HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2009.09.02 - 9949September 2, 2009
REPORT (MISC. 109192)
BY: Human Resources Committee, Sue Ann Douglas, Chairperson
RE: DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS —
COMMUNITY & HOME IMPROVEMENT DIVISION — 2009 ANNUAL ACTION
PLAN AND CONSOLIDATED GRANT ACCEPTANCE FOR CDBG, HOME
AND ESG PROGRAMS AND 2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
AMENDMENT
TO: Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Human Resources Committee having reviewed the above-mentioned resolution on
August 26, 2009 Reports with the recommendation the resolution be adopted.
Chairperson. on behalf of the Human Resources Committee, I move the acceptance of
the foregoing Report.
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Human Resources Committee Vote:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLU -PON 109192 September 2, 2009
BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE, JOHN scan', CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS -
COMMUNITY & HOME IMPROVEMENT DIVISION - 2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND
CONSOLIDATED GRANT ACCEPTANCE FOR CDRG, HOME AND ESC PROGRAMS AND
2008-2000 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AMENDMENT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorized submittal of the Oakland
County 2009 Annual Action Plan 10 the U.S. Department of [lousing and Urban Development (HUD); and
WHEREAS the 2009 Annual Action Plan contains a consolidated Federal grant application for
activities designed to accomplish the goals and objectives for the Community Development Block Grant
(CD/3G) Program. HOME Investment Partnership.c (HOME) Program and the Emergency Shelter Grant
(ESG) Program: and
WHEREAS HUD by iettcr dated June 29, 2009 transmitted to the Community & Home
Improvement Division a Program Year 2009 consolidated allocation of $5,799,885 including $3,917,404
for CDBG. S1.715,969 for HOME and S166,512 for ESG, for the period of May 1, 2009 through April 30,
2010; and
WHEREAS this is the thirty-fifth year of grant fundino and acceptance for these programs; and
WHEREAS total program revenue for the 2009-2010 CDBG Program will be $4,469,I 10.83
including 53.917,404 grant allocation. S500„000 in estimated CDBG Revolving Loan Funds and
151,706.83 in Community Program income; and
WHEREAS total program revenue for the 2009-2010 HOME Program will be $2,402,062
including $1,715,069 HOME grant allocation. S386,093 grant match and 5300,000 in estimated HOME
Program Income; and
WHEREAS funding for the 110ME program match is appropriated in the Oakland County 2009
Adopted Budget: and
WHEREAS total program revenue for the 2009-2010 ESC Program will be the grant allocation of
5166,512 mid
WHEREAS the CDBG and ESG grants are 100 percent federally funded and no County funds are
required; and
WHEREAS fund schedule and program descriptions for the 2009-2010 CDBG, HOME and ESG
programs appear in attachment A; and
WE IEREAS the CDBG. HOME and FSG grant agreements have been reviewed by County
Executive Departments through the County grant review process (1. R. 01320): and
WHEREAS acceptance of these 211.111is does not obligate Oakland County to any future
commitment; and
WHEREAS program budget amendments for 2009 CDBCi Home Improvement Program
Revolving Loan Fund and HOME PT00 -ailil Income actual amounts will be requested by resolution in 2010
after compilation of additional information and fiscal year closing: and
WHEREAS the 2008 Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Grant Acceptance for CDBG, HOME
and ESG (MR. t07164) estimated Home Improvement Program Revolving Loan Fund revenue of
51,000.000 and Home Investment Partnership Act Program laconic revenue of $600,000; and
WHEREAS the Home Improvement Revolving Loan Fund generated $689,118.46, the Home
Investment Partnership Act Program Income generated 5331,975.00, and the Home Investment Partnership
Act CHDO Program Income ,..orterated $9,031.00 in Program Year 2008
NOW TIIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
accepts consolidated CDBG. HOME and ESG grant funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development in the amount 4.ff S5.799.885, $500,000 in estimated Home Improvement Revolving
Loan Funds, 551,706.83 in Community Program Income. 5300.000 in estimated HOME Program Income
and HOME County match (4'5386,093 for a consolidated 2009 program year grant package totaling
$7,037,684.83.
PLANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Nash absent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 2008 Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Grant
Acceptance he amended to reflect CDBC, Horne Improvement Revolving Loan Funds totaling $689,118.46,
Home Investment Partnership Act Program Income totaling $331,975, and Home Investment Partnership
Act CHDO Proi:,rani Income totaling $9,03 I in the program year period of May 1.2008 through April 30,
2009.
BE IT FURTI IR RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the
Emergency Shelter Grant subject to Me clarifications provided by HUD ir: the letter from Jeannette Harris,
Director, Community Planning and Development, Detroit Field Office, U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development dated March 20, 200 7 that Oakland County's obligations under the grant for discharge
policies and participation in the HMIS System is to make those requirements for ESCI funded entities, The
letter from Ms, l.larris is attached and incorporated into this Ai/reemcnr and
BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that the future ]eve i of service, including personnel, will be
contingent upon the level of Federal funding available for these programs; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes both
the Board of Commissioners Chairperson and the County Executive to execute the grant agreements and to
approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen ( I5) percent Nariance from the award, consistent with the
agreement as originally approved: and
Chairperson. on behalf of the Plannin2 and Building Committee, I move-Vadoption 9f4the
foregoing resolution,
-PLANN1>6 AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Community 84 Home Improvement
GRANT NAME: 2009 - Consolidated Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG),
HOME Investment Partnership Grant (HOME), and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG)
FUNDING AGENCY: US. Department of Housing and Urban Development
DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Kerry L. Rieth (248) 858-3403
STATUS: Grant Acceptance
DATE: August 5,2009
Pursuant to Misc, Resolution 401320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have complcted
internal grant review. Below are the returned comments.
The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of
Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal
Note, and this Sign. Off email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the
appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Department of Management and Budget:
Apprbved. — Laurie Van Pelt (7/29/2009)
Department of Human Resources:
Approved. — Cathy Shallal (713012009)
Risk Management and Safety:
Approved. — Andrea Plotkowsld (8/3/2009)
Corporation Counsel:
There are no outstanding legal issues concerning the above grant. - Joellen Shortley Blaszczak
(7/31/2009)
COMPLIANCE
The grant agreement references a number of specific federal and state regulations. Below is a list of these
specifically cited compliance related documents for this grant.
