HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2009.09.24 - 9964Septeiriber 2, 2009
Miscellaneous Resolution 109198
CemmLttee Jeff =otter - OnairFern
RE: Circuit Court - Family Division - Oakland County Child Care Fund Budget
2009-2010
The Cc ,:inty of Comm:.ss'nerz
Mr, C'n,atrpeon, L,Adt.F rd 1rer
ESA, riri:rrovisions o: 21,7t: :e0 thej-J -oitc Acts cf
CohtvI re:21 :re., to. develop ,,J:d sJbmt'i a Flan ant btld:;,xt
provision of f .,;nd:ng of roster care sorvice to 7ht-2 B._:rea',i of Juven1le
Deprtment of 1-.:,:tan arld
JrJ r.: curt - :Ivisin.
-Jhd COj DE3rta Cf HUnOF.".izervls have devecd
bcdget f -_11- the S:ate's fit. year, ',:ctoer
oroy lawsuit
requit±_r(T Fill foiser parents LrelaL_:ve or
licen:c-,:!;
ooc a,ur.ty's d. OOt 1-;LL;
W]t re :mplicatons the settlemti-:t agreement. i.epresentat:ves froy7,
the
Admihistrat:Idn, the -t,cal 2tatt of .Itchigiln's :HS, Oak] ,)rd
122,eprt of iiuman ScryLcss and Cakland Co'Jnty's Depar==t oc
anagemen!:: tInd me: on re -cruary 2.'2C:-)9 to d:s:2,..:as these tisd .,,1
Stat.e of ,:iont;an's representatives asured is that :he :.;ett1eme7.7
w,cald not adversetv affcct o,ur treal pcsttion;
tre =.ounty.Exect:tive rellec.', on the leparl:ment of -.-iumar a:rvives
fe.ocrs,endi::ig th(,: 17'1- 2j1C-:2Y badeti
WHERE.A5, s .,_;t:sogdent T:ro tne reeemmndaion the loca: sdbmttted
fc,r tho FY Chtiu Care Fur-id contrct requesting an trcreasc tetaltnd
•..1rty E:,:e ,„:uttve Recommended bu:-..!gt. ,-7:oJnrtv
FC5f increazed 7,Tur.ity :Ail: Placed 7:tdr :are
and r7eyment3 Inereasod .4„V,432, Cunty T'la:ced
its Lricre,lec S4l -:,569, and l-nd*endent Living County U2r:S. pta,ed ictcr
aro: admtnistrative rate increased 45C. 908; ar.d
WH=REAS 7einEeenativcs from ask:Land Co=ty's nraqement al'k:and
County's Doard Oakland County's Depart7ent of i-PL'J.ILi
Hoe 1I Jiarvtces met witr; :2;ta -te of l'.'::chgah lcai :HS repreentatIves on
2C':',9 and made o-lar tnc Centy's annual Lnidge: th'3 .0y 2ii:o
approoriton. docs expect to stay with:in tneir County appropr:Jt:en; Jnd
')okland sutmit:ing to the of J.,;ven:Le
Depattment or 100.'3ervIces the 1n7rE%ased DILt :guTes zdbmitted to the
1.-.cadse it UTU.rr. aathoriz,dtton the aLlowi and
WHEREA, Servles Comm:lt'..ee Les reuiewd thH3 tud!.2et
redcm7.-mC,s .:.ott,ion to the ',:tate Offioe.
rL :T P=E301=, The Oakian Cetnty '2card or
or Oukland .7are 7dnd
.of milt Care !d .1-uman
BE 112 Departmen: of li -aman f.:ervio.es Is leoatly
1=he dontainod ti ',:he FY 291C-2012 PAdpted Co=tv Eeidgt.
t he 7 7TILT,:"
107ytiCI, ,17,f the forc7otrc: res ,ol .;tion,
!,171.-)n a r-..7.11 call vol_
County
lOakland
Court Contact Person
Cooperrider, Johr (Oaktahra248-858-0256
IE-Mail Address
cooperriderl@oakgov.com
Telephone Number
DHS
$3,831 ,405.00
$972.925.00
$985,500.00
COURT
$24,0371020,00
s3J42,760.99
550,000.00
COMBINED
s31 405.00
$27,009,945.00
s3.742 760.99
$1,035,500.00
CHILD CARE FUND
Poster Care During Release Appeal
Period j $8,000.00 $8,000.00
$ 1 $
JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
Basic Grant . . $0.00 I
DHS-2091 ()jolt livetTNRYLT 2091.htm) 4/ • Page 1 of 1
Cowry CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY
Michigan Department of Herman Services (OHS)
Child and Family Services
seal Year OHS Contact Person Telephone NumberIE-Mall Address
October 1. 2009 through September 30, 2010 Hull, Susar (OaKland)
TYPE OF CARE
I. CHILD CARE FUND
A. Family Foster Care
B. Institutional Care
C. In Home Care
D. Independent Living
E. suBroriu_s______
F. Revenue
G. Net Expenditure
ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES
r $7,789,830.00 L527.829,780$9 $35,519,610.99
$ .$2 300 000.00 $2,300,000.00
$7,789.8 780.99 $33,319,610.99 1
COST SHARING RATIOS County 50%/State 507
COST SHARING RATIOS County 0%IState 100%
County 0%i8tate 100%
$15,000.00 Maximum COST SHARING RATIOS
1 $33,327,61=1 IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE. We
certify that the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year: October
1. 2009 throuob Sebtember 30, 2010
Presiding Judy ate
4 ...id 4 ...1014filigiffii g 5-- o _
County Dire tor o Air A
Date
'4.- ailitalsO /5 ic., 9
Chairperson, 13 ir of Corn ss er's Signatu Date
AndlOr County Executive Signature Date
The Family Independence Agency will not discriminate AUTHORITY: Act 87, Publication of 1978, as amended.
against any individual or group because of race, sex, OMPLETION: Required
religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local
beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, government.
hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you
are invited to make your needs known to an DHS office in
your county.
DHS-2091 (Rev. 5-00) Previous edition may be used. MS Word.97
https://ijolt.famcare.nct/genfunc.exe 7/31/2009
County
bakl n d
Fiscal Year
rockibe
Page 1 of 1
rc 248-858-0256 ooperriderj@oa kg ov.com
Telephone Numbe E-Mall Address
Telephone Number
248-858-0256
Telephone Rumba -Mail Address
County 50%1State 50%
$3,831,405.00 1
$2,972,925.00 I
$ 53,831,405.00
$24,037,021.00 1$27,009,945.00
$3,742,760.99 T $3,742,760.99
$985,500.00
89 830.00 27.82S,780.99
s2.300,000.00
$1,035,500.00
$35,619,610.99
$8,000.00 sam00.03
$ $0.00
OHS COURT COMBINED
_L$33,327,61211
DHS-2091 (jjolt_liveixfUJCILT_2091.htm) (
COUNTY CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY
Michigan Department of Human Services (OHS)
Child and Family Services
1 Court Contact Person
Coaperntler. John (Oakifind) ..z.1
HS Contac _
Hull. Susan (OaKIftnd)
ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES TYPE OF CARE
1. CHILD CARE FUND
A. Family Foster Care
B. Institutional Care
C. In Home Care
D. independent Living
E, SUBTOTALS -
F. Revenue
G. Nat Expenditure
COST SHARING RATIOS
H. CHILD CARE FUND
Foster Care During Release Appeal
Period
COST SHARING RATIOS II County 03/4/State 100%]
IL
JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
Basic Grant
County 0%/State 100%
$15,000.00 Maximum COST SNARING RATIOS
IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE. We
certify that the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year: October
1 2009 throu.h Se timber 30 2010
County Dire tor *Mr
Data
IndlOr County Executive Signature
e Family independence Agency will not discriminate
gainst any individual or group because of race, sex,
'religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political
beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing,
hearing. etc.., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you
are invited to make your needs known to an DNS office in
your county.
DHS-2091 (Rev, 5-00) Previous ecUtion may be used. MS Word-97
AUTHORITY: Act 87, Publication of 1978, as amended.
'COMPLETION: Required
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local
government.
https://j1olt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 7/31/2009
AUTHORITY. Act 87, Public Acts of 196e, as
amended
RESPONSE: Required.
PENALTY
withheld from loca:
State reimbursement will be
government.
DI-IS-2093 - Summary' (jolt iive\ce11.1JOLT_2093.1itm) .% Page 1 of 2
Michigan Department of Human Services
lOcteberl, 2009 through September 35-,-2-07-3
1. List all service components which make up the INC program and specify the requested information for
each.
CCF Other Public Gross
Court Service (Adm. Unit) Expenditure Funding Expenditure
Components
1 STRIDE (Short- Court 75,075.99 0.00 75,075.99
Term Rapid
Intervention and
Diversion)
2 Intensive Court 1,086.407.00 0.00 1,086,407.00
Probation
3 Psychological Court 968642.00 0.00 968,642.00
Clinic Services
Unit
4 Wraparound Court 22,131.00 0,00 22.131.00
Services
6 Crossroads tor Court 1,016,884.00 0.00 1,016,884.00
Youth Learning
Center
6 Crossroads for Court 101,230_00 0.00 101,230.00
Youth LPC Day
_ Program
7 Family-Focused Court 450,341.00 0.00 450,341.00
Juvenile Drug
Court .
8 Parent CHOICE Court 22,050.00 0.00 22,050.00
Program
DHS Service . Components
___..
Subtotal - Court $1 3,742,760.99 $1 0.00 $1 3,742,760.99
Subtotal - DHS $1 0.00 SI 0.00
Grant Total $1 3,742,760.99 $1 0.00 , $1 3.742.760.99
II. For each service component listed above, there must be completed a separate 1N-HOME CARE/BASIC
GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (DHS-2094), filling in the appropriate budget items. If something does not
show, please review budget detail forms.
Trio Department of Human Services wi I not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex rengion, age. national origin, color marital status.
political beliefs or disability. If you need help reaging, writing, hearing. etc..
under the Americans will Disabilities Act. you are invited to make your needs Known '
to an 'IA office in your county.
iittps://jjoft.famcare.net/genftinc.exe 7/31/2009
DI-IS-167. In-Iiome Cue Colification (jjolt_live\ccf\HOLT_167.htrn) 4 Page 1 of 2
IN-HOME CARE CERTIFICATION
Fund Restriction and Program Requirements
Michigan Department of Human Services
October 1. 2009 through September 30, 2010
In-Home Care (INC) program expenditures are restricted to new or expanded programs that are alternatives out-of-home
institutional or foster care. 111C funds may not be used to duplicate services.
A. ELIGIBLE CLIENTTSTAFFiNG
1. Children under the jurisdiction of the Court, as an alternative to removal from the c.hrldS home, provided that
a. such care is an alternative to detention or other out-of-horne care ano:
A written complaint has been received and accepted by the Court
" the expenditures are not `Or Odiclal cost
" the caseload size or services are intensive
* non-scheduled payments are not made to pay for basic family needs otherwise available through public assistance
Frog id MS
* the parent(s) and tne youth have agreed in writing to receive IMC services, or a temporary order has been entered
penoing an adjudication hearing; or
b. such care is provided to children wno at the disposrtioral hearing are ordered into IHC as an alternative to foster care or
other out-of-home care. and
* the expenditures are not for judicial costs
' the services are intensive, and
non-schedured payments are not made to pay to basic family needs otherwise available through public assistance
erograms
2. The IlaC early return option may be used to accelerate the early return of a youth from family foster care. institutional care. or
other out-of-home care wrien the case identifies an early return goal and the services are provided to members of the cnild s
family. The case plan should identify the family strengths and deficiencies which, if corrected, would permit the youth to be
returned home early. Ii-IC services would typically be provided to the family during the time that the youth is in pet-of-home
care and, if necessary. tor a period of time after the youth has returned 10 the family.
3. The County Department of Human Services (OHS) may provide IHG services if the juvenile court orders care and supervision of
a court ward.
The County DHS may provide IHC services from its subaccount for CPS category I, or category 1,1 or category III cases
providea that
" such IHC services prevent the need to petition the itiven e court for removal or prevent placement in voluntary foster care.
and
• non-scheduled nayments are not made to cover basic family needs otherwise available through pubic assistance
programs.
5. IHC funds shall not be used to meet the court staff-to-youth population ratio of to 5.000 as specified in the Juvenile Court
Standards and Administrative Guidelinea icy the Care of Children.
6. Court staff hired after 4/30/85 who are responsible for case plan development and monitoring, must meet the qualifications
established in the Juvenile Court Staiadareis and Administrative Guidvines for the Care of Children.
Supervisory Personee ' Prouation Officers " Counselors
7. County DHS staff and supervisor staff providing direct IHC services must meet the standards set forth in Rules 400.6124.
