective manner are more than twice as likely to have a jail population that exceeds its capacity than those programs that assess risk exc.luelveiy treaugh ee objective risk assessment instrument-56 percent, compared to 27 percent, `Forty-seven percent of programs that add subjective input to an objective instrument are ir jurisdictions with overcrowded jails" (pg. 46). A 10% reduction was realized in Summit County Ohio after the ireteementattort of an objective tool. A 10% reduction to the pretrial ADP would be 31 4. Clearly describe any practices of your local community mental health agency anC law enforcement for reducing sail admissions • and/or length of Stey of mentally ill offencers. The Oaeland County Jail and Community Mental Health trove deve:opeda jail clversion program weich nas has 2 components. The first Is epic-. book diversion which is an option open to the police officers prior to making an arrest. It centers around a training curriculm for officers to reccgn,ze and deal with mental illness. Identifying melee illness is the first step in dive:ling oftenders. If an officer chooses to divert a defendant : they are taken to Common Ground which conducts all the .MH screenings for CMH: If the defendant qualifies for services the officer enters lnto an agreement with the deft, where no chareee will be flied in the person agrees to enter treatment. The agreement is sere to the Jail liasion fur tract-Ong purposes. If alter 30 days the defenoant has not engaged in treatment the arresting officer is notified ane charges may be fileo. The second component is a post book proerern ealed Jail Alliance with Support el/MS). If an offender is booked into the jail who 1 I 'II 1 J -II 4- • I 5, Provide a brief explanation detailing how the local jurisdiction ()tans to use the County jail reimbursement program to house offenders ir jell who would otherwise be sentenced to prison. 1 he eligibility criteria for our in jail cognitive behavioral program is straddle ceil offenders with PRVs greater than 35. Using leis criteria has allowed us to keep more ot these offenders locally erd use It to our advantage under the C..1R.P. The LESP currently has 3 groups running to meet demand. Page 1 6. Dearly dcsorte alhy locar pi%acitioes or procedures intended to imnreve upon offender reenty - the transition arkess froril jail to the community whether release is at the pretriai, prssentende, or post-sentence sfaes, incl:rde efforts that are mean:to better prepare offenders for s',..ccessful reintegration such as; established community linkages to address housing, employment, healthcare, family and other issues; assessment of crinnincgenic riziWneedsi transition planning lholLand intiatiation of treatr unt ano sozial service interventions, etc. _While not formally referred to as such, Oakland Coxiy has Seen providing jail re•entry setv:zes for a number of years. One of the purposes of a bond report and recommendation is to address Oerriets to rennind to court ans or eitgeging :r: lilegal behavior witie on bond. Conditions of bond and supervision are used to miticate these barriers and assist the defendant w:l.h any issoes she/he may be experiencing, It as long been the role of the sLpervision oasernanager to make referrals and ilnkages to needed sevices for their dients, if the offender is in custody she / he Wri most likely oe assistea by an inmate counselor. The ;ail currency has 17 of these pCSj -Or.3 who frtair focus is to assist Ire offenders in their transiCon into the jai; and out of the ;ail. Defendants are to have a d:scha:tge olar sriot to leaving the facility, ooviousiy this doesn't happen for everyone as some are aburptly released or trans:ere.,d, but a sogr'zanit effort is made for eecn offender. All of the programs currently offered with o the jail: LESP. Challenge to Change and Boot Camp nave .rear_dements for aftercareor discharge plans. Each of these programs deal with issues the offender may face usan release, and attemots to provide strategies fo7deaiing with those issues. One of the ways we identify these 'osues is throJgh the use of the COMPAS r.s'A and need instrument. The COMPAS 3SSUSSra,'Ilt drives program placement to ensure that offenders are sein!g matched with the appropriate C'eattnert I superv:sion services. The CaV?AS assessment is used by Step Forward to fashion an indivioualized case plan that addresses the identified cnmenogenio risk ono neecz. These risks are esciressecl through goals set ii conjuction with the offender. Many of the Toups offeres, through Step Forward we re deve.ioped to target speck oriminagenio factors. 