HUD Community Development Block Grants (24 CFR, Part 570)
http://www.access gpo.govinaratfriwaisidx_04/24cfr570 04.html
EUD Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HID Environmental Responsibilities (24 CFR,
Part 58)
lino: /AV W w.accegs wo.zovinara/cfriwatsidx 04/24cfir58 04.titni
Executive Order 12372 - Intergovernmental review of Federal programs
http://www ,f-ws.govioolicv/li rarcirge 12372.pdf
HUD Intergovernmental Review of Department of Housing and Urban Development Programs and Activities (24
CFR, Part 52)
http://www.access.gno.gQvinaraiefriwaisidx 04/24cfr52 04.htm:
ATTACHMENT A
County of Oakland ; Michigan PY 2009 Annual Action Plan
Comparison of Grant Application with Grant Award
Emergency Shelter Grant
Total Revenues
GRANT APPLICATION AWARD VARIAN
Community Develo_pment Block Grant $3,739,885 $3,917,404 4.75%
GRANT
HOME Investment Partnerships
$ 167,721
$1 HOME Investment Partnerships Grant , $1,531,087 $1,715,969 12.07% ,531 ,087 $1,715,969
$ 166,512
AWARD VARIANCE
12.07% r6g) , 0
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
2009 Program Narrative
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance it: 14-218
Statement of Need - Sixty two percent of the participating communities fell below the County's
2000 overall per capita income level of $32,534. Nearly half the participating communities have
median family income (MFI) levels below the County's overall level of $75,540 based on 1999
income data. Latest unemployment figures for December 2008 show that Michigan has the
country's highest unemployment rate at 10.6%. Along with the loss of 560,000 manufacturing
jobs over the past seven years and home foreclosures reaching 9,200 in 2008 Oakland County
faces great challenges. Housing values are also expected to stay depressed through 2010 and
Oakland County faces a looming shortage of skilled workers as the proportion of residents age
65 or older grows. Economists have predicted that the proportion of residents over the age of
65 in Oakland County, currently at one in eight people, will rise to one of every four by 2035.
That trend, which is not unique to either Oakland County or the state at large, is expected to
create huge shortages in meeting the demand for more services associated with aging
demographics.
CDBG Goals and Objectives - The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program
was initiated by the Housing and Community Development Act (HCDA) of 1974. The primary
objective of the CDBG program is the development of viable urban communities, by providing
decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities, principally
for low- and moderate-income persons. Through the CDBG program, HUD provides funds to
local governments for a wide range of community development activities for low-income
persons. CDBG funds are likely the most flexible federal funds available to local governments.
Activities include:
• Housing rehabilitation
• Down payment and other homeownership assistance
• Construction and rehabilitation of public facilities
• Removal of architectural barriers
• Public services such as transportation, chore services, and meals on wheels
Consistent with the primary goal Oakland County gives maximum feasible priority to housing,
public service, and capital improvement projects that are consistent with one or more of the
national and county objectives:
Development Block Grant National Objectives - Communi
Ensure benefit to low- and moderate-income persons;
Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or bliohtino community conditions; and
Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial
resources are not available to meet such need
County Objectives - Community Development Block Grant
Ensure that not less than 70% of CDBG funds received annually are used for activities that principally
benefit low- and moderate-income persons.
improve the human environment through infrastructure and public facilities projects in eligible areas of
participating communities.
Provide •ublic services for elig ible residents. _
Improve, upgrade, maintain or increase property values through the concentration of rehabilitation
efforts within neighborhoods.
Reduce the number of substandard dwelling units within the county through the rehabilitation of
existing residential units. _ ._
improve living conditions within housing units and reduce the financial burden of low- and moderate-
income persons.
Reduce housin• maintenance and fuel costs and enable lower-Income gersons to remain in their units.
Instill within homeowners the incentive to maintain and improve conditions within the housing unit.
1 Assist homeowners in using available funding sourms to accomplish housing rehabilitation activities.
, Reduce the isolation of income groups and increase housing opportunities for low- and moderate-
income persons.
Minimize displacement and relocation through a detailed plan in accordance with Uniform Relocation
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act requirements.
Ensure that the county maintains no more than 1.5 times its current year's allocation worth of CDBG
funds unexetLied in accordance with HUD spending performance guidelines.
Encourage communities to realistically plan for and invest in, future development.
Assist communities in developing the capacity to implement activities, _
Provide technical assistance to participating communities to enable them to more effectively carry out
CDBG projects and ensure compliance with federal regulations.
The County philosophy is that local communities know local needs best; therefore by formula
participating communities receive two-thirds of all CDBG funds less administration. The
communities then determine how to allocate resources within the program's overall objectives,
regulations, and laws. The Oakland County Board of Commissioners approved a revised CDBG
distribution formula in 2003. The formula still follows the federal "option one" method of CDBG
distribution to grantees as found in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended [42 USC 5306(b)(2)]. The county formula is expressed as: (P+3L)/4
P= ratio of participating community's population to population in all participating communities
L= ratio of the community's low-income population to all communities
The low-income ratio is factored three times and then multiplied by the total amount of CDBG
funds available to communities in a given year. All communities failing below $8,000.00 receive
$8,000.00 as a minimum amount. The formula applies to the "non- minimum allocation"
communities. The product is the community allocations for that given program year.
Total County Account
172170-731619
172170-731696
172170-731332
172170-730744
172170-732114
172170-731745
172170-732021
172170-730733
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0,00
$0.00
$0.00
$183,574.00
$216.114.00
$72,358,00
$115,072,00
$35,675.00
$27,235)30
$4,000.00
$11.608 00
PY 2009 CDBG Revenues
Revenue Amount
Federal CDBG Allocation $3,917,404.00
County Revolving Loan Fund (estimated) 1 $500,000.00
Community Program Income $51,706.83
Total Revenues
laY ZIJUU t.;UtSt..i Allocations
Allocation Amount
Home Improvement Revolving Loan Fund (estimated) $500,000.00 1
Home Improvement Program Project Costs S1;044,639.00
CDBG Administration $600,519.00 ,
Housing Counseling $100,000.00
Community Allocations $2,172,246.00
Community Program Income $51,706.83
jcAaj±lio_stior j_s W*L=10.83
p II' •I: :,- a - •II•. — -
T---
----
Classification Amount Percentage 1
Benefit to Low- and Moderate-Inc ome Persons $3,685,791.83 82.47% ' ____ _ PreventioniElimination of Siums/Biight $0.00 0%
1 Meeting an Urgent Community Need $0.00 0%
Administration and Planning (20% Cap of Total Revenues)
Public Service Actties 15% Ca• of Total Revenues
$783,319.00 17.52%
.• il .• l
I
—: I
*Public Service activities cannot exceed 15% of the total and are calculated independently.
*Public service activity funds are included in the benefit to low/mod income amounts.