400.6126 and 400 6125 of the Administrative R ules fCr Child Placing Agencies.
5. County DHS staff and supervisory staff providing direct IHC services must be state civil servants assigned to classifications
and levels equivaleet to staff and supervisors in the state foster care program_
9. In IHC programs county DHS or Juvenile Court contractual staff who are responsible fo7 case plan development and
monitoring, must meet the requirements of staff supervising children In foster care. as established in the 4.1.wenile_ Court
Standards and Guidelines for the care of children
10. !MC rein' bureements for program arid administrative office space, county ourchasect supplies, salaries and wages for county
employees who provide direct services or support for these services are subject to the same restrichons as reimeursernents
in county-operated inslitueons.
B. USE OF THE IN-HOME CARE OPTION FOR NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
If all other 1HC reqwrements are met OuLigeteci non-scheduled Payments for services available to youth n foster care may be
provided to youth in lneir own norne (Non-scneouled payments are defined in the Cflild CarftHandbook).
C. CASE RECORD DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
Individual case documentation is required for all IHC clients. A caseload list is required for every !HC component As a rninirmim.
case records must include the following:
family case assessment which identifies. by service component, the problems and need fur 1HC services
https://jjolt. famcare.netlgenfune.exe 7/31/2009
DHS-167, In-Home C.nre Celification (jjolt_live\ecNJOLT__167.htm) Page 2 of 2
The signatures bVow certify that IHC polity stated in this clocument have been reviewed. it rs understood that these are coneitions for
claiming IHC fund reimbursement.
Presiding
Juvenile
Aidtigf of Family Defn of Circuit C
and/or
DATE: gi 5
DATE:
•
•
•
•
•
•
day of intake
type of complaint/allegation. supported as follows:
(1) delinquency -- a copy of the complaint or court order, when applicable, placing the child in IHC as part of a forma!
disposition.
(2) abuse/neglect -- allegation and substantiation entered on the OHS-133 in Department cases;
treatment plan which identifies the treatment. objectives and the action steps and timetables which will be used to reach the
oojectives
case plan cnanges as a result of supervisor/case worker or contracteeicontractor case reviews
quarterly progress reports
dates, type and purpose of service contacts made with the client. Note. weekly face to face contact is required
legal status of youth and the family, and
the living a rrangeme it of the youth at termination of IHC services.
Note: Case record content for all foster care cases. under the supervision of a county OHS. should be maintained accord'ng to
Services Manual Item 722 (6a-9) It is suggested that all IHC material be kept ir the first inside section of the foster care file.
IHC sersece purcnases from a private or pi:die provider requires a contract unless the service is supportive of a large component (i.e.,
clothing or dental work for a youth serviced through an established II-IC program as for example. intensive supervision). These non-
scheduled payments do not require contracts.
Only IHC expenditures described in the Annual Plan and Budget and approved by Child and Family Services are reimbursable.
IHC funds and services are subject to state review and audit and non-compliance with the above restrictions and requirements may
result in withholding or repayment of state reimbursement.
All IHC contractual services purchased with county appropriated monies shall be_thilple responsibility 9f the county. The signature of
the County DHS Director must be with authority from the County to enter into contractual agreements on beealf of the County for the
expenditure of the County Child Care Funds
The county must have all II-IC contracts processec through the county's formal contract approval procedures
County Director of Department of Human Services as
Agent of the County
AUTHORITY: P.A 87 of 1978
RESPONSE. Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION . Child owe
funds
will net be reimbursed,
The Department of Human Services will not
discriminate against any Individual or group because of
race. sex. religion age. national ceigin, oior, manta/
status, political beliefs or disability If you neec help
with reading, writing. hearing, etc.. under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, you are ievitec to make
ves nimprts 4mrvear,
https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 7f3 I /2009
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit .17,- Cour! OHS
1. Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of
Miles
YEARLY COST
YEARLY COST
2094-Budget SununarS. Repot (jjolt_livelceNJOLT_2094.htm) 6 Page 1 of 6
IN-HOME CAREIBASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau Of Juvenile Justice
October 1. 2009 through September 30. 2010
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
Parent CHOICE Program
Check one
In Home Care Basic Grant
1. Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK Y I..1._Y COST
$
_
$
$
$
$
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
$
$
$
$
$
$0.00 Total Personnel
B, PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above
2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed'
https://jjolt.fameare .neVgenfune .exe 8/4/2009
Page 2 of 6 2094-Budget Summar Repo A (jjolt_live\ccf\JJOLT_2094.htm)
0
3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
$
$
$
Must comply with the definitions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support
listed for court operated facilities
in the Child Care Fund Hanclbooic.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNiTS/
NAME(S) RATE (Describe} CONTRACT YEARLY COST ,
Mary Seyuin 225.00 session 98 s22,050.00
,
S
4
s
$
2. Closed End Contracts
$
$
0
$
, Total Contractual $22050.00 1
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
I Anticipated No. Units
o
Average Cost of
L (Description) T be Provided
TYPE OF SERVICE
Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
$ $
$ $
$ $
,
hrips://jjolt.fameare.netigenfimc.exe 8/4/2009
•
Total (Add Totals for A, B. C, and D above)
Service Component Coal
022,050.00
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
fGroxe Cr$
$22,060.00
2094-Budget Sununail' Regan (jjolt_liveiceNJOLT_2094.httn) Page 3 of 6
$0.00 Total Non-Scheduled
E. SERVICE COMPONENT IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments} specify the following:
F. PUBLIC
REVENUE:
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
$
,
$
0
$0.00 Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost {E-F
AUTHORITY: Act 67. Public Acts of 1978, as
amended.
[
COMPLETION: Is Required.
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld
from local government.
DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may
be used, MS Word-97
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex, religion, age, national ortgln, color. marital status, political
beliefs or disacility, If you need help with reading. writing. hearing. etc.. under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS
office in your county.
https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Parent CHOICE Program
IN HOME CARE
BASIC GRANT
FROM: THRU:
October 1, 2009
through September 30,
2010
2094-Budget Summa* Report Wok livecefUJOLT_2094.htm) Page 4 of 6
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which triers was State
Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or or000sed for riøxt fisl ir rw aicl'
I Component Title J CHECK ONE I Time Period Covered
Component Manager Name
Davis, sameia (63)
Administrative Unit
F COURT r DHS
Telephone Number
(248 ) 868-0247
1. COMPONENT STATUS
"
CONTINUED 1-- TERMINATED r REVISED r NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT
—
E. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction cif Court r WRITTEN COMPLAINT r CP8 category I. It or III r glc-IMEN LIKELY To COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT – (Check primary area's} only.)
A REDUCTION IN; F Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
r Number of Youth Petitioned r Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Adjudications NUmDer of Days of Residential Treatment Care F F
r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r_ Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. SERVICE FOCUS
17 Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
n Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
▪ In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and costs tyear-to-date arid proiections if fiscal year is not complete).
. In columns 8 & 9 enter tie numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Tone Period Reported Oct. 1 Ihru Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct. 1 thru Sept.
30
5- 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST a. 9. PROJECTED COST
NUMBER PROJECTED
1.n•nnn•• muloop ,_
A. Number of Youth/Famil y Served 300 120 $ m._
B, Number of Service Units
(Define Service Lonit=calendar day } 16626 $ 21000 $
C Total Component Cost $29,465.00 $22,050.00
https://jjolt.famearemetigenfunc.exe 8'4/2009
66 176
106 2978
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 205 38950
2094-Budget Summary Repoli (jjolt_livelcet\DOL112094.htm) Page 5 of 6
O. Average Cost Per Unit $1.77 $1.05
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $98.22 $183.75
Ill IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended Identified
in Section 1.3.
AREAS OF IMPACT
A. Youth Petitioned
10. NUMBER OF
YOUTH SERVED
ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS
DAYS
B. Adjudications
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care
G. State Wards Committed
IV, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Component* In effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13 Assess strengths, weakness end problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual Account for all youth served
by this component.
In 200812009 (projected through the end of the 2008/09 fiscal year) the CHOICE program will have had
130 parent referrals, These parents represent 300 youth under Court jurisdiction. Parents are required to
attend six out of eight classes to complete the senes. CHOICE has been able to keep the number of
parents completing the class to approximately 90%. Thus approximately 219 parents will complete the
course. By providing education about parenting adjudicated adolescents, the parents learn skills that
will help them handle their children at home, and thus prevent out-of-home placement.
The goal of the CHOICE program (Court Help on Improving Control and Effectiveness) is to assist
parents of adjudicated youth to learn efective parenting methods. The program also provides a support
network for the parents to reduce their feelings of helplessness. The eight-week program is based on
research, which shows that youth are more likely to recidivate when their families are identified as
highly dysfunctional. In order to reduce repeat adjudications and avoid out-of-home placements,
parents' management skills are stengthened through training and role-play. The average group size is
10 to 12 parents. The parent education groups are run by a part-time psychologist who reports to the
Chief of Clinical Services. The psychologist participates in casework staff meetings to discuss issues in
parenting and family functioning.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
The strength of the program is that it teaches parents of juvenile delinquents how to handle their
difficult adolescents effectively. By providing parents of juvenile probationers with effective parenting
Skills, repeat adjudications are reduced and thus out-of-home placements are also reduced. Another
advantage of the program is that it provides support to parents of adjudicated delinquents and helps
them learn parenting techniques from other parents. The weakness of the program is that it is of a
predetermined duration. Some parents may need additional time to learn the parenting methods, or
would like the ongoign support of such a group.
In assessing the success of this program, you might look at the results of the intensive probation
program since this program is really tied to that one. The children and parents are in the parenting
I program, CHOICE, because they were in the intensive probation program.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year (Narrative may be
attached)
[
The goal of the parent education program is to assist parents of adjudicated youth In learning effective
parenting methods, and to provide parents with a support network to reduce their feelings of
helplessness. The program is named CHOICE, or Court Help On Improving Control and Effectiveness.
htips://jjolt.ffirneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
AUT4ORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will
not be reimbursed.
2094-Budget Summary Report (ijolt_Iive\cefUJOLT_2094.htm) Page 6 of 6
In order to reduce repeat adjudications and avoid out-of-home placements for youths, parents'
management skills are strengthened through training and role-play. We expect 9-10 parents to attend
each group. The number of Service Units represents the number of in-home care days multiplied by the
number of youths served.
The parent education groups are run by a part-time psychologist who will provide both direct and
indirect services ( maintain case records, provide written progress reports, etc.).
The CHOICE progam uses realistic everyday scenarios that parents can use. Examples of skills learned
and practiced by parents, which are covered in the course curriculum, include basic discipline skills,
problem solving with a teenager, conflict resolution when handling an adjudicated youth,
The Department at Homan Services will not discriminate against
any individual or group because of race. sex, religion, age. national
color, marital status, political beliefs or drsability. If you need
help with reading, wrtting, hearing. etc.. under the Arne:loans wan
Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DI-IS
offir-pi. in vett sr rrvi tnim
Notes
110477...r•rasorn-twiizrt
Ed31 Date Saved B!,, Con mentS
https://jjolt.farneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Estimate No. of
Miles
28,720
1. Travel Rate/Mile
.55 Mileage
YEARLY COST
$15,796.00
2094-Budget Summary Repoli (jjolt_1ivelocAMOLT_2094.htm) Page 1 of 9
1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juvenile Justice
October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
Family-Focused Juvenile Drug Court
Check One
In Home Care r Basic Grant
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit r DHS 1,7 Court
1 Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HO
Jacqueline Howes- Drug Court Supervisor 20 $34,360.00
Evanson
Vacant Juvenile Drug Court Probation ' $51,436.00
Officer
Megan Abraham-Wentz Juvenile Drug Court Probation 40 $63,148.00
Officer
Candace Soren° Clerk/Technical Assistant 20 $18,795.00
Pamela Davis Manager - Court Services (1/5 of 8 $20,019.00
Salary)
2. Fringe Benefits ( pecify)
Jacqueline Howes-Evanson $16,908.00
Vacant $33,428.00
Megan Abraham-Went $35,628.00
Candace Sereno $13,879.00
Pamela Davis s9,169.00
$296,770.00 Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above)
nIn1 2. Suppties and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* YEARLY COST
Stationary, Brochures, Pamphlets, Promotional Videos, Flyers, Training
Supplies
s1 ,000.00
https://jjolt.famearemet/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Repotit (ijolt_liveiceNJOLT 2094.htm) Page 2 of 9
$
3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
Client Incentives $4,000.00
Conferences/Travel *2,000.00
Indirect Costs (14.26% x $187,759) $26,775.00
4 .