7. Strategic Issue: Jail Utilization Jail resources should be prioritized for use by individuals convided of crimes against persons and/or offenders who present a higher risk of recidivism. Local comprehensive community corrections plans should reduce the demand for jail beds by diverting non-violent and lower-risA offenders, promote recidivism reduction, while maintaining public safety. and reduce jail overcrowding. Goal: Operate local jails at 90% or less of the rated design capacity which can reduce the costs and liabilities for the county. Priority: Improve jail utilization and reduce need to board inmates in other fa.ciiities, avoid releases under the emergency overcrowding act, maintain jail at or below the rated design capacity. Current Jail Utilization: Note: Regional OCABs should list each county and the rated design. capacity (ROC) for each facility. Please refer to JPIS data for detailed information County Oakland Rated Design Capacity 1822 Utilization as percentage of Rated Design Capacity. 115% Pace 2 a. Key ObjeCtivetsj.: • Note: Ptease refer to the most recent PIS data wnile establishing objectives to :mprcve jail utilization. Tau objectives should be supported by the data Example: Reouce LOS of sentenced misdemeanants by 10 days. Objective # i Objective To divert 50% (1,211) of the offenders sentenced for MAILS, no ops ciarges resulting in 16, 470 saved jal bcds. 1 - Lower the pretrial poluation by 10% throughthe uss.of an chjactIve pretria! risk assessment tool 2 3 •4 - 5 • i - b. STRA1EGIES: Note: Include all current, proposed, or modified poricies/practicosiprograms to improve jail utilization such as sheriffs good time, trustee credits, earned release policies, etc. Example: Grant additione 5 days credit beyond sheriffs gocx.-:' time for trListees (continuation). Strategy # Strategy Continue to track LSES progress in bringing technology to market 1 ] Create an alternative to jail aimed at DVV1_3 offenders'who have lost heir priveldge to drive as a result of a 2 ,anything except a drunk drving conviction. Secure funding for development July 09, deve:op the toot and implement by June 09. 3 4 5 C. Assessment: Note: Using JPIS, OMNI, CCIS and local data as appropriate, briefly explain how you will assess the attainment of your objectives including now frequently you will measure your objective, e.g., monthly, quarterly, etc. While the -IRS data is a useful tool for yearly comparison and analysis, we use busines.5obiedts as our day to day reporting ',o(x at the i.,4it populeiton. Each day i can review the jail population thrcugn this database. We will also use in-house dat.aases tc track number of refarrzi into programs to determine if we are achieving our goals. Page D. LOCAL PRIORITIES: • _ 1 Present !nformation relative to any other Iocs 'invites, e.g. pubic educaticr whic --. have not bee -, identified ir *.he above sections. Cur main focus on a locai level for FY 02 %Nil; be to contaIn costs. For each of the fisc'a years 08, 09 and 10, county departments were given "budget tasks'. Each department was then required to suomit a plan detallIng how it was going to achIeve the reouired reduction in threr budget. There are a variety of ways in which these buciet reductions could be achieved, however reducticks to the work force a[e being heaviiy stressed. Community Corrections has meet its budget task tnrough the celetion of a county Lindeo FTE in tne misdemeanor work crew program (current employee is retirirg). However we continue to loo:‹ at other cost containment measui-es such as contracting for se7viceso7esentiy-performed FTEs (like drug testing), anc switoning to a 10 hour 4 day a weak wor; so-herb...re. This past year the CJCC spent a considerab:e amount of time snepnerding amenoments to the Emergency Jai Overcrowding Act tit:rough the Senate ard House. Tricse changes toptc effect on .7-Iebrua:y 11, 2000, to date Oakland County has reaiesed over 700 offenders. We are currently releasir.g 14-17 toffenders per day to stay under the cap. While the amendments have relped to manooe tine popLatioa, they nave not aCdressed the underlyinci, issues that have lead to the crowding. In additiert the "tempry-ary closirg o the Sheriff's Bootcarp (60 Cads) last month and the scheduled closing of the !Southfiled facility later this year (another 50 beds) has ser:ously Larnourcu all efforts to ConirsE tne releases. For the last yeaf or so we have been working at securing funonng for and developing a pretrial risk assessment tea In October 07, I finally received approval from the CJOC to pursue this project. A letter went out to al: our District Court ,:udges mio-January aksing for their support. On May 13 at the district court judges meeting the proposal reo:eved