PY 2009 CDBG %wadi
Project Classification 1 Community
Public Facilities And Improvements
Remove Architectural Barriers
Senior Centers
Parks-Recreational Facilities
Flood Drain Im_provements
Water Sewer Improvements
Sidewalks
Tree Planting
Fire Station EAuipment
Publi
$183,574.00
$216,114.00
$72.358.00
$115,072.00
$35,675.00
$27,235.00
$4,000.00
$11,608.00
c Services
$0.00 j
$0.00
$0.00
172160-730535 j Disabled Services
172160-730137 Battered and Abused Spouses
172160-730571 1 Emeroencv Services
$7,608.00
$72.987.00
$43,347.00
$7.608.00
$72,987.00
$43,347.00
. 172160-730880 ' Housekeeping Services $0.00 $2,500.00
i
I $2,500.00 !
172160-731665 Sft d R Si Safety and Services $7,500.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 l 1 7
160-731712 I Senior Services $87,447.00 $0.00 $87,447.00
172160-732011 , Transportation Services _ $90,574.00 $0,00 $90,574.00
172160-732170 Yard Services $174,253.00 $0,00 $174,253,00
172160-732185 Youth Services ', .978.00 $0.00 $51,978.00
, Housing
I 132290-730898 Housing Rehabilitation _ $41,896.00 $0.00 $41.896.00
172170-731227 Minor Home Re•air MHR $432,997.00 $0.00 $432,997.00
172170-731227 Minor Mobile Home Re • air $52,855.00 $0 .00 $52,855.00
172160-731602 Rehab Public Owned Res Buildin s $4,600.00 $0.00 $4.600.00
132280-731605 Renabi itation Administration $13,000.00 $1,044.639.00 $1,057.639.00
Administration and Plannin
172140-730789 Gen Pro ram Administration $32,291.00 $600,519.00 $632,810.00
172150-731360 Planning $50.509.00 $0.00 $50,509.00
132210-702010 Housin Counseiin Services $0.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 ,
Other Projects
172170-730310 Code Enforcement S340,268.00 $0.00 $340,268.00
731227-40380 Novi Pro ram income MHR $51,706.83 $0.00 $51,706.83
132290-730905 HsgRehab RecPaybacks RI_ (est) $0,00 $500.000.00 $500,000.00
Total WitildrAL.1.-‘41:ki 83
HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME)
American Dream Down payment Initiative (ADDI)
2009 Program Narrative
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance#:14-239
Statement of Need - According to the Oakland County Comprehensive Housing Needs
Assessment almost 103,000 households (22% of all households) face affordability problems.
Nine percent (almost 40,600 households) face severe affordability problems. Oakland County's
elderly households face affordability problems much more frequently than younger households.
29% of all elderly households face cost burden (2nd highest rate in the state). 14% face severe
cost burden (highest rate in the state). Affordability problems impact all income groups in the
county. In addition, Oakland County's special needs population, frequently very low income,
faces severe affordability problems.
Affordability problems are especially prevalent among households at or below low-income, but a
considerable number of middie-income famifies also face affordability problems. The amount of
older housing stock continues to increase, and the need for home improvement loans is
expected to rise. In addition, many septic fields in the County are beginning to fail and many
wells are failing due to lower water tables. Subsequently, houses in many older communities
are in need of connections to municipal water and sewer systems.
Assessment of Relationship of HOME Funds to Goals and Objectives - The HOME
program developed as a result of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. HOME provides
federal funds for the development and rehabilitation of affordable rental and ownership housing
for low-income households (defined as below 80% of area median income). The program gives
local governments the flexibility to fund a wide range of affordable housing activities through
housing partnerships with private industry and non-profit organizations. HOME funds can be
used for activities that promote affordable rental housing and homeownership. including:
• Property and/or building acquisition
• New construction and reconstruction
• Moderate or substantial rehabilitation
• Homebuyer assistance
• Tenant-based assistance
Strict requirements govern the use of HOME funds including the use funds for activities that
target low-income families and a 25% non-federal match. In Oakland County, HOME funds are
used in combination with CDBG funds to address priority affordable housing needs.
i
I National Objectives - HOME Investment Partnership Grant
Expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing for very low and low-income
residents;
Strengthen the ability of the county to design and implement strategies for achieving adequate supplies
of decent, affordable housing; and _
Encourage public, private, and nonprofit partnershils in addressing affordable housing needs.
County Objectives - HOME Investment Partnership Grant
Fund housing rehabilitation for very low income households.
Work to nurture community housing development organizations (CHD0s) to provide decent, safe,
sanitary, and affordable housing for low- and moderate-income persons.
Strengthen public-private partnership through provision of HOME match.
Promote homeownership through homebuyer programs and assistance for low- and moderate-income '
persons.
Estimated Use of HOME Funds and Matching Contributions - The Consolidated Plan
indicates that Oakland County's housing stock is overwhelmingly single-family owner-occupied.
The goal of the HOME Program is to "expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and
affordable housing" for low-income persons (s.92.1). Oakland County meets the goal through
the rehabilitation of single-family homes owned and occupied by low-income persons. The
county's Consolidated Plan puts great emphasis on housing rehabilitation as a proven method
for improving the quality of housing stock in which low-income persons reside. The following
details the county's plan for use of PY 2009 HOME funds.
Moderate Rehabilitation - Oakland County plans to undertake moderate rehabilitation of
single-family owner-occupied housing for low-income families. Specifically, the program is used
to rehabilitate the principal residence of an owner whose family qualifies as low-income (i.e.
income not exceeding 80% of area median income) at the time HOME funds are committed to
the housing (s.92.254 (b)). Participants will reside in one of the communities participating in the
Oakland County HOME Program. The value of the property, after rehabilitation, will not exceed
the area's mortgage limit for single-family housing under HUD's single-family insuring authority,
the National Affordable Housing Act (s.92.254 (b)). For Oakland County, the value of housing,
after HOME-funded repairs, may not exceed $226,100 (56FR36985). These figures may vary as
HUD publishes new limits in the Federal Register.
Housing that is assisted with HOME funds will comply with the Michigan Residential Code, the
Residential Construction Performance Guidelines published by the National Association of
Home Builders, the Oakland County Community & Home improvement Guidelines and any and
all codes adopted by the governmental unit in which the property is located. Examples of
rehabilitation work that can be financed through this program may include, but are not limited to
the following: plumbing, wells, septic systems, structural repairs, electrical work, heating, roof
replacement, masonry work, energy items, lead remediation, and barrier-free access.
Imm 0-Bedroom 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom
$119,016 $136,42
2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom
The total property-related indebtedness after improvement may not exceed property value. This
value is determined by a market analysis or by the Mortgage Application Acceleration Program
(MAAP) through the Oakland County Equalization Division. Total indebtedness is determined as
a sum of the existing property debt and the amount of the home improvement loan. Income
eligibility will be determined for each household based on gross household income and family
size in accordance with HUD Section 8 Lower Income Limits. Eligible homeowners will receive
a zero percent interest deferred loan, a 3% interest loan or a combination loan based on
income. Loans will be limited to $18,000 plus a $2,000 contingency for a total possible loan
amount of $20,000. On a case by case basis, the loan amount may increase due to the amount
of lead based paint remediation or the amount of work needed to meet the Michigan Residential
Code. (Maximum loan amounts are subject to periodic updates.)