$
1.— • Must comply with the definitions $49,571.00 and limits Total Program Support liSted for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/
NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Jail Alternative of Michigan (Drug 10.00 1 Test 2000 $20,000.00 Testing)
A _
Office of Substance Abuse Services 42.00 1 Unit 2000 $84,000.00 t
$
I
$
2. Closed End Contracts
$
$
I
$
A -
$
Total Contractual $104,000.00 1
I
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Descriotion) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
7n.nn•n•n
$ $
$
$
https:h3jo1 lanacare.ineligertfune.exe 8/4/2009
Total (Add Totals for A, B, C, and D above)
Service Component Cost
$450,341.00
AUTHORITY: Act 87. Public Acts of 1978. as
amended.
COMPLETION. Is Required.
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld to an OHS office in your county.
from local government. n•• DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may
be used. MS Word-97
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex. religion, age. national origin, color, marital status.
political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc.,
under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known
s450,341.00
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ceNJOLL2094.htm) Page 3 of 9
s0.00 Total Non-Scheduled
E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following.
F. PUBLIC
.111.- w=11161.L.
SOURCE To be Provkied YEARLY COST
$
$
.....
$
Total Public Revenue $0,00
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfune.exe 8/4/2009
Component Title
Family-Focused Juvenile Drug Court
CHECK ONE
IN HOME CARE .17
BASIC GRANT
Time Period Covered
FROM: THRU:
October 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2010
2094-Budget Summary Report (jolt liveleeNJOLT_2094.htm) 4
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
Page 4 of 9 •
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State
Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or roDosed for next fiscal rsar as a nøw rsvL nr rnrhri1 -rI
Component Manager Name
Davie, Pamela (53)
Administrative Unit
F COURT r DHS
Telephone Number
(248 j 858-0247
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apoly.
1. COMPONENT STATUS F CONTINUED I— TERMINATED
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r WRITTEN COMPLAINT r CPS zategary I. li st III
REVISED r NEW
r— CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE
/ COURT
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
r- Number of Youth Petitioned
r Number of Adjudications
f— Number of Days of Family Foster Care
4. SERVICE FOCUS
F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
Effect early return from foster or institutional care
r Number of Days of Sheller Care
F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• in columns B & 9 enter The numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Repotted Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct 1 thru sew,
30
5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8
• PROJECTED COST
NUMBER PROJECTED NUMBER
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 45 $ 45 $ ..n.w,
B. Number of Service Units
(Dane Service Uttit=i unit = 1 14850 $ 14850 4
SalltaililLILCIAY_I--
Total Component Cost $523,680.00 $450,341.00
IrttpsJijjolt.farricare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
D. Average Cost Per Unit efAS.7fi __Amommon
E Average Cost Per Youth/Family s11,637.33 $10,007.58
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiive\cefUJOLL2094.htm) Page 5 of 9
III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified
in Section 1.3.
10, NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR1 12. COSTS
DAYS
A. Youth Petitioned
B Adjudications $
I A ,
C. Days of Family Foster Care $
,-
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $
1
E. Days of Shelter Care
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 30 11700 .1 07/ 1.11/1 rtn
G. State Wards Committed $
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths. weakness anti problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s). or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served
Inis component.
PROBLEM AREA
Circuit Court Family Division is serving a growing number of substance abusing juvenile offenders. A
concomitant reduction in treatment resources has added to the difficulties of dealing with this
population. Traditional methods of intervention and service are ill suited to respond to the needs of
these youngsters and their families.
In 2008, Oakland County authorized approximately 381 delinquency petitions for alcohol and controlled
substance offenses, These offenses constitute almost 13% of the total delinquency petitions authorized
in Oakland County in the same period, and an over 300% increase in total petitions for alcohol and other
drug related offenses since 1994. The extent to which substance abuse also plays a role in other crimes
coming to court, such as property offenses (22%), or assault crimes (26%), is obvious, since substance
abuse is a consistent predictor of juvenile crime and recidivism. Of newly adjudicated youth in Oakland
County, over 28% score chemically dependent on a paper and pencil test. Between 75 and 80% of
juvenile offenders in Oakland County used drugs or alcohol prior to or during the commission of their
crimes.
There were several problems with the system for processing drug offenses prior to institution of drug
court. Length of time between offense and treatment could be up to six months. Treatment was
fragmented and variable, since service providers were not prepared to treat court wards on a priority
basis. Approximately 30% of youth adjudicated for drug crimes were placed in a residential program,
where intensive specialized substance abuse treatment was not available, at a per diem cost of $169 per
youth. Recidivism rates for youth charged with drug offenses was a discouraging 70%.
A. PERSONNEL: JUVENILE DRUG COURT SALARIES
NAME Projected. .Fringe
2010 Benefit
Salary
J. Evanson. .. $34,360.00. . ..$18,908.00
M. Wentz $63,148.00.. . 435,628.00
Vacant $51,436.00.. ..$33,428
C. Serena. ... $18,795.99....$13,879.00
P. Davis $20,019.00. . .. $9,169.00
https://jjolt.famcareenet/genfunc.exe 8/4 (20 09
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltlive\ceNJOLT_2094.htm)
TOTALS.. .. $187,758.00... $109,012
Total 2009-2010 Projected Salaries: $298,770.00
Page 6 of 9
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT:
1. Personal Mileage. Oakland County reimbursement rate Is $ .55 for all employees. The $15,798.00
mileage reimbursement would cover the two Probation Officer positions.
2. Electronic Surveillance. This option remains a favorite for JDC (Juvenile Drug Court) Probation
Officers as a consequence for non-compliance and as a front-end transition when a youth has been
temporarily detained prior to entrance into the program. We anticipate an ongoing usage of four (4)
units for Court-ordered home detention cases. However, we retain the flexibility to increase capacity if
caseloads warrant.
3. Client Incentives: A crucial and highly effective aspect of drug court is the support, encouragement
and rewards offered by the judge and treatment team at status review hearings. Participants and their
parents are recognized for their accomplishments with verbal praise, public recognition and applause,
as well as with more concrete items. Rewards and incentives are earned through an accumulation of
points and dispensed as follows:
10-point week: Public recognition, praise, applause, edible treat (selected from the "incentive basket"). 3
or more consecutive 10 point weeks: Fast food certificate, release from home detention, curfew
extension, and public recognition.
85% of Phase I or Phase II points: Move to next phase PLUS certificate of recognition, PLUS gift
certificate.
90% of Phase III points: Move to Phase IV PLUS certificate of recognition, PLUS gift certificate.
95% of Phase IV points: Graduation, including ceremony and certificate of recognition.
Family accomplished goals: Gift certificate for entire family, to be used at a restaurant or movie theatre.
Youth may receive gift certificates for movies or CDs, meal or theatre vouchers or small gifts like tee
shirts, or assistance with obtaining hobby supplies and lessons. To encourage improvements in self-
discipline, release from home detention, curfew extensions, reductions in supervision requirements,
and other rewards are also considered. Since graduation to the next phase is identified as a key
incentive, graduation certificates are awarded to document this accomplishment. Group incentives are
also used as a means of providing constructive replacement activities for drug abusing behaviors.
These include field trips like bowling, indoor rock climbing or health club visits, or enrollment in classes
in music, fine arts, and the like. Group activities usually Include families as well.
4. Conference/Travel. JDC team members attend the annual Michigan Association of Drug Court
Professionals Conference, as well as various serninarsttrainings throughout the year to further enhance
their knowledge of techniques for successful drug court case management.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Jail Alternative of Michigan (J.A.M.S.). Drug testing services are provided to all participants and
families at a rate of $10.00 per test. An average of 2000 tests are administered annually. (2,000 x $10 7"
$20,000.00).
2. Office of Substance Abuse Services (0.S.A.S.). OSAS is the Coordinating Agency for the Juvenile
Drug Court. OSAS contracts with Oakland Family Services (OFS) to provide therapeutic intervention,
including but not limited to group, individual, family & conjoint therapy and family education. Although
each participant's treatment plan is individualized, the average amount spent per participant/ per unit is
$42.00. The JDC averages 2000 units per year. ($42 x 2000 = $84,000)
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
N/A
E. SERVICE COMPONENT
Service and Cost information for FY completed or being requested for the next fiscal year (MI financial
and program figures are projections based on actual experience from October 1, 2008 through May 31,
2009).
Number of Youth Served (FY 2008-2009).
We project service to 45 youth. Two probation officers with a maximum caseload of 15 youth and an
average length of days of service per youth is 330 for a total of 14,850 days (46 x 330 :=14,850).*
https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfune.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltlive\ecNJOLT_2094.htzn) Page 7 of 9
it should be noted that maximum program capacity at any given time, is 30 participants. We anticipate
that through the duration of FY 08-09, 45 total youth will be served.
F. PUBLIC REVENUE
N/A
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION
1. The program was implemented in June 2001.
2. The programs target population is delinquent youth between the ages of 12 and 17 years.
3. Areas of Impact include a reduction in the number of days in out-of-home, residential treatment care.
4. NIA
II. SERVICE & COST INFO. FOR FY BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FY
We anticipate serving 46 youth and families during FY 2009-2010. The average length of stay (in
calendar days) per family is 330 days. It is therefore anticipated that 14,860 days of service will be
provided (330 x 45 = 14,850). The average cost of service per unit is $30.33 for a total request of
$450,341.00.
Based on the above, we are therefore requesting a total of $450,341.00 for FY 2009-2010.
IMPACT EVALUATION
Areas of Impact. # of Youth: # of Days. Costs:
Days of Resident Placement: .30 11 ,700 $1,977,300.00
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Oakland County's research and experience indicate that 70% of the youth serviced by the Juvenile Drug
Court (Jmc) would have either entered long-term detention or would have been made a Permanent Court
Ward (PA 150) if not provided with these services. The JDC is projected to serve 45 youth during FY
2008-2009 (youth targeted for reduction). if the JDC had not been provided to this population, we would
have expected 31 youth to be placed residentially. Our actual experience was that 45 youth were served,
therefore, it would have been expected that 31 would have been placed in residential treatment.
However, only 1 was placed residentially. We therefore experienced a reduction of 30 fewer youth in our
detention/treatment facility (Oakland County Children's Village).
The average length of stay in Children's Village (an out-of-home detention facility with a residential
treatment program) is 390 days, at a cost of $169.00 per day. Therefore the reductions are as follows:
30 (reduction of youth detained) x 390 (average length of stay at Children's Village Treatment Program)
= 11,700 (reductions of days of care) x $169 (cost per day at Children's Village) = 81,977,300.00 (cost
reduction).
All figures are prorated based on figures obtained from October 2008 through March 2009.
Forty-five youth were served by the Juvenile Drug Court program. Ninety-eight percent of the youth
were successful under community supervision, while rio were placed residentially. We are targeting an
average caseload size of 15 youth per probation officer over the next fiscal year, for a projection of 45
youth to be served.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
The strengths of the JDC program Include frequent, random drug testing of all participants. JDC
continues to assure that all staff are aware of current drug trends and the most effective testing for such
drugs. Participants are tested according to program requirements and behavior indicators. Parents are also tested if information and behavior indicates testing is warranted.
Another strength is the intensive monitoring of all participants through frequent face-to-face and telephone contacts. The assigned probation officers and interns are able to develop positive
relationships with participants and their families. They are also able to attain current information on the
https://jjolt ,famcare.net/genfune.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelccf\JJOLT_2094.htin) . Page 8 of 9
status of participants and thus able to respond In a timely manner.
A third strength is the fact the team has remained relatively stable since its inception and all have a
clear understanding of strength-based programming. The current presiding judge, referee, defense
attorney and one probation officer were present at the initial hearing of the drug court. The coordinator
and the other probation officer joined a few months later. Although several prosecutors have sat on the
team, the office of the prosecuting attorney has consistently been supportive, as has our coordinating
council.
Intended Impact Areas:
The intended impact of the program is to reduce the number of chemically dependent youth placed in
residential treatment after coming under the jurisdiction of the court. The expected percentage is 70% or
31 of the 46 youth treated. 1 youth (2%) were actually placed in residential treatment for a 68%
reduction.
Additionally, the program uses weekend detentions as a sanction for drug use and other program
infractions. 39 youth received these Life Preparation weekends throughout this period. It is expected
that this sanction will continued to be used in subsequent periods. It has been noted that as the youth
progress through the program, the need for this sanction, as well as other sanctions, markedly
decreases.
How the 45 Youth Served Were Impacted by the Program:
14 youth graduated during this period. Of the 14, 1 is attending community college and 13 are working
andior completing their high school education.
During this period, over 87% of youth participating in the program experienced a significant
Improvement in their school behavior and grades.
Difference between Projected #s and Cost w/ Actuais
The projected numbers are what we anticipate having to_pay for each child. This is just an estimation.