unanimous support. arn now working on brIning it before the BOC to determine the most appropriate fu7ding stream. I am hopefully that by Fall a vendor will have been selected and we will be on our way to implementing this long overdue p iece in pretial. One of the .rocomme.ndations made by NIC in 2005 was that Oakland County develop a sanctiors and services matrix. The consultants showed some examples but most of them were manually maintained which would be impossible to do here. r.o.e the completion of our C`ster database last year we have been./ookmg at ways we can use it, and the infoamtion it captures In new and innovative ways. As a result we ourrenly have a prci:et on the table that taxes all of our data and dumss it into a dataware house environment. From this data wai-ehpuse 'dashboard' applications can be constructed. Basicaky anyone within the C,_/ systerr would be aole to access, in a visual format, the jail population, preitgam and bed utilization, etc. This information could be important to judges when making a final sentencing orde% In additcn we ore co5side7ing color coding programs . low risk. = Nue, so judges can easily eetermine which programs are best suited to the offender in fromt of them, aid at the some time be sure toe orogam isn't over utilized. Page 1 Does your CCAP use: ILSI-R Wisconst COMPAS 'None of the a bzive Assessments are cond opted by: Assessments are conducted at: Assessments are restricted to: If you checked other lease describe: CCAB Staff Servtce Prov;der (Resicential Services Vendor, etc.) Thad Pa7ty Pre-arraic :Intent Pretrial Pre-sentence Pest-sentence Felons Misdemeanants Other E. RISK/NEEDS ASSESSMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES: [Fe pOncibies of effective intervention rewire that an offender's risk of recidivism bs assessed using an objective instrument designed to measure risk of recidivism on criminal populatico.s. Toe instrument mast assess both static risk factors and dynamic risk factors, or oriminagenic needs. The instrument must have ueen tested for validity and rerability. Current litet'ature identifies three assessment instruments that meet the above criteria. LS COMPAS, ar,d the Mscor,sin R:skiNeeds. This section is NOT considering genera: r assessments such as the NEEDS, psychdogical or :perSOnaity assessments, or substarce abuse assessments. II your CCAB uses one of the above instruments, please provide information on the prness for administering the assessment, Mark wAn "x" I for all that appiy: Assessment results are used tot Assessment results are provided to Circuit Probation? Assessment results are provided to the Prosecution? Assessment results are provided to the Defense? Assessment results are provided to the Service Providers? Suppe Tt release on bond Target Straddles/PVs for prison/jail diverVtin Case icanning or program placement PretestiPostlest of dynamic needs Other x ; Usuady I Sometimes i rc,arely x L Usually sometimes Rarely Usuay Sometimes Rarely Usually Sometimes Rarely Rriefly describe the local assessment process as rnans.eo above. Especially explar multiple responses to a single qLestion. Identify areas in need of improvement in current risk/needs assessment polciesipractices. The COMPAS has been selectee as our toot et ur!,bice an.d kIias been imptemented irner..y at our progtaTos: The CIAU is using the COMP.EkS on selected inmates with:n the jail at both the orotrial and pest_ convicion stage. Results V the assessment are used to drive program fecornmeldaliorts and ta;a cements, While a COMPAS assessment is not required for emery into the Coollenge Clionge p7ogarn, one is completed an every client usually within days of starling the program. This informarton ie used to address Caen( specific reees arts develop a release plan. The Step Forward program is usMg the COMPAS at the point of intake. Each ciient's treatment I suemlsicn plans then uit around their assessment. In fact the case management module wAhin me CONIPAS is the module we are uurrg 10 ensure urJals are set according to reed and progress is trepfzee. MIDOC agents raw :lave access to both cur OrSlar case ma nagemnet ee.mponerl a5 weli us too COMPAS assessments ..orn their computers. This will snow them to inco:porate me assesenrent Thformation inlo a PS I receommendation. fl order to renIorce mouse at lie r-:-.0roPAS by the agents art overview trainirg wee held far oil MDOC. agents, Atteridemee was Mandatary and the training was conducted by Sandi Hoppaugh. Page 1 269.212 260.212 06.177 345,755 7C 2,12,9 H20•01 66.177 348.730 702,1Js IlAssesement & 1 reatment Services 11r; Jail Housrini5 Day Assessment ;1ResleenLal Services ;I Tolal ODJRP Fundln 269.212 _136.177 346.750 702139 ,1 RIDER C MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SUDGET SUMMARY Oakland County FY 2300 FUNDING SOURCES ' cols TOTAL ,I , PROGRAM - ACCOUNT CATEGORY 1 PRooruw pj,,N5 a I LOCAL ' TOTAL DUJNPA.703 MDOL., ;,EsouRcEs ! FES REVENUES CITHER t CODE SERVICS FUNDS FUNDING n , FUNDING I ,1, I -I 1 1Comm unity Service rn I I - i ,Paceeril AiS i - - , - - - - Work Crew A25 - - - . 