County Program Administration - Ten percent of the County's PY 2009 HOME allocation will
be reserved for administrative and planning costs per s.92.207.
Reservation of HOME Funds for Community Housing Development Organizations -
Community Housing Development Organizations (CHD0s) receive the required fifteen percent
of HOME funds, per regulations at s92.300. In keeping with Consolidated Plan goals, a
qualified CHDO may receive funds to implement Home Buyer Assistance through acquisition
with rehabilitation and /or new construction.
Home Buyer Assistance - Oakland County will continue to provide technical assistance to the
three certified CHDOs under contract with Oakland County to ensure continued successes with
HOME funding. A CHDO may use HOME funds to acquire and rehabilitate existing single family
homes and/or acquire vacant property and construct new or emplace modular homes for sale to
qualified low-income homebuyers. Typically, CHDOs would sell the property to a qualified
homebuyer by immediately transferring the title. However, due to the current economic situation
in Michigan including job losses. high foreclosure rates, and increased inventory of housing the
County has implemented a lease-purchase option. This option will enable CHDOs to transfer
title to qualified low income homebuyers within 36 months of signing a lease-purchase
agreement. All forms of home buyer assistance include pre and post purchase housing
counseling requirements. HUD has established a maximum HOME funded investment level
based on the number of bedrooms per unit.
TABLE 1.4A - Maximum Per-Unit Subsid
Source: U, S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
The appraised value of the property after rehabilitation may not exceed the limits established by
HUD ($226,100 for a single-family unit). The sale price of the home may not exceed the
appraised value limit.
At the time of purchase, housing that is newly constructed or rehabilitated using HOME funds
must comply with the Michigan Residential Code, the Residential Construction Performance
Guidelines published by the National Association of Home Builders, the Oakland County
Community & Home Improvement Guidelines and any and all codes adopted by the
governmental unit in which the property is located.
Congress mandates that all housing rehabilitation and/or new construction projects funded with
PY 2009 HOME funds are subject to matching fund requirements. Oakland County ensures that
rehabilitation projects receive one-dollar of matching funds per every four dollars of HOME
funds expended, in accordance with federal guideline (s.92.218).
Before disbursement of any HOME funds, the CHDO/RI must execute a contract. This grant
agreement will identify the grant amount, grant terms and the programmatic responsibilities of
the CHDO.
Resale/Recapture Provisions - [24CFR 92.254(05)] states that housing that qualifies as
affordable and is for purchase is subject to resale and/or recapture provisions. Oakland County
uses a recapture provision. Under the county's recapture provision, the HOME investment that
is subject to recapture is the HOME assistance that enables the homebuyer to buy the dwelling
unit. This homebuyer assistance is a subsidy ($1,000.00 minimum) that makes the home
affordable to a low-income homebuyer.
HUD accepts three different options under the recapture requirements including full recapture,
reduction during affordability, and shared net proceeds. Oakland County follows the recapture
provision that allows for the entire amount of hornebuyer assistance to be recaptured.
Oakland County's home buyer assistance is a deferred payment loan with 0% interest. Oakland
County Community & Home Improvement secures its interest in the property with a mortgage
and note. One hundred percent of the HOME investment is recaptured upon conversion of
property use and/or ownership unless, due to foreclosure, there are not enough proceeds to pay
the full amount of the loan. Oakland County will accept the balance of the net proceeds as
payment in full, the debt will be extinguished and the affordability period ends. The recaptured
funds must be used to carry out HOME-eligible activities.
PY 2009 HOME Bud ! et Revenues
Revenue Amount
HOME Allocation $1,715,969
Match Obli ation $386,093
HOME Pro•ram Income estimated $300,000
jotai
PY 2009 HOME Budaet Allocations
Allocation HOME Funds 25% Match* HOME Total PI est
Housing Rehabilitation
$1,286,977 $321,744 $300,000 1 $1,908,721 Home Improvement Program
1 Community Hsg Dev Organization .
$257,396 $64,349 ! $321,745 (CHDO) Activities (15% of Alloca(ion)
County Administration (10% of Allocation) $171,596 $171,596
Total $1,715,969 $386,093 I $300,000 I $2,402,062
'HOME requires a 25% match of funds for housing rehabilitation and new construction activities.
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG)
2009 Program Narrative
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance #:14-231
Statement of Need - Assessment of the six shelters that participated in the 2008 Oakland
County Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) program reveals 1,651 men, women, and children used
these facilities from June 2007 - May 2008. Homelessness continues to be a countywide
problem.
National Objectives - Emergency Shelter Grant
Increase the number and quality of emergency shelters and transitional housing facilities for homeless
individuals and families, to operate these facties and provide essential social services, and to help
prevent homelessness,
County Objectives - EmeaeLylc Shelter Grant
Provide essential supportive services, homeless prevention activities and operational support for area
shelters.
-I
Oakland County plans to allocate ESG monies based on program goals to expand and improve
the quality of existing emergency shelters. Local non-profit organizations will receive funding to
support certain operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, utilities, and furnishings as
well as essential service expenses and organizational support (shelter administration) costs as
provided by ESG regulations. Allocations are competitive and based on the following elements:
ratio of beds utilized at 100% capacity (utilization), ratio of clients whose last know address was
an Oakland County participating community weighted twice (residency), and number of
available beds (capacity). The following budget assumes that each participating shelter will take
the maximum allowable for essential services (30 percent) and organizational support and
shelter administration (10 percent). Donations of time, material, and labor satisfy match
requirements.
PY 2009 ESG Allocations
Project Classification Amount
Operations and Maintenance Expenses $99,908.00
Essential Services Ex. -nses $49953.00
Or. anizational Su •oort Shelter Administration $16.651.00
Total A A
Inventory of Facilities and Assistance Serving the Homeless - The six shelters that received
2008 ESG program funds are the South Oakland Shelter (SOS), Place of Hope Warming
Center, HAVEN (Help Against Violent Encounters Now), New Bethel Outreach Ministry,
Lighthouse PATH. and the Common Ground Sanctuary (A Step Forward and Graduate
Apartment Program). Each participating shelter provides services for residents from all parts of
Oakland County. Place of Hope, HAVEN, and New Bethel Outreach Ministry, are ail located in
the City of Pontiac. Lighthouse PATH is located in Pontiac and provides added services in the
City of Oak Park. The Common Ground Sanctuary is located in the City of Royal Oak. All of the
shelters except the South Oakland Shelter are permanently sited. SOS rotates its site each
week throughout many of the County's CDBG participating jurisdictions.