The actual numbers represent what was actually spent. This number will vary. We may project spending
a certain amount per child, but in actuality, we may end up spending more on one child and less on
another. The numbers are only estimates, hence the term "projected costs". We try to keep the numbers
around a certain range because the cost per unit is always an "average" number. It could increase or
decrease, depending on the needs of the child.
Section II - Impact shows 30 Youth in Residential
This is explained under section IV - Program Assessment/Evaluation:
"If the JDC had not been provided to this population, we would have expected 31 youth to be placed
residentially. Our actual experience was that 45 youth were served, therefore, it would have been
expected that 31 would have been placed in residential treatment. However, only 1 was placed
residentially. We therefore experienced a reduction of 30 fewer youth in our detention/treatment facility
(Oakland County Children's Village)."
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all component& except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be
attached)
Entitled Options, this family-focused juvenile drug treatment court program is a joint effort between
justice and public health treatment systems in an effort to address the problem of substance abuse for
eligible youth within the community. Realizing that alcohol and other drug use contributes to illegal
behavior, the mission of the Family Focused Juvenile Drug Court program is to promote public safety
by reducing juvenile criminal recidivism, assisting substance abusing juvenile offenders and their
families achieve drug-free lifestyles, and supporting families as they formulate healthy relationships.
The focus of Juvenile Drug Court is to intervene in substance use and eliminate criminal behavior
through intensive Court supervision and the utilization of various treatment tools.
This post-adjudication program targets severely substance abusing youth that are non-violent repeat
offenders, charged with alcohol and controlled substance related violations, or charged with minor
delinquency where substance abuse is a contributing factor (e.g. property crimes). The program's target
population is 12 to 17 year old adjudicated non-violent youth who are residents of Oakland County and
have a documented substance abuse history. Most are very high-risk, poly-substance abusing youth
with some mental health diagnosis. Clients are expected to participate in a 12-16 month program
https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report ("jolt live\ccMOLT 2094.htm) • Page 9 of 9
consisting of three, 12-week phases and an aftercare component. Movement to higher phases is
dependent upon performance and points earned in the previous phase. Various incentives and
sanctions (penalties) are utilized to ensure compliance with program guidelines. Successful completion
is dependant upon several factors, including maintaining at least 46 consecutive days of sobriety and
acquiring at least 426 points.
Through intensive supervision (including weekly, face-to-face contacts with Probation Officers and
Jurists), and in collaboration with over 10 community agencies (including the Office of Substance
Abuse services, Community Mental Health, schools, job placement services and a 501c3 partnership),
the Options program is able to provide services to not only participants, but also parents and siblings.
Our community partnerships also afford us the opportunity to meet the special needs of our
participants, while providing services at low or no cost to families.
The Options program has ten (10) objectives that include: serving 45 youth at full capacity; offering
coordinated, systematic, and accessible treatment services for youths and families; providing frequent
judicial supervision; providing intensive case monitoring, providing Intensive drug testing; issuing
immediate sanctions and rewards; creating a collaboration among the Prosecutor, Defense Attorney,
treatment providers and Court personnel; expediting case processing; creating community linkages and
support; and achieving clientifamily satisfaction.
Since its inception, the Options Program has served over 183 participants and approximately 317 family
members. To date, 88 youth have graduated from the program. These have been very high-risk youth,
with 73% of them having started their drug use prior to the age of 13, and an average age of first use of
12,6 years of age. Most have been poly-substance abusers, but the primary diagnosis has been
marijuana dependence. Had the Options Juvenile Drug Court program not existed, these youth would
have been ordered into residential placement.
AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will
not be reimbursed.
The Department Of Human Services will not discriminate against any
indivklual or group because of race sex. religion, age, national origin.
color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with
reading, writing, hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities
Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your nrnintv
Notes
1=111=1
Ed! t Date Saved By Comments
https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit r DHS Court
1. Travel Rate/Mile
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjelt_livelecNJOL112094.htm) Page 1 of 6
IN-HOME CARE1BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juverdie Justice
October 1. 2009 through September 30, 201C
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
Crossroads for Youth LPC Day Program
Check One
In HMO Care r Basic Grant
1. Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
$
$
_
$
$
2. Fringe Benefits (Specrly)
$
$
$
S
$
$0.00 Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above
2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed*
Estimate No. e
Miles
YEARLY COST
YEARLY COST
https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Total Comractuai $101,230.00
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ccfUJOLL2094.htm) Page 2 of 6
$
3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed'. Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
$
,
$
$
'
$
,
« Must comply with the definitions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support
listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund
Handbook.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTA- UNITS/
NAME(S) RATE , f Describe) CONTRACT , YEARLY COST
per diem 95.50 day 1060 v101,230.00
1
$
•
$
$
...... 4
2. Closed End Contracts '
$
$
$
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE
(Description)
Anticipated No. Units
To be Provided
Average Cost of
Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
11-1
https://jjolt.famcare.netlgenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
n•n1
' $
Total Non-Scheduled
Total
$0.00
E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
(Add Totals for A. B. C. and D above)
Service Component Cost
$101,230.00
C. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E.F
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
(Gross Costs Less Other Ravenna)
$101,230.00
2094-Budget Sununary'Report. (jjolt_live\ccf\BOLT_2094.htm) Page 3 of 6
If you pran to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue includirg other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following:
F. PUBLIC
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
$
$
$
(.min
4.00 Total Public Revenue
AUTHORITY Act 57. Public Acts of 1978. as
amended.
COMPLETION: Is Reauired,
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld
from local vovernmant.
DI-IS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may
be used. MS Word-91
The Department of Human Services will not disciim4na1e against any individual or
group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political
beliefs or disatAlity. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing. etc., under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS
office in your county.
https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Page 4 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiiveccf\JJOLT_2094.htm)
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department Of Human Services
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Cara or Basic Grant Service component for which there was Slate
r next fiscal year as a new. revised, or continued component.
Component Title CHECK ONE I Time Period Covered
pr IN HOME CARE I FROM: THRU:
Crossroads for Youth LPC Day Program r BASIC GRANT ' October 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2010
Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number
li cEreek, Janet (63)
F COURT 1-- DHS (248 ) 628-2561
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION; Check all that apply.
Ii, COMPONENT STATUS
F CONTINUED r TERMINATED r REVISED r NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r WRITTEN COMPLAINT r CPS category 1, II or Ill r Falik.Fr?EN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
r Number of Youth Petitioned I1— Number of Days of Shelter Care
r Nurnber of Adjudications Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care ' F.,
r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. SERVICE FOCUS
F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
r Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete),
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
I Time Period RepOrted Oct. 1 thin, Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct 1 Mr., Sept
3C
,
8. 5. 6 ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 9. PROJECTED COST
NUMBER PROJECTED
NUMBER
A. Number of Youth/Farn,ly Served 12 $ 14 $
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service unit.day 1 923 $ 1060 $
C Total Component Cost $88,147.00 001,230.00
https://jjolt.famcare.netlgenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Page 5 of 6 2094-Budget Summaiy Report tholt_1ive\ccfUJOLT_2094.htm)
D. Average Cost Per Unit
KAEL.Afl ..oe en
E. Average Cost Per Youthiramily $7,345.58 nJ $7,230.71
III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified
i 10, NUMBER OF ' ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS
• DAYS ..,-.
A. Youth Petitioned
B. AdiudioationS $
A
C. Days of Family Foster Care $
I
ID. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $
E. Days of Shelter Care $
,
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 12 1872 $289,520.00
a State Wards Committed $
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENVEVALUATION;
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the Intended Impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s). or cause(s) for the difference between the prolected No's and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served
by this component.
Strengths:
Youth and their families receive counseling, behavioral interventions and educational services.
Youth have limited access to the community slx days per week.
There is a large component for community service.
Family work is facilitated in the youth's home and at the program. Parents are accessible.
The program can be used as a step down from residential programming.
Students are transported in school buses driven by staff holding commercial drivers licenses.
The program encourages the learning of independent life skills and employability skills.
Referees and Judges support recommendatioins made by agency staff for students who have
attendance problems.
Weaknesses:
Youth are returned to their community in the evening hours, which requires reliance on parental
supervision. Youth have access to the community. A portion of the parents have difficulty
supervising/parenting their child.
Parent participation In supporting the program is critical in the child's success. When parents are
unable or unwilling to support the child and the program, the youth may have difficulty being
successful.
Problem Areas:
Transporting youth in a county the size of Oakland County. Bus rides in the morning and evening can
be impacted by distance and traffic conditions. Routes are continually revised to keep them as timely as
The targeted population for this program frequently have school truancy/refusal as part of their
presenting problems. A portion of these youth will therefore refuse to get up in the morning and be
ready to catch the bus provided by the program.
Intended Impact:
Increase academic skills
To keep youth in their homes.
To empower parents.
To repair parent and child relationships.
To assess additional family needs.
To increase a sense of self - through individual and family therapy.
Of the 10 youth served:
10% (1110) received treatment from another facility
https: iij oh, fame are .neti g enfunc .exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Surrunary .Report.(jjolt livelect-VJOLT 2094.hira) Page 6 of 6
110% Oil 0) were detained
80% (8/10i successfully completed the eit'enram and awn in tiles crtenmienitu with 41,..a.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be
attached)
This is an intensive six day per week treatment program for 10 males between the age of 15 and 17.
The program Is operated in conjunction with the existing Life Preparation Residential Program. The
program is designed to provide realistic and achievable goals for each youth so that the greatest
preparation for life in the community can be achieved.
Programming is an integral part of the Work Education continuum. Legally mandated buses pick up and
return youths to their family homes each day as they enter the demanding world of youn g adult
expectations. Youths can use this aspect of the program as a means of entry into Work Education
treatment or as a step-down towards re-entry ifitcheir community and family.
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any AUTHORITY: PA. 57 of 1978. indivkival or group because ol race. sex, religion, age. national origin, COMPLETION . Is required. color, marital status. pOlilical beliefs or disability. If you need help with
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities not be reimbursed. Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in
vivir r.nIErIv
Notes
Edit Date Saved By Cominents
https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfune.exe 8/4/2009
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit ,F„- Court OHS
Total Personnel $0.00
2094-Budget Summary( Report (jjolt_livelccf\HOLT_2094.htm) Page 1 of 7
1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juvenile Justice
October 1, 2049 through September 30, 2010
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
Crossroads for Youth Learning Center
Chet* One
In Home Care r Basic Grant
1 Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST n
$
$
, _._
$
$
$
2 Fringe Benefits (Specify)
$
4
,
$
-
$
$
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For OMMOYCOS identified in "A" above
Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST
Miles
2. Supplies and Materials (Desonotion/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* YEARLY COST
,
$
$
$
i
https://jjolt.famearesievgenfunc.exe 81412009
Page 2 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (jolt_liveocIWOLT_2094.htm)
$
3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
$
:
$
$
$
* Must comply with the defin tors $0.00 and limits Total Program Support
listed for court operated
facilities in the Child Care Fund
Handbook
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/
NAME(S) RATE (13.5cribe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Per-Diem 95.50 Day 10648 $1,016,884.00
$
$
$ •
2. Closed End Contracts
$
6
S
$
$1,016,884.00 ' Total Contractual
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description; To be Provided Eacri Service Unit YEARLY COST
..,
$ $
S $
$ $
https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Total (Add Totals for A. B. C. and D above)
Service Component Cost s1,016,884.00
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
2094-Budget Sununary'Report .(jjolt_livelecfUJOLL20941tni) Page 3 of 7
$0.00 Total Non-Scheduled
E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i e. third party payments) specify the following:
F, PUBLIC
REVENUE:
$0.00 Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
(Gross Costs Less Other Revenue)
s1,016,884.00
AUTHORITY: Act 87, Public Acts of 1978, as
amended.
COMPLETION: Is Required.
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld
from local overnment
DHS-2094 (ev. 11-99) Previous edition may
be used, MS Word-97
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex. religion, age. national origin, dolor, marital Status. political
beliefs or disability, if you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc.. under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS
office in your county.
https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiive\ect\HOLT_2094.htm)
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
Page 4 of 7
One of these forms must be completed for EACH in Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State
bursement during the oast Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal veer as a new, revised, or continued component. . . . _
Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered
IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: F Crossroads for Youth Learning Center r- BASIC GRANT October 1, 2009 through 1 September 30, 2010
Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number
F COURT r— DHS (240 ) 628-2561 McPeek, Janet (63)
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
1. COMPONENT STATUS F CONTINUED 1.-- TERMINATED r REVISED NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT 1-- NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r CPS category I. II or III r El-gii)_FI EN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE
I— COMPLAINT
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detenbon
r— Number of Youth Petitioned 11— Number of Days of Shelter Care
r Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. SERVICE FOCUS
p- Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
n Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete),
. In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Reported Oct. 1 ttin.1 Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct. 1 Thru Sept ao
5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST B.