1 I - , - , Sub Total • - - - - - Education - - - .1 - , - - Educational Smices BOO - - - coonitive Cnange 517 247.319 - 24730 - - 247,310 Sub Total 247,319 L .. 207,3 3 247,310 employment & Training - i , - . . . - Employment & 1 raining Services COO , Sub Total - • MN= - - - - Intensive Supervision MM. I Day Reporting 004 - - - - _ - ;n Electronic Monitoring DOC - - 11Supervisicn 023 , 61,933 I 81.933 ' - - - 81,933 Sub Total -_ 61,933 81.033 - 61,933 Mental Health - - - _ Outpatient E16 - - - .- - Sex Offender Treatrnent EIS - - - . _ 1 Sub Total - ., - _ _ Pretrial Services - - - • 5cieem0g/Assessmen1 F22 ' 586,932 536,932 1,099,151 - - 1.680.083 SJuervision F-23 201,342 - 201,342 ,1 288,785 - - 491127 , EIeGtronic. Multerin g '--24 4 3.425 43,425 31,5137 _ 14 992 ' Sub Total j 83-.,699 ! . 831699', 1,419,503 - -2,251,292 , Substance Abuse i . - - - _ - - _. Testing G17 00.412 I. - I' 90 412 636,797 7.29.118 Outpatient Treatment G18 J . 94,21A I, 94,214 - - -I, 94,2.14 Cognitive Treatment G19 _ - i Sub Total 90.412 i 94214! 154.625 636,707 -4 • I 52,3,333 ;Caee Managem . r ent - - 1 - - . _ 'Screening/Assessment 122 33.0G0 8,931 41,931 89,393 - 151,324 ..ail-BasocliCase Management 123 174,873 , - 174,073 - 174,873 Carnrnunity Case Management 124 30 1 ,473 104.134 405,607 ' 663,303 - 1.068,910 t Sub Total 509,346 113,055 622:411 752,696 - 1,375,197 other Zoo I - _ - _ , • - - , Sob Total 1 - - - ' , _ . i - ! Total Program Funding L. 1 978 767 289,212 1.967.970 2,810.206 - - 4178.055 COAS Administration il -I Personnel 101,680 101,55e 10,060 - - 203,330 Contractual Seice5 33,769 30,769 582,970 - 613,739 1 EquipMent -- 1 117940 - 1:7,940 Supplies 590 5001 400 - SOO 7,-avol 750 750 3 003 --3,750 maining 750 750 - _ 750 1 noard Expenses _ - - - Public Educalior ..„0001 1.050 I-- - - 1.0001 ,Ozner - r - - , Sub Total - 135.440 L. 3l-J,4,49 ---555.990-1 - _ 841,439 j1 1 Totals t 1,814,2161! 259,212 ' 2,103,428 lir----3,13-1 ._ 5.720.324 Ride; D MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FIELD OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION -OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS DDJRP BJDGET SUMMARY Oakland County FN 2007 FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #08132) July 17, 2008 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, MIKE ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON IN RN: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS - MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPLICATION FOR FY 2009 TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. This is the fifteenth (15) year of the grant application with Michigan Department of Corrections. Office of Community Corrections. 2. The grant period is October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. 3. The application requests State funding in the amount of $4,198,092, with no County match as detailed in the attached Schedule A. 4. Application seeks full time funding for positions 7424, 7425, 7426, 7427, 7428, 7429, 7430, 7431, 7432, 7433, 7434, 9003, 5243, 9247, 9291, 9295, 9648, 9649; .5 of full time positions 7834 and 9396; and PTNE position 9292 within the Community Corrections Division. 5. The application also seeks full time funding for positions 7419, 7420, 7418, 7421, 10393, and PTNE funding for positions 7417 and 9397 within the Sheriff's Department. G. Application and acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment. Continuation of the grant is contingent upon future levels of grant funding. FINANCE COMMITTEE FINANCE COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Woodward and Greimel absent. t Resolution #08132 July 17, 2008 Moved by Rogers supported by Nash the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Burns, Coulter, Crawford, Douglas, Gersherson. Gosselin, Gregory, Grelmel, Hatchett, Jacobsen, KowaII, Long, Nash, Potter, Potts, Rogers. Scott, Spector, Woodward, Zack. Bullard. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). I IBM MOW Pi MOMS RERUN STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Ruth Johnson, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 17, 2008, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 17th day of July, 2008: ede Ruth Johnson, County Clerk