The South Oakland Shelter is a consortium of approximately 55 sites designed to provide a
weekly rotating emergency shelter program. The sites of the SOS network consist of churches
and synagogues. Each site has the capacity to house and provide services to approximately 30
homeless individuals each night. During program year 2007, 340 persons were assisted. The
mission of SOS is to provide safe emergency shelter, work with individuals and families toward
their goals of improving their existing situation (i.e. attaining employment/income, budgeting and
saving, and locating affordable and appropriate housing) and ultimately eliminating the cycle of
homelessness one person at a time. SOS provides overnight lodging; morning and evening
meals; box lunches for those seeking employment; professional counseling; personal care
packages; laundry service; transportation; and clothing, housing, employment, social service,
social security, medical, veteran matter, and substance abuse referrals. Based on client need,
SOS has increased the length of stay, extended business hours, and made improvements in
business operations. South Oakland Shelter was at capacity 99 days last year.
Lighthouse PATH (Pontiac Area Transitional Housing), a subsidiary of Lighthouse of Oakland
County (a Pontiac-based nonprofit social service agency), is a transitional housing program for
homeless women and their young children. PATH operates 18 private apartments and six
adjacent residential structures within a two-block radius. In addition, 12 scattered site
apartments are available (7 in Oak Park and 5 in Waterford). The program is in the process of
adding 15 beds for homeless women with high-risk pregnancies and pregnant teens.
Guests can stay up to 24 months. While the program currently has 132 beds, Oakland County's
ESG program funds a portion of the Pontiac campus, which consists of 75 beds. 124 individuals
were assisted, 79 were children, during program year 2008. Among the support that this facility
provides its clients is shelter, counseling, training, mentoring, and day care.
Each adult is required to work, attend school, or volunteer 40 hours per week. Lighthouse
PATH program was at capacity 79 days last year. HAVEN is a private, nonprofit agency that
serves Oakland County residents as an emergency shelter for women and children left
homeless due to physical, sexual, and/or emotional abuse. HAVEN relocated from its
temporary shelter at POH Medical Center to a newly renovated shelter in December of 2004.
The current shelter has a capacity of 45 beds. HAVEN provides food, shelter, clothing,
transportation, counseling services, child care, advocacy, parenting classes, and referral
services to financial, legal, housing, medical, and other agencies that aid family stabilization.
HAVEN serves all of Oakland County. Haven's shelter assisted 479 clients (264 children) last
year.
Common Ground Sanctuary's A Step Forward program is a transitional living program for
homeless runaway/throwaway youth ages 16-20. Teens may stay for up to 18 months. A Step
Forward shelter has 7 beds and is located in Royal Oak. For those who need less than 24-hour
supervision, the Graduated Apartment Program has three scattered site apartments which
houses two teens each. Teens may stay up to 24 months. Programs promote self-sufficiency
through various residential and non-residential services such as a 24-hour crisis line;
information/referrals; training; meals; individual, family, group, aftercare, and peer counseling;
mentoring; substance abuse education and assessment; family preservation; and support
groups for youth, parents, and families. 23 teens were assisted during PY 2005.
New Bethel Outreach Ministry is a short term, 30-day emergency shelter for women with or
without children. The shelter teams with other agencies to provide counseling, mental health
services, food, medical, clothing, furniture, first and last month's rent, and security deposits.
They are also assisted with minimal transportation, housing search, life skill management, and
employment search. 527 clients (268 children) were served during the past 12 months. New
Bethel was over capacity 184 days during the program year.
Place of Hope is a warming center that currently operates out of Baldwin United Methodist
Church, Pontiac, from January 1 to the week before Easter. They hope to expand to a year
round rotating shelter for northern Oakland County. They have a capacity of 65 individuals and
served 317 people during the three-month period in PY2005. Place of Hope does not accept
children. They offer food, warmth, hospitality and support. Hygiene kits and a limited number of
showers are available. Place of Hope does not screen its clients and will accept any individual
who will abide by its rules.
Shelters respond to the immediate needs of the County's homeless population. Emergency
Shelter Grant funds will enable providers to target services to the homeless to foster economic
autonomy, self-sufficiency, and functional family units. The Emergency Shelter Program as an
essential component in assisting the homeless.
Many of the homeless lack jobs, the basic means to take care of themselves and social support
networks and may also face substance abuse; physical, emotional and/or mental health
concerns; and vocational needs. HAVEN, New Bethel Outreach Ministry, Place of Hope, and
SOS have taken the first step in attempting to address a very complex issue by simply offering a
safe place to sleep, a warm meal, and a listening ear. The Lighthouse PATH and Common
Ground Sanctuary offer both housing and independent living options.
erel
L---"
Aeadette Harris,
- r - Didcto
-7 - C9hmunity Planning and
Development
March 20, 2e.-7
U.S, Department of Housing and Urban Development
Detroit ,'Ted Office
(Ace of Comriurlity p;arining and Development
Patrick V. McNamara Federal Bull:irg
477 Michigar Averwe. Room 1710
Detroit, M,' 4822+5-2592
Te. (313) 225-7900 FAX (313) 225-6689
Ms. Karr ,/ Rieth
Oakland County
Department of Community and Economic Development
Oakland Pointe Suite 1900
250 Elizabeth Lake Road
Pontiac, MI 40341-0414
Dear Ms. Rieth:
SUBJECT: ESG and HMIS Cifif-al"nnq
f
/ 4 N
Thank you for the memo dated March 16, 2007, regarding
Oakland County's response to the ESG and HMIS 7.Prtiflt:nns
required by HUD. I have read through each action Oakland County
will take as they pertain to the compliance issues listed in the
ESG CE=Liaati.ans. Each action outlined by Oakland County is
approved. I will place a copy of the memo along with this
response in the Oakland County file.
understand your concern about signing a r,prficipp.4-4nn in
regard to intitutinnAl discharge policies. However, the ESG and
HMS Certirarinr, as well as the Discharge Policy forms are
not subject to change. Each form must be signed to insure
release of funds. HUD's reasoning for including the discharge
policy in the ce-rifie-Atinr was to bring awareness, to all
parties involved in homeless provision, of the need for solid
discharge policies, While HUD understands that Oakland County
itself cannot enforce discharge policies of other inRtitnt'nrs,
Oakland County can require that these policies be developed
and/or followed as part of contractual obligation. The idea is
to pet the word out that having these policies in place is not
only good practice but should be a requirement for operation.
Regarding the HMIS issue, Oakland County's assertion that
it will ensure each ESG funded sub-recipient institutes an HMS
system is completely acceptable. Oakland County is under no
obligation to do anything more than that.
P1ease contact your Community Planninc -, and Development
RPp-eqpn9i-tve, Ms. Shannon Hefter, if you need any further
Lie..--lific_ELLLan.. She can be reached at (313) 226-7900, extension
814a.