NUMBER PROJECTED 9. PROJECTED COST
, NUMBER
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 115 $ 116 $
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit=DAY ) 10634 $ 10048 $
C TOtaI Component Cost $1,015,647.00 $1,016,884.00
https://jjolt.famcare.netlgenfunc ,exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelecf\JJOLT_2094.htm) Page 5 of 7
D. Average Cost Per Unit
kci.c SG „no zn
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $8,1330.84 0,766.24
III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified
in Section 1.3.
10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS , rievc —
A
A. Youth Petitioned $
B. Adjudications $
.
C. Days of Family Foster Care s
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $
n
E. Days of Shelter Care $
A
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 115 14576
, 1 1/-14 an nn
G. State Wards Committed $
.
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT1EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s). or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youtn served
by this component.
Strengths:
Youth and their families receive counseling, behavioral interventions and educational services.
Youth have limited access to the community six days per week.
There is a large component for community service.
Family work is facilitated in the youth's home and at the program. Parents are accessible.
The program can be used as a step down from residential programming.
Students are transported in school buses driven by staff holding commercial drivers licenses.
The program encourages the learning of independent life skills and employability skills.
Referees and Judges support recommendatioins made by agency staff for students who have
attendance problems.
Weaknesses:
Youth are returned to their community in the evening hours, which requires reliance on parental
supervision. Youth have access to the community. A portion of the parents have difficulty
supervising/parenting their child.
Parent participation in supporting the program is critical in the child's success. When parents are
unable or unwilling to support the child and the program, the youth may have difficulty being
successful.
Problem Areas:
Transporting youth in a county the size of Oakland County. Bus rides in the morning and evening can
be impacted by distance and traffic conditions. Routes are continually revised to keep them as timely as
possible.
The targeted population for this program frequently have school truancy/refusal as part of their
presenting problems. A portion of these youth will therefore refuse to get up in the morning and be
ready to catch the bus provided by the program.
Intended Impact:
Increase academic skills
To keep youth in their homes.
To empower parents.
To repair parent and child relationships.
To assess additional family needs.
To increase a sense of self -through individual and family therapy.
Of the 92 youth served:
3% (3/92) received treatment from another facility
hups://jjolt.farneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summar):' Report (jjolt liveleciWOLT 2094.htm) Page 6 of 7
4% (4192) are currently receiving treatment in another Crossroads for Youth facility
5% (5192) truanted from their homes - no follow-up info available at this time
31% (29192) were detained
56%151192) successfully comoleted the nronram and Ara in the.community with their family
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be
attached)
The Learning Center cluster provides a daytime environment heavily weighted toward education,
community service and social skill development for both boys and girls. Students, age 10 to 18, are
transported in legally mandated buses six days a week. There are two campuses to localize groups and
reduce the time spent in transport. While the students live in their family homes, the program's twelve
hour days extend supervision to a point where it is difficult to find them in trouble in the community.
Since many of the students have had issues with school attendance, frequent communication with court
caseworkers and families is essential and critical. Often, this valuable communication leads to shorter
lengths of treatment and prevents more costly out-of-home placement. At times when court
caseworkers see a need for a more consequential approach, Crossroads for Youth offers overnight
working weekends in conjunction with its residential programs.
Many Learning Center students have benefited from "step-up" or "step-down" involvement with our
residential programs; this flexibility allows the Court to individualize interventions in the most efficient
and effective manner possible. The students are able to exercise this option with little or no disruption
in school placement and ancillary services.
Family involvement, as noted earlier, is an essential element of the Learning Center programs. Youths
are expected to take advantage of individual, as well as, group therapies, which concentrate on
functional behavior in the family, community and at school. Typically, groups deal with substance
abuse issues as well as anger management and inappropriate social behavior.
While treatment is clearly important at the Learning Center, the greatest emphasis is directed toward
school attendance, performance and behavior so that lengths of stay can be as short as one school
semester. Both campuses offer some educational evaluation, individualized course adaptation and
G.E.D. preparation if appropriate.
The Southwest Learning Center offers a "courtyard setting" within a recreational area in the fast
growing suburb of Walled Lake. As a smaller setting, It offers an intimacy among the students and with
staff that is seldom seen in school programs. At the same time, the Southwest Campus enjoys all the
technical, recreational, and administrative support as its main campus counterpart.
The Main Campus Learning Center offers a setting integrated within the Crossroads for Youth
community in Oxford. Students participate in the full array of campus wide activities already described.
Learning Skills to Succeed
The Learning Center is a highly structured day treatment program for young people who face
challenges in school, the community, or at home. Offered by Crossroads for Youth, a private, non-profit
agency, the program is held six days a week and incorporates academics, innovative therapies and
confidence-building exercises to help children learn the skills they need to succeed.
With several locations in metropolitan Detroit, the Learning Center cares for children from throughout
the community. Participants are referred by their schools or the court, and are typically age 10-18. The
ultimate goal of the program is to counter challenging behaviors early so children can focus on building
a bright future.
Helping Children Succeed
Children in the Learning Center begin each day at 6 a.m., commuting to designated program locations.
They engage in a full day of academics, therapy, exercise, community service, work crew and more.
Most participants don't return home until 8 p.m. each evening. This intense structure helps students
quickly identify problems and begin to verbalize issues. Throughout the program, students must follow
a strict dress code and attendance policy. They cannot interact with participants outside of the program.
Students "earn" their way out of the Learning Center through a stage system which helps them become
more responsible and independent. Each stage has goals, behavioral expectations and privileges. This
includes things like showing a willingness to control language and demonstrating good decision-
making skills. We also use individual and group problem-solving techniques as a foundation for
therapy, encouraging children to work together to overcome problems and reach goals.
Program Components
Beyond helping students deal with challenges, the Learning Center teaches important skills which will
help them throughout life. Learning Center components include:
Academics. In conjunction with local school districts, we provide students a comprehensive education.
At some locations, we also offer vocational training in landscaping, home improvement, silk-screening,
auto mechanics and more, helping children obtain valuable on-the-job experience. Students can
https://jjolt.farncare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiivelccflITOLT 2094.htm)
transfer school credits to their own institutions upon release from the program.
Community Service. At least once a week, Learning Center students participate in community service
projects such as visiting area hospitals and hospices. The projects help build student's trust,
confidence and self-esteem.
Page 7 of 7
Individual Counseling. Children meet regularty with therapists, psychologists and social workers to
discuss problems and work through difficult personal issues.
Family Counseling. The Learning Center staff works with students and their families to overcome
problems.
Life Skills. Through various programs, as well as, day-to-day living, participants learn essential life
skills such as social norms and manners.
Substance Abuse Group. Learning Center participants attend regular educational programs and group
discussions on substance and addiction.
Work Crew. Students must complete daily chores such as cooking, cleaning or lawn maintenance.
AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required,
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds
will not be reimbursed.
The Department Of Human Services will not discriminate againat any
individual or group because of race, sex. religion, age, national origin,
color, marital status. political beliefs or disability. If you need help with
reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
you are invited to make your needs known to a OHS office in your eun
Notes
11.71. 7"30 f."17 'r"1711.
Edit Date Saved By Comments
hups://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/412009
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
Wraparound Services
Check One
In Home Care Basic Grant
1. Travel .ate/Mile Estimate No. of
Miles
YEARLY COST
YEARLY COST
Page 1 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjohlivelcennOLT_2094.htm)
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juvenile Justice
October 1, 2009 through September 30. 2010
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit E DHS F, Court
1. Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No, HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
$
I
$
$
$
$
, , ,
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
i
$
$
$
$0.00 Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in HA" above)
2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed*
https://jjoh.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Page 2 of 7 2094-Budget Summary 'Report '(jjolt_live\cefUJOLT_2094.htm)
—
$
_
3, Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed - Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
$
$
.. . .
$
• Must comply with the definttions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support
tIsted for court operated facilities
In the Child Care Fund
Handbook.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
' 1. Unit Rates ' UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ -1
NAMEIS) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
$
- —
$
$
-
$
2. Ctosed End Contracts
' Oakland County Wraparound $22,131.00
$
$
$
522,131.00 "total Contractual
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF 'SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
$
-,
$
https://jjolt.famcare.inevgenfune.exe 8/4/2009
Total (Add Totals for A. B. C. and D above)
Service Component Cost
$22,131.00
AUTHORITY: Act V. Public Acts of 1076. as
amended.
COMPLETION: is Required
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld
from local! government.
DHS-2094 (Rev, 11-99) Previous edition may
be used. MS Word-97
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiive\oefUJOLT_2094.htm)Page 3 of 7 •
s0.00 Total Non-Scheciwed
E. SERVICE COMPONENT – IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies. or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following:
F. PUBLIC
REVENUE:
1 I
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
, in .
a
S
—
$
Total Public Revenue SCI.00
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
(Gross Crate Lem (-mar Rawann.1
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex. religion, age, national origin, color, marital status,
political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing. etc..
under the Americans with Disabilities Act. you are invited to make your needs known
to an DHS office in your county.
$22,131.00
https://jjolt , farneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary' Report (jolt jive\ecf,JJOLT_2094.hirn) -
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
Page 4 of 7
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State
Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component. _ Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered
IN HOME CARE FROM; THRU:
Wraparound Services .-- BASIC GRANT October 1, 2009 1 through September 30,
2010
Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number
Davie, Pamela (63)
F COURT 7 DHS (249 ) 858-0247
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
1. COMPONENT STATUS
F CONTINUED r TERMINATED 7 REVISED 7 NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A, Children Under Jurisdiction of Court
F DELINQUENT 7 NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction Of Court 7 WRITTEN COMPLAINT F CPS category I. II or III 7 2811tIrIgEN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDIOTION OF THE
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check pnmary area* only.)
A REDUCTION IN:
ir- Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
r Number of Youth Petitioned 1— Number of Days of Shelter Care i
F-, Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
7 Number of Days of Family Foster Care 1— Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) I
4. SERVICE FOCUS
F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
n Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections it fiscal yea- is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Reported Oct 1 thru Sept 30 Time Period Requested Oct 1 thre Sept.
30
,
5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8. 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER PROJECTED
NUMBER
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 15 $ 15 $ ,
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit=i day =1 unit ) 5235 $ 5235 $
C Total Component Cost 1 522,130.90 $22,131.00
https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary'Report(jjolt_liveloeNJOLT_2094.htm) Page 5 of 7
D. Average Cost Per Unit s4.23 s4.23
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family s1,475.39 $1,475.40 1._.
III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of )ntended identified
in Section 1.3,
10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS
DAYS
A. Youth Petitioned
. Adjudications 16 8 $16,056.00
C. Days of Family Foster Care $
D. Days of Out-of-Horne Detention $
E. Days of Shelter Care 0
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 270 2680
s438 600.00
G. State Wards Committed $
i
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13 Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the protected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for al youth served
by this component.
IL SERVICE & COST INFORMATION
5.3. Service Units are defined as one calendar day of in-home care.
Average length of service per case is 365 days.
6. Actual Number
A. Number of service units:
B. 365 x 15 (5,475) - 240 days of residential care (projected through 9/30/09) = 5235
7. Actual Cost (Projected through 9-30-09)
C. 5235 (total # of units) x 4.23 (average cost per unit) = $22,131
D. Average Cost per Unit:
$22,131 / 5,235 - $4.23
E. Average Cost per Youth:
$22,131 1 15 = $1,475
III. IMPACT EVALUATION
B. Reductions in Adjudications FY 2008-2009
The population of youth served by these highly individualized, intensive services is at very high risk for
recidivism. Our research suggests that 87% of this population would re-offend in the absence of
intervention. Actually, only 5 of the 15 youth served were re-adjudicated, and statistically, we predicted
a total of 13. Therefore, we have a reduction of 8 adjudication, at an average cost of $2007, each.
F. Reductions in Days of Residential Care FY 2008-2009
Historically, virtually all of the youth in the targeted population would be placed out of the home as part
hups://jjolt.farnearemet/genfune.exe 874/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jolt jiveccIWOLL2094.htm) . . Page 6 of 7
of their treatment. Actually, only 3 of the 16 youth served were placed in a residential facility, for a
period of 270 days. Thus, a reduction of 2,680 days was achieved.
The average cost of residential care available locally is $170/day.
(2,580 x $170 -v. $438,600 in cost savings)
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
Based on outcomes for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, 232 children who were assessed by a panel of cross-
disciplined professionals to be at the highest risk for removal from their homes and placed in detention,
psychiatric, or residential treatment facilities received services from Oakland County Wraparound.