US Daparbnant of Housing and Urban Development
Detroit Field Office
Office of Community Planning and Development
Patriot( V. McNamara Federal Building
477 Michigan Avenue, Room 1710
Detroit, Mt 45226-2592
Tel. (313) 226-6280 FAX (313) 226-6689
JUN 2 9 20139
Honorable L. Brooks Patterson
County Executive
County of Oakland
1.200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-1043
Dear Mr. Patterson:
SUBJECT: Oakland County
2009 Consolidated Plan Approval
Community Development Block Grant - B-09-UC-26-0002
HOME Investment Partnerships Program - M-09-11C260210
Emergency Shelter Grant - S-09-UC-26-0002
We are pleased to approve your Fiscal Year 2009 Consolidated Plan. The grant
assistance that is approved with the Plan is as follows:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program $3,917,404
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program $1,715,969
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Program $166,512
The total allocation for your community is $5,799,885
Your 2009 program year began on May 1, 2009.
We would like to take this opportunity to commend the City on your successful
completion of this year's Consolidated Plan. We believe that the goals and objectives developed
through this process provide the foundation for the formulation of new partnerships at all levels
of government and with the private sector including for-profit and non-profit organizations.
These partnerships are invaluable as you and your partners address the problems of affordable
housing, homelessness, and economic opportunities for all citizens, particularly for very low-
income and low-income persons.
Enclosed are three copies of each of the required Grant Agreements and Funding
Approvals_ This constitutes the contract between our Department and the County. You should
note any special conditions listed in the Funding Approvals. Please return two executed copies
for each Grant to the Detroit Office of Community Planning and Development, and retain the
other for your records. In addition to the Grant Agreements, we have also enclosed a copy of
"Consolidated Plan Advice and Guidance" applicable to the various Programs.
rely,
ette Harris, Director
'ommunity Planning and Development
Detroit Field Office
Again, we congratulate you and your staff on the preparation of this year's Consolidated
Plan. We look forward to working with you during the year to accomplish the goals the City has
set forth and to further refine and improve the Consolidated Plan development process. In the
meantime, if you have any questions or desire assistance concerning this letter or other items
related to the community development programs, please contact Ms. Shannon Baltimore, your
Community Planning and Development Representative, at (313) 226-7900, Extension 8148.
Enclosures
cc: Knrry Rieth
4. Date use of funds may begin
(wrilityyyy) 05/01/2009
Amornt Approved
S3,917,404
6b. Amount Approved
Sc, ProjectAlant No, 3 6c. Aroaual Approved
T r=
Project Numbe Amount
Number Arnge
Date Entered PAS rrnmeldryyyy) [fate ritertiOLGCCSI,mmickitiV7Y) 13atch Number Entered By Verified By
form HUD-7082 (4193;
Transauar, Code
24 CFR 570
L
Funding Approval/Agreement
Title t of the Housing and Community
Development Act (Public Law 930383)
H1-00515R of 20515R
1. Name of Grantee (as ahcwn in item 5 crt Stariciard Form 424)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
2. Grarraeds Conolete Address las shown a Itani 5 of Siuiart Form 424)
1200 NORTH TELEGRAPH ROAD
PONTIAC, MI 48341-1043
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Orrice of Community Planning and Development
Community Development Block Grant Program
; 3. Grantee's 9-digit Tax iD Number
386004876
5a. ProjuctiGrant No. 1
09-UC-26-0002
5b,PtelectiGrantNo. 2
Grant Agreement: This Grant Agreement between the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the above named Grantee is made pursuant to the
authority of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 USC 5301 at seq.). The Grantee's submissions for Title I assistance, the
HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 570 (as now in effect and as may be amended Brom time to date), and this Funding Approval, including any special conditions,
constitute pan attic Agreement. Subject ro the provisions of this Grant Agreernont, HUD will make the funding assistance specified tiare available to the Gnintee upon
execution of the Agreement by the parties. The funding assistance specified in the Funding Approval may be used to pay costs incurroi after the date specified in kern
4 above provided the activities to which such costs ate related are carried out in comphance with all applicable reipmernents. Pre-agreement costs may not be paid with
funding assistance specified here mass they arc authonzed in HUD =Balkh:Ina DT iffroved by waiver and listed in the special conditions La the Funding Approval
The Grantee agrees to assume all of the nzponsibilities far enviionmental review, decision making, and actions, as specified and required in regulations issued by the
Secretary purauain to Section 104(g) of Tule I and published m 24 CFR Pat 58. The Orantee further acknowledges its responsibiJity for adherence to the Aersemem by
sub-recinmat entities to which it makes funding assistance hereunder available.
, Deparlinutit ot housing and Urban Level:went (By Name) Grantee Narne
Jeanette Harris
TIM ritie
- of Co II unity Pluming and Development
SlgnaItia' Dab (mmidainyy) Signature Date (rornitkliwyy) 4' •."'iliath• , _MS
. i_n 4 otTitle IA ss-or. 4.- tor the Funding Acton
06/25/2009
B. Special Conditions 9a Date HUD Received Outtniasion 10. cheok one
. : t . one) (check oney (ffirnirldirri) 03/13/2009 0 a. Orig. Fading
EnIttlement. Sec 1094 Eil4cno X Data Grantee ticrlifted--( Apotovai
02 b. Slate-Adminebred. Secit243(d)(1) ig Attached (rrunkkitrfnl 0 b. Amendmeit
n c. HUD-Admaistered Small Clies, Sec 106(d)(2){D) 9s. Dala of Stan Di Program Year Amendment *miff
El d. Indian CD9G Pregrams, Sec 100(aX1) (rnmisict?yyyy) 03/01i2009
El 41. Skiipits,5 Urban Renewal Funds, Sec 114) 11. Amount of Community Development
0 f. Special Purpose Grants, Sec 107 13lock Grant FY (2009) F (
0 g. Lain Guarantee, Sec 108 a. Funds Reserved tor this Grantee 3917404
b. Funds now being 4:proved 3917404
c. Resentatiod to be Canceled , (11a minus lib)
12a. Amount of Loan Guarantee Commitment nail being Approved
_
1 12b. Name and complete Address of Pubin Agency
Lean Guarantee Acceptance Provisions for Designated Agencies:
The public agency hereby accepts the Grant Agreement CXCGLICO by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development on the above date with
reaped to the above grant numher(s) as Grantee designated to receive 120. Warne of Authorized Ofkial-Gbasignatad Pikhc Agency
loan guarantee assistance, and agrees to comply with the terms :Ind
conditions of the Agreement, applicable regulations, and othe:r
requirements of HUD now or hereafter in effect, pertaining to the lite
assistance provided it
Signature
HUD Accounting use Only
Bath 7AC Drogram 11 A Rag Area Document No. Pn:fasct Neater Catsgory Arcot
fiectivo Date
lrnmearlr)
SPECIAL CONTRACT CONDITIONS - FISCAL YEAR 2009
Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, no funds provided under this agreement
may be obligated or expended for the planning or construction of water or sewer facilities until
receipt of written notification from HUD of the release of funds on completion of the review
procedures required under Executive Order (E.0.) 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, and HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 52. The recipient shall also
complete the review procedures required under EX/. 12372 and 24 CFR Part 52 and receive
written notification from HUD of the release of funds before obligating or expending any funds
provided under this agreement for any new or revised activity for the planning or construction of
water or sewer facilities not previously reviewed under E.O. 12372 and implementing
regulations.
2009 ANNUAL PLAN ADVICE AND GUIDANCE
Reporting Reqllirements for Fiscal Year 2008 Grants
The Consolidated Annual performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER) which includes CD13G.
ESG, and HOME, for the 2008 Program Year are to be submitted to this Office no later than July
29, 2009 (90 days after your Program Year ends).
Environmental Review Procedures
Certain activities included in the Consolidated Annual Plan are subject to the provisions of 24
CFR Part 58 (Environmental Review Procedures for the CDI3G Program). Funds for all non-
exempt activities must not be obligated or expended unless the release of funds has been
approved in writing by HUD. A request for the release of funds must be accompanied by an
environmental certification. Appropriate forms are enclosed.
Emergency Shelter Grant Guidance
There are two critical deadlines set forth in the ESG program regulations. Title 24 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 576.55(b), requires that all ESG grant amounts be
obligated by 180 days and expended by 24 months after the date of the grant award letter. Any
grant amounts that are not obligated and expended by these dates may be recovered ad
reallocated for use in accordance with 576.67 of the regulations. These deadlines represent
maximum time periods. HUD is sure that each grantee wiLl make every effort to obligate and
expend all funds within these periods.
ESG funds may be used to fund a Continuum of Care's Homeless Management Information
System (HMIS), ESG funds may be used to iinplement and operate a Continuum of Care's
HINES system among homeless services providers and ESG-funded homeless prevention
programs. HMIS costs may be considered an eligible activity as an essential service, operation,
or administrative expense. ESO funds may not be used for planning costs.
Partirepant Name and Address
County of Oakland
1200 North Telegraph Road 3 Tax Identification Number
38-6004876
2. Participant Number
M09-UC260210
4. Previous Obligation (Enter C for initial FY allocation)
7 Current Transaction (+ or-)
b. CHDO Competitive Reallocation or Dere:ligation (see #18 below)
b. CHDO Cernpetitive Realiocation
Pontiac,M 48341-1043 4. Appropriation Number
see 1i18 below
5. FY (yyrs)
2009
11, For the U.S. Department of HUD (Name and Title of Authorized Official)
Jeanette Harris, Director, Community Planning & Developm
14. For the Participating Jurisdichon/Entity (Name and Tole of Authorized
1
13 Date
CS /25 1 2009
15. Date =I) „lee es,..5ig net u ro
0 India; Agreement 0 Amendment #
Page 1 of 1 form HUD-40093 (04/2304)
Funding Approval and HOME
investment Partnerships Agreement
Title 11 of the National Affordable Housing Act
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning
and Development
0ME3 Approval No. 2506..0171
(Exp. 03/31/2005)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for iswiewing instructions, se -thing
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, arid compieting and reviewing the collection of informatiOn. This agency may not °endue or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless that col/action clispiays a yard OMB control number.
The HOME statute irnooses a significant number of data Oollection and reporting requirements. This includes information on assisted properties, on the
owners or tenants of the prepertles and on other programmatic. areas. The information Vihl be used: 1) to assist HOME participants in managing Veer
programs; 2) to track performance of participants in meeting fund commitment and expenditure deadlines; 3) to permit HUD to determine wnether each
participant meets the HOME statutory income targeting and affordability requirements; and 4) to permit HUD to determine compliance with other statutory
and regulatory program requirements. This data collection is authorized under Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act or related
authorities. Access to Federal grant funds is contingent on the reporting of certain project-specific data elements. Record's of information coliected will be
maintained by the recipients of the assistance. Inferrnation on activities and expenditures of grant funds is public information and is generally available for
disclosure. Recipieras am responsible for ensuring confirlentiality when public disclosure is not required.
9, Special Conditions (check applicable box) 10. Dale of Obligation (Congressional Release Date)
Not applicable El Attached (Ines/ddiyyyy) 06 1 25/ 2009
This Agreement between the Department Of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Participating Jurisdiction/Entity is made OtirtVant to the
authority of the HOME Investment Partnerships Act (42 U.S.C. 12701 et seq.). The Participating Jurisdiction's ./Ently's approved Consolidated Plan
subnessien/Application and the HUD reguations at 24 CFR Part 92 (as is now in effect and as may be amended from time to time) arid this HOME
Investment Partnership Agreement, form HUD-40093, including any special conditions, constitute part of this Agreement. Subject to the provisions ce this
Agreement, HUD will make the funds for the Fiscal Year specified, available to the Participating Jurisdiction/Entity upon execution of this Agreement by the
parties. All funds for the specified Fiscal Year provided by HUD by formula reallocation are covered by this Agreement upon execution of an amendment
by HUD, without the Participating Jurisdictions execution of the amendment or other consent. HUD's payment of funds under this Agreement is subiect to
the Participating Jurisdiction's/Entity's compiiance with HUD's electronic funds hanger and information reporting procedures Issued pursuant to 24 CFR
92.502. To the extent authorized by HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 92, HUD may. by its execution of an amendment deobligate funds previously
awarded to the Participating Jurisdiotion/Entity without the Participating Jurtsdiction's/Entity's execution of the amendment or other consent. The
Participating Jurisdiction/Entity agrees that funds invested in affordable housing under 24 CFR Part 92 are repayable when the housing no longer qualifies
as affordable housing. Repayment shall be matte as specified in 24 CFR Pan 92. The Participating Jurtsdiclirxi agrees to assume all of the responsibility
for environmental review, decision making, and actions. as specified and required in regulation at 24 CFR 92.352 and 24 CFR Part 58_ .
17. Cheer one:
PA$ Code
HMG
18 Funding Information:
Sosiree of Funds Appropriation Code
FY 2009 HOME 568/90205
Amount
et.716,9e9
CI-IDO C.omperitee ReW?dcation
ource of Funds Anproariation Code PAS Cede Amount
2. GRANT NUMBER
S-09-UC-26-0002
4. DATE OF APPLICATION
03/12i2009
06/26/2009
TMENT OF HOUSIND At4D URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BY
r Office of Community Planning and Development
LE
June 25. 2009
DATE
12 1/ /4 10
I-- Eirs -rivEOATE: .