90.1% of these children remained placed in their homes following participation with the Wraparound
program.
Referrals come from all of the community partners, and cases are accepted on a weekly basis. In order
to be considered for acceptance to the program, a child must be involved with at least two formal
"systems" in Oakland County. These formal systems include the Court, special education, mental
health, and the child welfare system. Children who are involved with the mental health system are
represented in 79% of those referred to the program. Children who are involved in the court system are
represented in 75% of the referrals, while children who have family involvement with protective services
or foster care are reflected in 88% of those open to Wraparound. Children who are eligible to receive
special education services are seen in 87% of the referrals to the program.
Due to the continued positive effect Wraparound has had on reducing or eliminating out of home and
out of school placements for high-risk students, funding to Oakland Schools for this program was
increased by an additional $87,000. This increase from Strong Families/Safe Children and Child
Protection Community Partners Is designed to increase staff so that more high-risk students may be
served. Children with active court cases, High-risk students from all 28 districts participate in
Wraparound to eliminate barriers for educational success. There are currently five full-time Wraparound
facilitators assigned to the program., but enough referrals waiting to more than double the program.
The rough estimate is $3500.00 per child per year on an administrative basis. This cost is based upon
the 232 children served last fiscal year by Oakland County Wraparound. This does not include the
flexible funds that are provided by Easter Seals to accommodate the specific needs identified by
children and families in working toward family stability. (E.g. A bike for a teen that wants to get a
summer job.)
The length of stay In the program varies based on the severity and complexity of the needs of the
children. The average has dropped from three and a half years to 12 to 18 months currently.
Program statistics indicate that during FY 2008 and FY 2009, an average of 72% of the Wraparound
cases opened had some type of Court involvement. These statistics lend support in the decision to
request program funding for FY 2009-2010,
*The data recorded in Section II (Actual Number/ Actual Cost) for FY 2008 through FY 2009, represents
the number of children placed on Intensive Probation who have received Wraparound services, as they
are most likely to have been placed in residential care in the absence of intervention.
Strengths:
Wraparound is proven to be a highly successful intervention across the state of Michigan. Wraparound
is key in facilitating the planning and delivery of individualized services and supports. By brining the
child, his/her family, and all service agencies (schools, DHS, CMH, therapeutic agencies, etc.)to the
table, the Wraparound facilitator ensures congruency in planning and encourages healthy
communication between all service providers, in addition to the above, Wraparound Facilitators:
Configure a child and family team with each family
Facilitate the meetings of the child and family "team", and makes adjustments for the culture and
comfort level of the individual team members
Assist the child and family team in developing an individualized service and
culturally relevant and includes crisis and safety plans
Identify community resources and makes recommendations regarding their
Specific needs of the child & family, including 'basic needs'
Facilitate the development of transition strategies
Advocate for the child and his/her family
Assess training needs and arranges training of key individuals
Monitor the provision of services and supports
support plan, which is
usefulness, given the
fittps://jjoit.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\cenBOLL2094.htm) Page 7 of 7
Provide data to collaborative agencies so that they can monitor outcomes of wraparound services
Weaknesses
5 Wraparound facilitators manage a caseload of 15 to 20 high-risk families at any given time, usually
averaging 42 to 46 cases per year. Cases that are Court-involved comprise approximately 70% of all
referrals to the Wraparound program. In addition to the Court, referrals are generated from schools, the
Department of Human Services, Easter Seals/Community Mental Health and a small percentage of
referrals come directly from the community (law enforcement). Unfortunately, there are never enough
resources to provide services to all children requiring them. Historically, there has been up to a 3-month
waiting list for Wraparound services. Staff constantly monitor referrals to ensure that those requiring
immediate attention are prioritized; however, additional funding to increase the number of full-time
facilitators is always sought
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be
attached
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Increasingly, youth with serious emotional disturbances are referred to the Court for formal intervention
as a result of delinquent conduct that is secondary to having a psychiatric disorder. These youngsters
are typically identified in early childhood as having multiple adjustment problems. They receive services
from a variety of agencies, often without coordination. Through a partnership with the Department of
Human Services, Oakland County Schools, Oakland County Community Mental Health, and other
service organizations, a large number of these youth can be maintained in their own homes. Youth in
this special, high-risk population have significant rates of recidivism if left untreated. Through
appropriate intervention, which includes weekly face-to-face contacts with youth and families, we
anticipate reducing the number of new adjudications and maintaining these selected youth in the
community, with no new criminal offenses. By maintaining these youth in their homes rather than in
residential placement, we achieve a substantial cost savings.
AUTHORITY: PA. 87 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION. Child care funds will
not be reimbursed.
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against
any individual or group because Of race, sex. religion, age. national
origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need
help with reading. writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with
Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your neects known to a DHS
office in your county,
Notes
Edit Daze Saved By Comments
ht-tps://jjolt.famcaremetigenfunc,exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Surnmary Report (jjolt jiveceNJOLT_2094,htm)Page 1 of 7 •
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juvenile Justice
October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
Service Component (Full Title(Name)
Psychological Clinic Services Unit
Check One
In Home Care r Basic Grant
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit r DHS F Cou rl
1. Salary and Wages
HAMM FUNCTION No. HOURSIWEEK YEARLY COST
Scott Alien Senior Psychologist 40 $82,293.00
Gabe Martinez (ptne) Ct, clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
rKathy Spadafora (ptne) Ct Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
Paul 'rise° (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
Ann Wiersma (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
Gorda Mah (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
___._.
Katy Conti (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
J. Trombley (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
' Vacant (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $32,856.00
—...--
Kristin Meekhof Clinic Services Coordniator 40 s68,342.00
ffL.,
Pam Davis Manager Court Services 115 Salary 8 $20,019.00
Joanna Papiez Office Assistant II 40 $38,455.00
2 Fringe Benefits (Specify)
Scott Allen $49,428.00
Gabe Martinez $1,685.00
—
Kathy Spadafora $1,885.00
Paul TIseo s1685.00
Ann Wiersma $1,685.00
https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
I 1. Unit Rates
https://jjolt.fameare ,netigertfunc.exe
UNIT I TOTAL UNITS' I
8/4/2009
Page 2 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijolt_livelccf\JJOLT_2094.htm)
Gerda Mah $1,685.00
Katy Conti $1,685.00
J. Trombley $1,685.00
Vacant $1,685.00
Kristen Meekhoff $32,461.00
Pam Davis $9,126.00
Joanna Papiez $31,231M0
$607,683.00 Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees Identified in "A" above)
1: Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. a YEARLY COST
Miles
Personal Mileage .55 1000 $550.00
2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed YEARLY COST
Testing Materials $25,000.00
Indirect Cost (14.26% x $471,956) $67,301.00
Printing $2,108.00
3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit ' YEARLY COST
$
$
__....
a
* Must comply with the definitions 44,959.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Ha nclbook.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Total (Add Totals for A. B. C. and D above)
Service Component Cost
$968,642.00
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
2094-Budget Summary Report .(jjoltiivelccf\DOLT_2094.httn) Page 3 of 7
NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Psychological Consultants 60040 evaluation 410 $246,000.00
Psychological Consultants 400.00 evaluation 50 $20,000.00
$
2. ClOsed End Contracts
5
$
$266,000.00 Total Contractual
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
a $
$
$ $
S $
$
$ .
'dial Non-Scheduled $0•00
E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following:
F. PUBLIC
REVENUE:
https1//jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Total Public Revenue $0.00
2094-Budget Summary Report (iiolt_livelccf\KOLT_2094.htm) Page 4 of 7
$
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
(Gross coos i AKA Mbar R42,
$968,642.00 I
• AUTHORITY: Act 87. Public Acts of 1978, as
amended.
COMPLETION: Is Required.
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withhekl
, from local government.
DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-9S) Previous edition may
be used. MS Word-97
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex. religion. age, national origin, color, marital status. political
beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc_ under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS
office in your county.
https://jjolt. famcare.netlgenfurie ,exe 8/4/2009
Page 5 of 7 2094-Budget Summar); Report (jjolt_livelceNJOLT_2094.htm) -
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
One of these forms must be compieted for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State
Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new. revised. or
Component TItie CHECK ONE Time Period Covered 7 IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU:
Psychological Clinic Services Unit 1— BASIC GRANT October 1, 2009 through 1 September 30, 2010
Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephobe Number
F COURT r- DHS (248 ) 858-0247 Davia, Pamela (63)
L PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
1. COMPONENT STA-US F CONTINUED n TERMINATED r- REVISED r NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
1
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court
F DELINQUENT F NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court
I— r HCPS category I, or III 1— CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE COMPLAINT I COURT
3, AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN; r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
r Number of Youth Petitioned r Number of Days of Shelter Care
r Number of Adjudications ,F, Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
7 Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. SERVICE FOCUS
R, Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
F Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
▪ In coiumns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Reported Oct, 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct 1 thru Sept 1
30
5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8. 9, PROJECTED COST PROJECTED NUMBER NDRAFiFR
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 1402 $ 1400 $
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service unit-Referrals ) 1613 s 1600 s
C Total Component Cost $1,180,872.00 s968,642.00
https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summaiy Report (jjolt_live\ccEDOLT_2094.httn) Page 6 of 7
0 Average Cost Per Unit
.t 732 *IA .arle Aft
E. Average Cost Pei' Youth1Fami4y $842.28 I $691.89
i
,
Ill. IMPACT EVALUATION – Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified
in Section 1.3.
10, NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12, COSTS navq. , 1—,
• A. Youth PetitiOned $
B. Adjudications s
C. Days of Family Foster Care 889 95940
nnnfalearsiiiiiiIiin
D. Days of Out-of-Nome Detention $
E. Days of Shelter Care $
1
F, Days of Residential Treatment Care 513 36900
Imnn111.1111111gliggiiiin
G. State Wards Committed $ n
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component Assess the intended impact areas and results
Explain the reasons). or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served
by this component.
For 2007-2008, it had been estimated that the psychological clinic would perform 1,700 evaluations,
1,500 of which are for youth and family involved in neglect or delinquency matters. In actuality, the
clinic will have performed 1,480 evaluations representing 1,402 evaluations on delinquient or neglect
minors and families. Our experience and research tells us that 40% of the dispositional
recommendations coming from the evaluations or delinquent youth are for in-home services and 60% of
the disposltional recommendations coming from the neglect population are for in-home services. Thus,
calculations for reduction of days and costs for residential treatment and family foster care are as
follows:
Delinquent Populations
513 youth x 40% = 205 youth x 180 days (avg. length stay)=36,900 days x $180/day = $6,642,000
Neglect Populations
889 youth x 60% = 533 youth x 180 days (avg. length stay)= 95,940 days x $501day = $4,797,000
Strengths and Weaknesses:
The psychological clinic uses standard psychological interview and testing methods to assess the
mental status and treatment needs of a particular youth or family. Specific interventions are
recommended to address the needs of youth and are geared toward maintaining the least restrictive
environment and preserving the family. In doing psychological evaluations early on in the case,
appropriate services are identified and provided early and therefore the likelihood of out-of-home
placement is reduced. The evaluators have knowledge of local services available and make
recommendations that are realistic and can be easily implemented. The information in the reports is
used to develop interventions and parent-agency agreements which avoid or reduce the need for out-of-
home placements. All clients coming through the court are not referred to the clinic, and therefore their
needs may not be identified as early as possible. Therefore, agencies may not be able to plan for their
clients as thoroughly as they can when they have the benefit of a report prepared by the psychological
clinic.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION – Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be
attached)
Hearing officers make decisions regarding the out-of-home placement of youth who are involved with
the Court. The role of the psychological clinic is to prepare psychological evaluations to assist the
Court in making decisions regarding disposition or continued jurisdiction in delinquency and neglect
cases. These clinic reports help the hearing officer In determining early whether out-of-home placement
is needed or should be continued.
ht-tps://jjolt.famcare.netig enfime.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report' (jjolt_livelecf\JJOLT_2094.htm) Page 7 of 7
The clinic uses standard psychological interview testing methods to assess the mental status of the
treatment needs of a particular youth or family identified as disturbed or highly dysfunctional. The
evaluator recommends specific interventions to address the needs of the youth/family geared toward
maintaining the least restrictive environment and preserving the family. In doing psychological
evaluations early on in the the case, appropriate services are provided early and therefore the likelihood
of out-of-home placement is reduced. The evaluators have knowledge of local services available and
can recommend local community services, including those offered by the Court and local agencies. The
information in the report is used to develop interveintions and parent-agency agreements which avoid
or reduce the need for out-of-home placement.