'• .. - .
14
Aktamsr ' wrioanne
PROJECT KAMA
Funding Approval Under the
Steward B. McKinney Homeless
Assistance Act (Public Laws 100-77 and 100-68)
U. S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Emergency Shelter Grants Program
1, NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Oakland
3. APPLICANT ADDRESS (Include Street. City, County, State, and Zip Code)
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-1043
5. DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED BY
HUD 03/13/09
6. FUNDING APPROVAL
XX ORIGINAL
AMENDMENT NO.
• AMOUNT OF EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM FUNDS APPROVED
a Amount of ESOP Funds Currently Reserved for this Applicant $_ 166.512
b. Amount of ESGP Funds Now Being Approved for this Applicant $ 186,5i2
c. Amount of Reservaljon to De Cancelled (Line 7,a minus 7.b $_
SPECIAL CONDMONS (Check applicable box)
XX Not Applicable
In Attached
• DATE APPLICANT NOTIFIED FUNDING HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED:
DOCUMENT 2C
Grant No.: S-09-UC-26-0002
[Insert rest of grant number beginning with "MC" for Main) City or "C/C" for Urban County)?
Official Contact Person: Kan-v Rieth
Telephone No: 248-858-5403
FAX: 248-858-5311
.E-znall Address: rietligrnko,na klandani. us
Ti ID No; 38-6004876
Unit of Government No: 269125
FY 2009 LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT AGREEMENT
EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM
This Grant Agreement is made by and between the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) and Oakland County the Grantee, for FY 2009 of the
Emergency Shelter Grants Program in the amount of $ 166,512 , This grant-was
authorized by Subtitle B of Title IV of the McKinney-Vent° Homeless Assistance Act, 42
USC 11301 (1988), as amended (the 'Act"). In addition, the grant operates through HUD's
regulations at 24 CFR Part 576, as now in effect and as may be amended from time to time,
which are incorporated as part of this Agreement.
In reliance upon the Consolidated Plan and certifications, the Secretary agrees, upon
execution of the Grant Agreement, to provide the Grantee with the agreed grant funds. The
grantee must comply with requirements for record keeping and annual performance
reporting to HUT) within 90 days after the close of its consolidated program year, as
required by 24 CFR 91.5211 This includes the periodic information collected through
HUD's Integrated Disbursements and Information System (IDIS). The grantee's IDIS
reporting must include information on grant activities, project sponsors, project sites, and
beneficiaries (including racial and ethnic data on participants). This information will be
used for program monitoring and evaluation purposes.
The grantee agrees to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in distributing funds
provided under this Grant Agreement and to accept responsibility for ensuring compliance
by recipient entities which may receive funding assistance.
The grantee agrees to comply with the provisions of the environmental requirements of 24
CFR Part 58 as applicable under 24 CFR 576.57(e) with respect to funds provided under
this Grant Agreement.
Signature and Date
eanette Harris
Typed Name of Signatory
ft 4, • $
The grantee further agrees to provide sufficient detail on matching funds so as to identify
the specific sources and amounts of the funds as required by 42 LTSC 11375(a)(1).
The following parties execute this Grant Agreement on the dates set forth below as follows:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
v
06/25/2009
Director, Community Planning and_Dew lektL,i_tent ,
Title
GRANTEE
By:
Signature and Date
Typed Name of Signatory
Title
F'-nancQ
MD .Lion carried ::,nal-:imously on a roll call vote 'i:h Zack absent
COMMITTEE
September 2, 2009
FISCAL NOTE (MISC. 109192)
BY. FINANCE COMMITTEE. TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS — COMMUNITY &
HOME IMPROVEMENT DIVISION — 2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND CONSOLIDATED GRANT
ACCEPTANCE FOR CDBG, HOME AND ESG PROGRAMS AND 2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
AMENDMENT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced
resolution and finds:
1 The resolution authorizes acceptance of grant funding from the U.S Department of
Housing and Urban Development for program year 2009 for the consolidated Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Grant (HOME). and
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) in the amount of $5,799,885
2_ The award includes 83.917 404 for the Community Development Block Grant,
$1,715,969 for the HOME Investment Partnership Grant. and $166.512 for the
Emergency Shelter Grant.
3. The award also includes $500,000 in estimated Home Improvement Revolving Loan
Funds. $51.706.83 in Community Program Income, $300.000 in estimated HOME
Program Income, and requires a HOME County match of $386,093 for a consolidated
2009 program year grant total of $7,037,684 83,
The Federal grant award of $5,799,885 is $361,192, or 6.6%, more than the application
and $361,116 more than the 2008 program year award of $5,438.769_
Local County match of $336,093 (25%) is required for grant funding allocated to housing
rehabilitation and/or new construction activities for the HOME Investment Partnership
Grant, an increase of $44,801over the PY 2008 County Match of $341,292 The 25%
match percentage requirement is the same as the match requirement in the 2008 HOME
Investment Partnership Grant.
County Match of $386,093 is available in the Non-Departmental Grant Match line item of
the FY 2009 General Fund Budget, account #10100-9090101-196030-730800 No
additional appropriation is required.
Indirect costs associated with this grant are not paid due to administrative and planning
limits.
The funding period is for the program year May 1. 2009 through April 30 2010.
9. The resolution also amends the 2008 Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Grant
Acceptance to reflect actual funding generated by the CDBG Home Improvement
Revolving Loan Fund, the Home Investment Partnership Act Program, and Home
Investment Partnership Act CHDO Program in the program year period of May 1, 2008
through April 30, 2009.
10. A FY 2009 Budget amendment is recommended as follows:
General Fund #10100
Expenditures
9090101-196030-730800 Non-Dept Grant Match ($386,093)
1090669-196030-768001-29711 Transfer Out 386.093
$ -0-
Home Investment Partnership Fund #29711
Revenue
1090659-132240-695500-10100 Transfer In
1090659-132260-695500-10100 Transfer In
Expenditures
1090659-132240-730884
1090659-132260-730261
$321,744
64.349
$386.093
5321.744
64 349
$386,093
$ -0-
Housing Rehab Match
CHDO Match
0
I IRBY APPROVE THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
47/0 .1
Resolution #09192 September 2, 2009
Moved by Middleton supported by Nash the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent
Agenda, be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Burns, CapeIto, Coleman, Coulter, Douglas, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Greimel,
Hatchett, Jackson, Jacobsen, Long, McGillivray, Middleton, Nash, Potter, Potts, Runestad,
Schwartz, Scott. Taub, Woodward, Zack, Bullard. (25)
NAYS: None, (0)
A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent
Agenda, were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Ruth Jonnson, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on
September 2, 2009, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at
Pontiac, Michigan this 2nd day of September, 2009.
Gat
Ruth Johnson, County Clerk