The psychologists employed (or contracted) by the psychological clinic have limited or full censure in
the state of Michigan. They report to the Chief of Clinical Services. The clinicians have specific expertise
in evaluating individuals Involved with the Court and in making recommendations which help the Court
in making their determinations.
AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978,
COMPLETION. Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION1 Child care 'kinds
I will not be reimbursed
Notes
MIESZEI
- The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any
individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin,
color, marital status. politica; beliefs or disability. If you need help with
reading, writing. hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities
Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your caw
Edit Date Saved By Comments
https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 81412009
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit F Court DHS
2094-Budget Summary Repott (jjoltiivelccfUJOLT_2094.htrn)
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juvenile Justice
October 1, 200 through September 30. 2010
Page 1 of 8
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
Intensive Probation
Check One
F In Home Care r Basic Grant
1. Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
Michael Caminidi Intensive Caseworker 40 $51,436.00
Karen Evanson Intensive Caseworker $63,148.00
Kevin Gross Intensive Caseworker 40 s63,148.00
Ed Jones Intensive Caseworker 40 $61,436.00
Tonja Lawrence Intensive Caseworker 40 $63,148,00
Dave Pachmayer intensive Caseworker 40 41,436.00
Bill Hamilton intensive Casework Supervisor 40 s79,365.00
Tracey Howden Technical Assistant 10
(114 of Salary)
Dallas Coleman Chief, Casework 10 317,275.00
(1/4 of Salary)
Pamela Davis Manager - Court Services 8 $20,019,00
(115 of Salary)
Clinic Interns (3) Clinic Intern 20 029,677.00
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
Michael Caminidi $33,029.00
Karen Evanson s40,645.00
Kevin Gross 08,527.00
Ed Jones $33,029.00
Tonja Lawrence s39,321.00
Dave Pachmayer s33,029.00
https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfune.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Surnmary'Reporr(ijolt_1ive\ecf\KOLT_2094,htm) Page 2 of 8
Bill Hamilton s39,054.00
Tracey Howden $7,703.00
Dallas Coleman $10,005.00
Pamela Davis $9,126.00 ,
Clinic interns $1,684,00
$786,480.00 Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above • 1. Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST
Miles
Mileage .55 44000 $24,200.00
i 2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed YEARLY COST
Electronic Surveillance $34,878.00
Communication s800.00
$
$
3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed' Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
Client Motivation $4,120.00
Travel and Conference $300.00
_
Telephone $2,486,00
Indirect Cost (14.26% x $501,530) $71,518.00
1 - Must comply with the definitions $138,302.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook,
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Unit Rates l UNIT TOTAL UNITS/
NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Interns/Monitors (11 @ 250 hours) 8.75 hr 2750 $24,062.50
internaMonitors (11 @ 750 hours) 9.25 hr 8250 $76,312.50
https://jjoli.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
I (Add Totals for A. B, C. and D above)
Service Component Cost
Total sto88,407.00
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
2094-Budget Summary' Report (jjoitlivekeNJOLT_2094.htm) Page 3 of 8
Mileage for Interns (11 @4000 0.56 mile 44000 $24,200.00
miles)
Drug Testing 10.00 test 1500 s15,000.00
Adolescent Anger Management 226.00 session 98 s22,050.00
Group Therapy
2. Closed End Contracts
$
0
$
$
s161,625.00 Total Contractual
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
$ $
$ $
$ $
_
S
$ $
Total Non-Scheduled $0.00
E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you p,ar, to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grat monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following:
F. PUBLIC
REVENUE:
https://jjolt.famcare.netigentur. ic.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelccfOOLT_2094.htm) Page 4 of 8
a
$0.00 Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED INC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
(Gross Costs Less Other Revenue)
$1,086,407.00
AUTHORITY: Act 87, Public Acts of 1978. as
amended.
COMPLETION: Is Required.
PENALTY: State reimbffsement will be withheld
from local government.
DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may
be used MS Word-97
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race, sex, religion, age. natioital origin. coior, marital status. palitical
beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. wilting. hearing, etc., under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS
Office in your county.
https://jjolt.fanneare.net/genftmc.exe 8412009
CHECK ONE
IN HOME CARE
BASIC GRANT
Administrative Unit
Time Period Coveted
FROM: THRU:
October 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2010
Telephone Number
F COURT r OHS (248 } 858-0247
r NEW r REVISED
1— CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE COURT
Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
Number V Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
E Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
2094-Budget Summary Report '(jjoltiive\ccf\DOLL2094,htrn)
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
Page 5 of 8
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State
Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year Or ,tr4i I • - -o
Component Title
Intensive Probation
Component Manager Name
Davis, Pamela (63)
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check al: that appty .
1. COMPONENT STATUE
F CONTINUED 7 TERMINATED
2 TARGET POPUL.ATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINOLIENT r NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court
7 COMPLAINT r CPS categoly I. II car
3 Number of Youth Petitioned
Number of Adjudications
3 Number of Days of Family Foster Care
4. SERVICE FOCUS
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT — (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN:
F Provide early intervention to treat within th.e child's home
3 Effect early return from foster or institutional care
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number arid cost's (year-to-date and projections if fisca: year is not complete).
. In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Reported Oct 1 tru Sept. 30 Time Pertod Requested Oct. 1 tru Sept. 30
5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8. PROJECTED 9' PROJECTED COST
NUMBER NUMBER__
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 348 5 344
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service unitecalendar days 57112 $ 61920 $
IIMLIIn.=•1 ,
C Total Component Cost S'i054,921.7 .4.mdaik_.1 086 .4 7
https://jjolt.farneare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summary Repott (jjolt_livelecf\DOLT_2094.htm) Page 6 of 8
i ;
D. Average Cost Per Unit s18.47 .17 AA
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $3,031.38 1 $3,168.16 t ,
111. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified
in Section 1.3.
10. NUMBER OF F ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS
DAYS
A. Youth Petitioned s
,
B. Adjudications 56 247 $495,729.00
. .
C. Days of Family Foster Care $
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 82 4339 $733,291.00
A
, E. Days of Shelter Care $
l Al
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 235 44660
t 7 FaILA Asn nn
G. State Wards Committed $
..
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be Completed
13. Assess strengths. weeknesS" and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s). or causets1 for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youtn served
by this component.
IN-HOME BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
A. Program Support
1. Personal Mileage. Oakland County reimbursement rate is $.55 for all employees. The $24,200 mileage
reimbursement would cover the six casework, one supervisor and three clinical intern positions.
2. Electronic Surveillance. This option remains a favorite of ICU staff, both as a front end transition for
those entering ICU from temporary detention and as a consequence for short of program failure. We
anticipate an ongoing usage of ten units for ICU youngsters with a possibility of another four for court
ordered home detention cases. As in past years, we retain the flexibility to increase capacity If
caseloads warrant.
3. Communications. Cellular phones are now available to all intensive Caseworkers. The use of the
cellular phones increases the efficiency and effectiveness of staff time. It allows for quick responses to
the needs of this high-risk population.
4. Client Motivation Fund. This has been a part of our program since the Early Offender Program's
Inception. The fund is designed to shape behavior by providing specific rewards. Part of the money is
also used to underwrite group reward and enrichment activities.
B. Contractual Services
1. Interns/Monitors. Each probation staff is paired with a paid, paraprofessional intern/monitor. This
team approach results in extra client coverage. The Intensive workers in the Southwest quadrant and
the Pontiac area are assigned two interns each, to assist in the coverage of a large geographic area.
Each intern or monitor is allowed to work 1,000 hours. The hourly rate for the first 250 hours is $8.75.
For the remaining 750 hours, each intern is paid a rate of $9.25 per hour.
11 interns x $8.75/hr x 260 hours = $24,062.50
11 interns x $9.25/hr x 750 hours = $76,312.50
Total = $100,375.00
11 interns x $.55/mile x 4000 miles = $24,200.00
Drug Testing: $10/test x 1500 tests = $15,000.00
https://jjolt. fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Page 7 of 8 2094-Budget Summary*Report(jjolt jivelcoNJOLT_2094,htm)
Adolescent Anger Management Group Therapy:
$2251session x 97 sessions = $21,900.00
GRAND TOTAL = $161,400.00
INTENSIVE SALARIES
PROJECTED FRINGE
2010 BENEFIT
NAME SALARY
Michael Caminidi. $51,436.00..
Karen Evanson $63,148,00..
Kevin Gross $63,148.00..
Ed Jones $51,436.00..
Tonja Lawrence...463,148,00..
Dave Pachmayer $51,436.00..
Bill Hamilton $79,365.00..
Tracey Howden(1M) $11,540.00..
Dallas Coleman(1/4)$17,275.00.
Pamela Davis. 41/5) $20,019.00..
Clinic Interns $29,677,00.
. .$33,029.00
• .$40,545,00
.438,527.00
.433,029.00
..839,321.00
..$33,029.00
. .$39,054.00
.. $7,703.00
..$10,005.00
_59,126.00
... $1,584.00
TOTALS $501,528.00... $284,952.00
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT REPORT/REQUEST
I. Service and Cost information for Fiscal Year Completed or Being Requested for Next Fiscal Year: (All
financial and program figures are projections based on actual experience October 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2009).
A. Number of Youth Served (2009 - 2010)
We project service to 344 youth (228 new youth and 116 current youth). Six workers with an average
caseload of 19 youth and an average length of 180 days of service.
B. Number of Calendar Days of In-Home Care (2009 - 2010) 61,920
We are projecting 61,920 days of in-home care (344 youth x 180 days). A.service unit is defined as
calendar days of in-home care. (See Program Description)
C. Total Component Cost (2008 - 2009) - $1,054,921.71
Actual Cost for 2008 - 2009 is based on actual six months October 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009
projected over the fiscal year. Projected amount has been adjusted to reflect known amounts owing but
unpaid as of March 31, 2009.
II. IMPACT EVALUATION Must be completed for continuing or ending components.
Areas of Impact Number of Youth Numbers or Days Costs
Youth Petitioned
Adjudication's 56 247 496,729
Days of Family Foster Care
Days of Out-of-Home Detention 848 4,339 733,291
Days of Shelter Care
Days of Residential Treatment Care .. 26 youth 44,650 7,545,850
4,680 days
State Wards Committed
A. Each new adjudication costs $2007 to process through the system from signing of the petition,
through entering of a new disposition. A cost reduction of $495,729 was experienced by the 247 fewer
youth adjudicated. (The 247 fewer adjudications X $2007 = $495,729 cost reduction.)
B. A consequence of Intensive youth re-adjudicating is frequently temporary detention pending Court
actions leading to a new disposition being entered. Our experience is 50% of this population would be
https://jjoltiameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Bud8et Summary Repott (jjolt jive\ccf\DOLT_2094.htm)
placed in detention for an average of 42 days.
A reduction of 247 fewer adjudicated youth X 50% X 42 (average days of detention) results in a
reduction of 5187 days of detention. From that group we must subtract those who received short-term
detention as a consequence of rule violation, but no petition had been filed. Therefore, intensive
Probationer's would have served 5187 (days of detention) 848 of those days (short-term detention as
part of the original disposition) which equals 4339 days of reduced care. The current per diem of our
Children's Village detention center is $169. The cost reduction achieved is, therefore, $169 (per diem) X
4339 (reduction in detention days) = $733,291 (cost reductions).
C. It is projected that 75% of the Intensive population would be placed residentially if not for intensive
Probation. Three hundred forty eight received services in 2008 - 2009. Seventy-five percent of this
population or 261 youth would have been placed residentially. Our actual youth placed totaled 26. The
reduction of youth placed residentially Is therefore 235. The Children's Village current per diem is $169.
235 (reduction of youth placed) X 190 (average length of stay at Children's Village) = 44,650 (reduction in
days of care) X $169 = $7,545,850 (cost reductions)
lPi PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year, this section must be complete.
A. Assess strength, weakness' and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas
and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected numbers and
cost and the actual, Account for all youth served by this component.
All figures are prorated based on October 2008 thruough March 2009 actual figures.
Three hundred forty eight youth were served by the Intensive Probation Program. Ninety-three percent
of the youth were successful in community placement. Seven percent were placed residentially.
We are targeting an average caseload size of 19 youth for the new fiscal year. This projects to 344 youth
served. In 2008, we projected 321 youth served. We will involve supervision to identify additional
intensive youth.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components. except those being terminated. each year. (Narrative may be
attached)
Oakland County's research and experience indicate that 87% of the youth serviced by intensive
Probation would recidivate if not provided with Intensive services. intensive Probation is projected to
serve 348 youth in 2008 - 2009 (Youth targeted for reduction). If Intensive services had not been
provided to this population, we would have expected 303 adjudications. Our actual experience was that
56 new adjudications occurred. We therefore experienced a reduction of 247 fewer youth adjudicated.
Intensive probation is designed to maintain high-risk delinquents in their community in lieu of
residential care, while safeguarding the community as much as possible. A team approach, including
paid paraprofessional intern monitors, assures frequency and intensity of contacts (at least one, face-
to-face contact per week). Special tools have been designed to give probation staff the repertoire of
responses needed to work with this high risk population. Youth placed on intensive probation either
have the offense history or the level of dysfunction to a point where they would have been placed out of
the home had it not been for this program.
Page 8 of 8
AUTHORITY. P.A. 87 o' 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION' Child care funds
wiI not be reimbursed.
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any
individual or group because of race. sex. religion, age. national origin,
color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. if you need hate with
reading, willing, hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act,
you are invited to make your needs known to a OHS office in your
county.
Notes
Edit Date Soved By Comments
https://ijoit.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
Check One
F In Home Care Basic Grant
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit DHS Court
1 Travel Rale/Mile Estimate No. of
Miles
YEARLY COST
YEARLY COST
2094-Budget SUMInati Repoit (jjolt_1ive\eof\JJOLT_2094,httn) Page 1 of 6
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094)
Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
Bureau of Juvenile Justice
October 1, 2009 through September 30. 2010
Service Component (Full Title/Name)
STRIDE (Short-Term Rapid intervention and
Diversion)
1, Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION No HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
$
_ _
4
_
$
$
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify) __ _
$
_ _
$
_
$
_
I S
$
Total Personnel $0.00
I
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees Identified in "A" above)
4
2. Supplies and Materials iDescriptioniExamplest Attach Extra Sheet if Needed'
https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfune.exe 84/2009
Total Contractual $75,075.99
2094-Budget Summary'Report'OjoitJiveiceNJOLT_2094.htm) Page 2 of 6
$
• 1 Other Costs (Deacnplion/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
$
$
_
$
• Must comply with the definitions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund
Handborx.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UN:TS/
NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST , .
Crossroads for Youth 82.23 day 913 s75,075.99
. . _ .
$
_
$
_ -
$
2. Closed End Contracts
$
_
5
$
_
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Oescripbon) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
$ $
$
$
https://jjolt.fameare.netigetthme.exe 8/4/2009
Total (Add Totals for A. B. C. and D above)
Service Component Cost
$75,075.99
2094-Budget Summary . Report (jjoit_liveceNJOLT_2094.htm) Page 3 of 6
s0.00 Total Non-Scheduled
E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds
or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments! specify the following:
F. PUBLIC
REVENUE:
SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST
$
_
$
$
Total Public Revenue $0.00
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT. NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE
EXPENDITURE
Gross Costs Less Other Revenue
$75,075.99
AUTHORITY Act 87, Public Acts of 1978, as
amended.
COMPLETION: 1s Required.
PENALTY. State reimbursement will be withheld
from local government.
DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may
be used. MS Word-97
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or
group because of race. sex, religion, age. national origin, color, marital status.
political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing, etc..
under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known
to an OHS office in your county.
https://jjoh.famcaremetlgenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summa r];' Reflett (jjolt_livecetWOLT_2094.htm)
IN HOME CAREIBASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471)
REPORTIREQUEST
Michigan Department of Human Services
Page 4 of 6
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic. Grant Service component for which there was State
Reimbursement daing the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component
Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered
F IN HOME CARE FROM THRU:
STRIDE (Short-Term Rapid Intervention and
Diversion) n BASIC GRANT October 1, 2009
through September 30,
2010
-Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number
avis, anela )
F COURT r DHS (248 ) 858-0247 _ D P (153
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that appy.
1, COMPONENT STATUS
_
F CONTINUED r TERMINATED REVISED r NEW
2. TARGET POPUL.ATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court n WRITTEN COMPLAINT r CPS category I. II or III r- CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE
I COUR.T
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT — (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: F Nurnber of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
r Number of Youth Petitioned r-- Number of Days of Sheller Care
F Number of Adjudications Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r,..7
r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. SERVICE FOCUS
F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
r Effect ashy return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
.I coLumns 6 & 7 enter tile actual nurniaer and Cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete),
• in columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
[
Time Period Reported Oct l thru Sept 30 Trrt Period Reauested Oct 1 thru Sept.
x
_ —
PROJECTED 5. 6 ACTUAL 7, ACTUAL COST 8. 9. PROJECTED COST
, NUMBER NUMBER
A. Number Number of Youth/Family Served 440 $ 456 s
B. Number of Service Units
) 880 s 912 $ (Define Service Unit=1 day=1 unit . _ _
C Total Component Cost $70,500.00 $75,075.99
https://jjolt.farneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/4/2009
D. Average Cost Per Unit
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $160.23
10. NUMBER OF
YOUTH SERVED
ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
11. NUMBER'S OR
DAYS
AREAS OF IMPACT 12. COSTS
107 107
A. Youth Petitioned
. Adjudications
C. Days of Family Foster Care
$214,749.00
107 4494
2094-Budget Summary'RePorr (jjolt_1ive\ceNJOLT_2094.htm) Page 5 of 6
01. IMPACT EVALUATION Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified
in Section 1.3.
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care
. Days of Residential Treatment Care
0 State Wards Committed
.47 20330 1imminsansin___E _1
Immm
N. PROGRAM ASSESSMENTIEVALLIATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13 Assess sttengihs. weakness' and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reasonts). or cause(s) for the difference between the orolected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served
by this component.
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT
REPORT/REQUEST
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND REQUEST FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR.
II.A.6. To date, 224 youth have been referred to the program. There have been 23 session to date, with
an average of 9.7 referrals per session. It Is projected that an additional 216 referrals will be made from
3/31/09, for 24 sessions, with an average of 9 referrals per session, giving a total of 440 referrals for the
2008-2009 fiscal year.
II.A.8. Projecting 48 program sessions for fiscal year 2009-2010, with 9.6 referrals per session. Sessions
are designed to accommodate up to 10 participants, anticipating "no shows" and weeks with less than
10 referrals.
II.B.6. Each day is considered a unit. Each youth is expected to attend a two-day weekend of 7 plus
hours per day. Parents are expected on the evening of the first day. To date, there have been 448 units
utilized. We project an additional 432 units for the remainder of the year, for a total of 880 units utilized
for the 2008-2009 fiscal year.
II.B.8. Projecting 912 total units utilized for fiscal year 2009-2010, two units per 456 youth referred.
II.C.7. To date, 634,600.00 has been expended on 23 program sessions, with 224 youth referred. An
additional 836,000.00 will be expended on a projected 24 sessions with 216 youth referred for a total
cost of $70,500.00 for fiscal year 2008-2009.
II.C.9. Projecting a total cost of $75,000 for fiscal year 2009-2010, with total program session of 48 with
456 youth referred (average of 9.5 youth per session).
II.D.7. Average cost per unit to date is $80.11
11.0.9. Projected cost per unit for fiscal year 2009-2010 is $82.23
II.E.7. Average cost per youth/family to date is $160.23
II.E.9. Projected cost per youth/family for fiscal year 2009-2010 is $164.46
https:/jjoit.famcare.net/gentime.exe 8/4/2009
2094-Budget Summat-37Re3;ort (jjolt_livecef\HOLT_2094.htm) Page 6 of 6
IMPACT EVALUATION
111.8. Local research and statistics indicate that approximately 38% of youth on probation will be
returned to court for technical or criminal violations while on probation. Thus, if STRIDE services were
not provided, we would expect 167 new adjudications. Our actual experience was that 60 new
adjudications occurred. This represents a reduction of 107 youth.
The cost of processing a violation from authorization to disposition is $2007. 107 fewer adjudications
represents a cost reduction of $241,749(107 x 2007).
M.D. The consequence of readjudication is frequently temporary detention pending court action. The
average length of detention is 42 days and the per diem is $169. Thus the cost reduction is $769,486
(107 fewer youth detained x 42 x 169).
III.F. Youth who are readjudicated while on probation typically are placed residentially. The average
length of stay in placement is 190 days. The cost reduction is $3,436,770 (107 fewer youth placed x 190
days x 169).
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
In the first six months of fiscal year 2008-2009, 224 youth were referred to 23 program sessions, for an
average of 9.7 youth referred per session. Supervision has taken an active role in staff utilization of this
program as follows: 1) During weekly meetings, staff are directed to canvas assigned caseloads for
potential referrals. 2) Referral to the program will be considered before a violation of probation is
approved by supervision. 3) The program liaison will communicate to area supervisors program
availability and referrals to date. 4) The program liaison will maintain records as to referral sources.
Based upon year-to-date statistics, the program has lowered the recidivism rate of youth attending, and
fewer youth are being placed residential
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be
attached)
The purpose of this project is to establish a community based, daytime intervention as a tool for
responding to minor infractions committed by youth placed in their homes.
The STRIDE Program, offered by Crossroads for Youth (CFY) staff, is a weekend consequence program
for technical violators on juvenile probation. Composed of 3 to 4 Treatment Team members and the
STRIDE Coordinator, staff pick up the youth at their homes or a designated location each Saturday and
Sunday morning, and either parents or CFY staff return youth to their homes each evening.
Staff immediately begin to establish relationships with the youth upon pickup. Upon arrival at the
STRIDE building on Saturday morning, youth are offered a light breakfast and are orientated to the
program. They must complete a general information sheet and then participate in an introductory
discussion. Youth move on to participate in 1 or 2 group initiatives and community service projects.
Throughout the course of both days, the STRIDE treatment team provide several didactic presentations
that address different adolescent issues. Topics include impulse control, substance abuse education,
positive decision making, and positive self-esteem. On both Saturday and Sunday evenings, the
treatment team facilitates group discussion centered around processing the day. After the full weekend
on Sunday evenings, youth are instructed to write about their experiences. In addition to the light
breakfast served each morning, a mid-morning snack, lunch, an afternoon snack and dinner are also
provided for each participant.
Parents are strongly encouraged to attend a parent meeting with the STRIDE Coordinator on Saturday
evenings. if parents attend, they take their child home with them on Saturday night. If not, STRIDE staff
transport the youth home on both Saturday and Sunday evenings.
PM
AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will
not be reimbursed
The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any
individual or group because of race, sex. religion, age. national
color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need
help with reading, writing. hearing, etc.. under the Americans with
Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS
office in your co u
Notes
12111=11
Etiz Date Saved By Comments
https://jjolt,fameare.netigenfune.exe 8/4/2009
Resolution #09198 September 2, 2009
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections,
FISCAL NOTE (MR #09198) September 24, 2009
BY: Finance Committee. Torn Middleton. Chairperson
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT/FAMILY DIVISION - OAKLAND COUNTY CHID CARE FUND BUDGET 2009-2010
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Finance Committee, having reviewed the above referenced resolution, reports as follows:
1. Under the provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975, Oakland County is required to develop and
submit a plan and budget for funding foster care services to the Child and Family Services Office of the
Bureau of Juvenile Justice, Department of Human Services annually.
2. The Circuit Court/Family Division and the Oakland County Department of Health and Human Services
(1-11-1S) has developed the foster care services budget for the period covering October 1, 2009, through
September 30, 2010.
3. The application reflects $35,627,611 in gross expenditures and $2,300,000 in offsetting revenues, leaving
a net expenditure of $33,327,611. The Child Care fund reimburses 100% for Foster Care during release on
Appeal of $8.000 and 50% for all other child care fund eligible expenditures of $33,319,610 rendering a
State reimbursement of $16,667,806 should the State approve the budget and the County expends all
funds listed in the application.
4. The application reflects a 7.81% increase from last year's application of $2,580,534. This is due to HI-IS
increases of $1,722,499, Institutions care increases of $1,715,771. increase in Foster Care during release
appeal of $8,000. partially offset by a decrease of ($865,736) due to a reduction of In Home Care
programs.
5. The figures provided are estimates for State Child Care Fund budgeting purposes only, based on current
available data and may not reflect the eventual adopted budget and/or expenditures for this program. The
application expenditures exceed the FY 2010 Finance Committee Recommendation by 9.22% or
$3,006,472.
6. If necessary a budget amendment will be recommended at the time of the contract agreement.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote
4
Resolution #09198 September 24, 2009
Moved by Capella supported by Coleman the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent
Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Bums. Capella, Coleman, Coulter, Douglas, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin. Greimel.
Hatchett, Jackson, Jacobsen, Long, McGillivray, Middleton. Nash, Potter, Potts, Runestad, Scrmartz,
Scott, Taub. Woodward, Zack, E3ullard. (25)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent
Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
•n••-
I HEREBY APPR9VE THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Ruth Johnson, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and
accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on September 24.
2009, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof. / have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac,
Michigan this 24th day of September. 2009.
Ruth Johnson. County Clerk